Notebookcheck Logo
Manutenção do modelo: O XMG Pro 16 Studio (Mid 24)

Análise do XMG Pro 16 Studio (Mid 24): Core i9 e RTX 4070 para gamers e criadores

O prazer do criador? Os criadores de conteúdo e os gamers constituem o mercado-alvo do XMG Pro 16 Studio: A Schenker montou uma oferta que consiste em um processador Core i9, RTX 4070, porta Thunderbolt 4 e uma tela 16:10 (QHD+, 240Hz, sRGB). Supostamente, um bom resfriamento é garantido pelo uso de uma câmara de vapor.
Sascha Mölck, 👁 Florian Glaser (traduzido por DeepL / Ninh Duy) Published 🇺🇸 🇩🇪 ...
Gaming Geforce Intel Laptop / Notebook Nvidia Raptor Lake Thunderbolt Windows

O XMG Pro 16 Studio (Mid 24) é voltado para gamers e criadores. O hardware correspondente está a bordo: Um Core i9-14900HX, GeForce RTX 4070, bem como uma tela calibrada (X-Rite) de 16 polegadas com uma proporção de 16:10. Um barebone (PE60SNE-S) do fabricante Clevo serve como base para isso. Esse é o sucessor do XMG Pro 16 (meados de 23) que, visualmente, tem a mesma aparência. Os concorrentes incluem o Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX9, Acer Predator Helios Neo 16 (2024), Lenovo Legion 7 16 G9 e o Aorus 16X (2024).

SCHENKER XMG Pro 16 Studio (Mid 24)
Processador
Intel Core i9-14900HX 24 x 1.6 - 5.8 GHz, 150 W PL2 / Short Burst, 135 W PL1 / Sustained, Raptor Lake-HX Refresh
Placa gráfica
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU - 8 GB VRAM, Análises do: 2055 MHz, Memoría: 2000 MHz, 140 W TDP ( including 25 W Dynamic Boost), GDDR6, 32.0.15.5599, Optimus + MUX-Switch
Memória
32 GB 
, DDR5-5600, Dual-Channel-Mode, two memory slots (both in use)
Pantalha
16.00 polegadas 16:10, 2560 x 1600 pixel 189 PPI, BOE CQ NE160QDM-NZ1, IPS, Brilhante: não, 240 Hz
placa mãe
Intel HM770 (Raptor Lake-S PCH)
Disco rígido
Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB, 1024 GB 
, PCIe 4, M.2-2280, 864 GB livre
Placa de Som
Realtek ALC1220
Conexões
2 USB 3.0, 1 USB 3.1 Gen2, 1 USB 4.0 40 Gbps, 1 Thunderbolt, USB-C Power Delivery (PD), 1 HDMI, 2 DisplayPort, 1 Kensington Lock, Conexões Audio: Headset combined port, Mic-in, Card Reader: MicroSD, TPM 2.0
Funcionamento em rede
Realtek RTL8125 2.5GBe Family Ethernet Controller (10/100/1000/2500MBit/s), Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211 (a/b/g/h/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/ax = Wi-Fi 6/ Wi-Fi 6E 6 GHz), Bluetooth 5.3
Tamanho
altura x largura x profundidade (em mm): 19.9 x 359.5 x 273
Bateria
73 Wh, 4600 mAh Lítio-Polímero
Sistema Operativo
Microsoft Windows 11 Pro
Camera
Webcam: FHD
Primary Camera: 2.1 MPix
Características adicionais
Alto falantes: Stereo, Teclado: Chiclet, Iluminação do Teclado: sim, Driver-DVDs, screws, cloth, 24 Meses Garantia
peso
2.282 kg, Suprimento de energia: 666 g
Preço
2300 Euro
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

Possíveis concorrentes em comparação

Rating
Version
Date
Model
Weight
Height
Size
Resolution
Best Price
81.2 %v8
07/2024
SCHENKER XMG Pro 16 Studio (Mid 24)
i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
2.3 kg19.9 mm16.00"2560x1600
86.8 %v7 (old)
05/2024
Acer Predator Helios Neo 16 (2024)
i7-14700HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
2.6 kg25.95 mm16.00"2560x1600
89.3 %v7 (old)
04/2024
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX9
i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
2.5 kg26.95 mm16.00"2560x1600
87.4 %v7 (old)
04/2024
Aorus 16X 2024
i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
2.3 kg20 mm16.00"2560x1600
90.8 %v7 (old)
04/2024
Lenovo Legion 7 16 IRX G9
i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
2.3 kg19.8 mm16.00"3200x2000

Case e conectividade - Schenker usa um barebone da Clevo

Por fora, nada mudou: o Pro 16 mais recente usa o mesmo gabinete de alumínio preto fosco do modelo do ano passado modelo do ano passado-se o senhor considerar apenas a caixa externa. A unidade de base e a tampa podem ser ligeiramente torcidas, mas sua qualidade de construção é boa. O senhor procurará em vão por faixas de LED em um gabinete de aparência tão séria. O ângulo máximo de abertura da tampa é de 130 graus.

Duas portas USB-A (USB 3.2 Gen 1), duas portas USB-C (1x USB 3.2 Gen 2, 1x TB 4/USB 4), bem como três saídas de vídeo devem ser suficientes para a maioria dos usuários - na pior das hipóteses, talvez seja necessário usar uma docking station. O Power Delivery é suportado graças à porta TB4. A porta Gigabit Ethernet permite taxas de dados de até 2,5 Gbit/s.

Em condições ideais (sem dispositivos WiFi nas proximidades, curta distância entre o laptop e o PC servidor), o chip WiFi-6E da Intel (AX211) produz taxas de dados boas a muito boas. A webcam FHD (2,1 MP, sem cobertura) não tira nenhuma foto surpreendente. O leitor de cartão MicroSD (cartão de referência: AV PRO microSD 128 GB V60) tem velocidade média.

XMG Pro 16 Studio
XMG Pro 16 Studio
XMG Pro 16 Studio
XMG Pro 16 Studio
XMG Pro 16 Studio
XMG Pro 16 Studio
XMG Pro 16 Studio
XMG Pro 16 Studio
XMG Pro 16 Studio
XMG Pro 16 Studio
XMG Pro 16 Studio
XMG Pro 16 Studio
Hardware XMG Pro 16 Studio (M24)

Comparação de tamanho

363.4 mm 261.75 mm 26.95 mm 2.5 kg357.78 mm 278.63 mm 25.95 mm 2.6 kg359.5 mm 273 mm 19.9 mm 2.3 kg358 mm 262.5 mm 19.8 mm 2.3 kg356 mm 254 mm 20 mm 2.3 kg297 mm 210 mm 1 mm 5.7 g
Lado esquerdo: USB 3.2 Gen 1 (USB-A), entrada de microfone, combinação de áudio
Lado esquerdo: USB 3.2 Gen 1 (USB-A), entrada de microfone, combinação de áudio
Lado direito: leitor de cartão microSD, Thunderbolt 4/USB 4 (USB-C; Power Delivery, DisplayPort), USB 3.2 Gen 1 (USB-A), slot para trava de cabo
Lado direito: leitor de cartão microSD, Thunderbolt 4/USB 4 (USB-C; Power Delivery, DisplayPort), USB 3.2 Gen 1 (USB-A), slot para trava de cabo
Parte traseira: conexão de energia, USB 3.2 Gen 2 (USB-C), HDMI 2.1, Mini DisplayPort 1.4a, Gigabit Ethernet (2,5 GBit/s)
Parte traseira: conexão de energia, USB 3.2 Gen 2 (USB-C), HDMI 2.1, Mini DisplayPort 1.4a, Gigabit Ethernet (2,5 GBit/s)
SD Card Reader
average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs)
Aorus 16X 2024
Intel Core i9-14900HX (AV PRO microSD 128 GB V60)
186 MB/s +116%
Average of class Gaming
  (19 - 202, n=95, last 2 years)
96 MB/s +12%
XMG Pro 16 Studio (Mid 23)
Intel Core i9-13900H (AV PRO microSD 128 GB V60)
86 MB/s 0%
SCHENKER XMG Pro 16 Studio (Mid 24)
Intel Core i9-14900HX (AV PRO microSD 128 GB V60)
86 MB/s
Lenovo Legion 7 16 IRX G9
Intel Core i9-14900HX (Angelbird AV Pro V60)
76.7 MB/s -11%
Acer Predator Helios Neo 16 (2024)
Intel Core i7-14700HX (AV PRO microSD 128 GB V60)
20 MB/s -77%
maximum AS SSD Seq Read Test (1GB)
Aorus 16X 2024
Intel Core i9-14900HX (AV PRO microSD 128 GB V60)
188 MB/s +111%
Average of class Gaming
  (25.8 - 269, n=95, last 2 years)
120.1 MB/s +35%
XMG Pro 16 Studio (Mid 23)
Intel Core i9-13900H (AV PRO microSD 128 GB V60)
90 MB/s +1%
Lenovo Legion 7 16 IRX G9
Intel Core i9-14900HX (Angelbird AV Pro V60)
89.2 MB/s 0%
SCHENKER XMG Pro 16 Studio (Mid 24)
Intel Core i9-14900HX (AV PRO microSD 128 GB V60)
89 MB/s
Acer Predator Helios Neo 16 (2024)
Intel Core i7-14700HX (AV PRO microSD 128 GB V60)
25.8 MB/s -71%
Networking
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
Lenovo Legion 7 16 IRX G9
RealTek Semiconductor RTL8852CE WiFi 6E PCI-E NIC
1793 (1696min, 1700.64P1 - 1886max) MBit/s +57%
XMG Pro 16 Studio (Mid 23)
Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211
1386 (708min - 1471max) MBit/s +21%
Average Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211
  (464 - 1861, n=219)
1247 MBit/s +9%
Average of class Gaming
  (469 - 1843, n=155, last 2 years)
1236 MBit/s +8%
SCHENKER XMG Pro 16 Studio (Mid 24)
Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211
1143 (930min - 1352max) MBit/s
Acer Predator Helios Neo 16 (2024)
Killer Wi-Fi 6E AX1675i 160MHz Wireless Network Adapter
980 (886min - 1077max) MBit/s -14%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX9
Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211
636 (485min - 769max) MBit/s -44%
Aorus 16X 2024
Intel Wi-Fi 7 BE200 320MHz
469 (304min - 548max) MBit/s -59%
iperf3 receive AXE11000
XMG Pro 16 Studio (Mid 23)
Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211
1714 (1696min - 1727max) MBit/s +3%
Lenovo Legion 7 16 IRX G9
RealTek Semiconductor RTL8852CE WiFi 6E PCI-E NIC
1685 (1647min, 1651.64P1 - 1715max) MBit/s +1%
SCHENKER XMG Pro 16 Studio (Mid 24)
Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211
1672 (1316min - 1721max) MBit/s
Aorus 16X 2024
Intel Wi-Fi 7 BE200 320MHz
1577 (1237min - 1665max) MBit/s -6%
Average Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211
  (582 - 1890, n=219)
1392 MBit/s -17%
Average of class Gaming
  (685 - 1890, n=158, last 2 years)
1371 MBit/s -18%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX9
Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211
1040 (739min - 1218max) MBit/s -38%
Acer Predator Helios Neo 16 (2024)
Killer Wi-Fi 6E AX1675i 160MHz Wireless Network Adapter
957 (475min - 998max) MBit/s -43%
050100150200250300350400450500550600650700750800850900950100010501100115012001250130013501400145015001550160016501700175018001850Tooltip
SCHENKER XMG Pro 16 Studio (Mid 24) Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211; iperf3 transmit AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1143 (930-1352)
Acer Predator Helios Neo 16 (2024) Killer Wi-Fi 6E AX1675i 160MHz Wireless Network Adapter; iperf3 transmit AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø980 (886-1077)
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX9 Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211; iperf3 transmit AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø636 (485-769)
Aorus 16X 2024 Intel Wi-Fi 7 BE200 320MHz; iperf3 transmit AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø469 (304-548)
XMG Pro 16 Studio (Mid 23) Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211; iperf3 transmit AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1362 (708-1471)
Lenovo Legion 7 16 IRX G9 RealTek Semiconductor RTL8852CE WiFi 6E PCI-E NIC; iperf3 transmit AXE11000: Ø1793 (1696-1886)
SCHENKER XMG Pro 16 Studio (Mid 24) Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211; iperf3 receive AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1671 (1316-1721)
Acer Predator Helios Neo 16 (2024) Killer Wi-Fi 6E AX1675i 160MHz Wireless Network Adapter; iperf3 receive AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø941 (475-998)
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX9 Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211; iperf3 receive AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1039 (739-1218)
Aorus 16X 2024 Intel Wi-Fi 7 BE200 320MHz; iperf3 receive AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1576 (1237-1665)
XMG Pro 16 Studio (Mid 23) Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211; iperf3 receive AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1714 (1696-1727)
Lenovo Legion 7 16 IRX G9 RealTek Semiconductor RTL8852CE WiFi 6E PCI-E NIC; iperf3 receive AXE11000: Ø1685 (1647-1715)
ColorChecker
9.3 ∆E
12.9 ∆E
7.5 ∆E
7.9 ∆E
6.5 ∆E
9.9 ∆E
9.1 ∆E
7.7 ∆E
10.1 ∆E
8.2 ∆E
7.3 ∆E
6.8 ∆E
4.3 ∆E
9.9 ∆E
11.1 ∆E
7.4 ∆E
7.8 ∆E
11.6 ∆E
8.3 ∆E
11.6 ∆E
10.5 ∆E
9.7 ∆E
9.9 ∆E
9.1 ∆E
ColorChecker SCHENKER XMG Pro 16 Studio (Mid 24): 8.95 ∆E min: 4.27 - max: 12.93 ∆E

Sustentabilidade

O laptop e os acessórios são protegidos por todos os tipos de capas de plástico (suporte de espuma, filme, bolsa). Os nomes dos plásticos usados estão impressos nelas. Exceção: A capa de filme transparente na tampa não tem as informações correspondentes. O hardware do dispositivo pode ser acessado após a remoção da placa de base, para que o senhor possa realizar trabalhos de manutenção e reparo. As atualizações de software devem ser garantidas para os próximos anos.

Dispositivos de entrada - O laptop XMG com um teclado intercambiável

Geralmente, essa é a regra com a Schenker, e uma exceção quando se trata de outros fabricantes: O teclado chiclet retroiluminado (RGB, quatro níveis) poderia ser facilmente substituído, pois é mantido no lugar apenas por dois parafusos (e alguns clipes). Suas teclas planas e suaves têm um curso médio e um ponto de pressão claro. Sua resistência poderia ser mais nítida, mas isso é uma questão de gosto. Uma leve flexão do teclado não deve atrapalhar o senhor no uso diário. Pontos positivos: As quatro teclas de seta são de tamanho normal. Um clickpad multitoque de tamanho generoso (15,1 x 9,1 cm) é usado para controlar o ponteiro do mouse.

Teclado XMG Pro 16 Studio (Mid 24)
Teclado XMG Pro 16 Studio (Mid 24)

Tela - 16:10, IPS, sRGB

A tela de 16 polegadas (2.560 x 1.600 pixels) com proporção de 16:10 é familiar: O laptop usa o mesmo painel IPS da BOE que já foi usado na versão versão 2023 do Pro 16. No entanto, ele se beneficia de um brilho máximo ligeiramente maior. No geral, os valores da tela que medimos são suficientes para uso em ambientes internos. A leitura ao ar livre deve ser possível, desde que o sol não seja muito forte. Positivo: O painel responsivo de 240 Hz não apresenta oscilação de PWM. Não há opções alternativas de tela disponíveis.

Matriz de pixels
Matriz de pixels
O sangramento da luz de fundo é visível.
O sangramento da luz de fundo é visível.
Ao ar livre
Ao ar livre
378
cd/m²
390
cd/m²
390
cd/m²
368
cd/m²
416
cd/m²
396
cd/m²
371
cd/m²
427
cd/m²
390
cd/m²
Distribuição do brilho
BOE CQ NE160QDM-NZ1 tested with X-Rite i1Pro 2
Máximo: 427 cd/m² (Nits) Médio: 391.8 cd/m² Minimum: 41 cd/m²
iluminação: 86 %
iluminação com acumulador: 416 cd/m²
Contraste: 1095:1 (Preto: 0.38 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 2.33 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.95, calibrated: 1.02
ΔE Greyscale 3.7 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
70.8% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
99.5% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
68.8% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.161
SCHENKER XMG Pro 16 Studio (Mid 24)
BOE CQ NE160QDM-NZ1, IPS, 2560x1600, 16"
Acer Predator Helios Neo 16 (2024)
Chi Mei N160GME-GTB, LED, 2560x1600, 16"
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX9
BOE NE160QDM-NYC, IPS, 2560x1600, 16"
Aorus 16X 2024
BOE CQ NE160QDM-NY1, IPS, 2560x1600, 16"
XMG Pro 16 Studio (Mid 23)
BOE CQ NE160QDM-NZ1, IPS, 2560x1600, 16"
Lenovo Legion 7 16 IRX G9
MNG007ZA1-2, IPS, 3200x2000, 16"
Display
20%
0%
-2%
-0%
21%
Display P3 Coverage
68.8
95.9
39%
69.3
1%
67.2
-2%
69.4
1%
95
38%
sRGB Coverage
99.5
99.8
0%
99.4
0%
96.7
-3%
98.2
-1%
100
1%
AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage
70.8
86.4
22%
70.1
-1%
69.3
-2%
70.1
-1%
87.2
23%
Response Times
11%
-18%
28%
-9%
-14%
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% *
12.7 ?(6, 6.7)
5 ?(2.5, 2.5)
61%
11.9 ?(5.5, 6.4)
6%
7.5 ?(3.3, 4.2)
41%
12.2 ?(5.9, 6.3)
4%
14.4 ?(6.9, 7.5)
-13%
Response Time Black / White *
6.3 ?(2.5, 3.8)
8.8 ?(4.7, 4.1)
-40%
8.9 ?(4.8, 4.1)
-41%
5.4 ?(1.5, 3.9)
14%
7.7 ?(4, 3.7)
-22%
7.2 ?(2.9, 4.3)
-14%
PWM Frequency
Screen
19%
20%
4%
-5%
23%
Brightness middle
416
521
25%
384
-8%
542
30%
349
-16%
412
-1%
Brightness
392
506
29%
366
-7%
504
29%
348
-11%
396
1%
Brightness Distribution
86
85
-1%
91
6%
86
0%
93
8%
89
3%
Black Level *
0.38
0.44
-16%
0.35
8%
0.45
-18%
0.32
16%
0.43
-13%
Contrast
1095
1184
8%
1097
0%
1204
10%
1091
0%
958
-13%
Colorchecker dE 2000 *
2.33
1.74
25%
0.97
58%
2.73
-17%
1.98
15%
0.9
61%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *
6.07
3.88
36%
3.57
41%
5.29
13%
7.56
-25%
2
67%
Colorchecker dE 2000 calibrated *
1.02
0.52
49%
0.77
25%
1.32
-29%
1.45
-42%
0.6
41%
Greyscale dE 2000 *
3.7
3
19%
1.5
59%
2.9
22%
3.3
11%
1.4
62%
Gamma
2.161 102%
2.164 102%
2.24 98%
2.192 100%
2.137 103%
2.23 99%
CCT
7102 92%
6816 95%
6709 97%
6173 105%
6672 97%
6731 97%
Total Average (Program / Settings)
17% / 18%
1% / 11%
10% / 6%
-5% / -5%
10% / 17%

* ... smaller is better

A cobertura do espaço de cores do painel instalado é decepcionante. Somente o espaço sRGB pode ser reproduzido - não os espaços AdobeRGB e DCI-P3. No entanto, isso não é diferente das telas da maioria dos concorrentes. No entanto, a tela de um laptop que é comercializado como uma "estação de trabalho profissional para criação de conteúdo" deveria realmente oferecer a gama completa. Sua reprodução de cores parece melhor: Um leve desvio de 2,26 (meta: DeltaE < 3) poderia ser reduzido para 1,03 com a realização de uma calibração.

CalMAN: escala de cinza
CalMAN: escala de cinza
CalMAN: saturação de cor
CalMAN: saturação de cor
CalMAN: ColorChecker
CalMAN: ColorChecker
CalMAN: escala de cinza (calibrada)
CalMAN: escala de cinza (calibrada)
CalMAN: saturação de cor (calibrada)
CalMAN: saturação de cor (calibrada)
CalMAN: ColorChecker (calibrado)
CalMAN: ColorChecker (calibrado)
XMG Pro 16 Studio M24 vs sRGB
XMG Pro 16 Studio M24 vs sRGB
XMG Pro 16 Studio M24 vs AdobeRGB
XMG Pro 16 Studio M24 vs AdobeRGB
XMG Pro 16 Studio M24 vs DCI-P3
XMG Pro 16 Studio M24 vs DCI-P3

Display Response Times

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
       Response Time Black to White
6.3 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 2.5 ms rise
↘ 3.8 ms fall
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 16 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (21.2 ms).
       Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
12.7 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 6 ms rise
↘ 6.7 ms fall
The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 22 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (33.2 ms).

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM not detected

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 17373 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 3846000) Hz was measured.

100 % de brilho
100 % de brilho
75 % de brilho
75 % de brilho
50 % de brilho
50 % de brilho
25 % de brilho
25 % de brilho
0 % de brilho
0 % de brilho

Desempenho - Raptor Lake Refresh substitui o Raptor Lake

O XMG Pro 16 Studio (Mid 24), descrito pela Schenker como um "laptop de criação de conteúdo", é voltado para gamers e criadores. Todos os modelos apresentam um Core i9-14900HX e a seleção de GPU disponível inclui uma RTX 4060 e uma RTX 4070 - nosso dispositivo de teste está equipado com uma RTX 4070. Essa variante está disponível por cerca de US$ 2.500. Os preços começam em cerca de US$ 1.800.

CPU-Z
CPU-Z
CPU-Z
CPU-Z
Informações do sistema Nvidia
GPU-Z
GPU-Z
HWInfo
HWInfo
 

Condições de teste

Há uma opção de três modos de desempenho específicos do fabricante (consulte a tabela), que podem ser alternados usando o software Control Center (o centro de controle do laptop). Usamos os modos de desempenho (benchmarks) e silencioso (testes de bateria). O Optimus estava ativo.

Modo de desempenho Modo de entretenimento Modo silencioso (dGPU desligada)
Limite de energia 1 (HWInfo) 135 watts 55 watts 25 watts
Limite de energia 2 (HWInfo) 150 watts 135 watts 35 watts
Ruído (CP 2077 Phantom) 53 dB (A) 49 dB (A) -
Desempenho (CP 2077 Phantom) 78 fps 73 fps -
Centro de controle
Centro de controle
Centro de controle
Centro de controle
Centro de controle
Centro de controle
Centro de controle
Centro de controle
Centro de controle
Centro de controle

Problemas com o modo de entretenimento

O perfil de "entretenimento" causou flutuações significativas no desempenho durante nosso teste. Por isso, não o utilizamos. Durante o teste, Schenker conseguiu descobrir uma maneira de contornar o problema: ativando a opção de ventilador "modo silencioso" no Control Center. Espera-se que uma futura atualização do BIOS corrija esse erro.

Processador

O Core i9-14900HX (Raptor Lake) é usado em todas as variantes de configuração do Pro 16. Seus 24 núcleos (8P + 16E) podem processar um total de 32 threads. Uma surpresa: Mesmo quando o modo de desempenho está ativo, o processador não pode trabalhar com potência máxima o tempo todo. A carga contínua de vários threads (CB15 Loop) fez com que o clock da CPU caísse significativamente da primeira à quinta execução. Depois disso, a curva se estabilizou. Seus resultados de benchmark estão abaixo da média anterior da CPU.

Multi-thread (conectado à rede elétrica)
Multi-thread (conectado à rede elétrica)
Single-thread (conectado à rede elétrica)
Single-thread (conectado à rede elétrica)

Cinebench R15 Multi continuous test

0235470705940117514101645188021152350258528203055329035253760399542304465Tooltip
SCHENKER XMG Pro 16 Studio (Mid 24) Intel Core i9-14900HX: Ø3394 (3129.4-4350.66)
Acer Predator Helios Neo 16 (2024) Intel Core i7-14700HX: Ø3274 (3212.59-3455.14)
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX9 Intel Core i9-14900HX: Ø4230 (4151.1-4590.84)
Aorus 16X 2024 Intel Core i9-14900HX: Ø3877 (3701.99-4280.82)
XMG Pro 16 Studio (Mid 23) Intel Core i9-13900H: Ø2574 (2525.07-2739.09)
SCHENKER XMG Pro 16 Studio (Mid 24) Intel Core i9-14900HX; Unterhaltungsmodus + Geräuschlose Modus: Ø2674 (2445.88-3927.73)
Lenovo Legion 7 16 IRX G9 Intel Core i9-14900HX: Ø4024 (3900.54-4690.98)
CB15 Loop (modo de desempenho)
CB15 Loop (modo de desempenho)
CB15 Loop (modo de entretenimento)
CB15 Loop (modo de entretenimento)
CB15 Loop (modo silencioso)
CB15 Loop (modo silencioso)
CPU Performance Rating - Percent
Lenovo Legion 7 16 IRX G9
Intel Core i9-14900HX
83.2 pt
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX9
Intel Core i9-14900HX
82.8 pt
Aorus 16X 2024
Intel Core i9-14900HX
81.7 pt
Average Intel Core i9-14900HX
 
81.6 pt
SCHENKER XMG Pro 16 Studio (Mid 24)
Intel Core i9-14900HX
76.5 pt
Acer Predator Helios Neo 16 (2024)
Intel Core i7-14700HX
74.2 pt
Average of class Gaming
 
63.7 pt
XMG Pro 16 Studio (Mid 23)
Intel Core i9-13900H
60.4 pt
Cinebench R23
Multi Core
Lenovo Legion 7 16 IRX G9
Intel Core i9-14900HX
31127 Points +11%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX9
Intel Core i9-14900HX
29686 (26317.7min - 29686max) Points +6%
Average Intel Core i9-14900HX
  (17078 - 36249, n=31)
29063 Points +4%
SCHENKER XMG Pro 16 Studio (Mid 24)
Intel Core i9-14900HX
28075 Points
Aorus 16X 2024
Intel Core i9-14900HX
27818 Points -1%
Acer Predator Helios Neo 16 (2024)
Intel Core i7-14700HX
23207 Points -17%
Average of class Gaming
  (5668 - 36249, n=207, last 2 years)
21068 Points -25%
XMG Pro 16 Studio (Mid 23)
Intel Core i9-13900H
17706 Points -37%
Single Core
Lenovo Legion 7 16 IRX G9
Intel Core i9-14900HX
2195 Points +7%
Aorus 16X 2024
Intel Core i9-14900HX
2188 Points +7%
Average Intel Core i9-14900HX
  (1720 - 2235, n=31)
2156 Points +5%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX9
Intel Core i9-14900HX
2122 Points +4%
Acer Predator Helios Neo 16 (2024)
Intel Core i7-14700HX
2103 Points +3%
SCHENKER XMG Pro 16 Studio (Mid 24)
Intel Core i9-14900HX
2049 Points
XMG Pro 16 Studio (Mid 23)
Intel Core i9-13900H
1927 Points -6%
Average of class Gaming
  (1136 - 2235, n=205, last 2 years)
1858 Points -9%
Cinebench R20
CPU (Multi Core)
Lenovo Legion 7 16 IRX G9
Intel Core i9-14900HX
11898 Points +14%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX9
Intel Core i9-14900HX
11319 Points +8%
Average Intel Core i9-14900HX
  (6579 - 13832, n=31)
11064 Points +6%
Aorus 16X 2024
Intel Core i9-14900HX
10655 Points +2%
SCHENKER XMG Pro 16 Studio (Mid 24)
Intel Core i9-14900HX
10474 Points
Acer Predator Helios Neo 16 (2024)
Intel Core i7-14700HX
8361 Points -20%
Average of class Gaming
  (2179 - 13832, n=205, last 2 years)
8014 Points -23%
XMG Pro 16 Studio (Mid 23)
Intel Core i9-13900H
6773 Points -35%
CPU (Single Core)
Lenovo Legion 7 16 IRX G9
Intel Core i9-14900HX
845 Points +7%
Aorus 16X 2024
Intel Core i9-14900HX
841 Points +7%
Average Intel Core i9-14900HX
  (657 - 859, n=31)
826 Points +5%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX9
Intel Core i9-14900HX
812 Points +3%
Acer Predator Helios Neo 16 (2024)
Intel Core i7-14700HX
803 Points +2%
SCHENKER XMG Pro 16 Studio (Mid 24)
Intel Core i9-14900HX
789 Points
XMG Pro 16 Studio (Mid 23)
Intel Core i9-13900H
735 Points -7%
Average of class Gaming
  (439 - 855, n=205, last 2 years)
715 Points -9%
Cinebench R15
CPU Multi 64Bit
Lenovo Legion 7 16 IRX G9
Intel Core i9-14900HX
4691 (3900.54min - 4690.98max) Points +8%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX9
Intel Core i9-14900HX
4591 (4151.1min - 4590.84max) Points +6%
Average Intel Core i9-14900HX
  (3263 - 5589, n=32)
4444 Points +2%
SCHENKER XMG Pro 16 Studio (Mid 24)
Intel Core i9-14900HX
4350 Points
Aorus 16X 2024
Intel Core i9-14900HX
4280 Points -2%
Acer Predator Helios Neo 16 (2024)
Intel Core i7-14700HX
3455 Points -21%
Average of class Gaming
  (905 - 5663, n=211, last 2 years)
3311 Points -24%
XMG Pro 16 Studio (Mid 23)
Intel Core i9-13900H
2739 Points -37%
CPU Single 64Bit
Aorus 16X 2024
Intel Core i9-14900HX
312 Points +11%
Lenovo Legion 7 16 IRX G9
Intel Core i9-14900HX
309 Points +10%
Average Intel Core i9-14900HX
  (247 - 320, n=31)
306 Points +9%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX9
Intel Core i9-14900HX
299 Points +6%
Acer Predator Helios Neo 16 (2024)
Intel Core i7-14700HX
294 Points +5%
SCHENKER XMG Pro 16 Studio (Mid 24)
Intel Core i9-14900HX
281 Points
XMG Pro 16 Studio (Mid 23)
Intel Core i9-13900H
278 Points -1%
Average of class Gaming
  (191.9 - 318, n=208, last 2 years)
275 Points -2%
Blender - v2.79 BMW27 CPU
XMG Pro 16 Studio (Mid 23)
Intel Core i9-13900H
186 Seconds * -43%
Average of class Gaming
  (87 - 555, n=200, last 2 years)
177.4 Seconds * -36%
Acer Predator Helios Neo 16 (2024)
Intel Core i7-14700HX
140 Seconds * -8%
SCHENKER XMG Pro 16 Studio (Mid 24)
Intel Core i9-14900HX
130 Seconds *
Aorus 16X 2024
Intel Core i9-14900HX
126 Seconds * +3%
Lenovo Legion 7 16 IRX G9
Intel Core i9-14900HX
123 Seconds * +5%
Average Intel Core i9-14900HX
  (91 - 206, n=31)
120.4 Seconds * +7%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX9
Intel Core i9-14900HX
113 Seconds * +13%
7-Zip 18.03
7z b 4
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX9
Intel Core i9-14900HX
115585 MIPS +11%
Average Intel Core i9-14900HX
  (66769 - 136645, n=31)
111935 MIPS +7%
Lenovo Legion 7 16 IRX G9
Intel Core i9-14900HX
109964 MIPS +6%
Aorus 16X 2024
Intel Core i9-14900HX
106866 MIPS +3%
SCHENKER XMG Pro 16 Studio (Mid 24)
Intel Core i9-14900HX
104193 MIPS
Acer Predator Helios Neo 16 (2024)
Intel Core i7-14700HX
93134 MIPS -11%
Average of class Gaming
  (23795 - 140932, n=204, last 2 years)
82476 MIPS -21%
XMG Pro 16 Studio (Mid 23)
Intel Core i9-13900H
68491 MIPS -34%
7z b 4 -mmt1
Aorus 16X 2024
Intel Core i9-14900HX
7297 MIPS +6%
Lenovo Legion 7 16 IRX G9
Intel Core i9-14900HX
7204 MIPS +4%
Average Intel Core i9-14900HX
  (5452 - 7508, n=31)
7002 MIPS +1%
SCHENKER XMG Pro 16 Studio (Mid 24)
Intel Core i9-14900HX
6914 MIPS
Acer Predator Helios Neo 16 (2024)
Intel Core i7-14700HX
6890 MIPS 0%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX9
Intel Core i9-14900HX
6776 MIPS -2%
XMG Pro 16 Studio (Mid 23)
Intel Core i9-13900H
6458 MIPS -7%
Average of class Gaming
  (4199 - 7581, n=204, last 2 years)
6235 MIPS -10%
Geekbench 6.2
Multi-Core
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX9
Intel Core i9-14900HX
18126 Points +6%
Lenovo Legion 7 16 IRX G9
Intel Core i9-14900HX
18079 Points +6%
Aorus 16X 2024
Intel Core i9-14900HX
17408 Points +2%
Average Intel Core i9-14900HX
  (13158 - 19665, n=31)
17335 Points +1%
Acer Predator Helios Neo 16 (2024)
Intel Core i7-14700HX
17292 Points +1%
SCHENKER XMG Pro 16 Studio (Mid 24)
Intel Core i9-14900HX
17086 Points
Average of class Gaming
  (5340 - 19665, n=105, last 2 years)
14198 Points -17%
XMG Pro 16 Studio (Mid 23)
Intel Core i9-13900H
14090 Points -18%
Single-Core
Aorus 16X 2024
Intel Core i9-14900HX
3054 Points +10%
Lenovo Legion 7 16 IRX G9
Intel Core i9-14900HX
2980 Points +8%
Average Intel Core i9-14900HX
  (2419 - 3129, n=31)
2977 Points +8%
Acer Predator Helios Neo 16 (2024)
Intel Core i7-14700HX
2975 Points +8%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX9
Intel Core i9-14900HX
2889 Points +5%
SCHENKER XMG Pro 16 Studio (Mid 24)
Intel Core i9-14900HX
2764 Points
Average of class Gaming
  (1490 - 3129, n=105, last 2 years)
2649 Points -4%
XMG Pro 16 Studio (Mid 23)
Intel Core i9-13900H
2645 Points -4%
Geekbench 5.5
Multi-Core
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX9
Intel Core i9-14900HX
21299 Points +14%
Lenovo Legion 7 16 IRX G9
Intel Core i9-14900HX
20533 Points +10%
Aorus 16X 2024
Intel Core i9-14900HX
19607 Points +5%
Average Intel Core i9-14900HX
  (8618 - 23194, n=31)
19452 Points +4%
SCHENKER XMG Pro 16 Studio (Mid 24)
Intel Core i9-14900HX
18749 Points
Acer Predator Helios Neo 16 (2024)
Intel Core i7-14700HX
18225 Points -3%
Average of class Gaming
  (4557 - 23194, n=206, last 2 years)
14479 Points -23%
XMG Pro 16 Studio (Mid 23)
Intel Core i9-13900H
13072 Points -30%
Single-Core
Aorus 16X 2024
Intel Core i9-14900HX
2183 Points +12%
Acer Predator Helios Neo 16 (2024)
Intel Core i7-14700HX
2131 Points +10%
Lenovo Legion 7 16 IRX G9
Intel Core i9-14900HX
2101 Points +8%
Average Intel Core i9-14900HX
  (1669 - 2210, n=31)
2093 Points +8%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX9
Intel Core i9-14900HX
2046 Points +5%
SCHENKER XMG Pro 16 Studio (Mid 24)
Intel Core i9-14900HX
1941 Points
XMG Pro 16 Studio (Mid 23)
Intel Core i9-13900H
1861 Points -4%
Average of class Gaming
  (986 - 2210, n=206, last 2 years)
1860 Points -4%
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 - 4k Preset
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX9
Intel Core i9-14900HX
30.1 fps +14%
Average Intel Core i9-14900HX
  (16.8 - 38.9, n=31)
29.6 fps +12%
Lenovo Legion 7 16 IRX G9
Intel Core i9-14900HX
28.8 fps +9%
Aorus 16X 2024
Intel Core i9-14900HX
27 fps +2%
SCHENKER XMG Pro 16 Studio (Mid 24)
Intel Core i9-14900HX
26.5 fps
Acer Predator Helios Neo 16 (2024)
Intel Core i7-14700HX
24.6 fps -7%
Average of class Gaming
  (6.72 - 38.9, n=204, last 2 years)
22.8 fps -14%
XMG Pro 16 Studio (Mid 23)
Intel Core i9-13900H
18.9 fps -29%
LibreOffice - 20 Documents To PDF
Average of class Gaming
  (31.4 - 96.6, n=201, last 2 years)
48.3 s * -4%
SCHENKER XMG Pro 16 Studio (Mid 24)
Intel Core i9-14900HX
46.4 s *
Lenovo Legion 7 16 IRX G9
Intel Core i9-14900HX
44.6 s * +4%
XMG Pro 16 Studio (Mid 23)
Intel Core i9-13900H
44.2 s * +5%
Average Intel Core i9-14900HX
  (31.4 - 85.1, n=31)
43.4 s * +6%
Acer Predator Helios Neo 16 (2024)
Intel Core i7-14700HX
42.5 s * +8%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX9
Intel Core i9-14900HX
40.7 s * +12%
Aorus 16X 2024
Intel Core i9-14900HX
38.5 s * +17%
R Benchmark 2.5 - Overall mean
Average of class Gaming
  (0.3609 - 0.759, n=205, last 2 years)
0.4436 sec * -8%
XMG Pro 16 Studio (Mid 23)
Intel Core i9-13900H
0.4412 sec * -8%
SCHENKER XMG Pro 16 Studio (Mid 24)
Intel Core i9-14900HX
0.409 sec *
Lenovo Legion 7 16 IRX G9
Intel Core i9-14900HX
0.393 sec * +4%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX9
Intel Core i9-14900HX
0.3917 sec * +4%
Average Intel Core i9-14900HX
  (0.3609 - 0.4859, n=31)
0.3846 sec * +6%
Acer Predator Helios Neo 16 (2024)
Intel Core i7-14700HX
0.3821 sec * +7%
Aorus 16X 2024
Intel Core i9-14900HX
0.3782 sec * +8%

* ... smaller is better

Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64Bit
4350 Points
Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64Bit
257 fps
Cinebench R15 Ref. Match 64Bit
99.6 %
Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64Bit
281 Points
Ajuda
Performance Rating
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX9
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
97.8 pt
Average Intel Core i9-14900HX
 
97 pt
Aorus 16X 2024
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
91.1 pt
Lenovo Legion 7 16 IRX G9
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
89.5 pt
SCHENKER XMG Pro 16 Studio (Mid 24)
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
86.9 pt
Acer Predator Helios Neo 16 (2024)
Intel Core i7-14700HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
85 pt
Average of class Gaming
 
79.3 pt
XMG Pro 16 Studio (Mid 23)
Intel Core i9-13900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
71.1 pt
AIDA64 / FP32 Ray-Trace
Lenovo Legion 7 16 IRX G9
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
25381 KRay/s +19%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX9
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
25072 KRay/s +17%
Average Intel Core i9-14900HX
  (13098 - 33474, n=30)
25023 KRay/s +17%
Aorus 16X 2024
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
23082 KRay/s +8%
Acer Predator Helios Neo 16 (2024)
Intel Core i7-14700HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
21558 KRay/s +1%
SCHENKER XMG Pro 16 Studio (Mid 24)
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
21393 KRay/s
Average of class Gaming
  (4986 - 60169, n=201, last 2 years)
21094 KRay/s -1%
XMG Pro 16 Studio (Mid 23)
Intel Core i9-13900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
16419 KRay/s -23%
AIDA64 / FPU Julia
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX9
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
129169 Points +17%
Average Intel Core i9-14900HX
  (67573 - 166040, n=30)
125198 Points +14%
Lenovo Legion 7 16 IRX G9
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
117057 Points +6%
Aorus 16X 2024
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
116836 Points +6%
SCHENKER XMG Pro 16 Studio (Mid 24)
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
110279 Points
Acer Predator Helios Neo 16 (2024)
Intel Core i7-14700HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
107531 Points -2%
Average of class Gaming
  (25360 - 252486, n=201, last 2 years)
104437 Points -5%
XMG Pro 16 Studio (Mid 23)
Intel Core i9-13900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
83334 Points -24%
AIDA64 / CPU SHA3
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX9
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
6285 MB/s +12%
Average Intel Core i9-14900HX
  (3589 - 7979, n=30)
6192 MB/s +10%
Aorus 16X 2024
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
5723 MB/s +2%
Lenovo Legion 7 16 IRX G9
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
5658 MB/s +1%
SCHENKER XMG Pro 16 Studio (Mid 24)
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
5615 MB/s
Acer Predator Helios Neo 16 (2024)
Intel Core i7-14700HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
5056 MB/s -10%
Average of class Gaming
  (1339 - 10389, n=201, last 2 years)
4734 MB/s -16%
XMG Pro 16 Studio (Mid 23)
Intel Core i9-13900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
3809 MB/s -32%
AIDA64 / CPU Queen
Acer Predator Helios Neo 16 (2024)
Intel Core i7-14700HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
150835 Points +11%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX9
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
142503 Points +4%
Lenovo Legion 7 16 IRX G9
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
141814 Points +4%
Aorus 16X 2024
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
139355 Points +2%
Average Intel Core i9-14900HX
  (118405 - 148966, n=30)
138474 Points +1%
SCHENKER XMG Pro 16 Studio (Mid 24)
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
136489 Points
Average of class Gaming
  (41257 - 200651, n=201, last 2 years)
114772 Points -16%
XMG Pro 16 Studio (Mid 23)
Intel Core i9-13900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
104502 Points -23%
AIDA64 / FPU SinJulia
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX9
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
15401 Points +11%
Average Intel Core i9-14900HX
  (10475 - 18517, n=30)
15345 Points +11%
Aorus 16X 2024
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
14830 Points +7%
Lenovo Legion 7 16 IRX G9
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
13926 Points +1%
SCHENKER XMG Pro 16 Studio (Mid 24)
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
13846 Points
Acer Predator Helios Neo 16 (2024)
Intel Core i7-14700HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
13605 Points -2%
Average of class Gaming
  (3925 - 32988, n=201, last 2 years)
12967 Points -6%
XMG Pro 16 Studio (Mid 23)
Intel Core i9-13900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
10361 Points -25%
AIDA64 / FPU Mandel
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX9
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
62567 Points +19%
Average Intel Core i9-14900HX
  (32543 - 83662, n=30)
61660 Points +17%
Aorus 16X 2024
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
57633 Points +10%
Acer Predator Helios Neo 16 (2024)
Intel Core i7-14700HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
54174 Points +3%
Average of class Gaming
  (12321 - 134044, n=201, last 2 years)
52797 Points 0%
SCHENKER XMG Pro 16 Studio (Mid 24)
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
52621 Points
Lenovo Legion 7 16 IRX G9
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
47375 Points -10%
XMG Pro 16 Studio (Mid 23)
Intel Core i9-13900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
40932 Points -22%
AIDA64 / CPU AES
XMG Pro 16 Studio (Mid 23)
Intel Core i9-13900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
141059 MB/s +32%
Average Intel Core i9-14900HX
  (86964 - 241777, n=30)
138877 MB/s +30%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX9
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
120213 MB/s +12%
Aorus 16X 2024
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
112833 MB/s +5%
Lenovo Legion 7 16 IRX G9
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
111489 MB/s +4%
Average of class Gaming
  (19065 - 328679, n=201, last 2 years)
109368 MB/s +2%
SCHENKER XMG Pro 16 Studio (Mid 24)
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
107172 MB/s
Acer Predator Helios Neo 16 (2024)
Intel Core i7-14700HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
98391 MB/s -8%
AIDA64 / CPU ZLib
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX9
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
1866 MB/s +14%
Average Intel Core i9-14900HX
  (1054 - 2292, n=30)
1808 MB/s +10%
Aorus 16X 2024
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
1662 MB/s +1%
SCHENKER XMG Pro 16 Studio (Mid 24)
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
1643 MB/s
Lenovo Legion 7 16 IRX G9
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
1639 MB/s 0%
Acer Predator Helios Neo 16 (2024)
Intel Core i7-14700HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
1494 MB/s -9%
Average of class Gaming
  (269 - 2409, n=201, last 2 years)
1310 MB/s -20%
XMG Pro 16 Studio (Mid 23)
Intel Core i9-13900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
1088 MB/s -34%
AIDA64 / FP64 Ray-Trace
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX9
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
13776 KRay/s +20%
Average Intel Core i9-14900HX
  (6809 - 18349, n=30)
13478 KRay/s +17%
Lenovo Legion 7 16 IRX G9
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
12370 KRay/s +8%
Aorus 16X 2024
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
12355 KRay/s +8%
SCHENKER XMG Pro 16 Studio (Mid 24)
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
11481 KRay/s
Acer Predator Helios Neo 16 (2024)
Intel Core i7-14700HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
11438 KRay/s 0%
Average of class Gaming
  (2540 - 31796, n=201, last 2 years)
11364 KRay/s -1%
XMG Pro 16 Studio (Mid 23)
Intel Core i9-13900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
8955 KRay/s -22%
AIDA64 / CPU PhotoWorxx
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX9
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
49676 MPixel/s +2%
Aorus 16X 2024
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
49217 MPixel/s +1%
SCHENKER XMG Pro 16 Studio (Mid 24)
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
48831 MPixel/s
Lenovo Legion 7 16 IRX G9
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
48577 MPixel/s -1%
XMG Pro 16 Studio (Mid 23)
Intel Core i9-13900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
47412 MPixel/s -3%
Acer Predator Helios Neo 16 (2024)
Intel Core i7-14700HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
46636 MPixel/s -4%
Average Intel Core i9-14900HX
  (23903 - 54702, n=30)
46341 MPixel/s -5%
Average of class Gaming
  (10805 - 60161, n=202, last 2 years)
39022 MPixel/s -20%

Desempenho do sistema

O sistema de funcionamento suave oferece desempenho suficiente para jogos, renderização e streaming, mas o hardware instalado não é capaz de estabelecer novos recordes. As taxas de transferência da RAM estão em um nível normal para a RAM DDR5-5600.

A RAM é executada no modo de canal duplo.
A RAM é executada no modo de canal duplo.
PCMark 10 / Score
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX9
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i9-14900HX, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
8550 Points +5%
Aorus 16X 2024
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i9-14900HX, Gigabyte AG450E1024-SI
8389 Points +3%
Acer Predator Helios Neo 16 (2024)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i7-14700HX, Samsung PM9A1a MZVL21T0HDLU
8302 Points +2%
Average Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
  (7866 - 8550, n=6)
8253 Points +1%
SCHENKER XMG Pro 16 Studio (Mid 24)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i9-14900HX, Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB
8166 Points
Lenovo Legion 7 16 IRX G9
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i9-14900HX, SK Hynix HFS001TEJ9X115N
8023 Points -2%
XMG Pro 16 Studio (Mid 23)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i9-13900H, Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB
8010 Points -2%
Average of class Gaming
  (5442 - 9852, n=180, last 2 years)
7716 Points -6%
PCMark 10 / Essentials
XMG Pro 16 Studio (Mid 23)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i9-13900H, Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB
11940 Points +11%
Acer Predator Helios Neo 16 (2024)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i7-14700HX, Samsung PM9A1a MZVL21T0HDLU
11708 Points +9%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX9
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i9-14900HX, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
11286 Points +5%
Average Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
  (10621 - 11815, n=6)
11079 Points +3%
Aorus 16X 2024
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i9-14900HX, Gigabyte AG450E1024-SI
11071 Points +3%
Lenovo Legion 7 16 IRX G9
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i9-14900HX, SK Hynix HFS001TEJ9X115N
10958 Points +2%
Average of class Gaming
  (8829 - 12334, n=179, last 2 years)
10799 Points +1%
SCHENKER XMG Pro 16 Studio (Mid 24)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i9-14900HX, Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB
10725 Points
PCMark 10 / Productivity
Aorus 16X 2024
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i9-14900HX, Gigabyte AG450E1024-SI
11103 Points +1%
SCHENKER XMG Pro 16 Studio (Mid 24)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i9-14900HX, Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB
11014 Points
Average Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
  (9701 - 11103, n=6)
10493 Points -5%
XMG Pro 16 Studio (Mid 23)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i9-13900H, Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB
10425 Points -5%
Acer Predator Helios Neo 16 (2024)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i7-14700HX, Samsung PM9A1a MZVL21T0HDLU
10273 Points -7%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX9
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i9-14900HX, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
10139 Points -8%
Average of class Gaming
  (6662 - 14612, n=179, last 2 years)
9841 Points -11%
Lenovo Legion 7 16 IRX G9
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i9-14900HX, SK Hynix HFS001TEJ9X115N
9701 Points -12%
PCMark 10 / Digital Content Creation
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX9
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i9-14900HX, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
14827 Points +19%
Lenovo Legion 7 16 IRX G9
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i9-14900HX, SK Hynix HFS001TEJ9X115N
13185 Points +5%
Average Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
  (12114 - 14827, n=6)
13153 Points +5%
Aorus 16X 2024
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i9-14900HX, Gigabyte AG450E1024-SI
13036 Points +4%
Acer Predator Helios Neo 16 (2024)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i7-14700HX, Samsung PM9A1a MZVL21T0HDLU
12909 Points +3%
SCHENKER XMG Pro 16 Studio (Mid 24)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i9-14900HX, Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB
12511 Points
Average of class Gaming
  (6462 - 18475, n=179, last 2 years)
11847 Points -5%
XMG Pro 16 Studio (Mid 23)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i9-13900H, Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB
11204 Points -10%
CrossMark / Overall
Aorus 16X 2024
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i9-14900HX, Gigabyte AG450E1024-SI
2312 Points +12%
Lenovo Legion 7 16 IRX G9
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i9-14900HX, SK Hynix HFS001TEJ9X115N
2311 Points +12%
Acer Predator Helios Neo 16 (2024)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i7-14700HX, Samsung PM9A1a MZVL21T0HDLU
2235 Points +8%
Average Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
  (2002 - 2312, n=5)
2179 Points +5%
SCHENKER XMG Pro 16 Studio (Mid 24)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i9-14900HX, Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB
2067 Points
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX9
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i9-14900HX, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
2002 Points -3%
XMG Pro 16 Studio (Mid 23)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i9-13900H, Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB
1955 Points -5%
Average of class Gaming
  (1247 - 2344, n=162, last 2 years)
1881 Points -9%
CrossMark / Productivity
Aorus 16X 2024
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i9-14900HX, Gigabyte AG450E1024-SI
2191 Points +15%
Lenovo Legion 7 16 IRX G9
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i9-14900HX, SK Hynix HFS001TEJ9X115N
2172 Points +14%
Acer Predator Helios Neo 16 (2024)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i7-14700HX, Samsung PM9A1a MZVL21T0HDLU
2093 Points +10%
Average Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
  (1827 - 2191, n=5)
2042 Points +7%
SCHENKER XMG Pro 16 Studio (Mid 24)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i9-14900HX, Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB
1911 Points
XMG Pro 16 Studio (Mid 23)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i9-13900H, Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB
1884 Points -1%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX9
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i9-14900HX, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
1827 Points -4%
Average of class Gaming
  (1299 - 2204, n=162, last 2 years)
1787 Points -6%
CrossMark / Creativity
Aorus 16X 2024
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i9-14900HX, Gigabyte AG450E1024-SI
2458 Points +4%
Acer Predator Helios Neo 16 (2024)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i7-14700HX, Samsung PM9A1a MZVL21T0HDLU
2455 Points +4%
Lenovo Legion 7 16 IRX G9
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i9-14900HX, SK Hynix HFS001TEJ9X115N
2452 Points +3%
Average Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
  (2287 - 2458, n=5)
2385 Points +1%
SCHENKER XMG Pro 16 Studio (Mid 24)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i9-14900HX, Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB
2371 Points
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX9
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i9-14900HX, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
2287 Points -4%
Average of class Gaming
  (1275 - 2660, n=162, last 2 years)
2059 Points -13%
XMG Pro 16 Studio (Mid 23)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i9-13900H, Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB
2028 Points -14%
CrossMark / Responsiveness
Lenovo Legion 7 16 IRX G9
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i9-14900HX, SK Hynix HFS001TEJ9X115N
2330 Points +34%
Aorus 16X 2024
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i9-14900HX, Gigabyte AG450E1024-SI
2259 Points +30%
Acer Predator Helios Neo 16 (2024)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i7-14700HX, Samsung PM9A1a MZVL21T0HDLU
2053 Points +18%
Average Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
  (1734 - 2330, n=5)
2028 Points +17%
XMG Pro 16 Studio (Mid 23)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i9-13900H, Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB
1952 Points +13%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX9
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i9-14900HX, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
1769 Points +2%
SCHENKER XMG Pro 16 Studio (Mid 24)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i9-14900HX, Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB
1734 Points
Average of class Gaming
  (1030 - 2330, n=162, last 2 years)
1683 Points -3%
WebXPRT 3 / Overall
Lenovo Legion 7 16 IRX G9
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i9-14900HX, SK Hynix HFS001TEJ9X115N
342 Points +7%
Average Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
  (319 - 342, n=6)
333 Points +4%
Aorus 16X 2024
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i9-14900HX, Gigabyte AG450E1024-SI
330 Points +3%
Acer Predator Helios Neo 16 (2024)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i7-14700HX, Samsung PM9A1a MZVL21T0HDLU
323 Points +1%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX9
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i9-14900HX, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
322 Points +1%
XMG Pro 16 Studio (Mid 23)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i9-13900H, Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB
320 Points 0%
SCHENKER XMG Pro 16 Studio (Mid 24)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i9-14900HX, Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB
319 Points
Average of class Gaming
  (215 - 480, n=181, last 2 years)
301 Points -6%
WebXPRT 4 / Overall
Acer Predator Helios Neo 16 (2024)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i7-14700HX, Samsung PM9A1a MZVL21T0HDLU
307 Points +2%
SCHENKER XMG Pro 16 Studio (Mid 24)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i9-14900HX, Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB
301 Points
Average Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
  (291 - 301, n=4)
298 Points -1%
Lenovo Legion 7 16 IRX G9
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i9-14900HX, SK Hynix HFS001TEJ9X115N
297.6 Points -1%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX9
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i9-14900HX, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
291 Points -3%
Average of class Gaming
  (157.9 - 328, n=167, last 2 years)
264 Points -12%
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 / Total
Average of class Gaming
  (421 - 737, n=193, last 2 years)
512 ms * -11%
XMG Pro 16 Studio (Mid 23)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i9-13900H, Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB
505 ms * -10%
SCHENKER XMG Pro 16 Studio (Mid 24)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i9-14900HX, Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB
461 ms *
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX9
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i9-14900HX, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
449 ms * +3%
Acer Predator Helios Neo 16 (2024)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i7-14700HX, Samsung PM9A1a MZVL21T0HDLU
447 ms * +3%
Lenovo Legion 7 16 IRX G9
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i9-14900HX, SK Hynix HFS001TEJ9X115N
443 ms * +4%
Average Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
  (431 - 461, n=6)
443 ms * +4%
Aorus 16X 2024
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i9-14900HX, Gigabyte AG450E1024-SI
436 ms * +5%

* ... smaller is better

PCMark 10 Score
8166 pontos
Ajuda
AIDA64 / Memory Copy
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX9
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
78979 MB/s 0%
Lenovo Legion 7 16 IRX G9
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
78859 MB/s 0%
Aorus 16X 2024
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
78854 MB/s 0%
SCHENKER XMG Pro 16 Studio (Mid 24)
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
78788 MB/s
Acer Predator Helios Neo 16 (2024)
Intel Core i7-14700HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
75827 MB/s -4%
Average Intel Core i9-14900HX
  (38028 - 83392, n=30)
74366 MB/s -6%
XMG Pro 16 Studio (Mid 23)
Intel Core i9-13900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
70102 MB/s -11%
Average of class Gaming
  (21842 - 94222, n=201, last 2 years)
63356 MB/s -20%
AIDA64 / Memory Read
Aorus 16X 2024
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
86538 MB/s +1%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX9
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
86376 MB/s +1%
Lenovo Legion 7 16 IRX G9
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
85746 MB/s 0%
SCHENKER XMG Pro 16 Studio (Mid 24)
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
85460 MB/s
Acer Predator Helios Neo 16 (2024)
Intel Core i7-14700HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
83034 MB/s -3%
Average Intel Core i9-14900HX
  (43306 - 87507, n=30)
80356 MB/s -6%
XMG Pro 16 Studio (Mid 23)
Intel Core i9-13900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
75433 MB/s -12%
Average of class Gaming
  (23681 - 99713, n=201, last 2 years)
67002 MB/s -22%
AIDA64 / Memory Write
Aorus 16X 2024
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
77406 MB/s +6%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX9
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
77346 MB/s +6%
Lenovo Legion 7 16 IRX G9
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
74500 MB/s +2%
SCHENKER XMG Pro 16 Studio (Mid 24)
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
73167 MB/s
XMG Pro 16 Studio (Mid 23)
Intel Core i9-13900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
72225 MB/s -1%
Average Intel Core i9-14900HX
  (37146 - 80589, n=30)
71399 MB/s -2%
Acer Predator Helios Neo 16 (2024)
Intel Core i7-14700HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
70034 MB/s -4%
Average of class Gaming
  (22986 - 108954, n=201, last 2 years)
65198 MB/s -11%
AIDA64 / Memory Latency
Average of class Gaming
  (59.5 - 259, n=201, last 2 years)
93.4 ns * -11%
Acer Predator Helios Neo 16 (2024)
Intel Core i7-14700HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
91.1 ns * -8%
XMG Pro 16 Studio (Mid 23)
Intel Core i9-13900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
87.1 ns * -4%
Average Intel Core i9-14900HX
  (76.1 - 105, n=30)
85.1 ns * -1%
SCHENKER XMG Pro 16 Studio (Mid 24)
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
84 ns *
Lenovo Legion 7 16 IRX G9
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
83.5 ns * +1%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX9
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
83.4 ns * +1%
Aorus 16X 2024
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
82.5 ns * +2%

* ... smaller is better

Latências de DPC

Devido às latências relativamente altas do laptop, não se pretende fazer edição de vídeo e áudio em tempo real. Entretanto, futuras atualizações de software podem levar a mudanças nesse aspecto.

Monitor de latência
Monitor de latência
Monitor de latência
Monitor de latência
DPC Latencies / LatencyMon - interrupt to process latency (max), Web, Youtube, Prime95
XMG Pro 16 Studio (Mid 23)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i9-13900H, Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB
1857.6 μs * -4%
SCHENKER XMG Pro 16 Studio (Mid 24)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i9-14900HX, Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB
1791.8 μs *
Lenovo Legion 7 16 IRX G9
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i9-14900HX, SK Hynix HFS001TEJ9X115N
1559.5 μs * +13%
Acer Predator Helios Neo 16 (2024)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i7-14700HX, Samsung PM9A1a MZVL21T0HDLU
1451.9 μs * +19%
Aorus 16X 2024
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i9-14900HX, Gigabyte AG450E1024-SI
1162.9 μs * +35%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX9
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i9-14900HX, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
989.1 μs * +45%

* ... smaller is better

Dispositivos de armazenamento

A loja on-line da Schenker tem uma variedade de SSDs para o senhor escolher - nosso dispositivo de teste apresenta um modelo extremamente rápido (1 TB, PCIe 4, M.2-2280) da Samsung. Pontos positivos: Não houve estrangulamento induzido por calor. O laptop pode acomodar até dois SSDs PCIe 4 (M.2-2280). Há suporte para RAID-0/1.

O Pro 16 oferece espaço para dois SSDs PCIe-4.
O Pro 16 oferece espaço para dois SSDs PCIe-4.
Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB
CDM 5/6 Read Seq Q32T1: 7089 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write Seq Q32T1: 6849 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Read 4K Q32T1: 681.3 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write 4K Q32T1: 462.3 MB/s
CDM 5 Read Seq: 3840 MB/s
CDM 5 Write Seq: 4952 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Read 4K: 84.39 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write 4K: 266.6 MB/s
Drive Performance Rating - Percent
Lenovo Legion 7 16 IRX G9
SK Hynix HFS001TEJ9X115N
93.9 pt
XMG Pro 16 Studio (Mid 23)
Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB
86.8 pt
Acer Predator Helios Neo 16 (2024)
Samsung PM9A1a MZVL21T0HDLU
82.4 pt
SCHENKER XMG Pro 16 Studio (Mid 24)
Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB
82.2 pt
Average Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB
 
77.9 pt
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX9
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
74.3 pt
Aorus 16X 2024
Gigabyte AG450E1024-SI
71.7 pt
Average of class Gaming
 
62.5 pt
DiskSpd
seq read
Lenovo Legion 7 16 IRX G9
SK Hynix HFS001TEJ9X115N
4175 (4140.41min - 4174.97max) MB/s +63%
Acer Predator Helios Neo 16 (2024)
Samsung PM9A1a MZVL21T0HDLU
4104 (4091.75min - 4103.68max) MB/s +61%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX9
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
4037 (3964.04min - 4036.7max) MB/s +58%
Average of class Gaming
  (1319 - 7045, n=182, last 2 years)
3500 MB/s +37%
Average Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB
  (2556 - 4234, n=15)
3280 MB/s +28%
XMG Pro 16 Studio (Mid 23)
Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB
3157 (2968.73min - 3157.45max) MB/s +24%
Aorus 16X 2024
Gigabyte AG450E1024-SI
2620 (2556.56min - 2619.76max) MB/s +3%
SCHENKER XMG Pro 16 Studio (Mid 24)
Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB
2556 (2209.35min - 2555.51max) MB/s
seq write
Lenovo Legion 7 16 IRX G9
SK Hynix HFS001TEJ9X115N
5091 (5032.33min - 5091.26max) MB/s +5%
Average Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB
  (3637 - 5842, n=15)
4899 MB/s +1%
SCHENKER XMG Pro 16 Studio (Mid 24)
Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB
4834 (4439.32min - 4834.12max) MB/s
Aorus 16X 2024
Gigabyte AG450E1024-SI
4757 (4720.06min - 4757.31max) MB/s -2%
XMG Pro 16 Studio (Mid 23)
Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB
4698 (3640.45min - 4697.66max) MB/s -3%
Acer Predator Helios Neo 16 (2024)
Samsung PM9A1a MZVL21T0HDLU
4533 (4522.27min - 4532.95max) MB/s -6%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX9
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
4093 (4016.82min - 4092.8max) MB/s -15%
Average of class Gaming
  (535 - 9307, n=182, last 2 years)
3783 MB/s -22%
seq q8 t1 read
Average Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB
  (7011 - 7148, n=15)
7098 MB/s +1%
XMG Pro 16 Studio (Mid 23)
Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB
7090 (6633.87min - 7089.84max) MB/s +1%
Acer Predator Helios Neo 16 (2024)
Samsung PM9A1a MZVL21T0HDLU
7058 (6624.24min - 7058.17max) MB/s 0%
SCHENKER XMG Pro 16 Studio (Mid 24)
Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB
7049 (5964.33min - 7049.37max) MB/s
Lenovo Legion 7 16 IRX G9
SK Hynix HFS001TEJ9X115N
7019 (6133.64min - 7018.76max) MB/s 0%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX9
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
6636 (6205.02min - 6635.75max) MB/s -6%
Average of class Gaming
  (2594 - 16089, n=182, last 2 years)
6333 MB/s -10%
Aorus 16X 2024
Gigabyte AG450E1024-SI
5181 (4323.23min - 5181.35max) MB/s -27%
seq q8 t1 write
SCHENKER XMG Pro 16 Studio (Mid 24)
Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB
6896 (6883.77min - 6896.11max) MB/s
Average Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB
  (6531 - 6898, n=15)
6805 MB/s -1%
XMG Pro 16 Studio (Mid 23)
Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB
6770 (6323.06min - 6770.24max) MB/s -2%
Lenovo Legion 7 16 IRX G9
SK Hynix HFS001TEJ9X115N
6500 (6455.66min - 6499.7max) MB/s -6%
Acer Predator Helios Neo 16 (2024)
Samsung PM9A1a MZVL21T0HDLU
5265 (5223.42min - 5264.69max) MB/s -24%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX9
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
4949 (4932.28min - 4948.61max) MB/s -28%
Aorus 16X 2024
Gigabyte AG450E1024-SI
4821 (4606.6min - 4820.72max) MB/s -30%
Average of class Gaming
  (539 - 14571, n=182, last 2 years)
4799 MB/s -30%
4k q1 t1 read
Acer Predator Helios Neo 16 (2024)
Samsung PM9A1a MZVL21T0HDLU
95.2 (94.25min - 95.19max) MB/s +13%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX9
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
92.7 (91.49min - 92.68max) MB/s +10%
Lenovo Legion 7 16 IRX G9
SK Hynix HFS001TEJ9X115N
84.6 (83.7min - 84.58max) MB/s 0%
SCHENKER XMG Pro 16 Studio (Mid 24)
Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB
84.4 (72.17min - 84.41max) MB/s
Average Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB
  (55.3 - 97.7, n=15)
76.2 MB/s -10%
Average of class Gaming
  (30.6 - 95.9, n=182, last 2 years)
66.2 MB/s -22%
XMG Pro 16 Studio (Mid 23)
Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB
55.3 (53.37min - 55.32max) MB/s -34%
Aorus 16X 2024
Gigabyte AG450E1024-SI
47.2 (45.9min - 47.16max) MB/s -44%
4k q1 t1 write
XMG Pro 16 Studio (Mid 23)
Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB
343 (338.95min - 343.03max) MB/s +23%
Aorus 16X 2024
Gigabyte AG450E1024-SI
340 (329.38min - 339.78max) MB/s +21%
Lenovo Legion 7 16 IRX G9
SK Hynix HFS001TEJ9X115N
334 (316.9min - 334.07max) MB/s +19%
SCHENKER XMG Pro 16 Studio (Mid 24)
Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB
280 (277.46min - 279.66max) MB/s
Acer Predator Helios Neo 16 (2024)
Samsung PM9A1a MZVL21T0HDLU
270 (268.96min - 269.65max) MB/s -4%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX9
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
251 (249.74min - 251.16max) MB/s -10%
Average Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB
  (146.3 - 343, n=15)
242 MB/s -14%
Average of class Gaming
  (66.6 - 397, n=182, last 2 years)
219 MB/s -22%
4k q32 t16 read
Lenovo Legion 7 16 IRX G9
SK Hynix HFS001TEJ9X115N
5847 (5827.75min - 5846.56max) MB/s +19%
XMG Pro 16 Studio (Mid 23)
Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB
4923 (4891.68min - 4922.98max) MB/s 0%
SCHENKER XMG Pro 16 Studio (Mid 24)
Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB
4915 (4891.5min - 4914.51max) MB/s
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX9
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
4055 (4044.11min - 4055.48max) MB/s -17%
Acer Predator Helios Neo 16 (2024)
Samsung PM9A1a MZVL21T0HDLU
3764 (3700.88min - 3763.72max) MB/s -23%
Average Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB
  (818 - 4923, n=15)
3529 MB/s -28%
Aorus 16X 2024
Gigabyte AG450E1024-SI
3302 (3194.22min - 3302.44max) MB/s -33%
Average of class Gaming
  (417 - 6172, n=182, last 2 years)
2570 MB/s -48%
4k q32 t16 write
XMG Pro 16 Studio (Mid 23)
Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB
4394 (3486.17min - 4394.19max) MB/s +25%
Lenovo Legion 7 16 IRX G9
SK Hynix HFS001TEJ9X115N
3792 (3142.55min - 3791.52max) MB/s +8%
Acer Predator Helios Neo 16 (2024)
Samsung PM9A1a MZVL21T0HDLU
3717 (3584.28min - 3717.4max) MB/s +6%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX9
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
3542 (3491.17min - 3541.69max) MB/s +1%
SCHENKER XMG Pro 16 Studio (Mid 24)
Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB
3522 (3439.08min - 3521.99max) MB/s
Aorus 16X 2024
Gigabyte AG450E1024-SI
3443 (3007.99min - 3443.05max) MB/s -2%
Average Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB
  (413 - 4683, n=15)
2771 MB/s -21%
Average of class Gaming
  (162.3 - 4869, n=182, last 2 years)
2097 MB/s -40%
AS SSD
Score Total
Lenovo Legion 7 16 IRX G9
SK Hynix HFS001TEJ9X115N
10769 Points +18%
XMG Pro 16 Studio (Mid 23)
Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB
10265 Points +13%
SCHENKER XMG Pro 16 Studio (Mid 24)
Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB
9122 Points
Acer Predator Helios Neo 16 (2024)
Samsung PM9A1a MZVL21T0HDLU
9056 Points -1%
Aorus 16X 2024
Gigabyte AG450E1024-SI
8778 Points -4%
Average Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB
  (5405 - 10265, n=15)
8436 Points -8%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX9
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
8364 Points -8%
Average of class Gaming
  (2271 - 13854, n=172, last 2 years)
6736 Points -26%
Score Read
XMG Pro 16 Studio (Mid 23)
Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB
4721 Points +32%
Lenovo Legion 7 16 IRX G9
SK Hynix HFS001TEJ9X115N
3747 Points +4%
SCHENKER XMG Pro 16 Studio (Mid 24)
Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB
3590 Points
Acer Predator Helios Neo 16 (2024)
Samsung PM9A1a MZVL21T0HDLU
3368 Points -6%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX9
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
3233 Points -10%
Aorus 16X 2024
Gigabyte AG450E1024-SI
3152 Points -12%
Average Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB
  (1349 - 4721, n=15)
3011 Points -16%
Average of class Gaming
  (760 - 4721, n=172, last 2 years)
2445 Points -32%
Score Write
Lenovo Legion 7 16 IRX G9
SK Hynix HFS001TEJ9X115N
5126 Points +38%
XMG Pro 16 Studio (Mid 23)
Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB
4652 Points +26%
Acer Predator Helios Neo 16 (2024)
Samsung PM9A1a MZVL21T0HDLU
4018 Points +9%
Aorus 16X 2024
Gigabyte AG450E1024-SI
4006 Points +8%
Average Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB
  (2308 - 4684, n=15)
4002 Points +8%
SCHENKER XMG Pro 16 Studio (Mid 24)
Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB
3703 Points
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX9
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
3543 Points -4%
Average of class Gaming
  (515 - 7208, n=172, last 2 years)
3105 Points -16%
Seq Read
Lenovo Legion 7 16 IRX G9
SK Hynix HFS001TEJ9X115N
5849 MB/s +12%
Acer Predator Helios Neo 16 (2024)
Samsung PM9A1a MZVL21T0HDLU
5622.8 MB/s +8%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX9
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
5355.36 MB/s +3%
SCHENKER XMG Pro 16 Studio (Mid 24)
Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB
5214.03 MB/s
Average Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB
  (4362 - 5760, n=15)
5210 MB/s 0%
Average of class Gaming
  (2260 - 12763, n=172, last 2 years)
4922 MB/s -6%
XMG Pro 16 Studio (Mid 23)
Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB
4797.97 MB/s -8%
Aorus 16X 2024
Gigabyte AG450E1024-SI
4161.31 MB/s -20%
Seq Write
Lenovo Legion 7 16 IRX G9
SK Hynix HFS001TEJ9X115N
5482 MB/s +7%
SCHENKER XMG Pro 16 Studio (Mid 24)
Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB
5143.63 MB/s
Average Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB
  (3376 - 5651, n=15)
4842 MB/s -6%
XMG Pro 16 Studio (Mid 23)
Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB
4668.7 MB/s -9%
Acer Predator Helios Neo 16 (2024)
Samsung PM9A1a MZVL21T0HDLU
4482.43 MB/s -13%
Aorus 16X 2024
Gigabyte AG450E1024-SI
4431.76 MB/s -14%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX9
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
3950.35 MB/s -23%
Average of class Gaming
  (495 - 11316, n=172, last 2 years)
3687 MB/s -28%
4K Read
Acer Predator Helios Neo 16 (2024)
Samsung PM9A1a MZVL21T0HDLU
84.56 MB/s +10%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX9
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
82.62 MB/s +8%
Lenovo Legion 7 16 IRX G9
SK Hynix HFS001TEJ9X115N
80.9 MB/s +6%
XMG Pro 16 Studio (Mid 23)
Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB
76.81 MB/s 0%
SCHENKER XMG Pro 16 Studio (Mid 24)
Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB
76.57 MB/s
Average Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB
  (59.3 - 85.3, n=15)
71.4 MB/s -7%
Average of class Gaming
  (27.8 - 112.1, n=172, last 2 years)
65.3 MB/s -15%
Aorus 16X 2024
Gigabyte AG450E1024-SI
61.86 MB/s -19%
4K Write
XMG Pro 16 Studio (Mid 23)
Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB
306.26 MB/s +47%
Aorus 16X 2024
Gigabyte AG450E1024-SI
283.44 MB/s +36%
Lenovo Legion 7 16 IRX G9
SK Hynix HFS001TEJ9X115N
283 MB/s +36%
Acer Predator Helios Neo 16 (2024)
Samsung PM9A1a MZVL21T0HDLU
231.38 MB/s +11%
Average Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB
  (172.3 - 306, n=15)
224 MB/s +7%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX9
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
213.76 MB/s +3%
SCHENKER XMG Pro 16 Studio (Mid 24)
Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB
208.4 MB/s
Average of class Gaming
  (108.8 - 512, n=172, last 2 years)
208 MB/s 0%
4K-64 Read
XMG Pro 16 Studio (Mid 23)
Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB
3164.36 MB/s +6%
Lenovo Legion 7 16 IRX G9
SK Hynix HFS001TEJ9X115N
3081 MB/s +3%
SCHENKER XMG Pro 16 Studio (Mid 24)
Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB
2991.57 MB/s
Acer Predator Helios Neo 16 (2024)
Samsung PM9A1a MZVL21T0HDLU
2721.41 MB/s -9%
Aorus 16X 2024
Gigabyte AG450E1024-SI
2673.76 MB/s -11%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX9
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
2615.17 MB/s -13%
Average Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB
  (787 - 3164, n=15)
2362 MB/s -21%
Average of class Gaming
  (442 - 3475, n=172, last 2 years)
1883 MB/s -37%
4K-64 Write
Lenovo Legion 7 16 IRX G9
SK Hynix HFS001TEJ9X115N
4295 MB/s +44%
XMG Pro 16 Studio (Mid 23)
Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB
3878.76 MB/s +30%
Acer Predator Helios Neo 16 (2024)
Samsung PM9A1a MZVL21T0HDLU
3338.79 MB/s +12%
Average Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB
  (1592 - 3975, n=15)
3302 MB/s +11%
Aorus 16X 2024
Gigabyte AG450E1024-SI
3279.44 MB/s +10%
SCHENKER XMG Pro 16 Studio (Mid 24)
Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB
2980.22 MB/s
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX9
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
2933.74 MB/s -2%
Average of class Gaming
  (277 - 5909, n=172, last 2 years)
2531 MB/s -15%
Access Time Read
Aorus 16X 2024
Gigabyte AG450E1024-SI
0.088 ms * -175%
XMG Pro 16 Studio (Mid 23)
Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB
0.064 ms * -100%
Average of class Gaming
  (0.016 - 0.379, n=171, last 2 years)
0.0537 ms * -68%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX9
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
0.042 ms * -31%
Acer Predator Helios Neo 16 (2024)
Samsung PM9A1a MZVL21T0HDLU
0.038 ms * -19%
Average Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB
  (0.018 - 0.074, n=15)
0.03573 ms * -12%
SCHENKER XMG Pro 16 Studio (Mid 24)
Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB
0.032 ms *
Lenovo Legion 7 16 IRX G9
SK Hynix HFS001TEJ9X115N
0.016 ms * +50%
Access Time Write
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX9
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
0.059 ms * -228%
Average of class Gaming
  (0.011 - 1.028, n=172, last 2 years)
0.04906 ms * -173%
Average Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB
  (0.012 - 0.053, n=15)
0.0202 ms * -12%
Acer Predator Helios Neo 16 (2024)
Samsung PM9A1a MZVL21T0HDLU
0.019 ms * -6%
SCHENKER XMG Pro 16 Studio (Mid 24)
Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB
0.018 ms *
Lenovo Legion 7 16 IRX G9
SK Hynix HFS001TEJ9X115N
0.017 ms * +6%
Aorus 16X 2024
Gigabyte AG450E1024-SI
0.015 ms * +17%
XMG Pro 16 Studio (Mid 23)
Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB
0.012 ms * +33%

* ... smaller is better

Reading continuous performance: DiskSpd Read Loop, Queue Depth 8

036072010801440180021602520288032403600396043204680504054005760612064806840Tooltip
SCHENKER XMG Pro 16 Studio (Mid 24) Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB; diskspd 2.0.17 f: Ø6971 (4271.48-7056.44)
Acer Predator Helios Neo 16 (2024) Samsung PM9A1a MZVL21T0HDLU; diskspd 2.0.17 f: Ø7013 (6198.53-7048.48)
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX9 Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR; diskspd 2.0.17 f: Ø5723 (3286.38-6614.84)
Aorus 16X 2024 Gigabyte AG450E1024-SI; diskspd 2.0.17 f: Ø5164 (4823.45-5192.86)
XMG Pro 16 Studio (Mid 23) Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB: Ø7081 (6350.81-7114.2)
Lenovo Legion 7 16 IRX G9 SK Hynix HFS001TEJ9X115N; diskspd 2.0.17 f: Ø5669 (3420.66-6904)

Placa de vídeo

Os jogos em QHD com configurações altas ou máximas não são problema para a GeForce RTX 4070 (TGP: 140 watts): Ela oferece taxas de quadros (e resultados de benchmark) ligeiramente acima da média da GPU. Um pouco apertado para os requisitos atuais: A GPU tem apenas 8 GB de VRAM (GDDR6) à sua disposição. A alternância entre dGPU e Optimus requer uma reinicialização.

Time Spy (conectado à rede elétrica, modo de desempenho)
Time Spy (conectado à rede elétrica, modo de desempenho)
Time Spy (modo de bateria, modo de desempenho)
Time Spy (modo de bateria, modo de desempenho)
Time Spy (conectado à rede elétrica, modo de entretenimento + modo silencioso)
Time Spy (conectado à rede elétrica, modo de entretenimento + modo silencioso)
3DMark Performance Rating - Percent
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX9
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-14900HX
99.4 pt
Acer Predator Helios Neo 16 (2024)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-14700HX
98.9 pt
Average of class Gaming
 
96.9 pt
SCHENKER XMG Pro 16 Studio (Mid 24)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-14900HX
94.8 pt
XMG Pro 16 Studio (Mid 23)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13900H
93 pt
Aorus 16X 2024
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-14900HX
92.4 pt
Lenovo Legion 7 16 IRX G9
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-14900HX
90.9 pt
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
 
90.3 pt
3DMark 11 - 1280x720 Performance GPU
Acer Predator Helios Neo 16 (2024)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-14700HX
44538 Points +4%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX9
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-14900HX
43689 Points +2%
Average of class Gaming
  (1029 - 72178, n=200, last 2 years)
42835 Points 0%
SCHENKER XMG Pro 16 Studio (Mid 24)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-14900HX
42753 Points
Aorus 16X 2024
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-14900HX
41457 Points -3%
XMG Pro 16 Studio (Mid 23)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13900H
41432 Points -3%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
  (24229 - 46434, n=57)
40429 Points -5%
Lenovo Legion 7 16 IRX G9
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-14900HX
40259 Points -6%
3DMark
1920x1080 Fire Strike Graphics
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX9
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-14900HX
31105 Points +1%
Acer Predator Helios Neo 16 (2024)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-14700HX
31091 Points +1%
Average of class Gaming
  (781 - 53059, n=210, last 2 years)
30770 Points 0%
SCHENKER XMG Pro 16 Studio (Mid 24)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-14900HX
30687 Points
XMG Pro 16 Studio (Mid 23)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13900H
29892 Points -3%
Aorus 16X 2024
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-14900HX
29156 Points -5%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
  (12242 - 33451, n=59)
28982 Points -6%
Lenovo Legion 7 16 IRX G9
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-14900HX
28319 Points -8%
2560x1440 Time Spy Graphics
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX9
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-14900HX
13336 Points +12%
Acer Predator Helios Neo 16 (2024)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-14700HX
12900 Points +8%
Average of class Gaming
  (224 - 22717, n=206, last 2 years)
12742 Points +7%
Lenovo Legion 7 16 IRX G9
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-14900HX
12174 Points +2%
Aorus 16X 2024
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-14900HX
12048 Points +1%
XMG Pro 16 Studio (Mid 23)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13900H
11972 Points 0%
SCHENKER XMG Pro 16 Studio (Mid 24)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-14900HX
11959 Points
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
  (5012 - 13391, n=58)
11612 Points -3%
3DMark 11 Performance
34173 pontos
3DMark Fire Strike Score
23584 pontos
3DMark Time Spy Score
12286 pontos
3DMark Steel Nomad Score
2598 pontos
Ajuda
Blender
v3.3 Classroom OPTIX/RTX
SCHENKER XMG Pro 16 Studio (Mid 24)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-14900HX
23 Seconds *
Average of class Gaming
  (9 - 95, n=188, last 2 years)
21.7 Seconds * +6%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
  (18 - 30, n=58)
21.6 Seconds * +6%
XMG Pro 16 Studio (Mid 23)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13900H
21 Seconds * +9%
Aorus 16X 2024
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-14900HX
20 Seconds * +13%
Lenovo Legion 7 16 IRX G9
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-14900HX
20 Seconds * +13%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX9
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-14900HX
19 Seconds * +17%
Acer Predator Helios Neo 16 (2024)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-14700HX
19 Seconds * +17%
v3.3 Classroom CUDA
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
  (32 - 181, n=62)
43 Seconds * -26%
Average of class Gaming
  (16 - 175, n=194, last 2 years)
37.7 Seconds * -11%
XMG Pro 16 Studio (Mid 23)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13900H
34 Seconds * -0%
SCHENKER XMG Pro 16 Studio (Mid 24)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-14900HX
34 Seconds *
Acer Predator Helios Neo 16 (2024)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-14700HX
33 Seconds * +3%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX9
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-14900HX
32 Seconds * +6%
Aorus 16X 2024
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-14900HX
32 Seconds * +6%
Lenovo Legion 7 16 IRX G9
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-14900HX
32 Seconds * +6%
v3.3 Classroom CPU
XMG Pro 16 Studio (Mid 23)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13900H
326 Seconds * -40%
Average of class Gaming
  (138 - 962, n=204, last 2 years)
303 Seconds * -30%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
  (158 - 440, n=57)
288 Seconds * -24%
Acer Predator Helios Neo 16 (2024)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-14700HX
245 Seconds * -5%
SCHENKER XMG Pro 16 Studio (Mid 24)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-14900HX
233 Seconds *
Aorus 16X 2024
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-14900HX
227 Seconds * +3%
Lenovo Legion 7 16 IRX G9
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-14900HX
220 Seconds * +6%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX9
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-14900HX
205 Seconds * +12%
Geekbench 5.5
OpenCL Score
SCHENKER XMG Pro 16 Studio (Mid 24)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-14900HX
127544 Points
Aorus 16X 2024
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-14900HX
126537 Points -1%
Average of class Gaming
  (5039 - 237138, n=206, last 2 years)
124667 Points -2%
XMG Pro 16 Studio (Mid 23)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13900H
120585 Points -5%
Lenovo Legion 7 16 IRX G9
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-14900HX
118860 Points -7%
Acer Predator Helios Neo 16 (2024)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-14700HX
113950 Points -11%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
  (17391 - 129366, n=58)
113585 Points -11%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX9
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-14900HX
112841 Points -12%
Vulkan Score 5.5
XMG Pro 16 Studio (Mid 23)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13900H
88210 Points +13%
SCHENKER XMG Pro 16 Studio (Mid 24)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-14900HX
78091 Points
Aorus 16X 2024
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-14900HX
75575 Points -3%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
  (42883 - 102618, n=29)
71729 Points -8%
Average of class Gaming
  (7995 - 163089, n=129, last 2 years)
70618 Points -10%
Acer Predator Helios Neo 16 (2024)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-14700HX
65791 Points -16%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX9
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-14900HX
58476 Points -25%
Geekbench 6.2
GPU OpenCL
XMG Pro 16 Studio (Mid 23)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13900H
120852 Points +3%
Aorus 16X 2024
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-14900HX
120176 Points +3%
Acer Predator Helios Neo 16 (2024)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-14700HX
119119 Points +2%
SCHENKER XMG Pro 16 Studio (Mid 24)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-14900HX
117097 Points
Average of class Gaming
  (4321 - 207373, n=104, last 2 years)
116426 Points -1%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX9
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-14900HX
115718 Points -1%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
  (85488 - 129836, n=35)
113987 Points -3%
Lenovo Legion 7 16 IRX G9
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-14900HX
101474 Points -13%
GPU Vulkan 6.2
XMG Pro 16 Studio (Mid 23)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13900H
109205 Points +8%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX9
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-14900HX
105334 Points +4%
SCHENKER XMG Pro 16 Studio (Mid 24)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-14900HX
101006 Points
Aorus 16X 2024
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-14900HX
90584 Points -10%
Acer Predator Helios Neo 16 (2024)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-14700HX
89638 Points -11%
Average of class Gaming
  (4286 - 196201, n=101, last 2 years)
81915 Points -19%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
  (18099 - 120033, n=32)
69502 Points -31%
V-Ray 5 Benchmark
GPU RTX
Average of class Gaming
  (171 - 3824, n=116, last 2 years)
2162 mpaths +28%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX9
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-14900HX
1868 mpaths +11%
Acer Predator Helios Neo 16 (2024)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-14700HX
1805 mpaths +7%
Aorus 16X 2024
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-14900HX
1737 mpaths +3%
SCHENKER XMG Pro 16 Studio (Mid 24)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-14900HX
1690 mpaths
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
  (171 - 1872, n=35)
1648 mpaths -2%
XMG Pro 16 Studio (Mid 23)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13900H
1643 mpaths -3%
GPU CUDA
Average of class Gaming
  (120 - 2797, n=119, last 2 years)
1545 mpaths +24%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX9
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-14900HX
1333 mpaths +7%
Acer Predator Helios Neo 16 (2024)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-14700HX
1289 mpaths +4%
Aorus 16X 2024
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-14900HX
1256 mpaths +1%
SCHENKER XMG Pro 16 Studio (Mid 24)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-14900HX
1244 mpaths
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
  (120 - 1356, n=35)
1190 mpaths -4%
XMG Pro 16 Studio (Mid 23)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13900H
1180 mpaths -5%
CPU
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX9
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-14900HX
19077 mpaths +14%
Aorus 16X 2024
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-14900HX
17465 mpaths +4%
SCHENKER XMG Pro 16 Studio (Mid 24)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-14900HX
16766 mpaths
Acer Predator Helios Neo 16 (2024)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-14700HX
16168 mpaths -4%
Average of class Gaming
  (3562 - 26944, n=128, last 2 years)
14647 mpaths -13%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
  (9339 - 20388, n=34)
14474 mpaths -14%
XMG Pro 16 Studio (Mid 23)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13900H
11943 mpaths -29%
V-Ray Benchmark Next 4.10
GPU
Lenovo Legion 7 16 IRX G9
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-14900HX
686 mpaths +15%
Average of class Gaming
  (54 - 1334, n=161, last 2 years)
676 mpaths +13%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX9
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-14900HX
675 mpaths +13%
Acer Predator Helios Neo 16 (2024)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-14700HX
649 mpaths +8%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
  (434 - 686, n=44)
606 mpaths +1%
SCHENKER XMG Pro 16 Studio (Mid 24)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-14900HX
599 mpaths
Aorus 16X 2024
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-14900HX
587 mpaths -2%
XMG Pro 16 Studio (Mid 23)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13900H
579 mpaths -3%
CPU
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX9
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-14900HX
28791 ksamples +10%
Lenovo Legion 7 16 IRX G9
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-14900HX
27701 ksamples +6%
Aorus 16X 2024
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-14900HX
26677 ksamples +2%
SCHENKER XMG Pro 16 Studio (Mid 24)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-14900HX
26235 ksamples
Acer Predator Helios Neo 16 (2024)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-14700HX
24305 ksamples -7%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
  (12638 - 35173, n=44)
20944 ksamples -20%
Average of class Gaming
  (5413 - 37629, n=161, last 2 years)
20859 ksamples -20%
XMG Pro 16 Studio (Mid 23)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13900H
18346 ksamples -30%

* ... smaller is better

Performance Rating - Percent
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX9
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
99.7 pt
Lenovo Legion 7 16 IRX G9
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
96.1 pt
Acer Predator Helios Neo 16 (2024)
Intel Core i7-14700HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
94.7 pt
XMG Pro 16 Studio (Mid 23)
Intel Core i9-13900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
91.2 pt
SCHENKER XMG Pro 16 Studio (Mid 24)
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
90.9 pt
Aorus 16X 2024
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
88.6 pt
Average of class Gaming
 
87.5 pt
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
 
83.5 pt
Cyberpunk 2077 2.1 Phantom Liberty - 1920x1080 Ultra Preset (FSR off)
XMG Pro 16 Studio (Mid 23)
Intel Core i9-13900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
87.9 (48.6min) fps +7%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX9
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
87.1 (52.5min) fps +6%
Average of class Gaming
  (6.76 - 144.7, n=73, last 2 years)
85.9 fps +4%
Lenovo Legion 7 16 IRX G9
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
85.2 (70min) fps +3%
Acer Predator Helios Neo 16 (2024)
Intel Core i7-14700HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
83.3 (37.9min) fps +1%
SCHENKER XMG Pro 16 Studio (Mid 24)
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
82.5 (68.4min) fps
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
  (30.7 - 90.7, n=27)
79.6 fps -4%
Aorus 16X 2024
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
75.8 (32.9min) fps -8%
GTA V - 1920x1080 Highest Settings possible AA:4xMSAA + FX AF:16x
Acer Predator Helios Neo 16 (2024)
Intel Core i7-14700HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
127.8 (8.14min, 90.9P1) fps +1%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX9
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
127.2 (5.17min, 83.3P1) fps +1%
SCHENKER XMG Pro 16 Studio (Mid 24)
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
126 (8.93min, 83.3P1) fps
XMG Pro 16 Studio (Mid 23)
Intel Core i9-13900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
125.4 (4.46min, 83.3P1) fps 0%
Lenovo Legion 7 16 IRX G9
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
124.1 (4.37min, 76.9P1) fps -2%
Average of class Gaming
  (12.1 - 167.7, n=185, last 2 years)
111.6 fps -11%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
  (48.3 - 140.5, n=53)
110.9 fps -12%
Aorus 16X 2024
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
107.2 (4.31min, 71.4P1) fps -15%
Final Fantasy XV Benchmark - 1920x1080 High Quality
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX9
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
131 fps +9%
Acer Predator Helios Neo 16 (2024)
Intel Core i7-14700HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
122.1 fps +2%
Lenovo Legion 7 16 IRX G9
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
119.8 fps 0%
SCHENKER XMG Pro 16 Studio (Mid 24)
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
119.7 fps
Average of class Gaming
  (19.2 - 201, n=197, last 2 years)
117.3 fps -2%
XMG Pro 16 Studio (Mid 23)
Intel Core i9-13900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
115.5 fps -4%
Aorus 16X 2024
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
111.5 fps -7%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
  (41 - 131.9, n=55)
111.1 fps -7%
Strange Brigade - 1920x1080 ultra AA:ultra AF:16
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX9
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
234 (27.8min, 175.8P1) fps +14%
Average of class Gaming
  (38.9 - 421, n=196, last 2 years)
223 fps +8%
Lenovo Legion 7 16 IRX G9
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
220 fps +7%
Acer Predator Helios Neo 16 (2024)
Intel Core i7-14700HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
213 (26.4min, 161.7P1) fps +3%
SCHENKER XMG Pro 16 Studio (Mid 24)
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
206 (37.8min, 155P1) fps
Aorus 16X 2024
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
204 (69.2min, 153P1) fps -1%
XMG Pro 16 Studio (Mid 23)
Intel Core i9-13900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
202 (47.3min, 151P1) fps -2%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
  (76.3 - 234, n=56)
196.2 fps -5%
Dota 2 Reborn - 1920x1080 ultra (3/3) best looking
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX9
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
185.3 (161min) fps +15%
Acer Predator Helios Neo 16 (2024)
Intel Core i7-14700HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
181.7 (153.5min) fps +13%
Aorus 16X 2024
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
180.9 (156.5min) fps +13%
Lenovo Legion 7 16 IRX G9
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
179.5 (154.3min) fps +12%
XMG Pro 16 Studio (Mid 23)
Intel Core i9-13900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
162.8 (140.6min) fps +1%
SCHENKER XMG Pro 16 Studio (Mid 24)
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
160.8 (136.5min) fps
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
  (89.7 - 187.5, n=57)
147.6 fps -8%
Average of class Gaming
  (33.2 - 220, n=205, last 2 years)
147.1 fps -9%
X-Plane 11.11 - 1920x1080 high (fps_test=3)
Lenovo Legion 7 16 IRX G9
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
138.2 fps +16%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX9
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
137.6 fps +15%
Aorus 16X 2024
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
126.4 fps +6%
Acer Predator Helios Neo 16 (2024)
Intel Core i7-14700HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
126.3 fps +6%
XMG Pro 16 Studio (Mid 23)
Intel Core i9-13900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
119.5 fps 0%
SCHENKER XMG Pro 16 Studio (Mid 24)
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
119.5 fps
Average of class Gaming
  (31.5 - 166.2, n=211, last 2 years)
104.8 fps -12%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
  (58.9 - 144.4, n=59)
104.5 fps -13%
Baldur's Gate 3
1920x1080 Ultra Preset
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX9
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
125.6 fps +12%
Acer Predator Helios Neo 16 (2024)
Intel Core i7-14700HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
117 (72.8min, 80.4P0.1, 90.5P1) fps +5%
Lenovo Legion 7 16 IRX G9
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
115 fps +3%
SCHENKER XMG Pro 16 Studio (Mid 24)
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
111.8 (87.2min, 87.8P0.1, 95.1P1) fps
Average of class Gaming
  (34.5 - 208, n=39, last 2 years)
104 fps -7%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
  (66.7 - 128.5, n=18)
102.2 fps -9%
2560x1440 Ultra Preset
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX9
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
89.6 fps +16%
Acer Predator Helios Neo 16 (2024)
Intel Core i7-14700HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
82.8 (61.9min, 63.9P0.1, 68.7P1) fps +7%
Average of class Gaming
  (44 - 155.2, n=31, last 2 years)
82.2 fps +6%
SCHENKER XMG Pro 16 Studio (Mid 24)
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
77.2 (60.8min, 61.7P0.1, 66.4P1) fps
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
  (54.4 - 89.6, n=16)
73.4 fps -5%
Lenovo Legion 7 16 IRX G9
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
71.9 fps -7%
Dragon's Dogma 2
1920x1080 High Preset
SCHENKER XMG Pro 16 Studio (Mid 24)
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
70.4 (29.5min, 31P0.1, 35.9P1) fps
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
  (61.3 - 80, n=5)
67.8 fps -4%
Average of class Gaming
  (49.5 - 80, n=8, last 2 years)
64.5 fps -8%
2560x1440 High Preset
SCHENKER XMG Pro 16 Studio (Mid 24)
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
58.5 (31.3min, 34.1P0.1, 45.9P1) fps
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
  (47.7 - 61.3, n=5)
55.3 fps -5%
Average of class Gaming
  (34.6 - 61.3, n=5, last 2 years)
51.8 fps -11%
Senua's Saga Hellblade 2
1920x1080 High Preset
Average of class Gaming
  (38.4 - 78.8, n=4, last 2 years)
52 fps +2%
SCHENKER XMG Pro 16 Studio (Mid 24)
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
51.2 (33.8min, 36.4P0.1, 43P1) fps
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
  (46.2 - 51.2, n=2)
48.7 fps -5%
2560x1440 High Preset
Average of class Gaming
  (33.3 - 57.3, n=2, last 2 years)
45.3 fps +36%
SCHENKER XMG Pro 16 Studio (Mid 24)
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
33.3 (25.5min, 26.8P0.1, 29.7P1) fps
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
  (32 - 33.3, n=2)
32.7 fps -2%
2560x1440 High Preset + Quality DLSS
Average of class Gaming
  (47.8 - 83.1, n=2, last 2 years)
65.5 fps +37%
SCHENKER XMG Pro 16 Studio (Mid 24)
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
47.8 (30.3min, 33.1P0.1, 40.9P1) fps
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
  ()
47.8 fps 0%
Ghost of Tsushima
1920x1080 Very High Preset AA:T
SCHENKER XMG Pro 16 Studio (Mid 24)
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
73.7 (30min, 46.2P0.1, 55.4P1) fps
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
  (68.1 - 73.7, n=3)
70.2 fps -5%
Average of class Gaming
  (28.5 - 73.7, n=7, last 2 years)
59 fps -20%
2560x1440 Very High Preset AA:T
SCHENKER XMG Pro 16 Studio (Mid 24)
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
56.1 (32min, 37.7P0.1, 43.8P1) fps
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
  (50.5 - 56.1, n=3)
53.1 fps -5%
Average of class Gaming
  (22.7 - 56.1, n=5, last 2 years)
44.1 fps -21%
2560x1440 Very High Preset + Quality DLSS
SCHENKER XMG Pro 16 Studio (Mid 24)
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
74.2 (40.6min, 44.9P0.1, 57.2P1) fps
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
  (69.6 - 74.2, n=2)
71.9 fps -3%
Average of class Gaming
  (63.6 - 74.2, n=3, last 2 years)
69.1 fps -7%
The First Descendant
1920x1080 Ultra Preset
SCHENKER XMG Pro 16 Studio (Mid 24)
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
80 (53.7min, 54.9P0.1, 62.7P1) fps
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
  (73.7 - 80, n=4)
78 fps -2%
Average of class Gaming
  (15.4 - 80, n=5, last 2 years)
62.2 fps -22%
2560x1440 Ultra Preset
SCHENKER XMG Pro 16 Studio (Mid 24)
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
51.2 (34min, 38.1P0.1, 43.3P1) fps
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
  (48.2 - 51.2, n=4)
50 fps -2%
Average of class Gaming
  (43.7 - 51.2, n=3, last 2 years)
48.3 fps -6%
2560x1440 Ultra Preset + Ultra Ray Tracing + DLSS Quality
SCHENKER XMG Pro 16 Studio (Mid 24)
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
51.8 (23.7min, 31.9P0.1, 40.2P1) fps
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
  (48.6 - 51.8, n=2)
50.2 fps -3%
Average of class Gaming
  (43.3 - 51.8, n=2, last 2 years)
47.6 fps -8%
F1 24
1920x1080 Ultra High Preset AA:T AF:16x
Average of class Gaming
  (54.1 - 127, n=12, last 2 years)
76.2 fps +8%
SCHENKER XMG Pro 16 Studio (Mid 24)
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
70.4 (57min, 56P1) fps
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
  (64.7 - 74.1, n=5)
70.1 fps 0%
2560x1440 Ultra High Preset AA:T AF:16x
Average of class Gaming
  (36.7 - 84.7, n=9, last 2 years)
53.8 fps +19%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
  (41.1 - 48.4, n=5)
45.2 fps 0%
SCHENKER XMG Pro 16 Studio (Mid 24)
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
45.1 (36min, 36P1) fps
2560x1440 Ultra High Preset + Quality DLSS AF:16x
Average of class Gaming
  (59.2 - 129.5, n=8, last 2 years)
79.4 fps +11%
SCHENKER XMG Pro 16 Studio (Mid 24)
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
71.8 (58min, 58P1) fps
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
  (65.2 - 73.9, n=4)
70 fps -3%

Cyberpunk 2077 ultra FPS diagram

051015202530354045505560657075Tooltip
SCHENKER XMG Pro 16 Studio (Mid 24) i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU: Ø77.5 (72.5-79.1)
SCHENKER XMG Pro 16 Studio (Mid 24) i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU; Unterhaltungsmodus + Geräuschloser Modus: Ø72.3 (68.6-73.6)
Cyberpunk 2077 Phantom (modo de desempenho)
Cyberpunk 2077 Phantom (modo de desempenho)
baixo média alto ultraQHD
GTA V (2015) 186.7 184.9 180.9 126 95.9
Dota 2 Reborn (2015) 231 196.2 181.6 160.8
Final Fantasy XV Benchmark (2018) 214 163.6 119.7 86.8
X-Plane 11.11 (2018) 178 147.3 119.5
Strange Brigade (2018) 457 297 236 206 135.9
Baldur's Gate 3 (2023) 171.8 132 115.3 111.8 77.2
Cyberpunk 2077 2.1 Phantom Liberty (2023) 126.3 112.1 95.5 82.5 48.6
Dragon's Dogma 2 (2024) 81 70.4 58.5
Ghost of Tsushima (2024) 114.9 102.8 93 73.7 56.1
Senua's Saga Hellblade 2 (2024) 78.3 64.9 51.2 33.3
F1 24 (2024) 239 238 203 70.4 45.1
The First Descendant (2024) 171 110.9 91.3 80 51.2

Emissões e potência - O XMG Pro com alto consumo de energia

Emissões de ruído

O Cyberpunk 2077 aumenta as emissões de ruído do laptop para até 53 dB(A)( modode desempenho ), enquanto o perfil de entretenimento produz valores um pouco mais moderados. O modo silencioso não é adequado para jogos, pois a dGPU está desligada. O nível de ruído do dispositivo é menor em marcha lenta e durante o uso diário (escritório, Internet): As ventoinhas não aceleram excessivamente e, ocasionalmente, ficam paradas. Às vezes, um estalo eletrônico pode ser ouvido de dentro do laptop.

Barulho

Ocioso
28 / 31 / 35 dB
Carga
52 / 52 dB
  red to green bar
 
 
30 dB
silencioso
40 dB(A)
audível
50 dB(A)
ruidosamente alto
 
min: dark, med: mid, max: light   Earthworks M23R, Arta (15 cm de distância)   environment noise: 25 dB(A)
dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2026.232.137.631.434.235.72524.828.228.425.531.129.23133.937.243.238.544.541.74025.723.127.92728.629.25020.821.822.421.924.324.7632319.825.221.319.523.38023.620.920.319.418.136.810023.718.118.41814.925.21252824.125.825.722.42816030.63130.730.82730.420032.22826.527.421.63325031.523.324.122.718.632.731532.422.224.422.71735.440035.521.724.721.116.136.250038.921.726.420.614.338.963038.423.52521.612.84080040.622.125.618.912.741.3100041.120.425.517.414.940.2125041.719.625.616.611.940.7160042.31826.115.211.541.6200040.417.223.51512.140.3250039.815.422.613.71341315038.414.22113.112.840.440003913.72013.213.138.750004113.51813.41340.2630038.713.417.813.613.436.380003213.615.713.713.633.61000029.113.717.313.713.329.81250026.71315.412.912.825.31600024.512.514.112.412.120.7SPL51.730.635.329.125.851.6N81.42.31.20.88.1median 38.4median 18.1median 24.1median 16.6median 13.3median 36.3Delta5.44.83.84.52.25.2hearing rangehide median Fan NoiseSCHENKER XMG Pro 16 Studio (Mid 24)
SCHENKER XMG Pro 16 Studio (Mid 24)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i9-14900HX, Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB
Acer Predator Helios Neo 16 (2024)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i7-14700HX, Samsung PM9A1a MZVL21T0HDLU
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX9
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i9-14900HX, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
Aorus 16X 2024
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i9-14900HX, Gigabyte AG450E1024-SI
XMG Pro 16 Studio (Mid 23)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i9-13900H, Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB
Lenovo Legion 7 16 IRX G9
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i9-14900HX, SK Hynix HFS001TEJ9X115N
Noise
3%
10%
-3%
7%
16%
off / environment *
25
25.2
-1%
23.9
4%
26
-4%
25
-0%
24.5
2%
Idle Minimum *
28
27.8
1%
24.3
13%
26
7%
26
7%
24.5
12%
Idle Average *
31
32
-3%
24.3
22%
32
-3%
29
6%
24.5
21%
Idle Maximum *
35
29.6
15%
28.9
17%
38
-9%
34
3%
24.5
30%
Load Average *
52
45.2
13%
45.8
12%
54
-4%
43
17%
34.8
33%
Cyberpunk 2077 ultra *
53
Load Maximum *
52
55.8
-7%
56.6
-9%
55
-6%
48
8%
54.1
-4%
Witcher 3 ultra *
51
50
48
54.1

* ... smaller is better

Temperatura

O laptop aquece visivelmente: O Cyberpunk e os testes de estresse resultaram em temperaturas acima de 60 graus Celsius em determinados pontos. Valores acima da média também podem ser alcançados durante o uso diário (escritório, Internet). As temperaturas do apoio para as mãos não são tão ruins.

O cenário de teste de estresse extremo (Prime95 e Furmark em operação contínua) verifica a estabilidade do sistema sob carga total. As prioridades do dispositivo estão claramente distribuídas: Enquanto a GPU trabalhava com potência máxima, o clock da CPU (400 MHz a 2 GHz) estava abaixo do clock base.

 50 °C48 °C51 °C 
 44 °C49 °C48 °C 
 29 °C31 °C31 °C 
Máximo: 51 °C
Médio: 42.3 °C
66 °C65 °C58 °C
55 °C58 °C47 °C
34 °C34 °C32 °C
Máximo: 66 °C
Médio: 49.9 °C
alimentação elétrica  50 °C | Temperatura do quarto 22 °C | Fluke t3000FC (calibrated), Voltcraft IR-900
(-) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 42.3 °C / 108 F, compared to the average of 33.9 °C / 93 F for the devices in the class Gaming.
(-) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 51 °C / 124 F, compared to the average of 40.4 °C / 105 F, ranging from 21.2 to 68.8 °C for the class Gaming.
(-) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 66 °C / 151 F, compared to the average of 43.2 °C / 110 F
(±) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 32.3 °C / 90 F, compared to the device average of 33.9 °C / 93 F.
(-) 3: The average temperature for the upper side is 42.2 °C / 108 F, compared to the average of 33.9 °C / 93 F for the class Gaming.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are cooler than skin temperature with a maximum of 31 °C / 87.8 F and are therefore cool to the touch.
(-) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.9 °C / 84 F (-2.1 °C / -3.8 F).
Modo de desempenho Cyberpunk 2077
Modo de desempenho Cyberpunk 2077
Modo de desempenho Cyberpunk 2077
Modo de desempenho Cyberpunk 2077
Modo de desempenho Cyberpunk 2077
Modo de desempenho Cyberpunk 2077
Modo de desempenho Furmark e Prime95
Modo de desempenho Furmark e Prime95
Modo de desempenho Furmark e Prime95
Modo de desempenho Furmark e Prime95
Modo de desempenho Furmark e Prime95
Modo de desempenho Furmark e Prime95
SCHENKER XMG Pro 16 Studio (Mid 24)
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
Acer Predator Helios Neo 16 (2024)
Intel Core i7-14700HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX9
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
Aorus 16X 2024
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
XMG Pro 16 Studio (Mid 23)
Intel Core i9-13900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
Lenovo Legion 7 16 IRX G9
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
Heat
9%
11%
14%
2%
22%
Maximum Upper Side *
51
58
-14%
43.8
14%
41
20%
55
-8%
43.7
14%
Maximum Bottom *
66
45.2
32%
55.4
16%
41
38%
66
-0%
42.9
35%
Idle Upper Side *
35
31.1
11%
32.8
6%
37
-6%
33
6%
29.1
17%
Idle Bottom *
39
37.2
5%
36
8%
38
3%
35
10%
30.6
22%

* ... smaller is better

Alto-falantes

Há uma clara falta de graves. Por outro lado, os alto-falantes estéreo produzem um som aceitável. Seu nível máximo poderia ser um pouco mais alto.

dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2034.234.92531.128.43144.540.14028.628.65024.329.66319.525.98018.124.410014.924.312522.437.61602747.120021.655.325018.663.33151765.140016.166.950014.368.763012.870.280012.768.9100014.970.8125011.968160011.565.4200012.169.525001368.5315012.863.3400013.161.250001360.6630013.459.7800013.657.21000013.352.41250012.853.21600012.151.2SPL25.878.6N0.843.7median 13.3median 63.3Delta2.2830.533.830.523.627.923.621.426.421.421.525.321.522.322.822.325.927.825.926.624.726.627.221.127.235.11735.145.814.745.850.115.150.154.915.654.957.816.657.861.215.661.263.412.863.469.911.669.972.51172.567.810.167.869.91069.968.810.368.869.811.969.869.211.369.267.111.867.164.111.864.167136771.412.571.469.313.169.364.212.664.259.713.459.752.913.552.980.724.380.750.40.650.4median 64.2median 12.8median 64.28.21.78.2hearing rangehide median Pink NoiseSCHENKER XMG Pro 16 Studio (Mid 24)Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX9
Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)
SCHENKER XMG Pro 16 Studio (Mid 24) audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (79 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 15.1% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (13.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 5.3% higher than median
(+) | mids are linear (4.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 4.4% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (17.7% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 50% of all tested devices in this class were better, 10% similar, 40% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 18%, worst was 132%
Compared to all devices tested
» 31% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 61% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX9 audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (80.7 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 19% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (10.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.7% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3.3% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (5.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (17.2% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 45% of all tested devices in this class were better, 11% similar, 44% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 18%, worst was 132%
Compared to all devices tested
» 28% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 65% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Consumo de energia

No modo inativo, o consumo de energia do laptop é muito alto, significativamente mais alto do que o modelo predecessor equipado de forma semelhante. O Cyberpunk e os testes de estresse foram executados com um consumo de energia ligeiramente decrescente e constantemente flutuante. A fonte de alimentação de 230 watts ainda tem tamanho suficiente. Os picos de carga de curto prazo, como no início do teste de estresse, não são um problema para ela.

Consumo de energia
desligadodarklight 0.1 /  Watt
Ociosodarkmidlight 31 / 33 / 41 Watt
Carga midlight 114 / 250 Watt
 color bar
Key: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
Currently we use the Metrahit Energy, a professional single phase power quality and energy measurement digital multimeter, for our measurements. Find out more about it here. All of our test methods can be found here.
SCHENKER XMG Pro 16 Studio (Mid 24)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i9-14900HX, Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB
Acer Predator Helios Neo 16 (2024)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i7-14700HX, Samsung PM9A1a MZVL21T0HDLU
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX9
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i9-14900HX, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
Aorus 16X 2024
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i9-14900HX, Gigabyte AG450E1024-SI
XMG Pro 16 Studio (Mid 23)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i9-13900H, Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB
Power Consumption
11%
23%
22%
43%
Idle Minimum *
31
26.7
14%
12.5
60%
13
58%
8
74%
Idle Average *
33
24.4
26%
24.6
25%
18
45%
12
64%
Idle Maximum *
41
32.7
20%
24.8
40%
35
15%
23
44%
Load Average *
114
122.1
-7%
109.6
4%
138
-21%
94
18%
Cyberpunk 2077 ultra *
218
Cyberpunk 2077 ultra external monitor *
196.8
Load Maximum *
250
241
4%
284.9
-14%
222
11%
215
14%
Witcher 3 ultra *
190.6
218
172.6
181.5

* ... smaller is better

Power consumption Cyberpunk / stress test

0153045607590105120135150165180195210225240Tooltip
SCHENKER XMG Pro 16 Studio (Mid 24); 1280x720 Prime95 28.10 and Furmark 1.25: Ø152.8 (135.5-250)
SCHENKER XMG Pro 16 Studio (Mid 24); Idle 150cd/m2: Ø33.1 (31.4-41.5)
SCHENKER XMG Pro 16 Studio (Mid 24); Cyberpunk 2077 FHD ultra no FSR 150cd: Ø218 (198.6-231)

Power consumption with external monitor

0153045607590105120135150165180195210Tooltip
SCHENKER XMG Pro 16 Studio (Mid 24); Prime95 V2810 Stress (external Monitor): Ø102.9 (90.4-157.6)
SCHENKER XMG Pro 16 Studio (Mid 24); Cinebench R23 Multi (external Monitor): Ø154 (147.4-167.4)
SCHENKER XMG Pro 16 Studio (Mid 24); 1280x720 FurMark 1.19 GPU Stress Test (external Monitor): Ø187 (176.6-193.3)
SCHENKER XMG Pro 16 Studio (Mid 24); Idle 1min (external Monitor): Ø28.5 (27.6-33.1)
SCHENKER XMG Pro 16 Studio (Mid 24); Cyberpunk 2077 FHD ultra no FSR - external Monitor: Ø196.8 (187.7-222)

Tempos de execução

O Pro 16 também requer mais energia do que seu antecessor sob carga baixa no modo de bateria. Como resultado, ele atingiu um tempo de execução de 5:37 horas durante o teste de WiFi (mapeando a carga ao acessar sites usando um script). Isso o deixa uma boa hora atrás de seu antecessor-que tinha a mesma capacidade de bateria de 73 Wh.

Tempo de Execução da Bateria
WiFi Websurfing (Edge 126)
5h 37min
Battery Runtime - WiFi Websurfing
Aorus 16X 2024
i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, 99 Wh
481 min +43%
Lenovo Legion 7 16 IRX G9
i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, 99.9 Wh
433 min +28%
XMG Pro 16 Studio (Mid 23)
i9-13900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, 73 Wh
405 min +20%
Average of class Gaming
  (85 - 889, n=170, last 2 years)
377 min +12%
SCHENKER XMG Pro 16 Studio (Mid 24)
i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, 73 Wh
337 min
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX9
i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, 80 Wh
290 min -14%
Acer Predator Helios Neo 16 (2024)
i7-14700HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, 90.61 Wh
227 min -33%

Pro

+ tela 16:10 (WQXGA, 240 Hz)
+ A RAM pode ser trocada/atualizada
+ dois slots SSD (PCIe 4)
+ Iluminação de fundo do teclado RGB
+ Thunderbolt 4
+ Fornecimento de energia

Contra

- 8 GB de VRAM não são preparados para o futuro
- as partes do gabinete esquentam muito
- alto consumo de energia no modo inativo
- sem DCI-P3

Veredicto - Uma potência com problemas

O XMG Pro 16 Studio (Mid 24), amostra de teste fornecida pela Schenker.
O XMG Pro 16 Studio (Mid 24), amostra de teste fornecida pela Schenker.

O foco do Pro 16 está na potência permanentemente alta da GPU com valores de desempenho ligeiramente acima da média da GPU. A CPU já tem que ter calma depois de um curto período de tempo - o CB15 Loop revelou isso.

O XMG Pro 16 Studio (Mid 24) pode ser atribuído ao departamento de manutenção de modelos. Além da mudança de Raptor Lake para Raptor Lake Refresh, o laptop não apresenta novos recursos significativos.

O ruído e o desenvolvimento de calor do dispositivo, bem como seu consumo de energia no modo inativo, são todos (muito) altos. Com relação ao consumo intenso de energia do laptop, não podemos descartar que nossa amostra de teste tenha um defeito. Seus tempos de execução são decentes.

Seu painel 16:10 instalado (16 polegadas, 2.560 x 1.600 pixels, sRGB, IPS, 240 Hz) é bom, mas não possui o espaço de cores DCI-P3, que é um pré-requisito para um laptop para criadores. O dispositivo ainda pode acomodar dois SSDs PCIe 4 e há suporte para RAID 0/1. Uma porta TB-4 oferece opções de expansão (GPU externa, docking) e suporta Power Delivery.

Uma alternativa poderia ser o Aorus 16X (2024). Ele pode obter um pouco mais de potência de computação com a mesma CPU, apresenta uma tela muito mais brilhante (incluindo Dolby Vision) - além disso, apresenta melhores tempos de execução.

Preço e disponibilidade

O novo XMG Pro 16 Studio (Mid 24) pode ser configurado e encomendado pelo site bestware.comcom o dispositivo de teste atual custando cerca de US$ 2.500.

Observação: Atualizamos recentemente nosso sistema de classificação e os resultados da versão 8 não são comparáveis aos resultados da versão 7. Mais informações estão disponíveis aqui.

SCHENKER XMG Pro 16 Studio (Mid 24) - 07/23/2024 v8
Sascha Mölck

Acabamento
77 / 98 → 79%
Teclado
78%
Mouse
83%
Conectividade
72 / 80 → 90%
Peso
61 / 10-68 → 88%
Bateria
67 / 95 → 70%
Pantalha
82%
Desempenho do jogos
87%
Desempenho da aplicação
86%
AI Performance
96%
Temperatura
74 / 95 → 78%
Ruído
60 / 90 → 67%
Audio
72%
Camera
40 / 75 → 53%
Médio
60%
81%
Gaming - Médio equilibrado
CO2 Emissions
No Data
Materials
0%
Packaging
25%
Power Use
75.7%
Repairability
70%
Software Updates
22.3%
Total Sustainability Score: 32.2%

Transparency

The present review sample was made available to the author as a loan by the manufacturer or a shop for the purposes of review. The lender had no influence on this review, nor did the manufacturer receive a copy of this review before publication. There was no obligation to publish this review.

Price comparison

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Análises e revisões de portáteis e celulares > Análises > Análises > Análise do XMG Pro 16 Studio (Mid 24): Core i9 e RTX 4070 para gamers e criadores
Sascha Mölck, 2024-07-26 (Update: 2024-07-26)