Notebookcheck Logo

Breve Análise do Asus TUF A15 com AMD Renoir e gráficos Nvidia Graphics

Excelente valor!

Com seus mais recentes portáteis para jogos TUF, a Asus conta com o novíssimo SoC Renoir da AMD. Um olhar mais atento aos resultados de desempenho mostra que, combinada com a GPU Nvidia, esta é uma poderosa máquina de jogos. No artigo seguinte vamos determinar se a nossa análise do Asus TUF A15 FA506 confirma isso.
Asus TUF Gaming A15 FA506IV-HN172 (TUF Gaming A15 FA506 Serie)
Processador
AMD Ryzen 7 4800H 8 x 2.9 - 4.2 GHz, Renoir-H (Zen 2)
Placa gráfica
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile - 6 GB VRAM, Análises do: 1350 MHz, Memoría: 5500 MHz, GDDR6, Nvidia 442.53
Memória
8 GB 
, DDR4
Pantalha
15.60 polegadas 16:9, 1920 x 1080 pixel 141 PPI, LM156LF-2F01, IPS, Brilhante: não, 144 Hz
placa mãe
AMD Promontory/Bixby FCH
Disco rígido
Kingston OM8PCP3512F-AB, 512 GB 
, SSD M.2 2280, 450 GB livre
Placa de Som
Realtek Audio
Conexões
1 USB 2.0, 2 USB 3.0, 1 USB 3.1 Gen2, 1 Thunderbolt, 1 HDMI, 1 DisplayPort, 1 Kensington Lock, Conexões Audio: Conector de áudio de 3,5 mm
Funcionamento em rede
Realtek PCIe GBE Family Controller (10/100/1000MBit/s), Realtek 8822CE Wireless LAN 802.11ac PCI-E NIC (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/), Bluetooth 5
Tamanho
altura x largura x profundidade (em mm): 24.9 x 359 x 256
Bateria
48 Wh, 4110 mAh Lítio-Ion
Sistema Operativo
Microsoft Windows 10 Home 64 Bit
Camera
Webcam: HD
Primary Camera: 0.9 MPix
Características adicionais
Alto falantes: Estéreo, Teclado: Chiclet de 6 filas, Adaptador de CA de 230 watts, 24 Meses Garantia
peso
2.175 kg, Suprimento de energia: 754 g
Preço
1299 EUR
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

Rating
Date
Model
Weight
Height
Size
Resolution
Price
82.7 %
v7 (old)
06/2020
Asus TUF Gaming A15 FA506IV-HN172
R7 4800H, GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile
2.2 kg24.9 mm15.60"1920x1080
82.3 %
v7 (old)
08/2019
Lenovo Legion Y540-15IRH-81SX00B2GE
i7-9750H, GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile
2.2 kg26 mm15.60"1920x1080
78.8 %
v7 (old)
02/2020
MSI Alpha 15 A3DDK-034
R7 3750H, Radeon RX 5500M
2.3 kg27.5 mm15.60"1920x1080
80.8 %
v7 (old)
10/2019
MSI GL65 9SEK
i7-9750H, GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile
2.3 kg27.5 mm15.60"1920x1080
81.5 %
v7 (old)
07/2019
HP Omen 15-dc1020ng
i5-9300H, GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile
2.3 kg25 mm15.60"1920x1080
83.3 %
v6 (old)
05/2019
Asus ROG Zephyrus G15 GA502DU
R7 3750H, GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q
2.1 kg20.4 mm15.60"1920x1080
Asus TUF FA506IV-HN172
Asus TUF FA506IV-HN172
Asus TUF FA506IV-HN172
Asus TUF FA506IV-HN172
Asus TUF FA506IV-HN172
Asus TUF FA506IV-HN172
Asus TUF FA506IV-HN172
Asus TUF FA506IV-HN172
Asus TUF FA506IV-HN172
Asus TUF FA506IV-HN172
Asus TUF FA506IV-HN172
Asus TUF FA506IV-HN172

Size Comparison

365 mm 260 mm 26 mm 2.2 kg357.7 mm 248 mm 27.5 mm 2.3 kg357.7 mm 248 mm 27.5 mm 2.3 kg360 mm 263 mm 25 mm 2.3 kg359 mm 256 mm 24.9 mm 2.2 kg360 mm 252 mm 20.4 mm 2.1 kg297 mm 210 mm 1 mm 5.7 g
Left: AC adapter, HDMI 2.0b, RJ45, 2x Type-A USB 3.2 (Gen 1), Type-C USB 3.2 (Gen 2) with display support DP1.4, combined audio jack
Left: AC adapter, HDMI 2.0b, RJ45, 2x Type-A USB 3.2 (Gen 1), Type-C USB 3.2 (Gen 2) with display support DP1.4, combined audio jack
Right: 1x Type-A USB 2.0, vents
Right: 1x Type-A USB 2.0, vents
Front: No connectivity
Front: No connectivity
Back: vents
Back: vents
Networking
iperf3 transmit AX12
HP Omen 15-dc1020ng
Intel Wireless-AC 9560
680 MBit/s +3%
Asus TUF Gaming A15 FA506IV-HN172
Realtek 8822CE Wireless LAN 802.11ac PCI-E NIC
662 (553min - 769max) MBit/s
MSI Alpha 15 A3DDK-034
Realtek 8822CE Wireless LAN 802.11ac PCI-E NIC
634 MBit/s -4%
Lenovo Legion Y540-15IRH-81SX00B2GE
Intel Wireless-AC 9560
630 MBit/s -5%
Average Realtek 8822CE Wireless LAN 802.11ac PCI-E NIC
  (87 - 690, n=29)
618 MBit/s -7%
MSI GL65 9SEK
Intel Wireless-AC 9560
355 MBit/s -46%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G15 GA502DU
Realtek 8821CE Wireless LAN 802.11ac PCI-E NIC
252 MBit/s -62%
iperf3 receive AX12
MSI Alpha 15 A3DDK-034
Realtek 8822CE Wireless LAN 802.11ac PCI-E NIC
665 MBit/s +6%
HP Omen 15-dc1020ng
Intel Wireless-AC 9560
646 MBit/s +3%
MSI GL65 9SEK
Intel Wireless-AC 9560
637 MBit/s +1%
Asus TUF Gaming A15 FA506IV-HN172
Realtek 8822CE Wireless LAN 802.11ac PCI-E NIC
630 (571min - 641max) MBit/s
Average Realtek 8822CE Wireless LAN 802.11ac PCI-E NIC
  (486 - 685, n=29)
622 MBit/s -1%
Lenovo Legion Y540-15IRH-81SX00B2GE
Intel Wireless-AC 9560
619 MBit/s -2%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G15 GA502DU
Realtek 8821CE Wireless LAN 802.11ac PCI-E NIC
332 MBit/s -47%
050100150200250300350400450500550600650700750Tooltip
Asus TUF Gaming A15 FA506IV-HN172; iperf3 receive AX12; iperf 3.1.3: Ø629 (571-641)
Asus TUF Gaming A15 FA506IV-HN172; iperf3 transmit AX12; iperf 3.1.3: Ø661 (553-769)
ColorChecker
14.8 ∆E
12.7 ∆E
18.3 ∆E
15.8 ∆E
17.6 ∆E
14.6 ∆E
12.4 ∆E
24.2 ∆E
13.6 ∆E
11.1 ∆E
13.5 ∆E
11.9 ∆E
15.1 ∆E
14.1 ∆E
12.1 ∆E
6.9 ∆E
15.9 ∆E
18.8 ∆E
2.3 ∆E
12 ∆E
14.8 ∆E
14.5 ∆E
11.2 ∆E
4.2 ∆E
ColorChecker Asus TUF Gaming A15 FA506IV-HN172: 13.44 ∆E min: 2.33 - max: 24.17 ∆E
252
cd/m²
247
cd/m²
251
cd/m²
253
cd/m²
280
cd/m²
246
cd/m²
249
cd/m²
260
cd/m²
251
cd/m²
Distribuição do brilho
LM156LF-2F01 tested with Xrite i1 Pro
Máximo: 280 cd/m² (Nits) Médio: 254.3 cd/m² Minimum: 12 cd/m²
iluminação: 88 %
iluminação com acumulador: 280 cd/m²
Contraste: 1867:1 (Preto: 0.15 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 5.89 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.92, calibrated: 4.79
ΔE Greyscale 4.08 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
58% sRGB (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
37% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
40.22% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
58.5% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
38.92% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.33
Asus TUF Gaming A15 FA506IV-HN172
LM156LF-2F01, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6"
Lenovo Legion Y540-15IRH-81SX00B2GE
BOE 084D, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6"
MSI Alpha 15 A3DDK-034
AU Optronics B156HAN08.0 (AUO80ED), IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6"
MSI GL65 9SEK
AU Optronics B156HAN13.0, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6"
HP Omen 15-dc1020ng
LGD05CE, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6"
Asus ROG Zephyrus G15 GA502DU
Panda LM156LF-CL03, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6"
Display
61%
64%
-6%
-1%
4%
Display P3 Coverage
38.92
63.6
63%
66.4
71%
36.63
-6%
38.37
-1%
40.33
4%
sRGB Coverage
58.5
91.7
57%
91
56%
55
-6%
57.6
-2%
60.6
4%
AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage
40.22
65.2
62%
66.6
66%
37.85
-6%
39.69
-1%
41.69
4%
Response Times
62%
68%
-2%
-21%
-9%
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% *
34 ?(16, 18)
8.8 ?(4, 4.4)
74%
7 ?(3.4, 3.6)
79%
26.4 ?(13.2, 13.2)
22%
40 ?(21.2, 18.8)
-18%
34 ?(17.2, 16.8)
-0%
Response Time Black / White *
24 ?(13, 11)
12 ?(6.8, 5.2)
50%
10.4 ?(5.2, 5.2)
57%
30 ?(17.6, 12.4)
-25%
29.6 ?(17.2, 12.4)
-23%
28 ?(17.2, 10.8)
-17%
PWM Frequency
21280 ?(34)
Screen
15%
11%
-4%
-7%
-11%
Brightness middle
280
299
7%
310
11%
277.3
-1%
251
-10%
240.1
-14%
Brightness
254
290
14%
310
22%
256
1%
232
-9%
231
-9%
Brightness Distribution
88
89
1%
86
-2%
86
-2%
76
-14%
85
-3%
Black Level *
0.15
0.29
-93%
0.29
-93%
0.2
-33%
0.17
-13%
0.34
-127%
Contrast
1867
1031
-45%
1069
-43%
1387
-26%
1476
-21%
706
-62%
Colorchecker dE 2000 *
5.89
3.7
37%
4.78
19%
5.25
11%
6.2
-5%
4.2
29%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *
19
7
63%
8.1
57%
19.43
-2%
18.6
2%
17.8
6%
Colorchecker dE 2000 calibrated *
4.79
2
58%
2.36
51%
4.39
8%
4.8
-0%
4.09
15%
Greyscale dE 2000 *
4.08
4.1
-0%
4.78
-17%
3.5
14%
4.2
-3%
2.8
31%
Gamma
2.33 94%
2.19 100%
2.43 91%
2.1 105%
2.32 95%
2.2 100%
CCT
7303 89%
7166 91%
7739 84%
6895 94%
7454 87%
6925 94%
Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998)
37
59.3
60%
59
59%
35
-5%
36.5
-1%
38.4
4%
Color Space (Percent of sRGB)
58
91.5
58%
91
57%
55
-5%
57.4
-1%
60.4
4%
Total Average (Program / Settings)
46% / 29%
48% / 28%
-4% / -4%
-10% / -8%
-5% / -8%

* ... smaller is better

CalMAN: Grayscale
CalMAN: Grayscale
CalMAN: ColorChecker
CalMAN: ColorChecker
CalMAN: Saturation sweeps
CalMAN: Saturation sweeps
CalMAN: Grayscale (calibrated)
CalMAN: Grayscale (calibrated)
CalMAN: ColorChecker (calibrated)
CalMAN: ColorChecker (calibrated)
CalMAN: Saturation sweeps (calibrated)
CalMAN: Saturation sweeps (calibrated)

Display Response Times

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
       Response Time Black to White
24 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 13 ms rise
↘ 11 ms fall
The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 50 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (21 ms).
       Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
34 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 16 ms rise
↘ 18 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 42 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is similar to the average of all tested devices (32.9 ms).

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM not detected

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8743 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured.

CPU-Z
CPU-Z
CPU-Z
CPU-Z
CPU-Z
CPU-Z
CPU-Z
CPU-Z
GPU-Z
GPU-Z
GPU-Z
GPU-Z
HWiNFO
 
Cinebench R20: CPU (Single Core) | CPU (Multi Core)
Cinebench R15: CPU Single 64Bit | CPU Multi 64Bit
Blender: v2.79 BMW27 CPU
7-Zip 18.03: 7z b 4 -mmt1 | 7z b 4
Geekbench 5.5: Single-Core | Multi-Core
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2: 4k Preset
LibreOffice : 20 Documents To PDF
R Benchmark 2.5: Overall mean
Cinebench R20 / CPU (Single Core)
Average of class Gaming
  (427 - 856, n=190, last 2 years)
722 Points +49%
Average Intel Core i7-10875H
  (430 - 524, n=32)
486 Points 0%
Asus TUF Gaming A15 FA506IV-HN172
AMD Ryzen 7 4800H
485 Points
MSI GL65 9SEK
Intel Core i7-9750H
465 Points -4%
Lenovo Legion Y540-15IRH-81SX00B2GE
Intel Core i7-9750H
458 Points -6%
HP Omen 15-dc1020ng
Intel Core i5-9300H
419 Points -14%
MSI Alpha 15 A3DDK-034
AMD Ryzen 7 3750H
352 Points -27%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G15 GA502DU
AMD Ryzen 7 3750H
340 Points -30%
Cinebench R20 / CPU (Multi Core)
Average of class Gaming
  (2179 - 13832, n=190, last 2 years)
8254 Points +94%
Asus TUF Gaming A15 FA506IV-HN172
AMD Ryzen 7 4800H
4257 Points
Average Intel Core i7-10875H
  (1986 - 4176, n=32)
3455 Points -19%
MSI GL65 9SEK
Intel Core i7-9750H
2785 Points -35%
Lenovo Legion Y540-15IRH-81SX00B2GE
Intel Core i7-9750H
2595 Points -39%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G15 GA502DU
AMD Ryzen 7 3750H
1825 Points -57%
HP Omen 15-dc1020ng
Intel Core i5-9300H
1723 Points -60%
MSI Alpha 15 A3DDK-034
AMD Ryzen 7 3750H
1633 Points -62%
Cinebench R15 / CPU Single 64Bit
Average of class Gaming
  (176.6 - 318, n=194, last 2 years)
277 Points +49%
Average Intel Core i7-10875H
  (190 - 220, n=37)
204 Points +10%
MSI GL65 9SEK
Intel Core i7-9750H
188 Points +1%
Lenovo Legion Y540-15IRH-81SX00B2GE
Intel Core i7-9750H
187 Points +1%
Asus TUF Gaming A15 FA506IV-HN172
AMD Ryzen 7 4800H
186 Points
HP Omen 15-dc1020ng
Intel Core i5-9300H
171 Points -8%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G15 GA502DU
AMD Ryzen 7 3750H
144 Points -23%
MSI Alpha 15 A3DDK-034
AMD Ryzen 7 3750H
143 Points -23%
Cinebench R15 / CPU Multi 64Bit
Average of class Gaming
  (905 - 5663, n=197, last 2 years)
3399 Points +84%
Asus TUF Gaming A15 FA506IV-HN172
AMD Ryzen 7 4800H
1850 Points
Average Intel Core i7-10875H
  (1003 - 1833, n=38)
1554 Points -16%
MSI GL65 9SEK
Intel Core i7-9750H
1281 Points -31%
Lenovo Legion Y540-15IRH-81SX00B2GE
Intel Core i7-9750H
1155 (899.54min - 1211.72max) Points -38%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G15 GA502DU
AMD Ryzen 7 3750H
805 Points -56%
HP Omen 15-dc1020ng
Intel Core i5-9300H
769 Points -58%
MSI Alpha 15 A3DDK-034
AMD Ryzen 7 3750H
734 Points -60%
Blender / v2.79 BMW27 CPU
HP Omen 15-dc1020ng
Intel Core i5-9300H
643 Seconds * -145%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G15 GA502DU
AMD Ryzen 7 3750H
584 Seconds * -122%
Lenovo Legion Y540-15IRH-81SX00B2GE
Intel Core i7-9750H
410 Seconds * -56%
Average Intel Core i7-10875H
  (259 - 535, n=30)
327 Seconds * -25%
Asus TUF Gaming A15 FA506IV-HN172
AMD Ryzen 7 4800H
262.5 Seconds *
Average of class Gaming
  (87 - 555, n=185, last 2 years)
171.9 Seconds * +35%
7-Zip 18.03 / 7z b 4 -mmt1
Average of class Gaming
  (4168 - 7581, n=189, last 2 years)
6283 MIPS +35%
Average Intel Core i7-10875H
  (5071 - 5780, n=31)
5360 MIPS +15%
Lenovo Legion Y540-15IRH-81SX00B2GE
Intel Core i7-9750H
4962 MIPS +6%
Asus TUF Gaming A15 FA506IV-HN172
AMD Ryzen 7 4800H
4666 MIPS
HP Omen 15-dc1020ng
Intel Core i5-9300H
4626 MIPS -1%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G15 GA502DU
AMD Ryzen 7 3750H
3511 MIPS -25%
7-Zip 18.03 / 7z b 4
Average of class Gaming
  (23795 - 140932, n=189, last 2 years)
84760 MIPS +86%
Asus TUF Gaming A15 FA506IV-HN172
AMD Ryzen 7 4800H
45679 MIPS
Average Intel Core i7-10875H
  (29844 - 49562, n=31)
43117 MIPS -6%
Lenovo Legion Y540-15IRH-81SX00B2GE
Intel Core i7-9750H
34458 MIPS -25%
HP Omen 15-dc1020ng
Intel Core i5-9300H
20736 MIPS -55%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G15 GA502DU
AMD Ryzen 7 3750H
18689 MIPS -59%
Geekbench 5.5 / Single-Core
Average of class Gaming
  (986 - 2210, n=190, last 2 years)
1884 Points +62%
Average Intel Core i7-10875H
  (1233 - 1371, n=29)
1304 Points +12%
Asus TUF Gaming A15 FA506IV-HN172
AMD Ryzen 7 4800H
1166 Points
MSI Alpha 15 A3DDK-034
AMD Ryzen 7 3750H
874 Points -25%
Geekbench 5.5 / Multi-Core
Average of class Gaming
  (4557 - 23194, n=190, last 2 years)
14915 Points +152%
Average Intel Core i7-10875H
  (5715 - 8620, n=29)
7734 Points +31%
Asus TUF Gaming A15 FA506IV-HN172
AMD Ryzen 7 4800H
5920 Points
MSI Alpha 15 A3DDK-034
AMD Ryzen 7 3750H
3537 Points -40%
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 / 4k Preset
Average of class Gaming
  (6.72 - 38.9, n=189, last 2 years)
23.3 fps +116%
Average Intel Core i7-10875H
  (7.27 - 14.1, n=27)
11.7 fps +8%
Asus TUF Gaming A15 FA506IV-HN172
AMD Ryzen 7 4800H
10.8 fps
Lenovo Legion Y540-15IRH-81SX00B2GE
Intel Core i7-9750H
9.2 fps -15%
HP Omen 15-dc1020ng
Intel Core i5-9300H
5.7 fps -47%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G15 GA502DU
AMD Ryzen 7 3750H
4.352 fps -60%
LibreOffice / 20 Documents To PDF
Average Intel Core i7-10875H
  (30.2 - 84.3, n=30)
50.3 s * -76%
Average of class Gaming
  (31.4 - 96.6, n=186, last 2 years)
47.5 s * -66%
Asus TUF Gaming A15 FA506IV-HN172
AMD Ryzen 7 4800H
28.6 s *
R Benchmark 2.5 / Overall mean
Asus TUF Gaming A15 FA506IV-HN172
AMD Ryzen 7 4800H
0.603 sec *
Average Intel Core i7-10875H
  (0.546 - 0.662, n=29)
0.582 sec * +3%
Average of class Gaming
  (0.3609 - 0.759, n=190, last 2 years)
0.44 sec * +27%

* ... smaller is better

Cinebench R15 Multi-Thread Loop

095190285380475570665760855950104511401235133014251520161517101805Tooltip
Asus TUF Gaming A15 FA506IV-HN172: Ø1753 (1601.6-1850.14)
Cinebench R10
Cinebench R10
Cinebench R11
Cinebench R11
Cinebench R15
Cinebench R15
Cinebench R20
Cinebench R20
Jetstream 1.1
Jetstream 1.1
Octane V2
Octane V2
Cinebench R10 Shading 32Bit
10064
Cinebench R10 Rendering Multiple CPUs 32Bit
37236
Cinebench R10 Rendering Single 32Bit
5643
Cinebench R10 Shading 64Bit
10190 Points
Cinebench R10 Rendering Multiple CPUs 64Bit
61208 Points
Cinebench R10 Rendering Single CPUs 64Bit
9712 Points
Cinebench R11.5 OpenGL 64Bit
69.6 fps
Cinebench R11.5 CPU Single 64Bit
2.16 Points
Cinebench R11.5 OpenGL 32Bit
71.7 fps
Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 32Bit
19.85 Points
Cinebench R11.5 CPU Single 32Bit
2.04 Points
Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 64Bit
21.1 Points
Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64Bit
186 Points
Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64Bit
1850 Points
Cinebench R15 Ref. Match 64Bit
99.6 %
Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64Bit
99.2 fps
Cinebench R20 CPU (Multi Core)
4257 Points
Cinebench R20 CPU (Single Core)
485 Points
Ajuda
PCMark 10
Score
Average of class Gaming
  (5776 - 9852, n=167, last 2 years)
7777 Points +53%
MSI GL65 9SEK
GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile, i7-9750H, WDC PC SN520 SDAPNUW-512G
5761 Points +13%
Lenovo Legion Y540-15IRH-81SX00B2GE
GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile, i7-9750H, WDC PC SN720 SDAPNTW-512G
5716 Points +12%
Average AMD Ryzen 7 4800H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile
  (5095 - 5766, n=6)
5510 Points +8%
Asus TUF Gaming A15 FA506IV-HN172
GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile, R7 4800H, Kingston OM8PCP3512F-AB
5095 Points
HP Omen 15-dc1020ng
GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile, i5-9300H, WDC PC SN720 SDAQNTW-512G
4873 Points -4%
MSI Alpha 15 A3DDK-034
Radeon RX 5500M, R7 3750H, Kingston RBUSNS8154P3512GJ
4605 Points -10%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G15 GA502DU
GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q, R7 3750H, Intel SSD 660p SSDPEKNW512G8
4322 Points -15%
Essentials
Average of class Gaming
  (9057 - 12334, n=166, last 2 years)
10836 Points +23%
MSI GL65 9SEK
GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile, i7-9750H, WDC PC SN520 SDAPNUW-512G
9431 Points +7%
Average AMD Ryzen 7 4800H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile
  (8806 - 9784, n=6)
9285 Points +5%
Lenovo Legion Y540-15IRH-81SX00B2GE
GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile, i7-9750H, WDC PC SN720 SDAPNTW-512G
9020 Points +2%
Asus TUF Gaming A15 FA506IV-HN172
GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile, R7 4800H, Kingston OM8PCP3512F-AB
8806 Points
HP Omen 15-dc1020ng
GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile, i5-9300H, WDC PC SN720 SDAQNTW-512G
8575 Points -3%
MSI Alpha 15 A3DDK-034
Radeon RX 5500M, R7 3750H, Kingston RBUSNS8154P3512GJ
8174 Points -7%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G15 GA502DU
GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q, R7 3750H, Intel SSD 660p SSDPEKNW512G8
7424 Points -16%
Productivity
Average of class Gaming
  (6662 - 14612, n=166, last 2 years)
9880 Points +38%
MSI GL65 9SEK
GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile, i7-9750H, WDC PC SN520 SDAPNUW-512G
7748 Points +8%
Lenovo Legion Y540-15IRH-81SX00B2GE
GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile, i7-9750H, WDC PC SN720 SDAPNTW-512G
7430 Points +4%
Average AMD Ryzen 7 4800H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile
  (7122 - 7586, n=6)
7296 Points +2%
HP Omen 15-dc1020ng
GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile, i5-9300H, WDC PC SN720 SDAQNTW-512G
7261 Points +1%
Asus TUF Gaming A15 FA506IV-HN172
GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile, R7 4800H, Kingston OM8PCP3512F-AB
7156 Points
Asus ROG Zephyrus G15 GA502DU
GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q, R7 3750H, Intel SSD 660p SSDPEKNW512G8
6305 Points -12%
MSI Alpha 15 A3DDK-034
Radeon RX 5500M, R7 3750H, Kingston RBUSNS8154P3512GJ
6067 Points -15%
Digital Content Creation
Average of class Gaming
  (6703 - 18475, n=166, last 2 years)
12042 Points +111%
Lenovo Legion Y540-15IRH-81SX00B2GE
GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile, i7-9750H, WDC PC SN720 SDAPNTW-512G
7564 Points +33%
MSI GL65 9SEK
GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile, i7-9750H, WDC PC SN520 SDAPNUW-512G
7104 Points +25%
Average AMD Ryzen 7 4800H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile
  (5695 - 7887, n=6)
6724 Points +18%
Asus TUF Gaming A15 FA506IV-HN172
GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile, R7 4800H, Kingston OM8PCP3512F-AB
5695 Points
MSI Alpha 15 A3DDK-034
Radeon RX 5500M, R7 3750H, Kingston RBUSNS8154P3512GJ
5344 Points -6%
HP Omen 15-dc1020ng
GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile, i5-9300H, WDC PC SN720 SDAQNTW-512G
5044 Points -11%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G15 GA502DU
GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q, R7 3750H, Intel SSD 660p SSDPEKNW512G8
4682 Points -18%
PCMark 8
Home Score Accelerated v2
Average of class Gaming
  (4560 - 5937, n=20, last 2 years)
5223 Points +11%
Average AMD Ryzen 7 4800H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile
  (4698 - 5197, n=4)
4912 Points +5%
Asus TUF Gaming A15 FA506IV-HN172
GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile, R7 4800H, Kingston OM8PCP3512F-AB
4698 Points
Lenovo Legion Y540-15IRH-81SX00B2GE
GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile, i7-9750H, WDC PC SN720 SDAPNTW-512G
4507 Points -4%
MSI GL65 9SEK
GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile, i7-9750H, WDC PC SN520 SDAPNUW-512G
4136 Points -12%
MSI Alpha 15 A3DDK-034
Radeon RX 5500M, R7 3750H, Kingston RBUSNS8154P3512GJ
4121 Points -12%
HP Omen 15-dc1020ng
GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile, i5-9300H, WDC PC SN720 SDAQNTW-512G
3691 Points -21%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G15 GA502DU
GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q, R7 3750H, Intel SSD 660p SSDPEKNW512G8
3642 Points -22%
Work Score Accelerated v2
Average of class Gaming
  (5520 - 6853, n=18, last 2 years)
6102 Points +6%
Average AMD Ryzen 7 4800H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile
  (5742 - 5983, n=4)
5867 Points +2%
Asus TUF Gaming A15 FA506IV-HN172
GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile, R7 4800H, Kingston OM8PCP3512F-AB
5773 Points
MSI GL65 9SEK
GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile, i7-9750H, WDC PC SN520 SDAPNUW-512G
5287 Points -8%
HP Omen 15-dc1020ng
GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile, i5-9300H, WDC PC SN720 SDAQNTW-512G
5107 Points -12%
MSI Alpha 15 A3DDK-034
Radeon RX 5500M, R7 3750H, Kingston RBUSNS8154P3512GJ
5045 Points -13%
Lenovo Legion Y540-15IRH-81SX00B2GE
GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile, i7-9750H, WDC PC SN720 SDAPNTW-512G
5041 Points -13%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G15 GA502DU
GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q, R7 3750H, Intel SSD 660p SSDPEKNW512G8
4956 Points -14%
PCMark 8 Home Score Accelerated v2
4698 pontos
PCMark 8 Creative Score Accelerated v2
7841 pontos
PCMark 8 Work Score Accelerated v2
5773 pontos
PCMark 10 Score
5095 pontos
Ajuda
DPC Latencies / LatencyMon - interrupt to process latency (max), Web, Youtube, Prime95
Asus TUF Gaming A15 FA506IV-HN172
GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile, R7 4800H, Kingston OM8PCP3512F-AB
797 μs *

* ... smaller is better

Asus TUF Gaming A15 FA506IV-HN172
Kingston OM8PCP3512F-AB
Lenovo Legion Y540-15IRH-81SX00B2GE
WDC PC SN720 SDAPNTW-512G
MSI Alpha 15 A3DDK-034
Kingston RBUSNS8154P3512GJ
MSI GL65 9SEK
WDC PC SN520 SDAPNUW-512G
HP Omen 15-dc1020ng
WDC PC SN720 SDAQNTW-512G
Asus ROG Zephyrus G15 GA502DU
Intel SSD 660p SSDPEKNW512G8
Average Kingston OM8PCP3512F-AB
 
CrystalDiskMark 5.2 / 6
30%
-20%
10%
35%
-17%
-5%
Write 4K
219.8
158.8
-28%
105.4
-52%
150.2
-32%
112.1
-49%
132.2
-40%
194.5 ?(107.3 - 286, n=8)
-12%
Read 4K
50.2
29.11
-42%
33.24
-34%
43.46
-13%
42.01
-16%
55.5
11%
Write Seq
979
1584
62%
1029
5%
1412
44%
1964
101%
986
1%
Read Seq
1990
1694
-15%
1098
-45%
1340
-33%
2065
4%
1318
-34%
1299 ?(1043 - 1990, n=8)
-35%
Write 4K Q32T1
516
536
4%
322.1
-38%
482.2
-7%
318.2
-38%
220.3
-57%
505 ?(327 - 625, n=8)
-2%
Read 4K Q32T1
298.3
363.9
22%
352
18%
535
79%
406.7
36%
315.5
6%
Write Seq Q32T1
982
2536
158%
1036
5%
1454
48%
2534
158%
987
1%
Read Seq Q32T1
1907
3458
81%
1606
-16%
1744
-9%
3438
80%
1416
-26%
Write 4K Q8T8
981
981 ?()
0%
Read 4K Q8T8
300.9
301 ?()
0%
AS SSD
63%
-9%
10%
66%
-10%
-9%
Seq Read
1682
2927
74%
1423
-15%
1315
-22%
2955
76%
907
-46%
Seq Write
904
2149
138%
958
6%
1378
52%
2440
170%
926
2%
4K Read
60.2
42.43
-30%
33.2
-45%
25.31
-58%
40.56
-33%
47.26
-21%
48.2 ?(36.2 - 60.2, n=10)
-20%
4K Write
164.8
147.1
-11%
80.7
-51%
118.2
-28%
118.6
-28%
98.7
-40%
118.9 ?(66 - 170.5, n=10)
-28%
4K-64 Read
472.5
1286
172%
816
73%
839
78%
1283
172%
321.5
-32%
4K-64 Write
845
1432
69%
708
-16%
720
-15%
1538
82%
736
-13%
Access Time Read *
0.087
0.065
25%
0.1
-15%
0.116
-33%
0.084
3%
0.064
26%
0.1294 ?(0.081 - 0.191, n=10)
-49%
Access Time Write *
0.02
0.026
-30%
0.047
-135%
0.091
-355%
0.032
-60%
0.045
-125%
0.0371 ?(0.019 - 0.084, n=10)
-86%
Score Read
701
1621
131%
991
41%
996
42%
1619
131%
459
-35%
619 ?(379 - 701, n=10)
-12%
Score Write
1101
1794
63%
885
-20%
976
-11%
1901
73%
927
-16%
Score Total
2143
4208
96%
2365
10%
2485
16%
4323
102%
1641
-23%
Copy ISO MB/s
675
1043
55%
1279
89%
1418
110%
905
34%
Copy Program MB/s
248.4
252.7
2%
889
258%
392.5
58%
496.9
100%
373 ?(248 - 609, n=7)
50%
Copy Game MB/s
535
483.6
-10%
1218
128%
907
70%
819
53%
Total Average (Program / Settings)
47% / 49%
-15% / -13%
10% / 10%
51% / 55%
-14% / -12%
-7% / -7%

* ... smaller is better

Kingston OM8PCP3512F-AB
Sequential Read: 1136 MB/s
Sequential Write: 979 MB/s
512K Read: 892 MB/s
512K Write: 978 MB/s
4K Read: 38.53 MB/s
4K Write: 121.2 MB/s
4K QD32 Read: 297.9 MB/s
4K QD32 Write: 495.7 MB/s

Continuous read performance: DiskSpd Read Loop, Queue Depth 8

No graph data
3DMark 11 - 1280x720 Performance GPU
Average of class Gaming
  (1029 - 72178, n=185, last 2 years)
43596 Points +103%
Asus TUF Gaming A15 FA506IV-HN172
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile, AMD Ryzen 7 4800H
21480 Points
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile
  (19143 - 24662, n=40)
21459 Points 0%
MSI GL65 9SEK
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile, Intel Core i7-9750H
21075 Points -2%
Lenovo Legion Y540-15IRH-81SX00B2GE
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile, Intel Core i7-9750H
19553 Points -9%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G15 GA502DU
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q, AMD Ryzen 7 3750H
17170 Points -20%
MSI Alpha 15 A3DDK-034
AMD Radeon RX 5500M, AMD Ryzen 7 3750H
16335 Points -24%
HP Omen 15-dc1020ng
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile, Intel Core i5-9300H
13447 Points -37%
3DMark
1280x720 Cloud Gate Standard Graphics
Average of class Gaming
  (15902 - 193851, n=100, last 2 years)
143183 Points +159%
MSI GL65 9SEK
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile, Intel Core i7-9750H
107016 Points +93%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile
  (55324 - 116593, n=36)
93235 Points +69%
Lenovo Legion Y540-15IRH-81SX00B2GE
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile, Intel Core i7-9750H
92951 Points +68%
HP Omen 15-dc1020ng
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile, Intel Core i5-9300H
57365 Points +4%
Asus TUF Gaming A15 FA506IV-HN172
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile, AMD Ryzen 7 4800H
55325 Points
MSI Alpha 15 A3DDK-034
AMD Radeon RX 5500M, AMD Ryzen 7 3750H
46119 Points -17%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G15 GA502DU
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q, AMD Ryzen 7 3750H
44557 Points -19%
1920x1080 Fire Strike Graphics
Average of class Gaming
  (781 - 53059, n=195, last 2 years)
31290 Points +96%
MSI GL65 9SEK
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile, Intel Core i7-9750H
16331 Points +2%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile
  (14768 - 18358, n=43)
16301 Points +2%
Asus TUF Gaming A15 FA506IV-HN172
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile, AMD Ryzen 7 4800H
15967 Points
Lenovo Legion Y540-15IRH-81SX00B2GE
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile, Intel Core i7-9750H
14288 Points -11%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G15 GA502DU
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q, AMD Ryzen 7 3750H
13355 Points -16%
MSI Alpha 15 A3DDK-034
AMD Radeon RX 5500M, AMD Ryzen 7 3750H
12441 Points -22%
HP Omen 15-dc1020ng
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile, Intel Core i5-9300H
9536 Points -40%
2560x1440 Time Spy Graphics
Average of class Gaming
  (224 - 22717, n=190, last 2 years)
13056 Points +116%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile
  (5660 - 6910, n=41)
6206 Points +3%
MSI GL65 9SEK
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile, Intel Core i7-9750H
6159 Points +2%
Asus TUF Gaming A15 FA506IV-HN172
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile, AMD Ryzen 7 4800H
6043 Points
Asus ROG Zephyrus G15 GA502DU
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q, AMD Ryzen 7 3750H
4867 Points -19%
MSI Alpha 15 A3DDK-034
AMD Radeon RX 5500M, AMD Ryzen 7 3750H
4298 Points -29%
HP Omen 15-dc1020ng
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile, Intel Core i5-9300H
3565 Points -41%
3DMark 11 Performance
17390 pontos
3DMark Ice Storm Standard Score
72466 pontos
3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score
34649 pontos
3DMark Fire Strike Score
14757 pontos
3DMark Fire Strike Extreme Score
7382 pontos
3DMark Time Spy Score
6256 pontos
Ajuda
The Witcher 3
1024x768 Low Graphics & Postprocessing
Average of class Gaming
  (108.2 - 718, n=98, last 2 years)
454 fps +138%
MSI GL65 9SEK
Intel Core i7-9750H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile
286 fps +50%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile
  (188.7 - 295, n=27)
256 fps +34%
Asus TUF Gaming A15 FA506IV-HN172
AMD Ryzen 7 4800H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile
191 (167min - 211max) fps
MSI Alpha 15 A3DDK-034
AMD Ryzen 7 3750H, AMD Radeon RX 5500M
173.6 fps -9%
HP Omen 15-dc1020ng
Intel Core i5-9300H, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile
157.1 fps -18%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G15 GA502DU
AMD Ryzen 7 3750H, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q
138.4 fps -28%
1366x768 Medium Graphics & Postprocessing
Average of class Gaming
  (168.5 - 617, n=101, last 2 years)
362 fps +126%
MSI GL65 9SEK
Intel Core i7-9750H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile
204 fps +28%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile
  (152.2 - 215, n=24)
185.1 fps +16%
Asus TUF Gaming A15 FA506IV-HN172
AMD Ryzen 7 4800H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile
160 (142min - 179max) fps
MSI Alpha 15 A3DDK-034
AMD Ryzen 7 3750H, AMD Radeon RX 5500M
129 fps -19%
HP Omen 15-dc1020ng
Intel Core i5-9300H, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile
109.6 fps -31%
1920x1080 High Graphics & Postprocessing (Nvidia HairWorks Off)
Average of class Gaming
  (35.6 - 449, n=124, last 2 years)
239 fps +128%
MSI GL65 9SEK
Intel Core i7-9750H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile
117.5 fps +12%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile
  (74.4 - 131, n=33)
111.3 fps +6%
Asus TUF Gaming A15 FA506IV-HN172
AMD Ryzen 7 4800H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile
105 (90min - 115max) fps
Asus ROG Zephyrus G15 GA502DU
AMD Ryzen 7 3750H, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q
83.9 fps -20%
MSI Alpha 15 A3DDK-034
AMD Ryzen 7 3750H, AMD Radeon RX 5500M
73.3 fps -30%
HP Omen 15-dc1020ng
Intel Core i5-9300H, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile
62.2 fps -41%
1920x1080 Ultra Graphics & Postprocessing (HBAO+)
Average of class Gaming
  (18.4 - 216, n=167, last 2 years)
127.2 fps +110%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile
  (50.6 - 74, n=40)
61.1 fps +1%
Asus TUF Gaming A15 FA506IV-HN172
AMD Ryzen 7 4800H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile
60.5 (51min - 68max) fps
MSI GL65 9SEK
Intel Core i7-9750H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile
58.7 fps -3%
Lenovo Legion Y540-15IRH-81SX00B2GE
Intel Core i7-9750H, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile
53.1 (50min, 51P1 - 58max) fps -12%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G15 GA502DU
AMD Ryzen 7 3750H, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q
48.8 fps -19%
MSI Alpha 15 A3DDK-034
AMD Ryzen 7 3750H, AMD Radeon RX 5500M
44.7 fps -26%
HP Omen 15-dc1020ng
Intel Core i5-9300H, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile
37 fps -39%
051015202530354045505560Tooltip
Asus TUF Gaming A15 FA506IV-HN172 GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile, R7 4800H, Kingston OM8PCP3512F-AB: Ø58.6 (54-62)
baixomédiaaltoultra
BioShock Infinite (2013) 232 209 189 119
The Witcher 3 (2015) 191 160 105 60.5
Dota 2 Reborn (2015) 103.8 94.7 85.4 81.3
Rise of the Tomb Raider (2016) 99.7 124 85.2
X-Plane 11.11 (2018) 69.9 63.9 55.6

Barulho

Ocioso
30.2 / 30.2 / 30.2 dB
Carga
40 / 49 dB
  red to green bar
 
 
30 dB
silencioso
40 dB(A)
audível
50 dB(A)
ruidosamente alto
 
min: dark, med: mid, max: light   Audix TM1, Arta (15 cm de distância)   environment noise: 30.2 dB(A)
Stress test: Prime95 only
Stress test: Prime95 only
Stress test: FurMark only
Stress test: FurMark only
 37.8 °C42.9 °C42.6 °C 
 30.3 °C41.9 °C38.4 °C 
 26.2 °C26.9 °C26.9 °C 
Máximo: 42.9 °C
Médio: 34.9 °C
49.9 °C42.2 °C44.2 °C
34 °C35.5 °C27.2 °C
27 °C26.4 °C26.4 °C
Máximo: 49.9 °C
Médio: 34.8 °C
alimentação elétrica  39.2 °C | Temperatura do quarto 23.7 °C | FIRT 550-Pocket
(±) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 34.9 °C / 95 F, compared to the average of 33.9 °C / 93 F for the devices in the class Gaming.
(±) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 42.9 °C / 109 F, compared to the average of 40.5 °C / 105 F, ranging from 21.2 to 68.8 °C for the class Gaming.
(-) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 49.9 °C / 122 F, compared to the average of 43.2 °C / 110 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 26.4 °C / 80 F, compared to the device average of 33.9 °C / 93 F.
(±) Playing The Witcher 3, the average temperature for the upper side is 32.9 °C / 91 F, compared to the device average of 33.9 °C / 93 F.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are cooler than skin temperature with a maximum of 26.9 °C / 80.4 F and are therefore cool to the touch.
(±) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.9 °C / 84 F (+2 °C / 3.6 F).
dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2031.533.22528.530.83127.430.34026.528.75024.927.86325.327.4802328.51002228.512522.328.816022.239.920022.151.325020.958.231520.657.640020.357.650019.660.463019.365.580018.766.3100018.463.8125018.166.4160017.265.5200016.766.5250016.468.3315015.667.7400015.565.4500015.661.7630015.564.2800015.561.81000015.357.11250014.960.9160001560.4SPL29.377.4N1.240.7median 18.1median 61.7Delta2.57.4hearing rangehide median Pink NoiseLenovo Legion Y540-15IRH-81SX00B2GE
Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)
Lenovo Legion Y540-15IRH-81SX00B2GE audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (77.4 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 17.7% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (11.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 3.7% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (4.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3.3% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (5.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (18.1% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 55% of all tested devices in this class were better, 8% similar, 37% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 18%, worst was 132%
Compared to all devices tested
» 35% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 58% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Consumo de energia
desligadodarklight 0.5 / 0.7 Watt
Ociosodarkmidlight 5.4 / 10 / 10.5 Watt
Carga midlight 135 / 147 Watt
 color bar
Key: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
Asus TUF Gaming A15 FA506IV-HN172
R7 4800H, GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile, Kingston OM8PCP3512F-AB, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6"
Lenovo Legion Y540-15IRH-81SX00B2GE
i7-9750H, GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile, WDC PC SN720 SDAPNTW-512G, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6"
MSI Alpha 15 A3DDK-034
R7 3750H, Radeon RX 5500M, Kingston RBUSNS8154P3512GJ, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6"
MSI GL65 9SEK
i7-9750H, GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile, WDC PC SN520 SDAPNUW-512G, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6"
HP Omen 15-dc1020ng
i5-9300H, GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile, WDC PC SN720 SDAQNTW-512G, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6"
Asus ROG Zephyrus G15 GA502DU
R7 3750H, GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q, Intel SSD 660p SSDPEKNW512G8, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6"
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile
 
Average of class Gaming
 
Power Consumption
-56%
-68%
-230%
20%
-36%
-64%
-88%
Idle Minimum *
5.4
14.5
-169%
14
-159%
41
-659%
4.04
25%
7.4
-37%
11.5 ?(2.9 - 41, n=36)
-113%
Idle Average *
10
18.5
-85%
18
-80%
45.3
-353%
7.2
28%
8.6
14%
16.5 ?(5.9 - 45.3, n=36)
-65%
Idle Maximum *
10.5
20
-90%
32
-205%
47.1
-349%
11.4
-9%
39.1
-272%
23.7 ?(8.5 - 47.1, n=36)
-126%
Load Average *
135
81.6
40%
64
53%
94.9
30%
80.8
40%
65.9
51%
107.5 ?(82 - 147, n=37)
20%
Witcher 3 ultra *
144
132
8%
123
15%
149.4
-4%
93.6
35%
106.9
26%
Load Maximum *
147
208.1
-42%
193
-31%
214.2
-46%
144.5
2%
141.3
4%
199.7 ?(145 - 243, n=37)
-36%

* ... smaller is better

Tempo de Execução da Bateria
Ocioso (sem WLAN, min brilho)
9h 47min
WiFi Websurfing (EDGE: 44.18362.449.0)
6h 10min
WiFi Websurfing max. Brightness (EDGE: 44.18362.449.0)
5h 29min
Big Buck Bunny H.264 1080p
5h 22min
Carga (máximo brilho)
1h 56min
Asus TUF Gaming A15 FA506IV-HN172
R7 4800H, GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile, 48 Wh
Lenovo Legion Y540-15IRH-81SX00B2GE
i7-9750H, GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile, 57 Wh
MSI Alpha 15 A3DDK-034
R7 3750H, Radeon RX 5500M, 51 Wh
MSI GL65 9SEK
i7-9750H, GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile, 51 Wh
HP Omen 15-dc1020ng
i5-9300H, GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile, 52.5 Wh
Asus ROG Zephyrus G15 GA502DU
R7 3750H, GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q, 76 Wh
Average of class Gaming
 
Battery Runtime
-51%
-40%
-47%
19%
31%
-1%
Reader / Idle
587
240
-59%
349
-41%
262
-55%
951
62%
916
56%
H.264
322
234
-27%
482
50%
WiFi v1.3
370
145
-61%
245
-34%
230
-38%
385
4%
482
30%
Load
116
76
-34%
49
-58%
60
-48%
71
-39%
123
6%
Witcher 3 ultra
59
Maximum battery life
Maximum battery life
Minimum battery life
Minimum battery life
Wi-Fi runtime (70 % brightness)
Wi-Fi runtime (70 % brightness)
Wi-Fi runtime (100 % brightness)
Wi-Fi runtime (100 % brightness)
H.264 battery life
H.264 battery life
Battery charge time
Battery charge time

Pro

+ O Ryzen 7 4800H oferece desempenho multi-thread mais rápido que o do Core i7-10875H
+ GeForce RTX 2060 com 6 GB de VRAM
+ Tela de 144-Hz com boa relação de contraste
+ Botões do mouse dedicados e porta USB Type-C integrada
+ Boas opções de manutenção; 3 baias para armazenamento massivo, 2 SODIMM
+ Boa duração da bateria
+ Teclado iluminado

Contra

- Sem deslizador de webcam, IV ou leitor de digitais
- Sem iluminação RGB por tecla, sem Thunderbolt 3
- Sem leitor de cartões SD
- Teclas de setas pequenas
- Gama de cores pobre
- Sem Wi-Fi 6
- Apenas 8 GB de RAM

Veredicto - Preço Competitivo e Desempenho Sólido

O Asus TUF A15 FA506 é um portátil para jogos com ótimo hardware por um preço justo. O aparelho pode ser adquirido de vários revendedores online por menos de 1.300 Euros (~$1.470), e vem com a novíssima CPU AMD Ryzen 7 4800H, que supera a sua contraparte Intel graças aos seus oito núcleos. A anterior é uma sólida CPU de jogos e adequada como base para uma máquina de jogos, que roda até mesmo jogos muito exigentes com detalhes no máximo quando emparelhada com a Nvidia GeForce RTX 2060.

Por falar de visual, a tela instalada oferece uma ótima relação de contraste e uma rápida taxa de atualização de 144-Hz. Além disso, não há PWM e, portanto, não há fadiga ocular adicional durante o uso prolongado. Dito isto, ficamos desapontados com a pequena gama de cores. Enquanto isso, a carcaça é decente, embora sua sensação não tenha nos convencido inteiramente devido à construção plástica. Pelo contrário, não temos nenhuma reclamação quando se trata de desempenho bruto, que pode ser parcialmente atribuído ao SoC da AMD. Dispositivos similares nesta classe de preço tendem a ser limitados a processadores com 6 núcleos. É difícil reclamar de dois núcleos adicionais pelo mesmo preço.

Com bom desempenho e um preço competitivo, o Asus TUF A15 FA506 vale definitivamente a pena considerar se você está procurando um portátil para jogos de baixo custo.

Além disso, a duração da bateria é surpreendentemente boa, o que não pode ser tomado como garantido, particularmente em um dispositivo de jogos. Se você está interessado neste sistema, vale a pena dar uma olhada nas opções de atualização de RAM e armazenamento. Infelizmente, nosso modelo só está equipado com a configuração mínima de memória para um portátil de jogos. Dito isto, 8 GB de RAM e 512 GB de armazenamento SSD ainda são suficientes para muitas tarefas e aplicações.

In review: Asus TUF A15 FA506, courtesy of Asus Germany
In review: Asus TUF A15 FA506, courtesy of Asus Germany

The Asus TUF A15 FA506 is a gaming laptop with great hardware for a fair price. The device can be purchased from various online retailers for below 1300 Euros (~$1470), and it comes with the brand-new AMD Ryzen 7 4800H CPU, which outperforms its Intel counterpart thanks to its eight cores. The former is a solid gaming CPU and suitable as a foundation for a gaming machine, which runs even very demanding games at maximum details when paired with the Nvidia GeForce RTX 2060.

Speaking of visuals, the installed display offers a great contrast ratio and a fast 144-Hz refresh rate. Furthermore, there is no PWM and thus, no additional eyestrain during prolonged use. That being said, we were disappointed with the small color gamut. Meanwhile, the case is decent, although its feel did not entirely convince us due to the full plastic construction. By contrast, we have no complaints at all when it comes to raw performance, which can be partially attributed to the AMD SoC. Similar devices in this price class tend to be limited to 6-core processors. It is hard to complain about two additional cores for the same price.

With good performance and a competitive price, the Asus TUF A15 FA506 is definitely worth considering if you are looking for an inexpensive gaming laptop.

Furthermore, the battery life is surprisingly good, which cannot be taken for granted, particularly on a gaming device. If you are interested in this system, RAM and storage upgrade options are worth taking a look at. Unfortunately, our model is only equipped with the bare minimum memory configuration for a gaming laptop. That being said, 8 GB of RAM and 512 GB of SSD storage are still sufficient for many tasks and applications.

Asus TUF Gaming A15 FA506IV-HN172 - 06/09/2020 v7 (old)
Sebastian Bade

Acabamento
81 / 98 → 83%
Teclado
81%
Mouse
86%
Conectividade
58 / 80 → 72%
Peso
62 / 10-66 → 93%
Bateria
66 / 95 → 69%
Pantalha
81%
Desempenho do jogos
91%
Desempenho da aplicação
86%
Workstation
76%
Temperatura
89 / 95 → 93%
Ruído
83 / 90 → 93%
Audio
70%
Camera
39 / 85 → 46%
Médio
75%
83%
Gaming - Médio equilibrado

Price comparison

Please share our article, every link counts!
Mail Logo
> Análises e revisões de portáteis e celulares > Análises > Análises > Breve Análise do Asus TUF A15 com AMD Renoir e gráficos Nvidia Graphics
Sebastian Bade, 2020-06-16 (Update: 2021-03-12)