Análise do Intel NUC X15 LAPAC71H: O laptop multimídia com um Intel Arc A730M a partir de US$ 1.050

Name: Intel NUC X15 LAPAC71H
Brand: Intel

Atrasado.

O X15 tem como objetivo atrair compradores com seu preço de cerca de US$ 1.050 - no entanto, ele só apresenta tecnologia de 2022 (Alder Lake). Nossa análise revelará se esse laptop é uma verdadeira pechincha ou se simplesmente não vale o dinheiro.

Sascha Mölck, 👁 Christian Hintze (traduzido por DeepL / Ninh Duy), Published 10/16/2023 🇺🇸 🇩🇪 ...

Alder Lake Arc Gaming Intel Laptop / Notebook Thunderbolt Windows

Depois de ser anunciado para o outono de 2022, o Intel NUC X15 - um laptop para gamers e criadores - finalmente vê a luz do dia um ano depois. Isso deve ser principalmente um caso de se livrar de mercadorias: O X15, assim como a série NUC como um todo, já foi descontinuado pela Intel. O laptop distribuído pela Schenker tem o Core i7-12700H, Arc A730Me o painel FHD são definidos, enquanto a RAM e o(s) SSD(s) podem ser selecionados.

Os concorrentes incluem dispositivos como o Asus TUF A15 FA507, Gigabyte G5 KE, MSI Cyborg 15 A12VF, Dell Inspiron 16 Plus 7630 e o Asus VivoBook Pro 16.

Test device courtesy of Schenker Technologies

Download your licensed rating image as PNG / SVG

Intel NUC X15 LAPAC71H

Processador

Intel Core i7-12700H 14 x 1.7 - 4.7 GHz, 90 W PL2 / Short Burst, 45 W PL1 / Sustained, Alder Lake-H

Placa gráfica

Intel Arc A730M - 12 GB VRAM, Análises do: 2050 MHz, Memoría: 1750 MHz, 85 W TDP, GDDR6, 31.0.101.4824

Memória

32 GB

, DDR5-4800, Dual-Channel-Mode, two memory slots (both in use)

Pantalha

15.60 polegadas 16:9, 1920 x 1080 pixel 141 PPI, BOE HF NV156FHM-N4G, IPS, Brilhante: não, 144 Hz

placa mãe

Intel Alder Lake-P PCH

Disco rígido

Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB, 1024 GB

, PCIe 4, M.2-2280, 839 GB livre

Placa de Som

Realtek ALC274 @ Intel Alder Point-M/P

Conexões

3 USB 3.0, 1 USB 4.0 40 Gbps, 1 Thunderbolt, 1 HDMI, 1 DisplayPort, 1 Kensington Lock, Conexões Audio: Headset combined port, TPM 2.0

Funcionamento em rede

Intel Ethernet Controller I225-V (10/100/1000/2500MBit/s), Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201 (a/b/g/h/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/ax = Wi-Fi 6/), Bluetooth 5.2

Tamanho

altura x largura x profundidade (em mm): 26.7 x 360.2 x 243.5

Bateria

62.3 Wh, 4100 mAh Lítio-Polímero

Sistema Operativo

Microsoft Windows 11 Pro

Camera

Webcam: HD
Primary Camera: 0.9 MPix

Características adicionais

Alto falantes: Stereo, Teclado: Chiclet, Iluminação do Teclado: sim, 24 Meses Garantia

peso

2.2 kg, Suprimento de energia: 695 g

Preço

1220 Euro

Links

Intel página inicial

Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

see all specifications

Possíveis concorrentes em comparação

Rating	Date	Model	Weight	Height	Size	Resolution
84.4 % v7 ^(old)	10/2023	Intel NUC X15 LAPAC71H i7-12700H, A730M	2.2 kg	26.7 mm	15.60"	1920x1080
86.3 % v7 ^(old)	06/2023	Asus TUF A15 FA507 R7 7735HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU	2.2 kg	24.9 mm	15.60"	1920x1080
81.8 % v7 ^(old)	04/2023	Gigabyte G5 KE i5-12500H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU	2 kg	23.9 mm	15.60"	1920x1080
87.1 % v7 ^(old)	08/2023	Dell Inspiron 16 Plus 7630 i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU	2.2 kg	19.95 mm	16.00"	2560x1600
86.3 % v7 ^(old)	05/2023	Asus VivoBook Pro 16 i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU	1.9 kg	20 mm	16.00"	2560x1600
82.4 % v7 ^(old)	04/2023	MSI Cyborg 15 A12VF i7-12650H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU	2 kg	22.9 mm	15.60"	1920x1080

Case e conectividade - O Intel NUC possui Thunderbolt 4

A parte traseira da tampa e a parte superior do gabinete preto fosco são feitas de alumínio, e a parte inferior da moldura da tela é feita de plástico. Não notamos nenhum problema de construção. A Intel conta com um gabinete elegante e despojado que não deve chamar muita atenção em ambientes profissionais. Depois de desmontar a parte inferior do gabinete, o senhor pode acessar a bateria (aparafusada, não colada), bem como o restante das entranhas do laptop.

O LAPAC71H possui três portas USB-A (USB 3.2 Gen 1) e uma porta USB-C (Thunderbolt 4/USB 4). A última não é compatível com Power Delivery, mas pode emitir um sinal DisplayPort. No total, o laptop tem duas saídas de vídeo (1x HDMI, 1x DP). A Intel não forneceu ao dispositivo um leitor de cartão SD. Sua webcam (0,9 MP, máx. 1.280 x 720 pixels, sem cobertura) oferece resultados bastante padronizados.

Em condições ideais (sem dispositivos WiFi nas proximidades, curta distância entre o laptop e o PC servidor), ela pode atingir excelentes taxas de dados WiFi. O laptop usa um chip WiFi 6E (Intel AX201). As conexões com fio também são controladas por um controlador Intel (I225-V; 2,5 GBit/s).

Comparação de tamanho

Intel NUC X15 LAPAC71H Gigabyte G5 KE MSI Cyborg 15 A12VF Asus TUF A15 FA507 Dell Inspiron 16 Plus 7630 Asus VivoBook Pro 16 DIN A4 ❌

Lado esquerdo: Slot para uma trava de cabo, Gigabit Ethernet (2,5 GBit/s), 2x USB 3.2 Gen 1 (USB A), combinação de áudio

Lado direito: Thunderbolt 4 (USB-C; DisplayPort), USB 3.2 Gen 1 (USB-A), HDMI 2.0, conexão de energia

Networking
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
Gigabyte G5 KE Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201	1622 (823^min - 1820^max) MBit/s +8%
MSI Cyborg 15 A12VF Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201	1606 (1267^min - 1656^max) MBit/s +6%
Intel NUC X15 LAPAC71H Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201	1508 (758^min - 1552^max) MBit/s
Asus VivoBook Pro 16 MediaTek Wi-Fi 6E MT7922 160MHz Wireless LAN Card	1492 (829^min - 1665^max) MBit/s -1%
Average of class Multimedia (358 - 1921, n=78, last 2 years)	1359 MBit/s -10%
Average Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201 (438 - 1715, n=71)	1287 MBit/s -15%
Dell Inspiron 16 Plus 7630 Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211	1261 (1137^min - 1385^max) MBit/s -16%
Asus TUF A15 FA507 MediaTek MT7921	985 (902^min - 1065^max) MBit/s -35%
iperf3 receive AXE11000
Gigabyte G5 KE Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201	1686 (1451^min - 1716^max) MBit/s +6%
MSI Cyborg 15 A12VF Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201	1679 (1634^min - 1714^max) MBit/s +6%
Intel NUC X15 LAPAC71H Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201	1589 (1459^min - 1620^max) MBit/s
Average of class Multimedia (709 - 1789, n=77, last 2 years)	1447 MBit/s -9%
Average Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201 (390 - 1734, n=76)	1421 MBit/s -11%
Dell Inspiron 16 Plus 7630 Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211	1184 (1047^min - 1237^max) MBit/s -25%
Asus TUF A15 FA507 MediaTek MT7921	917 (797^min - 933^max) MBit/s -42%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz
Dell Inspiron 16 Plus 7630 Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211	1524 (1318^min - 1580^max) MBit/s
Average of class Multimedia (705 - 1816, n=37, last 2 years)	1416 MBit/s
Average Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201 (745 - 1252, n=3)	993 MBit/s
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz
Asus VivoBook Pro 16 MediaTek Wi-Fi 6E MT7922 160MHz Wireless LAN Card	1712 (1593^min - 1743^max) MBit/s
Average of class Multimedia (700 - 1807, n=37, last 2 years)	1494 MBit/s
Dell Inspiron 16 Plus 7630 Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211	1229 (1099^min - 1323^max) MBit/s
Average Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201 (390 - 1670, n=3)	993 MBit/s

Dell Inspiron 16 Plus 7630 Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211; iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1524 (1318-1580)

Dell Inspiron 16 Plus 7630 Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211; iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1229 (1099-1323)

Asus VivoBook Pro 16 MediaTek Wi-Fi 6E MT7922 160MHz Wireless LAN Card; iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1711 (1593-1743)

Intel NUC X15 LAPAC71H Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201; iperf3 transmit AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1482 (758-1552)

Asus TUF A15 FA507 MediaTek MT7921; iperf3 transmit AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø985 (902-1065)

Gigabyte G5 KE Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201; iperf3 transmit AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1595 (823-1820)

Dell Inspiron 16 Plus 7630 Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211; iperf3 transmit AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1261 (1137-1385)

Asus VivoBook Pro 16 MediaTek Wi-Fi 6E MT7922 160MHz Wireless LAN Card; iperf3 transmit AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1465 (829-1665)

MSI Cyborg 15 A12VF Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201; iperf3 transmit AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1606 (1267-1656)

Intel NUC X15 LAPAC71H Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201; iperf3 receive AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1589 (1459-1620)

Asus TUF A15 FA507 MediaTek MT7921; iperf3 receive AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø916 (797-933)

Gigabyte G5 KE Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201; iperf3 receive AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1685 (1451-1716)

Dell Inspiron 16 Plus 7630 Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211; iperf3 receive AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1183 (1047-1237)

MSI Cyborg 15 A12VF Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201; iperf3 receive AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1679 (1634-1714)

ColorChecker Intel NUC X15 LAPAC71H: 12.17 ∆E min: 2.33 - max: 16.7 ∆E

Dispositivos de entrada - Um teclado com iluminação RGB

O teclado chiclet do laptop (iluminação RGB) não apresenta um teclado numérico, embora haja espaço suficiente para um. Suas teclas uniformes e suaves apresentam uma elevação média e um ponto de pressão claro. A resistência das teclas poderia ser um pouco mais nítida. O teclado não se deforma quando o usuário digita nele. No total, a Intel forneceu um teclado adequado para o uso diário. Um clickpad (aprox. 13,3 x 8,3 cm) é instalado como substituto do mouse e apresenta uma elevação curta e um ponto de pressão claro.

Tela - O LAPAC71H apresenta um painel FHD de alto contraste

O painel de 144 Hz de reação rápida com uma relação de aspecto de 16:9 não apresenta oscilação de PWM em nenhum nível de brilho. As metas de brilho e contraste da tela de 15,6 polegadas (1.920 x 1.080 pixels) foram atingidas (> 300 cd/m² e 1.000:1). Seu valor de contraste relativamente alto merece ser mencionado. Não estão disponíveis outras opções de tela.


379 cd/m²	356 cd/m²	381 cd/m²
357 cd/m²	365 cd/m²	361 cd/m²
327 cd/m²	335 cd/m²	341 cd/m²

Distribuição do brilho

BOE HF NV156FHM-N4G tested with X-Rite i1Pro 3

Máximo: 381 cd/m² (Nits) Médio: 355.8 cd/m² Minimum: 8.5 cd/m²
iluminação: 86 %
iluminação com acumulador: 366 cd/m²
Contraste: 2147:1 (Preto: 0.17 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 3.51 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.92, calibrated: 1.88
ΔE Greyscale 3.83 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
66.3% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
92.6% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
64.9% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.47

Download Arquivo ICC (X-Rite i1Pro 3)

	Intel NUC X15 LAPAC71H BOE HF NV156FHM-N4G, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6"	Asus TUF A15 FA507 N156HMA-GA1, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6"	Gigabyte G5 KE Chi Mei N156HRA-EA1, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6"	Dell Inspiron 16 Plus 7630 LG Philips 160WQ2, IPS, 2560x1600, 16"	Asus VivoBook Pro 16 Au Optronics B160QAN02.L, IPS, 2560x1600, 16"	MSI Cyborg 15 A12VF AU Optronics B156HAN15.1, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6"
Display		1%	-36%	8%	30%	-34%
Display P3 Coverage	64.9	64.9 0%	40.7 -37%	70.1 8%	98.5 52%	42.3 -35%
sRGB Coverage	92.6	96.5 4%	61 -34%	99.6 8%	99.9 8%	62.6 -32%
AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage	66.3	66.6 0%	42.1 -37%	72.3 9%	86.1 30%	43.7 -34%
Response Times		-238%	-199%	-291%	32%	-137%
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% *	7.8 ?(3.9, 3.9)	30.4 ?(14.8, 15.6) -290%	26.64 ?(12.52, 14.12) -242%	35 ?(15.7, 19.3) -349%	2 ?(1, 1) 74%	22 ?(9, 13) -182%
Response Time Black / White *	7.3 ?(3.3, 4)	20.8 ?(11.7, 9.1) -185%	18.65 ?(10.83, 7.82) -155%	24.2 ?(10.8, 13.4) -232%	8 ?(1, 7) -10%	14 ?(7, 7) -92%
PWM Frequency
Screen		13%	-67%	-10%	5%	-27%
Brightness middle	365	288 -21%	269 -26%	299.4 -18%	504 38%	247 -32%
Brightness	356	271 -24%	248 -30%	290 -19%	465 31%	234 -34%
Brightness Distribution	86	91 6%	85 -1%	92 7%	87 1%	89 3%
Black Level *	0.17	0.17 -0%	0.5 -194%	0.21 -24%	0.35 -106%	0.25 -47%
Contrast	2147	1694 -21%	538 -75%	1426 -34%	1440 -33%	988 -54%
Colorchecker dE 2000 *	3.51	1.9 46%	4.54 -29%	4.25 -21%	1.83 48%	3.78 -8%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *	6.37	3.3 48%	17.28 -171%	6.71 -5%	5.51 14%	6.42 -1%
Colorchecker dE 2000 calibrated *	1.88	0.9 52%	3.34 -78%	0.52 72%	1.34 29%	3.94 -110%
Greyscale dE 2000 *	3.83	2.7 30%	3.8 1%	5.5 -44%	3.02 21%	2.16 44%
Gamma	2.47 ^89%	2.32 ^95%	2.17 ^101%	2.35 ^94%	2.39 ^92%	2.33 ^94%
CCT	7362 ^88%	6535 ^99%	7408 ^88%	6368 ^102%	6688 ^97%	6906 ^94%
Total Average (Program / Settings)		-75% / -25%	-101% / -79%	-98% / -46%	22% / 14%	-66% / -44%

* ... smaller is better

Quando o senhor trabalha, a tela mostra uma representação de cores relativamente boa: Com um desvio de cerca de 3,5, a meta (DeltaE < 3) não foi atingida por pouco. A calibração da tela reduz o desvio para 1,9 e resulta em tons de cinza mais equilibrados. O painel pode cobrir quase completamente o espaço de cores sRGB, mas não o AdobeRGB ou o DCI P3. A maioria dos painéis de seus concorrentes apresenta um quadro semelhante. Somente oVivoBookpode cobrir o espaço de cores P3.

Display Response Times

ℹ

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.

↔ Response Time Black to White
7.3 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↗ 3.3 ms rise
7.3 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↘ 4 ms fall
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 18 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (21 ms).
↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
7.8 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↗ 3.9 ms rise
7.8 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↘ 3.9 ms fall
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 17 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (32.9 ms).

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

ℹ

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.

Screen flickering / PWM not detected

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8743 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured.

O painel IPS estável em termos de ângulo de visão permanece legível de todos os ângulos. Ao ar livre, o senhor pode ler na tela, desde que o sol não esteja brilhando muito forte.

Desempenho - O laptop para jogos é alimentado por uma equipe da Intel

ACore i7-12700He Arc A730Malimentam o Intel NUC X15 LAPAC71H voltado para jogadores e criadores. Não há outras opções disponíveis. O laptop pode ser encontrado atualmente por cerca de US$ 1.050. A variante atual custa cerca de US$ 1.280. É possível que o senhor tenha que levar em conta os custos adicionais para uma licença do Windows.

Condições de teste

O Intel NUC Software Studio (Control Center) oferece três perfis para influenciar o desempenho e o controle da ventoinha (consulte a tabela). Os perfis "Performance" (benchmarks) e "Power Saving Mode" (testes de bateria) foram usados para realizar este teste. Seu desempenho máximo só está disponível após a ativação da opção "Benchmark Mode". No entanto, os ventiladores também funcionam permanentemente na potência máxima.

	Desempenho	Balanceado	Modo de economia de energia	Modo de referência
Limite de energia 1 (HWInfo)	45 watts	35 watts	35 watts	45 watts
Limite de energia 2 (HWInfo)	90 watts	80 watts	65 watts	90 watts
TGP (Controle de arco)	75 watts	65 watts	55 watts	85 watts

Processador

Os 14 núcleos de CPU do Core i7-12700H (6P, 8E) atingem taxas de clock máximas de 4,7 GHz (P) e 3,5 GHz (E). O desempenho contínuo de vários threads (CB15 Loop) levou o clock turbo a diminuir da primeira para a segunda execução. Depois disso, ele permaneceu estável.

Os resultados do benchmark ficaram ligeiramente acima da média da CPU quando conectado à rede elétrica. No modo de bateria, seu desempenho single-thread mais relevante (213 pontos) caiu menos do que seu desempenho multi-thread (1.012 pontos).

Multi-thread (conectado à rede elétrica)

Single-thread (conectado à rede elétrica)

Cinebench R15 Multi continuous test

Intel NUC X15 LAPAC71H Intel Core i7-12700H: Ø2001 (1933.86-2506.16)

Asus TUF A15 FA507 AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS: Ø2219 (2188.66-2273.89)

Gigabyte G5 KE Intel Core i5-12500H: Ø2063 (1956.47-2112.49)

Dell Inspiron 16 Plus 7630 Intel Core i7-13700H: Ø2049 (1806.77-2421.45)

Asus VivoBook Pro 16 Intel Core i7-12700H: Ø2194 (2130.95-2446.31)

MSI Cyborg 15 A12VF Intel Core i7-12650H: Ø1776 (1635.52-2155.04)

CPU Performance Rating - Percent
Intel NUC X15 LAPAC71H Intel Core i7-12700H	80.4 pt
Dell Inspiron 16 Plus 7630 Intel Core i7-13700H	80.1 pt
Average Intel Core i7-12700H	77.2 pt
Average of class Multimedia	75.3 pt
MSI Cyborg 15 A12VF Intel Core i7-12650H	74.1 pt
Asus VivoBook Pro 16 Intel Core i7-12700H	71.3 pt
Asus TUF A15 FA507 AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS	70.8 pt
Gigabyte G5 KE Intel Core i5-12500H	68.7 pt

Cinebench R23
Multi Core
Intel NUC X15 LAPAC71H Intel Core i7-12700H	16338 Points
Dell Inspiron 16 Plus 7630 Intel Core i7-13700H	15922 (13533.8^min - 15922.1^max) Points -3%
Average Intel Core i7-12700H (4032 - 19330, n=63)	15636 Points -4%
Average of class Multimedia (6936 - 30789, n=100, last 2 years)	15387 Points -6%
Asus VivoBook Pro 16 Intel Core i7-12700H	14555 Points -11%
MSI Cyborg 15 A12VF Intel Core i7-12650H	14252 Points -13%
Asus TUF A15 FA507 AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS	13750 Points -16%
Gigabyte G5 KE Intel Core i5-12500H	13155 Points -19%
Single Core
Dell Inspiron 16 Plus 7630 Intel Core i7-13700H	1874 Points +5%
Intel NUC X15 LAPAC71H Intel Core i7-12700H	1789 Points
MSI Cyborg 15 A12VF Intel Core i7-12650H	1758 Points -2%
Average Intel Core i7-12700H (778 - 1826, n=62)	1758 Points -2%
Average of class Multimedia (878 - 2290, n=91, last 2 years)	1757 Points -2%
Asus VivoBook Pro 16 Intel Core i7-12700H	1739 Points -3%
Gigabyte G5 KE Intel Core i5-12500H	1629 Points -9%
Asus TUF A15 FA507 AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS	1546 Points -14%

Cinebench R20
CPU (Multi Core)
Intel NUC X15 LAPAC71H Intel Core i7-12700H	6338 Points
Dell Inspiron 16 Plus 7630 Intel Core i7-13700H	6162 Points -3%
Average Intel Core i7-12700H (1576 - 7407, n=63)	5933 Points -6%
Average of class Multimedia (2681 - 11768, n=86, last 2 years)	5683 Points -10%
Asus VivoBook Pro 16 Intel Core i7-12700H	5551 Points -12%
MSI Cyborg 15 A12VF Intel Core i7-12650H	5506 Points -13%
Asus TUF A15 FA507 AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS	5354 Points -16%
Gigabyte G5 KE Intel Core i5-12500H	5066 Points -20%
CPU (Single Core)
Dell Inspiron 16 Plus 7630 Intel Core i7-13700H	725 Points +6%
Intel NUC X15 LAPAC71H Intel Core i7-12700H	687 Points
MSI Cyborg 15 A12VF Intel Core i7-12650H	679 Points -1%
Average Intel Core i7-12700H (300 - 704, n=63)	679 Points -1%
Asus VivoBook Pro 16 Intel Core i7-12700H	670 Points -2%
Average of class Multimedia (341 - 853, n=86, last 2 years)	652 Points -5%
Gigabyte G5 KE Intel Core i5-12500H	627 Points -9%
Asus TUF A15 FA507 AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS	603 Points -12%

Cinebench R15
CPU Multi 64Bit
Average Intel Core i7-12700H (1379 - 2916, n=69)	2517 Points 0%
Intel NUC X15 LAPAC71H Intel Core i7-12700H	2506 Points
Asus VivoBook Pro 16 Intel Core i7-12700H	2446 Points -2%
Average of class Multimedia (1252 - 4774, n=90, last 2 years)	2435 Points -3%
Dell Inspiron 16 Plus 7630 Intel Core i7-13700H	2421 (1806.77^min - 2421.45^max) Points -3%
Asus TUF A15 FA507 AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS	2274 (2188.66^min - 2273.89^max) Points -9%
MSI Cyborg 15 A12VF Intel Core i7-12650H	2155 Points -14%
Gigabyte G5 KE Intel Core i5-12500H	2112 (1956.47^min - 2112.49^max) Points -16%
CPU Single 64Bit
Dell Inspiron 16 Plus 7630 Intel Core i7-13700H	265 Points +3%
Intel NUC X15 LAPAC71H Intel Core i7-12700H	257 Points
Average of class Multimedia (99.6 - 323, n=86, last 2 years)	257 Points 0%
Average Intel Core i7-12700H (113 - 263, n=64)	253 Points -2%
Asus VivoBook Pro 16 Intel Core i7-12700H	252 Points -2%
Asus TUF A15 FA507 AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS	249 Points -3%
Gigabyte G5 KE Intel Core i5-12500H	245 Points -5%
MSI Cyborg 15 A12VF Intel Core i7-12650H	243 Points -5%

Blender - v2.79 BMW27 CPU
Average of class Multimedia (107 - 502, n=84, last 2 years)	253 Seconds * -8%
MSI Cyborg 15 A12VF Intel Core i7-12650H	250 Seconds * -6%
Intel NUC X15 LAPAC71H Intel Core i7-12700H	235 Seconds *
Gigabyte G5 KE Intel Core i5-12500H	230 Seconds * +2%
Asus VivoBook Pro 16 Intel Core i7-12700H	227 Seconds * +3%
Average Intel Core i7-12700H (168 - 732, n=62)	225 Seconds * +4%
Asus TUF A15 FA507 AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS	223 Seconds * +5%
Dell Inspiron 16 Plus 7630 Intel Core i7-13700H	221 Seconds * +6%

7-Zip 18.03
7z b 4
Intel NUC X15 LAPAC71H Intel Core i7-12700H	61768 MIPS
Asus TUF A15 FA507 AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS	60612 MIPS -2%
Average Intel Core i7-12700H (22844 - 73067, n=62)	60292 MIPS -2%
Average of class Multimedia (30592 - 121228, n=79, last 2 years)	60265 MIPS -2%
Dell Inspiron 16 Plus 7630 Intel Core i7-13700H	59433 MIPS -4%
MSI Cyborg 15 A12VF Intel Core i7-12650H	55420 MIPS -10%
Gigabyte G5 KE Intel Core i5-12500H	54380 MIPS -12%
Asus VivoBook Pro 16 Intel Core i7-12700H	48332 MIPS -22%
7z b 4 -mmt1
Intel NUC X15 LAPAC71H Intel Core i7-12700H	5878 MIPS
Asus TUF A15 FA507 AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS	5786 MIPS -2%
MSI Cyborg 15 A12VF Intel Core i7-12650H	5765 MIPS -2%
Average of class Multimedia (3398 - 7545, n=79, last 2 years)	5722 MIPS -3%
Dell Inspiron 16 Plus 7630 Intel Core i7-13700H	5703 MIPS -3%
Average Intel Core i7-12700H (2743 - 5972, n=62)	5648 MIPS -4%
Asus VivoBook Pro 16 Intel Core i7-12700H	5590 MIPS -5%
Gigabyte G5 KE Intel Core i5-12500H	5383 MIPS -8%

Geekbench 5.5
Multi-Core
Intel NUC X15 LAPAC71H Intel Core i7-12700H	12929 Points
Dell Inspiron 16 Plus 7630 Intel Core i7-13700H	12805 Points -1%
Average of class Multimedia (4990 - 23059, n=86, last 2 years)	11967 Points -7%
Average Intel Core i7-12700H (5144 - 13745, n=63)	11729 Points -9%
MSI Cyborg 15 A12VF Intel Core i7-12650H	11041 Points -15%
Gigabyte G5 KE Intel Core i5-12500H	10260 Points -21%
Asus TUF A15 FA507 AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS	9346 Points -28%
Asus VivoBook Pro 16 Intel Core i7-12700H	8346 Points -35%
Single-Core
Dell Inspiron 16 Plus 7630 Intel Core i7-13700H	1906 Points +9%
Average of class Multimedia (891 - 2342, n=86, last 2 years)	1818 Points +4%
MSI Cyborg 15 A12VF Intel Core i7-12650H	1781 Points +1%
Intel NUC X15 LAPAC71H Intel Core i7-12700H	1756 Points
Average Intel Core i7-12700H (803 - 1851, n=63)	1732 Points -1%
Asus VivoBook Pro 16 Intel Core i7-12700H	1683 Points -4%
Gigabyte G5 KE Intel Core i5-12500H	1647 Points -6%
Asus TUF A15 FA507 AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS	1507 Points -14%

HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 - 4k Preset
Asus TUF A15 FA507 AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS	17.4 fps +3%
Intel NUC X15 LAPAC71H Intel Core i7-12700H	16.9 fps
Average Intel Core i7-12700H (4.67 - 21.8, n=63)	16.7 fps -1%
Gigabyte G5 KE Intel Core i5-12500H	16.6 fps -2%
Average of class Multimedia (5.26 - 30.5, n=78, last 2 years)	16.4 fps -3%
MSI Cyborg 15 A12VF Intel Core i7-12650H	16.1 fps -5%
MSI Cyborg 15 A12VF Intel Core i7-12650H	16.1 fps -5%
Dell Inspiron 16 Plus 7630 Intel Core i7-13700H	15.9 fps -6%
Asus VivoBook Pro 16 Intel Core i7-12700H	15.3 fps -9%

LibreOffice - 20 Documents To PDF
Gigabyte G5 KE Intel Core i5-12500H	57.7 s * -56%
Asus TUF A15 FA507 AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS	50.6 s * -37%
Average of class Multimedia (6.7 - 146.7, n=80, last 2 years)	49.6 s * -34%
Asus VivoBook Pro 16 Intel Core i7-12700H	47.4 s * -28%
Average Intel Core i7-12700H (34.2 - 95.3, n=62)	45.7 s * -24%
Dell Inspiron 16 Plus 7630 Intel Core i7-13700H	45.1 s * -22%
MSI Cyborg 15 A12VF Intel Core i7-12650H	39.1 s * -6%
Intel NUC X15 LAPAC71H Intel Core i7-12700H	37 s *

R Benchmark 2.5 - Overall mean
Asus TUF A15 FA507 AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS	0.4964 sec * -7%
Asus VivoBook Pro 16 Intel Core i7-12700H	0.4873 sec * -6%
Gigabyte G5 KE Intel Core i5-12500H	0.4865 sec * -5%
Average of class Multimedia (0.3604 - 0.947, n=79, last 2 years)	0.484 sec * -5%
Average Intel Core i7-12700H (0.4441 - 1.052, n=62)	0.4723 sec * -2%
MSI Cyborg 15 A12VF Intel Core i7-12650H	0.47 sec * -2%
Intel NUC X15 LAPAC71H Intel Core i7-12700H	0.4618 sec *
Dell Inspiron 16 Plus 7630 Intel Core i7-13700H	0.4338 sec * +6%

* ... smaller is better

Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64Bit

2506 Points

Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64Bit

196.3 fps

Cinebench R15 Ref. Match 64Bit

97.8 %

Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64Bit

257 Points

Cinebench R20 CPU (Multi Core)

6338 Points

Cinebench R20 CPU (Single Core)

687 Points

Cinebench R23 Single Core

1789 Points

Cinebench R23 Multi Core

16338 Points

Ajuda

... comparado com

Performance Rating
Asus TUF A15 FA507 AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU	89.2 pt
Average of class Multimedia	83.5 pt
Intel NUC X15 LAPAC71H Intel Core i7-12700H, A730M	81.6 pt
Dell Inspiron 16 Plus 7630 Intel Core i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU	78.7 pt
Gigabyte G5 KE Intel Core i5-12500H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU	77.2 pt
Asus VivoBook Pro 16 Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU	76.7 pt
MSI Cyborg 15 A12VF Intel Core i7-12650H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU	75.1 pt
Average Intel Core i7-12700H	74.8 pt

AIDA64 / FP32 Ray-Trace
Asus TUF A15 FA507 AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU	16315 KRay/s +27%
Average of class Multimedia (4906 - 36957, n=76, last 2 years)	14429 KRay/s +13%
Asus VivoBook Pro 16 Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU	14390 KRay/s +12%
Dell Inspiron 16 Plus 7630 Intel Core i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU	13648 KRay/s +7%
Intel NUC X15 LAPAC71H Intel Core i7-12700H, A730M	12797 KRay/s
MSI Cyborg 15 A12VF Intel Core i7-12650H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU	12590 KRay/s -2%
Gigabyte G5 KE Intel Core i5-12500H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU	12542 KRay/s -2%
Average Intel Core i7-12700H (2585 - 17957, n=62)	10834 KRay/s -15%

AIDA64 / FPU Julia
Asus TUF A15 FA507 AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU	102221 Points +60%
Asus VivoBook Pro 16 Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU	72920 Points +14%
Average of class Multimedia (14528 - 147248, n=77, last 2 years)	72714 Points +14%
MSI Cyborg 15 A12VF Intel Core i7-12650H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU	68900 Points +8%
Dell Inspiron 16 Plus 7630 Intel Core i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU	68323 Points +7%
Gigabyte G5 KE Intel Core i5-12500H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU	65919 Points +3%
Intel NUC X15 LAPAC71H Intel Core i7-12700H, A730M	63794 Points
Average Intel Core i7-12700H (12439 - 90760, n=62)	52825 Points -17%

AIDA64 / CPU SHA3
Asus TUF A15 FA507 AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU	3421 MB/s +14%
Average of class Multimedia (1529 - 6698, n=77, last 2 years)	3389 MB/s +13%
Asus VivoBook Pro 16 Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU	3375 MB/s +12%
Gigabyte G5 KE Intel Core i5-12500H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU	3212 MB/s +7%
Average Intel Core i7-12700H (833 - 4242, n=62)	3077 MB/s +2%
Dell Inspiron 16 Plus 7630 Intel Core i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU	3029 MB/s +1%
Intel NUC X15 LAPAC71H Intel Core i7-12700H, A730M	3012 MB/s
MSI Cyborg 15 A12VF Intel Core i7-12650H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU	2992 MB/s -1%

AIDA64 / CPU Queen
Dell Inspiron 16 Plus 7630 Intel Core i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU	105205 Points +5%
Asus TUF A15 FA507 AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU	103991 Points +3%
Asus VivoBook Pro 16 Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU	102438 Points +2%
Intel NUC X15 LAPAC71H Intel Core i7-12700H, A730M	100647 Points
Average Intel Core i7-12700H (57923 - 103202, n=62)	97916 Points -3%
Average of class Multimedia (21547 - 141074, n=77, last 2 years)	90849 Points -10%
MSI Cyborg 15 A12VF Intel Core i7-12650H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU	84959 Points -16%
Gigabyte G5 KE Intel Core i5-12500H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU	80337 Points -20%

AIDA64 / FPU SinJulia
Asus TUF A15 FA507 AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU	12579 Points +48%
Average of class Multimedia (1240 - 19021, n=77, last 2 years)	9329 Points +10%
Average Intel Core i7-12700H (3249 - 9939, n=62)	9055 Points +7%
Asus VivoBook Pro 16 Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU	8932 Points +5%
Dell Inspiron 16 Plus 7630 Intel Core i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU	8930 Points +5%
MSI Cyborg 15 A12VF Intel Core i7-12650H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU	8557 Points +1%
Intel NUC X15 LAPAC71H Intel Core i7-12700H, A730M	8475 Points
Gigabyte G5 KE Intel Core i5-12500H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU	7388 Points -13%

AIDA64 / FPU Mandel
Asus TUF A15 FA507 AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU	55524 Points +76%
Average of class Multimedia (9903 - 75780, n=76, last 2 years)	36169 Points +15%
Asus VivoBook Pro 16 Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU	35011 Points +11%
Dell Inspiron 16 Plus 7630 Intel Core i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU	33737 Points +7%
Gigabyte G5 KE Intel Core i5-12500H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU	31844 Points +1%
Intel NUC X15 LAPAC71H Intel Core i7-12700H, A730M	31485 Points
MSI Cyborg 15 A12VF Intel Core i7-12650H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU	31425 Points 0%
Average Intel Core i7-12700H (7135 - 44760, n=62)	27939 Points -11%

AIDA64 / CPU AES
Intel NUC X15 LAPAC71H Intel Core i7-12700H, A730M	111598 MB/s
Gigabyte G5 KE Intel Core i5-12500H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU	110639 MB/s -1%
Average Intel Core i7-12700H (31839 - 144360, n=62)	85388 MB/s -23%
Average of class Multimedia (31432 - 169946, n=77, last 2 years)	75995 MB/s -32%
Asus TUF A15 FA507 AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU	66447 MB/s -40%
Asus VivoBook Pro 16 Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU	65858 MB/s -41%
MSI Cyborg 15 A12VF Intel Core i7-12650H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU	65015 MB/s -42%
Dell Inspiron 16 Plus 7630 Intel Core i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU	63127 MB/s -43%

AIDA64 / CPU ZLib
Average Intel Core i7-12700H (305 - 1171, n=62)	970 MB/s +13%
Asus VivoBook Pro 16 Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU	940 MB/s +9%
Average of class Multimedia (454 - 1973, n=77, last 2 years)	935 MB/s +9%
Gigabyte G5 KE Intel Core i5-12500H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU	924 MB/s +7%
MSI Cyborg 15 A12VF Intel Core i7-12650H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU	891 MB/s +4%
Intel NUC X15 LAPAC71H Intel Core i7-12700H, A730M	860 MB/s
Dell Inspiron 16 Plus 7630 Intel Core i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU	829 MB/s -4%
Asus TUF A15 FA507 AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU	651 MB/s -24%

AIDA64 / FP64 Ray-Trace
Asus TUF A15 FA507 AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU	8556 KRay/s +27%
Average of class Multimedia (2738 - 20608, n=77, last 2 years)	7836 KRay/s +17%
Asus VivoBook Pro 16 Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU	7629 KRay/s +14%
Dell Inspiron 16 Plus 7630 Intel Core i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU	7318 KRay/s +9%
Gigabyte G5 KE Intel Core i5-12500H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU	6989 KRay/s +4%
Intel NUC X15 LAPAC71H Intel Core i7-12700H, A730M	6715 KRay/s
MSI Cyborg 15 A12VF Intel Core i7-12650H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU	6708 KRay/s 0%
Average Intel Core i7-12700H (1437 - 9692, n=62)	5986 KRay/s -11%

AIDA64 / CPU PhotoWorxx
Intel NUC X15 LAPAC71H Intel Core i7-12700H, A730M	42564 MPixel/s
Average of class Multimedia (7419 - 53918, n=77, last 2 years)	40459 MPixel/s -5%
Dell Inspiron 16 Plus 7630 Intel Core i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU	37857 MPixel/s -11%
MSI Cyborg 15 A12VF Intel Core i7-12650H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU	36156 MPixel/s -15%
Average Intel Core i7-12700H (12863 - 52207, n=62)	33149 MPixel/s -22%
Gigabyte G5 KE Intel Core i5-12500H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU	29085 MPixel/s -32%
Asus TUF A15 FA507 AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU	28318 MPixel/s -33%
Asus VivoBook Pro 16 Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU	13699 MPixel/s -68%

Desempenho do sistema

O sistema de funcionamento suave não carece de potência de computação. O laptop lida com jogos, streaming e renderização sem nenhum problema. As taxas de transferência da RAM estão em um nível normal para a RAM DDR5-4800.

A RAM é executada no modo de canal duplo.

PCMark 10 / Score
Dell Inspiron 16 Plus 7630 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, i7-13700H, WD PC SN740 SDDPTQD-1T00	7661 Points +12%
Asus TUF A15 FA507 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, R7 7735HS, Micron 2400 MTFDKBA512QFM	7210 Points +5%
Gigabyte G5 KE GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, i5-12500H, Gigabyte AG4512G-SI B10	7201 Points +5%
MSI Cyborg 15 A12VF NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, i7-12650H, Samsung PM9B1 1024GB MZVL41T0HBLB	7098 Points +4%
Intel NUC X15 LAPAC71H A730M, i7-12700H, Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB	6845 Points
Average Intel Core i7-12700H, Intel Arc A730M (6830 - 6845, n=2)	6838 Points 0%
Average of class Multimedia (4542 - 8670, n=72, last 2 years)	6795 Points -1%
Asus VivoBook Pro 16 GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU, i7-12700H, Intel SSD 670p SSDPEKNU010TZ	6652 Points -3%

PCMark 10 / Essentials
Dell Inspiron 16 Plus 7630 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, i7-13700H, WD PC SN740 SDDPTQD-1T00	11200 Points +6%
Gigabyte G5 KE GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, i5-12500H, Gigabyte AG4512G-SI B10	11150 Points +6%
Average Intel Core i7-12700H, Intel Arc A730M (10529 - 11116, n=2)	10823 Points +3%
MSI Cyborg 15 A12VF NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, i7-12650H, Samsung PM9B1 1024GB MZVL41T0HBLB	10669 Points +1%
Asus TUF A15 FA507 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, R7 7735HS, Micron 2400 MTFDKBA512QFM	10573 Points 0%
Intel NUC X15 LAPAC71H A730M, i7-12700H, Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB	10529 Points
Average of class Multimedia (8480 - 12420, n=72, last 2 years)	10521 Points 0%
Asus VivoBook Pro 16 GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU, i7-12700H, Intel SSD 670p SSDPEKNU010TZ	9540 Points -9%

PCMark 10 / Productivity
MSI Cyborg 15 A12VF NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, i7-12650H, Samsung PM9B1 1024GB MZVL41T0HBLB	9931 Points +40%
Gigabyte G5 KE GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, i5-12500H, Gigabyte AG4512G-SI B10	9475 Points +34%
Dell Inspiron 16 Plus 7630 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, i7-13700H, WD PC SN740 SDDPTQD-1T00	9394 Points +33%
Asus TUF A15 FA507 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, R7 7735HS, Micron 2400 MTFDKBA512QFM	9313 Points +32%
Asus VivoBook Pro 16 GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU, i7-12700H, Intel SSD 670p SSDPEKNU010TZ	9016 Points +28%
Average of class Multimedia (6089 - 10742, n=72, last 2 years)	8932 Points +26%
Average Intel Core i7-12700H, Intel Arc A730M (7070 - 7260, n=2)	7165 Points +1%
Intel NUC X15 LAPAC71H A730M, i7-12700H, Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB	7070 Points

PCMark 10 / Digital Content Creation
Intel NUC X15 LAPAC71H A730M, i7-12700H, Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB	11691 Points
Dell Inspiron 16 Plus 7630 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, i7-13700H, WD PC SN740 SDDPTQD-1T00	11598 Points -1%
Average Intel Core i7-12700H, Intel Arc A730M (10714 - 11691, n=2)	11203 Points -4%
Asus TUF A15 FA507 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, R7 7735HS, Micron 2400 MTFDKBA512QFM	10333 Points -12%
Gigabyte G5 KE GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, i5-12500H, Gigabyte AG4512G-SI B10	9593 Points -18%
Asus VivoBook Pro 16 GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU, i7-12700H, Intel SSD 670p SSDPEKNU010TZ	9288 Points -21%
Average of class Multimedia (3651 - 13548, n=72, last 2 years)	9202 Points -21%
MSI Cyborg 15 A12VF NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, i7-12650H, Samsung PM9B1 1024GB MZVL41T0HBLB	9159 Points -22%

CrossMark / Overall
Intel NUC X15 LAPAC71H A730M, i7-12700H, Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB	1881 Points
Average Intel Core i7-12700H, Intel Arc A730M ()	1881 Points 0%
Dell Inspiron 16 Plus 7630 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, i7-13700H, WD PC SN740 SDDPTQD-1T00	1849 Points -2%
MSI Cyborg 15 A12VF NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, i7-12650H, Samsung PM9B1 1024GB MZVL41T0HBLB	1798 Points -4%
Gigabyte G5 KE GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, i5-12500H, Gigabyte AG4512G-SI B10	1752 Points -7%
Average of class Multimedia (978 - 2184, n=87, last 2 years)	1703 Points -9%
Asus VivoBook Pro 16 GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU, i7-12700H, Intel SSD 670p SSDPEKNU010TZ	1683 Points -11%
Asus TUF A15 FA507 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, R7 7735HS, Micron 2400 MTFDKBA512QFM	1550 Points -18%

CrossMark / Productivity
Intel NUC X15 LAPAC71H A730M, i7-12700H, Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB	1795 Points
Average Intel Core i7-12700H, Intel Arc A730M ()	1795 Points 0%
Dell Inspiron 16 Plus 7630 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, i7-13700H, WD PC SN740 SDDPTQD-1T00	1743 Points -3%
Gigabyte G5 KE GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, i5-12500H, Gigabyte AG4512G-SI B10	1720 Points -4%
MSI Cyborg 15 A12VF NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, i7-12650H, Samsung PM9B1 1024GB MZVL41T0HBLB	1718 Points -4%
Asus VivoBook Pro 16 GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU, i7-12700H, Intel SSD 670p SSDPEKNU010TZ	1669 Points -7%
Average of class Multimedia (913 - 2064, n=87, last 2 years)	1616 Points -10%
Asus TUF A15 FA507 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, R7 7735HS, Micron 2400 MTFDKBA512QFM	1517 Points -15%

CrossMark / Creativity
Dell Inspiron 16 Plus 7630 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, i7-13700H, WD PC SN740 SDDPTQD-1T00	2064 Points +6%
Intel NUC X15 LAPAC71H A730M, i7-12700H, Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB	1952 Points
Average Intel Core i7-12700H, Intel Arc A730M ()	1952 Points 0%
MSI Cyborg 15 A12VF NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, i7-12650H, Samsung PM9B1 1024GB MZVL41T0HBLB	1936 Points -1%
Average of class Multimedia (1054 - 2594, n=87, last 2 years)	1909 Points -2%
Gigabyte G5 KE GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, i5-12500H, Gigabyte AG4512G-SI B10	1778 Points -9%
Asus TUF A15 FA507 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, R7 7735HS, Micron 2400 MTFDKBA512QFM	1709 Points -12%
Asus VivoBook Pro 16 GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU, i7-12700H, Intel SSD 670p SSDPEKNU010TZ	1699 Points -13%

CrossMark / Responsiveness
Intel NUC X15 LAPAC71H A730M, i7-12700H, Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB	1923 Points
Average Intel Core i7-12700H, Intel Arc A730M ()	1923 Points 0%
Gigabyte G5 KE GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, i5-12500H, Gigabyte AG4512G-SI B10	1771 Points -8%
Asus VivoBook Pro 16 GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU, i7-12700H, Intel SSD 670p SSDPEKNU010TZ	1677 Points -13%
MSI Cyborg 15 A12VF NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, i7-12650H, Samsung PM9B1 1024GB MZVL41T0HBLB	1651 Points -14%
Dell Inspiron 16 Plus 7630 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, i7-13700H, WD PC SN740 SDDPTQD-1T00	1589 Points -17%
Average of class Multimedia (869 - 2171, n=87, last 2 years)	1435 Points -25%
Asus TUF A15 FA507 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, R7 7735HS, Micron 2400 MTFDKBA512QFM	1231 Points -36%

PCMark 10 Score		6845 pontos
Ajuda

AIDA64: Memory Copy | Memory Read | Memory Write | Memory Latency

AIDA64 / Memory Copy
Average of class Multimedia (20549 - 104459, n=77, last 2 years)	68580 MB/s +8%
Intel NUC X15 LAPAC71H Intel Core i7-12700H, A730M	63311 MB/s
Dell Inspiron 16 Plus 7630 Intel Core i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU	59555 MB/s -6%
MSI Cyborg 15 A12VF Intel Core i7-12650H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU	56679 MB/s -10%
Average Intel Core i7-12700H (25615 - 80511, n=62)	53891 MB/s -15%
Asus TUF A15 FA507 AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU	48432 MB/s -24%
Gigabyte G5 KE Intel Core i5-12500H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU	44445 MB/s -30%
Asus VivoBook Pro 16 Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU	25615 MB/s -60%

AIDA64 / Memory Read
Average of class Multimedia (22917 - 125604, n=77, last 2 years)	69599 MB/s +4%
Dell Inspiron 16 Plus 7630 Intel Core i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU	68066 MB/s +2%
Intel NUC X15 LAPAC71H Intel Core i7-12700H, A730M	66919 MB/s
MSI Cyborg 15 A12VF Intel Core i7-12650H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU	65453 MB/s -2%
Average Intel Core i7-12700H (25586 - 79442, n=62)	57340 MB/s -14%
Asus TUF A15 FA507 AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU	49994 MB/s -25%
Gigabyte G5 KE Intel Core i5-12500H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU	47514 MB/s -29%
Asus VivoBook Pro 16 Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU	25586 MB/s -62%

AIDA64 / Memory Write
Average of class Multimedia (20226 - 117933, n=77, last 2 years)	69752 MB/s +6%
Intel NUC X15 LAPAC71H Intel Core i7-12700H, A730M	66098 MB/s
Dell Inspiron 16 Plus 7630 Intel Core i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU	59733 MB/s -10%
MSI Cyborg 15 A12VF Intel Core i7-12650H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU	56131 MB/s -15%
Asus TUF A15 FA507 AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU	54997 MB/s -17%
Average Intel Core i7-12700H (23679 - 88660, n=62)	54793 MB/s -17%
Gigabyte G5 KE Intel Core i5-12500H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU	46901 MB/s -29%
Asus VivoBook Pro 16 Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU	23679 MB/s -64%

AIDA64 / Memory Latency
Average of class Multimedia (7 - 346, n=77, last 2 years)	106.6 ns * -19%
Gigabyte G5 KE Intel Core i5-12500H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU	96.1 ns * -8%
Dell Inspiron 16 Plus 7630 Intel Core i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU	93.7 ns * -5%
Asus VivoBook Pro 16 Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU	91.1 ns * -2%
MSI Cyborg 15 A12VF Intel Core i7-12650H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU	90.9 ns * -2%
Intel NUC X15 LAPAC71H Intel Core i7-12700H, A730M	89.3 ns *
Asus TUF A15 FA507 AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU	82.2 ns * +8%
Average Intel Core i7-12700H (76.2 - 133.9, n=60)	77.8 ns * +13%

* ... smaller is better

Latência DPC

O teste padronizado do monitor de latência (navegação na Web, reprodução de vídeo 4k, alta carga do Prime95) não revelou nenhuma anormalidade. O sistema parece ser adequado para edição de vídeo e áudio em tempo real. Futuras atualizações de software podem levar a melhorias ou até mesmo a degradações.

DPC Latencies / LatencyMon - interrupt to process latency (max), Web, Youtube, Prime95
Asus VivoBook Pro 16 GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU, i7-12700H, Intel SSD 670p SSDPEKNU010TZ	1573.4 μs * -61%
MSI Cyborg 15 A12VF NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, i7-12650H, Samsung PM9B1 1024GB MZVL41T0HBLB	1219.9 μs * -25%
Dell Inspiron 16 Plus 7630 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, i7-13700H, WD PC SN740 SDDPTQD-1T00	1020.2 μs * -4%
Gigabyte G5 KE GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, i5-12500H, Gigabyte AG4512G-SI B10	1002.5 μs * -2%
Intel NUC X15 LAPAC71H A730M, i7-12700H, Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB	978.1 μs *

* ... smaller is better

Dispositivos de armazenamento

O laptop pode acomodar dois SSDs M.2-2280 (1x PCIe 4.0, 1x PCIe 3.0/SATA). Há suporte para RAID-0/1. O SSD da Samsung (1 TB, PCIe 4, M.2-2280) em nosso dispositivo de teste apresentou excelentes taxas de transferência. Ponto positivo: Não houve estrangulamento térmico.

Um SSD PCIe 4 funciona como a unidade do sistema.

CrystalDiskMark 5.2 / 6

AS SSD

DiskSpd

Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB

CDM 5/6 Read Seq Q32T1: 7123 MB/s

CDM 5/6 Write Seq Q32T1: 6770 MB/s

CDM 5/6 Read 4K Q32T1: 842.2 MB/s

CDM 5/6 Write 4K Q32T1: 661.3 MB/s

CDM 5 Read Seq: 3014 MB/s

CDM 5 Write Seq: 4436 MB/s

CDM 5/6 Read 4K: 77.35 MB/s

CDM 5/6 Write 4K: 272.5 MB/s

Drive Performance Rating | DiskSpd | AS SSD

Drive Performance Rating - Percent
Intel NUC X15 LAPAC71H Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB	91.6 pt
Average Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB	84.6 pt
Gigabyte G5 KE Gigabyte AG4512G-SI B10	62.5 pt
MSI Cyborg 15 A12VF Samsung PM9B1 1024GB MZVL41T0HBLB	58.3 pt
Average of class Multimedia	57.4 pt
Dell Inspiron 16 Plus 7630 WD PC SN740 SDDPTQD-1T00	55.9 pt
Asus VivoBook Pro 16 Intel SSD 670p SSDPEKNU010TZ	49.2 pt
Asus TUF A15 FA507 Micron 2400 MTFDKBA512QFM	34.9 pt

DiskSpd
seq read
Average Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB (2556 - 4234, n=18)	3249 MB/s +11%
Dell Inspiron 16 Plus 7630 WD PC SN740 SDDPTQD-1T00	3156 (3078.2^min - 3156.21^max) MB/s +7%
Average of class Multimedia (1629 - 4861, n=76, last 2 years)	2970 MB/s +1%
Intel NUC X15 LAPAC71H Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB	2939 (2921.09^min - 2938.95^max) MB/s
Asus VivoBook Pro 16 Intel SSD 670p SSDPEKNU010TZ	2669 (2638.39^min - 2668.53^max) MB/s -9%
MSI Cyborg 15 A12VF Samsung PM9B1 1024GB MZVL41T0HBLB	2641 (2618.08^min - 2641.4^max) MB/s -10%
Gigabyte G5 KE Gigabyte AG4512G-SI B10	2390 (2088.15^min - 2390.38^max) MB/s -19%
Asus TUF A15 FA507 Micron 2400 MTFDKBA512QFM	1759 (1754.48^min - 1759.3^max) MB/s -40%
Asus TUF A15 FA507 Micron 2400 MTFDKBA512QFM	1759 (1754.48^min - 1759.3^max) MB/s -40%
seq write
Intel NUC X15 LAPAC71H Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB	5709 (4134.63^min - 5709.29^max) MB/s
Average Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB (3598 - 5842, n=18)	4777 MB/s -16%
Dell Inspiron 16 Plus 7630 WD PC SN740 SDDPTQD-1T00	3503 (3341.99^min - 3503.29^max) MB/s -39%
Average of class Multimedia (463 - 5711, n=76, last 2 years)	3092 MB/s -46%
MSI Cyborg 15 A12VF Samsung PM9B1 1024GB MZVL41T0HBLB	2567 (2503.61^min - 2566.81^max) MB/s -55%
Asus VivoBook Pro 16 Intel SSD 670p SSDPEKNU010TZ	2292 (2277.15^min - 2292.43^max) MB/s -60%
Gigabyte G5 KE Gigabyte AG4512G-SI B10	2230 (2171.45^min - 2229.69^max) MB/s -61%
Asus TUF A15 FA507 Micron 2400 MTFDKBA512QFM	1554 (1534.35^min - 1553.61^max) MB/s -73%
Asus TUF A15 FA507 Micron 2400 MTFDKBA512QFM	1554 (1534.35^min - 1553.61^max) MB/s -73%
seq q8 t1 read
Intel NUC X15 LAPAC71H Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB	7099 MB/s
Average Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB (7011 - 7148, n=18)	7091 MB/s 0%
Average of class Multimedia (2132 - 7126, n=76, last 2 years)	5486 MB/s -23%
Dell Inspiron 16 Plus 7630 WD PC SN740 SDDPTQD-1T00	5187 (4478.95^min - 5186.89^max) MB/s -27%
Gigabyte G5 KE Gigabyte AG4512G-SI B10	4725 (4035.45^min - 4724.88^max) MB/s -33%
Asus TUF A15 FA507 Micron 2400 MTFDKBA512QFM	3886 (3200.77^min - 3885.81^max) MB/s -45%
Asus TUF A15 FA507 Micron 2400 MTFDKBA512QFM	3886 (3200.77^min - 3885.81^max) MB/s -45%
MSI Cyborg 15 A12VF Samsung PM9B1 1024GB MZVL41T0HBLB	3629 (3340.34^min - 3628.78^max) MB/s -49%
Asus VivoBook Pro 16 Intel SSD 670p SSDPEKNU010TZ	3034 (2688.83^min - 3034.37^max) MB/s -57%
seq q8 t1 write
Average Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB (6531 - 6898, n=18)	6802 MB/s +1%
Intel NUC X15 LAPAC71H Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB	6742 (1600.81^min - 6742.41^max) MB/s
Dell Inspiron 16 Plus 7630 WD PC SN740 SDDPTQD-1T00	4824 (4712.92^min - 4824.08^max) MB/s -28%
Average of class Multimedia (555 - 6898, n=76, last 2 years)	4169 MB/s -38%
MSI Cyborg 15 A12VF Samsung PM9B1 1024GB MZVL41T0HBLB	2813 (2739.96^min - 2813.36^max) MB/s -58%
Asus VivoBook Pro 16 Intel SSD 670p SSDPEKNU010TZ	2514 (2483.93^min - 2513.65^max) MB/s -63%
Gigabyte G5 KE Gigabyte AG4512G-SI B10	2255 (2245.25^min - 2255.17^max) MB/s -67%
Asus TUF A15 FA507 Micron 2400 MTFDKBA512QFM	1640 (1630.54^min - 1639.84^max) MB/s -76%
Asus TUF A15 FA507 Micron 2400 MTFDKBA512QFM	1640 (1630.54^min - 1639.84^max) MB/s -76%
4k q1 t1 read
Asus VivoBook Pro 16 Intel SSD 670p SSDPEKNU010TZ	84.7 (83.57^min - 84.65^max) MB/s 0%
Intel NUC X15 LAPAC71H Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB	84.5 (83.37^min - 84.5^max) MB/s
MSI Cyborg 15 A12VF Samsung PM9B1 1024GB MZVL41T0HBLB	83.2 (76.7^min - 83.24^max) MB/s -2%
Average Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB (55.3 - 99, n=18)	76.4 MB/s -10%
Dell Inspiron 16 Plus 7630 WD PC SN740 SDDPTQD-1T00	73.2 (70.67^min - 73.2^max) MB/s -13%
Average of class Multimedia (14.6 - 97.7, n=76, last 2 years)	62.9 MB/s -26%
Gigabyte G5 KE Gigabyte AG4512G-SI B10	62.6 (62.25^min - 62.63^max) MB/s -26%
Asus TUF A15 FA507 Micron 2400 MTFDKBA512QFM	32.6 (32.27^min - 32.56^max) MB/s -61%
Asus TUF A15 FA507 Micron 2400 MTFDKBA512QFM	32.6 (32.27^min - 32.56^max) MB/s -61%
4k q1 t1 write
Gigabyte G5 KE Gigabyte AG4512G-SI B10	369 (333.31^min - 369.47^max) MB/s +20%
Intel NUC X15 LAPAC71H Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB	307 (305.62^min - 307.04^max) MB/s
Asus VivoBook Pro 16 Intel SSD 670p SSDPEKNU010TZ	265 (263.14^min - 265.39^max) MB/s -14%
MSI Cyborg 15 A12VF Samsung PM9B1 1024GB MZVL41T0HBLB	239 (229.28^min - 238.84^max) MB/s -22%
Average Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB (133.9 - 343, n=18)	235 MB/s -23%
Average of class Multimedia (69.4 - 378, n=76, last 2 years)	170.9 MB/s -44%
Dell Inspiron 16 Plus 7630 WD PC SN740 SDDPTQD-1T00	158.8 (155.42^min - 158.82^max) MB/s -48%
Asus TUF A15 FA507 Micron 2400 MTFDKBA512QFM	129.5 (125.88^min - 129.52^max) MB/s -58%
Asus TUF A15 FA507 Micron 2400 MTFDKBA512QFM	129.5 (125.88^min - 129.52^max) MB/s -58%
4k q32 t16 read
Intel NUC X15 LAPAC71H Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB	3910 (3867.98^min - 3909.59^max) MB/s
Average Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB (818 - 4926, n=18)	3327 MB/s -15%
MSI Cyborg 15 A12VF Samsung PM9B1 1024GB MZVL41T0HBLB	2116 (2103.16^min - 2115.54^max) MB/s -46%
Average of class Multimedia (295 - 4881, n=76, last 2 years)	1357 MB/s -65%
Gigabyte G5 KE Gigabyte AG4512G-SI B10	1323 (1320.64^min - 1322.54^max) MB/s -66%
Asus VivoBook Pro 16 Intel SSD 670p SSDPEKNU010TZ	932 (902.95^min - 931.73^max) MB/s -76%
Asus TUF A15 FA507 Micron 2400 MTFDKBA512QFM	789 (769.77^min - 789.25^max) MB/s -80%
Asus TUF A15 FA507 Micron 2400 MTFDKBA512QFM	789 (769.77^min - 789.25^max) MB/s -80%
Dell Inspiron 16 Plus 7630 WD PC SN740 SDDPTQD-1T00	725 (704.24^min - 724.66^max) MB/s -81%
4k q32 t16 write
Intel NUC X15 LAPAC71H Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB	4074 (3652.82^min - 4073.79^max) MB/s
Average Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB (413 - 4683, n=18)	2563 MB/s -37%
Gigabyte G5 KE Gigabyte AG4512G-SI B10	2234 (2227.81^min - 2234.36^max) MB/s -45%
MSI Cyborg 15 A12VF Samsung PM9B1 1024GB MZVL41T0HBLB	1923 (1866.75^min - 1922.74^max) MB/s -53%
Asus VivoBook Pro 16 Intel SSD 670p SSDPEKNU010TZ	1299 (1149.78^min - 1298.86^max) MB/s -68%
Average of class Multimedia (192.1 - 4074, n=76, last 2 years)	1025 MB/s -75%
Dell Inspiron 16 Plus 7630 WD PC SN740 SDDPTQD-1T00	513 (490.37^min - 513.26^max) MB/s -87%
Asus TUF A15 FA507 Micron 2400 MTFDKBA512QFM	314 (293.25^min - 314.3^max) MB/s -92%
Asus TUF A15 FA507 Micron 2400 MTFDKBA512QFM	314 (293.25^min - 314.3^max) MB/s -92%

AS SSD
Score Total
Intel NUC X15 LAPAC71H Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB	9972 Points
Average Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB (5405 - 10591, n=18)	8308 Points -17%
MSI Cyborg 15 A12VF Samsung PM9B1 1024GB MZVL41T0HBLB	5577 Points -44%
Gigabyte G5 KE Gigabyte AG4512G-SI B10	5541 Points -44%
Average of class Multimedia (2033 - 9972, n=73, last 2 years)	5061 Points -49%
Dell Inspiron 16 Plus 7630 WD PC SN740 SDDPTQD-1T00	4383 Points -56%
Asus VivoBook Pro 16 Intel SSD 670p SSDPEKNU010TZ	3450 Points -65%
Asus TUF A15 FA507 Micron 2400 MTFDKBA512QFM	3315 Points -67%
Score Read
Intel NUC X15 LAPAC71H Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB	3501 Points
Average Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB (1349 - 4721, n=18)	2891 Points -17%
MSI Cyborg 15 A12VF Samsung PM9B1 1024GB MZVL41T0HBLB	2279 Points -35%
Gigabyte G5 KE Gigabyte AG4512G-SI B10	2128 Points -39%
Average of class Multimedia (669 - 3501, n=73, last 2 years)	1630 Points -53%
Dell Inspiron 16 Plus 7630 WD PC SN740 SDDPTQD-1T00	1459 Points -58%
Asus VivoBook Pro 16 Intel SSD 670p SSDPEKNU010TZ	1172 Points -67%
Asus TUF A15 FA507 Micron 2400 MTFDKBA512QFM	1116 Points -68%
Score Write
Intel NUC X15 LAPAC71H Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB	4684 Points
Average Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB (2308 - 4852, n=18)	4043 Points -14%
Average of class Multimedia (656 - 4813, n=73, last 2 years)	2660 Points -43%
Gigabyte G5 KE Gigabyte AG4512G-SI B10	2388 Points -49%
Dell Inspiron 16 Plus 7630 WD PC SN740 SDDPTQD-1T00	2233 Points -52%
MSI Cyborg 15 A12VF Samsung PM9B1 1024GB MZVL41T0HBLB	2151 Points -54%
Asus TUF A15 FA507 Micron 2400 MTFDKBA512QFM	1735 Points -63%
Asus VivoBook Pro 16 Intel SSD 670p SSDPEKNU010TZ	1684 Points -64%
Seq Read
Average Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB (4362 - 5760, n=18)	5211 MB/s +18%
Intel NUC X15 LAPAC71H Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB	4407.85 MB/s
Dell Inspiron 16 Plus 7630 WD PC SN740 SDDPTQD-1T00	4349.04 MB/s -1%
Average of class Multimedia (1718 - 5730, n=73, last 2 years)	4248 MB/s -4%
Gigabyte G5 KE Gigabyte AG4512G-SI B10	3697.92 MB/s -16%
Asus TUF A15 FA507 Micron 2400 MTFDKBA512QFM	3466 MB/s -21%
MSI Cyborg 15 A12VF Samsung PM9B1 1024GB MZVL41T0HBLB	3136.99 MB/s -29%
Asus VivoBook Pro 16 Intel SSD 670p SSDPEKNU010TZ	2786.1 MB/s -37%
Seq Write
Average Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB (3376 - 5651, n=18)	4712 MB/s +6%
Intel NUC X15 LAPAC71H Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB	4432.83 MB/s
Dell Inspiron 16 Plus 7630 WD PC SN740 SDDPTQD-1T00	2904.62 MB/s -34%
Average of class Multimedia (414 - 5651, n=73, last 2 years)	2749 MB/s -38%
MSI Cyborg 15 A12VF Samsung PM9B1 1024GB MZVL41T0HBLB	2554.35 MB/s -42%
Asus VivoBook Pro 16 Intel SSD 670p SSDPEKNU010TZ	2188.43 MB/s -51%
Gigabyte G5 KE Gigabyte AG4512G-SI B10	2106.21 MB/s -52%
Asus TUF A15 FA507 Micron 2400 MTFDKBA512QFM	1295 MB/s -71%
4K Read
Gigabyte G5 KE Gigabyte AG4512G-SI B10	82.5 MB/s +17%
Asus VivoBook Pro 16 Intel SSD 670p SSDPEKNU010TZ	75.84 MB/s +7%
MSI Cyborg 15 A12VF Samsung PM9B1 1024GB MZVL41T0HBLB	74.2 MB/s +5%
Average Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB (52.7 - 90.9, n=18)	71.6 MB/s +1%
Intel NUC X15 LAPAC71H Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB	70.66 MB/s
Dell Inspiron 16 Plus 7630 WD PC SN740 SDDPTQD-1T00	65.43 MB/s -7%
Average of class Multimedia (28.7 - 98.5, n=73, last 2 years)	61.6 MB/s -13%
Asus TUF A15 FA507 Micron 2400 MTFDKBA512QFM	30.4 MB/s -57%
4K Write
Gigabyte G5 KE Gigabyte AG4512G-SI B10	312.09 MB/s +17%
Intel NUC X15 LAPAC71H Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB	265.85 MB/s
Dell Inspiron 16 Plus 7630 WD PC SN740 SDDPTQD-1T00	225.06 MB/s -15%
Average Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB (172.3 - 306, n=18)	223 MB/s -16%
Asus VivoBook Pro 16 Intel SSD 670p SSDPEKNU010TZ	221.6 MB/s -17%
MSI Cyborg 15 A12VF Samsung PM9B1 1024GB MZVL41T0HBLB	207.87 MB/s -22%
Average of class Multimedia (66.5 - 328, n=73, last 2 years)	190.3 MB/s -28%
Asus TUF A15 FA507 Micron 2400 MTFDKBA512QFM	137.5 MB/s -48%
4K-64 Read
Intel NUC X15 LAPAC71H Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB	2989.09 MB/s
Average Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB (787 - 3182, n=18)	2252 MB/s -25%
MSI Cyborg 15 A12VF Samsung PM9B1 1024GB MZVL41T0HBLB	1890.81 MB/s -37%
Gigabyte G5 KE Gigabyte AG4512G-SI B10	1675.54 MB/s -44%
Average of class Multimedia (350 - 2989, n=73, last 2 years)	1144 MB/s -62%
Dell Inspiron 16 Plus 7630 WD PC SN740 SDDPTQD-1T00	959.03 MB/s -68%
Asus VivoBook Pro 16 Intel SSD 670p SSDPEKNU010TZ	817.72 MB/s -73%
Asus TUF A15 FA507 Micron 2400 MTFDKBA512QFM	739 MB/s -75%
4K-64 Write
Intel NUC X15 LAPAC71H Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB	3975.19 MB/s
Average Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB (1592 - 4090, n=18)	3356 MB/s -16%
Average of class Multimedia (411 - 4265, n=73, last 2 years)	2195 MB/s -45%
Gigabyte G5 KE Gigabyte AG4512G-SI B10	1865.08 MB/s -53%
Dell Inspiron 16 Plus 7630 WD PC SN740 SDDPTQD-1T00	1717.85 MB/s -57%
MSI Cyborg 15 A12VF Samsung PM9B1 1024GB MZVL41T0HBLB	1688.15 MB/s -58%
Asus TUF A15 FA507 Micron 2400 MTFDKBA512QFM	1468 MB/s -63%
Asus VivoBook Pro 16 Intel SSD 670p SSDPEKNU010TZ	1243.09 MB/s -69%
Access Time Read
Asus VivoBook Pro 16 Intel SSD 670p SSDPEKNU010TZ	0.104 ms * -41%
MSI Cyborg 15 A12VF Samsung PM9B1 1024GB MZVL41T0HBLB	0.102 ms * -38%
Intel NUC X15 LAPAC71H Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB	0.074 ms *
Gigabyte G5 KE Gigabyte AG4512G-SI B10	0.066 ms * +11%
Dell Inspiron 16 Plus 7630 WD PC SN740 SDDPTQD-1T00	0.057 ms * +23%
Average of class Multimedia (0.018 - 0.15, n=73, last 2 years)	0.0551 ms * +26%
Asus TUF A15 FA507 Micron 2400 MTFDKBA512QFM	0.039 ms * +47%
Average Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB (0.018 - 0.074, n=18)	0.0345 ms * +53%
Access Time Write
Asus TUF A15 FA507 Micron 2400 MTFDKBA512QFM	0.139 ms * -827%
Dell Inspiron 16 Plus 7630 WD PC SN740 SDDPTQD-1T00	0.07 ms * -367%
Average of class Multimedia (0.013 - 0.414, n=73, last 2 years)	0.06104 ms * -307%
MSI Cyborg 15 A12VF Samsung PM9B1 1024GB MZVL41T0HBLB	0.03 ms * -100%
Asus VivoBook Pro 16 Intel SSD 670p SSDPEKNU010TZ	0.028 ms * -87%
Average Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB (0.012 - 0.053, n=18)	0.01978 ms * -32%
Intel NUC X15 LAPAC71H Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB	0.015 ms *
Gigabyte G5 KE Gigabyte AG4512G-SI B10	0.013 ms * +13%

* ... smaller is better

Reading continuous performance: DiskSpd Read Loop, Queue Depth 8

Intel NUC X15 LAPAC71H Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB: Ø7069 (6280.74-7125.06)

Asus TUF A15 FA507 Micron 2400 MTFDKBA512QFM: Ø4012 (3504.22-4030.94)

Gigabyte G5 KE Gigabyte AG4512G-SI B10: Ø2113 (226.43-4712.52)

Dell Inspiron 16 Plus 7630 WD PC SN740 SDDPTQD-1T00: Ø3914 (2328.05-5205.69)

Asus VivoBook Pro 16 Intel SSD 670p SSDPEKNU010TZ: Ø3315 (2957.78-3377.46)

MSI Cyborg 15 A12VF Samsung PM9B1 1024GB MZVL41T0HBLB: Ø3610 (3316.15-3652.15)

Placa de vídeo

OArc A730M- a segunda DGPU móvel mais potente da Intel - tem um TGP máximo de 85 watts, depende da memória GDDR6 super-rápida (12.288 GB) e pode atingir uma taxa de clock máxima de 2,05 GHz. O núcleo gráfico é adequado para jogos em FHD em configurações médias a altas. Jogos menos exigentes permitem mais.

O desempenho da GPU depende muito de qual modo de desempenho é usado: O perfil "Performance" resultou em resultados de benchmark abaixo (benchmarks sintéticos) ou no mesmo nível (prática de jogos) da média da GPU determinada anteriormente. O desempenho máximo foi alcançado quando o "Modo de referência" estava ativo (TGP: 85 watts). Em suma, a GPU foi classificada entre aGeForce RTX 3050 eRTX 3060 em termos de desempenho.

Fire Strike (conectado à rede elétrica, Desempenho)

Fire Strike (modo de bateria, desempenho)

Fire Strike (conectado à rede elétrica, balanceado)

Fire Strike (conectado à rede elétrica, modo de economia de energia)

Fire Strike (conectado à rede elétrica, modo Benchmark)

3DMark Performance Rating | 3DMark 11 | 3DMark

3DMark Performance Rating - Percent
Asus TUF A15 FA507 ^-1! NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS	99.6 pt
Gigabyte G5 KE NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i5-12500H	96.8 pt
MSI Cyborg 15 A12VF NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-12650H	91.5 pt
Dell Inspiron 16 Plus 7630 ^-1! NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-13700H	91.4 pt
Average Intel Arc A730M	86.1 pt
Intel NUC X15 LAPAC71H Intel Arc A730M, Intel Core i7-12700H	77.7 pt
Average of class Multimedia	57.1 pt
Asus VivoBook Pro 16 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-12700H	54.4 pt

3DMark 11 - 1280x720 Performance GPU
Asus TUF A15 FA507 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS	31690 Points +27%
Gigabyte G5 KE NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i5-12500H	29569 Points +19%
Average Intel Arc A730M (24928 - 31551, n=4)	28692 Points +15%
Dell Inspiron 16 Plus 7630 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-13700H	28621 Points +15%
MSI Cyborg 15 A12VF NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-12650H	28136 Points +13%
Intel NUC X15 LAPAC71H Intel Arc A730M, Intel Core i7-12700H	24928 Points
Average of class Multimedia (3505 - 60250, n=77, last 2 years)	20075 Points -19%
Asus VivoBook Pro 16 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-12700H	16509 Points -34%

3DMark
1280x720 Cloud Gate Standard Graphics
MSI Cyborg 15 A12VF NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-12650H	142065 Points +57%
Gigabyte G5 KE NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i5-12500H	136826 Points +51%
Intel NUC X15 LAPAC71H Intel Arc A730M, Intel Core i7-12700H	90371 Points
Average Intel Arc A730M (75370 - 105420, n=4)	86896 Points -4%
Asus VivoBook Pro 16 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-12700H	83553 Points -8%
Average of class Multimedia (14679 - 130614, n=38, last 2 years)	56887 Points -37%
1920x1080 Fire Strike Graphics
Asus TUF A15 FA507 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS	22899 Points +15%
Gigabyte G5 KE NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i5-12500H	22625 Points +14%
Dell Inspiron 16 Plus 7630 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-13700H	21600 Points +9%
Average Intel Arc A730M (19850 - 22620, n=4)	21265 Points +7%
MSI Cyborg 15 A12VF NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-12650H	21062 Points +6%
Intel NUC X15 LAPAC71H Intel Arc A730M, Intel Core i7-12700H	19850 Points
Average of class Multimedia (1835 - 46022, n=80, last 2 years)	14437 Points -27%
Asus VivoBook Pro 16 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-12700H	12449 Points -37%
2560x1440 Time Spy Graphics
Average Intel Arc A730M (7212 - 10352, n=4)	8798 Points +22%
Asus TUF A15 FA507 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS	8692 Points +21%
Gigabyte G5 KE NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i5-12500H	8686 Points +20%
Dell Inspiron 16 Plus 7630 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-13700H	7877 Points +9%
MSI Cyborg 15 A12VF NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-12650H	7484 Points +4%
Intel NUC X15 LAPAC71H Intel Arc A730M, Intel Core i7-12700H	7212 Points
Average of class Multimedia (622 - 17620, n=81, last 2 years)	5446 Points -24%
Asus VivoBook Pro 16 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-12700H	4611 Points -36%

3DMark 11 Performance		23160 pontos
3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score		46415 pontos
3DMark Fire Strike Score		17884 pontos
3DMark Time Spy Score		7653 pontos
Ajuda

... comparado com

Blender - v3.3 Classroom CPU
Average Intel Arc A730M (315 - 633, n=3)	455 Seconds * -9%
MSI Cyborg 15 A12VF NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-12650H	435 Seconds * -5%
Average of class Multimedia (189 - 946, n=84, last 2 years)	430 Seconds * -3%
Gigabyte G5 KE NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i5-12500H	423 Seconds * -2%
Intel NUC X15 LAPAC71H Intel Arc A730M, Intel Core i7-12700H	416 Seconds *
Dell Inspiron 16 Plus 7630 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-13700H	400 Seconds * +4%
Asus VivoBook Pro 16 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-12700H	379 Seconds * +9%
Asus TUF A15 FA507 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS	376 Seconds * +10%
Asus TUF A15 FA507 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS	376 Seconds * +10%

Geekbench 5.5
OpenCL Score
Gigabyte G5 KE NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i5-12500H	102369 Points +42%
Dell Inspiron 16 Plus 7630 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-13700H	94563 Points +31%
MSI Cyborg 15 A12VF NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-12650H	88192 Points +22%
Asus TUF A15 FA507 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS	87554 Points +21%
Average Intel Arc A730M (20185 - 138625, n=3)	76986 Points +7%
Intel NUC X15 LAPAC71H Intel Arc A730M, Intel Core i7-12700H	72149 Points
Asus VivoBook Pro 16 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-12700H	61413 Points -15%
Average of class Multimedia (10769 - 122560, n=85, last 2 years)	60173 Points -17%
Vulkan Score 5.5
Intel NUC X15 LAPAC71H Intel Arc A730M, Intel Core i7-12700H	61294 Points
Dell Inspiron 16 Plus 7630 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-13700H	54288 Points -11%
Average Intel Arc A730M (20299 - 61294, n=3)	36351 Points -41%
Average of class Multimedia (2104 - 62587, n=46, last 2 years)	28640 Points -53%

Geekbench 6.3
GPU Vulkan
Dell Inspiron 16 Plus 7630 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-13700H	83815 Points +9%
Intel NUC X15 LAPAC71H Intel Arc A730M, Intel Core i7-12700H	76553 Points
Average Intel Arc A730M (74820 - 76553, n=2)	75687 Points -1%
Average of class Multimedia (11351 - 92135, n=47, last 2 years)	34313 Points -55%
GPU OpenCL
Dell Inspiron 16 Plus 7630 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-13700H	86617 Points +15%
Intel NUC X15 LAPAC71H Intel Arc A730M, Intel Core i7-12700H	75288 Points
Average Intel Arc A730M (74442 - 75288, n=2)	74865 Points -1%
Average of class Multimedia (9994 - 112310, n=57, last 2 years)	52106 Points -31%

V-Ray 5 Benchmark
GPU CUDA
Asus TUF A15 FA507 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS	1075 mpaths +292%
Dell Inspiron 16 Plus 7630 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-13700H	1053 mpaths +284%
MSI Cyborg 15 A12VF NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-12650H	975 mpaths +256%
Average of class Multimedia (274 - 1259, n=23, last 2 years)	883 mpaths +222%
Asus VivoBook Pro 16 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-12700H	495 mpaths +81%
Intel NUC X15 LAPAC71H Intel Arc A730M, Intel Core i7-12700H	274 mpaths
Average Intel Arc A730M (156 - 274, n=2)	215 mpaths -22%
CPU
Intel NUC X15 LAPAC71H Intel Arc A730M, Intel Core i7-12700H	10398 mpaths
Average of class Multimedia (5027 - 19998, n=39, last 2 years)	10018 mpaths -4%
MSI Cyborg 15 A12VF NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-12650H	9997 mpaths -4%
Dell Inspiron 16 Plus 7630 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-13700H	9771 mpaths -6%
Asus VivoBook Pro 16 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-12700H	9733 mpaths -6%
Asus TUF A15 FA507 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS	9623 mpaths -7%
Average Intel Arc A730M (6258 - 10398, n=2)	8328 mpaths -20%

V-Ray Benchmark Next 4.10
GPU
Asus TUF A15 FA507 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS	501 mpaths +534%
MSI Cyborg 15 A12VF NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-12650H	490 mpaths +520%
Gigabyte G5 KE NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i5-12500H	396 mpaths +401%
Average of class Multimedia (45 - 684, n=64, last 2 years)	270 mpaths +242%
Asus VivoBook Pro 16 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-12700H	194 mpaths +146%
Intel NUC X15 LAPAC71H Intel Arc A730M, Intel Core i7-12700H	79 mpaths
Average Intel Arc A730M (53 - 88, n=3)	73.3 mpaths -7%
CPU
Intel NUC X15 LAPAC71H Intel Arc A730M, Intel Core i7-12700H	15998 ksamples
Average of class Multimedia (7035 - 30140, n=64, last 2 years)	15553 ksamples -3%
MSI Cyborg 15 A12VF NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-12650H	15234 ksamples -5%
Asus TUF A15 FA507 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS	14627 ksamples -9%
Asus VivoBook Pro 16 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-12700H	14461 ksamples -10%
Gigabyte G5 KE NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i5-12500H	14118 ksamples -12%
Average Intel Arc A730M (9833 - 15998, n=3)	13768 ksamples -14%

SPECviewperf 2020
1920x1080 Solidworks (solidworks-05)
Average of class Multimedia (93.1 - 250, n=2, last 2 years)	171.4 fps +84%
Intel NUC X15 LAPAC71H Intel Arc A730M, Intel Core i7-12700H	93.1 fps
Average Intel Arc A730M (29.9 - 93.1, n=2)	61.5 fps -34%
1920x1080 Siemens NX (snx-04)
Average of class Multimedia (2.54 - 22.5, n=2, last 2 years)	12.5 fps +392%
Average Intel Arc A730M (2.54 - 2.93, n=2)	2.74 fps +8%
Intel NUC X15 LAPAC71H Intel Arc A730M, Intel Core i7-12700H	2.54 fps
1920x1080 Medical (medical-03)
Average of class Multimedia (24.6 - 34.7, n=2, last 2 years)	29.6 fps +20%
Intel NUC X15 LAPAC71H Intel Arc A730M, Intel Core i7-12700H	24.6 fps
Average Intel Arc A730M (23.5 - 24.6, n=2)	24 fps -2%
1920x1080 Maya (maya-06)
Average of class Multimedia (223 - 364, n=2, last 2 years)	293 fps +31%
Intel NUC X15 LAPAC71H Intel Arc A730M, Intel Core i7-12700H	223.03 fps
Average Intel Arc A730M (123.1 - 223, n=2)	173.1 fps -22%
1920x1080 Energy (energy-03)
Average of class Multimedia (14.1 - 42, n=2, last 2 years)	28 fps +99%
Average Intel Arc A730M (14.1 - 31.9, n=2)	23 fps +63%
Intel NUC X15 LAPAC71H Intel Arc A730M, Intel Core i7-12700H	14.1 fps
1920x1080 Creo (creo-03)
Average of class Multimedia (57 - 113, n=2, last 2 years)	85 fps +49%
Intel NUC X15 LAPAC71H Intel Arc A730M, Intel Core i7-12700H	57 fps
Average Intel Arc A730M (52 - 57, n=2)	54.5 fps -4%
1920x1080 CATIA (catia-06)
Average of class Multimedia (20.7 - 63.5, n=2, last 2 years)	42.1 fps +103%
Intel NUC X15 LAPAC71H Intel Arc A730M, Intel Core i7-12700H	20.7 fps
Average Intel Arc A730M (19.9 - 20.7, n=2)	20.3 fps -2%
1920x1080 3ds Max (3dsmax-07)
Average of class Multimedia (47.5 - 96.9, n=2, last 2 years)	72.2 fps +52%
Intel NUC X15 LAPAC71H Intel Arc A730M, Intel Core i7-12700H	47.5 fps
Average Intel Arc A730M (47.4 - 47.5, n=2)	47.5 fps 0%

* ... smaller is better

Performance Rating - Percent
Dell Inspiron 16 Plus 7630 ^-1! Intel Core i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU	99.7 pt
Gigabyte G5 KE Intel Core i5-12500H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU	94.1 pt
MSI Cyborg 15 A12VF Intel Core i7-12650H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU	87.2 pt
Asus TUF A15 FA507 AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU	83.9 pt
Asus VivoBook Pro 16 Intel Core i7-12700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU	60 pt
Average of class Multimedia	58.1 pt
Intel NUC X15 LAPAC71H Intel Core i7-12700H, Intel Arc A730M	51.2 pt
Average Intel Arc A730M	51.1 pt

The Witcher 3 - 1920x1080 Ultra Graphics & Postprocessing (HBAO+)
Dell Inspiron 16 Plus 7630 Intel Core i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU	90.9 (85^min) fps +128%
Gigabyte G5 KE Intel Core i5-12500H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU	87.6 (77^min, 77.42^P1) fps +120%
Asus TUF A15 FA507 AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU	82.2 (79^min, 80^P1) fps +107%
MSI Cyborg 15 A12VF Intel Core i7-12650H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU	77.4 (66^min) fps +94%
Average of class Multimedia (8 - 143.2, n=80, last 2 years)	54 fps +36%
Asus VivoBook Pro 16 Intel Core i7-12700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU	47.1 (39^min) fps +18%
Average Intel Arc A730M (39.8 - 49.4, n=2)	44.6 fps +12%
Intel NUC X15 LAPAC71H Intel Core i7-12700H, Intel Arc A730M	39.8 (36^min) fps

GTA V - 1920x1080 Highest Settings possible AA:4xMSAA + FX AF:16x
Gigabyte G5 KE Intel Core i5-12500H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU	103 (7.98^min, 71.4^P1) fps +157%
MSI Cyborg 15 A12VF Intel Core i7-12650H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU	89.3 (20.5^min, 55.6^P1) fps +123%
Asus TUF A15 FA507 AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU	83.5 (2.82^min, 58.8^P1) fps +108%
Asus VivoBook Pro 16 Intel Core i7-12700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU	53.8 (30.1^min, 38.5^P1) fps +34%
Average of class Multimedia (5.09 - 126.3, n=80, last 2 years)	53.5 fps +33%
Average Intel Arc A730M (40.1 - 43.1, n=3)	42 fps +5%
Intel NUC X15 LAPAC71H Intel Core i7-12700H, Intel Arc A730M	40.1 (4.48^min, 27^P1) fps

Final Fantasy XV Benchmark - 1920x1080 High Quality
Gigabyte G5 KE Intel Core i5-12500H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU	90.3 fps +120%
Dell Inspiron 16 Plus 7630 Intel Core i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU	88.9 fps +116%
Asus TUF A15 FA507 AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU	81.5 fps +98%
MSI Cyborg 15 A12VF Intel Core i7-12650H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU	76.9 fps +87%
Average of class Multimedia (6.53 - 141.8, n=81, last 2 years)	50.9 fps +24%
Asus VivoBook Pro 16 Intel Core i7-12700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU	46.2 fps +12%
Average Intel Arc A730M (41.1 - 49.7, n=3)	44.1 fps +7%
Intel NUC X15 LAPAC71H Intel Core i7-12700H, Intel Arc A730M	41.1 fps

Strange Brigade - 1920x1080 ultra AA:ultra AF:16
Dell Inspiron 16 Plus 7630 Intel Core i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU	161 (79.8^min, 120.7^P1) fps +38%
Gigabyte G5 KE Intel Core i5-12500H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU	153.3 (32.3^min, 117.2^P1) fps +31%
Asus TUF A15 FA507 AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU	147 fps +26%
MSI Cyborg 15 A12VF Intel Core i7-12650H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU	137.3 (59.3^min, 93^P1) fps +18%
Average Intel Arc A730M (116.6 - 137.7, n=3)	126.1 fps +8%
Intel NUC X15 LAPAC71H Intel Core i7-12700H, Intel Arc A730M	116.6 (15.9^min, 93.3^P1) fps
Average of class Multimedia (11 - 233, n=80, last 2 years)	87.4 fps -25%
Asus VivoBook Pro 16 Intel Core i7-12700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU	84.5 (48.3^min, 64.9^P1) fps -28%

Dota 2 Reborn - 1920x1080 ultra (3/3) best looking
Dell Inspiron 16 Plus 7630 Intel Core i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU	146.1 (126.2^min) fps +59%
Gigabyte G5 KE Intel Core i5-12500H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU	137.5 (121.2^min) fps +50%
MSI Cyborg 15 A12VF Intel Core i7-12650H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU	135.4 (113.7^min) fps +47%
Asus TUF A15 FA507 AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU	115.8 (102.7^min) fps +26%
Asus VivoBook Pro 16 Intel Core i7-12700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU	101.6 (87.6^min) fps +11%
Average of class Multimedia (26.3 - 179.9, n=82, last 2 years)	96.4 fps +5%
Intel NUC X15 LAPAC71H Intel Core i7-12700H, Intel Arc A730M	91.9 (53.5^min) fps
Average Intel Arc A730M (80.4 - 91.9, n=3)	86.5 fps -6%

X-Plane 11.11 - 1920x1080 high (fps_test=3)
Dell Inspiron 16 Plus 7630 Intel Core i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU	109.7 fps +130%
MSI Cyborg 15 A12VF Intel Core i7-12650H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU	96.8 fps +103%
Asus VivoBook Pro 16 Intel Core i7-12700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU	90.5 fps +90%
Gigabyte G5 KE Intel Core i5-12500H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU	86.7 fps +82%
Asus TUF A15 FA507 AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU	77.8 fps +63%
Average of class Multimedia (23 - 141.1, n=82, last 2 years)	66.8 fps +40%
Intel NUC X15 LAPAC71H Intel Core i7-12700H, Intel Arc A730M	47.6 fps
Average Intel Arc A730M (14.4 - 47.6, n=3)	33.5 fps -30%

Witcher 3 FPS diagram

Intel NUC X15 LAPAC71H i7-12700H, A730M: Ø38.8 (33-41)

Asus TUF A15 FA507 R7 7735HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU: Ø82.2 (79-84)

Gigabyte G5 KE i5-12500H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU: Ø84.8 (81-91)

Dell Inspiron 16 Plus 7630 i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU: Ø81.8 (78-87)

Asus VivoBook Pro 16 i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU: Ø48.1 (43-51)

MSI Cyborg 15 A12VF i7-12650H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU: Ø75.3 (71-79)

	baixo	média	alto	ultra
GTA V (2015)	177.4	170.6	94.3	40.1
The Witcher 3 (2015)	267.3	190.3	106.9	39.8
Dota 2 Reborn (2015)	102.2	101.6	96.8	91.9
Final Fantasy XV Benchmark (2018)	98.5	67.9	41.1
X-Plane 11.11 (2018)	70.7	55.8	47.6
Strange Brigade (2018)	377	167.8	140	116.6
Control (2019)	145.7	66	51.1
Flight Simulator 2020 (2020)	69.3	44.2	33.7	25.7
Cyberpunk 2077 1.6 (2022)	70.5	57.5	50.4	47
Uncharted Legacy of Thieves Collection (2022)	31.3	35.3	27.6	26.7
Call of Duty Modern Warfare 2 2022 (2022)	77	65	56	55
Spider-Man Miles Morales (2022)	60.5	58	53.4	51.4
The Callisto Protocol (2022)	80.2	72.6	67.9	47.5
Need for Speed Unbound (2022)	59.8	52.5	44.7	37.9
High On Life (2023)	147.9	110.1	80.9	64.7
The Witcher 3 v4.00 (2023)	126.2	102.8	51.2	44.4
Dead Space Remake (2023)	48.2	46.7	42.2	41.3
Hogwarts Legacy (2023)	69.6	48.6	43.7	34.3
Returnal (2023)	55	53	49	41
Atomic Heart (2023)	100.1	73.3	51.1	37.5
Company of Heroes 3 (2023)	111.3	90.6	74	72.8
Sons of the Forest (2023)	53.1	35.2	34.9	34.2
Resident Evil 4 Remake (2023)	86.4	64.9	60	41.3
The Last of Us (2023)	34.3	32.2	31.3	28.7
Star Wars Jedi Survivor (2023)	44	39.4	36.7	34.7
Diablo 4 (2023)	129.7	115.6	104.5	87.8
F1 23 (2023)	164.9	150.3	109.6	33.1
Ratchet & Clank Rift Apart (2023)	55.4	50.7	42.5	42.1
Atlas Fallen (2023)	78	74.1	70.4	59.2
Starfield (2023)	34	30.1	24.8	22
The Crew Motorfest (2023)	60	57	50	46
Lies of P (2023)	97	85.8	75.1	67
Baldur's Gate 3 (2023)	74.6	63	55.1	52.8
Cyberpunk 2077 2.1 Phantom Liberty (2023)	71.6	57	50	47.7
EA Sports FC 24 (2023)				121.8
Assassin's Creed Mirage (2023)	60	55	55	44
Total War Pharaoh (2023)	207.4	121.7	74.9	60.9
Lords of the Fallen (2023)	45.1	40.1	36.8	35.4

Emissões e energia - O NUC X15 oferece tempos de execução reduzidos

Emissões de ruído

Ao jogar, as emissões de ruído do laptop aumentam até 51 dB(A) ("Desempenho"). o "Modo Benchmark" gera emissões ainda mais altas, pois as ventoinhas funcionam constantemente em velocidade máxima. No modo inativo e no uso diário (escritório, Internet), o NUC é muito mais silencioso. No entanto: Uma das duas ventoinhas funciona constantemente em baixa velocidade. Ao ativar a configuração "Passive Cooling Mode" (Modo de resfriamento passivo) no NUC Software Studio, isso pode ser evitado.

Barulho

Ocioso		23 / 24 / 24 dB
Carga		50.61 / 50.89 dB

	30 dB silencioso 40 dB(A) audível 50 dB(A) ruidosamente alto
min: , med: , max: Earthworks M23R, Arta (15 cm de distância) environment noise: 23 dB(A)

	Intel NUC X15 LAPAC71H A730M, i7-12700H, Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB	Asus TUF A15 FA507 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, R7 7735HS, Micron 2400 MTFDKBA512QFM	Gigabyte G5 KE GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, i5-12500H, Gigabyte AG4512G-SI B10	Dell Inspiron 16 Plus 7630 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, i7-13700H, WD PC SN740 SDDPTQD-1T00	Asus VivoBook Pro 16 GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU, i7-12700H, Intel SSD 670p SSDPEKNU010TZ	MSI Cyborg 15 A12VF NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, i7-12650H, Samsung PM9B1 1024GB MZVL41T0HBLB
Noise		11%	-15%	4%	-10%	-28%
off / environment *	23	23.3 -1%	19.52 15%	23.2 -1%	25.2 -10%	27 -17%
Idle Minimum *	23	23.3 -1%	31.05 -35%	23.2 -1%	25.2 -10%	27 -17%
Idle Average *	24	23.3 3%	31.05 -29%	23.2 3%	25.2 -5%	37.5 -56%
Idle Maximum *	24	23.3 3%	31.05 -29%	23.2 3%	25.2 -5%	38 -58%
Load Average *	50.61	29.6 42%	55.66 -10%	35.1 31%	55.1 -9%	56.3 -11%
Witcher 3 ultra *	50.65	43 15%	55.7 -10%	52.5 -4%
Load Maximum *	50.89	43 16%	55.51 -9%	52.5 -3%	61.5 -21%	56.3 -11%

* ... smaller is better

Temperatura

Cargas elevadas (teste de estresse, Witcher 3 teste) fazem com que o laptop aqueça consideravelmente em algumas áreas. Em suma, os valores nunca atingiram níveis críticos. As temperaturas do gabinete permanecem dentro da zona verde no uso diário (escritório, Internet).

O teste de estresse (Prime95 e Furmark em operação contínua) simula um cenário extremo para testar a estabilidade do sistema sob carga total. As taxas de clock da CPU e da GPU flutuaram na faixa média.

Carga Máxima

Inatividade

Witcher 3


46 °C	52 °C	52 °C
44 °C	52 °C	59 °C
35 °C	36 °C	36 °C

Máximo: 59 °C
Médio: 45.8 °C


48 °C	51 °C	51 °C
38 °C	45 °C	43 °C
30 °C	31 °C	30 °C

Máximo: 51 °C
Médio: 40.8 °C

alimentação elétrica 57 °C | Temperatura do quarto 23 °C | Fluke t3000FC (calibrated), Fluke 62 Mini

Carga Máxima

Inatividade

Witcher 3


28 °C	28 °C	28 °C
28 °C	28 °C	27 °C
27 °C	26 °C	26 °C

Máximo: 28 °C
Médio: 27.3 °C


28 °C	28 °C	29 °C
27 °C	29 °C	30 °C
25 °C	26 °C	26 °C

Máximo: 30 °C
Médio: 27.6 °C

alimentação elétrica 29 °C | Temperatura do quarto 23 °C | Fluke t3000FC (calibrated), Fluke 62 Mini

Carga Máxima

Inatividade

Witcher 3


43 °C	48 °C	45 °C
43 °C	49 °C	41 °C
33 °C	33 °C	33 °C

Máximo: 49 °C
Médio: 40.9 °C


43 °C	46 °C	48 °C
33 °C	43 °C	39 °C
28 °C	28 °C	28 °C

Máximo: 48 °C
Médio: 37.3 °C

alimentação elétrica 56 °C | Temperatura do quarto 23 °C | Fluke t3000FC (calibrated), Fluke 62 Mini

(-) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 45.8 °C / 114 F, compared to the average of 31.3 °C / 88 F for the devices in the class Multimedia.
(-) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 59 °C / 138 F, compared to the average of 36.9 °C / 98 F, ranging from 21.1 to 71 °C for the class Multimedia.
(-) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 51 °C / 124 F, compared to the average of 39.2 °C / 103 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 27.3 °C / 81 F, compared to the device average of 31.3 °C / 88 F.
(-) Playing The Witcher 3, the average temperature for the upper side is 40.9 °C / 106 F, compared to the device average of 31.3 °C / 88 F.
(±) The palmrests and touchpad can get very hot to the touch with a maximum of 36 °C / 96.8 F.
(-) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.8 °C / 83.8 F (-7.2 °C / -13 F).

	Intel NUC X15 LAPAC71H Intel Core i7-12700H, Intel Arc A730M	Asus TUF A15 FA507 AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU	Gigabyte G5 KE Intel Core i5-12500H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU	Dell Inspiron 16 Plus 7630 Intel Core i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU	Asus VivoBook Pro 16 Intel Core i7-12700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU	MSI Cyborg 15 A12VF Intel Core i7-12650H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU
Heat		10%	-12%	-2%	-6%	13%
Maximum Upper Side *	59	48.9 17%	52.6 11%	47.8 19%	44.2 25%	47.5 19%
Maximum Bottom *	51	44.6 13%	62.4 -22%	42.2 17%	53 -4%	35.5 30%
Idle Upper Side *	28	27.1 3%	33.6 -20%	35.2 -26%	32.1 -15%	27.7 1%
Idle Bottom *	30	27.5 8%	34.8 -16%	35 -17%	38.4 -28%	29.5 2%

* ... smaller is better

Alto-falantes

Os alto-falantes estéreo produzem um som decente, mas quase sem graves.

Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)

Intel NUC X15 LAPAC71H audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (79.38 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 17.1% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (14.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 1.7% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (3.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2.2% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (5.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (12.1% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 17% of all tested devices in this class were better, 2% similar, 80% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 18%, worst was 45%
Compared to all devices tested
» 8% of all tested devices were better, 2% similar, 90% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Dell Inspiron 16 Plus 7630 audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (81.8 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 17% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (8.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 6.3% higher than median
(+) | mids are linear (6.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2.2% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (5.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (15.9% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 36% of all tested devices in this class were better, 6% similar, 58% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 18%, worst was 45%
Compared to all devices tested
» 22% of all tested devices were better, 5% similar, 73% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Consumo de energia

O consumo de energia do laptop está no nível esperado para o hardware instalado. O teste de estresse e o Witcher 3 foram executados com níveis de consumo de energia (ligeiramente) flutuantes. A fonte de alimentação incluída (230 watts) tem tamanho suficiente.

A julgar pelo seu desempenho por watt, o dispositivo consome muita energia. Para comparação: OMSI Cyborg precisa apenas da metade da energia sob carga, mas oferece um desempenho significativamente maior em jogos. OGeForce RTX 4060 no laptop MSI, que é limitado a um TGP de 45 watts, funciona com muito mais eficiência do que o Arc 730M.

Consumo de energia

desligado	0.01 / 0.01 Watt
Ocioso	7.5 / 11.9 / 13.9 Watt
Carga	137 / 203 Watt


Key: min: , med: , max: Metrahit Energy

	Intel NUC X15 LAPAC71H Intel Core i7-12700H, Intel Arc A730M	Asus TUF A15 FA507 AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU	Gigabyte G5 KE Intel Core i5-12500H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU	Dell Inspiron 16 Plus 7630 Intel Core i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU	Asus VivoBook Pro 16 Intel Core i7-12700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU	MSI Cyborg 15 A12VF Intel Core i7-12650H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU
Power Consumption		12%	-1%	-18%	1%	32%
Idle Minimum *	7.5	8 -7%	7.66 -2%	15.6 -108%	8.7 -16%	6 20%
Idle Average *	11.9	12.1 -2%	10.3 13%	17.7 -49%	13.1 -10%	8.8 26%
Idle Maximum *	13.9	12.5 10%	16.05 -15%	20.6 -48%	18.3 -32%	11.9 14%
Load Average *	137	74.9 45%	115.8 15%	87.4 36%	116 15%	89 35%
Witcher 3 ultra *	166	136.6 18%	168.7 -2%	121.7 27%	117.6 29%	90.3 46%
Load Maximum *	203	185 9%	234.6 -16%	138 32%	162 20%	99 51%

* ... smaller is better

Power consumption Witcher 3 / stress test

Intel NUC X15 LAPAC71H; Witcher 3 ultra: Ø165.5 (121.7-197.37)

Intel NUC X15 LAPAC71H; 1280x720 Prime95 28.10 and Furmark 1.25: Ø179.9 (123.91-203.45)

Intel NUC X15 LAPAC71H; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø11.9 (7.232-15.198)

Power consumption with external monitor

Intel NUC X15 LAPAC71H; Prime95 V2810 Stress (external Monitor): Ø98.1 (78.91-143.12)

Intel NUC X15 LAPAC71H; Cinebench R15 Multi (external Monitor): Ø205 (137.81-212.8)

Intel NUC X15 LAPAC71H; Cinebench R23 Multi (external Monitor): Ø116.9 (66.98-180.89)

Intel NUC X15 LAPAC71H; 1280x720 FurMark 1.19 GPU Stress Test (external Monitor): Ø140.2 (133.37-143.02)

Intel NUC X15 LAPAC71H; 1920x1080 The Witcher 3 ultra (external Monitor): Ø149 (142.21-186.46)

Tempos de execução

O dispositivo de 15,6 polegadas alcançou tempos de execução de 5:44 h em nosso teste realista de WLAN (mapeamento da carga ao acessar páginas da Web usando um script) - um valor decente, mas não excelente.

Tempo de Execução da Bateria


WiFi Websurfing (Edge 117)		5h 44min

Battery Runtime - WiFi Websurfing
Asus TUF A15 FA507 R7 7735HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, 90 Wh	701 min +104%
Average of class Multimedia (279 - 1204, n=85, last 2 years)	625 min +82%
Dell Inspiron 16 Plus 7630 i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, 86 Wh	566 min +65%
MSI Cyborg 15 A12VF i7-12650H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, 53.5 Wh	452 min +31%
Asus VivoBook Pro 16 i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU, 70 Wh	435 min +26%
Intel NUC X15 LAPAC71H i7-12700H, A730M, 62.3 Wh	344 min
Gigabyte G5 KE i5-12500H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, 54 Wh	342 min -1%

Pro

+ tela FHD rica em contraste

+ SSD PCIe 4

+ espaço para um segundo SSD (PCIe 3/SATA)

+ 12 GB DE VRAM

+ Codec AV1

+ RAM intercambiável/expansível

+ Thunderbolt 4

Contra

- gPU ineficiente com baixo desempenho por watt

- sem Power Delivery

- sem leitor de cartão SD

- alto consumo de energia sob carga

Veredicto - Não há nenhuma pechincha a ser feita aqui

O Intel NUC X15 LAPAC71H, amostra de teste fornecida pela Schenker.

Com o NUC X15, a Intel está voltada para gamers e profissionais criativos. Isso significa que a edição de vídeo e imagem, o streaming, a renderização e os jogos fazem parte dos campos de uso do laptop. ACore i7-12700HeArc A730Mfornecem a potência necessária - ambos os chips funcionam com taxas de clock consistentemente altas.

O Intel NUC X15 não impressiona nem decepciona. Entretanto, levando em conta o desempenho da CPU e o alto consumo de energia, o preço do laptop é simplesmente muito alto.

Sua ineficiente GPU Arc oferece menos desempenho por watt em comparação com seus concorrentes comparáveis. Assim como em todas as GPUs atuais (RX7000, RTX 4000), a A730M apresenta núcleos de ray-tracing e suporte a AV1 (decodificação e codificação) - recursos necessários em um laptop para criadores.

As emissões do dispositivo são típicas para essa classe. O tempo de execução prático de quase 6 horas pode ser classificado como decente. Sua porta USB-C (Thunderbolt 4) não é compatível com Power Delivery, mas pode emitir um sinal DisplayPort. Além disso, o laptop apresenta opções de expansão (solução de acoplamento, GPU externa). No geral, a tela FHD instalada (15,6 polegadas, IPS, 144 Hz) nos deixou uma boa impressão.

Uma alternativa poderia ser oAsus VivoBook Pro 16: Ele apresenta um desempenho de computação ligeiramente inferior no total, mas se beneficia de tempos de execução mais longos, Power Delivery e uma tela 16:10. O Aorus 15 9KF-E3DE383SH pode ser uma boa alternativa econômica. Graças ao seu GeForce RTX 4060 (TGP: 140 watts), ele oferece um desempenho muito melhor em jogos do que o X15. Atualmente, o senhor pode encontrá-lo on-line por cerca de US$ 1.040. Já testamos umaversão mais potentedo Aorus 15.

Preço e disponibilidade

O Intel NUC X15 LAPAC71H pode ser configurado individualmente e encomendado por meio da loja on-line da Schenker. O dispositivo de teste atual pode ser adquirido por cerca de US$ 1.280. A variante básica (16 GB de RAM, 500 GB SSD) pode ser adquirida por cerca de US$ 1.050.

Intel NUC X15 LAPAC71H - 10/13/2023 v7 ^(old)
Sascha Mölck

Acabamento

78 / 98 → 80%

Teclado

79%

Mouse

84%

Conectividade

63 / 80 → 79%

Peso

62 / 20-72 → 80%

Bateria

67 / 95 → 71%

Pantalha

87%

Desempenho do jogos

92 / 90 → 100%

Desempenho da aplicação

92 / 90 → 100%

Temperatura

82%

Ruído

80 / 95 → 84%

Audio

78%

Camera

40 / 85 → 47%

Médio

76%

84%

Multimedia - Médio equilibrado

Transparency

The selection of devices to be reviewed is made by our editorial team. The test sample was provided to the author as a loan by the manufacturer or retailer for the purpose of this review. The lender had no influence on this review, nor did the manufacturer receive a copy of this review before publication. There was no obligation to publish this review. We never accept compensation or payment in return for our reviews. As an independent media company, Notebookcheck is not subjected to the authority of manufacturers, retailers or publishers.

This is how Notebookcheck is testing

Every year, Notebookcheck independently reviews hundreds of laptops and smartphones using standardized procedures to ensure that all results are comparable. We have continuously developed our test methods for around 20 years and set industry standards in the process. In our test labs, high-quality measuring equipment is utilized by experienced technicians and editors. These tests involve a multi-stage validation process. Our complex rating system is based on hundreds of well-founded measurements and benchmarks, which maintains objectivity. Further information on our test methods can be found here.

Price comparison

Editor of the original article: Daisy Dickson - Translator - 339 articles published on Notebookcheck since 2023

Translator: Ninh Ngoc Duy - Editorial Assistant - 460014 articles published on Notebookcheck since 2008

contact me via: Facebook

Please share our article, every link counts!

> Análises e revisões de portáteis e celulares > Análises > Análises > Análise do Intel NUC X15 LAPAC71H: O laptop multimídia com um Intel Arc A730M a partir de US$ 1.050

Sascha Mölck, 2023-10-16 (Update: 2023-10-16)