Análise do Asus TUF Gaming A16 Advantage Edition FA617XS: O laptop AMD com autonomia de até 20 horas

Name: Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617XS
Brand: Asus

Corredor de longa distância.

A Asus escolheu o hardware da AMD - um Ryzen 9 7940HS e Radeon RX 7600S - para alimentar o laptop para jogos. Uma tela de 16 polegadas 16:10 de reação rápida (WUXGA, 165 Hz, FreeSync) e excelentes tempos de execução completam a configuração.

Sascha Mölck, 👁 Florian Glaser (traduzido por DeepL / Ninh Duy), Published 06/08/2023 🇺🇸 🇩🇪 ...

AMD Gaming Laptop / Notebook Radeon Ryzen (Zen) Windows Zen 4

O Asus TUF Gaming A16 Advantage Edition - um laptop para jogos de médio porte - conta com o hardware da AMD: ARyzen-9-7940HSe aRadeon-RX-7600Salimentam o dispositivo. Os concorrentes incluem oLenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX8, oMSI Katana 15 B12VEK, oMedion Erazer Defender P40e o Gigabyte G5 KE.

Para obter informações mais detalhadas sobre o gabinete, a conectividade e os dispositivos de entrada do laptop, dê uma olhada em nossa análise do modelo irmão do A16, de construção idêntica, Asus TUF Gaming A16 Advantage Edition em revisão: Caderno AMD sob os auspícios da 7 .

Test device courtesy of Asus Deutschland

Download your licensed rating image as PNG / SVG

Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617XS (TUF Gaming A16 Serie)

Processador

AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS 8 x 4 - 5.2 GHz, 114 W PL2 / Short Burst, 105 W PL1 / Sustained, Phoenix-HS (Zen 4)

Placa gráfica

AMD Radeon RX 7600S - 8 GB VRAM, Análises do: 2207 MHz, Memoría: 2000 MHz, 95 W TDP, GDDR6, 31.0.14003.25002, MUX Switch, AMD Smart Access Graphic

Memória

16 GB

, DDR5-4800, Dual-Channel-Mode, two memory slots (both in use)

Pantalha

16.00 polegadas 16:10, 1920 x 1200 pixel 142 PPI, BOE NE160WUM-NX2, IPS, FreeSync, Brilhante: não, 165 Hz

placa mãe

AMD Promontory/Bixby FCH

Disco rígido

Micron 2400 MTFDKBA512QFM, 512 GB

, PCIe 4, M.2-2280, 400 GB livre

Placa de Som

Realtek ALC256

Conexões

2 USB 3.1 Gen2, 1 USB 3.2 Gen 2x2 20Gbps, 1 USB 4.0 40 Gbps, USB-C Power Delivery (PD), 1 HDMI, 2 DisplayPort, 1 Kensington Lock, Conexões Audio: Headset combined port, TPM 2.0

Funcionamento em rede

Realtek RTL8168/8111 Gigabit-LAN (10/100/1000MBit/s), Realtek RTL8852BE (b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/ax = Wi-Fi 6/), Bluetooth 5.3

Tamanho

altura x largura x profundidade (em mm): 22.1 x 355 x 252

Bateria

90 Wh, 5845 mAh Lítio-Polímero

Charging

fast charging / Quickcharge

Sistema Operativo

Microsoft Windows 11 Home

Camera

Webcam: HD
Primary Camera: 0.9 MPix

Características adicionais

Alto falantes: Stereo, Teclado: Chiclet, Iluminação do Teclado: sim, McAfee LiveSafe (Trial), Microsoft 365 (Trial), Microsoft OneNote (Trial), 24 Meses Garantia

peso

2.184 kg, Suprimento de energia: 548 g

Preço

1699 Euro

Links

Asus página inicial
Asus Seção de notebook

Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

see all specifications

Possíveis concorrentes em comparação

Rating	Date	Model	Weight	Height	Size	Resolution
86.9 % v7 ^(old)	06/2023	Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617XS R9 7940HS, Radeon RX 7600S	2.2 kg	22.1 mm	16.00"	1920x1200
87.9 % v7 ^(old)	05/2023	Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX8 i7-13700HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU	2.5 kg	26.8 mm	16.00"	2560x1600
82.9 % v7 ^(old)	03/2023	MSI Katana 15 B12VEK i7-12650H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU	2.3 kg	24.9 mm	15.60"	1920x1080
84.6 % v7 ^(old)	05/2023	Medion Erazer Defender P40 i7-13700HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU	2.9 kg	33 mm	17.30"	2560x1440
81.8 % v7 ^(old)	04/2023	Gigabyte G5 KE i5-12500H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU	2 kg	23.9 mm	15.60"	1920x1080

Estojo e conectividade - pequenas alterações em comparação com seu modelo irmão

Em comparação com seu modelo irmãoconhecido gabinete preto, o A16 tem um gabinete de dois tons. A parte traseira da tampa e a parte inferior do gabinete são de cor arenosa ("Sandstorm"). As opções de conectividade também são um pouco diferentes: Uma das duas portas USB-C foi atualizada para o padrão USB-4.

Comparação de tamanho

Medion Erazer Defender P40 Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX8 MSI Katana 15 B12VEK Gigabyte G5 KE Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617XS DIN A4 ❌

lado esquerdo: conexão de energia, Gigabit Ethernet, HDMI, USB 4 (USB-C; DisplayPort), USB 3.2 Gen 2 (USB-C; DisplayPort, Power Delivery), USB 3.2 Gen 1 (USB-A), combinação de áudio

Networking
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
Gigabyte G5 KE Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201	1622 (823^min - 1820^max) MBit/s +109%
MSI Katana 15 B12VEK Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201	1529 (623^min - 1608^max) MBit/s +97%
Medion Erazer Defender P40 Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211	1445 (1373^min - 1515^max) MBit/s +86%
Average of class Gaming (469 - 1843, n=151, last 2 years)	1235 MBit/s +59%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617 MediaTek MT7921	908 (806^min - 973^max) MBit/s +17%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX8 Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211	802 (579^min - 1120^max) MBit/s +3%
Average Realtek RTL8852BE (536 - 925, n=42)	792 MBit/s +2%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617XS Realtek RTL8852BE	776 (392^min - 802^max) MBit/s
iperf3 receive AXE11000
Medion Erazer Defender P40 Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211	1734 (1706^min - 1750^max) MBit/s +92%
Gigabyte G5 KE Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201	1686 (1451^min - 1716^max) MBit/s +86%
MSI Katana 15 B12VEK Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201	1666 (840^min - 1685^max) MBit/s +84%
Average of class Gaming (680 - 1890, n=151, last 2 years)	1383 MBit/s +53%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX8 Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211	1223 (1136^min - 1272^max) MBit/s +35%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617XS Realtek RTL8852BE	905 (765^min - 969^max) MBit/s
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617 MediaTek MT7921	899 (755^min - 936^max) MBit/s -1%
Average Realtek RTL8852BE (455 - 984, n=43)	847 MBit/s -6%

Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617XS Realtek RTL8852BE; iperf3 transmit AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø763 (392-802)

Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX8 Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211; iperf3 transmit AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø802 (579-1120)

MSI Katana 15 B12VEK Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201; iperf3 transmit AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1509 (623-1608)

Medion Erazer Defender P40 Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211; iperf3 transmit AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1445 (1373-1515)

Gigabyte G5 KE Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201; iperf3 transmit AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1595 (823-1820)

Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617 MediaTek MT7921; iperf3 transmit AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø908 (806-973)

Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617XS Realtek RTL8852BE; iperf3 receive AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø905 (765-969)

Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX8 Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211; iperf3 receive AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1223 (1136-1272)

MSI Katana 15 B12VEK Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201; iperf3 receive AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1637 (840-1685)

Medion Erazer Defender P40 Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211; iperf3 receive AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1733 (1706-1750)

Gigabyte G5 KE Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201; iperf3 receive AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1685 (1451-1716)

Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617 MediaTek MT7921; iperf3 receive AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø898 (755-936)

ColorChecker Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617XS: 15.99 ∆E min: 2.33 - max: 24.28 ∆E

Tela - painel 16:10 com cobertura sRGB

O A16 é equipado com o mesmo painel de 165 Hz que pode ser encontrado em seu modelo irmão. Sua tela fosca de 16 polegadas (1.920 x 1.200 pixels, IPS) tem formato 16:10 e ganha pontos graças ao suporte ao FreeSync, à ausência de oscilação de PWM e às rápidas velocidades de reação. Embora seu contraste seja aceitável, seu brilho poderia ser um pouco melhor.


292 cd/m²	291 cd/m²	290 cd/m²
298 cd/m²	301 cd/m²	303 cd/m²
284 cd/m²	284 cd/m²	299 cd/m²

Distribuição do brilho

BOE NE160WUM-NX2 tested with X-Rite i1Pro 2

Máximo: 303 cd/m² (Nits) Médio: 293.6 cd/m² Minimum: 13 cd/m²
iluminação: 94 %
iluminação com acumulador: 301 cd/m²
Contraste: 1433:1 (Preto: 0.21 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 1.79 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.92, calibrated: 1.2
ΔE Greyscale 2.5 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
70.7% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
97.3% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
69.3% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.265

Download Arquivo ICC (X-Rite i1Pro 2)

	Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617XS BOE NE160WUM-NX2, IPS, 1920x1200, 16"	Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX8 AU Optronics B160QAN03.1, IPS, 2560x1600, 16"	MSI Katana 15 B12VEK AUOAF90 (B156HAN08.4), IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6"	Medion Erazer Defender P40 BOE CQ NE173QHM-NZ3, IPS, 2560x1440, 17.3"	Gigabyte G5 KE Chi Mei N156HRA-EA1, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6"	Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617 NE160WUM-NX2 (BOE0B33), IPS-Level, 1920x1200, 16"
Display		3%	-44%	-0%	-39%	0%
Display P3 Coverage	69.3	71.2 3%	38.1 -45%	68.3 -1%	40.7 -41%	69.4 0%
sRGB Coverage	97.3	98.8 2%	56.8 -42%	98.1 1%	61 -37%	97.8 1%
AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage	70.7	73.3 4%	39.3 -44%	69.8 -1%	42.1 -40%	70.9 0%
Response Times		2%	-159%	10%	-79%	-5%
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% *	15.6 ?(7.3, 8.3)	14.5 ?(7, 7.5) 7%	38.8 ?(18.6, 20.2) -149%	14.6 ?(7.1, 7.5) 6%	26.64 ?(12.52, 14.12) -71%	17 ?(8, 9) -9%
Response Time Black / White *	10 ?(5.7, 4.3)	10.4 ?(5.7, 4.7) -4%	26.8 ?(14.2, 12.6) -168%	8.7 ?(3.6, 5.1) 13%	18.65 ?(10.83, 7.82) -87%	10.1 ?(5.4, 4.7) -1%
PWM Frequency
Screen		5%	-115%	7%	-113%	4%
Brightness middle	301	405.7 35%	261 -13%	364 21%	269 -11%	308 2%
Brightness	294	368 25%	258 -12%	343 17%	248 -16%	293 0%
Brightness Distribution	94	87 -7%	92 -2%	86 -9%	85 -10%	90 -4%
Black Level *	0.21	0.38 -81%	0.19 10%	0.28 -33%	0.5 -138%	0.23 -10%
Contrast	1433	1068 -25%	1374 -4%	1300 -9%	538 -62%	1339 -7%
Colorchecker dE 2000 *	1.79	1.65 8%	5.57 -211%	1.67 7%	4.54 -154%	1.47 18%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *	3.48	4.2 -21%	20.6 -492%	2.78 20%	17.28 -397%	2.98 14%
Colorchecker dE 2000 calibrated *	1.2	0.53 56%	4.63 -286%	1.14 5%	3.34 -178%	1.02 15%
Greyscale dE 2000 *	2.5	1.2 52%	3.19 -28%	1.4 44%	3.8 -52%	2.2 12%
Gamma	2.265 ^97%	2.3 ^96%	2.45 ^90%	2.091 ^105%	2.17 ^101%	2.228 ^99%
CCT	6157 ^106%	6453 ^101%	6146 ^106%	6568 ^99%	7408 ^88%	6228 ^104%
Total Average (Program / Settings)		3% / 4%	-106% / -106%	6% / 6%	-77% / -92%	-0% / 2%

* ... smaller is better

Em trabalhos ex, a tela apresenta boa representação de cores: Um desvio de cerca de 1,8 é aceitável (DeltaE < 3). A calibração reduz essa taxa para 1,2 e resulta em tons de cinza mais equilibrados. O painel pode representar todo o espaço de cores sRGB, mas não os espaços AdobeRGB e DCI P3. Isso é semelhante à maioria dos monitores de seus concorrentes.

Display Response Times

ℹ

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.

↔ Response Time Black to White
10 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↗ 5.7 ms rise
10 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↘ 4.3 ms fall
The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 23 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (21 ms).
↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
15.6 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↗ 7.3 ms rise
15.6 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↘ 8.3 ms fall
The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 26 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (32.9 ms).

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

ℹ

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.

Screen flickering / PWM not detected

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8746 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured.

O painel IPS estável com ângulo de visão do laptop permanece legível de todos os ângulos. É possível visualizar o painel do lado de fora, desde que o sol não esteja brilhando muito forte.

Desempenho - A Asus utiliza a potência da AMD

O Asus TUF Gaming A16 Advantage Edition FA617XS é um laptop para jogos de médio porte. O hardware AMD oferece a potência de computação necessária. O modelo atual pode ser adquirido por cerca de US$ 1.700.

Condições de teste

Você pode alternar entre os três perfis de desempenho específicos do fabricante (consulte a tabela) por meio da combinação de teclas "Fn" + "F5". Foram usados os perfis "Performance" (benchmarks) e "Quiet" (testes de bateria). O modo GPU foi definido como "Standard" (= comutação de gráficos). O centro de controle do notebook ("Armoury Crate") permite a criação de perfis individuais ("Manual"), que inclui a configuração do PPT e das curvas da ventoinha.

	Turbo	Desempenho	Silencioso
Limite de potência 1 (HWInfo)	120 watts	105 watts	75 watts
Limite de potência 2 (HWInfo)	144 watts	114 watts	90 watts
Ruído (Wichter 3)	53 dB(A)	51 dB(A)	46 dB(A)
Desempenho (Witcher 3)	~100 fps	~100 fps	~94 fps

Processador

A parte da CPU doRyzen-9-7940HS-APU (Phoenix, Zen 4) apresenta oito núcleos de processamento com 16 threads. A taxa de clock base de 4 GHz pode ser aumentada para até 5,25 GHz (um núcleo). Nossos resultados de benchmark medidos são praticamente os mesmos dos laptops 7940HS testados anteriormente. O uso do perfil "Turbo" leva a um desempenho um pouco melhor (4 a 5%).

O modelo irmão do Asus TUF Gaming A16 Advantage Edition em revisão: Caderno AMD sob os auspícios da 7 Ryzen-7-7735HS-APU (Rembrandt R, Zen 3+) é claramente superado pelo Ryzen 9, mesmo com o mesmo número de núcleos e os mesmos limites de potência. Graças à sua melhor arquitetura e taxas de clock mais altas, seu desempenho por watt é maior.

O teste de loop CB15 mostra isso: A carga contínua de vários threads leva a CPU a trabalhar com taxas de clock turbo consistentemente altas, independentemente do perfil de desempenho escolhido.

Observação: informações detalhadas sobre a APU instalada e sua arquitetura podem ser lidas em nosso artigo de análiseZen4.

multi-thread (conectado à rede elétrica)

single-thread (conectado à rede elétrica)

Cinebench R15 multi continuous test

Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617XS AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS: Ø2646 (2596.9-2666.67)

Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX8 Intel Core i7-13700HX: Ø3057 (3008.42-3230.23)

MSI Katana 15 B12VEK Intel Core i7-12650H: Ø1968 (1876.44-2253.14)

Medion Erazer Defender P40 Intel Core i7-13700HX: Ø2369 (2270.92-3189.19)

Gigabyte G5 KE Intel Core i5-12500H: Ø2063 (1956.47-2112.49)

Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617 AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS: Ø2250 (2235.89-2298.72)

CPU Performance Rating - Percent
Average of class Gaming	78.1 pt
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX8 Intel Core i7-13700HX	74.9 pt
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617XS AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS	71.6 pt
Average AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS	70.9 pt
Medion Erazer Defender P40 Intel Core i7-13700HX	68.8 pt
MSI Katana 15 B12VEK Intel Core i7-12650H	58.9 pt
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617 AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS	56.5 pt
Gigabyte G5 KE Intel Core i5-12500H	54.6 pt

Cinebench R23
Multi Core
Average of class Gaming (5668 - 36249, n=193, last 2 years)	21651 Points +28%
Medion Erazer Defender P40 Intel Core i7-13700HX	20341 Points +20%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX8 Intel Core i7-13700HX	19987 (10270.1^min - 19987.3^max) Points +18%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617XS AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS	16907 Points
Average AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS (15556 - 18131, n=10)	16867 Points 0%
MSI Katana 15 B12VEK Intel Core i7-12650H	15537 Points -8%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617 AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS	13995 Points -17%
Gigabyte G5 KE Intel Core i5-12500H	13155 Points -22%
Single Core
Average of class Gaming (1088 - 2235, n=191, last 2 years)	1877 Points +5%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617XS AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS	1791 Points
Average AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS (1733 - 1832, n=10)	1788 Points 0%
MSI Katana 15 B12VEK Intel Core i7-12650H	1697 Points -5%
Medion Erazer Defender P40 Intel Core i7-13700HX	1668 Points -7%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX8 Intel Core i7-13700HX	1666 Points -7%
Gigabyte G5 KE Intel Core i5-12500H	1629 Points -9%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617 AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS	1561 Points -13%

Cinebench R20
CPU (Multi Core)
Average of class Gaming (2179 - 13832, n=191, last 2 years)	8240 Points +25%
Medion Erazer Defender P40 Intel Core i7-13700HX	7710 Points +17%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX8 Intel Core i7-13700HX	6889 Points +5%
Average AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS (6277 - 7111, n=10)	6604 Points +1%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617XS AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS	6571 Points
MSI Katana 15 B12VEK Intel Core i7-12650H	6009 Points -9%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617 AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS	5441 Points -17%
Gigabyte G5 KE Intel Core i5-12500H	5066 Points -23%
CPU (Single Core)
Average of class Gaming (427 - 856, n=191, last 2 years)	722 Points +3%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617XS AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS	702 Points
Average AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS (680 - 714, n=10)	701 Points 0%
MSI Katana 15 B12VEK Intel Core i7-12650H	652 Points -7%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX8 Intel Core i7-13700HX	652 Points -7%
Medion Erazer Defender P40 Intel Core i7-13700HX	644 Points -8%
Gigabyte G5 KE Intel Core i5-12500H	627 Points -11%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617 AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS	612 Points -13%

Cinebench R15
CPU Multi 64Bit
Average of class Gaming (905 - 5663, n=198, last 2 years)	3394 Points +27%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX8 Intel Core i7-13700HX	3230 (3008.42^min - 3230.23^max) Points +21%
Medion Erazer Defender P40 Intel Core i7-13700HX	3189 Points +20%
Average AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS (2470 - 2848, n=10)	2673 Points 0%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617XS AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS	2666.7 Points
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617 AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS	2299 (2235.89^min - 2298.72^max) Points -14%
MSI Katana 15 B12VEK Intel Core i7-12650H	2253 (1876.44^min - 2253.14^max) Points -16%
Gigabyte G5 KE Intel Core i5-12500H	2112 (1956.47^min - 2112.49^max) Points -21%
CPU Single 64Bit
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617XS AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS	283 Points
Average AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS (277 - 288, n=10)	283 Points 0%
Average of class Gaming (176.6 - 318, n=195, last 2 years)	276 Points -2%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX8 Intel Core i7-13700HX	265 Points -6%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617 AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS	248 Points -12%
MSI Katana 15 B12VEK Intel Core i7-12650H	247 Points -13%
Gigabyte G5 KE Intel Core i5-12500H	245 Points -13%
Medion Erazer Defender P40 Intel Core i7-13700HX	243 Points -14%

Blender
v2.79 BMW27 CPU
MSI Katana 15 B12VEK Intel Core i7-12650H	234 Seconds * -24%
Gigabyte G5 KE Intel Core i5-12500H	230 Seconds * -22%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617 AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS	225 Seconds * -19%
Medion Erazer Defender P40 Intel Core i7-13700HX	198 Seconds * -5%
Average AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS (182 - 202, n=9)	191.1 Seconds * -1%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617XS AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS	189 Seconds *
Average of class Gaming (87 - 555, n=186, last 2 years)	172.1 Seconds * +9%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX8 Intel Core i7-13700HX	151 Seconds * +20%
v3.3 Classroom CPU
MSI Katana 15 B12VEK Intel Core i7-12650H (3.3.3)	441 Seconds * -47%
Gigabyte G5 KE Intel Core i5-12500H (3.3.2)	423 Seconds * -41%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617 AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS (3.3.3)	376 Seconds * -25%
Medion Erazer Defender P40 Intel Core i7-13700HX (3.3.3)	345 Seconds * -15%
Average AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS (287 - 331, n=10)	308 Seconds * -2%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617XS AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS (3.3.3)	301 Seconds *
Average of class Gaming (138 - 962, n=191, last 2 years)	297 Seconds * +1%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX8 Intel Core i7-13700HX (3.3.3)	264 Seconds * +12%

7-Zip 18.03
7z b 4
Average of class Gaming (23795 - 140932, n=190, last 2 years)	84653 MIPS +21%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX8 Intel Core i7-13700HX	78076 MIPS +11%
Medion Erazer Defender P40 Intel Core i7-13700HX	72220 MIPS +3%
Average AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS (66408 - 73434, n=10)	70912 MIPS +1%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617XS AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS	70081 MIPS
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617 AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS	61292 MIPS -13%
MSI Katana 15 B12VEK Intel Core i7-12650H	59034 MIPS -16%
Gigabyte G5 KE Intel Core i5-12500H	54380 MIPS -22%
7z b 4 -mmt1
Average AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS (6417 - 6776, n=10)	6645 MIPS 0%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617XS AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS	6621 MIPS
Average of class Gaming (4168 - 7581, n=190, last 2 years)	6281 MIPS -5%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617 AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS	5779 MIPS -13%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX8 Intel Core i7-13700HX	5718 MIPS -14%
Medion Erazer Defender P40 Intel Core i7-13700HX	5552 MIPS -16%
MSI Katana 15 B12VEK Intel Core i7-12650H	5537 MIPS -16%
Gigabyte G5 KE Intel Core i5-12500H	5383 MIPS -19%

Geekbench 5.5
Multi-Core
Average of class Gaming (4557 - 23194, n=191, last 2 years)	14891 Points +23%
Medion Erazer Defender P40 Intel Core i7-13700HX	14222 Points +17%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX8 Intel Core i7-13700HX	14144 Points +17%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617XS AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS	12111 Points
Average AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS (11207 - 12500, n=11)	11902 Points -2%
MSI Katana 15 B12VEK Intel Core i7-12650H	11198 Points -8%
Gigabyte G5 KE Intel Core i5-12500H	10260 Points -15%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617 AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS	9836 Points -19%
Single-Core
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617XS AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS	2032 Points
Average AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS (1823 - 2032, n=11)	1983 Points -2%
Average of class Gaming (986 - 2210, n=191, last 2 years)	1882 Points -7%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX8 Intel Core i7-13700HX	1777 Points -13%
MSI Katana 15 B12VEK Intel Core i7-12650H	1667 Points -18%
Medion Erazer Defender P40 Intel Core i7-13700HX	1666 Points -18%
Gigabyte G5 KE Intel Core i5-12500H	1647 Points -19%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617 AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS	1574 Points -23%

HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 - 4k Preset
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX8 Intel Core i7-13700HX	24.2 fps +16%
Average of class Gaming (6.72 - 38.9, n=190, last 2 years)	23.3 fps +12%
Average AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS (20.1 - 22.6, n=9)	21.1 fps +1%
Medion Erazer Defender P40 Intel Core i7-13700HX	20.8 fps 0%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617XS AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS	20.8 fps
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617 AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS	17.5 fps -16%
MSI Katana 15 B12VEK Intel Core i7-12650H	17.4 fps -16%
Gigabyte G5 KE Intel Core i5-12500H	16.6 fps -20%

LibreOffice - 20 Documents To PDF
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617 AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS	59.1 s * -42%
Gigabyte G5 KE Intel Core i5-12500H	57.7 s * -38%
Medion Erazer Defender P40 Intel Core i7-13700HX	49.8 s * -19%
Average of class Gaming (31.4 - 96.6, n=187, last 2 years)	47.6 s * -14%
MSI Katana 15 B12VEK Intel Core i7-12650H	47 s * -13%
Average AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS (36.9 - 54.8, n=10)	45.4 s * -9%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617XS AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS	41.7 s *
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX8 Intel Core i7-13700HX	36.5 s * +12%

R Benchmark 2.5 - Overall mean
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617 AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS	0.5 sec * -18%
Medion Erazer Defender P40 Intel Core i7-13700HX	0.493 sec * -16%
MSI Katana 15 B12VEK Intel Core i7-12650H	0.4904 sec * -15%
Gigabyte G5 KE Intel Core i5-12500H	0.4865 sec * -14%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX8 Intel Core i7-13700HX	0.4769 sec * -12%
Average of class Gaming (0.3609 - 0.759, n=191, last 2 years)	0.4402 sec * -4%
Average AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS (0.4159 - 0.4467, n=10)	0.4297 sec * -1%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617XS AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS	0.4253 sec *

* ... smaller is better

Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64Bit

2666.7 Points

Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64Bit

188.6 fps

Cinebench R15 Ref. Match 64Bit

97.9 %

Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64Bit

283 Points

Cinebench R20 CPU (Multi Core)

6571 Points

Cinebench R20 CPU (Single Core)

702 Points

Cinebench R23 Multi Core

16907 Points

Cinebench R23 Single Core

1791 Points

Ajuda

... comparado com

Performance Rating
Average AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS	94.6 pt
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617XS AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS, Radeon RX 7600S	91.7 pt
Average of class Gaming	88.9 pt
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX8 Intel Core i7-13700HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU	84.6 pt
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617 AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS, Radeon RX 7600S	71.2 pt
Medion Erazer Defender P40 Intel Core i7-13700HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU	68.2 pt
MSI Katana 15 B12VEK Intel Core i7-12650H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU	63.7 pt
Gigabyte G5 KE Intel Core i5-12500H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU	60.1 pt

AIDA64 / FP32 Ray-Trace
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617XS AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS, Radeon RX 7600S (v6.75.6100)	28033 KRay/s
Average AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS (25226 - 29109, n=8)	27015 KRay/s -4%
Average of class Gaming (4986 - 60169, n=187, last 2 years)	21640 KRay/s -23%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX8 Intel Core i7-13700HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU (v6.85.6300)	20413 KRay/s -27%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617 AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS, Radeon RX 7600S (v6.85.6300)	16661 KRay/s -41%
MSI Katana 15 B12VEK Intel Core i7-12650H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU (v6.85.6300)	15620 KRay/s -44%
Medion Erazer Defender P40 Intel Core i7-13700HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU (v6.75.6100)	15397 KRay/s -45%
Gigabyte G5 KE Intel Core i5-12500H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU (v6.75.6100)	12542 KRay/s -55%

AIDA64 / FPU Julia
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617XS AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS, Radeon RX 7600S (v6.75.6100)	122098 Points
Average AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS (106512 - 123214, n=8)	115513 Points -5%
Average of class Gaming (25360 - 252486, n=187, last 2 years)	106090 Points -13%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX8 Intel Core i7-13700HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU (v6.85.6300)	103903 Points -15%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617 AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS, Radeon RX 7600S (v6.85.6300)	101275 Points -17%
Medion Erazer Defender P40 Intel Core i7-13700HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU (v6.75.6100)	77807 Points -36%
MSI Katana 15 B12VEK Intel Core i7-12650H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU (v6.85.6300)	76434 Points -37%
Gigabyte G5 KE Intel Core i5-12500H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU (v6.75.6100)	65919 Points -46%

AIDA64 / CPU SHA3
Average AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS (4566 - 5119, n=8)	4877 MB/s +7%
Average of class Gaming (1339 - 10389, n=187, last 2 years)	4852 MB/s +6%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX8 Intel Core i7-13700HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU (v6.85.6300)	4633 MB/s +1%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617XS AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS, Radeon RX 7600S (v6.75.6100)	4566 MB/s
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617 AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS, Radeon RX 7600S (v6.85.6300)	3494 MB/s -23%
Medion Erazer Defender P40 Intel Core i7-13700HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU (v6.75.6100)	3412 MB/s -25%
MSI Katana 15 B12VEK Intel Core i7-12650H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU (v6.85.6300)	3244 MB/s -29%
Gigabyte G5 KE Intel Core i5-12500H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU (v6.75.6100)	3212 MB/s -30%

AIDA64 / CPU Queen
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617XS AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS, Radeon RX 7600S (v6.75.6100)	124433 Points
Average AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS (118174 - 124783, n=8)	121129 Points -3%
Average of class Gaming (50699 - 200651, n=187, last 2 years)	116237 Points -7%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX8 Intel Core i7-13700HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU (v6.85.6300)	113990 Points -8%
Medion Erazer Defender P40 Intel Core i7-13700HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU (v6.75.6100)	113837 Points -9%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617 AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS, Radeon RX 7600S (v6.85.6300)	104709 Points -16%
MSI Katana 15 B12VEK Intel Core i7-12650H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU (v6.85.6300)	87225 Points -30%
Gigabyte G5 KE Intel Core i5-12500H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU (v6.75.6100)	80337 Points -35%

AIDA64 / FPU SinJulia
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617XS AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS, Radeon RX 7600S (v6.75.6100)	15380 Points
Average AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS (14663 - 15551, n=8)	15145 Points -2%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX8 Intel Core i7-13700HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU (v6.85.6300)	13285 Points -14%
Average of class Gaming (4800 - 32988, n=187, last 2 years)	13175 Points -14%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617 AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS, Radeon RX 7600S (v6.85.6300)	12691 Points -17%
Medion Erazer Defender P40 Intel Core i7-13700HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU (v6.75.6100)	10407 Points -32%
MSI Katana 15 B12VEK Intel Core i7-12650H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU (v6.85.6300)	8694 Points -43%
Gigabyte G5 KE Intel Core i5-12500H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU (v6.75.6100)	7388 Points -52%

AIDA64 / FPU Mandel
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617XS AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS, Radeon RX 7600S (v6.75.6100)	63432 Points
Average AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS (56839 - 66238, n=8)	61581 Points -3%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617 AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS, Radeon RX 7600S (v6.85.6300)	55209 Points -13%
Average of class Gaming (12321 - 134044, n=187, last 2 years)	53471 Points -16%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX8 Intel Core i7-13700HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU (v6.85.6300)	50250 Points -21%
Medion Erazer Defender P40 Intel Core i7-13700HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU (v6.75.6100)	38311 Points -40%
MSI Katana 15 B12VEK Intel Core i7-12650H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU (v6.85.6300)	37738 Points -41%
Gigabyte G5 KE Intel Core i5-12500H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU (v6.75.6100)	31844 Points -50%

AIDA64 / CPU AES
Average AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS (86309 - 169946, n=8)	128009 MB/s +48%
Gigabyte G5 KE Intel Core i5-12500H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU (v6.75.6100)	110639 MB/s +28%
Average of class Gaming (19065 - 328679, n=187, last 2 years)	109176 MB/s +26%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX8 Intel Core i7-13700HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU (v6.85.6300)	94177 MB/s +9%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617XS AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS, Radeon RX 7600S (v6.75.6100)	86309 MB/s
Medion Erazer Defender P40 Intel Core i7-13700HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU (v6.75.6100)	72510 MB/s -16%
MSI Katana 15 B12VEK Intel Core i7-12650H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU (v6.85.6300)	66845 MB/s -23%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617 AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS, Radeon RX 7600S (v6.85.6300)	64725 MB/s -25%

AIDA64 / CPU ZLib
Average of class Gaming (373 - 2409, n=187, last 2 years)	1349 MB/s +24%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX8 Intel Core i7-13700HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU (v6.85.6300)	1339 MB/s +23%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617XS AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS, Radeon RX 7600S (v6.75.6100)	1089 MB/s
Average AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS (866 - 1152, n=8)	1062 MB/s -2%
Medion Erazer Defender P40 Intel Core i7-13700HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU (v6.75.6100)	981 MB/s -10%
Gigabyte G5 KE Intel Core i5-12500H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU (v6.75.6100)	924 MB/s -15%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617 AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS, Radeon RX 7600S (v6.85.6300)	883 MB/s -19%
MSI Katana 15 B12VEK Intel Core i7-12650H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU (v6.85.6300)	879 MB/s -19%

AIDA64 / FP64 Ray-Trace
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617XS AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS, Radeon RX 7600S (v6.75.6100)	15209 KRay/s
Average AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS (13175 - 15675, n=8)	14510 KRay/s -5%
Average of class Gaming (2540 - 31796, n=187, last 2 years)	11654 KRay/s -23%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX8 Intel Core i7-13700HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU (v6.85.6300)	11057 KRay/s -27%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617 AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS, Radeon RX 7600S (v6.85.6300)	8923 KRay/s -41%
MSI Katana 15 B12VEK Intel Core i7-12650H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU (v6.85.6300)	8448 KRay/s -44%
Medion Erazer Defender P40 Intel Core i7-13700HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU (v6.75.6100)	8145 KRay/s -46%
Gigabyte G5 KE Intel Core i5-12500H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU (v6.75.6100)	6989 KRay/s -54%

AIDA64 / CPU PhotoWorxx
Average of class Gaming (10805 - 60161, n=188, last 2 years)	39919 MPixel/s +33%
MSI Katana 15 B12VEK Intel Core i7-12650H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU (v6.85.6300)	37023 MPixel/s +24%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX8 Intel Core i7-13700HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU (v6.85.6300)	36147 MPixel/s +21%
Medion Erazer Defender P40 Intel Core i7-13700HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU (v6.75.6100)	36118 MPixel/s +21%
Average AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS (29922 - 41024, n=8)	35306 MPixel/s +18%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617XS AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS, Radeon RX 7600S (v6.75.6100)	29922 MPixel/s
Gigabyte G5 KE Intel Core i5-12500H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU (v6.75.6100)	29085 MPixel/s -3%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617 AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS, Radeon RX 7600S (v6.85.6300)	27871 MPixel/s -7%

Desempenho do sistema

O sistema de funcionamento suave oferece desempenho suficiente para áreas de uso exigentes, como renderização, edição de vídeo e jogos - os bons resultados do PCMark confirmam isso. As taxas de transferência da RAM estão em um nível normal para a RAM DDR5 4800. É importante observar: a troca automática entre dGPU e iGPU (Smart Access Graphic) sempre leva um ou dois segundos. Durante esse tempo, o sistema congela.

A RAM é executada no modo de canal duplo.

PCMark 10 / Score
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617XS Radeon RX 7600S, R9 7940HS, Micron 2400 MTFDKBA512QFM	7927 Points
Average AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS, AMD Radeon RX 7600S ()	7927 Points 0%
Average of class Gaming (5776 - 9852, n=168, last 2 years)	7774 Points -2%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX8 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, i7-13700HX, SK hynix PC801 HFS512GEJ9X115N	7691 Points -3%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617 Radeon RX 7600S, R7 7735HS, Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM	7332 Points -8%
Gigabyte G5 KE GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, i5-12500H, Gigabyte AG4512G-SI B10	7201 Points -9%
Medion Erazer Defender P40 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, i7-13700HX, Phison PS5021-E21 1TB	6909 Points -13%
MSI Katana 15 B12VEK NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, i7-12650H, Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM	6892 Points -13%

PCMark 10 / Essentials
Gigabyte G5 KE GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, i5-12500H, Gigabyte AG4512G-SI B10	11150 Points +3%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX8 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, i7-13700HX, SK hynix PC801 HFS512GEJ9X115N	10872 Points 0%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617XS Radeon RX 7600S, R9 7940HS, Micron 2400 MTFDKBA512QFM	10844 Points
Average AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS, AMD Radeon RX 7600S ()	10844 Points 0%
Average of class Gaming (9057 - 12334, n=167, last 2 years)	10836 Points 0%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617 Radeon RX 7600S, R7 7735HS, Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM	10622 Points -2%
MSI Katana 15 B12VEK NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, i7-12650H, Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM	10180 Points -6%
Medion Erazer Defender P40 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, i7-13700HX, Phison PS5021-E21 1TB	9760 Points -10%

PCMark 10 / Productivity
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617XS Radeon RX 7600S, R9 7940HS, Micron 2400 MTFDKBA512QFM	10505 Points
Average AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS, AMD Radeon RX 7600S ()	10505 Points 0%
Average of class Gaming (6662 - 14612, n=167, last 2 years)	9878 Points -6%
Medion Erazer Defender P40 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, i7-13700HX, Phison PS5021-E21 1TB	9760 Points -7%
MSI Katana 15 B12VEK NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, i7-12650H, Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM	9744 Points -7%
Gigabyte G5 KE GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, i5-12500H, Gigabyte AG4512G-SI B10	9475 Points -10%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617 Radeon RX 7600S, R7 7735HS, Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM	9332 Points -11%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX8 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, i7-13700HX, SK hynix PC801 HFS512GEJ9X115N	9131 Points -13%

PCMark 10 / Digital Content Creation
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX8 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, i7-13700HX, SK hynix PC801 HFS512GEJ9X115N	12434 Points +5%
Average of class Gaming (6703 - 18475, n=167, last 2 years)	12030 Points +1%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617XS Radeon RX 7600S, R9 7940HS, Micron 2400 MTFDKBA512QFM	11868 Points
Average AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS, AMD Radeon RX 7600S ()	11868 Points 0%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617 Radeon RX 7600S, R7 7735HS, Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM	10790 Points -9%
Gigabyte G5 KE GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, i5-12500H, Gigabyte AG4512G-SI B10	9593 Points -19%
Medion Erazer Defender P40 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, i7-13700HX, Phison PS5021-E21 1TB	9393 Points -21%
MSI Katana 15 B12VEK NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, i7-12650H, Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM	8957 Points -25%

CrossMark / Overall
Average of class Gaming (1247 - 2344, n=151, last 2 years)	1899 Points +7%
Medion Erazer Defender P40 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, i7-13700HX, Phison PS5021-E21 1TB	1774 Points 0%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617XS Radeon RX 7600S, R9 7940HS, Micron 2400 MTFDKBA512QFM	1774 Points
Average AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS, AMD Radeon RX 7600S ()	1774 Points 0%
Gigabyte G5 KE GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, i5-12500H, Gigabyte AG4512G-SI B10	1752 Points -1%
MSI Katana 15 B12VEK NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, i7-12650H, Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM	1718 Points -3%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX8 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, i7-13700HX, SK hynix PC801 HFS512GEJ9X115N	1663 Points -6%

CrossMark / Productivity
Average of class Gaming (1299 - 2204, n=151, last 2 years)	1801 Points +5%
Gigabyte G5 KE GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, i5-12500H, Gigabyte AG4512G-SI B10	1720 Points 0%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617XS Radeon RX 7600S, R9 7940HS, Micron 2400 MTFDKBA512QFM	1715 Points
Average AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS, AMD Radeon RX 7600S ()	1715 Points 0%
MSI Katana 15 B12VEK NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, i7-12650H, Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM	1653 Points -4%
Medion Erazer Defender P40 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, i7-13700HX, Phison PS5021-E21 1TB	1643 Points -4%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX8 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, i7-13700HX, SK hynix PC801 HFS512GEJ9X115N	1618 Points -6%

CrossMark / Creativity
Average of class Gaming (1275 - 2660, n=151, last 2 years)	2083 Points +5%
Medion Erazer Defender P40 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, i7-13700HX, Phison PS5021-E21 1TB	1992 Points 0%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617XS Radeon RX 7600S, R9 7940HS, Micron 2400 MTFDKBA512QFM	1990 Points
Average AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS, AMD Radeon RX 7600S ()	1990 Points 0%
MSI Katana 15 B12VEK NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, i7-12650H, Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM	1840 Points -8%
Gigabyte G5 KE GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, i5-12500H, Gigabyte AG4512G-SI B10	1778 Points -11%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX8 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, i7-13700HX, SK hynix PC801 HFS512GEJ9X115N	1710 Points -14%

CrossMark / Responsiveness
Gigabyte G5 KE GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, i5-12500H, Gigabyte AG4512G-SI B10	1771 Points +28%
Average of class Gaming (1030 - 2330, n=151, last 2 years)	1699 Points +22%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX8 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, i7-13700HX, SK hynix PC801 HFS512GEJ9X115N	1663 Points +20%
Medion Erazer Defender P40 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, i7-13700HX, Phison PS5021-E21 1TB	1577 Points +14%
MSI Katana 15 B12VEK NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, i7-12650H, Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM	1570 Points +13%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617XS Radeon RX 7600S, R9 7940HS, Micron 2400 MTFDKBA512QFM	1388 Points
Average AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS, AMD Radeon RX 7600S ()	1388 Points 0%

PCMark 8 Home Score Accelerated v2		5937 pontos
PCMark 8 Work Score Accelerated v2		6458 pontos
PCMark 10 Score		7927 pontos
Ajuda

AIDA64: Memory Copy | Memory Read | Memory Write | Memory Latency

AIDA64 / Memory Copy
Average AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS (59712 - 78739, n=8)	65738 MB/s +10%
Average of class Gaming (21842 - 94222, n=187, last 2 years)	64907 MB/s +9%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617XS AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS, Radeon RX 7600S	59712 MB/s
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX8 Intel Core i7-13700HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU	58458 MB/s -2%
Medion Erazer Defender P40 Intel Core i7-13700HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU	57466 MB/s -4%
MSI Katana 15 B12VEK Intel Core i7-12650H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU	56560 MB/s -5%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617 AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS, Radeon RX 7600S	48549 MB/s -19%
Gigabyte G5 KE Intel Core i5-12500H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU	44445 MB/s -26%

AIDA64 / Memory Read
Average of class Gaming (23681 - 99713, n=187, last 2 years)	68658 MB/s +11%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX8 Intel Core i7-13700HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU	67644 MB/s +10%
Medion Erazer Defender P40 Intel Core i7-13700HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU	67639 MB/s +10%
MSI Katana 15 B12VEK Intel Core i7-12650H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU	65535 MB/s +6%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617XS AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS, Radeon RX 7600S	61609 MB/s
Average AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS (50399 - 61836, n=8)	60105 MB/s -2%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617 AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS, Radeon RX 7600S	50338 MB/s -18%
Gigabyte G5 KE Intel Core i5-12500H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU	47514 MB/s -23%

AIDA64 / Memory Write
Average AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS (72541 - 91567, n=8)	81839 MB/s +13%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617XS AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS, Radeon RX 7600S	72541 MB/s
Average of class Gaming (22986 - 108954, n=187, last 2 years)	66727 MB/s -8%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX8 Intel Core i7-13700HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU	65896 MB/s -9%
Medion Erazer Defender P40 Intel Core i7-13700HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU	57744 MB/s -20%
MSI Katana 15 B12VEK Intel Core i7-12650H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU	57505 MB/s -21%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617 AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS, Radeon RX 7600S	55012 MB/s -24%
Gigabyte G5 KE Intel Core i5-12500H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU	46901 MB/s -35%

AIDA64 / Memory Latency
Gigabyte G5 KE Intel Core i5-12500H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU	96.1 ns * -6%
MSI Katana 15 B12VEK Intel Core i7-12650H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU	94.9 ns * -5%
Average of class Gaming (59.5 - 259, n=187, last 2 years)	94.1 ns * -4%
Medion Erazer Defender P40 Intel Core i7-13700HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU	93 ns * -3%
Average AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS (87.6 - 111.1, n=8)	92.7 ns * -3%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617XS AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS, Radeon RX 7600S	90.4 ns *
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617 AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS, Radeon RX 7600S	84.6 ns * +6%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX8 Intel Core i7-13700HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU	81.9 ns * +9%

* ... smaller is better

Latência DPC

O teste padronizado do monitor de latência (navegação na Web, reprodução de vídeo 4k, alta carga do Prime95) revelou algumas anomalias. O sistema não parece ser adequado para edição de vídeo e áudio em tempo real. Futuras atualizações de software podem levar a melhorias ou até mesmo a degradações.

DPC Latencies / LatencyMon - interrupt to process latency (max), Web, Youtube, Prime95
MSI Katana 15 B12VEK NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, i7-12650H, Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM	7213.9 μs * -539%
Medion Erazer Defender P40 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, i7-13700HX, Phison PS5021-E21 1TB	4343.1 μs * -285%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617XS Radeon RX 7600S, R9 7940HS, Micron 2400 MTFDKBA512QFM	1128.7 μs *
Gigabyte G5 KE GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, i5-12500H, Gigabyte AG4512G-SI B10	1002.5 μs * +11%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX8 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, i7-13700HX, SK hynix PC801 HFS512GEJ9X115N	869.7 μs * +23%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617 Radeon RX 7600S, R7 7735HS, Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM	237.9 μs * +79%

* ... smaller is better

Dispositivos de armazenamento

A Asus equipou o A16 com um SSD de 512 GB (PCIe 4, M.2-2280) da Micron - espaço de armazenamento (muito) pequeno para um notebook para jogos. Ele oferece taxas de dados decentes, mas não é um dos melhores modelos entre todos os SSDs disponíveis. Especialmente as taxas de gravação estão muito abaixo das possibilidades atuais.

Um SSD PCIe-4 funciona como a unidade do sistema.

CrystalDiskMark 5.2 / 6

AS SSD

DiskSpd

Micron 2400 MTFDKBA512QFM

CDM 5/6 Read Seq Q32T1: 4285 MB/s

CDM 5/6 Write Seq Q32T1: 1772 MB/s

CDM 5/6 Read 4K Q32T1: 482 MB/s

CDM 5/6 Write 4K Q32T1: 269.6 MB/s

CDM 5 Read Seq: 2316 MB/s

CDM 5 Write Seq: 1674 MB/s

CDM 5/6 Read 4K: 51.92 MB/s

CDM 5/6 Write 4K: 119.5 MB/s

Drive Performance Rating | DiskSpd | AS SSD

Drive Performance Rating - Percent
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX8 SK hynix PC801 HFS512GEJ9X115N	87.1 pt
Medion Erazer Defender P40 Phison PS5021-E21 1TB	77.7 pt
Average of class Gaming	74.7 pt
Gigabyte G5 KE Gigabyte AG4512G-SI B10	64.8 pt
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617 Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM	59.3 pt
MSI Katana 15 B12VEK Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM	54.2 pt
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617XS Micron 2400 MTFDKBA512QFM	45 pt
Average Micron 2400 MTFDKBA512QFM	33.3 pt

DiskSpd
seq read
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX8 SK hynix PC801 HFS512GEJ9X115N	5346 (4832.89^min - 5346.06^max) MB/s +137%
Average of class Gaming (1319 - 7045, n=168, last 2 years)	3487 MB/s +55%
Medion Erazer Defender P40 Phison PS5021-E21 1TB	2501 (2479.67^min - 2500.68^max) MB/s +11%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617 Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM	2460 (2456.1^min - 2460.17^max) MB/s +9%
Gigabyte G5 KE Gigabyte AG4512G-SI B10	2390 (2088.15^min - 2390.38^max) MB/s +6%
MSI Katana 15 B12VEK Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM	2291 (2271.71^min - 2290.75^max) MB/s +2%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617XS Micron 2400 MTFDKBA512QFM	2253 (2206.83^min - 2252.55^max) MB/s
Average Micron 2400 MTFDKBA512QFM (1748 - 2253, n=5)	1891 MB/s -16%
seq write
Medion Erazer Defender P40 Phison PS5021-E21 1TB	4675 (4517.46^min - 4675.27^max) MB/s +180%
Average of class Gaming (535 - 9307, n=168, last 2 years)	3797 MB/s +127%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617 Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM	2991 (2932.66^min - 2991.48^max) MB/s +79%
MSI Katana 15 B12VEK Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM	2903 (2823.62^min - 2902.74^max) MB/s +74%
Gigabyte G5 KE Gigabyte AG4512G-SI B10	2230 (2171.45^min - 2229.69^max) MB/s +33%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617XS Micron 2400 MTFDKBA512QFM	1671 (1641.02^min - 1670.59^max) MB/s
Average Micron 2400 MTFDKBA512QFM (1519 - 1671, n=5)	1585 MB/s -5%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX8 SK hynix PC801 HFS512GEJ9X115N	1495 (1277.34^min - 1495.48^max) MB/s -11%
seq q8 t1 read
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX8 SK hynix PC801 HFS512GEJ9X115N	7127 (6535.15^min - 7127.37^max) MB/s +66%
Average of class Gaming (2594 - 16089, n=168, last 2 years)	6328 MB/s +47%
Medion Erazer Defender P40 Phison PS5021-E21 1TB	5009 (4674.55^min - 5008.89^max) MB/s +17%
Gigabyte G5 KE Gigabyte AG4512G-SI B10	4725 (4035.45^min - 4724.88^max) MB/s +10%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617 Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM	4633 (4029.05^min - 4633.45^max) MB/s +8%
MSI Katana 15 B12VEK Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM	4556 (3742.64^min - 4556.27^max) MB/s +6%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617XS Micron 2400 MTFDKBA512QFM	4294 (3669.6^min - 4293.91^max) MB/s
Average Micron 2400 MTFDKBA512QFM (3234 - 4294, n=5)	3728 MB/s -13%
seq q8 t1 write
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX8 SK hynix PC801 HFS512GEJ9X115N	4903 (812.65^min - 4902.98^max) MB/s +177%
Average of class Gaming (539 - 14571, n=168, last 2 years)	4823 MB/s +172%
Medion Erazer Defender P40 Phison PS5021-E21 1TB	4797 (4359.23^min - 4796.61^max) MB/s +171%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617 Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM	3415 (3353.98^min - 3415.42^max) MB/s +93%
MSI Katana 15 B12VEK Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM	3411 (3334.51^min - 3410.81^max) MB/s +92%
Gigabyte G5 KE Gigabyte AG4512G-SI B10	2255 (2245.25^min - 2255.17^max) MB/s +27%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617XS Micron 2400 MTFDKBA512QFM	1773 (1734.23^min - 1773.16^max) MB/s
Average Micron 2400 MTFDKBA512QFM (1610 - 1773, n=5)	1682 MB/s -5%
4k q1 t1 read
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX8 SK hynix PC801 HFS512GEJ9X115N	65.9 (62.88^min - 65.94^max) MB/s +101%
Average of class Gaming (30.6 - 95.9, n=168, last 2 years)	65.8 MB/s +101%
Gigabyte G5 KE Gigabyte AG4512G-SI B10	62.6 (62.25^min - 62.63^max) MB/s +91%
Medion Erazer Defender P40 Phison PS5021-E21 1TB	51.1 (49.74^min - 51.1^max) MB/s +56%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617 Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM	35.5 (35.31^min - 35.47^max) MB/s +8%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617XS Micron 2400 MTFDKBA512QFM	32.8 (32.61^min - 32.76^max) MB/s
Average Micron 2400 MTFDKBA512QFM (29.9 - 32.8, n=5)	31.9 MB/s -3%
MSI Katana 15 B12VEK Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM	31.8 (31.24^min - 31.76^max) MB/s -3%
4k q1 t1 write
Gigabyte G5 KE Gigabyte AG4512G-SI B10	369 (333.31^min - 369.47^max) MB/s +180%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX8 SK hynix PC801 HFS512GEJ9X115N	328 (300.52^min - 328.36^max) MB/s +148%
Medion Erazer Defender P40 Phison PS5021-E21 1TB	281 (267.52^min - 281.12^max) MB/s +113%
MSI Katana 15 B12VEK Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM	267 (258.43^min - 266.75^max) MB/s +102%
Average of class Gaming (66.6 - 397, n=168, last 2 years)	222 MB/s +68%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617 Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM	181.3 (175.93^min - 181.25^max) MB/s +37%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617XS Micron 2400 MTFDKBA512QFM	132 (125.41^min - 131.99^max) MB/s
Average Micron 2400 MTFDKBA512QFM (106.4 - 132, n=5)	123.7 MB/s -6%
4k q32 t16 read
Medion Erazer Defender P40 Phison PS5021-E21 1TB	3335 (3324.73^min - 3334.83^max) MB/s +96%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX8 SK hynix PC801 HFS512GEJ9X115N	2889 (2819.64^min - 2889.22^max) MB/s +69%
Average of class Gaming (417 - 6172, n=168, last 2 years)	2555 MB/s +50%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617 Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM	2025 (1213.07^min - 2024.78^max) MB/s +19%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617XS Micron 2400 MTFDKBA512QFM	1705 (1701.1^min - 1704.63^max) MB/s
MSI Katana 15 B12VEK Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM	1678 (1211.7^min - 1678.15^max) MB/s -2%
Gigabyte G5 KE Gigabyte AG4512G-SI B10	1323 (1320.64^min - 1322.54^max) MB/s -22%
Average Micron 2400 MTFDKBA512QFM (766 - 1705, n=5)	1017 MB/s -40%
4k q32 t16 write
Medion Erazer Defender P40 Phison PS5021-E21 1TB	3737 (3683.15^min - 3737.15^max) MB/s +136%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617 Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM	2291 (2256.15^min - 2290.93^max) MB/s +45%
Gigabyte G5 KE Gigabyte AG4512G-SI B10	2234 (2227.81^min - 2234.36^max) MB/s +41%
Average of class Gaming (162.3 - 4869, n=168, last 2 years)	2101 MB/s +33%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617XS Micron 2400 MTFDKBA512QFM	1585 (1554.44^min - 1585.47^max) MB/s
MSI Katana 15 B12VEK Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM	1509 MB/s -5%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX8 SK hynix PC801 HFS512GEJ9X115N	1457 (1124.17^min - 1456.77^max) MB/s -8%
Average Micron 2400 MTFDKBA512QFM (313 - 1585, n=5)	595 MB/s -62%

AS SSD
Score Total
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX8 SK hynix PC801 HFS512GEJ9X115N	9125 Points +114%
Medion Erazer Defender P40 Phison PS5021-E21 1TB	7599 Points +78%
Average of class Gaming (2271 - 13854, n=159, last 2 years)	6737 Points +58%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617 Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM	5903 Points +39%
Gigabyte G5 KE Gigabyte AG4512G-SI B10	5541 Points +30%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617XS Micron 2400 MTFDKBA512QFM	4261 Points
MSI Katana 15 B12VEK Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM	4020 Points -6%
Average Micron 2400 MTFDKBA512QFM (2845 - 4261, n=4)	3370 Points -21%
Score Read
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX8 SK hynix PC801 HFS512GEJ9X115N	3235 Points +77%
Medion Erazer Defender P40 Phison PS5021-E21 1TB	2625 Points +43%
Average of class Gaming (776 - 4721, n=159, last 2 years)	2441 Points +33%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617 Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM	2348 Points +28%
Gigabyte G5 KE Gigabyte AG4512G-SI B10	2128 Points +16%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617XS Micron 2400 MTFDKBA512QFM	1830 Points
MSI Katana 15 B12VEK Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM	1726 Points -6%
Average Micron 2400 MTFDKBA512QFM (1031 - 1830, n=4)	1305 Points -29%
Score Write
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX8 SK hynix PC801 HFS512GEJ9X115N	4288 Points +167%
Medion Erazer Defender P40 Phison PS5021-E21 1TB	3618 Points +126%
Average of class Gaming (515 - 7208, n=159, last 2 years)	3113 Points +94%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617 Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM	2404 Points +50%
Gigabyte G5 KE Gigabyte AG4512G-SI B10	2388 Points +49%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617XS Micron 2400 MTFDKBA512QFM	1604 Points
Average Micron 2400 MTFDKBA512QFM (1257 - 1735, n=4)	1491 Points -7%
MSI Katana 15 B12VEK Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM	1456 Points -9%
Seq Read
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX8 SK hynix PC801 HFS512GEJ9X115N	5856.12 MB/s +59%
Average of class Gaming (2260 - 12763, n=159, last 2 years)	4944 MB/s +34%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617 Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM	3976.53 MB/s +8%
MSI Katana 15 B12VEK Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM	3792 MB/s +3%
Gigabyte G5 KE Gigabyte AG4512G-SI B10	3697.92 MB/s 0%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617XS Micron 2400 MTFDKBA512QFM	3690.93 MB/s
Medion Erazer Defender P40 Phison PS5021-E21 1TB	3667.76 MB/s -1%
Average Micron 2400 MTFDKBA512QFM (2798 - 3691, n=4)	3189 MB/s -14%
Seq Write
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX8 SK hynix PC801 HFS512GEJ9X115N	4750.28 MB/s +191%
Medion Erazer Defender P40 Phison PS5021-E21 1TB	3884.67 MB/s +138%
Average of class Gaming (495 - 11316, n=159, last 2 years)	3720 MB/s +128%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617 Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM	3020.8 MB/s +85%
MSI Katana 15 B12VEK Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM	2772 MB/s +70%
Gigabyte G5 KE Gigabyte AG4512G-SI B10	2106.21 MB/s +29%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617XS Micron 2400 MTFDKBA512QFM	1633.49 MB/s
Average Micron 2400 MTFDKBA512QFM (1156 - 1633, n=4)	1329 MB/s -19%
4K Read
Gigabyte G5 KE Gigabyte AG4512G-SI B10	82.5 MB/s +93%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX8 SK hynix PC801 HFS512GEJ9X115N	77.12 MB/s +80%
Average of class Gaming (27.8 - 112.1, n=159, last 2 years)	65.1 MB/s +52%
Medion Erazer Defender P40 Phison PS5021-E21 1TB	63.89 MB/s +49%
MSI Katana 15 B12VEK Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM	51.2 MB/s +20%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617 Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM	49.25 MB/s +15%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617XS Micron 2400 MTFDKBA512QFM	42.75 MB/s
Average Micron 2400 MTFDKBA512QFM (30 - 42.8, n=4)	35.7 MB/s -16%
4K Write
Gigabyte G5 KE Gigabyte AG4512G-SI B10	312.09 MB/s +164%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX8 SK hynix PC801 HFS512GEJ9X115N	276.66 MB/s +134%
MSI Katana 15 B12VEK Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM	225 MB/s +90%
Average of class Gaming (108.8 - 512, n=159, last 2 years)	211 MB/s +79%
Medion Erazer Defender P40 Phison PS5021-E21 1TB	207.32 MB/s +75%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617 Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM	152.75 MB/s +29%
Average Micron 2400 MTFDKBA512QFM (99.8 - 137.5, n=4)	121.6 MB/s +3%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617XS Micron 2400 MTFDKBA512QFM	118.17 MB/s
4K-64 Read
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX8 SK hynix PC801 HFS512GEJ9X115N	2572.63 MB/s +80%
Medion Erazer Defender P40 Phison PS5021-E21 1TB	2194.79 MB/s +54%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617 Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM	1901.41 MB/s +33%
Average of class Gaming (451 - 3475, n=159, last 2 years)	1876 MB/s +31%
Gigabyte G5 KE Gigabyte AG4512G-SI B10	1675.54 MB/s +17%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617XS Micron 2400 MTFDKBA512QFM	1429.83 MB/s
MSI Katana 15 B12VEK Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM	1296 MB/s -9%
Average Micron 2400 MTFDKBA512QFM (721 - 1430, n=4)	953 MB/s -33%
4K-64 Write
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX8 SK hynix PC801 HFS512GEJ9X115N	3536.78 MB/s +151%
Medion Erazer Defender P40 Phison PS5021-E21 1TB	3021.8 MB/s +114%
Average of class Gaming (277 - 5909, n=159, last 2 years)	2533 MB/s +79%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617 Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM	1949.13 MB/s +38%
Gigabyte G5 KE Gigabyte AG4512G-SI B10	1865.08 MB/s +32%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617XS Micron 2400 MTFDKBA512QFM	1411.25 MB/s
Average Micron 2400 MTFDKBA512QFM (1003 - 1468, n=4)	1258 MB/s -11%
MSI Katana 15 B12VEK Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM	954 MB/s -32%
Access Time Read
Average Micron 2400 MTFDKBA512QFM (0.039 - 0.15, n=4)	0.095 ms * -64%
Medion Erazer Defender P40 Phison PS5021-E21 1TB	0.08 ms * -38%
Gigabyte G5 KE Gigabyte AG4512G-SI B10	0.066 ms * -14%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617XS Micron 2400 MTFDKBA512QFM	0.058 ms *
Average of class Gaming (0.016 - 0.379, n=158, last 2 years)	0.05509 ms * +5%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617 Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM	0.05 ms * +14%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX8 SK hynix PC801 HFS512GEJ9X115N	0.044 ms * +24%
MSI Katana 15 B12VEK Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM	0.029 ms * +50%
Access Time Write
Average Micron 2400 MTFDKBA512QFM (0.116 - 0.414, n=4)	0.1968 ms * -67%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617XS Micron 2400 MTFDKBA512QFM	0.118 ms *
MSI Katana 15 B12VEK Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM	0.108 ms * +8%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617 Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM	0.105 ms * +11%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX8 SK hynix PC801 HFS512GEJ9X115N	0.053 ms * +55%
Average of class Gaming (0.011 - 1.028, n=159, last 2 years)	0.04843 ms * +59%
Medion Erazer Defender P40 Phison PS5021-E21 1TB	0.033 ms * +72%
Gigabyte G5 KE Gigabyte AG4512G-SI B10	0.013 ms * +89%

* ... smaller is better

reading continuous performance: DiskSpd Read Loop, Queue Depth 8

Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617XS Micron 2400 MTFDKBA512QFM: Ø3496 (2896.67-3526.02)

Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX8 SK hynix PC801 HFS512GEJ9X115N: Ø6448 (5744.31-7139.12)

MSI Katana 15 B12VEK Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM: Ø4460 (3778.02-4582.76)

Medion Erazer Defender P40 Phison PS5021-E21 1TB: Ø5011 (4694.47-5029.18)

Gigabyte G5 KE Gigabyte AG4512G-SI B10: Ø2113 (226.43-4712.52)

Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617 Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM: Ø4593 (4015.9-4669.31)

Placa de vídeo

A Radeon RX 7600S da AMDapresenta 1.792 shaders, um barramento de 128 bits de largura e armazenamento GDDR6 rápido (8.192 MB). Seu TGP máximo (95 watts) não é utilizado em todo o seu potencial, de acordo com o Witcher 3 teste. Os resultados de benchmark são exatamente os esperados e o uso do perfil "Turbo" não leva a nenhum desempenho aprimorado.

Os concorrentes da GPU de médio porte podem ser encontrados nos modelos GeForce RTX 4060,RTX 4050e RTX 3060(= TGP máximo). Embora não consiga acompanhar o ritmo do RTX 4060, ele ainda se saiu melhor nos benchmarks do 3DMark do que os outros dois modelos do GeForce. No uso prático em jogos, não foi possível obter uma imagem consistente: Dependendo do jogo, às vezes uma GPU se saía melhor, às vezes a outra, pelo menos nos jogos que testamos.

Fire Strike (conectado à rede elétrica, desempenho)

Fire Strike (uso da bateria, desempenho)Fire Strike (uso da bateria, desempenho) — Fire Strike (uso da bateria, desempenho)

Fire Strike (conectado à rede elétrica, turbo)

Fire Strike (conectado à rede elétrica, silencioso)

Fire Strike (conectado à rede elétrica, turbo, dGPU)

3DMark Performance Rating | 3DMark 11 | 3DMark

3DMark Performance Rating - Percent
Average of class Gaming	97.4 pt
Medion Erazer Defender P40 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-13700HX	87.1 pt
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX8 ^-1! NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-13700HX	84.9 pt
Average AMD Radeon RX 7600S	82.5 pt
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617XS AMD Radeon RX 7600S, AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS	82 pt
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617 AMD Radeon RX 7600S, AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS	81 pt
MSI Katana 15 B12VEK NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-12650H	77.8 pt
Gigabyte G5 KE NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i5-12500H	73.2 pt

3DMark 11 - 1280x720 Performance GPU
Average of class Gaming (1029 - 72178, n=186, last 2 years)	43521 Points +32%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX8 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-13700HX	37654 Points +14%
Medion Erazer Defender P40 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-13700HX	36470 Points +10%
Average AMD Radeon RX 7600S (33037 - 35278, n=4)	34188 Points +3%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617 AMD Radeon RX 7600S, AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS	33988 Points +3%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617XS AMD Radeon RX 7600S, AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS	33037 Points
MSI Katana 15 B12VEK NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-12650H	30959 Points -6%
Gigabyte G5 KE NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i5-12500H	29569 Points -10%

3DMark
1280x720 Cloud Gate Standard Graphics
MSI Katana 15 B12VEK NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-12650H	159354 Points +2%
Medion Erazer Defender P40 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-13700HX	157190 Points +1%
Average AMD Radeon RX 7600S (150582 - 164406, n=3)	156931 Points +1%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617XS AMD Radeon RX 7600S, AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS	155806 Points
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617 AMD Radeon RX 7600S, AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS	150582 Points -3%
Average of class Gaming (15902 - 193851, n=101, last 2 years)	142796 Points -8%
Gigabyte G5 KE NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i5-12500H	136826 Points -12%
1920x1080 Fire Strike Graphics
Average of class Gaming (781 - 53059, n=196, last 2 years)	31245 Points +19%
Medion Erazer Defender P40 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-13700HX	27122 Points +4%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX8 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-13700HX	26561 Points +2%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617XS AMD Radeon RX 7600S, AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS	26154 Points
Average AMD Radeon RX 7600S (25514 - 26154, n=3)	25856 Points -1%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617 AMD Radeon RX 7600S, AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS	25514 Points -2%
MSI Katana 15 B12VEK NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-12650H	23443 Points -10%
Gigabyte G5 KE NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i5-12500H	22625 Points -13%
2560x1440 Time Spy Graphics
Average of class Gaming (224 - 22717, n=191, last 2 years)	13034 Points +42%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX8 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-13700HX	10855 Points +18%
Medion Erazer Defender P40 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-13700HX	10329 Points +12%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617XS AMD Radeon RX 7600S, AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS	9203 Points
Average AMD Radeon RX 7600S (9080 - 9208, n=3)	9164 Points 0%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617 AMD Radeon RX 7600S, AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS	9080 Points -1%
Gigabyte G5 KE NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i5-12500H	8686 Points -6%
MSI Katana 15 B12VEK NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-12650H	8500 Points -8%

3DMark 06 Standard Score		55435 pontos
3DMark 11 Performance		28721 pontos
3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score		64441 pontos
3DMark Fire Strike Score		23346 pontos
3DMark Time Spy Score		9530 pontos
Ajuda

... comparado com

Geekbench 5.5 | Geekbench 6.0 | V-Ray 5 Benchmark | V-Ray Benchmark Next 4.10 | SPECviewperf 2020

Geekbench 5.5
OpenCL Score
Average of class Gaming (5039 - 237138, n=193, last 2 years)	125975 Points +93%
Gigabyte G7 KE NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i5-12500H	104225 Points +60%
Medion Erazer Defender P40 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-13700HX	102522 Points +57%
Gigabyte G5 KE NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i5-12500H	102369 Points +57%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX8 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-13700HX	100490 Points +54%
MSI Katana 15 B12VEK NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-12650H	87670 Points +35%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617 AMD Radeon RX 7600S, AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS	66133 Points +2%
Average AMD Radeon RX 7600S (65110 - 66133, n=2)	65622 Points +1%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617XS AMD Radeon RX 7600S, AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS	65110 Points
Vulkan Score 5.5
Average of class Gaming (7995 - 163089, n=123, last 2 years)	71890 Points +98%
Gigabyte G7 KE NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i5-12500H	55994 Points +55%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX8 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-13700HX	48885 Points +35%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617XS AMD Radeon RX 7600S, AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS	36222 Points
Average AMD Radeon RX 7600S (26646 - 36222, n=2)	31434 Points -13%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617 AMD Radeon RX 7600S, AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS	26646 Points -26%

Geekbench 6.0
GPU OpenCL 6.0
Average of class Gaming (30029 - 213472, n=46, last 2 years)	115603 Points +76%
Medion Erazer Defender P40 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-13700HX	96539 Points +47%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617XS AMD Radeon RX 7600S, AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS	65701 Points
Average AMD Radeon RX 7600S ()	65701 Points 0%
GPU Vulkan 6.0
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617XS AMD Radeon RX 7600S, AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS	83464 Points
Average AMD Radeon RX 7600S ()	83464 Points 0%
Average of class Gaming (1827 - 159996, n=45, last 2 years)	48002 Points -42%
Medion Erazer Defender P40 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-13700HX	4237 Points -95%

V-Ray 5 Benchmark
GPU RTX
Average of class Gaming (171 - 3824, n=114, last 2 years)	2181 mpaths
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX8 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-13700HX (5.0.1)	1817 mpaths
Medion Erazer Defender P40 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-13700HX (5.0.1)	1690 mpaths
Gigabyte G7 KE NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i5-12500H (5.0.1)	1197 mpaths
GPU CUDA
Average of class Gaming (120 - 2797, n=116, last 2 years)	1568 mpaths +423%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX8 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-13700HX (5.0.1)	1231 mpaths +310%
Medion Erazer Defender P40 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-13700HX (5.0.1)	1176 mpaths +292%
Gigabyte G7 KE NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i5-12500H (5.0.1)	909 mpaths +203%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617XS AMD Radeon RX 7600S, AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS (5.0.1)	300 mpaths
Average AMD Radeon RX 7600S ()	300 mpaths 0%
CPU
Average of class Gaming (3562 - 26944, n=119, last 2 years)	15070 mpaths +24%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX8 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-13700HX (5.0.1)	14543 mpaths +20%
Medion Erazer Defender P40 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-13700HX (5.0.1)	12370 mpaths +2%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617XS AMD Radeon RX 7600S, AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS (5.0.1)	12169 mpaths
Average AMD Radeon RX 7600S ()	12169 mpaths 0%
Gigabyte G7 KE NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i5-12500H (5.0.1)	9406 mpaths -23%

V-Ray Benchmark Next 4.10
GPU
Average of class Gaming (54 - 1334, n=152, last 2 years)	701 mpaths +630%
Medion Erazer Defender P40 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-13700HX (v4.10.07 )	618 mpaths +544%
MSI Katana 15 B12VEK NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-12650H (v4.10.07 )	480 mpaths +400%
Gigabyte G5 KE NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i5-12500H (v4.10.07 )	396 mpaths +313%
Gigabyte G7 KE NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i5-12500H (v4.10.07 )	390 mpaths +306%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617XS AMD Radeon RX 7600S, AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS (v4.10.07 )	96 mpaths
Average AMD Radeon RX 7600S (83 - 96, n=2)	89.5 mpaths -7%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617 AMD Radeon RX 7600S, AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS (v4.10.07 )	83 mpaths -14%
CPU
Average of class Gaming (5413 - 37629, n=152, last 2 years)	21367 ksamples +21%
Medion Erazer Defender P40 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-13700HX (v4.10.07 )	19237 ksamples +9%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617XS AMD Radeon RX 7600S, AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS (v4.10.07 )	17623 ksamples
Average AMD Radeon RX 7600S (14759 - 17623, n=2)	16191 ksamples -8%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617 AMD Radeon RX 7600S, AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS (v4.10.07 )	14759 ksamples -16%
Gigabyte G7 KE NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i5-12500H (v4.10.07 )	14218 ksamples -19%
Gigabyte G5 KE NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i5-12500H (v4.10.07 )	14118 ksamples -20%
MSI Katana 15 B12VEK NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-12650H (v4.10.07 )	13494 ksamples -23%

SPECviewperf 2020
1920x1080 Siemens NX (snx-04)
Average AMD Radeon RX 7600S ()	231 fps 0%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617XS AMD Radeon RX 7600S, AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS	230.8 fps
Average of class Gaming (16.2 - 231, n=27, last 2 years)	37.3 fps -84%
Gigabyte G7 KE NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i5-12500H	17.5 fps -92%
1920x1080 Medical (medical-03)
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617XS AMD Radeon RX 7600S, AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS	56.9 fps
Average AMD Radeon RX 7600S ()	56.9 fps 0%
Average of class Gaming (25.7 - 59.9, n=27, last 2 years)	40.3 fps -29%
Gigabyte G7 KE NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i5-12500H	30 fps -47%
1920x1080 Maya (maya-06)
Average of class Gaming (99.8 - 687, n=26, last 2 years)	416 fps +29%
Average AMD Radeon RX 7600S ()	323 fps 0%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617XS AMD Radeon RX 7600S, AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS	322.7 fps
Gigabyte G7 KE NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i5-12500H	201.6 fps -38%
1920x1080 Energy (energy-03)
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617XS AMD Radeon RX 7600S, AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS	53.5 fps
Average AMD Radeon RX 7600S ()	53.5 fps 0%
Average of class Gaming (20.6 - 76.5, n=27, last 2 years)	47.6 fps -11%
Gigabyte G7 KE NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i5-12500H	20.6 fps -61%
1920x1080 Creo (creo-03)
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617XS AMD Radeon RX 7600S, AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS	126.5 fps
Average AMD Radeon RX 7600S ()	126.5 fps 0%
Average of class Gaming (44 - 141.9, n=27, last 2 years)	107.9 fps -15%
Gigabyte G7 KE NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i5-12500H	86.5 fps -32%
1920x1080 CATIA (catia-06)
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617XS AMD Radeon RX 7600S, AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS	73.4 fps
Average AMD Radeon RX 7600S ()	73.4 fps 0%
Average of class Gaming (17.8 - 117.2, n=27, last 2 years)	73.4 fps 0%
Gigabyte G7 KE NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i5-12500H	53.9 fps -27%
1920x1080 3ds Max (3dsmax-07)
Average of class Gaming (25.7 - 221, n=27, last 2 years)	125.8 fps +86%
Gigabyte G7 KE NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i5-12500H	89.4 fps +32%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617XS AMD Radeon RX 7600S, AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS	67.5 fps
Average AMD Radeon RX 7600S ()	67.5 fps 0%

Desempenho em jogos

O FA617 foi projetado para jogos em configurações altas ou máximas. A resolução de tela cheia (1.920 x 1.200 pixels) pode ser usada. Resoluções mais altas poderão ser usadas quando um monitor correspondente estiver conectado, com configurações parcialmente reduzidas. O perfil "Turbo" não aumenta as taxas de quadros.

Performance Rating - Percent
Average of class Gaming	95.8 pt
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX8 ^-1! Intel Core i7-13700HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU	95.4 pt
Medion Erazer Defender P40 Intel Core i7-13700HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU	87.2 pt
Gigabyte G5 KE Intel Core i5-12500H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU	75.8 pt
MSI Katana 15 B12VEK Intel Core i7-12650H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU	74.2 pt
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617XS AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS, AMD Radeon RX 7600S	70.1 pt
Average AMD Radeon RX 7600S	67.9 pt
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617 AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS, AMD Radeon RX 7600S	65.6 pt

The Witcher 3 - 1920x1080 Ultra Graphics & Postprocessing (HBAO+)
Average of class Gaming (18.4 - 216, n=168, last 2 years)	126.9 fps +29%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX8 Intel Core i7-13700HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU	107.6 (101^min) fps +10%
Medion Erazer Defender P40 Intel Core i7-13700HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU	103 (89^min) fps +5%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617XS AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS, AMD Radeon RX 7600S (neu)	98.1 (84^min) fps
Average AMD Radeon RX 7600S (91 - 98.1, n=2)	94.6 fps -4%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617 AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS, AMD Radeon RX 7600S	91 (77^min) fps -7%
Gigabyte G5 KE Intel Core i5-12500H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU	87.6 (77^min, 77.42^P1) fps -11%
MSI Katana 15 B12VEK Intel Core i7-12650H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU	83 fps -15%

GTA V - 1920x1080 Highest Settings possible AA:4xMSAA + FX AF:16x
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX8 Intel Core i7-13700HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU	119.6 (3.03^min, 76.9^P1) fps +29%
Medion Erazer Defender P40 Intel Core i7-13700HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU	113.9 (5.92^min, 76.9^P1) fps +23%
Average of class Gaming (12.1 - 167.7, n=171, last 2 years)	113 fps +22%
Gigabyte G5 KE Intel Core i5-12500H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU	103 (7.98^min, 71.4^P1) fps +11%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617XS AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS, AMD Radeon RX 7600S	92.9 (26.7^min, 62.5^P1) fps
MSI Katana 15 B12VEK Intel Core i7-12650H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU	92.2 (4.55^min, 55.6^P1) fps -1%
Average AMD Radeon RX 7600S (85.5 - 92.9, n=2)	89.2 fps -4%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617 AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS, AMD Radeon RX 7600S	85.5 (3.46^min, 62.5^P1) fps -8%

Final Fantasy XV Benchmark - 1920x1080 High Quality
Average of class Gaming (19.2 - 201, n=184, last 2 years)	119 fps +40%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX8 Intel Core i7-13700HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU (1.3)	109.8 fps +29%
Medion Erazer Defender P40 Intel Core i7-13700HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU (1.3)	100.8 fps +18%
Gigabyte G5 KE Intel Core i5-12500H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU (1.3)	90.3 fps +6%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617XS AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS, AMD Radeon RX 7600S (1.3)	85.2 fps
MSI Katana 15 B12VEK Intel Core i7-12650H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU (1.3)	82.8 fps -3%
Average AMD Radeon RX 7600S (78.2 - 85.2, n=2)	81.7 fps -4%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617 AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS, AMD Radeon RX 7600S (1.3)	78.2 fps -8%

Strange Brigade - 1920x1080 ultra AA:ultra AF:16
Average of class Gaming (38.9 - 421, n=182, last 2 years)	227 fps +39%
Medion Erazer Defender P40 Intel Core i7-13700HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU (1.47.22.14 D3D12)	188.3 (28^min, 137.1^P1) fps +15%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617XS AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS, AMD Radeon RX 7600S (1.47.22.14 D3D12)	163.3 (16.3^min, 119.3^P1) fps
Average AMD Radeon RX 7600S (162.7 - 163.3, n=2)	163 fps 0%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617 AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS, AMD Radeon RX 7600S (1.47.22.14 D3D12)	162.7 (111.4^min, 120.7^P1) fps 0%
Gigabyte G5 KE Intel Core i5-12500H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU (1.47.22.14 D3D12)	153.3 (32.3^min, 117.2^P1) fps -6%
MSI Katana 15 B12VEK Intel Core i7-12650H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU (1.47.22.14 D3D12)	148.7 (20.2^min, 114.3^P1) fps -9%

Dota 2 Reborn - 1920x1080 ultra (3/3) best looking
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX8 Intel Core i7-13700HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU	161.8 (140.3^min) fps +33%
Average of class Gaming (30.8 - 220, n=190, last 2 years)	149.3 fps +23%
Medion Erazer Defender P40 Intel Core i7-13700HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU	144.3 (117.7^min) fps +19%
MSI Katana 15 B12VEK Intel Core i7-12650H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU	142.5 (121.3^min) fps +17%
Gigabyte G5 KE Intel Core i5-12500H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU	137.5 (121.2^min) fps +13%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617XS AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS, AMD Radeon RX 7600S	121.6 (100.8^min) fps
Average AMD Radeon RX 7600S (110 - 121.6, n=2)	115.8 fps -5%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617 AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS, AMD Radeon RX 7600S	110 (85.8^min) fps -10%

X-Plane 11.11 - 1920x1080 high (fps_test=3)
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX8 Intel Core i7-13700HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU	121.9 fps +113%
Medion Erazer Defender P40 Intel Core i7-13700HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU	109.3 fps +91%
Average of class Gaming (31.5 - 166.2, n=196, last 2 years)	107.2 fps +87%
MSI Katana 15 B12VEK Intel Core i7-12650H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU	97 fps +69%
Gigabyte G5 KE Intel Core i5-12500H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU	86.7 fps +51%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617XS AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS, AMD Radeon RX 7600S	57.3 fps
Average AMD Radeon RX 7600S (55 - 57.3, n=2)	56.2 fps -2%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617 AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS, AMD Radeon RX 7600S	55 fps -4%

Returnal
1920x1080 Epic Preset
Average of class Gaming (27 - 155, n=26, last 2 years)	84.7 fps +26%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX8 Intel Core i7-13700HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU	70 (38^min) fps +4%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617XS AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS, AMD Radeon RX 7600S	67 (34^min) fps
Average AMD Radeon RX 7600S ()	67 fps 0%
1920x1080 Epic Preset + Epic Ray-Tracing
Average of class Gaming (4 - 128, n=11, last 2 years)	73.5 fps +79%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617XS AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS, AMD Radeon RX 7600S	41 (16^min) fps
Average AMD Radeon RX 7600S ()	41 fps 0%

Atomic Heart - 1920x1080 Atomic Preset
Average of class Gaming (10.2 - 166, n=18, last 2 years)	72.8 fps +29%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617XS AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS, AMD Radeon RX 7600S	56.6 (31.1^min, 47.6^P0.1, 49.1^P1) fps
Average AMD Radeon RX 7600S ()	56.6 fps 0%

Sons of the Forest - 1920x1080 Ultra Preset AA:T
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617XS AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS, AMD Radeon RX 7600S	76.7 (36.2^min, 50.2^P0.1, 56.6^P1) fps
Average AMD Radeon RX 7600S ()	76.7 fps 0%
Average of class Gaming (14.8 - 93.9, n=19, last 2 years)	68.8 fps -10%

Resident Evil 4 Remake - 1920x1080 Max Preset
Medion Erazer Defender P40 Intel Core i7-13700HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU	72.7 (14.6^min, 26.1^P0.1, 52.5^P1) fps +39%
Average of class Gaming (19.7 - 143.2, n=15, last 2 years)	70.7 fps +35%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617XS AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS, AMD Radeon RX 7600S	52.3 (6.38^min, 13.8^P0.1, 34.2^P1) fps
Average AMD Radeon RX 7600S ()	52.3 fps 0%

The Last of Us - 1920x1080 Ultra Preset
Average of class Gaming (31.6 - 105, n=13, last 2 years)	61.2 fps +19%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617XS AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS, AMD Radeon RX 7600S	51.5 (4.4^min, 32.8^P0.1, 43.4^P1) fps
Average AMD Radeon RX 7600S ()	51.5 fps 0%

Hogwarts Legacy
1920x1080 Ultra Preset AA:High T
Average of class Gaming (10.3 - 166.1, n=27, last 2 years)	73.7 fps +33%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617XS AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS, AMD Radeon RX 7600S	55.4 (27^min, 28.2^P0.1, 39^P1) fps
Average AMD Radeon RX 7600S ()	55.4 fps 0%
1920x1080 Ultra Preset + Full Ray Tracing AA:High T
Average of class Gaming (26.8 - 67, n=13, last 2 years)	46.3 fps +64%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617XS AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS, AMD Radeon RX 7600S	28.3 (13.7^min, 14.6^P0.1, 17.8^P1) fps
Average AMD Radeon RX 7600S ()	28.3 fps 0%

Company of Heroes 3 - 1920x1080 Maximum Settings
Average of class Gaming (43.8 - 235, n=16, last 2 years)	129 fps +33%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617XS AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS, AMD Radeon RX 7600S	97.2 (41.4^P0.1, 54.7^P1) fps
Average AMD Radeon RX 7600S ()	97.2 fps 0%

Dead Island 2 - 1920x1080 Ultra Preset AA:High T
Medion Erazer Defender P40 Intel Core i7-13700HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU	148.5 (19.5^min, 20.4^P0.1, 94.8^P1) fps +31%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617XS AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS, AMD Radeon RX 7600S	113.1 (18.3^min, 19^P0.1, 73^P1) fps
Average AMD Radeon RX 7600S ()	113.1 fps 0%
Average of class Gaming (14.6 - 181.7, n=11, last 2 years)	97.9 fps -13%

Flight Simulator 2020 - 1920x1080 Ultra AA:TAA AF:16x
Average of class Gaming (24.7 - 74, n=8, last 2 years)	50.5 fps +18%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617XS AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS, AMD Radeon RX 7600S	42.7 (29.5^min, 33.8^P0.1, 36.4^P1) fps
Average AMD Radeon RX 7600S ()	42.7 fps 0%

Far Cry 6
1920x1080 Ultra Graphics Quality + HD Textures AA:T
Average of class Gaming (35 - 167, n=28, last 2 years)	110.6 fps +6%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617XS AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS, AMD Radeon RX 7600S	104.7 (86^min) fps
Average AMD Radeon RX 7600S ()	104.7 fps 0%
1920x1080 Ultra Graphics Quality + HD Textures + DXR AA:T
Average of class Gaming (71.9 - 119, n=9, last 2 years)	93.6 fps +19%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617XS AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS, AMD Radeon RX 7600S	78.5 (36^min) fps
Average AMD Radeon RX 7600S ()	78.5 fps 0%

Para verificar se as taxas de quadros permanecem praticamente constantes em um período mais longo, executamos o jogo The Witcher 3 por cerca de 60 minutos em resolução Full HD e configurações de qualidade máxima. O personagem do jogo não foi movido. Não foi observada uma queda no desempenho.

Witcher 3 FPS diagram

Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617XS R9 7940HS, Radeon RX 7600S; neu: Ø95.2 (89-101)

Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX8 i7-13700HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU: Ø96.9 (93-103)

MSI Katana 15 B12VEK i7-12650H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU: Ø77.6 (73-84)

Medion Erazer Defender P40 i7-13700HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU: Ø100.7 (96-104)

Gigabyte G5 KE i5-12500H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU: Ø84.8 (81-91)

	baixo	média	alto	ultra
GTA V (2015)	184.7		171.7	92.9
The Witcher 3 (2015)	382		166.5	98.1
Dota 2 Reborn (2015)	157.5	143.1	132.2	121.6
Final Fantasy XV Benchmark (2018)	215	117.2	85.2
X-Plane 11.11 (2018)	85.1	72	57.3
Far Cry 5 (2018)	135	120	115	108
Strange Brigade (2018)	440	228	190.8	163.3
Metro Exodus (2019)	187.3	116.5
The Division 2 (2019)	232	167	131	95
Control (2019)	235	116.6	83.5
Doom Eternal (2020)	376	209	184.3	179
Gears Tactics (2020)	381.4	216.1	138.1	95.4
Death Stranding (2020)	189.5	144.1	133.6	129.6
Flight Simulator 2020 (2020)	134.9	85.5	60.1	42.7
Crysis Remastered (2020)	294	190.9	90.6	38.6
Watch Dogs Legion (2020)	122.6	118.5	106.6	69.5
Assassin´s Creed Valhalla (2020)	203	124	102	88
Hitman 3 (2021)	270	178.2	157.4	145.7
Far Cry 6 (2021)	151	133	119	104.7
Forza Horizon 5 (2021)	197	144	135	74
GRID Legends (2022)	214.9	182.8	156.5	129.3
Tiny Tina's Wonderlands (2022)	198.1	156.8	105.7	82.2
F1 22 (2022)	263	244	190	50.5
A Plague Tale Requiem (2022)	98.2	78	66.1	55.4
Hogwarts Legacy (2023)	118.4	88.7	72	55.4
Returnal (2023)	91	88	78	67
Atomic Heart (2023)	167.1	125.5	71.6	56.6
Company of Heroes 3 (2023)	143.4	125.9	97.4	97.2
Sons of the Forest (2023)	93.2	81.4	78	76.7
Resident Evil 4 Remake (2023)	107.4	83.2	78.9	52.3
The Last of Us (2023)	81.4	67.6	60.2	51.5
Dead Island 2 (2023)	201	168.1	122.7	113.1

Emissões - O FA617XS pode ser bastante barulhento

Emissões de ruído

No uso diário (escritório, Internet etc.), o A16 geralmente funciona de forma silenciosa, muitas vezes silenciosa - independentemente do perfil selecionado. O nível de pressão sonora pode aumentar até 53 dB(A) ("Turbo") ou 51 dB(A) ("Performance") no modo de jogo. É possível obter emissões de ruído mais baixas em geral usando o perfil "Quiet". A potência de computação é reduzida apenas em um grau muito pequeno.

Barulho

Ocioso		25 / 26 / 28 dB
Carga		43 / 53 dB

	30 dB silencioso 40 dB(A) audível 50 dB(A) ruidosamente alto
min: , med: , max: Earthworks M23R, Arta (15 cm de distância) environment noise: 25 dB(A)

	Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617XS R9 7940HS, Radeon RX 7600S	Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX8 i7-13700HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU	MSI Katana 15 B12VEK i7-12650H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU	Medion Erazer Defender P40 i7-13700HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU	Gigabyte G5 KE i5-12500H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU	Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617 R7 7735HS, Radeon RX 7600S
Noise		8%	7%	-11%	-11%	3%
off / environment *	25	23 8%	24 4%	25 -0%	19.52 22%	24 4%
Idle Minimum *	25	23.1 8%	24 4%	26 -4%	31.05 -24%	24 4%
Idle Average *	26	23.1 11%	24 8%	27 -4%	31.05 -19%	25 4%
Idle Maximum *	28	26.6 5%	24 14%	32 -14%	31.05 -11%	28 -0%
Load Average *	43	34.7 19%	37.71 12%	53 -23%	55.66 -29%	42 2%
Witcher 3 ultra *	51	47.6 7%	45.75 10%	56 -10%	55.7 -9%	50 2%
Load Maximum *	53	54.8 -3%	54.55 -3%	64 -21%	55.51 -5%	50 6%

* ... smaller is better

Temperatura

O notebook aquece visivelmente sob carga, mas não excessivamente. As temperaturas estão dentro de uma zona verde no uso diário. Este último não era o caso do modelo irmão- presumimos que seja um erro/defeito do dispositivo.

Carga Máxima

Inatividade

Witcher 3


50 °C	53 °C	45 °C
40 °C	47 °C	44 °C
38 °C	26 °C	31 °C

Máximo: 53 °C
Médio: 41.6 °C


48 °C	44 °C	46 °C
37 °C	33 °C	37 °C
27 °C	25 °C	30 °C

Máximo: 48 °C
Médio: 36.3 °C

alimentação elétrica 54 °C | Temperatura do quarto 20 °C | Fluke t3000FC (calibrated), Voltcraft IR-900

Carga Máxima

Inatividade

Witcher 3


29 °C	29 °C	27 °C
30 °C	29 °C	30 °C
30 °C	28 °C	27 °C

Máximo: 30 °C
Médio: 28.8 °C


29 °C	29 °C	30 °C
29 °C	29 °C	29 °C
27 °C	27 °C	27 °C

Máximo: 30 °C
Médio: 28.4 °C

Temperatura do quarto 20 °C | Fluke t3000FC (calibrated), Voltcraft IR-900

Carga Máxima

Inatividade

Witcher 3


47 °C	49 °C	43 °C
40 °C	44 °C	43 °C
34 °C	30 °C	30 °C

Máximo: 49 °C
Médio: 40 °C


47 °C	44 °C	45 °C
36 °C	31 °C	35 °C
26 °C	26 °C	28 °C

Máximo: 47 °C
Médio: 35.3 °C

alimentação elétrica 52 °C | Temperatura do quarto 20 °C | Fluke t3000FC (calibrated), Voltcraft IR-900

(-) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 41.6 °C / 107 F, compared to the average of 33.9 °C / 93 F for the devices in the class Gaming.
(-) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 53 °C / 127 F, compared to the average of 40.5 °C / 105 F, ranging from 21.2 to 68.8 °C for the class Gaming.
(-) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 48 °C / 118 F, compared to the average of 43.2 °C / 110 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 28.8 °C / 84 F, compared to the device average of 33.9 °C / 93 F.
(-) Playing The Witcher 3, the average temperature for the upper side is 40 °C / 104 F, compared to the device average of 33.9 °C / 93 F.
(±) The palmrests and touchpad can get very hot to the touch with a maximum of 38 °C / 100.4 F.
(-) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.9 °C / 84 F (-9.1 °C / -16.4 F).

	Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617XS AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS, AMD Radeon RX 7600S	Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX8 Intel Core i7-13700HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU	MSI Katana 15 B12VEK Intel Core i7-12650H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU	Medion Erazer Defender P40 Intel Core i7-13700HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU	Gigabyte G5 KE Intel Core i5-12500H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU	Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617 AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS, AMD Radeon RX 7600S
Heat		1%	-8%	9%	-14%	-17%
Maximum Upper Side *	53	42.8 19%	47 11%	42 21%	52.6 1%	54 -2%
Maximum Bottom *	48	50 -4%	48 -0%	45 6%	62.4 -30%	47 2%
Idle Upper Side *	30	29.6 1%	35 -17%	28 7%	33.6 -12%	40 -33%
Idle Bottom *	30	34 -13%	38 -27%	30 -0%	34.8 -16%	40 -33%

* ... smaller is better

Teste de estresse

O teste de estresse (Prime95 e Furmark em operação contínua) simula um cenário extremo para testar a estabilidade do sistema sob carga total. A CPU (3,4 a 3,5 GHz) e a GPU (~1.500 MHz) passaram pelo teste com taxas de clock abaixo do respectivo clock base.

Alto-falantes

Os alto-falantes estéreo produzem um som decente em geral.

Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)

Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617XS audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (79 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 11.6% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (7% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 5.7% higher than median
(+) | mids are linear (3.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2.6% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (6.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (15.4% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 32% of all tested devices in this class were better, 7% similar, 61% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 18%, worst was 132%
Compared to all devices tested
» 20% of all tested devices were better, 4% similar, 76% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX8 audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (72.7 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 23.7% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (10.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 3.8% away from median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (7.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3.7% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (6.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (21.9% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 77% of all tested devices in this class were better, 6% similar, 17% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 18%, worst was 132%
Compared to all devices tested
» 59% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 34% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Gerenciamento de energia - O laptop para jogos com ótimos tempos de execução

Consumo de energia

Não há anormalidades em termos de consumo de energia. As taxas estão em um nível normal para o hardware instalado. O teste de estresse e o teste Witcher 3 foram executados com consumo de energia constante. A fonte de alimentação (240 watts) tem tamanho mais do que suficiente.

Consumo de energia

desligado	0.1 / Watt
Ocioso	7 / 10 / 15 Watt
Carga	86 / 172 Watt


Key: min: , med: , max: Metrahit Energy

	Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617XS R9 7940HS, Radeon RX 7600S	Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX8 i7-13700HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU	MSI Katana 15 B12VEK i7-12650H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU	Medion Erazer Defender P40 i7-13700HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU	Gigabyte G5 KE i5-12500H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU	Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617 R7 7735HS, Radeon RX 7600S	Average AMD Radeon RX 7600S	Average of class Gaming
Power Consumption		-107%	2%	-25%	-16%	-7%	-4%	-66%
Idle Minimum *	7	24.5 -250%	8.5 -21%	8 -14%	7.66 -9%	8 -14%	7.5 ?(7 - 8, n=2) -7%	13.5 ?(2 - 39, n=157, last 2 years) -93%
Idle Average *	10	29.2 -192%	10.2 -2%	12 -20%	10.3 -3%	11 -10%	10.5 ?(10 - 11, n=2) -5%	18.9 ?(8 - 55.6, n=157, last 2 years) -89%
Idle Maximum *	15	34.3 -129%	11.3 25%	18 -20%	16.05 -7%	16 -7%	15.5 ?(15 - 16, n=2) -3%	26.7 ?(9 - 101.1, n=157, last 2 years) -78%
Load Average *	86	98.7 -15%	84 2%	101 -17%	115.8 -35%	97 -13%	91.5 ?(86 - 97, n=2) -6%	106.6 ?(32.1 - 201, n=155, last 2 years) -24%
Witcher 3 ultra *	160.6	178.6 -11%	128 20%	180.8 -13%	168.7 -5%	161.5 -1%
Load Maximum *	172	249.6 -45%	189 -10%	284 -65%	234.6 -36%	168 2%	170 ?(168 - 172, n=2) 1%	249 ?(55.3 - 418, n=157, last 2 years) -45%

* ... smaller is better

power consumption Witcher 3 / stress test

Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617XS; Witcher 3 ultra: Ø160.6 (159.6-162.3)

Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617XS; 1280x720 Prime95 28.10 and Furmark 1.25: Ø159.3 (157.9-160.8)

Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617XS; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø9.82 (7.33-14.6)

power consumption with external monitor

Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617XS; Prime95 V2810 Stress (external Monitor): Ø98.9 (91.1-102.9)

Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617XS; Cinebench R23 Multi (external Monitor): Ø103.1 (98.2-128)

Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617XS; 1280x720 FurMark 1.19 GPU Stress Test (external Monitor): Ø156.4 (155-168.2)

Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617XS; 1920x1080 The Witcher 3 ultra (external Monitor): Ø156.5 (155.1-169.5)

Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617XS; Idle 1min (external Monitor): Ø17 (11.6-29.8)

Duração da bateria

O dispositivo de 16 polegadas alcançou tempos de execução de 12:25 h e 12:26 h em nosso teste de WLAN (acessando sites por meio de um script) e teste de vídeo (curta-metragem Big Buck Bunny (codificação H.264, FHD) em um loop), respectivamente. Durante os dois testes, os recursos de economia de energia do laptop foram desativados e o brilho da tela foi definido para cerca de 150 cd/m². Os módulos sem fio também foram desativados para o teste de vídeo

O FA617 apresentou excelentes tempos de execução e deixou a concorrência para trás. A combinação de uma APU econômica com uma bateria de grande capacidade definitivamente vale a pena.

Tempo de Execução da Bateria

Ocioso (sem WLAN, min brilho)		20h 17min
WiFi Websurfing (Edge 113)		12h 25min
Big Buck Bunny H.264 1080p		12h 26min
Carga (máximo brilho)		0h 52min

	Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617XS R9 7940HS, Radeon RX 7600S, 90 Wh	Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX8 i7-13700HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, 80 Wh	MSI Katana 15 B12VEK i7-12650H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, 53.5 Wh	Medion Erazer Defender P40 i7-13700HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, 73 Wh	Gigabyte G5 KE i5-12500H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, 54 Wh	Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617 R7 7735HS, Radeon RX 7600S, 90 Wh	Average of class Gaming
Battery Runtime		-53%	-20%	-29%	-39%	23%	-21%
Reader / Idle	1217	401 -67%		528 -57%		1212 0%	565 ?(155 - 1290, n=69, last 2 years) -54%
H.264	746		264 -65%	339 -55%	130 -83%		408 ?(129 - 837, n=80, last 2 years) -45%
WiFi v1.3	745	205 -72%	260 -65%	373 -50%	342 -54%	724 -3%	376 ?(85 - 889, n=157, last 2 years) -50%
Load	52	41 -21%	89 71%	76 46%	62 19%	90 73%	85.3 ?(41 - 173, n=121, last 2 years) 64%
Witcher 3 ultra					79		78.3 ?(47 - 155, n=16, last 2 years)

Pro

+ tela WUXGA fosca (165 Hz) no formato 16:10

+ bom desempenho do sistema

+ dois slots M.2 (PCIe 4, M.2-2280)

+ rAM expansível

+ USB 4

+ Fornecimento de energia

+ ótima duração da bateria

Contra

- pode ficar barulhento sob carga

- SSD de baixo custo com pouco armazenamento

- taxas de dados WLAN medíocres

- feedback esponjoso do teclado

- webcam decepcionante

Veredicto - O laptop Asus com (muito) pouco armazenamento

O Asus TUF Gaming A16 Advantage Edition FA617XS, dispositivo de teste fornecido pela Asus Germany.

O A16 está configurado para jogos WUXGA em configurações altas ou máximas, mas deve ser útil em muitos outros campos, como edição e renderização de vídeo. Uma equipe da AMD composta por umRyzen 9 7940HSe umaRadeon RX 7600Sfornece ao laptop o desempenho necessário. Ambos os componentes funcionam com taxas de clock consistentemente altas.

O Asus TUF Gaming A16 Advantage Edition é um laptop para jogos de médio porte bem equipado, cuja impressionante duração da bateria é seu orgulho e alegria.

Em comparação com oRyzen-7-7735HSencontrada em seumodelo irmãoo 7940HS-APU oferece um desempenho de CPU consideravelmente melhor, apesar de ter o mesmo número de núcleos e os mesmos limites de energia. Aqui, sua arquitetura moderna (Zen 4 vs. Zen 3+) e taxas de clock mais altas se destacam.

Os incríveis tempos de execução do dispositivo são certamente seu ponto de venda exclusivo: suas medidas práticas de cerca de 12,5 horas geralmente não são alcançadas por muitos outros laptops de escritório. Um ponto positivo: A bateria pode ser carregada usando uma fonte de alimentação USB-C (mín. 65 watts, 20 V) - uma porta USB-C suporta Power Delivery. A fonte de alimentação proprietária não precisaria necessariamente ser carregada com você.

A tela IPS instalada (16 polegadas, 1.920 x 1.200 pixels) tem uma proporção de 16:10 que facilita o trabalho e, em geral, nos deixou uma boa impressão - o brilho poderia ser um pouco mais forte. O SSD de nível básico instalado seria perfeitamente adequado para um simples laptop de escritório, mas não para um laptop para jogos de US$ 1.700. O armazenamento oferecido (512 GB) e os dados não atendem aos requisitos dos usuários nem às suas expectativas.

OLegion Pro 5 16IRX8poderia ser uma alternativa adequada. Ele apresenta melhor desempenho e uma tela mais brilhante do que o A16, mas claramente não tem os mesmos tempos de execução impressionantes a oferecer. OGigabyte G5 KEpode ser uma boa alternativa econômica: Você obtém um nível semelhante de desempenho gráfico por um preço muito menor. Apesar disso: Esse laptop não vem com um sistema operacional Windows pré-instalado.

Preço e disponibilidade

A versão do A16 com 16 GB de RAM e um SSD de 512 GB pode ser adquirida no site da Asus https://uk.store.asus.com/asus-tuf-gaming-a16-advantage-edition-2023-9415-22280.html por cerca de US$ 1.371.

Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617XS - 06/05/2023 v7 ^(old)
Sascha Mölck

Acabamento

79 / 98 → 81%

Teclado

77%

Mouse

92%

Conectividade

63 / 80 → 79%

Peso

62 / 10-66 → 93%

Bateria

89 / 95 → 94%

Pantalha

88%

Desempenho do jogos

99%

Desempenho da aplicação

96%

Temperatura

83 / 95 → 87%

Ruído

79 / 90 → 87%

Audio

77%

Camera

39 / 85 → 46%

Médio

79%

87%

Gaming - Médio equilibrado

Price comparison

Editor of the original article: Daisy Dickson - Translator - 337 articles published on Notebookcheck since 2023

Translator: Ninh Ngoc Duy - Editorial Assistant - 458020 articles published on Notebookcheck since 2008

contact me via: Facebook

Please share our article, every link counts!

> Análises e revisões de portáteis e celulares > Análises > Análises > Análise do Asus TUF Gaming A16 Advantage Edition FA617XS: O laptop AMD com autonomia de até 20 horas

Sascha Mölck, 2023-06- 8 (Update: 2023-06- 8)

Análise do Asus TUF Gaming A16 Advantage Edition FA617XS: O laptop AMD com autonomia de até 20 horas

Corredor de longa distância.

Possíveis concorrentes em comparação

Estojo e conectividade - pequenas alterações em comparação com seu modelo irmão

Comparação de tamanho

Tela - painel 16:10 com cobertura sRGB

Display Response Times

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

Desempenho - A Asus utiliza a potência da AMD

Condições de teste

Processador

Cinebench R15 multi continuous test

Desempenho do sistema

Latência DPC

Dispositivos de armazenamento

reading continuous performance: DiskSpd Read Loop, Queue Depth 8

Placa de vídeo

Desempenho em jogos

Witcher 3 FPS diagram

Emissões - O FA617XS pode ser bastante barulhento

Emissões de ruído

Temperatura

Teste de estresse

Alto-falantes

Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617XS audio analysis

Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX8 audio analysis

Gerenciamento de energia - O laptop para jogos com ótimos tempos de execução

Consumo de energia

power consumption Witcher 3 / stress test

power consumption with external monitor

Duração da bateria

Pro

Contra

Veredicto - O laptop Asus com (muito) pouco armazenamento

Preço e disponibilidade

More articles related to this device

Transparency

Price comparison