Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 revisão: Um laptop de jogo incomum com uma boa duração da bateria

Name: Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX
Brand: Asus

Duo dinâmico.

Um Ryzen 9-6900HX APU e GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU trazem todos os jogos atuais suavemente para a tela Matte 4k (IPS, DCI P3, FreeSync) no formato 16:10. Eles são acompanhados por 4 TB de armazenamento (RAID 0), 64 GB de memória de trabalho e uma duração de bateria surpreendentemente boa.

Sascha Mölck, 👁 Florian Glaser (traduzido por DeepL / Ninh Duy), Published 05/24/2022 🇺🇸 🇩🇪 ...

AMD Gaming Geforce Laptop / Notebook Ryzen (Zen) Touchscreen Windows

Com o Zephyrus Duo 16, a Asus apresenta um laptop para jogadores, streamers e criadores de conteúdo, cuja característica mais marcante se torna imediatamente aparente: Colocado acima do teclado é uma segunda tela, incluindo a funcionalidade touchscreen (Screenpad Plus). Os concorrentes incluem dispositivos tais como o Razer Blade 15 Modelo avançadooGigabyte Aero 16 YE5oMSI GE76 RaideroMedion Erazer Beast X30e o Apple MacBook Pro 16 2021.

Test device courtesy of Asus Deutschland

Download your licensed rating image as PNG / SVG

Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX (ROG Zephyrus Duo Serie)

Processador

AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX 8 x 3.3 - 4.9 GHz, 80 W PL2 / Short Burst, 80 W PL1 / Sustained, Rembrandt-H (Zen 3+)

Placa gráfica

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU - 16 GB VRAM, Análises do: 1395 MHz, Memoría: 2000 MHz, 165 W TDP ( including 25 W Dynamic Boost), GDDR6, 30.0.15.1259, Optimus

Memória

64 GB

, DDR5-4800, dual-channel mode, two memory slots (both in use)

Pantalha

16.00 polegadas 16:10, 3840 x 2400 pixel 283 PPI, BOE NE160QAM-NX1, IPS level, FreeSync Premium, Pantone Validated, (second screen: 14 in, 3840 x 1100 pixels, IPS level, capacitive, stylus support), Brilhante: não, HDR, 120 Hz

placa mãe

AMD Promontory/Bixby FCH

Disco rígido

2x Samsung SSD 980 Pro 2TB MZ-V8P2T0 (RAID 0), 4096 GB

, 3620 GB livre

Placa de Som

Realtek ALC285

Conexões

4 USB 3.1 Gen2, USB-C Power Delivery (PD), 1 HDMI, 2 DisplayPort, Conexões Audio: combined audio port, Card Reader: MicroSD, TPM 2.0

Funcionamento em rede

Realtek RTL8125 2.5GBe Family Ethernet Controller (10/100/1000/2500MBit/s), MediaTek Wi-Fi 6E MT7922 160MHz Wireless LAN Card (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/ax = Wi-Fi 6/ Wi-Fi 6E 6 GHz), Bluetooth 5.2

Tamanho

altura x largura x profundidade (em mm): 20.5 x 355 x 266

Bateria

90 Wh, 5845 mAh Lítio-Polímero, 4 cells

Sistema Operativo

Microsoft Windows 11 Pro

Camera

Webcam: HD
Primary Camera: 0.9 MPix

Características adicionais

Alto falantes: 6 speakers, Teclado: chiclet, Iluminação do Teclado: sim, palm rest, Microsoft 365 (trial), Microsoft OneNote (trial), 24 Meses Garantia

peso

2.56 kg, Suprimento de energia: 850 g

Preço

4999 Euro

Links

Asus página inicial
Asus Seção de notebook

Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

see all specifications

Possíveis concorrentes em comparação

Rating	Date	Model	Weight	Height	Size	Resolution
88.2 % v7 ^(old)	05/2022	Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX R9 6900HX, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU	2.6 kg	20.5 mm	16.00"	3840x2400
92.5 % v7 ^(old)	11/2021	Apple MacBook Pro 16 2021 M1 Max M1 Max, M1 Max 32-Core GPU	2.2 kg	16.8 mm	16.20"	3456x2234
88.3 % v7 ^(old)	05/2022	Razer Blade 15 Advanced Model Early 2022 i7-12800H, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU	2.1 kg	16.99 mm	15.60"	1920x1080
87.5 % v7 ^(old)	01/2022	MSI GE76 Raider i9-12900HK, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU	3 kg	26 mm	17.30"	1920x1080
86.7 % v7 ^(old)	05/2022	Medion Erazer Beast X30 i9-12900HK, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU	2.2 kg	23 mm	17.30"	2560x1440
84.7 % v7 ^(old)	03/2022	Gigabyte Aero 16 YE5 i9-12900HK, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU	2.3 kg	22.4 mm	16.00"	3840x2400

Estojo - GX650 com um robusto estojo metálico

A caixa de metal preto fosco oferece um bom acabamento. Não há lacunas aparentes e nenhuma aresta afiada perceptível. Outro ponto positivo é que a unidade base não pode ser deformada. Por outro lado, a tampa poderia usar um pouco mais de rigidez. As dobradiças são capazes de segurar a tampa firmemente na posição. O ângulo máximo de abertura é de cerca de 130 graus, e é possível abrir a tampa com uma mão

Uma vez aberta a tampa do visor, o Screenpad, um segundo visor com funcionalidade touchscreen, é levantado por um ângulo fixo de cerca de 15 graus em direção ao usuário. Além disso, ele é movido em cerca de 2 cm (~0,8 pol.) em direção à tela principal. A abertura resultante mostra uma placa de plástico transparente que oferece um vislumbre do interior da caixa em alguns lugares. A elevação do Screenpad não só tem razões ergonômicas, mas também há aberturas de ventilação abaixo da tela para permitir o fluxo de ar para dentro da caixa.

O Zephyrus é um dos computadores portáteis mais pesados em nosso campo de comparação. Somente o MSI GE76 Raideré mais pesado. As dimensões também são ligeiramente maiores do que laptops comparáveis de 16 polegadas, tais como o MacBook Pro 16.

Comparação de tamanho

MSI GE76 Raider Medion Erazer Beast X30 Gigabyte Aero 16 YE5 Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX Apple MacBook Pro 16 2021 M1 Max Razer Blade 15 Advanced Model Early 2022 DIN A4 ❌

Equipamento - A Zephyrus não oferece Thunderbolt 4

Todas as quatro conexões USB (2x USB-A, 2x USB-C) suportam o padrão USB 3.2 Gen 2. Uma das duas portas USB-C oferece fornecimento de energia, e ambas as portas suportam DisplayPort via USB-C. Com isso, o laptop oferece três portas de saída de vídeo juntamente com a conexão HDMI 2.1. As conexões são completadas por uma porta de áudio combinada e uma porta Gigabit Ethernet.

Lado esquerdo: alimentação, USB 3.2 Gen 2 (USB-A), USB 3.2 Gen 2 (USB-C; DisplayPort, Power Delivery, G-Sync), leitor de cartões de armazenamento (MicroSD), combinação de áudio

Lado direito: USB 3.2 Gen 2 (USB-C; DisplayPort)

Voltar: Gigabit Ethernet, USB 3.2 Gen 2 (USB-A), HDMI 2.1

Leitor de cartões SD

O leitor de cartões de armazenamento MicroSD é um dos modelos rápidos com taxas máximas de transferência de 155 MB/s (transferindo 250 arquivos de imagem jpg de cerca de 5 MB cada) e 185 MB/s (copiando grandes blocos de dados) usando nosso cartão de armazenamento de referência AV PRO microSD 128 GB V60.

SD Card Reader
average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs)
Razer Blade 15 Advanced Model Early 2022 Intel Core i7-12800H (AV PRO microSD 128 GB V60)	155 MB/s 0%
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX (AV PRO microSD 128 GB V60)	155 MB/s
Average of class Gaming (19 - 202, n=87, last 2 years)	95.9 MB/s -38%
MSI GE76 Raider Intel Core i9-12900HK (AV PRO microSD 128 GB V60)	79.9 MB/s -48%
Medion Erazer Beast X30 Intel Core i9-12900HK (AV PRO microSD 128 GB V60)	66 MB/s -57%
maximum AS SSD Seq Read Test (1GB)
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX (AV PRO microSD 128 GB V60)	185 MB/s
Average of class Gaming (25.8 - 269, n=87, last 2 years)	120.4 MB/s -35%
Medion Erazer Beast X30 Intel Core i9-12900HK (AV PRO microSD 128 GB V60)	83 MB/s -55%

Comunicação

As taxas de transferência WLAN determinadas sob condições ótimas (sem dispositivos WLAN adicionais nas proximidades e o laptop e o PC servidor nas proximidades) são excelentes e correspondem às capacidades do chip WiFi (Mediatek MT7922; 802.11 ax, WiFi 6E). As conexões de rede com fio são tratadas por um chip Gigabit Ethernet (RTL8125) da Realtek.

Networking
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX MediaTek Wi-Fi 6E MT7922 160MHz Wireless LAN Card	1695 (1556^min - 1768^max) MBit/s
Razer Blade 15 Advanced Model Early 2022 Killer Wi-Fi 6E AX1690i 160MHz	1621 (1412^min - 1672^max) MBit/s -4%
Medion Erazer Beast X30 Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201	1503 (1451^min - 1558^max) MBit/s -11%
Gigabyte Aero 16 YE5 Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX210	1333 (1044^min - 1390^max) MBit/s -21%
Average MediaTek Wi-Fi 6E MT7922 160MHz Wireless LAN Card (358 - 1785, n=55)	1279 MBit/s -25%
Average of class Gaming (469 - 1843, n=147, last 2 years)	1227 MBit/s -28%
iperf3 receive AXE11000
Razer Blade 15 Advanced Model Early 2022 Killer Wi-Fi 6E AX1690i 160MHz	1727 (866^min - 1759^max) MBit/s +2%
Medion Erazer Beast X30 Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201	1721 (1500^min - 1744^max) MBit/s +2%
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX MediaTek Wi-Fi 6E MT7922 160MHz Wireless LAN Card	1692 (1567^min - 1738^max) MBit/s
Average MediaTek Wi-Fi 6E MT7922 160MHz Wireless LAN Card (707 - 1775, n=55)	1397 MBit/s -17%
Average of class Gaming (680 - 1890, n=147, last 2 years)	1390 MBit/s -18%
Gigabyte Aero 16 YE5 Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX210	1030 (752^min - 1313^max) MBit/s -39%

Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX MediaTek Wi-Fi 6E MT7922 160MHz Wireless LAN Card; iperf3 receive AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1691 (1567-1738)

Razer Blade 15 Advanced Model Early 2022 Killer Wi-Fi 6E AX1690i 160MHz; iperf3 receive AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1697 (866-1759)

Medion Erazer Beast X30 Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201; iperf3 receive AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1721 (1500-1744)

Gigabyte Aero 16 YE5 Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX210; iperf3 receive AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1029 (752-1313)

MSI GE76 Raider Killer Wi-Fi 6E AX1675i 160MHz Wireless Network Adapter; iperf3 receive AX12; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1117 (588-1235)

Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX MediaTek Wi-Fi 6E MT7922 160MHz Wireless LAN Card; iperf3 transmit AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1695 (1556-1768)

Razer Blade 15 Advanced Model Early 2022 Killer Wi-Fi 6E AX1690i 160MHz; iperf3 transmit AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1621 (1412-1672)

Medion Erazer Beast X30 Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201; iperf3 transmit AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1503 (1451-1558)

Gigabyte Aero 16 YE5 Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX210; iperf3 transmit AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1333 (1044-1390)

MSI GE76 Raider Killer Wi-Fi 6E AX1675i 160MHz Wireless Network Adapter; iperf3 transmit AX12; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1235 (650-1337)

Webcam

A webcam de 0,9 MP da Zephyrus produz imagens com uma resolução máxima de 1280 x 720 pixels. Falta precisão de cor, e as cores se desviam significativamente do alvo. A câmera não possui uma tampa mecânica.

ColorChecker Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX: 15.96 ∆E min: 2.53 - max: 27.32 ∆E

Acessórios

Além da documentação usual (manual de início rápido e informações sobre garantia), o laptop também inclui um apoio para a palma da mão de borracha.

Manutenção

Para tirar o fundo da caixa, primeiro é preciso remover os parafusos no fundo. Mas você precisa prestar atenção, já que um dos parafusos no meio da caixa é coberto por uma pequena placa de borracha. A parte de trás da caixa também é mantida no lugar por alguns grampos que podem ser soltos por alguns abanões cuidadosos ou com a ajuda de uma ferramenta de biselar plana. Após remover o fundo da caixa, você tem acesso aos bancos de memória de trabalho (ambos ocupados), aos dois SSDs (PCIe 4), aos ventiladores, e à bateria.

Garantia

A Asus oferece uma garantia de 2 anos sobre o Zephyrus. Uma extensão de garantia para 3 anos custará 129 Euros (~$136) a mais.

Dispositivos de entrada - Uma segunda tela para o laptop Asus

Teclado

O teclado só permite uma digitação confortável se você usar o apoio de mão incluído feito de borracha (profundidade: ~5,5 cm, 2,2 pol., angulado). Embora faça um trabalho bastante bom, ele realmente só funciona em uma superfície fixa. As teclas lisas do teclado chiclet iluminado têm um curso curto e um ponto de pressão claro. A resistência das teclas é boa, e o teclado não dobra enquanto digita. A iluminação RGB de três etapas é controlada através de uma tecla de função. Em geral, o Asus fornece aqui um teclado que é adequado para as tarefas diárias.

Touchpad

Um Clickpad multitouch-capable (~5,8 x 9,6 cm, ~2,3 x 3,8 pol.) em orientação retrato serve como substituto do mouse. Sua superfície lisa facilita o deslizamento dos dedos. O tapete tem um curso curto e um ponto de pressão claro. Bater no símbolo correspondente na almofada mostrará um teclado numérico.

Bloco de tela Asus Plus

Há uma opção adicional de entrada na forma do Screenpad Plus (14 pol., 3840 x 1100 pixels, mate), que é uma segunda tela que inclui a funcionalidade de tela tátil (suporte para canetas de entrada ativas). Ele se comporta como qualquer outra tela externa plugada e pode ser ligado e desligado através de uma tecla separada.

O Screenpad dá a opção de mover aplicações ou seus elementos de navegação para a tela sensível ao toque. Este último depende se a aplicação suporta isto. Por exemplo, somos capazes de mover a janela de bate-papo para o Screenpad, enquanto um jogo está rodando na tela principal.

Há várias pequenas aplicações pré-instaladas que dão uma impressão das possibilidades do Screenpad. Por exemplo, há uma calculadora e um campo para a entrada da caligrafia, e um pacote de aplicações de teclas rápidas que muitas vezes utilizam funções tais como cortar, copiar e colar.

Display - Boa reprodução de cores

O brilho (433,9 cd/m²) e o contraste (1043:1) do visor mate de 16 polegadas (3840 x 2400 pixels) preenchem os requisitos. Os pontos positivos são os tempos de resposta rápidos e a falta de PWM cintilante.

O display suporta a tecnologia FreeSync da AMD, que ajusta dinamicamente as taxas de atualização do display e as taxas de quadros da GPU uns aos outros. Desta forma, a imagem criada deve ser a mais suave possível, particularmente durante jogos de computador.


464 cd/m²	431 cd/m²	430 cd/m²
426 cd/m²	459 cd/m²	409 cd/m²
442 cd/m²	432 cd/m²	412 cd/m²

Distribuição do brilho

BOE NE160QAM-NX1 tested with X-Rite i1Pro 2

Máximo: 464 cd/m² (Nits) Médio: 433.9 cd/m² Minimum: 22 cd/m²
iluminação: 88 %
iluminação com acumulador: 459 cd/m²
Contraste: 1043:1 (Preto: 0.44 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 2.97 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.91, calibrated: 1.03
ΔE Greyscale 4.9 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
86.3% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
99.9% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
98% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.235

Download Arquivo ICC (X-Rite i1Pro 2)

	Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX BOE NE160QAM-NX1, IPS-Level, 3840x2400, 16"	Apple MacBook Pro 16 2021 M1 Max Mini-LED, 3456x2234, 16.2"	Razer Blade 15 Advanced Model Early 2022 TL156VDXP02-0, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6"	MSI GE76 Raider AU Optronics B173HAN05.4 (AUOE295), IPS-Level, 1920x1080, 17.3"	Medion Erazer Beast X30 BOE CQ NE173QHM-NZ3, IPS, 2560x1440, 17.3"	Gigabyte Aero 16 YE5 Samsung SDC416B, AMOLED, 3840x2400, 16"
Display			-23%	-22%	-18%
Display P3 Coverage	98		65.3 -33%	63.1 -36%	67.7 -31%
sRGB Coverage	99.9		85.1 -15%	94 -6%	97.6 -2%
AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage	86.3		67.4 -22%	65.2 -24%	69.2 -20%
Response Times			-9%	-5%	-26%	74%
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% *	14.6 ?(6.7, 7.9)		4.3 ?(2.4, 1.9) 71%	5.6 ?(2, 3.6) 62%	14.7 ?(7, 7.7) -1%	2.4 ?(1.2, 1.2) 84%
Response Time Black / White *	5.6 ?(2, 3.6)		10.5 ?(5.7, 4.8) -88%	9.6 ?(5.2, 4.4) -71%	8.4 ?(3.2, 5.2) -50%	2 ?(1, 1) 64%
PWM Frequency						60 ?(58)
Screen		329%	27%	20%	3%	456%
Brightness middle	459	507 10%	330 -28%	290 -37%	377 -18%	368 -20%
Brightness	434	494 14%	315 -27%	290 -33%	352 -19%	368 -15%
Brightness Distribution	88	96 9%	89 1%	96 9%	86 -2%	93 6%
Black Level *	0.44	0.02 95%	0.24 45%	0.23 48%	0.32 27%	0.01 98%
Contrast	1043	25350 2330%	1375 32%	1261 21%	1178 13%	36800 3428%
Colorchecker dE 2000 *	2.97	1.4 53%	1.47 51%	1.59 46%	2.91 2%	2.33 22%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *	8.13	2.8 66%	2.73 66%	3.17 61%	6.78 17%	4.34 47%
Colorchecker dE 2000 calibrated *	1.03		0.63 39%	0.87 16%	1.3 -26%
Greyscale dE 2000 *	4.9	2.3 53%	1.8 63%	2.5 49%	3.4 31%	0.8 84%
Gamma	2.235 ^98%	2.27 ^97%	2.282 ^96%	2.253 ^98%	2.109 ^104%	2.119 ^104%
CCT	6775 ^96%	6792 ^96%	6499 ^100%	6640 ^98%	7273 ^89%	6569 ^99%
Total Average (Program / Settings)		329% / 329%	-2% / 11%	-2% / 8%	-14% / -6%	265% / 380%

* ... smaller is better

A certificação X Rite Pantone do display garante uma reprodução de cores muito natural. De forma correspondente, o display colorido já está bastante preciso no estado de entrega. Embora o desvio de cor permaneça dentro dos limites do alvo, uma calibração ainda traz melhorias significativas. A tela é capaz de exibir os espaços de cor sRGB (99,9%) e DCI-P3 (98%) quase completamente, e 86% do espaço de cor AdobeRGB também são cobertos.

Display Response Times

ℹ

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.

↔ Response Time Black to White
5.6 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↗ 2 ms rise
5.6 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↘ 3.6 ms fall
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 14 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (20.9 ms).
↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
14.6 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↗ 6.7 ms rise
14.6 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↘ 7.9 ms fall
The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 25 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (32.8 ms).

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

ℹ

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.

Screen flickering / PWM not detected

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8706 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured.

Os ângulos de visão do painel IPS são estáveis, e pode ser lido de qualquer ângulo. O visor pode ser lido ao ar livre, se a luz do sol não for muito brilhante.

Desempenho - Rembrandt encontra Ampere

Com o Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX, a Asus oferece um laptop de 16 polegadas que é posicionado principalmente como um laptop para jogos. No entanto, o dispositivo também é voltado para serpentinas e criadores de conteúdo.

Condições de teste

O laptop oferece três perfis de desempenho específicos do fabricante ("Silent", "Performance" e "Turbo"), e você pode alternar entre eles usando a combinação de teclas "Fn" + "F5". O perfil "Turbo" só pode ser usado em operação de rede elétrica. Nossos testes de bateria foram realizados utilizando o perfil "Silent" e todos os benchmarks com o perfil "Performance" ativado.

	Desempenho	Turbo	Silencioso
Limite de potência 1	80 Watt	100 Watt	70 Watt
Limite de potência 2	80 Watt	125 Watt	70 Watt

O software Armoury Crate pré-instalado permite a criação de perfis individuais ("Manual"). Por exemplo, configuramos os limites de potência da CPU e o impulso dinâmico da GPU individualmente. Você também pode fazer overclock do armazenamento gráfico.

Processador

O segmento de CPU do Ryzen 9-6900HXaPU (Rembrandt) consiste em um processador octa-core que funciona a uma velocidade básica de relógio de 3,3 GHz. A velocidade pode ser aumentada até 4,9 GHz via Turbo. É suportado multithreading simultâneo (dois fios por núcleo).

O teste multi-tarefa do benchmark Cinebench R15 funciona brevemente a velocidades entre 4 e 4,4 GHz, e o teste de rosca única entre 3,1 e 4,7 GHz. Na operação com bateria, a CPU funciona entre 3 e 4,1 GHz (multithread) e 2 e 4,7 GHz (single-thread).

Avaliamos se a CPU Turbo é usada constantemente em operação de rede elétrica executando o teste multithread do benchmark Cinebench R15 por pelo menos 30 minutos em um loop constante. O Turbo é usado em um nível elevado. Usando o perfil de desempenho "Turbo", a velocidade do relógio pode ser aumentada ainda um pouco mais.

Cinebench R15 Multi Constant Load Test

Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX: Ø2247 (2222.47-2257.72)

Apple MacBook Pro 16 2021 M1 Max Apple M1 Max; Rosetta 2: Ø1687 (1667.29-1693.05)

Razer Blade 15 Advanced Model Early 2022 Intel Core i7-12800H: Ø1535 (1448.91-1565.5)

MSI GE76 Raider Intel Core i9-12900HK: Ø2722 (2660.99-2908.88)

Medion Erazer Beast X30 Intel Core i9-12900HK: Ø2761 (2697.24-2854.49)

Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX; Leise: Ø2069 (2039.36-2194.43)

Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX; Turbo: Ø2369 (2355.85-2411.64)

Gigabyte Aero 16 YE5 Intel Core i9-12900HK: Ø2616 (2562.79-2779.9)

Velocidades do relógio da CPU durante a execução do loop CB15

Velocidades do relógio da CPU durante o funcionamento do loop CB15 (Turbo)

Velocidades do relógio da CPU durante a execução do loop CB15 (Silencioso)

Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64Bit

2292 Points

Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64Bit

158.6 fps

Cinebench R15 Ref. Match 64Bit

99.6 %

Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64Bit

249 Points

Cinebench R20 CPU (Multi Core)

5489 Points

Cinebench R20 CPU (Single Core)

595 Points

Cinebench R23 Single Core

1566 Points

Cinebench R23 Multi Core

14085 Points

Ajuda

... comparado com

CPU Performance Rating - Percent
Average of class Gaming	82.9 pt
MSI GE76 Raider Intel Core i9-12900HK	77.5 pt
Gigabyte Aero 16 YE5 Intel Core i9-12900HK	75.7 pt
Medion Erazer Beast X30 Intel Core i9-12900HK	70 pt
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX	65.4 pt
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX	63.3 pt
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX	62.2 pt
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2021 M1 Max ^-5! Apple M1 Max	61.8 pt
Average AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX	60.1 pt
Razer Blade 15 Advanced Model Early 2022 Intel Core i7-12800H	56.5 pt

Cinebench R23
Multi Core
Average of class Gaming (5668 - 36249, n=189, last 2 years)	21994 Points +56%
Medion Erazer Beast X30 Intel Core i9-12900HK	18935 Points +34%
MSI GE76 Raider Intel Core i9-12900HK	18288 Points +30%
Gigabyte Aero 16 YE5 Intel Core i9-12900HK	18106 Points +29%
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX (Turbo)	15100 Points +7%
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX	14085 Points
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX (Leise)	13966 Points -1%
Average AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX (9709 - 15100, n=19)	13307 Points -6%
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2021 M1 Max Apple M1 Max	12385 Points -12%
Razer Blade 15 Advanced Model Early 2022 Intel Core i7-12800H	9777 Points -31%
Single Core
Gigabyte Aero 16 YE5 Intel Core i9-12900HK	1940 Points +24%
MSI GE76 Raider Intel Core i9-12900HK	1909 Points +22%
Average of class Gaming (1136 - 2235, n=188, last 2 years)	1894 Points +21%
Razer Blade 15 Advanced Model Early 2022 Intel Core i7-12800H	1799 Points +15%
Medion Erazer Beast X30 Intel Core i9-12900HK	1659 Points +6%
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX (Leise)	1576 Points +1%
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX (Turbo)	1570 Points 0%
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX	1566 Points
Average AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX (1516 - 1616, n=19)	1565 Points 0%
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2021 M1 Max Apple M1 Max	1530 Points -2%

Cinebench R20
CPU (Multi Core)
Average of class Gaming (2179 - 13832, n=186, last 2 years)	8352 Points +52%
Medion Erazer Beast X30 Intel Core i9-12900HK	7203 Points +31%
Gigabyte Aero 16 YE5 Intel Core i9-12900HK	6941 Points +26%
MSI GE76 Raider Intel Core i9-12900HK	6849 Points +25%
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX (Turbo)	5813 Points +6%
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX	5489 Points
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX (Leise)	5403 Points -2%
Average AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX (3742 - 5813, n=19)	5162 Points -6%
Razer Blade 15 Advanced Model Early 2022 Intel Core i7-12800H	3741 Points -32%
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2021 M1 Max Apple M1 Max	2735 Points -50%
CPU (Single Core)
MSI GE76 Raider Intel Core i9-12900HK	734 Points +23%
Average of class Gaming (439 - 856, n=186, last 2 years)	727 Points +22%
Razer Blade 15 Advanced Model Early 2022 Intel Core i7-12800H	695 Points +17%
Gigabyte Aero 16 YE5 Intel Core i9-12900HK	685 Points +15%
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX (Turbo)	612 Points +3%
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX (Leise)	610 Points +3%
Average AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX (595 - 631, n=19)	610 Points +3%
Medion Erazer Beast X30 Intel Core i9-12900HK	596 Points 0%
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX	595 Points
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2021 M1 Max Apple M1 Max	390 Points -34%

Cinebench R15
CPU Multi 64Bit
Average of class Gaming (905 - 5663, n=193, last 2 years)	3440 Points +50%
MSI GE76 Raider Intel Core i9-12900HK	2909 (2660.99^min - 2908.88^max) Points +27%
Medion Erazer Beast X30 Intel Core i9-12900HK	2854 Points +25%
Gigabyte Aero 16 YE5 Intel Core i9-12900HK	2780 Points +21%
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX (Turbo)	2411 Points +5%
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX	2292 Points
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX (Leise)	2194 Points -4%
Average AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX (1588 - 2411, n=19)	2163 Points -6%
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2021 M1 Max Apple M1 Max (Rosetta 2)	1693 (1667^min - 1693^max) Points -26%
Razer Blade 15 Advanced Model Early 2022 Intel Core i7-12800H	1566 (1448.91^min - 1565.5^max) Points -32%
CPU Single 64Bit
Gigabyte Aero 16 YE5 Intel Core i9-12900HK	279 Points +12%
Average of class Gaming (191.9 - 318, n=190, last 2 years)	278 Points +12%
MSI GE76 Raider Intel Core i9-12900HK	275 Points +10%
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX (Turbo)	253 Points +2%
Average AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX (241 - 261, n=19)	250 Points 0%
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX	249 Points
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX (Leise)	249 Points 0%
Razer Blade 15 Advanced Model Early 2022 Intel Core i7-12800H	242 Points -3%
Medion Erazer Beast X30 Intel Core i9-12900HK	240 Points -4%
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2021 M1 Max Apple M1 Max (Rosetta 2)	197 Points -21%

Blender - v2.79 BMW27 CPU
Razer Blade 15 Advanced Model Early 2022 Intel Core i7-12800H	306 Seconds * -39%
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX (Leise)	242 Seconds * -10%
Average AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX (212 - 357, n=21)	239 Seconds * -9%
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX	220 Seconds *
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX (Turbo)	212 Seconds * +4%
Gigabyte Aero 16 YE5 Intel Core i9-12900HK	200 Seconds * +9%
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2021 M1 Max Apple M1 Max (Blender 3.0 beta for mac)	189 Seconds * +14%
MSI GE76 Raider Intel Core i9-12900HK	181 Seconds * +18%
Medion Erazer Beast X30 Intel Core i9-12900HK	175.8 Seconds * +20%
Average of class Gaming (87 - 555, n=181, last 2 years)	169.4 Seconds * +23%

7-Zip 18.03
7z b 4
Average of class Gaming (23795 - 140932, n=185, last 2 years)	85738 MIPS +33%
Medion Erazer Beast X30 Intel Core i9-12900HK	73485 MIPS +14%
MSI GE76 Raider Intel Core i9-12900HK	72836 MIPS +13%
Gigabyte Aero 16 YE5 Intel Core i9-12900HK	68520 MIPS +6%
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX (Turbo)	65336 MIPS +1%
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX	64457 MIPS
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX (Leise)	63706 MIPS -1%
Average AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX (49526 - 65336, n=20)	60091 MIPS -7%
Razer Blade 15 Advanced Model Early 2022 Intel Core i7-12800H	44553 MIPS -31%
7z b 4 -mmt1
Average of class Gaming (4199 - 7581, n=185, last 2 years)	6322 MIPS +10%
Gigabyte Aero 16 YE5 Intel Core i9-12900HK	6186 MIPS +8%
MSI GE76 Raider Intel Core i9-12900HK	6144 MIPS +7%
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX (Turbo)	5920 MIPS +3%
Razer Blade 15 Advanced Model Early 2022 Intel Core i7-12800H	5892 MIPS +3%
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX (Leise)	5813 MIPS +2%
Average AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX (5090 - 6070, n=20)	5799 MIPS +1%
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX	5727 MIPS
Medion Erazer Beast X30 Intel Core i9-12900HK	5257 MIPS -8%

Geekbench 5.5
Multi-Core
Average of class Gaming (4557 - 23194, n=186, last 2 years)	15098 Points +49%
Gigabyte Aero 16 YE5 Intel Core i9-12900HK	13865 Points +36%
MSI GE76 Raider Intel Core i9-12900HK	13648 Points +34%
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2021 M1 Max Apple M1 Max	12708 Points +25%
Medion Erazer Beast X30 Intel Core i9-12900HK	12559 Points +24%
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX (Turbo)	10490 Points +3%
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX	10167 Points
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX (Leise)	10071 Points -1%
Average AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX (8313 - 10490, n=21)	9642 Points -5%
Razer Blade 15 Advanced Model Early 2022 Intel Core i7-12800H	9607 Points -6%
Single-Core
MSI GE76 Raider Intel Core i9-12900HK	1918 Points +20%
Average of class Gaming (986 - 2210, n=186, last 2 years)	1898 Points +19%
Gigabyte Aero 16 YE5 Intel Core i9-12900HK	1870 Points +17%
Razer Blade 15 Advanced Model Early 2022 Intel Core i7-12800H	1842 Points +16%
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2021 M1 Max Apple M1 Max	1782 Points +12%
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX (Turbo)	1604 Points +1%
Medion Erazer Beast X30 Intel Core i9-12900HK	1596 Points 0%
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX	1594 Points
Average AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX (1523 - 1652, n=21)	1589 Points 0%
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX (Leise)	1523 Points -4%

HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 - 4k Preset
Average of class Gaming (6.72 - 38.9, n=185, last 2 years)	23.6 fps +31%
Medion Erazer Beast X30 Intel Core i9-12900HK	20.5 fps +14%
MSI GE76 Raider Intel Core i9-12900HK	19.9 fps +11%
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX (Turbo)	18.7 fps +4%
Gigabyte Aero 16 YE5 Intel Core i9-12900HK	18.1 fps +1%
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX	18 fps
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX (Leise)	17.6 fps -2%
Average AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX (12.6 - 18.7, n=20)	16.7 fps -7%
Razer Blade 15 Advanced Model Early 2022 Intel Core i7-12800H	11.7 fps -35%

LibreOffice - 20 Documents To PDF
Average AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX (44.8 - 81.7, n=20)	53.1 s * -18%
Medion Erazer Beast X30 Intel Core i9-12900HK	49.5 s * -10%
Average of class Gaming (31.4 - 199, n=182, last 2 years)	48.1 s * -7%
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX (Leise)	45.2 s * -0%
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX	45 s *
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX (Turbo)	44.8 s * -0%
Razer Blade 15 Advanced Model Early 2022 Intel Core i7-12800H	42.9 s * +5%
Gigabyte Aero 16 YE5 Intel Core i9-12900HK	39 s * +13%
MSI GE76 Raider Intel Core i9-12900HK	38.9 s * +14%

R Benchmark 2.5 - Overall mean
Medion Erazer Beast X30 Intel Core i9-12900HK	0.4936 sec * -3%
Average AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX (0.4627 - 0.4974, n=20)	0.483 sec * -1%
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX (Leise)	0.4808 sec * -0%
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX	0.4799 sec *
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX (Turbo)	0.4742 sec * +1%
Razer Blade 15 Advanced Model Early 2022 Intel Core i7-12800H	0.4522 sec * +6%
Average of class Gaming (0.3609 - 0.759, n=186, last 2 years)	0.4366 sec * +9%
MSI GE76 Raider Intel Core i9-12900HK	0.4252 sec * +11%
Gigabyte Aero 16 YE5 Intel Core i9-12900HK	0.4155 sec * +13%

* ... smaller is better

Performance Rating | AIDA64

Performance Rating - Percent
Average of class Gaming	96.2 pt
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU	87 pt
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU	83.7 pt
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU	82.4 pt
Average AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX	77.4 pt
MSI GE76 Raider Intel Core i9-12900HK, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU	64.4 pt
Medion Erazer Beast X30 Intel Core i9-12900HK, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU	64.2 pt
Gigabyte Aero 16 YE5 Intel Core i9-12900HK, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU	60.7 pt
Razer Blade 15 Advanced Model Early 2022 Intel Core i7-12800H, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU	46.8 pt

AIDA64
FP32 Ray-Trace
Average of class Gaming (4986 - 60169, n=182, last 2 years)	21963 KRay/s +30%
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU (v6.50.5800, Turbo)	17963 KRay/s +7%
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU (v6.50.5800)	16852 KRay/s
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU (v6.50.5800, Leise)	16192 KRay/s -4%
Average AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX (10950 - 17963, n=20)	15327 KRay/s -9%
Medion Erazer Beast X30 Intel Core i9-12900HK, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU (v6.50.5800)	9405 KRay/s -44%
MSI GE76 Raider Intel Core i9-12900HK, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU (v6.50.5800)	9065 KRay/s -46%
Gigabyte Aero 16 YE5 Intel Core i9-12900HK, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU (v6.50.5800)	8265 KRay/s -51%
Razer Blade 15 Advanced Model Early 2022 Intel Core i7-12800H, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU (v6.50.5800)	5839 KRay/s -65%
FPU Julia
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU (v6.50.5800, Turbo)	110797 Points +7%
Average of class Gaming (25360 - 252486, n=182, last 2 years)	106952 Points +3%
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU (v6.50.5800)	103794 Points
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU (v6.50.5800, Leise)	101849 Points -2%
Average AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX (71414 - 110797, n=20)	96546 Points -7%
Medion Erazer Beast X30 Intel Core i9-12900HK, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU (v6.50.5800)	42843 Points -59%
MSI GE76 Raider Intel Core i9-12900HK, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU (v6.50.5800)	40570 Points -61%
Gigabyte Aero 16 YE5 Intel Core i9-12900HK, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU (v6.50.5800)	38277 Points -63%
Razer Blade 15 Advanced Model Early 2022 Intel Core i7-12800H, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU (v6.50.5800)	27801 Points -73%
CPU SHA3
Average of class Gaming (1339 - 10389, n=182, last 2 years)	4920 MB/s +39%
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU (v6.50.5800, Turbo)	3804 MB/s +7%
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU (v6.50.5800)	3547 MB/s
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU (v6.50.5800, Leise)	3480 MB/s -2%
Medion Erazer Beast X30 Intel Core i9-12900HK, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU (v6.50.5800)	3354 MB/s -5%
Average AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX (2471 - 3804, n=20)	3301 MB/s -7%
MSI GE76 Raider Intel Core i9-12900HK, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU (v6.50.5800)	3178 MB/s -10%
Gigabyte Aero 16 YE5 Intel Core i9-12900HK, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU (v6.50.5800)	2931 MB/s -17%
Razer Blade 15 Advanced Model Early 2022 Intel Core i7-12800H, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU (v6.50.5800)	2013 MB/s -43%
CPU Queen
Average of class Gaming (50699 - 200651, n=182, last 2 years)	117347 Points +12%
Gigabyte Aero 16 YE5 Intel Core i9-12900HK, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU (v6.50.5800)	107042 Points +2%
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU (v6.50.5800, Turbo)	107007 Points +2%
MSI GE76 Raider Intel Core i9-12900HK, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU (v6.50.5800)	106414 Points +1%
Medion Erazer Beast X30 Intel Core i9-12900HK, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU (v6.50.5800)	106369 Points +1%
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU (v6.50.5800)	104920 Points
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU (v6.50.5800, Leise)	104649 Points 0%
Average AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX (84185 - 107544, n=20)	100656 Points -4%
Razer Blade 15 Advanced Model Early 2022 Intel Core i7-12800H, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU (v6.50.5800)	85965 Points -18%
FPU SinJulia
Average of class Gaming (4800 - 32988, n=182, last 2 years)	13290 Points +3%
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU (v6.50.5800, Turbo)	13062 Points +1%
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU (v6.50.5800, Leise)	12957 Points 0%
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU (v6.50.5800)	12955 Points
Average AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX (10970 - 13205, n=20)	12630 Points -3%
MSI GE76 Raider Intel Core i9-12900HK, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU (v6.50.5800)	10237 Points -21%
Medion Erazer Beast X30 Intel Core i9-12900HK, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU (v6.50.5800)	10226 Points -21%
Gigabyte Aero 16 YE5 Intel Core i9-12900HK, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU (v6.50.5800)	9655 Points -25%
Razer Blade 15 Advanced Model Early 2022 Intel Core i7-12800H, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU (v6.50.5800)	7027 Points -46%
FPU Mandel
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU (v6.50.5800, Turbo)	61370 Points +7%
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU	57334 Points
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU (v6.50.5800, Leise)	56121 Points -2%
Average of class Gaming (12321 - 134044, n=182, last 2 years)	53819 Points -6%
Average AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX (39164 - 61370, n=20)	52842 Points -8%
Medion Erazer Beast X30 Intel Core i9-12900HK, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU (v6.50.5800)	26859 Points -53%
MSI GE76 Raider Intel Core i9-12900HK, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU (v6.50.5800)	24693 Points -57%
Gigabyte Aero 16 YE5 Intel Core i9-12900HK, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU (v6.50.5800)	22873 Points -60%
Razer Blade 15 Advanced Model Early 2022 Intel Core i7-12800H, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU (v6.50.5800)	15765 Points -73%
CPU AES
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU (v6.50.5800, Turbo)	140776 MB/s +1%
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU (v6.50.5800)	139407 MB/s
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU (v6.50.5800, Leise)	137667 MB/s -1%
Average AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX (54613 - 142360, n=20)	115891 MB/s -17%
Average of class Gaming (19065 - 328679, n=182, last 2 years)	109208 MB/s -22%
MSI GE76 Raider Intel Core i9-12900HK, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU (v6.50.5800)	100062 MB/s -28%
Gigabyte Aero 16 YE5 Intel Core i9-12900HK, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU (v6.50.5800)	91041 MB/s -35%
Medion Erazer Beast X30 Intel Core i9-12900HK, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU (v6.50.5800)	67814 MB/s -51%
Razer Blade 15 Advanced Model Early 2022 Intel Core i7-12800H, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU (v6.50.5800)	65871 MB/s -53%
CPU ZLib
Average of class Gaming (373 - 2409, n=182, last 2 years)	1369 MB/s +54%
Medion Erazer Beast X30 Intel Core i9-12900HK, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU (v6.50.5800)	1174 MB/s +32%
MSI GE76 Raider Intel Core i9-12900HK, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU (v6.50.5800)	1085 MB/s +22%
Gigabyte Aero 16 YE5 Intel Core i9-12900HK, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU (v6.50.5800)	988 MB/s +11%
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU (v6.50.5800, Turbo)	911 MB/s +2%
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU (v6.50.5800)	890 MB/s
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU (v6.50.5800, Leise)	863 MB/s -3%
Average AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX (578 - 911, n=20)	803 MB/s -10%
Razer Blade 15 Advanced Model Early 2022 Intel Core i7-12800H, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU (v6.50.5800)	701 MB/s -21%
FP64 Ray-Trace
Average of class Gaming (2540 - 31796, n=182, last 2 years)	11830 KRay/s +31%
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU (v6.50.5800, Turbo)	9540 KRay/s +6%
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU (v6.50.5800)	9001 KRay/s
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU (v6.50.5800, Leise)	8759 KRay/s -3%
Average AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX (5798 - 9540, n=20)	8175 KRay/s -9%
Medion Erazer Beast X30 Intel Core i9-12900HK, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU (v6.50.5800)	5596 KRay/s -38%
MSI GE76 Raider Intel Core i9-12900HK, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU (v6.50.5800)	5239 KRay/s -42%
Gigabyte Aero 16 YE5 Intel Core i9-12900HK, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU (v6.50.5800)	4776 KRay/s -47%
Razer Blade 15 Advanced Model Early 2022 Intel Core i7-12800H, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU (v6.50.5800)	3257 KRay/s -64%
CPU PhotoWorxx
Average of class Gaming (10805 - 60161, n=183, last 2 years)	40303 MPixel/s +36%
Medion Erazer Beast X30 Intel Core i9-12900HK, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU (v6.50.5800)	40095 MPixel/s +35%
MSI GE76 Raider Intel Core i9-12900HK, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU (v6.50.5800)	40000 MPixel/s +35%
Razer Blade 15 Advanced Model Early 2022 Intel Core i7-12800H, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU (v6.50.5800)	39666 MPixel/s +34%
Gigabyte Aero 16 YE5 Intel Core i9-12900HK, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU (v6.50.5800)	38990 MPixel/s +31%
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU (v6.50.5800, Turbo)	29975 MPixel/s +1%
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU (v6.50.5800, Leise)	29894 MPixel/s +1%
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU (v6.50.5800)	29705 MPixel/s
Average AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX (26873 - 30604, n=20)	29389 MPixel/s -1%

Desempenho do sistema

O sistema que funciona bem oferece desempenho suficiente para jogos, edição de vídeo e renderização para os próximos anos. As taxas de transferência da memória de trabalho incorporada permanecem abaixo dos valores de laptops comparáveis que são equipados com armazenamento DDR5-4800. Isto é acompanhado de muito bons resultados PC-Mark.

A memória de trabalho é executada em modo de canal duplo.

PCMark 8 Home Score Accelerated v2		4418 pontos
PCMark 8 Creative Score Accelerated v2		5798 pontos
PCMark 8 Work Score Accelerated v2		4622 pontos
PCMark 10 Score		6351 pontos
Ajuda

PCMark 10 / Score
MSI GE76 Raider GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, i9-12900HK, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB	8007 Points +26%
Gigabyte Aero 16 YE5 GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, i9-12900HK, Phison ESR01TBMFCT	7816 Points +23%
Average of class Gaming (5776 - 9852, n=163, last 2 years)	7813 Points +23%
Razer Blade 15 Advanced Model Early 2022 GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, i7-12800H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	7313 Points +15%
Medion Erazer Beast X30 GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, i9-12900HK, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	7149 Points +13%
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, R9 6900HX, 2x Samsung SSD 980 Pro 2TB MZ-V8P2T0 (RAID 0)	6351 Points

PCMark 10 / Essentials
Gigabyte Aero 16 YE5 GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, i9-12900HK, Phison ESR01TBMFCT	10945 Points +17%
Average of class Gaming (9057 - 12334, n=162, last 2 years)	10836 Points +16%
MSI GE76 Raider GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, i9-12900HK, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB	10688 Points +14%
Razer Blade 15 Advanced Model Early 2022 GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, i7-12800H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	10597 Points +13%
Medion Erazer Beast X30 GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, i9-12900HK, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	9870 Points +5%
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, R9 6900HX, 2x Samsung SSD 980 Pro 2TB MZ-V8P2T0 (RAID 0)	9374 Points

PCMark 10 / Productivity
MSI GE76 Raider GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, i9-12900HK, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB	10100 Points +31%
Gigabyte Aero 16 YE5 GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, i9-12900HK, Phison ESR01TBMFCT	10050 Points +30%
Average of class Gaming (6662 - 14612, n=162, last 2 years)	9909 Points +29%
Razer Blade 15 Advanced Model Early 2022 GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, i7-12800H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	9675 Points +26%
Medion Erazer Beast X30 GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, i9-12900HK, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	9173 Points +19%
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, R9 6900HX, 2x Samsung SSD 980 Pro 2TB MZ-V8P2T0 (RAID 0)	7704 Points

PCMark 10 / Digital Content Creation
MSI GE76 Raider GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, i9-12900HK, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB	12905 Points +34%
Average of class Gaming (6807 - 18475, n=162, last 2 years)	12168 Points +26%
Gigabyte Aero 16 YE5 GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, i9-12900HK, Phison ESR01TBMFCT	11777 Points +22%
Medion Erazer Beast X30 GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, i9-12900HK, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	10951 Points +14%
Razer Blade 15 Advanced Model Early 2022 GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, i7-12800H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	10351 Points +8%
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, R9 6900HX, 2x Samsung SSD 980 Pro 2TB MZ-V8P2T0 (RAID 0)	9626 Points

CrossMark / Overall
Gigabyte Aero 16 YE5 GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, i9-12900HK, Phison ESR01TBMFCT	2113 Points +23%
Average of class Gaming (1247 - 2344, n=144, last 2 years)	1910 Points +12%
Razer Blade 15 Advanced Model Early 2022 GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, i7-12800H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	1768 Points +3%
Medion Erazer Beast X30 GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, i9-12900HK, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	1727 Points +1%
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, R9 6900HX, 2x Samsung SSD 980 Pro 2TB MZ-V8P2T0 (RAID 0)	1711 Points
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2021 M1 Max M1 Max 32-Core GPU, M1 Max, Apple SSD AP2048R	1586 Points -7%

CrossMark / Productivity
Gigabyte Aero 16 YE5 GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, i9-12900HK, Phison ESR01TBMFCT	2031 Points +20%
Average of class Gaming (1299 - 2204, n=144, last 2 years)	1809 Points +7%
Razer Blade 15 Advanced Model Early 2022 GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, i7-12800H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	1719 Points +1%
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, R9 6900HX, 2x Samsung SSD 980 Pro 2TB MZ-V8P2T0 (RAID 0)	1698 Points
Medion Erazer Beast X30 GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, i9-12900HK, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	1585 Points -7%
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2021 M1 Max M1 Max 32-Core GPU, M1 Max, Apple SSD AP2048R	1361 Points -20%

CrossMark / Creativity
Gigabyte Aero 16 YE5 GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, i9-12900HK, Phison ESR01TBMFCT	2161 Points +25%
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2021 M1 Max M1 Max 32-Core GPU, M1 Max, Apple SSD AP2048R	2102 Points +22%
Average of class Gaming (1275 - 2660, n=144, last 2 years)	2099 Points +22%
Medion Erazer Beast X30 GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, i9-12900HK, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	1985 Points +15%
Razer Blade 15 Advanced Model Early 2022 GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, i7-12800H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	1868 Points +8%
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, R9 6900HX, 2x Samsung SSD 980 Pro 2TB MZ-V8P2T0 (RAID 0)	1724 Points

CrossMark / Responsiveness
Gigabyte Aero 16 YE5 GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, i9-12900HK, Phison ESR01TBMFCT	2228 Points +30%
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, R9 6900HX, 2x Samsung SSD 980 Pro 2TB MZ-V8P2T0 (RAID 0)	1715 Points
Average of class Gaming (1030 - 2330, n=144, last 2 years)	1707 Points 0%
Razer Blade 15 Advanced Model Early 2022 GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, i7-12800H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	1633 Points -5%
Medion Erazer Beast X30 GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, i9-12900HK, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	1471 Points -14%
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2021 M1 Max M1 Max 32-Core GPU, M1 Max, Apple SSD AP2048R	1080 Points -37%

AIDA64: Memory Copy | Memory Read | Memory Write | Memory Latency

AIDA64 / Memory Copy
Average of class Gaming (21842 - 94222, n=182, last 2 years)	65546 MB/s +23%
MSI GE76 Raider Intel Core i9-12900HK, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU (v6.50.5800)	62554 MB/s +18%
Gigabyte Aero 16 YE5 Intel Core i9-12900HK, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU (v6.50.5800)	62419 MB/s +17%
Razer Blade 15 Advanced Model Early 2022 Intel Core i7-12800H, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU (v6.50.5800)	61946 MB/s +17%
Medion Erazer Beast X30 Intel Core i9-12900HK, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU (v6.50.5800)	61605 MB/s +16%
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU	53162 MB/s
Average AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX (47938 - 53345, n=20)	50405 MB/s -5%

AIDA64 / Memory Read
Average of class Gaming (23681 - 99713, n=182, last 2 years)	69486 MB/s +30%
Medion Erazer Beast X30 Intel Core i9-12900HK, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU (v6.50.5800)	65865 MB/s +24%
Gigabyte Aero 16 YE5 Intel Core i9-12900HK, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU (v6.50.5800)	65835 MB/s +23%
MSI GE76 Raider Intel Core i9-12900HK, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU (v6.50.5800)	65452 MB/s +23%
Razer Blade 15 Advanced Model Early 2022 Intel Core i7-12800H, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU (v6.50.5800)	65277 MB/s +22%
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU (v6.50.5800)	53321 MB/s
Average AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX (43892 - 53321, n=20)	51062 MB/s -4%

AIDA64 / Memory Write
Average of class Gaming (22986 - 108954, n=182, last 2 years)	67309 MB/s +18%
Razer Blade 15 Advanced Model Early 2022 Intel Core i7-12800H, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU (v6.50.5800)	65772 MB/s +15%
Medion Erazer Beast X30 Intel Core i9-12900HK, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU (v6.50.5800)	65159 MB/s +14%
MSI GE76 Raider Intel Core i9-12900HK, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU (v6.50.5800)	64282 MB/s +12%
Gigabyte Aero 16 YE5 Intel Core i9-12900HK, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU (v6.50.5800)	61981 MB/s +8%
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU (v6.50.5800)	57180 MB/s
Average AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX (51085 - 57202, n=20)	55188 MB/s -3%

AIDA64 / Memory Latency
Razer Blade 15 Advanced Model Early 2022 Intel Core i7-12800H, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU (v6.50.5800)	95.2 ns * -3%
Average of class Gaming (59.5 - 259, n=182, last 2 years)	93.8 ns * -2%
MSI GE76 Raider Intel Core i9-12900HK, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU (v6.50.5800)	92.6 ns * -0%
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU (v6.50.5800)	92.3 ns *
Gigabyte Aero 16 YE5 Intel Core i9-12900HK, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU (v6.50.5800)	89.7 ns * +3%
Average AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX (80.7 - 120.6, n=20)	88.7 ns * +4%
Medion Erazer Beast X30 Intel Core i9-12900HK, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU (v6.50.5800)	0 ns * +100%

* ... smaller is better

Latências DPC

O teste padronizado do Monitor de Latência (navegação na web, reprodução de vídeo 4k, carga alta Prime95) revelou alguns atrasos notáveis nas latências DPC. O sistema não parece ser adequado para o processamento de vídeo e áudio em tempo real. Entretanto, futuras atualizações de software podem levar a algumas melhorias ou mesmo piorar as coisas.

DPC Latencies / LatencyMon - interrupt to process latency (max), Web, Youtube, Prime95
Razer Blade 15 Advanced Model Early 2022 GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, i7-12800H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	4836 μs * -827%
MSI GE76 Raider GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, i9-12900HK, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB	1642 μs * -215%
Medion Erazer Beast X30 GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, i9-12900HK, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	879.6 μs * -69%
Gigabyte Aero 16 YE5 GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, i9-12900HK, Phison ESR01TBMFCT	623 μs * -19%
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, R9 6900HX, 2x Samsung SSD 980 Pro 2TB MZ-V8P2T0 (RAID 0)	521.5 μs *

* ... smaller is better

Solução de armazenamento

Dois SSDs PCIe 4 (M.2-2280) com capacidade de armazenamento de 2 TB são combinados em uma matriz RAID 0, de modo que o sistema operacional vê os dois SSDs como um único SSD de 4 TB. Todos os dados a serem armazenados são distribuídos entre os dois SSDs. As altas taxas de transferência resultantes e os curtos tempos de carga são ideais para jogos.

CrystalDiskMark 5.2 / 6

AS SSD

DiskSpd

2x Samsung SSD 980 Pro 2TB MZ-V8P2T0 (RAID 0)

CDM 5/6 Read Seq Q32T1: 9490 MB/s

CDM 5/6 Write Seq Q32T1: 10135 MB/s

CDM 5/6 Read 4K Q32T1: 563.8 MB/s

CDM 5/6 Write 4K Q32T1: 412 MB/s

CDM 5 Read Seq: 5266 MB/s

CDM 5 Write Seq: 9867 MB/s

CDM 5/6 Read 4K: 71.92 MB/s

CDM 5/6 Write 4K: 327.5 MB/s

Drive Performance Rating | DiskSpd | AS SSD

Drive Performance Rating - Percent
Gigabyte Aero 16 YE5 Phison ESR01TBMFCT	81.7 pt
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX 2x Samsung SSD 980 Pro 2TB MZ-V8P2T0 (RAID 0)	75.5 pt
MSI GE76 Raider Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB	73.6 pt
Razer Blade 15 Advanced Model Early 2022 Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	71.5 pt
Medion Erazer Beast X30 Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	71.3 pt
Average of class Gaming	58 pt

DiskSpd
seq read
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX 2x Samsung SSD 980 Pro 2TB MZ-V8P2T0 (RAID 0)	4903 MB/s
Razer Blade 15 Advanced Model Early 2022 Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	3946 (3883.92^min - 3946.42^max) MB/s -20%
Medion Erazer Beast X30 Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	3887 MB/s -21%
Gigabyte Aero 16 YE5 Phison ESR01TBMFCT	3819 (3405.77^min - 3819.33^max) MB/s -22%
Average of class Gaming (1319 - 7045, n=164, last 2 years)	3477 MB/s -29%
MSI GE76 Raider Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB	2529 (2450.31^min - 2528.54^max) MB/s -48%
seq write
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX 2x Samsung SSD 980 Pro 2TB MZ-V8P2T0 (RAID 0)	7889 (6495.73^min - 7888.81^max) MB/s
Gigabyte Aero 16 YE5 Phison ESR01TBMFCT	4457 MB/s -44%
MSI GE76 Raider Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB	3923 (3818.83^min - 3922.64^max) MB/s -50%
Razer Blade 15 Advanced Model Early 2022 Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	3899 (3880.57^min - 3898.61^max) MB/s -51%
Medion Erazer Beast X30 Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	3863 (3808.78^min - 3862.78^max) MB/s -51%
Average of class Gaming (535 - 9307, n=164, last 2 years)	3818 MB/s -52%
seq q8 t1 read
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX 2x Samsung SSD 980 Pro 2TB MZ-V8P2T0 (RAID 0)	10557 (9742.97^min - 10557.3^max) MB/s
Gigabyte Aero 16 YE5 Phison ESR01TBMFCT	7028 (6634.28^min - 7027.76^max) MB/s -33%
MSI GE76 Raider Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB	6722 (5765.49^min - 6722^max) MB/s -36%
Razer Blade 15 Advanced Model Early 2022 Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	6666 (5850.89^min - 6666.43^max) MB/s -37%
Medion Erazer Beast X30 Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	6643 (6200.62^min - 6642.94^max) MB/s -37%
Average of class Gaming (2594 - 16089, n=164, last 2 years)	6318 MB/s -40%
seq q8 t1 write
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX 2x Samsung SSD 980 Pro 2TB MZ-V8P2T0 (RAID 0)	9830 (9799.27^min - 9829.82^max) MB/s
Gigabyte Aero 16 YE5 Phison ESR01TBMFCT	5004 (4980.32^min - 5004.43^max) MB/s -49%
MSI GE76 Raider Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB	4999 (4978.75^min - 4998.98^max) MB/s -49%
Medion Erazer Beast X30 Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	4951 (4938.35^min - 4951.38^max) MB/s -50%
Razer Blade 15 Advanced Model Early 2022 Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	4939 (4931.24^min - 4938.77^max) MB/s -50%
Average of class Gaming (539 - 14571, n=164, last 2 years)	4859 MB/s -51%
4k q1 t1 read
Razer Blade 15 Advanced Model Early 2022 Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	90.6 (86.51^min - 90.63^max) MB/s +24%
MSI GE76 Raider Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB	89.8 (89.42^min - 89.75^max) MB/s +23%
Gigabyte Aero 16 YE5 Phison ESR01TBMFCT	88.7 MB/s +21%
Medion Erazer Beast X30 Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	87.3 (86.6^min - 87.26^max) MB/s +19%
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX 2x Samsung SSD 980 Pro 2TB MZ-V8P2T0 (RAID 0)	73.1 (72.79^min - 73.06^max) MB/s
Average of class Gaming (30.6 - 95.9, n=164, last 2 years)	65.9 MB/s -10%
4k q1 t1 write
Gigabyte Aero 16 YE5 Phison ESR01TBMFCT	373 (371.9^min - 373.21^max) MB/s +4%
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX 2x Samsung SSD 980 Pro 2TB MZ-V8P2T0 (RAID 0)	359 (324.09^min - 358.58^max) MB/s
MSI GE76 Raider Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB	275 (273.95^min - 275.11^max) MB/s -23%
Razer Blade 15 Advanced Model Early 2022 Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	252 (240.11^min - 252.24^max) MB/s -30%
Average of class Gaming (78 - 397, n=164, last 2 years)	223 MB/s -38%
Medion Erazer Beast X30 Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	210 (209.55^min - 210.02^max) MB/s -42%
4k q32 t16 read
MSI GE76 Raider Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB	4073 (4064.94^min - 4073.47^max) MB/s +70%
Medion Erazer Beast X30 Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	3908 (3879.66^min - 3907.88^max) MB/s +64%
Gigabyte Aero 16 YE5 Phison ESR01TBMFCT	3555 (3552.55^min - 3555.1^max) MB/s +49%
Razer Blade 15 Advanced Model Early 2022 Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	3493 (3465.14^min - 3493.06^max) MB/s +46%
Average of class Gaming (417 - 6172, n=164, last 2 years)	2565 MB/s +7%
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX 2x Samsung SSD 980 Pro 2TB MZ-V8P2T0 (RAID 0)	2390 (2226.95^min - 2390.15^max) MB/s
4k q32 t16 write
Gigabyte Aero 16 YE5 Phison ESR01TBMFCT	3612 (3585.78^min - 3612.01^max) MB/s +134%
Medion Erazer Beast X30 Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	3004 (2951.07^min - 3004.3^max) MB/s +95%
Razer Blade 15 Advanced Model Early 2022 Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	2645 (2612.9^min - 2645.36^max) MB/s +72%
Average of class Gaming (162.3 - 4869, n=164, last 2 years)	2128 MB/s +38%
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX 2x Samsung SSD 980 Pro 2TB MZ-V8P2T0 (RAID 0)	1542 (1501.74^min - 1541.63^max) MB/s
MSI GE76 Raider Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB	1066 (1060.72^min - 1066.17^max) MB/s -31%

AS SSD
Score Total
Gigabyte Aero 16 YE5 Phison ESR01TBMFCT	9380 Points +41%
MSI GE76 Raider Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB	8982 Points +35%
Medion Erazer Beast X30 Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	8658 Points +30%
Razer Blade 15 Advanced Model Early 2022 Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	8103 Points +22%
Average of class Gaming (2271 - 13854, n=155, last 2 years)	6733 Points +1%
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX 2x Samsung SSD 980 Pro 2TB MZ-V8P2T0 (RAID 0)	6635 Points
Score Read
Gigabyte Aero 16 YE5 Phison ESR01TBMFCT	3634 Points +39%
MSI GE76 Raider Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB	3344 Points +28%
Medion Erazer Beast X30 Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	3192 Points +22%
Razer Blade 15 Advanced Model Early 2022 Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	3054 Points +17%
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX 2x Samsung SSD 980 Pro 2TB MZ-V8P2T0 (RAID 0)	2619 Points
Average of class Gaming (776 - 4721, n=155, last 2 years)	2440 Points -7%
Score Write
MSI GE76 Raider Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB	3997 Points +56%
Gigabyte Aero 16 YE5 Phison ESR01TBMFCT	3991 Points +56%
Medion Erazer Beast X30 Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	3893 Points +52%
Razer Blade 15 Advanced Model Early 2022 Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	3545 Points +39%
Average of class Gaming (515 - 7208, n=155, last 2 years)	3109 Points +22%
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX 2x Samsung SSD 980 Pro 2TB MZ-V8P2T0 (RAID 0)	2556 Points
Seq Read
Gigabyte Aero 16 YE5 Phison ESR01TBMFCT	5588 MB/s +5%
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX 2x Samsung SSD 980 Pro 2TB MZ-V8P2T0 (RAID 0)	5344.88 MB/s
Razer Blade 15 Advanced Model Early 2022 Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	5205 MB/s -3%
MSI GE76 Raider Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB	5120 MB/s -4%
Medion Erazer Beast X30 Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	5098.67 MB/s -5%
Average of class Gaming (2260 - 12763, n=155, last 2 years)	4948 MB/s -7%
Seq Write
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX 2x Samsung SSD 980 Pro 2TB MZ-V8P2T0 (RAID 0)	7663.27 MB/s
Razer Blade 15 Advanced Model Early 2022 Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	3936 MB/s -49%
Medion Erazer Beast X30 Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	3872.7 MB/s -49%
Average of class Gaming (495 - 11316, n=155, last 2 years)	3759 MB/s -51%
MSI GE76 Raider Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB	3692 MB/s -52%
Gigabyte Aero 16 YE5 Phison ESR01TBMFCT	3267 MB/s -57%
4K Read
Gigabyte Aero 16 YE5 Phison ESR01TBMFCT	109.4 MB/s +59%
MSI GE76 Raider Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB	82.8 MB/s +20%
Razer Blade 15 Advanced Model Early 2022 Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	81.55 MB/s +18%
Medion Erazer Beast X30 Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	76.99 MB/s +12%
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX 2x Samsung SSD 980 Pro 2TB MZ-V8P2T0 (RAID 0)	68.93 MB/s
Average of class Gaming (27.8 - 112.1, n=155, last 2 years)	65 MB/s -6%
4K Write
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX 2x Samsung SSD 980 Pro 2TB MZ-V8P2T0 (RAID 0)	328.69 MB/s
Gigabyte Aero 16 YE5 Phison ESR01TBMFCT	321.6 MB/s -2%
MSI GE76 Raider Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB	241.3 MB/s -27%
Average of class Gaming (108.8 - 512, n=155, last 2 years)	212 MB/s -36%
Razer Blade 15 Advanced Model Early 2022 Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	201.1 MB/s -39%
Medion Erazer Beast X30 Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	176.69 MB/s -46%
4K-64 Read
Gigabyte Aero 16 YE5 Phison ESR01TBMFCT	2966 MB/s +47%
MSI GE76 Raider Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB	2749 MB/s +36%
Medion Erazer Beast X30 Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	2604.76 MB/s +29%
Razer Blade 15 Advanced Model Early 2022 Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	2451.55 MB/s +22%
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX 2x Samsung SSD 980 Pro 2TB MZ-V8P2T0 (RAID 0)	2015.68 MB/s
Average of class Gaming (451 - 3475, n=155, last 2 years)	1874 MB/s -7%
4K-64 Write
MSI GE76 Raider Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB	3387 MB/s +132%
Gigabyte Aero 16 YE5 Phison ESR01TBMFCT	3342 MB/s +129%
Medion Erazer Beast X30 Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	3329.28 MB/s +128%
Razer Blade 15 Advanced Model Early 2022 Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	2950.05 MB/s +102%
Average of class Gaming (277 - 5909, n=155, last 2 years)	2524 MB/s +73%
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX 2x Samsung SSD 980 Pro 2TB MZ-V8P2T0 (RAID 0)	1460.96 MB/s
Access Time Read
Medion Erazer Beast X30 Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	0.057 ms * -8%
Gigabyte Aero 16 YE5 Phison ESR01TBMFCT	0.056 ms * -6%
Average of class Gaming (0.016 - 0.379, n=154, last 2 years)	0.05551 ms * -5%
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX 2x Samsung SSD 980 Pro 2TB MZ-V8P2T0 (RAID 0)	0.053 ms *
Razer Blade 15 Advanced Model Early 2022 Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	0.044 ms * +17%
MSI GE76 Raider Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB	0.029 ms * +45%
Access Time Write
Average of class Gaming (0.011 - 1.028, n=155, last 2 years)	0.04751 ms * -265%
Medion Erazer Beast X30 Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	0.023 ms * -77%
Razer Blade 15 Advanced Model Early 2022 Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	0.021 ms * -62%
MSI GE76 Raider Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB	0.018 ms * -38%
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX 2x Samsung SSD 980 Pro 2TB MZ-V8P2T0 (RAID 0)	0.013 ms *
Gigabyte Aero 16 YE5 Phison ESR01TBMFCT	0.012 ms * +8%

* ... smaller is better

Constant Performance Reading: DiskSpd Read Loop, Queue Depth 8

Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX 2x Samsung SSD 980 Pro 2TB MZ-V8P2T0 (RAID 0): Ø8257 (5868.26-10519.1)

Razer Blade 15 Advanced Model Early 2022 Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR: Ø6642 (6357.38-6687.03)

MSI GE76 Raider Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB: Ø4011 (3422.21-6714.24)

Medion Erazer Beast X30 Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR: Ø6290 (5297.3-6328.92)

Gigabyte Aero 16 YE5 Phison ESR01TBMFCT: Ø7004 (6456.5-7039.72)

Placa Gráfica

O desempenho real de uma GPU RTX 3000 depende de vários fatores: o resfriamento, o equipamento de armazenamento e o TGP máximo que um fabricante configura dentro dos limites definidos pela Nvidia. O Asus permite o GeForce Laptop RTX 3080 TigPU um TGP máximo de 165 watts (140 watts + 25 watts de impulso dinâmico). A GPU é capaz de usar o rápido armazenamento gráfico GDDR6 (16.384 MB).

Segundo a Asus, o impulso dinâmico (10 watts máximo) só está disponível se o perfil de desempenho "Turbo" for selecionado, e o teste Witcher 3 confirma isso. O máximo (25 watts) precisaria ser habilitado usando o software Armoury Crate (perfil "Manual"). A faixa de resultados de referência fica logo acima da média RTX 3080 Ti que determinamos até agora.

Mas isto não é o fim da história. Há também a opção de saída direta de imagem via GeForce GPU (Armoury Crate, MUX switch: GPU separado). Em combinação com um aumento manual do impulso dinâmico para 25 watts, a performance gráfica aumenta visivelmente.

Fire Strike (operação de rede, sep. GPU, dyn. boost 25 watts)

A saída da imagem pode ser mudada para a GPU GeForce através de um clique do mouse

3DMark 11 Performance		31771 pontos
3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score		47119 pontos
3DMark Fire Strike Score		24278 pontos
Ajuda

... comparado com

3DMark Performance Rating | 3DMark 11 | 3DMark | SPECviewperf 13 | SPECviewperf 2020

3DMark Performance Rating - Percent
MSI GE76 Raider ^-25! NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-12900HK	99.2 pt
Average of class Gaming	98.1 pt
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX ^-25! NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX	96.7 pt
Medion Erazer Beast X30 ^-25! NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-12900HK	90.6 pt
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX ^-25! NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX	89.5 pt
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU	76.5 pt
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX ^-2! NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX	76.2 pt
Razer Blade 15 Advanced Model Early 2022 ^-25! NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-12800H	72.5 pt
Gigabyte Aero 16 YE5 ^-1! NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-12900HK	68.7 pt
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX ^-25! NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX	57.2 pt

3DMark 11 - 1280x720 Performance GPU
MSI GE76 Raider NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-12900HK	45050 Points +12%
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX (Turbo)	44012 Points +9%
Average of class Gaming (1029 - 72178, n=182, last 2 years)	43891 Points +9%
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX (sep. GPU, 25W)	42275 Points +5%
Medion Erazer Beast X30 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-12900HK	41590 Points +3%
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX	40257 Points
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU (13920 - 45841, n=45)	39402 Points -2%
Gigabyte Aero 16 YE5 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-12900HK	33249 Points -17%
Razer Blade 15 Advanced Model Early 2022 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-12800H	31565 Points -22%
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX (Leise)	14745 Points -63%

3DMark
1920x1080 Fire Strike Graphics
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX (sep. GPU, 25W)	34080 Points +24%
MSI GE76 Raider NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-12900HK	34041 Points +24%
Average of class Gaming (781 - 53059, n=193, last 2 years)	31461 Points +14%
Medion Erazer Beast X30 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-12900HK	31082 Points +13%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU (6928 - 34439, n=43)	29496 Points +7%
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX	27562 Points
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX (Turbo)	26460 Points -4%
Razer Blade 15 Advanced Model Early 2022 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-12800H	25240 Points -8%
Gigabyte Aero 16 YE5 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-12900HK	24580 Points -11%
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX (Leise)	14198 Points -48%
2560x1440 Time Spy Graphics
MSI GE76 Raider NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-12900HK	13324 Points +19%
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX (sep. GPU, 25W)	13302 Points +18%
Average of class Gaming (224 - 22717, n=188, last 2 years)	13142 Points +17%
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX (Turbo)	12269 Points +9%
Medion Erazer Beast X30 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-12900HK	12060 Points +7%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU (4921 - 13835, n=43)	11850 Points +6%
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX	11227 Points
Razer Blade 15 Advanced Model Early 2022 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-12800H	9646 Points -14%
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX (Leise)	9515 Points -15%
Gigabyte Aero 16 YE5 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-12900HK	9488 Points -15%
2560x1440 Port Royal Graphics
Average of class Gaming (371 - 14592, n=112, last 2 years)	8736 Points +19%
MSI GE76 Raider NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-12900HK	8462 Points +15%
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX (sep. GPU, 25W)	8139 Points +11%
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX (Turbo)	7919 Points +8%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU (6423 - 8462, n=28)	7800 Points +6%
Medion Erazer Beast X30 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-12900HK	7733 Points +6%
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX	7329 Points
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX (Leise)	7251 Points -1%
Razer Blade 15 Advanced Model Early 2022 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-12800H	6423 Points -12%

SPECviewperf 13
Solidworks (sw-04)
Average of class Gaming (91.9 - 159.1, n=8, last 2 years)	125 fps +15%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU (62.9 - 133.4, n=8)	108.8 fps 0%
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX	108.6 fps
Gigabyte Aero 16 YE5 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-12900HK	102.3 fps -6%
Siemens NX (snx-03)
Average of class Gaming (20.7 - 99.6, n=8, last 2 years)	36.6 fps +73%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU (18.3 - 25.3, n=8)	22.3 fps +5%
Gigabyte Aero 16 YE5 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-12900HK	21.7 fps +2%
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX	21.2 fps
Showcase (showcase-02)
Average of class Gaming (25.9 - 281, n=8, last 2 years)	166 fps +11%
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX	148.9 fps
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU (110 - 175, n=8)	146.6 fps -2%
Gigabyte Aero 16 YE5 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-12900HK	127.2 fps -15%
Medical (medical-02)
Average of class Gaming (62.8 - 122.8, n=8, last 2 years)	93 fps +24%
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX	75.2 fps
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU (65.3 - 79.1, n=8)	74.5 fps -1%
Gigabyte Aero 16 YE5 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-12900HK	71.9 fps -4%
Maya (maya-05)
Average of class Gaming (83.7 - 601, n=8, last 2 years)	398 fps +29%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU (212 - 430, n=8)	321 fps +4%
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX	308.1 fps
Gigabyte Aero 16 YE5 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-12900HK	275.8 fps -10%
Energy (energy-02)
Average of class Gaming (20.3 - 74.7, n=8, last 2 years)	51.5 fps +97%
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX	26.1 fps
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU (19.3 - 27.3, n=8)	24.5 fps -6%
Gigabyte Aero 16 YE5 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-12900HK	21.7 fps -17%
Creo (creo-02)
Average of class Gaming (70.4 - 461, n=8, last 2 years)	295 fps +23%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU (177.4 - 311, n=8)	249 fps +4%
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX	239.7 fps
Gigabyte Aero 16 YE5 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-12900HK	215.7 fps -10%
Catia (catia-05)
Average of class Gaming (83 - 281, n=8, last 2 years)	197.3 fps +15%
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX	171.4 fps
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU (130.4 - 190.3, n=8)	170 fps -1%
Gigabyte Aero 16 YE5 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-12900HK	161.6 fps -6%
3ds Max (3dsmax-06)
Average of class Gaming (68.9 - 373, n=8, last 2 years)	260 fps +25%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU (161 - 260, n=8)	223 fps +7%
Gigabyte Aero 16 YE5 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-12900HK	210.2 fps +1%
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX	208.7 fps

SPECviewperf 2020
1920x1080 Solidworks (solidworks-05)
Average of class Gaming (47.1 - 515, n=20, last 2 years)	313 fps
Gigabyte Aero 16 YE5 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-12900HK	210.7 fps
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU (174.7 - 211, n=3)	198.6 fps
1920x1080 Siemens NX (snx-04)
Average of class Gaming (18.3 - 231, n=25, last 2 years)	38.9 fps +84%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU (18.1 - 25, n=6)	21.8 fps +3%
Gigabyte Aero 16 YE5 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-12900HK	21.4 fps +1%
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX	21.1 fps
1920x1080 Medical (medical-03)
Average of class Gaming (25.7 - 59.9, n=25, last 2 years)	41.2 fps +6%
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX	38.7 fps
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU (33 - 40.2, n=6)	37.4 fps -3%
Gigabyte Aero 16 YE5 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-12900HK	36.2 fps -6%
1920x1080 Maya (maya-06)
Average of class Gaming (99.8 - 687, n=24, last 2 years)	430 fps +28%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU (248 - 456, n=6)	351 fps +4%
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX	336 fps
Gigabyte Aero 16 YE5 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-12900HK	308.7 fps -8%
1920x1080 Energy (energy-03)
Average of class Gaming (21.3 - 76.5, n=25, last 2 years)	49.8 fps +90%
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX	26.2 fps
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU (19.6 - 27, n=6)	23.7 fps -10%
Gigabyte Aero 16 YE5 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-12900HK	21.6 fps -18%
1920x1080 Creo (creo-03)
Average of class Gaming (44 - 141.9, n=25, last 2 years)	109.8 fps +27%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU (55.3 - 114.7, n=6)	92.3 fps +7%
Gigabyte Aero 16 YE5 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-12900HK	89.6 fps +4%
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX	86.4 fps
1920x1080 CATIA (catia-06)
Average of class Gaming (17.8 - 117.2, n=25, last 2 years)	75 fps +13%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU (51.8 - 78.7, n=6)	67.4 fps +1%
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX	66.6 fps
Gigabyte Aero 16 YE5 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-12900HK	65.1 fps -2%
1920x1080 3ds Max (3dsmax-07)
Average of class Gaming (25.7 - 221, n=25, last 2 years)	128.9 fps 0%
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX	128.7 fps
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU (99.2 - 153, n=6)	128.4 fps 0%
Gigabyte Aero 16 YE5 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-12900HK	121.5 fps -6%
3840x2160 Solidworks (solidworks-05)
Average of class Gaming (97.2 - 251, n=4, last 2 years)	180 fps
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU (87.9 - 255, n=4)	137.6 fps
Gigabyte Aero 16 YE5 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-12900HK	104.1 fps
3840x2160 Siemens NX (snx-04)
Average of class Gaming (17.5 - 32.8, n=6, last 2 years)	25.1 fps +39%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU (15.5 - 21.1, n=7)	18.9 fps +4%
Gigabyte Aero 16 YE5 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-12900HK	18.1 fps 0%
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX	18.1 fps
3840x2160 Medical (medical-03)
Average of class Gaming (10.9 - 56, n=6, last 2 years)	29 fps +80%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU (13.2 - 34.3, n=7)	17.9 fps +11%
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX	16.1 fps
Gigabyte Aero 16 YE5 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-12900HK	14.5 fps -10%
3840x2160 Maya (maya-06)
Average of class Gaming (188 - 474, n=6, last 2 years)	332 fps +106%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU (137.4 - 345, n=7)	208 fps +29%
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX	161.1 fps
Gigabyte Aero 16 YE5 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-12900HK	152.1 fps -6%
3840x2160 Energy (energy-03)
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX	118.7 fps
Average of class Gaming (20 - 118.3, n=6, last 2 years)	66.1 fps -44%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU (27.7 - 118.7, n=7)	65.1 fps -45%
Gigabyte Aero 16 YE5 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-12900HK	64.6 fps -46%
3840x2160 Creo (creo-03)
Average of class Gaming (78 - 132, n=6, last 2 years)	108.6 fps +48%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU (49 - 93.3, n=7)	77.4 fps +5%
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX	73.5 fps
Gigabyte Aero 16 YE5 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-12900HK	70.4 fps -4%
3840x2160 CATIA (catia-06)
Average of class Gaming (33.8 - 109, n=6, last 2 years)	65 fps +61%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU (30.3 - 69.6, n=7)	43.7 fps +8%
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX	40.3 fps
Gigabyte Aero 16 YE5 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-12900HK	37.6 fps -7%
3840x2160 3ds Max (3dsmax-07)
Average of class Gaming (61.6 - 199, n=6, last 2 years)	116.1 fps +32%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU (69.5 - 144, n=7)	95.7 fps +9%
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX	87.9 fps
Gigabyte Aero 16 YE5 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-12900HK	84.4 fps -4%

Desempenho nos jogos

O hardware traz todos os jogos atuais suavemente para a tela em FHD para a resolução QHD e configurações máximas. A utilização da resolução total da tela de 3840 x 2400 pixels requer ajustes reduzidos em alguns momentos. As taxas de quadros variam em torno da média RTX 3080 Ti. A saída direta de imagem via GeForce GPU (chave MUX: GPU separada) em combinação com um aumento do impulso dinâmico para 25 watt leva a um ligeiro aumento das taxas de quadros.

As taxas de quadros baixas quando o perfil "Silencioso" é ativado são devidas ao "Modo Whisper 2.0" da GPU GeForce, que é suposto manter o nível de ruído tão baixo quanto possível enquanto o nível de taxa de quadros ainda é suficiente para um jogo (pelo menos 30 a 60 fps). Isto significa que a GPU não precisa funcionar em potência máxima, produzindo assim menos calor e permitindo que os ventiladores permaneçam mais silenciosos.

The Witcher 3
1920x1080 Ultra Graphics & Postprocessing (HBAO+)
Average of class Gaming (18.4 - 216, n=162, last 2 years)	128.5 fps +16%
MSI GE76 Raider Intel Core i9-12900HK, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU	126 (108^min) fps +13%
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU (sep. GPU, 25W)	124.4 (20.1^min, 40.2^P0.1, 88.9^P1) fps +12%
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU (Turbo)	120.7 (22.4^min, 49.9^P0.1, 82.6^P1) fps +9%
Medion Erazer Beast X30 Intel Core i9-12900HK, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU	117.4 (26.9^min, 30.4^P0.1, 81.6^P1) fps +6%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU (30 - 130.6, n=43)	112.1 fps +1%
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU	111.1 (30^min, 41.5^P0.1, 74.7^P1) fps
Gigabyte Aero 16 YE5 Intel Core i9-12900HK, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU	92.2 (19.1^min, 45.8^P0.1, 67.7^P1) fps -17%
Razer Blade 15 Advanced Model Early 2022 Intel Core i7-12800H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU	89.3 (64^min) fps -20%
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU (Leise)	60 (33.6^min, 39^P0.1, 47.5^P1) fps -46%
3840x2160 Ultra Graphics & Postprocessing (HBAO+)
Average of class Gaming (42.8 - 107.6, n=10, last 2 years)	73.4 fps +35%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU (44.8 - 62.7, n=5)	56.4 fps +4%
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU	54.4 (30.3^min, 36.3^P0.1, 43.6^P1) fps
Gigabyte Aero 16 YE5 Intel Core i9-12900HK, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU	44.8 (14.7^min, 26.1^P0.1, 36.7^P1) fps -18%

Dota 2 Reborn
1920x1080 ultra (3/3) best looking
Gigabyte Aero 16 YE5 Intel Core i9-12900HK, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU	160 (139.4^min) fps +44%
MSI GE76 Raider Intel Core i9-12900HK, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU	156 (137^min) fps +40%
Average of class Gaming (65.1 - 220, n=186, last 2 years)	151.2 fps +36%
Medion Erazer Beast X30 Intel Core i9-12900HK, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU	145.1 (124.5^min) fps +30%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU (29.9 - 170.5, n=45)	141.1 fps +27%
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU (sep. GPU, 25W)	118.5 (101.8^min) fps +6%
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU (Turbo)	115 (97.7^min) fps +3%
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU	111.3 (96.1^min) fps
Razer Blade 15 Advanced Model Early 2022 Intel Core i7-12800H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU	59.9 (57.1^min) fps -46%
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU (Leise)	59.6 (57.5^min) fps -46%
3840x2160 ultra (3/3) best looking
Average of class Gaming (101.2 - 205, n=66, last 2 years)	146.8 fps +65%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU (70.8 - 155.6, n=19)	124.8 fps +40%
Gigabyte Aero 16 YE5 Intel Core i9-12900HK, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU	112 (98.7^min) fps +26%
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU (Leise)	105.5 (92.7^min) fps +18%
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU (Turbo)	92.3 (81.3^min) fps +3%
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU	89.2 (77.6^min) fps

X-Plane 11.11
3840x2160 high (fps_test=3)
Average of class Gaming (64.3 - 145.5, n=63, last 2 years)	104.1 fps +57%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU (32.9 - 109.5, n=20)	82.7 fps +25%
Gigabyte Aero 16 YE5 Intel Core i9-12900HK, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU	78.6 fps +19%
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU (Turbo)	66.7 fps +1%
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU	66.1 fps
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU (Leise)	58.5 fps -11%
1920x1080 high (fps_test=3)
MSI GE76 Raider Intel Core i9-12900HK, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU	109 fps +39%
Average of class Gaming (32.8 - 166.2, n=193, last 2 years)	108.5 fps +39%
Gigabyte Aero 16 YE5 Intel Core i9-12900HK, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU	108 fps +38%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU (32.6 - 127, n=45)	101.1 fps +29%
Medion Erazer Beast X30 Intel Core i9-12900HK, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU	99.3 fps +27%
Razer Blade 15 Advanced Model Early 2022 Intel Core i7-12800H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU	93.4 fps +19%
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU (sep. GPU, 25W)	82.8 fps +6%
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU (Turbo)	79.7 fps +2%
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU	78.2 fps
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU (Leise)	60.4 fps -23%

Final Fantasy XV Benchmark
3840x2160 High Quality
Average of class Gaming (32.2 - 94.7, n=53, last 2 years)	66.8 fps +30%
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU (1.3, sep. GPU, 25W)	58.4 fps +14%
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU (1.3, Turbo)	55.4 fps +8%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU (35.1 - 61.2, n=18)	52.7 fps +3%
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU (1.3)	51.4 fps
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU (1.3, Leise)	47.2 fps -8%
Gigabyte Aero 16 YE5 Intel Core i9-12900HK, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU (1.3)	40.1 fps -22%
1920x1080 High Quality
MSI GE76 Raider Intel Core i9-12900HK, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU	131 (86^min) fps +21%
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU (1.3, sep. GPU, 25W)	125.1 fps +16%
Average of class Gaming (19.2 - 201, n=181, last 2 years)	120.1 fps +11%
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU (1.3, Turbo)	118.5 fps +10%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU (30.7 - 140.6, n=42)	113.8 fps +5%
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU (1.3)	108 fps
Razer Blade 15 Advanced Model Early 2022 Intel Core i7-12800H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU (1.3)	90.4 fps -16%
Medion Erazer Beast X30 Intel Core i9-12900HK, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU (1.3)	89.4 fps -17%
Gigabyte Aero 16 YE5 Intel Core i9-12900HK, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU (1.3)	85.8 fps -21%

GTA V
3840x2160 Highest Settings possible AA:4xMSAA + FX AF:16x
Average of class Gaming (33.6 - 90.9, n=40, last 2 years)	65.9 fps +12%
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU (Turbo)	63.2 (14.7^min, 47.6^P1) fps +7%
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU	59 (14.1^min, 43.5^P1) fps
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU (37.7 - 67.2, n=14)	58.6 fps -1%
Gigabyte Aero 16 YE5 Intel Core i9-12900HK, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU	41.8 (13^min, 32.3^P1) fps -29%
1920x1080 Highest Settings possible AA:4xMSAA + FX AF:16x
MSI GE76 Raider Intel Core i9-12900HK, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU	125 (10.6^min, 83.3^P1) fps +23%
Average of class Gaming (12.1 - 167.7, n=169, last 2 years)	113.8 fps +12%
Gigabyte Aero 16 YE5 Intel Core i9-12900HK, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU	113 (20.6^min, 76.9^P1) fps +11%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU (30 - 139.2, n=42)	111 fps +9%
Medion Erazer Beast X30 Intel Core i9-12900HK, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU	110.9 (20.6^min, 71.4^P1) fps +9%
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU (sep. GPU, 25W)	106.6 (3.82^min, 71.4^P1) fps +5%
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU (Turbo)	102.7 (18.1^min, 76.9^P1) fps +1%
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU	101.5 (21.1^min, 71.4^P1) fps
Razer Blade 15 Advanced Model Early 2022 Intel Core i7-12800H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU	92.4 (7.56^min, 62.5^P1) fps -9%
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU (Leise)	60 (11.5^min, 58.8^P1) fps -41%

F1 2021
3840x2160 Ultra High Preset + Raytracing AA:T AF:16x
Average of class Gaming (50.2 - 115.1, n=6, last 2 years)	96.8 fps +61%
MSI GE76 Raider Intel Core i9-12900HK, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU	68 (59^min) fps +13%
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU (874931, sep. GPU, 25W)	66.4 (58^min, 57^P1) fps +11%
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU (874931, Turbo)	64.4 (56^min, 53^P1) fps +7%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU (41.1 - 70.2, n=18)	60.9 fps +2%
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU (874931)	60 (51^min, 49^P1) fps
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU (874931, Leise)	56.5 (50^min, 47^P1) fps -6%
Gigabyte Aero 16 YE5 Intel Core i9-12900HK, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU (852849)	47.3 (39^min, 38^P1) fps -21%
1920x1080 Ultra High Preset + Raytracing AA:T AF:16x
MSI GE76 Raider Intel Core i9-12900HK, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU	157 (132^min) fps +21%
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU (874931, sep. GPU, 25W)	155.9 (129^min, 120^P1) fps +20%
Average of class Gaming (27.6 - 271, n=16, last 2 years)	145.2 fps +12%
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU (874931, Turbo)	142.1 (121^min, 103^P1) fps +9%
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU (874931)	130.2 (109^min, 92^P1) fps
Medion Erazer Beast X30 Intel Core i9-12900HK, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU (874931)	126.3 (112^min, 91^P1) fps -3%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU (30.2 - 160.6, n=30)	126.1 fps -3%
Gigabyte Aero 16 YE5 Intel Core i9-12900HK, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU (852849)	103 (76^min, 83^P1) fps -21%
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU (874931, Leise)	60 (59^min, 57^P1) fps -54%

Strange Brigade
3840x2160 ultra AA:ultra AF:16
Average of class Gaming (54.5 - 298, n=48, last 2 years)	119.1 fps +41%
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU (1.47.22.14 D3D12, Turbo)	92.9 (64.3^min, 67.3^P1) fps +10%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU (61.7 - 100.7, n=15)	87.6 fps +4%
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU (1.47.22.14 D3D12)	84.5 (30.7^min, 66.2^P1) fps
Gigabyte Aero 16 YE5 Intel Core i9-12900HK, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU (1.47.22.14 D3D12)	68.4 (41.3^min, 58.5^P1) fps -19%
1920x1080 ultra AA:ultra AF:16
Average of class Gaming (38.9 - 421, n=178, last 2 years)	229 fps +26%
MSI GE76 Raider Intel Core i9-12900HK, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU (1.47.22.14 D3D12)	221 (94.6^min, 162^P1) fps +21%
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU (1.47.22.14 D3D12, sep. GPU, 25W)	221 (76.3^min, 154.1^P1) fps +21%
Medion Erazer Beast X30 Intel Core i9-12900HK, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU (1.47.22.14 D3D12)	196.3 (44.4^min, 139.6^P1) fps +8%
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU (1.47.22.14 D3D12, Turbo)	194.9 (119.9^min, 137.3^P1) fps +7%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU (42.3 - 224, n=41)	187.3 fps +3%
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU (1.47.22.14 D3D12)	182.4 (66.8^min, 132.6^P1) fps
Gigabyte Aero 16 YE5 Intel Core i9-12900HK, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU (1.47.22.14 D3D12)	151 (35.4^min, 116^P1) fps -17%
Razer Blade 15 Advanced Model Early 2022 Intel Core i7-12800H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU (1.47.22.14 D3D12)	149.8 (29.6^min, 114.2^P1) fps -18%
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU (1.47.22.14 D3D12, Leise)	60 (44^min, 59.5^P1) fps -67%

Far Cry 5
3840x2160 Ultra Preset AA:T
Average of class Gaming (39 - 113, n=28, last 2 years)	85.1 fps +42%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU (45 - 76, n=9)	67.6 fps +13%
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU	60 (54^min) fps
Gigabyte Aero 16 YE5 Intel Core i9-12900HK, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU	45 (37^min) fps -25%
1920x1080 Ultra Preset AA:T
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU (111 - 162, n=24)	133 fps +20%
Average of class Gaming (34 - 218, n=100, last 2 years)	131.2 fps +18%
Medion Erazer Beast X30 Intel Core i9-12900HK, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU	130 (93^min) fps +17%
Gigabyte Aero 16 YE5 Intel Core i9-12900HK, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU	122 (97^min) fps +10%
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU	111 (82^min) fps

Cyberpunk 2077 1.6
1920x1080 Ray Tracing Ultra Preset (DLSS off)
Gigabyte Aero 16 YE5 Intel Core i9-12900HK, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU	49.9 (28.1^min) fps +24%
Average of class Gaming (19.1 - 74, n=25, last 2 years)	49 fps +22%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU (39.2 - 49.9, n=7)	43.3 fps +7%
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU	40.3 (29.8^min) fps
3840x2160 Ultra Preset
Average of class Gaming (17.4 - 56, n=34, last 2 years)	36 fps +43%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU (19.6 - 32.4, n=6)	27.1 fps +8%
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU	25.2 (16.6^min) fps
Gigabyte Aero 16 YE5 Intel Core i9-12900HK, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU	19.6 (13^min) fps -22%
1920x1080 Ultra Preset
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU	99.1 (29^min) fps
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU (54 - 144.1, n=16)	93.6 fps -6%
Average of class Gaming (16.7 - 159.7, n=68, last 2 years)	93.5 fps -6%
Gigabyte Aero 16 YE5 Intel Core i9-12900HK, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU	73.2 (55.1^min) fps -26%

Far Cry 6
1920x1080 Ultra Graphics Quality + HD Textures AA:T
MSI GE76 Raider Intel Core i9-12900HK, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU	114 (96^min) fps +32%
Average of class Gaming (35 - 167, n=27, last 2 years)	111.4 fps +29%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU (71.3 - 114, n=6)	98.7 fps +15%
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU	86.2 (65^min) fps
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU	71.3 (59^min) fps -17%
3840x2160 Ultra Graphics Quality + HD Textures AA:T
Average of class Gaming (3.38 - 92, n=16, last 2 years)	63.8 fps +38%
MSI GE76 Raider Intel Core i9-12900HK, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU	57 (47^min) fps +23%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU (46.2 - 57, n=4)	52.9 fps +15%
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU	46.2 (42^min) fps
1920x1080 Ultra Graphics Quality + HD Textures + DXR AA:T
Average of class Gaming (71.9 - 119, n=9, last 2 years)	93.6 fps
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU (91 - 92, n=3)	91.3 fps
MSI GE76 Raider Intel Core i9-12900HK, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU	91 (81^min) fps

Rainbow Six Extraction
1920x1080 Ultra Preset (with Fixed Resolution Quality)
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU	169 (107^min) fps
Medion Erazer Beast X30 Intel Core i9-12900HK, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU	159 (114^min) fps -6%
Average of class Gaming (33 - 314, n=7, last 2 years)	153.6 fps -9%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU (128 - 169, n=3)	152 fps -10%
Gigabyte Aero 16 YE5 Intel Core i9-12900HK, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU	128 fps -24%
3840x2160 Ultra Preset (with Fixed Resolution Quality)
Average of class Gaming (37 - 112, n=4, last 2 years)	72.4 fps +27%
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU	57 (30^min) fps
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU (44 - 57, n=2)	50.5 fps -11%
Gigabyte Aero 16 YE5 Intel Core i9-12900HK, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU	44 (19^min) fps -23%

Ghostwire Tokyo
1920x1080 Highest Settings
Average of class Gaming (65.9 - 231, n=7, last 2 years)	151.7 fps +6%
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU	143.3 fps
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU (125 - 143.3, n=2)	134.2 fps -6%
Medion Erazer Beast X30 Intel Core i9-12900HK, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU	125 (28.2^min, 41.7^P0.1, 80.1^P1) fps -13%
3840x2160 Highest Settings
Average of class Gaming (29.6 - 100, n=6, last 2 years)	64.8 fps +8%
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU	59.9 (20.5^min, 29.9^P0.1, 40.4^P1) fps
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU ()	59.9 fps 0%
1920x1080 Highest Settings + Maximum Ray Tracing
Average of class Gaming (25.7 - 127, n=7, last 2 years)	75.9 fps +15%
Medion Erazer Beast X30 Intel Core i9-12900HK, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU	68.3 (19.2^min, 29.1^P0.1, 43.2^P1) fps +3%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU (66.1 - 68.3, n=2)	67.2 fps +2%
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU	66.1 (22.5^min, 32.9^P0.1, 42.2^P1) fps

Tiny Tina's Wonderlands
1920x1080 Badass Preset (DX12)
Average of class Gaming (22.3 - 189.4, n=47, last 2 years)	123.1 fps +18%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU (100.7 - 110.5, n=4)	104.6 fps 0%
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU	104.3 fps
Medion Erazer Beast X30 Intel Core i9-12900HK, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU	103 fps -1%
3840x2160 Badass Preset (DX12)
Average of class Gaming (21.9 - 73.7, n=31, last 2 years)	52.2 fps +30%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU (40.1 - 43.9, n=2)	42 fps +5%
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU	40.1 fps

Guardians of the Galaxy
1920x1080 Ultra Preset
MSI GE76 Raider Intel Core i9-12900HK, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU	155 (87^min) fps +38%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU (112 - 155, n=3)	139.7 fps +25%
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU	112 (74^min) fps
Average of class Gaming (42 - 163, n=8, last 2 years)	111.4 fps -1%
3840x2160 Ultra Preset
MSI GE76 Raider Intel Core i9-12900HK, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU	75 (20^min) fps +25%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU (60 - 75, n=2)	67.5 fps +13%
Average of class Gaming (42 - 96, n=3, last 2 years)	66 fps +10%
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU	60 (45^min) fps
1920x1080 Ultra Preset + Ultra Ray-Tracing
MSI GE76 Raider Intel Core i9-12900HK, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU	104 (72^min) fps +27%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU (82 - 104, n=2)	93 fps +13%
Average of class Gaming (54 - 128, n=6, last 2 years)	87.3 fps +6%
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU	82 (52^min) fps

Alan Wake Remastered
3840x2160 High Preset
MSI GE76 Raider Intel Core i9-12900HK, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU	89 (40.7^min, 52^P0.1, 72.3^P1) fps +24%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU (71.6 - 89, n=2)	80.3 fps +12%
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU	71.6 (21.9^min, 39.4^P0.1, 48.8^P1) fps
1920x1080 High Preset
MSI GE76 Raider Intel Core i9-12900HK, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU	155 (49.6^min, 56^P0.1, 120^P1) fps +30%
Average of class Gaming (131.6 - 144.9, n=2, last 2 years)	138.3 fps +16%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU (118.8 - 155, n=2)	136.9 fps +15%
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU	118.8 (31.4^min, 50^P0.1, 97.7^P1) fps

Dying Light 2
1920x1080 High Quality Raytracing
Average of class Gaming (19.8 - 83.9, n=10, last 2 years)	50.2 fps +29%
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU	38.8 (22.1^min, 25.7^P0.1, 30.7^P1) fps
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU (33.4 - 42.3, n=5)	38.5 fps -1%
Gigabyte Aero 16 YE5 Intel Core i9-12900HK, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU	33.4 (23.3^min, 24.3^P0.1, 27.8^P1) fps -14%
3840x2160 High Quality
Average of class Gaming (20.8 - 62, n=7, last 2 years)	47.1 fps +52%
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU	31 (24.4^min, 26^P0.1, 27.8^P1) fps
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU (27.3 - 31, n=2)	29.2 fps -6%
Gigabyte Aero 16 YE5 Intel Core i9-12900HK, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU	27.3 (15.7^min, 18.5^P0.1, 24.9^P1) fps -12%
1920x1080 High Quality
Average of class Gaming (52 - 174, n=10, last 2 years)	109.8 fps +41%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU (69.2 - 88.4, n=5)	80.5 fps +4%
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU	77.6 (65.2^min, 69.1^P0.1, 71.6^P1) fps
Gigabyte Aero 16 YE5 Intel Core i9-12900HK, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU	69.2 (52^min, 58.4^P0.1, 62.9^P1) fps -11%

Para avaliar se as taxas de quadros permanecem razoavelmente constantes durante um período de tempo mais longo, deixamos o jogo"The Witcher 3" funcionar por cerca de 60 minutos em resolução Full-HD e configurações de qualidade máxima, sem mover o personagem do jogo. Não notamos uma queda nas taxas de quadros.

The Witcher 3 FPS Chart

Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX R9 6900HX, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU: Ø111.3 (107-116)

Razer Blade 15 Advanced Model Early 2022 i7-12800H, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU: Ø87.2 (70-92)

MSI GE76 Raider i9-12900HK, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU: Ø122.2 (107-127)

Medion Erazer Beast X30 i9-12900HK, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU: Ø112.9 (95-119)

Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX R9 6900HX, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU; Leise: Ø60 (59-61)

Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX R9 6900HX, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU; Turbo: Ø117.9 (98-124)

Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX R9 6900HX, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU; sep. GPU, 25W: Ø124.6 (120-128)

Gigabyte Aero 16 YE5 i9-12900HK, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU: Ø91.2 (87-96)

Medidas da GPU durante o teste Witcher 3

Medidas de GPU durante o teste Witcher 3 (Turbo)

Medidas de GPU durante o teste Witcher 3 (Silencioso)

Medidas de GPU durante o teste Witcher 3 (sep. GPU, dyn. boost 25W)

	baixo	média	alto	ultra	QHD	4K
GTA V (2015)	180.4	175.4	158.9	101.5	92.2	101.5
The Witcher 3 (2015)	345	298	197.9	111.1		80.5
Dota 2 Reborn (2015)	133.8	122.2	114.8	111.3		89.2
Final Fantasy XV Benchmark (2018)	177.8	138.7	108		84.6	51.4
X-Plane 11.11 (2018)	112.9	95.1	78.2			66.1
Far Cry 5 (2018)	146	124	120	111	104	60
Strange Brigade (2018)	359	229	198.8	182.4	140.2	84.5
F1 2021 (2021)	330	275	225	130.2	102.5	60
Alan Wake Remastered (2021)	142.4	123.4	118.8		114.4	71.6
Far Cry 6 (2021)	116.2	100.3	90.9	71.3	75.2	46.2
Guardians of the Galaxy (2021)	118	113	112	112	103	60
Rainbow Six Extraction (2022)	243	207	202	169	113	57
Dying Light 2 (2022)	106.9	88.4	77.6		55.8	31
Cyberpunk 2077 1.6 (2022)	136.3	119.6	98.3	99.1	53.7	25.2
Ghostwire Tokyo (2022)	148.1	146.8	143.8	143.3	110.6	59.9
Tiny Tina's Wonderlands (2022)	192.7	167.3	128.9	104.3	73.5	40.1

Emissões - Asus ROG 16 com desenvolvimento aceitável de ruído e calor

Emissões sonoras

Durante o funcionamento diário com tarefas de escritório e de Internet, os dois ventiladores facilitam a operação, produzindo muito pouco ruído. Às vezes, eles até permanecem desligados. Por outro lado, sob carga total, eles ficam barulhentos com um nível máximo de ruído de 50 dB(A) durante o teste de estresse e 48 dB(A) durante o teste Witcher 3. Embora o desenvolvimento do ruído possa ser reduzido pela seleção do perfil "Silencioso", isto acontece ao custo do desempenho computacional.

Barulho

Ocioso		26 / 27 / 29 dB
Carga		41 / 50 dB

	30 dB silencioso 40 dB(A) audível 50 dB(A) ruidosamente alto
min: , med: , max: Earthworks M23R, Arta (15 cm de distância) environment noise: 26 dB(A)

	Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX R9 6900HX, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU	Apple MacBook Pro 16 2021 M1 Max M1 Max, M1 Max 32-Core GPU	Razer Blade 15 Advanced Model Early 2022 i7-12800H, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU	MSI GE76 Raider i9-12900HK, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU	Medion Erazer Beast X30 i9-12900HK, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU	Gigabyte Aero 16 YE5 i9-12900HK, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
Noise		10%	4%	-11%	-8%	-9%
off / environment *	26	24.2 7%	26 -0%	26 -0%	26 -0%	25 4%
Idle Minimum *	26	24.2 7%	26 -0%	26 -0%	27 -4%	30 -15%
Idle Average *	27	24.2 10%	27 -0%	27 -0%	29 -7%	32 -19%
Idle Maximum *	29	24.2 17%	29 -0%	40 -38%	34 -17%	33 -14%
Load Average *	41	42.9 -5%	37 10%	50 -22%	48 -17%	45 -10%
Witcher 3 ultra *	48	39.5 18%	44 8%	53 -10%	51 -6%	50 -4%
Load Maximum *	50	42.9 14%	45 10%	53 -6%	53 -6%	52 -4%

* ... smaller is better

Temperaturas

Durante o funcionamento diário (escritório, Internet), as temperaturas da caixa permanecem dentro da faixa verde. Sob carga (teste de estresse, Witcher 3 teste), o laptop aquece sem se tornar excessivamente quente. As temperaturas da CPU variam dentro de níveis aceitáveis.

Carga Máxima

Inatividade

Witcher 3


35 °C	36 °C	35 °C
44 °C	45 °C	39 °C
41 °C	40 °C	38 °C

Máximo: 45 °C
Médio: 39.2 °C


50 °C	50 °C	46 °C
45 °C	46 °C	44 °C
43 °C	44 °C	42 °C

Máximo: 50 °C
Médio: 45.6 °C

alimentação elétrica 47 °C | Temperatura do quarto 20 °C | Fluke t3000FC (calibrated), Voltcraft IR-900

Carga Máxima

Inatividade

Witcher 3


29 °C	29 °C	28 °C
32 °C	33 °C	31 °C
29 °C	29 °C	28 °C

Máximo: 33 °C
Médio: 29.8 °C


33 °C	33 °C	32 °C
33 °C	33 °C	32 °C
30 °C	31 °C	30 °C

Máximo: 33 °C
Médio: 31.9 °C

alimentação elétrica 34 °C | Temperatura do quarto 20 °C | Fluke t3000FC (calibrated), Voltcraft IR-900

Carga Máxima

Inatividade

Witcher 3


35 °C	39 °C	37 °C
46 °C	44 °C	39 °C
42 °C	41 °C	38 °C

Máximo: 46 °C
Médio: 40.1 °C


51 °C	51 °C	46 °C
45 °C	46 °C	43 °C
43 °C	44 °C	43 °C

Máximo: 51 °C
Médio: 45.8 °C

alimentação elétrica 45 °C | Temperatura do quarto 20 °C | Fluke t3000FC (calibrated), Voltcraft IR-900

(-) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 39.2 °C / 103 F, compared to the average of 33.9 °C / 93 F for the devices in the class Gaming.
(±) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 45 °C / 113 F, compared to the average of 40.5 °C / 105 F, ranging from 21.2 to 68.8 °C for the class Gaming.
(-) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 50 °C / 122 F, compared to the average of 43.2 °C / 110 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 29.8 °C / 86 F, compared to the device average of 33.9 °C / 93 F.
(-) Playing The Witcher 3, the average temperature for the upper side is 40.1 °C / 104 F, compared to the device average of 33.9 °C / 93 F.
(-) The palmrests and touchpad can get very hot to the touch with a maximum of 42 °C / 107.6 F.
(-) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.9 °C / 84 F (-13.1 °C / -23.6 F).

	Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU	Apple MacBook Pro 16 2021 M1 Max Apple M1 Max, Apple M1 Max 32-Core GPU	Razer Blade 15 Advanced Model Early 2022 Intel Core i7-12800H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU	MSI GE76 Raider Intel Core i9-12900HK, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU	Medion Erazer Beast X30 Intel Core i9-12900HK, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU	Gigabyte Aero 16 YE5 Intel Core i9-12900HK, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
Heat		20%	-12%	-1%	-13%	-5%
Maximum Upper Side *	45	42.3 6%	53 -18%	43 4%	55 -22%	49 -9%
Maximum Bottom *	50	41.7 17%	53 -6%	47 6%	62 -24%	55 -10%
Idle Upper Side *	33	23.9 28%	36 -9%	33 -0%	32 3%	33 -0%
Idle Bottom *	33	23.9 28%	38 -15%	37 -12%	36 -9%	33 -0%

* ... smaller is better

Teste de estresse

No início do teste de estresse com Prime95 e Furmark funcionando por pelo menos uma hora, a CPU (4 a 4,1 GHz) e a GPU (1.000 a 1.600 MHz) funcionam em altas velocidades de relógio. Continuando, os valores caem para entre 3 e 3,1 GHz (CPU) e entre 850 e 900 MHz (GPU). O teste de estresse representa um cenário extremo, e usamos este teste para avaliar se o sistema permanece estável sob carga total.

Oradores

Os alto-falantes estéreo produzem um som decente, apesar de poder utilizar mais graves. Para uma melhor experiência sonora, é recomendado o uso de fones de ouvido ou alto-falantes externos.

Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)

Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (80 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 8.9% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (12.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 6.8% higher than median
(+) | mids are linear (4.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | reduced highs - on average 6% lower than median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (7.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (16.5% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 40% of all tested devices in this class were better, 6% similar, 54% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 18%, worst was 132%
Compared to all devices tested
» 25% of all tested devices were better, 5% similar, 70% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Gerenciamento de energia - O Zephyrus Duo oferece uma boa vida útil da bateria

Consumo de energia

Durante a operação ociosa, o GX650 tem um consumo de energia ligeiramente maior do que a maioria dos outros concorrentes Windows. Entretanto, nenhum dos outros concorrentes pode alcançar os baixos valores do MacBook Pro 16. O teste de estresse ou teste Witcher-3 leva a um aumento do consumo de Zephyrus até um máximo de 256 watts ou 186,5 watts em média, que são valores normais para o hardware utilizado aqui. Enquanto o consumo de energia permanece constante durante o teste Witcher 3, ele cai ligeiramente durante o curso do teste de estresse. Classificado em 280 watts, a fonte de alimentação incluída é suficientemente grande.

Consumo de energia

desligado	0.1 / Watt
Ocioso	19 / 24 / 31 Watt
Carga	104 / 256 Watt


Key: min: , med: , max: Metrahit Energy

	Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX R9 6900HX, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU	Apple MacBook Pro 16 2021 M1 Max M1 Max, M1 Max 32-Core GPU	Razer Blade 15 Advanced Model Early 2022 i7-12800H, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU	MSI GE76 Raider i9-12900HK, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU	Medion Erazer Beast X30 i9-12900HK, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU	Gigabyte Aero 16 YE5 i9-12900HK, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU	Average of class Gaming
Power Consumption		42%	16%	4%	9%	-15%	13%
Idle Minimum *	19	5.4 72%	17 11%	12 37%	12 37%	26 -37%	13.6 ?(2 - 39, n=154, last 2 years) 28%
Idle Average *	24	16.4 32%	19 21%	17 29%	16 33%	30 -25%	19 ?(8 - 55.6, n=154, last 2 years) 21%
Idle Maximum *	31	16.7 46%	25 19%	28 10%	22 29%	37 -19%	26.8 ?(9 - 101.1, n=154, last 2 years) 14%
Load Average *	104	94 10%	108 -4%	118 -13%	118 -13%	127 -22%	106.3 ?(32.1 - 201, n=152, last 2 years) -2%
Witcher 3 ultra *	186.5	104 44%	150 20%	252 -35%	223 -20%	176 6%
Load Maximum *	256	135 47%	179 30%	272 -6%	290 -13%	236 8%	249 ?(64.5 - 418, n=153, last 2 years) 3%

* ... smaller is better

Power Consumption The Witcher 3 / Stress Test

Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX; Witcher 3 ultra: Ø186.5 (182.4-193.3)

Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX; 1280x720 Prime95 28.10 and Furmark 1.25: Ø202 (151.3-250)

Power Consumption With External Monitor

Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX; Prime95 V2810 Stress (external Monitor): Ø130.5 (128-133.6)

Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX; Cinebench R15 Multi (external Monitor): Ø129.5 (127.8-130.9)

Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX; 1280x720 FurMark 1.19 GPU Stress Test (external Monitor): Ø166.2 (157.9-172.1)

Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX; 1920x1080 The Witcher 3 ultra (external Monitor): Ø174.7 (170-184)

Vida útil da bateria

No teste WLAN onde os sites são carregados via roteiro e no teste de vídeo rodando o curta-metragem Big Buck Bunny (codificação H.264, FHD) em loop constante, o laptop de 16 polegadas dura 7:49 horas e 9:19 horas, respectivamente. Durante ambos os testes, as funções de economia de energia do laptop são desativadas e o brilho do display é ajustado para cerca de 150 cd/m². Durante a execução do teste de vídeo, os módulos de comunicação também são desativados.

A bateria oferece uma capacidade de 90 Wh.

Tempo de Execução da Bateria

Ocioso (sem WLAN, min brilho)		12h 29min
WiFi Websurfing (Edge 101)		7h 49min
Big Buck Bunny H.264 1080p		9h 19min
Carga (máximo brilho)		1h 02min

	Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX R9 6900HX, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, 90 Wh	Apple MacBook Pro 16 2021 M1 Max M1 Max, M1 Max 32-Core GPU, 99.6 Wh	Razer Blade 15 Advanced Model Early 2022 i7-12800H, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, 80 Wh	MSI GE76 Raider i9-12900HK, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, 99.99 Wh	Medion Erazer Beast X30 i9-12900HK, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, 91.2 Wh	Gigabyte Aero 16 YE5 i9-12900HK, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, 99 Wh	Average of class Gaming
Battery Runtime		59%	-3%	-35%	10%	-3%	-8%
Reader / Idle	749		484 -35%		463 -38%	533 -29%	567 ?(155 - 1290, n=66, last 2 years) -24%
H.264	559	1021 83%	356 -36%		386 -31%	452 -19%	413 ?(129 - 837, n=78, last 2 years) -26%
WiFi v1.3	469	894 91%	293 -38%	306 -35%	341 -27%	381 -19%	376 ?(85 - 889, n=153, last 2 years) -20%
Load	62	63 2%	122 97%		145 134%	96 55%	85.7 ?(41 - 173, n=116, last 2 years) 38%

Pro

+ display 4k mate no formato 16:10

+ boa reprodução de cores (certificação Pantone)

+ alta cobertura de espaço de cor

+ Dolby Vision/HDR

+ FreeSync e G-Sync (este último via USB-C)

+ alto desempenho do sistema

+ opções de overclocking

+ caixa metálica robusta

+ 2 PCIe 4 SSDs (Raid 0)

+ muito espaço de armazenamento (4 TB)

+ leitor de cartões de armazenamento rápido

+ excelentes taxas de transferência WLAN

+ muito boa duração da bateria

+ Fornecimento de energia

Contra

- sem Thunderbolt 4 ou USB 4

- maiores e mais pesados que dispositivos comparáveis

Veredicto - Um laptop poderoso para o segmento criativo

O ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX, fornecido pela Asus Alemanha

Asus anuncia o Zephyrus principalmente como um laptop para jogos, mas o conceito do laptop também é voltado para os criadores de conteúdo: Processamento de vídeo e imagem, renderização e, é claro, também jogos são as disciplinas centrais. os jogos de 4k são possíveis em configurações de alto a máximo.

Embora o Screenpad Plus deva oferecer um certo valor agregado em alguns cenários de aplicação, ele também aumenta o peso, o preço de compra e o tamanho do laptop.

ARyzen 9-6900HXaPU e GeForce Computador portátil RTX 3080-Tia GPU proporciona a performance informática necessária, e ambos os componentes funcionam a uma velocidade de relógio alta e constante. Dois SSDs PCIe 4 (RAID 0) garantem tempos de carga curtos e oferecem muito espaço de armazenamento (4 TB). O pacote completo é arredondado por 64 GB de memória de trabalho.

O desenvolvimento de ruído e calor sob carga no nível habitual para esta classe de laptop. Entretanto, durante o funcionamento diário, o laptop permanece muito silencioso. O bom visor de 16 polegadas no formato 16:10 pontua com uma excelente reprodução de cores (certificação Pantone) e cobre completamente o espaço de cores DCI-P3.

Apesar do alto desempenho em computação, você não precisa viver com uma bateria de curta duração. Uma carga de bateria (90 Wh) dura quase 8 horas de funcionamento WLAN. Outro ponto positivo é a capacidade de carregar a bateria usando um carregador USB-C universal (45 watts mín.), já que a porta USB-C Gen 2 esquerda também suporta o fornecimento de energia. Isto significa que você não precisa necessariamente trazer consigo a fonte de alimentação pesada de 280 watts.

Uma alternativa para o Zephyrus seria Gigabyte Aero 16que oferece um maior desempenho da CPU e uma porta Thunderbolt 4. As desvantagens são uma vida útil pior da bateria, um visor refletivo e mais desenvolvimento de calor. Se você precisa de um desempenho computacional poderoso e uma vida útil da bateria tão longa quanto possível, você dificilmente poderá contornar a Apple MacBook Pro 16. Por outro lado, você então não poderia substituir ou expandir o SSD, nem a memória de trabalho. Além disso, o MacBook também usa uma tela refletiva.

Preço e Disponibilidade

Enquanto o ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX já está listado no site Asus dos EUAno momento deste teste, outras lojas online como CDW ($4097) e B&H Photo ($4000) mostrá-lo como ainda não em estoque.

Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX - 05/23/2022 v7 ^(old)
Sascha Mölck

Acabamento

86 / 98 → 88%

Teclado

81%

Mouse

83%

Conectividade

70 / 80 → 88%

Peso

59 / 10-66 → 88%

Bateria

80 / 95 → 84%

Pantalha

89%

Desempenho do jogos

98%

Desempenho da aplicação

97%

Temperatura

80 / 95 → 84%

Ruído

81 / 90 → 90%

Audio

74%

Camera

41 / 85 → 48%

Médio

78%

88%

Gaming - Médio equilibrado

Price comparison

Editor of the original article: Mark Riege - Translator - 535 articles published on Notebookcheck since 2018

Translator: Ninh Ngoc Duy - Editorial Assistant - 471132 articles published on Notebookcheck since 2008

contact me via: Facebook

Please share our article, every link counts!

> Análises e revisões de portáteis e celulares > Análises > Análises > Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 revisão: Um laptop de jogo incomum com uma boa duração da bateria

Sascha Mölck, 2022-05-24 (Update: 2022-05-24)

Possíveis concorrentes em comparação

Estojo - GX650 com um robusto estojo metálico

Comparação de tamanho

Equipamento - A Zephyrus não oferece Thunderbolt 4

Leitor de cartões SD

Comunicação

Webcam

Acessórios

Manutenção

Garantia

Dispositivos de entrada - Uma segunda tela para o laptop Asus

Teclado

Touchpad

Bloco de tela Asus Plus

Display - Boa reprodução de cores

Display Response Times

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

Desempenho - Rembrandt encontra Ampere

Condições de teste

Processador

Cinebench R15 Multi Constant Load Test

Desempenho do sistema

Latências DPC

Solução de armazenamento

Constant Performance Reading: DiskSpd Read Loop, Queue Depth 8

Placa Gráfica

Desempenho nos jogos

The Witcher 3 FPS Chart

Emissões - Asus ROG 16 com desenvolvimento aceitável de ruído e calor

Emissões sonoras

Temperaturas

Teste de estresse

Oradores

Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX audio analysis

Gerenciamento de energia - O Zephyrus Duo oferece uma boa vida útil da bateria

Consumo de energia

Power Consumption The Witcher 3 / Stress Test

Power Consumption With External Monitor

Vida útil da bateria

Pro

Contra

Veredicto - Um laptop poderoso para o segmento criativo

Preço e Disponibilidade

More articles related to this device

Price comparison