Notebookcheck Logo

Razer Blade 15 Advanced Model Early 2022 review - Laptop compacto para jogos com visor rápido

Uma lâmina de barbear ainda mais afiada.

O novo Razer Blade 15 vem com processadores Intel da 12ª geração e um Nvidia GeForce RTX 3070 Ti/3080 Ti. Junto com um painel de 360 Hz, este promete uma visualização incrivelmente suave. Descubra como o pequeno chassi lida com o hardware potente na próxima revisão.

Embalado com os últimos chips Intel e Nvidia, o modelo de mola Razer Blade 15 2022 promete melhorias iterativas para a popular linha de laptops para jogos de 15 polegadas. A principal diferença entre o modelo analisado aqui e o lâmina 15 2022, anteriormente revista é o painel 1080p 360 Hz, de modo que os leitores podem se ater a esta revisão para obter detalhes sobre as especificações físicas em grande parte idênticas. Os concorrentes diretos da Blade 15 incluem outros laptops de 15,6 polegadas de alto desempenho, tais como o Schenker XMG Neo 15 E22o Asus ROG Strix Scar 15o MSI Stealth GS66 12UGS e o MSI Vetor GP66 12UGS.

Outras revisões da Razer:

Blade 15 Profimodell Frühjahr 2022 (Blade 15 Serie)
Processador
Intel Core i7-12800H 14 x 1.8 - 4.8 GHz, 160 W PL2 / Short Burst, 65 W PL1 / Sustained, Alder Lake-H
Placa gráfica
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU - 16 GB VRAM, Análises do: 1125 MHz, Memoría: 1750 MHz, 110 W TDP, GDDR6, 511,69, Optimus
Memória
32 GB 
, Quad-channel DDR5-4800
Pantalha
15.60 polegadas 16:9, 1920 x 1080 pixel 141 PPI, TL156VDXP02-0, IPS, Brilhante: não, 360 Hz
placa mãe
Intel Alder Lake-P PCH
Disco rígido
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR, 1024 GB 
, PCIe 4
Placa de Som
Intel Alder Lake-P PCH - cAVS (Audio, Voice, Speech)
Conexões
5 USB 3.1 Gen2, 1 Thunderbolt, USB-C Power Delivery (PD), 1 HDMI, 1 DisplayPort, 1 Kensington Lock, Conexões Audio: 3.5mm headset, Card Reader: SD card reader
Funcionamento em rede
Killer Wi-Fi 6E AX1690i 160MHz (a/b/g/h/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/ax = Wi-Fi 6/ Wi-Fi 6E 6 GHz), Bluetooth 5.2
Tamanho
altura x largura x profundidade (em mm): 16.99 x 355 x 235
Bateria
80 Wh, 5209 mAh Lítio-Ion
Sistema Operativo
Microsoft Windows 11 Home
Camera
Webcam: 1080p webcam
Primary Camera: 2 MPix
Secondary Camera: IR camera
Características adicionais
Alto falantes: Stereo, Teclado: Chiclet, Iluminação do Teclado: sim, Razer Synapse, 12 Meses Garantia
peso
2.09 kg, Suprimento de energia: 646 g
Preço
4099 Euro
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

Possíveis concorrentes em comparação

Rating
Date
Model
Weight
Height
Size
Resolution
Price
88.3 %
v7 (old)
05/2022
Razer Blade 15 Advanced Model Early 2022
i7-12800H, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
2.1 kg16.99 mm15.60"1920x1080
89.1 %
v7 (old)
03/2022
Razer Blade 15 2022
i7-12800H, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
2.1 kg16.99 mm15.60"2560x1440

v (old)
03/2022
SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 E22 (Early 2022, RTX 3080 Ti)
i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
2.2 kg26.6 mm15.60"2560x1440
86.3 %
v7 (old)
07/2021
Asus ROG Strix Scar 15 G533QS
R9 5900HX, GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU
2.3 kg27.2 mm15.60"2560x1440
84.5 %
v7 (old)
02/2022
MSI Stealth GS66 12UGS
i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
2.2 kg19.8 mm15.60"2560x1440
86.9 %
v7 (old)
03/2022
MSI Vector GP66 12UGS
i9-12900H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
2.3 kg23.4 mm15.60"1920x1080

Estojo - Compacto e adequado para viagens

Para o caso, vemos mais uma vez a familiar e manhosa construção metálica com a qual a série Blade fez originalmente um nome para si mesma. A estabilidade, o acabamento e a resistência à torção permanecem, portanto, excelentes. A inversão é a alta suscetibilidade a impressões digitais

O Razer Blade 15 é um laptop muito compacto de 15,6 polegadas e é tanto menor quanto mais fino do que a maioria de seus concorrentes. Em particular, o ROG Strix Scar 15 e o XMG Neo 15 E22 são significativamente mais espessos e cerca de 100-200 g mais pesados que nosso dispositivo de revisão de 2,1 kg.

Comparação de tamanho

360.2 mm 243.5 mm 26.6 mm 2.2 kg358 mm 267 mm 23.4 mm 2.3 kg354 mm 259 mm 27.2 mm 2.3 kg358 mm 248 mm 19.8 mm 2.2 kg355 mm 235 mm 16.99 mm 2.1 kg355 mm 235 mm 16.99 mm 2.1 kg297 mm 210 mm 1 mm 5.7 g

Hardware - Lâmina 15 com conectividade moderna

Não há grandes surpresas em termos de conectividade. Vale a pena mencionar o leitor de cartões SD completo e a porta HDMI, que suporta a versão 2.1. Ao contrário de muitos concorrentes, tais como o XMG Neo 15 E22não há aqui nenhum porto LAN dedicado. Mas isto pode ser retificado através de uma doca Thunderbolt, se necessário.

Esquerda: Conector de alimentação, 2x USB-A 3.2 Gen. 2, USB-C 3.2 Gen. 2, conector de áudio de 3,5 mm
Esquerda: Conector de alimentação, 2x USB-A 3.2 Gen. 2, USB-C 3.2 Gen. 2, conector de áudio de 3,5 mm
Certo: Leitor de cartões SD, Thunderbolt, USB-A 3.2 Gen. 2, HDMI 2.1, porta de bloqueio
Certo: Leitor de cartões SD, Thunderbolt, USB-A 3.2 Gen. 2, HDMI 2.1, porta de bloqueio

Leitor de cartões SD

O desempenho do leitor de cartões SD está em um nível elevado. No teste seqüencial de leitura AS-SSD com nosso cartão microSD AV PRO 128GB V60, ocorreu um erro em nosso dispositivo de revisão

SD Card Reader - average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs)
Razer Blade 15 2022
Intel Core i7-12800H (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
165.4 MB/s +7%
Razer Blade 15 Advanced Model Early 2022
Intel Core i7-12800H (AV PRO microSD 128 GB V60)
155 MB/s
Average of class Gaming
  (19 - 202, n=89, last 2 years)
95.5 MB/s -38%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 E22 (Early 2022, RTX 3080 Ti)
Intel Core i7-12700H
68.3 (65.41min - 69.52max) MB/s -56%

Comunicação

O módulo Killer Wi-Fi 6E 1690i integrado ofereceu taxas de transferência muito rápidas quando conectado ao nosso roteador de teste Asus GT-AXE11000. O suporte a Bluetooth 5.2 também é fornecido

Networking
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
Razer Blade 15 Advanced Model Early 2022
Killer Wi-Fi 6E AX1690i 160MHz
1621 (1412min - 1672max) MBit/s
Average of class Gaming
  (469 - 1843, n=151, last 2 years)
1235 MBit/s -24%
iperf3 receive AXE11000
Razer Blade 15 Advanced Model Early 2022
Killer Wi-Fi 6E AX1690i 160MHz
1727 (866min - 1759max) MBit/s
MSI Stealth GS66 12UGS
Killer Wi-Fi 6E AX1675i 160MHz Wireless Network Adapter
1569 (622min - 1690max) MBit/s -9%
Average of class Gaming
  (680 - 1890, n=151, last 2 years)
1383 MBit/s -20%
0501001502002503003504004505005506006507007508008509009501000105011001150120012501300135014001450150015501600165017001750Tooltip
Razer Blade 15 Advanced Model Early 2022; iperf3 receive AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1697 (866-1759)
Razer Blade 15 Advanced Model Early 2022; iperf3 transmit AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1621 (1412-1672)

Webcam


ColorChecker
10.7 ∆E
13.3 ∆E
15.5 ∆E
15 ∆E
16 ∆E
18.4 ∆E
10.4 ∆E
17.9 ∆E
13.7 ∆E
9.2 ∆E
14.5 ∆E
10.2 ∆E
9.3 ∆E
15.1 ∆E
13.7 ∆E
9.6 ∆E
12.8 ∆E
17.1 ∆E
2.3 ∆E
13.9 ∆E
14.2 ∆E
12.1 ∆E
10.3 ∆E
5.7 ∆E
ColorChecker Razer Blade 15 Advanced Model Early 2022: 12.53 ∆E min: 2.28 - max: 18.39 ∆E

Manutenção

Após remover seis parafusos Torx (T5), tem-se acesso aos dois módulos RAM, a bateria, o módulo WLAN e (após remover uma tampa adicional) o M.2 SSD

Lâmina Razer 15 2022 - funcionamento interno

Dispositivos de entrada - Clickpad grande e teclado arrumado

Teclado

O teclado possui iluminação de teclas RGB com 16 níveis de brilho (incluindo "off") e setas de meia altura para cima e para baixo, o que permite que a Razer coloque todo o teclado em uma área retangular centrada entre as aberturas do alto-falante. As teclas oferecem um deslocamento plano da tecla e sons de digitação silenciosos e abafados. A resistência das teclas é moderada e o centro do teclado dificilmente cede quando se digita.

Lâmina Razer 15 2022 - Dispositivos de entrada
Razer Blade 15 2022 - Razer Blade 15 2022 - Retroiluminação

Touchpad

O touchpad compreende uma área de cerca de 13x8 cm e permite um excelente deslizamento dos dedos. Os cliques são caracterizados por uma curta viagem com teclas e um claro feedback táctil

Display - Painel rápido com espectro de cores limitado

Subpixel
Subpixel

Um painel IPS mate de alta definição com uma resolução nativa de 1920x1080 pixels e uma taxa de atualização de 360 Hz é instalado em nosso dispositivo de revisão. Alternativamente, um QHD 240 Hz e um display de 4K 144 Hz estão disponíveis, cada um dos quais deve cobrir o espaço de cor DCI-P3. O modelo QHD também suporta Nvidia G-Sync e Advanced Optimus.

O brilho de 315 cd/m² em média é mais do que suficiente para a maioria dos cenários de aplicação e, juntamente com um valor decente de 0,24, resulta em um contraste acima da média de 1.375:1 na comparação de classes. Os tempos de resposta cinza a cinza são particularmente curtos e não pudemos detectar nenhum PWM.

311
cd/m²
294
cd/m²
305
cd/m²
324
cd/m²
330
cd/m²
320
cd/m²
321
cd/m²
320
cd/m²
307
cd/m²
Distribuição do brilho
TL156VDXP02-0 tested with X-Rite i1Pro 2
Máximo: 330 cd/m² (Nits) Médio: 314.7 cd/m² Minimum: 16 cd/m²
iluminação: 89 %
iluminação com acumulador: 330 cd/m²
Contraste: 1375:1 (Preto: 0.24 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 1.47 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.93, calibrated: 0.63
ΔE Greyscale 1.8 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
67.4% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
85.1% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
65.3% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.282
Razer Blade 15 Advanced Model Early 2022
TL156VDXP02-0, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6"
Razer Blade 15 2022
Sharp LQ156T1JW03, IPS, 2560x1440, 15.6"
SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 E22 (Early 2022, RTX 3080 Ti)
BOE0A67 (BOE CQ NE156QHM-NZ1), IPS, 2560x1440, 15.6"
Asus ROG Strix Scar 15 G533QS
BOE CQ NE156QHM-NY1, IPS, 2560x1440, 15.6"
MSI Stealth GS66 12UGS
Sharp LQ156T1JW04 (SHP153C), IPS-Level, 2560x1440, 15.6"
MSI Vector GP66 12UGS
BOE NE156FHM-NZ3, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6"
Display
33%
31%
31%
10%
Display P3 Coverage
65.3
99.1
52%
97.6
49%
96.4
48%
70.1
7%
sRGB Coverage
85.1
99.9
17%
99.9
17%
99.7
17%
99.5
17%
AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage
67.4
86.8
29%
85.3
27%
85.6
27%
72.1
7%
Response Times
-123%
-119%
-122%
-10%
-13%
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% *
4.3 ?(2.4, 1.9)
14.4 ?(6.8, 7.6)
-235%
14.4 ?(6.6, 7.8)
-235%
14 ?(7.2, 6.8)
-226%
6 ?(3.2, 2.8)
-40%
5.8 ?(3.4, 2.4)
-35%
Response Time Black / White *
10.5 ?(5.7, 4.8)
11.6 ?(5.6, 6)
-10%
10.8 ?(5.4, 5.4)
-3%
12.4 ?(7.2, 5.2)
-18%
8.4 ?(4.4, 4)
20%
9.6 ?(5.2, 4.4)
9%
PWM Frequency
Screen
-54%
-38%
-77%
-87%
-45%
Brightness middle
330
286
-13%
295
-11%
304.3
-8%
272
-18%
353.1
7%
Brightness
315
271
-14%
277
-12%
286
-9%
253
-20%
325
3%
Brightness Distribution
89
89
0%
62
-30%
76
-15%
87
-2%
85
-4%
Black Level *
0.24
0.25
-4%
0.28
-17%
0.33
-38%
0.25
-4%
0.38
-58%
Contrast
1375
1144
-17%
1054
-23%
922
-33%
1088
-21%
929
-32%
Colorchecker dE 2000 *
1.47
2.74
-86%
2.36
-61%
2.76
-88%
3.73
-154%
2.24
-52%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *
2.73
5.21
-91%
4.24
-55%
5.57
-104%
9.43
-245%
5
-83%
Colorchecker dE 2000 calibrated *
0.63
2.52
-300%
2.38
-278%
0.98
-56%
1.02
-62%
Greyscale dE 2000 *
1.8
1.1
39%
3.43
-91%
4
-122%
6.5
-261%
4
-122%
Gamma
2.282 96%
2.2 100%
2.44 90%
2.14 103%
2.172 101%
2.24 98%
CCT
6499 100%
6408 101%
6266 104%
6844 95%
6485 100%
6864 95%
Total Average (Program / Settings)
-48% / -45%
-79% / -54%
-56% / -60%
-22% / -51%
-16% / -28%

* ... smaller is better

Em nossa configuração, a Razer Blade 15 cobre apenas 85% do espaço de cor sRGB. Considerando a reivindicação do fabricante de "até 100%", esperávamos mais aqui.

CalMAN: Escala de cinza
CalMAN: Escala de cinza
CalMAN: saturação de cores
CalMAN: saturação de cores
CalMAN: ColorChecker
CalMAN: ColorChecker
CalMAN: Escala de cinza (calibrada)
CalMAN: Escala de cinza (calibrada)
CalMAN: saturação de cor (calibrada)
CalMAN: saturação de cor (calibrada)
CalMAN: ColorChecker (calibrado)
CalMAN: ColorChecker (calibrado)

Na entrega, os desvios do espaço de cor DeltaE das escalas de cinza e cores já estão na faixa ideal (menos de 3) e podem ser melhorados para um sólido 0,63 e 0,8, respectivamente, através de calibragem posterior

Lâmina Razer 15 vs sRGB
Lâmina Razer 15 vs sRGB
Razer Blade 15 vs AdobeRGB
Razer Blade 15 vs AdobeRGB
Lâmina Razer 15 vs P3
Lâmina Razer 15 vs P3

Display Response Times

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
       Response Time Black to White
10.5 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 5.7 ms rise
↘ 4.8 ms fall
The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 25 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (21 ms).
       Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
4.3 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 2.4 ms rise
↘ 1.9 ms fall
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 12 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (32.9 ms).

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM not detected

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8774 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured.

Graças a um brilho de mais de 300 cd/m², a tela também está equipada para uso ao ar livre, desde que você permaneça na sombra

Uso ao ar livre
Uso ao ar livre
Ângulo de visão
Ângulo de visão

Os ângulos de visão são soberbos. Mesmo em ângulos íngremes, as cores e os contrastes da tela IPS são dificilmente distorcidos

Desempenho - Laptop de jogos Razer com hardware de ponta

Nossa Razer Blade 15 está equipada com um Intel Core i7-12800H e um Nvidia GeForce RTX 3080 Ti. Há também 32 GB de RAM DDR5 em modo quad-canal e um SSD de 1 TB PCIe 4.0. Em combinação com o painel de 4K, o laptop está alternativamente disponível com o Núcleo i9-12900H.

CPU-Z
CPU-Z - Placa principal
CPU-Z - Memória
CPU-Z - SPD
GPU-Z - Intel
GPU-Z - Nvidia
HWiNFO
 

Condições de teste

A fim de obter novos conhecimentos durante os testes, realizamos todas as medições com o perfil "equilibrado" Synapse. Isto faz com que a GPU trabalhe com um TGP máximo de cerca de 95 W e também limita a CPU. Você pode encontrar a pontuação máxima atingível em nossa outras revisões.

Processador

O Intel Core i7-12800H é um novíssimo processador Intel de 12ª geração com suporte de RAM DDR5. A funcionalidade DDR5 permite que os dois módulos de RAM operem em modo quad-canal.

O Razer Blade 15 é menos capaz de acompanhar a concorrência em termos de desempenho da CPU em modo "balanceado" do que sem limitações de desempenho. Mesmo os nominalmente mais fracos Núcleo i7-12700H no XMG Neo 15 E22 bate nosso dispositivo de revisão em ambos os cenários no teste Cinebench R15 multi-loop. O fato de alguns benchmarks de linha única serem melhores é provavelmente devido ao fato de que os limites de temperatura são atingidos antes dos limites do TDP. O turboalimentação permanece ativo apenas por um curto período.

O teste Cinebench R15 multi-tarefa fornece a mesma pontuação em modo de bateria sob o perfil que selecionamos.

Cinebench R15 Multi Sustained Load

01452904355807258701015116013051450159517401885203021752320246526102755Tooltip
Razer Blade 15 Advanced Model Early 2022 Intel Core i7-12800H: Ø1535 (1448.91-1565.5)
Razer Blade 15 2022 Intel Core i7-12800H: Ø2081 (2061.43-2178.41)
SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 E22 (Early 2022, RTX 3080 Ti) Intel Core i7-12700H: Ø2766 (2740.48-2824.46)
Asus ROG Strix Scar 15 G533QS AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX: Ø2175 (2157.5-2197.2)
MSI Stealth GS66 12UGS Intel Core i7-12700H: Ø2624 (2577.65-2843.74)
MSI Vector GP66 12UGS Intel Core i9-12900H: Ø2372 (2349.62-2449.33)
CPU Performance Rating - Percent
Average of class Gaming
 
83 pt
SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 E22 (Early 2022, RTX 3080 Ti)
Intel Core i7-12700H
75.7 pt
MSI Vector GP66 12UGS
Intel Core i9-12900H
74.6 pt
MSI Stealth GS66 12UGS
Intel Core i7-12700H
74.3 pt
Average Intel Core i7-12800H
 
67.1 pt
Razer Blade 15 2022
Intel Core i7-12800H
66.6 pt
Razer Blade 15 Advanced Model Early 2022
Intel Core i7-12800H
57.1 pt
Asus ROG Strix Scar 15 G533QS -2!
AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX
56.8 pt
Cinebench R23
Multi Core
Average of class Gaming
  (5668 - 36249, n=194, last 2 years)
21642 Points +121%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 E22 (Early 2022, RTX 3080 Ti)
Intel Core i7-12700H
18452 Points +89%
MSI Stealth GS66 12UGS
Intel Core i7-12700H
17940 Points +83%
MSI Vector GP66 12UGS
Intel Core i9-12900H
16812 (15129.6min - 16812.1max) Points +72%
Razer Blade 15 2022
Intel Core i7-12800H
14893 (13078min - 14893.1max) Points +52%
Average Intel Core i7-12800H
  (9777 - 16597, n=5)
14387 Points +47%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 15 G533QS
AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX
13519 (13222.6min - 13519.5max) Points +38%
Razer Blade 15 Advanced Model Early 2022
Intel Core i7-12800H
9777 Points
Single Core
MSI Vector GP66 12UGS
Intel Core i9-12900H
1887 Points +5%
Average of class Gaming
  (1088 - 2235, n=192, last 2 years)
1878 Points +4%
Average Intel Core i7-12800H
  (1796 - 1859, n=5)
1824 Points +1%
MSI Stealth GS66 12UGS
Intel Core i7-12700H
1803 Points 0%
Razer Blade 15 Advanced Model Early 2022
Intel Core i7-12800H
1799 Points
Razer Blade 15 2022
Intel Core i7-12800H
1796 Points 0%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 E22 (Early 2022, RTX 3080 Ti)
Intel Core i7-12700H
1782 Points -1%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 15 G533QS
AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX
1469 Points -18%
Cinebench R20
CPU (Multi Core)
Average of class Gaming
  (2179 - 13832, n=192, last 2 years)
8236 Points +120%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 E22 (Early 2022, RTX 3080 Ti)
Intel Core i7-12700H
6988 Points +87%
MSI Stealth GS66 12UGS
Intel Core i7-12700H
6651 Points +78%
MSI Vector GP66 12UGS
Intel Core i9-12900H
6594 Points +76%
Razer Blade 15 2022
Intel Core i7-12800H
5731 Points +53%
Average Intel Core i7-12800H
  (3741 - 6433, n=5)
5443 Points +45%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 15 G533QS
AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX
5214 Points +39%
Razer Blade 15 Advanced Model Early 2022
Intel Core i7-12800H
3741 Points
CPU (Single Core)
MSI Vector GP66 12UGS
Intel Core i9-12900H
730 Points +5%
Average of class Gaming
  (427 - 856, n=192, last 2 years)
722 Points +4%
Average Intel Core i7-12800H
  (690 - 714, n=5)
703 Points +1%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 E22 (Early 2022, RTX 3080 Ti)
Intel Core i7-12700H
696 Points 0%
Razer Blade 15 Advanced Model Early 2022
Intel Core i7-12800H
695 Points
MSI Stealth GS66 12UGS
Intel Core i7-12700H
693 Points 0%
Razer Blade 15 2022
Intel Core i7-12800H
690 Points -1%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 15 G533QS
AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX
574 Points -17%
Cinebench R15
CPU Multi 64Bit
Average of class Gaming
  (905 - 5663, n=199, last 2 years)
3392 Points +117%
MSI Stealth GS66 12UGS
Intel Core i7-12700H
2844 (2577.65min - 2843.74max) Points +82%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 E22 (Early 2022, RTX 3080 Ti)
Intel Core i7-12700H
2824 (2740.48min - 2824.46max) Points +80%
MSI Vector GP66 12UGS
Intel Core i9-12900H
2449 (2349.62min - 2449.33max) Points +56%
Average Intel Core i7-12800H
  (1566 - 2697, n=5)
2236 Points +43%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 15 G533QS
AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX
2197 (2157.5min - 2197.2max) Points +40%
Razer Blade 15 2022
Intel Core i7-12800H
2178 (2061.43min - 2178.41max) Points +39%
Razer Blade 15 Advanced Model Early 2022
Intel Core i7-12800H
1566 (1448.91min - 1565.5max) Points
CPU Single 64Bit
Average of class Gaming
  (176.6 - 318, n=196, last 2 years)
276 Points +14%
MSI Vector GP66 12UGS
Intel Core i9-12900H
273 Points +13%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 E22 (Early 2022, RTX 3080 Ti)
Intel Core i7-12700H
261 Points +8%
MSI Stealth GS66 12UGS
Intel Core i7-12700H
260 Points +7%
Average Intel Core i7-12800H
  (242 - 269, n=5)
260 Points +7%
Razer Blade 15 2022
Intel Core i7-12800H
258 Points +7%
Razer Blade 15 Advanced Model Early 2022
Intel Core i7-12800H
242 Points
Asus ROG Strix Scar 15 G533QS
AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX
234 Points -3%
Blender - v2.79 BMW27 CPU
Razer Blade 15 Advanced Model Early 2022
Intel Core i7-12800H
306 Seconds *
Asus ROG Strix Scar 15 G533QS
AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX
240 Seconds * +22%
Average Intel Core i7-12800H
  (192 - 306, n=5)
233 Seconds * +24%
Razer Blade 15 2022
Intel Core i7-12800H
226 Seconds * +26%
MSI Vector GP66 12UGS
Intel Core i9-12900H
197 Seconds * +36%
MSI Stealth GS66 12UGS
Intel Core i7-12700H
187 Seconds * +39%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 E22 (Early 2022, RTX 3080 Ti)
Intel Core i7-12700H
177 Seconds * +42%
Average of class Gaming
  (87 - 555, n=187, last 2 years)
172.1 Seconds * +44%
7-Zip 18.03
7z b 4
Average of class Gaming
  (23795 - 140932, n=191, last 2 years)
84613 MIPS +90%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 E22 (Early 2022, RTX 3080 Ti)
Intel Core i7-12700H
73067 MIPS +64%
MSI Stealth GS66 12UGS
Intel Core i7-12700H
69454 MIPS +56%
MSI Vector GP66 12UGS
Intel Core i9-12900H
66678 MIPS +50%
Razer Blade 15 2022
Intel Core i7-12800H
61936 MIPS +39%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 15 G533QS
AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX
61422 MIPS +38%
Average Intel Core i7-12800H
  (44553 - 68930, n=5)
59950 MIPS +35%
Razer Blade 15 Advanced Model Early 2022
Intel Core i7-12800H
44553 MIPS
7z b 4 -mmt1
Average of class Gaming
  (4168 - 7581, n=191, last 2 years)
6280 MIPS +7%
MSI Vector GP66 12UGS
Intel Core i9-12900H
6071 MIPS +3%
Razer Blade 15 Advanced Model Early 2022
Intel Core i7-12800H
5892 MIPS
Average Intel Core i7-12800H
  (5726 - 5976, n=5)
5835 MIPS -1%
MSI Stealth GS66 12UGS
Intel Core i7-12700H
5804 MIPS -1%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 E22 (Early 2022, RTX 3080 Ti)
Intel Core i7-12700H
5775 MIPS -2%
Razer Blade 15 2022
Intel Core i7-12800H
5726 MIPS -3%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 15 G533QS
AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX
5568 MIPS -5%
Geekbench 5.5
Multi-Core
Average of class Gaming
  (4557 - 23194, n=192, last 2 years)
14892 Points +55%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 E22 (Early 2022, RTX 3080 Ti)
Intel Core i7-12700H
13745 Points +43%
MSI Stealth GS66 12UGS
Intel Core i7-12700H
13033 Points +36%
Razer Blade 15 2022
Intel Core i7-12800H
12434 Points +29%
MSI Vector GP66 12UGS
Intel Core i9-12900H
12382 Points +29%
Average Intel Core i7-12800H
  (9607 - 12940, n=5)
11957 Points +24%
Razer Blade 15 Advanced Model Early 2022
Intel Core i7-12800H
9607 Points
Single-Core
MSI Vector GP66 12UGS
Intel Core i9-12900H
1883 Points +2%
Average of class Gaming
  (986 - 2210, n=192, last 2 years)
1882 Points +2%
Razer Blade 15 Advanced Model Early 2022
Intel Core i7-12800H
1842 Points
Average Intel Core i7-12800H
  (1739 - 1842, n=5)
1790 Points -3%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 E22 (Early 2022, RTX 3080 Ti)
Intel Core i7-12700H
1784 Points -3%
Razer Blade 15 2022
Intel Core i7-12800H
1758 Points -5%
MSI Stealth GS66 12UGS
Intel Core i7-12700H
1718 Points -7%
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 - 4k Preset
Average of class Gaming
  (6.72 - 38.9, n=191, last 2 years)
23.3 fps +99%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 E22 (Early 2022, RTX 3080 Ti)
Intel Core i7-12700H
20.9 fps +79%
MSI Vector GP66 12UGS
Intel Core i9-12900H
19.8 fps +69%
MSI Stealth GS66 12UGS
Intel Core i7-12700H
19.6 fps +68%
Razer Blade 15 2022
Intel Core i7-12800H
17.2 fps +47%
Average Intel Core i7-12800H
  (11.7 - 19.4, n=5)
16.3 fps +39%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 15 G533QS
AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX
15.6 fps +33%
Razer Blade 15 Advanced Model Early 2022
Intel Core i7-12800H
11.7 fps
LibreOffice - 20 Documents To PDF
Asus ROG Strix Scar 15 G533QS
AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX
52.3 s * -22%
Razer Blade 15 2022
Intel Core i7-12800H
51.5 s * -20%
Average of class Gaming
  (31.4 - 96.6, n=188, last 2 years)
47.6 s * -11%
Average Intel Core i7-12800H
  (41.3 - 51.5, n=5)
45.1 s * -5%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 E22 (Early 2022, RTX 3080 Ti)
Intel Core i7-12700H
42.9 s * -0%
Razer Blade 15 Advanced Model Early 2022
Intel Core i7-12800H
42.9 s *
MSI Stealth GS66 12UGS
Intel Core i7-12700H
40.3 s * +6%
MSI Vector GP66 12UGS
Intel Core i9-12900H
40.3 s * +6%
R Benchmark 2.5 - Overall mean
Asus ROG Strix Scar 15 G533QS
AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX
0.4908 sec * -9%
Razer Blade 15 2022
Intel Core i7-12800H
0.4715 sec * -4%
Average Intel Core i7-12800H
  (0.4442 - 0.4715, n=5)
0.4562 sec * -1%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 E22 (Early 2022, RTX 3080 Ti)
Intel Core i7-12700H
0.4553 sec * -1%
Razer Blade 15 Advanced Model Early 2022
Intel Core i7-12800H
0.4522 sec *
MSI Stealth GS66 12UGS
Intel Core i7-12700H
0.448 sec * +1%
Average of class Gaming
  (0.3609 - 0.759, n=192, last 2 years)
0.4401 sec * +3%
MSI Vector GP66 12UGS
Intel Core i9-12900H
0.4218 sec * +7%

* ... smaller is better

Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64Bit
1566 Points
Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64Bit
198 fps
Cinebench R15 Ref. Match 64Bit
99.6 %
Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64Bit
242 Points
Ajuda
Performance Rating
Average of class Gaming
 
97.6 pt
Asus ROG Strix Scar 15 G533QS
AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX, GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU
81.8 pt
MSI Stealth GS66 12UGS
Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
64.7 pt
SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 E22 (Early 2022, RTX 3080 Ti)
Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
64.4 pt
MSI Vector GP66 12UGS
Intel Core i9-12900H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
60.7 pt
Average Intel Core i7-12800H
 
58.2 pt
Razer Blade 15 2022
Intel Core i7-12800H, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
56.1 pt
Razer Blade 15 Advanced Model Early 2022
Intel Core i7-12800H, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
47.7 pt
AIDA64 / FP32 Ray-Trace
Average of class Gaming
  (4986 - 60169, n=188, last 2 years)
21618 KRay/s +270%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 15 G533QS
AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX, GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU
15150 KRay/s +159%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 E22 (Early 2022, RTX 3080 Ti)
Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
9537 KRay/s +63%
MSI Stealth GS66 12UGS
Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
9023 KRay/s +55%
Average Intel Core i7-12800H
  (5839 - 15206, n=5)
8773 KRay/s +50%
MSI Vector GP66 12UGS
Intel Core i9-12900H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
8506 KRay/s +46%
Razer Blade 15 2022
Intel Core i7-12800H, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
7671 KRay/s +31%
Razer Blade 15 Advanced Model Early 2022
Intel Core i7-12800H, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
5839 KRay/s
AIDA64 / FPU Julia
Average of class Gaming
  (25360 - 252486, n=188, last 2 years)
105988 Points +281%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 15 G533QS
AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX, GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU
100744 Points +262%
Average Intel Core i7-12800H
  (27801 - 80002, n=5)
43634 Points +57%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 E22 (Early 2022, RTX 3080 Ti)
Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
41732 Points +50%
MSI Stealth GS66 12UGS
Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
41116 Points +48%
MSI Vector GP66 12UGS
Intel Core i9-12900H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
38603 Points +39%
Razer Blade 15 2022
Intel Core i7-12800H, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
36695 Points +32%
Razer Blade 15 Advanced Model Early 2022
Intel Core i7-12800H, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
27801 Points
AIDA64 / CPU SHA3
Average of class Gaming
  (1339 - 10389, n=188, last 2 years)
4848 MB/s +141%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 15 G533QS
AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX, GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU
3412 MB/s +69%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 E22 (Early 2022, RTX 3080 Ti)
Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
3343 MB/s +66%
MSI Stealth GS66 12UGS
Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
3192 MB/s +59%
MSI Vector GP66 12UGS
Intel Core i9-12900H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
3031 MB/s +51%
Average Intel Core i7-12800H
  (2013 - 3684, n=5)
2749 MB/s +37%
Razer Blade 15 2022
Intel Core i7-12800H, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
2681 MB/s +33%
Razer Blade 15 Advanced Model Early 2022
Intel Core i7-12800H, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
2013 MB/s
AIDA64 / CPU Queen
Average of class Gaming
  (50699 - 200651, n=188, last 2 years)
116174 Points +35%
MSI Vector GP66 12UGS
Intel Core i9-12900H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
106194 Points +24%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 15 G533QS
AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX, GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU
102329 Points +19%
MSI Stealth GS66 12UGS
Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
97910 Points +14%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 E22 (Early 2022, RTX 3080 Ti)
Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
97871 Points +14%
Average Intel Core i7-12800H
  (85965 - 108084, n=5)
96746 Points +13%
Razer Blade 15 2022
Intel Core i7-12800H, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
93492 Points +9%
Razer Blade 15 Advanced Model Early 2022
Intel Core i7-12800H, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
85965 Points
AIDA64 / FPU SinJulia
Average of class Gaming
  (4800 - 32988, n=188, last 2 years)
13167 Points +87%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 15 G533QS
AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX, GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU
12610 Points +79%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 E22 (Early 2022, RTX 3080 Ti)
Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
9928 Points +41%
MSI Stealth GS66 12UGS
Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
9899 Points +41%
MSI Vector GP66 12UGS
Intel Core i9-12900H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
9756 Points +39%
Razer Blade 15 2022
Intel Core i7-12800H, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
9205 Points +31%
Average Intel Core i7-12800H
  (7027 - 9658, n=5)
8839 Points +26%
Razer Blade 15 Advanced Model Early 2022
Intel Core i7-12800H, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
7027 Points
AIDA64 / FPU Mandel
Asus ROG Strix Scar 15 G533QS
AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX, GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU
55702 Points +253%
Average of class Gaming
  (12321 - 134044, n=188, last 2 years)
53413 Points +239%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 E22 (Early 2022, RTX 3080 Ti)
Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
26824 Points +70%
MSI Stealth GS66 12UGS
Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
24769 Points +57%
Average Intel Core i7-12800H
  (15765 - 38179, n=5)
23653 Points +50%
MSI Vector GP66 12UGS
Intel Core i9-12900H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
23055 Points +46%
Razer Blade 15 2022
Intel Core i7-12800H, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
21312 Points +35%
Razer Blade 15 Advanced Model Early 2022
Intel Core i7-12800H, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
15765 Points
AIDA64 / CPU AES
Asus ROG Strix Scar 15 G533QS
AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX, GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU
132655 MB/s +101%
Average of class Gaming
  (19065 - 328679, n=188, last 2 years)
109484 MB/s +66%
MSI Stealth GS66 12UGS
Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
99638 MB/s +51%
MSI Vector GP66 12UGS
Intel Core i9-12900H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
96687 MB/s +47%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 E22 (Early 2022, RTX 3080 Ti)
Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
67282 MB/s +2%
Razer Blade 15 Advanced Model Early 2022
Intel Core i7-12800H, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
65871 MB/s
Average Intel Core i7-12800H
  (55371 - 73928, n=5)
61463 MB/s -7%
Razer Blade 15 2022
Intel Core i7-12800H, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
55775 MB/s -15%
AIDA64 / CPU ZLib
Average of class Gaming
  (373 - 2409, n=188, last 2 years)
1348 MB/s +92%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 E22 (Early 2022, RTX 3080 Ti)
Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
1156 MB/s +65%
MSI Vector GP66 12UGS
Intel Core i9-12900H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
1081 MB/s +54%
MSI Stealth GS66 12UGS
Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
1069 MB/s +52%
Razer Blade 15 2022
Intel Core i7-12800H, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
928 MB/s +32%
Average Intel Core i7-12800H
  (701 - 1047, n=5)
926 MB/s +32%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 15 G533QS
AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX, GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU
841 MB/s +20%
Razer Blade 15 Advanced Model Early 2022
Intel Core i7-12800H, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
701 MB/s
AIDA64 / FP64 Ray-Trace
Average of class Gaming
  (2540 - 31796, n=188, last 2 years)
11643 KRay/s +257%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 15 G533QS
AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX, GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU
8644 KRay/s +165%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 E22 (Early 2022, RTX 3080 Ti)
Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
5597 KRay/s +72%
MSI Stealth GS66 12UGS
Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
5237 KRay/s +61%
Average Intel Core i7-12800H
  (3257 - 8559, n=5)
4904 KRay/s +51%
MSI Vector GP66 12UGS
Intel Core i9-12900H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
4883 KRay/s +50%
Razer Blade 15 2022
Intel Core i7-12800H, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
4173 KRay/s +28%
Razer Blade 15 Advanced Model Early 2022
Intel Core i7-12800H, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
3257 KRay/s
AIDA64 / CPU PhotoWorxx
Razer Blade 15 2022
Intel Core i7-12800H, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
40992 MPixel/s +3%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 E22 (Early 2022, RTX 3080 Ti)
Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
40524 MPixel/s +2%
Average of class Gaming
  (10805 - 60161, n=189, last 2 years)
39933 MPixel/s +1%
MSI Stealth GS66 12UGS
Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
39921 MPixel/s +1%
Razer Blade 15 Advanced Model Early 2022
Intel Core i7-12800H, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
39666 MPixel/s
Average Intel Core i7-12800H
  (31329 - 40992, n=5)
38291 MPixel/s -3%
MSI Vector GP66 12UGS
Intel Core i9-12900H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
27416 MPixel/s -31%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 15 G533QS
AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX, GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU
25533 MPixel/s -36%

Desempenho do sistema

O desempenho do sistema é sólido, de acordo com os testes PCMark 10. No uso diário, a velocidade de operação é suave e não há atrasos perceptíveis, razão pela qual você pode usar o modo "Equilibrado" livre de preocupações.

PCMark 10 / Score
MSI Vector GP66 12UGS
GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, i9-12900H
8004 Points +9%
Average of class Gaming
  (5776 - 9852, n=169, last 2 years)
7771 Points +6%
Razer Blade 15 2022
GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, i7-12800H, SSSTC CA6-8D1024
7706 Points +5%
Average Intel Core i7-12800H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
  (7313 - 7744, n=3)
7588 Points +4%
MSI Stealth GS66 12UGS
GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, i7-12700H, WDC PC SN810 1TB
7582 Points +4%
Razer Blade 15 Advanced Model Early 2022
GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, i7-12800H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
7313 Points
SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 E22 (Early 2022, RTX 3080 Ti)
GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, i7-12700H, Samsung SSD 980 Pro 250GB MZ-V8P250BW
7240 Points -1%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 15 G533QS
GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU, R9 5900HX, ADATA Swordfish 2 TB
7201 Points -2%
PCMark 10 / Essentials
MSI Vector GP66 12UGS
GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, i9-12900H
10943 Points +3%
MSI Stealth GS66 12UGS
GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, i7-12700H, WDC PC SN810 1TB
10847 Points +2%
Average of class Gaming
  (9057 - 12334, n=168, last 2 years)
10833 Points +2%
Razer Blade 15 2022
GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, i7-12800H, SSSTC CA6-8D1024
10708 Points +1%
Average Intel Core i7-12800H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
  (10597 - 10814, n=3)
10706 Points +1%
Razer Blade 15 Advanced Model Early 2022
GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, i7-12800H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
10597 Points
Asus ROG Strix Scar 15 G533QS
GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU, R9 5900HX, ADATA Swordfish 2 TB
10218 Points -4%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 E22 (Early 2022, RTX 3080 Ti)
GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, i7-12700H, Samsung SSD 980 Pro 250GB MZ-V8P250BW
10070 Points -5%
PCMark 10 / Productivity
MSI Vector GP66 12UGS
GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, i9-12900H
10141 Points +5%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 15 G533QS
GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU, R9 5900HX, ADATA Swordfish 2 TB
10066 Points +4%
Average of class Gaming
  (6662 - 14612, n=168, last 2 years)
9878 Points +2%
Razer Blade 15 Advanced Model Early 2022
GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, i7-12800H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
9675 Points
Razer Blade 15 2022
GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, i7-12800H, SSSTC CA6-8D1024
9581 Points -1%
Average Intel Core i7-12800H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
  (9470 - 9675, n=3)
9575 Points -1%
MSI Stealth GS66 12UGS
GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, i7-12700H, WDC PC SN810 1TB
9495 Points -2%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 E22 (Early 2022, RTX 3080 Ti)
GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, i7-12700H, Samsung SSD 980 Pro 250GB MZ-V8P250BW
8944 Points -8%
PCMark 10 / Digital Content Creation
MSI Vector GP66 12UGS
GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, i9-12900H
12541 Points +21%
Razer Blade 15 2022
GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, i7-12800H, SSSTC CA6-8D1024
12104 Points +17%
Average of class Gaming
  (6703 - 18475, n=168, last 2 years)
12018 Points +16%
Average Intel Core i7-12800H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
  (10351 - 12306, n=3)
11587 Points +12%
MSI Stealth GS66 12UGS
GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, i7-12700H, WDC PC SN810 1TB
11488 Points +11%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 E22 (Early 2022, RTX 3080 Ti)
GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, i7-12700H, Samsung SSD 980 Pro 250GB MZ-V8P250BW
11434 Points +10%
Razer Blade 15 Advanced Model Early 2022
GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, i7-12800H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
10351 Points
Asus ROG Strix Scar 15 G533QS
GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU, R9 5900HX, ADATA Swordfish 2 TB
9852 Points -5%
CrossMark / Overall
Average of class Gaming
  (1247 - 2344, n=152, last 2 years)
1900 Points +7%
Razer Blade 15 Advanced Model Early 2022
GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, i7-12800H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
1768 Points
Average Intel Core i7-12800H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
  ()
1768 Points 0%
CrossMark / Productivity
Average of class Gaming
  (1299 - 2204, n=152, last 2 years)
1802 Points +5%
Razer Blade 15 Advanced Model Early 2022
GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, i7-12800H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
1719 Points
Average Intel Core i7-12800H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
  ()
1719 Points 0%
CrossMark / Creativity
Average of class Gaming
  (1275 - 2660, n=152, last 2 years)
2084 Points +12%
Razer Blade 15 Advanced Model Early 2022
GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, i7-12800H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
1868 Points
Average Intel Core i7-12800H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
  ()
1868 Points 0%
CrossMark / Responsiveness
Average of class Gaming
  (1030 - 2330, n=152, last 2 years)
1700 Points +4%
Razer Blade 15 Advanced Model Early 2022
GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, i7-12800H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
1633 Points
Average Intel Core i7-12800H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
  ()
1633 Points 0%
PCMark 8 Home Score Accelerated v2
6657 pontos
PCMark 8 Work Score Accelerated v2
7009 pontos
PCMark 10 Score
7313 pontos
Ajuda
AIDA64 / Memory Copy
SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 E22 (Early 2022, RTX 3080 Ti)
Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
65103 MB/s +5%
Average of class Gaming
  (21842 - 94222, n=188, last 2 years)
64901 MB/s +5%
Razer Blade 15 2022
Intel Core i7-12800H, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
62522 MB/s +1%
MSI Stealth GS66 12UGS
Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
61994 MB/s 0%
Razer Blade 15 Advanced Model Early 2022
Intel Core i7-12800H, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
61946 MB/s
Average Intel Core i7-12800H
  (48643 - 62522, n=5)
59483 MB/s -4%
MSI Vector GP66 12UGS
Intel Core i9-12900H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
45395 MB/s -27%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 15 G533QS
AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX, GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU
43318 MB/s -30%
AIDA64 / Memory Read
Average of class Gaming
  (23681 - 99713, n=188, last 2 years)
68661 MB/s +5%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 E22 (Early 2022, RTX 3080 Ti)
Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
66265 MB/s +2%
Razer Blade 15 2022
Intel Core i7-12800H, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
65933 MB/s +1%
MSI Stealth GS66 12UGS
Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
65341 MB/s 0%
Razer Blade 15 Advanced Model Early 2022
Intel Core i7-12800H, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
65277 MB/s
Average Intel Core i7-12800H
  (56629 - 66199, n=5)
63902 MB/s -2%
MSI Vector GP66 12UGS
Intel Core i9-12900H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
49035 MB/s -25%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 15 G533QS
AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX, GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU
45841 MB/s -30%
AIDA64 / Memory Write
Average of class Gaming
  (22986 - 108954, n=188, last 2 years)
66722 MB/s +1%
MSI Stealth GS66 12UGS
Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
66256 MB/s +1%
Razer Blade 15 2022
Intel Core i7-12800H, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
66074 MB/s 0%
Razer Blade 15 Advanced Model Early 2022
Intel Core i7-12800H, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
65772 MB/s
SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 E22 (Early 2022, RTX 3080 Ti)
Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
65495 MB/s 0%
Average Intel Core i7-12800H
  (50923 - 66074, n=5)
62637 MB/s -5%
MSI Vector GP66 12UGS
Intel Core i9-12900H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
46932 MB/s -29%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 15 G533QS
AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX, GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU
46062 MB/s -30%
AIDA64 / Memory Latency
Razer Blade 15 Advanced Model Early 2022
Intel Core i7-12800H, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
95.2 ns *
MSI Stealth GS66 12UGS
Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
94.7 ns * +1%
Average of class Gaming
  (59.5 - 259, n=188, last 2 years)
94.1 ns * +1%
MSI Vector GP66 12UGS
Intel Core i9-12900H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
90.6 ns * +5%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 15 G533QS
AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX, GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU
85.3 ns * +10%
Average Intel Core i7-12800H
  (89.3 - 95.2, n=5)
36.9 (89.3min - 95.2max) ns * +61%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 E22 (Early 2022, RTX 3080 Ti)
Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
0 ns * +100%
Razer Blade 15 2022
Intel Core i7-12800H, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
0 ns * +100%

* ... smaller is better

Latências DPC

De acordo com LatencyMon, as latências DPC podem ser muito altas para edição de áudio e vídeo em tempo real na configuração que testamos

LatencyMon
Motoristas LatencyMon
DPC Latencies / LatencyMon - interrupt to process latency (max), Web, Youtube, Prime95
Razer Blade 15 Advanced Model Early 2022
GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, i7-12800H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
4836 μs *
MSI Vector GP66 12UGS
GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, i9-12900H
3882 μs * +20%
MSI Stealth GS66 12UGS
GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, i7-12700H, WDC PC SN810 1TB
2156 μs * +55%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 15 G533QS
GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU, R9 5900HX, ADATA Swordfish 2 TB
1380 μs * +71%
Razer Blade 15 2022
GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, i7-12800H, SSSTC CA6-8D1024
1364 μs * +72%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 E22 (Early 2022, RTX 3080 Ti)
GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, i7-12700H, Samsung SSD 980 Pro 250GB MZ-V8P250BW
808 μs * +83%

* ... smaller is better

Dispositivos de armazenamento

Um 1TB Samsung PM9A1 M.2 SDD com PCIe 4.0 está instalado em nosso dispositivo de revisão, o que resulta em taxas de transferência de dados muito altas. Desde que o SSD PCIe 4.0 "CA6-8D1024" do SSSTC foi instalado em nosso primeiro dispositivo de revisão Blade 15os modelos de acionamento e as taxas de transferência podem ser diferentes.

Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
CDM 5/6 Read Seq Q32T1: 7096.4 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write Seq Q32T1: 5251.3 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Read 4K Q32T1: 863.75 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write 4K Q32T1: 631.75 MB/s
CDM 5 Read Seq: 4212.51 MB/s
CDM 5 Write Seq: 3980.96 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Read 4K: 92.87 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write 4K: 242.96 MB/s
Drive Performance Rating - Percent
Razer Blade 15 Advanced Model Early 2022
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
87.2 pt
MSI Stealth GS66 12UGS -8!
WDC PC SN810 1TB
87.1 pt
Razer Blade 15 2022
SSSTC CA6-8D1024
84.7 pt
Average Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
 
77.1 pt
Average of class Gaming
 
75.4 pt
SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 E22 (Early 2022, RTX 3080 Ti)
Samsung SSD 980 Pro 250GB MZ-V8P250BW
72.1 pt
MSI Vector GP66 12UGS
 
68.1 pt
Asus ROG Strix Scar 15 G533QS
ADATA Swordfish 2 TB
24.8 pt
DiskSpd
seq read
Razer Blade 15 2022
SSSTC CA6-8D1024
4119 (4098.66min - 4118.81max) MB/s +4%
Razer Blade 15 Advanced Model Early 2022
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
3946 (3883.92min - 3946.42max) MB/s
Average Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
  (1761 - 4677, n=85)
3764 MB/s -5%
Average of class Gaming
  (1319 - 7045, n=169, last 2 years)
3500 MB/s -11%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 E22 (Early 2022, RTX 3080 Ti)
Samsung SSD 980 Pro 250GB MZ-V8P250BW
3225 (3206.01min - 3225.21max) MB/s -18%
MSI Vector GP66 12UGS
 
2119 (2058.22min - 2119.13max) MB/s -46%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 15 G533QS
ADATA Swordfish 2 TB
1160 (560.08min - 1160.14max) MB/s -71%
seq write
Razer Blade 15 2022
SSSTC CA6-8D1024
4167 (4120.63min - 4166.62max) MB/s +7%
Razer Blade 15 Advanced Model Early 2022
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
3899 (3880.57min - 3898.61max) MB/s
Average of class Gaming
  (535 - 9307, n=169, last 2 years)
3819 MB/s -2%
Average Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
  (2220 - 4564, n=85)
3578 MB/s -8%
MSI Vector GP66 12UGS
 
3405 (3386.69min - 3404.63max) MB/s -13%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 E22 (Early 2022, RTX 3080 Ti)
Samsung SSD 980 Pro 250GB MZ-V8P250BW
2661 (2641.11min - 2661max) MB/s -32%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 15 G533QS
ADATA Swordfish 2 TB
1156 (590.64min - 1155.74max) MB/s -70%
seq q8 t1 read
Razer Blade 15 2022
SSSTC CA6-8D1024
6921 (6631.14min - 6921.02max) MB/s +4%
Razer Blade 15 Advanced Model Early 2022
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
6666 (5850.89min - 6666.43max) MB/s
Average Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
  (3421 - 7100, n=85)
6477 MB/s -3%
Average of class Gaming
  (2594 - 16089, n=169, last 2 years)
6365 MB/s -5%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 E22 (Early 2022, RTX 3080 Ti)
Samsung SSD 980 Pro 250GB MZ-V8P250BW
4536 (4257.18min - 4536.14max) MB/s -32%
MSI Vector GP66 12UGS
 
3563 (3099.47min - 3563.48max) MB/s -47%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 15 G533QS
ADATA Swordfish 2 TB
1741 (791.56min - 1740.72max) MB/s -74%
seq q8 t1 write
Razer Blade 15 Advanced Model Early 2022
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
4939 (4931.24min - 4938.77max) MB/s
Average of class Gaming
  (539 - 14571, n=169, last 2 years)
4855 MB/s -2%
Average Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
  (2216 - 5281, n=85)
4814 MB/s -3%
Razer Blade 15 2022
SSSTC CA6-8D1024
4740 (4542.15min - 4740.19max) MB/s -4%
MSI Vector GP66 12UGS
 
3448 (3378.51min - 3448.14max) MB/s -30%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 E22 (Early 2022, RTX 3080 Ti)
Samsung SSD 980 Pro 250GB MZ-V8P250BW
2665 (2644.09min - 2664.64max) MB/s -46%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 15 G533QS
ADATA Swordfish 2 TB
1185 (657.19min - 1184.83max) MB/s -76%
4k q1 t1 read
Razer Blade 15 Advanced Model Early 2022
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
90.6 (86.51min - 90.63max) MB/s
SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 E22 (Early 2022, RTX 3080 Ti)
Samsung SSD 980 Pro 250GB MZ-V8P250BW
89.7 (89.47min - 89.72max) MB/s -1%
Razer Blade 15 2022
SSSTC CA6-8D1024
79.6 (78.85min - 79.63max) MB/s -12%
Average Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
  (48.4 - 97.4, n=85)
76.7 MB/s -15%
MSI Vector GP66 12UGS
 
69.5 (66.71min - 69.49max) MB/s -23%
Average of class Gaming
  (30.6 - 95.9, n=169, last 2 years)
65.9 MB/s -27%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 15 G533QS
ADATA Swordfish 2 TB
23.3 (23.23min - 23.32max) MB/s -74%
4k q1 t1 write
MSI Vector GP66 12UGS
 
408 (406.25min - 408.46max) MB/s +62%
Razer Blade 15 2022
SSSTC CA6-8D1024
256 (23.49min - 256.28max) MB/s +2%
Razer Blade 15 Advanced Model Early 2022
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
252 (240.11min - 252.24max) MB/s
SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 E22 (Early 2022, RTX 3080 Ti)
Samsung SSD 980 Pro 250GB MZ-V8P250BW
223 (222.49min - 223.25max) MB/s -12%
Average of class Gaming
  (66.6 - 397, n=169, last 2 years)
222 MB/s -12%
Average Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
  (49.9 - 280, n=85)
188.5 MB/s -25%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 15 G533QS
ADATA Swordfish 2 TB
138 (137.2min - 137.78max) MB/s -45%
4k q32 t16 read
Razer Blade 15 Advanced Model Early 2022
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
3493 (3465.14min - 3493.06max) MB/s
Razer Blade 15 2022
SSSTC CA6-8D1024
3184 (3180.75min - 3183.86max) MB/s -9%
Average Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
  (376 - 4185, n=85)
2579 MB/s -26%
Average of class Gaming
  (417 - 6172, n=169, last 2 years)
2553 MB/s -27%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 E22 (Early 2022, RTX 3080 Ti)
Samsung SSD 980 Pro 250GB MZ-V8P250BW
2272 (2266.88min - 2271.97max) MB/s -35%
MSI Vector GP66 12UGS
 
1844 (1840.41min - 1844.18max) MB/s -47%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 15 G533QS
ADATA Swordfish 2 TB
439 (211.56min - 439max) MB/s -87%
4k q32 t16 write
MSI Vector GP66 12UGS
 
3354 (3320.28min - 3353.86max) MB/s +27%
Razer Blade 15 Advanced Model Early 2022
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
2645 (2612.9min - 2645.36max) MB/s
SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 E22 (Early 2022, RTX 3080 Ti)
Samsung SSD 980 Pro 250GB MZ-V8P250BW
2613 (2594.87min - 2613.35max) MB/s -1%
Razer Blade 15 2022
SSSTC CA6-8D1024
2141 (2137.08min - 2141.26max) MB/s -19%
Average of class Gaming
  (162.3 - 4869, n=169, last 2 years)
2101 MB/s -21%
Average Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
  (291 - 3559, n=85)
1957 MB/s -26%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 15 G533QS
ADATA Swordfish 2 TB
618 (524.5min - 618max) MB/s -77%
AS SSD
Score Total
MSI Stealth GS66 12UGS
WDC PC SN810 1TB
8556 Points +6%
Razer Blade 15 Advanced Model Early 2022
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
8103 Points
Razer Blade 15 2022
SSSTC CA6-8D1024
7659 Points -5%
Average Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
  (2577 - 9147, n=85)
6855 Points -15%
Average of class Gaming
  (2271 - 13854, n=160, last 2 years)
6742 Points -17%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 E22 (Early 2022, RTX 3080 Ti)
Samsung SSD 980 Pro 250GB MZ-V8P250BW
6267 Points -23%
MSI Vector GP66 12UGS
 
6130 Points -24%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 15 G533QS
ADATA Swordfish 2 TB
1814 Points -78%
Score Read
MSI Stealth GS66 12UGS
WDC PC SN810 1TB
3482 Points +14%
Razer Blade 15 2022
SSSTC CA6-8D1024
3431 Points +12%
Razer Blade 15 Advanced Model Early 2022
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
3054 Points
SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 E22 (Early 2022, RTX 3080 Ti)
Samsung SSD 980 Pro 250GB MZ-V8P250BW
2462 Points -19%
Average of class Gaming
  (776 - 4721, n=160, last 2 years)
2445 Points -20%
Average Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
  (983 - 3469, n=85)
2417 Points -21%
MSI Vector GP66 12UGS
 
2008 Points -34%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 15 G533QS
ADATA Swordfish 2 TB
637 Points -79%
Score Write
Razer Blade 15 Advanced Model Early 2022
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
3545 Points
MSI Stealth GS66 12UGS
WDC PC SN810 1TB
3325 Points -6%
Average Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
  (921 - 4043, n=85)
3272 Points -8%
Average of class Gaming
  (515 - 7208, n=160, last 2 years)
3113 Points -12%
MSI Vector GP66 12UGS
 
3087 Points -13%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 E22 (Early 2022, RTX 3080 Ti)
Samsung SSD 980 Pro 250GB MZ-V8P250BW
2661 Points -25%
Razer Blade 15 2022
SSSTC CA6-8D1024
2563 Points -28%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 15 G533QS
ADATA Swordfish 2 TB
882 Points -75%
Seq Read
Razer Blade 15 2022
SSSTC CA6-8D1024
5750 MB/s +10%
MSI Stealth GS66 12UGS
WDC PC SN810 1TB
5450 MB/s +5%
Razer Blade 15 Advanced Model Early 2022
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
5205 MB/s
SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 E22 (Early 2022, RTX 3080 Ti)
Samsung SSD 980 Pro 250GB MZ-V8P250BW
5022 MB/s -4%
Average of class Gaming
  (2260 - 12763, n=160, last 2 years)
4976 MB/s -4%
Average Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
  (2638 - 5621, n=85)
4891 MB/s -6%
MSI Vector GP66 12UGS
 
3080 MB/s -41%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 15 G533QS
ADATA Swordfish 2 TB
1757 MB/s -66%
Seq Write
MSI Stealth GS66 12UGS
WDC PC SN810 1TB
4795 MB/s +22%
Razer Blade 15 2022
SSSTC CA6-8D1024
4073 MB/s +3%
Razer Blade 15 Advanced Model Early 2022
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
3936 MB/s
Average of class Gaming
  (495 - 11316, n=160, last 2 years)
3750 MB/s -5%
Average Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
  (1617 - 4526, n=85)
3320 MB/s -16%
MSI Vector GP66 12UGS
 
2997 MB/s -24%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 E22 (Early 2022, RTX 3080 Ti)
Samsung SSD 980 Pro 250GB MZ-V8P250BW
2466 MB/s -37%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 15 G533QS
ADATA Swordfish 2 TB
1071 MB/s -73%
4K Read
MSI Stealth GS66 12UGS
WDC PC SN810 1TB
81.9 MB/s 0%
Razer Blade 15 Advanced Model Early 2022
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
81.55 MB/s
SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 E22 (Early 2022, RTX 3080 Ti)
Samsung SSD 980 Pro 250GB MZ-V8P250BW
80.4 MB/s -1%
Average Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
  (45.9 - 89.2, n=85)
72.4 MB/s -11%
MSI Vector GP66 12UGS
 
70 MB/s -14%
Razer Blade 15 2022
SSSTC CA6-8D1024
67.2 MB/s -18%
Average of class Gaming
  (27.8 - 112.1, n=160, last 2 years)
65.1 MB/s -20%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 15 G533QS
ADATA Swordfish 2 TB
22.07 MB/s -73%
4K Write
MSI Vector GP66 12UGS
 
352 MB/s +75%
MSI Stealth GS66 12UGS
WDC PC SN810 1TB
302.8 MB/s +51%
Razer Blade 15 2022
SSSTC CA6-8D1024
221.3 MB/s +10%
Average of class Gaming
  (108.8 - 512, n=160, last 2 years)
211 MB/s +5%
Razer Blade 15 Advanced Model Early 2022
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
201.1 MB/s
SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 E22 (Early 2022, RTX 3080 Ti)
Samsung SSD 980 Pro 250GB MZ-V8P250BW
193.7 MB/s -4%
Average Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
  (118.6 - 246, n=85)
186 MB/s -8%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 15 G533QS
ADATA Swordfish 2 TB
124.2 MB/s -38%
4K-64 Read
MSI Stealth GS66 12UGS
WDC PC SN810 1TB
2855 MB/s +16%
Razer Blade 15 2022
SSSTC CA6-8D1024
2789 MB/s +14%
Razer Blade 15 Advanced Model Early 2022
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
2451.55 MB/s
SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 E22 (Early 2022, RTX 3080 Ti)
Samsung SSD 980 Pro 250GB MZ-V8P250BW
1880 MB/s -23%
Average of class Gaming
  (451 - 3475, n=160, last 2 years)
1876 MB/s -23%
Average Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
  (421 - 2854, n=85)
1855 MB/s -24%
MSI Vector GP66 12UGS
 
1630 MB/s -34%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 15 G533QS
ADATA Swordfish 2 TB
439.4 MB/s -82%
4K-64 Write
Razer Blade 15 Advanced Model Early 2022
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
2950.05 MB/s
Average Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
  (367 - 3451, n=85)
2754 MB/s -7%
MSI Stealth GS66 12UGS
WDC PC SN810 1TB
2542 MB/s -14%
Average of class Gaming
  (277 - 5909, n=160, last 2 years)
2529 MB/s -14%
MSI Vector GP66 12UGS
 
2435 MB/s -17%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 E22 (Early 2022, RTX 3080 Ti)
Samsung SSD 980 Pro 250GB MZ-V8P250BW
2221 MB/s -25%
Razer Blade 15 2022
SSSTC CA6-8D1024
1934 MB/s -34%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 15 G533QS
ADATA Swordfish 2 TB
651 MB/s -78%
Access Time Read
MSI Stealth GS66 12UGS
WDC PC SN810 1TB
0.07 ms * -59%
Average of class Gaming
  (0.016 - 0.379, n=159, last 2 years)
0.05489 ms * -25%
Razer Blade 15 Advanced Model Early 2022
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
0.044 ms *
Asus ROG Strix Scar 15 G533QS
ADATA Swordfish 2 TB
0.043 ms * +2%
Average Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
  (0.018 - 0.083, n=84)
0.03777 ms * +14%
MSI Vector GP66 12UGS
 
0.033 ms * +25%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 E22 (Early 2022, RTX 3080 Ti)
Samsung SSD 980 Pro 250GB MZ-V8P250BW
0.025 ms * +43%
Razer Blade 15 2022
SSSTC CA6-8D1024
0.023 ms * +48%
Access Time Write
MSI Vector GP66 12UGS
 
0.425 ms * -1924%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 15 G533QS
ADATA Swordfish 2 TB
0.341 ms * -1524%
Razer Blade 15 2022
SSSTC CA6-8D1024
0.058 ms * -176%
Average of class Gaming
  (0.011 - 1.028, n=160, last 2 years)
0.04827 ms * -130%
Average Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
  (0.017 - 0.101, n=85)
0.03406 ms * -62%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 E22 (Early 2022, RTX 3080 Ti)
Samsung SSD 980 Pro 250GB MZ-V8P250BW
0.022 ms * -5%
Razer Blade 15 Advanced Model Early 2022
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
0.021 ms *
MSI Stealth GS66 12UGS
WDC PC SN810 1TB
0.012 ms * +43%

* ... smaller is better

Sustained Read Performance: DiskSpd Read Loop, Queue Depth 8

033567010051340167520102345268030153350368540204355469050255360569560306365Tooltip
Razer Blade 15 Advanced Model Early 2022: Ø6642 (6357.38-6687.03)

GPU

O móvel Nvidia GeForce RTX 3080 Ti com 16 GB de VRAM pertence à geração Ampere Refresh. Com base nos 3DMark benchmarks, o uso do modo "Equilibrado" resulta em um déficit de desempenho de cerca de 10-20%. Pequenas quedas podem ser vistas na progressão da taxa de quadros do The Witcher 3, mas isto teve um impacto subjetivamente mínimo na experiência do jogo.

O desempenho é limitado no modo de bateria. Um Fire Strike run forneceu resultados físicos e gráficos de 12.888 e 10.344 respectivamente no modo de bateria, em comparação com 21866 e 25240 no modo de rede.

3DMark Performance Rating - Percent
SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 E22 (Early 2022, RTX 3080 Ti)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-12700H
97.6 pt
Average of class Gaming
 
95.2 pt
MSI Vector GP66 12UGS
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-12900H
93.7 pt
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
 
89.6 pt
Razer Blade 15 2022
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-12800H
87.5 pt
Asus ROG Strix Scar 15 G533QS
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU, AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX
77 pt
MSI Stealth GS66 12UGS
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-12700H
76.7 pt
Razer Blade 15 Advanced Model Early 2022
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-12800H
76.6 pt
3DMark 11 - 1280x720 Performance GPU
SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 E22 (Early 2022, RTX 3080 Ti)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-12700H
43546 Points +38%
Average of class Gaming
  (1029 - 72178, n=187, last 2 years)
43524 Points +38%
MSI Vector GP66 12UGS
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-12900H
40880 Points +30%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 15 G533QS
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU, AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX
39782 Points +26%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
  (13920 - 45841, n=45)
39402 Points +25%
Razer Blade 15 2022
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-12800H
37438 Points +19%
MSI Stealth GS66 12UGS
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-12700H
32525 Points +3%
Razer Blade 15 Advanced Model Early 2022
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-12800H
31565 Points
3DMark
1280x720 Cloud Gate Standard Graphics
MSI Vector GP66 12UGS
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-12900H
167720 Points +21%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 E22 (Early 2022, RTX 3080 Ti)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-12700H
160517 Points +15%
Razer Blade 15 2022
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-12800H
153993 Points +11%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
  (73574 - 192520, n=26)
145836 Points +5%
Average of class Gaming
  (15902 - 193851, n=101, last 2 years)
142796 Points +3%
Razer Blade 15 Advanced Model Early 2022
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-12800H
138996 Points
MSI Stealth GS66 12UGS
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-12700H
134948 Points -3%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 15 G533QS
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU, AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX
78421 Points -44%
1920x1080 Fire Strike Graphics
SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 E22 (Early 2022, RTX 3080 Ti)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-12700H
32703 Points +30%
Average of class Gaming
  (781 - 53059, n=197, last 2 years)
31252 Points +24%
MSI Vector GP66 12UGS
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-12900H
29729 Points +18%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
  (6928 - 34439, n=43)
29496 Points +17%
Razer Blade 15 2022
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-12800H
28601 Points +13%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 15 G533QS
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU, AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX
26956 Points +7%
Razer Blade 15 Advanced Model Early 2022
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-12800H
25240 Points
MSI Stealth GS66 12UGS
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-12700H
25169 Points 0%
2560x1440 Time Spy Graphics
Average of class Gaming
  (224 - 22717, n=192, last 2 years)
13032 Points +35%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 E22 (Early 2022, RTX 3080 Ti)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-12700H
12320 Points +28%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
  (4921 - 13835, n=43)
11850 Points +23%
MSI Vector GP66 12UGS
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-12900H
11739 Points +22%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 15 G533QS
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU, AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX
11396 Points +18%
Razer Blade 15 2022
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-12800H
11071 Points +15%
MSI Stealth GS66 12UGS
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-12700H
9758 Points +1%
Razer Blade 15 Advanced Model Early 2022
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-12800H
9646 Points
3DMark 11 Performance
25091 pontos
3DMark Ice Storm Standard Score
158195 pontos
3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score
43351 pontos
3DMark Fire Strike Score
21106 pontos
3DMark Time Spy Score
9596 pontos
Ajuda

Desempenho nos jogos

Os benchmarks de Gming são naturalmente mais fracos no modo de desempenho equilibrado. No entanto, as taxas de quadros absolutos ainda são altas o suficiente para uma experiência de jogo suave, de modo que você não precisa necessariamente rodar a Lâmina 15 no modo de alto desempenho.

The Witcher 3
1920x1080 High Graphics & Postprocessing (Nvidia HairWorks Off)
Average of class Gaming
  (35.6 - 449, n=125, last 2 years)
238 fps +53%
MSI Vector GP66 12UGS
GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, i9-12900H
223.9 (214min) fps +44%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
  (144 - 268, n=28)
220 fps +41%
Razer Blade 15 2022
GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, i7-12800H
213.7 (196min) fps +37%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 E22 (Early 2022, RTX 3080 Ti)
GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, i7-12700H
212.4 fps +37%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 15 G533QS
GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU, R9 5900HX
189.5 (186min) fps +22%
MSI Stealth GS66 12UGS
GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, i7-12700H
166 (146min) fps +7%
Razer Blade 15 Advanced Model Early 2022
GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, i7-12800H
155.5 (115min) fps
1920x1080 Ultra Graphics & Postprocessing (HBAO+)
Average of class Gaming
  (18.4 - 216, n=169, last 2 years)
126.8 fps +42%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 E22 (Early 2022, RTX 3080 Ti)
GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, i7-12700H
121 fps +35%
MSI Vector GP66 12UGS
GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, i9-12900H
114.6 (108min) fps +28%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
  (30 - 130.6, n=43)
112.1 fps +26%
Razer Blade 15 2022
GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, i7-12800H
107.2 (99min) fps +20%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 15 G533QS
GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU, R9 5900HX
105.8 (100min) fps +18%
MSI Stealth GS66 12UGS
GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, i7-12700H
90.4 (78min) fps +1%
Razer Blade 15 Advanced Model Early 2022
GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, i7-12800H
89.3 (64min) fps
GTA V
1920x1080 High/On (Advanced Graphics Off) AA:2xMSAA + FX AF:8x
MSI Vector GP66 12UGS
GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, i9-12900H
179 (3.57min, 125P1) fps +17%
Razer Blade 15 2022
GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, i7-12800H
177 (3.71min, 125P1) fps +15%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
  (153.4 - 184.3, n=28)
175.1 fps +14%
MSI Stealth GS66 12UGS
GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, i7-12700H
170 (3.61min, 111P1) fps +11%
Average of class Gaming
  (24.2 - 187.1, n=147, last 2 years)
168.8 fps +10%
Razer Blade 15 Advanced Model Early 2022
GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, i7-12800H
153.4 (4.65min, 100P1) fps
Asus ROG Strix Scar 15 G533QS
GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU, R9 5900HX
150 (21.4min, 100P1) fps -2%
1920x1080 Highest Settings possible AA:4xMSAA + FX AF:16x
MSI Vector GP66 12UGS
GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, i9-12900H
123 (4.38min, 83.3P1) fps +33%
Razer Blade 15 2022
GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, i7-12800H
118 (4.44min, 76.9P1) fps +28%
Average of class Gaming
  (12.1 - 167.7, n=172, last 2 years)
113.1 fps +22%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
  (30 - 139.2, n=42)
111 fps +20%
MSI Stealth GS66 12UGS
GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, i7-12700H
105 (21.6min, 71.4P1) fps +14%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 15 G533QS
GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU, R9 5900HX
94.5 (9.87min, 66.7P1) fps +2%
Razer Blade 15 Advanced Model Early 2022
GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, i7-12800H
92.4 (7.56min, 62.5P1) fps
Final Fantasy XV Benchmark - 1920x1080 High Quality
Average of class Gaming
  (19.2 - 201, n=185, last 2 years)
119 fps +32%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 E22 (Early 2022, RTX 3080 Ti)
GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, i7-12700H
115 fps +27%
MSI Vector GP66 12UGS
GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, i9-12900H
115 fps +27%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
  (30.7 - 140.6, n=42)
113.8 fps +26%
Razer Blade 15 2022
GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, i7-12800H
106 fps +17%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 15 G533QS
GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU, R9 5900HX
105 fps +16%
Razer Blade 15 Advanced Model Early 2022
GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, i7-12800H
90.4 fps
MSI Stealth GS66 12UGS
GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, i7-12700H
87 (53min) fps -4%
Strange Brigade
1920x1080 high AA:high AF:8
Average of class Gaming
  (49.4 - 465, n=156, last 2 years)
253 fps +51%
MSI Vector GP66 12UGS
GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, i9-12900H
244 (113min, 182P1) fps +46%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
  (156 - 255, n=29)
219 fps +31%
Razer Blade 15 2022
GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, i7-12800H
205 (74.7min, 147P1) fps +22%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 15 G533QS
GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU, R9 5900HX
191 (54.2min, 128P1) fps +14%
MSI Stealth GS66 12UGS
GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, i7-12700H
175 (95.7min, 131P1) fps +4%
Razer Blade 15 Advanced Model Early 2022
GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, i7-12800H
167.6 (110.5min, 127P1) fps
1920x1080 ultra AA:ultra AF:16
Average of class Gaming
  (38.9 - 421, n=183, last 2 years)
227 fps +52%
MSI Vector GP66 12UGS
GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, i9-12900H
213 (67.3min, 162P1) fps +42%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
  (42.3 - 224, n=41)
187.3 fps +25%
Razer Blade 15 2022
GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, i7-12800H
184 (33.3min, 131P1) fps +23%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 15 G533QS
GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU, R9 5900HX
174 (26.8min, 123P1) fps +16%
MSI Stealth GS66 12UGS
GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, i7-12700H
153 (77.1min, 115P1) fps +2%
Razer Blade 15 Advanced Model Early 2022
GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, i7-12800H
149.8 (29.6min, 114.2P1) fps

Witcher 3 FPS Diagram

051015202530354045505560657075808590Tooltip
Razer Blade 15 Advanced Model Early 2022 i7-12800H, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU: Ø87.2 (70-92)
baixomédiaaltoultra
GTA V (2015) 178.7 170.7 153.4 92.4
The Witcher 3 (2015) 316 200 155.5 89.3
Dota 2 Reborn (2015) 59.9 59.9 59.9 59.9
Final Fantasy XV Benchmark (2018) 148.3 119.4 90.4
X-Plane 11.11 (2018) 124.3 109.5 93.4
Strange Brigade (2018) 361 212 167.6 149.8

Emissões - carcaça condutora de calor

Ruído

Os ventiladores são lentos e permitem que os componentes se tornem um pouco quentes antes de fazer efeito. Em particular, o nível médio de ruído sob carga é sensivelmente mais baixo no modo balanceado. O nível de ruído de nossos primeira Lâmina 15 (modo: desempenho máximo) estava dentro da faixa habitual. Não foi detectada nenhuma lamúria de bobina em nosso dispositivo de revisão.

Barulho

Ocioso
26 / 27 / 29 dB
Carga
37 / 45 dB
  red to green bar
 
 
30 dB
silencioso
40 dB(A)
audível
50 dB(A)
ruidosamente alto
 
min: dark, med: mid, max: light   Earthworks M23R, Arta (15 cm de distância)   environment noise: 26 dB(A)
dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2035.540.137.834.637.7253536.636.235.434.33144.645.446.541.345.14029.330.330.427.129.75026.528.425.32737.66331.628.930.627.734.2802423.22421.428.310021.619.419.42025.512521.620.720.817.828.6160222219.118.329.520023.621.72520.825.625025.623.824.423.430.131526.623.321.721.52940024.619.814.614.428.550024.720.617.11828.76302619.215.315.931800261813.413.332.9100026.818.513.413.633.5125026.518.511.811.733.1160027.517.911.611.534.6200027.517.111.911.435250026.215.412.512.934.9315024.81412.613.235.140002013.712.913.231.4500019.114.213.514.230.5630018.214.31414.626.6800016.81413.414.223.81000014.813.31314.121.81250014.112.912.61317.51600013.812.712.412.614.4SPL36.829.226.426.444.6N2.51.20.80.84.7median 24.6median 18median 13.4median 14.2median 29.5Delta432.62.44.235.63535.634.437.634.441.640.441.631.931.431.930.230.430.232.329.432.328.225.528.231.72831.731.222.231.232.419.232.434.423.334.435.923.935.938.814.538.840.714.740.741.411.341.440.39.640.342.19.742.143.31043.342.99.542.941.29.841.241.410.541.442.410.442.443.910.343.942.811.242.842.311.642.338.311.638.333.811.733.829.511.829.524.61224.619.611.419.653.624.353.69.30.69.3median 40.3median 11.6median 40.35.33.75.3hearing rangehide median Fan NoiseRazer Blade 15 Advanced Model Early 2022SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 E22 (Early 2022, RTX 3080 Ti)
Razer Blade 15 Advanced Model Early 2022
i7-12800H, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
Razer Blade 15 2022
i7-12800H, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 E22 (Early 2022, RTX 3080 Ti)
i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
Asus ROG Strix Scar 15 G533QS
R9 5900HX, GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU
MSI Stealth GS66 12UGS
i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
MSI Vector GP66 12UGS
i9-12900H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
Noise
-5%
-2%
-8%
-12%
-2%
off / environment *
26
25.4
2%
24
8%
25.5
2%
24
8%
22.9
12%
Idle Minimum *
26
26.2
-1%
24
8%
25.5
2%
31
-19%
23.4
10%
Idle Average *
27
26.2
3%
24
11%
25.5
6%
32
-19%
23.4
13%
Idle Maximum *
29
28.4
2%
27.76
4%
37.1
-28%
35
-21%
27.4
6%
Load Average *
37
44.7
-21%
38.81
-5%
39.2
-6%
48
-30%
36
3%
Witcher 3 ultra *
44
44.7
-2%
54.2
-23%
50.5
-15%
43
2%
58.2
-32%
Load Maximum *
45
51.9
-15%
54.18
-20%
51.8
-15%
48
-7%
58
-29%

* ... smaller is better

Temperatura

Devido à construção metálica e aos componentes potentes, o case se torna relativamente quente sob carga moderada. O laptop também aquece fortemente através das superfícies de controle quando se joga The Witcher 3, por exemplo.

Witcher 3
Witcher 3
Witcher 3
Witcher 3
Witcher 3
Witcher 3
Teste de estresse
Teste de estresse
Teste de estresse
Teste de estresse
Teste de estresse
Teste de estresse
 48 °C53 °C50 °C 
 47 °C48 °C37 °C 
 43 °C43 °C36 °C 
Máximo: 53 °C
Médio: 45 °C
49 °C53 °C53 °C
44 °C45 °C42 °C
42 °C42 °C43 °C
Máximo: 53 °C
Médio: 45.9 °C
alimentação elétrica  45 °C | Temperatura do quarto 20 °C | Fluke t3000FC (calibrated), Voltcraft IR-900
(-) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 45 °C / 113 F, compared to the average of 33.9 °C / 93 F for the devices in the class Gaming.
(-) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 53 °C / 127 F, compared to the average of 40.5 °C / 105 F, ranging from 21.2 to 68.8 °C for the class Gaming.
(-) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 53 °C / 127 F, compared to the average of 43.2 °C / 110 F
(±) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 33.2 °C / 92 F, compared to the device average of 33.9 °C / 93 F.
(-) Playing The Witcher 3, the average temperature for the upper side is 45.2 °C / 113 F, compared to the device average of 33.9 °C / 93 F.
(-) The palmrests and touchpad can get very hot to the touch with a maximum of 43 °C / 109.4 F.
(-) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.9 °C / 84 F (-14.1 °C / -25.4 F).
Razer Blade 15 Advanced Model Early 2022
Intel Core i7-12800H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
Razer Blade 15 2022
Intel Core i7-12800H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 E22 (Early 2022, RTX 3080 Ti)
Intel Core i7-12700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
Asus ROG Strix Scar 15 G533QS
AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU
MSI Stealth GS66 12UGS
Intel Core i7-12700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
MSI Vector GP66 12UGS
Intel Core i9-12900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
Heat
3%
-3%
8%
11%
12%
Maximum Upper Side *
53
50
6%
52
2%
43.4
18%
54
-2%
40.2
24%
Maximum Bottom *
53
47
11%
68
-28%
48.2
9%
59
-11%
43.8
17%
Idle Upper Side *
36
37.4
-4%
32
11%
35.2
2%
26
28%
34.8
3%
Idle Bottom *
38
38.4
-1%
36
5%
37
3%
27
29%
37
3%

* ... smaller is better

Teste de estresse

Em nosso teste de estresse, carregamos o sistema simultaneamente com Prime95 e FurMark. A CPU começou o teste com velocidades de relógio P e E-core de cerca de 2 e 1,9 GHz, respectivamente, e estabilizou em 1,7 e 1,5 GHz, respectivamente, e em torno de 85°C durante períodos de tempo mais longos. A GPU começou em torno de 1.100 MHz e eventualmente nivelou-se em 640 MHz e a uma temperatura central de 77°C

Oradores

Os alto-falantes estão sintonizados de forma desigual. O diagrama de ruído rosa mostra a queda de freqüência significativamente mais plana do MacBook Pro 16, que é um dos melhores laptops desta disciplina. Os dispositivos de áudio externos podem ser conectados via Bluetooth, USB ou pela porta de 3,5mm

dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2034.640.12535.438.73141.345.34027.134.4502733.76327.734.48021.433.91002035.712517.846.116018.352.720020.857.125023.465.331521.568.240014.471.25001873.863015.976.280013.380.2100013.679.6125011.781.1160011.581.5200011.483.5250012.982.8315013.279.8400013.271.4500014.276630014.677.2800014.272.21000014.178.7125001373.21600012.666.2SPL26.491.6N0.892.5median 14.2median 76Delta2.46.826.325.821.422.12624.925.127.622.532.523.448.72655.818.860.922.167.2267019.372.317.674.217.774.319.575.31571.711.871.311.27410.574.21072.710.17210.67210.97511.374.811.671.71269.71269.612.371.112.669.61270.111.269.824.784.70.666.6median 12median 71.73.42.2hearing rangehide median Pink NoiseRazer Blade 15 Advanced Model Early 2022Apple MacBook Pro 16 2021 M1 Pro
Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)
Razer Blade 15 Advanced Model Early 2022 audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (92 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 21.8% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (9.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.1% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (3.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3.3% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (6.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (15% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 30% of all tested devices in this class were better, 6% similar, 64% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 18%, worst was 132%
Compared to all devices tested
» 18% of all tested devices were better, 4% similar, 78% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Apple MacBook Pro 16 2021 M1 Pro audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (84.7 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(+) | good bass - only 3.8% away from median
(+) | bass is linear (5.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 1.3% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (2.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 1.9% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (2.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (4.6% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 0% of all tested devices in this class were better, 0% similar, 100% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 18%, worst was 45%
Compared to all devices tested
» 0% of all tested devices were better, 0% similar, 100% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Gerenciamento de energia - Sem registros de tempo de execução

Consumo de energia

Os valores de consumo ocioso de 19 W em média são significativamente mais baixos do que os dos valores anteriormente revisados Lâmina Razer 15 (36.4 W). Isto é provavelmente devido ao perfil de desempenho mais econômico e à menor resolução de exibição. Na tela Witcher 3o consumo total é cerca de 13% menor.

O consumo máximo da fonte de alimentação de 230 W durante a execução simultânea de Prime95 e FurMark foi de 179 W. A fonte de alimentação de 230 W é suficientemente grande.

Consumo de energia
desligadodarklight 0.2 /  Watt
Ociosodarkmidlight 17 / 19 / 25 Watt
Carga midlight 108 / 179 Watt
 color bar
Key: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
Razer Blade 15 Advanced Model Early 2022
i7-12800H, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
Razer Blade 15 2022
i7-12800H, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 E22 (Early 2022, RTX 3080 Ti)
i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
Asus ROG Strix Scar 15 G533QS
R9 5900HX, GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU
MSI Stealth GS66 12UGS
i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
MSI Vector GP66 12UGS
i9-12900H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
Average of class Gaming
 
Power Consumption
-48%
-14%
-2%
5%
-34%
-5%
Idle Minimum *
17
33.2
-95%
14
18%
11.2
34%
11
35%
17.5
-3%
Idle Average *
19
36.4
-92%
18
5%
16.4
14%
16
16%
20.1
-6%
Idle Maximum *
25
37.6
-50%
19
24%
29.4
-18%
23
8%
47.3
-89%
Load Average *
108
116.7
-8%
115
-6%
106.2
2%
110
-2%
107.3
1%
Witcher 3 ultra *
150
172
-15%
228
-52%
189
-26%
151
-1%
225
-50%
Load Maximum *
179
228.6
-28%
307
-72%
213.6
-19%
230
-28%
277.7
-55%

* ... smaller is better

Power Consumption Witcher 3 / Stress test

0102030405060708090100110120130140150160Tooltip
Razer Blade 15 Advanced Model Early 2022; Witcher 3 ultra: Ø149.6 (143-155)
Razer Blade 15 Advanced Model Early 2022; 1280x720 Prime95 28.10 and Furmark 1.25: Ø145.5 (138-161)

{

0102030405060708090100110120130140Tooltip
Razer Blade 15 Advanced Model Early 2022; Prime95 V2810 Stress (external Monitor): Ø67.7 (65.1-83.5)
Razer Blade 15 Advanced Model Early 2022; Cinebench R15 Multi (external Monitor): Ø84.3 (65.1-96.2)
Razer Blade 15 Advanced Model Early 2022; 1280x720 FurMark 1.19 GPU Stress Test (external Monitor): Ø139.8 (138-142)
Razer Blade 15 Advanced Model Early 2022; 1920x1080 The Witcher 3 ultra (external Monitor): Ø144.2 (140-150)

Vida útil da bateria

Em nosso teste WLAN do mundo real, a Lâmina 15 atinge um tempo de execução de 4:53 h. Quase nenhum concorrente consegue acompanhar as 7:20 h do Asus ROG Strix Scar 15enquanto o MSI Vetor GP66 também oferece um tempo de funcionamento mais longo, apesar de uma bateria menor (65 Wh vs. 80 Wh).

Tempo de Execução da Bateria
Ocioso (sem WLAN, min brilho)
8h 04min
WiFi Websurfing
4h 53min
Big Buck Bunny H.264 1080p
5h 56min
Carga (máximo brilho)
2h 02min
Razer Blade 15 Advanced Model Early 2022
i7-12800H, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, 80 Wh
Razer Blade 15 2022
i7-12800H, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, 80 Wh
SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 E22 (Early 2022, RTX 3080 Ti)
i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, 93 Wh
Asus ROG Strix Scar 15 G533QS
R9 5900HX, GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU, 90 Wh
MSI Stealth GS66 12UGS
i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, 99.9 Wh
MSI Vector GP66 12UGS
i9-12900H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, 65 Wh
Average of class Gaming
 
Battery Runtime
0%
47%
19%
-5%
-12%
8%
Reader / Idle
484
668
38%
467
-4%
473
-2%
H.264
356
413
16%
WiFi v1.3
293
292
0%
403
38%
440
50%
324
11%
342
17%
Load
122
228
87%
85
-30%
96
-21%
61
-50%

Pro

+ visualização rápida com brilho máximo decente
+ alto desempenho em jogos
+ bom acabamento
+ caixa compacta e fornecimento de energia
+ leitor rápido de cartões SD

Contra

- altas temperaturas superficiais
- Os oradores não fazem justiça à classe de preço
- sem Advanced Optimus (apenas modelo QHD)

Veredicto

Em revisão: Razer Blade 15 Spring 2022. Dispositivo de revisão fornecido pela Razer Alemanha.
Em revisão: Razer Blade 15 Spring 2022. Dispositivo de revisão fornecido pela Razer Alemanha.

O Blade 15 é um laptop muito compacto e bem feito. A conectividade é tão moderna quanto os novos chips da Intel e Nvidia e é bem completada por um rápido leitor de cartões SD. A tela oferece uma representação visual incrivelmente suave e um brilho máximo decente, mas, ao contrário do modelo QHD, falta o Advanced Optimus e a cobertura do espaço de cores poderia ser um pouco melhor. Considerando o grupo alvo, no entanto, este último é aceitável

As referências no modo "Equilibrado" dão uma imagem interessante. Na prática, o desempenho é frequentemente mais do que suficiente e o nível de ruído é significativamente menor. Entretanto, as superfícies do case ainda aquecem muito fortemente.

Se você está procurando um laptop elegante e compacto com um display excepcionalmente rápido, não procure mais. Entretanto, os usuários sensíveis à temperatura devem ser cautelosos aqui


Outro ponto de crítica são os alto-falantes: Muitos laptops mais baratos oferecem melhor som

Cicatriz ROG Strix Scar 15 da Asus é uma alternativa menos compacta, baseada em AMD para o Razer Blade 15, com tempos de funcionamento da bateria muito mais longos. Para usuários que estão frequentemente em movimento e precisam de muito desempenho, o Razer Blade 15 ainda pode ser a escolha certa.

Preço e Disponibilidade

Nossa configuração da Razer Blade 15 está atualmente disponível em B&H Photo Video por US$ 3.699,99 ou através do site oficial Razer pelo mesmo preço.

Razer Blade 15 Advanced Model Early 2022 - 05/04/2022 v7 (old)
Marius Schell

Acabamento
87 / 98 → 89%
Teclado
83%
Mouse
88%
Conectividade
69 / 80 → 86%
Peso
62 / 10-66 → 94%
Bateria
64 / 95 → 67%
Pantalha
90%
Desempenho do jogos
96%
Desempenho da aplicação
97%
Temperatura
73 / 95 → 77%
Ruído
86 / 90 → 96%
Audio
79%
Camera
43 / 85 → 50%
Médio
78%
88%
Gaming - Médio equilibrado

Price comparison

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Análises e revisões de portáteis e celulares > Análises > Análises > Razer Blade 15 Advanced Model Early 2022 review - Laptop compacto para jogos com visor rápido
Marius Schell, 2022-05- 5 (Update: 2022-05- 5)