Notebookcheck Logo

Análise do laptop Asus ZenBook S 16 OLED: Estreia do Ryzen AI 9 365 e da Radeon 880M

Novato. O ZenBook S 16 OLED é um dos primeiros dispositivos no mercado a ser equipado com os novos processadores AI 9 da AMD. Depois de já termos testado um modelo baseado no HX 370 (Radeon 890M), agora foi a vez do modelo 365 (Radeon 880M). Como o senhor se sai em relação à concorrência e à última geração?
Asus ZenBook S 16 OLED

A variante do ZenBook S 16 que analisamos tem o nome de modelo UM5606WA e está atualmente disponível por cerca de 1.700 euros (~$1886), o que é bastante alto considerando o desempenho oferecido. Por esse preço, a Asus inclui o já mencionado Ryzen AI 9 365 incluindo Radeon 880Mcom 24 GB de memória LPDDR5X rápida (não expansível) e um SSD NVMe de 1 TB sob o capô. As imagens geradas são exibidas em um painel OLED brilhante no formato 16:10, que tem uma resolução relativamente alta de 2.880 x 1.800 pixels, capacidade HDR e é especificado a 120 Hz. O sistema operacional é o Windows 11 Home.

Asus ZenBook S 16 OLED UM5606WA
Processador
AMD Ryzen AI 9 365 10 x 2 - 5 GHz, 33 W PL2 / Short Burst, 28 W PL1 / Sustained, Strix Point (Zen 5)
Placa gráfica
AMD Radeon 880M - 512 MB VRAM, LPDDR5, Adrenalin 24.10.18.08
Memória
24 GB 
, LPDDR5X onboard (no expansion)
Pantalha
16.00 polegadas 16:10, 2880 x 1800 pixel 212 PPI, ATNA60CL10-0, OLED, Pantone validated, Brilhante: sim, HDR, 120 Hz
placa mãe
AMD Promontory/Bixby FCH
Disco rígido
Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM, 1024 GB 
, NVMe-SSD, one M.2-2280-slot (in use)
Placa de Som
Realtek ALC294 @ AMD K1A.2 - Audio Processor - High Definition Audio Controller
Conexões
1 USB 3.1 Gen2, 2 USB 4.0 40 Gbps, USB-C Power Delivery (PD), 1 HDMI, 2 DisplayPort, Conexões Audio: Combined (Headset/Mic), Card Reader: SD
Funcionamento em rede
Mediatek Wi-Fi 7 MT7925 Wireless LAN Card (a/b/g/ac = Wi-Fi 5/ax = Wi-Fi 6/ Wi-Fi 6E 6 GHz be = Wi-Fi 7), Bluetooth 5.4
Tamanho
altura x largura x profundidade (em mm): 12.9 x 353 x 243
Bateria
78 Wh Lítio-Ion, 4 Cells
Sistema Operativo
Microsoft Windows 11 Home
Camera
Webcam: 2 MP
Características adicionais
Alto falantes: 2.0, Teclado: Chiclet, Iluminação do Teclado: sim, 65 W Power Supply, MyAsus, 24 Meses Garantia
peso
1.5 kg, Suprimento de energia: 188 g
Preço
1700 EUR
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

Os principais concorrentes do ZenBook S 16 são laptops com Core Ultra da Intel, como o Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 16 (7 155H & Arc 8). Para melhor classificação, há também dois laptops das séries Ryzen 7000 e Ryzen 8000 nas tabelas de comparação, que são baseados na antiga Radeon 780M e têm um TDP semelhante ao do computador Samsung (Lenovo ThinkPad T16 G2 & HP Envy x360 2 em 1 16). As fotos no artigo são do idêntico ZenBook S 16 com Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 e Radeon 890Mque foi testado recentemente (apenas o tom da cor difere ligeiramente).

Possíveis concorrentes em comparação

Rating
Version
Date
Model
Weight
Height
Size
Resolution
Best Price
84.1 %v8
09/2024
Asus ZenBook S 16 OLED UM5606WA
Ryzen AI 9 365, Radeon 880M
1.5 kg12.9 mm16.00"2880x1800
84.7 %v8
07/2024
Asus Zenbook S16 UM5606
Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, Radeon 890M
1.5 kg12.9 mm16.00"2880x1800
88.9 %v7 (old)
04/2024
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 16
Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core
1.5 kg12.5 mm16.00"2880x1800
87.2 %v7 (old)
05/2024
HP Envy x360 2-in-1 16-ad0097nr
R7 8840HS, Radeon 780M
1.8 kg18.3 mm16.00"2880x1800
89.9 %v7 (old)
05/2024
Lenovo ThinkPad T16 G2 21K70035GE
R7 7840U, Radeon 780M
1.8 kg23.8 mm16.00"1920x1200

Observação: Atualizamos recentemente nosso sistema de classificação e os resultados da versão 8 não são comparáveis aos resultados da versão 7. Mais informações podem ser encontradas aqui disponível aqui.

Caso

O computador de 16 polegadas impressiona com uma carcaça extremamente elegante, que, de acordo com o fabricante, é feita de cerâmica (a Asus usa o termo de marketing alumínio de cério). Apesar da baixa altura de apenas 1,3 cm (~0,5 pol.), as superfícies foscas são surpreendentemente estáveis. Somente o touchpad e a seção central do teclado podem ser dobrados visivelmente quando é aplicada mais pressão. O peso de 1,5 kg (~3,3 lb) também é bastante baixo na classe de 16 polegadas e permite um transporte confortável. Há também uma fonte de alimentação muito compacta de 65 watts, que pesa menos de 200 gramas com o cabo, mas esquenta bastante durante a operação.

Em geral, não há nada a reclamar sobre o acabamento do ZenBook S 16. Todos os elementos do dispositivo de teste se encaixam perfeitamente. Embora as dobradiças só permitam um ângulo de abertura de aprox. 135°, elas causam uma boa impressão, embora ainda seja possível abrir com uma só mão.

Asus ZenBook S 16 OLED
Asus ZenBook S 16 OLED
Asus ZenBook S 16 OLED
Asus ZenBook S 16 OLED
Asus ZenBook S 16 OLED
Asus ZenBook S 16 OLED
Asus ZenBook S 16 OLED
Asus ZenBook S 16 OLED
Asus ZenBook S 16 OLED
Asus ZenBook S 16 OLED

Comparação de tamanho

361.9 mm 255.5 mm 23.8 mm 1.8 kg357 mm 246 mm 18.3 mm 1.8 kg355.4 mm 250.4 mm 12.5 mm 1.5 kg353.6 mm 243 mm 12.9 mm 1.5 kg353 mm 243 mm 12.9 mm 1.5 kg297 mm 210 mm 1 mm 5.7 g

Equipamentos

Embora tivéssemos gostado de ter uma porta USB-A adicional, a conectividade é sólida no geral e, acima de tudo, moderna. Das três portas USB disponíveis, as duas interfaces Type-C suportam USB 4, incluindo Power Delivery e DisplayPort. Há também uma conexão de áudio combinada, uma porta HDMI 2.1 e um leitor de cartão SD extremamente rápido.

A velocidade do chip Wi-Fi 7 soldado (Mediatek MT7925) é muito boa, especialmente para recepção.

A webcam oferece, como quase todos os notebooks, um desempenho padrão. Além da fidelidade das cores, a nitidez da imagem também poderia ser melhor.

Do ponto de vista da atualização, o dispositivo é decepcionante. A WLAN e a RAM estão integradas, como mencionado, mas somente o SSD está conectado e, portanto, pode ser substituído, sendo que o ZenBook S 16 oferece somente um único slot M.2, o que não é uma conquista brilhante no segmento de 16 polegadas.

A embalagem é em grande parte feita de papelão. O notebook em si é embrulhado em papel alumínio. O plástico é usado apenas para a unidade de fonte de alimentação.

SD Card Reader
average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs)
Asus ZenBook S 16 OLED UM5606WA
AMD Ryzen AI 9 365 (AV PRO microSD 128 GB V60)
198 MB/s
Asus Zenbook S16 UM5606
AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 (Angelbird AV Pro V60)
151 MB/s -24%
Average of class Multimedia
  (18.4 - 201, n=58, last 2 years)
96.3 MB/s -51%
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 16
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H (Angelbird AV Pro V60)
76.6 MB/s -61%
maximum AS SSD Seq Read Test (1GB)
Asus ZenBook S 16 OLED UM5606WA
AMD Ryzen AI 9 365 (AV PRO microSD 128 GB V60)
260 MB/s
Asus Zenbook S16 UM5606
AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 (Angelbird AV Pro V60)
256.9 MB/s -1%
Average of class Multimedia
  (25.8 - 266, n=57, last 2 years)
132.9 MB/s -49%
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 16
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H (Angelbird AV Pro V60)
87.8 MB/s -66%
Networking
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
Asus Zenbook S16 UM5606
Mediatek Wi-Fi 7 MT7925 Wireless LAN Card
1828 (1755min - 1892max) MBit/s +86%
Average Mediatek Wi-Fi 7 MT7925 Wireless LAN Card
  (983 - 1854, n=5)
1659 MBit/s +69%
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 16
Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211
1625 (1307min, 1314.54P1 - 1751max) MBit/s +65%
HP Envy x360 2-in-1 16-ad0097nr
MediaTek Wi-Fi 6E MT7922 160MHz Wireless LAN Card
1608 (1424min - 1752max) MBit/s +64%
Average of class Multimedia
  (358 - 1854, n=76, last 2 years)
1335 MBit/s +36%
Asus ZenBook S 16 OLED UM5606WA
Mediatek Wi-Fi 7 MT7925 Wireless LAN Card
983 (529min - 1209max) MBit/s
Lenovo ThinkPad T16 G2 21K70035GE
Qualcomm WCN685x
711 (573min - 825max) MBit/s -28%
iperf3 receive AXE11000
Asus Zenbook S16 UM5606
Mediatek Wi-Fi 7 MT7925 Wireless LAN Card
1754 (1730min - 1771max) MBit/s +4%
Average Mediatek Wi-Fi 7 MT7925 Wireless LAN Card
  (1689 - 1770, n=5)
1725 MBit/s +2%
Lenovo ThinkPad T16 G2 21K70035GE
Qualcomm WCN685x
1712 (1679min - 1739max) MBit/s +1%
Asus ZenBook S 16 OLED UM5606WA
Mediatek Wi-Fi 7 MT7925 Wireless LAN Card
1689 (1670min - 1706max) MBit/s
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 16
Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211
1666 (1613min, 1621.7P1 - 1691max) MBit/s -1%
HP Envy x360 2-in-1 16-ad0097nr
MediaTek Wi-Fi 6E MT7922 160MHz Wireless LAN Card
1551 (1450min - 1626max) MBit/s -8%
Average of class Multimedia
  (701 - 1789, n=75, last 2 years)
1411 MBit/s -16%
050100150200250300350400450500550600650700750800850900950100010501100115012001250130013501400145015001550160016501700175018001850Tooltip
Asus ZenBook S 16 OLED UM5606WA Mediatek Wi-Fi 7 MT7925 Wireless LAN Card; iperf3 transmit AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø983 (695-1209)
Asus Zenbook S16 UM5606 Mediatek Wi-Fi 7 MT7925 Wireless LAN Card; iperf3 transmit AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1828 (1755-1892)
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 16 Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211; iperf3 transmit AXE11000: Ø1625 (1307-1751)
HP Envy x360 2-in-1 16-ad0097nr MediaTek Wi-Fi 6E MT7922 160MHz Wireless LAN Card; iperf3 transmit AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1608 (1424-1752)
Lenovo ThinkPad T16 G2 21K70035GE Qualcomm WCN685x; iperf3 transmit AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø711 (573-825)
Asus ZenBook S 16 OLED UM5606WA Mediatek Wi-Fi 7 MT7925 Wireless LAN Card; iperf3 receive AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1689 (1670-1706)
Asus Zenbook S16 UM5606 Mediatek Wi-Fi 7 MT7925 Wireless LAN Card; iperf3 receive AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1754 (1730-1771)
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 16 Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211; iperf3 receive AXE11000: Ø1666 (1613-1691)
HP Envy x360 2-in-1 16-ad0097nr MediaTek Wi-Fi 6E MT7922 160MHz Wireless LAN Card; iperf3 receive AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1551 (1450-1626)
Lenovo ThinkPad T16 G2 21K70035GE Qualcomm WCN685x; iperf3 receive AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1712 (1679-1739)
ColorChecker
9.1 ∆E
11.5 ∆E
10.2 ∆E
7.7 ∆E
10.1 ∆E
15.5 ∆E
9.8 ∆E
9.7 ∆E
12.4 ∆E
9.4 ∆E
3.5 ∆E
6.5 ∆E
7.8 ∆E
7.7 ∆E
14 ∆E
3 ∆E
11.2 ∆E
14.4 ∆E
8.8 ∆E
14.1 ∆E
12.6 ∆E
14.1 ∆E
12.4 ∆E
12.1 ∆E
ColorChecker Asus ZenBook S 16 OLED UM5606WA: 10.31 ∆E min: 2.95 - max: 15.47 ∆E

Dispositivos de entrada

O ZenBook S 16 tem dispositivos de entrada bons (teclado) a muito bons (touchpad). O teclado poderia ser um pouco mais nítido para o gosto do autor, mas por outro lado oferece uma boa experiência de digitação. Embora a maioria das teclas tenha um tamanho mais do que adequado, a Asus recorre a um tamanho bastante reduzido para a linha F e as setas direcionais. O layout também não é o ideal, pois a tecla liga/desliga, por exemplo, foi simplesmente integrada ao bloco principal. Há pontos positivos para a iluminação ajustável em vários níveis.

O touchpad impressiona com suas dimensões generosas de pouco menos de 15 x 10 cm (~5,9 x 3,9), boas propriedades de deslizamento e precisão convincente. Por outro lado, as superfícies de clique são um pouco frágeis, tanto em termos acústicos quanto táteis.

Asus ZenBook S 16 OLED
Asus ZenBook S 16 OLED

Tela

A designação do modelo do painel OLED é a mesma do já testado ZenBook S 16 (ATNA60CL10-0), o que significa que a maioria dos valores é muito semelhante.

393
cd/m²
390
cd/m²
388
cd/m²
393
cd/m²
391
cd/m²
391
cd/m²
391
cd/m²
391
cd/m²
394
cd/m²
Distribuição do brilho
ATNA60CL10-0 tested with X-Rite i1Pro 2
Máximo: 394 cd/m² (Nits) Médio: 391.3 cd/m² Minimum: 4 cd/m²
iluminação: 98 %
iluminação com acumulador: 391 cd/m²
Contraste: 19550:1 (Preto: 0.02 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 1.42 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.95, calibrated: 1.49
ΔE Greyscale 1.5 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
94.6% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
100% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
99.8% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.199
Asus ZenBook S 16 OLED UM5606WA
ATNA60CL10-0, OLED, 2880x1800, 16", 120 Hz
Asus Zenbook S16 UM5606
ATNA60CL10-0, OLED, 2880x1800, 16", 120 Hz
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 16
ATNA60CL07-0, OLED, 2880x1800, 16", 120 Hz
HP Envy x360 2-in-1 16-ad0097nr
Samsung SDC41A6, OLED, 2880x1800, 16", 120 Hz
Lenovo ThinkPad T16 G2 21K70035GE
B160UAN01.K, IPS LED, 1920x1200, 16",  Hz
Display
0%
1%
1%
-15%
Display P3 Coverage
99.8
99.9
0%
99.5
0%
99.6
0%
75.9
-24%
sRGB Coverage
100
100
0%
100
0%
100
0%
98.2
-2%
AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage
94.6
95.6
1%
97.5
3%
96.5
2%
77.2
-18%
Response Times
-16%
-41%
-49%
-7242%
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% *
0.4 ?(0.3, 0.1)
0.56 ?(0.3, 0.26)
-40%
0.64 ?(0.33, 0.31)
-60%
0.8 ?(0.45, 0.35)
-100%
40.8 ?(19.1, 21.7)
-10100%
Response Time Black / White *
0.6 ?(0.3, 0.3)
0.65 ?(0.35, 0.3)
-8%
0.68 ?(0.38, 0.3)
-13%
0.89 ?(0.42, 0.47)
-48%
26.9 ?(14.7, 12.2)
-4383%
PWM Frequency
480
480
0%
240 ?(100)
-50%
491.8 ?(100)
2%
Screen
26%
15%
-23%
-215%
Brightness middle
391
407
4%
385
-2%
399.4
2%
446
14%
Brightness
391
405
4%
391
0%
405
4%
425
9%
Brightness Distribution
98
97
-1%
97
-1%
98
0%
91
-7%
Black Level *
0.02
0.02
-0%
0.28
-1300%
Contrast
19550
20350
4%
1593
-92%
Colorchecker dE 2000 *
1.42
0.6
58%
1.1
23%
4.05
-185%
3.7
-161%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *
4.69
1.2
74%
1.8
62%
6.69
-43%
8.8
-88%
Colorchecker dE 2000 calibrated *
1.49
1.02
32%
1.6
-7%
Greyscale dE 2000 *
1.5
0.5
67%
1.4
7%
1.1
27%
6
-300%
Gamma
2.199 100%
2.2 100%
2.24 98%
2.27 97%
2.2 100%
CCT
6684 97%
6453 101%
6444 101%
6419 101%
6499 100%
Total Average (Program / Settings)
3% / 12%
-8% / -3%
-24% / -24%
-2491% / -1176%

* ... smaller is better

No modo SDR, o valor de 400 cd/m² especificado pela Asus é aproximadamente alcançado, o que é mais do que suficiente para a maioria das áreas internas, mas já está no limite para uso externo devido à superfície altamente reflexiva.

CalMAN: Escala de cinza
CalMAN: Escala de cinza
CalMAN: Saturação de cor
CalMAN: Saturação de cor
CalMAN: ColorChecker
CalMAN: ColorChecker
CalMAN: Escala de cinza (calibrada)
CalMAN: Escala de cinza (calibrada)
CalMAN: Saturação de cor (calibrada)
CalMAN: Saturação de cor (calibrada)
CalMAN: ColorChecker (calibrado)
CalMAN: ColorChecker (calibrado)

Como é típico dos OLEDs, não há nada a reclamar quando se trata de níveis de preto e contraste. Em comparação com um painel IPS clássico, a imagem parece muito mais poderosa e saturada. Além disso, as cores são limpas, como mostram nossas medições CalMAN.

ZenBook S 16 OLED vs sRGB
ZenBook S 16 OLED vs sRGB
ZenBook S 16 OLED vs AdobeRGB
ZenBook S 16 OLED vs AdobeRGB
ZenBook S 16 OLED vs DCI-P3
ZenBook S 16 OLED vs DCI-P3

O ZenBook S 16 também recebe elogios por seus tempos de resposta rápidos, embora os compradores possam ter que conviver com a oscilação a 480 Hz, o que pode ser um problema para algumas pessoas. Os ângulos de visão, por outro lado, são irrepreensíveis.

Ponto de vista
Ponto de vista
Subpixel
Subpixel
Sol direto
Sol direto

Display Response Times

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
       Response Time Black to White
0.6 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 0.3 ms rise
↘ 0.3 ms fall
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 0 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (21.1 ms).
       Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
0.4 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 0.3 ms rise
↘ 0.1 ms fall
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 0 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (33.1 ms).

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM detected 480 Hz
Amplitude: 30 %

The display backlight flickers at 480 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) .

The frequency of 480 Hz is relatively high, so most users sensitive to PWM should not notice any flickering. However, there are reports that some users are still sensitive to PWM at 500 Hz and above, so be aware.

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 17271 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 3846000) Hz was measured.

100 % de brilho
100 % de brilho
80 % de brilho
80 % de brilho
60 % de brilho
60 % de brilho
40 % de brilho
40 % de brilho
20 % de brilho
20 % de brilho
0 % de brilho
0 % de brilho

Desempenho

Em termos de desempenho, o ZenBook S 16 se sente confortável na faixa intermediária de notebooks multimídia e de escritório. 24 GB de RAM devem ser suficientes para a maioria dos usuários nos próximos anos. O SSD de 1 TB pode ser substituído por um modelo maior, se necessário.

CPU-Z
CPU-Z
CPU-Z
GPU-Z
HWiNFO
 

Condições de teste

Quatro modos diferentes de ventoinha estão disponíveis no aplicativo MyAsus pré-instalado. Análogo ao outro ZenBook S 16 - nossas medições são baseadas no perfil padrão, já que o desempenho 3D quase não aumenta com os perfis mais fortes, mas o desenvolvimento do ruído aumenta notavelmente. Como esperado, é mais silencioso no modo silencioso, naturalmente à custa da velocidade (veja a tabela).

Asus ZenBook S 16 OLED
Asus ZenBook S 16 OLED
Asus ZenBook S 16 OLED
Asus ZenBook S 16 OLED
Asus ZenBook S 16 OLED
Asus ZenBook S 16 OLED
Asus ZenBook S 16 OLED
 
Cyberpunk 2077 (FHD/Ultra) Whisper Padrão Desempenho Velocidade máxima
Ruído 32 dB(A) 36 dB(A) 43 dB(A) 44 dB(A)
Desempenho 14 fps 20 fps 20 fps 20 fps

Processador

Em contraste com o Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, o AI 9 365 contém "apenas" 10 em vez de 12 núcleos, o que leva a 20 em vez de 24 threads simultâneos, incluindo SMT. Para permitir a linha fina do chassi, a Asus usa um TDP relativamente baixo de 28 watts PL1 e 33 watts PL2 em ambos os casos, o que significa restrições em termos de desempenho máximo. No loop Cinebench R15, o AI 9 365 é superado tanto pelo Ryzen 7 8840HS bem como pelo Ryzen 7 7840U que também apresentam resultados ainda mais consistentes em seus notebooks.

Entretanto, se o senhor considerar todos os benchmarks de CPU juntos, a nova geração está ligeiramente à frente. De acordo com nossa classificação de desempenho, o AI 9 HX 370 vence por pouco menos de 16%, enquanto o Core Ultra 7 155H é apenas um pouco mais rápido.

Cinebench R15 Multi Endurance test

0130260390520650780910104011701300143015601690182019502080221023402470Tooltip
Asus ZenBook S 16 OLED UM5606WA AMD Ryzen AI 9 365: Ø1724 (1686.84-1949.7)
Asus Zenbook S16 UM5606 AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370: Ø2407 (2382.65-2498.13)
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 16 Intel Core Ultra 7 155H: Ø2016 (1825.4-2515.57)
HP Envy x360 2-in-1 16-ad0097nr AMD Ryzen 7 8840HS: Ø1951 (1885.73-2044.68)
Lenovo ThinkPad T16 G2 21K70035GE AMD Ryzen 7 7840U: Ø2040 (2010.86-2119.65)
CPU Performance Rating - Percent
Asus Zenbook S16 UM5606
AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370
84.4 pt
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 16
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
76 pt
Average of class Multimedia
 
73.6 pt
Asus ZenBook S 16 OLED UM5606WA
AMD Ryzen AI 9 365
72.9 pt
Average AMD Ryzen AI 9 365
 
72.9 pt
Lenovo ThinkPad T16 G2 21K70035GE
AMD Ryzen 7 7840U
71.1 pt
HP Envy x360 2-in-1 16-ad0097nr
AMD Ryzen 7 8840HS
69.8 pt
Cinebench R23
Multi Core
Asus Zenbook S16 UM5606
AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370
16522 Points +44%
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 16
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
15171 Points +32%
Average of class Multimedia
  (4624 - 30789, n=100, last 2 years)
14997 Points +31%
HP Envy x360 2-in-1 16-ad0097nr
AMD Ryzen 7 8840HS
13082 (12624.7min - 13082.1max) Points +14%
Lenovo ThinkPad T16 G2 21K70035GE
AMD Ryzen 7 7840U
13053 Points +14%
Asus ZenBook S 16 OLED UM5606WA
AMD Ryzen AI 9 365
11462 Points
Average AMD Ryzen AI 9 365
  ()
11462 Points 0%
Single Core
Asus Zenbook S16 UM5606
AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370
1953 Points +1%
Asus ZenBook S 16 OLED UM5606WA
AMD Ryzen AI 9 365
1942 Points
Average AMD Ryzen AI 9 365
  ()
1942 Points 0%
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 16
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
1755 Points -10%
HP Envy x360 2-in-1 16-ad0097nr
AMD Ryzen 7 8840HS
1745 Points -10%
Average of class Multimedia
  (878 - 2110, n=91, last 2 years)
1729 Points -11%
Lenovo ThinkPad T16 G2 21K70035GE
AMD Ryzen 7 7840U
1708 Points -12%
Cinebench R20
CPU (Multi Core)
Asus Zenbook S16 UM5606
AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370
6469 Points +23%
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 16
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
5865 Points +12%
Average of class Multimedia
  (1795 - 11768, n=88, last 2 years)
5583 Points +6%
Asus ZenBook S 16 OLED UM5606WA
AMD Ryzen AI 9 365
5247 Points
Average AMD Ryzen AI 9 365
  ()
5247 Points 0%
Lenovo ThinkPad T16 G2 21K70035GE
AMD Ryzen 7 7840U
5082 Points -3%
HP Envy x360 2-in-1 16-ad0097nr
AMD Ryzen 7 8840HS
4994 Points -5%
CPU (Single Core)
Asus Zenbook S16 UM5606
AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370
772 Points +2%
Asus ZenBook S 16 OLED UM5606WA
AMD Ryzen AI 9 365
758 Points
Average AMD Ryzen AI 9 365
  ()
758 Points 0%
Lenovo ThinkPad T16 G2 21K70035GE
AMD Ryzen 7 7840U
678 Points -11%
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 16
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
670 Points -12%
HP Envy x360 2-in-1 16-ad0097nr
AMD Ryzen 7 8840HS
649 Points -14%
Average of class Multimedia
  (341 - 812, n=88, last 2 years)
647 Points -15%
Cinebench R15
CPU Multi 64Bit
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 16
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
2516 (1825.4min - 2515.57max) Points +29%
Asus Zenbook S16 UM5606
AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370
2498.13 (2382.65min - 2498.13max) Points +28%
Average of class Multimedia
  (1057 - 4703, n=92, last 2 years)
2392 Points +23%
Lenovo ThinkPad T16 G2 21K70035GE
AMD Ryzen 7 7840U
2120 (2010.86min - 2119.65max) Points +9%
HP Envy x360 2-in-1 16-ad0097nr
AMD Ryzen 7 8840HS
2045 (1885.73min - 2044.68max) Points +5%
Asus ZenBook S 16 OLED UM5606WA
AMD Ryzen AI 9 365
1950 (1686.84min - 1949.7max) Points
Average AMD Ryzen AI 9 365
  ()
1950 Points 0%
CPU Single 64Bit
Asus Zenbook S16 UM5606
AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370
298 Points +2%
Asus ZenBook S 16 OLED UM5606WA
AMD Ryzen AI 9 365
293 Points
Average AMD Ryzen AI 9 365
  ()
293 Points 0%
Lenovo ThinkPad T16 G2 21K70035GE
AMD Ryzen 7 7840U
267 Points -9%
HP Envy x360 2-in-1 16-ad0097nr
AMD Ryzen 7 8840HS
261 Points -11%
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 16
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
254 Points -13%
Average of class Multimedia
  (99.6 - 310, n=90, last 2 years)
254 Points -13%
Blender - v2.79 BMW27 CPU
Asus ZenBook S 16 OLED UM5606WA
AMD Ryzen AI 9 365
270 Seconds *
Average AMD Ryzen AI 9 365
  ()
270 Seconds * -0%
Average of class Multimedia
  (107 - 502, n=86, last 2 years)
255 Seconds * +6%
HP Envy x360 2-in-1 16-ad0097nr
AMD Ryzen 7 8840HS
246 Seconds * +9%
Lenovo ThinkPad T16 G2 21K70035GE
AMD Ryzen 7 7840U
245 Seconds * +9%
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 16
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
224 Seconds * +17%
Asus Zenbook S16 UM5606
AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370
192 Seconds * +29%
7-Zip 18.03
7z b 4
Asus Zenbook S16 UM5606
AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370
67615 MIPS +42%
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 16
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
61091 MIPS +28%
Average of class Multimedia
  (27677 - 119900, n=81, last 2 years)
59292 MIPS +24%
Lenovo ThinkPad T16 G2 21K70035GE
AMD Ryzen 7 7840U
56666 MIPS +19%
HP Envy x360 2-in-1 16-ad0097nr
AMD Ryzen 7 8840HS
54768 MIPS +15%
Asus ZenBook S 16 OLED UM5606WA
AMD Ryzen AI 9 365
47754 MIPS
Average AMD Ryzen AI 9 365
  ()
47754 MIPS 0%
7z b 4 -mmt1
Asus Zenbook S16 UM5606
AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370
6063 MIPS +1%
Asus ZenBook S 16 OLED UM5606WA
AMD Ryzen AI 9 365
6012 MIPS
Average AMD Ryzen AI 9 365
  ()
6012 MIPS 0%
Lenovo ThinkPad T16 G2 21K70035GE
AMD Ryzen 7 7840U
5940 MIPS -1%
HP Envy x360 2-in-1 16-ad0097nr
AMD Ryzen 7 8840HS
5912 MIPS -2%
Average of class Multimedia
  (3398 - 7163, n=81, last 2 years)
5660 MIPS -6%
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 16
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
5496 MIPS -9%
Geekbench 6.2
Multi-Core
Asus Zenbook S16 UM5606
AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370
13648 Points +8%
Average of class Multimedia
  (7592 - 21264, n=55, last 2 years)
13207 Points +5%
Asus ZenBook S 16 OLED UM5606WA
AMD Ryzen AI 9 365
12627 Points
Average AMD Ryzen AI 9 365
  ()
12627 Points 0%
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 16
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
12422 Points -2%
Lenovo ThinkPad T16 G2 21K70035GE
AMD Ryzen 7 7840U
11363 Points -10%
HP Envy x360 2-in-1 16-ad0097nr
AMD Ryzen 7 8840HS
11081 Points -12%
Single-Core
Asus Zenbook S16 UM5606
AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370
2785 Points 0%
Asus ZenBook S 16 OLED UM5606WA
AMD Ryzen AI 9 365
2778 Points
Average AMD Ryzen AI 9 365
  ()
2778 Points 0%
Average of class Multimedia
  (1534 - 3157, n=51, last 2 years)
2603 Points -6%
HP Envy x360 2-in-1 16-ad0097nr
AMD Ryzen 7 8840HS
2525 Points -9%
Lenovo ThinkPad T16 G2 21K70035GE
AMD Ryzen 7 7840U
2519 Points -9%
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 16
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
2440 Points -12%
Geekbench 5.5
Multi-Core
Asus Zenbook S16 UM5606
AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370
12487 Points +30%
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 16
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
12158 Points +27%
Average of class Multimedia
  (3828 - 23059, n=88, last 2 years)
11835 Points +23%
Lenovo ThinkPad T16 G2 21K70035GE
AMD Ryzen 7 7840U
10003 Points +4%
HP Envy x360 2-in-1 16-ad0097nr
AMD Ryzen 7 8840HS
9949 Points +4%
Asus ZenBook S 16 OLED UM5606WA
AMD Ryzen AI 9 365
9599 Points
Average AMD Ryzen AI 9 365
  ()
9599 Points 0%
Single-Core
Asus Zenbook S16 UM5606
AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370
2078 Points +1%
Asus ZenBook S 16 OLED UM5606WA
AMD Ryzen AI 9 365
2065 Points
Average AMD Ryzen AI 9 365
  ()
2065 Points 0%
HP Envy x360 2-in-1 16-ad0097nr
AMD Ryzen 7 8840HS
1894 Points -8%
Average of class Multimedia
  (891 - 2342, n=88, last 2 years)
1801 Points -13%
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 16
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
1764 Points -15%
Lenovo ThinkPad T16 G2 21K70035GE
AMD Ryzen 7 7840U
1753 Points -15%
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 - 4k Preset
Asus Zenbook S16 UM5606
AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370
20.3 fps +9%
Asus ZenBook S 16 OLED UM5606WA
AMD Ryzen AI 9 365
18.6 fps
Average AMD Ryzen AI 9 365
  ()
18.6 fps 0%
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 16
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
16.8 fps -10%
Lenovo ThinkPad T16 G2 21K70035GE
AMD Ryzen 7 7840U
16.4 fps -12%
Average of class Multimedia
  (5.26 - 30.5, n=80, last 2 years)
16.1 fps -13%
HP Envy x360 2-in-1 16-ad0097nr
AMD Ryzen 7 8840HS
15.7 fps -16%
LibreOffice - 20 Documents To PDF
Asus ZenBook S 16 OLED UM5606WA
AMD Ryzen AI 9 365
54.9 s *
Average AMD Ryzen AI 9 365
  ()
54.9 s * -0%
HP Envy x360 2-in-1 16-ad0097nr
AMD Ryzen 7 8840HS
51.7 s * +6%
Asus Zenbook S16 UM5606
AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370
49.6 s * +10%
Average of class Multimedia
  (6.7 - 146.7, n=82, last 2 years)
49.5 s * +10%
Lenovo ThinkPad T16 G2 21K70035GE
AMD Ryzen 7 7840U
44.5 s * +19%
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 16
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
40.9 s * +26%
R Benchmark 2.5 - Overall mean
Average of class Multimedia
  (0.3826 - 0.947, n=81, last 2 years)
0.4874 sec * -14%
Lenovo ThinkPad T16 G2 21K70035GE
AMD Ryzen 7 7840U
0.4753 sec * -11%
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 16
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
0.4688 sec * -10%
HP Envy x360 2-in-1 16-ad0097nr
AMD Ryzen 7 8840HS
0.4638 sec * -9%
Asus ZenBook S 16 OLED UM5606WA
AMD Ryzen AI 9 365
0.4272 sec *
Average AMD Ryzen AI 9 365
  ()
0.4272 sec * -0%
Asus Zenbook S16 UM5606
AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370
0.4257 sec * -0%

* ... smaller is better

Cinebench R10 Shading 32Bit
22668
Cinebench R10 Rendering Single 32Bit
8436
Cinebench R10 Rendering Multiple CPUs 32Bit
42669
Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 64Bit
27.35 Points
Cinebench R11.5 CPU Single 64Bit
3.47 Points
Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64Bit
1950 Points
Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64Bit
179.4 fps
Cinebench R15 Ref. Match 64Bit
97.9 %
Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64Bit
293 Points
Ajuda
Performance Rating
Asus Zenbook S16 UM5606
AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, Radeon 890M
96.5 pt
Lenovo ThinkPad T16 G2 21K70035GE
AMD Ryzen 7 7840U, Radeon 780M
85.8 pt
HP Envy x360 2-in-1 16-ad0097nr
AMD Ryzen 7 8840HS, Radeon 780M
83.1 pt
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 16
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core
73.3 pt
Average of class Multimedia
 
73.1 pt
Asus ZenBook S 16 OLED UM5606WA
AMD Ryzen AI 9 365, Radeon 880M
70 pt
Average AMD Ryzen AI 9 365
 
70 pt
AIDA64 / FP32 Ray-Trace
Asus Zenbook S16 UM5606
AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, Radeon 890M
24673 KRay/s +44%
Lenovo ThinkPad T16 G2 21K70035GE
AMD Ryzen 7 7840U, Radeon 780M
20854 KRay/s +22%
HP Envy x360 2-in-1 16-ad0097nr
AMD Ryzen 7 8840HS, Radeon 780M
20007 KRay/s +17%
Asus ZenBook S 16 OLED UM5606WA
AMD Ryzen AI 9 365, Radeon 880M
17096 KRay/s
Average AMD Ryzen AI 9 365
  ()
17096 KRay/s 0%
Average of class Multimedia
  (4906 - 36957, n=78, last 2 years)
14003 KRay/s -18%
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 16
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core
13431 KRay/s -21%
AIDA64 / FPU Julia
Asus Zenbook S16 UM5606
AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, Radeon 890M
97073 Points +57%
Lenovo ThinkPad T16 G2 21K70035GE
AMD Ryzen 7 7840U, Radeon 780M
87858 Points +42%
HP Envy x360 2-in-1 16-ad0097nr
AMD Ryzen 7 8840HS, Radeon 780M
84591 Points +36%
Average of class Multimedia
  (14528 - 147248, n=79, last 2 years)
71135 Points +15%
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 16
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core
68747 Points +11%
Asus ZenBook S 16 OLED UM5606WA
AMD Ryzen AI 9 365, Radeon 880M
61976 Points
Average AMD Ryzen AI 9 365
  ()
61976 Points 0%
AIDA64 / CPU SHA3
Asus Zenbook S16 UM5606
AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, Radeon 890M
4421 MB/s +50%
Lenovo ThinkPad T16 G2 21K70035GE
AMD Ryzen 7 7840U, Radeon 780M
3953 MB/s +34%
HP Envy x360 2-in-1 16-ad0097nr
AMD Ryzen 7 8840HS, Radeon 780M
3847 MB/s +30%
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 16
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core
3320 MB/s +13%
Average of class Multimedia
  (1529 - 6681, n=79, last 2 years)
3308 MB/s +12%
Asus ZenBook S 16 OLED UM5606WA
AMD Ryzen AI 9 365, Radeon 880M
2951 MB/s
Average AMD Ryzen AI 9 365
  ()
2951 MB/s 0%
AIDA64 / CPU Queen
HP Envy x360 2-in-1 16-ad0097nr
AMD Ryzen 7 8840HS, Radeon 780M
107640 Points +26%
Lenovo ThinkPad T16 G2 21K70035GE
AMD Ryzen 7 7840U, Radeon 780M
97793 Points +15%
Average of class Multimedia
  (21547 - 134321, n=79, last 2 years)
90527 Points +6%
Asus ZenBook S 16 OLED UM5606WA
AMD Ryzen AI 9 365, Radeon 880M
85333 Points
Average AMD Ryzen AI 9 365
  ()
85333 Points 0%
Asus Zenbook S16 UM5606
AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, Radeon 890M
84460 Points -1%
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 16
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core
83844 Points -2%
AIDA64 / FPU SinJulia
Asus Zenbook S16 UM5606
AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, Radeon 890M
16445 Points +42%
Lenovo ThinkPad T16 G2 21K70035GE
AMD Ryzen 7 7840U, Radeon 780M
13146 Points +13%
HP Envy x360 2-in-1 16-ad0097nr
AMD Ryzen 7 8840HS, Radeon 780M
12929 Points +12%
Asus ZenBook S 16 OLED UM5606WA
AMD Ryzen AI 9 365, Radeon 880M
11586 Points
Average AMD Ryzen AI 9 365
  ()
11586 Points 0%
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 16
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core
9521 Points -18%
Average of class Multimedia
  (1240 - 19021, n=79, last 2 years)
9228 Points -20%
AIDA64 / FPU Mandel
Asus Zenbook S16 UM5606
AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, Radeon 890M
51277 Points +53%
Lenovo ThinkPad T16 G2 21K70035GE
AMD Ryzen 7 7840U, Radeon 780M
46549 Points +39%
HP Envy x360 2-in-1 16-ad0097nr
AMD Ryzen 7 8840HS, Radeon 780M
44969 Points +35%
Average of class Multimedia
  (9903 - 75780, n=78, last 2 years)
35427 Points +6%
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 16
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core
34153 Points +2%
Asus ZenBook S 16 OLED UM5606WA
AMD Ryzen AI 9 365, Radeon 880M
33409 Points
Average AMD Ryzen AI 9 365
  ()
33409 Points 0%
AIDA64 / CPU AES
Average of class Multimedia
  (31432 - 169946, n=79, last 2 years)
75476 MB/s +59%
Lenovo ThinkPad T16 G2 21K70035GE
AMD Ryzen 7 7840U, Radeon 780M
74060 MB/s +56%
HP Envy x360 2-in-1 16-ad0097nr
AMD Ryzen 7 8840HS, Radeon 780M
70892 MB/s +49%
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 16
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core
68954 MB/s +45%
Asus Zenbook S16 UM5606
AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, Radeon 890M
68042 MB/s +43%
Asus ZenBook S 16 OLED UM5606WA
AMD Ryzen AI 9 365, Radeon 880M
47468 MB/s
Average AMD Ryzen AI 9 365
  ()
47468 MB/s 0%
AIDA64 / CPU ZLib
Asus Zenbook S16 UM5606
AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, Radeon 890M
1086 MB/s +54%
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 16
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core
966 MB/s +37%
Average of class Multimedia
  (302 - 1901, n=79, last 2 years)
916 MB/s +30%
Lenovo ThinkPad T16 G2 21K70035GE
AMD Ryzen 7 7840U, Radeon 780M
887 MB/s +26%
HP Envy x360 2-in-1 16-ad0097nr
AMD Ryzen 7 8840HS, Radeon 780M
857 MB/s +21%
Asus ZenBook S 16 OLED UM5606WA
AMD Ryzen AI 9 365, Radeon 880M
706 MB/s
Average AMD Ryzen AI 9 365
  ()
706 MB/s 0%
AIDA64 / FP64 Ray-Trace
Asus Zenbook S16 UM5606
AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, Radeon 890M
13959 KRay/s +54%
Lenovo ThinkPad T16 G2 21K70035GE
AMD Ryzen 7 7840U, Radeon 780M
10875 KRay/s +20%
HP Envy x360 2-in-1 16-ad0097nr
AMD Ryzen 7 8840HS, Radeon 780M
10571 KRay/s +17%
Asus ZenBook S 16 OLED UM5606WA
AMD Ryzen AI 9 365, Radeon 880M
9061 KRay/s
Average AMD Ryzen AI 9 365
  ()
9061 KRay/s 0%
Average of class Multimedia
  (2738 - 20608, n=79, last 2 years)
7612 KRay/s -16%
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 16
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core
6970 KRay/s -23%
AIDA64 / CPU PhotoWorxx
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 16
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core
51338 MPixel/s +8%
Asus Zenbook S16 UM5606
AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, Radeon 890M
49404 MPixel/s +4%
Asus ZenBook S 16 OLED UM5606WA
AMD Ryzen AI 9 365, Radeon 880M
47654 MPixel/s
Average AMD Ryzen AI 9 365
  ()
47654 MPixel/s 0%
Average of class Multimedia
  (7419 - 53918, n=79, last 2 years)
39938 MPixel/s -16%
Lenovo ThinkPad T16 G2 21K70035GE
AMD Ryzen 7 7840U, Radeon 780M
38173 MPixel/s -20%
HP Envy x360 2-in-1 16-ad0097nr
AMD Ryzen 7 8840HS, Radeon 780M
31491 MPixel/s -34%

Desempenho do sistema

As duas variantes do ZenBook S 16 oferecem o melhor desempenho do sistema no campo de teste. O sistema inicializa, reage e carrega com uma rapidez agradável. A velocidade da memória de trabalho também é impressionante.

PCMark 10 / Score
Asus Zenbook S16 UM5606
Radeon 890M, Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM
7487 Points +6%
Asus ZenBook S 16 OLED UM5606WA
Radeon 880M, Ryzen AI 9 365, Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM
7045 Points
Average AMD Ryzen AI 9 365, AMD Radeon 880M
  ()
7045 Points 0%
HP Envy x360 2-in-1 16-ad0097nr
Radeon 780M, R7 8840HS, KIOXIA BG5 KBG50ZNV1T02
6958 Points -1%
Average of class Multimedia
  (4542 - 8670, n=72, last 2 years)
6764 Points -4%
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 16
Arc 8-Core, Ultra 7 155H, Samsung PM9B1 512GB MZVL4512HBLU
6713 Points -5%
Lenovo ThinkPad T16 G2 21K70035GE
Radeon 780M, R7 7840U, SK hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X162N
6421 Points -9%
PCMark 10 / Essentials
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 16
Arc 8-Core, Ultra 7 155H, Samsung PM9B1 512GB MZVL4512HBLU
11079 Points +6%
Asus Zenbook S16 UM5606
Radeon 890M, Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM
10918 Points +5%
Average of class Multimedia
  (8480 - 12420, n=72, last 2 years)
10519 Points +1%
HP Envy x360 2-in-1 16-ad0097nr
Radeon 780M, R7 8840HS, KIOXIA BG5 KBG50ZNV1T02
10503 Points +1%
Asus ZenBook S 16 OLED UM5606WA
Radeon 880M, Ryzen AI 9 365, Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM
10421 Points
Average AMD Ryzen AI 9 365, AMD Radeon 880M
  ()
10421 Points 0%
Lenovo ThinkPad T16 G2 21K70035GE
Radeon 780M, R7 7840U, SK hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X162N
9904 Points -5%
PCMark 10 / Productivity
Asus Zenbook S16 UM5606
Radeon 890M, Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM
10615 Points +5%
Asus ZenBook S 16 OLED UM5606WA
Radeon 880M, Ryzen AI 9 365, Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM
10150 Points
Average AMD Ryzen AI 9 365, AMD Radeon 880M
  ()
10150 Points 0%
HP Envy x360 2-in-1 16-ad0097nr
Radeon 780M, R7 8840HS, KIOXIA BG5 KBG50ZNV1T02
9933 Points -2%
Lenovo ThinkPad T16 G2 21K70035GE
Radeon 780M, R7 7840U, SK hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X162N
8922 Points -12%
Average of class Multimedia
  (6089 - 10742, n=72, last 2 years)
8870 Points -13%
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 16
Arc 8-Core, Ultra 7 155H, Samsung PM9B1 512GB MZVL4512HBLU
8343 Points -18%
PCMark 10 / Digital Content Creation
Asus Zenbook S16 UM5606
Radeon 890M, Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM
9828 Points +10%
Average of class Multimedia
  (3651 - 13548, n=72, last 2 years)
9138 Points +2%
Asus ZenBook S 16 OLED UM5606WA
Radeon 880M, Ryzen AI 9 365, Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM
8973 Points
Average AMD Ryzen AI 9 365, AMD Radeon 880M
  ()
8973 Points 0%
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 16
Arc 8-Core, Ultra 7 155H, Samsung PM9B1 512GB MZVL4512HBLU
8885 Points -1%
HP Envy x360 2-in-1 16-ad0097nr
Radeon 780M, R7 8840HS, KIOXIA BG5 KBG50ZNV1T02
8763 Points -2%
Lenovo ThinkPad T16 G2 21K70035GE
Radeon 780M, R7 7840U, SK hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X162N
8132 Points -9%
CrossMark / Overall
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 16
Arc 8-Core, Ultra 7 155H, Samsung PM9B1 512GB MZVL4512HBLU
1751 Points
Asus Zenbook S16 UM5606
Radeon 890M, Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM
1749 Points
Average of class Multimedia
  (978 - 2146, n=86, last 2 years)
1679 Points
HP Envy x360 2-in-1 16-ad0097nr
Radeon 780M, R7 8840HS, KIOXIA BG5 KBG50ZNV1T02
1643 Points
Lenovo ThinkPad T16 G2 21K70035GE
Radeon 780M, R7 7840U, SK hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X162N
1608 Points
CrossMark / Productivity
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 16
Arc 8-Core, Ultra 7 155H, Samsung PM9B1 512GB MZVL4512HBLU
1685 Points
Asus Zenbook S16 UM5606
Radeon 890M, Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM
1625 Points
HP Envy x360 2-in-1 16-ad0097nr
Radeon 780M, R7 8840HS, KIOXIA BG5 KBG50ZNV1T02
1611 Points
Average of class Multimedia
  (913 - 2064, n=86, last 2 years)
1594 Points
Lenovo ThinkPad T16 G2 21K70035GE
Radeon 780M, R7 7840U, SK hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X162N
1557 Points
CrossMark / Creativity
Asus Zenbook S16 UM5606
Radeon 890M, Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM
2029 Points
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 16
Arc 8-Core, Ultra 7 155H, Samsung PM9B1 512GB MZVL4512HBLU
1911 Points
Average of class Multimedia
  (1054 - 2564, n=86, last 2 years)
1877 Points
HP Envy x360 2-in-1 16-ad0097nr
Radeon 780M, R7 8840HS, KIOXIA BG5 KBG50ZNV1T02
1790 Points
Lenovo ThinkPad T16 G2 21K70035GE
Radeon 780M, R7 7840U, SK hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X162N
1754 Points
CrossMark / Responsiveness
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 16
Arc 8-Core, Ultra 7 155H, Samsung PM9B1 512GB MZVL4512HBLU
1514 Points
Average of class Multimedia
  (869 - 2171, n=86, last 2 years)
1418 Points
Asus Zenbook S16 UM5606
Radeon 890M, Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM
1398 Points
Lenovo ThinkPad T16 G2 21K70035GE
Radeon 780M, R7 7840U, SK hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X162N
1363 Points
HP Envy x360 2-in-1 16-ad0097nr
Radeon 780M, R7 8840HS, KIOXIA BG5 KBG50ZNV1T02
1347 Points
WebXPRT 3 / Overall
Asus Zenbook S16 UM5606
Radeon 890M, Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM
321 Points
Average of class Multimedia
  (136.4 - 476, n=84, last 2 years)
305 Points
HP Envy x360 2-in-1 16-ad0097nr
Radeon 780M, R7 8840HS, KIOXIA BG5 KBG50ZNV1T02
297 Points
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 16
Arc 8-Core, Ultra 7 155H, Samsung PM9B1 512GB MZVL4512HBLU
275 Points
Lenovo ThinkPad T16 G2 21K70035GE
Radeon 780M, R7 7840U, SK hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X162N
262 Points
WebXPRT 4 / Overall
Asus Zenbook S16 UM5606
Radeon 890M, Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM
266 Points +4%
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 16
Arc 8-Core, Ultra 7 155H, Samsung PM9B1 512GB MZVL4512HBLU
257 Points +1%
Asus ZenBook S 16 OLED UM5606WA
Radeon 880M, Ryzen AI 9 365, Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM
255 Points
Asus ZenBook S 16 OLED UM5606WA
Radeon 880M, Ryzen AI 9 365, Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM
255 Points 0%
Average AMD Ryzen AI 9 365, AMD Radeon 880M
  (255 - 255, n=2)
255 Points 0%
Average of class Multimedia
  (133.2 - 348, n=76, last 2 years)
253 Points -1%
HP Envy x360 2-in-1 16-ad0097nr
Radeon 780M, R7 8840HS, KIOXIA BG5 KBG50ZNV1T02
246 Points -4%
Lenovo ThinkPad T16 G2 21K70035GE
Radeon 780M, R7 7840U, SK hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X162N
194.4 Points -24%
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 / Total
Lenovo ThinkPad T16 G2 21K70035GE
Radeon 780M, R7 7840U, SK hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X162N
571 ms * -25%
HP Envy x360 2-in-1 16-ad0097nr
Radeon 780M, R7 8840HS, KIOXIA BG5 KBG50ZNV1T02
538 ms * -18%
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 16
Arc 8-Core, Ultra 7 155H, Samsung PM9B1 512GB MZVL4512HBLU
528 ms * -16%
Average of class Multimedia
  (363 - 1016, n=88, last 2 years)
520 ms * -14%
Asus ZenBook S 16 OLED UM5606WA
Radeon 880M, Ryzen AI 9 365, Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM
456 ms *
Asus ZenBook S 16 OLED UM5606WA
Radeon 880M, Ryzen AI 9 365, Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM
456 ms * -0%
Average AMD Ryzen AI 9 365, AMD Radeon 880M
  (456 - 456, n=2)
456 ms * -0%
Asus Zenbook S16 UM5606
Radeon 890M, Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM
439 ms * +4%

* ... smaller is better

PCMark 10 Score
7045 pontos
Ajuda
AIDA64 / Memory Copy
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 16
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core
91209 MB/s +1%
Asus Zenbook S16 UM5606
AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, Radeon 890M
90221 MB/s 0%
Asus ZenBook S 16 OLED UM5606WA
AMD Ryzen AI 9 365, Radeon 880M
90113 MB/s
Average AMD Ryzen AI 9 365
  ()
90113 MB/s 0%
HP Envy x360 2-in-1 16-ad0097nr
AMD Ryzen 7 8840HS, Radeon 780M
68720 MB/s -24%
Lenovo ThinkPad T16 G2 21K70035GE
AMD Ryzen 7 7840U, Radeon 780M
67760 MB/s -25%
Average of class Multimedia
  (20549 - 94300, n=79, last 2 years)
67334 MB/s -25%
AIDA64 / Memory Read
Asus Zenbook S16 UM5606
AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, Radeon 890M
100903 MB/s +13%
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 16
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core
90142 MB/s +1%
Asus ZenBook S 16 OLED UM5606WA
AMD Ryzen AI 9 365, Radeon 880M
89012 MB/s
Average AMD Ryzen AI 9 365
  ()
89012 MB/s 0%
Average of class Multimedia
  (22917 - 125604, n=79, last 2 years)
68577 MB/s -23%
Lenovo ThinkPad T16 G2 21K70035GE
AMD Ryzen 7 7840U, Radeon 780M
50402 MB/s -43%
HP Envy x360 2-in-1 16-ad0097nr
AMD Ryzen 7 8840HS, Radeon 780M
50273 MB/s -44%
AIDA64 / Memory Write
Asus ZenBook S 16 OLED UM5606WA
AMD Ryzen AI 9 365, Radeon 880M
100507 MB/s
Average AMD Ryzen AI 9 365
  ()
100507 MB/s 0%
Asus Zenbook S16 UM5606
AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, Radeon 890M
100401 MB/s 0%
HP Envy x360 2-in-1 16-ad0097nr
AMD Ryzen 7 8840HS, Radeon 780M
91050 MB/s -9%
Lenovo ThinkPad T16 G2 21K70035GE
AMD Ryzen 7 7840U, Radeon 780M
89716 MB/s -11%
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 16
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core
75823 MB/s -25%
Average of class Multimedia
  (20226 - 100507, n=79, last 2 years)
67968 MB/s -32%
AIDA64 / Memory Latency
Lenovo ThinkPad T16 G2 21K70035GE
AMD Ryzen 7 7840U, Radeon 780M
129 ns * -11%
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 16
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core
125.8 ns * -8%
HP Envy x360 2-in-1 16-ad0097nr
AMD Ryzen 7 8840HS, Radeon 780M
121.8 ns * -5%
Asus ZenBook S 16 OLED UM5606WA
AMD Ryzen AI 9 365, Radeon 880M
116.3 ns *
Average AMD Ryzen AI 9 365
  ()
116.3 ns * -0%
Asus Zenbook S16 UM5606
AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, Radeon 890M
112.4 ns * +3%
Average of class Multimedia
  (7 - 346, n=78, last 2 years)
107.5 ns * +8%

* ... smaller is better

Latências de DPC

Os compradores terão que fazer concessões no que diz respeito à latência. A ferramenta LatencyMon atesta que o dispositivo de 16 polegadas não apresenta bons valores nesse quesito, o que pode levar a possíveis quedas durante a edição de áudio e vídeo em tempo real.

LatencyMon
LatencyMon
DPC Latencies / LatencyMon - interrupt to process latency (max), Web, Youtube, Prime95
Asus ZenBook S 16 OLED UM5606WA
Radeon 880M, Ryzen AI 9 365, Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM
3298 μs *
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 16
Arc 8-Core, Ultra 7 155H, Samsung PM9B1 512GB MZVL4512HBLU
1736.9 μs * +47%
HP Envy x360 2-in-1 16-ad0097nr
Radeon 780M, R7 8840HS, KIOXIA BG5 KBG50ZNV1T02
1639.8 μs * +50%
Lenovo ThinkPad T16 G2 21K70035GE
Radeon 780M, R7 7840U, SK hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X162N
674.4 μs * +80%

* ... smaller is better

Armazenamento em massa

O armazenamento em massa não é nem fraco nem particularmente rápido, mas está na faixa intermediária. O Micron 2400 baseado em NVMe integrado oferece desempenho estável mesmo sob uso prolongado, conforme comprovado pelo loop do DiskSpd.

Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM
CDM 5/6 Read Seq Q32T1: 4631 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write Seq Q32T1: 3346 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Read 4K Q32T1: 450.3 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write 4K Q32T1: 417.8 MB/s
CDM 5 Read Seq: 2427 MB/s
CDM 5 Write Seq: 2565 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Read 4K: 57.44 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write 4K: 155.1 MB/s
Drive Performance Rating - Percent
Lenovo ThinkPad T16 G2 21K70035GE
SK hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X162N
81 pt
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 16
Samsung PM9B1 512GB MZVL4512HBLU
78.1 pt
Average of class Multimedia
 
77 pt
Average Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM
 
67 pt
Asus ZenBook S 16 OLED UM5606WA
Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM
55.9 pt
Asus Zenbook S16 UM5606
Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM
55 pt
HP Envy x360 2-in-1 16-ad0097nr
KIOXIA BG5 KBG50ZNV1T02
49.1 pt
DiskSpd
seq read
Lenovo ThinkPad T16 G2 21K70035GE
SK hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X162N
4554 (4440.09min - 4553.67max) MB/s +88%
Average of class Multimedia
  (756 - 4861, n=78, last 2 years)
2898 MB/s +20%
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 16
Samsung PM9B1 512GB MZVL4512HBLU
2652 (2626.88min - 2652.48max) MB/s +10%
Asus ZenBook S 16 OLED UM5606WA
Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM
2421 (2387.4min - 2420.55max) MB/s
Asus Zenbook S16 UM5606
Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM
2411 (2392.64min - 2410.68max) MB/s 0%
HP Envy x360 2-in-1 16-ad0097nr
KIOXIA BG5 KBG50ZNV1T02
2381 (2369.66min - 2380.54max) MB/s -2%
Average Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM
  (1870 - 2660, n=17)
2289 MB/s -5%
seq write
Lenovo ThinkPad T16 G2 21K70035GE
SK hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X162N
3471 (3431.21min - 3471.39max) MB/s +27%
Average of class Multimedia
  (463 - 5711, n=78, last 2 years)
3019 MB/s +11%
Asus Zenbook S16 UM5606
Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM
2768 (2672.71min - 2768.03max) MB/s +1%
Asus ZenBook S 16 OLED UM5606WA
Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM
2729 (2601.73min - 2729.02max) MB/s
Average Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM
  (2138 - 3141, n=17)
2678 MB/s -2%
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 16
Samsung PM9B1 512GB MZVL4512HBLU
2328 (2307.7min - 2328.26max) MB/s -15%
HP Envy x360 2-in-1 16-ad0097nr
KIOXIA BG5 KBG50ZNV1T02
2320 (2187.12min - 2319.66max) MB/s -15%
seq q8 t1 read
Lenovo ThinkPad T16 G2 21K70035GE
SK hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X162N
7113 (6578.98min - 7112.7max) MB/s +40%
Average of class Multimedia
  (1023 - 7126, n=78, last 2 years)
5445 MB/s +7%
Asus ZenBook S 16 OLED UM5606WA
Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM
5093 (4325.8min - 5093.35max) MB/s
Asus Zenbook S16 UM5606
Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM
5048 (4430.92min - 5048.23max) MB/s -1%
Average Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM
  (4239 - 5093, n=17)
4726 MB/s -7%
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 16
Samsung PM9B1 512GB MZVL4512HBLU
3562 (3054.5min - 3562.01max) MB/s -30%
HP Envy x360 2-in-1 16-ad0097nr
KIOXIA BG5 KBG50ZNV1T02
2723 (2395.19min - 2722.52max) MB/s -47%
seq q8 t1 write
Lenovo ThinkPad T16 G2 21K70035GE
SK hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X162N
6009 (5981.29min - 6008.76max) MB/s +66%
Average of class Multimedia
  (555 - 6898, n=78, last 2 years)
4058 MB/s +12%
Asus ZenBook S 16 OLED UM5606WA
Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM
3626 (3509.49min - 3625.77max) MB/s
Asus Zenbook S16 UM5606
Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM
3597 (3491.97min - 3597.45max) MB/s -1%
Average Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM
  (2884 - 3635, n=17)
3370 MB/s -7%
HP Envy x360 2-in-1 16-ad0097nr
KIOXIA BG5 KBG50ZNV1T02
2939 (2905.25min - 2938.94max) MB/s -19%
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 16
Samsung PM9B1 512GB MZVL4512HBLU
2344 (1404.04min - 2343.99max) MB/s -35%
4k q1 t1 read
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 16
Samsung PM9B1 512GB MZVL4512HBLU
80.8 (80.01min - 80.76max) MB/s +146%
Average of class Multimedia
  (14.6 - 149.1, n=78, last 2 years)
62.7 MB/s +91%
Lenovo ThinkPad T16 G2 21K70035GE
SK hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X162N
59.8 (58.4min - 59.75max) MB/s +82%
HP Envy x360 2-in-1 16-ad0097nr
KIOXIA BG5 KBG50ZNV1T02
52.5 (51.53min - 52.46max) MB/s +60%
Asus Zenbook S16 UM5606
Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM
33.5 (33.26min - 33.51max) MB/s +2%
Average Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM
  (14.6 - 40.3, n=17)
33.5 MB/s +2%
Asus ZenBook S 16 OLED UM5606WA
Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM
32.8 (32.29min - 32.8max) MB/s
4k q1 t1 write
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 16
Samsung PM9B1 512GB MZVL4512HBLU
190.9 (186.79min - 190.93max) MB/s +37%
Average Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM
  (75.9 - 286, n=17)
177.5 MB/s +27%
Average of class Multimedia
  (69.4 - 378, n=78, last 2 years)
167.6 MB/s +20%
Lenovo ThinkPad T16 G2 21K70035GE
SK hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X162N
155.6 (149.42min - 155.61max) MB/s +12%
Asus Zenbook S16 UM5606
Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM
140.9 (133.2min - 140.87max) MB/s +1%
Asus ZenBook S 16 OLED UM5606WA
Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM
139.3 (133.75min - 139.27max) MB/s
HP Envy x360 2-in-1 16-ad0097nr
KIOXIA BG5 KBG50ZNV1T02
136.5 (133.54min - 136.47max) MB/s -2%
4k q32 t16 read
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 16
Samsung PM9B1 512GB MZVL4512HBLU
1821 (1804.4min - 1821.4max) MB/s +287%
Average of class Multimedia
  (295 - 4881, n=78, last 2 years)
1301 MB/s +177%
Average Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM
  (283 - 2850, n=17)
1133 MB/s +141%
Lenovo ThinkPad T16 G2 21K70035GE
SK hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X162N
925 (898.46min - 924.71max) MB/s +97%
HP Envy x360 2-in-1 16-ad0097nr
KIOXIA BG5 KBG50ZNV1T02
859 (846.09min - 858.76max) MB/s +83%
Asus Zenbook S16 UM5606
Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM
521 (508.25min - 520.66max) MB/s +11%
Asus ZenBook S 16 OLED UM5606WA
Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM
470 (452.58min - 469.76max) MB/s
4k q32 t16 write
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 16
Samsung PM9B1 512GB MZVL4512HBLU
1643 (1597.74min - 1643.45max) MB/s +506%
Average Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM
  (222 - 2635, n=17)
1028 MB/s +279%
Average of class Multimedia
  (192.1 - 4074, n=78, last 2 years)
987 MB/s +264%
Lenovo ThinkPad T16 G2 21K70035GE
SK hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X162N
461 (430.21min - 460.94max) MB/s +70%
HP Envy x360 2-in-1 16-ad0097nr
KIOXIA BG5 KBG50ZNV1T02
384 (367.4min - 383.87max) MB/s +42%
Asus Zenbook S16 UM5606
Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM
295 (292.32min - 295.22max) MB/s +9%
Asus ZenBook S 16 OLED UM5606WA
Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM
271 (259.81min - 271.42max) MB/s
AS SSD
Score Total
Lenovo ThinkPad T16 G2 21K70035GE
SK hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X162N
5498 Points +62%
Average of class Multimedia
  (2010 - 9972, n=75, last 2 years)
4958 Points +46%
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 16
Samsung PM9B1 512GB MZVL4512HBLU
4643 Points +37%
Average Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM
  (2404 - 6406, n=17)
4298 Points +26%
Asus ZenBook S 16 OLED UM5606WA
Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM
3398 Points
Asus Zenbook S16 UM5606
Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM
3044 Points -10%
HP Envy x360 2-in-1 16-ad0097nr
KIOXIA BG5 KBG50ZNV1T02
2449 Points -28%
Score Read
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 16
Samsung PM9B1 512GB MZVL4512HBLU
1795 Points +92%
Average of class Multimedia
  (669 - 3501, n=75, last 2 years)
1601 Points +71%
Average Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM
  (787 - 2482, n=17)
1507 Points +61%
HP Envy x360 2-in-1 16-ad0097nr
KIOXIA BG5 KBG50ZNV1T02
1151 Points +23%
Lenovo ThinkPad T16 G2 21K70035GE
SK hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X162N
1130 Points +21%
Asus ZenBook S 16 OLED UM5606WA
Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM
936 Points
Asus Zenbook S16 UM5606
Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM
852 Points -9%
Score Write
Lenovo ThinkPad T16 G2 21K70035GE
SK hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X162N
3808 Points +86%
Average of class Multimedia
  (656 - 4813, n=75, last 2 years)
2598 Points +27%
Average Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM
  (1086 - 2796, n=17)
2077 Points +1%
Asus ZenBook S 16 OLED UM5606WA
Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM
2047 Points
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 16
Samsung PM9B1 512GB MZVL4512HBLU
1962 Points -4%
Asus Zenbook S16 UM5606
Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM
1820 Points -11%
HP Envy x360 2-in-1 16-ad0097nr
KIOXIA BG5 KBG50ZNV1T02
738 Points -64%
Seq Read
Average of class Multimedia
  (1192 - 5730, n=75, last 2 years)
4183 MB/s +8%
Asus Zenbook S16 UM5606
Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM
3882 MB/s 0%
Asus ZenBook S 16 OLED UM5606WA
Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM
3873.54 MB/s
Average Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM
  (3616 - 4177, n=17)
3850 MB/s -1%
Lenovo ThinkPad T16 G2 21K70035GE
SK hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X162N
3385 MB/s -13%
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 16
Samsung PM9B1 512GB MZVL4512HBLU
3189 MB/s -18%
HP Envy x360 2-in-1 16-ad0097nr
KIOXIA BG5 KBG50ZNV1T02
2597 MB/s -33%
Seq Write
Average of class Multimedia
  (388 - 5651, n=75, last 2 years)
2727 MB/s +17%
Lenovo ThinkPad T16 G2 21K70035GE
SK hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X162N
2687 MB/s +16%
Average Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM
  (1946 - 3177, n=17)
2589 MB/s +11%
Asus Zenbook S16 UM5606
Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM
2500 MB/s +8%
Asus ZenBook S 16 OLED UM5606WA
Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM
2324.19 MB/s
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 16
Samsung PM9B1 512GB MZVL4512HBLU
2260 MB/s -3%
HP Envy x360 2-in-1 16-ad0097nr
KIOXIA BG5 KBG50ZNV1T02
1738.71 MB/s -25%
4K Read
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 16
Samsung PM9B1 512GB MZVL4512HBLU
69.8 MB/s +45%
Average of class Multimedia
  (28.7 - 98.5, n=75, last 2 years)
62 MB/s +29%
Lenovo ThinkPad T16 G2 21K70035GE
SK hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X162N
59.1 MB/s +23%
HP Envy x360 2-in-1 16-ad0097nr
KIOXIA BG5 KBG50ZNV1T02
52.79 MB/s +10%
Asus ZenBook S 16 OLED UM5606WA
Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM
48.19 MB/s
Average Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM
  (27.8 - 58.8, n=17)
47.9 MB/s -1%
Asus Zenbook S16 UM5606
Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM
32.4 MB/s -33%
4K Write
Average Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM
  (135.6 - 288, n=17)
202 MB/s +9%
Average of class Multimedia
  (66.5 - 328, n=75, last 2 years)
186.9 MB/s 0%
Asus ZenBook S 16 OLED UM5606WA
Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM
186.11 MB/s
Asus Zenbook S16 UM5606
Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM
181.5 MB/s -2%
Lenovo ThinkPad T16 G2 21K70035GE
SK hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X162N
169.1 MB/s -9%
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 16
Samsung PM9B1 512GB MZVL4512HBLU
168.8 MB/s -9%
HP Envy x360 2-in-1 16-ad0097nr
KIOXIA BG5 KBG50ZNV1T02
156.53 MB/s -16%
4K-64 Read
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 16
Samsung PM9B1 512GB MZVL4512HBLU
1407 MB/s +181%
Average of class Multimedia
  (350 - 2989, n=75, last 2 years)
1121 MB/s +124%
Average Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM
  (349 - 2005, n=17)
1074 MB/s +115%
HP Envy x360 2-in-1 16-ad0097nr
KIOXIA BG5 KBG50ZNV1T02
838.9 MB/s +68%
Lenovo ThinkPad T16 G2 21K70035GE
SK hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X162N
733 MB/s +46%
Asus ZenBook S 16 OLED UM5606WA
Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM
500.47 MB/s
Asus Zenbook S16 UM5606
Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM
431 MB/s -14%
4K-64 Write
Lenovo ThinkPad T16 G2 21K70035GE
SK hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X162N
3370 MB/s +107%
Average of class Multimedia
  (411 - 4265, n=75, last 2 years)
2138 MB/s +31%
Asus ZenBook S 16 OLED UM5606WA
Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM
1628.92 MB/s
Average Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM
  (669 - 2255, n=17)
1619 MB/s -1%
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 16
Samsung PM9B1 512GB MZVL4512HBLU
1567 MB/s -4%
Asus Zenbook S16 UM5606
Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM
1388 MB/s -15%
HP Envy x360 2-in-1 16-ad0097nr
KIOXIA BG5 KBG50ZNV1T02
407.67 MB/s -75%
Access Time Read
HP Envy x360 2-in-1 16-ad0097nr
KIOXIA BG5 KBG50ZNV1T02
0.109 ms * -43%
Asus ZenBook S 16 OLED UM5606WA
Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM
0.076 ms *
Average of class Multimedia
  (0.018 - 0.168, n=75, last 2 years)
0.05608 ms * +26%
Average Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM
  (0.021 - 0.116, n=17)
0.05359 ms * +29%
Lenovo ThinkPad T16 G2 21K70035GE
SK hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X162N
0.045 ms * +41%
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 16
Samsung PM9B1 512GB MZVL4512HBLU
0.033 ms * +57%
Asus Zenbook S16 UM5606
Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM
0.025 ms * +67%
Access Time Write
Asus Zenbook S16 UM5606
Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM
0.13 ms * -27%
Average Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM
  (0.091 - 0.139, n=17)
0.1092 ms * -7%
Asus ZenBook S 16 OLED UM5606WA
Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM
0.102 ms *
HP Envy x360 2-in-1 16-ad0097nr
KIOXIA BG5 KBG50ZNV1T02
0.078 ms * +24%
Average of class Multimedia
  (0.013 - 0.414, n=75, last 2 years)
0.06333 ms * +38%
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 16
Samsung PM9B1 512GB MZVL4512HBLU
0.032 ms * +69%
Lenovo ThinkPad T16 G2 21K70035GE
SK hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X162N
0.023 ms * +77%

* ... smaller is better

Continuous reading performance: DiskSpd Read Loop, Queue Depth 8

036072010801440180021602520288032403600396043204680504054005760612064806840Tooltip
Asus ZenBook S 16 OLED UM5606WA Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM; diskspd 2.0.17 f: Ø5057 (4144.49-5095.03)
Asus Zenbook S16 UM5606 Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM; diskspd 2.0.17 f: Ø4987 (4559-5054.72)
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 16 Samsung PM9B1 512GB MZVL4512HBLU; diskspd 2.0.17 f: Ø3477 (2383.41-3561.17)
HP Envy x360 2-in-1 16-ad0097nr KIOXIA BG5 KBG50ZNV1T02; diskspd 2.0.17 f: Ø2951 (2827.17-3293.07)
Lenovo ThinkPad T16 G2 21K70035GE SK hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X162N; diskspd 2.0.17 f: Ø7091 (5951.77-7123.61)

Placa de vídeo

A avaliação da Radeon 880M, que tem apenas 768 em vez de 1024 unidades de sombreamento em comparação com a Radeon 890M, não é fácil, pois a Asus se baseia em um TDP bastante moderado do Ryzen AI 9, conforme explicado.

Nos testes de gráficos sintéticos, ele tem um desempenho apenas ligeiramente mais rápido do que seu antecessor, a Radeon 780M, quando são aplicados valores PL1 quase idênticos. Esse resultado é um tanto preocupante. Para o Intel Arc 8 e a Radeon 890M, o resultado final é de aproximadamente 10% a mais. Com um TDP mais alto, as novas Radeons poderiam ter um desempenho correspondentemente melhor. Um bom exemplo disso é o VivoBook S 14 OLEDem que a Asus define 54 watts PL1 e 65 watts PL2, mas o laptop ainda é bastante econômico em operação normal e atinge excelente duração da bateria.

3DMark Performance Rating - Percent
Average of class Multimedia
 
100 pt
Asus Zenbook S16 UM5606
AMD Radeon 890M, AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370
60.8 pt
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 16
Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU, Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
60.4 pt
Asus ZenBook S 16 OLED UM5606WA
AMD Radeon 880M, AMD Ryzen AI 9 365
55.2 pt
Average AMD Radeon 880M
 
55.2 pt
Lenovo ThinkPad T16 G2 21K70035GE
AMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen 7 7840U
53.5 pt
HP Envy x360 2-in-1 16-ad0097nr
AMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen 7 8840HS
52.5 pt
3DMark 11 - 1280x720 Performance GPU
Average of class Multimedia
  (3505 - 60250, n=79, last 2 years)
20380 Points +64%
Asus Zenbook S16 UM5606
AMD Radeon 890M, AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370
13345 Points +7%
Lenovo ThinkPad T16 G2 21K70035GE
AMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen 7 7840U
12453 Points 0%
Asus ZenBook S 16 OLED UM5606WA
AMD Radeon 880M, AMD Ryzen AI 9 365
12439 Points
Average AMD Radeon 880M
  ()
12439 Points 0%
HP Envy x360 2-in-1 16-ad0097nr
AMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen 7 8840HS
12413 Points 0%
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 16
Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU, Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
12099 Points -3%
3DMark
1920x1080 Fire Strike Graphics
Average of class Multimedia
  (1835 - 46022, n=81, last 2 years)
14740 Points +96%
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 16
Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU, Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
8886 Points +18%
Asus Zenbook S16 UM5606
AMD Radeon 890M, AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370
8188 Points +9%
Lenovo ThinkPad T16 G2 21K70035GE
AMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen 7 7840U
7663 Points +2%
Asus ZenBook S 16 OLED UM5606WA
AMD Radeon 880M, AMD Ryzen AI 9 365
7538 Points
Average AMD Radeon 880M
  ()
7538 Points 0%
HP Envy x360 2-in-1 16-ad0097nr
AMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen 7 8840HS
7357 Points -2%
2560x1440 Time Spy Graphics
Average of class Multimedia
  (622 - 17620, n=82, last 2 years)
5561 Points +87%
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 16
Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU, Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
3426 Points +15%
Asus Zenbook S16 UM5606
AMD Radeon 890M, AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370
3421 Points +15%
Asus ZenBook S 16 OLED UM5606WA
AMD Radeon 880M, AMD Ryzen AI 9 365
2970 Points
Average AMD Radeon 880M
  ()
2970 Points 0%
Lenovo ThinkPad T16 G2 21K70035GE
AMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen 7 7840U
2631 Points -11%
HP Envy x360 2-in-1 16-ad0097nr
AMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen 7 8840HS
2591 Points -13%
3DMark 06 Standard Score
39128 pontos
3DMark 11 Performance
12375 pontos
3DMark Ice Storm Standard Score
167077 pontos
3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score
29760 pontos
3DMark Fire Strike Score
6861 pontos
3DMark Time Spy Score
3272 pontos
Ajuda
Blender - v3.3 Classroom CPU
Average of class Multimedia
  (190 - 946, n=86, last 2 years)
431 Seconds * -0%
Asus ZenBook S 16 OLED UM5606WA
AMD Radeon 880M, AMD Ryzen AI 9 365
429 Seconds *
Average AMD Radeon 880M
  ()
429 Seconds * -0%
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 16
Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU, Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
412 Seconds * +4%
Lenovo ThinkPad T16 G2 21K70035GE
AMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen 7 7840U
407 Seconds * +5%
HP Envy x360 2-in-1 16-ad0097nr
AMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen 7 8840HS
405 Seconds * +6%
Asus Zenbook S16 UM5606
AMD Radeon 890M, AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370
306 Seconds * +29%

* ... smaller is better

Desempenho em jogos

Embora a conclusão da Radeon 680M e 780M foram bastante positivas na época, a Radeon 880M não está se saindo tão bem devido aos requisitos de hardware muito mais altos dos novos títulos. Jogos exigentes como Alan Wake 2, Horizon Forbidden West e Star Wars Outlaws nem sequer são executados sem problemas ao usar 1.920 x 1.080 pixels e configurações baixas. Jogos mais antigos e/ou que exigem menos da CPU, como Far Cry 5, Counter-Strike 2 e F1 24 ainda são jogáveis em alguns lugares, mesmo com configurações altas - pelo menos em Full HD.

Portanto, a Radeon 880M é adequada apenas para jogadores ocasionais que estejam dispostos a reduzir consideravelmente as configurações e resoluções. A AMD também deveria trabalhar no driver em geral: Três dos jogos testados não queriam iniciar de forma alguma (Resident Evil 4 Remake, Atlas Fallen & Dragon's Dogma 2). A classificação de desempenho dos benchmarks de jogos é semelhante à dos testes sintéticos de GPU, com a 880M até mesmo ficando em último lugar.

Performance Rating - Percent
Average of class Multimedia
 
100 pt
Asus Zenbook S16 UM5606
AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, AMD Radeon 890M
53.2 pt
HP Envy x360 2-in-1 16-ad0097nr -1!
AMD Ryzen 7 8840HS, AMD Radeon 780M
51 pt
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 16
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU
48.4 pt
Lenovo ThinkPad T16 G2 21K70035GE
AMD Ryzen 7 7840U, AMD Radeon 780M
48.3 pt
Asus ZenBook S 16 OLED UM5606WA -1!
AMD Ryzen AI 9 365, AMD Radeon 880M
46.8 pt
Average AMD Radeon 880M -1!
 
46.8 pt
The Witcher 3 - 1920x1080 Ultra Graphics & Postprocessing (HBAO+)
Average of class Multimedia
  (8 - 143.2, n=84, last 2 years)
54.9 fps
Asus Zenbook S16 UM5606
AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, AMD Radeon 890M
31 fps
HP Envy x360 2-in-1 16-ad0097nr
AMD Ryzen 7 8840HS, AMD Radeon 780M
28.8 (24min) fps
Lenovo ThinkPad T16 G2 21K70035GE
AMD Ryzen 7 7840U, AMD Radeon 780M
24.9 (20min) fps
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 16
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU
23.1 (12min, 21P1) fps
GTA V - 1920x1080 Highest Settings possible AA:4xMSAA + FX AF:16x
Average of class Multimedia
  (5.09 - 123, n=80, last 2 years)
55.7 fps +103%
Asus Zenbook S16 UM5606
AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, AMD Radeon 890M
30.4 (3.23min, 21.7P1) fps +11%
Asus ZenBook S 16 OLED UM5606WA
AMD Ryzen AI 9 365, AMD Radeon 880M
27.5 (1.477min, 18.2P1) fps
Average AMD Radeon 880M
  ()
27.5 fps 0%
Lenovo ThinkPad T16 G2 21K70035GE
AMD Ryzen 7 7840U, AMD Radeon 780M
24.2 (2.78min, 16.9P1) fps -12%
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 16
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU
14.3 (1.247min, 7.75P1) fps -48%
Final Fantasy XV Benchmark - 1920x1080 High Quality
Average of class Multimedia
  (6.53 - 141.8, n=82, last 2 years)
52.4 fps +109%
Asus Zenbook S16 UM5606
AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, AMD Radeon 890M
28.6 fps +14%
HP Envy x360 2-in-1 16-ad0097nr
AMD Ryzen 7 8840HS, AMD Radeon 780M
25.2 fps 0%
Asus ZenBook S 16 OLED UM5606WA
AMD Ryzen AI 9 365, AMD Radeon 880M
25.1 fps
Average AMD Radeon 880M
  ()
25.1 fps 0%
Lenovo ThinkPad T16 G2 21K70035GE
AMD Ryzen 7 7840U, AMD Radeon 780M
24.5 fps -2%
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 16
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU
24.4 fps -3%
Strange Brigade - 1920x1080 ultra AA:ultra AF:16
Average of class Multimedia
  (11 - 233, n=80, last 2 years)
92.4 fps +109%
Asus Zenbook S16 UM5606
AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, AMD Radeon 890M
49.8 (31.1min, 37.7P1) fps +13%
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 16
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU
47 fps +6%
Asus ZenBook S 16 OLED UM5606WA
AMD Ryzen AI 9 365, AMD Radeon 880M
44.2 (7.8min, 23P1) fps
Average AMD Radeon 880M
  ()
44.2 fps 0%
Lenovo ThinkPad T16 G2 21K70035GE
AMD Ryzen 7 7840U, AMD Radeon 780M
43.7 (17.1min, 33.7P1) fps -1%
HP Envy x360 2-in-1 16-ad0097nr
AMD Ryzen 7 8840HS, AMD Radeon 780M
42.2 (7.1min, 9.18P1) fps -5%
Dota 2 Reborn - 1920x1080 ultra (3/3) best looking
Average of class Multimedia
  (26.3 - 171.6, n=83, last 2 years)
97.3 fps +236%
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 16
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU
73.6 (51.1min) fps +154%
Lenovo ThinkPad T16 G2 21K70035GE
AMD Ryzen 7 7840U, AMD Radeon 780M
65.8 (57.7min) fps +127%
HP Envy x360 2-in-1 16-ad0097nr
AMD Ryzen 7 8840HS, AMD Radeon 780M
65.4 (54.7min) fps +126%
Asus Zenbook S16 UM5606
AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, AMD Radeon 890M
33.1 (18.7min) fps +14%
Asus ZenBook S 16 OLED UM5606WA
AMD Ryzen AI 9 365, AMD Radeon 880M
29 (15.8min) fps
Average AMD Radeon 880M
  ()
29 fps 0%
X-Plane 11.11 - 1920x1080 high (fps_test=3)
Average of class Multimedia
  (23 - 131.1, n=83, last 2 years)
67.3 fps +69%
Asus Zenbook S16 UM5606
AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, AMD Radeon 890M
44.2 fps +11%
Asus ZenBook S 16 OLED UM5606WA
AMD Ryzen AI 9 365, AMD Radeon 880M
39.8 fps
Average AMD Radeon 880M
  ()
39.8 fps 0%
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 16
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU
33.5 fps -16%
HP Envy x360 2-in-1 16-ad0097nr
AMD Ryzen 7 8840HS, AMD Radeon 780M
27.9 fps -30%
Lenovo ThinkPad T16 G2 21K70035GE
AMD Ryzen 7 7840U, AMD Radeon 780M
26.6 fps -33%
Cyberpunk 2077 2.1 Phantom Liberty
1920x1080 Low Preset (FSR off)
Average of class Multimedia
  (4.66 - 129.6, n=42, last 2 years)
51.2 fps +38%
Asus Zenbook S16 UM5606
AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, AMD Radeon 890M
46 (38.3min) fps +24%
Asus ZenBook S 16 OLED UM5606WA
AMD Ryzen AI 9 365, AMD Radeon 880M
37.2 (28min) fps
Average AMD Radeon 880M
  ()
37.2 fps 0%
HP Envy x360 2-in-1 16-ad0097nr
AMD Ryzen 7 8840HS, AMD Radeon 780M
35.5 (19.3min) fps -5%
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 16
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU
27.6 (20.7min) fps -26%
1920x1080 Medium Preset (FSR off)
Average of class Multimedia
  (9.42 - 110, n=36, last 2 years)
44.7 fps +54%
Asus Zenbook S16 UM5606
AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, AMD Radeon 890M
31.3 (19.7min) fps +8%
Asus ZenBook S 16 OLED UM5606WA
AMD Ryzen AI 9 365, AMD Radeon 880M
29.1 (24min) fps
Average AMD Radeon 880M
  ()
29.1 fps 0%
HP Envy x360 2-in-1 16-ad0097nr
AMD Ryzen 7 8840HS, AMD Radeon 780M
27.8 (15.3min) fps -4%
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 16
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU
25.4 (20.9min) fps -13%
1920x1080 High Preset (FSR off)
Average of class Multimedia
  (7.3 - 94.1, n=40, last 2 years)
37.9 fps +59%
Asus Zenbook S16 UM5606
AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, AMD Radeon 890M
25.4 (15.6min) fps +6%
Asus ZenBook S 16 OLED UM5606WA
AMD Ryzen AI 9 365, AMD Radeon 880M
23.9 (20min) fps
Average AMD Radeon 880M
  ()
23.9 fps 0%
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 16
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU
22.8 (19.1min) fps -5%
HP Envy x360 2-in-1 16-ad0097nr
AMD Ryzen 7 8840HS, AMD Radeon 780M
22.1 (11min) fps -8%

Afinal de contas, o ZenBook S 16 parece se dar melhor com o Ryzen AI 9 365 do que com o HX 370: No teste de 30 minutos com o Cyberpunk 2077 não houve nenhuma queda estranha no desempenho (veja o gráfico).

Cyberpunk 2077 ultra FPS-Diagram

05101520Tooltip
Asus ZenBook S 16 OLED UM5606WA Ryzen AI 9 365, Radeon 880M: Ø22.7 (21.1-23.3)
Asus Zenbook S16 UM5606 Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, Radeon 890M: Ø19.5 (13.6-21.2)
baixo média alto ultra
GTA V (2015) 148.5 132.3 62.7 27.5
Dota 2 Reborn (2015) 147.1 109.3 31.1 29
Final Fantasy XV Benchmark (2018) 66.5 34.6 25.1
X-Plane 11.11 (2018) 64.1 51.2 39.8
Far Cry 5 (2018) 76 43 40 37
Strange Brigade (2018) 156.1 64.2 53.7 44.2
Hogwarts Legacy (2023) 32.4 25 19.3 12.3
Returnal (2023) 27 26 23 19
Atomic Heart (2023) 46.2 34 20.5 15.2
Company of Heroes 3 (2023) 61.2 46.2 36.5 36
Resident Evil 4 Remake (2023) 0 game wont start 0 game wont start 0 game wont start 0 game wont start
Ratchet & Clank Rift Apart (2023) 24.8 21 17.5 15.7
Baldur's Gate 3 (2023) 31.1 24.4 19.6 17.6
Atlas Fallen (2023) 0 game wont start 0 game wont start 0 game wont start 0 game wont start
Armored Core 6 (2023) 37.1 32.7 26.1 26
The Crew Motorfest (2023) 32 30 24 20
Lies of P (2023) 43 37.5 30.1 28.3
Cyberpunk 2077 2.1 Phantom Liberty (2023) 37.2 29.1 23.9 20
Counter-Strike 2 (2023) 95 70 45.6 32.7
Assassin's Creed Mirage (2023) 41 35 34 25
Total War Pharaoh (2023) 83.3 54.6 30.8 23.4
Lords of the Fallen (2023) 19.6 17.1 15.2 10.9
Alan Wake 2 (2023) 15.3 13.8 12.2
Call of Duty Modern Warfare 3 2023 (2023) 56 48 34 31
Avatar Frontiers of Pandora (2023) 19 16 14 8.3
The Finals (2023) 60.7 43.3 38.5 28
Ready or Not (2023) 59.4 47.3 33.7 21.6
Prince of Persia The Lost Crown (2024) 168.5 128.6 120.5
Palworld (2024) 54.9 42.1 23.8 21.3
Enshrouded (2024) 18.4 17 13.8 9.73
Helldivers 2 (2024) 32 24.6 22.7 21.1
Skull & Bones (2024) 33 29 23 17
Last Epoch (2024) 53.8 41.3 34.7 24.9
Horizon Forbidden West (2024) 18.8 16.6 12.5 12.4
Dragon's Dogma 2 (2024) 0 game wont start 0 game wont start
Ghost of Tsushima (2024) 29.3 23.7 20.2 16
Senua's Saga Hellblade 2 (2024) 14.6 12.3 9.2
F1 24 (2024) 63 53 39 8
The First Descendant (2024) 37.6 23.4 17.3 14.7
Once Human (2024) 36.1 25.3 22.8 20.6
Star Wars Outlaws (2024) 14.7 13.2 11.5 8.52

Emissões

Emissões de ruído

O ruído de fundo é muito semelhante ao do mais potente ZenBook S 16. Ao usar o modo padrão, conseguimos extrair de 24 a 26 dB(A) do dispositivo de 16 polegadas no modo inativo (os ventiladores geralmente ficam parados) e de 35 a 36 dB(A) sob carga. Esses valores representam um resultado moderado e devem ser aceitáveis para a maioria dos compradores. A concorrência está em um nível semelhante aqui.

Barulho

Ocioso
24 / 25 / 26 dB
Carga
35 / 36 dB
  red to green bar
 
 
30 dB
silencioso
40 dB(A)
audível
50 dB(A)
ruidosamente alto
 
min: dark, med: mid, max: light   Earthworks M23R, Arta (15 cm de distância)   environment noise: 24 dB(A)
dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2038.443.737.537.3372534.138.331.833.533.23145.645.444.24342.74030.73229.630.628.85033.434.232.432.733.76324.630.72422.523.880181819.417.717.410024.417.216.916.423.212518.61716.216.220.416017.718.117.915.717.920021.822.419.62022.525018.117.116.116.317.831517.614.114.413.618.14001813.713.81219.250020.713.214.611.821.76302011.714.311.721.380023.611.115.310.623.8100022.711.414.311.122.9125023.811.415.211.224.7160025.211.614.811.425.9200025.311.914.511.726.1250024.112.514.612.625.3315022.913.214.51324400023.413.51413.325500023.613.413.813.325.6630020.413.713.81422.4800017.814.214.414.219.31000015.614.715.213.6171250014.413.914.612.8161600012.712.512.712.313.2SPL34.925.326.724.936N20.70.80.62.3median 20.7median 13.5median 14.6median 13median 22.4Delta3.42.10.71.33.1hearing rangehide median Fan NoiseAsus ZenBook S 16 OLED UM5606WA
Asus ZenBook S 16 OLED UM5606WA
Ryzen AI 9 365, Radeon 880M
Asus Zenbook S16 UM5606
Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, Radeon 890M
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 16
Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core
HP Envy x360 2-in-1 16-ad0097nr
R7 8840HS, Radeon 780M
Lenovo ThinkPad T16 G2 21K70035GE
R7 7840U, Radeon 780M
Noise
-2%
-5%
7%
5%
off / environment *
24
24.7
-3%
24.6
-3%
22.9
5%
24.5
-2%
Idle Minimum *
24
24.7
-3%
24.6
-3%
23
4%
24.5
-2%
Idle Average *
25
24.7
1%
24.6
2%
23
8%
24.5
2%
Idle Maximum *
26
26.4
-2%
26.4
-2%
23
12%
24.5
6%
Load Average *
35
35.7
-2%
40
-14%
23.8
32%
26.6
24%
Cyberpunk 2077 ultra *
36
36.8
-2%
Load Maximum *
36
36.8
-2%
40
-11%
43.8
-22%
35.5
1%
Witcher 3 ultra *
40
43.8
37.2

* ... smaller is better

Temperatura

Os valores de temperatura não são exatamente ideais. Os dois modelos de ZenBook atingem os valores mais altos no campo de teste - tanto no modo inativo quanto no modo de carga. Esse problema certamente poderia ter sido neutralizado com um gabinete um pouco mais grosso e um sistema de resfriamento correspondentemente maior, mas a Asus está totalmente comprometida com a tendência de redução de peso - quer isso faça sentido ou não.

 47 °C48 °C45 °C 
 42 °C43 °C37 °C 
 33 °C32 °C33 °C 
Máximo: 48 °C
Médio: 40 °C
49 °C53 °C46 °C
42 °C44 °C38 °C
35 °C36 °C34 °C
Máximo: 53 °C
Médio: 41.9 °C
alimentação elétrica  58 °C | Temperatura do quarto 23 °C | Fluke t3000FC (calibrated), Voltcraft IR-900
(-) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 40 °C / 104 F, compared to the average of 31.3 °C / 88 F for the devices in the class Multimedia.
(-) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 48 °C / 118 F, compared to the average of 36.9 °C / 98 F, ranging from 21.1 to 71 °C for the class Multimedia.
(-) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 53 °C / 127 F, compared to the average of 39.2 °C / 103 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 29.8 °C / 86 F, compared to the device average of 31.3 °C / 88 F.
(-) 3: The average temperature for the upper side is 42.2 °C / 108 F, compared to the average of 31.3 °C / 88 F for the class Multimedia.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are reaching skin temperature as a maximum (35 °C / 95 F) and are therefore not hot.
(-) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.8 °C / 83.8 F (-6.2 °C / -11.2 F).
Asus ZenBook S 16 OLED UM5606WA
AMD Ryzen AI 9 365, AMD Radeon 880M
Asus Zenbook S16 UM5606
AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, AMD Radeon 890M
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 16
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU
HP Envy x360 2-in-1 16-ad0097nr
AMD Ryzen 7 8840HS, AMD Radeon 780M
Lenovo ThinkPad T16 G2 21K70035GE
AMD Ryzen 7 7840U, AMD Radeon 780M
Heat
3%
20%
12%
9%
Maximum Upper Side *
48
46.9
2%
40.9
15%
42.6
11%
48.7
-1%
Maximum Bottom *
53
53.5
-1%
42.6
20%
47.8
10%
52
2%
Idle Upper Side *
31
29.5
5%
24.5
21%
27.4
12%
26.4
15%
Idle Bottom *
32
30.2
6%
24.8
22%
27.8
13%
26.3
18%

* ... smaller is better

Teste de estresse

Não houve anomalias específicas no teste de estresse. Após uma hora de carga total com as ferramentas FurMark e Prime95, a CPU atingiu cerca de 70 °C (158 °F). O mesmo se aplica ao teste Cyberpunk.

FurMark e Prime95
FurMark e Prime95
FurMark e Prime95
FurMark e Prime95
FurMark e Prime95
FurMark e Prime95
Cyberpunk 2077
Cyberpunk 2077
Cyberpunk 2077
Cyberpunk 2077
Cyberpunk 2077
Cyberpunk 2077

Alto-falante

A qualidade do som do ZenBook S 16 está acima da média, especialmente considerando sua baixa altura. Entretanto, os graves e o volume máximo deveriam ser mais fortes e intensos para uma classificação de áudio ainda melhor.

dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs203647.72532.139.43140.143.24030.328.15031.335.76323.7298017.342.710014.750.712516.457.916017.560.120021.262.325016.965.531513.866.940012.969.150012.868.563011.768.180011.566.6100011.364.2125011.565.3160011.767.820001271.3250012.370.3315012.665.140001371.3500013.271.1630013.468.1800013.670.21000013.465.31250012.862.11600012.263.6SPL24.980.8N0.653.2median 12.9median 66.6Delta1.83.14542.14446.433.735.533.634.432.638.628.129.424.529.123.938.321.749.319.353.621.459.322.462.317.366.714.7681367.312.270.711.177.610.873.710.473.310.671.610.974.211.173.211.869.111.866.411.961.112.364.412.364.112.56812.468.711.856.724.683.40.657.7median 12.3median 67.32.95.6hearing rangehide median Pink NoiseAsus ZenBook S 16 OLED UM5606WASamsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 16
Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)
Asus ZenBook S 16 OLED UM5606WA audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (81 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 6.1% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (7.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 1.9% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (3.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (6.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (8.1% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 5% of all tested devices in this class were better, 1% similar, 94% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 18%, worst was 45%
Compared to all devices tested
» 1% of all tested devices were better, 1% similar, 98% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 16 audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (83.4 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 12.4% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (11.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.7% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (4.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3.1% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (5.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (12.5% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 19% of all tested devices in this class were better, 4% similar, 78% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 18%, worst was 45%
Compared to all devices tested
» 9% of all tested devices were better, 2% similar, 89% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Gerenciamento de energia

Consumo de energia

A variante AI 9 365 é um pouco mais econômica do que sua contraparte HX 370. de 6 a 13 watts no modo inativo e de 44 a 58 watts sob carga representam uma eficiência energética respeitável. O sistema Core Ultra 7 consome menos energia no modo inativo e mais sob carga.

Consumo de energia
desligadodarklight 0.6 / 0.6 Watt
Ociosodarkmidlight 6 / 7 / 13 Watt
Carga midlight 44 / 58 Watt
 color bar
Key: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
Currently we use the Metrahit Energy, a professional single phase power quality and energy measurement digital multimeter, for our measurements. Find out more about it here. All of our test methods can be found here.
Asus ZenBook S 16 OLED UM5606WA
Ryzen AI 9 365, Radeon 880M
Asus Zenbook S16 UM5606
Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, Radeon 890M
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 16
Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core
HP Envy x360 2-in-1 16-ad0097nr
R7 8840HS, Radeon 780M
Lenovo ThinkPad T16 G2 21K70035GE
R7 7840U, Radeon 780M
Average of class Multimedia
 
Power Consumption
-7%
16%
-2%
14%
-51%
Idle Minimum *
6
5.4
10%
3.6
40%
5
17%
3.7
38%
Idle Average *
7
10.5
-50%
5.7
19%
6.2
11%
7.2
-3%
Idle Maximum *
13
10.9
16%
6.1
53%
14.7
-13%
8.7
33%
Load Average *
44
47.8
-9%
52.5
-19%
49.9
-13%
44.1
-0%
Cyberpunk 2077 ultra *
44.6
49.2
-10%
Load Maximum *
58
58.6
-1%
64.7
-12%
65
-12%
58.2
-0%
Cyberpunk 2077 ultra external monitor *
46.7
Witcher 3 ultra *
46.6
54.5
50.9

* ... smaller is better

Energy consumption Cyberpunk / Stress test

0510152025303540455055Tooltip
Asus ZenBook S 16 OLED UM5606WA; 1280x720 Prime95 28.10 and Furmark 1.25: Ø37.7 (33.5-57.8)
Asus ZenBook S 16 OLED UM5606WA; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø7.12 (6.34-13.5)
Asus ZenBook S 16 OLED UM5606WA; Cyberpunk 2077 FHD ultra no FSR 150cd: Ø44.6 (43.6-45.9)

Energy consumption with external Monitor

051015202530354045Tooltip
Asus ZenBook S 16 OLED UM5606WA; Prime95 V2810 Stress (external Monitor): Ø38.9 (28.5-48.7)
Asus ZenBook S 16 OLED UM5606WA; Cinebench R23 Multi (external Monitor): Ø41.2 (40.7-41.8)
Asus ZenBook S 16 OLED UM5606WA; 1280x720 FurMark 1.19 GPU Stress Test (external Monitor): Ø32 (31.6-32.6)
Asus ZenBook S 16 OLED UM5606WA; Idle 1min (external Monitor): Ø3.47 (2.97-9.32)

Duração da bateria

O tempo de funcionamento da bateria integrada de 78 Wh definitivamente não é ruim. Pouco menos de 12 horas de navegação na Internet via WLAN com brilho reduzido para 150 cd/m² marca o melhor valor no campo de teste. O mais caro ZenBook S 16 mais caro, durou mais de uma hora a menos aqui.

Tempo de Execução da Bateria
WiFi Websurfing
12h 02min
Asus ZenBook S 16 OLED UM5606WA
Ryzen AI 9 365, Radeon 880M, 78 Wh
Asus Zenbook S16 UM5606
Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, Radeon 890M, 78 Wh
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 16
Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core, 76 Wh
HP Envy x360 2-in-1 16-ad0097nr
R7 8840HS, Radeon 780M, 68 Wh
Lenovo ThinkPad T16 G2 21K70035GE
R7 7840U, Radeon 780M, 52.5 Wh
Average of class Multimedia
 
Battery Runtime
-11%
-11%
-36%
-9%
-17%
WiFi v1.3
722
640
-11%
644
-11%
459
-36%
658
-9%
H.264
1204
1144
Load
107
100
116
56
Reader / Idle
935

Pro

+ painel OLED de alto contraste e cores reais
+ carcaça leve e de alta qualidade
+ ótima duração da bateria
+ som sólido
+ 2x USB 4

Contra

- Tela altamente reflexiva
- RAM e Wi-Fi soldados

Veredicto

Análise do Asus ZenBook S 16 OLED UM5606WA
Análise do Asus ZenBook S 16 OLED UM5606WA

Se o senhor não tem problemas com o fato de que o potencial de desempenho do Ryzen AI 9 365 (ou da Radeon 880M) não seja totalmente desenvolvido devido ao TDP, o ZenBook S 16 UM5606WA é um notebook versátil, incrivelmente elegante e fino para todos os tipos de aplicações.

A carcaça de alta qualidade abriga portas modernas (incluindo 2x USB 4) e uma tela de altíssimo contraste e responsiva - como a conhecemos dos painéis OLED - embora sua superfície brilhante possa causar reflexos irritantes.

Os bons alto-falantes do notebook e a ampla duração da bateria também falam a seu favor. Ficamos menos impressionados com os componentes parcialmente soldados (RAM, Wi-Fi) e as temperaturas da superfície sob carga.

Cada um tem que decidir por si mesmo se o preço estimado de cerca de 1.700 euros (~$1886) é justificado. Para nós, ele tende a ser muito alto para o que está sendo oferecido, pois o aumento de desempenho em comparação com a última geração de CPU/iGPU é limitado. Talvez faça mais sentido simplesmente optar por um dispositivo mais antigo.

Os fãs da Intel, por outro lado, encontrarão o que procuram no Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 16 com Core Ultra 7 155H que, no entanto, custa ainda mais.

Preço e disponibilidade

O Asus ZenBook S 16 OLED UM5606WA testado está disponível em várias lojas on-line por cerca de 1.700 euros (~$1886) (por exemplo, Playox).

Observação: Atualizamos recentemente nosso sistema de classificação e os resultados da versão 8 não são comparáveis aos resultados da versão 7. Mais informações podem ser encontradas aqui disponível aqui.

Asus ZenBook S 16 OLED UM5606WA - 09/03/2024 v8
Florian Glaser

Acabamento
88 / 98 → 90%
Teclado
86%
Mouse
92%
Conectividade
72 / 80 → 90%
Peso
69 / 20-74 → 91%
Bateria
89 / 95 → 94%
Pantalha
84%
Desempenho do jogos
51 / 88 → 58%
Desempenho da aplicação
83 / 92 → 90%
AI Performance
90%
Temperatura
82%
Ruído
92 / 95 → 97%
Audio
84%
Camera
34 / 75 → 46%
Médio
66%
84%
Multimedia - Médio equilibrado
CO2 Emissions
No Data
Materials
25%
Packaging
75%
Power Use
80.4%
Repairability
50%
Software Updates
22.3%
Total Sustainability Score: 42.1%

Transparency

The present review sample was made available to the author as a loan by the manufacturer or a shop for the purposes of review. The lender had no influence on this review, nor did the manufacturer receive a copy of this review before publication. There was no obligation to publish this review.

Price comparison

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Análises e revisões de portáteis e celulares > Análises > Análises > Análise do laptop Asus ZenBook S 16 OLED: Estreia do Ryzen AI 9 365 e da Radeon 880M
Florian Glaser, 2024-09- 8 (Update: 2024-09- 8)