Análise do Mini-PC Aoostar GEM12: AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS com 32 GB de RAM, 1 TB SSD e interface OCuLink

Name: Aoostar GEM12
Brand: Aoostar

Dica de preço e desempenho?

O Aoostar GEM12 combina um poderoso e moderno AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS com 32 GB de RAM e um SSD de 1 TB em um gabinete relativamente compacto. A conectividade está acima da média e permite a conexão simples de placas de vídeo externas via OCuLink. Colocamos o Aoostar GEM12 à prova e analisamos seu desempenho em detalhes.

Sebastian Bade, 👁 Sebastian Bade (traduzido por DeepL / Ninh Duy), Published 06/16/2024 🇺🇸 🇩🇪 ...

Mini PC Desktop AMD Ryzen (Zen) Radeon Thunderbolt

Recentemente, demos uma olhada mais de perto no menor Aoostar GEM10 e agora estamos prontos para testar o Aoostar GEM12. Visualmente, o GEM12 pertence claramente à família Aoostar. Em comparação com o Aoostar GEM10 o GEM12 é um pouco maior. Na configuração de desempenho máximo, que é a base para este teste, um AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS é usado. Como alternativa, o Aoostar GEM12 também está disponível com AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS ou AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX processadores. O último só pode lidar com DDR5 4.800 MT/s por motivos técnicos, embora os dois modelos Ryzen 7 funcionem com DDR5 5.600 MT/s.

O dispositivo de teste com 32 GB de RAM e SSD de 1 TB custa pelo menos 649 dólares americanos - um preço justificado e que não parece excessivo se o senhor observar os dados técnicos em comparação com os concorrentes. O Aoostar GEM12 também está disponível como uma versão barebone por 499 dólares americanos. Se o senhor precisar de 64 GB de RAM diretamente, deverá pagar 749 dólares. Acreditamos que esse também é um preço razoável no momento.

No teste, o Aoostar GEM12 tem que se manter firme em relação aos mini-PCs atuais. Entre outras coisas, também analisamos o desempenho do minicarro em relação aos rivais mais caros. No entanto, o Aoostar GEM12 tem um concorrente muito sério, o Aoostar GEM10, que também é significativamente mais barato. O senhor pode encontrar uma visão geral dos dispositivos de comparação para esta análise na visão geral a seguir.

Test device courtesy of Aoostar

Download your licensed rating image as PNG / SVG

Aoostar GEM12

Processador

AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS 8 x 3.8 - 5.1 GHz, 65 W PL2 / Short Burst, 54 W PL1 / Sustained, Hawk Point-HS (Zen 4)

Placa gráfica

AMD Radeon 780M, Análises do: 2700 MHz

Memória

32 GB

, DDR5-5600

placa mãe

AMD Promontory/Bixby FCH

Disco rígido

Crucial P3 Plus CT1000P3PSSD8, 1024 GB

, NVMe, 881 GB livre

Placa de Som

AMD Zen - Audio Processor - HD Audio Controller

Conexões

2 USB 2.0, 2 USB 3.1 Gen2, 1 USB 4.0 40 Gbps, 1 Thunderbolt, 1 HDMI, 2 DisplayPort, 1 Docking Station Port, Conexões Audio: 3.5mm Audio Jack

Funcionamento em rede

Intel Ethernet Controller I226-V (10/2500MBit/s), Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX200 (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/ax = Wi-Fi 6/), Bluetooth 5.2

Tamanho

altura x largura x profundidade (em mm): 60 x 130 x 130

Sistema Operativo

Microsoft Windows 11 Pro

Características adicionais

12 Meses Garantia

peso

653 g, Suprimento de energia: 279 g

Preço

649 US-Dollar

Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

see all specifications

Possíveis concorrentes em comparação

Date	Model	Memory	Weight	Height
06/2024	Aoostar GEM12 R7 8845HS, Radeon 780M	32768 MB	653 g	60 mm
05/2024	Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti Ultra 9 185H, Arc 8-Core	32768 MB	863 g	48.6 mm
05/2024	Geekom A8 R9 8945HS, Radeon 780M	32768 MB	432 g	38 mm
04/2024	Acemagic F2A Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core	32768 MB	768 g	57 mm
04/2024	Geekom XT12 Pro i9-12900H, Iris Xe G7 96EUs	32768 MB	545 g	37 mm
05/2024	Minisforum Venus Series NAB9 i9-12900HK, Iris Xe G7 96EUs	32768 MB	615 g	55 mm
04/2024	Acemagic AM18 R7 7840HS, Radeon 780M	32768 MB	600 g	58 mm
	Aoostar GEM10 R7 6800H, Radeon 680M	32768 MB	525 g	60 mm

Aoostar GEM12 com unidade de fonte de alimentação (19 V; 6,32 A)

Unidade de fonte de alimentação (19 V; 6,32 A)

Caixa - Alumínio e plástico em uma boa combinação

Aoostar GEM12 Pro e Aoostar GEM12 (Fonte: Aoostar)

Aoostar GEM12 com duas opções de cores (Fonte: Aoostar)

Os modelos GEM da Aoostar são visualmente semelhantes. Com 13 x 13 centímetros, o Aoostar GEM12 ocupa um pouco mais de espaço na mesa do que o Aoostar GEM10 (10,7 x 10,7 centímetros). No gráfico, o senhor pode ver que alguns dispositivos ocupam ainda mais espaço. Com uma altura de 6 centímetros, os dispositivos Aoostar são um pouco mais grossos do que seus concorrentes. Em termos de seleção de materiais, vemos uma boa combinação de plástico e alumínio. O último é usado principalmente na carcaça, o que significa que o Aoostar GEM12 também causa uma excelente impressão tátil. A parte inferior, por outro lado, é feita de plástico, o que acontece com a maioria dos dispositivos. Há também um pequeno elemento de plástico na parte superior, que apenas agrega valor visual ao dispositivo. Apesar dos materiais de alta qualidade, o Aoostar GEM12 não é fora do comum em termos de peso. Nossa balança mostra apenas um pouco mais de 650 gramas. A própria unidade de fonte de alimentação pesa 278 gramas e, portanto, tem aproximadamente o mesmo peso que a maioria dos outros mini-PCs dessa classe de desempenho.

A Aoostar também tem um GEM12 Pro em seu portfólio, que é equipado com uma tela pequena e um scanner de impressões digitais. Infelizmente, o modelo não-Pro não tem esse recurso. A Aoostar oferece duas opções de cores, como o senhor pode ver nas fotos do fabricante. Em termos de preço, há uma diferença de 20 dólares americanos entre o modelo preto e o prateado em favor da versão prateada.

Comparação de tamanho

Recursos - USB4 e OCuLink estão integrados

As conexões estão localizadas apenas na parte frontal e traseira. Em termos de números, o Aoostar GEM12 não é muito bem equipado e é bastante mediano aqui: Há um total de quatro soquetes USB Tipo A, dois dos quais, no entanto, fornecem apenas o padrão slow 2.0. Além disso, uma conexão USB-C é sempre necessária para a fonte de alimentação. Pelo menos o USB4 e até mesmo o OCuLink estão instalados. Assim como no Aoostar GEM10criticamos a localização da porta OCuLink, que, em nossa opinião, seria melhor colocada na parte traseira. Na parte traseira, também vemos um HDMI 2.1 e um DisplayPort 1.4 para saída de imagem. Duas conexões de rede também podem ser encontradas aqui.

Há um ponto importante a ser observado ao usar a interface OCuLink: A porta não é hot-swappable, o que significa que o mini-PC deve ser desligado antes de conectar uma eGPU. O mesmo se aplica à remoção de dispositivos conectados via OCuLink. Os defeitos causados por manuseio inadequado não são cobertos pela garantia do fabricante.

As conexões externas do Aoostar GEM12 (Fonte: Aoostar)

Comunicação

Um módulo Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX200 é responsável pela comunicação sem fio no Aoostar GEM12. O módulo WLAN pode lidar com as frequências de 2,4 e 5 GHz e obteve resultados aceitáveis no teste. Portanto, nossa amostra de teste está classificada no meio termo. Usamos o roteador Asus ROG Rapture GT-AXE11000 para esse teste. Para a transferência de grandes quantidades de dados, recomendamos o uso de uma conexão a cabo. Nesse caso, o Aoostar GEM12 está equipado com dois soquetes RJ45 - 2,5 GBit/s cada.

Networking
iperf3 receive AXE11000
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti Intel Wi-Fi 7 BE200 320MHz	1599 (802^min - 1683^max) MBit/s +116%
Average Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX200 (451 - 1746, n=23)	1274 MBit/s +72%
Geekom A8 MediaTek Wi-Fi 6E MT7922 160MHz Wireless LAN Card	1101 (606^min - 1257^max) MBit/s +49%
Average of class Mini PC (320 - 1796, n=113, last 2 years)	945 MBit/s +28%
Geekom XT12 Pro MediaTek Wi-Fi 6E MT7922 160MHz Wireless LAN Card	892 (460^min - 921^max) MBit/s +21%
Acemagic F2A Intel Wi-Fi 7 BE200 320MHz	838 (728^min - 926^max) MBit/s +13%
Aoostar GEM12 Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX200	740 (676^min - 758^max) MBit/s
Minisforum Venus Series NAB9 MediaTek MT7921	503 (371^min - 687^max) MBit/s -32%
Acemagic AM18 Realtek RTL8852BE	455 (221^min - 519^max) MBit/s -39%
Aoostar GEM10 Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX200	451 (228^min - 466^max) MBit/s -39%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti Intel Wi-Fi 7 BE200 320MHz	1566 (904^min - 1695^max) MBit/s +113%
Average Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX200 (429 - 1748, n=23)	1164 MBit/s +58%
Geekom A8 MediaTek Wi-Fi 6E MT7922 160MHz Wireless LAN Card	1105 (489^min - 1222^max) MBit/s +50%
Average of class Mini PC (184.1 - 1776, n=113, last 2 years)	874 MBit/s +19%
Aoostar GEM12 Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX200	736 (369^min - 756^max) MBit/s
Acemagic F2A Intel Wi-Fi 7 BE200 320MHz	709 (369^min - 977^max) MBit/s -4%
Acemagic AM18 Realtek RTL8852BE	665 (343^min - 743^max) MBit/s -10%
Geekom XT12 Pro MediaTek Wi-Fi 6E MT7922 160MHz Wireless LAN Card	589 (295^min - 624^max) MBit/s -20%
Minisforum Venus Series NAB9 MediaTek MT7921	531 (255^min - 725^max) MBit/s -28%
Aoostar GEM10 Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX200	429 (325^min - 510^max) MBit/s -42%

Aoostar GEM12 Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX200; iperf3 receive AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø739 (676-758)

Acemagic AM18 Realtek RTL8852BE; iperf3 receive AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø448 (221-519)

Aoostar GEM10 Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX200; iperf3 receive AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø442 (228-466)

Aoostar GEM12 Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX200; iperf3 transmit AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø724 (369-756)

Acemagic AM18 Realtek RTL8852BE; iperf3 transmit AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø654 (343-743)

Aoostar GEM10 Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX200; iperf3 transmit AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø429 (325-510)

Acessórios

A caixa relativamente pequena contém o Aoostar GEM12, juntamente com a fonte de alimentação de 120 watts e um guia de início rápido. Há também um cabo de conexão HDMI e um suporte VESA com parafusos. O fabricante também inclui dois coolers passivos para SSD com almofadas térmicas e um conjunto de pés de borracha como acessórios adicionais.

Manutenção

Sabendo que o Aoostar GEM12 é oferecido como uma versão barebone, entre outras coisas, é importante que o dispositivo seja fácil de abrir. Para acessar os slots de SSD ou RAM, somente a parte inferior precisa ser removida. Os quatro parafusos que prendem a tampa ao gabinete estão localizados sob os pés de borracha. O senhor deve ter cuidado ao abrir a tampa para não danificar as antenas WLAN. Há também um pequeno ventilador na parte inferior. Após remover a placa de base, os dois slots de SSD e os dois slots SO-DIMM ficam facilmente acessíveis. Em nosso sistema de teste, um slot M.2-2280 ainda está livre para um suporte de dados adicional.

Aoostar GEM12 com a parte inferior aberta

Desempenho - Sempre oito núcleos e 16 threads no Aoostar GEM12

O Aoostar GEM12 é uma potência compacta e oferece oito núcleos com 16 threads em todas as configurações. No teste, vamos nos dedicar ao AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS - o modelo mais rápido atualmente instalado no GEM12. Como alternativa, o senhor também pode mudar para o AMD Ryzen 7 7840HSou o AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX. Equipado com 32 GB de RAM e um SSD de 1 TB, o Aoostar GEM12 também pode lidar com tarefas que exigem muita memória. De acordo com o fabricante, é possível instalar um máximo de 128 GB de RAM DDR5 rápida.

Condições de teste

Usamos o perfil de energia "High performance" para todos os testes de desempenho com esse dispositivo. Além disso, não houve alterações no BIOS, portanto, todos os valores foram determinados de acordo com as configurações de fábrica.

Processador

Três modos de energia disponíveis (fonte: Aoostar)

O AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS é baseado na arquitetura Zen4 e combina oito núcleos de computação nativos, o que garante uma alta velocidade de trabalho. No entanto, o Aoostar GEM12 não consegue superar substancialmente seus concorrentes. Juntamente com o AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS, o Acemagic AM18 oferece praticamente o mesmo desempenho, embora um AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX seja cerca de dez pontos percentuais mais lento em nossa classificação. Esses dois processadores são de interesse juntamente com o AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS, pois o minicarro GEM12 também está disponível com esses SoCs.

Se dermos uma olhada no modelo superior da Intel - Core 9 Ultra 185H - que está instalado no Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti, não há diferença de desempenho à primeira vista. No entanto, nos testes individuais, o modelo da Intel oferece quase 10 a 15% a mais de desempenho multi-thread.

O fabricante anuncia um consumo máximo de energia de 70 watts, que é armazenado como o modo de desempenho no BIOS. O modo balanceado com um máximo de 65 watts é a configuração padrão. Há também uma opção de modo silencioso, o que significa que o processador só tem 54 watts disponíveis no desempenho máximo. Realizamos todos os testes no modo balanceado. No modo de desempenho, o AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS pode oferecer cerca de 5% a mais de desempenho multi-thread

Para outras comparações e benchmarks, consulte nossa Tabela de comparação de CPUs.

Resultados do Cinebench - Modo silencioso - PL2 54 W; PL1 45 W

Resultados do Cinebench - Modo balanceado - PL2 65 W; PL1 54 W

Resultados do Cinebench - Modo de desempenho - PL2 70 W; PL1 65 W

Performance Rating - Percent
Geekom A8 AMD Ryzen 9 8945HS	58.2 pt
Average AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS	57.1 pt
Aoostar GEM12 AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS	57 pt
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti Intel Core Ultra 9 185H	56.9 pt
Acemagic AM18 AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS	56.9 pt
Average AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS	56.9 pt
Acemagic F2A Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	55.6 pt
Minisforum Venus Series NAB9 Intel Core i9-12900HK	55.5 pt
Geekom XT12 Pro Intel Core i9-12900H	52.1 pt
Average AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX	51.7 pt
Aoostar GEM10 AMD Ryzen 7 6800H	50.9 pt

Cinebench 2024
CPU Multi Core
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti Intel Core Ultra 9 185H	1067 Points +14%
Acemagic F2A Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	1022 Points +10%
Geekom A8 AMD Ryzen 9 8945HS	967 Points +4%
Aoostar GEM12 AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS	933 Points
Acemagic AM18 AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS	923 Points -1%
Average AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS (880 - 956, n=4)	918 Points -2%
Average AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS (567 - 956, n=9)	853 Points -9%
Minisforum Venus Series NAB9 Intel Core i9-12900HK	746 Points -20%
Aoostar GEM10 AMD Ryzen 7 6800H	709 Points -24%
Average AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX (666 - 724, n=2)	695 Points -26%
Geekom XT12 Pro Intel Core i9-12900H	578 Points -38%
CPU Single Core
Minisforum Venus Series NAB9 Intel Core i9-12900HK	114 Points +7%
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti Intel Core Ultra 9 185H	110 Points +3%
Geekom XT12 Pro Intel Core i9-12900H	108 Points +1%
Geekom A8 AMD Ryzen 9 8945HS	108 Points +1%
Aoostar GEM12 AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS	107 Points
Acemagic F2A Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	106 Points -1%
Average AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS (101 - 107, n=4)	104.5 Points -2%
Average AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS (102 - 107.8, n=6)	104.1 Points -3%
Acemagic AM18 AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS	104 Points -3%
Average AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX (91 - 92, n=2)	91.5 Points -14%
Aoostar GEM10 AMD Ryzen 7 6800H	88 Points -18%

Cinebench R23
Multi Core
Acemagic F2A Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	18497 Points +15%
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti Intel Core Ultra 9 185H	18016 Points +12%
Geekom A8 AMD Ryzen 9 8945HS	16795 Points +4%
Average AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS (15515 - 17214, n=17)	16414 Points +2%
Average AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS (14895 - 18037, n=11)	16146 Points 0%
Aoostar GEM12 AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS	16130 Points
Acemagic AM18 AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS	15979 Points -1%
Minisforum Venus Series NAB9 Intel Core i9-12900HK	14659 Points -9%
Average AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX (9709 - 15100, n=19)	13307 Points -18%
Aoostar GEM10 AMD Ryzen 7 6800H	13117 Points -19%
Geekom XT12 Pro Intel Core i9-12900H	11036 Points -32%
Single Core
Minisforum Venus Series NAB9 Intel Core i9-12900HK	1901 Points +7%
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti Intel Core Ultra 9 185H	1851 Points +4%
Geekom A8 AMD Ryzen 9 8945HS	1825 Points +2%
Geekom XT12 Pro Intel Core i9-12900H	1824 Points +2%
Aoostar GEM12 AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS	1783 Points
Acemagic F2A Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	1771 Points -1%
Average AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS (1718 - 1812, n=17)	1768 Points -1%
Average AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS (1623 - 1783, n=11)	1747 Points -2%
Acemagic AM18 AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS	1737 Points -3%
Average AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX (1516 - 1616, n=19)	1565 Points -12%
Aoostar GEM10 AMD Ryzen 7 6800H	1542 Points -14%

Cinebench R15
CPU Single 64Bit
Geekom A8 AMD Ryzen 9 8945HS	287 Points +3%
Aoostar GEM12 AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS	279 Points
Average AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS (270 - 286, n=17)	278 Points 0%
Average AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS (269 - 283, n=11)	276 Points -1%
Acemagic AM18 AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS	274 Points -2%
Minisforum Venus Series NAB9 Intel Core i9-12900HK	270 Points -3%
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti Intel Core Ultra 9 185H	268 Points -4%
Acemagic F2A Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	258 Points -8%
Geekom XT12 Pro Intel Core i9-12900H	251 Points -10%
Average AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX (241 - 261, n=19)	250 Points -10%
Aoostar GEM10 AMD Ryzen 7 6800H	240 Points -14%
CPU Multi 64Bit
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti Intel Core Ultra 9 185H	2746 Points +8%
Acemagic F2A Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	2738 Points +8%
Geekom A8 AMD Ryzen 9 8945HS	2640 Points +4%
Average AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS (2473 - 2729, n=17)	2598 Points +2%
Average AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS (2342 - 2908, n=11)	2556 Points +1%
Aoostar GEM12 AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS	2537 Points
Acemagic AM18 AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS	2505 Points -1%
Minisforum Venus Series NAB9 Intel Core i9-12900HK	2249 Points -11%
Average AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX (1588 - 2411, n=19)	2163 Points -15%
Geekom XT12 Pro Intel Core i9-12900H	2121 Points -16%
Aoostar GEM10 AMD Ryzen 7 6800H	2117 Points -17%

Cinebench R20
CPU (Single Core)
Minisforum Venus Series NAB9 Intel Core i9-12900HK	734 Points +6%
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti Intel Core Ultra 9 185H	715 Points +3%
Geekom A8 AMD Ryzen 9 8945HS	711 Points +3%
Geekom XT12 Pro Intel Core i9-12900H	701 Points +1%
Aoostar GEM12 AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS	691 Points
Average AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS (661 - 705, n=17)	686 Points -1%
Average AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS (673 - 698, n=11)	685 Points -1%
Acemagic F2A Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	679 Points -2%
Acemagic AM18 AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS	673 Points -3%
Average AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX (595 - 631, n=19)	610 Points -12%
Aoostar GEM10 AMD Ryzen 7 6800H	598 Points -13%
CPU (Multi Core)
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti Intel Core Ultra 9 185H	7196 Points +13%
Acemagic F2A Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	7188 Points +13%
Geekom A8 AMD Ryzen 9 8945HS	6591 Points +4%
Average AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS (6061 - 6744, n=17)	6414 Points +1%
Aoostar GEM12 AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS	6346 Points
Average AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS (5808 - 7026, n=11)	6309 Points -1%
Acemagic AM18 AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS	6250 Points -2%
Minisforum Venus Series NAB9 Intel Core i9-12900HK	5691 Points -10%
Aoostar GEM10 AMD Ryzen 7 6800H	5216 Points -18%
Average AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX (3742 - 5813, n=19)	5162 Points -19%
Geekom XT12 Pro Intel Core i9-12900H	4294 Points -32%

Cinebench R11.5
CPU Single 64Bit
Geekom A8 AMD Ryzen 9 8945HS	3.45 Points +4%
Aoostar GEM12 AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS	3.32 Points
Average AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS (3.29 - 3.33, n=2)	3.31 Points 0%
Average AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS (3.29 - 3.32, n=2)	3.31 Points 0%
Acemagic AM18 AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS	3.29 Points -1%
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti Intel Core Ultra 9 185H	3.27 Points -2%
Minisforum Venus Series NAB9 Intel Core i9-12900HK	3.26 Points -2%
Acemagic F2A Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	3.13 Points -6%
Geekom XT12 Pro Intel Core i9-12900H	2.99 Points -10%
Average AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX (2.86 - 3.07, n=8)	2.94 Points -11%
Aoostar GEM10 AMD Ryzen 7 6800H	2.86 Points -14%
CPU Multi 64Bit
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti Intel Core Ultra 9 185H	33.95 Points +14%
Acemagic F2A Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	33.49 Points +13%
Geekom A8 AMD Ryzen 9 8945HS	31.31 Points +5%
Average AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS (29.7 - 30.3, n=2)	30 Points +1%
Aoostar GEM12 AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS	29.76 Points
Acemagic AM18 AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS	29.7 Points 0%
Average AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS (29.3 - 29.8, n=2)	29.5 Points -1%
Minisforum Venus Series NAB9 Intel Core i9-12900HK	27.25 Points -8%
Aoostar GEM10 AMD Ryzen 7 6800H	24.57 Points -17%
Average AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX (19 - 26.4, n=8)	23.9 Points -20%
Geekom XT12 Pro Intel Core i9-12900H	21.11 Points -29%

Cinebench R10
Rendering Single CPUs 64Bit
Minisforum Venus Series NAB9 Intel Core i9-12900HK	15303 Points +8%
Geekom A8 AMD Ryzen 9 8945HS	14561 Points +3%
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti Intel Core Ultra 9 185H	14374 Points +1%
Aoostar GEM12 AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS	14163 Points
Average AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS ()	14163 Points 0%
Average AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS (14015 - 14177, n=2)	14096 Points 0%
Acemagic AM18 AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS	14015 Points -1%
Acemagic F2A Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	13938 Points -2%
Geekom XT12 Pro Intel Core i9-12900H	13378 Points -6%
Average AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX (11870 - 12943, n=8)	12332 Points -13%
Aoostar GEM10 AMD Ryzen 7 6800H	12142 Points -14%
Rendering Multiple CPUs 64Bit
Acemagic F2A Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	95005 Points +11%
Geekom A8 AMD Ryzen 9 8945HS	90144 Points +5%
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti Intel Core Ultra 9 185H	88902 Points +4%
Aoostar GEM12 AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS	85872 Points
Average AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS ()	85872 Points 0%
Average AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS (83726 - 87064, n=2)	85395 Points -1%
Acemagic AM18 AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS	83726 Points -2%
Minisforum Venus Series NAB9 Intel Core i9-12900HK	75947 Points -12%
Aoostar GEM10 AMD Ryzen 7 6800H	70792 Points -18%
Average AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX (55915 - 77450, n=8)	69650 Points -19%
Geekom XT12 Pro Intel Core i9-12900H	69621 Points -19%

Blender - v2.79 BMW27 CPU
Geekom XT12 Pro Intel Core i9-12900H	296 Seconds * -50%
Aoostar GEM10 AMD Ryzen 7 6800H	259 Seconds * -31%
Average AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX (212 - 357, n=21)	239 Seconds * -21%
Minisforum Venus Series NAB9 Intel Core i9-12900HK	234 Seconds * -19%
Acemagic AM18 AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS	202 Seconds * -3%
Average AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS (179 - 216, n=11)	202 Seconds * -3%
Average AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS (185 - 229, n=18)	198.6 Seconds * -1%
Aoostar GEM12 AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS	197 Seconds *
Geekom A8 AMD Ryzen 9 8945HS	196 Seconds * +1%
Acemagic F2A Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	178 Seconds * +10%
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti Intel Core Ultra 9 185H	171 Seconds * +13%

wPrime 2.10
32m
Geekom XT12 Pro Intel Core i9-12900H	4.111 s * -52%
Average AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX (3.46 - 4.69, n=7)	4 s * -48%
Average AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS (2.7 - 5.3, n=2)	4 s * -48%
Aoostar GEM10 AMD Ryzen 7 6800H	3.55 s * -31%
Acemagic F2A Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	3.523 s * -30%
Minisforum Venus Series NAB9 Intel Core i9-12900HK	3.454 s * -28%
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti Intel Core Ultra 9 185H	3.254 s * -20%
Aoostar GEM12 AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS	2.703 s *
Acemagic AM18 AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS	2.658 s * +2%
Average AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS (2.63 - 2.66, n=2)	2.64 s * +2%
Geekom A8 AMD Ryzen 9 8945HS	2.563 s * +5%
1024m
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti Intel Core Ultra 9 185H	441.275 s * -346%
Geekom XT12 Pro Intel Core i9-12900H	202.68 s * -105%
Minisforum Venus Series NAB9 Intel Core i9-12900HK	186.394 s * -88%
Acemagic F2A Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	139.617 s * -41%
Average AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS (98.9 - 170, n=2)	134.4 s * -36%
Average AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX (93.2 - 149.4, n=7)	114.7 s * -16%
Aoostar GEM12 AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS	98.896 s *
Aoostar GEM10 AMD Ryzen 7 6800H	97.298 s * +2%
Average AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS (71.9 - 72.8, n=2)	72.4 s * +27%
Acemagic AM18 AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS	71.922 s * +27%
Geekom A8 AMD Ryzen 9 8945HS	67.933 s * +31%

X264 HD Benchmark 4.0
Pass 1
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti Intel Core Ultra 9 185H	335.5 (329^min - 340^max) fps +16%
Acemagic F2A Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	325 (323^min - 328^max) fps +12%
Minisforum Venus Series NAB9 Intel Core i9-12900HK	317.5 (292^min - 319^max) fps +10%
Geekom A8 AMD Ryzen 9 8945HS	298 (297^min - 305^max) fps +3%
Average AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS (282 - 298, n=2)	290 fps 0%
Aoostar GEM12 AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS	289 (286^min - 292^max) fps
Average AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS ()	289 fps 0%
Acemagic AM18 AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS	281.5 (277^min - 286^max) fps -3%
Geekom XT12 Pro Intel Core i9-12900H	262 (259^min - 282^max) fps -9%
Average AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX (241 - 263, n=7)	254 fps -12%
Aoostar GEM10 AMD Ryzen 7 6800H	251.5 (250^min - 256^max) fps -13%
Pass 2
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti Intel Core Ultra 9 185H	158.2 (157.4^min - 158.8^max) fps +10%
Acemagic F2A Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	154.15 (153.8^min - 154.3^max) fps +7%
Geekom A8 AMD Ryzen 9 8945HS	150.65 (150.4^min - 154.2^max) fps +5%
Average AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS (144.1 - 149.3, n=2)	146.7 fps +2%
Acemagic AM18 AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS	144.1 (143.9^min - 145.6^max) fps 0%
Aoostar GEM12 AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS	143.7 (143^min - 145.2^max) fps
Average AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS ()	143.7 fps 0%
Minisforum Venus Series NAB9 Intel Core i9-12900HK	125.05 (112.4^min - 132^max) fps -13%
Aoostar GEM10 AMD Ryzen 7 6800H	122.2 (120.3^min - 126.1^max) fps -15%
Average AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX (93.3 - 127.8, n=7)	115.2 fps -20%
Geekom XT12 Pro Intel Core i9-12900H	92.2 (91^min - 114.5^max) fps -36%

WinRAR - Result
Average AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS (7327 - 19008, n=2)	13168 KB/s +80%
Minisforum Venus Series NAB9 Intel Core i9-12900HK	8735 KB/s +19%
Geekom XT12 Pro Intel Core i9-12900H	7945 KB/s +8%
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti Intel Core Ultra 9 185H	7940 KB/s +8%
Geekom A8 AMD Ryzen 9 8945HS	7843 KB/s +7%
Acemagic F2A Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	7723 KB/s +5%
Aoostar GEM12 AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS	7327 KB/s
Average AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS (6428 - 7699, n=2)	7064 KB/s -4%
Average AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX (6795 - 6980, n=7)	6875 KB/s -6%
Acemagic AM18 AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS	6428 KB/s -12%
Aoostar GEM10 AMD Ryzen 7 6800H	5890 KB/s -20%

TrueCrypt
AES Mean 100MB
Geekom A8 AMD Ryzen 9 8945HS	15.4 GB/s +7%
Average AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS (14.7 - 14.9, n=2)	14.8 GB/s +3%
Acemagic AM18 AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS	14.7 GB/s +2%
Aoostar GEM12 AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS	14.4 GB/s
Average AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS (14 - 14.4, n=2)	14.2 GB/s -1%
Aoostar GEM10 AMD Ryzen 7 6800H	13.5 GB/s -6%
Minisforum Venus Series NAB9 Intel Core i9-12900HK	13 GB/s -10%
Average AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX (9.3 - 13.5, n=7)	11.8 GB/s -18%
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti Intel Core Ultra 9 185H	11.3 GB/s -22%
Geekom XT12 Pro Intel Core i9-12900H	11.2 GB/s -22%
Acemagic F2A Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	10.6 GB/s -26%
Twofish Mean 100MB
Minisforum Venus Series NAB9 Intel Core i9-12900HK	2.2 GB/s +10%
Acemagic AM18 AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS	2.1 GB/s +5%
Average AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS (2.1 - 2.1, n=2)	2.1 GB/s +5%
Geekom A8 AMD Ryzen 9 8945HS	2 GB/s 0%
Aoostar GEM12 AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS	2 GB/s
Average AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS (2 - 2, n=2)	2 GB/s 0%
Geekom XT12 Pro Intel Core i9-12900H	1.9 GB/s -5%
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti Intel Core Ultra 9 185H	1.8 GB/s -10%
Aoostar GEM10 AMD Ryzen 7 6800H	1.8 GB/s -10%
Acemagic F2A Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	1.7 GB/s -15%
Average AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX (1.3 - 1.8, n=7)	1.643 GB/s -18%
Serpent Mean 100MB
Geekom A8 AMD Ryzen 9 8945HS	1.4 GB/s +8%
Acemagic AM18 AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS	1.3 GB/s 0%
Aoostar GEM12 AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS	1.3 GB/s
Average AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS (1.3 - 1.3, n=2)	1.3 GB/s 0%
Average AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS (1.3 - 1.3, n=2)	1.3 GB/s 0%
Minisforum Venus Series NAB9 Intel Core i9-12900HK	1.2 GB/s -8%
Aoostar GEM10 AMD Ryzen 7 6800H	1.2 GB/s -8%
Geekom XT12 Pro Intel Core i9-12900H	1.1 GB/s -15%
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti Intel Core Ultra 9 185H	1.1 GB/s -15%
Average AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX (0.857 - 1.2, n=7)	1.094 GB/s -16%
Acemagic F2A Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	1 GB/s -23%

Geekbench 5.5
Multi-Core
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti Intel Core Ultra 9 185H	13392 Points +10%
Acemagic F2A Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	12662 Points +4%
Geekom A8 AMD Ryzen 9 8945HS	12481 Points +3%
Aoostar GEM12 AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS	12143 Points
Acemagic AM18 AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS	12049 Points -1%
Average AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS (11256 - 12726, n=12)	11855 Points -2%
Average AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS (8446 - 12339, n=20)	11674 Points -4%
Minisforum Venus Series NAB9 Intel Core i9-12900HK	10378 Points -15%
Geekom XT12 Pro Intel Core i9-12900H	10028 Points -17%
Average AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX (8313 - 10490, n=21)	9642 Points -21%
Aoostar GEM10 AMD Ryzen 7 6800H	8898 Points -27%
Single-Core
Geekom A8 AMD Ryzen 9 8945HS	1996 Points +2%
Average AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS (1837 - 2017, n=20)	1966 Points 0%
Aoostar GEM12 AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS	1958 Points
Acemagic AM18 AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS	1946 Points -1%
Average AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS (1765 - 2004, n=12)	1924 Points -2%
Minisforum Venus Series NAB9 Intel Core i9-12900HK	1866 Points -5%
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti Intel Core Ultra 9 185H	1856 Points -5%
Geekom XT12 Pro Intel Core i9-12900H	1790 Points -9%
Acemagic F2A Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	1746 Points -11%
Average AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX (1523 - 1652, n=21)	1589 Points -19%
Aoostar GEM10 AMD Ryzen 7 6800H	1552 Points -21%

Geekbench 5.0
5.0 Multi-Core
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti Intel Core Ultra 9 185H	13228 Points +9%
Acemagic F2A Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	12438 Points +3%
Geekom A8 AMD Ryzen 9 8945HS	12386 Points +2%
Aoostar GEM12 AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS	12086 Points
Acemagic AM18 AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS	12019 Points -1%
Average AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS (11742 - 12109, n=3)	11979 Points -1%
Average AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS (8572 - 12278, n=10)	11483 Points -5%
Minisforum Venus Series NAB9 Intel Core i9-12900HK	10276 Points -15%
Geekom XT12 Pro Intel Core i9-12900H	9892 Points -18%
Average AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX (9220 - 10426, n=15)	9880 Points -18%
Aoostar GEM10 AMD Ryzen 7 6800H	8868 Points -27%
5.0 Single-Core
Geekom A8 AMD Ryzen 9 8945HS	1906 Points 0%
Average AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS (1895 - 1914, n=3)	1903 Points 0%
Aoostar GEM12 AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS	1900 Points
Average AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS (1834 - 1936, n=10)	1891 Points 0%
Acemagic AM18 AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS	1870 Points -2%
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti Intel Core Ultra 9 185H	1821 Points -4%
Minisforum Venus Series NAB9 Intel Core i9-12900HK	1795 Points -6%
Geekom XT12 Pro Intel Core i9-12900H	1710 Points -10%
Acemagic F2A Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	1708 Points -10%
Average AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX (1531 - 1603, n=15)	1561 Points -18%
Aoostar GEM10 AMD Ryzen 7 6800H	1509 Points -21%

Geekbench 4.4
64 Bit Single-Core Score
Geekom A8 AMD Ryzen 9 8945HS	8178 Points +2%
Average AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS (7924 - 8166, n=6)	8100 Points +1%
Average AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS (8034 - 8063, n=2)	8049 Points 0%
Aoostar GEM12 AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS	8034 Points
Minisforum Venus Series NAB9 Intel Core i9-12900HK	7932 Points -1%
Acemagic AM18 AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS	7924 Points -1%
Geekom XT12 Pro Intel Core i9-12900H	7635 Points -5%
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti Intel Core Ultra 9 185H	7602 Points -5%
Acemagic F2A Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	6927 Points -14%
Average AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX (6191 - 6804, n=11)	6642 Points -17%
Aoostar GEM10 AMD Ryzen 7 6800H	6341 Points -21%
64 Bit Multi-Core Score
Geekom A8 AMD Ryzen 9 8945HS	49269 Points +3%
Average AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS (47599 - 48906, n=6)	48417 Points +1%
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti Intel Core Ultra 9 185H	47960 Points 0%
Aoostar GEM12 AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS	47777 Points
Average AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS (47602 - 47777, n=2)	47690 Points 0%
Acemagic AM18 AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS	47599 Points 0%
Acemagic F2A Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	45250 Points -5%
Minisforum Venus Series NAB9 Intel Core i9-12900HK	39510 Points -17%
Average AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX (36780 - 39852, n=11)	39028 Points -18%
Geekom XT12 Pro Intel Core i9-12900H	37359 Points -22%
Aoostar GEM10 AMD Ryzen 7 6800H	35898 Points -25%

3DMark 11 - 1280x720 Performance Physics
Geekom A8 AMD Ryzen 9 8945HS	22978 Points +6%
Acemagic AM18 AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS	22786 Points +5%
Average AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS (19492 - 26212, n=12)	22246 Points +2%
Average AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS (17320 - 25584, n=23)	22172 Points +2%
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti Intel Core Ultra 9 185H	21875 Points +1%
Aoostar GEM12 AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS	21762 Points
Acemagic F2A Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	20846 Points -4%
Minisforum Venus Series NAB9 Intel Core i9-12900HK	18553 Points -15%
Average AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX (15855 - 21036, n=23)	18161 Points -17%
Geekom XT12 Pro Intel Core i9-12900H	16634 Points -24%
Aoostar GEM10 AMD Ryzen 7 6800H	16034 Points -26%

7-Zip 18.03
7z b 4
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti Intel Core Ultra 9 185H	71934 MIPS +2%
Geekom A8 AMD Ryzen 9 8945HS	71874 MIPS +2%
Aoostar GEM12 AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS	70733 MIPS
Acemagic AM18 AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS	70723 MIPS 0%
Average AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS (59538 - 73035, n=18)	69127 MIPS -2%
Average AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS (62669 - 74664, n=11)	67906 MIPS -4%
Acemagic F2A Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	66438 MIPS -6%
Average AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX (49526 - 65336, n=20)	60091 MIPS -15%
Minisforum Venus Series NAB9 Intel Core i9-12900HK	55620 MIPS -21%
Aoostar GEM10 AMD Ryzen 7 6800H	55067 MIPS -22%
Geekom XT12 Pro Intel Core i9-12900H	47146 MIPS -33%
7z b 4 -mmt1
Geekom A8 AMD Ryzen 9 8945HS	6668 MIPS 0%
Aoostar GEM12 AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS	6644 MIPS
Average AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS (6049 - 6754, n=18)	6561 MIPS -1%
Acemagic AM18 AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS	6545 MIPS -1%
Average AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS (5197 - 6714, n=11)	6288 MIPS -5%
Minisforum Venus Series NAB9 Intel Core i9-12900HK	6136 MIPS -8%
Geekom XT12 Pro Intel Core i9-12900H	5881 MIPS -11%
Average AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX (5090 - 6070, n=20)	5799 MIPS -13%
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti Intel Core Ultra 9 185H	5560 MIPS -16%
Aoostar GEM10 AMD Ryzen 7 6800H	5521 MIPS -17%
Acemagic F2A Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	5485 MIPS -17%

HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 - 4k Preset
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti Intel Core Ultra 9 185H	20.9 fps +2%
Geekom A8 AMD Ryzen 9 8945HS	20.9 fps +2%
Acemagic AM18 AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS	20.5 fps 0%
Aoostar GEM12 AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS	20.5 fps
Average AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS (18.6 - 22.7, n=11)	20 fps -2%
Average AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS (11.7 - 21.8, n=18)	19.8 fps -3%
Acemagic F2A Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	19.6 fps -4%
Average AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX (12.6 - 18.7, n=20)	16.7 fps -19%
Minisforum Venus Series NAB9 Intel Core i9-12900HK	16.2 fps -21%
Aoostar GEM10 AMD Ryzen 7 6800H	14.9 fps -27%
Geekom XT12 Pro Intel Core i9-12900H	12.3 fps -40%

R Benchmark 2.5 - Overall mean
Aoostar GEM10 AMD Ryzen 7 6800H	0.515 sec * -17%
Average AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX (0.4627 - 0.4974, n=20)	0.483 sec * -10%
Acemagic F2A Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	0.4652 sec * -6%
Geekom XT12 Pro Intel Core i9-12900H	0.4632 sec * -5%
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti Intel Core Ultra 9 185H	0.4627 sec * -5%
Average AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS (0.4304 - 0.4935, n=11)	0.4528 sec * -3%
Acemagic AM18 AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS	0.4398 sec * -0%
Average AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS (0.4184 - 0.4739, n=18)	0.4394 sec * -0%
Aoostar GEM12 AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS	0.4392 sec *
Minisforum Venus Series NAB9 Intel Core i9-12900HK	0.4391 sec * -0%
Geekom A8 AMD Ryzen 9 8945HS	0.4346 sec * +1%

LibreOffice - 20 Documents To PDF
Average AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX (44.8 - 81.7, n=20)	53.1 s * -12%
Aoostar GEM10 AMD Ryzen 7 6800H	51.2 s * -8%
Average AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS (44.4 - 77, n=11)	51 s * -7%
Geekom A8 AMD Ryzen 9 8945HS	49.9 s * -5%
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti Intel Core Ultra 9 185H	49.5 s * -4%
Average AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS (38.3 - 68.3, n=18)	48.6 s * -2%
Acemagic AM18 AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS	47.7 s * -0%
Aoostar GEM12 AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS	47.5 s *
Acemagic F2A Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	44.5 s * +6%
Geekom XT12 Pro Intel Core i9-12900H	39.6 s * +17%
Minisforum Venus Series NAB9 Intel Core i9-12900HK	37.2 s * +22%

WebXPRT 3 - Overall
Acemagic AM18 AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS	320 Points +7%
Average AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS (288 - 339, n=18)	317 Points +6%
Geekom A8 AMD Ryzen 9 8945HS	316 Points +5%
Average AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS (275 - 334, n=11)	304 Points +1%
Minisforum Venus Series NAB9 Intel Core i9-12900HK	301 Points 0%
Aoostar GEM12 AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS	300 Points
Geekom XT12 Pro Intel Core i9-12900H	291 Points -3%
Average AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX (248 - 304, n=17)	280 Points -7%
Acemagic F2A Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	276 Points -8%
Aoostar GEM10 AMD Ryzen 7 6800H	275 Points -8%
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti Intel Core Ultra 9 185H	264 Points -12%

Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total
Aoostar GEM10 AMD Ryzen 7 6800H	591 ms * -14%
Average AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX (564 - 607, n=18)	588 ms * -14%
Average AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS (496 - 664, n=11)	537 ms * -4%
Acemagic F2A Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	535 ms * -3%
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti Intel Core Ultra 9 185H	532 ms * -3%
Acemagic AM18 AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS	518 ms * -0%
Aoostar GEM12 AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS	517 ms *
Geekom XT12 Pro Intel Core i9-12900H	511 ms * +1%
Average AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS (480 - 544, n=19)	508 ms * +2%
Geekom A8 AMD Ryzen 9 8945HS	505 ms * +2%
Minisforum Venus Series NAB9 Intel Core i9-12900HK	499 ms * +3%

3DMark
1920x1080 Fire Strike Physics
Geekom A8 AMD Ryzen 9 8945HS	27732 Points +6%
Average AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS (24338 - 29343, n=24)	27607 Points +5%
Average AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS (25099 - 30715, n=12)	27245 Points +4%
Acemagic AM18 AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS	27120 Points +4%
Aoostar GEM12 AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS	26194 Points
Minisforum Venus Series NAB9 Intel Core i9-12900HK	26093 Points 0%
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti Intel Core Ultra 9 185H	26038 Points -1%
Acemagic F2A Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	25043 Points -4%
Average AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX (18389 - 27338, n=23)	24551 Points -6%
Aoostar GEM10 AMD Ryzen 7 6800H	23807 Points -9%
Geekom XT12 Pro Intel Core i9-12900H	22242 Points -15%
2560x1440 Time Spy CPU
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti Intel Core Ultra 9 185H	11481 Points +6%
Geekom A8 AMD Ryzen 9 8945HS	11298 Points +4%
Average AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS (8550 - 19164, n=12)	11294 Points +4%
Average AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS (8903 - 12218, n=23)	10942 Points +1%
Acemagic AM18 AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS	10926 Points +1%
Aoostar GEM12 AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS	10824 Points
Minisforum Venus Series NAB9 Intel Core i9-12900HK	10402 Points -4%
Acemagic F2A Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	10014 Points -7%
Average AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX (6621 - 11039, n=23)	9584 Points -11%
Aoostar GEM10 AMD Ryzen 7 6800H	8128 Points -25%
Geekom XT12 Pro Intel Core i9-12900H	7985 Points -26%

Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M - 1M
Average AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS (7.11 - 8.77, n=2)	7.94 s * -8%
Aoostar GEM10 AMD Ryzen 7 6800H	7.839 s * -7%
Average AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX (7.33 - 8.57, n=6)	7.8 s * -6%
Geekom XT12 Pro Intel Core i9-12900H	7.454 s * -2%
Aoostar GEM12 AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS	7.331 s *
Minisforum Venus Series NAB9 Intel Core i9-12900HK	7.281 s * +1%
Average AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS (7.1 - 7.33, n=2)	7.22 s * +2%
Acemagic F2A Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	7.168 s * +2%
Acemagic AM18 AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS	7.112 s * +3%
Geekom A8 AMD Ryzen 9 8945HS	7.045 s * +4%
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti Intel Core Ultra 9 185H	6.751 s * +8%

Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M - 2M
Average AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS (17.7 - 21.3, n=2)	19.5 s * -8%
Aoostar GEM10 AMD Ryzen 7 6800H	19.101 s * -5%
Average AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX (16.4 - 20.7, n=6)	18.8 s * -4%
Aoostar GEM12 AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS	18.138 s *
Average AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS (17.6 - 18.1, n=2)	17.9 s * +1%
Acemagic AM18 AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS	17.697 s * +2%
Geekom A8 AMD Ryzen 9 8945HS	17.549 s * +3%
Minisforum Venus Series NAB9 Intel Core i9-12900HK	16.498 s * +9%
Geekom XT12 Pro Intel Core i9-12900H	16.424 s * +9%
Acemagic F2A Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	16.125 s * +11%
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti Intel Core Ultra 9 185H	14.879 s * +18%

Super Pi Mod 1.5 XS 32M - 32M
Aoostar GEM10 AMD Ryzen 7 6800H	694.152 s * -4%
Average AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS (655 - 724, n=2)	690 s * -4%
Aoostar GEM12 AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS	665.289 s *
Average AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS (660 - 665, n=2)	662 s * -0%
Acemagic AM18 AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS	655.388 s * +1%
Geekom A8 AMD Ryzen 9 8945HS	624.748 s * +6%
Average AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX (386 - 693, n=6)	622 s * +7%
Minisforum Venus Series NAB9 Intel Core i9-12900HK	397.363 s * +40%
Geekom XT12 Pro Intel Core i9-12900H	396.475 s * +40%
Acemagic F2A Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	394.754 s * +41%
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti Intel Core Ultra 9 185H	304.446 s * +54%

* ... smaller is better

Cinebench R10 Rendering Single 32Bit

7426

Cinebench R10 Shading 64Bit

20330 Points

Cinebench R10 Rendering Multiple CPUs 64Bit

85872 Points

Cinebench R10 Rendering Single CPUs 64Bit

14163 Points

Cinebench R10 Shading 32Bit

16738

Cinebench R10 Rendering Multiple CPUs 32Bit

47500

Cinebench R11.5 CPU Single 32Bit

2.92 Points

Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 32Bit

26.58 Points

Cinebench R11.5 CPU Single 64Bit

3.32 Points

Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 64Bit

29.76 Points

Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64Bit

279 Points

Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64Bit

2537 Points

Cinebench R15 Ref. Match 64Bit

97.9 %

Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64Bit

224.66 fps

Cinebench R20 CPU (Single Core)

691 Points

Cinebench R20 CPU (Multi Core)

6346 Points

Cinebench R23 Multi Core

16130 Points

Cinebench R23 Single Core

1783 Points

Cinebench 2024 CPU Single Core

107 Points

Cinebench 2024 CPU Multi Core

933 Points

Ajuda

... comparado com

Performance Rating
Geekom A8 AMD Ryzen 9 8945HS, Radeon 780M	97.2 pt
Acemagic AM18 AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS, Radeon 780M	94.3 pt
Aoostar GEM12 AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS, Radeon 780M	90.2 pt
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti Intel Core Ultra 9 185H, Arc 8-Core	80.7 pt
Acemagic F2A Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core	76.7 pt
Aoostar GEM10 AMD Ryzen 7 6800H, Radeon 680M	67 pt
Minisforum Venus Series NAB9 Intel Core i9-12900HK, Iris Xe G7 96EUs	59.2 pt
Average of class Mini PC	56.7 pt
Geekom XT12 Pro Intel Core i9-12900H, Iris Xe G7 96EUs	51.1 pt

AIDA64 / FP32 Ray-Trace
Geekom A8 AMD Ryzen 9 8945HS, Radeon 780M	26846 KRay/s +4%
Aoostar GEM12 AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS, Radeon 780M	25916 KRay/s
Acemagic AM18 AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS, Radeon 780M	25725 KRay/s -1%
Acemagic F2A Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core	17544 KRay/s -32%
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti Intel Core Ultra 9 185H, Arc 8-Core	17312 KRay/s -33%
Aoostar GEM10 AMD Ryzen 7 6800H, Radeon 680M	13726 KRay/s -47%
Average of class Mini PC (646 - 51004, n=119, last 2 years)	12878 KRay/s -50%
Minisforum Venus Series NAB9 Intel Core i9-12900HK, Iris Xe G7 96EUs	12389 KRay/s -52%
Geekom XT12 Pro Intel Core i9-12900H, Iris Xe G7 96EUs	10476 KRay/s -60%

AIDA64 / FPU Julia
Geekom A8 AMD Ryzen 9 8945HS, Radeon 780M	113406 Points +3%
Aoostar GEM12 AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS, Radeon 780M	109747 Points
Acemagic AM18 AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS, Radeon 780M	108506 Points -1%
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti Intel Core Ultra 9 185H, Arc 8-Core	91112 Points -17%
Acemagic F2A Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core	88829 Points -19%
Aoostar GEM10 AMD Ryzen 7 6800H, Radeon 680M	86223 Points -21%
Average of class Mini PC (3857 - 214250, n=119, last 2 years)	64921 Points -41%
Minisforum Venus Series NAB9 Intel Core i9-12900HK, Iris Xe G7 96EUs	64350 Points -41%
Geekom XT12 Pro Intel Core i9-12900H, Iris Xe G7 96EUs	54166 Points -51%

AIDA64 / CPU SHA3
Geekom A8 AMD Ryzen 9 8945HS, Radeon 780M	4952 MB/s +5%
Acemagic AM18 AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS, Radeon 780M	4769 MB/s +2%
Aoostar GEM12 AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS, Radeon 780M	4695 MB/s
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti Intel Core Ultra 9 185H, Arc 8-Core	4343 MB/s -7%
Acemagic F2A Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core	4246 MB/s -10%
Minisforum Venus Series NAB9 Intel Core i9-12900HK, Iris Xe G7 96EUs	3028 MB/s -36%
Aoostar GEM10 AMD Ryzen 7 6800H, Radeon 680M	2953 MB/s -37%
Average of class Mini PC (260 - 9399, n=119, last 2 years)	2856 MB/s -39%
Geekom XT12 Pro Intel Core i9-12900H, Iris Xe G7 96EUs	2504 MB/s -47%

AIDA64 / CPU Queen
Geekom A8 AMD Ryzen 9 8945HS, Radeon 780M	119802 Points +3%
Aoostar GEM12 AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS, Radeon 780M	116083 Points
Acemagic AM18 AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS, Radeon 780M	115133 Points -1%
Minisforum Venus Series NAB9 Intel Core i9-12900HK, Iris Xe G7 96EUs	99851 Points -14%
Aoostar GEM10 AMD Ryzen 7 6800H, Radeon 680M	98582 Points -15%
Acemagic F2A Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core	89748 Points -23%
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti Intel Core Ultra 9 185H, Arc 8-Core	87291 Points -25%
Geekom XT12 Pro Intel Core i9-12900H, Iris Xe G7 96EUs	82291 Points -29%
Average of class Mini PC (8172 - 184747, n=119, last 2 years)	80187 Points -31%

AIDA64 / FPU SinJulia
Geekom A8 AMD Ryzen 9 8945HS, Radeon 780M	15026 Points +1%
Aoostar GEM12 AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS, Radeon 780M	14876 Points
Acemagic AM18 AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS, Radeon 780M	14590 Points -2%
Aoostar GEM10 AMD Ryzen 7 6800H, Radeon 680M	12159 Points -18%
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti Intel Core Ultra 9 185H, Arc 8-Core	10759 Points -28%
Acemagic F2A Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core	10247 Points -31%
Average of class Mini PC (408 - 29064, n=119, last 2 years)	8812 Points -41%
Minisforum Venus Series NAB9 Intel Core i9-12900HK, Iris Xe G7 96EUs	8417 Points -43%
Geekom XT12 Pro Intel Core i9-12900H, Iris Xe G7 96EUs	7317 Points -51%

AIDA64 / FPU Mandel
Geekom A8 AMD Ryzen 9 8945HS, Radeon 780M	60482 Points +3%
Aoostar GEM12 AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS, Radeon 780M	58597 Points
Acemagic AM18 AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS, Radeon 780M	57881 Points -1%
Aoostar GEM10 AMD Ryzen 7 6800H, Radeon 680M	47463 Points -19%
Acemagic F2A Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core	45718 Points -22%
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti Intel Core Ultra 9 185H, Arc 8-Core	44874 Points -23%
Average of class Mini PC (1987 - 113499, n=119, last 2 years)	33863 Points -42%
Minisforum Venus Series NAB9 Intel Core i9-12900HK, Iris Xe G7 96EUs	31933 Points -46%
Geekom XT12 Pro Intel Core i9-12900H, Iris Xe G7 96EUs	26850 Points -54%

AIDA64 / CPU AES
Geekom A8 AMD Ryzen 9 8945HS, Radeon 780M	169431 MB/s +98%
Acemagic AM18 AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS, Radeon 780M	163604 MB/s +91%
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti Intel Core Ultra 9 185H, Arc 8-Core	154066 MB/s +80%
Acemagic F2A Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core	144741 MB/s +69%
Aoostar GEM10 AMD Ryzen 7 6800H, Radeon 680M	119681 MB/s +40%
Minisforum Venus Series NAB9 Intel Core i9-12900HK, Iris Xe G7 96EUs	112254 MB/s +31%
Geekom XT12 Pro Intel Core i9-12900H, Iris Xe G7 96EUs	95500 MB/s +12%
Average of class Mini PC (3691 - 325960, n=119, last 2 years)	88382 MB/s +3%
Aoostar GEM12 AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS, Radeon 780M	85572 MB/s

AIDA64 / CPU ZLib
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti Intel Core Ultra 9 185H, Arc 8-Core	1233 MB/s +18%
Acemagic F2A Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core	1183 MB/s +13%
Aoostar GEM12 AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS, Radeon 780M	1048 MB/s
Acemagic AM18 AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS, Radeon 780M	1042 MB/s -1%
Geekom A8 AMD Ryzen 9 8945HS, Radeon 780M	1029 MB/s -2%
Minisforum Venus Series NAB9 Intel Core i9-12900HK, Iris Xe G7 96EUs	870 MB/s -17%
Aoostar GEM10 AMD Ryzen 7 6800H, Radeon 680M	757 MB/s -28%
Geekom XT12 Pro Intel Core i9-12900H, Iris Xe G7 96EUs	745 MB/s -29%
Average of class Mini PC (74.9 - 2039, n=119, last 2 years)	740 MB/s -29%

AIDA64 / FP64 Ray-Trace
Geekom A8 AMD Ryzen 9 8945HS, Radeon 780M	14240 KRay/s +3%
Aoostar GEM12 AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS, Radeon 780M	13875 KRay/s
Acemagic AM18 AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS, Radeon 780M	13617 KRay/s -2%
Acemagic F2A Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core	9284 KRay/s -33%
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti Intel Core Ultra 9 185H, Arc 8-Core	9270 KRay/s -33%
Aoostar GEM10 AMD Ryzen 7 6800H, Radeon 680M	7279 KRay/s -48%
Average of class Mini PC (350 - 26952, n=119, last 2 years)	6881 KRay/s -50%
Minisforum Venus Series NAB9 Intel Core i9-12900HK, Iris Xe G7 96EUs	6325 KRay/s -54%
Geekom XT12 Pro Intel Core i9-12900H, Iris Xe G7 96EUs	5777 KRay/s -58%

AIDA64 / CPU PhotoWorxx
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti Intel Core Ultra 9 185H, Arc 8-Core	45560 MPixel/s +13%
Acemagic AM18 AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS, Radeon 780M	40655 MPixel/s +1%
Geekom A8 AMD Ryzen 9 8945HS, Radeon 780M	40475 MPixel/s +1%
Aoostar GEM12 AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS, Radeon 780M	40245 MPixel/s
Acemagic F2A Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core	33092 MPixel/s -18%
Average of class Mini PC (4408 - 50500, n=119, last 2 years)	28301 MPixel/s -30%
Aoostar GEM10 AMD Ryzen 7 6800H, Radeon 680M	26496 MPixel/s -34%
Minisforum Venus Series NAB9 Intel Core i9-12900HK, Iris Xe G7 96EUs	24903 MPixel/s -38%
Geekom XT12 Pro Intel Core i9-12900H, Iris Xe G7 96EUs	24858 MPixel/s -38%

Cinebench R15 multi loop

O Aoostar GEM12 tem um excelente desempenho no loop contínuo do Cinebench R15. Não é de se esperar uma perda de desempenho devido à carga contínua. Em termos de consistência, nossa amostra de teste, juntamente com o Acemagic AM18 em um duelo ao nível dos olhos. O consumo máximo de energia de 65 watts é alcançado a cada ciclo, o que, por sua vez, indica uma unidade de resfriamento potente.

Métricas da CPU durante o loop do Cinebench R15

Aoostar GEM12 AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS, AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS: Ø2530 (2503.13-2552.81)

Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti Intel Core Ultra 9 185H, Intel Core Ultra 9 185H: Ø2784 (2721.64-2831.86)

Geekom A8 AMD Ryzen 9 8945HS, AMD Ryzen 9 8945HS: Ø2605 (2529.88-2677.73)

Acemagic F2A Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Intel Core Ultra 7 155H: Ø2759 (2690.7-2800.92)

Geekom XT12 Pro Intel Core i9-12900H, Intel Core i9-12900H: Ø1545 (1395.97-2133.22)

Minisforum Venus Series NAB9 Intel Core i9-12900HK, Intel Core i9-12900HK: Ø1981 (1895.47-2262.7)

Acemagic AM18 AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS, AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS: Ø2489 (2476.93-2539.84)

Aoostar GEM10 AMD Ryzen 7 6800H, AMD Ryzen 7 6800H: Ø1983 (1919.75-2106.82)

Desempenho do sistema

O Aoostar GEM12 oferece valores sólidos nas medições de desempenho do sistema, colocando nossa amostra de teste em um bom meio de campo. O desempenho de todos os dispositivos listados aqui é mais do que adequado para o uso diário; o senhor não notará uma diferença perceptível no uso normal (por exemplo, navegar na Internet ou trabalhar no escritório). Os 32 GB de RAM instalados são generosos, o que beneficiará muito sua experiência de navegação com várias páginas da Web abertas simultaneamente.

PCMark 10: Score | Essentials | Productivity

PCMark 10 / Score
Geekom A8, AMD Ryzen 9 8945HS AMD Radeon 780M, Acer N5000	7705 Points +4%
Acemagic AM18, AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS AMD Radeon 780M, Rayson RS512GSSD710 512 GB PCIe 4.0 NVMe	7651 Points +3%
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti, Intel Core Ultra 9 185H Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU, Kingston OM8PGP41024Q-A0	7510 Points +1%
Aoostar GEM12, AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS AMD Radeon 780M, Crucial P3 Plus CT1000P3PSSD8	7431 Points
Acemagic F2A, Intel Core Ultra 7 155H Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU, Kingston OM8SEP1024Q-A0	7120 Points -4%
Aoostar GEM10, AMD Ryzen 7 6800H AMD Radeon 680M, BIWIN CE980Y28900-1TB	6749 Points -9%
Minisforum Venus Series NAB9, Intel Core i9-12900HK Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, Kingston OM3PGP41024P-A0	6435 Points -13%
Geekom XT12 Pro, Intel Core i9-12900H Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, Lexar SSD NM7A1 1TB	6295 Points -15%

PCMark 10 / Essentials
Minisforum Venus Series NAB9, Intel Core i9-12900HK Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, Kingston OM3PGP41024P-A0	11591 Points +7%
Geekom A8, AMD Ryzen 9 8945HS AMD Radeon 780M, Acer N5000	11333 Points +5%
Geekom XT12 Pro, Intel Core i9-12900H Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, Lexar SSD NM7A1 1TB	11273 Points +4%
Acemagic F2A, Intel Core Ultra 7 155H Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU, Kingston OM8SEP1024Q-A0	11125 Points +3%
Acemagic AM18, AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS AMD Radeon 780M, Rayson RS512GSSD710 512 GB PCIe 4.0 NVMe	11097 Points +3%
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti, Intel Core Ultra 9 185H Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU, Kingston OM8PGP41024Q-A0	11030 Points +2%
Aoostar GEM12, AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS AMD Radeon 780M, Crucial P3 Plus CT1000P3PSSD8	10822 Points
Aoostar GEM10, AMD Ryzen 7 6800H AMD Radeon 680M, BIWIN CE980Y28900-1TB	10522 Points -3%

PCMark 10 / Productivity
Geekom A8, AMD Ryzen 9 8945HS AMD Radeon 780M, Acer N5000	11082 Points +6%
Acemagic AM18, AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS AMD Radeon 780M, Rayson RS512GSSD710 512 GB PCIe 4.0 NVMe	10970 Points +5%
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti, Intel Core Ultra 9 185H Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU, Kingston OM8PGP41024Q-A0	10484 Points 0%
Aoostar GEM12, AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS AMD Radeon 780M, Crucial P3 Plus CT1000P3PSSD8	10482 Points
Aoostar GEM10, AMD Ryzen 7 6800H AMD Radeon 680M, BIWIN CE980Y28900-1TB	9367 Points -11%
Acemagic F2A, Intel Core Ultra 7 155H Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU, Kingston OM8SEP1024Q-A0	8901 Points -15%
Geekom XT12 Pro, Intel Core i9-12900H Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, Lexar SSD NM7A1 1TB	8114 Points -23%
Minisforum Venus Series NAB9, Intel Core i9-12900HK Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, Kingston OM3PGP41024P-A0	7924 Points -24%

CrossMark: Overall | Responsiveness | Creativity | Productivity

CrossMark / Overall
Minisforum Venus Series NAB9, Intel Core i9-12900HK Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, Kingston OM3PGP41024P-A0	1986 Points +2%
Aoostar GEM12, AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS AMD Radeon 780M, Crucial P3 Plus CT1000P3PSSD8	1939 Points
Geekom A8, AMD Ryzen 9 8945HS AMD Radeon 780M, Acer N5000	1866 Points -4%
Geekom XT12 Pro, Intel Core i9-12900H Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, Lexar SSD NM7A1 1TB	1860 Points -4%
Acemagic AM18, AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS AMD Radeon 780M, Rayson RS512GSSD710 512 GB PCIe 4.0 NVMe	1828 Points -6%
Acemagic F2A, Intel Core Ultra 7 155H Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU, Kingston OM8SEP1024Q-A0	1802 Points -7%
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti, Intel Core Ultra 9 185H Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU, Kingston OM8PGP41024Q-A0	1675 Points -14%
Aoostar GEM10, AMD Ryzen 7 6800H AMD Radeon 680M, BIWIN CE980Y28900-1TB	1648 Points -15%

CrossMark / Responsiveness
Minisforum Venus Series NAB9, Intel Core i9-12900HK Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, Kingston OM3PGP41024P-A0	2205 Points +19%
Geekom XT12 Pro, Intel Core i9-12900H Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, Lexar SSD NM7A1 1TB	1919 Points +4%
Aoostar GEM12, AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS AMD Radeon 780M, Crucial P3 Plus CT1000P3PSSD8	1849 Points
Acemagic F2A, Intel Core Ultra 7 155H Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU, Kingston OM8SEP1024Q-A0	1700 Points -8%
Aoostar GEM10, AMD Ryzen 7 6800H AMD Radeon 680M, BIWIN CE980Y28900-1TB	1566 Points -15%
Acemagic AM18, AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS AMD Radeon 780M, Rayson RS512GSSD710 512 GB PCIe 4.0 NVMe	1541 Points -17%
Geekom A8, AMD Ryzen 9 8945HS AMD Radeon 780M, Acer N5000	1494 Points -19%
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti, Intel Core Ultra 9 185H Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU, Kingston OM8PGP41024Q-A0	1378 Points -25%

CrossMark / Creativity
Geekom A8, AMD Ryzen 9 8945HS AMD Radeon 780M, Acer N5000	2127 Points +4%
Aoostar GEM12, AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS AMD Radeon 780M, Crucial P3 Plus CT1000P3PSSD8	2040 Points
Acemagic AM18, AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS AMD Radeon 780M, Rayson RS512GSSD710 512 GB PCIe 4.0 NVMe	2030 Points 0%
Acemagic F2A, Intel Core Ultra 7 155H Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU, Kingston OM8SEP1024Q-A0	1929 Points -5%
Minisforum Venus Series NAB9, Intel Core i9-12900HK Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, Kingston OM3PGP41024P-A0	1907 Points -7%
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti, Intel Core Ultra 9 185H Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU, Kingston OM8PGP41024Q-A0	1883 Points -8%
Geekom XT12 Pro, Intel Core i9-12900H Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, Lexar SSD NM7A1 1TB	1870 Points -8%
Aoostar GEM10, AMD Ryzen 7 6800H AMD Radeon 680M, BIWIN CE980Y28900-1TB	1696 Points -17%

CrossMark / Productivity
Minisforum Venus Series NAB9, Intel Core i9-12900HK Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, Kingston OM3PGP41024P-A0	1996 Points +7%
Aoostar GEM12, AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS AMD Radeon 780M, Crucial P3 Plus CT1000P3PSSD8	1872 Points
Geekom XT12 Pro, Intel Core i9-12900H Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, Lexar SSD NM7A1 1TB	1831 Points -2%
Geekom A8, AMD Ryzen 9 8945HS AMD Radeon 780M, Acer N5000	1764 Points -6%
Acemagic AM18, AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS AMD Radeon 780M, Rayson RS512GSSD710 512 GB PCIe 4.0 NVMe	1743 Points -7%
Acemagic F2A, Intel Core Ultra 7 155H Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU, Kingston OM8SEP1024Q-A0	1717 Points -8%
Aoostar GEM10, AMD Ryzen 7 6800H AMD Radeon 680M, BIWIN CE980Y28900-1TB	1629 Points -13%
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti, Intel Core Ultra 9 185H Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU, Kingston OM8PGP41024Q-A0	1589 Points -15%

AIDA64: Memory Copy | Memory Read | Memory Write | Memory Latency

AIDA64 / Memory Copy
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti Intel Core Ultra 9 185H, Arc 8-Core	71990 MB/s +6%
Geekom A8 AMD Ryzen 9 8945HS, Radeon 780M	68603 MB/s +1%
Acemagic AM18 AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS, Radeon 780M	68299 MB/s +1%
Aoostar GEM12 AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS, Radeon 780M	67777 MB/s
Acemagic F2A Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core	62397 MB/s -8%
Aoostar GEM10 AMD Ryzen 7 6800H, Radeon 680M	50829 MB/s -25%
Average of class Mini PC (6481 - 89287, n=119, last 2 years)	48357 MB/s -29%
Geekom XT12 Pro Intel Core i9-12900H, Iris Xe G7 96EUs	45792 MB/s -32%
Minisforum Venus Series NAB9 Intel Core i9-12900HK, Iris Xe G7 96EUs	44442 MB/s -34%

AIDA64 / Memory Read
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti Intel Core Ultra 9 185H, Arc 8-Core	75449 MB/s +24%
Acemagic F2A Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core	64323 MB/s +5%
Geekom A8 AMD Ryzen 9 8945HS, Radeon 780M	61710 MB/s +1%
Acemagic AM18 AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS, Radeon 780M	61463 MB/s +1%
Aoostar GEM12 AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS, Radeon 780M	61006 MB/s
Average of class Mini PC (6914 - 99171, n=119, last 2 years)	49177 MB/s -19%
Geekom XT12 Pro Intel Core i9-12900H, Iris Xe G7 96EUs	48963 MB/s -20%
Minisforum Venus Series NAB9 Intel Core i9-12900HK, Iris Xe G7 96EUs	47960 MB/s -21%
Aoostar GEM10 AMD Ryzen 7 6800H, Radeon 680M	43828 MB/s -28%

AIDA64 / Memory Write
Geekom A8 AMD Ryzen 9 8945HS, Radeon 780M	86974 MB/s 0%
Aoostar GEM12 AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS, Radeon 780M	86677 MB/s
Acemagic AM18 AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS, Radeon 780M	86273 MB/s 0%
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti Intel Core Ultra 9 185H, Arc 8-Core	70596 MB/s -19%
Acemagic F2A Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core	65057 MB/s -25%
Average of class Mini PC (6862 - 98583, n=119, last 2 years)	52856 MB/s -39%
Aoostar GEM10 AMD Ryzen 7 6800H, Radeon 680M	51116 MB/s -41%
Geekom XT12 Pro Intel Core i9-12900H, Iris Xe G7 96EUs	47201 MB/s -46%
Minisforum Venus Series NAB9 Intel Core i9-12900HK, Iris Xe G7 96EUs	45952 MB/s -47%

AIDA64 / Memory Latency
Acemagic F2A Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core	149 ns * -68%
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti Intel Core Ultra 9 185H, Arc 8-Core	146.1 ns * -65%
Aoostar GEM10 AMD Ryzen 7 6800H, Radeon 680M	104.1 ns * -17%
Average of class Mini PC (44.9 - 184.8, n=119, last 2 years)	92.1 ns * -4%
Geekom A8 AMD Ryzen 9 8945HS, Radeon 780M	91.2 ns * -3%
Aoostar GEM12 AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS, Radeon 780M	88.6 ns *
Acemagic AM18 AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS, Radeon 780M	87.9 ns * +1%
Minisforum Venus Series NAB9 Intel Core i9-12900HK, Iris Xe G7 96EUs	79.9 ns * +10%
Geekom XT12 Pro Intel Core i9-12900H, Iris Xe G7 96EUs	74.7 ns * +16%

* ... smaller is better

Latências de DPC

Os valores de DPC documentados são um pouco mais altos para o Aoostar GEM12. Uma olhada na visão geral da comparação mostra que alguns dispositivos apresentaram resultados significativamente piores. No entanto, só atingimos o valor máximo pouco depois de iniciar a reprodução do vídeo de teste em 4K. Há também alguns quadros perdidos, mas isso não atrapalha a apreciação do filme. Durante a reprodução, a carga da iGPU chega a 64%, o que é comparativamente alto.

Latência máxima ao abrir várias guias do navegador e reproduzir vídeo 4K

Latência máxima após dez segundos de Prime95

DPC Latencies / LatencyMon - interrupt to process latency (max), Web, Youtube, Prime95
Acemagic F2A Arc 8-Core, Ultra 7 155H, Kingston OM8SEP1024Q-A0	2724 μs * -172%
Geekom XT12 Pro Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i9-12900H, Lexar SSD NM7A1 1TB	2151 μs * -115%
Geekom A8 Radeon 780M, R9 8945HS, Acer N5000	2097.9 μs * -109%
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti Arc 8-Core, Ultra 9 185H, Kingston OM8PGP41024Q-A0	2069.2 μs * -107%
Minisforum Venus Series NAB9 Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i9-12900HK, Kingston OM3PGP41024P-A0	1026 μs * -2%
Aoostar GEM12 Radeon 780M, R7 8845HS, Crucial P3 Plus CT1000P3PSSD8	1001.9 μs *
Aoostar GEM10 Radeon 680M, R7 6800H, BIWIN CE980Y28900-1TB	962.8 μs * +4%
Acemagic AM18 Radeon 780M, R7 7840HS, Rayson RS512GSSD710 512 GB PCIe 4.0 NVMe	900 μs * +10%

* ... smaller is better

Armazenamento em massa

O Aoostar GEM12 está equipado com um SSD de 1 TB da Crucial. Em comparação, vemos um excelente resultado, com o qual nosso dispositivo de teste pode garantir o primeiro lugar. A Aoostar instala resfriamento ativo no GEM12, mas ele consiste em apenas uma ventoinha. No entanto, essa combinação não é suficiente para manter o desempenho estável sob carga. Entretanto, a perda de desempenho é muito pequena e quase imperceptível. Dois SSDs NVMe com um comprimento de 80 milímetros podem ser instalados no dispositivo.

Para mais comparações e benchmarks, consulte nossa tabela de comparação.

CrystalDiskMark 3.0

CrystalDiskMark 5.2 / 6

AS SSD

DiskSpd

Crucial P3 Plus CT1000P3PSSD8

Sequential Read: 2984 MB/s

Sequential Write: 4487 MB/s

512K Read: 2076 MB/s

512K Write: 4270 MB/s

4K Read: 61.03 MB/s

4K Write: 131.2 MB/s

4K QD32 Read: 574.4 MB/s

4K QD32 Write: 335.5 MB/s

Drive Performance Rating | DiskSpd | AS SSD

Drive Performance Rating - Percent
Aoostar GEM12 Crucial P3 Plus CT1000P3PSSD8	90.9 pt
Minisforum Venus Series NAB9 Kingston OM3PGP41024P-A0	85.6 pt
Aoostar GEM10 BIWIN CE980Y28900-1TB	71.7 pt
Geekom XT12 Pro Lexar SSD NM7A1 1TB	66.6 pt
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti Kingston OM8PGP41024Q-A0	59.6 pt
Geekom A8 Acer N5000	57.2 pt
Average of class Mini PC	49.2 pt
Acemagic F2A Kingston OM8SEP1024Q-A0	46.7 pt
Acemagic AM18 Rayson RS512GSSD710 512 GB PCIe 4.0 NVMe	46 pt

DiskSpd
seq read
Aoostar GEM10 BIWIN CE980Y28900-1TB	4000 (3961.36^min - 3999.66^max) MB/s +29%
Geekom A8 Acer N5000	3114 (3080.09^min - 3114.48^max) MB/s 0%
Aoostar GEM12 Crucial P3 Plus CT1000P3PSSD8	3108 (3065.99^min - 3107.56^max) MB/s
Minisforum Venus Series NAB9 Kingston OM3PGP41024P-A0	2668 (2648.91^min - 2668.42^max) MB/s -14%
Average of class Mini PC (277 - 4357, n=119, last 2 years)	2333 MB/s -25%
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti Kingston OM8PGP41024Q-A0	2315 (2293.84^min - 2315.26^max) MB/s -26%
Acemagic AM18 Rayson RS512GSSD710 512 GB PCIe 4.0 NVMe	2279 (2272.33^min - 2279.03^max) MB/s -27%
Geekom XT12 Pro Lexar SSD NM7A1 1TB	2178 (2158.39^min - 2177.68^max) MB/s -30%
Acemagic F2A Kingston OM8SEP1024Q-A0	1674 (1242.56^min - 1673.54^max) MB/s -46%
seq write
Aoostar GEM12 Crucial P3 Plus CT1000P3PSSD8	4619 (4584.79^min - 4619.39^max) MB/s
Aoostar GEM10 BIWIN CE980Y28900-1TB	4553 (4417.86^min - 4552.92^max) MB/s -1%
Minisforum Venus Series NAB9 Kingston OM3PGP41024P-A0	3866 (206.78^min - 3865.71^max) MB/s -16%
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti Kingston OM8PGP41024Q-A0	3386 (3076.94^min - 3385.64^max) MB/s -27%
Geekom A8 Acer N5000	3271 (3235.73^min - 3270.93^max) MB/s -29%
Acemagic AM18 Rayson RS512GSSD710 512 GB PCIe 4.0 NVMe	2629 (1414.22^min - 2628.56^max) MB/s -43%
Average of class Mini PC (229 - 5595, n=119, last 2 years)	2509 MB/s -46%
Geekom XT12 Pro Lexar SSD NM7A1 1TB	2341 (2252.02^min - 2341.4^max) MB/s -49%
Acemagic F2A Kingston OM8SEP1024Q-A0	1348 (1117.85^min - 1347.87^max) MB/s -71%
seq q8 t1 read
Aoostar GEM12 Crucial P3 Plus CT1000P3PSSD8	5213 (4500.71^min - 5212.95^max) MB/s
Aoostar GEM10 BIWIN CE980Y28900-1TB	4878 (4476.29^min - 4877.98^max) MB/s -6%
Geekom A8 Acer N5000	4800 (4387.45^min - 4800.17^max) MB/s -8%
Minisforum Venus Series NAB9 Kingston OM3PGP41024P-A0	4780 (4492.97^min - 4780.46^max) MB/s -8%
Geekom XT12 Pro Lexar SSD NM7A1 1TB	4769 (3791.02^min - 4769.24^max) MB/s -9%
Acemagic AM18 Rayson RS512GSSD710 512 GB PCIe 4.0 NVMe	4684 (4089.86^min - 4684.2^max) MB/s -10%
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti Kingston OM8PGP41024Q-A0	4676 (4310.07^min - 4675.81^max) MB/s -10%
Average of class Mini PC (236 - 8430, n=119, last 2 years)	3790 MB/s -27%
Acemagic F2A Kingston OM8SEP1024Q-A0	3194 (2810.81^min - 3194.17^max) MB/s -39%
seq q8 t1 write
Aoostar GEM12 Crucial P3 Plus CT1000P3PSSD8	4754 (4738.27^min - 4754.03^max) MB/s
Aoostar GEM10 BIWIN CE980Y28900-1TB	4505 (4403.81^min - 4505.09^max) MB/s -5%
Geekom A8 Acer N5000	4081 (3987.52^min - 4081.49^max) MB/s -14%
Minisforum Venus Series NAB9 Kingston OM3PGP41024P-A0	3901 (912.47^min - 3901.29^max) MB/s -18%
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti Kingston OM8PGP41024Q-A0	3729 (3700.15^min - 3728.95^max) MB/s -22%
Geekom XT12 Pro Lexar SSD NM7A1 1TB	3255 (2485.13^min - 3254.57^max) MB/s -32%
Average of class Mini PC (239 - 6669, n=119, last 2 years)	2810 MB/s -41%
Acemagic AM18 Rayson RS512GSSD710 512 GB PCIe 4.0 NVMe	2627 (2402.52^min - 2626.88^max) MB/s -45%
Acemagic F2A Kingston OM8SEP1024Q-A0	2212 (1222.43^min - 2212.27^max) MB/s -53%
4k q1 t1 read
Minisforum Venus Series NAB9 Kingston OM3PGP41024P-A0	80.9 (78.95^min - 80.85^max) MB/s +3%
Aoostar GEM12 Crucial P3 Plus CT1000P3PSSD8	78.7 (78.09^min - 78.69^max) MB/s
Geekom XT12 Pro Lexar SSD NM7A1 1TB	64.1 (56.32^min - 64.06^max) MB/s -19%
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti Kingston OM8PGP41024Q-A0	63.5 (59.81^min - 63.5^max) MB/s -19%
Aoostar GEM10 BIWIN CE980Y28900-1TB	61.7 (61.26^min - 61.71^max) MB/s -22%
Acemagic AM18 Rayson RS512GSSD710 512 GB PCIe 4.0 NVMe	55.6 (53.92^min - 55.58^max) MB/s -29%
Average of class Mini PC (6.85 - 86.6, n=119, last 2 years)	55.3 MB/s -30%
Geekom A8 Acer N5000	54.4 (52.17^min - 54.39^max) MB/s -31%
Acemagic F2A Kingston OM8SEP1024Q-A0	47.3 (47.07^min - 47.31^max) MB/s -40%
4k q1 t1 write
Minisforum Venus Series NAB9 Kingston OM3PGP41024P-A0	422 (409.3^min - 421.98^max) MB/s +54%
Geekom XT12 Pro Lexar SSD NM7A1 1TB	279 (237.61^min - 279.08^max) MB/s +2%
Aoostar GEM12 Crucial P3 Plus CT1000P3PSSD8	274 (271.38^min - 273.89^max) MB/s
Aoostar GEM10 BIWIN CE980Y28900-1TB	235 (230.8^min - 235.02^max) MB/s -14%
Average of class Mini PC (30.4 - 435, n=119, last 2 years)	196.9 MB/s -28%
Acemagic F2A Kingston OM8SEP1024Q-A0	187.2 (181.54^min - 187.2^max) MB/s -32%
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti Kingston OM8PGP41024Q-A0	184.4 (177.6^min - 184.36^max) MB/s -33%
Geekom A8 Acer N5000	169.3 (157.77^min - 169.29^max) MB/s -38%
Acemagic AM18 Rayson RS512GSSD710 512 GB PCIe 4.0 NVMe	151.3 (148.71^min - 151.28^max) MB/s -45%
4k q32 t16 read
Aoostar GEM12 Crucial P3 Plus CT1000P3PSSD8	3197 (3174.44^min - 3196.85^max) MB/s
Minisforum Venus Series NAB9 Kingston OM3PGP41024P-A0	2967 (2962.7^min - 2967.4^max) MB/s -7%
Aoostar GEM10 BIWIN CE980Y28900-1TB	2004 (2002.37^min - 2004.23^max) MB/s -37%
Acemagic F2A Kingston OM8SEP1024Q-A0	1824 (1239.47^min - 1824.09^max) MB/s -43%
Geekom A8 Acer N5000	1558 (1523.21^min - 1557.75^max) MB/s -51%
Geekom XT12 Pro Lexar SSD NM7A1 1TB	1452 (1402.67^min - 1451.9^max) MB/s -55%
Average of class Mini PC (26.1 - 4158, n=119, last 2 years)	1411 MB/s -56%
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti Kingston OM8PGP41024Q-A0	1143 (1091.01^min - 1142.98^max) MB/s -64%
Acemagic AM18 Rayson RS512GSSD710 512 GB PCIe 4.0 NVMe	910 (889.36^min - 909.64^max) MB/s -72%
4k q32 t16 write
Aoostar GEM12 Crucial P3 Plus CT1000P3PSSD8	3639 (3534.46^min - 3639.09^max) MB/s
Minisforum Venus Series NAB9 Kingston OM3PGP41024P-A0	3364 (866.38^min - 3364.31^max) MB/s -8%
Aoostar GEM10 BIWIN CE980Y28900-1TB	2681 (2560.18^min - 2680.76^max) MB/s -26%
Acemagic AM18 Rayson RS512GSSD710 512 GB PCIe 4.0 NVMe	1583 (825.5^min - 1583.41^max) MB/s -56%
Geekom XT12 Pro Lexar SSD NM7A1 1TB	1499 (1114.25^min - 1499.4^max) MB/s -59%
Acemagic F2A Kingston OM8SEP1024Q-A0	1434 (1410.26^min - 1433.71^max) MB/s -61%
Average of class Mini PC (32.6 - 4288, n=119, last 2 years)	1332 MB/s -63%
Geekom A8 Acer N5000	600 (492.7^min - 600.03^max) MB/s -84%
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti Kingston OM8PGP41024Q-A0	497 (467.49^min - 497.28^max) MB/s -86%

AS SSD
Score Total
Aoostar GEM12 Crucial P3 Plus CT1000P3PSSD8	10021 Points
Minisforum Venus Series NAB9 Kingston OM3PGP41024P-A0	7931 Points -21%
Aoostar GEM10 BIWIN CE980Y28900-1TB	6147 Points -39%
Geekom XT12 Pro Lexar SSD NM7A1 1TB	5975 Points -40%
Geekom A8 Acer N5000	5132 Points -49%
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti Kingston OM8PGP41024Q-A0	4987 Points -50%
Acemagic F2A Kingston OM8SEP1024Q-A0	4412 Points -56%
Average of class Mini PC (211 - 10021, n=117, last 2 years)	4244 Points -58%
Acemagic AM18 Rayson RS512GSSD710 512 GB PCIe 4.0 NVMe	3435 Points -66%
Score Read
Aoostar GEM12 Crucial P3 Plus CT1000P3PSSD8	3741 Points
Minisforum Venus Series NAB9 Kingston OM3PGP41024P-A0	2899 Points -23%
Geekom XT12 Pro Lexar SSD NM7A1 1TB	2119 Points -43%
Aoostar GEM10 BIWIN CE980Y28900-1TB	2109 Points -44%
Geekom A8 Acer N5000	1643 Points -56%
Average of class Mini PC (76 - 3741, n=117, last 2 years)	1578 Points -58%
Acemagic F2A Kingston OM8SEP1024Q-A0	1561 Points -58%
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti Kingston OM8PGP41024Q-A0	1482 Points -60%
Acemagic AM18 Rayson RS512GSSD710 512 GB PCIe 4.0 NVMe	1248 Points -67%
Score Write
Aoostar GEM12 Crucial P3 Plus CT1000P3PSSD8	4371 Points
Minisforum Venus Series NAB9 Kingston OM3PGP41024P-A0	3564 Points -18%
Aoostar GEM10 BIWIN CE980Y28900-1TB	2964 Points -32%
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti Kingston OM8PGP41024Q-A0	2807 Points -36%
Geekom XT12 Pro Lexar SSD NM7A1 1TB	2777 Points -36%
Geekom A8 Acer N5000	2735 Points -37%
Acemagic F2A Kingston OM8SEP1024Q-A0	2082 Points -52%
Average of class Mini PC (88 - 4371, n=117, last 2 years)	1902 Points -56%
Acemagic AM18 Rayson RS512GSSD710 512 GB PCIe 4.0 NVMe	1600 Points -63%
Seq Read
Geekom XT12 Pro Lexar SSD NM7A1 1TB	4349.85 MB/s +1%
Aoostar GEM12 Crucial P3 Plus CT1000P3PSSD8	4317 MB/s
Aoostar GEM10 BIWIN CE980Y28900-1TB	4264 MB/s -1%
Minisforum Venus Series NAB9 Kingston OM3PGP41024P-A0	4162 MB/s -4%
Acemagic AM18 Rayson RS512GSSD710 512 GB PCIe 4.0 NVMe	3835 MB/s -11%
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti Kingston OM8PGP41024Q-A0	3779 MB/s -12%
Geekom A8 Acer N5000	3741 MB/s -13%
Average of class Mini PC (291 - 6620, n=117, last 2 years)	3231 MB/s -25%
Acemagic F2A Kingston OM8SEP1024Q-A0	3010 MB/s -30%
Seq Write
Aoostar GEM12 Crucial P3 Plus CT1000P3PSSD8	4188 MB/s
Aoostar GEM10 BIWIN CE980Y28900-1TB	3970 MB/s -5%
Geekom XT12 Pro Lexar SSD NM7A1 1TB	3936.64 MB/s -6%
Minisforum Venus Series NAB9 Kingston OM3PGP41024P-A0	3477 MB/s -17%
Acemagic AM18 Rayson RS512GSSD710 512 GB PCIe 4.0 NVMe	2568 MB/s -39%
Acemagic F2A Kingston OM8SEP1024Q-A0	2369 MB/s -43%
Average of class Mini PC (242 - 5783, n=117, last 2 years)	2292 MB/s -45%
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti Kingston OM8PGP41024Q-A0	2285 MB/s -45%
Geekom A8 Acer N5000	1897 MB/s -55%
4K Read
Minisforum Venus Series NAB9 Kingston OM3PGP41024P-A0	104.3 MB/s +17%
Aoostar GEM12 Crucial P3 Plus CT1000P3PSSD8	89.3 MB/s
Geekom XT12 Pro Lexar SSD NM7A1 1TB	80.89 MB/s -9%
Aoostar GEM10 BIWIN CE980Y28900-1TB	68.4 MB/s -23%
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti Kingston OM8PGP41024Q-A0	63.3 MB/s -29%
Average of class Mini PC (21.4 - 104.3, n=117, last 2 years)	59.7 MB/s -33%
Acemagic AM18 Rayson RS512GSSD710 512 GB PCIe 4.0 NVMe	52.4 MB/s -41%
Geekom A8 Acer N5000	50.3 MB/s -44%
Acemagic F2A Kingston OM8SEP1024Q-A0	41.8 MB/s -53%
4K Write
Minisforum Venus Series NAB9 Kingston OM3PGP41024P-A0	366 MB/s +66%
Geekom XT12 Pro Lexar SSD NM7A1 1TB	316.33 MB/s +43%
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti Kingston OM8PGP41024Q-A0	238 MB/s +8%
Aoostar GEM12 Crucial P3 Plus CT1000P3PSSD8	221 MB/s
Acemagic F2A Kingston OM8SEP1024Q-A0	196.9 MB/s -11%
Aoostar GEM10 BIWIN CE980Y28900-1TB	196.5 MB/s -11%
Average of class Mini PC (30.9 - 366, n=117, last 2 years)	177.5 MB/s -20%
Geekom A8 Acer N5000	171.7 MB/s -22%
Acemagic AM18 Rayson RS512GSSD710 512 GB PCIe 4.0 NVMe	139.4 MB/s -37%
4K-64 Read
Aoostar GEM12 Crucial P3 Plus CT1000P3PSSD8	3220 MB/s
Minisforum Venus Series NAB9 Kingston OM3PGP41024P-A0	2379 MB/s -26%
Aoostar GEM10 BIWIN CE980Y28900-1TB	1614 MB/s -50%
Geekom XT12 Pro Lexar SSD NM7A1 1TB	1602.91 MB/s -50%
Acemagic F2A Kingston OM8SEP1024Q-A0	1218 MB/s -62%
Geekom A8 Acer N5000	1218 MB/s -62%
Average of class Mini PC (23.4 - 3220, n=117, last 2 years)	1195 MB/s -63%
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti Kingston OM8PGP41024Q-A0	1041 MB/s -68%
Acemagic AM18 Rayson RS512GSSD710 512 GB PCIe 4.0 NVMe	812 MB/s -75%
4K-64 Write
Aoostar GEM12 Crucial P3 Plus CT1000P3PSSD8	3731 MB/s
Minisforum Venus Series NAB9 Kingston OM3PGP41024P-A0	2850 MB/s -24%
Geekom A8 Acer N5000	2374 MB/s -36%
Aoostar GEM10 BIWIN CE980Y28900-1TB	2370 MB/s -36%
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti Kingston OM8PGP41024Q-A0	2340 MB/s -37%
Geekom XT12 Pro Lexar SSD NM7A1 1TB	2066.57 MB/s -45%
Acemagic F2A Kingston OM8SEP1024Q-A0	1649 MB/s -56%
Average of class Mini PC (32.8 - 3731, n=117, last 2 years)	1495 MB/s -60%
Acemagic AM18 Rayson RS512GSSD710 512 GB PCIe 4.0 NVMe	1204 MB/s -68%
Access Time Read
Acemagic AM18 Rayson RS512GSSD710 512 GB PCIe 4.0 NVMe	0.173 ms * -128%
Aoostar GEM10 BIWIN CE980Y28900-1TB	0.098 ms * -29%
Average of class Mini PC (0.022 - 0.489, n=117, last 2 years)	0.09579 ms * -26%
Aoostar GEM12 Crucial P3 Plus CT1000P3PSSD8	0.076 ms *
Geekom A8 Acer N5000	0.069 ms * +9%
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti Kingston OM8PGP41024Q-A0	0.067 ms * +12%
Geekom XT12 Pro Lexar SSD NM7A1 1TB	0.049 ms * +36%
Acemagic F2A Kingston OM8SEP1024Q-A0	0.046 ms * +39%
Minisforum Venus Series NAB9 Kingston OM3PGP41024P-A0	0.044 ms * +42%
Access Time Write
Acemagic F2A Kingston OM8SEP1024Q-A0	0.126 ms * -641%
Average of class Mini PC (0.014 - 0.765, n=117, last 2 years)	0.1133 ms * -566%
Acemagic AM18 Rayson RS512GSSD710 512 GB PCIe 4.0 NVMe	0.078 ms * -359%
Geekom A8 Acer N5000	0.072 ms * -324%
Aoostar GEM10 BIWIN CE980Y28900-1TB	0.061 ms * -259%
Geekom XT12 Pro Lexar SSD NM7A1 1TB	0.059 ms * -247%
Minisforum Venus Series NAB9 Kingston OM3PGP41024P-A0	0.031 ms * -82%
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti Kingston OM8PGP41024Q-A0	0.02 ms * -18%
Aoostar GEM12 Crucial P3 Plus CT1000P3PSSD8	0.017 ms *

* ... smaller is better

Continuous load: DiskSpd Read Loop, Queue Depth 8

Aoostar GEM12 Crucial P3 Plus CT1000P3PSSD8; diskspd 2.0.17 f: Ø5121 (4152.57-5218.34)

Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti Kingston OM8PGP41024Q-A0; diskspd 2.0.17 f: Ø4683 (3872.18-4767.25)

Geekom A8 Acer N5000; diskspd 2.0.17 f: Ø4786 (4324.07-4802.27)

Acemagic F2A Kingston OM8SEP1024Q-A0; diskspd 2.0.17 f: Ø1320 (771.89-3141.95)

Geekom XT12 Pro Lexar SSD NM7A1 1TB; diskspd 2.0.17 f: Ø1764 (1425.22-4795.56)

Minisforum Venus Series NAB9 Kingston OM3PGP41024P-A0; diskspd 2.0.17 f: Ø4764 (3862.99-4794.3)

Acemagic AM18 Rayson RS512GSSD710 512 GB PCIe 4.0 NVMe; diskspd 2.0.17 f: Ø4663 (3995.26-4684.2)

Aoostar GEM10 BIWIN CE980Y28900-1TB; diskspd 2.0.17 f: Ø4833 (4418.07-4847.99)

Placa de vídeo

A saída de imagem é gerenciada pela AMD Radeon 780M que já testamos várias vezes. Em combinação com o AMD Ryzen 7 8845HSum máximo de 65 watts está disponível. O desempenho da iGPU é bom e está no mesmo nível de seus rivais com o mesmo adaptador gráfico. O duelo contra o Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti e o Acemagic F2Aque funcionam com o Intel Arc 8, foi vencido por uma pequena margem pela nossa amostra de teste. Aqueles que usam o Aoostar GEM12 com AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX podem se orientar pelo Aoostar GEM10 em termos de desempenho.

Para obter mais comparações e benchmarks, consulte nossa Tabela de comparação de GPUs.

3DMark Performance Rating | 3DMark 11 | 3DMark

3DMark Performance Rating - Percent
Acemagic AM18 AMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS	96.8 pt
Geekom A8 AMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen 9 8945HS	96.6 pt
Aoostar GEM12 AMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS	94.3 pt
Acemagic F2A Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU, Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	93.6 pt
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU, Intel Core Ultra 9 185H	92.1 pt
Aoostar GEM10 AMD Radeon 680M, AMD Ryzen 7 6800H	85.2 pt
Geekom XT12 Pro Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, Intel Core i9-12900H	55.1 pt
Minisforum Venus Series NAB9 Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, Intel Core i9-12900HK	55.1 pt

3DMark 11 - 1280x720 Performance GPU
Acemagic AM18 AMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS	13636 Points +2%
Geekom A8 AMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen 9 8945HS	13533 Points +1%
Aoostar GEM12 AMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS	13410 Points
Acemagic F2A Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU, Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	12085 Points -10%
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU, Intel Core Ultra 9 185H	11691 Points -13%
Aoostar GEM10 AMD Radeon 680M, AMD Ryzen 7 6800H	11668 Points -13%
Minisforum Venus Series NAB9 Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, Intel Core i9-12900HK	6999 Points -48%
Geekom XT12 Pro Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, Intel Core i9-12900H	6975 Points -48%

3DMark
2560x1440 Time Spy Graphics
Acemagic F2A Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU, Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	3205 Points +13%
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU, Intel Core Ultra 9 185H	3193 Points +12%
Acemagic AM18 AMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS	2912 Points +2%
Geekom A8 AMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen 9 8945HS	2901 Points +2%
Aoostar GEM12 AMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS	2846 Points
Aoostar GEM10 AMD Radeon 680M, AMD Ryzen 7 6800H	2518 Points -12%
Minisforum Venus Series NAB9 Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, Intel Core i9-12900HK	1583 Points -44%
Geekom XT12 Pro Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, Intel Core i9-12900H	1581 Points -44%
1920x1080 Fire Strike Graphics
Geekom A8 AMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen 9 8945HS	8354 Points +4%
Acemagic AM18 AMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS	8327 Points +4%
Aoostar GEM12 AMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS	8007 Points
Acemagic F2A Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU, Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	7710 Points -4%
Aoostar GEM10 AMD Radeon 680M, AMD Ryzen 7 6800H	7653 Points -4%
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU, Intel Core Ultra 9 185H	7599 Points -5%
Geekom XT12 Pro Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, Intel Core i9-12900H	5421 Points -32%
Minisforum Venus Series NAB9 Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, Intel Core i9-12900HK	5407 Points -32%

Unigine Heaven 4.0
Extreme Preset OpenGL
Aoostar GEM10 AMD Radeon 680M, AMD Ryzen 7 6800H	37 fps +7%
Aoostar GEM12 AMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS	34.6 fps
Acemagic AM18 AMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS	34 fps -2%
Acemagic F2A Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU, Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	31.6 fps -9%
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU, Intel Core Ultra 9 185H	29.7 fps -14%
Geekom A8 AMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen 9 8945HS	27.3 fps -21%
Minisforum Venus Series NAB9 Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, Intel Core i9-12900HK	22.3 fps -36%
Geekom XT12 Pro Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, Intel Core i9-12900H	21.8 fps -37%
Extreme Preset DX11
Aoostar GEM12 AMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS	36.3 fps
Acemagic AM18 AMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS	35.3 fps -3%
Aoostar GEM10 AMD Radeon 680M, AMD Ryzen 7 6800H	34.7 fps -4%
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU, Intel Core Ultra 9 185H	33.2 fps -9%
Geekom A8 AMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen 9 8945HS	32.8 fps -10%
Acemagic F2A Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU, Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	32.7 fps -10%
Minisforum Venus Series NAB9 Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, Intel Core i9-12900HK	23.2 fps -36%
Geekom XT12 Pro Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, Intel Core i9-12900H	22.7 fps -37%

Unigine Valley 1.0
1920x1080 Extreme HD DirectX AA:x8
Aoostar GEM12 AMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS	24.5 fps
Acemagic AM18 AMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS	24 fps -2%
Aoostar GEM10 AMD Radeon 680M, AMD Ryzen 7 6800H	23.7 fps -3%
Geekom A8 AMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen 9 8945HS	19.1 fps -22%
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU, Intel Core Ultra 9 185H	18.5 fps -24%
Acemagic F2A Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU, Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	17.1 fps -30%
Minisforum Venus Series NAB9 Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, Intel Core i9-12900HK	13.7 fps -44%
Geekom XT12 Pro Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, Intel Core i9-12900H	13.3 fps -46%
1920x1080 Extreme HD Preset OpenGL AA:x8
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU, Intel Core Ultra 9 185H	32.4 fps +54%
Aoostar GEM10 AMD Radeon 680M, AMD Ryzen 7 6800H	25.5 fps +21%
Aoostar GEM12 AMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS	21 fps
Acemagic AM18 AMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS	20.8 fps -1%
Acemagic F2A Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU, Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	18.3 fps -13%
Geekom A8 AMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen 9 8945HS	15.2 fps -28%
Minisforum Venus Series NAB9 Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, Intel Core i9-12900HK	14.6 fps -30%
Geekom XT12 Pro Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, Intel Core i9-12900H	13.9 fps -34%

Unigine Superposition
1280x720 720p Low
Aoostar GEM12 AMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS	12174 Points
Aoostar GEM10 AMD Radeon 680M, AMD Ryzen 7 6800H	11940 Points -2%
Acemagic AM18 AMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS	11903 Points -2%
Geekom A8 AMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen 9 8945HS	10702 Points -12%
Acemagic F2A Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU, Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	10491 Points -14%
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU, Intel Core Ultra 9 185H	10102 Points -17%
Minisforum Venus Series NAB9 Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, Intel Core i9-12900HK	6129 Points -50%
Geekom XT12 Pro Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, Intel Core i9-12900H	5950 Points -51%
1920x1080 1080p High
Acemagic AM18 AMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS	3631 Points +1%
Aoostar GEM12 AMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS	3592 Points
Acemagic F2A Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU, Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	3391 Points -6%
Geekom A8 AMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen 9 8945HS	3387 Points -6%
Aoostar GEM10 AMD Radeon 680M, AMD Ryzen 7 6800H	3380 Points -6%
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU, Intel Core Ultra 9 185H	3341 Points -7%
Minisforum Venus Series NAB9 Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, Intel Core i9-12900HK	2113 Points -41%
Geekom XT12 Pro Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, Intel Core i9-12900H	2035 Points -43%
1920x1080 1080p Extreme
Acemagic F2A Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU, Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	1920 Points +11%
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU, Intel Core Ultra 9 185H	1812 Points +4%
Acemagic AM18 AMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS	1777 Points +2%
Aoostar GEM12 AMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS	1737 Points
Geekom A8 AMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen 9 8945HS	1585 Points -9%
Aoostar GEM10 AMD Radeon 680M, AMD Ryzen 7 6800H	1424 Points -18%
Minisforum Venus Series NAB9 Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, Intel Core i9-12900HK	1060 Points -39%
Geekom XT12 Pro Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, Intel Core i9-12900H	1042 Points -40%

ComputeMark v2.1
1024x600 Normal, Score
Acemagic AM18 AMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS	9863 Points +4%
Aoostar GEM12 AMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS	9494 Points
Geekom A8 AMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen 9 8945HS	8909 Points -6%
Acemagic F2A Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU, Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	7480 Points -21%
Aoostar GEM10 AMD Radeon 680M, AMD Ryzen 7 6800H	6763 Points -29%
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU, Intel Core Ultra 9 185H	6270 Points -34%
Geekom XT12 Pro Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, Intel Core i9-12900H	3390 Points -64%
Minisforum Venus Series NAB9 Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, Intel Core i9-12900HK	3382 Points -64%
1024x600 Normal, Fluid 3DTex
Geekom A8 AMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen 9 8945HS	492 Points +2%
Aoostar GEM12 AMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS	483 Points
Acemagic AM18 AMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS	471 Points -2%
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU, Intel Core Ultra 9 185H	469 Points -3%
Acemagic F2A Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU, Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	427 Points -12%
Aoostar GEM10 AMD Radeon 680M, AMD Ryzen 7 6800H	427 Points -12%
Geekom XT12 Pro Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, Intel Core i9-12900H	231 Points -52%
Minisforum Venus Series NAB9 Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, Intel Core i9-12900HK	226 Points -53%
1024x600 Normal, Fluid 2DTexArr
Geekom A8 AMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen 9 8945HS	492 Points +2%
Acemagic AM18 AMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS	486 Points +1%
Aoostar GEM12 AMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS	481 Points
Aoostar GEM10 AMD Radeon 680M, AMD Ryzen 7 6800H	468 Points -3%
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU, Intel Core Ultra 9 185H	462 Points -4%
Acemagic F2A Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU, Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	422 Points -12%
Geekom XT12 Pro Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, Intel Core i9-12900H	246 Points -49%
Minisforum Venus Series NAB9 Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, Intel Core i9-12900HK	239 Points -50%
1024x600 Normal, Mandel Vector
Acemagic AM18 AMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS	2589 Points +5%
Aoostar GEM12 AMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS	2477 Points
Geekom A8 AMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen 9 8945HS	2356 Points -5%
Acemagic F2A Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU, Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	1961 Points -21%
Aoostar GEM10 AMD Radeon 680M, AMD Ryzen 7 6800H	1900 Points -23%
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU, Intel Core Ultra 9 185H	1620 Points -35%
Geekom XT12 Pro Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, Intel Core i9-12900H	860 Points -65%
Minisforum Venus Series NAB9 Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, Intel Core i9-12900HK	850 Points -66%
1024x600 Normal, Mandel Scalar
Acemagic AM18 AMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS	2651 Points +5%
Aoostar GEM12 AMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS	2519 Points
Geekom A8 AMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen 9 8945HS	2345 Points -7%
Aoostar GEM10 AMD Radeon 680M, AMD Ryzen 7 6800H	1812 Points -28%
Acemagic F2A Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU, Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	1594 Points -37%
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU, Intel Core Ultra 9 185H	1274 Points -49%
Geekom XT12 Pro Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, Intel Core i9-12900H	872 Points -65%
Minisforum Venus Series NAB9 Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, Intel Core i9-12900HK	866 Points -66%
1024x600 Normal, QJuliaRayTrace
Acemagic AM18 AMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS	3667 Points +4%
Aoostar GEM12 AMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS	3535 Points
Geekom A8 AMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen 9 8945HS	3225 Points -9%
Acemagic F2A Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU, Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	3076 Points -13%
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU, Intel Core Ultra 9 185H	2444 Points -31%
Aoostar GEM10 AMD Radeon 680M, AMD Ryzen 7 6800H	2157 Points -39%
Minisforum Venus Series NAB9 Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, Intel Core i9-12900HK	1201 Points -66%
Geekom XT12 Pro Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, Intel Core i9-12900H	1182 Points -67%

LuxMark v2.0 64Bit
Room GPUs-only
Geekom A8 AMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen 9 8945HS	1173 Samples/s +46%
Acemagic AM18 AMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS	808 Samples/s +1%
Aoostar GEM12 AMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS	801 Samples/s
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU, Intel Core Ultra 9 185H	640 Samples/s -20%
Minisforum Venus Series NAB9 Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, Intel Core i9-12900HK	577 Samples/s -28%
Aoostar GEM10 AMD Radeon 680M, AMD Ryzen 7 6800H	567 Samples/s -29%
Acemagic F2A Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU, Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	549 Samples/s -31%
Sala GPUs-only
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU, Intel Core Ultra 9 185H	2732 Samples/s +83%
Minisforum Venus Series NAB9 Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, Intel Core i9-12900HK	2349 Samples/s +57%
Acemagic F2A Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU, Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	2319 Samples/s +55%
Acemagic AM18 AMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS	1512 Samples/s +1%
Aoostar GEM12 AMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS	1496 Samples/s
Aoostar GEM10 AMD Radeon 680M, AMD Ryzen 7 6800H	1288 Samples/s -14%
Geekom A8 AMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen 9 8945HS	991 Samples/s -34%

Affinity Photo 2 - Combined (Single / Multi GPU)
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU, Intel Core Ultra 9 185H	5308 Points +211%
Acemagic F2A Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU, Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	4928 Points +188%
Minisforum Venus Series NAB9 Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, Intel Core i9-12900HK	4215 Points +147%
Geekom XT12 Pro Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, Intel Core i9-12900H	3830 Points +124%
Aoostar GEM10 AMD Radeon 680M, AMD Ryzen 7 6800H	2339 Points +37%
Aoostar GEM12 AMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS	1709 Points
Geekom A8 AMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen 9 8945HS	1512 Points -12%
Acemagic AM18 AMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS	1371 Points -20%

Photoshop PugetBench - GPU Score
Geekom A8 AMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen 9 8945HS	114.5 Points +11%
Acemagic AM18 AMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS	113 Points +9%
Aoostar GEM12 AMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS	103.4 Points
Acemagic F2A Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU, Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	98 Points -5%
Minisforum Venus Series NAB9 Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, Intel Core i9-12900HK	95.7 Points -7%
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU, Intel Core Ultra 9 185H	92.3 Points -11%
Aoostar GEM10 AMD Radeon 680M, AMD Ryzen 7 6800H	90.6 Points -12%
Geekom XT12 Pro Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, Intel Core i9-12900H	79.4 Points -23%

Premiere Pro PugetBench - GPU 0.9
Acemagic F2A Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU, Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	16.8 Points +47%
Aoostar GEM12 AMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS	11.4 Points
Geekom A8 AMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen 9 8945HS	11.2 Points -2%
Acemagic AM18 AMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS	10.1 Points -11%
Minisforum Venus Series NAB9 Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, Intel Core i9-12900HK	8.2 Points -28%
Geekom XT12 Pro Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, Intel Core i9-12900H	7.6 Points -33%
Aoostar GEM10 AMD Radeon 680M, AMD Ryzen 7 6800H	7 Points -39%
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU, Intel Core Ultra 9 185H	6.8 Points -40%

	Aoostar GEM12, AMD Radeon 780M R7 8845HS	Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti, Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU Ultra 9 185H	Geekom A8, AMD Radeon 780M R9 8945HS	Acemagic F2A, Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU Ultra 7 155H	Geekom XT12 Pro, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs i9-12900H	Minisforum Venus Series NAB9, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs i9-12900HK	Acemagic AM18, AMD Radeon 780M R7 7840HS	Aoostar GEM10, AMD Radeon 680M R7 6800H	Average of class Mini PC
SPECviewperf 12		-52%	-1%	-53%	-60%	-60%	6%	38%	-21%
1900x1060 3ds Max (3dsmax-05)	85.7	49.7 -42%	87.4 2%	49.8 -42%	40.1 -53%	40.2 -53%	83.7 -2%	90.8 6%	75.4 ?(13.6 - 295, n=63, last 2 years) -12%
1900x1060 Catia (catia-04)	86.6	51.3 -41%	86.4 0%	48.2 -44%	37.1 -57%	35.9 -59%	88.5 2%	91.2 5%	64.2 ?(10.9 - 251, n=63, last 2 years) -26%
1900x1060 Creo (creo-01)	53.3	22.7 -57%	55.1 3%	23.1 -57%	26.9 -50%	27.7 -48%	56.3 6%	56.7 6%	37 ?(4.03 - 117, n=63, last 2 years) -31%
1900x1060 Energy (energy-01)	18.4	0.67 -96%	19 3%	0.91 -95%	0.4 -98%	0.4 -98%	21.3 16%	70.6 284%	13.3 ?(0.15 - 80.4, n=57, last 2 years) -28%
1900x1060 Maya (maya-04)	67.3	58 -14%	75 11%	54.9 -18%	38.3 -43%	39.8 -41%	71.5 6%	75.7 12%	64 ?(11.4 - 226, n=63, last 2 years) -5%
1900x1060 Medical (medical-01)	51.4	15.9 -69%	47.7 -7%	16.9 -67%	11.8 -77%	12.2 -76%	60.5 18%	49.3 -4%	28.5 ?(2.53 - 136, n=60, last 2 years) -45%
1900x1060 Showcase (showcase-01)	30.3	19.9 -34%	25.8 -15%	18.2 -40%	16.6 -45%	17.4 -43%	30 -1%	28.2 -7%	35.3 ?(5.71 - 133, n=63, last 2 years) 17%
1900x1060 Solidworks (sw-03)	114	43 -62%	106 -7%	42.7 -63%	45.3 -60%	47.3 -59%	116 2%	120 5%	72.4 ?(20.9 - 243, n=63, last 2 years) -36%
SPECviewperf 13		-53%	-3%	-53%	-59%	-59%	4%	-15%	-18%
3ds Max (3dsmax-06)	82.4	48.5 -41%	85.8 4%	46.4 -44%	40.1 -51%	39.9 -52%	83.1 1%	63.5 -23%	74.8 ?(13.4 - 294, n=63, last 2 years) -9%
Catia (catia-05)	124	76.8 -38%	126 2%	71.6 -42%	51.3 -59%	51.6 -58%	129 4%	93.8 -24%	91.4 ?(15.6 - 381, n=62, last 2 years) -26%
Creo (creo-02)	90.7	29.3 -68%	92.8 2%	29.6 -67%	41.1 -55%	40.2 -56%	92 1%	64.8 -29%	73 ?(11.6 - 275, n=63, last 2 years) -20%
Energy (energy-02)	22.2	5.27 -76%	22.6 2%	5.69 -74%	4.5 -80%	4.39 -80%	24.1 9%	14.1 -36%	17.7 ?(0.92 - 310, n=60, last 2 years) -20%
Maya (maya-05)	109	62.5 -43%	103 -6%	59.5 -45%	47.5 -56%	48.3 -56%	108 -1%	113 4%	97.5 ?(15.9 - 340, n=63, last 2 years) -11%
Medical (medical-02)	70.5	25 -65%	69.2 -2%	29.7 -58%	14.4 -80%	14.4 -80%	79 12%	61.8 -12%	37.6 ?(2.28 - 198, n=63, last 2 years) -47%
Showcase (showcase-02)	29.9	19.9 -33%	24.2 -19%	18.2 -39%	17.3 -42%	17.3 -42%	29.9 0%	27.5 -8%	35 ?(5.69 - 133, n=63, last 2 years) 17%
Solidworks (sw-04)	104	45.6 -56%	97.3 -6%	44.8 -57%	57.1 -45%	57.4 -45%	107 3%	111 7%	76.6 ?(27.4 - 223, n=63, last 2 years) -26%
SPECviewperf 2020		-52%	11%	-56%	-67%	-66%	-3%	-9%	-16%
3840x2160 Medical (medical-03)	11.2	4.23 -62%	10.9 -3%	5.05 -55%	3.49 -69%	3.48 -69%	13 16%	10.7 -4%	7.85 ?(0.78 - 30.8, n=66, last 2 years) -30%
3840x2160 Energy (energy-03)	19.9	6.03 -70%	31 56%	4.61 -77%	3.05 -85%	3 -85%	14.2 -29%	10.6 -47%	11.3 ?(0.52 - 47.9, n=66, last 2 years) -43%
3840x2160 Creo (creo-03)	33.4	18.5 -45%	35.6 7%	17.9 -46%	14.8 -56%	15.1 -55%	31.2 -7%	32 -4%	30.7 ?(7.73 - 97.5, n=66, last 2 years) -8%
3840x2160 CATIA (catia-06)	23.2	11.1 -52%	24.6 6%	10 -57%	7.78 -66%	8.08 -65%	24.7 6%	22.8 -2%	18.6 ?(4.61 - 64.1, n=65, last 2 years) -20%
3840x2160 3ds Max (3dsmax-07)	20.4	14.9 -27%	21 3%	12.9 -37%	9.69 -52%	9.78 -52%	20.7 1%	18.9 -7%	22.5 ?(5.53 - 87.5, n=66, last 2 years) 10%
3840x2160 Siemens NX (snx-04)	64.1	6.24 -90%	65.9 3%	5.7 -91%	6.29 -90%	6.67 -90%	61.1 -5%	61.4 -4%	37.2 ?(2.25 - 224, n=64, last 2 years) -42%
3840x2160 Maya (maya-06)	47.7	37.7 -21%	50.1 5%	35.4 -26%	23.9 -50%	24.4 -49%	46.7 -2%	49.7 4%	58.9 ?(12.2 - 223, n=66, last 2 years) 23%
Total Average (Program / Settings)		-52% / -52%	2% / 2%	-54% / -54%	-62% / -62%	-62% / -61%	2% / 2%	5% / 5%	-18% / -18%

3DMark 05 Standard		55130 pontos
3DMark 06 Standard Score		45449 pontos
3DMark Vantage P Result		44358 pontos
3DMark 11 Performance		13249 pontos
3DMark Ice Storm Standard Score		162597 pontos
3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score		35738 pontos
3DMark Fire Strike Score		7353 pontos
3DMark Fire Strike Extreme Score		3940 pontos
3DMark Time Spy Score		3199 pontos
3DMark Steel Nomad Score		502 pontos
3DMark Steel Nomad Light Score		2806 pontos
3DMark Steel Nomad Light Unlimited Score		2827 pontos
Ajuda

... comparado com

Desempenho em jogos

O Aoostar GEM12 oferece AMD Radeon 780M - uma iGPU muito potente. Isso proporciona um bom desempenho em 3D, o que é suficiente para jogar alguns jogos. No entanto, as limitações em termos de qualidade de detalhes devem ser aceitas ocasionalmente para que sejam alcançadas boas taxas de quadros jogáveis.

Para obter uma visão geral detalhada do desempenho da iGPU em comparação com outras placas de vídeo, consulte nossa Lista de jogos da GPU.

The Witcher 3
1024x768 Low Graphics & Postprocessing
Geekom A8 Radeon 780M, R9 8945HS, Acer N5000	153.5 (7.45^min, 37.4^P0.1, 101.7^P1) fps +4%
Acemagic AM18 Radeon 780M, R7 7840HS, Rayson RS512GSSD710 512 GB PCIe 4.0 NVMe	148.9 (7.41^min, 12.7^P0.1, 96.9^P1) fps +1%
Aoostar GEM12 Radeon 780M, R7 8845HS, Crucial P3 Plus CT1000P3PSSD8	147.5 (7.32^min, 34.2^P0.1, 83.2^P1) fps
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti Arc 8-Core, Ultra 9 185H, Kingston OM8PGP41024Q-A0	140.2 (26.9^min, 57.9^P0.1, 101.9^P1) fps -5%
Acemagic F2A Arc 8-Core, Ultra 7 155H, Kingston OM8SEP1024Q-A0	126 (36.4^min, 62.1^P0.1, 99.1^P1) fps -15%
Aoostar GEM10 Radeon 680M, R7 6800H, BIWIN CE980Y28900-1TB	119.6 (6.3^min, 25^P0.1, 75.7^P1) fps -19%
Minisforum Venus Series NAB9 Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i9-12900HK, Kingston OM3PGP41024P-A0	98.1 (22.4^min, 35.3^P0.1, 58.9^P1) fps -33%
Geekom XT12 Pro Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i9-12900H, Lexar SSD NM7A1 1TB	87.7 (4.87^min, 27.9^P0.1, 53^P1) fps -41%
1920x1080 High Graphics & Postprocessing (Nvidia HairWorks Off)
Acemagic AM18 Radeon 780M, R7 7840HS, Rayson RS512GSSD710 512 GB PCIe 4.0 NVMe	49.3 (25.6^min, 36.7^P0.1, 40.9^P1) fps 0%
Aoostar GEM12 Radeon 780M, R7 8845HS, Crucial P3 Plus CT1000P3PSSD8	49.1 (14.6^min, 36.4^P0.1, 40.8^P1) fps
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti Arc 8-Core, Ultra 9 185H, Kingston OM8PGP41024Q-A0	46.8 (28.7^min, 32.6^P0.1, 37.1^P1) fps -5%
Geekom A8 Radeon 780M, R9 8945HS, Acer N5000	46.2 (14.1^min, 14.7^P0.1, 16^P1) fps -6%
Acemagic F2A Arc 8-Core, Ultra 7 155H, Kingston OM8SEP1024Q-A0	44.8 (26.8^min, 32^P0.1, 37.7^P1) fps -9%
Aoostar GEM10 Radeon 680M, R7 6800H, BIWIN CE980Y28900-1TB	41.7 (8.33^min, 17.3^P0.1, 31.2^P1) fps -15%
Minisforum Venus Series NAB9 Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i9-12900HK, Kingston OM3PGP41024P-A0	32.2 (15.4^min, 16^P0.1, 18.1^P1) fps -34%
Geekom XT12 Pro Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i9-12900H, Lexar SSD NM7A1 1TB	31.4 (16^min, 16.2^P0.1, 17.4^P1) fps -36%

Borderlands 3
1280x720 Very Low Overall Quality (DX11)
Geekom A8 Radeon 780M, R9 8945HS, Acer N5000	102.5 fps +2%
Acemagic AM18 Radeon 780M, R7 7840HS, Rayson RS512GSSD710 512 GB PCIe 4.0 NVMe	101.9 fps +2%
Aoostar GEM12 Radeon 780M, R7 8845HS, Crucial P3 Plus CT1000P3PSSD8	100.3 fps
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti Arc 8-Core, Ultra 9 185H, Kingston OM8PGP41024Q-A0	93 fps -7%
Aoostar GEM10 Radeon 680M, R7 6800H, BIWIN CE980Y28900-1TB	83.6 fps -17%
Acemagic F2A Arc 8-Core, Ultra 7 155H, Kingston OM8SEP1024Q-A0	68.5 fps -32%
Minisforum Venus Series NAB9 Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i9-12900HK, Kingston OM3PGP41024P-A0	57.2 fps -43%
Geekom XT12 Pro Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i9-12900H, Lexar SSD NM7A1 1TB	49.2 fps -51%
1920x1080 High Overall Quality (DX11)
Acemagic AM18 Radeon 780M, R7 7840HS, Rayson RS512GSSD710 512 GB PCIe 4.0 NVMe	32.7 fps +3%
Aoostar GEM12 Radeon 780M, R7 8845HS, Crucial P3 Plus CT1000P3PSSD8	31.7 fps
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti Arc 8-Core, Ultra 9 185H, Kingston OM8PGP41024Q-A0	28.7 fps -9%
Geekom A8 Radeon 780M, R9 8945HS, Acer N5000	27.8 fps -12%
Acemagic F2A Arc 8-Core, Ultra 7 155H, Kingston OM8SEP1024Q-A0	27.7 fps -13%
Aoostar GEM10 Radeon 680M, R7 6800H, BIWIN CE980Y28900-1TB	26.4 fps -17%
Minisforum Venus Series NAB9 Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i9-12900HK, Kingston OM3PGP41024P-A0	16.1 fps -49%
Geekom XT12 Pro Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i9-12900H, Lexar SSD NM7A1 1TB	14.9 fps -53%

GTA V
1024x768 Lowest Settings possible
Geekom A8 Radeon 780M, R9 8945HS, Acer N5000	166.9 (5.05^min, 125^P1) fps +1%
Acemagic AM18 Radeon 780M, R7 7840HS, Rayson RS512GSSD710 512 GB PCIe 4.0 NVMe	165.1 (4.54^min, 100^P1) fps 0%
Aoostar GEM12 Radeon 780M, R7 8845HS, Crucial P3 Plus CT1000P3PSSD8	165.1 (4.83^min, 125^P1) fps
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti Arc 8-Core, Ultra 9 185H, Kingston OM8PGP41024Q-A0	163.6 (4.63^min, 111.1^P1) fps -1%
Acemagic F2A Arc 8-Core, Ultra 7 155H, Kingston OM8SEP1024Q-A0	161 (4.76^min, 100^P1) fps -2%
Aoostar GEM10 Radeon 680M, R7 6800H, BIWIN CE980Y28900-1TB	145.3 (5.31^min, 100^P1) fps -12%
Minisforum Venus Series NAB9 Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i9-12900HK, Kingston OM3PGP41024P-A0	120.8 (22.9^min, 83.3^P1) fps -27%
1920x1080 High/On (Advanced Graphics Off) AA:2xMSAA + FX AF:8x
Acemagic AM18 Radeon 780M, R7 7840HS, Rayson RS512GSSD710 512 GB PCIe 4.0 NVMe	66.7 (4.68^min, 45.5^P1) fps +2%
Aoostar GEM12 Radeon 780M, R7 8845HS, Crucial P3 Plus CT1000P3PSSD8	65.3 (4.57^min, 45.5^P1) fps
Geekom A8 Radeon 780M, R9 8945HS, Acer N5000	64.7 (4.56^min, 31.3^P1) fps -1%
Aoostar GEM10 Radeon 680M, R7 6800H, BIWIN CE980Y28900-1TB	53.9 (3.82^min, 38.5^P1) fps -17%
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti Arc 8-Core, Ultra 9 185H, Kingston OM8PGP41024Q-A0	41.2 (3.12^min, 30.3^P1) fps -37%
Acemagic F2A Arc 8-Core, Ultra 7 155H, Kingston OM8SEP1024Q-A0	31.3 (2.94^min, 22.7^P1) fps -52%
Minisforum Venus Series NAB9 Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i9-12900HK, Kingston OM3PGP41024P-A0	20.3 (10.5^min, 16.1^P1) fps -69%

Far Cry 5
1280x720 Low Preset AA:T
Geekom A8 Radeon 780M, R9 8945HS, Acer N5000	88 (77^min) fps +5%
Acemagic AM18 Radeon 780M, R7 7840HS, Rayson RS512GSSD710 512 GB PCIe 4.0 NVMe	84 (74^min) fps 0%
Aoostar GEM12 Radeon 780M, R7 8845HS, Crucial P3 Plus CT1000P3PSSD8	84 (73^min) fps
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti Arc 8-Core, Ultra 9 185H, Kingston OM8PGP41024Q-A0	79 (39^min) fps -6%
Aoostar GEM10 Radeon 680M, R7 6800H, BIWIN CE980Y28900-1TB	72 (63^min) fps -14%
Acemagic F2A Arc 8-Core, Ultra 7 155H, Kingston OM8SEP1024Q-A0	69 (25^min) fps -18%
Geekom XT12 Pro Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i9-12900H, Lexar SSD NM7A1 1TB	50 (45^min) fps -40%
1920x1080 High Preset AA:T
Acemagic AM18 Radeon 780M, R7 7840HS, Rayson RS512GSSD710 512 GB PCIe 4.0 NVMe	46 (41^min) fps +2%
Aoostar GEM12 Radeon 780M, R7 8845HS, Crucial P3 Plus CT1000P3PSSD8	45 (39^min) fps
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti Arc 8-Core, Ultra 9 185H, Kingston OM8PGP41024Q-A0	42 (34^min) fps -7%
Geekom A8 Radeon 780M, R9 8945HS, Acer N5000	42 (33^min) fps -7%
Aoostar GEM10 Radeon 680M, R7 6800H, BIWIN CE980Y28900-1TB	38 (31^min) fps -16%
Acemagic F2A Arc 8-Core, Ultra 7 155H, Kingston OM8SEP1024Q-A0	37 (30^min) fps -18%
Geekom XT12 Pro Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i9-12900H, Lexar SSD NM7A1 1TB	23 (21^min) fps -49%

Far Cry New Dawn
1280x720 Low Preset
Geekom A8 Radeon 780M, R9 8945HS, Acer N5000	76 (58^min) fps +6%
Acemagic AM18 Radeon 780M, R7 7840HS, Rayson RS512GSSD710 512 GB PCIe 4.0 NVMe	74 (48^min) fps +3%
Aoostar GEM12 Radeon 780M, R7 8845HS, Crucial P3 Plus CT1000P3PSSD8	72 (54^min) fps
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti Arc 8-Core, Ultra 9 185H, Kingston OM8PGP41024Q-A0	69 (2^min) fps -4%
Acemagic F2A Arc 8-Core, Ultra 7 155H, Kingston OM8SEP1024Q-A0	65 (11^min) fps -10%
Aoostar GEM10 Radeon 680M, R7 6800H, BIWIN CE980Y28900-1TB	62 (50^min) fps -14%
Geekom XT12 Pro Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i9-12900H, Lexar SSD NM7A1 1TB	47 (31^min) fps -35%
1920x1080 High Preset
Acemagic AM18 Radeon 780M, R7 7840HS, Rayson RS512GSSD710 512 GB PCIe 4.0 NVMe	44 (35^min) fps +7%
Geekom A8 Radeon 780M, R9 8945HS, Acer N5000	44 (37^min) fps +7%
Aoostar GEM12 Radeon 780M, R7 8845HS, Crucial P3 Plus CT1000P3PSSD8	41 (32^min) fps
Aoostar GEM10 Radeon 680M, R7 6800H, BIWIN CE980Y28900-1TB	40 (33^min) fps -2%
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti Arc 8-Core, Ultra 9 185H, Kingston OM8PGP41024Q-A0	39 (25^min) fps -5%
Acemagic F2A Arc 8-Core, Ultra 7 155H, Kingston OM8SEP1024Q-A0	37 (25^min) fps -10%
Geekom XT12 Pro Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i9-12900H, Lexar SSD NM7A1 1TB	24 (18^min) fps -41%

Dota 2 Reborn
1280x720 min (0/3) fastest
Acemagic AM18 Radeon 780M, R7 7840HS, Rayson RS512GSSD710 512 GB PCIe 4.0 NVMe	163.1 (143^min) fps +7%
Geekom A8 Radeon 780M, R9 8945HS, Acer N5000	159.7 (142.1^min) fps +5%
Aoostar GEM12 Radeon 780M, R7 8845HS, Crucial P3 Plus CT1000P3PSSD8	152.7 (134.2^min) fps
Aoostar GEM10 Radeon 680M, R7 6800H, BIWIN CE980Y28900-1TB	124 (8.9^min) fps -19%
Minisforum Venus Series NAB9 Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i9-12900HK, Kingston OM3PGP41024P-A0	119.5 (88.5^min) fps -22%
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti Arc 8-Core, Ultra 9 185H, Kingston OM8PGP41024Q-A0	106.5 (61^min) fps -30%
Geekom XT12 Pro Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i9-12900H, Lexar SSD NM7A1 1TB	106.3 (81.7^min) fps -30%
Acemagic F2A Arc 8-Core, Ultra 7 155H, Kingston OM8SEP1024Q-A0	103.2 (59.8^min) fps -32%
1920x1080 high (2/3)
Geekom A8 Radeon 780M, R9 8945HS, Acer N5000	88.3 (74.1^min) fps +2%
Aoostar GEM12 Radeon 780M, R7 8845HS, Crucial P3 Plus CT1000P3PSSD8	86.6 (72.2^min) fps
Acemagic AM18 Radeon 780M, R7 7840HS, Rayson RS512GSSD710 512 GB PCIe 4.0 NVMe	82.9 (69.1^min) fps -4%
Aoostar GEM10 Radeon 680M, R7 6800H, BIWIN CE980Y28900-1TB	81.6 (72.3^min) fps -6%
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti Arc 8-Core, Ultra 9 185H, Kingston OM8PGP41024Q-A0	79 (48.2^min) fps -9%
Acemagic F2A Arc 8-Core, Ultra 7 155H, Kingston OM8SEP1024Q-A0	77.3 (52.5^min) fps -11%
Minisforum Venus Series NAB9 Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i9-12900HK, Kingston OM3PGP41024P-A0	67 (60.7^min) fps -23%
Geekom XT12 Pro Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i9-12900H, Lexar SSD NM7A1 1TB	61.3 (54.1^min) fps -29%

F1 2020
1280x720 Ultra Low Preset
Geekom A8 Radeon 780M, R9 8945HS, Acer N5000	197.3 (171^min) fps +7%
Acemagic AM18 Radeon 780M, R7 7840HS, Rayson RS512GSSD710 512 GB PCIe 4.0 NVMe	194.4 (178^min) fps +5%
Aoostar GEM12 Radeon 780M, R7 8845HS, Crucial P3 Plus CT1000P3PSSD8	184.7 (163^min) fps
Aoostar GEM10 Radeon 680M, R7 6800H, BIWIN CE980Y28900-1TB	164 (150^min) fps -11%
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti Arc 8-Core, Ultra 9 185H, Kingston OM8PGP41024Q-A0	139.1 (126^min) fps -25%
Minisforum Venus Series NAB9 Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i9-12900HK, Kingston OM3PGP41024P-A0	88.7 (79^min) fps -52%
Geekom XT12 Pro Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i9-12900H, Lexar SSD NM7A1 1TB	84.5 (74^min) fps -54%
1920x1080 High Preset AA:T AF:16x
Acemagic AM18 Radeon 780M, R7 7840HS, Rayson RS512GSSD710 512 GB PCIe 4.0 NVMe	79.5 (67^min) fps +8%
Geekom A8 Radeon 780M, R9 8945HS, Acer N5000	76.4 (67^min) fps +4%
Aoostar GEM12 Radeon 780M, R7 8845HS, Crucial P3 Plus CT1000P3PSSD8	73.6 (62^min) fps
Aoostar GEM10 Radeon 680M, R7 6800H, BIWIN CE980Y28900-1TB	64.5 (51^min) fps -12%
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti Arc 8-Core, Ultra 9 185H, Kingston OM8PGP41024Q-A0	60.5 (51^min) fps -18%
Minisforum Venus Series NAB9 Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i9-12900HK, Kingston OM3PGP41024P-A0	35.6 (30^min) fps -52%
Geekom XT12 Pro Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i9-12900H, Lexar SSD NM7A1 1TB	34.2 (29^min) fps -54%

GRID Legends
1280x720 Low Preset
Geekom A8 Radeon 780M, R9 8945HS, Acer N5000	141.4 (2.69^min) fps +4%
Aoostar GEM12 Radeon 780M, R7 8845HS, Crucial P3 Plus CT1000P3PSSD8	136.2 (6.48^min) fps
Acemagic AM18 Radeon 780M, R7 7840HS, Rayson RS512GSSD710 512 GB PCIe 4.0 NVMe	136.1 (8.29^min) fps 0%
Aoostar GEM10 Radeon 680M, R7 6800H, BIWIN CE980Y28900-1TB	116.5 (34.8^min) fps -14%
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti Arc 8-Core, Ultra 9 185H, Kingston OM8PGP41024Q-A0	86.6 (7.26^min) fps -36%
Acemagic F2A Arc 8-Core, Ultra 7 155H, Kingston OM8SEP1024Q-A0	80 (35^min) fps -41%
1920x1080 High Preset
Acemagic AM18 Radeon 780M, R7 7840HS, Rayson RS512GSSD710 512 GB PCIe 4.0 NVMe	62.5 (1.931^min) fps 0%
Aoostar GEM12 Radeon 780M, R7 8845HS, Crucial P3 Plus CT1000P3PSSD8	62.3 (30.5^min) fps
Geekom A8 Radeon 780M, R9 8945HS, Acer N5000	56.4 (21.6^min) fps -9%
Aoostar GEM10 Radeon 680M, R7 6800H, BIWIN CE980Y28900-1TB	53.3 (24.4^min) fps -14%
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti Arc 8-Core, Ultra 9 185H, Kingston OM8PGP41024Q-A0	44.8 (29.3^min) fps -28%
Acemagic F2A Arc 8-Core, Ultra 7 155H, Kingston OM8SEP1024Q-A0	41.7 (24^min) fps -33%

Shadow of the Tomb Raider
1280x720 Lowest Preset
Acemagic F2A Arc 8-Core, Ultra 7 155H, Kingston OM8SEP1024Q-A0	131.4 fps +27%
Aoostar GEM12 Radeon 780M, R7 8845HS, Crucial P3 Plus CT1000P3PSSD8	103.8 fps
Acemagic AM18 Radeon 780M, R7 7840HS, Rayson RS512GSSD710 512 GB PCIe 4.0 NVMe	101.2 fps -3%
Aoostar GEM10 Radeon 680M, R7 6800H, BIWIN CE980Y28900-1TB	91.3 fps -12%
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti Arc 8-Core, Ultra 9 185H, Kingston OM8PGP41024Q-A0	79.3 fps -24%
Geekom A8 Radeon 780M, R9 8945HS, Acer N5000	65.9 fps -37%
Geekom XT12 Pro Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i9-12900H, Lexar SSD NM7A1 1TB	39.6 fps -62%
1920x1080 High Preset AA:SM
Acemagic F2A Arc 8-Core, Ultra 7 155H, Kingston OM8SEP1024Q-A0	49.5 fps +25%
Acemagic AM18 Radeon 780M, R7 7840HS, Rayson RS512GSSD710 512 GB PCIe 4.0 NVMe	40.3 fps +2%
Aoostar GEM12 Radeon 780M, R7 8845HS, Crucial P3 Plus CT1000P3PSSD8	39.5 fps
Aoostar GEM10 Radeon 680M, R7 6800H, BIWIN CE980Y28900-1TB	36.9 fps -7%
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti Arc 8-Core, Ultra 9 185H, Kingston OM8PGP41024Q-A0	35.8 fps -9%
Geekom A8 Radeon 780M, R9 8945HS, Acer N5000	23.4 fps -41%
Geekom XT12 Pro Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i9-12900H, Lexar SSD NM7A1 1TB	18.8 fps -52%

Cyberpunk 2077 2.1 Phantom Liberty
1920x1080 Low Preset (FSR off)
Acemagic AM18 Radeon 780M, R7 7840HS, Rayson RS512GSSD710 512 GB PCIe 4.0 NVMe	45.4 (38.4^min) fps +7%
Geekom A8 Radeon 780M, R9 8945HS, Acer N5000	44 (37.6^min) fps +4%
Aoostar GEM12 Radeon 780M, R7 8845HS, Crucial P3 Plus CT1000P3PSSD8	42.4 (35.7^min) fps
Aoostar GEM10 Radeon 680M, R7 6800H, BIWIN CE980Y28900-1TB	34.8 (29.9^min) fps -18%
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti Arc 8-Core, Ultra 9 185H, Kingston OM8PGP41024Q-A0	34.3 (29.1^min) fps -19%
Acemagic F2A Arc 8-Core, Ultra 7 155H, Kingston OM8SEP1024Q-A0	29.5 (24.1^min) fps -30%
Minisforum Venus Series NAB9 Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i9-12900HK, Kingston OM3PGP41024P-A0	18.2 (14.1^min) fps -57%
Geekom XT12 Pro Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i9-12900H, Lexar SSD NM7A1 1TB	16.4 (13.6^min) fps -61%
1920x1080 High Preset (FSR off)
Acemagic AM18 Radeon 780M, R7 7840HS, Rayson RS512GSSD710 512 GB PCIe 4.0 NVMe	27.8 (23.7^min) fps +6%
Aoostar GEM12 Radeon 780M, R7 8845HS, Crucial P3 Plus CT1000P3PSSD8	26.3 (22.2^min) fps
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti Arc 8-Core, Ultra 9 185H, Kingston OM8PGP41024Q-A0	24 (20.6^min) fps -9%
Geekom A8 Radeon 780M, R9 8945HS, Acer N5000	22.4 (15.6^min) fps -15%
Aoostar GEM10 Radeon 680M, R7 6800H, BIWIN CE980Y28900-1TB	21.3 (18.4^min) fps -19%
Acemagic F2A Arc 8-Core, Ultra 7 155H, Kingston OM8SEP1024Q-A0	20.4 (13.8^min) fps -22%
Minisforum Venus Series NAB9 Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i9-12900HK, Kingston OM3PGP41024P-A0	12.2 (10.3^min) fps -54%
Geekom XT12 Pro Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i9-12900H, Lexar SSD NM7A1 1TB	11.5 (10^min) fps -56%

Cyberpunk 2077 FPS chart

Aoostar GEM12 R7 8845HS, Radeon 780M: Ø21.7 (20.1-23.3)

Aoostar GEM10 R7 6800H, Radeon 680M: Ø17 (13-17.6)

	baixo	média	alto	ultra
GTA V (2015)	165.1	154.8	65.3	26.8
The Witcher 3 (2015)	147.5	95.3	49.1	31.6
Dota 2 Reborn (2015)	152.7	123.3	86.6	80.2
Final Fantasy XV Benchmark (2018)	77.9	38.3	28.1
X-Plane 11.11 (2018)	62.6	44.9	38.1
Far Cry 5 (2018)	84	48	45	42
Strange Brigade (2018)	166.8	68	57.3	49.3
Shadow of the Tomb Raider (2018)	103.8	43.3	39.5	33.9
Far Cry New Dawn (2019)	72	43	41	38
Metro Exodus (2019)	86.9	37	27.9	23
Total War: Three Kingdoms (2019)	145.3	60.6	60.6	51.2
Borderlands 3 (2019)	100.3	48.6	31.7	25.3
F1 2020 (2020)	184.7	94.7	73.6	52.4
F1 2021 (2021)	207	105.5	79.9	34.6
God of War (2022)	42.3	34.1	27.2	18.3
GRID Legends (2022)	105.7	82.3	62.3	49.4
Tiny Tina's Wonderlands (2022)	65.8	49.1	34.5	28.1
F1 22 (2022)	94.9	82.7	61.5	17.6
F1 23 (2023)	89.8	79	57.8	13.9
Baldur's Gate 3 (2023)	38.6	30	24.7	24.6
Cyberpunk 2077 2.1 Phantom Liberty (2023)	42.4	32.9	26.3	23.3
Total War Pharaoh (2023)	89.9	75.6	61	55.2
Prince of Persia The Lost Crown (2024)		173.5	134.9	128.9

Aoostar GEM12 com a GPD G1 eGPU na verificação de desempenho

A Aoostar instala uma interface OCuLink no GEM12, que está disponível principalmente para o uso de placas gráficas externas. O USB4 também está disponível, embora a largura de banda da conexão OCuLink seja melhor e permita cerca de 10% a mais de desempenho 3D. Testamos uma vez o desempenho em conjunto com o GPD G1 (AMD Radeon RX 7600M XT) e executamos alguns benchmarks sintéticos e de jogos.

O desempenho em conjunto com a GPD G1 eGPU é melhor do que o de todos os outros dispositivos que testamos nessa combinação até agora. A diferença de desempenho em comparação com o Aoostar GEM10 ou o Minisforum AtomMan x7 Ti é insignificante. Muitos jogos podem agora ser desfrutados em alta qualidade.

Performance Rating - Percent
Aoostar GEM12 (GPD G1 Radeon RX 7600M XT @OCuLink) AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS	99.4 pt
Aoostar GEM10 (GPD G1 Radeon RX 7600M XT @OCuLink) AMD Ryzen 7 6800H	98.7 pt
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti (GPD G1 Radeon RX 7600M XT @OCuLink) Intel Core Ultra 9 185H	96.6 pt
Geekom A8 (GPD G1 Radeon RX 7600M XT @USB4) AMD Ryzen 9 8945HS	88.7 pt
Aoostar GOD77 (GPD G1 Radeon RX 7600M XT @USB4) AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS	83.6 pt

3DMark 11 - 1280x720 Performance GPU
Aoostar GEM12 (GPD G1 Radeon RX 7600M XT @OCuLink) AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS	42102 Points +214%
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti (GPD G1 Radeon RX 7600M XT @OCuLink) Intel Core Ultra 9 185H	41824 Points +212%
Aoostar GEM10 (GPD G1 Radeon RX 7600M XT @OCuLink) AMD Ryzen 7 6800H	41706 Points +211%
Geekom A8 (GPD G1 Radeon RX 7600M XT @USB4) AMD Ryzen 9 8945HS	33843 Points +152%
Aoostar GOD77 (GPD G1 Radeon RX 7600M XT @USB4) AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS	27060 Points +102%
	13410 Points

3DMark
2560x1440 Time Spy Graphics
Aoostar GEM10 (GPD G1 Radeon RX 7600M XT @OCuLink) AMD Ryzen 7 6800H	10237 Points +260%
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti (GPD G1 Radeon RX 7600M XT @OCuLink) Intel Core Ultra 9 185H	10204 Points +259%
Aoostar GEM12 (GPD G1 Radeon RX 7600M XT @OCuLink) AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS	10195 Points +258%
Geekom A8 (GPD G1 Radeon RX 7600M XT @USB4) AMD Ryzen 9 8945HS	9734 Points +242%
Aoostar GOD77 (GPD G1 Radeon RX 7600M XT @USB4) AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS	9555 Points +236%
	2846 Points
1920x1080 Fire Strike Graphics
Aoostar GEM10 (GPD G1 Radeon RX 7600M XT @OCuLink) AMD Ryzen 7 6800H	29444 Points +268%
Aoostar GOD77 (GPD G1 Radeon RX 7600M XT @USB4) AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS	29101 Points +263%
Aoostar GEM12 (GPD G1 Radeon RX 7600M XT @OCuLink) AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS	29080 Points +263%
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti (GPD G1 Radeon RX 7600M XT @OCuLink) Intel Core Ultra 9 185H	29015 Points +262%
Geekom A8 (GPD G1 Radeon RX 7600M XT @USB4) AMD Ryzen 9 8945HS	28653 Points +258%
	8007 Points
3840x2160 Fire Strike Ultra Graphics
Aoostar GEM10 (GPD G1 Radeon RX 7600M XT @OCuLink) AMD Ryzen 7 6800H	6805 Points +218%
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti (GPD G1 Radeon RX 7600M XT @OCuLink) Intel Core Ultra 9 185H	6784 Points +217%
Aoostar GEM12 (GPD G1 Radeon RX 7600M XT @OCuLink) AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS	6754 Points +216%
Aoostar GOD77 (GPD G1 Radeon RX 7600M XT @USB4) AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS	6738 Points +215%
Geekom A8 (GPD G1 Radeon RX 7600M XT @USB4) AMD Ryzen 9 8945HS	6704 Points +214%
	2138 Points

Unigine Superposition
1280x720 720p Low
Aoostar GEM12 (GPD G1 Radeon RX 7600M XT @OCuLink) AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS	27759 Points +128%
Aoostar GEM10 (GPD G1 Radeon RX 7600M XT @OCuLink) AMD Ryzen 7 6800H	24191 Points +99%
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti (GPD G1 Radeon RX 7600M XT @OCuLink) Intel Core Ultra 9 185H	19596 Points +61%
	12174 Points
Geekom A8 (GPD G1 Radeon RX 7600M XT @USB4) AMD Ryzen 9 8945HS	6849 Points -44%
Aoostar GOD77 (GPD G1 Radeon RX 7600M XT @USB4) AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS	5014 Points -59%
1920x1080 1080p High
Aoostar GEM10 (GPD G1 Radeon RX 7600M XT @OCuLink) AMD Ryzen 7 6800H	12860 Points +258%
Aoostar GEM12 (GPD G1 Radeon RX 7600M XT @OCuLink) AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS	12816 Points +257%
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti (GPD G1 Radeon RX 7600M XT @OCuLink) Intel Core Ultra 9 185H	12194 Points +239%
Geekom A8 (GPD G1 Radeon RX 7600M XT @USB4) AMD Ryzen 9 8945HS	7660 Points +113%
Aoostar GOD77 (GPD G1 Radeon RX 7600M XT @USB4) AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS	5621 Points +56%
	3592 Points
1920x1080 1080p Extreme
Aoostar GEM10 (GPD G1 Radeon RX 7600M XT @OCuLink) AMD Ryzen 7 6800H	5858 Points +237%
Aoostar GEM12 (GPD G1 Radeon RX 7600M XT @OCuLink) AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS	5829 Points +236%
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti (GPD G1 Radeon RX 7600M XT @OCuLink) Intel Core Ultra 9 185H	5799 Points +234%
Geekom A8 (GPD G1 Radeon RX 7600M XT @USB4) AMD Ryzen 9 8945HS	5328 Points +207%
Aoostar GOD77 (GPD G1 Radeon RX 7600M XT @USB4) AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS	4275 Points +146%
	1737 Points
3840x2160 4k Optimized
Aoostar GEM10 (GPD G1 Radeon RX 7600M XT @OCuLink) AMD Ryzen 7 6800H	7197 Points
Aoostar GEM12 (GPD G1 Radeon RX 7600M XT @OCuLink) AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS	7139 Points
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti (GPD G1 Radeon RX 7600M XT @OCuLink) Intel Core Ultra 9 185H	7049 Points
Geekom A8 (GPD G1 Radeon RX 7600M XT @USB4) AMD Ryzen 9 8945HS	6043 Points
Aoostar GOD77 (GPD G1 Radeon RX 7600M XT @USB4) AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS	4765 Points
7680x4320 8k Optimized
Aoostar GEM10 (GPD G1 Radeon RX 7600M XT @OCuLink) AMD Ryzen 7 6800H	2778 Points
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti (GPD G1 Radeon RX 7600M XT @OCuLink) Intel Core Ultra 9 185H	2777 Points
Aoostar GOD77 (GPD G1 Radeon RX 7600M XT @USB4) AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS	2770 Points
Aoostar GEM12 (GPD G1 Radeon RX 7600M XT @OCuLink) AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS	2765 Points
Geekom A8 (GPD G1 Radeon RX 7600M XT @USB4) AMD Ryzen 9 8945HS	2764 Points

Unigine Valley 1.0
1920x1080 Extreme HD DirectX AA:x8
Aoostar GEM10 (GPD G1 Radeon RX 7600M XT @OCuLink) AMD Ryzen 7 6800H	99 fps +304%
Aoostar GEM12 (GPD G1 Radeon RX 7600M XT @OCuLink) AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS	98.8 fps +303%
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti (GPD G1 Radeon RX 7600M XT @OCuLink) Intel Core Ultra 9 185H	98.5 fps +302%
Geekom A8 (GPD G1 Radeon RX 7600M XT @USB4) AMD Ryzen 9 8945HS	96.5 fps +294%
Aoostar GOD77 (GPD G1 Radeon RX 7600M XT @USB4) AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS	91.6 fps +274%
	24.5 fps
1920x1080 Extreme HD Preset OpenGL AA:x8
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti (GPD G1 Radeon RX 7600M XT @OCuLink) Intel Core Ultra 9 185H	89.9 fps +328%
Aoostar GEM10 (GPD G1 Radeon RX 7600M XT @OCuLink) AMD Ryzen 7 6800H	89.4 fps +326%
Aoostar GEM12 (GPD G1 Radeon RX 7600M XT @OCuLink) AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS	88.5 fps +321%
Geekom A8 (GPD G1 Radeon RX 7600M XT @USB4) AMD Ryzen 9 8945HS	81 fps +286%
Aoostar GOD77 (GPD G1 Radeon RX 7600M XT @USB4) AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS	79.1 fps +277%
	21 fps

Unigine Heaven 4.0
Extreme Preset OpenGL
Aoostar GEM12 (GPD G1 Radeon RX 7600M XT @OCuLink) AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS	136.2 fps +294%
Aoostar GEM10 (GPD G1 Radeon RX 7600M XT @OCuLink) AMD Ryzen 7 6800H	135.3 fps +291%
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti (GPD G1 Radeon RX 7600M XT @OCuLink) Intel Core Ultra 9 185H	132.3 fps +282%
Geekom A8 (GPD G1 Radeon RX 7600M XT @USB4) AMD Ryzen 9 8945HS	121.7 fps +252%
Aoostar GOD77 (GPD G1 Radeon RX 7600M XT @USB4) AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS	118.1 fps +241%
	34.6 fps
Extreme Preset DX11
Aoostar GEM10 (GPD G1 Radeon RX 7600M XT @OCuLink) AMD Ryzen 7 6800H	134.9 fps +272%
Aoostar GEM12 (GPD G1 Radeon RX 7600M XT @OCuLink) AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS	134.7 fps +271%
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti (GPD G1 Radeon RX 7600M XT @OCuLink) Intel Core Ultra 9 185H	130.8 fps +260%
Geekom A8 (GPD G1 Radeon RX 7600M XT @USB4) AMD Ryzen 9 8945HS	129.7 fps +257%
Aoostar GOD77 (GPD G1 Radeon RX 7600M XT @USB4) AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS	123.2 fps +239%
	36.3 fps

ComputeMark v2.1
1024x600 Normal, Score
Aoostar GEM12 (GPD G1 Radeon RX 7600M XT @OCuLink) AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS	20937 Points +121%
Aoostar GEM10 (GPD G1 Radeon RX 7600M XT @OCuLink) AMD Ryzen 7 6800H	20653 Points +118%
Geekom A8 (GPD G1 Radeon RX 7600M XT @USB4) AMD Ryzen 9 8945HS	20490 Points +116%
Aoostar GOD77 (GPD G1 Radeon RX 7600M XT @USB4) AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS	20386 Points +115%
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti (GPD G1 Radeon RX 7600M XT @OCuLink) Intel Core Ultra 9 185H	20340 Points +114%
	9494 Points
1024x600 Normal, Fluid 3DTex
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti (GPD G1 Radeon RX 7600M XT @OCuLink) Intel Core Ultra 9 185H	1765 Points +265%
Aoostar GEM12 (GPD G1 Radeon RX 7600M XT @OCuLink) AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS	1729 Points +258%
Aoostar GEM10 (GPD G1 Radeon RX 7600M XT @OCuLink) AMD Ryzen 7 6800H	1726 Points +257%
Geekom A8 (GPD G1 Radeon RX 7600M XT @USB4) AMD Ryzen 9 8945HS	1703 Points +253%
Aoostar GOD77 (GPD G1 Radeon RX 7600M XT @USB4) AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS	1701 Points +252%
	483 Points
1024x600 Normal, Fluid 2DTexArr
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti (GPD G1 Radeon RX 7600M XT @OCuLink) Intel Core Ultra 9 185H	1797 Points +274%
Aoostar GEM12 (GPD G1 Radeon RX 7600M XT @OCuLink) AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS	1772 Points +268%
Geekom A8 (GPD G1 Radeon RX 7600M XT @USB4) AMD Ryzen 9 8945HS	1754 Points +265%
Aoostar GOD77 (GPD G1 Radeon RX 7600M XT @USB4) AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS	1748 Points +263%
Aoostar GEM10 (GPD G1 Radeon RX 7600M XT @OCuLink) AMD Ryzen 7 6800H	1735 Points +261%
	481 Points
1024x600 Normal, Mandel Vector
Aoostar GEM12 (GPD G1 Radeon RX 7600M XT @OCuLink) AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS	4583 Points +85%
Aoostar GEM10 (GPD G1 Radeon RX 7600M XT @OCuLink) AMD Ryzen 7 6800H	4580 Points +85%
Geekom A8 (GPD G1 Radeon RX 7600M XT @USB4) AMD Ryzen 9 8945HS	4512 Points +82%
Aoostar GOD77 (GPD G1 Radeon RX 7600M XT @USB4) AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS	4450 Points +80%
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti (GPD G1 Radeon RX 7600M XT @OCuLink) Intel Core Ultra 9 185H	4300 Points +74%
	2477 Points
1024x600 Normal, Mandel Scalar
Aoostar GEM12 (GPD G1 Radeon RX 7600M XT @OCuLink) AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS	5543 Points +120%
Aoostar GEM10 (GPD G1 Radeon RX 7600M XT @OCuLink) AMD Ryzen 7 6800H	5421 Points +115%
Geekom A8 (GPD G1 Radeon RX 7600M XT @USB4) AMD Ryzen 9 8945HS	5375 Points +113%
Aoostar GOD77 (GPD G1 Radeon RX 7600M XT @USB4) AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS	5373 Points +113%
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti (GPD G1 Radeon RX 7600M XT @OCuLink) Intel Core Ultra 9 185H	5356 Points +113%
	2519 Points
1024x600 Normal, QJuliaRayTrace
Aoostar GEM12 (GPD G1 Radeon RX 7600M XT @OCuLink) AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS	7310 Points +107%
Aoostar GEM10 (GPD G1 Radeon RX 7600M XT @OCuLink) AMD Ryzen 7 6800H	7190 Points +103%
Geekom A8 (GPD G1 Radeon RX 7600M XT @USB4) AMD Ryzen 9 8945HS	7145 Points +102%
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti (GPD G1 Radeon RX 7600M XT @OCuLink) Intel Core Ultra 9 185H	7122 Points +101%
Aoostar GOD77 (GPD G1 Radeon RX 7600M XT @USB4) AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS	7114 Points +101%
	3535 Points

Premiere Pro PugetBench - GPU 0.9
Aoostar GEM10 (GPD G1 Radeon RX 7600M XT @OCuLink) AMD Ryzen 7 6800H	36.1 Points +217%
Aoostar GEM12 (GPD G1 Radeon RX 7600M XT @OCuLink) AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS	35.2 Points +209%
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti (GPD G1 Radeon RX 7600M XT @OCuLink) Intel Core Ultra 9 185H	34.1 Points +199%
Geekom A8 (GPD G1 Radeon RX 7600M XT @USB4) AMD Ryzen 9 8945HS	30.9 Points +171%
Aoostar GOD77 (GPD G1 Radeon RX 7600M XT @USB4) AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS	26.9 Points +136%
	11.4 Points

	baixo	média	alto	ultra	QHD	4K
GTA V (2015)	180.9	175.9	166.8	97.6	70.3	76.8
The Witcher 3 (2015)	372	304	195.1	111.9	78.2	55
Dota 2 Reborn (2015)	163.7	149.3	148.6	136.2		98.9
Final Fantasy XV Benchmark (2018)	216	136.4	97.6		69.3	37.8
X-Plane 11.11 (2018)	111.8	89.5	71.1			51.8
Far Cry 5 (2018)	134	121	116	108	101	52
Strange Brigade (2018)	455	264	218	186.7	123.1	65.6
Shadow of the Tomb Raider (2018)	185.1	153.5	148	126.2	76.5	35.7
Far Cry New Dawn (2019)	117	106	103	93	91	58
Metro Exodus (2019)	180.3	114.7	99.9	78.3	60.9	36.1
Total War: Three Kingdoms (2019)	288.9	173.6	123.1	85	50.7	21.3
Borderlands 3 (2019)	126.1	112.3	99.1	83.7	59.9	31.9
F1 2020 (2020)	307	258	223	153.3	114.2	64.6
F1 2021 (2021)	359	325	252	106.8	71.8	11.7
Far Cry 6 (2021)	125.7	114	105.2	99	70.1
God of War (2022)	120.2	119	99.6	69.3	53.9	34.5
GRID Legends (2022)	158.9	142.7	131.3	120.5	106.3	62.4
Tiny Tina's Wonderlands (2022)	228	181.8	118.2	90.8	61	16.6
F1 22 (2022)	259	253	212	56.5	31.9	8.2
F1 23 (2023)	256	263	200	14.5	11.3
Baldur's Gate 3 (2023)	140.2	107.8	92.3	89	62.2	31.3
Cyberpunk 2077 2.1 Phantom Liberty (2023)	139	107.5	90.3	80.6	49.1	20.2
Assassin's Creed Mirage (2023)	132	118	101	71	46	29
Total War Pharaoh (2023)	297.3	200.5	132.2	106.8	72.9	35.6
Avatar Frontiers of Pandora (2023)	60	53	46	39	27	8
Skull & Bones (2024)	128	114	91	86	47	24

	Aoostar GEM12, AMD Radeon 780M R7 8845HS	Aoostar GEM12 (GPD G1 Radeon RX 7600M XT @OCuLink) , R7 8845HS	Aoostar GEM10 (GPD G1 Radeon RX 7600M XT @OCuLink) , R7 6800H	Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti (GPD G1 Radeon RX 7600M XT @OCuLink) , Ultra 9 185H	Geekom A8 (GPD G1 Radeon RX 7600M XT @USB4), R9 8945HS	Aoostar GOD77 (GPD G1 Radeon RX 7600M XT @USB4) , AMD Radeon RX 7600M XT R7 7735HS
SPECviewperf 12		150%	144%	151%	146%	98%
1900x1060 3ds Max (3dsmax-05)	85.7	246 187%	241 181%	226 164%	123 44%	105 23%
1900x1060 Catia (catia-04)	86.6	244 182%	240 177%	234 170%	187 116%	176 103%
1900x1060 Creo (creo-01)	53.3	101 89%	96.2 80%	96.5 81%	84.1 58%	73.1 37%
1900x1060 Energy (energy-01)	18.4	36.1 96%	36.5 98%	36.4 98%	72 291%	24.2 32%
1900x1060 Maya (maya-04)	67.3	214 218%	196 191%	187 178%	171 154%	160 138%
1900x1060 Medical (medical-01)	51.4	122 137%	124 141%	121 135%	123 139%	107 108%
1900x1060 Showcase (showcase-01)	30.3	87.6 189%	90.9 200%	122 303%	119 293%	118 289%
1900x1060 Solidworks (sw-03)	114	228 100%	210 84%	208 82%	193 69%	175 54%
SPECviewperf 13		187%	179%	193%	150%	138%
3ds Max (3dsmax-06)	82.4	244 196%	240 191%	223 171%	123 49%	104 26%
Catia (catia-05)	124	366 195%	361 191%	355 186%	291 135%	273 120%
Creo (creo-02)	90.7	270 198%	268 195%	268 195%	190 109%	175 93%
Energy (energy-02)	22.2	73.5 231%	71.8 223%	73.6 232%	73.4 231%	71.6 223%
Maya (maya-05)	109	328 201%	323 196%	326 199%	278 155%	270 148%
Medical (medical-02)	70.5	197 179%	176 150%	182 158%	170 141%	163 131%
Showcase (showcase-02)	29.9	87.8 194%	90.2 202%	122 308%	119 298%	118 295%
Solidworks (sw-04)	104	210 102%	192 85%	201 93%	192 85%	176 69%
SPECviewperf 2020		191%	174%	183%	172%	167%
3840x2160 Medical (medical-03)	11.2	24.4 118%	23.6 111%	22.6 102%	26.8 139%	27.8 148%
3840x2160 Energy (energy-03)	19.9	56.8 185%	37.1 86%	57.1 187%	89.9 352%	87.7 341%
3840x2160 Creo (creo-03)	33.4	92.9 178%	90.8 172%	87.4 162%	63.1 89%	57 71%
3840x2160 CATIA (catia-06)	23.2	63.8 175%	63.2 172%	61.6 166%	58.7 153%	57.4 147%
3840x2160 3ds Max (3dsmax-07)	20.4	60.5 197%	60.1 195%	56.8 178%	33.7 65%	33.1 62%
3840x2160 Siemens NX (snx-04)	64.1	214 234%	214 234%	218 240%	201 214%	207 223%
3840x2160 Maya (maya-06)	47.7	166 248%	165 246%	164 244%	139 191%	131 175%
Total Average (Program / Settings)		176% / 175%	166% / 165%	176% / 175%	156% / 155%	134% / 133%

Emissões - AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS com bom resfriamento

Emissões de ruído

Embora a Aoostar tenha instalado duas ventoinhas no GEM12, o dispositivo é significativamente mais silencioso do que todos os outros dispositivos desta análise. No modo inativo, medimos um nível de pressão sonora de apenas 27,6 dB(A). Sob carga média, o Aoostar GEM12 atinge 36 dB(A) e é silenciosamente audível. Em seguida, atingimos o volume máximo no teste de estresse, com pouco mais de 38 dB(A). O ruído agradável da ventoinha, que não tende a ser irritante devido à sua baixa frequência, deve ser enfatizado positivamente.

Barulho

Ocioso		27.5 / 27.6 / 27.6 dB
Carga		36 / 38.2 dB

	30 dB silencioso 40 dB(A) audível 50 dB(A) ruidosamente alto
min: , med: , max: Earthworks M23R (15 cm de distância) environment noise: 24.3 dB(A)

	Aoostar GEM12 R7 8845HS, Radeon 780M	Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti Ultra 9 185H, Arc 8-Core	Geekom A8 R9 8945HS, Radeon 780M	Acemagic F2A Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core	Geekom XT12 Pro i9-12900H, Iris Xe G7 96EUs	Minisforum Venus Series NAB9 i9-12900HK, Iris Xe G7 96EUs	Acemagic AM18 R7 7840HS, Radeon 780M	Aoostar GEM10 R7 6800H, Radeon 680M
Noise		-8%	-9%	-10%	-10%	-13%	-13%	-19%
off / environment *	24.3	24.1 1%	24.4 -0%	24.9 -2%	25.4 -5%	25.4 -5%	24.8 -2%	24.3 -0%
Idle Minimum *	27.5	29.8 -8%	24.5 11%	25.4 8%	28 -2%	27.5 -0%	31 -13%	36.5 -33%
Idle Average *	27.6	29.9 -8%	24.7 11%	25.7 7%	28.1 -2%	28 -1%	31.2 -13%	36.6 -33%
Idle Maximum *	27.6	30 -9%	24.7 11%	25.7 7%	28.5 -3%	33 -20%	31.4 -14%	36.6 -33%
Load Average *	36	37.3 -4%	48.5 -35%	47.8 -33%	39.6 -10%	42.8 -19%	37.1 -3%	41.7 -16%
Witcher 3 ultra *	35.4	40.2 -14%	47 -33%	45.23 -28%	47.2 -33%	44.5 -26%	37.6 -6%	40.18 -14%
Cyberpunk 2077 ultra *	35.4							40.3 -14%
Load Maximum *	38.2	43.5 -14%	49.2 -29%	49 -28%	44.2 -16%	44.9 -18%	53.7 -41%	40.8 -7%

* ... smaller is better

Temperatura

O invólucro de metal distribui muito bem o calor resultante. Documentamos uma área na parte superior como o ponto mais quente, onde medimos cerca de 46 °C na superfície. Os componentes são ventilados por cima e por baixo. Duas ventoinhas funcionam aqui para aspirar ar fresco. Entretanto, a ventoinha inferior fornece ar fresco apenas para o armazenamento em massa e a RAM, enquanto a ventoinha instalada na parte superior resfria o processador. Esse conceito de resfriamento funciona e, com um máximo de 84,4 °C, não há nada a criticar em termos de temperatura. Os limites de desempenho predefinidos são atingidos; o desempenho total do AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS pode ser mantido permanentemente, mesmo durante o teste de estresse.

Aoostar GEM12 durante o teste de estresse (lado superior)

Aoostar GEM12 durante o teste de estresse (parte inferior)

Aoostar GEM12 durante o teste de estresse (atrás)

Unidade de fonte de alimentação durante o teste de estresse

Carga Máxima

Inatividade

Cyberpunk


45.2 °C	46 °C	41.7 °C
37.4 °C	27.3 °C	29.2 °C
35.4 °C	33.7 °C	33.5 °C

Máximo: 46 °C
Médio: 36.6 °C


34.6 °C	31.3 °C	33.2 °C
28.7 °C	24.2 °C	29.2 °C
27.5 °C	27.4 °C	29.2 °C

Máximo: 34.6 °C
Médio: 29.5 °C

alimentação elétrica 47.1 °C | Temperatura do quarto 21.3 °C | Fluke t3000FC (calibrated)

Carga Máxima

Inatividade

Cyberpunk


30.3 °C	30.1 °C	29.7 °C
30.1 °C	28.3 °C	28.5 °C
29.2 °C	28.7 °C	29 °C

Máximo: 30.3 °C
Médio: 29.3 °C


29.6 °C	29.2 °C	29.2 °C
29.1 °C	27.8 °C	28.5 °C
29 °C	28.5 °C	28.5 °C

Máximo: 29.6 °C
Médio: 28.8 °C

alimentação elétrica 35.2 °C | Temperatura do quarto 21.9 °C | Fluke t3000FC (calibrated)

Carga Máxima

Inatividade

Cyberpunk


43.3 °C	44.9 °C	41.2 °C
35.8 °C	27 °C	30.8 °C
33.2 °C	33.1 °C	35.2 °C

Máximo: 44.9 °C
Médio: 36.1 °C


35.4 °C	31.1 °C	32.3 °C
30.3 °C	25.5 °C	30.2 °C
29.1 °C	28.4 °C	29.5 °C

Máximo: 35.4 °C
Médio: 30.2 °C

alimentação elétrica 41.9 °C | Temperatura do quarto 21.9 °C | Fluke t3000FC (calibrated)

(±) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 36.6 °C / 98 F, compared to the average of 32.3 °C / 90 F for the devices in the class Mini PC.
(-) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 46 °C / 115 F, compared to the average of 35.8 °C / 96 F, ranging from 24 to 69.5 °C for the class Mini PC.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 34.6 °C / 94 F, compared to the average of 36.1 °C / 97 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 29.3 °C / 85 F, compared to the device average of 32.3 °C / 90 F.
(±) 3: The average temperature for the upper side is 36.1 °C / 97 F, compared to the average of 32.3 °C / 90 F for the class Mini PC.

Gerenciamento de energia

Infelizmente, o Aoostar GEM12 não ganha o prêmio de eficiência. Embora os requisitos de energia no modo inativo ainda sejam razoáveis, de 8 a 14,6 watts, eles aumentam significativamente sob carga. Com 73,9 watts, nossa amostra de teste requer muito mais energia do que o Minisforum AtomMan X7 Tique está no mesmo nível em termos de desempenho. Em curto prazo, a fonte de alimentação de 120 watts deve ser capaz de fornecer até 95 watts, o que não causa nenhum problema na prática.

Aoostar GEM10 com unidade de fonte de alimentação (19 V; 6,32 A)

Consumo de energia

desligado	1.7 / 2.4 Watt
Ocioso	8.2 / 10 / 14.6 Watt
Carga	73.9 / 95.3 Watt


Key: min: , med: , max: Metrahit Energy

	Aoostar GEM12 R7 8845HS, Radeon 780M	Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti Ultra 9 185H, Arc 8-Core	Geekom A8 R9 8945HS, Radeon 780M	Acemagic F2A Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core	Geekom XT12 Pro i9-12900H, Iris Xe G7 96EUs	Minisforum Venus Series NAB9 i9-12900HK, Iris Xe G7 96EUs	Acemagic AM18 R7 7840HS, Radeon 780M	Aoostar GEM10 R7 6800H, Radeon 680M	Average AMD Radeon 780M	Average of class Mini PC
Power Consumption		1%	34%	-1%	12%	-20%	-10%	14%	23%	-5%
Idle Minimum *	8.2	8.2 -0%	3.2 61%	9.1 -11%	5.7 30%	12.1 -48%	9.8 -20%	7.3 11%	6.11 ?(2.7 - 14, n=51) 25%	9.69 ?(1.9 - 45.7, n=121, last 2 years) -18%
Idle Average *	10	12.1 -21%	4.9 51%	10.3 -3%	9.5 5%	13.2 -32%	11.5 -15%	8.7 13%	8.32 ?(4.7 - 17.6, n=51) 17%	11.9 ?(1.9 - 47.5, n=119, last 2 years) -19%
Idle Maximum *	14.6	14 4%	6.8 53%	14.4 1%	16.5 -13%	14.1 3%	15.3 -5%	10.4 29%	10.6 ?(5.2 - 27, n=51) 27%	15.2 ?(2.6 - 57.1, n=121, last 2 years) -4%
Load Average *	73.9	53.1 28%	71.3 4%	54.9 26%	53.3 28%	82.9 -12%	75.3 -2%	67.2 9%	56.1 ?(19.7 - 93.2, n=50) 24%	59 ?(11.3 - 170.6, n=121, last 2 years) 20%
Cyberpunk 2077 ultra external monitor *	79.9							58.8 26%
Load Maximum *	95.3	100.4 -5%	93.2 2%	110.4 -16%	87.8 8%	106.8 -12%	102.8 -8%	101.6 -7%	74.9 ?(34.9 - 111.8, n=51) 21%	100.5 ?(18.1 - 423, n=121, last 2 years) -5%

* ... smaller is better

Power consumption with the external monitor

Aoostar GEM12 R7 8845HS, Radeon 780M; Idle 1min (external Monitor): Ø10 (9.28-14.3)

Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti Ultra 9 185H, Arc 8-Core; Idle 1min (external Monitor): Ø12.2 (10.9-14.1)

Geekom A8 R9 8945HS, Radeon 780M; Idle 1min (external Monitor): Ø4.93 (3.89-6.83)

Acemagic F2A Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core; Idle 1min (external Monitor): Ø10.4 (9.08-14.4)

Aoostar GEM12 R7 8845HS, Radeon 780M; 1920x1080 The Witcher 3 ultra (external Monitor): Ø79.6 (76-85.2)

Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti Ultra 9 185H, Arc 8-Core; 1920x1080 The Witcher 3 ultra (external Monitor): Ø43.8 (42.6-45.7)

Geekom A8 R9 8945HS, Radeon 780M; 1920x1080 The Witcher 3 ultra (external Monitor): Ø67.5 (54.1-87.8)

Acemagic F2A Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core; 1920x1080 The Witcher 3 ultra (external Monitor): Ø48.4 (45.6-52.4)

Aoostar GEM12 R7 8845HS, Radeon 780M; 1280x720 Prime95 28.10 and Furmark 1.25: Ø84.4 (83.6-85.1)

Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti Ultra 9 185H, Arc 8-Core; 1280x720 Prime95 28.10 and Furmark 1.25: Ø91.8 (87.6-95.4)

Geekom A8 R9 8945HS, Radeon 780M; 1280x720 Prime95 28.10 and Furmark 1.25: Ø69.9 (55.2-93.2)

Acemagic F2A Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core; 1280x720 Prime95 28.10 and Furmark 1.25: Ø92.2 (78.7-114)

Aoostar GEM12 R7 8845HS, Radeon 780M; 3DMark06 Return To Proxycon: Ø73.9 (55.4-87)

Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti Ultra 9 185H, Arc 8-Core; 3DMark06 Return To Proxycon: Ø53.1 (49.6-57.6)

Geekom A8 R9 8945HS, Radeon 780M; 3DMark06 Return To Proxycon: Ø71.3 (62.5-83.3)

Acemagic F2A Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core; 3DMark06 Return To Proxycon: Ø54.9 (50.2-57)

Power consumption with the external monitor

Aoostar GEM12 R7 8845HS, Radeon 780M; Prime95 V2810 Stress (external Monitor): Ø83.6 (80.7-95.3)

Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti Ultra 9 185H, Arc 8-Core; Prime95 V2810 Stress (external Monitor): Ø98.1 (94.2-100.4)

Geekom A8 R9 8945HS, Radeon 780M; Prime95 V2810 Stress (external Monitor): Ø72.5 (69.7-93.2)

Acemagic F2A Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core; Prime95 V2810 Stress (external Monitor): Ø99.6 (92-110.4)

Aoostar GEM12 R7 8845HS, Radeon 780M; Cinebench R15 Multi (external Monitor): Ø82.1 (74.2-89.2)

Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti Ultra 9 185H, Arc 8-Core; Cinebench R15 Multi (external Monitor): Ø88 (87.7-88.3)

Geekom A8 R9 8945HS, Radeon 780M; Cinebench R15 Multi (external Monitor): Ø73.7 (64.4-85.7)

Acemagic F2A Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core; Cinebench R15 Multi (external Monitor): Ø103 (99.2-107)

Aoostar GEM12 R7 8845HS, Radeon 780M; Cinebench R23 Single (external Monitor): Ø34 (31.1-57.1)

Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti Ultra 9 185H, Arc 8-Core; Cinebench R23 Single (external Monitor): Ø33.3 (28.9-63)

Geekom A8 R9 8945HS, Radeon 780M; Cinebench R23 Single (external Monitor): Ø29.6 (24.6-64.4)

Acemagic F2A Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core; Cinebench R23 Single (external Monitor): Ø32.7 (19.4-55.3)

Aoostar GEM12 R7 8845HS, Radeon 780M; Cinebench R23 Multi (external Monitor): Ø75.3 (72.3-87.5)

Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti Ultra 9 185H, Arc 8-Core; Cinebench R23 Multi (external Monitor): Ø87.7 (87.3-88.3)

Geekom A8 R9 8945HS, Radeon 780M; Cinebench R23 Multi (external Monitor): Ø66.8 (64.3-85.9)

Acemagic F2A Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core; Cinebench R23 Multi (external Monitor): Ø100.7 (97.2-108.6)

Aoostar GEM12 R7 8845HS, Radeon 780M; 1280x720 FurMark 1.19 GPU Stress Test (external Monitor): Ø83.1 (79.2-88.5)

Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti Ultra 9 185H, Arc 8-Core; 1280x720 FurMark 1.19 GPU Stress Test (external Monitor): Ø50.3 (47.7-65.3)

Geekom A8 R9 8945HS, Radeon 780M; 1280x720 FurMark 1.19 GPU Stress Test (external Monitor): Ø71.9 (63.7-91)

Acemagic F2A Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core; 1280x720 FurMark 1.19 GPU Stress Test (external Monitor): Ø49.7 (47.3-60.6)

Pro

+ carcaça de alumínio resistente

+ acabamento perfeito

+ moderno AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS

+ iGPU potente (AMD Radeon 780M)

+ dois SSDs NVMe podem ser instalados (M.2-2280)

+ cooler ativo para SSD

+ USB4 e OCuLink

+ rJ45 duplo (2,5G)

+ temperaturas do gabinete consistentemente baixas

+ unidade de resfriamento potente

+ relativamente silencioso

+ preço razoável

Contra

- localização pouco prática das portas USB4 e OCuLink

- Desempenho da WLAN abaixo da média

- sem Wi-Fi 6E

- apenas duas portas USB 3.2 Tipo A

Veredicto - Aoostar GEM12 com preço justo

O Aoostar GEM12 em análise: fornecido pela Aoostar

O Aoostar GEM12 é ideal em combinação com o AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS e é um minicomputador potente com muito desempenho. Juntamente com 32 GB de RAM e 1 TB de espaço de armazenamento, o computador compacto é ideal para muitas tarefas. No entanto, em termos de desempenho relativo, o Aoostar GEM12 não consegue se destacar de seus concorrentes, pois eles também oferecem um desempenho igualmente bom. Em termos visuais, o Aoostar dispensou quaisquer artifícios em nosso dispositivo de teste. Se o senhor ainda valoriza esses pequenos detalhes, pode dar uma olhada no modelo Pro da série, pois ele é equipado com uma pequena tela na parte superior. No entanto, não vemos a necessidade disso.

O Aoostar GEM12 oferece um desempenho impressionante com o AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS. Uma interface moderna e um gabinete de alta qualidade com resfriamento potente são um bom ponto de venda, que anda de mãos dadas com um preço justo.

O gabinete do Aoostar GEM12 tem acabamento perfeito e a escolha dos materiais é igualmente excelente. A combinação de alumínio e plástico é boa e melhora a aparência do dispositivo. Com relação ao preço de compra, o Aoostar GEM12 está significativamente melhor posicionado do que alguns outros minicomputadores dessa classe de desempenho. Isso também se aplica à conectividade do Aoostar GEM12. Com o USB4 e o OCuLink, o fabricante instalou duas interfaces modernas que certamente podem influenciar a decisão de compra. No entanto, a Aoostar não pode reivindicar isso como um ponto de venda exclusivo, pois a Minisforum já integrou a conexão OCuLink em alguns de seus modelos. No entanto, a combinação com a placa de vídeo externa proporcionou o melhor desempenho com o Aoostar GEM12.

Outro aspecto positivo do Aoostar GEM12 é o sistema de resfriamento integrado: sob carga total, o minicarro é significativamente mais silencioso do que os concorrentes que testamos aqui. O desempenho do AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS pode ser mantido estável durante todo o tempo. A Aoostar comete um pequeno erro com o resfriamento do SSD. Apesar do resfriamento ativo, há uma perda mínima de desempenho sob carga. O Aoostar GEM10 foi capaz de proporcionar um desempenho mais estável da SSD com uma unidade de resfriamento mais potente. Outro pequeno ponto fraco é o desempenho da conexão sem fio. Não conseguimos entender por que o fabricante não instalou o Wi-Fi 6E, já que o Aoostar está equipado com conexões modernas, como USB4 e OCuLink. Felizmente, o módulo sem fio não está instalado de forma permanente e pode ser substituído. Além disso, o usuário ainda tem duas interfaces de 2,5 GBit disponíveis, o que não é necessariamente o padrão para mini-PCs.

Preço e disponibilidade

O Aoostar GEM12 está disponível diretamente no site , o fabricante em três variantes, sendo que a versão barebone custa a partir de US$ 499. Como alternativa, os usuários podem comprar o mini-PC na Amazon.

Aoostar GEM12 - 06/21/2024 v8
Sebastian Bade

Acabamento

87 / 98 → 89%

Conectividade

65 / 81 → 80%

Peso

81%

Desempenho do jogos

52 / 80 → 66%

Desempenho da aplicação

86 / 92 → 93%

Workstation

55%

AI Performance

89%

Temperatura

89%

Ruído

86%

Médio

60%

81%

Mini PC - Médio equilibrado

CO2 Emissions
No Data

Materials
50%

Packaging
50%

Power Use
64.8%

Repairability
40%

Software Updates
22.3%

Total Sustainability Score: 37.9%

Transparency

The selection of devices to be reviewed is made by our editorial team. The test sample was provided to the author as a loan by the manufacturer or retailer for the purpose of this review. The lender had no influence on this review, nor did the manufacturer receive a copy of this review before publication. There was no obligation to publish this review. We never accept compensation or payment in return for our reviews. As an independent media company, Notebookcheck is not subjected to the authority of manufacturers, retailers or publishers.

This is how Notebookcheck is testing

Every year, Notebookcheck independently reviews hundreds of laptops and smartphones using standardized procedures to ensure that all results are comparable. We have continuously developed our test methods for around 20 years and set industry standards in the process. In our test labs, high-quality measuring equipment is utilized by experienced technicians and editors. These tests involve a multi-stage validation process. Our complex rating system is based on hundreds of well-founded measurements and benchmarks, which maintains objectivity. Further information on our test methods can be found here.

Editor of the original article: Ninh Ngoc Duy - Editorial Assistant - 469273 articles published on Notebookcheck since 2008

contact me via: Facebook

Please share our article, every link counts!

> Análises e revisões de portáteis e celulares > Análises > Análises > Análise do Mini-PC Aoostar GEM12: AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS com 32 GB de RAM, 1 TB SSD e interface OCuLink

Sebastian Bade, 2024-06-16 (Update: 2024-06-16)