Breve Análise do Asus TUF A15 com AMD Renoir e gráficos Nvidia Graphics

Name: Asus TUF Gaming A15 FA506IV-HN172
Brand: Asus

Excelente valor!

Com seus mais recentes portáteis para jogos TUF, a Asus conta com o novíssimo SoC Renoir da AMD. Um olhar mais atento aos resultados de desempenho mostra que, combinada com a GPU Nvidia, esta é uma poderosa máquina de jogos. No artigo seguinte vamos determinar se a nossa análise do Asus TUF A15 FA506 confirma isso.

Sebastian Bade, 👁 Sebastian Jentsch, ✓ Felicitas Krohn (traduzido por Ricardo Soto), Published 06/16/2020 🇺🇸 🇩🇪 ...

AMD Gaming Geforce Laptop / Notebook Renoir Windows

Test device courtesy of Asus Deutschland

Download your licensed rating image as PNG / SVG

Asus TUF Gaming A15 FA506IV-HN172 (TUF Gaming A15 FA506 Serie)

Processador

AMD Ryzen 7 4800H 8 x 2.9 - 4.2 GHz, Renoir-H (Zen 2)

Placa gráfica

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile - 6 GB VRAM, Análises do: 1350 MHz, Memoría: 5500 MHz, GDDR6, Nvidia 442.53

Memória

8 GB

, DDR4

Pantalha

15.60 polegadas 16:9, 1920 x 1080 pixel 141 PPI, LM156LF-2F01, IPS, Brilhante: não, 144 Hz

placa mãe

AMD Promontory/Bixby FCH

Disco rígido

Kingston OM8PCP3512F-AB, 512 GB

, SSD M.2 2280, 450 GB livre

Placa de Som

Realtek Audio

Conexões

1 USB 2.0, 2 USB 3.0, 1 USB 3.1 Gen2, 1 Thunderbolt, 1 HDMI, 1 DisplayPort, 1 Kensington Lock, Conexões Audio: Conector de áudio de 3,5 mm

Funcionamento em rede

Realtek PCIe GBE Family Controller (10/100/1000MBit/s), Realtek 8822CE Wireless LAN 802.11ac PCI-E NIC (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/), Bluetooth 5

Tamanho

altura x largura x profundidade (em mm): 24.9 x 359 x 256

Bateria

48 Wh, 4110 mAh Lítio-Ion

Sistema Operativo

Microsoft Windows 10 Home 64 Bit

Camera

Webcam: HD
Primary Camera: 0.9 MPix

Características adicionais

Alto falantes: Estéreo, Teclado: Chiclet de 6 filas, Adaptador de CA de 230 watts, 24 Meses Garantia

peso

2.175 kg, Suprimento de energia: 754 g

Preço

1299 EUR

Links

Asus página inicial
Asus Seção de notebook

Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

see all specifications

Rating	Date	Model	Weight	Height	Size	Resolution
82.7 % v7 ^(old)	06/2020	Asus TUF Gaming A15 FA506IV-HN172 R7 4800H, GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile	2.2 kg	24.9 mm	15.60"	1920x1080
82.3 % v7 ^(old)	08/2019	Lenovo Legion Y540-15IRH-81SX00B2GE i7-9750H, GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile	2.2 kg	26 mm	15.60"	1920x1080
78.8 % v7 ^(old)	02/2020	MSI Alpha 15 A3DDK-034 R7 3750H, Radeon RX 5500M	2.3 kg	27.5 mm	15.60"	1920x1080
80.8 % v7 ^(old)	10/2019	MSI GL65 9SEK i7-9750H, GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile	2.3 kg	27.5 mm	15.60"	1920x1080
81.5 % v7 ^(old)	07/2019	HP Omen 15-dc1020ng i5-9300H, GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile	2.3 kg	25 mm	15.60"	1920x1080
83.3 % v6 ^(old)	05/2019	Asus ROG Zephyrus G15 GA502DU R7 3750H, GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q	2.1 kg	20.4 mm	15.60"	1920x1080

Size Comparison

Lenovo Legion Y540-15IRH-81SX00B2GE MSI Alpha 15 A3DDK-034 MSI GL65 9SEK HP Omen 15-dc1020ng Asus TUF Gaming A15 FA506IV-HN172 Asus ROG Zephyrus G15 GA502DU DIN A4 ❌

Left: AC adapter, HDMI 2.0b, RJ45, 2x Type-A USB 3.2 (Gen 1), Type-C USB 3.2 (Gen 2) with display support DP1.4, combined audio jack

Networking
iperf3 transmit AX12
HP Omen 15-dc1020ng Intel Wireless-AC 9560	680 MBit/s +3%
Asus TUF Gaming A15 FA506IV-HN172 Realtek 8822CE Wireless LAN 802.11ac PCI-E NIC	662 (553^min - 769^max) MBit/s
MSI Alpha 15 A3DDK-034 Realtek 8822CE Wireless LAN 802.11ac PCI-E NIC	634 MBit/s -4%
Lenovo Legion Y540-15IRH-81SX00B2GE Intel Wireless-AC 9560	630 MBit/s -5%
Average Realtek 8822CE Wireless LAN 802.11ac PCI-E NIC (87 - 690, n=29)	618 MBit/s -7%
MSI GL65 9SEK Intel Wireless-AC 9560	355 MBit/s -46%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G15 GA502DU Realtek 8821CE Wireless LAN 802.11ac PCI-E NIC	252 MBit/s -62%
iperf3 receive AX12
MSI Alpha 15 A3DDK-034 Realtek 8822CE Wireless LAN 802.11ac PCI-E NIC	665 MBit/s +6%
HP Omen 15-dc1020ng Intel Wireless-AC 9560	646 MBit/s +3%
MSI GL65 9SEK Intel Wireless-AC 9560	637 MBit/s +1%
Asus TUF Gaming A15 FA506IV-HN172 Realtek 8822CE Wireless LAN 802.11ac PCI-E NIC	630 (571^min - 641^max) MBit/s
Average Realtek 8822CE Wireless LAN 802.11ac PCI-E NIC (486 - 685, n=29)	622 MBit/s -1%
Lenovo Legion Y540-15IRH-81SX00B2GE Intel Wireless-AC 9560	619 MBit/s -2%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G15 GA502DU Realtek 8821CE Wireless LAN 802.11ac PCI-E NIC	332 MBit/s -47%

Asus TUF Gaming A15 FA506IV-HN172; iperf3 receive AX12; iperf 3.1.3: Ø629 (571-641)

Asus TUF Gaming A15 FA506IV-HN172; iperf3 transmit AX12; iperf 3.1.3: Ø661 (553-769)

ColorChecker Asus TUF Gaming A15 FA506IV-HN172: 13.44 ∆E min: 2.33 - max: 24.17 ∆E


252 cd/m²	247 cd/m²	251 cd/m²
253 cd/m²	280 cd/m²	246 cd/m²
249 cd/m²	260 cd/m²	251 cd/m²

Distribuição do brilho

LM156LF-2F01 tested with Xrite i1 Pro

Máximo: 280 cd/m² (Nits) Médio: 254.3 cd/m² Minimum: 12 cd/m²
iluminação: 88 %
iluminação com acumulador: 280 cd/m²
Contraste: 1867:1 (Preto: 0.15 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 5.89 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.93, calibrated: 4.79
ΔE Greyscale 4.08 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
58% sRGB (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
37% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
40.22% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
58.5% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
38.92% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.33

Download Arquivo ICC (X-Rite i1Pro 2)

	Asus TUF Gaming A15 FA506IV-HN172 LM156LF-2F01, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6"	Lenovo Legion Y540-15IRH-81SX00B2GE BOE 084D, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6"	MSI Alpha 15 A3DDK-034 AU Optronics B156HAN08.0 (AUO80ED), IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6"	MSI GL65 9SEK AU Optronics B156HAN13.0, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6"	HP Omen 15-dc1020ng LGD05CE, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6"	Asus ROG Zephyrus G15 GA502DU Panda LM156LF-CL03, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6"
Display		61%	64%	-6%	-1%	4%
Display P3 Coverage	38.92	63.6 63%	66.4 71%	36.63 -6%	38.37 -1%	40.33 4%
sRGB Coverage	58.5	91.7 57%	91 56%	55 -6%	57.6 -2%	60.6 4%
AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage	40.22	65.2 62%	66.6 66%	37.85 -6%	39.69 -1%	41.69 4%
Response Times		62%	68%	-2%	-21%	-9%
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% *	34 ?(16, 18)	8.8 ?(4, 4.4) 74%	7 ?(3.4, 3.6) 79%	26.4 ?(13.2, 13.2) 22%	40 ?(21.2, 18.8) -18%	34 ?(17.2, 16.8) -0%
Response Time Black / White *	24 ?(13, 11)	12 ?(6.8, 5.2) 50%	10.4 ?(5.2, 5.2) 57%	30 ?(17.6, 12.4) -25%	29.6 ?(17.2, 12.4) -23%	28 ?(17.2, 10.8) -17%
PWM Frequency						21280 ?(34)
Screen		15%	11%	-4%	-7%	-11%
Brightness middle	280	299 7%	310 11%	277.3 -1%	251 -10%	240.1 -14%
Brightness	254	290 14%	310 22%	256 1%	232 -9%	231 -9%
Brightness Distribution	88	89 1%	86 -2%	86 -2%	76 -14%	85 -3%
Black Level *	0.15	0.29 -93%	0.29 -93%	0.2 -33%	0.17 -13%	0.34 -127%
Contrast	1867	1031 -45%	1069 -43%	1387 -26%	1476 -21%	706 -62%
Colorchecker dE 2000 *	5.89	3.7 37%	4.78 19%	5.25 11%	6.2 -5%	4.2 29%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *	19	7 63%	8.1 57%	19.43 -2%	18.6 2%	17.8 6%
Colorchecker dE 2000 calibrated *	4.79	2 58%	2.36 51%	4.39 8%	4.8 -0%	4.09 15%
Greyscale dE 2000 *	4.08	4.1 -0%	4.78 -17%	3.5 14%	4.2 -3%	2.8 31%
Gamma	2.33 ^94%	2.19 ^100%	2.43 ^91%	2.1 ^105%	2.32 ^95%	2.2 ^100%
CCT	7303 ^89%	7166 ^91%	7739 ^84%	6895 ^94%	7454 ^87%	6925 ^94%
Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998)	37	59.3 60%	59 59%	35 -5%	36.5 -1%	38.4 4%
Color Space (Percent of sRGB)	58	91.5 58%	91 57%	55 -5%	57.4 -1%	60.4 4%
Total Average (Program / Settings)		46% / 29%	48% / 28%	-4% / -4%	-10% / -8%	-5% / -8%

* ... smaller is better

Display Response Times

ℹ

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.

↔ Response Time Black to White
24 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↗ 13 ms rise
24 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↘ 11 ms fall
The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 50 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (21 ms).
↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
34 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↗ 16 ms rise
34 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↘ 18 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 42 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is similar to the average of all tested devices (32.9 ms).

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

ℹ

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.

Screen flickering / PWM not detected

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8774 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured.

Cinebench R20: CPU (Single Core) | CPU (Multi Core)
Cinebench R15: CPU Single 64Bit | CPU Multi 64Bit
Blender: v2.79 BMW27 CPU
7-Zip 18.03: 7z b 4 -mmt1 | 7z b 4
Geekbench 5.5: Single-Core | Multi-Core
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2: 4k Preset
LibreOffice : 20 Documents To PDF
R Benchmark 2.5: Overall mean

Cinebench R20 / CPU (Single Core)
Average of class Gaming (427 - 856, n=193, last 2 years)	721 Points +49%
Average Intel Core i7-10875H (430 - 524, n=32)	486 Points 0%
Asus TUF Gaming A15 FA506IV-HN172 AMD Ryzen 7 4800H	485 Points
MSI GL65 9SEK Intel Core i7-9750H	465 Points -4%
Lenovo Legion Y540-15IRH-81SX00B2GE Intel Core i7-9750H	458 Points -6%
HP Omen 15-dc1020ng Intel Core i5-9300H	419 Points -14%
MSI Alpha 15 A3DDK-034 AMD Ryzen 7 3750H	352 Points -27%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G15 GA502DU AMD Ryzen 7 3750H	340 Points -30%

Cinebench R20 / CPU (Multi Core)
Average of class Gaming (2179 - 13832, n=193, last 2 years)	8222 Points +93%
Asus TUF Gaming A15 FA506IV-HN172 AMD Ryzen 7 4800H	4257 Points
Average Intel Core i7-10875H (1986 - 4176, n=32)	3455 Points -19%
MSI GL65 9SEK Intel Core i7-9750H	2785 Points -35%
Lenovo Legion Y540-15IRH-81SX00B2GE Intel Core i7-9750H	2595 Points -39%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G15 GA502DU AMD Ryzen 7 3750H	1825 Points -57%
HP Omen 15-dc1020ng Intel Core i5-9300H	1723 Points -60%
MSI Alpha 15 A3DDK-034 AMD Ryzen 7 3750H	1633 Points -62%

Cinebench R15 / CPU Single 64Bit
Average of class Gaming (176.6 - 318, n=197, last 2 years)	276 Points +48%
Average Intel Core i7-10875H (190 - 220, n=37)	204 Points +10%
MSI GL65 9SEK Intel Core i7-9750H	188 Points +1%
Lenovo Legion Y540-15IRH-81SX00B2GE Intel Core i7-9750H	187 Points +1%
Asus TUF Gaming A15 FA506IV-HN172 AMD Ryzen 7 4800H	186 Points
HP Omen 15-dc1020ng Intel Core i5-9300H	171 Points -8%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G15 GA502DU AMD Ryzen 7 3750H	144 Points -23%
MSI Alpha 15 A3DDK-034 AMD Ryzen 7 3750H	143 Points -23%

Cinebench R15 / CPU Multi 64Bit
Average of class Gaming (905 - 5663, n=200, last 2 years)	3387 Points +83%
Asus TUF Gaming A15 FA506IV-HN172 AMD Ryzen 7 4800H	1850 Points
Average Intel Core i7-10875H (1003 - 1833, n=38)	1554 Points -16%
MSI GL65 9SEK Intel Core i7-9750H	1281 Points -31%
Lenovo Legion Y540-15IRH-81SX00B2GE Intel Core i7-9750H	1155 (899.54^min - 1211.72^max) Points -38%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G15 GA502DU AMD Ryzen 7 3750H	805 Points -56%
HP Omen 15-dc1020ng Intel Core i5-9300H	769 Points -58%
MSI Alpha 15 A3DDK-034 AMD Ryzen 7 3750H	734 Points -60%

Blender / v2.79 BMW27 CPU
HP Omen 15-dc1020ng Intel Core i5-9300H	643 Seconds * -145%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G15 GA502DU AMD Ryzen 7 3750H	584 Seconds * -122%
Lenovo Legion Y540-15IRH-81SX00B2GE Intel Core i7-9750H	410 Seconds * -56%
Average Intel Core i7-10875H (259 - 535, n=30)	327 Seconds * -25%
Asus TUF Gaming A15 FA506IV-HN172 AMD Ryzen 7 4800H	262.5 Seconds *
Average of class Gaming (87 - 555, n=188, last 2 years)	172.4 Seconds * +34%

7-Zip 18.03 / 7z b 4 -mmt1
Average of class Gaming (4168 - 7581, n=192, last 2 years)	6279 MIPS +35%
Average Intel Core i7-10875H (5071 - 5780, n=31)	5360 MIPS +15%
Lenovo Legion Y540-15IRH-81SX00B2GE Intel Core i7-9750H	4962 MIPS +6%
Asus TUF Gaming A15 FA506IV-HN172 AMD Ryzen 7 4800H	4666 MIPS
HP Omen 15-dc1020ng Intel Core i5-9300H	4626 MIPS -1%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G15 GA502DU AMD Ryzen 7 3750H	3511 MIPS -25%

7-Zip 18.03 / 7z b 4
Average of class Gaming (23795 - 140932, n=192, last 2 years)	84502 MIPS +85%
Asus TUF Gaming A15 FA506IV-HN172 AMD Ryzen 7 4800H	45679 MIPS
Average Intel Core i7-10875H (29844 - 49562, n=31)	43117 MIPS -6%
Lenovo Legion Y540-15IRH-81SX00B2GE Intel Core i7-9750H	34458 MIPS -25%
HP Omen 15-dc1020ng Intel Core i5-9300H	20736 MIPS -55%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G15 GA502DU AMD Ryzen 7 3750H	18689 MIPS -59%

Geekbench 5.5 / Single-Core
Average of class Gaming (986 - 2210, n=193, last 2 years)	1881 Points +61%
Average Intel Core i7-10875H (1233 - 1371, n=29)	1304 Points +12%
Asus TUF Gaming A15 FA506IV-HN172 AMD Ryzen 7 4800H	1166 Points
MSI Alpha 15 A3DDK-034 AMD Ryzen 7 3750H	874 Points -25%

Geekbench 5.5 / Multi-Core
Average of class Gaming (4557 - 23194, n=193, last 2 years)	14867 Points +151%
Average Intel Core i7-10875H (5715 - 8620, n=29)	7734 Points +31%
Asus TUF Gaming A15 FA506IV-HN172 AMD Ryzen 7 4800H	5920 Points
MSI Alpha 15 A3DDK-034 AMD Ryzen 7 3750H	3537 Points -40%

HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 / 4k Preset
Average of class Gaming (6.72 - 38.9, n=192, last 2 years)	23.3 fps +116%
Average Intel Core i7-10875H (7.27 - 14.1, n=27)	11.7 fps +8%
Asus TUF Gaming A15 FA506IV-HN172 AMD Ryzen 7 4800H	10.8 fps
Lenovo Legion Y540-15IRH-81SX00B2GE Intel Core i7-9750H	9.2 fps -15%
HP Omen 15-dc1020ng Intel Core i5-9300H	5.7 fps -47%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G15 GA502DU AMD Ryzen 7 3750H	4.352 fps -60%

LibreOffice / 20 Documents To PDF
Average Intel Core i7-10875H (30.2 - 84.3, n=30)	50.3 s * -76%
Average of class Gaming (31.4 - 96.6, n=189, last 2 years)	47.6 s * -66%
Asus TUF Gaming A15 FA506IV-HN172 AMD Ryzen 7 4800H	28.6 s *

R Benchmark 2.5 / Overall mean
Asus TUF Gaming A15 FA506IV-HN172 AMD Ryzen 7 4800H	0.603 sec *
Average Intel Core i7-10875H (0.546 - 0.662, n=29)	0.582 sec * +3%
Average of class Gaming (0.3609 - 0.759, n=193, last 2 years)	0.4402 sec * +27%

* ... smaller is better

Cinebench R15 Multi-Thread Loop

Asus TUF Gaming A15 FA506IV-HN172: Ø1753 (1601.6-1850.14)

Cinebench R10 Shading 32Bit

10064

Cinebench R10 Rendering Single CPUs 64Bit

9712 Points

Cinebench R10 Rendering Multiple CPUs 64Bit

61208 Points

Cinebench R10 Shading 64Bit

10190 Points

Cinebench R10 Rendering Single 32Bit

5643

Cinebench R10 Rendering Multiple CPUs 32Bit

37236

Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 32Bit

19.85 Points

Cinebench R11.5 OpenGL 32Bit

71.7 fps

Cinebench R11.5 CPU Single 64Bit

2.16 Points

Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 64Bit

21.1 Points

Cinebench R11.5 OpenGL 64Bit

69.6 fps

Cinebench R11.5 CPU Single 32Bit

2.04 Points

Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64Bit

186 Points

Cinebench R15 Ref. Match 64Bit

99.6 %

Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64Bit

99.2 fps

Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64Bit

1850 Points

Ajuda

... comparado com

PCMark 10 | PCMark 8

PCMark 10
Score
Average of class Gaming (5776 - 9852, n=170, last 2 years)	7770 Points +53%
MSI GL65 9SEK GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile, i7-9750H, WDC PC SN520 SDAPNUW-512G	5761 Points +13%
Lenovo Legion Y540-15IRH-81SX00B2GE GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile, i7-9750H, WDC PC SN720 SDAPNTW-512G	5716 Points +12%
Average AMD Ryzen 7 4800H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile (5095 - 5766, n=6)	5510 Points +8%
Asus TUF Gaming A15 FA506IV-HN172 GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile, R7 4800H, Kingston OM8PCP3512F-AB	5095 Points
HP Omen 15-dc1020ng GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile, i5-9300H, WDC PC SN720 SDAQNTW-512G	4873 Points -4%
MSI Alpha 15 A3DDK-034 Radeon RX 5500M, R7 3750H, Kingston RBUSNS8154P3512GJ	4605 Points -10%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G15 GA502DU GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q, R7 3750H, Intel SSD 660p SSDPEKNW512G8	4322 Points -15%
Essentials
Average of class Gaming (9057 - 12334, n=169, last 2 years)	10832 Points +23%
MSI GL65 9SEK GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile, i7-9750H, WDC PC SN520 SDAPNUW-512G	9431 Points +7%
Average AMD Ryzen 7 4800H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile (8806 - 9784, n=6)	9285 Points +5%
Lenovo Legion Y540-15IRH-81SX00B2GE GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile, i7-9750H, WDC PC SN720 SDAPNTW-512G	9020 Points +2%
Asus TUF Gaming A15 FA506IV-HN172 GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile, R7 4800H, Kingston OM8PCP3512F-AB	8806 Points
HP Omen 15-dc1020ng GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile, i5-9300H, WDC PC SN720 SDAQNTW-512G	8575 Points -3%
MSI Alpha 15 A3DDK-034 Radeon RX 5500M, R7 3750H, Kingston RBUSNS8154P3512GJ	8174 Points -7%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G15 GA502DU GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q, R7 3750H, Intel SSD 660p SSDPEKNW512G8	7424 Points -16%
Productivity
Average of class Gaming (6662 - 14612, n=169, last 2 years)	9878 Points +38%
MSI GL65 9SEK GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile, i7-9750H, WDC PC SN520 SDAPNUW-512G	7748 Points +8%
Lenovo Legion Y540-15IRH-81SX00B2GE GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile, i7-9750H, WDC PC SN720 SDAPNTW-512G	7430 Points +4%
Average AMD Ryzen 7 4800H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile (7122 - 7586, n=6)	7296 Points +2%
HP Omen 15-dc1020ng GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile, i5-9300H, WDC PC SN720 SDAQNTW-512G	7261 Points +1%
Asus TUF Gaming A15 FA506IV-HN172 GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile, R7 4800H, Kingston OM8PCP3512F-AB	7156 Points
Asus ROG Zephyrus G15 GA502DU GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q, R7 3750H, Intel SSD 660p SSDPEKNW512G8	6305 Points -12%
MSI Alpha 15 A3DDK-034 Radeon RX 5500M, R7 3750H, Kingston RBUSNS8154P3512GJ	6067 Points -15%
Digital Content Creation
Average of class Gaming (6703 - 18475, n=169, last 2 years)	12015 Points +111%
Lenovo Legion Y540-15IRH-81SX00B2GE GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile, i7-9750H, WDC PC SN720 SDAPNTW-512G	7564 Points +33%
MSI GL65 9SEK GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile, i7-9750H, WDC PC SN520 SDAPNUW-512G	7104 Points +25%
Average AMD Ryzen 7 4800H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile (5695 - 7887, n=6)	6724 Points +18%
Asus TUF Gaming A15 FA506IV-HN172 GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile, R7 4800H, Kingston OM8PCP3512F-AB	5695 Points
MSI Alpha 15 A3DDK-034 Radeon RX 5500M, R7 3750H, Kingston RBUSNS8154P3512GJ	5344 Points -6%
HP Omen 15-dc1020ng GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile, i5-9300H, WDC PC SN720 SDAQNTW-512G	5044 Points -11%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G15 GA502DU GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q, R7 3750H, Intel SSD 660p SSDPEKNW512G8	4682 Points -18%

PCMark 8
Home Score Accelerated v2
Average of class Gaming (4560 - 5937, n=20, last 2 years)	5223 Points +11%
Average AMD Ryzen 7 4800H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile (4698 - 5197, n=4)	4912 Points +5%
Asus TUF Gaming A15 FA506IV-HN172 GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile, R7 4800H, Kingston OM8PCP3512F-AB	4698 Points
Lenovo Legion Y540-15IRH-81SX00B2GE GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile, i7-9750H, WDC PC SN720 SDAPNTW-512G	4507 Points -4%
MSI GL65 9SEK GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile, i7-9750H, WDC PC SN520 SDAPNUW-512G	4136 Points -12%
MSI Alpha 15 A3DDK-034 Radeon RX 5500M, R7 3750H, Kingston RBUSNS8154P3512GJ	4121 Points -12%
HP Omen 15-dc1020ng GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile, i5-9300H, WDC PC SN720 SDAQNTW-512G	3691 Points -21%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G15 GA502DU GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q, R7 3750H, Intel SSD 660p SSDPEKNW512G8	3642 Points -22%
Work Score Accelerated v2
Average of class Gaming (5520 - 6853, n=18, last 2 years)	6102 Points +6%
Average AMD Ryzen 7 4800H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile (5742 - 5983, n=4)	5867 Points +2%
Asus TUF Gaming A15 FA506IV-HN172 GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile, R7 4800H, Kingston OM8PCP3512F-AB	5773 Points
MSI GL65 9SEK GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile, i7-9750H, WDC PC SN520 SDAPNUW-512G	5287 Points -8%
HP Omen 15-dc1020ng GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile, i5-9300H, WDC PC SN720 SDAQNTW-512G	5107 Points -12%
MSI Alpha 15 A3DDK-034 Radeon RX 5500M, R7 3750H, Kingston RBUSNS8154P3512GJ	5045 Points -13%
Lenovo Legion Y540-15IRH-81SX00B2GE GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile, i7-9750H, WDC PC SN720 SDAPNTW-512G	5041 Points -13%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G15 GA502DU GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q, R7 3750H, Intel SSD 660p SSDPEKNW512G8	4956 Points -14%

PCMark 8 Home Score Accelerated v2		4698 pontos
PCMark 8 Creative Score Accelerated v2		7841 pontos
PCMark 8 Work Score Accelerated v2		5773 pontos
PCMark 10 Score		5095 pontos
Ajuda

DPC Latencies / LatencyMon - interrupt to process latency (max), Web, Youtube, Prime95
Asus TUF Gaming A15 FA506IV-HN172 GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile, R7 4800H, Kingston OM8PCP3512F-AB	797 μs *

* ... smaller is better

	Asus TUF Gaming A15 FA506IV-HN172 Kingston OM8PCP3512F-AB	Lenovo Legion Y540-15IRH-81SX00B2GE WDC PC SN720 SDAPNTW-512G	MSI Alpha 15 A3DDK-034 Kingston RBUSNS8154P3512GJ	MSI GL65 9SEK WDC PC SN520 SDAPNUW-512G	HP Omen 15-dc1020ng WDC PC SN720 SDAQNTW-512G	Asus ROG Zephyrus G15 GA502DU Intel SSD 660p SSDPEKNW512G8	Average Kingston OM8PCP3512F-AB
CrystalDiskMark 5.2 / 6		30%	-20%	10%	35%	-17%	-5%
Write 4K	219.8	158.8 -28%	105.4 -52%	150.2 -32%	112.1 -49%	132.2 -40%	194.5 ?(107.3 - 286, n=8) -12%
Read 4K	50.2	29.11 -42%	33.24 -34%	43.46 -13%	42.01 -16%	55.5 11%	47.3 ?(42.5 - 50.4, n=8) -6%
Write Seq	979	1584 62%	1029 5%	1412 44%	1964 101%	986 1%	978 ?(965 - 985, n=8) 0%
Read Seq	1990	1694 -15%	1098 -45%	1340 -33%	2065 4%	1318 -34%	1299 ?(1043 - 1990, n=8) -35%
Write 4K Q32T1	516	536 4%	322.1 -38%	482.2 -7%	318.2 -38%	220.3 -57%	505 ?(327 - 625, n=8) -2%
Read 4K Q32T1	298.3	363.9 22%	352 18%	535 79%	406.7 36%	315.5 6%	301 ?(298 - 303, n=8) 1%
Write Seq Q32T1	982	2536 158%	1036 5%	1454 48%	2534 158%	987 1%	978 ?(968 - 982, n=8) 0%
Read Seq Q32T1	1907	3458 81%	1606 -16%	1744 -9%	3438 80%	1416 -26%	1930 ?(1631 - 1986, n=8) 1%
Write 4K Q8T8	981						981 ?() 0%
Read 4K Q8T8	300.9						301 ?() 0%
AS SSD		63%	-9%	10%	66%	-10%	-9%
Seq Read	1682	2927 74%	1423 -15%	1315 -22%	2955 76%	907 -46%	1570 ?(252 - 1777, n=10) -7%
Seq Write	904	2149 138%	958 6%	1378 52%	2440 170%	926 2%	904 ?(716 - 941, n=10) 0%
4K Read	60.2	42.43 -30%	33.2 -45%	25.31 -58%	40.56 -33%	47.26 -21%	48.2 ?(36.2 - 60.2, n=10) -20%
4K Write	164.8	147.1 -11%	80.7 -51%	118.2 -28%	118.6 -28%	98.7 -40%	118.9 ?(66 - 170.5, n=10) -28%
4K-64 Read	472.5	1286 172%	816 73%	839 78%	1283 172%	321.5 -32%	415 ?(163.6 - 473, n=10) -12%
4K-64 Write	845	1432 69%	708 -16%	720 -15%	1538 82%	736 -13%	829 ?(263 - 928, n=10) -2%
Access Time Read *	0.087	0.065 25%	0.1 -15%	0.116 -33%	0.084 3%	0.064 26%	0.1294 ?(0.081 - 0.191, n=10) -49%
Access Time Write *	0.02	0.026 -30%	0.047 -135%	0.091 -355%	0.032 -60%	0.045 -125%	0.0371 ?(0.019 - 0.084, n=10) -86%
Score Read	701	1621 131%	991 41%	996 42%	1619 131%	459 -35%	619 ?(379 - 701, n=10) -12%
Score Write	1101	1794 63%	885 -20%	976 -11%	1901 73%	927 -16%	1036 ?(429 - 1178, n=10) -6%
Score Total	2143	4208 96%	2365 10%	2485 16%	4323 102%	1641 -23%	1955 ?(976 - 2184, n=10) -9%
Copy ISO MB/s	675		1043 55%	1279 89%	1418 110%	905 34%	977 ?(675 - 1277, n=7) 45%
Copy Program MB/s	248.4		252.7 2%	889 258%	392.5 58%	496.9 100%	373 ?(248 - 609, n=7) 50%
Copy Game MB/s	535		483.6 -10%	1218 128%	907 70%	819 53%	610 ?(144.6 - 977, n=7) 14%
Total Average (Program / Settings)		47% / 49%	-15% / -13%	10% / 10%	51% / 55%	-14% / -12%	-7% / -7%

* ... smaller is better

CrystalDiskMark 3.0

CrystalDiskMark 5.2 / 6

AS SSD

DiskSpd

Kingston OM8PCP3512F-AB

Sequential Read: 1136 MB/s

Sequential Write: 979 MB/s

512K Read: 892 MB/s

512K Write: 978 MB/s

4K Read: 38.53 MB/s

4K Write: 121.2 MB/s

4K QD32 Read: 297.9 MB/s

4K QD32 Write: 495.7 MB/s

Continuous read performance: DiskSpd Read Loop, Queue Depth 8

No graph data

3DMark 11 | 3DMark

3DMark 11 - 1280x720 Performance GPU
Average of class Gaming (1029 - 72178, n=188, last 2 years)	43480 Points +102%
Asus TUF Gaming A15 FA506IV-HN172 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile, AMD Ryzen 7 4800H	21480 Points
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile (19143 - 24662, n=40)	21459 Points 0%
MSI GL65 9SEK NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile, Intel Core i7-9750H	21075 Points -2%
Lenovo Legion Y540-15IRH-81SX00B2GE NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile, Intel Core i7-9750H	19553 Points -9%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G15 GA502DU NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q, AMD Ryzen 7 3750H	17170 Points -20%
MSI Alpha 15 A3DDK-034 AMD Radeon RX 5500M, AMD Ryzen 7 3750H	16335 Points -24%
HP Omen 15-dc1020ng NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile, Intel Core i5-9300H	13447 Points -37%

3DMark
1280x720 Cloud Gate Standard Graphics
Average of class Gaming (15902 - 193851, n=102, last 2 years)	142963 Points +158%
MSI GL65 9SEK NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile, Intel Core i7-9750H	107016 Points +93%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile (55324 - 116593, n=36)	93235 Points +69%
Lenovo Legion Y540-15IRH-81SX00B2GE NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile, Intel Core i7-9750H	92951 Points +68%
HP Omen 15-dc1020ng NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile, Intel Core i5-9300H	57365 Points +4%
Asus TUF Gaming A15 FA506IV-HN172 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile, AMD Ryzen 7 4800H	55325 Points
MSI Alpha 15 A3DDK-034 AMD Radeon RX 5500M, AMD Ryzen 7 3750H	46119 Points -17%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G15 GA502DU NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q, AMD Ryzen 7 3750H	44557 Points -19%
1920x1080 Fire Strike Graphics
Average of class Gaming (781 - 53059, n=198, last 2 years)	31223 Points +96%
MSI GL65 9SEK NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile, Intel Core i7-9750H	16331 Points +2%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile (14768 - 18358, n=43)	16301 Points +2%
Asus TUF Gaming A15 FA506IV-HN172 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile, AMD Ryzen 7 4800H	15967 Points
Lenovo Legion Y540-15IRH-81SX00B2GE NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile, Intel Core i7-9750H	14288 Points -11%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G15 GA502DU NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q, AMD Ryzen 7 3750H	13355 Points -16%
MSI Alpha 15 A3DDK-034 AMD Radeon RX 5500M, AMD Ryzen 7 3750H	12441 Points -22%
HP Omen 15-dc1020ng NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile, Intel Core i5-9300H	9536 Points -40%
2560x1440 Time Spy Graphics
Average of class Gaming (224 - 22717, n=193, last 2 years)	13010 Points +115%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile (5660 - 6910, n=41)	6206 Points +3%
MSI GL65 9SEK NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile, Intel Core i7-9750H	6159 Points +2%
Asus TUF Gaming A15 FA506IV-HN172 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile, AMD Ryzen 7 4800H	6043 Points
Asus ROG Zephyrus G15 GA502DU NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q, AMD Ryzen 7 3750H	4867 Points -19%
MSI Alpha 15 A3DDK-034 AMD Radeon RX 5500M, AMD Ryzen 7 3750H	4298 Points -29%
HP Omen 15-dc1020ng NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile, Intel Core i5-9300H	3565 Points -41%

3DMark 11 Performance		17390 pontos
3DMark Ice Storm Standard Score		72466 pontos
3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score		34649 pontos
3DMark Fire Strike Score		14757 pontos
3DMark Fire Strike Extreme Score		7382 pontos
3DMark Time Spy Score		6256 pontos
Ajuda

... comparado com

The Witcher 3
1024x768 Low Graphics & Postprocessing
Average of class Gaming (108.2 - 718, n=100, last 2 years)	451 fps +136%
MSI GL65 9SEK Intel Core i7-9750H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile	286 fps +50%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile (188.7 - 295, n=27)	256 fps +34%
Asus TUF Gaming A15 FA506IV-HN172 AMD Ryzen 7 4800H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile	191 (167^min - 211^max) fps
MSI Alpha 15 A3DDK-034 AMD Ryzen 7 3750H, AMD Radeon RX 5500M	173.6 fps -9%
HP Omen 15-dc1020ng Intel Core i5-9300H, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile	157.1 fps -18%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G15 GA502DU AMD Ryzen 7 3750H, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q	138.4 fps -28%
1366x768 Medium Graphics & Postprocessing
Average of class Gaming (168.5 - 617, n=103, last 2 years)	359 fps +124%
MSI GL65 9SEK Intel Core i7-9750H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile	204 fps +28%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile (152.2 - 215, n=24)	185.1 fps +16%
Asus TUF Gaming A15 FA506IV-HN172 AMD Ryzen 7 4800H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile	160 (142^min - 179^max) fps
MSI Alpha 15 A3DDK-034 AMD Ryzen 7 3750H, AMD Radeon RX 5500M	129 fps -19%
HP Omen 15-dc1020ng Intel Core i5-9300H, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile	109.6 fps -31%
1920x1080 High Graphics & Postprocessing (Nvidia HairWorks Off)
Average of class Gaming (35.6 - 449, n=126, last 2 years)	238 fps +127%
MSI GL65 9SEK Intel Core i7-9750H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile	117.5 fps +12%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile (74.4 - 131, n=33)	111.3 fps +6%
Asus TUF Gaming A15 FA506IV-HN172 AMD Ryzen 7 4800H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile	105 (90^min - 115^max) fps
Asus ROG Zephyrus G15 GA502DU AMD Ryzen 7 3750H, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q	83.9 fps -20%
MSI Alpha 15 A3DDK-034 AMD Ryzen 7 3750H, AMD Radeon RX 5500M	73.3 fps -30%
HP Omen 15-dc1020ng Intel Core i5-9300H, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile	62.2 fps -41%
1920x1080 Ultra Graphics & Postprocessing (HBAO+)
Average of class Gaming (18.4 - 216, n=170, last 2 years)	126.6 fps +109%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile (50.6 - 74, n=40)	61.1 fps +1%
Asus TUF Gaming A15 FA506IV-HN172 AMD Ryzen 7 4800H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile	60.5 (51^min - 68^max) fps
MSI GL65 9SEK Intel Core i7-9750H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile	58.7 fps -3%
Lenovo Legion Y540-15IRH-81SX00B2GE Intel Core i7-9750H, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile	53.1 (50^min, 51^P1 - 58^max) fps -12%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G15 GA502DU AMD Ryzen 7 3750H, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q	48.8 fps -19%
MSI Alpha 15 A3DDK-034 AMD Ryzen 7 3750H, AMD Radeon RX 5500M	44.7 fps -26%
HP Omen 15-dc1020ng Intel Core i5-9300H, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile	37 fps -39%

Asus TUF Gaming A15 FA506IV-HN172 GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile, R7 4800H, Kingston OM8PCP3512F-AB: Ø58.6 (54-62)

	baixo	média	alto	ultra
BioShock Infinite (2013)	232	209	189	119
The Witcher 3 (2015)	191	160	105	60.5
Dota 2 Reborn (2015)	103.8	94.7	85.4	81.3
Rise of the Tomb Raider (2016)	99.7	124		85.2
X-Plane 11.11 (2018)	69.9	63.9	55.6

Barulho

Ocioso		30.2 / 30.2 / 30.2 dB
Carga		40 / 49 dB

	30 dB silencioso 40 dB(A) audível 50 dB(A) ruidosamente alto
min: , med: , max: Audix TM1, Arta (15 cm de distância) environment noise: 30.2 dB(A)

Carga Máxima

Inatividade

Witcher 3


37.8 °C	42.9 °C	42.6 °C
30.3 °C	41.9 °C	38.4 °C
26.2 °C	26.9 °C	26.9 °C

Máximo: 42.9 °C
Médio: 34.9 °C


49.9 °C	42.2 °C	44.2 °C
34 °C	35.5 °C	27.2 °C
27 °C	26.4 °C	26.4 °C

Máximo: 49.9 °C
Médio: 34.8 °C

alimentação elétrica 39.2 °C | Temperatura do quarto 23.7 °C | FIRT 550-Pocket

Carga Máxima

Inatividade

Witcher 3


27 °C	27.2 °C	27 °C
27.1 °C	27.4 °C	27.8 °C
24.6 °C	24.8 °C	24.6 °C

Máximo: 27.8 °C
Médio: 26.4 °C


27 °C	26.6 °C	25.9 °C
26.4 °C	26.5 °C	26.9 °C
24.7 °C	24.9 °C	25.2 °C

Máximo: 27 °C
Médio: 26 °C

alimentação elétrica 29.9 °C | Temperatura do quarto 23 °C | FIRT 550-Pocket

Carga Máxima

Inatividade

Witcher 3


35.8 °C	38.9 °C	41.6 °C
28.6 °C	40.9 °C	36 °C
24.1 °C	25 °C	25 °C

Máximo: 41.6 °C
Médio: 32.9 °C


50.4 °C	42.4 °C	42.9 °C
28.4 °C	26.1 °C	25.2 °C
24.4 °C	24.5 °C	24.4 °C

Máximo: 50.4 °C
Médio: 32.1 °C

alimentação elétrica 40.9 °C | Temperatura do quarto 22.9 °C | FIRT 550-Pocket

(±) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 34.9 °C / 95 F, compared to the average of 33.9 °C / 93 F for the devices in the class Gaming.
(±) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 42.9 °C / 109 F, compared to the average of 40.5 °C / 105 F, ranging from 21.2 to 68.8 °C for the class Gaming.
(-) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 49.9 °C / 122 F, compared to the average of 43.2 °C / 110 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 26.4 °C / 80 F, compared to the device average of 33.9 °C / 93 F.
(±) Playing The Witcher 3, the average temperature for the upper side is 32.9 °C / 91 F, compared to the device average of 33.9 °C / 93 F.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are cooler than skin temperature with a maximum of 26.9 °C / 80.4 F and are therefore cool to the touch.
(±) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.9 °C / 84 F (+2 °C / 3.6 F).

Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)

Lenovo Legion Y540-15IRH-81SX00B2GE audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (77.4 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 17.7% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (11.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 3.7% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (4.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3.3% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (5.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (18.1% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 55% of all tested devices in this class were better, 8% similar, 37% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 18%, worst was 132%
Compared to all devices tested
» 34% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 58% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Consumo de energia

desligado	0.5 / 0.7 Watt
Ocioso	5.4 / 10 / 10.5 Watt
Carga	135 / 147 Watt


Key: min: , med: , max: Metrahit Energy

	Asus TUF Gaming A15 FA506IV-HN172 R7 4800H, GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile, Kingston OM8PCP3512F-AB, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6"	Lenovo Legion Y540-15IRH-81SX00B2GE i7-9750H, GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile, WDC PC SN720 SDAPNTW-512G, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6"	MSI Alpha 15 A3DDK-034 R7 3750H, Radeon RX 5500M, Kingston RBUSNS8154P3512GJ, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6"	MSI GL65 9SEK i7-9750H, GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile, WDC PC SN520 SDAPNUW-512G, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6"	HP Omen 15-dc1020ng i5-9300H, GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile, WDC PC SN720 SDAQNTW-512G, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6"	Asus ROG Zephyrus G15 GA502DU R7 3750H, GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q, Intel SSD 660p SSDPEKNW512G8, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6"	Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile	Average of class Gaming
Power Consumption		-56%	-68%	-230%	20%	-36%	-64%	-89%
Idle Minimum *	5.4	14.5 -169%	14 -159%	41 -659%	4.04 25%	7.4 -37%	11.5 ?(2.9 - 41, n=36) -113%	13.5 ?(2 - 39, n=158, last 2 years) -150%
Idle Average *	10	18.5 -85%	18 -80%	45.3 -353%	7.2 28%	8.6 14%	16.5 ?(5.9 - 45.3, n=36) -65%	19 ?(8 - 55.6, n=158, last 2 years) -90%
Idle Maximum *	10.5	20 -90%	32 -205%	47.1 -349%	11.4 -9%	39.1 -272%	23.7 ?(8.5 - 47.1, n=36) -126%	26.7 ?(9 - 101.1, n=158, last 2 years) -154%
Load Average *	135	81.6 40%	64 53%	94.9 30%	80.8 40%	65.9 51%	107.5 ?(82 - 147, n=37) 20%	106.7 ?(32.1 - 201, n=157, last 2 years) 21%
Witcher 3 ultra *	144	132 8%	123 15%	149.4 -4%	93.6 35%	106.9 26%
Load Maximum *	147	208.1 -42%	193 -31%	214.2 -46%	144.5 2%	141.3 4%	199.7 ?(145 - 243, n=37) -36%	251 ?(64.5 - 418, n=158, last 2 years) -71%

* ... smaller is better

Tempo de Execução da Bateria

Ocioso (sem WLAN, min brilho)		9h 47min
WiFi Websurfing (EDGE: 44.18362.449.0)		6h 10min
WiFi Websurfing max. Brightness (EDGE: 44.18362.449.0)		5h 29min
Big Buck Bunny H.264 1080p		5h 22min
Carga (máximo brilho)		1h 56min

	Asus TUF Gaming A15 FA506IV-HN172 R7 4800H, GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile, 48 Wh	Lenovo Legion Y540-15IRH-81SX00B2GE i7-9750H, GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile, 57 Wh	MSI Alpha 15 A3DDK-034 R7 3750H, Radeon RX 5500M, 51 Wh	MSI GL65 9SEK i7-9750H, GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile, 51 Wh	HP Omen 15-dc1020ng i5-9300H, GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile, 52.5 Wh	Asus ROG Zephyrus G15 GA502DU R7 3750H, GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q, 76 Wh	Average of class Gaming
Battery Runtime		-51%	-40%	-47%	19%	31%	-1%
Reader / Idle	587	240 -59%	349 -41%	262 -55%	951 62%	916 56%	565 ?(155 - 1290, n=69, last 2 years) -4%
H.264	322		234 -27%		482 50%		408 ?(129 - 837, n=80, last 2 years) 27%
WiFi v1.3	370	145 -61%	245 -34%	230 -38%	385 4%	482 30%	375 ?(85 - 889, n=158, last 2 years) 1%
Load	116	76 -34%	49 -58%	60 -48%	71 -39%	123 6%	85.3 ?(41 - 173, n=121, last 2 years) -26%
Witcher 3 ultra					59		78.3 ?(47 - 155, n=16, last 2 years)

Pro

+ O Ryzen 7 4800H oferece desempenho multi-thread mais rápido que o do Core i7-10875H

+ GeForce RTX 2060 com 6 GB de VRAM

+ Tela de 144-Hz com boa relação de contraste

+ Botões do mouse dedicados e porta USB Type-C integrada

+ Boas opções de manutenção; 3 baias para armazenamento massivo, 2 SODIMM

+ Boa duração da bateria

+ Teclado iluminado

Contra

- Sem deslizador de webcam, IV ou leitor de digitais

- Sem iluminação RGB por tecla, sem Thunderbolt 3

- Sem leitor de cartões SD

- Teclas de setas pequenas

- Gama de cores pobre

- Sem Wi-Fi 6

- Apenas 8 GB de RAM

Veredicto - Preço Competitivo e Desempenho Sólido

O Asus TUF A15 FA506 é um portátil para jogos com ótimo hardware por um preço justo. O aparelho pode ser adquirido de vários revendedores online por menos de 1.300 Euros (~$1.470), e vem com a novíssima CPU AMD Ryzen 7 4800H, que supera a sua contraparte Intel graças aos seus oito núcleos. A anterior é uma sólida CPU de jogos e adequada como base para uma máquina de jogos, que roda até mesmo jogos muito exigentes com detalhes no máximo quando emparelhada com a Nvidia GeForce RTX 2060.

Por falar de visual, a tela instalada oferece uma ótima relação de contraste e uma rápida taxa de atualização de 144-Hz. Além disso, não há PWM e, portanto, não há fadiga ocular adicional durante o uso prolongado. Dito isto, ficamos desapontados com a pequena gama de cores. Enquanto isso, a carcaça é decente, embora sua sensação não tenha nos convencido inteiramente devido à construção plástica. Pelo contrário, não temos nenhuma reclamação quando se trata de desempenho bruto, que pode ser parcialmente atribuído ao SoC da AMD. Dispositivos similares nesta classe de preço tendem a ser limitados a processadores com 6 núcleos. É difícil reclamar de dois núcleos adicionais pelo mesmo preço.

Com bom desempenho e um preço competitivo, o Asus TUF A15 FA506 vale definitivamente a pena considerar se você está procurando um portátil para jogos de baixo custo.

Além disso, a duração da bateria é surpreendentemente boa, o que não pode ser tomado como garantido, particularmente em um dispositivo de jogos. Se você está interessado neste sistema, vale a pena dar uma olhada nas opções de atualização de RAM e armazenamento. Infelizmente, nosso modelo só está equipado com a configuração mínima de memória para um portátil de jogos. Dito isto, 8 GB de RAM e 512 GB de armazenamento SSD ainda são suficientes para muitas tarefas e aplicações.

In review: Asus TUF A15 FA506, courtesy of Asus Germany

The Asus TUF A15 FA506 is a gaming laptop with great hardware for a fair price. The device can be purchased from various online retailers for below 1300 Euros (~$1470), and it comes with the brand-new AMD Ryzen 7 4800H CPU, which outperforms its Intel counterpart thanks to its eight cores. The former is a solid gaming CPU and suitable as a foundation for a gaming machine, which runs even very demanding games at maximum details when paired with the Nvidia GeForce RTX 2060.

Speaking of visuals, the installed display offers a great contrast ratio and a fast 144-Hz refresh rate. Furthermore, there is no PWM and thus, no additional eyestrain during prolonged use. That being said, we were disappointed with the small color gamut. Meanwhile, the case is decent, although its feel did not entirely convince us due to the full plastic construction. By contrast, we have no complaints at all when it comes to raw performance, which can be partially attributed to the AMD SoC. Similar devices in this price class tend to be limited to 6-core processors. It is hard to complain about two additional cores for the same price.

With good performance and a competitive price, the Asus TUF A15 FA506 is definitely worth considering if you are looking for an inexpensive gaming laptop.

Furthermore, the battery life is surprisingly good, which cannot be taken for granted, particularly on a gaming device. If you are interested in this system, RAM and storage upgrade options are worth taking a look at. Unfortunately, our model is only equipped with the bare minimum memory configuration for a gaming laptop. That being said, 8 GB of RAM and 512 GB of SSD storage are still sufficient for many tasks and applications.

Asus TUF Gaming A15 FA506IV-HN172 - 2020-06-09 06/09/2020 v7 ^(old)
Sebastian Bade

Acabamento

81 / 98 → 83%

Teclado

81%

Mouse

86%

Conectividade

58 / 80 → 72%

Peso

62 / 10-66 → 93%

Bateria

66 / 95 → 69%

Pantalha

81%

Desempenho do jogos

91%

Desempenho da aplicação

86%

Workstation

76%

Temperatura

89 / 95 → 93%

Ruído

83 / 90 → 93%

Audio

70%

Camera

39 / 85 → 46%

Médio

75%

83%

Gaming - Médio equilibrado

Price comparison

Editor of the original article: Marius Schell - Tech Writer and translator - 398 articles published on Notebookcheck since 2020

contact me via: LinkedIn

Please share our article, every link counts!

> Análises e revisões de portáteis e celulares > Análises > Análises > Breve Análise do Asus TUF A15 com AMD Renoir e gráficos Nvidia Graphics

Sebastian Bade, 2020-06-16 (Update: 2021-03-12)

Size Comparison

Display Response Times

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

Cinebench R15 Multi-Thread Loop

Continuous read performance: DiskSpd Read Loop, Queue Depth 8

Lenovo Legion Y540-15IRH-81SX00B2GE audio analysis

Pro

Contra

Veredicto - Preço Competitivo e Desempenho Sólido

More articles related to this device

Price comparison