Notebookcheck Logo

Análise do laptop HP Omen Transcend 16 (2024): Uma máquina para jogos RTX 4070 com tela OLED

Imagem poderosa.

Com o Omen 16, os compradores podem escolher entre a versão "normal" e a chamada variante Transcend, que, em muitos aspectos, praticamente não diferem uma da outra. Leia nossa análise para descobrir como o dispositivo de 16 polegadas se sai em relação à concorrência.
HP Omen Transcend 16

O modelo de análise Omen Transcend 16 - terminado em u1095ng - pode ser adquirido atualmente por pouco menos de US$ 3.000. Por esse preço, o comprador recebe um Core i9-14900HX combinado com uma GeForce RTX 4070 que tende a pertencer mais à categoria de médio porte e não à de alto nível devido aos seus escassos 8 GB de VRAM. A isso se juntam 32 GB de RAM DDR5-5600 (2x 16 GB SO-DIMM) e um SSD M.2 NVMe de 1 TB. O destaque é o vibrante painel OLED com 2.560 x 1.600 pixels, 240 Hz, 400 cd/m² e 100% DCI P3. O pacote é completado com o Windows 11 Home.

HP Omen Transcend 16-u1095ng (Omen Transcend 16 Serie)
Processador
Intel Core i9-14900HX 24 x 1.6 - 5.8 GHz, 130 W PL2 / Short Burst, 55 W PL1 / Sustained, Raptor Lake-HX Refresh
Placa gráfica
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU - 8 GB VRAM, Análises do: 1980 MHz, Memoría: 2000 MHz, 130 W TDP, GDDR6, ForceWare 546.56, Optimus
Memória
32 GB 
, 2x 16 GB SO-DIMM DDR5-5600, two slots (both in use)
Pantalha
16.00 polegadas 16:10, 2560 x 1600 pixel 189 PPI, ATNA60DL02-0 (SDC41A4), OLED, WQXGA, Brilhante: não, HDR, 240 Hz
placa mãe
Intel HM770 (Raptor Lake-S PCH)
Disco rígido
Kioxia XG8 KXG80ZNV1T02, 1024 GB 
, NVMe SSD, one M.2 slot (in use)
Placa de Som
Intel Raptor Point-S PCH - HD Audio (Audio, Voice, Speech)
Conexões
2 USB 3.0, 2 USB 4.0 40 Gbps, 2 Thunderbolt, USB-C Power Delivery (PD), 1 HDMI, 2 DisplayPort, Conexões Audio: Combo (Headset/Mic)
Funcionamento em rede
Realtek Gaming GBE Family Controller (10/100/1000MBit/s), Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211 (a/b/g/h/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/ax = Wi-Fi 6/ Wi-Fi 6E 6 GHz), Bluetooth 5.3
Tamanho
altura x largura x profundidade (em mm): 20 x 356 x 269
Bateria
97 Wh Lítio-Polímero
Sistema Operativo
Microsoft Windows 11 Home
Camera
Webcam: 2 MP
Características adicionais
Alto falantes: 2.0, Teclado: Chiclet, Iluminação do Teclado: sim, 230 W Power Supply, Hyper X Cloud II Core Wireless Gaming Headset, Omen Gaming Hub, 24 Meses Garantia
peso
2.284 kg, Suprimento de energia: 790 g
Preço
3000 EUR
Amazon
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

O concorrente do Omen Transcend 16 pode ser encontrado na forma de outros gamers de 16 polegadas equipados com o GeForce RTX 4070, bem como o Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 (Ultra 7 155H), o Schenker XMG Core 16 L23 (Ryzen 7 7840HS) e o Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16ARX8 (Ryzen 7 7745HX), todos os quais aparecem em nossa tabela de dispositivos de comparação.

Como o chassi é praticamente idêntico ao do antecessor, que tinha um Core i9-13900HX (veja nossa análise), abordaremos brevemente as categorias de gabinete, recursos e dispositivo de entrada.

Possíveis concorrentes em comparação

Rating
Date
Model
Weight
Height
Size
Resolution
Price
88.4 %
v7 (old)
02/2024
HP Omen Transcend 16-u1095ng
i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
2.3 kg20 mm16.00"2560x1600
87.9 %
v7 (old)
08/2023
HP Omen Transcend 16
i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
2.3 kg19.8 mm16.00"2560x1600
92.3 %
v7 (old)
02/2024
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605M
Ultra 7 155H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
1.8 kg16.4 mm16.00"2560x1600
89.2 %
v7 (old)
10/2023
SCHENKER XMG CORE 16 (L23)
R7 7840HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
2.4 kg26.1 mm16.00"2560x1600
88.4 %
v7 (old)
05/2023
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16ARX8
R7 7745HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
2.5 kg26.8 mm16.00"2560x1600

Caso

O Transcend 16 oferece um design atraente e, do ponto de vista visual, é impressionantemente fino (todos os dispositivos concorrentes são mais grossos, exceto o Zephyrus G16). No que diz respeito à estabilidade, a unidade básica consegue, pelo menos, oferecer um desempenho sólido. Por outro lado, a tampa - como em muitos dispositivos - poderia ter sido melhorada em termos de rigidez de torção. À primeira vista, a superfície fosca tem um aspecto premium, no entanto, a HP utilizou principalmente plástico. Não se pode reclamar em termos de qualidade de construção. O fabricante merece elogios pelo generoso ângulo de abertura de 180°, embora as dobradiças pudessem ser mais fortes. Quando se trata de peso, com 2,3 kg, o dispositivo fica no meio do pacote, o que faz com que o computador de 16 polegadas não seja nem particularmente leve nem pesado.

HP Omen Transcend 16
HP Omen Transcend 16
HP Omen Transcend 16
HP Omen Transcend 16
HP Omen Transcend 16
HP Omen Transcend 16
HP Omen Transcend 16
HP Omen Transcend 16

Comparação de tamanho

363.4 mm 260.4 mm 26.8 mm 2.5 kg358.4 mm 266.8 mm 26.1 mm 2.4 kg357 mm 269 mm 19.8 mm 2.3 kg356 mm 269 mm 20 mm 2.3 kg354 mm 246 mm 16.4 mm 1.8 kg297 mm 210 mm 1 mm 5.7 g

Recursos

A seleção de portas pode ser descrita como muito moderna. Enquanto a parte traseira abriga uma porta RJ45 (infelizmente não é uma LAN de 2,5 Gbit), uma saída HDMI 2.1 e uma porta USB 3.0 (tipo A), o lado esquerdo abriga duas portas Thunderbolt 4 (incluindo Power Delivery) e um conector de áudio. No lado direito, há apenas uma porta USB 3.0 solitária (tipo A). Os compradores terão que se contentar com uma trava Kensington e um leitor de cartão.

Lado esquerdo: 2x Thunderbolt 4 (PD), conector de áudio de 3,5 mm
Lado esquerdo: 2x Thunderbolt 4 (PD), conector de áudio de 3,5 mm
Traseira: conector de rede, LAN RJ45, HDMI 2.1, USB-A 3.0
Traseira: conector de rede, LAN RJ45, HDMI 2.1, USB-A 3.0
Lado direito: USB-A 3.0
Lado direito: USB-A 3.0

Comunicação

O desempenho do Wi-Fi é de alto nível e com uma velocidade de envio de quase 1.400 Mbit/s e cerca de 1.700 Mbit/s quando se trata de receber dados (1 m de distância do roteador de referência), o desempenho está entre bom e muito bom. Com o Wi-Fi 6E AX211, a HP instalou um módulo sem fio Intel atualizado.

Networking
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605M
Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211
1654 (1599min, 1600.16P1 - 1713max) MBit/s +17%
SCHENKER XMG CORE 16 (L23)
Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX200
1494 (1257min - 1548max) MBit/s +6%
HP Omen Transcend 16
Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211
1444 (1170min - 1766max) MBit/s +2%
HP Omen Transcend 16-u1095ng
Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211
1411 (1327min - 1472max) MBit/s
Average of class Gaming
  (469 - 1843, n=151, last 2 years)
1235 MBit/s -12%
Average Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211
  (464 - 1921, n=238)
1233 MBit/s -13%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16ARX8
MediaTek Wi-Fi 6E MT7922 160MHz Wireless LAN Card
1173 (839min - 1366max) MBit/s -17%
iperf3 receive AXE11000
HP Omen Transcend 16-u1095ng
Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211
1697 (849min - 1712max) MBit/s
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605M
Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211
1600 (1564min, 1564.87P1 - 1627max) MBit/s -6%
SCHENKER XMG CORE 16 (L23)
Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX200
1583 (1176min - 1662max) MBit/s -7%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16ARX8
MediaTek Wi-Fi 6E MT7922 160MHz Wireless LAN Card
1438 (767min - 1513max) MBit/s -15%
Average of class Gaming
  (680 - 1890, n=151, last 2 years)
1383 MBit/s -19%
Average Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211
  (582 - 1890, n=238)
1379 MBit/s -19%
HP Omen Transcend 16
Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211
1339 (1216min - 1449max) MBit/s -21%
0501001502002503003504004505005506006507007508008509009501000105011001150120012501300135014001450150015501600165017001750Tooltip
HP Omen Transcend 16-u1095ng Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211; iperf3 transmit AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1411 (1327-1472)
HP Omen Transcend 16 Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211; iperf3 transmit AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1445 (1170-1766)
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605M Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211; iperf3 transmit AXE11000: Ø1654 (1599-1713)
SCHENKER XMG CORE 16 (L23) Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX200; iperf3 transmit AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1494 (1257-1548)
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16ARX8 MediaTek Wi-Fi 6E MT7922 160MHz Wireless LAN Card; iperf3 transmit AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1174 (839-1366)
HP Omen Transcend 16-u1095ng Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211; iperf3 receive AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1668 (849-1712)
HP Omen Transcend 16 Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211; iperf3 receive AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1339 (1216-1449)
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605M Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211; iperf3 receive AXE11000: Ø1600 (1564-1627)
SCHENKER XMG CORE 16 (L23) Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX200; iperf3 receive AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1582 (1176-1662)
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16ARX8 MediaTek Wi-Fi 6E MT7922 160MHz Wireless LAN Card; iperf3 receive AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1412 (767-1513)

Webcam

Temos sentimentos contraditórios com relação à webcam de 2 MP. Embora a nitidez da imagem esteja acima da média, a precisão das cores deixa muito a desejar. O que é bom é o obturador manual para privacidade.

ColorChecker
13.3 ∆E
12.8 ∆E
10.1 ∆E
13.8 ∆E
11.3 ∆E
8 ∆E
14.2 ∆E
9.5 ∆E
17.4 ∆E
13 ∆E
10.7 ∆E
11.5 ∆E
5.9 ∆E
12.2 ∆E
23.9 ∆E
9.1 ∆E
16.9 ∆E
9.8 ∆E
5 ∆E
6.9 ∆E
10 ∆E
9 ∆E
8.3 ∆E
2 ∆E
ColorChecker HP Omen Transcend 16-u1095ng: 11.02 ∆E min: 2.04 - max: 23.85 ∆E

Acessórios

Nosso dispositivo de análise também veio com uma PSU muito fina de 230 watts, bem como um headset HyperX (Cloud II Core sem fio).

Manutenção

Em termos de manutenção, o Omen 16 não é particularmente complicado. Depois de cuidar de seis pequenos parafusos de cabeça cruzada, a placa de base pode ser levantada de sua posição ancorada com a ajuda de uma ferramenta plana. Dentro do dispositivo, todos os componentes importantes estão acessíveis, sejam eles os bancos de RAM, a bateria, o slot M.2, as ventoinhas ou o módulo sem fio.

HP Omen Transcend 16
HP Omen Transcend 16
HP Omen Transcend 16

Garantia

A garantia é de 24 meses.

Dispositivos de entrada

Teclado

Com suas teclas WASD transparentes, a HP adotou um certo visual de jogador. O layout é muito exclusivo e leva algum tempo para o senhor se acostumar. O fabricante optou por não instalar um teclado numérico e, em vez disso, deu ao dispositivo de 16 polegadas teclas de seta separadas e de bom tamanho. Outras decisões (por exemplo, a localização do botão liga/desliga) são realmente difíceis de entender. A experiência de digitação é medíocre e a HP teve que usar um modelo mecânico para obter melhor feedback. Os fãs de teclas retroiluminadas podem esperar por várias cores.

HP Omen Transcend 16

Touchpad

Com cerca de 13,5 x 8,5 cm, o touchpad agradavelmente grande pode ser descrito como despretensioso no que se refere à precisão, suavidade e áreas de clique. Da mesma forma, o suporte a gestos é intuitivo.

Tela

As opiniões divergem quando se trata de painéis OLED. Do lado negativo, alguns problemas são as superfícies muito reflexivas (que podem tornar o uso em ambientes externos tortuoso), a cintilação da tela em todos os níveis de brilho e a questão do possível burn-in.

393
cd/m²
393
cd/m²
391
cd/m²
393
cd/m²
390
cd/m²
389
cd/m²
392
cd/m²
395
cd/m²
390
cd/m²
Distribuição do brilho
ATNA60DL02-0 (SDC41A4) tested with X-Rite i1Pro 2
Máximo: 395 cd/m² (Nits) Médio: 391.8 cd/m² Minimum: 20 cd/m²
iluminação: 98 %
iluminação com acumulador: 390 cd/m²
Contraste: 19500:1 (Preto: 0.02 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 1.94 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.92, calibrated: 4.21
ΔE Greyscale 1.5 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
97% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
100% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
99.8% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.221
HP Omen Transcend 16-u1095ng
ATNA60DL02-0 (SDC41A4), OLED, 2560x1600, 16"
HP Omen Transcend 16
AUOA3A6, Mini-LED, 2560x1600, 16"
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605M
ATNA60DL01-0, OLED, 2560x1600, 16"
SCHENKER XMG CORE 16 (L23)
BOE0AF0 (), IPS, 2560x1600, 16"
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16ARX8
CSOT T3 MNG007DA1-Q, IPS, 2560x1600, 16"
Display
-4%
0%
-20%
-18%
Display P3 Coverage
99.8
99.2
-1%
99.9
0%
68.3
-32%
70.4
-29%
sRGB Coverage
100
100
0%
100
0%
98.6
-1%
99.6
0%
AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage
97
87.6
-10%
96.9
0%
69.6
-28%
72.6
-25%
Response Times
-8093%
222%
-4850%
-3925%
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% *
0.2 ?(0.1, 0.1)
26.4 ?(15, 11.4)
-13100%
0.22 ?(0.11, 0.11)
-10%
13.2 ?(6.1, 7.1)
-6500%
7 ?(3.2, 3.8)
-3400%
Response Time Black / White *
0.2 ?(0.1, 0.1)
28.2 ?(21.6, 6.6)
-14000%
0.25 ?(0.13, 0.12)
-25%
6.6 ?(2.5, 4.1)
-3200%
9.1 ?(4.9, 4.2)
-4450%
PWM Frequency
120 ?(100)
3506 ?(100)
2822%
960 ?(60)
700%
Screen
-47%
0%
-203%
-161%
Brightness middle
390
791.1
103%
416
7%
376
-4%
355.3
-9%
Brightness
392
800
104%
418
7%
358
-9%
340
-13%
Brightness Distribution
98
95
-3%
96
-2%
88
-10%
91
-7%
Black Level *
0.02
0.04
-100%
0.33
-1550%
0.32
-1500%
Contrast
19500
19778
1%
1139
-94%
1110
-94%
Colorchecker dE 2000 *
1.94
4.37
-125%
1.6
18%
2.74
-41%
1.13
42%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *
4.26
10.39
-144%
2.1
51%
6.78
-59%
2.78
35%
Colorchecker dE 2000 calibrated *
4.21
1.04
75%
0.88
79%
0.32
92%
Greyscale dE 2000 *
1.5
6.5
-333%
2.7
-80%
3.57
-138%
1.4
7%
Gamma
2.221 99%
2.28 96%
2.16 102%
2.4 92%
2.24 98%
CCT
6395 102%
6000 108%
6331 103%
7246 90%
6372 102%
Total Average (Program / Settings)
-2715% / -1647%
74% / 56%
-1691% / -828%
-1368% / -668%

* ... smaller is better

Em contrapartida, a tecnologia OLED tem um bom desempenho com níveis de preto maravilhosos (quase 0,0 cd/m²), o que leva a uma excelente taxa de contraste da qual os painéis IPS não se aproximam. O mesmo se aplica à estabilidade do ângulo de visão.

CalMAN: escalas de cinza
CalMAN: escalas de cinza
CalMAN: saturação de cor
CalMAN: saturação de cor
CalMAN: ColorChecker
CalMAN: ColorChecker
CalMAN: escalas de cinza (calibradas)
CalMAN: escalas de cinza (calibradas)
CalMAN: saturação de cor (calibrada)
CalMAN: saturação de cor (calibrada)
CalMAN: ColorChecker (calibrado)
CalMAN: ColorChecker (calibrado)

Um destaque adicional é a riqueza do espaço de cores: 100% DCI P3 e 97% AdobeRGB não são algo garantido no mundo dos jogos. As coisas são semelhantes na área de precisão de cores, que já era impressionante antes da calibração.

HP Omen Transcend 16 vs sRGB
HP Omen Transcend 16 vs sRGB
HP Omen Transcend 16 vs AdobeRGB
HP Omen Transcend 16 vs AdobeRGB
HP Omen Transcend 16 vs DCI P3
HP Omen Transcend 16 vs DCI P3

Os elogios também são reservados para os tempos de resposta curtos: Os painéis IPS clássicos só podem sonhar com 0,2 ms. A tela mini LED do antecessor era consideravelmente mais brilhante (800 vs. 392 cd/m²), mas também significativamente mais lenta.

Luz solar frontal
Luz solar frontal
Subpixels
Subpixels
Ângulo de visão
Ângulo de visão

Display Response Times

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
       Response Time Black to White
0.2 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 0.1 ms rise
↘ 0.1 ms fall
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 0 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (21 ms).
       Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
0.2 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 0.1 ms rise
↘ 0.1 ms fall
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 0 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (32.9 ms).

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM detected 120 Hz ≤ 100 % brightness setting

The display backlight flickers at 120 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) Flickering detected at a brightness setting of 100 % and below. There should be no flickering or PWM above this brightness setting.

The frequency of 120 Hz is very low, so the flickering may cause eyestrain and headaches after extended use.

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8746 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured.

100 % de brilho
100 % de brilho
80 % de brilho
80 % de brilho
60 % de brilho
60 % de brilho
40 % de brilho
40 % de brilho
20 % de brilho
20 % de brilho
0 % de brilho
0 % de brilho

Desempenho

Em termos de preço, o Omen Transcend 16 custa a partir de US$ 1.600. A variante de nível básico é equipada com um Core i7-13700HX, a GeForce RTX 406016 GB de RAM e uma tela IPS de baixa resolução. Nosso modelo de análise se encontra mais na extremidade superior da escala de preços e especificações.

CPU-Z
CPU-Z
CPU-Z
CPU-Z
GPU-Z
GPU-Z
HWiNFO
 

Condições de teste

O gerenciamento de desempenho do hub de jogos pré-instalado é um pouco difícil de acessar. No menu correspondente, o senhor encontrará três modos de energia e um gerenciador de calor. Como o modo de desempenho - análogo à maioria dos laptops para jogos - garante um melhor desempenho, mas também uma produção de ruído desproporcional, todas as medições foram realizadas usando o modo balanceado. Portanto, os valores determinados só podem ser comparados com o antecessor até certo ponto. Além disso, o controle automático da ventoinha e a comutação automática de gráficos estavam ativos.

Centro de jogos Omen
Centro de jogos Omen
Centro de jogos Omen
Centro de jogos Omen
Centro de jogos Omen
Centro de jogos Omen
Witcher 3 (FHD/Ultra) Eco Ausgegleichen Leistung
Ruído 39 dB(A) 44 dB(A) 53 dB(A)
Desempenho 60 fps lock 114 fps 126 fps

Processador

O Core i9-14900HX é quase desproporcional em comparação com a potência da GPU e a espessura do gabinete. O modelo de 10 nm da série Raptor Lake oferece 8 núcleos de desempenho com hyper threading e 16 núcleos de eficiência sem HT, o que resulta em um total de 32 threads. No modo balanceado, a CPU atinge seu potencial apenas de forma limitada. O melhor exemplo é o nosso loop Cinebench: Embora o desempenho tenha sido relativamente alto nas primeiras execuções, após um curto período, a pontuação caiu bastante (mas depois permaneceu em um nível constante). Em suma, ele só é suficiente para atingir o nível do Ultra 7 155H (ROG Zephyrus G16) ou do Ryzen 7 7840HS (Schenker XMG Core 16).

Cinebench R15 Multi Continuous Test

0210420630840105012601470168018902100231025202730294031503360357037803990Tooltip
HP Omen Transcend 16-u1095ng Intel Core i9-14900HX: Ø2840 (2582.31-3904.72)
HP Omen Transcend 16 Intel Core i9-13900HX: Ø3989 (3846.15-4100.04)
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605M Intel Core Ultra 7 155H: Ø2533 (2383.65-2679.17)
SCHENKER XMG CORE 16 (L23) AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS: Ø2657 (2635.57-2681.14)
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16ARX8 AMD Ryzen 7 7745HX: Ø2918 (2861.03-2977.96)
CPU Performance Rating - Percent
Average Intel Core i9-14900HX
 
86.6 pt
HP Omen Transcend 16 -2!
Intel Core i9-13900HX
79.9 pt
HP Omen Transcend 16-u1095ng
Intel Core i9-14900HX
75.7 pt
Average of class Gaming
 
69.4 pt
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16ARX8 -2!
AMD Ryzen 7 7745HX
66.3 pt
SCHENKER XMG CORE 16 (L23)
AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS
61.8 pt
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605M
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
60.2 pt
Cinebench R23
Multi Core
Average Intel Core i9-14900HX
  (17078 - 36249, n=34)
29130 Points +41%
HP Omen Transcend 16
Intel Core i9-13900HX
25932 (23977.8min - 25931.6max) Points +25%
Average of class Gaming
  (5668 - 36249, n=193, last 2 years)
21651 Points +5%
HP Omen Transcend 16-u1095ng
Intel Core i9-14900HX
20702 Points
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16ARX8
AMD Ryzen 7 7745HX
18060 (17729.5min - 18059.9max) Points -13%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605M
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
17267 Points -17%
SCHENKER XMG CORE 16 (L23)
AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS
17205 Points -17%
Single Core
HP Omen Transcend 16-u1095ng
Intel Core i9-14900HX
2182 Points
Average Intel Core i9-14900HX
  (1720 - 2245, n=34)
2157 Points -1%
HP Omen Transcend 16
Intel Core i9-13900HX
2105 Points -4%
Average of class Gaming
  (1088 - 2235, n=191, last 2 years)
1877 Points -14%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16ARX8
AMD Ryzen 7 7745HX
1846 Points -15%
SCHENKER XMG CORE 16 (L23)
AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS
1767 Points -19%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605M
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
1681 Points -23%
Cinebench R20
CPU (Multi Core)
Average Intel Core i9-14900HX
  (6579 - 13832, n=34)
11084 Points +32%
HP Omen Transcend 16
Intel Core i9-13900HX
9895 Points +17%
HP Omen Transcend 16-u1095ng
Intel Core i9-14900HX
8427 Points
Average of class Gaming
  (2179 - 13832, n=191, last 2 years)
8240 Points -2%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16ARX8
AMD Ryzen 7 7745HX
7072 Points -16%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605M
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
6682 Points -21%
SCHENKER XMG CORE 16 (L23)
AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS
6656 Points -21%
CPU (Single Core)
HP Omen Transcend 16-u1095ng
Intel Core i9-14900HX
836 Points
Average Intel Core i9-14900HX
  (657 - 859, n=34)
826 Points -1%
HP Omen Transcend 16
Intel Core i9-13900HX
805 Points -4%
Average of class Gaming
  (427 - 856, n=191, last 2 years)
722 Points -14%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16ARX8
AMD Ryzen 7 7745HX
717 Points -14%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605M
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
693 Points -17%
SCHENKER XMG CORE 16 (L23)
AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS
686 Points -18%
Cinebench R15
CPU Multi 64Bit
Average Intel Core i9-14900HX
  (3263 - 5589, n=35)
4462 Points +14%
HP Omen Transcend 16
Intel Core i9-13900HX
4100 (3846.15min - 4100.04max) Points +5%
HP Omen Transcend 16-u1095ng
Intel Core i9-14900HX
3905 (2582.31min - 3904.72max) Points
Average of class Gaming
  (905 - 5663, n=198, last 2 years)
3394 Points -13%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16ARX8
AMD Ryzen 7 7745HX
2978 (2861.03min - 2977.96max) Points -24%
SCHENKER XMG CORE 16 (L23)
AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS
2681 (2635.57min - 2681.14max) Points -31%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605M
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
2679 (2383.65min - 2679.17max) Points -31%
CPU Single 64Bit
Average Intel Core i9-14900HX
  (247 - 323, n=34)
306 Points +3%
HP Omen Transcend 16
Intel Core i9-13900HX
299 Points 0%
HP Omen Transcend 16-u1095ng
Intel Core i9-14900HX
298 Points
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16ARX8
AMD Ryzen 7 7745HX
294 Points -1%
Average of class Gaming
  (176.6 - 318, n=195, last 2 years)
276 Points -7%
SCHENKER XMG CORE 16 (L23)
AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS
270 Points -9%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605M
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
264 Points -11%
Blender - v2.79 BMW27 CPU
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605M
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
193 Seconds * -18%
SCHENKER XMG CORE 16 (L23)
AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS
186 Seconds * -13%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16ARX8
AMD Ryzen 7 7745HX
174 Seconds * -6%
Average of class Gaming
  (87 - 555, n=186, last 2 years)
172.1 Seconds * -5%
HP Omen Transcend 16-u1095ng
Intel Core i9-14900HX
164 Seconds *
HP Omen Transcend 16
Intel Core i9-13900HX
123 Seconds * +25%
Average Intel Core i9-14900HX
  (91 - 206, n=34)
119.5 Seconds * +27%
7-Zip 18.03
7z b 4
Average Intel Core i9-14900HX
  (66769 - 136645, n=34)
112494 MIPS +28%
HP Omen Transcend 16
Intel Core i9-13900HX
105001 MIPS +19%
HP Omen Transcend 16-u1095ng
Intel Core i9-14900HX
88012 MIPS
Average of class Gaming
  (23795 - 140932, n=190, last 2 years)
84653 MIPS -4%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16ARX8
AMD Ryzen 7 7745HX
75557 MIPS -14%
SCHENKER XMG CORE 16 (L23)
AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS
73035 MIPS -17%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605M
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
68500 MIPS -22%
7z b 4 -mmt1
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16ARX8
AMD Ryzen 7 7745HX
7244 MIPS +1%
HP Omen Transcend 16-u1095ng
Intel Core i9-14900HX
7142 MIPS
Average Intel Core i9-14900HX
  (5452 - 7545, n=34)
7017 MIPS -2%
HP Omen Transcend 16
Intel Core i9-13900HX
6866 MIPS -4%
SCHENKER XMG CORE 16 (L23)
AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS
6632 MIPS -7%
Average of class Gaming
  (4168 - 7581, n=190, last 2 years)
6281 MIPS -12%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605M
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
5439 MIPS -24%
Geekbench 6.3
Multi-Core
Average Intel Core i9-14900HX
  (13158 - 19665, n=34)
17369 Points +8%
HP Omen Transcend 16-u1095ng
Intel Core i9-14900HX
16011 Points
Average of class Gaming
  (5340 - 19665, n=110, last 2 years)
14171 Points -11%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605M
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
13323 Points -17%
SCHENKER XMG CORE 16 (L23)
AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS
13088 Points -18%
Single-Core
Average Intel Core i9-14900HX
  (2419 - 3129, n=34)
2973 Points +6%
HP Omen Transcend 16-u1095ng
Intel Core i9-14900HX
2800 Points
SCHENKER XMG CORE 16 (L23)
AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS
2694 Points -4%
Average of class Gaming
  (1490 - 3129, n=110, last 2 years)
2641 Points -6%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605M
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
2410 Points -14%
Geekbench 5.5
Multi-Core
Average Intel Core i9-14900HX
  (8618 - 23194, n=34)
19540 Points +11%
HP Omen Transcend 16
Intel Core i9-13900HX
19012 Points +8%
HP Omen Transcend 16-u1095ng
Intel Core i9-14900HX
17612 Points
Average of class Gaming
  (4557 - 23194, n=191, last 2 years)
14891 Points -15%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605M
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
12905 Points -27%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16ARX8
AMD Ryzen 7 7745HX
12378 Points -30%
SCHENKER XMG CORE 16 (L23)
AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS
11803 Points -33%
Single-Core
Average Intel Core i9-14900HX
  (1669 - 2210, n=34)
2092 Points +2%
HP Omen Transcend 16
Intel Core i9-13900HX
2058 Points 0%
HP Omen Transcend 16-u1095ng
Intel Core i9-14900HX
2053 Points
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16ARX8
AMD Ryzen 7 7745HX
2040 Points -1%
SCHENKER XMG CORE 16 (L23)
AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS
1951 Points -5%
Average of class Gaming
  (986 - 2210, n=191, last 2 years)
1882 Points -8%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605M
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
1755 Points -15%
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 - 4k Preset
Average Intel Core i9-14900HX
  (16.8 - 38.9, n=34)
29.7 fps +31%
HP Omen Transcend 16
Intel Core i9-13900HX
26.2 fps +15%
Average of class Gaming
  (6.72 - 38.9, n=190, last 2 years)
23.3 fps +3%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16ARX8
AMD Ryzen 7 7745HX
23.2 fps +2%
HP Omen Transcend 16-u1095ng
Intel Core i9-14900HX
22.7 fps
SCHENKER XMG CORE 16 (L23)
AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS
21.6 fps -5%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605M
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
19.9 fps -12%
LibreOffice - 20 Documents To PDF
SCHENKER XMG CORE 16 (L23)
AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS
68.1 s * -28%
HP Omen Transcend 16-u1095ng
Intel Core i9-14900HX
53.1 s *
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605M
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
49.6 s * +7%
Average of class Gaming
  (31.4 - 96.6, n=187, last 2 years)
47.6 s * +10%
HP Omen Transcend 16
Intel Core i9-13900HX
43.8 s * +18%
Average Intel Core i9-14900HX
  (31.4 - 85.1, n=34)
43.4 s * +18%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16ARX8
AMD Ryzen 7 7745HX
37.9 s * +29%
R Benchmark 2.5 - Overall mean
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605M
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
0.4654 sec * -18%
Average of class Gaming
  (0.3609 - 0.759, n=191, last 2 years)
0.4402 sec * -11%
SCHENKER XMG CORE 16 (L23)
AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS
0.4352 sec * -10%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16ARX8
AMD Ryzen 7 7745HX
0.421 sec * -6%
HP Omen Transcend 16
Intel Core i9-13900HX
0.4028 sec * -2%
HP Omen Transcend 16-u1095ng
Intel Core i9-14900HX
0.3955 sec *
Average Intel Core i9-14900HX
  (0.3604 - 0.4859, n=34)
0.3845 sec * +3%

* ... smaller is better

Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64Bit
3905 Points
Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64Bit
270 fps
Cinebench R15 Ref. Match 64Bit
99.6 %
Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64Bit
298 Points
Cinebench R20 CPU (Multi Core)
8427 Points
Cinebench R20 CPU (Single Core)
836 Points
Cinebench R23 Single Core
2182 Points
Cinebench R23 Multi Core
20702 Points
Ajuda
Performance Rating
Average Intel Core i9-14900HX
 
95.4 pt
HP Omen Transcend 16
Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
89 pt
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16ARX8
AMD Ryzen 7 7745HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
83.9 pt
SCHENKER XMG CORE 16 (L23)
AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
83.3 pt
Average of class Gaming
 
79.1 pt
HP Omen Transcend 16-u1095ng
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
71.5 pt
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605M
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
65.2 pt
AIDA64 / FP32 Ray-Trace
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16ARX8
AMD Ryzen 7 7745HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
29656 KRay/s +72%
SCHENKER XMG CORE 16 (L23)
AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
27731 KRay/s +61%
Average Intel Core i9-14900HX
  (13098 - 33474, n=33)
25096 KRay/s +46%
HP Omen Transcend 16
Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
23600 KRay/s +37%
Average of class Gaming
  (4986 - 60169, n=187, last 2 years)
21640 KRay/s +25%
HP Omen Transcend 16-u1095ng
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
17244 KRay/s
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605M
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
16431 KRay/s -5%
AIDA64 / FPU Julia
Average Intel Core i9-14900HX
  (67573 - 166040, n=33)
125765 Points +42%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16ARX8
AMD Ryzen 7 7745HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
120974 Points +37%
SCHENKER XMG CORE 16 (L23)
AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
118600 Points +34%
HP Omen Transcend 16
Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
117390 Points +33%
Average of class Gaming
  (25360 - 252486, n=187, last 2 years)
106090 Points +20%
HP Omen Transcend 16-u1095ng
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
88537 Points
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605M
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
85461 Points -3%
AIDA64 / CPU SHA3
Average Intel Core i9-14900HX
  (3589 - 7979, n=33)
6212 MB/s +46%
HP Omen Transcend 16
Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
5888 MB/s +38%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16ARX8
AMD Ryzen 7 7745HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
4974 MB/s +17%
SCHENKER XMG CORE 16 (L23)
AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
4920 MB/s +15%
Average of class Gaming
  (1339 - 10389, n=187, last 2 years)
4852 MB/s +14%
HP Omen Transcend 16-u1095ng
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
4267 MB/s
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605M
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
3814 MB/s -11%
AIDA64 / CPU Queen
Average Intel Core i9-14900HX
  (118405 - 148966, n=33)
138709 Points +17%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16ARX8
AMD Ryzen 7 7745HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
126954 Points +7%
HP Omen Transcend 16
Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
126217 Points +7%
HP Omen Transcend 16-u1095ng
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
118405 Points
Average of class Gaming
  (50699 - 200651, n=187, last 2 years)
116237 Points -2%
SCHENKER XMG CORE 16 (L23)
AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
105028 Points -11%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605M
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
90347 Points -24%
AIDA64 / FPU SinJulia
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16ARX8
AMD Ryzen 7 7745HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
15887 Points +30%
Average Intel Core i9-14900HX
  (10475 - 18517, n=33)
15369 Points +26%
SCHENKER XMG CORE 16 (L23)
AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
15189 Points +24%
HP Omen Transcend 16
Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
13440 Points +10%
Average of class Gaming
  (4800 - 32988, n=187, last 2 years)
13175 Points +8%
HP Omen Transcend 16-u1095ng
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
12217 Points
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605M
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
10641 Points -13%
AIDA64 / FPU Mandel
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16ARX8
AMD Ryzen 7 7745HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
64255 Points +48%
SCHENKER XMG CORE 16 (L23)
AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
63114 Points +46%
Average Intel Core i9-14900HX
  (32543 - 83662, n=33)
61872 Points +43%
HP Omen Transcend 16
Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
58716 Points +36%
Average of class Gaming
  (12321 - 134044, n=187, last 2 years)
53471 Points +23%
HP Omen Transcend 16-u1095ng
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
43302 Points
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605M
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
41806 Points -3%
AIDA64 / CPU AES
Average Intel Core i9-14900HX
  (86964 - 241777, n=33)
137399 MB/s +58%
HP Omen Transcend 16
Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
111789 MB/s +29%
Average of class Gaming
  (19065 - 328679, n=187, last 2 years)
109176 MB/s +26%
SCHENKER XMG CORE 16 (L23)
AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
88619 MB/s +2%
HP Omen Transcend 16-u1095ng
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
86964 MB/s
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605M
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
79475 MB/s -9%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16ARX8
AMD Ryzen 7 7745HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
71191 MB/s -18%
AIDA64 / CPU ZLib
Average Intel Core i9-14900HX
  (1054 - 2292, n=33)
1815 MB/s +43%
HP Omen Transcend 16
Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
1689 MB/s +34%
Average of class Gaming
  (373 - 2409, n=187, last 2 years)
1349 MB/s +7%
HP Omen Transcend 16-u1095ng
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
1265 MB/s
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16ARX8
AMD Ryzen 7 7745HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
1147 MB/s -9%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605M
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
1128 MB/s -11%
SCHENKER XMG CORE 16 (L23)
AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
1099 MB/s -13%
AIDA64 / FP64 Ray-Trace
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16ARX8
AMD Ryzen 7 7745HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
15975 KRay/s +74%
SCHENKER XMG CORE 16 (L23)
AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
14776 KRay/s +61%
Average Intel Core i9-14900HX
  (6809 - 18349, n=33)
13525 KRay/s +47%
HP Omen Transcend 16
Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
12891 KRay/s +41%
Average of class Gaming
  (2540 - 31796, n=187, last 2 years)
11654 KRay/s +27%
HP Omen Transcend 16-u1095ng
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
9170 KRay/s
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605M
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
8449 KRay/s -8%
AIDA64 / CPU PhotoWorxx
HP Omen Transcend 16
Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
50609 MPixel/s +2%
HP Omen Transcend 16-u1095ng
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
49507 MPixel/s
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605M
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
49238 MPixel/s -1%
Average Intel Core i9-14900HX
  (23903 - 54702, n=33)
46637 MPixel/s -6%
SCHENKER XMG CORE 16 (L23)
AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
39928 MPixel/s -19%
Average of class Gaming
  (10805 - 60161, n=188, last 2 years)
39919 MPixel/s -19%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16ARX8
AMD Ryzen 7 7745HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
28499 MPixel/s -42%

Desempenho do sistema

O desempenho do sistema é bom, mas não está entre os primeiros colocados. Quando se trata da velocidade da RAM, o Transcend garante o segundo lugar no campo de comparação.

PCMark 10 / Score
Average Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
  (7866 - 8550, n=6)
8253 Points +5%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16ARX8
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, R7 7745HX, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
8206 Points +4%
SCHENKER XMG CORE 16 (L23)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, R7 7840HS, Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB
8183 Points +4%
HP Omen Transcend 16
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i9-13900HX, SK hynix PC801 HFS002TEJ9X101N
8153 Points +4%
HP Omen Transcend 16-u1095ng
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i9-14900HX, Kioxia XG8 KXG80ZNV1T02
7866 Points
Average of class Gaming
  (5776 - 9852, n=168, last 2 years)
7774 Points -1%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605M
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Ultra 7 155H, WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00
7123 Points -9%
PCMark 10 / Essentials
HP Omen Transcend 16
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i9-13900HX, SK hynix PC801 HFS002TEJ9X101N
11302 Points +6%
Average Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
  (10621 - 11815, n=6)
11079 Points +4%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16ARX8
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, R7 7745HX, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
11074 Points +4%
SCHENKER XMG CORE 16 (L23)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, R7 7840HS, Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB
10934 Points +3%
Average of class Gaming
  (9057 - 12334, n=167, last 2 years)
10836 Points +2%
HP Omen Transcend 16-u1095ng
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i9-14900HX, Kioxia XG8 KXG80ZNV1T02
10621 Points
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605M
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Ultra 7 155H, WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00
10038 Points -5%
PCMark 10 / Productivity
SCHENKER XMG CORE 16 (L23)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, R7 7840HS, Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB
10526 Points +3%
Average Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
  (9701 - 11103, n=6)
10493 Points +2%
HP Omen Transcend 16-u1095ng
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i9-14900HX, Kioxia XG8 KXG80ZNV1T02
10268 Points
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16ARX8
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, R7 7745HX, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
10235 Points 0%
Average of class Gaming
  (6662 - 14612, n=167, last 2 years)
9878 Points -4%
HP Omen Transcend 16
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i9-13900HX, SK hynix PC801 HFS002TEJ9X101N
9735 Points -5%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605M
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Ultra 7 155H, WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00
9208 Points -10%
PCMark 10 / Digital Content Creation
HP Omen Transcend 16
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i9-13900HX, SK hynix PC801 HFS002TEJ9X101N
13370 Points +10%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16ARX8
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, R7 7745HX, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
13229 Points +9%
Average Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
  (12114 - 14827, n=6)
13153 Points +9%
SCHENKER XMG CORE 16 (L23)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, R7 7840HS, Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB
12920 Points +7%
HP Omen Transcend 16-u1095ng
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i9-14900HX, Kioxia XG8 KXG80ZNV1T02
12114 Points
Average of class Gaming
  (6703 - 18475, n=167, last 2 years)
12030 Points -1%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605M
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Ultra 7 155H, WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00
10612 Points -12%
CrossMark / Overall
Average Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
  (2002 - 2312, n=5)
2179 Points
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16ARX8
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, R7 7745HX, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
2027 Points
HP Omen Transcend 16
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i9-13900HX, SK hynix PC801 HFS002TEJ9X101N
1970 Points
Average of class Gaming
  (1247 - 2344, n=151, last 2 years)
1899 Points
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605M
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Ultra 7 155H, WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00
1721 Points
SCHENKER XMG CORE 16 (L23)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, R7 7840HS, Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB
1694 Points
CrossMark / Productivity
Average Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
  (1827 - 2191, n=5)
2042 Points
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16ARX8
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, R7 7745HX, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
1930 Points
HP Omen Transcend 16
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i9-13900HX, SK hynix PC801 HFS002TEJ9X101N
1812 Points
Average of class Gaming
  (1299 - 2204, n=151, last 2 years)
1801 Points
SCHENKER XMG CORE 16 (L23)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, R7 7840HS, Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB
1629 Points
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605M
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Ultra 7 155H, WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00
1624 Points
CrossMark / Creativity
Average Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
  (2287 - 2458, n=5)
2385 Points
HP Omen Transcend 16
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i9-13900HX, SK hynix PC801 HFS002TEJ9X101N
2316 Points
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16ARX8
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, R7 7745HX, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
2222 Points
Average of class Gaming
  (1275 - 2660, n=151, last 2 years)
2083 Points
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605M
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Ultra 7 155H, WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00
1942 Points
SCHENKER XMG CORE 16 (L23)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, R7 7840HS, Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB
1862 Points
CrossMark / Responsiveness
Average Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
  (1734 - 2330, n=5)
2028 Points
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16ARX8
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, R7 7745HX, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
1785 Points
Average of class Gaming
  (1030 - 2330, n=151, last 2 years)
1699 Points
HP Omen Transcend 16
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i9-13900HX, SK hynix PC801 HFS002TEJ9X101N
1557 Points
SCHENKER XMG CORE 16 (L23)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, R7 7840HS, Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB
1435 Points
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605M
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Ultra 7 155H, WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00
1424 Points
WebXPRT 3 / Overall
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16ARX8
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, R7 7745HX, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
345 Points +1%
HP Omen Transcend 16-u1095ng
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i9-14900HX, Kioxia XG8 KXG80ZNV1T02
342 Points
Average Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
  (319 - 342, n=6)
333 Points -3%
HP Omen Transcend 16
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i9-13900HX, SK hynix PC801 HFS002TEJ9X101N
331 Points -3%
Average of class Gaming
  (215 - 480, n=165, last 2 years)
303 Points -11%
SCHENKER XMG CORE 16 (L23)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, R7 7840HS, Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB
288 Points -16%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605M
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Ultra 7 155H, WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00
283 Points -17%
WebXPRT 4 / Overall
HP Omen Transcend 16
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i9-13900HX, SK hynix PC801 HFS002TEJ9X101N
300 Points
Average Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
  (291 - 301, n=4)
298 Points
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16ARX8
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, R7 7745HX, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
283 Points
Average of class Gaming
  (157.9 - 328, n=153, last 2 years)
266 Points
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605M
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Ultra 7 155H, WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00
256 Points
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 / Total
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605M
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Ultra 7 155H, WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00
548 ms * -25%
SCHENKER XMG CORE 16 (L23)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, R7 7840HS, Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB
533 ms * -22%
Average of class Gaming
  (421 - 779, n=179, last 2 years)
506 ms * -16%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16ARX8
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, R7 7745HX, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
471 ms * -8%
HP Omen Transcend 16
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i9-13900HX, SK hynix PC801 HFS002TEJ9X101N
455 ms * -4%
Average Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
  (431 - 461, n=6)
443 ms * -1%
HP Omen Transcend 16-u1095ng
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i9-14900HX, Kioxia XG8 KXG80ZNV1T02
438 ms *

* ... smaller is better

PCMark 10 Score
7866 pontos
Ajuda
AIDA64 / Memory Copy
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605M
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
89414 MB/s +14%
HP Omen Transcend 16-u1095ng
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
78330 MB/s
HP Omen Transcend 16
Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
77103 MB/s -2%
Average Intel Core i9-14900HX
  (38028 - 83392, n=33)
74739 MB/s -5%
SCHENKER XMG CORE 16 (L23)
AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
67907 MB/s -13%
Average of class Gaming
  (21842 - 94222, n=187, last 2 years)
64907 MB/s -17%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16ARX8
AMD Ryzen 7 7745HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
50007 MB/s -36%
AIDA64 / Memory Read
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605M
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
86576 MB/s +2%
HP Omen Transcend 16-u1095ng
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
85070 MB/s
HP Omen Transcend 16
Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
84131 MB/s -1%
Average Intel Core i9-14900HX
  (43306 - 87568, n=33)
80919 MB/s -5%
Average of class Gaming
  (23681 - 99713, n=187, last 2 years)
68658 MB/s -19%
SCHENKER XMG CORE 16 (L23)
AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
60730 MB/s -29%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16ARX8
AMD Ryzen 7 7745HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
50703 MB/s -40%
AIDA64 / Memory Write
SCHENKER XMG CORE 16 (L23)
AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
84517 MB/s +9%
HP Omen Transcend 16-u1095ng
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
77579 MB/s
HP Omen Transcend 16
Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
76244 MB/s -2%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605M
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
73337 MB/s -5%
Average Intel Core i9-14900HX
  (37146 - 80589, n=33)
71949 MB/s -7%
Average of class Gaming
  (22986 - 108954, n=187, last 2 years)
66727 MB/s -14%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16ARX8
AMD Ryzen 7 7745HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
54587 MB/s -30%
AIDA64 / Memory Latency
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605M
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
140 ns * -62%
Average of class Gaming
  (59.5 - 259, n=187, last 2 years)
94.1 ns * -9%
SCHENKER XMG CORE 16 (L23)
AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
87.9 ns * -2%
HP Omen Transcend 16
Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
87.8 ns * -2%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16ARX8
AMD Ryzen 7 7745HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
86.5 ns * -0%
HP Omen Transcend 16-u1095ng
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
86.5 ns *
Average Intel Core i9-14900HX
  (76.1 - 105, n=33)
84.8 ns * +2%

* ... smaller is better

Latências de DPC

Assim como o antecessor, o novo Omen 16 também precisa lidar com latências relativamente altas e isso pode causar problemas em alguns cenários de aplicativos (por exemplo, processamento de áudio e vídeo em tempo real).

LatencyMon
LatencyMon
DPC Latencies / LatencyMon - interrupt to process latency (max), Web, Youtube, Prime95
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605M
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Ultra 7 155H, WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00
2484.4 μs * -59%
HP Omen Transcend 16-u1095ng
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i9-14900HX, Kioxia XG8 KXG80ZNV1T02
1566 μs *
HP Omen Transcend 16
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i9-13900HX, SK hynix PC801 HFS002TEJ9X101N
1518 μs * +3%
SCHENKER XMG CORE 16 (L23)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, R7 7840HS, Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB
673.1 μs * +57%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16ARX8
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, R7 7745HX, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
603 μs * +61%

* ... smaller is better

Armazenamento em massa

Em comparação com o desempenho da CPU, não observamos nenhuma queda no desempenho da SSD. A unidade Kioxia instalada é um pouco mais lenta do que a unidade SK hynix encontrada no antigo Transcend, mas, apesar disso, oferece velocidades suficientemente altas. É uma pena que o dispositivo de 16 polegadas tenha apenas um slot M.2, o que significa que a SSD integrada terá que ser substituída para expandir o armazenamento.

Kioxia XG8 KXG80ZNV1T02
CDM 5/6 Read Seq Q32T1: 6967 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write Seq Q32T1: 5341 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Read 4K Q32T1: 511.2 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write 4K Q32T1: 400.9 MB/s
CDM 5 Read Seq: 3599 MB/s
CDM 5 Write Seq: 3651 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Read 4K: 53.34 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write 4K: 125.3 MB/s
Drive Performance Rating - Percent
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16ARX8
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
90 pt
Average of class Gaming
 
73.4 pt
SCHENKER XMG CORE 16 (L23)
Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB
70.8 pt
Average Kioxia XG8 KXG80ZNV1T02
 
68.9 pt
HP Omen Transcend 16
SK hynix PC801 HFS002TEJ9X101N
66.4 pt
HP Omen Transcend 16-u1095ng
Kioxia XG8 KXG80ZNV1T02
61.7 pt
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605M
WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00
48.9 pt
DiskSpd
seq read
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16ARX8
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
4677 (4664.17min - 4676.56max) MB/s +51%
Average of class Gaming
  (1319 - 7045, n=168, last 2 years)
3487 MB/s +12%
Average Kioxia XG8 KXG80ZNV1T02
  (2735 - 4156, n=9)
3471 MB/s +12%
SCHENKER XMG CORE 16 (L23)
Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB
3449 (3368.24min - 3448.79max) MB/s +11%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605M
WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00
3202 (3129.61min - 3201.93max) MB/s +3%
HP Omen Transcend 16-u1095ng
Kioxia XG8 KXG80ZNV1T02
3102 (3080.64min - 3101.78max) MB/s
HP Omen Transcend 16
SK hynix PC801 HFS002TEJ9X101N
3023 (3010.73min - 3023.25max) MB/s -3%
seq write
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16ARX8
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
4326 (4313.21min - 4326.48max) MB/s +42%
Average Kioxia XG8 KXG80ZNV1T02
  (3038 - 4893, n=9)
3943 MB/s +30%
Average of class Gaming
  (535 - 9307, n=168, last 2 years)
3797 MB/s +25%
SCHENKER XMG CORE 16 (L23)
Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB
3637 (3591.53min - 3636.88max) MB/s +20%
HP Omen Transcend 16
SK hynix PC801 HFS002TEJ9X101N
3152 (3026.22min - 3152.01max) MB/s +4%
HP Omen Transcend 16-u1095ng
Kioxia XG8 KXG80ZNV1T02
3038 (2862.26min - 3038.15max) MB/s
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605M
WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00
2526 (2498.97min - 2525.81max) MB/s -17%
seq q8 t1 read
SCHENKER XMG CORE 16 (L23)
Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB
7137 (6595.15min - 7137.45max) MB/s +12%
HP Omen Transcend 16
SK hynix PC801 HFS002TEJ9X101N
6899 (5306.42min - 6899.46max) MB/s +8%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16ARX8
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
6660 (6017.57min - 6659.93max) MB/s +4%
Average Kioxia XG8 KXG80ZNV1T02
  (6169 - 6985, n=9)
6644 MB/s +4%
HP Omen Transcend 16-u1095ng
Kioxia XG8 KXG80ZNV1T02
6388 (5544.27min - 6387.72max) MB/s
Average of class Gaming
  (2594 - 16089, n=168, last 2 years)
6328 MB/s -1%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605M
WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00
5008 (4421.01min - 5007.74max) MB/s -22%
seq q8 t1 write
SCHENKER XMG CORE 16 (L23)
Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB
6818 (6604.35min - 6817.63max) MB/s +30%
HP Omen Transcend 16
SK hynix PC801 HFS002TEJ9X101N
5716 (5661.68min - 5716.31max) MB/s +9%
Average Kioxia XG8 KXG80ZNV1T02
  (5144 - 5667, n=9)
5420 MB/s +4%
HP Omen Transcend 16-u1095ng
Kioxia XG8 KXG80ZNV1T02
5234 (5167.11min - 5234.47max) MB/s
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16ARX8
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
4943 (4926min - 4942.6max) MB/s -6%
Average of class Gaming
  (539 - 14571, n=168, last 2 years)
4823 MB/s -8%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605M
WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00
3230 (3169.22min - 3230.03max) MB/s -38%
4k q1 t1 read
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16ARX8
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
80.1 (78.57min - 80.12max) MB/s +56%
Average of class Gaming
  (30.6 - 95.9, n=168, last 2 years)
65.8 MB/s +28%
SCHENKER XMG CORE 16 (L23)
Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB
64.2 (63.05min - 64.22max) MB/s +25%
Average Kioxia XG8 KXG80ZNV1T02
  (51.3 - 69.6, n=9)
59.2 MB/s +15%
HP Omen Transcend 16
SK hynix PC801 HFS002TEJ9X101N
56.3 (55.9min - 56.3max) MB/s +10%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605M
WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00
52.9 (51.15min - 52.91max) MB/s +3%
HP Omen Transcend 16-u1095ng
Kioxia XG8 KXG80ZNV1T02
51.3 (50.48min - 51.25max) MB/s
4k q1 t1 write
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16ARX8
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
244 (243min - 243.65max) MB/s +90%
Average of class Gaming
  (66.6 - 397, n=168, last 2 years)
222 MB/s +73%
Average Kioxia XG8 KXG80ZNV1T02
  (116.4 - 219, n=9)
164.7 MB/s +29%
SCHENKER XMG CORE 16 (L23)
Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB
146.3 (140.58min - 146.31max) MB/s +14%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605M
WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00
128.4 (126.56min - 128.36max) MB/s 0%
HP Omen Transcend 16-u1095ng
Kioxia XG8 KXG80ZNV1T02
128.1 (123.78min - 128.05max) MB/s
HP Omen Transcend 16
SK hynix PC801 HFS002TEJ9X101N
127 (124.67min - 127.01max) MB/s -1%
4k q32 t16 read
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16ARX8
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
4173 (4166.98min - 4173.4max) MB/s +364%
Average of class Gaming
  (417 - 6172, n=168, last 2 years)
2555 MB/s +184%
Average Kioxia XG8 KXG80ZNV1T02
  (561 - 3829, n=9)
2173 MB/s +141%
SCHENKER XMG CORE 16 (L23)
Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB
1077 (1013.53min - 1077.14max) MB/s +20%
HP Omen Transcend 16
SK hynix PC801 HFS002TEJ9X101N
932 (919.54min - 932.39max) MB/s +4%
HP Omen Transcend 16-u1095ng
Kioxia XG8 KXG80ZNV1T02
900 (832.36min - 900.34max) MB/s
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605M
WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00
604 (565.74min - 603.6max) MB/s -33%
4k q32 t16 write
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16ARX8
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
3552 (3546.24min - 3551.63max) MB/s +711%
Average of class Gaming
  (162.3 - 4869, n=168, last 2 years)
2101 MB/s +380%
Average Kioxia XG8 KXG80ZNV1T02
  (365 - 2682, n=9)
1414 MB/s +223%
HP Omen Transcend 16
SK hynix PC801 HFS002TEJ9X101N
501 (456.23min - 501.33max) MB/s +14%
HP Omen Transcend 16-u1095ng
Kioxia XG8 KXG80ZNV1T02
438 (405.08min - 437.5max) MB/s
SCHENKER XMG CORE 16 (L23)
Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB
413 (372.31min - 412.68max) MB/s -6%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605M
WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00
402 (389.17min - 402.07max) MB/s -8%
AS SSD
Score Total
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16ARX8
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
8963 Points +74%
Average of class Gaming
  (2271 - 13854, n=159, last 2 years)
6737 Points +31%
HP Omen Transcend 16
SK hynix PC801 HFS002TEJ9X101N
6291 Points +22%
Average Kioxia XG8 KXG80ZNV1T02
  (4465 - 8212, n=9)
6264 Points +22%
SCHENKER XMG CORE 16 (L23)
Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB
6198 Points +21%
HP Omen Transcend 16-u1095ng
Kioxia XG8 KXG80ZNV1T02
5138 Points
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605M
WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00
3272 Points -36%
Score Read
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16ARX8
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
3449 Points +137%
Average of class Gaming
  (776 - 4721, n=159, last 2 years)
2441 Points +67%
Average Kioxia XG8 KXG80ZNV1T02
  (1359 - 3403, n=9)
2277 Points +56%
SCHENKER XMG CORE 16 (L23)
Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB
1603 Points +10%
HP Omen Transcend 16
SK hynix PC801 HFS002TEJ9X101N
1523 Points +4%
HP Omen Transcend 16-u1095ng
Kioxia XG8 KXG80ZNV1T02
1458 Points
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605M
WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00
1020 Points -30%
Score Write
HP Omen Transcend 16
SK hynix PC801 HFS002TEJ9X101N
4064 Points +34%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16ARX8
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
3832 Points +27%
SCHENKER XMG CORE 16 (L23)
Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB
3812 Points +26%
Average of class Gaming
  (515 - 7208, n=159, last 2 years)
3113 Points +3%
HP Omen Transcend 16-u1095ng
Kioxia XG8 KXG80ZNV1T02
3029 Points
Average Kioxia XG8 KXG80ZNV1T02
  (2518 - 3244, n=9)
2908 Points -4%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605M
WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00
1808 Points -40%
Seq Read
HP Omen Transcend 16-u1095ng
Kioxia XG8 KXG80ZNV1T02
5625.54 MB/s
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16ARX8
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
5621.18 MB/s 0%
HP Omen Transcend 16
SK hynix PC801 HFS002TEJ9X101N
5588.41 MB/s -1%
Average Kioxia XG8 KXG80ZNV1T02
  (5197 - 5837, n=9)
5560 MB/s -1%
Average of class Gaming
  (2260 - 12763, n=159, last 2 years)
4944 MB/s -12%
SCHENKER XMG CORE 16 (L23)
Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB
4362 MB/s -22%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605M
WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00
3662 MB/s -35%
Seq Write
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16ARX8
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
4010.3 MB/s +12%
HP Omen Transcend 16
SK hynix PC801 HFS002TEJ9X101N
3875.81 MB/s +8%
Average Kioxia XG8 KXG80ZNV1T02
  (2824 - 5175, n=9)
3759 MB/s +5%
Average of class Gaming
  (495 - 11316, n=159, last 2 years)
3720 MB/s +4%
HP Omen Transcend 16-u1095ng
Kioxia XG8 KXG80ZNV1T02
3587.95 MB/s
SCHENKER XMG CORE 16 (L23)
Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB
3376 MB/s -6%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605M
WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00
1921 MB/s -46%
4K Read
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16ARX8
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
73.46 MB/s +48%
Average of class Gaming
  (27.8 - 112.1, n=159, last 2 years)
65.1 MB/s +31%
SCHENKER XMG CORE 16 (L23)
Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB
61.2 MB/s +23%
Average Kioxia XG8 KXG80ZNV1T02
  (49.8 - 65.6, n=9)
59.3 MB/s +19%
HP Omen Transcend 16
SK hynix PC801 HFS002TEJ9X101N
54.59 MB/s +10%
HP Omen Transcend 16-u1095ng
Kioxia XG8 KXG80ZNV1T02
49.79 MB/s
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605M
WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00
42.2 MB/s -15%
4K Write
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16ARX8
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
211.54 MB/s +10%
Average of class Gaming
  (108.8 - 512, n=159, last 2 years)
211 MB/s +10%
HP Omen Transcend 16-u1095ng
Kioxia XG8 KXG80ZNV1T02
191.79 MB/s
Average Kioxia XG8 KXG80ZNV1T02
  (147.9 - 224, n=9)
189 MB/s -1%
SCHENKER XMG CORE 16 (L23)
Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB
181.9 MB/s -5%
HP Omen Transcend 16
SK hynix PC801 HFS002TEJ9X101N
177.87 MB/s -7%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605M
WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00
157.9 MB/s -18%
4K-64 Read
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16ARX8
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
2813.87 MB/s +233%
Average of class Gaming
  (451 - 3475, n=159, last 2 years)
1876 MB/s +122%
Average Kioxia XG8 KXG80ZNV1T02
  (773 - 2766, n=9)
1661 MB/s +96%
SCHENKER XMG CORE 16 (L23)
Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB
1105 MB/s +31%
HP Omen Transcend 16
SK hynix PC801 HFS002TEJ9X101N
909.92 MB/s +8%
HP Omen Transcend 16-u1095ng
Kioxia XG8 KXG80ZNV1T02
845.48 MB/s
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605M
WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00
612 MB/s -28%
4K-64 Write
HP Omen Transcend 16
SK hynix PC801 HFS002TEJ9X101N
3498.72 MB/s +41%
SCHENKER XMG CORE 16 (L23)
Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB
3293 MB/s +33%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16ARX8
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
3219.74 MB/s +30%
Average of class Gaming
  (277 - 5909, n=159, last 2 years)
2533 MB/s +2%
HP Omen Transcend 16-u1095ng
Kioxia XG8 KXG80ZNV1T02
2478.06 MB/s
Average Kioxia XG8 KXG80ZNV1T02
  (2083 - 2535, n=9)
2344 MB/s -5%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605M
WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00
1458 MB/s -41%
Access Time Read
Average Kioxia XG8 KXG80ZNV1T02
  (0.037 - 0.126, n=9)
0.07367 ms * -36%
Average of class Gaming
  (0.016 - 0.379, n=158, last 2 years)
0.05509 ms * -2%
HP Omen Transcend 16-u1095ng
Kioxia XG8 KXG80ZNV1T02
0.054 ms *
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605M
WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00
0.032 ms * +41%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16ARX8
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
0.031 ms * +43%
HP Omen Transcend 16
SK hynix PC801 HFS002TEJ9X101N
0.023 ms * +57%
SCHENKER XMG CORE 16 (L23)
Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB
0.022 ms * +59%
Access Time Write
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16ARX8
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
0.064 ms * -220%
HP Omen Transcend 16
SK hynix PC801 HFS002TEJ9X101N
0.054 ms * -170%
Average of class Gaming
  (0.011 - 1.028, n=159, last 2 years)
0.04843 ms * -142%
Average Kioxia XG8 KXG80ZNV1T02
  (0.018 - 0.071, n=9)
0.03678 ms * -84%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605M
WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00
0.023 ms * -15%
SCHENKER XMG CORE 16 (L23)
Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB
0.022 ms * -10%
HP Omen Transcend 16-u1095ng
Kioxia XG8 KXG80ZNV1T02
0.02 ms *

* ... smaller is better

Continuous Performance Read: DiskSpd Read Loop, Queue Depth 8

036072010801440180021602520288032403600396043204680504054005760612064806840Tooltip
HP Omen Transcend 16-u1095ng Kioxia XG8 KXG80ZNV1T02; diskspd 2.0.17 f: Ø6318 (5640.08-6341.89)
HP Omen Transcend 16 SK hynix PC801 HFS002TEJ9X101N: Ø6898 (5515.51-6944.88)
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605M WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00; diskspd 2.0.17 f: Ø4947 (4458.34-4961.59)
SCHENKER XMG CORE 16 (L23) Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB: Ø7119 (6237.25-7138.29)
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16ARX8 Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR: Ø6087 (3287.84-6658.98)

Placa de vídeo

A GeForce RTX 4070 é baseada na arquitetura Ada Lovelace e, em termos de desempenho, está mais próxima da RTX 4060 do que da RTX 4080. Apesar do generoso TGP de 130 watts, o Omen 16 navegou em nosso curso de benchmark de maneira ligeiramente abaixo da média, embora a diferença em relação à concorrência seja, às vezes, muito pequena. A preparação para o futuro da RTX 4070 é bastante ruim devido à baixa quantidade de VRAM. Em alguns jogos, 8 GB já pode se tornar um fator limitante. Em nossa opinião, a Nvidia deveria ter dado à GPU pelo menos 12 GB, especialmente porque laptops desse tipo não são exatamente baratos.

3DMark Performance Rating - Percent
SCHENKER XMG CORE 16 (L23)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
100 pt
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16ARX8 -1!
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
93.7 pt
Average of class Gaming
 
93.7 pt
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
 
88.4 pt
HP Omen Transcend 16 -1!
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
86.7 pt
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605M -1!
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
82.4 pt
HP Omen Transcend 16-u1095ng
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
81.3 pt
3DMark 11 - 1280x720 Performance GPU
SCHENKER XMG CORE 16 (L23)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
45606 Points +16%
Average of class Gaming
  (1029 - 72178, n=186, last 2 years)
43521 Points +10%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16ARX8
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
41090 Points +4%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
  (24229 - 46434, n=59)
40410 Points +3%
HP Omen Transcend 16-u1095ng
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
39424 Points
HP Omen Transcend 16
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
38784 Points -2%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605M
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
37313 Points -5%
3DMark
1280x720 Cloud Gate Standard Graphics
SCHENKER XMG CORE 16 (L23)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
169253 Points +51%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
  (54238 - 193851, n=24)
148053 Points +32%
Average of class Gaming
  (15902 - 193851, n=101, last 2 years)
142796 Points +27%
HP Omen Transcend 16-u1095ng
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
112162 Points
1920x1080 Fire Strike Graphics
SCHENKER XMG CORE 16 (L23)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
32810 Points +15%
Average of class Gaming
  (781 - 53059, n=196, last 2 years)
31245 Points +10%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16ARX8
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
30936 Points +9%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
  (12242 - 33451, n=62)
29041 Points +2%
HP Omen Transcend 16-u1095ng
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
28461 Points
HP Omen Transcend 16
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
27343 Points -4%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605M
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
26568 Points -7%
2560x1440 Time Spy Graphics
SCHENKER XMG CORE 16 (L23)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
13040 Points +17%
Average of class Gaming
  (224 - 22717, n=191, last 2 years)
13034 Points +17%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16ARX8
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
12617 Points +13%
HP Omen Transcend 16
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
11960 Points +7%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
  (5012 - 13391, n=60)
11603 Points +4%
HP Omen Transcend 16-u1095ng
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
11181 Points
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605M
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
10989 Points -2%
3DMark 11 Performance
32528 pontos
3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score
53528 pontos
3DMark Fire Strike Score
23683 pontos
3DMark Time Spy Score
11682 pontos
Ajuda
Blender
v3.3 Classroom OPTIX/RTX
HP Omen Transcend 16-u1095ng
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-14900HX
23 Seconds *
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605M
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
22 Seconds * +4%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
  (18 - 30, n=60)
21.5 Seconds * +7%
Average of class Gaming
  (9 - 95, n=177, last 2 years)
21 Seconds * +9%
SCHENKER XMG CORE 16 (L23)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS
20 Seconds * +13%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16ARX8
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, AMD Ryzen 7 7745HX
19 Seconds * +17%
HP Omen Transcend 16
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13900HX
19 Seconds * +17%
v3.3 Classroom CUDA
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
  (32 - 181, n=63)
40.6 Seconds * -13%
Average of class Gaming
  (16 - 175, n=183, last 2 years)
36.7 Seconds * -2%
HP Omen Transcend 16
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13900HX
36 Seconds * -0%
HP Omen Transcend 16-u1095ng
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-14900HX
36 Seconds *
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605M
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
34 Seconds * +6%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16ARX8
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, AMD Ryzen 7 7745HX
33 Seconds * +8%
SCHENKER XMG CORE 16 (L23)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS
32 Seconds * +11%
v3.3 Classroom CPU
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605M
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
330 Seconds * -11%
SCHENKER XMG CORE 16 (L23)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS
298 Seconds * -0%
HP Omen Transcend 16-u1095ng
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-14900HX
298 Seconds *
Average of class Gaming
  (138 - 962, n=191, last 2 years)
297 Seconds * -0%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
  (158 - 440, n=59)
290 Seconds * +3%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16ARX8
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, AMD Ryzen 7 7745HX
277 Seconds * +7%
HP Omen Transcend 16
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13900HX
222 Seconds * +26%

* ... smaller is better

Desempenho em jogos

O Transcend 16 é rápido o suficiente para poder jogar quase todos os jogos em sua resolução nativa de 2.560 x 1.600 e em configurações altas ou máximas. As coisas só ficam problemáticas em jogos muito exigentes ou mal otimizados, como o Enshrouded. Para monitores 4K, recomendamos pelo menos uma RTX 4080.

Performance Rating - Percent
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16ARX8
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, R7 7745HX
96.2 pt
HP Omen Transcend 16 -2!
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i9-13900HX
93.1 pt
Average of class Gaming
 
92 pt
HP Omen Transcend 16-u1095ng
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i9-14900HX
88.3 pt
SCHENKER XMG CORE 16 (L23)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, R7 7840HS
87.6 pt
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
 
86 pt
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605M
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Ultra 7 155H
71.9 pt
The Witcher 3 - 1920x1080 Ultra Graphics & Postprocessing (HBAO+)
Average of class Gaming
  (18.4 - 216, n=168, last 2 years)
126.9 fps +11%
SCHENKER XMG CORE 16 (L23)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, R7 7840HS
120 fps +5%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16ARX8
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, R7 7745HX
119.8 (114min) fps +5%
HP Omen Transcend 16-u1095ng
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i9-14900HX
114 fps
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
  (69.8 - 133.7, n=55)
112.2 fps -2%
HP Omen Transcend 16
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i9-13900HX
111.8 (102min) fps -2%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605M
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Ultra 7 155H
98.6 (94min, 94P1) fps -14%
GTA V - 1920x1080 Highest Settings possible AA:4xMSAA + FX AF:16x
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16ARX8
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, R7 7745HX
119.9 (3.81min, 76.9P1) fps +4%
SCHENKER XMG CORE 16 (L23)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, R7 7840HS
116.1 (4.31min, 83.3P1) fps 0%
HP Omen Transcend 16-u1095ng
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i9-14900HX
115.8 (21.8min, 83.3P1) fps
Average of class Gaming
  (12.1 - 167.7, n=171, last 2 years)
113 fps -2%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
  (48.3 - 140.5, n=55)
110.9 fps -4%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605M
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Ultra 7 155H
98.8 (3.78min, 58.8P1) fps -15%
Final Fantasy XV Benchmark - 1920x1080 High Quality
SCHENKER XMG CORE 16 (L23)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, R7 7840HS
124.8 fps +15%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16ARX8
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, R7 7745HX
119.9 fps +11%
Average of class Gaming
  (19.2 - 201, n=184, last 2 years)
119 fps +10%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
  (41 - 131.9, n=57)
111 fps +2%
HP Omen Transcend 16-u1095ng
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i9-14900HX
108.3 fps
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605M
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Ultra 7 155H
100.8 fps -7%
Strange Brigade - 1920x1080 ultra AA:ultra AF:16
Average of class Gaming
  (38.9 - 421, n=182, last 2 years)
227 fps +17%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16ARX8
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, R7 7745HX
223 (89min, 167.8P1) fps +15%
SCHENKER XMG CORE 16 (L23)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, R7 7840HS
218 (57.2min, 162.5P1) fps +12%
HP Omen Transcend 16
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i9-13900HX
208 (60.7min, 153.8P1) fps +7%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
  (76.3 - 234, n=58)
196.1 fps +1%
HP Omen Transcend 16-u1095ng
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i9-14900HX
194.2 (59.2min, 144.5P1) fps
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605M
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Ultra 7 155H
129.3 (30.4min, 84.7P1) fps -33%
Dota 2 Reborn - 1920x1080 ultra (3/3) best looking
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16ARX8
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, R7 7745HX
182 (152.8min) fps +18%
HP Omen Transcend 16
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i9-13900HX
168.4 (146.6min) fps +9%
HP Omen Transcend 16-u1095ng
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i9-14900HX
154.1 (133.3min) fps
Average of class Gaming
  (30.8 - 220, n=190, last 2 years)
149.3 fps -3%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
  (89.7 - 187.5, n=59)
147.6 fps -4%
SCHENKER XMG CORE 16 (L23)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, R7 7840HS
134.8 (119.8min) fps -13%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605M
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Ultra 7 155H
131.6 (114.5min) fps -15%
X-Plane 11.11 - 1920x1080 high (fps_test=3)
HP Omen Transcend 16
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i9-13900HX
132.9 fps +16%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16ARX8
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, R7 7745HX
117.8 fps +3%
HP Omen Transcend 16-u1095ng
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i9-14900HX
114.9 fps
Average of class Gaming
  (31.5 - 166.2, n=196, last 2 years)
107.2 fps -7%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
  (58.9 - 144.4, n=61)
104.6 fps -9%
SCHENKER XMG CORE 16 (L23)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, R7 7840HS
85.5 fps -26%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605M
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Ultra 7 155H
81.2 fps -29%
Enshrouded - 2560x1440 Max. Quality AA:FX
Average of class Gaming
  (25.3 - 76, n=6, last 2 years)
55 fps +30%
HP Omen Transcend 16-u1095ng
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i9-14900HX
42.3 (24.7min, 28.4P0.1, 30.5P1) fps
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
  (38.9 - 42.3, n=2)
40.6 fps -4%
XMG Pro 15 E23
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i9-13900HX
38.9 (26.5min, 28.9P0.1, 30.1P1) fps -8%
Palworld - 2560x1440 Epic Preset AA:TSR
XMG Pro 15 E23
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i9-13900HX
81.3 (33.5min, 35.1P0.1, 56.1P1) fps +18%
Average of class Gaming
  (39.4 - 119.8, n=3, last 2 years)
76.1 fps +10%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
  (69.1 - 81.3, n=2)
75.2 fps +9%
HP Omen Transcend 16-u1095ng
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i9-14900HX
69.1 (19.7min, 22P0.1, 49.9P1) fps
Prince of Persia The Lost Crown - 2560x1440 Ultra Preset AA:SM
XMG Pro 15 E23
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i9-13900HX
354 (18.9min, 190.3P0.1, 305P1) fps +9%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
  (325 - 354, n=2)
340 fps +5%
HP Omen Transcend 16-u1095ng
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i9-14900HX
325 (13.8min, 53.2P0.1, 210P1) fps
Average of class Gaming
  (35.3 - 355, n=4, last 2 years)
235 fps -28%
Ready or Not - 2560x1440 Epic Preset
Average of class Gaming
  (53.2 - 144.3, n=5, last 2 years)
99.4 fps +17%
XMG Pro 15 E23
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i9-13900HX
95.6 (20.2min, 38.9P0.1, 55.1P1) fps +13%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
  (84.8 - 95.6, n=2)
90.2 fps +6%
HP Omen Transcend 16-u1095ng
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i9-14900HX
84.8 (20.1min, 21.4P0.1, 51.1P1) fps
The Finals - 2560x1440 Epic Preset
XMG Pro 15 E23
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i9-13900HX
94.6 (58.2min, 65.2P0.1, 71.9P1) fps +14%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
  (82.8 - 94.6, n=3)
90.2 fps +9%
Average of class Gaming
  (13.2 - 147.4, n=7, last 2 years)
85.2 fps +3%
HP Omen Transcend 16-u1095ng
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i9-14900HX
82.8 (50.1min, 52.1P0.1, 61.1P1) fps

Usamos o jogo de interpretação de papéis, The Witcher 3 (FHD/Ultra) para ver como o desempenho 3D se comporta em um período de tempo mais longo e, mesmo depois de aproximadamente uma hora, a taxa de quadros permaneceu muito estável.

Witcher 3 FPS diagram

0102030405060708090100110120Tooltip
HP Omen Transcend 16-u1095ng i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU: Ø113.2 (109-118)
HP Omen Transcend 16 i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU: Ø105.7 (97-112)
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605M Ultra 7 155H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU: Ø98.6 (94-104)
SCHENKER XMG CORE 16 (L23) R7 7840HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU: Ø118.4 (110-125)
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16ARX8 R7 7745HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU: Ø112.3 (106-121)
baixomédiaaltoultraQHD
GTA V (2015) 181.2 175.3 115.8
The Witcher 3 (2015) 114
Dota 2 Reborn (2015) 202 178.9 167 154.1
Final Fantasy XV Benchmark (2018) 147.5 108.3
X-Plane 11.11 (2018) 166.6 141.7 114.9
Strange Brigade (2018) 272 220 194.2
The Finals (2023) 168 130.2 82.8
Ready or Not (2023) 194.2 134 84.8
Prince of Persia The Lost Crown (2024) 358 358 325
Palworld (2024) 102.2 96.6 69.1
Enshrouded (2024) 66.6 56.5 42.3
Helldivers 2 (2024) 91.5 91.1 69.2

Emissões

Emissões de ruído

Se o senhor se limitar a usar o modo balanceado, o dispositivo de 16 polegadas não fica muito alto. O nível de ruído 3D de 44 a 47 dB(A) é audível, mas não irritante (o último se aplica ao modo de desempenho com uma gravação de mais de 50 dB). No modo ocioso, as ventoinhas estão continuamente ativas e funcionam a um nível audível de 29 a 31 dB(A), o que não é o ideal.

Barulho

Ocioso
29 / 30 / 31 dB
Carga
45 / 47 dB
  red to green bar
 
 
30 dB
silencioso
40 dB(A)
audível
50 dB(A)
ruidosamente alto
 
min: dark, med: mid, max: light   Earthworks M23R, Arta (15 cm de distância)   environment noise: 24 dB(A)
dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2039.441.835.539.938.62535.437.336.635.638.23148.746.244.244.245.74034.730.128.630.734.25030.529.230.429.131.46333.626.624.723.834.18028.621.819.614.930.410025.519.418.61625.412526.319.718.215.529.316027.820.519.617.730.220030.324.722.118.331.325027.119.817.716.131.23152818.818.311.93040029.51917.81133.150032.219.21811.933.763032.117.717.611.533.580032.117.517.212.234.3100034.719.118.911.436.4125035.719.41911.137.416003519.118.910.837.1200035.319.619.611.537.3250034.718.318.211.936315034.716.215.712.936.2400032.915.515.212.934.9500028.414.714.113.130.5630027.114.513.613.128.980002514.113.613.127.31000022.214.313.612.624.31250017.713.61312.418.51600016.313.412.511.715.5SPL45.129.729.324.546.9N4.91.21.10.65.7median 29.5median 18.8median 17.8median 12.4median 31.3Delta3.91.81.91.53.9hearing rangehide median Fan NoiseHP Omen Transcend 16-u1095ng
HP Omen Transcend 16-u1095ng
i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
HP Omen Transcend 16
i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605M
Ultra 7 155H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
SCHENKER XMG CORE 16 (L23)
R7 7840HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16ARX8
R7 7745HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
Noise
-4%
7%
5%
10%
off / environment *
24
22.9
5%
23.9
-0%
23
4%
23.2
3%
Idle Minimum *
29
29.1
-0%
23.9
18%
23
21%
23.2
20%
Idle Average *
30
29.1
3%
27.8
7%
28.48
5%
23.2
23%
Idle Maximum *
31
29.1
6%
30.1
3%
28.48
8%
26.2
15%
Load Average *
45
45.7
-2%
34.2
24%
30
33%
31.4
30%
Witcher 3 ultra *
44
54.3
-23%
46.4
-5%
54.12
-23%
48.4
-10%
Load Maximum *
47
54.3
-16%
46.4
1%
54.12
-15%
53.8
-14%

* ... smaller is better

Temperatura

Embora as temperaturas na parte superior do laptop estejam no meio do pacote, a base do gabinete fica mais quente do que a concorrência sob carga. Um máximo de 63 °C (em jogos) impedirá que os usuários usem o dispositivo colocado no colo. Em operação inativa, a situação é significativamente mais confortável, com o chassi permanecendo agradavelmente frio a um máximo de 30 °C.

 47 °C49 °C45 °C 
 43 °C46 °C42 °C 
 31 °C34 °C33 °C 
Máximo: 49 °C
Médio: 41.1 °C
62 °C63 °C53 °C
49 °C49 °C41 °C
36 °C37 °C34 °C
Máximo: 63 °C
Médio: 47.1 °C
alimentação elétrica  50 °C | Temperatura do quarto 21 °C | Fluke t3000FC (calibrated), Voltcraft IR-900
(-) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 41.1 °C / 106 F, compared to the average of 33.9 °C / 93 F for the devices in the class Gaming.
(-) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 49 °C / 120 F, compared to the average of 40.5 °C / 105 F, ranging from 21.2 to 68.8 °C for the class Gaming.
(-) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 63 °C / 145 F, compared to the average of 43.2 °C / 110 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 26.6 °C / 80 F, compared to the device average of 33.9 °C / 93 F.
(-) Playing The Witcher 3, the average temperature for the upper side is 40.3 °C / 105 F, compared to the device average of 33.9 °C / 93 F.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are reaching skin temperature as a maximum (35 °C / 95 F) and are therefore not hot.
(-) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.9 °C / 84 F (-6.1 °C / -11 F).
HP Omen Transcend 16-u1095ng
i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
HP Omen Transcend 16
i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605M
Ultra 7 155H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
SCHENKER XMG CORE 16 (L23)
R7 7840HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16ARX8
R7 7745HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
Heat
5%
6%
4%
12%
Maximum Upper Side *
49
47.4
3%
50.3
-3%
46
6%
41.8
15%
Maximum Bottom *
63
54.4
14%
48
24%
44
30%
41.4
34%
Idle Upper Side *
30
28.4
5%
28.8
4%
32
-7%
29
3%
Idle Bottom *
29
29.2
-1%
29.8
-3%
33
-14%
30.4
-5%

* ... smaller is better

Teste de estresse

No teste de estresse usando as ferramentas Furmark e Prime95, após 60 minutos, a CPU ficou em torno de 85 °C, enquanto a GPU atingiu 81 °C (um ponto de acesso de 88 °C) - ambos valores relativamente altos, mas inofensivos.

Furmark e Prime95
Furmark e Prime95
Furmark e Prime95
Furmark e Prime95
Furmark e Prime95
Furmark e Prime95
Witcher 3
Witcher 3
Witcher 3
Witcher 3
Witcher 3
Witcher 3

Alto-falantes

A qualidade do som é um pouco melhor do que a média geral dos notebooks para jogos, embora, como geralmente acontece, os graves tenham dificuldades e poderiam ser mais potentes e precisos. O volume máximo de 82 dB(A) é mais do que decente.

dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2041.842.62536.639.43143.141.1403133.75041.743.26325.831.28026.827.810029.526.312529.134.216023.642.720022.253.32502258.531516.260.940012.967.350012.768.163013.971.280011.673.5100011.368.8125011.170.6160011.374.3200011.873.7250011.968.931501366.1400013.266.8500013.267.9630013.171800013.265.91000013.168.31250012.768.61600012.162.6SPL25.882.4N0.855.7median 13.1median 67.9Delta3.15.536.143.62639.829.441.436.64732.638.426.743.323.85022.461.62166.118.963.618.269.322.972.717.27213.772.711.971.211.472.710.372.510.3719.674.19.575.4107410.469.410.769.611.266.511.566.411.765.511.768.411.865.111.76211.259.723.983.30.661.9median 11.7median 69.42.73.7hearing rangehide median Pink NoiseHP Omen Transcend 16-u1095ngAsus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605M
Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)
HP Omen Transcend 16-u1095ng audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (82 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 21.9% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (11% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 3.2% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 1.4% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (5.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (14.5% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 26% of all tested devices in this class were better, 7% similar, 68% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 18%, worst was 132%
Compared to all devices tested
» 16% of all tested devices were better, 4% similar, 80% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605M audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (83.3 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(+) | good bass - only 3.8% away from median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (8.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 3.5% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (2.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2.2% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (3.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (7.3% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 1% of all tested devices in this class were better, 0% similar, 99% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 18%, worst was 132%
Compared to all devices tested
» 1% of all tested devices were better, 0% similar, 99% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Gerenciamento de energia

Consumo de energia

Os requisitos de energia são semelhantes aos valores padrão encontrados nessa categoria de desempenho. o consumo de 10 a 32 watts em modo inativo e o consumo de 128 a 242 watts sob carga não são particularmente altos nem baixos.

Consumo de energia
desligadodarklight 0.1 /  Watt
Ociosodarkmidlight 10 / 18 / 32 Watt
Carga midlight 128 / 242 Watt
 color bar
Key: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
HP Omen Transcend 16-u1095ng
i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
HP Omen Transcend 16
i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605M
Ultra 7 155H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
SCHENKER XMG CORE 16 (L23)
R7 7840HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16ARX8
R7 7745HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
Average of class Gaming
 
Power Consumption
-42%
33%
12%
1%
-2%
Idle Minimum *
10
19.2
-92%
8.3
17%
11
-10%
8.1
19%
Idle Average *
18
22.7
-26%
12.5
31%
15.2
16%
15.9
12%
Idle Maximum *
32
55.4
-73%
12.8
60%
16
50%
37.2
-16%
Load Average *
128
128.4
-0%
71.3
44%
64
50%
90.9
29%
Witcher 3 ultra *
148.4
206
-39%
127.5
14%
179
-21%
189.6
-28%
Load Maximum *
242
292
-21%
169.1
30%
280
-16%
263.5
-9%

* ... smaller is better

Power consumption Witcher 3 / stress test

0153045607590105120135150165180195210225240Tooltip
HP Omen Transcend 16-u1095ng; Witcher 3 ultra: Ø148.4 (143.6-156)
HP Omen Transcend 16-u1095ng; 1280x720 Prime95 28.10 and Furmark 1.25: Ø186.1 (161-242)
HP Omen Transcend 16-u1095ng; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø18.2 (10.5-31.9)

Power consumption with an external monitor

0102030405060708090100110120130140150160170180190Tooltip
HP Omen Transcend 16-u1095ng; Prime95 V2810 Stress (external Monitor): Ø110 (93.2-197)
HP Omen Transcend 16-u1095ng; Cinebench R23 Multi (external Monitor): Ø159.9 (158.2-163.7)
HP Omen Transcend 16-u1095ng; 1280x720 FurMark 1.19 GPU Stress Test (external Monitor): Ø137.2 (134-145.6)
HP Omen Transcend 16-u1095ng; 1920x1080 The Witcher 3 ultra (external Monitor): Ø142.9 (132.4-150.1)
HP Omen Transcend 16-u1095ng; Idle 1min (external Monitor): Ø19.3 (11.5-34.3)

Duração da bateria

No que diz respeito aos requisitos de energia no modo de bateria, a HP ainda tem algum trabalho a fazer. Apesar da potente bateria de 97 Wh, a máquina de 16 polegadas só conseguiu durar pouco menos de 5 horas em nosso teste de Wi-Fi com um brilho reduzido de 150 cd/m². Como comparação: O ROG Zyphrus G16 conseguiu mais de 7 horas e o XMG Core 16 chegou a durar mais de 8 horas.

Tempo de Execução da Bateria
WiFi Websurfing
4h 52min
HP Omen Transcend 16-u1095ng
i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, 97 Wh
HP Omen Transcend 16
i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, 97 Wh
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605M
Ultra 7 155H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, 90 Wh
SCHENKER XMG CORE 16 (L23)
R7 7840HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, 99 Wh
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16ARX8
R7 7745HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, 80 Wh
Average of class Gaming
 
Battery Runtime
-14%
49%
72%
-18%
29%
WiFi v1.3
292
250
-14%
435
49%
501
72%
240
-18%
Reader / Idle
375
392
Load
73
71
143
61
H.264
671
609

Pro

+ Vantagens do OLED: tempo de resposta, contraste, ângulo de visão
+ alto-falantes decentes
+ 2x Thunderbolt 4
+ obturador de privacidade
+ wi-Fi rápido

Contra

- desempenho limitado do Core i9-14900HX
- Desvantagens do OLED: cintilação, superfície brilhante
- muito caro para um laptop RTX 4070
- a duração da bateria poderia ser melhor
- apenas um slot M.2

Veredicto

Omen Transcend 16-u1095ng: Dispositivo de revisão fornecido pela HP Alemanha
Omen Transcend 16-u1095ng: Dispositivo de revisão fornecido pela HP Alemanha

Antes de mais nada, o Omen Transcend 16-u1095ng tenta atrair clientes em potencial com uma tela OLED brilhante que agrada tanto aos jogadores quanto aos criadores.

Se o senhor puder lidar com uma tela muito reflexiva e não tiver problemas com cintilação, terá uma tela colorida com uma excelente taxa de contraste e ótimos tempos de resposta, além de excelentes níveis de preto e ângulos de visão.

Há alguns pontos negativos em relação às emissões e à velocidade. Enquanto a máquina de 16 polegadas fica desagradavelmente barulhenta no modo de desempenho, o desempenho do modo equilibrado parece um pouco abaixo da média. Fora isso, o Omen Transcend 16 é semelhante a outros laptops para jogos no que diz respeito à qualidade do gabinete, dispositivos de entrada e seleção de portas.

De modo geral, a pontuação total é comparável à do XMG Core 16 L23 ou do Legion Pro 5 16ARX8. Quem procura um dispositivo especialmente leve e compacto na categoria de 16 polegadas deve dar uma olhada no novo ROG Zeyphrus G16.

Preço e disponibilidade

No momento de nossa análise, o HP Omen Transcend 16-u1095ng com o Core i9-14900HX e o GeForce RTX 4070 não está disponível na loja on-line da HP, na Amazon ou na Best Buy.

HP Omen Transcend 16-u1095ng - 02/12/2024 v7 (old)
Florian Glaser

Acabamento
83 / 98 → 85%
Teclado
81%
Mouse
86%
Conectividade
67 / 80 → 83%
Peso
61 / 10-66 → 91%
Bateria
63 / 95 → 66%
Pantalha
94%
Desempenho do jogos
99%
Desempenho da aplicação
97%
Temperatura
80 / 95 → 84%
Ruído
76 / 90 → 85%
Audio
78%
Camera
42 / 85 → 49%
Médio
77%
88%
Gaming - Médio equilibrado

Transparency

The selection of devices to be reviewed is made by our editorial team. The test sample was provided to the author as a loan by the manufacturer or retailer for the purpose of this review. The lender had no influence on this review, nor did the manufacturer receive a copy of this review before publication. There was no obligation to publish this review. We never accept compensation or payment in return for our reviews. As an independent media company, Notebookcheck is not subjected to the authority of manufacturers, retailers or publishers.

This is how Notebookcheck is testing

Every year, Notebookcheck independently reviews hundreds of laptops and smartphones using standardized procedures to ensure that all results are comparable. We have continuously developed our test methods for around 20 years and set industry standards in the process. In our test labs, high-quality measuring equipment is utilized by experienced technicians and editors. These tests involve a multi-stage validation process. Our complex rating system is based on hundreds of well-founded measurements and benchmarks, which maintains objectivity. Further information on our test methods can be found here.

Price comparison

Please share our article, every link counts!
Mail Logo
> Análises e revisões de portáteis e celulares > Análises > Análises > Análise do laptop HP Omen Transcend 16 (2024): Uma máquina para jogos RTX 4070 com tela OLED
Florian Glaser, 2024-02-15 (Update: 2024-02-15)