Análise do Acer Nitro 16 AN16-41: Laptop para jogos acessível com RTX 4050 e longos tempos de execução

Name: Acer Nitro 16 AN16-41-R7YE
Brand: Acer

Duradouro.

Um Ryzen 5 7535HS, GeForce RTX 4050, USB 4 e uma tela 16:10 brilhante (16 polegadas, WUXGA, 165 Hz, G-Sync) são os destaques do relativamente barato (€1.250) Nitro 16. Sob as condições certas, o tempo de duração da bateria do antecessor, que já era muito bom, foi superado. Esta análise avalia o desempenho e outras características dessa configuração alternativa.

Sascha Mölck, 👁 Florian Glaser (traduzido por DeepL / Ninh Duy), Published 08/13/2023 🇺🇸 🇩🇪 ...

AMD Gaming Geforce Laptop / Notebook Ryzen (Zen) Windows

Com um preço de pouco menos de 1.250 euros, a configuração atual do Acer Nitro 16 pertence ao segmento de laptops para jogos de preço mais baixo. Nossa unidade Nitro 16 é alimentada por um processador AMD Ryzen 5 7535HS E um processador GPU para laptop Nvidia GeForce RTX 4050.

A concorrência inclui dispositivos como o Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617XS, Schenker XMG Focus 15 (E23), Gigabyte G7 KE, Asus TUF A15 FA507e o Medion Erazer Scout E20.

Informações sobre o gabinete, o equipamento e os dispositivos de entrada podem ser encontradas em nossa análise do modelo irmão de construção idêntica modelo irmãoque apresenta um Ryzen 7 7735HS e uma GPU para laptop RTX 4070.

Test device courtesy of Nvidia DE

Download your licensed rating image as PNG / SVG

Acer Nitro 16 AN16-41-R7YE (Nitro 16 Serie)

Processador

AMD Ryzen 5 7535HS 6 x 3.3 - 4.6 GHz, 100 W PL2 / Short Burst, 65 W PL1 / Sustained, Rembrandt R

Placa gráfica

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU - 6 GB VRAM, Análises do: 2355 MHz, Memoría: 2000 MHz, 140 W TDP ( including 25 W Dynamic Boost), GDDR6, 31.0.15.3623, Optimus

Memória

16 GB

, DDR5-4800, Dual-Channel-Mode, two memory slots (both in use)

Pantalha

16.00 polegadas 16:10, 1920 x 1200 pixel 142 PPI, AU Optronics B160UAN01.Q, IPS, Brilhante: não, 165 Hz

placa mãe

AMD Promontory/Bixby FCH

Disco rígido

SK hynix HFS512GEJ9X125N, 512 GB

, 426 GB livre

Placa de Som

Realtek ALC245 @ AMD K19.4

Conexões

1 USB 2.0, 3 USB 3.1 Gen2, 1 USB 4.0 40 Gbps, USB-C Power Delivery (PD), 1 HDMI, 2 DisplayPort, 1 Kensington Lock, Conexões Audio: Headset combined port, Card Reader: MicroSD, TPM 2.0

Funcionamento em rede

Killer E2600 Gigabit Ethernet Controller (10/100/1000MBit/s), MediaTek Wi-Fi 6E MT7922 160MHz Wireless LAN Card (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/ax = Wi-Fi 6/ Wi-Fi 6E 6 GHz), Bluetooth 5.1

Tamanho

altura x largura x profundidade (em mm): 27.9 x 360.1 x 279.9

Bateria

90 Wh, 5850 mAh Lítio-Ion

Sistema Operativo

Microsoft Windows 11 Home

Camera

Webcam: HD
Primary Camera: 0.9 MPix

Características adicionais

Alto falantes: Stereo, Teclado: Chiclet, Iluminação do Teclado: sim, McAfee LiveSafe (Trial), Microsoft 365 (Trial), Microsoft OneNote (Trial), 24 Meses Garantia

peso

2.56 kg, Suprimento de energia: 620 g

Preço

1399 Euro

Links

Acer página inicial
Acer Seção de notebook

Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

see all specifications

Possíveis concorrentes em comparação

Rating	Date	Model	Weight	Height	Size	Resolution
86.7 % v7 ^(old)	08/2023	Acer Nitro 16 AN16-41-R7YE R5 7535HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU	2.6 kg	27.9 mm	16.00"	1920x1200
86.9 % v7 ^(old)	06/2023	Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617XS R9 7940HS, Radeon RX 7600S	2.2 kg	22.1 mm	16.00"	1920x1200
85.1 % v7 ^(old)	07/2023	SCHENKER XMG Focus 15 (E23) i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU	2.4 kg	26.9 mm	15.60"	2569x1440
83.3 % v7 ^(old)	01/2023	Gigabyte G7 KE i5-12500H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU	2.6 kg	25 mm	17.30"	1920x1080
86.3 % v7 ^(old)	06/2023	Asus TUF A15 FA507 R7 7735HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU	2.2 kg	24.9 mm	15.60"	1920x1080
83 % v7 ^(old)	05/2023	Medion Erazer Scout E20 i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU	2.8 kg	29 mm	17.30"	1920x1080

Comparação de tamanho

Medion Erazer Scout E20 Gigabyte G7 KE Acer Nitro 16 AN16-41-R7YE SCHENKER XMG Focus 15 (E23) Asus TUF A15 FA507 Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617XS DIN A4 ❌

Lado esquerdo: Gigabit Ethernet, USB 2.0 (USB-A), leitor de cartão de memória (MicroSD), combinação de áudio

Lado direito: 2x USB 3.2 Gen 2 (USB-A), slot para trava de cabo

Traseira: Porta de alimentação, HDMI 2.1, USB 4 (USB-C; fornecimento de energia, Displayport), USB 3.2 Gen 2 (USB-C; fornecimento de energia, Displayport)

SD Card Reader
average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs)
Average of class Gaming (19 - 202, n=88, last 2 years)	95.7 MB/s +14%
Acer Nitro 16 AN16-41-R7YE AMD Ryzen 5 7535HS (AV PRO microSD 128 GB V60)	84 MB/s
Acer Nitro 16 AN16-41 AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS (AV Pro SD microSD 128 GB V60)	80.3 MB/s -4%
maximum AS SSD Seq Read Test (1GB)
Average of class Gaming (25.8 - 269, n=89, last 2 years)	119.6 MB/s +37%
SCHENKER XMG Focus 15 (E23) Intel Core i9-13900HX	89.98 MB/s +3%
Gigabyte G7 KE Intel Core i5-12500H (AV PRO microSD 128 GB V60)	89 MB/s +2%
Acer Nitro 16 AN16-41 AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS (AV Pro SD microSD 128 GB V60)	87.5 MB/s +1%
Acer Nitro 16 AN16-41-R7YE AMD Ryzen 5 7535HS (AV PRO microSD 128 GB V60)	87 MB/s

Networking
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
Gigabyte G7 KE Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211	1636 (1591^min - 1674^max) MBit/s +10%
Acer Nitro 16 AN16-41-R7YE MediaTek Wi-Fi 6E MT7922 160MHz Wireless LAN Card	1491 (1391^min - 1562^max) MBit/s
Medion Erazer Scout E20 Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211	1476 (1278^min - 1551^max) MBit/s -1%
Average MediaTek Wi-Fi 6E MT7922 160MHz Wireless LAN Card (358 - 1785, n=55)	1279 MBit/s -14%
Average of class Gaming (469 - 1843, n=150, last 2 years)	1237 MBit/s -17%
Asus TUF A15 FA507 MediaTek MT7921	985 (902^min - 1065^max) MBit/s -34%
SCHENKER XMG Focus 15 (E23) Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211	941 (465^min - 984^max) MBit/s -37%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617XS Realtek RTL8852BE	776 (392^min - 802^max) MBit/s -48%
iperf3 receive AXE11000
Medion Erazer Scout E20 Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211	1744 (1670^min - 1770^max) MBit/s +4%
Acer Nitro 16 AN16-41-R7YE MediaTek Wi-Fi 6E MT7922 160MHz Wireless LAN Card	1685 (1180^min - 1751^max) MBit/s
Gigabyte G7 KE Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211	1655 (1627^min - 1681^max) MBit/s -2%
Average MediaTek Wi-Fi 6E MT7922 160MHz Wireless LAN Card (707 - 1775, n=55)	1397 MBit/s -17%
Average of class Gaming (680 - 1890, n=150, last 2 years)	1386 MBit/s -18%
SCHENKER XMG Focus 15 (E23) Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211	957 (480^min - 968^max) MBit/s -43%
Asus TUF A15 FA507 MediaTek MT7921	917 (797^min - 933^max) MBit/s -46%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617XS Realtek RTL8852BE	905 (765^min - 969^max) MBit/s -46%

Acer Nitro 16 AN16-41-R7YE MediaTek Wi-Fi 6E MT7922 160MHz Wireless LAN Card; iperf3 transmit AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1491 (1391-1562)

Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617XS Realtek RTL8852BE; iperf3 transmit AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø763 (392-802)

SCHENKER XMG Focus 15 (E23) Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211; iperf3 transmit AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø925 (465-984)

Gigabyte G7 KE Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211; iperf3 transmit AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1636 (1591-1674)

Asus TUF A15 FA507 MediaTek MT7921; iperf3 transmit AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø985 (902-1065)

Medion Erazer Scout E20 Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211; iperf3 transmit AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1476 (1278-1551)

Acer Nitro 16 AN16-41 MediaTek Wi-Fi 6E MT7922 160MHz Wireless LAN Card; iperf3 transmit AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1679 (1470-1802)

Acer Nitro 16 AN16-41-R7YE MediaTek Wi-Fi 6E MT7922 160MHz Wireless LAN Card; iperf3 receive AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1684 (1180-1751)

Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617XS Realtek RTL8852BE; iperf3 receive AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø905 (765-969)

SCHENKER XMG Focus 15 (E23) Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211; iperf3 receive AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø940 (480-968)

Gigabyte G7 KE Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211; iperf3 receive AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1655 (1627-1681)

Asus TUF A15 FA507 MediaTek MT7921; iperf3 receive AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø916 (797-933)

Medion Erazer Scout E20 Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211; iperf3 receive AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1744 (1670-1770)

Acer Nitro 16 AN16-41 MediaTek Wi-Fi 6E MT7922 160MHz Wireless LAN Card; iperf3 receive AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1725 (1685-1740)

ColorChecker Acer Nitro 16 AN16-41-R7YE: 14.18 ∆E min: 0.59 - max: 20.56 ∆E

Tela - painel 16:10 com cobertura sRGB

Os pontos positivos da tela IPS fosca de 16 polegadas e 1.920 x 1.200 no formato 16:10 incluem o suporte ao G-Sync, a ausência de oscilação de PWM e tempos de resposta curtos. O brilho e o contraste do painel de 165 Hz atendem às respectivas metas (> 300 cd/m² e 1.000:1, respectivamente).

Não há muitas diferenças além dessas quando comparado ao painel WQXGA (2.560 x 1.600 pixels) do modelo irmãoembora este último ofereça um brilho máximo maior (quase 500 cd/m²).


387 cd/m²	381 cd/m²	378 cd/m²
381 cd/m²	415 cd/m²	388 cd/m²
358 cd/m²	378 cd/m²	350 cd/m²

Distribuição do brilho

AU Optronics B160UAN01.Q tested with X-Rite i1Pro 2

Máximo: 415 cd/m² (Nits) Médio: 379.6 cd/m² Minimum: 24 cd/m²
iluminação: 84 %
iluminação com acumulador: 415 cd/m²
Contraste: 1153:1 (Preto: 0.36 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 4.71 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.92, calibrated: 2.68
ΔE Greyscale 3.6 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
77.4% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
99.4% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
80% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.182

Download Arquivo ICC (X-Rite i1Pro 2)

	Acer Nitro 16 AN16-41-R7YE AU Optronics B160UAN01.Q, IPS, 1920x1200, 16"	Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617XS BOE NE160WUM-NX2, IPS, 1920x1200, 16"	SCHENKER XMG Focus 15 (E23) BOE0AD1, IPS, 2569x1440, 15.6"	Gigabyte G7 KE AU Optronics B173HAN05.1, IPS, 1920x1080, 17.3"	Asus TUF A15 FA507 N156HMA-GA1, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6"	Medion Erazer Scout E20 LG Philips LGD0611, IPS, 1920x1080, 17.3"	Acer Nitro 16 AN16-41 BOE CQ NE16QDM-NY1, IPS, 2560x1600, 16"
Display		-8%	12%	-6%	-12%	-12%	-8%
Display P3 Coverage	80	69.3 -13%	98.6 23%	70.4 -12%	64.9 -19%	65.1 -19%	67.9 -15%
sRGB Coverage	99.4	97.3 -2%	99.9 1%	99.8 0%	96.5 -3%	96.7 -3%	99.1 0%
AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage	77.4	70.7 -9%	86.3 11%	71.7 -7%	66.6 -14%	66.5 -14%	69.9 -10%
Response Times		-66%	-81%	-3%	-236%	-66%	3%
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% *	11.2 ?(5.3, 5.9)	15.6 ?(7.3, 8.3) -39%	15.6 ?(7.4, 8.2) -39%	5 ?(2.1, 2.9) 55%	30.4 ?(14.8, 15.6) -171%	14.8 ?(7.2, 7.6) -32%	11 ?(5, 6) 2%
Response Time Black / White *	5.2 ?(1.9, 3.3)	10 ?(5.7, 4.3) -92%	11.6 ?(5.8, 5.8) -123%	8.3 ?(4.2, 4.1) -60%	20.8 ?(11.7, 9.1) -300%	10.4 ?(5.4, 5) -100%	5 ?(2, 3) 4%
PWM Frequency
Screen		25%	-2%	28%	28%	14%	27%
Brightness middle	415	301 -27%	302 -27%	307 -26%	288 -31%	312 -25%	520 25%
Brightness	380	294 -23%	278 -27%	301 -21%	271 -29%	303 -20%	494 30%
Brightness Distribution	84	94 12%	85 1%	93 11%	91 8%	91 8%	91 8%
Black Level *	0.36	0.21 42%	0.36 -0%	0.2 44%	0.17 53%	0.25 31%	0.39 -8%
Contrast	1153	1433 24%	839 -27%	1535 33%	1694 47%	1248 8%	1333 16%
Colorchecker dE 2000 *	4.71	1.79 62%	2.24 52%	1.32 72%	1.9 60%	2.65 44%	1.94 59%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *	6.98	3.48 50%	5.52 21%	4.6 34%	3.3 53%	6.44 8%	5.62 19%
Colorchecker dE 2000 calibrated *	2.68	1.2 55%		1.03 62%	0.9 66%	0.96 64%	0.74 72%
Greyscale dE 2000 *	3.6	2.5 31%	3.87 -8%	2.1 42%	2.7 25%	3.2 11%	2.94 18%
Gamma	2.182 ^101%	2.265 ^97%	2.42 ^91%	2.247 ^98%	2.32 ^95%	2.246 ^98%	2.37 ^93%
CCT	7153 ^91%	6157 ^106%	6936 ^94%	6815 ^95%	6535 ^99%	7258 ^90%	6443 ^101%
Total Average (Program / Settings)		-16% / 5%	-24% / -11%	6% / 16%	-73% / -18%	-21% / -3%	7% / 16%

* ... smaller is better

A tela mostra uma reprodução de cores decente de fábrica - com um desvio de cerca de 4,7, a meta (DeltaE < 3) não é exatamente igual. Uma calibração reduz o desvio para 2,68 e garante níveis de escala de cinza mais equilibrados. O painel pode reproduzir completamente a gama de cores sRGB, mas não os espaços de cores Adobe RGB e Display P3.

Esse é o caso do painel WQXGA na seção ooutra variante do Nitro 16, assim como as telas da maioria dos concorrentes. Somente a tela do XMG Focus 15 oferece boa cobertura DCI-P3.

Display Response Times

ℹ

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.

↔ Response Time Black to White
5.2 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↗ 1.9 ms rise
5.2 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↘ 3.3 ms fall
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 14 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (21 ms).
↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
11.2 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↗ 5.3 ms rise
11.2 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↘ 5.9 ms fall
The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 21 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (32.9 ms).

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

ℹ

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.

Screen flickering / PWM not detected

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8743 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured.

O painel IPS oferece ângulos de visão estáveis que podem ser lidos de qualquer posição. O brilho do painel é bom o suficiente para legibilidade em ambientes externos se o sol não brilhar muito forte.

Desempenho: Acer se concentra em Rembrandt e Ada Lovelace

A série Nitro 16 combina GPUs Ada-Lovelace com CPUs da Intel ou da AMD. O modelo atual conta com a AMD e está disponível por cerca de € 1.250 (~US$ 1.500). Portanto, ele é atualmente o representante mais barato da série.

Condições de teste

Dos seis modos de desempenho específicos do fabricante (consulte a tabela abaixo), foram usados os modos "Balanced" (para benchmarks) e "Eco" (para testes de bateria). os modos "Turbo" e "Performance" só estão disponíveis na operação da rede elétrica (nível de bateria > 30%). Um botão acima do teclado permite alternar entre os modos. Como alternativa, isso pode ser feito por meio do software NitroSense (centro de controle do laptop). Um LED indica o modo ativo.

Observação: embora o outro modelo Nitro 16 tenha sido testado com o modo Optimus ativo, o modo dGPU (= a iGPU está desativada) é usado no dispositivo de teste atual. Os testes de bateria são uma exceção, no entanto. Portanto, os resultados de benchmark nem sempre são diretamente comparáveis.

	Turbo	Power	Balanced	Quiet	Balanced (bateria)	Eco (bateria)
PowerLimit1 (HWInfo)	95 Watt	75 Watt	65 Watt	45 Watt	25 Watt	25 Watt
Limitede potência 2 (HWInfo)	100 Watt	100 Watt	100 Watt	100 Watt	25 Watt	25 Watt
Desempenho (Witcher 3 )	~84 fps	~83 fps	~82 fps	~74 fps	-	-
Ruído (Witcher 3 )	61 dB(A)	56 dB(A)	45 dB(A)	35 dB(A)	-	-

Processador

O Ryzen 5 7535HSaPU (Zen 3+, Rembrandt-R) oferece seis núcleos de CPU com um total de 12 threads em um aumento máximo de núcleo único de 4,55 GHz. A CPU reconhece a carga permanente de vários threads (CB15 Loop) com um Turbo clock constantemente alto, independentemente do modo de sistema selecionado. As diferenças entre os modos são pequenas.

Não é de surpreender que a APU Ryzen 7 do modelo irmão oferece maior desempenho multi-thread - afinal, ela tem 8 núcleos de CPU. Em termos de desempenho single-thread, que é mais relevante no uso diário, as APUs estão quase no mesmo nível.

Cinebench R15 multi-core loop

Acer Nitro 16 AN16-41-R7YE AMD Ryzen 5 7535HS: Ø1686 (1633.32-1757.16)

Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617XS AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS: Ø2646 (2596.9-2666.67)

SCHENKER XMG Focus 15 (E23) Intel Core i9-13900HX: Ø3594 (3477.05-4085.8)

Gigabyte G7 KE Intel Core i5-12500H: Ø2150 (2119.99-2197.32)

Asus TUF A15 FA507 AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS: Ø2219 (2188.66-2273.89)

Medion Erazer Scout E20 Intel Core i7-13700H: Ø2149 (1980.2-2683.11)

Acer Nitro 16 AN16-41 AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS: Ø2303 (2287.15-2328.15)

CPU Performance Rating - Percent
SCHENKER XMG Focus 15 (E23) Intel Core i9-13900HX	83.3 pt
Average of class Gaming	77.5 pt
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617XS AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS	71.8 pt
Medion Erazer Scout E20 Intel Core i7-13700H	67 pt
Gigabyte G7 KE Intel Core i5-12500H	60.3 pt
Acer Nitro 16 AN16-41 AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS	58.4 pt
Asus TUF A15 FA507 AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS	58.3 pt
Acer Nitro 16 AN16-41-R7YE AMD Ryzen 5 7535HS	51.8 pt
Average AMD Ryzen 5 7535HS	46.7 pt

Cinebench R23
Multi Core
SCHENKER XMG Focus 15 (E23) Intel Core i9-13900HX	24270 Points +123%
Average of class Gaming (5668 - 36249, n=192, last 2 years)	21689 Points +99%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617XS AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS	16907 Points +55%
Medion Erazer Scout E20 Intel Core i7-13700H	15718 Points +44%
Gigabyte G7 KE Intel Core i5-12500H	14232 Points +31%
Acer Nitro 16 AN16-41 AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS	14131 Points +30%
Asus TUF A15 FA507 AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS	13750 Points +26%
Acer Nitro 16 AN16-41-R7YE AMD Ryzen 5 7535HS	10900 Points
Average AMD Ryzen 5 7535HS (8613 - 10900, n=2)	9757 Points -10%
Single Core
SCHENKER XMG Focus 15 (E23) Intel Core i9-13900HX	1935 Points +30%
Average of class Gaming (1088 - 2235, n=190, last 2 years)	1879 Points +26%
Medion Erazer Scout E20 Intel Core i7-13700H	1849 Points +24%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617XS AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS	1791 Points +20%
Gigabyte G7 KE Intel Core i5-12500H	1701 Points +14%
Asus TUF A15 FA507 AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS	1546 Points +4%
Acer Nitro 16 AN16-41 AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS	1546 Points +4%
Acer Nitro 16 AN16-41-R7YE AMD Ryzen 5 7535HS	1488 Points
Average AMD Ryzen 5 7535HS (1445 - 1488, n=2)	1467 Points -1%

Cinebench R20
CPU (Multi Core)
SCHENKER XMG Focus 15 (E23) Intel Core i9-13900HX	9152 Points +117%
Average of class Gaming (2179 - 13832, n=190, last 2 years)	8254 Points +95%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617XS AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS	6571 Points +56%
Medion Erazer Scout E20 Intel Core i7-13700H	6051 Points +43%
Acer Nitro 16 AN16-41 AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS	5502 Points +30%
Gigabyte G7 KE Intel Core i5-12500H	5368 Points +27%
Asus TUF A15 FA507 AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS	5354 Points +27%
Acer Nitro 16 AN16-41-R7YE AMD Ryzen 5 7535HS	4224 Points
Average AMD Ryzen 5 7535HS (3333 - 4224, n=2)	3779 Points -11%
CPU (Single Core)
SCHENKER XMG Focus 15 (E23) Intel Core i9-13900HX	742 Points +28%
Average of class Gaming (427 - 856, n=190, last 2 years)	722 Points +24%
Medion Erazer Scout E20 Intel Core i7-13700H	717 Points +23%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617XS AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS	702 Points +21%
Gigabyte G7 KE Intel Core i5-12500H	654 Points +13%
Asus TUF A15 FA507 AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS	603 Points +4%
Acer Nitro 16 AN16-41 AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS	601 Points +3%
Acer Nitro 16 AN16-41-R7YE AMD Ryzen 5 7535HS	581 Points
Average AMD Ryzen 5 7535HS (560 - 581, n=2)	571 Points -2%

Cinebench R15
CPU Multi 64Bit
SCHENKER XMG Focus 15 (E23) Intel Core i9-13900HX	4086 (3477.05^min - 4085.8^max) Points +133%
Average of class Gaming (905 - 5663, n=197, last 2 years)	3399 Points +93%
Medion Erazer Scout E20 Intel Core i7-13700H	2683 Points +53%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617XS AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS	2666.7 Points +52%
Acer Nitro 16 AN16-41 AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS	2328 Points +32%
Asus TUF A15 FA507 AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS	2274 (2188.66^min - 2273.89^max) Points +29%
Gigabyte G7 KE Intel Core i5-12500H	2197 Points +25%
Acer Nitro 16 AN16-41-R7YE AMD Ryzen 5 7535HS	1757 Points
Average AMD Ryzen 5 7535HS (1457 - 1757, n=2)	1607 Points -9%
CPU Single 64Bit
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617XS AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS	283 Points +17%
Average of class Gaming (176.6 - 318, n=194, last 2 years)	277 Points +15%
SCHENKER XMG Focus 15 (E23) Intel Core i9-13900HX	270 Points +12%
Medion Erazer Scout E20 Intel Core i7-13700H	269 Points +12%
Gigabyte G7 KE Intel Core i5-12500H	250 Points +4%
Asus TUF A15 FA507 AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS	249 Points +3%
Acer Nitro 16 AN16-41 AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS	247 Points +2%
Acer Nitro 16 AN16-41-R7YE AMD Ryzen 5 7535HS	241 Points
Average AMD Ryzen 5 7535HS (232 - 241, n=2)	237 Points -2%

Blender - v2.79 BMW27 CPU
Average AMD Ryzen 5 7535HS (286 - 467, n=2)	377 Seconds * -32%
Acer Nitro 16 AN16-41-R7YE AMD Ryzen 5 7535HS	286 Seconds *
Gigabyte G7 KE Intel Core i5-12500H	225 Seconds * +21%
Asus TUF A15 FA507 AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS	223 Seconds * +22%
Acer Nitro 16 AN16-41 AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS	219 Seconds * +23%
Medion Erazer Scout E20 Intel Core i7-13700H	213 Seconds * +26%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617XS AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS	189 Seconds * +34%
Average of class Gaming (87 - 555, n=185, last 2 years)	171.9 Seconds * +40%
SCHENKER XMG Focus 15 (E23) Intel Core i9-13900HX	135 Seconds * +53%

7-Zip 18.03
7z b 4
SCHENKER XMG Focus 15 (E23) Intel Core i9-13900HX	99191 MIPS +104%
Average of class Gaming (23795 - 140932, n=189, last 2 years)	84760 MIPS +74%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617XS AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS	70081 MIPS +44%
Medion Erazer Scout E20 Intel Core i7-13700H	63399 MIPS +30%
Acer Nitro 16 AN16-41 AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS	61191 MIPS +26%
Asus TUF A15 FA507 AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS	60612 MIPS +25%
Gigabyte G7 KE Intel Core i5-12500H	53712 MIPS +10%
Acer Nitro 16 AN16-41-R7YE AMD Ryzen 5 7535HS	48646 MIPS
Average AMD Ryzen 5 7535HS (40996 - 48646, n=2)	44821 MIPS -8%
7z b 4 -mmt1
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617XS AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS	6621 MIPS +17%
SCHENKER XMG Focus 15 (E23) Intel Core i9-13900HX	6367 MIPS +12%
Average of class Gaming (4168 - 7581, n=189, last 2 years)	6283 MIPS +11%
Medion Erazer Scout E20 Intel Core i7-13700H	6004 MIPS +6%
Asus TUF A15 FA507 AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS	5786 MIPS +2%
Acer Nitro 16 AN16-41-R7YE AMD Ryzen 5 7535HS	5670 MIPS
Acer Nitro 16 AN16-41 AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS	5584 MIPS -2%
Gigabyte G7 KE Intel Core i5-12500H	5563 MIPS -2%
Average AMD Ryzen 5 7535HS (5206 - 5670, n=2)	5438 MIPS -4%

Geekbench 5.5
Multi-Core
SCHENKER XMG Focus 15 (E23) Intel Core i9-13900HX	18308 Points +133%
Average of class Gaming (4557 - 23194, n=190, last 2 years)	14915 Points +90%
Medion Erazer Scout E20 Intel Core i7-13700H	12423 Points +58%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617XS AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS	12111 Points +54%
Gigabyte G7 KE Intel Core i5-12500H	10284 Points +31%
Acer Nitro 16 AN16-41 AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS	9683 Points +23%
Asus TUF A15 FA507 AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS	9346 Points +19%
Acer Nitro 16 AN16-41-R7YE AMD Ryzen 5 7535HS	7852 Points
Average AMD Ryzen 5 7535HS (7189 - 7852, n=2)	7521 Points -4%
Single-Core
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617XS AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS	2032 Points +35%
Average of class Gaming (986 - 2210, n=190, last 2 years)	1884 Points +25%
Medion Erazer Scout E20 Intel Core i7-13700H	1813 Points +21%
Gigabyte G7 KE Intel Core i5-12500H	1683 Points +12%
Acer Nitro 16 AN16-41 AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS	1555 Points +4%
Asus TUF A15 FA507 AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS	1507 Points 0%
Acer Nitro 16 AN16-41-R7YE AMD Ryzen 5 7535HS	1502 Points
Average AMD Ryzen 5 7535HS (1481 - 1502, n=2)	1492 Points -1%
SCHENKER XMG Focus 15 (E23) Intel Core i9-13900HX	1345 Points -10%

HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 - 4k Preset
SCHENKER XMG Focus 15 (E23) Intel Core i9-13900HX	25 fps +76%
Average of class Gaming (6.72 - 38.9, n=189, last 2 years)	23.3 fps +64%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617XS AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS	20.8 fps +46%
Acer Nitro 16 AN16-41 AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS	17.5 fps +23%
Asus TUF A15 FA507 AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS	17.4 fps +23%
Medion Erazer Scout E20 Intel Core i7-13700H	16.9 fps +19%
Gigabyte G7 KE Intel Core i5-12500H	16.6 fps +17%
Acer Nitro 16 AN16-41-R7YE AMD Ryzen 5 7535HS	14.2 fps
Average AMD Ryzen 5 7535HS (11.3 - 14.2, n=2)	12.8 fps -10%

LibreOffice - 20 Documents To PDF
Acer Nitro 16 AN16-41 AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS	53.4 s * -16%
Average AMD Ryzen 5 7535HS (46.2 - 57, n=2)	51.6 s * -12%
Asus TUF A15 FA507 AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS	50.6 s * -10%
Average of class Gaming (31.4 - 96.6, n=186, last 2 years)	47.5 s * -3%
Acer Nitro 16 AN16-41-R7YE AMD Ryzen 5 7535HS	46.2 s *
Gigabyte G7 KE Intel Core i5-12500H	45.5 s * +2%
Medion Erazer Scout E20 Intel Core i7-13700H	44.9 s * +3%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617XS AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS	41.7 s * +10%
SCHENKER XMG Focus 15 (E23) Intel Core i9-13900HX	39.5 s * +15%

R Benchmark 2.5 - Overall mean
Average AMD Ryzen 5 7535HS (0.503 - 0.557, n=2)	0.53 sec * -5%
Acer Nitro 16 AN16-41-R7YE AMD Ryzen 5 7535HS	0.503 sec *
Asus TUF A15 FA507 AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS	0.4964 sec * +1%
Acer Nitro 16 AN16-41 AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS	0.4958 sec * +1%
Gigabyte G7 KE Intel Core i5-12500H	0.4748 sec * +6%
Medion Erazer Scout E20 Intel Core i7-13700H	0.4451 sec * +12%
Average of class Gaming (0.3609 - 0.759, n=190, last 2 years)	0.44 sec * +13%
SCHENKER XMG Focus 15 (E23) Intel Core i9-13900HX	0.4345 sec * +14%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617XS AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS	0.4253 sec * +15%

* ... smaller is better

Cinebench R10 Shading 32Bit

14167

Cinebench R10 Rendering Multiple CPUs 32Bit

37321

Cinebench R10 Rendering Single 32Bit

6257

Cinebench R11.5 CPU Single 64Bit

2.79 Points

Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 64Bit

20.14 Points

Cinebench R11.5 OpenGL 64Bit

102.32 fps

Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64Bit

1757 Points

Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64Bit

241 Points

Cinebench R15 Ref. Match 64Bit

99.6 %

Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64Bit

151.1 fps

Cinebench R20 CPU (Multi Core)

4224 Points

Cinebench R20 CPU (Single Core)

581 Points

Cinebench R23 Single Core

1488 Points

Cinebench R23 Multi Core

10900 Points

Ajuda

... comparado com

Performance Rating
SCHENKER XMG Focus 15 (E23) Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU	90.1 pt
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617XS AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS, Radeon RX 7600S	88.4 pt
Average of class Gaming	85.2 pt
Acer Nitro 16 AN16-41 AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	69.3 pt
Asus TUF A15 FA507 AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU	66.6 pt
Medion Erazer Scout E20 Intel Core i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU	61.3 pt
Acer Nitro 16 AN16-41-R7YE AMD Ryzen 5 7535HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU	59.5 pt
Gigabyte G7 KE Intel Core i5-12500H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU	58.1 pt
Average AMD Ryzen 5 7535HS	52 pt

AIDA64 / FP32 Ray-Trace
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617XS AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS, Radeon RX 7600S	28033 KRay/s +117%
Average of class Gaming (4986 - 60169, n=186, last 2 years)	21665 KRay/s +67%
SCHENKER XMG Focus 15 (E23) Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU	20615 KRay/s +59%
Acer Nitro 16 AN16-41 AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	17161 KRay/s +33%
Asus TUF A15 FA507 AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU	16315 KRay/s +26%
Medion Erazer Scout E20 Intel Core i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU	14305 KRay/s +11%
Gigabyte G7 KE Intel Core i5-12500H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU	13017 KRay/s +1%
Acer Nitro 16 AN16-41-R7YE AMD Ryzen 5 7535HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU	12945 KRay/s
Average AMD Ryzen 5 7535HS (9617 - 12945, n=2)	11281 KRay/s -13%

AIDA64 / FPU Julia
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617XS AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS, Radeon RX 7600S	122098 Points +54%
SCHENKER XMG Focus 15 (E23) Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU	108878 Points +37%
Average of class Gaming (25360 - 252486, n=186, last 2 years)	106091 Points +34%
Acer Nitro 16 AN16-41 AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	105483 Points +33%
Asus TUF A15 FA507 AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU	102221 Points +29%
Acer Nitro 16 AN16-41-R7YE AMD Ryzen 5 7535HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU	79252 Points
Medion Erazer Scout E20 Intel Core i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU	71043 Points -10%
Average AMD Ryzen 5 7535HS (62262 - 79252, n=2)	70757 Points -11%
Gigabyte G7 KE Intel Core i5-12500H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU	65572 Points -17%

AIDA64 / CPU SHA3
SCHENKER XMG Focus 15 (E23) Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU	5324 MB/s +99%
Average of class Gaming (1339 - 10389, n=186, last 2 years)	4859 MB/s +81%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617XS AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS, Radeon RX 7600S	4566 MB/s +70%
Acer Nitro 16 AN16-41 AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	3492 MB/s +30%
Asus TUF A15 FA507 AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU	3421 MB/s +28%
Gigabyte G7 KE Intel Core i5-12500H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU	3236 MB/s +21%
Medion Erazer Scout E20 Intel Core i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU	3233 MB/s +21%
Acer Nitro 16 AN16-41-R7YE AMD Ryzen 5 7535HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU	2679 MB/s
Average AMD Ryzen 5 7535HS (2092 - 2679, n=2)	2386 MB/s -11%

AIDA64 / CPU Queen
SCHENKER XMG Focus 15 (E23) Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU	134897 Points +63%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617XS AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS, Radeon RX 7600S	124433 Points +51%
Average of class Gaming (50699 - 200651, n=186, last 2 years)	116375 Points +41%
Acer Nitro 16 AN16-41 AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	108729 Points +32%
Medion Erazer Scout E20 Intel Core i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU	106626 Points +29%
Asus TUF A15 FA507 AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU	103991 Points +26%
Acer Nitro 16 AN16-41-R7YE AMD Ryzen 5 7535HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU	82540 Points
Gigabyte G7 KE Intel Core i5-12500H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU	80285 Points -3%
Average AMD Ryzen 5 7535HS (73607 - 82540, n=2)	78074 Points -5%

AIDA64 / FPU SinJulia
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617XS AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS, Radeon RX 7600S	15380 Points +57%
SCHENKER XMG Focus 15 (E23) Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU	13789 Points +41%
Average of class Gaming (4800 - 32988, n=186, last 2 years)	13176 Points +35%
Acer Nitro 16 AN16-41 AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	13097 Points +34%
Asus TUF A15 FA507 AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU	12579 Points +29%
Acer Nitro 16 AN16-41-R7YE AMD Ryzen 5 7535HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU	9786 Points
Medion Erazer Scout E20 Intel Core i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU	9408 Points -4%
Average AMD Ryzen 5 7535HS (8888 - 9786, n=2)	9337 Points -5%
Gigabyte G7 KE Intel Core i5-12500H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU	7390 Points -24%

AIDA64 / FPU Mandel
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617XS AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS, Radeon RX 7600S	63432 Points +46%
Acer Nitro 16 AN16-41 AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	58232 Points +34%
Asus TUF A15 FA507 AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU	55524 Points +28%
Average of class Gaming (12321 - 134044, n=186, last 2 years)	53445 Points +23%
SCHENKER XMG Focus 15 (E23) Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU	51986 Points +20%
Acer Nitro 16 AN16-41-R7YE AMD Ryzen 5 7535HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU	43495 Points
Average AMD Ryzen 5 7535HS (34054 - 43495, n=2)	38775 Points -11%
Medion Erazer Scout E20 Intel Core i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU	35141 Points -19%
Gigabyte G7 KE Intel Core i5-12500H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU	32002 Points -26%

AIDA64 / CPU AES
Gigabyte G7 KE Intel Core i5-12500H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU	110707 MB/s +5%
Average of class Gaming (19065 - 328679, n=186, last 2 years)	109398 MB/s +4%
Acer Nitro 16 AN16-41-R7YE AMD Ryzen 5 7535HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU	105083 MB/s
SCHENKER XMG Focus 15 (E23) Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU	102731 MB/s -2%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617XS AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS, Radeon RX 7600S	86309 MB/s -18%
Average AMD Ryzen 5 7535HS (35651 - 105083, n=2)	70367 MB/s -33%
Medion Erazer Scout E20 Intel Core i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU	67010 MB/s -36%
Asus TUF A15 FA507 AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU	66447 MB/s -37%
Acer Nitro 16 AN16-41 AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	55915 MB/s -47%

AIDA64 / CPU ZLib
SCHENKER XMG Focus 15 (E23) Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU	1587 MB/s +139%
Average of class Gaming (373 - 2409, n=186, last 2 years)	1351 MB/s +103%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617XS AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS, Radeon RX 7600S	1089 MB/s +64%
Medion Erazer Scout E20 Intel Core i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU	961 MB/s +45%
Gigabyte G7 KE Intel Core i5-12500H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU	921 MB/s +38%
Acer Nitro 16 AN16-41 AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	906 MB/s +36%
Acer Nitro 16 AN16-41-R7YE AMD Ryzen 5 7535HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU	665 MB/s
Asus TUF A15 FA507 AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU	651 MB/s -2%
Average AMD Ryzen 5 7535HS (551 - 665, n=2)	608 MB/s -9%

AIDA64 / FP64 Ray-Trace
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617XS AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS, Radeon RX 7600S	15209 KRay/s +120%
Average of class Gaming (2540 - 31796, n=186, last 2 years)	11668 KRay/s +69%
SCHENKER XMG Focus 15 (E23) Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU	11242 KRay/s +63%
Acer Nitro 16 AN16-41 AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	9094 KRay/s +32%
Asus TUF A15 FA507 AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU	8556 KRay/s +24%
Medion Erazer Scout E20 Intel Core i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU	7630 KRay/s +11%
Gigabyte G7 KE Intel Core i5-12500H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU	6932 KRay/s 0%
Acer Nitro 16 AN16-41-R7YE AMD Ryzen 5 7535HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU	6899 KRay/s
Average AMD Ryzen 5 7535HS (5170 - 6899, n=2)	6035 KRay/s -13%

AIDA64 / CPU PhotoWorxx
SCHENKER XMG Focus 15 (E23) Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU	50110 MPixel/s +74%
Average of class Gaming (10805 - 60161, n=187, last 2 years)	39972 MPixel/s +38%
Medion Erazer Scout E20 Intel Core i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU	37944 MPixel/s +31%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617XS AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS, Radeon RX 7600S	29922 MPixel/s +4%
Gigabyte G7 KE Intel Core i5-12500H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU	29206 MPixel/s +1%
Acer Nitro 16 AN16-41-R7YE AMD Ryzen 5 7535HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU	28865 MPixel/s
Asus TUF A15 FA507 AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU	28318 MPixel/s -2%
Average AMD Ryzen 5 7535HS (27096 - 28865, n=2)	27981 MPixel/s -3%
Acer Nitro 16 AN16-41 AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	27554 MPixel/s -5%

Desempenho do sistema

O sistema com bom funcionamento fornece potência de computação suficiente para aplicativos exigentes, como renderização, edição de vídeo e jogos. As taxas de transferência da memória de trabalho (DDR5-4800) permanecem abaixo do potencial, em comparação com os valores do Asus TUF Gaming A16 mostra.

A memória de trabalho é executada no modo de canal duplo.

PCMark 10 / Score
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617XS Radeon RX 7600S, R9 7940HS, Micron 2400 MTFDKBA512QFM	7927 Points +18%
Average of class Gaming (5776 - 9852, n=167, last 2 years)	7777 Points +16%
Medion Erazer Scout E20 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, i7-13700H, Phison PS5021-E21 1TB	7556 Points +13%
Acer Nitro 16 AN16-41 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, R7 7735HS, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	7220 Points +8%
Asus TUF A15 FA507 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, R7 7735HS, Micron 2400 MTFDKBA512QFM	7210 Points +8%
SCHENKER XMG Focus 15 (E23) NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, i9-13900HX, Crucial P5 Plus 1TB CT1000P5PSSD8	6926 Points +4%
Acer Nitro 16 AN16-41-R7YE NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, R5 7535HS, SK hynix HFS512GEJ9X125N	6690 Points
Average AMD Ryzen 5 7535HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU ()	6690 Points 0%
Gigabyte G7 KE GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, i5-12500H, Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10	6126 Points -8%

PCMark 10 / Essentials
Medion Erazer Scout E20 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, i7-13700H, Phison PS5021-E21 1TB	11207 Points +15%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617XS Radeon RX 7600S, R9 7940HS, Micron 2400 MTFDKBA512QFM	10844 Points +11%
Average of class Gaming (9057 - 12334, n=166, last 2 years)	10836 Points +11%
Acer Nitro 16 AN16-41 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, R7 7735HS, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	10579 Points +9%
Asus TUF A15 FA507 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, R7 7735HS, Micron 2400 MTFDKBA512QFM	10573 Points +9%
Gigabyte G7 KE GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, i5-12500H, Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10	10301 Points +6%
Acer Nitro 16 AN16-41-R7YE NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, R5 7535HS, SK hynix HFS512GEJ9X125N	9736 Points
Average AMD Ryzen 5 7535HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU ()	9736 Points 0%
SCHENKER XMG Focus 15 (E23) NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, i9-13900HX, Crucial P5 Plus 1TB CT1000P5PSSD8	9726 Points 0%

PCMark 10 / Productivity
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617XS Radeon RX 7600S, R9 7940HS, Micron 2400 MTFDKBA512QFM	10505 Points +29%
Average of class Gaming (6662 - 14612, n=166, last 2 years)	9880 Points +21%
Medion Erazer Scout E20 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, i7-13700H, Phison PS5021-E21 1TB	9836 Points +20%
SCHENKER XMG Focus 15 (E23) NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, i9-13900HX, Crucial P5 Plus 1TB CT1000P5PSSD8	9674 Points +18%
Asus TUF A15 FA507 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, R7 7735HS, Micron 2400 MTFDKBA512QFM	9313 Points +14%
Acer Nitro 16 AN16-41 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, R7 7735HS, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	9146 Points +12%
Gigabyte G7 KE GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, i5-12500H, Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10	9038 Points +11%
Acer Nitro 16 AN16-41-R7YE NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, R5 7535HS, SK hynix HFS512GEJ9X125N	8167 Points
Average AMD Ryzen 5 7535HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU ()	8167 Points 0%

PCMark 10 / Digital Content Creation
Average of class Gaming (6703 - 18475, n=166, last 2 years)	12042 Points +18%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617XS Radeon RX 7600S, R9 7940HS, Micron 2400 MTFDKBA512QFM	11868 Points +16%
Medion Erazer Scout E20 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, i7-13700H, Phison PS5021-E21 1TB	10622 Points +4%
Acer Nitro 16 AN16-41 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, R7 7735HS, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	10558 Points +3%
Asus TUF A15 FA507 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, R7 7735HS, Micron 2400 MTFDKBA512QFM	10333 Points +1%
Acer Nitro 16 AN16-41-R7YE NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, R5 7535HS, SK hynix HFS512GEJ9X125N	10219 Points
Average AMD Ryzen 5 7535HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU ()	10219 Points 0%
SCHENKER XMG Focus 15 (E23) NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, i9-13900HX, Crucial P5 Plus 1TB CT1000P5PSSD8	9585 Points -6%
Gigabyte G7 KE GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, i5-12500H, Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10	6703 Points -34%

CrossMark / Overall
SCHENKER XMG Focus 15 (E23) NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, i9-13900HX, Crucial P5 Plus 1TB CT1000P5PSSD8	2114 Points +42%
Medion Erazer Scout E20 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, i7-13700H, Phison PS5021-E21 1TB	1937 Points +30%
Average of class Gaming (1247 - 2344, n=150, last 2 years)	1901 Points +28%
Gigabyte G7 KE GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, i5-12500H, Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10	1824 Points +22%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617XS Radeon RX 7600S, R9 7940HS, Micron 2400 MTFDKBA512QFM	1774 Points +19%
Asus TUF A15 FA507 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, R7 7735HS, Micron 2400 MTFDKBA512QFM	1550 Points +4%
Acer Nitro 16 AN16-41 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, R7 7735HS, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	1535 Points +3%
Acer Nitro 16 AN16-41-R7YE NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, R5 7535HS, SK hynix HFS512GEJ9X125N	1489 Points
Average AMD Ryzen 5 7535HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU ()	1489 Points 0%

CrossMark / Productivity
SCHENKER XMG Focus 15 (E23) NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, i9-13900HX, Crucial P5 Plus 1TB CT1000P5PSSD8	1949 Points +30%
Medion Erazer Scout E20 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, i7-13700H, Phison PS5021-E21 1TB	1857 Points +24%
Gigabyte G7 KE GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, i5-12500H, Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10	1804 Points +21%
Average of class Gaming (1299 - 2204, n=150, last 2 years)	1803 Points +21%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617XS Radeon RX 7600S, R9 7940HS, Micron 2400 MTFDKBA512QFM	1715 Points +15%
Asus TUF A15 FA507 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, R7 7735HS, Micron 2400 MTFDKBA512QFM	1517 Points +2%
Acer Nitro 16 AN16-41 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, R7 7735HS, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	1508 Points +1%
Acer Nitro 16 AN16-41-R7YE NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, R5 7535HS, SK hynix HFS512GEJ9X125N	1494 Points
Average AMD Ryzen 5 7535HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU ()	1494 Points 0%

CrossMark / Creativity
SCHENKER XMG Focus 15 (E23) NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, i9-13900HX, Crucial P5 Plus 1TB CT1000P5PSSD8	2384 Points +55%
Average of class Gaming (1275 - 2660, n=150, last 2 years)	2085 Points +36%
Medion Erazer Scout E20 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, i7-13700H, Phison PS5021-E21 1TB	2023 Points +32%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617XS Radeon RX 7600S, R9 7940HS, Micron 2400 MTFDKBA512QFM	1990 Points +29%
Gigabyte G7 KE GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, i5-12500H, Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10	1800 Points +17%
Asus TUF A15 FA507 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, R7 7735HS, Micron 2400 MTFDKBA512QFM	1709 Points +11%
Acer Nitro 16 AN16-41 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, R7 7735HS, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	1637 Points +6%
Acer Nitro 16 AN16-41-R7YE NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, R5 7535HS, SK hynix HFS512GEJ9X125N	1538 Points
Average AMD Ryzen 5 7535HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU ()	1538 Points 0%

CrossMark / Responsiveness
Gigabyte G7 KE GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, i5-12500H, Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10	1966 Points +46%
Medion Erazer Scout E20 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, i7-13700H, Phison PS5021-E21 1TB	1929 Points +44%
SCHENKER XMG Focus 15 (E23) NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, i9-13900HX, Crucial P5 Plus 1TB CT1000P5PSSD8	1878 Points +40%
Average of class Gaming (1030 - 2330, n=150, last 2 years)	1701 Points +27%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617XS Radeon RX 7600S, R9 7940HS, Micron 2400 MTFDKBA512QFM	1388 Points +3%
Acer Nitro 16 AN16-41-R7YE NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, R5 7535HS, SK hynix HFS512GEJ9X125N	1342 Points
Average AMD Ryzen 5 7535HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU ()	1342 Points 0%
Acer Nitro 16 AN16-41 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, R7 7735HS, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	1337 Points 0%
Asus TUF A15 FA507 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, R7 7735HS, Micron 2400 MTFDKBA512QFM	1231 Points -8%

PCMark 8 Home Score Accelerated v2		5548 pontos
PCMark 8 Work Score Accelerated v2		5810 pontos
PCMark 10 Score		6690 pontos
Ajuda

AIDA64: Memory Copy | Memory Read | Memory Write | Memory Latency

AIDA64 / Memory Copy
SCHENKER XMG Focus 15 (E23) Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU	77899 MB/s +61%
Average of class Gaming (21842 - 94222, n=186, last 2 years)	64981 MB/s +34%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617XS AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS, Radeon RX 7600S	59712 MB/s +23%
Medion Erazer Scout E20 Intel Core i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU	59079 MB/s +22%
Average AMD Ryzen 5 7535HS (48529 - 49119, n=2)	48824 MB/s +1%
Acer Nitro 16 AN16-41-R7YE AMD Ryzen 5 7535HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU	48529 MB/s
Asus TUF A15 FA507 AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU	48432 MB/s 0%
Acer Nitro 16 AN16-41 AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	47903 MB/s -1%
Gigabyte G7 KE Intel Core i5-12500H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU	44994 MB/s -7%

AIDA64 / Memory Read
SCHENKER XMG Focus 15 (E23) Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU	84974 MB/s +69%
Average of class Gaming (23681 - 99713, n=186, last 2 years)	68750 MB/s +37%
Medion Erazer Scout E20 Intel Core i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU	67235 MB/s +34%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617XS AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS, Radeon RX 7600S	61609 MB/s +23%
Acer Nitro 16 AN16-41-R7YE AMD Ryzen 5 7535HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU	50259 MB/s
Acer Nitro 16 AN16-41 AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	50111 MB/s 0%
Asus TUF A15 FA507 AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU	49994 MB/s -1%
Gigabyte G7 KE Intel Core i5-12500H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU	47559 MB/s -5%
Average AMD Ryzen 5 7535HS (40191 - 50259, n=2)	45225 MB/s -10%

AIDA64 / Memory Write
SCHENKER XMG Focus 15 (E23) Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU	76412 MB/s +39%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617XS AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS, Radeon RX 7600S	72541 MB/s +32%
Average of class Gaming (22986 - 108954, n=186, last 2 years)	66789 MB/s +21%
Medion Erazer Scout E20 Intel Core i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU	59900 MB/s +9%
Asus TUF A15 FA507 AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU	54997 MB/s 0%
Acer Nitro 16 AN16-41-R7YE AMD Ryzen 5 7535HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU	54982 MB/s
Acer Nitro 16 AN16-41 AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	54955 MB/s 0%
Average AMD Ryzen 5 7535HS (51316 - 54982, n=2)	53149 MB/s -3%
Gigabyte G7 KE Intel Core i5-12500H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU	46966 MB/s -15%

AIDA64 / Memory Latency
Medion Erazer Scout E20 Intel Core i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU	98.7 ns * -13%
Average AMD Ryzen 5 7535HS (87.7 - 103.4, n=2)	95.6 ns * -9%
Average of class Gaming (59.5 - 259, n=186, last 2 years)	94.2 ns * -7%
Acer Nitro 16 AN16-41 AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	93.5 ns * -7%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617XS AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS, Radeon RX 7600S	90.4 ns * -3%
Gigabyte G7 KE Intel Core i5-12500H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU	89.8 ns * -2%
Acer Nitro 16 AN16-41-R7YE AMD Ryzen 5 7535HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU	87.7 ns *
SCHENKER XMG Focus 15 (E23) Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU	85 ns * +3%
Asus TUF A15 FA507 AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU	82.2 ns * +6%

* ... smaller is better

Latência DPC

O teste padronizado do monitor de latência (navegação na Web, reprodução de vídeo 4K, FFTs grandes no local do Prime95) não revelou nenhuma anormalidade. O sistema parece ser adequado para edição de vídeo e áudio em tempo real. Futuras atualizações de software podem levar a melhorias ou até mesmo a degradações.

DPC Latencies / LatencyMon - interrupt to process latency (max), Web, Youtube, Prime95
SCHENKER XMG Focus 15 (E23) NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, i9-13900HX, Crucial P5 Plus 1TB CT1000P5PSSD8	2504.7 μs * -239%
Medion Erazer Scout E20 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, i7-13700H, Phison PS5021-E21 1TB	2463.6 μs * -234%
Gigabyte G7 KE GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, i5-12500H, Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10	1969.3 μs * -167%
Acer Nitro 16 AN16-41 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, R7 7735HS, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	1312.1 μs * -78%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617XS Radeon RX 7600S, R9 7940HS, Micron 2400 MTFDKBA512QFM	1128.7 μs * -53%
Acer Nitro 16 AN16-41-R7YE NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, R5 7535HS, SK hynix HFS512GEJ9X125N	738.5 μs *

* ... smaller is better

Armazenamento em massa

A Acer equipa o Nitro 16 com um SSD de 512 GB (PCIe 4, M.2-2280) da SK Hynix. Ele oferece boas taxas de dados, mas não está entre os modelos de SSD com melhor desempenho. Um aspecto negativo é que ocorrem quedas de desempenho devido ao estrangulamento térmico. O notebook tem espaço para um segundo SSD PCIe Gen 4.

Um SSD PCIe-4 funciona como a unidade do sistema.

CrystalDiskMark 5.2 / 6

AS SSD

DiskSpd

SK hynix HFS512GEJ9X125N

CDM 5/6 Read Seq Q32T1: 7015 MB/s

CDM 5/6 Write Seq Q32T1: 2229 MB/s

CDM 5/6 Read 4K Q32T1: 515.6 MB/s

CDM 5/6 Write 4K Q32T1: 311.8 MB/s

CDM 5 Read Seq: 4990 MB/s

CDM 5 Write Seq: 1311 MB/s

CDM 5/6 Read 4K: 61.77 MB/s

CDM 5/6 Write 4K: 184.6 MB/s

Drive Performance Rating | DiskSpd | AS SSD

Drive Performance Rating - Percent
Gigabyte G7 KE Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10	87.6 pt
Medion Erazer Scout E20 Phison PS5021-E21 1TB	79.5 pt
SCHENKER XMG Focus 15 (E23) Crucial P5 Plus 1TB CT1000P5PSSD8	77.1 pt
Average of class Gaming	75 pt
Acer Nitro 16 AN16-41 Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	73.8 pt
Average SK hynix HFS512GEJ9X125N	67 pt
Acer Nitro 16 AN16-41-R7YE SK hynix HFS512GEJ9X125N	64.7 pt
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617XS Micron 2400 MTFDKBA512QFM	44.1 pt
Asus TUF A15 FA507 Micron 2400 MTFDKBA512QFM	36.3 pt

DiskSpd
seq read
Acer Nitro 16 AN16-41 Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	3520 (3490.23^min - 3519.95^max) MB/s +34%
Average of class Gaming (1319 - 7045, n=167, last 2 years)	3488 MB/s +33%
SCHENKER XMG Focus 15 (E23) Crucial P5 Plus 1TB CT1000P5PSSD8	3396 (3160.41^min - 3395.84^max) MB/s +30%
Gigabyte G7 KE Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10	3101 (2775.37^min - 3100.52^max) MB/s +18%
Average SK hynix HFS512GEJ9X125N (2228 - 4315, n=5)	2947 MB/s +12%
Acer Nitro 16 AN16-41-R7YE SK hynix HFS512GEJ9X125N	2620 (2568.07^min - 2619.97^max) MB/s
Medion Erazer Scout E20 Phison PS5021-E21 1TB	2506 (2484.56^min - 2506.33^max) MB/s -4%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617XS Micron 2400 MTFDKBA512QFM	2253 (2206.83^min - 2252.55^max) MB/s -14%
Asus TUF A15 FA507 Micron 2400 MTFDKBA512QFM	1759 (1754.48^min - 1759.3^max) MB/s -33%
Asus TUF A15 FA507 Micron 2400 MTFDKBA512QFM	1759 (1754.48^min - 1759.3^max) MB/s -33%
seq write
Medion Erazer Scout E20 Phison PS5021-E21 1TB	4695 (4459.59^min - 4695.15^max) MB/s +93%
SCHENKER XMG Focus 15 (E23) Crucial P5 Plus 1TB CT1000P5PSSD8	4252 (3845.2^min - 4251.56^max) MB/s +75%
Average of class Gaming (535 - 9307, n=167, last 2 years)	3801 MB/s +56%
Gigabyte G7 KE Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10	2749 (2612.84^min - 2749.11^max) MB/s +13%
Average SK hynix HFS512GEJ9X125N (1505 - 4923, n=5)	2663 MB/s +10%
Acer Nitro 16 AN16-41-R7YE SK hynix HFS512GEJ9X125N	2430 (1756.94^min - 2429.93^max) MB/s
Acer Nitro 16 AN16-41 Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	2220 (2186.31^min - 2219.63^max) MB/s -9%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617XS Micron 2400 MTFDKBA512QFM	1671 (1641.02^min - 1670.59^max) MB/s -31%
Asus TUF A15 FA507 Micron 2400 MTFDKBA512QFM	1554 (1534.35^min - 1553.61^max) MB/s -36%
Asus TUF A15 FA507 Micron 2400 MTFDKBA512QFM	1554 (1534.35^min - 1553.61^max) MB/s -36%
seq q8 t1 read
Gigabyte G7 KE Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10	7032 (6100.58^min - 7031.96^max) MB/s +23%
Acer Nitro 16 AN16-41 Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	6661 (6037.07^min - 6660.97^max) MB/s +16%
SCHENKER XMG Focus 15 (E23) Crucial P5 Plus 1TB CT1000P5PSSD8	6638 (5706.05^min - 6638.12^max) MB/s +16%
Average of class Gaming (2594 - 16089, n=167, last 2 years)	6325 MB/s +10%
Acer Nitro 16 AN16-41-R7YE SK hynix HFS512GEJ9X125N	5729 (5328.06^min - 5728.58^max) MB/s
Medion Erazer Scout E20 Phison PS5021-E21 1TB	5035 (4670.78^min - 5034.63^max) MB/s -12%
Average SK hynix HFS512GEJ9X125N (3050 - 6418, n=5)	4966 MB/s -13%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617XS Micron 2400 MTFDKBA512QFM	4294 (3669.6^min - 4293.91^max) MB/s -25%
Asus TUF A15 FA507 Micron 2400 MTFDKBA512QFM	3886 (3200.77^min - 3885.81^max) MB/s -32%
Asus TUF A15 FA507 Micron 2400 MTFDKBA512QFM	3886 (3200.77^min - 3885.81^max) MB/s -32%
seq q8 t1 write
Acer Nitro 16 AN16-41-R7YE SK hynix HFS512GEJ9X125N	4958 (862.3^min - 4957.61^max) MB/s
SCHENKER XMG Focus 15 (E23) Crucial P5 Plus 1TB CT1000P5PSSD8	4914 (4501.33^min - 4914.49^max) MB/s -1%
Average of class Gaming (539 - 14571, n=167, last 2 years)	4822 MB/s -3%
Medion Erazer Scout E20 Phison PS5021-E21 1TB	4776 MB/s -4%
Average SK hynix HFS512GEJ9X125N (2869 - 4968, n=5)	4160 MB/s -16%
Gigabyte G7 KE Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10	3613 (3580.5^min - 3612.97^max) MB/s -27%
Acer Nitro 16 AN16-41 Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	2216 (2187.96^min - 2215.64^max) MB/s -55%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617XS Micron 2400 MTFDKBA512QFM	1773 (1734.23^min - 1773.16^max) MB/s -64%
Asus TUF A15 FA507 Micron 2400 MTFDKBA512QFM	1640 (1630.54^min - 1639.84^max) MB/s -67%
Asus TUF A15 FA507 Micron 2400 MTFDKBA512QFM	1640 (1630.54^min - 1639.84^max) MB/s -67%
4k q1 t1 read
Gigabyte G7 KE Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10	76.7 (73.36^min - 76.74^max) MB/s +32%
Medion Erazer Scout E20 Phison PS5021-E21 1TB	72.8 MB/s +25%
Average of class Gaming (30.6 - 95.9, n=167, last 2 years)	65.9 MB/s +13%
SCHENKER XMG Focus 15 (E23) Crucial P5 Plus 1TB CT1000P5PSSD8	63.2 (62.77^min - 63.18^max) MB/s +8%
Average SK hynix HFS512GEJ9X125N (46.2 - 78.3, n=5)	58.6 MB/s +1%
Acer Nitro 16 AN16-41-R7YE SK hynix HFS512GEJ9X125N	58.3 (57.69^min - 58.29^max) MB/s
Acer Nitro 16 AN16-41 Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	48.4 (47.92^min - 48.42^max) MB/s -17%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617XS Micron 2400 MTFDKBA512QFM	32.8 (32.61^min - 32.76^max) MB/s -44%
Asus TUF A15 FA507 Micron 2400 MTFDKBA512QFM	32.6 (32.27^min - 32.56^max) MB/s -44%
Asus TUF A15 FA507 Micron 2400 MTFDKBA512QFM	32.6 (32.27^min - 32.56^max) MB/s -44%
4k q1 t1 write
Gigabyte G7 KE Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10	391 (373.18^min - 391.21^max) MB/s +102%
Medion Erazer Scout E20 Phison PS5021-E21 1TB	342 (331.18^min - 341.62^max) MB/s +76%
Average SK hynix HFS512GEJ9X125N (117.2 - 393, n=5)	222 MB/s +14%
Average of class Gaming (66.6 - 397, n=167, last 2 years)	222 MB/s +14%
SCHENKER XMG Focus 15 (E23) Crucial P5 Plus 1TB CT1000P5PSSD8	201 (197.55^min - 200.57^max) MB/s +4%
Acer Nitro 16 AN16-41-R7YE SK hynix HFS512GEJ9X125N	193.9 (190.37^min - 193.9^max) MB/s
Acer Nitro 16 AN16-41 Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	159.6 (158.36^min - 159.58^max) MB/s -18%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617XS Micron 2400 MTFDKBA512QFM	132 (125.41^min - 131.99^max) MB/s -32%
Asus TUF A15 FA507 Micron 2400 MTFDKBA512QFM	129.5 (125.88^min - 129.52^max) MB/s -33%
Asus TUF A15 FA507 Micron 2400 MTFDKBA512QFM	129.5 (125.88^min - 129.52^max) MB/s -33%
4k q32 t16 read
Acer Nitro 16 AN16-41-R7YE SK hynix HFS512GEJ9X125N	3789 (3765.64^min - 3788.53^max) MB/s
Gigabyte G7 KE Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10	3551 (3544.16^min - 3551.38^max) MB/s -6%
Medion Erazer Scout E20 Phison PS5021-E21 1TB	3335 (3259.03^min - 3334.54^max) MB/s -12%
Acer Nitro 16 AN16-41 Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	3311 (3243.78^min - 3311.19^max) MB/s -13%
Average SK hynix HFS512GEJ9X125N (615 - 4255, n=5)	2879 MB/s -24%
Average of class Gaming (417 - 6172, n=167, last 2 years)	2564 MB/s -32%
SCHENKER XMG Focus 15 (E23) Crucial P5 Plus 1TB CT1000P5PSSD8	1963 (1812.48^min - 1962.92^max) MB/s -48%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617XS Micron 2400 MTFDKBA512QFM	1705 (1701.1^min - 1704.63^max) MB/s -55%
Asus TUF A15 FA507 Micron 2400 MTFDKBA512QFM	789 (769.77^min - 789.25^max) MB/s -79%
Asus TUF A15 FA507 Micron 2400 MTFDKBA512QFM	789 (769.77^min - 789.25^max) MB/s -79%
4k q32 t16 write
Gigabyte G7 KE Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10	3576 (3480.8^min - 3575.55^max) MB/s +182%
Medion Erazer Scout E20 Phison PS5021-E21 1TB	3275 (2719.74^min - 3275.22^max) MB/s +159%
SCHENKER XMG Focus 15 (E23) Crucial P5 Plus 1TB CT1000P5PSSD8	2659 (2629.9^min - 2658.76^max) MB/s +110%
Acer Nitro 16 AN16-41 Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	2193 (2174.06^min - 2193.44^max) MB/s +73%
Average of class Gaming (162.3 - 4869, n=167, last 2 years)	2112 MB/s +67%
Average SK hynix HFS512GEJ9X125N (328 - 3869, n=5)	1849 MB/s +46%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617XS Micron 2400 MTFDKBA512QFM	1585 (1554.44^min - 1585.47^max) MB/s +25%
Acer Nitro 16 AN16-41-R7YE SK hynix HFS512GEJ9X125N	1266 (1012.7^min - 1266.22^max) MB/s
Asus TUF A15 FA507 Micron 2400 MTFDKBA512QFM	314 (293.25^min - 314.3^max) MB/s -75%
Asus TUF A15 FA507 Micron 2400 MTFDKBA512QFM	314 (293.25^min - 314.3^max) MB/s -75%

AS SSD
Score Total
Gigabyte G7 KE Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10	8837 Points +48%
Acer Nitro 16 AN16-41 Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	8452 Points +41%
SCHENKER XMG Focus 15 (E23) Crucial P5 Plus 1TB CT1000P5PSSD8	7213 Points +20%
Average of class Gaming (2271 - 13854, n=158, last 2 years)	6747 Points +13%
Medion Erazer Scout E20 Phison PS5021-E21 1TB	6392 Points +7%
Average SK hynix HFS512GEJ9X125N (2811 - 10092, n=5)	6342 Points +6%
Acer Nitro 16 AN16-41-R7YE SK hynix HFS512GEJ9X125N	5988 Points
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617XS Micron 2400 MTFDKBA512QFM	4261 Points -29%
Asus TUF A15 FA507 Micron 2400 MTFDKBA512QFM	3315 Points -45%
Score Read
Gigabyte G7 KE Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10	3468 Points +21%
Acer Nitro 16 AN16-41 Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	3174 Points +11%
Acer Nitro 16 AN16-41-R7YE SK hynix HFS512GEJ9X125N	2860 Points
SCHENKER XMG Focus 15 (E23) Crucial P5 Plus 1TB CT1000P5PSSD8	2712 Points -5%
Medion Erazer Scout E20 Phison PS5021-E21 1TB	2573 Points -10%
Average SK hynix HFS512GEJ9X125N (986 - 3412, n=5)	2502 Points -13%
Average of class Gaming (776 - 4721, n=158, last 2 years)	2446 Points -14%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617XS Micron 2400 MTFDKBA512QFM	1830 Points -36%
Asus TUF A15 FA507 Micron 2400 MTFDKBA512QFM	1116 Points -61%
Score Write
Acer Nitro 16 AN16-41 Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	3723 Points +96%
Gigabyte G7 KE Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10	3621 Points +91%
SCHENKER XMG Focus 15 (E23) Crucial P5 Plus 1TB CT1000P5PSSD8	3145 Points +66%
Average of class Gaming (515 - 7208, n=158, last 2 years)	3115 Points +64%
Average SK hynix HFS512GEJ9X125N (1346 - 4956, n=5)	2629 Points +38%
Medion Erazer Scout E20 Phison PS5021-E21 1TB	2475 Points +30%
Acer Nitro 16 AN16-41-R7YE SK hynix HFS512GEJ9X125N	1899 Points
Asus TUF A15 FA507 Micron 2400 MTFDKBA512QFM	1735 Points -9%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617XS Micron 2400 MTFDKBA512QFM	1604 Points -16%
Seq Read
Acer Nitro 16 AN16-41-R7YE SK hynix HFS512GEJ9X125N	5449.25 MB/s
Acer Nitro 16 AN16-41 Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	5185.49 MB/s -5%
Average of class Gaming (2260 - 12763, n=158, last 2 years)	4945 MB/s -9%
SCHENKER XMG Focus 15 (E23) Crucial P5 Plus 1TB CT1000P5PSSD8	4887.18 MB/s -10%
Gigabyte G7 KE Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10	4540.75 MB/s -17%
Average SK hynix HFS512GEJ9X125N (2256 - 5796, n=5)	4339 MB/s -20%
Medion Erazer Scout E20 Phison PS5021-E21 1TB	3886.94 MB/s -29%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617XS Micron 2400 MTFDKBA512QFM	3690.93 MB/s -32%
Asus TUF A15 FA507 Micron 2400 MTFDKBA512QFM	3466 MB/s -36%
Seq Write
SCHENKER XMG Focus 15 (E23) Crucial P5 Plus 1TB CT1000P5PSSD8	4286.27 MB/s +347%
Medion Erazer Scout E20 Phison PS5021-E21 1TB	4081.48 MB/s +325%
Acer Nitro 16 AN16-41 Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	3900.46 MB/s +306%
Gigabyte G7 KE Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10	3805.55 MB/s +297%
Average of class Gaming (495 - 11316, n=158, last 2 years)	3726 MB/s +288%
Average SK hynix HFS512GEJ9X125N (960 - 4914, n=5)	2972 MB/s +210%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617XS Micron 2400 MTFDKBA512QFM	1633.49 MB/s +70%
Asus TUF A15 FA507 Micron 2400 MTFDKBA512QFM	1295 MB/s +35%
Acer Nitro 16 AN16-41-R7YE SK hynix HFS512GEJ9X125N	959.57 MB/s
4K Read
Gigabyte G7 KE Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10	99.79 MB/s +107%
Medion Erazer Scout E20 Phison PS5021-E21 1TB	97.96 MB/s +103%
Average of class Gaming (27.8 - 112.1, n=158, last 2 years)	65.1 MB/s +35%
Acer Nitro 16 AN16-41 Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	62.76 MB/s +30%
SCHENKER XMG Focus 15 (E23) Crucial P5 Plus 1TB CT1000P5PSSD8	58.79 MB/s +22%
Average SK hynix HFS512GEJ9X125N (42.4 - 80.1, n=5)	56.7 MB/s +18%
Acer Nitro 16 AN16-41-R7YE SK hynix HFS512GEJ9X125N	48.18 MB/s
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617XS Micron 2400 MTFDKBA512QFM	42.75 MB/s -11%
Asus TUF A15 FA507 Micron 2400 MTFDKBA512QFM	30.4 MB/s -37%
4K Write
Gigabyte G7 KE Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10	325.41 MB/s +117%
Medion Erazer Scout E20 Phison PS5021-E21 1TB	286.81 MB/s +91%
Average of class Gaming (108.8 - 512, n=158, last 2 years)	212 MB/s +41%
Average SK hynix HFS512GEJ9X125N (109.2 - 307, n=5)	185.4 MB/s +23%
SCHENKER XMG Focus 15 (E23) Crucial P5 Plus 1TB CT1000P5PSSD8	169.41 MB/s +13%
Acer Nitro 16 AN16-41-R7YE SK hynix HFS512GEJ9X125N	150.14 MB/s
Acer Nitro 16 AN16-41 Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	137.9 MB/s -8%
Asus TUF A15 FA507 Micron 2400 MTFDKBA512QFM	137.5 MB/s -8%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617XS Micron 2400 MTFDKBA512QFM	118.17 MB/s -21%
4K-64 Read
Gigabyte G7 KE Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10	2914.54 MB/s +31%
Acer Nitro 16 AN16-41 Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	2593.07 MB/s +17%
Acer Nitro 16 AN16-41-R7YE SK hynix HFS512GEJ9X125N	2216.52 MB/s
SCHENKER XMG Focus 15 (E23) Crucial P5 Plus 1TB CT1000P5PSSD8	2146.9 MB/s -3%
Medion Erazer Scout E20 Phison PS5021-E21 1TB	2085.99 MB/s -6%
Average SK hynix HFS512GEJ9X125N (713 - 2799, n=5)	2002 MB/s -10%
Average of class Gaming (451 - 3475, n=158, last 2 years)	1881 MB/s -15%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617XS Micron 2400 MTFDKBA512QFM	1429.83 MB/s -35%
Asus TUF A15 FA507 Micron 2400 MTFDKBA512QFM	739 MB/s -67%
4K-64 Write
Acer Nitro 16 AN16-41 Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	3195.33 MB/s +93%
Gigabyte G7 KE Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10	2915.33 MB/s +76%
SCHENKER XMG Focus 15 (E23) Crucial P5 Plus 1TB CT1000P5PSSD8	2546.59 MB/s +54%
Average of class Gaming (277 - 5909, n=158, last 2 years)	2533 MB/s +53%
Average SK hynix HFS512GEJ9X125N (1064 - 4158, n=5)	2146 MB/s +30%
Medion Erazer Scout E20 Phison PS5021-E21 1TB	1779.79 MB/s +8%
Acer Nitro 16 AN16-41-R7YE SK hynix HFS512GEJ9X125N	1652.79 MB/s
Asus TUF A15 FA507 Micron 2400 MTFDKBA512QFM	1468 MB/s -11%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617XS Micron 2400 MTFDKBA512QFM	1411.25 MB/s -15%
Access Time Read
Gigabyte G7 KE Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10	0.094 ms * -52%
Acer Nitro 16 AN16-41 Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	0.079 ms * -27%
Medion Erazer Scout E20 Phison PS5021-E21 1TB	0.066 ms * -6%
Acer Nitro 16 AN16-41-R7YE SK hynix HFS512GEJ9X125N	0.062 ms *
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617XS Micron 2400 MTFDKBA512QFM	0.058 ms * +6%
Average of class Gaming (0.016 - 0.379, n=157, last 2 years)	0.05525 ms * +11%
SCHENKER XMG Focus 15 (E23) Crucial P5 Plus 1TB CT1000P5PSSD8	0.052 ms * +16%
Average SK hynix HFS512GEJ9X125N (0.032 - 0.062, n=5)	0.0446 ms * +28%
Asus TUF A15 FA507 Micron 2400 MTFDKBA512QFM	0.039 ms * +37%
Access Time Write
Asus TUF A15 FA507 Micron 2400 MTFDKBA512QFM	0.139 ms * -435%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617XS Micron 2400 MTFDKBA512QFM	0.118 ms * -354%
Average SK hynix HFS512GEJ9X125N (0.018 - 0.128, n=5)	0.0668 ms * -157%
Average of class Gaming (0.011 - 1.028, n=158, last 2 years)	0.04855 ms * -87%
Acer Nitro 16 AN16-41 Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	0.029 ms * -12%
Acer Nitro 16 AN16-41-R7YE SK hynix HFS512GEJ9X125N	0.026 ms *
SCHENKER XMG Focus 15 (E23) Crucial P5 Plus 1TB CT1000P5PSSD8	0.025 ms * +4%
Medion Erazer Scout E20 Phison PS5021-E21 1TB	0.02 ms * +23%
Gigabyte G7 KE Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10	0.012 ms * +54%

* ... smaller is better

Drive throttling: DiskSpd Read Loop, Queue Depth 8

Acer Nitro 16 AN16-41-R7YE SK hynix HFS512GEJ9X125N: Ø4012 (3381.19-5725.73)

Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617XS Micron 2400 MTFDKBA512QFM: Ø3496 (2896.67-3526.02)

SCHENKER XMG Focus 15 (E23) Crucial P5 Plus 1TB CT1000P5PSSD8: Ø5260 (1672.91-6655)

Gigabyte G7 KE Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10: Ø5191 (3583.79-7029.65)

Asus TUF A15 FA507 Micron 2400 MTFDKBA512QFM: Ø4012 (3504.22-4030.94)

Medion Erazer Scout E20 Phison PS5021-E21 1TB: Ø5011 (4351.17-5032.96)

Acer Nitro 16 AN16-41 Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR: Ø3831 (253.34-6627.38)

Placa de vídeo

Os resultados de benchmark da GeForce RTX 4050 estão acima dos resultados médios do RTX 4050 ("Balanceado"). os modos "Performance" e "Turbo" resultam em um aumento mínimo de desempenho, na melhor das hipóteses.

A Acer definiu o TGP máximo para 140 W - não é possível uma potência mais alta. De acordo com o teste do site Witcher 3, ele não está nem perto de se esgotar. Alternar entre dGPU e Optimus não requer uma reinicialização, pois o Advanced Optimus é suportado.

Fire Strike (Operação de rede elétrica, balanceada)

Fire Strike (Operação com bateria, balanceada)

Fire Strike (Operação da rede elétrica, alimentação)

Fire Strike (Operação da rede elétrica, Turbo)

Fire Strike (Operação na rede elétrica, silenciosa)

3DMark Performance Rating | 3DMark 11 | 3DMark

3DMark Performance Rating - Percent
Average of class Gaming	97.2 pt
Acer Nitro 16 AN16-41 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS	94.5 pt
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617XS AMD Radeon RX 7600S, AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS	81.6 pt
Acer Nitro 16 AN16-41-R7YE NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, AMD Ryzen 5 7535HS	77.2 pt
Medion Erazer Scout E20 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-13700H	74.9 pt
Asus TUF A15 FA507 ^-1! NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS	70.8 pt
SCHENKER XMG Focus 15 (E23) NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13900HX	68.5 pt
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU	67.9 pt
Gigabyte G7 KE NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i5-12500H	59.6 pt

3DMark 11 - 1280x720 Performance GPU
Average of class Gaming (1029 - 72178, n=185, last 2 years)	43596 Points +42%
Acer Nitro 16 AN16-41 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS	40995 Points +33%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617XS AMD Radeon RX 7600S, AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS	33037 Points +8%
Asus TUF A15 FA507 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS	31690 Points +3%
SCHENKER XMG Focus 15 (E23) NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13900HX	30877 Points +1%
Acer Nitro 16 AN16-41-R7YE NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, AMD Ryzen 5 7535HS	30717 Points
Medion Erazer Scout E20 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-13700H	30298 Points -1%
Gigabyte G7 KE NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i5-12500H	28934 Points -6%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU (13339 - 32642, n=38)	28641 Points -7%

3DMark
1280x720 Cloud Gate Standard Graphics
Acer Nitro 16 AN16-41-R7YE NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, AMD Ryzen 5 7535HS	161152 Points
Acer Nitro 16 AN16-41 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS	157673 Points -2%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617XS AMD Radeon RX 7600S, AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS	155806 Points -3%
Medion Erazer Scout E20 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-13700H	153301 Points -5%
Average of class Gaming (15902 - 193851, n=100, last 2 years)	143183 Points -11%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU (51138 - 161152, n=25)	126416 Points -22%
SCHENKER XMG Focus 15 (E23) NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13900HX	105057 Points -35%
Gigabyte G7 KE NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i5-12500H	54830 Points -66%
1920x1080 Fire Strike Graphics
Average of class Gaming (781 - 53059, n=195, last 2 years)	31290 Points +35%
Acer Nitro 16 AN16-41 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS	29853 Points +29%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617XS AMD Radeon RX 7600S, AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS	26154 Points +13%
Acer Nitro 16 AN16-41-R7YE NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, AMD Ryzen 5 7535HS	23204 Points
Asus TUF A15 FA507 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS	22899 Points -1%
Medion Erazer Scout E20 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-13700H	22715 Points -2%
Gigabyte G7 KE NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i5-12500H	22522 Points -3%
SCHENKER XMG Focus 15 (E23) NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13900HX	22480 Points -3%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU (13591 - 24007, n=36)	21155 Points -9%
2560x1440 Time Spy Graphics
Average of class Gaming (224 - 22717, n=190, last 2 years)	13056 Points +56%
Acer Nitro 16 AN16-41 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS	11868 Points +42%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617XS AMD Radeon RX 7600S, AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS	9203 Points +10%
Asus TUF A15 FA507 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS	8692 Points +4%
SCHENKER XMG Focus 15 (E23) NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13900HX	8626 Points +3%
Gigabyte G7 KE NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i5-12500H	8597 Points +3%
Acer Nitro 16 AN16-41-R7YE NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, AMD Ryzen 5 7535HS	8363 Points
Medion Erazer Scout E20 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-13700H	8152 Points -3%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU (5107 - 9040, n=36)	7812 Points -7%

3DMark 06 Standard Score		43233 pontos
3DMark 11 Performance		24596 pontos
3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score		47710 pontos
3DMark Fire Strike Score		20291 pontos
3DMark Time Spy Score		8227 pontos
Ajuda

... comparado com

Blender
v3.3 Classroom OPTIX/RTX
Gigabyte G7 KE NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i5-12500H	33 Seconds * -27%
Medion Erazer Scout E20 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-13700H	29 Seconds * -12%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU (25 - 37, n=37)	28.8 Seconds * -11%
SCHENKER XMG Focus 15 (E23) NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13900HX	27 Seconds * -4%
Asus TUF A15 FA507 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS	27 Seconds * -4%
Asus TUF A15 FA507 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS	27 Seconds * -4%
Acer Nitro 16 AN16-41-R7YE NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, AMD Ryzen 5 7535HS	26 Seconds *
Acer Nitro 16 AN16-41 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS	21 Seconds * +19%
Average of class Gaming (9 - 95, n=176, last 2 years)	21 Seconds * +19%
v3.3 Classroom CUDA
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU (47 - 175, n=37)	56.2 Seconds * -12%
Gigabyte G7 KE NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i5-12500H	53 Seconds * -6%
SCHENKER XMG Focus 15 (E23) NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13900HX	52 Seconds * -4%
Medion Erazer Scout E20 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-13700H	52 Seconds * -4%
Asus TUF A15 FA507 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS	50 Seconds * -0%
Asus TUF A15 FA507 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS	50 Seconds * -0%
Acer Nitro 16 AN16-41-R7YE NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, AMD Ryzen 5 7535HS	50 Seconds *
Average of class Gaming (16 - 175, n=182, last 2 years)	36.6 Seconds * +27%
Acer Nitro 16 AN16-41 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS	35 Seconds * +30%
v3.3 Classroom CPU
Acer Nitro 16 AN16-41-R7YE NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, AMD Ryzen 5 7535HS	481 Seconds *
Gigabyte G7 KE NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i5-12500H	399 Seconds * +17%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU (243 - 907, n=37)	395 Seconds * +18%
Asus TUF A15 FA507 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS	376 Seconds * +22%
Asus TUF A15 FA507 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS	376 Seconds * +22%
Medion Erazer Scout E20 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-13700H	374 Seconds * +22%
Acer Nitro 16 AN16-41 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS	364 Seconds * +24%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617XS AMD Radeon RX 7600S, AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS	301 Seconds * +37%
Average of class Gaming (138 - 962, n=190, last 2 years)	297 Seconds * +38%
SCHENKER XMG Focus 15 (E23) NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13900HX	243 Seconds * +49%

Geekbench 5.5
OpenCL Score
Average of class Gaming (5039 - 237138, n=192, last 2 years)	126097 Points +45%
Acer Nitro 16 AN16-41 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS	117889 Points +35%
Gigabyte G7 KE NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i5-12500H	104225 Points +20%
Asus TUF A15 FA507 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS	87554 Points 0%
Acer Nitro 16 AN16-41-R7YE NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, AMD Ryzen 5 7535HS	87135 Points
SCHENKER XMG Focus 15 (E23) NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13900HX	86024 Points -1%
Medion Erazer Scout E20 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-13700H	84557 Points -3%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU (63538 - 90075, n=35)	82571 Points -5%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617XS AMD Radeon RX 7600S, AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS	65110 Points -25%
Vulkan Score 5.5
Average of class Gaming (7995 - 163089, n=123, last 2 years)	71890 Points +42%
Gigabyte G7 KE NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i5-12500H	55994 Points +10%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU (45884 - 59879, n=11)	53438 Points +5%
Acer Nitro 16 AN16-41-R7YE NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, AMD Ryzen 5 7535HS	50695 Points
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617XS AMD Radeon RX 7600S, AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS	36222 Points -29%

Geekbench 6.0
GPU Vulkan 6.0
Acer Nitro 16 AN16-41 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS	108353 Points +57%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617XS AMD Radeon RX 7600S, AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS	83464 Points +21%
Acer Nitro 16 AN16-41-R7YE NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, AMD Ryzen 5 7535HS	68870 Points
Average of class Gaming (1827 - 159996, n=45, last 2 years)	48002 Points -30%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU (9845 - 103262, n=12)	32694 Points -53%
Asus TUF A15 FA507 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS	28137 Points -59%
Medion Erazer Scout E20 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-13700H	22444 Points -67%
SCHENKER XMG Focus 15 (E23) NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13900HX	9845 Points -86%
GPU OpenCL 6.0
Acer Nitro 16 AN16-41 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS	120271 Points +42%
Average of class Gaming (30029 - 213472, n=46, last 2 years)	115603 Points +37%
Acer Nitro 16 AN16-41-R7YE NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, AMD Ryzen 5 7535HS	84452 Points
SCHENKER XMG Focus 15 (E23) NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13900HX	83483 Points -1%
Asus TUF A15 FA507 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS	81622 Points -3%
Medion Erazer Scout E20 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-13700H	80466 Points -5%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU (66574 - 84452, n=12)	76353 Points -10%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617XS AMD Radeon RX 7600S, AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS	65701 Points -22%

Geekbench 6.3
GPU Vulkan
Average of class Gaming (4286 - 196201, n=106, last 2 years)	82317 Points +4%
Acer Nitro 16 AN16-41-R7YE NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, AMD Ryzen 5 7535HS	79423 Points
SCHENKER XMG Focus 15 (E23) NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13900HX	77343 Points -3%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU (4454 - 85084, n=18)	51089 Points -36%
GPU OpenCL
Average of class Gaming (4321 - 207373, n=109, last 2 years)	115663 Points +37%
Acer Nitro 16 AN16-41-R7YE NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, AMD Ryzen 5 7535HS	84723 Points
SCHENKER XMG Focus 15 (E23) NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13900HX	83663 Points -1%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU (60815 - 86892, n=18)	78987 Points -7%

V-Ray 5 Benchmark
GPU RTX
Average of class Gaming (171 - 3824, n=113, last 2 years)	2190 mpaths +47%
Acer Nitro 16 AN16-41 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS	1664 mpaths +12%
SCHENKER XMG Focus 15 (E23) NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13900HX	1503 mpaths +1%
Acer Nitro 16 AN16-41-R7YE NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, AMD Ryzen 5 7535HS	1485 mpaths
Asus TUF A15 FA507 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS	1465 mpaths -1%
Medion Erazer Scout E20 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-13700H	1458 mpaths -2%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU (618 - 1588, n=22)	1388 mpaths -7%
Gigabyte G7 KE NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i5-12500H	1197 mpaths -19%
GPU CUDA
Average of class Gaming (120 - 2797, n=115, last 2 years)	1574 mpaths +47%
Acer Nitro 16 AN16-41 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS	1194 mpaths +11%
SCHENKER XMG Focus 15 (E23) NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13900HX	1079 mpaths +1%
Asus TUF A15 FA507 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS	1075 mpaths 0%
Acer Nitro 16 AN16-41-R7YE NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, AMD Ryzen 5 7535HS	1073 mpaths
Medion Erazer Scout E20 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-13700H	1071 mpaths 0%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU (735 - 1174, n=22)	1033 mpaths -4%
Gigabyte G7 KE NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i5-12500H	909 mpaths -15%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617XS AMD Radeon RX 7600S, AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS	300 mpaths -72%
CPU
Average of class Gaming (3562 - 26944, n=119, last 2 years)	15070 mpaths +95%
SCHENKER XMG Focus 15 (E23) NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13900HX	14401 mpaths +86%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617XS AMD Radeon RX 7600S, AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS	12169 mpaths +57%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU (3562 - 14401, n=22)	10693 mpaths +38%
Medion Erazer Scout E20 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-13700H	10427 mpaths +35%
Acer Nitro 16 AN16-41 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS	10005 mpaths +29%
Asus TUF A15 FA507 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS	9623 mpaths +24%
Gigabyte G7 KE NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i5-12500H	9406 mpaths +22%
Acer Nitro 16 AN16-41-R7YE NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, AMD Ryzen 5 7535HS	7731 mpaths

V-Ray Benchmark Next 4.10
GPU
Average of class Gaming (54 - 1334, n=151, last 2 years)	703 mpaths +45%
Acer Nitro 16 AN16-41 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS	583 mpaths +20%
SCHENKER XMG Focus 15 (E23) NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13900HX	507 mpaths +5%
Asus TUF A15 FA507 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS	501 mpaths +3%
Medion Erazer Scout E20 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-13700H	495 mpaths +2%
Acer Nitro 16 AN16-41-R7YE NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, AMD Ryzen 5 7535HS	485 mpaths
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU (333 - 565, n=32)	471 mpaths -3%
Gigabyte G7 KE NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i5-12500H	390 mpaths -20%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617XS AMD Radeon RX 7600S, AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS	96 mpaths -80%
CPU
SCHENKER XMG Focus 15 (E23) NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13900HX	24181 ksamples +117%
Average of class Gaming (5413 - 37629, n=151, last 2 years)	21409 ksamples +92%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617XS AMD Radeon RX 7600S, AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS	17623 ksamples +58%
Medion Erazer Scout E20 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-13700H	15817 ksamples +42%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU (5413 - 24181, n=32)	15639 ksamples +40%
Acer Nitro 16 AN16-41 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS	14668 ksamples +32%
Asus TUF A15 FA507 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS	14627 ksamples +31%
Gigabyte G7 KE NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i5-12500H	14218 ksamples +28%
Acer Nitro 16 AN16-41-R7YE NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, AMD Ryzen 5 7535HS	11139 ksamples

SPECviewperf 2020
1920x1080 Solidworks (solidworks-05)
Average of class Gaming (47.1 - 515, n=20, last 2 years)	313 fps +76%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU (177.8 - 188.3, n=3)	184 fps +3%
Acer Nitro 16 AN16-41-R7YE NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, AMD Ryzen 5 7535HS	177.8 fps
1920x1080 Siemens NX (snx-04)
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617XS AMD Radeon RX 7600S, AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS	230.8 fps +1161%
Average of class Gaming (17.5 - 231, n=26, last 2 years)	38.1 fps +108%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU (18.3 - 21.4, n=4)	20.3 fps +11%
Acer Nitro 16 AN16-41-R7YE NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, AMD Ryzen 5 7535HS	18.3 fps
Gigabyte G7 KE NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i5-12500H	17.5 fps -4%
1920x1080 Medical (medical-03)
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617XS AMD Radeon RX 7600S, AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS	56.9 fps +100%
Average of class Gaming (25.7 - 59.9, n=26, last 2 years)	40.8 fps +43%
Gigabyte G7 KE NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i5-12500H	30 fps +5%
Acer Nitro 16 AN16-41-R7YE NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, AMD Ryzen 5 7535HS	28.5 fps
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU (25.7 - 30.1, n=4)	28.3 fps -1%
1920x1080 Maya (maya-06)
Average of class Gaming (99.8 - 687, n=25, last 2 years)	421 fps +50%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617XS AMD Radeon RX 7600S, AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS	322.7 fps +15%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU (281 - 334, n=4)	307 fps +9%
Acer Nitro 16 AN16-41-R7YE NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, AMD Ryzen 5 7535HS	281.4 fps
Gigabyte G7 KE NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i5-12500H	201.6 fps -28%
1920x1080 Energy (energy-03)
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617XS AMD Radeon RX 7600S, AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS	53.5 fps +74%
Average of class Gaming (20.6 - 76.5, n=26, last 2 years)	48.7 fps +59%
Acer Nitro 16 AN16-41-R7YE NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, AMD Ryzen 5 7535HS	30.7 fps
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU (28.2 - 30.7, n=4)	29.2 fps -5%
Gigabyte G7 KE NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i5-12500H	20.6 fps -33%
1920x1080 Creo (creo-03)
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617XS AMD Radeon RX 7600S, AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS	126.5 fps +60%
Average of class Gaming (44 - 141.9, n=26, last 2 years)	108.9 fps +37%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU (79.3 - 94.5, n=4)	87.3 fps +10%
Gigabyte G7 KE NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i5-12500H	86.5 fps +9%
Acer Nitro 16 AN16-41-R7YE NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, AMD Ryzen 5 7535HS	79.3 fps
1920x1080 CATIA (catia-06)
Average of class Gaming (17.8 - 117.2, n=26, last 2 years)	74.2 fps +55%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617XS AMD Radeon RX 7600S, AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS	73.4 fps +53%
Gigabyte G7 KE NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i5-12500H	53.9 fps +13%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU (47.9 - 50.7, n=4)	49.3 fps +3%
Acer Nitro 16 AN16-41-R7YE NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, AMD Ryzen 5 7535HS	47.9 fps
1920x1080 3ds Max (3dsmax-07)
Average of class Gaming (25.7 - 221, n=26, last 2 years)	127.4 fps +64%
Gigabyte G7 KE NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i5-12500H	89.4 fps +15%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU (76.2 - 79.7, n=4)	78.2 fps +1%
Acer Nitro 16 AN16-41-R7YE NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, AMD Ryzen 5 7535HS	77.6 fps
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617XS AMD Radeon RX 7600S, AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS	67.5 fps -13%

* ... smaller is better

Desempenho em jogos

O hardware foi projetado para jogos em FHD em configurações altas ou máximas. Assim, as altas taxas de quadros na resolução FHD da tela podem ser totalmente utilizadas e as taxas de quadros acima da média determinada da RTX 4050 são alcançadas.

A tecnologia DLSS da Nvidia pode proporcionar um aumento nas taxas de quadros. Se estiver ativa, a GPU calcula um jogo em uma resolução mais baixa e, em seguida, dimensiona-o para a resolução desejada por meio de IA. O DLSS precisa ser explicitamente suportado por um jogo. Testamos alguns títulos correspondentes em caráter experimental.

	Raytracing (FHD, Ultra)	Raytracing (FHD, Ultra) + DLSS (Qualidade)	Raytracing (FHD, Ultra) + DLSS (Equilibrado)	Raytracing (FHD, Ultra) + DLSS (Desempenho)
Cyberpunk 2077 V1.6	24,9 fps	43 fps	53,6 fps	58 fps
Spider-Man: Miles Morales	42,1 fps	54,2 fps	68,2 fps	68,4 fps
The Witcher 3 V4.00	25.4 fps	30.1 fps	31.9 fps	33.2 fps
Hogwarts Legacy	34.9 f ps	43.4 fps	44.5 fps	44.7 fps
Returnal	66 fps	81 fps	84 fps	91 fps

Performance Rating - Percent
Average of class Gaming	96.9 pt
Acer Nitro 16 AN16-41 AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	80.4 pt
SCHENKER XMG Focus 15 (E23) Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU	77.6 pt
Medion Erazer Scout E20 Intel Core i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU	75.2 pt
Gigabyte G7 KE Intel Core i5-12500H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU	72 pt
Acer Nitro 16 AN16-41-R7YE AMD Ryzen 5 7535HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU	69.6 pt
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617XS AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS, AMD Radeon RX 7600S	69 pt
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU	68.8 pt
Asus TUF A15 FA507 AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU	67.3 pt

The Witcher 3 - 1920x1080 Ultra Graphics & Postprocessing (HBAO+)
Average of class Gaming (18.4 - 216, n=167, last 2 years)	127.2 fps +52%
Acer Nitro 16 AN16-41 AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	113.2 (98^min) fps +35%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617XS AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS, AMD Radeon RX 7600S	98.1 (84^min) fps +17%
Acer Nitro 16 AN16-41-R7YE AMD Ryzen 5 7535HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU	83.9 (71^min) fps
Medion Erazer Scout E20 Intel Core i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU	83.4 (75^min) fps -1%
Gigabyte G7 KE Intel Core i5-12500H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU	82.4 (31.1^min, 37.5^P0.1, 50.1^P1) fps -2%
Asus TUF A15 FA507 AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU	82.2 (79^min, 80^P1) fps -2%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU (18.5 - 94.7, n=39)	75.4 fps -10%
SCHENKER XMG Focus 15 (E23) Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU	64 fps -24%

Final Fantasy XV Benchmark - 1920x1080 High Quality
Average of class Gaming (19.2 - 201, n=183, last 2 years)	119.2 fps +43%
Acer Nitro 16 AN16-41 AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	109.1 fps +31%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617XS AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS, AMD Radeon RX 7600S	85.2 fps +2%
SCHENKER XMG Focus 15 (E23) Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU	85 fps +2%
Gigabyte G7 KE Intel Core i5-12500H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU	84.7 fps +1%
Acer Nitro 16 AN16-41-R7YE AMD Ryzen 5 7535HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU	83.5 fps
Medion Erazer Scout E20 Intel Core i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU	82.6 fps -1%
Asus TUF A15 FA507 AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU	81.5 fps -2%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU (15.5 - 122.3, n=36)	76.4 fps -9%

Strange Brigade - 1920x1080 ultra AA:ultra AF:16
Average of class Gaming (38.9 - 421, n=181, last 2 years)	227 fps +55%
Acer Nitro 16 AN16-41 AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	192.6 (25.1^min, 144.3^P1) fps +31%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617XS AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS, AMD Radeon RX 7600S	163.3 (16.3^min, 119.3^P1) fps +11%
SCHENKER XMG Focus 15 (E23) Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU	151.2 (35.6^min, 115.5^P1) fps +3%
Asus TUF A15 FA507 AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU	147 fps 0%
Acer Nitro 16 AN16-41-R7YE AMD Ryzen 5 7535HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU	146.8 (93.6^min, 114.3^P1) fps
Gigabyte G7 KE Intel Core i5-12500H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU	146.4 (27.5^min, 106.4^P1) fps 0%
Medion Erazer Scout E20 Intel Core i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU	144 (76^min, 109.9^P1) fps -2%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU (21.2 - 156.6, n=35)	134.4 fps -8%

Dota 2 Reborn - 1920x1080 ultra (3/3) best looking
SCHENKER XMG Focus 15 (E23) Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU	160.7 (136.8^min) fps +28%
Average of class Gaming (30.8 - 220, n=189, last 2 years)	149.5 fps +19%
Medion Erazer Scout E20 Intel Core i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU	142.5 (121.6^min) fps +14%
Gigabyte G7 KE Intel Core i5-12500H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU	137.3 (120.2^min) fps +10%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU (73.5 - 175.6, n=36)	131.9 fps +5%
Acer Nitro 16 AN16-41-R7YE AMD Ryzen 5 7535HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU	125.2 (109.9^min) fps
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617XS AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS, AMD Radeon RX 7600S	121.6 (100.8^min) fps -3%
Asus TUF A15 FA507 AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU	115.8 (102.7^min) fps -8%
Acer Nitro 16 AN16-41 AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	114.8 (97.8^min) fps -8%

X-Plane 11.11 - 1920x1080 high (fps_test=3)
SCHENKER XMG Focus 15 (E23) Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU	117 fps +44%
Average of class Gaming (31.5 - 166.2, n=195, last 2 years)	107.3 fps +32%
Medion Erazer Scout E20 Intel Core i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU	104.4 fps +28%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU (65 - 117, n=37)	92.9 fps +14%
Gigabyte G7 KE Intel Core i5-12500H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU	86.8 fps +7%
Acer Nitro 16 AN16-41-R7YE AMD Ryzen 5 7535HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU	81.4 fps
Asus TUF A15 FA507 AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU	77.8 fps -4%
Acer Nitro 16 AN16-41 AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	76.3 fps -6%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617XS AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS, AMD Radeon RX 7600S	57.3 fps -30%

Para verificar se as taxas de quadros permanecem praticamente constantes em um período mais longo, executamos o Witcher 3 por cerca de 60 minutos com resolução Full HD e configurações de qualidade máxima. O personagem do jogo não é movido. Não se nota uma queda nas taxas de quadros.

The Witcher 3 FPS Chart

Acer Nitro 16 AN16-41-R7YE R5 7535HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU: Ø81.7 (71-84)

Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617XS R9 7940HS, Radeon RX 7600S; neu: Ø95.2 (89-101)

SCHENKER XMG Focus 15 (E23) i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU: Ø59.6 (19-74)

Gigabyte G7 KE i5-12500H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU: Ø81 (77-86)

Asus TUF A15 FA507 R7 7735HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU: Ø82.2 (79-84)

Medion Erazer Scout E20 i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU: Ø80.5 (77-85)

Acer Nitro 16 AN16-41 R7 7735HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU: Ø111.1 (107-116)

	baixo	média	alto	ultra
The Witcher 3 (2015)	307.8	262.4	156.2	83.9
Dota 2 Reborn (2015)	151	136.5	132.1	125.2
Final Fantasy XV Benchmark (2018)	187.4	116.2	83.5
X-Plane 11.11 (2018)	115.3	101.6	81.4
Far Cry 5 (2018)	131	114	108	102
Strange Brigade (2018)	355	209	169.3	146.8
F1 22 (2022)	207	198.1	166.8	52.9

Emissões: O Acer Nitro 16 aquece significativamente

Emissões de ruído

Apesar da dGPU permanentemente ativa, o notebook é silencioso no uso diário (escritório, Internet, etc.). Como esperado, isso é diferente no modo de jogo.

Níveis de pressão sonora de até 61 dB(A) ("Turbo") ou 56 dB(A) ("Performance") exigem o uso de fones de ouvido. O modo "Balanced" que usamos chega a 45 dB(A). É possível obter um desenvolvimento geral de ruído mais baixo usando o modo "Quiet", mas às custas do desempenho de computação, é claro.

Barulho

Ocioso		25 / 26 / 27 dB
Carga		42 / 45 dB

	30 dB silencioso 40 dB(A) audível 50 dB(A) ruidosamente alto
min: , med: , max: Earthworks M23R, Arta (15 cm de distância) environment noise: 24 dB(A)

	Acer Nitro 16 AN16-41-R7YE R5 7535HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU	Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617XS R9 7940HS, Radeon RX 7600S	SCHENKER XMG Focus 15 (E23) i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU	Gigabyte G7 KE i5-12500H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU	Asus TUF A15 FA507 R7 7735HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU	Medion Erazer Scout E20 i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU	Acer Nitro 16 AN16-41 R7 7735HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
Noise		-7%	-15%	-26%	10%	-16%	-4%
off / environment *	24	25 -4%	24 -0%	27 -13%	23.3 3%	25 -4%	25.7 -7%
Idle Minimum *	25	25 -0%	24 4%	27 -8%	23.3 7%	26 -4%	25.7 -3%
Idle Average *	26	26 -0%	25.14 3%	35 -35%	23.3 10%	27 -4%	25.7 1%
Idle Maximum *	27	28 -4%	35.14 -30%	38 -41%	23.3 14%	32 -19%	26.3 3%
Load Average *	42	43 -2%	55.93 -33%	52 -24%	29.6 30%	57 -36%	33.9 19%
Witcher 3 ultra *	43	51 -19%	54.62 -27%	56 -30%	43 -0%	50 -16%
Load Maximum *	45	53 -18%	56.34 -25%	59 -31%	43 4%	57 -27%	62 -38%

* ... smaller is better

Temperatura

O Nitro 16 aquece visivelmente sob carga. Uma temperatura de mais de 60 °C é atingida em um ponto de medição.

As temperaturas estão dentro da zona verde no uso diário, mas são mais altas do que no modelo irmão devido ao modo dGPU ativo.

Carga Máxima

Inatividade

Witcher 3


51 °C	45 °C	48 °C
43 °C	45 °C	43 °C
41 °C	42 °C	41 °C

Máximo: 51 °C
Médio: 44.3 °C


57 °C	63 °C	46 °C
44 °C	52 °C	43 °C
33 °C	34 °C	34 °C

Máximo: 63 °C
Médio: 45.1 °C

alimentação elétrica 51 °C | Temperatura do quarto 21 °C | Fluke t3000FC (calibrated), Voltcraft IR-900

Carga Máxima

Inatividade

Witcher 3


30 °C	30 °C	29 °C
33 °C	34 °C	34 °C
31 °C	31 °C	32 °C

Máximo: 34 °C
Médio: 31.6 °C


31 °C	32 °C	31 °C
30 °C	31 °C	30 °C
28 °C	26 °C	26 °C

Máximo: 32 °C
Médio: 29.4 °C

alimentação elétrica 36 °C | Temperatura do quarto 21 °C | Fluke t3000FC (calibrated), Voltcraft IR-900

Carga Máxima

Inatividade

Witcher 3


54 °C	44 °C	45 °C
42 °C	43 °C	42 °C
35 °C	41 °C	39 °C

Máximo: 54 °C
Médio: 42.8 °C


57 °C	61 °C	48 °C
45 °C	51 °C	41 °C
32 °C	32 °C	33 °C

Máximo: 61 °C
Médio: 44.4 °C

alimentação elétrica 48 °C | Temperatura do quarto 21 °C | Fluke t3000FC (calibrated), Voltcraft IR-900

(-) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 44.3 °C / 112 F, compared to the average of 33.9 °C / 93 F for the devices in the class Gaming.
(-) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 51 °C / 124 F, compared to the average of 40.5 °C / 105 F, ranging from 21.2 to 68.8 °C for the class Gaming.
(-) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 63 °C / 145 F, compared to the average of 43.2 °C / 110 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 31.6 °C / 89 F, compared to the device average of 33.9 °C / 93 F.
(-) Playing The Witcher 3, the average temperature for the upper side is 42.8 °C / 109 F, compared to the device average of 33.9 °C / 93 F.
(-) The palmrests and touchpad can get very hot to the touch with a maximum of 42 °C / 107.6 F.
(-) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.9 °C / 84 F (-13.1 °C / -23.6 F).

	Acer Nitro 16 AN16-41-R7YE AMD Ryzen 5 7535HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU	Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617XS AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS, AMD Radeon RX 7600S	SCHENKER XMG Focus 15 (E23) Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU	Gigabyte G7 KE Intel Core i5-12500H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU	Asus TUF A15 FA507 AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU	Medion Erazer Scout E20 Intel Core i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU	Acer Nitro 16 AN16-41 AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
Heat		10%	9%	8%	17%	19%	9%
Maximum Upper Side *	51	53 -4%	51 -0%	52 -2%	48.9 4%	41 20%	41.5 19%
Maximum Bottom *	63	48 24%	53 16%	54 14%	44.6 29%	39 38%	51.8 18%
Idle Upper Side *	34	30 12%	29 15%	28 18%	27.1 20%	31 9%	31.6 7%
Idle Bottom *	32	30 6%	30 6%	32 -0%	27.5 14%	29 9%	34.5 -8%

* ... smaller is better

Teste de estresse

O teste de estresse (Prime95 e Furmark em operação contínua) é um cenário extremo para testar a estabilidade do sistema sob carga total. A CPU inicia o teste de estresse com taxas de clock de 4,1 a 4,2 GHz, o núcleo gráfico é executado a 2,3 a 2,4 GHz. As taxas caem para 2,6 GHz (processador) e 2,2 GHz (núcleo gráfico) no decorrer do teste.

Alto-falante

Os alto-falantes estéreo produzem um som decente, em grande parte sem graves. Uma experiência sonora melhor pode ser obtida com fones de ouvido ou alto-falantes externos.

Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)

Acer Nitro 16 AN16-41-R7YE audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (82 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 28.2% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (12.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2.2% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (3.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3.5% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (17.3% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 45% of all tested devices in this class were better, 12% similar, 43% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 18%, worst was 132%
Compared to all devices tested
» 29% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 63% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617XS audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (79 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 11.6% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (7% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 5.7% higher than median
(+) | mids are linear (3.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2.6% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (6.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (15.4% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 32% of all tested devices in this class were better, 7% similar, 61% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 18%, worst was 132%
Compared to all devices tested
» 20% of all tested devices were better, 4% similar, 76% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Gerenciamento de energia: O Nitro 16 pode atingir tempos de execução muito bons

Consumo de energia

O consumo de energia está em um nível normal para o hardware instalado. O modo dGPU é responsável pelo consumo ocioso mais alto em comparação com o modelo irmão. O teste de estresse e o teste Witcher 3 são executados com consumo de energia constante. A fonte de alimentação fornecida (230 W) pode alimentar totalmente o laptop sob carga.

Consumo de energia

desligado	0.5 / Watt
Ocioso	19 / 20 / 23 Watt
Carga	80 / 184 Watt


Key: min: , med: , max: Metrahit Energy

	Acer Nitro 16 AN16-41-R7YE R5 7535HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU	Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617XS R9 7940HS, Radeon RX 7600S	SCHENKER XMG Focus 15 (E23) i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU	Gigabyte G7 KE i5-12500H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU	Asus TUF A15 FA507 R7 7735HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU	Medion Erazer Scout E20 i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU	Acer Nitro 16 AN16-41 R7 7735HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	Average of class Gaming
Power Consumption		20%	-32%	-10%	23%	13%	-7%	-10%
Idle Minimum *	19	7 63%	11.4 40%	15 21%	8 58%	5 74%	11.6 39%	13.5 ?(2 - 39, n=156, last 2 years) 29%
Idle Average *	20	10 50%	16.7 16%	17 15%	12.1 39%	11 45%	15.6 22%	18.9 ?(8 - 55.6, n=156, last 2 years) 5%
Idle Maximum *	23	15 35%	25.8 -12%	24 -4%	12.5 46%	22 4%	16.5 28%	26.8 ?(9 - 101.1, n=156, last 2 years) -17%
Load Average *	80	86 -8%	139 -74%	111 -39%	74.9 6%	96 -20%	155 -94%	106.7 ?(32.1 - 201, n=154, last 2 years) -33%
Witcher 3 ultra *	125.8	160.6 -28%	265 -111%	174.1 -38%	136.6 -9%	145.2 -15%	154.8 -23%
Load Maximum *	184	172 7%	280 -52%	208 -13%	185 -1%	201 -9%	205 -11%	249 ?(55.3 - 418, n=156, last 2 years) -35%

* ... smaller is better

Power consumption: The Witcher 3 / Stress test

Acer Nitro 16 AN16-41-R7YE; Witcher 3 ultra: Ø125.8 (122.5-130.1)

Acer Nitro 16 AN16-41-R7YE; 1280x720 Prime95 28.10 and Furmark 1.25: Ø148.3 (146.6-151.8)

Acer Nitro 16 AN16-41-R7YE; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø20.1 (18.7-23)

Power consumption: External monitor

Acer Nitro 16 AN16-41-R7YE; Prime95 V2810 Stress (external Monitor): Ø60.4 (57.4-64.1)

Acer Nitro 16 AN16-41-R7YE; Cinebench R23 Multi (external Monitor): Ø103 (100.6-116.5)

Acer Nitro 16 AN16-41-R7YE; 1280x720 FurMark 1.19 GPU Stress Test (external Monitor): Ø136.8 (123.5-142.4)

Acer Nitro 16 AN16-41-R7YE; 1920x1080 The Witcher 3 ultra (external Monitor): Ø135 (128.8-144.2)

Acer Nitro 16 AN16-41-R7YE; Idle 1min (external Monitor): Ø18.2 (9.17-27)

Duração da bateria

O Nitro 16 atinge tempos de execução de 11:00 h e 10:50 h no teste de WLAN (acessando sites por meio de um script) e no teste de vídeo (filme curto Big Buck Bunny FHD H.264 codificado em um loop), respectivamente. Durante ambos os testes, os recursos de economia de energia do notebook são desativados e o brilho da tela é definido para cerca de 150 cd/m². Os módulos sem fio também são desativados para o teste de vídeo.

Observação: O Nitro mostra um aumento no consumo de energia no modo de bateria no Windows 11 (instalação da Acer, instalação própria). Consequentemente, os tempos de execução ficam atrás das taxas do modelo irmão Análise do Acer Nitro 16 AN16-41: Um laptop para jogos RTX 4070 com boa duração da bateria (WLAN: 5,5 vs. 9 h) com as mesmas capacidades de bateria. Portanto, os tempos de execução foram determinados no Windows 10. O problema não ocorre aqui.

Não podemos apontar um motivo para o aumento do consumo de energia. Pode ser um problema do nosso dispositivo de teste.

Tempo de Execução da Bateria

Ocioso (sem WLAN, min brilho)		12h 01min
WiFi Websurfing (Edge 115)		11h 00min
Big Buck Bunny H.264 1080p		10h 50min
Carga (máximo brilho)		2h 14min

	Acer Nitro 16 AN16-41-R7YE R5 7535HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, 90 Wh	Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617XS R9 7940HS, Radeon RX 7600S, 90 Wh	SCHENKER XMG Focus 15 (E23) i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, 73 Wh	Gigabyte G7 KE i5-12500H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, 54 Wh	Asus TUF A15 FA507 R7 7735HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, 90 Wh	Medion Erazer Scout E20 i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, 53.35 Wh	Acer Nitro 16 AN16-41 R7 7735HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, 90 Wh	Average of class Gaming
Battery Runtime		9%	-45%	-54%	-12%	-48%	-11%	-35%
Reader / Idle	721	1217 69%		425 -41%		399 -45%	729 1%	565 ?(155 - 1290, n=69, last 2 years) -22%
H.264	650	746 15%		132 -80%	747 15%	277 -57%	614 -6%	408 ?(129 - 837, n=80, last 2 years) -37%
WiFi v1.3	660	745 13%	355 -46%	317 -52%	701 6%	284 -57%	540 -18%	375 ?(85 - 889, n=156, last 2 years) -43%
Load	134	52 -61%	77 -43%	76 -43%	59 -56%	89 -34%	105 -22%	85.4 ?(41 - 173, n=120, last 2 years) -36%

Pro

+ Tela WUXGA brilhante no formato 16:10

+ painel de 165 Hz com suporte a G-Sync

+ dois slots PCIe 4 (M.2-2280)

+ teclado iluminado (RGB)

+ A memória de trabalho pode ser expandida

+ Pasta térmica de metal líquido

+ USB 4

+ Fornecimento de energia

+ bateria com duração muito boa

Contra

- pode ficar barulhento sob carga

- aquecimento significativo sob carga

- limitação térmica do SSD

- pouco espaço de armazenamento

Veredicto: Entrada econômica no mundo dos jogos

Acer Nitro 16 AN16-41-R7YE. Unidade de análise fornecida pela Nvidia.

O Acer Nitro 16 foi projetado para jogos em FHD com configurações altas ou máximas, mas também é bom em outras áreas (edição de vídeo, renderização). O processadorRyzen 5 7535HS e GeForce RTX 4050oferece o desempenho necessário, e a CPU e a GPU podem trabalhar com taxas de clock constantemente altas.

A Acer apresenta um laptop para jogos completo no segmento de nível básico com o Nitro 16.

Surpreendentemente, o laptop esquenta mais sob carga do que seu modelo irmão equipado com hardware mais potente. Os modelos Nitro não têm muito em comum em termos de desenvolvimento de ruído. O modo "Equilibrado" proporciona um ruído de fundo moderado.

A tela de 16 polegadas (WUXGA) não é muito inferior ao painel (WQXGA) do modelo irmão. O último oferece um brilho máximo maior (400 nits vs. 500 nits). Os já bons tempos de execução do Ryzen 7 Nitro são superados pelo modelo atual, mesmo que apenas no Windows 10. A capacidade de armazenamento (512 GB) é escassa para um notebook para jogos.

Uma alternativa pode ser encontrada no Asus TUF A15 FA507. Ele oferece mais desempenho da CPU com tempos de execução da bateria ligeiramente melhores. O Gigabyte G7 KE seria a alternativa econômica em que um nível de desempenho mais baixo seria compensado por um preço de compra mais baixo (€1.050). No entanto, o sistema operacional Windows não está incluído no escopo da entrega.

Preço e disponibilidade

Nos EUA, os usuários podem encomendar algumas variantes do Acer Nitro 16 AN16-41 na Amazon, que têm configurações mais poderosas do que a que analisamos.

Acer Nitro 16 AN16-41-R7YE - 08/01/2023 v7 ^(old)
Sascha Mölck

Acabamento

74 / 98 → 76%

Teclado

79%

Mouse

83%

Conectividade

69 / 80 → 86%

Peso

59 / 10-66 → 88%

Bateria

88 / 95 → 93%

Pantalha

87%

Desempenho do jogos

98%

Desempenho da aplicação

95%

Temperatura

75 / 95 → 79%

Ruído

82 / 90 → 92%

Audio

81%

Camera

45 / 85 → 52%

Médio

78%

87%

Gaming - Médio equilibrado

Price comparison

Editor of the original article: Ninh Ngoc Duy - Editorial Assistant - 460014 articles published on Notebookcheck since 2008

contact me via: Facebook

Please share our article, every link counts!

> Análises e revisões de portáteis e celulares > Análises > Análises > Análise do Acer Nitro 16 AN16-41: Laptop para jogos acessível com RTX 4050 e longos tempos de execução

Sascha Mölck, 2023-08-13 (Update: 2023-08-13)

Análise do Acer Nitro 16 AN16-41: Laptop para jogos acessível com RTX 4050 e longos tempos de execução

Duradouro.

Possíveis concorrentes em comparação

Comparação de tamanho

Tela - painel 16:10 com cobertura sRGB

Display Response Times

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

Desempenho: Acer se concentra em Rembrandt e Ada Lovelace

Condições de teste

Processador

Cinebench R15 multi-core loop

Desempenho do sistema

Latência DPC

Armazenamento em massa

Drive throttling: DiskSpd Read Loop, Queue Depth 8

Placa de vídeo

Desempenho em jogos

The Witcher 3 FPS Chart

Emissões: O Acer Nitro 16 aquece significativamente

Emissões de ruído

Temperatura

Teste de estresse

Alto-falante

Acer Nitro 16 AN16-41-R7YE audio analysis

Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617XS audio analysis

Gerenciamento de energia: O Nitro 16 pode atingir tempos de execução muito bons

Consumo de energia

Power consumption: The Witcher 3 / Stress test

Power consumption: External monitor

Duração da bateria

Pro

Contra

Veredicto: Entrada econômica no mundo dos jogos

Preço e disponibilidade

More articles related to this device

Transparency

Price comparison