Notebookcheck Logo

Revisão HP Omen 17 (2023): O laptop para jogos usa RTX 4080

Jogador de alto nível.

Um Core i9-13900HX e GeForce RTX 4080 fornecem desempenho suficiente para processamento de vídeo, renderização e jogos QHD. O teclado do laptop também oferece iluminação individual das teclas, seis teclas macro e muito espaço para as teclas de seta.

O modelo 2023 do Omen 17, que é um laptop de alto nível para jogos, usa o mesmo caso que já conhecemos do antecessor, mas inclui o hardware atual: O laptop é executado por Raptor Lake e Ada Lovelace chips. A HP combina um Core i9 com uma GPU RTX 4080, pedindo quase 3.300 euros ($3.582) para o pacote completo. Os concorrentes incluem laptops tais como o Alienware m17 R5oLâmina Razer 16 (Início de 2023)oAsus ROG Strix G16 G614JZe o Lenovo Legion Pro 7 16IRX8H.

Você pode encontrar informações sobre a caixa, equipamentos, dispositivos de entrada e alto-falantes em nosso revisão do modelo antecessorque é idêntico nesses aspectos.

HP Omen 17-ck2097ng (Omen 17 Serie)
Processador
Intel Core i9-13900HX 24 x 1.6 - 5.4 GHz, 130 W PL2 / Short Burst, 55 W PL1 / Sustained, Raptor Lake-HX
Placa gráfica
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU - 12 GB VRAM, Análises do: 2010 MHz, Memoría: 2250 MHz, 175 W TDP ( including 25 W Dynamic Boost), GDDR6, 31.0.15.3118, Optimus
Memória
32 GB 
, DDR5-5600, dual-channel mode, two memory slots (both in use)
Pantalha
17.30 polegadas 16:9, 2560 x 1440 pixel 170 PPI, BOE BOE09BF, IPS, Brilhante: não, 165 Hz
placa mãe
Intel HM770 (Raptor Lake-S PCH)
Disco rígido
SK hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X101N, 1024 GB 
, 893 GB livre
Conexões
3 USB 3.0, 1 USB 3.1 Gen2, 1 Thunderbolt, USB-C Power Delivery (PD), 1 HDMI, 2 DisplayPort, Conexões Audio: combo audio port, Card Reader: SD, SDXC, SDHC, TPM 2.0
Funcionamento em rede
Realtek RTL8168/8111 Gigabit-LAN (10/100/1000MBit/s), Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211 (a/b/g/h/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/ax = Wi-Fi 6/ Wi-Fi 6E 6 GHz), Bluetooth 5.3
Tamanho
altura x largura x profundidade (em mm): 27 x 397.1 x 262
Bateria
83 Wh, 6880 mAh Lítio-Polímero
Charging
fast charging / Quickcharge
Sistema Operativo
Microsoft Windows 11 Home
Camera
Webcam: HD
Primary Camera: 0.9 MPix
Características adicionais
Alto falantes: stereo, Teclado: chiclet, Iluminação do Teclado: sim, McAfee LiveSafe (trial), Microsoft 365 (trial), Microsoft OneNote (trial), 24 Meses Garantia
peso
2.766 kg, Suprimento de energia: 1.154 kg
Preço
3299 Euro
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

Possíveis concorrentes em comparação

Rating
Date
Model
Weight
Height
Size
Resolution
Price
85.4 %
v7 (old)
03/2023
HP Omen 17-ck2097ng
i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU
2.8 kg27 mm17.30"2560x1440
86.1 %
v7 (old)
01/2023
Alienware m17 R5 (R9 6900HX, RX 6850M XT)
R9 6900HX, Radeon RX 6850M XT
3.4 kg26.7 mm17.00"3840x2160
91.2 %
v7 (old)
02/2023
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023
i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU
2.4 kg21.99 mm16.00"2560x1600
89.4 %
v7 (old)
02/2023
Lenovo Legion Pro 7 16IRX8H
i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU
2.7 kg26 mm16.00"2560x1600
88.4 %
v7 (old)
03/2023
Asus ROG Strix G16 G614JZ
i9-13980HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU
2.4 kg30.4 mm16.00"2560x1600

Comparação de tamanho

397.1 mm 262 mm 27 mm 2.8 kg397.3 mm 298.71 mm 26.7 mm 3.4 kg363 mm 262 mm 26 mm 2.7 kg354 mm 264 mm 30.4 mm 2.4 kg355 mm 244 mm 21.99 mm 2.4 kg297 mm 210 mm 1 mm 5.7 g
Esquerda: alimentação, Gigabit Ethernet, USB 3.2 Gen 1 (USB-A), Mini DisplayPort, HDMI 2.1, Thunderbolt 4 (USB-C; Power Delivery, DisplayPort), combo de áudio, leitor de cartões de armazenamento (SD)
Esquerda: alimentação, Gigabit Ethernet, USB 3.2 Gen 1 (USB-A), Mini DisplayPort, HDMI 2.1, Thunderbolt 4 (USB-C; Power Delivery, DisplayPort), combo de áudio, leitor de cartões de armazenamento (SD)
Direito: 2x USB 3.2 Gen 1 (USB-A)
Direito: 2x USB 3.2 Gen 1 (USB-A)
SD Card Reader
average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs)
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023
Intel Core i9-13950HX (AV PRO microSD 128 GB V60)
125 MB/s +74%
Average of class Gaming
  (19 - 202, n=87, last 2 years)
95.9 MB/s +33%
HP Omen 17-ck2097ng
Intel Core i9-13900HX (AV PRO microSD 128 GB V60)
72 MB/s
maximum AS SSD Seq Read Test (1GB)
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023
Intel Core i9-13950HX (AV PRO microSD 128 GB V60)
207.6 MB/s +144%
Average of class Gaming
  (25.8 - 269, n=88, last 2 years)
120 MB/s +41%
HP Omen 17-ck2097ng
Intel Core i9-13900HX (AV PRO microSD 128 GB V60)
85 MB/s
Networking
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
Lenovo Legion Pro 7 16IRX8H
Killer Wi-Fi 6E AX1675i 160MHz Wireless Network Adapter
1579 (848min - 1696max) MBit/s +8%
Asus ROG Strix G16 G614JZ
Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211
1545 (1189min - 1625max) MBit/s +5%
HP Omen 17-ck2097ng
Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211
1467 (733min - 1546max) MBit/s
Average Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211
  (64 - 1921, n=242)
1231 MBit/s -16%
Average of class Gaming
  (469 - 1843, n=148, last 2 years)
1230 MBit/s -16%
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023
Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211
1155 (495min - 1441max) MBit/s -21%
Alienware m17 R5 (R9 6900HX, RX 6850M XT)
MediaTek MT7921
981 MBit/s -33%
iperf3 receive AXE11000
HP Omen 17-ck2097ng
Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211
1627 (1381min - 1714max) MBit/s
Lenovo Legion Pro 7 16IRX8H
Killer Wi-Fi 6E AX1675i 160MHz Wireless Network Adapter
1619 (1537min - 1665max) MBit/s 0%
Asus ROG Strix G16 G614JZ
Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211
1557 (795min - 1691max) MBit/s -4%
Average of class Gaming
  (680 - 1890, n=148, last 2 years)
1392 MBit/s -14%
Average Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211
  (582 - 1890, n=242)
1382 MBit/s -15%
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023
Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211
1328 (1093min - 1448max) MBit/s -18%
Alienware m17 R5 (R9 6900HX, RX 6850M XT)
MediaTek MT7921
968 MBit/s -41%
050100150200250300350400450500550600650700750800850900950100010501100115012001250130013501400145015001550160016501700Tooltip
HP Omen 17-ck2097ng Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211; iperf3 transmit AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1443 (733-1546)
Alienware m17 R5 (R9 6900HX, RX 6850M XT) MediaTek MT7921; iperf3 transmit AXE11000: Ø976 (930-1012)
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211; iperf3 transmit AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1155 (495-1441)
Lenovo Legion Pro 7 16IRX8H Killer Wi-Fi 6E AX1675i 160MHz Wireless Network Adapter; iperf3 transmit AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1551 (848-1696)
Asus ROG Strix G16 G614JZ Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211; iperf3 transmit AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1545 (1189-1625)
HP Omen 17-ck2097ng Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211; iperf3 receive AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1626 (1381-1714)
Alienware m17 R5 (R9 6900HX, RX 6850M XT) MediaTek MT7921; iperf3 receive AXE11000: Ø968 (947-983)
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211; iperf3 receive AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1327 (1093-1448)
Lenovo Legion Pro 7 16IRX8H Killer Wi-Fi 6E AX1675i 160MHz Wireless Network Adapter; iperf3 receive AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1618 (1537-1665)
Asus ROG Strix G16 G614JZ Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211; iperf3 receive AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1530 (795-1691)
ColorChecker
9 ∆E
12.6 ∆E
12.7 ∆E
8.5 ∆E
13.1 ∆E
9.5 ∆E
13.8 ∆E
16.4 ∆E
17.9 ∆E
8.8 ∆E
9.4 ∆E
10.5 ∆E
9.6 ∆E
8.2 ∆E
20.4 ∆E
4.7 ∆E
16.7 ∆E
13.2 ∆E
2.9 ∆E
7.2 ∆E
10.8 ∆E
8.7 ∆E
5.8 ∆E
4.5 ∆E
ColorChecker HP Omen 17-ck2097ng: 10.63 ∆E min: 2.95 - max: 20.42 ∆E

Display - QHD incluindo cobertura sRGB

Grelha subpixel
Grelha subpixel

Enquanto neste ponto muitos concorrentes preferem usar displays 16:10, a HP permanece fiel ao formato 16:9 no Omen. Uma característica positiva é que o painel 165-Hz responsivo não mostra nenhum PWM cintilando em qualquer nível de brilho.

O brilho e o contraste da tela mate de 17,3 polegadas (2.560 x 1.440 pixels) satisfazem os requisitos (> 300 cd/m² e 1.000:1). Entretanto, o display Omen oferece o menor brilho entre os displays de nossos concorrentes. O Legion 7 Pro tem aqui o painel mais brilhante.

337
cd/m²
349
cd/m²
360
cd/m²
334
cd/m²
371
cd/m²
358
cd/m²
347
cd/m²
357
cd/m²
336
cd/m²
Distribuição do brilho
BOE BOE09BF tested with X-Rite i1Pro 2
Máximo: 371 cd/m² (Nits) Médio: 349.9 cd/m² Minimum: 19 cd/m²
iluminação: 90 %
iluminação com acumulador: 371 cd/m²
Contraste: 1159:1 (Preto: 0.32 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 1.74 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.91, calibrated: 1.01
ΔE Greyscale 2.8 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
69.6% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
97.6% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
67.4% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.19
HP Omen 17-ck2097ng
BOE BOE09BF, IPS, 2560x1440, 17.3"
Alienware m17 R5 (R9 6900HX, RX 6850M XT)
AU Optronics AUODBA3, IPS, 3840x2160, 17"
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023
CSOT T3 MNG007DA4-1, IPS, 2560x1600, 16"
Lenovo Legion Pro 7 16IRX8H
MNG007DA2-3 (CSO1628), IPS, 2560x1600, 16"
Asus ROG Strix G16 G614JZ
TL160ADMP03-0, IPS, 2560x1600, 16"
HP Omen 17-ck1075ng
BOE09EE, IPS, 1920x1080, 17.3"
Display
24%
26%
2%
23%
-11%
Display P3 Coverage
67.4
97.2
44%
98.5
46%
69.1
3%
97
44%
59.03
-12%
sRGB Coverage
97.6
99.6
2%
100
2%
99.7
2%
99.9
2%
87.46
-10%
AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage
69.6
88.4
27%
89.7
29%
71.2
2%
84.9
22%
61.04
-12%
Response Times
-18%
12%
28%
47%
-1%
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% *
15.6 ?(7.3, 8.3)
16.4 ?(7.8, 8.6)
-5%
6.6 ?(3.4, 3.2)
58%
12.3 ?(5.7, 6.6)
21%
5.1 ?(2.3, 2.8)
67%
14 ?(7, 7)
10%
Response Time Black / White *
8.9 ?(3.7, 5.2)
11.6 ?(6.2, 5.4)
-30%
12 ?(6.8, 5.2)
-35%
5.9 ?(2.2, 3.7)
34%
6.6 ?(2.2, 4.2)
26%
10 ?(6, 4)
-12%
PWM Frequency
100 ?(50)
Screen
-88%
-12%
25%
3%
-15%
Brightness middle
371
484
30%
456.8
23%
511
38%
470
27%
321
-13%
Brightness
350
449
28%
437
25%
469
34%
459
31%
302
-14%
Brightness Distribution
90
87
-3%
83
-8%
86
-4%
93
3%
84
-7%
Black Level *
0.32
0.55
-72%
0.35
-9%
0.4
-25%
0.42
-31%
0.41
-28%
Contrast
1159
880
-24%
1305
13%
1278
10%
1119
-3%
783
-32%
Colorchecker dE 2000 *
1.74
4.8
-176%
3.7
-113%
0.95
45%
1.86
-7%
1.62
7%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *
3.59
7.48
-108%
6.42
-79%
2.07
42%
3.87
-8%
4.08
-14%
Colorchecker dE 2000 calibrated *
1.01
4.74
-369%
0.66
35%
0.91
10%
0.93
8%
1.93
-91%
Greyscale dE 2000 *
2.8
5.5
-96%
2.6
7%
0.6
79%
2.7
4%
1.24
56%
Gamma
2.19 100%
2.42 91%
2.3 96%
2.176 101%
2.246 98%
2.41 91%
CCT
6474 100%
6148 106%
6108 106%
6545 99%
6711 97%
6261 104%
Total Average (Program / Settings)
-27% / -54%
9% / -0%
18% / 21%
24% / 13%
-9% / -12%

* ... smaller is better

No estado de entrega, a reprodução da cor já é muito boa e pode ser melhorada ainda mais com uma calibração, o que faz com que o desvio da cor caia de 1,74 para 1 (valor alvo < 3). Além disso, a escala de cinza também é então reproduzida de forma mais uniforme.

O visor é capaz de cobrir o espaço de cor sRGB quase completamente, mas não os espaços de cor AdobeRGB e DCI-P3. Os mostradores da maioria dos concorrentes têm melhor desempenho aqui, com apenas o painel do Legionque variam no mesmo nível.

CalMAN: Escala de cinza
CalMAN: Escala de cinza
CalMAN: Saturação
CalMAN: Saturação
CalMAN: ColorChecker
CalMAN: ColorChecker
CalMAN: Escala de cinza (calibrada)
CalMAN: Escala de cinza (calibrada)
CalMAN: Saturação (calibrada)
CalMAN: Saturação (calibrada)
CalMAN: ColorChecker (calibrado)
CalMAN: ColorChecker (calibrado)
HP Omen 17 vs sRGB
HP Omen 17 vs sRGB
HP Omen 17 vs AdobeRGB
HP Omen 17 vs AdobeRGB
HP Omen 17 vs P3
HP Omen 17 vs P3

Display Response Times

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
       Response Time Black to White
8.9 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 3.7 ms rise
↘ 5.2 ms fall
The screen shows fast response rates in our tests and should be suited for gaming.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 21 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (20.9 ms).
       Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
15.6 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 7.3 ms rise
↘ 8.3 ms fall
The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 26 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (32.8 ms).

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM not detected

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8715 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured.

Os ângulos de visão do painel IPS são estáveis, de modo que pode ser lido de qualquer ângulo de visão. O display pode ser lido ao ar livre, desde que não haja luz solar direta.

O Presságio 17 ao ar livre
O Presságio 17 ao ar livre
Ângulos de visualização
Ângulos de visualização

Desempenho - O laptop HP oferece hardware poderoso

Com o Omen 17, a Hewlett Packard oferece um laptop de 17,3 polegadas que é direcionado para jogos QHD, mas também atinge uma boa figura em outras áreas de aplicação que exigem um alto desempenho. O desempenho computacional necessário é fornecido pelos chips Raptor Lake e Ada Lovelace. Nossa unidade de teste do Omen está disponível por cerca de 3.300 euros (~$3.582).

CPU-Z
CPU-Z
CPU-Z
CPU-Z
CPU-Z
GPU-Z
GPU-Z
HWInfo
HWInfo
Nvidia Systeminfo

Condições de teste

O software pré-instalado Omen Gaming Hub representa o centro de controle do laptop. Além de selecionar um modo de alimentação (ver tabela), ele também permite subvoltar a CPU e configurar uma curva individual do ventilador. Como o modo "Performance" criou alguns problemas em nossa unidade de teste (gagueira estranha e queda de performance), usamos principalmente o modo de potência "Balanceada" junto com o controle automático do ventilador. O Optimus foi ativado.

Desempenho Equilibrado Eco
Limite de potência 1 100 Watt 55 Watt 55 Watt
Limite de potência 2 130 Watt 130 Watt 130 Watt
Omen Gaming Hub
Omen Gaming Hub
Omen Gaming Hub
Omen Gaming Hub
Omen Gaming Hub
Omen Gaming Hub
Omen Gaming Hub
Omen Gaming Hub
Omen Gaming Hub
Omen Gaming Hub
Omen Gaming Hub
Omen Gaming Hub

Processador

ONúcleo i9-13900HX(Raptor Lake) consiste em dezesseis núcleos de eficiência (sem hiperthreading, 1,6 a 3,9 GHz) e oito núcleos de desempenho (hiperthreading, 2,2 a 5,4 GHz), resultando em um total de 32 núcleos de CPU lógica.

Na operação de rede, o processador passa pelos testes de CPU do benchmark Cinebench R15 com velocidades de relógio de média-alta a alta (multi-tarefa) e alta a máxima (rosca única). Enquanto o desempenho de rosca única (254 pontos) cai ligeiramente na operação com bateria, a queda no desempenho de rosca múltipla é significativa (1.303 pontos).

Os resultados de referência variam no nível (linha única) da média para a CPU ou abaixo (multi-linha). Em geral, o modo "Desempenho" resulta apenas em uma ligeira vantagem de desempenho, sendo que os benchmarks da AIDA são os que mais lucram. Por outro lado, também fará com que a velocidade da CPU permaneça em um nível elevado sob carga multi-tarefa constante, como mostra o teste de loop CB15.

Multifios (operação em rede)
Multifios (operação em rede)
Rosca única (operação de rede)
Rosca única (operação de rede)

Cinebench R15 Multi Constant Load Test

0230460690920115013801610184020702300253027602990322034503680391041404370Tooltip
HP Omen 17-ck2097ng Intel Core i9-13900HX: Ø2810 (2649.18-4311.13)
Alienware m17 R5 (R9 6900HX, RX 6850M XT) AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX: Ø2287 (2247.19-2314.81)
Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 SE G733CX-LL014W Intel Core i9-12950HX: Ø2740 (2605.18-3101.02)
HP Omen 17-ck1075ng Intel Core i7-12700H; Performance: Ø2434 (2349.9-2579.98)
HP Omen 17-ck1075ng Intel Core i7-12700H; Balanced: Ø1944 (1886.88-2518.1)
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 Intel Core i9-13950HX: Ø4512 (4463.29-4528.99)
HP Omen 17-ck2097ng Intel Core i9-13900HX; Leistung: Ø4174 (4028.2-4381.06)
Velocidades de relógio da CPU durante a execução do loop CB15 (Equilibrado)
Velocidades de relógio da CPU durante a execução do loop CB15 (Equilibrado)
Velocidades do relógio da CPU durante a execução do loop CB15 (Desempenho)
Velocidades do relógio da CPU durante a execução do loop CB15 (Desempenho)
Velocidades do relógio da CPU durante o funcionamento do loop CB15 (Eco)
Velocidades do relógio da CPU durante o funcionamento do loop CB15 (Eco)
CPU Performance Rating - Percent
Lenovo Legion Pro 7 16IRX8H
Intel Core i9-13900HX
84.4 pt
Asus ROG Strix G16 G614JZ
Intel Core i9-13980HX
83 pt
HP Omen 17-ck2097ng
Intel Core i9-13900HX
81.2 pt
Average Intel Core i9-13900HX
 
80.5 pt
HP Omen 17-ck2097ng
Intel Core i9-13900HX
77.5 pt
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023
Intel Core i9-13950HX
75.6 pt
Average of class Gaming
 
66.5 pt
Alienware m17 R5 (R9 6900HX, RX 6850M XT)
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX
48.4 pt
Cinebench R23
Multi Core
Lenovo Legion Pro 7 16IRX8H
Intel Core i9-13900HX
30162 Points +14%
Asus ROG Strix G16 G614JZ
Intel Core i9-13980HX
30139 Points +14%
Average Intel Core i9-13900HX
  (24270 - 32623, n=22)
28225 Points +7%
HP Omen 17-ck2097ng
Intel Core i9-13900HX (Leistung)
27299 Points +3%
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023
Intel Core i9-13950HX
26736 (22394.1min - 26736.1max) Points +1%
HP Omen 17-ck2097ng
Intel Core i9-13900HX
26407 Points
Average of class Gaming
  (5668 - 36249, n=190, last 2 years)
21953 Points -17%
Alienware m17 R5 (R9 6900HX, RX 6850M XT)
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX
13872 Points -47%
Single Core
Asus ROG Strix G16 G614JZ
Intel Core i9-13980HX
2126 Points +1%
HP Omen 17-ck2097ng
Intel Core i9-13900HX
2095 Points
HP Omen 17-ck2097ng
Intel Core i9-13900HX (Leistung)
2077 Points -1%
Average Intel Core i9-13900HX
  (1867 - 2105, n=19)
2044 Points -2%
Lenovo Legion Pro 7 16IRX8H
Intel Core i9-13900HX
2043 Points -2%
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023
Intel Core i9-13950HX
2029 Points -3%
Average of class Gaming
  (1136 - 2235, n=189, last 2 years)
1893 Points -10%
Alienware m17 R5 (R9 6900HX, RX 6850M XT)
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX
1554 Points -26%
Cinebench R20
CPU (Multi Core)
Asus ROG Strix G16 G614JZ
Intel Core i9-13980HX
11510 Points +14%
Lenovo Legion Pro 7 16IRX8H
Intel Core i9-13900HX
11500 Points +14%
Average Intel Core i9-13900HX
  (9152 - 12541, n=20)
10766 Points +6%
HP Omen 17-ck2097ng
Intel Core i9-13900HX (Leistung)
10537 Points +4%
HP Omen 17-ck2097ng
Intel Core i9-13900HX
10118 Points
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023
Intel Core i9-13950HX
8697 Points -14%
Average of class Gaming
  (2179 - 13832, n=187, last 2 years)
8336 Points -18%
Alienware m17 R5 (R9 6900HX, RX 6850M XT)
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX
5306 Points -48%
CPU (Single Core)
Asus ROG Strix G16 G614JZ
Intel Core i9-13980HX
818 Points +2%
HP Omen 17-ck2097ng
Intel Core i9-13900HX
805 Points
HP Omen 17-ck2097ng
Intel Core i9-13900HX (Leistung)
796 Points -1%
Lenovo Legion Pro 7 16IRX8H
Intel Core i9-13900HX
788 Points -2%
Average Intel Core i9-13900HX
  (722 - 810, n=20)
784 Points -3%
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023
Intel Core i9-13950HX
742 Points -8%
Average of class Gaming
  (439 - 856, n=187, last 2 years)
727 Points -10%
Alienware m17 R5 (R9 6900HX, RX 6850M XT)
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX
612 Points -24%
Cinebench R15
CPU Multi 64Bit
Lenovo Legion Pro 7 16IRX8H
Intel Core i9-13900HX
4819 (4429.68min - 4819.28max) Points +12%
Asus ROG Strix G16 G614JZ
Intel Core i9-13980HX (turbo)
4764 (4425.76min - 4764.17max) Points +11%
Asus ROG Strix G16 G614JZ
Intel Core i9-13980HX
4731 (1123.72min - 4730.93max) Points +10%
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023
Intel Core i9-13950HX
4529 (4463.29min - 4528.99max) Points +5%
Average Intel Core i9-13900HX
  (3913 - 4970, n=21)
4522 Points +5%
HP Omen 17-ck2097ng
Intel Core i9-13900HX (Leistung)
4381 Points +2%
HP Omen 17-ck2097ng
Intel Core i9-13900HX
4311 Points
Average of class Gaming
  (905 - 5663, n=194, last 2 years)
3433 Points -20%
Alienware m17 R5 (R9 6900HX, RX 6850M XT)
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX
2315 (2247.19min - 2314.81max) Points -46%
CPU Single 64Bit
Asus ROG Strix G16 G614JZ
Intel Core i9-13980HX
306 Points +2%
Asus ROG Strix G16 G614JZ
Intel Core i9-13980HX (turbo)
296 Points -2%
Lenovo Legion Pro 7 16IRX8H
Intel Core i9-13900HX
301 Points 0%
HP Omen 17-ck2097ng
Intel Core i9-13900HX
301 Points
HP Omen 17-ck2097ng
Intel Core i9-13900HX (Leistung)
300 Points 0%
Average Intel Core i9-13900HX
  (247 - 304, n=21)
292 Points -3%
Average of class Gaming
  (191.9 - 318, n=191, last 2 years)
278 Points -8%
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023
Intel Core i9-13950HX
274 Points -9%
Alienware m17 R5 (R9 6900HX, RX 6850M XT)
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX
250 Points -17%
Blender - v2.79 BMW27 CPU
Alienware m17 R5 (R9 6900HX, RX 6850M XT)
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX
221 Seconds * -44%
Average of class Gaming
  (87 - 555, n=182, last 2 years)
169.7 Seconds * -11%
HP Omen 17-ck2097ng
Intel Core i9-13900HX
153 Seconds *
Average Intel Core i9-13900HX
  (101 - 153, n=21)
117.9 Seconds * +23%
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023
Intel Core i9-13950HX
114 Seconds * +25%
HP Omen 17-ck2097ng
Intel Core i9-13900HX (Leistung)
114 Seconds * +25%
Asus ROG Strix G16 G614JZ
Intel Core i9-13980HX
106 Seconds * +31%
Lenovo Legion Pro 7 16IRX8H
Intel Core i9-13900HX
105 Seconds * +31%
7-Zip 18.03
7z b 4
Lenovo Legion Pro 7 16IRX8H
Intel Core i9-13900HX
122254 MIPS +29%
Asus ROG Strix G16 G614JZ
Intel Core i9-13980HX
114658 MIPS +21%
HP Omen 17-ck2097ng
Intel Core i9-13900HX (Leistung)
112526 MIPS +19%
Average Intel Core i9-13900HX
  (90675 - 127283, n=20)
111796 MIPS +18%
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023
Intel Core i9-13950HX
109330 MIPS +16%
HP Omen 17-ck2097ng
Intel Core i9-13900HX
94649 MIPS
Average of class Gaming
  (23795 - 140932, n=186, last 2 years)
85566 MIPS -10%
Alienware m17 R5 (R9 6900HX, RX 6850M XT)
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX
61988 MIPS -35%
7z b 4 -mmt1
Lenovo Legion Pro 7 16IRX8H
Intel Core i9-13900HX
7035 MIPS +2%
HP Omen 17-ck2097ng
Intel Core i9-13900HX
6925 MIPS
Asus ROG Strix G16 G614JZ
Intel Core i9-13980HX
6909 MIPS 0%
Average Intel Core i9-13900HX
  (6340 - 7177, n=20)
6848 MIPS -1%
HP Omen 17-ck2097ng
Intel Core i9-13900HX (Leistung)
6811 MIPS -2%
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023
Intel Core i9-13950HX
6445 MIPS -7%
Average of class Gaming
  (4199 - 7581, n=186, last 2 years)
6318 MIPS -9%
Alienware m17 R5 (R9 6900HX, RX 6850M XT)
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX
5734 MIPS -17%
Geekbench 5.5
Multi-Core
Lenovo Legion Pro 7 16IRX8H
Intel Core i9-13900HX
21058 Points +4%
HP Omen 17-ck2097ng
Intel Core i9-13900HX
20245 Points
Average Intel Core i9-13900HX
  (17614 - 21075, n=21)
19809 Points -2%
HP Omen 17-ck2097ng
Intel Core i9-13900HX (Leistung)
19801 Points -2%
Asus ROG Strix G16 G614JZ
Intel Core i9-13980HX
19433 Points -4%
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023
Intel Core i9-13950HX
18152 Points -10%
Average of class Gaming
  (4557 - 23194, n=187, last 2 years)
15073 Points -26%
Alienware m17 R5 (R9 6900HX, RX 6850M XT)
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX
10021 Points -51%
Single-Core
HP Omen 17-ck2097ng
Intel Core i9-13900HX (Leistung)
2084 Points 0%
HP Omen 17-ck2097ng
Intel Core i9-13900HX
2079 Points
Asus ROG Strix G16 G614JZ
Intel Core i9-13980HX
2044 Points -2%
Lenovo Legion Pro 7 16IRX8H
Intel Core i9-13900HX
2025 Points -3%
Average Intel Core i9-13900HX
  (1345 - 2093, n=21)
1988 Points -4%
Average of class Gaming
  (986 - 2210, n=187, last 2 years)
1897 Points -9%
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023
Intel Core i9-13950HX
1805 Points -13%
Alienware m17 R5 (R9 6900HX, RX 6850M XT)
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX
1575 Points -24%
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 - 4k Preset
Lenovo Legion Pro 7 16IRX8H
Intel Core i9-13900HX
31.9 fps +27%
HP Omen 17-ck2097ng
Intel Core i9-13900HX (Leistung)
30.1 fps +19%
Asus ROG Strix G16 G614JZ
Intel Core i9-13980HX
29.7 fps +18%
Average Intel Core i9-13900HX
  (23.5 - 34.4, n=21)
29.1 fps +15%
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023
Intel Core i9-13950HX
28.7 fps +14%
HP Omen 17-ck2097ng
Intel Core i9-13900HX
25.2 fps
Average of class Gaming
  (6.72 - 38.9, n=186, last 2 years)
23.6 fps -6%
Alienware m17 R5 (R9 6900HX, RX 6850M XT)
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX
16.8 fps -33%
LibreOffice - 20 Documents To PDF
Alienware m17 R5 (R9 6900HX, RX 6850M XT)
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX
57.3 s * -30%
Average of class Gaming
  (31.4 - 199, n=183, last 2 years)
48.1 s * -9%
Asus ROG Strix G16 G614JZ
Intel Core i9-13980HX
47.7 s * -8%
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023
Intel Core i9-13950HX
47.5 s * -7%
HP Omen 17-ck2097ng
Intel Core i9-13900HX
44.2 s *
Lenovo Legion Pro 7 16IRX8H
Intel Core i9-13900HX
44 s * -0%
Average Intel Core i9-13900HX
  (32.8 - 51.1, n=20)
42.5 s * +4%
HP Omen 17-ck2097ng
Intel Core i9-13900HX (Leistung)
41.7 s * +6%
R Benchmark 2.5 - Overall mean
Alienware m17 R5 (R9 6900HX, RX 6850M XT)
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX
0.486 sec * -26%
Average of class Gaming
  (0.3609 - 0.759, n=187, last 2 years)
0.4368 sec * -13%
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023
Intel Core i9-13950HX
0.4121 sec * -7%
Average Intel Core i9-13900HX
  (0.375 - 0.4564, n=21)
0.402 sec * -4%
Lenovo Legion Pro 7 16IRX8H
Intel Core i9-13900HX
0.3979 sec * -3%
HP Omen 17-ck2097ng
Intel Core i9-13900HX (Leistung)
0.3959 sec * -3%
Asus ROG Strix G16 G614JZ
Intel Core i9-13980HX
0.387 sec * -0%
HP Omen 17-ck2097ng
Intel Core i9-13900HX
0.3862 sec *

* ... smaller is better

Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64Bit
4311 Points
Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64Bit
275 fps
Cinebench R15 Ref. Match 64Bit
99.6 %
Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64Bit
301 Points
Cinebench R20 CPU (Multi Core)
10118 Points
Cinebench R20 CPU (Single Core)
805 Points
Cinebench R23 Single Core
2095 Points
Cinebench R23 Multi Core
26407 Points
Ajuda
Performance Rating
Lenovo Legion Pro 7 16IRX8H
Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU
97.2 pt
Asus ROG Strix G16 G614JZ
Intel Core i9-13980HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU
95.9 pt
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023
Intel Core i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU
94.4 pt
Average Intel Core i9-13900HX
 
91.4 pt
HP Omen 17-ck2097ng
Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU
88.8 pt
Average of class Gaming
 
78.2 pt
HP Omen 17-ck2097ng
Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU
72.2 pt
Alienware m17 R5 (R9 6900HX, RX 6850M XT)
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, Radeon RX 6850M XT
62.8 pt
AIDA64 / FP32 Ray-Trace
Asus ROG Strix G16 G614JZ
Intel Core i9-13980HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU (v6.75.6100)
27227 KRay/s +55%
Lenovo Legion Pro 7 16IRX8H
Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU (v6.85.6300)
26741 KRay/s +52%
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023
Intel Core i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU (v6.85.6300)
25857 KRay/s +47%
Average Intel Core i9-13900HX
  (17589 - 27615, n=21)
24097 KRay/s +37%
HP Omen 17-ck2097ng
Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU (v6.75.6100, Leistung)
23990 KRay/s +36%
Average of class Gaming
  (4986 - 60169, n=183, last 2 years)
21914 KRay/s +25%
HP Omen 17-ck2097ng
Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU (v6.75.6100)
17589 KRay/s
Alienware m17 R5 (R9 6900HX, RX 6850M XT)
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, Radeon RX 6850M XT (v6.75.6100)
16202 KRay/s -8%
AIDA64 / FPU Julia
Lenovo Legion Pro 7 16IRX8H
Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU (v6.85.6300)
133668 Points +51%
Asus ROG Strix G16 G614JZ
Intel Core i9-13980HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU (v6.75.6100)
131131 Points +48%
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023
Intel Core i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU (v6.85.6300)
125944 Points +42%
Average Intel Core i9-13900HX
  (88686 - 137015, n=21)
120602 Points +36%
HP Omen 17-ck2097ng
Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU (v6.75.6100, Leistung)
118518 Points +34%
Average of class Gaming
  (25360 - 252486, n=183, last 2 years)
106726 Points +20%
Alienware m17 R5 (R9 6900HX, RX 6850M XT)
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, Radeon RX 6850M XT (v6.75.6100)
104841 Points +18%
HP Omen 17-ck2097ng
Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU (v6.75.6100)
88686 Points
AIDA64 / CPU SHA3
Lenovo Legion Pro 7 16IRX8H
Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU (v6.85.6300)
6750 MB/s +55%
Asus ROG Strix G16 G614JZ
Intel Core i9-13980HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU (v6.75.6100)
6596 MB/s +51%
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023
Intel Core i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU (v6.85.6300)
6350 MB/s +46%
Average Intel Core i9-13900HX
  (4362 - 7029, n=21)
6061 MB/s +39%
HP Omen 17-ck2097ng
Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU (v6.75.6100, Leistung)
5888 MB/s +35%
Average of class Gaming
  (1339 - 10389, n=183, last 2 years)
4910 MB/s +13%
HP Omen 17-ck2097ng
Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU (v6.75.6100)
4362 MB/s
Alienware m17 R5 (R9 6900HX, RX 6850M XT)
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, Radeon RX 6850M XT (v6.75.6100)
3457 MB/s -21%
AIDA64 / CPU Queen
Asus ROG Strix G16 G614JZ
Intel Core i9-13980HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU (v6.75.6100)
143409 Points +7%
HP Omen 17-ck2097ng
Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU
134514 Points
Lenovo Legion Pro 7 16IRX8H
Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU (v6.85.6300)
134227 Points 0%
Average Intel Core i9-13900HX
  (125644 - 141385, n=21)
133924 Points 0%
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023
Intel Core i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU (v6.85.6300)
133226 Points -1%
HP Omen 17-ck2097ng
Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU (v6.75.6100, Leistung)
125644 Points -7%
Average of class Gaming
  (50699 - 200651, n=183, last 2 years)
117145 Points -13%
Alienware m17 R5 (R9 6900HX, RX 6850M XT)
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, Radeon RX 6850M XT (v6.75.6100)
105169 Points -22%
AIDA64 / FPU SinJulia
Asus ROG Strix G16 G614JZ
Intel Core i9-13980HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU (v6.75.6100)
17026 Points +38%
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023
Intel Core i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU (v6.85.6300)
15813 Points +28%
Lenovo Legion Pro 7 16IRX8H
Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU (v6.85.6300)
15807 Points +28%
HP Omen 17-ck2097ng
Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU (v6.75.6100, Leistung)
14959 Points +21%
Average Intel Core i9-13900HX
  (12334 - 17179, n=21)
14889 Points +21%
Average of class Gaming
  (4800 - 32988, n=183, last 2 years)
13258 Points +7%
Alienware m17 R5 (R9 6900HX, RX 6850M XT)
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, Radeon RX 6850M XT (v6.75.6100)
12918 Points +5%
HP Omen 17-ck2097ng
Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU (v6.75.6100)
12334 Points
AIDA64 / FPU Mandel
Lenovo Legion Pro 7 16IRX8H
Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU (v6.85.6300)
66753 Points +52%
Asus ROG Strix G16 G614JZ
Intel Core i9-13980HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU (v6.75.6100)
66336 Points +51%
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023
Intel Core i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU (v6.85.6300)
63308 Points +44%
Average Intel Core i9-13900HX
  (43850 - 69202, n=21)
59821 Points +36%
HP Omen 17-ck2097ng
Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU (v6.75.6100, Leistung)
59656 Points +36%
Alienware m17 R5 (R9 6900HX, RX 6850M XT)
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, Radeon RX 6850M XT (v6.75.6100)
57695 Points +32%
Average of class Gaming
  (12321 - 134044, n=183, last 2 years)
53700 Points +22%
HP Omen 17-ck2097ng
Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU (v6.75.6100)
43850 Points
AIDA64 / CPU AES
Average Intel Core i9-13900HX
  (89413 - 237881, n=21)
139015 MB/s +55%
Asus ROG Strix G16 G614JZ
Intel Core i9-13980HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU (v6.75.6100)
128070 MB/s +43%
Lenovo Legion Pro 7 16IRX8H
Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU (v6.85.6300)
127698 MB/s +43%
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023
Intel Core i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU (v6.85.6300)
125644 MB/s +41%
HP Omen 17-ck2097ng
Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU (v6.75.6100, Leistung)
114553 MB/s +28%
Average of class Gaming
  (19065 - 328679, n=183, last 2 years)
109216 MB/s +22%
HP Omen 17-ck2097ng
Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU (v6.75.6100)
89413 MB/s
Alienware m17 R5 (R9 6900HX, RX 6850M XT)
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, Radeon RX 6850M XT (v6.75.6100)
54897 MB/s -39%
AIDA64 / CPU ZLib
Lenovo Legion Pro 7 16IRX8H
Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU (v6.85.6300)
1936 MB/s +51%
Asus ROG Strix G16 G614JZ
Intel Core i9-13980HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU (v6.75.6100)
1912 MB/s +49%
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023
Intel Core i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU (v6.85.6300)
1850 MB/s +44%
Average Intel Core i9-13900HX
  (1284 - 1958, n=21)
1755 MB/s +37%
HP Omen 17-ck2097ng
Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU (v6.75.6100, Leistung)
1747 MB/s +36%
Average of class Gaming
  (373 - 2409, n=183, last 2 years)
1367 MB/s +6%
HP Omen 17-ck2097ng
Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU (v6.75.6100)
1284 MB/s
Alienware m17 R5 (R9 6900HX, RX 6850M XT)
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, Radeon RX 6850M XT (v6.75.6100)
854 MB/s -33%
AIDA64 / FP64 Ray-Trace
Lenovo Legion Pro 7 16IRX8H
Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU (v6.85.6300)
14722 KRay/s +55%
Asus ROG Strix G16 G614JZ
Intel Core i9-13980HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU (v6.75.6100)
14671 KRay/s +55%
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023
Intel Core i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU (v6.85.6300)
13844 KRay/s +46%
Average Intel Core i9-13900HX
  (9481 - 15279, n=21)
13066 KRay/s +38%
HP Omen 17-ck2097ng
Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU (v6.75.6100, Leistung)
12871 KRay/s +36%
Average of class Gaming
  (2540 - 31796, n=183, last 2 years)
11803 KRay/s +24%
HP Omen 17-ck2097ng
Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU (v6.75.6100)
9481 KRay/s
Alienware m17 R5 (R9 6900HX, RX 6850M XT)
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, Radeon RX 6850M XT (v6.75.6100)
8777 KRay/s -7%
AIDA64 / CPU PhotoWorxx
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023
Intel Core i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU (v6.85.6300)
50834 MPixel/s +1%
HP Omen 17-ck2097ng
Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU (v6.75.6100)
50563 MPixel/s
HP Omen 17-ck2097ng
Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU (v6.75.6100, Leistung)
50544 MPixel/s 0%
Lenovo Legion Pro 7 16IRX8H
Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU (v6.85.6300)
48626 MPixel/s -4%
Average Intel Core i9-13900HX
  (42994 - 51994, n=21)
48439 MPixel/s -4%
Average of class Gaming
  (10805 - 60161, n=184, last 2 years)
40243 MPixel/s -20%
Asus ROG Strix G16 G614JZ
Intel Core i9-13980HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU (v6.75.6100)
37069 MPixel/s -27%
Alienware m17 R5 (R9 6900HX, RX 6850M XT)
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, Radeon RX 6850M XT (v6.75.6100)
30343 MPixel/s -40%

Desempenho do sistema

O sistema em bom funcionamento oferece desempenho computacional suficiente para áreas de aplicação ávidas de energia, tais como renderização e jogos. As taxas de transferência da faixa de memória de trabalho em níveis normais para armazenamento DDR5-5600. Elas são acompanhadas de bons resultados PC-Mark.

A memória de trabalho é executada em modo de canal duplo.
A memória de trabalho é executada em modo de canal duplo.
PCMark 10 / Score
Average Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU
  (7609 - 8549, n=3)
7996 Points +5%
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, i9-13950HX, SSSTC CA6-8D1024
7888 Points +4%
Lenovo Legion Pro 7 16IRX8H
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, i9-13900HX, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
7830 Points +3%
Average of class Gaming
  (5776 - 9852, n=164, last 2 years)
7803 Points +3%
HP Omen 17-ck2097ng
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, i9-13900HX, SK hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X101N
7609 Points
Alienware m17 R5 (R9 6900HX, RX 6850M XT)
Radeon RX 6850M XT, R9 6900HX, SSSTC CA6-8D1024
7292 Points -4%
Asus ROG Strix G16 G614JZ
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, i9-13980HX, WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00
7223 Points -5%
PCMark 10 / Essentials
Asus ROG Strix G16 G614JZ
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, i9-13980HX, WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00
12031 Points +2%
HP Omen 17-ck2097ng
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, i9-13900HX, SK hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X101N
11824 Points
Lenovo Legion Pro 7 16IRX8H
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, i9-13900HX, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
11703 Points -1%
Average Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU
  (10982 - 11824, n=3)
11503 Points -3%
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, i9-13950HX, SSSTC CA6-8D1024
11078 Points -6%
Average of class Gaming
  (9057 - 12334, n=163, last 2 years)
10833 Points -8%
Alienware m17 R5 (R9 6900HX, RX 6850M XT)
Radeon RX 6850M XT, R9 6900HX, SSSTC CA6-8D1024
10250 Points -13%
PCMark 10 / Productivity
Lenovo Legion Pro 7 16IRX8H
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, i9-13900HX, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
10788 Points +8%
Average Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU
  (9976 - 10788, n=3)
10417 Points +4%
HP Omen 17-ck2097ng
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, i9-13900HX, SK hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X101N
9976 Points
Average of class Gaming
  (6662 - 14612, n=163, last 2 years)
9904 Points -1%
Alienware m17 R5 (R9 6900HX, RX 6850M XT)
Radeon RX 6850M XT, R9 6900HX, SSSTC CA6-8D1024
9090 Points -9%
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, i9-13950HX, SSSTC CA6-8D1024
8271 Points -17%
Asus ROG Strix G16 G614JZ
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, i9-13980HX, WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00
7686 Points -23%
PCMark 10 / Digital Content Creation
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, i9-13950HX, SSSTC CA6-8D1024
14535 Points +43%
Average of class Gaming
  (6703 - 18475, n=163, last 2 years)
12134 Points +20%
Average Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU
  (10135 - 14720, n=3)
11725 Points +16%
Alienware m17 R5 (R9 6900HX, RX 6850M XT)
Radeon RX 6850M XT, R9 6900HX, SSSTC CA6-8D1024
11296 Points +11%
Asus ROG Strix G16 G614JZ
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, i9-13980HX, WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00
11058 Points +9%
Lenovo Legion Pro 7 16IRX8H
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, i9-13900HX, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
10319 Points +2%
HP Omen 17-ck2097ng
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, i9-13900HX, SK hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X101N
10135 Points
CrossMark / Overall
Asus ROG Strix G16 G614JZ
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, i9-13980HX, WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00
2182 Points +10%
Average Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU
  (1991 - 2194, n=2)
2093 Points +5%
HP Omen 17-ck2097ng
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, i9-13900HX, SK hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X101N
1991 Points
Average of class Gaming
  (1247 - 2344, n=145, last 2 years)
1910 Points -4%
Alienware m17 R5 (R9 6900HX, RX 6850M XT)
Radeon RX 6850M XT, R9 6900HX, SSSTC CA6-8D1024
1597 Points -20%
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, i9-13950HX, SSSTC CA6-8D1024
1592 Points -20%
CrossMark / Productivity
Asus ROG Strix G16 G614JZ
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, i9-13980HX, WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00
2044 Points +12%
Average Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU
  (1828 - 2059, n=2)
1944 Points +6%
HP Omen 17-ck2097ng
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, i9-13900HX, SK hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X101N
1828 Points
Average of class Gaming
  (1299 - 2204, n=145, last 2 years)
1809 Points -1%
Alienware m17 R5 (R9 6900HX, RX 6850M XT)
Radeon RX 6850M XT, R9 6900HX, SSSTC CA6-8D1024
1565 Points -14%
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, i9-13950HX, SSSTC CA6-8D1024
1509 Points -17%
CrossMark / Creativity
Asus ROG Strix G16 G614JZ
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, i9-13980HX, WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00
2400 Points +7%
Average Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU
  (2239 - 2411, n=2)
2325 Points +4%
HP Omen 17-ck2097ng
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, i9-13900HX, SK hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X101N
2239 Points
Average of class Gaming
  (1275 - 2660, n=145, last 2 years)
2097 Points -6%
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, i9-13950HX, SSSTC CA6-8D1024
1780 Points -21%
Alienware m17 R5 (R9 6900HX, RX 6850M XT)
Radeon RX 6850M XT, R9 6900HX, SSSTC CA6-8D1024
1738 Points -22%
CrossMark / Responsiveness
Asus ROG Strix G16 G614JZ
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, i9-13980HX, WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00
1990 Points +10%
Average Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU
  (1808 - 1998, n=2)
1903 Points +5%
HP Omen 17-ck2097ng
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, i9-13900HX, SK hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X101N
1808 Points
Average of class Gaming
  (1030 - 2330, n=145, last 2 years)
1709 Points -5%
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, i9-13950HX, SSSTC CA6-8D1024
1342 Points -26%
Alienware m17 R5 (R9 6900HX, RX 6850M XT)
Radeon RX 6850M XT, R9 6900HX, SSSTC CA6-8D1024
1315 Points -27%
PCMark 8 Home Score Accelerated v2
5074 pontos
PCMark 8 Work Score Accelerated v2
6244 pontos
PCMark 10 Score
7609 pontos
Ajuda
AIDA64 / Memory Copy
HP Omen 17-ck2097ng
Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU
77973 MB/s
Lenovo Legion Pro 7 16IRX8H
Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU
77544 MB/s -1%
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023
Intel Core i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU
77060 MB/s -1%
Average Intel Core i9-13900HX
  (67716 - 78835, n=21)
75033 MB/s -4%
Average of class Gaming
  (21842 - 94222, n=183, last 2 years)
65434 MB/s -16%
Asus ROG Strix G16 G614JZ
Intel Core i9-13980HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU
62189 MB/s -20%
HP Omen 17-ck1075ng
Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
53008 MB/s -32%
Alienware m17 R5 (R9 6900HX, RX 6850M XT)
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, Radeon RX 6850M XT
50334 MB/s -35%
AIDA64 / Memory Read
HP Omen 17-ck2097ng
Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU
86248 MB/s
Lenovo Legion Pro 7 16IRX8H
Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU
85073 MB/s -1%
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023
Intel Core i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU
84869 MB/s -2%
Average Intel Core i9-13900HX
  (73998 - 88462, n=21)
82199 MB/s -5%
Asus ROG Strix G16 G614JZ
Intel Core i9-13980HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU
72658 MB/s -16%
Average of class Gaming
  (23681 - 99713, n=183, last 2 years)
69366 MB/s -20%
HP Omen 17-ck1075ng
Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
59935 MB/s -31%
Alienware m17 R5 (R9 6900HX, RX 6850M XT)
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, Radeon RX 6850M XT
50996 MB/s -41%
AIDA64 / Memory Write
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023
Intel Core i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU
80441 MB/s +4%
HP Omen 17-ck2097ng
Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU
76988 MB/s
Average Intel Core i9-13900HX
  (65472 - 77045, n=21)
73168 MB/s -5%
Lenovo Legion Pro 7 16IRX8H
Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU
70939 MB/s -8%
Average of class Gaming
  (22986 - 108954, n=183, last 2 years)
67198 MB/s -13%
Asus ROG Strix G16 G614JZ
Intel Core i9-13980HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU
59912 MB/s -22%
HP Omen 17-ck1075ng
Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
58827 MB/s -24%
Alienware m17 R5 (R9 6900HX, RX 6850M XT)
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, Radeon RX 6850M XT
55214 MB/s -28%
AIDA64 / Memory Latency
HP Omen 17-ck1075ng
Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
100.8 ns * -19%
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023
Intel Core i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU
99.5 ns * -17%
Alienware m17 R5 (R9 6900HX, RX 6850M XT)
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, Radeon RX 6850M XT
94.6 ns * -12%
Average of class Gaming
  (59.5 - 259, n=183, last 2 years)
93.7 ns * -11%
Asus ROG Strix G16 G614JZ
Intel Core i9-13980HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU
87.5 ns * -3%
Average Intel Core i9-13900HX
  (80.4 - 91.1, n=21)
86.3 ns * -2%
HP Omen 17-ck2097ng
Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU
84.7 ns *
Lenovo Legion Pro 7 16IRX8H
Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU
83.2 ns * +2%

* ... smaller is better

Latências DPC

O teste padronizado do Monitor de Latência (navegação na web, reprodução de vídeo 4k, carga alta Prime95) revela algum comportamento conspícuo. O sistema não parece ser adequado para o processamento de vídeo e áudio em tempo real. Futuras atualizações de software podem levar a algumas melhorias ou tornar as coisas ainda piores.

Monitor de latência
Monitor de latência
DPC Latencies / LatencyMon - interrupt to process latency (max), Web, Youtube, Prime95
Asus ROG Strix G16 G614JZ
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, i9-13980HX, WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00
2505 μs * -19%
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, i9-13950HX, SSSTC CA6-8D1024
2448.6 μs * -16%
HP Omen 17-ck2097ng
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, i9-13900HX, SK hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X101N
2103 μs *
Alienware m17 R5 (R9 6900HX, RX 6850M XT)
Radeon RX 6850M XT, R9 6900HX, SSSTC CA6-8D1024
1366.3 μs * +35%
Lenovo Legion Pro 7 16IRX8H
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, i9-13900HX, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
437.7 μs * +79%

* ... smaller is better

Solução de armazenamento

A Omen oferece espaço para duas SSDs PCIe 4 no formato M.2-2280. O PCIe 4 SSD (1 TB) da SK Hynix que é usado aqui oferece taxas de transferência muito boas. Entretanto, nas partes posteriores do loop do DiskSpd, observamos algumas quedas ocasionais de desempenho, provavelmente devido à estrangulamento térmico.

Um SSD PCIe 4 serve como a unidade do sistema.
Um SSD PCIe 4 serve como a unidade do sistema.
Há também um espaço para um segundo SSD.
Há também um espaço para um segundo SSD.
SK hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X101N
CDM 5/6 Read Seq Q32T1: 7152 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write Seq Q32T1: 6095 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Read 4K Q32T1: 752.4 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write 4K Q32T1: 461.8 MB/s
CDM 5 Read Seq: 5626 MB/s
CDM 5 Write Seq: 5120 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Read 4K: 74.2 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write 4K: 286.5 MB/s
Drive Performance Rating - Percent
HP Omen 17-ck2097ng
SK hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X101N
92.9 pt
Lenovo Legion Pro 7 16IRX8H
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
85.1 pt
Average SK hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X101N
 
70 pt
Average of class Gaming
 
67.9 pt
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023
SSSTC CA6-8D1024
64.6 pt
Asus ROG Strix G16 G614JZ
WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00
61.1 pt
Alienware m17 R5 (R9 6900HX, RX 6850M XT)
SSSTC CA6-8D1024
51.9 pt
DiskSpd
seq read
Lenovo Legion Pro 7 16IRX8H
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
4525 (4498.41min - 4525.41max) MB/s +18%
Asus ROG Strix G16 G614JZ
WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00
4093 (4067.17min - 4092.59max) MB/s +6%
Asus ROG Strix G16 G614JZ
WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00
3650 (3626.52min - 3649.67max) MB/s -5%
HP Omen 17-ck2097ng
SK hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X101N
3848 (3815.64min - 3848.21max) MB/s
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023
SSSTC CA6-8D1024
3844 (3257.93min - 3843.87max) MB/s 0%
Average SK hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X101N
  (2511 - 5665, n=18)
3832 MB/s 0%
Average of class Gaming
  (1319 - 7045, n=165, last 2 years)
3475 MB/s -10%
Alienware m17 R5 (R9 6900HX, RX 6850M XT)
SSSTC CA6-8D1024
3428 (3412.07min - 3428.49max) MB/s -11%
seq write
HP Omen 17-ck2097ng
SK hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X101N
5145 (5060.48min - 5145.38max) MB/s
Lenovo Legion Pro 7 16IRX8H
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
4378 (4355.78min - 4378.43max) MB/s -15%
Average of class Gaming
  (535 - 9307, n=165, last 2 years)
3812 MB/s -26%
Average SK hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X101N
  (1690 - 5181, n=18)
3776 MB/s -27%
Asus ROG Strix G16 G614JZ
WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00
3416 (3372.4min - 3415.84max) MB/s -34%
Asus ROG Strix G16 G614JZ
WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00
3366 (3313.08min - 3366.35max) MB/s -35%
Alienware m17 R5 (R9 6900HX, RX 6850M XT)
SSSTC CA6-8D1024
3243 (3188.93min - 3243.04max) MB/s -37%
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023
SSSTC CA6-8D1024
3242 (1498min - 3241.78max) MB/s -37%
seq q8 t1 read
Average SK hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X101N
  (6508 - 7177, n=18)
6917 MB/s +1%
HP Omen 17-ck2097ng
SK hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X101N
6878 (6539.55min - 6877.94max) MB/s
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023
SSSTC CA6-8D1024
6872 (4963.33min - 6872.25max) MB/s 0%
Alienware m17 R5 (R9 6900HX, RX 6850M XT)
SSSTC CA6-8D1024
6861 MB/s 0%
Lenovo Legion Pro 7 16IRX8H
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
6682 (5778.28min - 6681.95max) MB/s -3%
Average of class Gaming
  (2594 - 16089, n=165, last 2 years)
6323 MB/s -8%
Asus ROG Strix G16 G614JZ
WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00
5023 MB/s -27%
Asus ROG Strix G16 G614JZ
WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00
5017 (4534.25min - 5017.23max) MB/s -27%
seq q8 t1 write
HP Omen 17-ck2097ng
SK hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X101N
6110 (6082.58min - 6110.11max) MB/s
Average SK hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X101N
  (2382 - 6159, n=18)
5647 MB/s -8%
Lenovo Legion Pro 7 16IRX8H
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
4943 (4923.06min - 4943.2max) MB/s -19%
Average of class Gaming
  (539 - 14571, n=165, last 2 years)
4851 MB/s -21%
Alienware m17 R5 (R9 6900HX, RX 6850M XT)
SSSTC CA6-8D1024
4831 (4610.18min - 4830.79max) MB/s -21%
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023
SSSTC CA6-8D1024
4244 (427.59min - 4244.22max) MB/s -31%
Asus ROG Strix G16 G614JZ
WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00
3429 (3365.09min - 3429.47max) MB/s -44%
Asus ROG Strix G16 G614JZ
WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00
3387 (3363.41min - 3386.9max) MB/s -45%
4k q1 t1 read
Lenovo Legion Pro 7 16IRX8H
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
95.3 (93.25min - 95.25max) MB/s +19%
HP Omen 17-ck2097ng
SK hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X101N
80 (78.03min - 80.03max) MB/s
Average SK hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X101N
  (54.3 - 85, n=18)
68.9 MB/s -14%
Average of class Gaming
  (30.6 - 95.9, n=165, last 2 years)
66 MB/s -17%
Asus ROG Strix G16 G614JZ
WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00
62.5 (61.85min - 62.46max) MB/s -22%
Asus ROG Strix G16 G614JZ
WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00
61.5 (60.59min - 61.49max) MB/s -23%
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023
SSSTC CA6-8D1024
56.5 (49.8min - 56.49max) MB/s -29%
Alienware m17 R5 (R9 6900HX, RX 6850M XT)
SSSTC CA6-8D1024
52.5 (50.71min - 52.46max) MB/s -34%
4k q1 t1 write
HP Omen 17-ck2097ng
SK hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X101N
289 (284.65min - 288.96max) MB/s
Lenovo Legion Pro 7 16IRX8H
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
255 (243.79min - 255.25max) MB/s -12%
Asus ROG Strix G16 G614JZ
WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00
239 (230.87min - 239.2max) MB/s -17%
Asus ROG Strix G16 G614JZ
WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00
236 (223.33min - 235.64max) MB/s -18%
Average of class Gaming
  (78 - 397, n=165, last 2 years)
224 MB/s -22%
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023
SSSTC CA6-8D1024
220 (56.84min - 219.56max) MB/s -24%
Average SK hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X101N
  (77.7 - 335, n=18)
192.3 MB/s -33%
Alienware m17 R5 (R9 6900HX, RX 6850M XT)
SSSTC CA6-8D1024
126.7 (123.88min - 126.69max) MB/s -56%
4k q32 t16 read
HP Omen 17-ck2097ng
SK hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X101N
5829 (5404.65min - 5828.67max) MB/s
Lenovo Legion Pro 7 16IRX8H
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
4100 (4085.58min - 4100.1max) MB/s -30%
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023
SSSTC CA6-8D1024
3111 (2388.54min - 3111.42max) MB/s -47%
Average of class Gaming
  (417 - 6172, n=165, last 2 years)
2571 MB/s -56%
Average SK hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X101N
  (353 - 5829, n=18)
2082 MB/s -64%
Asus ROG Strix G16 G614JZ
WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00
1533 (1526.72min - 1532.76max) MB/s -74%
Asus ROG Strix G16 G614JZ
WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00
1527 (1525.66min - 1526.54max) MB/s -74%
Alienware m17 R5 (R9 6900HX, RX 6850M XT)
SSSTC CA6-8D1024
843 (833.55min - 843.1max) MB/s -86%
4k q32 t16 write
Lenovo Legion Pro 7 16IRX8H
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
3537 (3519.01min - 3536.66max) MB/s +10%
HP Omen 17-ck2097ng
SK hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X101N
3208 (2280.32min - 3207.74max) MB/s
Asus ROG Strix G16 G614JZ
WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00
2783 (2698.54min - 2783.41max) MB/s -13%
Asus ROG Strix G16 G614JZ
WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00
2689 (2088.87min - 2688.7max) MB/s -16%
Average of class Gaming
  (162.3 - 4869, n=165, last 2 years)
2137 MB/s -33%
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023
SSSTC CA6-8D1024
1282 (960.6min - 1281.78max) MB/s -60%
Average SK hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X101N
  (148.5 - 3719, n=18)
1210 MB/s -62%
Alienware m17 R5 (R9 6900HX, RX 6850M XT)
SSSTC CA6-8D1024
288 (123min - 287.76max) MB/s -91%
AS SSD
Score Total
HP Omen 17-ck2097ng
SK hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X101N
10330 Points
Lenovo Legion Pro 7 16IRX8H
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
8224 Points -20%
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023
SSSTC CA6-8D1024
7311 Points -29%
Average SK hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X101N
  (4390 - 10562, n=18)
6931 Points -33%
Average of class Gaming
  (2271 - 13854, n=156, last 2 years)
6746 Points -35%
Asus ROG Strix G16 G614JZ
WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00
5610 Points -46%
Alienware m17 R5 (R9 6900HX, RX 6850M XT)
SSSTC CA6-8D1024
4008 Points -61%
Score Read
HP Omen 17-ck2097ng
SK hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X101N
3448 Points
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023
SSSTC CA6-8D1024
3308 Points -4%
Lenovo Legion Pro 7 16IRX8H
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
3188 Points -8%
Average of class Gaming
  (776 - 4721, n=156, last 2 years)
2446 Points -29%
Average SK hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X101N
  (953 - 3793, n=18)
1997 Points -42%
Asus ROG Strix G16 G614JZ
WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00
1761 Points -49%
Alienware m17 R5 (R9 6900HX, RX 6850M XT)
SSSTC CA6-8D1024
1250 Points -64%
Score Write
HP Omen 17-ck2097ng
SK hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X101N
5157 Points
Average SK hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X101N
  (2690 - 5157, n=18)
3976 Points -23%
Lenovo Legion Pro 7 16IRX8H
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
3468 Points -33%
Average of class Gaming
  (515 - 7208, n=156, last 2 years)
3112 Points -40%
Asus ROG Strix G16 G614JZ
WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00
3010 Points -42%
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023
SSSTC CA6-8D1024
2428 Points -53%
Alienware m17 R5 (R9 6900HX, RX 6850M XT)
SSSTC CA6-8D1024
2211 Points -57%
Seq Read
HP Omen 17-ck2097ng
SK hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X101N
5861.95 MB/s
Lenovo Legion Pro 7 16IRX8H
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
5429.33 MB/s -7%
Average SK hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X101N
  (3522 - 5892, n=18)
5299 MB/s -10%
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023
SSSTC CA6-8D1024
5144.76 MB/s -12%
Average of class Gaming
  (2260 - 12763, n=156, last 2 years)
4945 MB/s -16%
Alienware m17 R5 (R9 6900HX, RX 6850M XT)
SSSTC CA6-8D1024
4716 MB/s -20%
Asus ROG Strix G16 G614JZ
WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00
4308.28 MB/s -27%
Seq Write
HP Omen 17-ck2097ng
SK hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X101N
5242.91 MB/s
Lenovo Legion Pro 7 16IRX8H
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
4064.76 MB/s -22%
Average SK hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X101N
  (2489 - 5880, n=18)
3846 MB/s -27%
Average of class Gaming
  (495 - 11316, n=156, last 2 years)
3760 MB/s -28%
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023
SSSTC CA6-8D1024
3058.47 MB/s -42%
Asus ROG Strix G16 G614JZ
WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00
2890.58 MB/s -45%
Alienware m17 R5 (R9 6900HX, RX 6850M XT)
SSSTC CA6-8D1024
2671 MB/s -49%
4K Read
Lenovo Legion Pro 7 16IRX8H
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
85.9 MB/s +35%
Average SK hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X101N
  (56 - 79.4, n=18)
66.1 MB/s +4%
Average of class Gaming
  (27.8 - 112.1, n=156, last 2 years)
65.2 MB/s +2%
HP Omen 17-ck2097ng
SK hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X101N
63.85 MB/s
Asus ROG Strix G16 G614JZ
WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00
58.78 MB/s -8%
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023
SSSTC CA6-8D1024
49.65 MB/s -22%
Alienware m17 R5 (R9 6900HX, RX 6850M XT)
SSSTC CA6-8D1024
49.14 MB/s -23%
4K Write
HP Omen 17-ck2097ng
SK hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X101N
251.87 MB/s
Asus ROG Strix G16 G614JZ
WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00
220.74 MB/s -12%
Average SK hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X101N
  (144.4 - 286, n=18)
220 MB/s -13%
Average of class Gaming
  (108.8 - 512, n=156, last 2 years)
213 MB/s -15%
Lenovo Legion Pro 7 16IRX8H
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
205.06 MB/s -19%
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023
SSSTC CA6-8D1024
144.8 MB/s -43%
Alienware m17 R5 (R9 6900HX, RX 6850M XT)
SSSTC CA6-8D1024
120.14 MB/s -52%
4K-64 Read
HP Omen 17-ck2097ng
SK hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X101N
2798.41 MB/s
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023
SSSTC CA6-8D1024
2744.3 MB/s -2%
Lenovo Legion Pro 7 16IRX8H
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
2558.72 MB/s -9%
Average of class Gaming
  (451 - 3475, n=156, last 2 years)
1881 MB/s -33%
Average SK hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X101N
  (359 - 3131, n=18)
1401 MB/s -50%
Asus ROG Strix G16 G614JZ
WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00
1271.5 MB/s -55%
Alienware m17 R5 (R9 6900HX, RX 6850M XT)
SSSTC CA6-8D1024
728.79 MB/s -74%
4K-64 Write
HP Omen 17-ck2097ng
SK hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X101N
4380.62 MB/s
Average SK hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X101N
  (2206 - 4381, n=18)
3371 MB/s -23%
Lenovo Legion Pro 7 16IRX8H
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
2856.24 MB/s -35%
Average of class Gaming
  (277 - 5909, n=156, last 2 years)
2527 MB/s -42%
Asus ROG Strix G16 G614JZ
WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00
2499.95 MB/s -43%
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023
SSSTC CA6-8D1024
1944.47 MB/s -56%
Alienware m17 R5 (R9 6900HX, RX 6850M XT)
SSSTC CA6-8D1024
1824.12 MB/s -58%
Access Time Read
Asus ROG Strix G16 G614JZ
WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00
0.087 ms * -112%
Average of class Gaming
  (0.016 - 0.379, n=155, last 2 years)
0.05576 ms * -36%
HP Omen 17-ck2097ng
SK hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X101N
0.041 ms *
Average SK hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X101N
  (0.017 - 0.062, n=18)
0.03817 ms * +7%
Alienware m17 R5 (R9 6900HX, RX 6850M XT)
SSSTC CA6-8D1024
0.031 ms * +24%
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023
SSSTC CA6-8D1024
0.028 ms * +32%
Lenovo Legion Pro 7 16IRX8H
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
0.025 ms * +39%
Access Time Write
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023
SSSTC CA6-8D1024
0.082 ms * -356%
Average of class Gaming
  (0.011 - 1.028, n=156, last 2 years)
0.04728 ms * -163%
Average SK hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X101N
  (0.017 - 0.069, n=18)
0.03561 ms * -98%
Alienware m17 R5 (R9 6900HX, RX 6850M XT)
SSSTC CA6-8D1024
0.032 ms * -78%
Lenovo Legion Pro 7 16IRX8H
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
0.019 ms * -6%
HP Omen 17-ck2097ng
SK hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X101N
0.018 ms *
Asus ROG Strix G16 G614JZ
WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00
0.017 ms * +6%

* ... smaller is better

Disk Throttling: DiskSpd Read Loop, Queue Depth 8

036072010801440180021602520288032403600396043204680504054005760612064806840Tooltip
HP Omen 17-ck2097ng SK hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X101N: Ø6777 (3480.47-7122.14)
Alienware m17 R5 (R9 6900HX, RX 6850M XT) SSSTC CA6-8D1024: Ø4118 (1511-6910.52)
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 SSSTC CA6-8D1024: Ø6412 (5645.36-6872.58)
Lenovo Legion Pro 7 16IRX8H Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR: Ø5697 (3283.58-6647.05)
Asus ROG Strix G16 G614JZ WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00: Ø5002 (4613.53-5017.26)

Placa Gráfica

Com oGeForce RTX 4080gPU para laptop, a HP usa o atual número dois do portfólio de GPU móvel da Nvidia. Ela tem 7.424 shaders, um ônibus de 192 bits, e é capaz de usar o rápido armazenamento GDDR6 (12.288 MB). O RTX 4080 é configurado com um TGP de 175 watts (150 W + 25 W Dynamic Boost), que é o máximo configurável de acordo com a Nvidia. De acordo com nosso teste The Witcher 3, o TGP não é totalmente utilizado.

Os resultados de referência variam abaixo da média das GPUs RTX 4080 que testamos até agora. O perfil "Performance" levará a alguns pequenos aumentos ocasionais na performance gráfica. O modo dGPU não levará a nenhuma outra melhoria. A troca entre o dGPU e o Optimus não requer reinício - o Optimus avançado é suportado.

Fire Strike (funcionamento em rede, Equilibrado)
Fire Strike (funcionamento em rede, Equilibrado)
Fire Strike (funcionamento por bateria, balanceado)
Fire Strike (funcionamento por bateria, balanceado)
Fire Strike (operação de rede, desempenho)
Fire Strike (operação de rede, desempenho)
Fire Strike (operação de rede, Eco)
Fire Strike (operação de rede, Eco)
Fire Strike (operação de rede, desempenho, dGPU)
Fire Strike (operação de rede, desempenho, dGPU)
3DMark Performance Rating - Percent
Asus ROG Strix G16 G614JZ
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13980HX
98.9 pt
Lenovo Legion Pro 7 16IRX8H
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13900HX
94.4 pt
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 -1!
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13950HX
94.3 pt
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU
 
90 pt
HP Omen 17-ck2097ng
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13900HX
89.1 pt
HP Omen 17-ck2097ng
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13900HX
86.1 pt
HP Omen 17-ck2097ng
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13900HX
85.8 pt
Alienware m17 R5 (R9 6900HX, RX 6850M XT)
AMD Radeon RX 6850M XT, AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX
77.9 pt
Average of class Gaming
 
74.6 pt
3DMark 11 - 1280x720 Performance GPU
Lenovo Legion Pro 7 16IRX8H
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13900HX
60038 Points +9%
HP Omen 17-ck2097ng
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13900HX (Leistung)
59457 Points +8%
Asus ROG Strix G16 G614JZ
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13980HX
58631 Points +6%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU
  (45199 - 63128, n=24)
56791 Points +3%
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13950HX
56565 Points +3%
HP Omen 17-ck2097ng
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13900HX
55111 Points
HP Omen 17-ck2097ng
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13900HX (Leistung, dGPU)
54336 Points -1%
Average of class Gaming
  (1029 - 72178, n=183, last 2 years)
43810 Points -21%
Alienware m17 R5 (R9 6900HX, RX 6850M XT)
AMD Radeon RX 6850M XT, AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX
41942 Points -24%
3DMark
1280x720 Cloud Gate Standard Graphics
Alienware m17 R5 (R9 6900HX, RX 6850M XT)
AMD Radeon RX 6850M XT, AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX
168293 Points +30%
Asus ROG Strix G16 G614JZ
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13980HX
164706 Points +27%
Average of class Gaming
  (15902 - 193851, n=101, last 2 years)
143583 Points +11%
Lenovo Legion Pro 7 16IRX8H
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13900HX
138528 Points +7%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU
  (92134 - 167815, n=10)
133526 Points +3%
HP Omen 17-ck2097ng
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13900HX (Leistung, dGPU)
133330 Points +3%
HP Omen 17-ck2097ng
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13900HX (Leistung)
131984 Points +2%
HP Omen 17-ck2097ng
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13900HX
129611 Points
1920x1080 Fire Strike Graphics
Asus ROG Strix G16 G614JZ
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13980HX
43847 Points +8%
Lenovo Legion Pro 7 16IRX8H
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13900HX
43525 Points +8%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU
  (33058 - 45220, n=22)
40862 Points +1%
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13950HX
40570 Points 0%
HP Omen 17-ck2097ng
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13900HX
40449 Points
HP Omen 17-ck2097ng
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13900HX (Leistung)
39852 Points -1%
HP Omen 17-ck2097ng
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13900HX (Leistung, dGPU)
38171 Points -6%
Alienware m17 R5 (R9 6900HX, RX 6850M XT)
AMD Radeon RX 6850M XT, AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX
34948 Points -14%
Average of class Gaming
  (781 - 53059, n=194, last 2 years)
31415 Points -22%
2560x1440 Time Spy Graphics
Asus ROG Strix G16 G614JZ
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13980HX
19157 Points +20%
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13950HX
18441 Points +15%
Lenovo Legion Pro 7 16IRX8H
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13900HX
18417 Points +15%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU
  (13282 - 19663, n=22)
17777 Points +11%
HP Omen 17-ck2097ng
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13900HX (Leistung)
16852 Points +5%
HP Omen 17-ck2097ng
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13900HX (Leistung, dGPU)
16584 Points +4%
HP Omen 17-ck2097ng
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13900HX
15982 Points
Average of class Gaming
  (224 - 22717, n=189, last 2 years)
13118 Points -18%
Alienware m17 R5 (R9 6900HX, RX 6850M XT)
AMD Radeon RX 6850M XT, AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX
11912 Points -25%
Blender
v3.3 Classroom OPTIX/RTX
Average of class Gaming
  (9 - 95, n=179, last 2 years)
20.9 Seconds * -31%
HP Omen 17-ck2097ng
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13900HX (3.3.3)
16 Seconds *
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU
  (13 - 20, n=22)
15.3 Seconds * +4%
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13950HX (3.3.3)
15 Seconds * +6%
Lenovo Legion Pro 7 16IRX8H
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13900HX (3.3.3)
15 Seconds * +6%
Asus ROG Strix G16 G614JZ
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13980HX (3.3.3)
14 Seconds * +12%
HP Omen 17-ck2097ng
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13900HX (3.3.3, Leistung)
14 Seconds * +12%
v3.3 Classroom CUDA
Average of class Gaming
  (16 - 175, n=185, last 2 years)
36.9 Seconds * -68%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU
  (21 - 127, n=24)
27.2 Seconds * -24%
Lenovo Legion Pro 7 16IRX8H
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13900HX (3.3.3)
23 Seconds * -5%
HP Omen 17-ck2097ng
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13900HX (3.3.3, Leistung)
23 Seconds * -5%
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13950HX (3.3.3)
22 Seconds * -0%
HP Omen 17-ck2097ng
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13900HX (3.3.3)
22 Seconds *
Asus ROG Strix G16 G614JZ
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13980HX (3.3.3)
22 Seconds * -0%
HP Omen 17-ck2097ng
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13900HX (3.3.3, dGPU, Leistung)
22 Seconds * -0%
V-Ray 5 Benchmark
GPU RTX
HP Omen 17-ck2097ng
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13900HX (5.0.1)
2688 mpaths
HP Omen 17-ck2097ng
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13900HX (5.0.1, dGPU, Leistung)
2672 mpaths -1%
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13950HX (5.0.1)
2655 mpaths -1%
HP Omen 17-ck2097ng
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13900HX (5.0.1, Leistung)
2632 mpaths -2%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU
  (2128 - 2843, n=17)
2620 mpaths -3%
Average of class Gaming
  (171 - 3824, n=113, last 2 years)
2190 mpaths -19%
GPU CUDA
HP Omen 17-ck2097ng
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13900HX (5.0.1, dGPU, Leistung)
1989 mpaths 0%
HP Omen 17-ck2097ng
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13900HX (5.0.1, Leistung)
1988 mpaths 0%
HP Omen 17-ck2097ng
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13900HX (5.0.1)
1983 mpaths
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU
  (1647 - 2112, n=17)
1949 mpaths -2%
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13950HX (5.0.1)
1945 mpaths -2%
Average of class Gaming
  (120 - 2797, n=115, last 2 years)
1574 mpaths -21%
CPU
HP Omen 17-ck2097ng
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13900HX (5.0.1, Leistung)
19593 mpaths +30%
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13950HX (5.0.1)
18935 mpaths +26%
HP Omen 17-ck2097ng
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13900HX (5.0.1, dGPU, Leistung)
17206 mpaths +14%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU
  (11906 - 21823, n=17)
17159 mpaths +14%
Average of class Gaming
  (3562 - 26944, n=117, last 2 years)
15137 mpaths 0%
HP Omen 17-ck2097ng
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13900HX (5.0.1)
15071 mpaths
V-Ray Benchmark Next 4.10
GPU
HP Omen 17-ck2097ng
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13900HX (v4.10.07, Leistung)
940 mpaths +2%
Asus ROG Strix G16 G614JZ
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13980HX (v4.10.07 )
939 mpaths +1%
Lenovo Legion Pro 7 16IRX8H
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13900HX (v4.10.07 )
937 mpaths +1%
HP Omen 17-ck2097ng
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13900HX (v4.10.07 )
926 mpaths
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU
  (812 - 1036, n=16)
924 mpaths 0%
HP Omen 17-ck2097ng
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13900HX (v4.10.07, dGPU, Leistung)
923 mpaths 0%
Average of class Gaming
  (54 - 1334, n=151, last 2 years)
713 mpaths -23%
Alienware m17 R5 (R9 6900HX, RX 6850M XT)
AMD Radeon RX 6850M XT, AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX (v4.10.07 )
83 mpaths -91%
CPU
Lenovo Legion Pro 7 16IRX8H
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13900HX (v4.10.07 )
30622 ksamples +31%
Asus ROG Strix G16 G614JZ
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13980HX (v4.10.07 )
30614 ksamples +31%
HP Omen 17-ck2097ng
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13900HX (v4.10.07, Leistung)
29548 ksamples +27%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU
  (19636 - 31653, n=16)
27474 ksamples +18%
HP Omen 17-ck2097ng
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13900HX (v4.10.07, dGPU, Leistung)
25321 ksamples +9%
HP Omen 17-ck2097ng
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13900HX (v4.10.07 )
23289 ksamples
Average of class Gaming
  (5413 - 37629, n=151, last 2 years)
21537 ksamples -8%
Alienware m17 R5 (R9 6900HX, RX 6850M XT)
AMD Radeon RX 6850M XT, AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX (v4.10.07 )
14626 ksamples -37%
Geekbench 5.5 - OpenCL Score
Asus ROG Strix G16 G614JZ
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13980HX
189320 Points +10%
HP Omen 17-ck2097ng
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13900HX (Leistung)
177979 Points +3%
HP Omen 17-ck2097ng
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13900HX (dGPU, Leistung)
174882 Points +1%
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13950HX
173311 Points +1%
HP Omen 17-ck2097ng
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13900HX
172437 Points
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU
  (146413 - 189320, n=23)
170663 Points -1%
Lenovo Legion Pro 7 16IRX8H
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13900HX
165052 Points -4%
Average of class Gaming
  (5039 - 237138, n=189, last 2 years)
127541 Points -26%
Alienware m17 R5 (R9 6900HX, RX 6850M XT)
AMD Radeon RX 6850M XT, AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX
107088 Points -38%
Geekbench 6.0 - GPU OpenCL 6.0
HP Omen 17-ck2097ng
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13900HX
175235 Points
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU
  (153564 - 175235, n=3)
164645 Points -6%
Average of class Gaming
  (30029 - 213472, n=46, last 2 years)
115603 Points -34%

* ... smaller is better

Desempenho nos jogos

O Omen, que é direcionado para jogos de QHD em configurações altas a máximas, também permite resoluções mais altas quando o monitor correspondente é conectado. As taxas de quadros dos jogos que testamos variam abaixo da média de todas as GPUs RTX 4080 que testamos até agora. O perfil de "Performance" leva a um aumento das taxas de quadros que está ligeiramente acima da média. Em alguns jogos, o modo dGPU é capaz de proporcionar um aumento adicional.

Performance Rating - Percent
Asus ROG Strix G16 G614JZ
Intel Core i9-13980HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU
98.5 pt
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023
Intel Core i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU
97.3 pt
Lenovo Legion Pro 7 16IRX8H
Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU
96.2 pt
HP Omen 17-ck2097ng
Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU
93 pt
HP Omen 17-ck2097ng
Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU
91 pt
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU
 
90.7 pt
HP Omen 17-ck2097ng
Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU
84.8 pt
Average of class Gaming
 
74.1 pt
Alienware m17 R5 (R9 6900HX, RX 6850M XT)
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, AMD Radeon RX 6850M XT
58.2 pt
The Witcher 3 - 1920x1080 Ultra Graphics & Postprocessing (HBAO+)
Lenovo Legion Pro 7 16IRX8H
Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU
178 (151min) fps +9%
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023
Intel Core i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU
176.8 (159min) fps +8%
Asus ROG Strix G16 G614JZ
Intel Core i9-13980HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU
175 (150min) fps +7%
HP Omen 17-ck2097ng
Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU (dGPU)
174.9 (128min) fps +7%
HP Omen 17-ck2097ng
Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU (Leistung)
172.2 (121min) fps +5%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU
  (130.4 - 186.1, n=20)
168 fps +2%
HP Omen 17-ck2097ng
Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU
164 (128min) fps
Average of class Gaming
  (18.4 - 216, n=163, last 2 years)
128.3 fps -22%
Alienware m17 R5 (R9 6900HX, RX 6850M XT)
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, AMD Radeon RX 6850M XT
126.2 fps -23%
GTA V - 1920x1080 Highest Settings possible AA:4xMSAA + FX AF:16x
Asus ROG Strix G16 G614JZ
Intel Core i9-13980HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU
146.1 (5.24min, 100P1) fps +21%
Lenovo Legion Pro 7 16IRX8H
Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU
145.5 (3.79min, 100P1) fps +20%
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023
Intel Core i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU
140.7 (3.02min, 100P1) fps +16%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU
  (102.9 - 152.7, n=21)
130.7 fps +8%
HP Omen 17-ck2097ng
Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU (Leistung)
128.1 (5.93min, 83.3P1) fps +6%
HP Omen 17-ck2097ng
Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU (dGPU, Leistung)
125.7 (8.63min, 83.3P1) fps +4%
HP Omen 17-ck2097ng
Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU
121.1 (13.2min, 83.3P1) fps
Average of class Gaming
  (12.1 - 167.7, n=170, last 2 years)
113.7 fps -6%
Alienware m17 R5 (R9 6900HX, RX 6850M XT)
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, AMD Radeon RX 6850M XT
92.6 (7.62min, 55.6P1) fps -24%
Final Fantasy XV Benchmark - 1920x1080 High Quality
Asus ROG Strix G16 G614JZ
Intel Core i9-13980HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU (1.3)
168.1 fps +16%
HP Omen 17-ck2097ng
Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU (1.3, dGPU, Leistung)
163.4 fps +12%
HP Omen 17-ck2097ng
Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU (1.3, Leistung)
163.1 fps +12%
Lenovo Legion Pro 7 16IRX8H
Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU (1.3)
162.4 fps +12%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU
  (129 - 182.1, n=23)
158.6 fps +9%
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023
Intel Core i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU (1.3)
157.8 fps +9%
HP Omen 17-ck2097ng
Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU (1.3)
145.4 fps
Average of class Gaming
  (19.2 - 201, n=182, last 2 years)
119.9 fps -18%
Alienware m17 R5 (R9 6900HX, RX 6850M XT)
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, AMD Radeon RX 6850M XT (1.3)
113.6 fps -22%
Strange Brigade - 1920x1080 ultra AA:ultra AF:16
Asus ROG Strix G16 G614JZ
Intel Core i9-13980HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU (1.47.22.14 D3D12)
338 (43.6min, 243P1) fps +22%
HP Omen 17-ck2097ng
Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU (1.47.22.14 D3D12, dGPU, Leistung)
330 (13.4min, 237P1) fps +20%
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023
Intel Core i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU (1.47.22.14 D3D12)
323 (61.7min, 222P1) fps +17%
Lenovo Legion Pro 7 16IRX8H
Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU (1.47.22.14 D3D12)
318 (29.2min, 228P1) fps +15%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU
  (239 - 357, n=22)
312 fps +13%
HP Omen 17-ck2097ng
Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU (1.47.22.14 D3D12, Leistung)
305 (27.1min, 203P1) fps +11%
HP Omen 17-ck2097ng
Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU (1.47.22.14 D3D12)
276 (60.5min, 196.3P1) fps
Alienware m17 R5 (R9 6900HX, RX 6850M XT)
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, AMD Radeon RX 6850M XT (1.47.22.14 D3D12)
230 (121.4min, 165.6P1) fps -17%
Average of class Gaming
  (38.9 - 421, n=179, last 2 years)
229 fps -17%
Dota 2 Reborn - 1920x1080 ultra (3/3) best looking
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023
Intel Core i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU
194.7 (160min) fps +25%
Asus ROG Strix G16 G614JZ
Intel Core i9-13980HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU
180.7 (154.9min) fps +16%
Lenovo Legion Pro 7 16IRX8H
Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU
179 (152.4min) fps +15%
HP Omen 17-ck2097ng
Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU (Leistung)
165.9 (140.7min) fps +7%
HP Omen 17-ck2097ng
Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU (dGPU, Leistung)
165.2 (142.4min) fps +6%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU
  (133 - 194.7, n=23)
164.6 fps +6%
HP Omen 17-ck2097ng
Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU
155.3 (128.4min) fps
Average of class Gaming
  (65.1 - 220, n=187, last 2 years)
151.2 fps -3%
Alienware m17 R5 (R9 6900HX, RX 6850M XT)
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, AMD Radeon RX 6850M XT
94 (75.5min) fps -39%
X-Plane 11.11 - 1920x1080 high (fps_test=3)
Asus ROG Strix G16 G614JZ
Intel Core i9-13980HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU
138.8 fps +16%
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023
Intel Core i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU
137 fps +15%
Lenovo Legion Pro 7 16IRX8H
Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU
131.8 fps +10%
HP Omen 17-ck2097ng
Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU (dGPU, Leistung)
130.5 fps +9%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU
  (89.3 - 143.5, n=25)
123.7 fps +4%
HP Omen 17-ck2097ng
Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU (Leistung)
123.5 fps +3%
HP Omen 17-ck2097ng
Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU
119.4 fps
Average of class Gaming
  (32.8 - 166.2, n=194, last 2 years)
108.4 fps -9%
Alienware m17 R5 (R9 6900HX, RX 6850M XT)
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, AMD Radeon RX 6850M XT
43.3 fps -64%

A fim de avaliar se as taxas de quadros permanecem constantes em grande parte durante um período de tempo mais longo, executamos o jogo "The Witcher 3" por cerca de 60 minutos em resolução Full-HD e ajustes de qualidade máxima. O personagem do jogo não é movido durante este tempo. Não notamos nenhuma queda nas taxas de quadros.

The Witcher 3 FPS Chart

0102030405060708090100110120130140150160170180190Tooltip
HP Omen 17-ck2097ng i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU: Ø157.5 (139-169)
Alienware m17 R5 (R9 6900HX, RX 6850M XT) R9 6900HX, Radeon RX 6850M XT: Ø114.1 (101-125)
Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 SE G733CX-LL014W i9-12950HX, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU: Ø118.8 (111-126)
Eurocom Nightsky TXi317 i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU: Ø107.4 (100-116)
HP Omen 17-ck1075ng i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU: Ø105.5 (72.6-190.19)
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU: Ø166.9 (141-179)
Medidas de GPU durante nosso teste Witcher 3 (Balanced, Optimus)
Medidas de GPU durante nosso teste Witcher 3 (Balanced, Optimus)
Medidas de GPU durante nosso teste Witcher 3 (Performance, dGPU)
Medidas de GPU durante nosso teste Witcher 3 (Performance, dGPU)
baixomédiaaltoultraQHD
GTA V (2015) 183.8 183.1 175.5 121.1 116
The Witcher 3 (2015) 459.7 400.5 287.8 164
Dota 2 Reborn (2015) 206 180.5 167.2 155.3
Final Fantasy XV Benchmark (2018) 192.4 173 145.4 117.5
X-Plane 11.11 (2018) 169 146.9 119.4
Far Cry 5 (2018) 160 132 129 126 124
Strange Brigade (2018) 388 300 290 276 208
F1 22 (2022) 255 248 231 97.5 67.6
The Callisto Protocol (2022) 167.6 153.7 148.3 111.5 83.7
Returnal (2023) 150 147 137 121 92
Atomic Heart (2023) 170.8 142.3 121.1 100.3 79.2
Company of Heroes 3 (2023) 275 244.6 206.5 205.31 153.8
Sons of the Forest (2023) 78.1 75 74.6 69.7 66.8

Emissões - O laptop HP produz muito ruído

Níveis de ruídos

Na operação diária (Escritório, Internet) e durante a operação ociosa, os ventiladores em funcionamento constante são claramente audíveis. Sob carga pesada (teste de estresse, The Witcher 3), o nível de ruído aumenta ainda mais e volumes de até 50 dB (A) são possíveis. O modo "Desempenho" leva a um aumento mais rápido do nível de ruído até o máximo, permanecendo a esse nível. O ruído consiste em algum assobio acompanhado por um assobio moderado.

A BIOS do Omen contém a opção "Ventilador sempre ligado" da própria HP, que é ativada por padrão. A desativação desta opção não leva a nenhuma mudança em nossa unidade de teste.

Barulho

Ocioso
31 / 32 / 33 dB
Carga
45 / 50 dB
  red to green bar
 
 
30 dB
silencioso
40 dB(A)
audível
50 dB(A)
ruidosamente alto
 
min: dark, med: mid, max: light   Earthworks M23R, Arta (15 cm de distância)   environment noise: 24 dB(A)
dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2048.539.740.939.150.52542.140.639.742.344.63147.445.550.746.156.3403428.632.328.639.45033.927.827.130.138.76335.528.228.227.839.98031.325.724.321.632.710031.22421.913.331.112529.621.920.414.531.616029.624.324.417.930.520032.224.823.719.133.425031.425.223.516.134.331530.321.720.212.833.240032.625.42210.635.550034.526.523.111.940630352422.810.53980034.723.122.710.739.2100035.523.121.910.639.9125036.823.522.510.740.4160034.621.420.511.138.8200033.920.119.211.638.3250034.321.722.211.939.3315031.720.31812.436.9400031.41514.812.735.9500030.114141335.9630027.113.613.513.434.6800023.113.113.413.130.91000019.81313.112.927.21250015.412.612.712.421.616000131211.811.816.3SPL45.233.13224.449.7N5.11.81.60.67.2median 31.4median 21.7median 20.5median 12.4median 35.5Delta4.34.84.11.44.3hearing rangehide median Fan NoiseHP Omen 17-ck2097ng
HP Omen 17-ck2097ng
i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU
Alienware m17 R5 (R9 6900HX, RX 6850M XT)
R9 6900HX, Radeon RX 6850M XT
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023
i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU
Lenovo Legion Pro 7 16IRX8H
i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU
Asus ROG Strix G16 G614JZ
i9-13980HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU
HP Omen 17-ck1075ng
i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
Noise
11%
12%
-2%
2%
-2%
off / environment *
24
23
4%
23
4%
24
-0%
25
-4%
25.4
-6%
Idle Minimum *
31
23
26%
23
26%
26
16%
26
16%
28
10%
Idle Average *
32
28.11
12%
23
28%
28
12%
28
12%
28
12%
Idle Maximum *
33
28.11
15%
23.6
28%
34
-3%
30
9%
31.2
5%
Load Average *
45
30.62
32%
39
13%
47
-4%
48
-7%
52.2
-16%
Witcher 3 ultra *
45
49.75
-11%
51.6
-15%
55
-22%
49
-9%
52.2
-16%
Load Maximum *
50
50.17
-0%
51.3
-3%
56
-12%
52
-4%
52.2
-4%

* ... smaller is better

Temperaturas

No funcionamento diário (Escritório, Internet), as temperaturas do estojo permanecem dentro da faixa verde. Sob carga (teste de estresse, The Witcher 3), o laptop aquece visivelmente, mas isto permanece dentro dos limites - pelo menos na parte superior. As temperaturas da CPU não dão motivos para preocupações.

 34 °C38 °C37 °C 
 38 °C41 °C39 °C 
 34 °C34 °C35 °C 
Máximo: 41 °C
Médio: 36.7 °C
46 °C51 °C43 °C
45 °C45 °C39 °C
35 °C35 °C30 °C
Máximo: 51 °C
Médio: 41 °C
alimentação elétrica  36 °C | Temperatura do quarto 20 °C | Fluke t3000FC (calibrated), Voltcraft IR-900
(±) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 36.7 °C / 98 F, compared to the average of 33.9 °C / 93 F for the devices in the class Gaming.
(±) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 41 °C / 106 F, compared to the average of 40.5 °C / 105 F, ranging from 21.2 to 68.8 °C for the class Gaming.
(-) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 51 °C / 124 F, compared to the average of 43.2 °C / 110 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 23.7 °C / 75 F, compared to the device average of 33.9 °C / 93 F.
(-) Playing The Witcher 3, the average temperature for the upper side is 38.2 °C / 101 F, compared to the device average of 33.9 °C / 93 F.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are reaching skin temperature as a maximum (35 °C / 95 F) and are therefore not hot.
(-) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.9 °C / 84 F (-6.1 °C / -11 F).
HP Omen 17-ck2097ng
Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU
Alienware m17 R5 (R9 6900HX, RX 6850M XT)
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, AMD Radeon RX 6850M XT
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023
Intel Core i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU
Lenovo Legion Pro 7 16IRX8H
Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU
Asus ROG Strix G16 G614JZ
Intel Core i9-13980HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU
HP Omen 17-ck1075ng
Intel Core i7-12700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
Heat
-20%
-8%
-28%
-23%
-16%
Maximum Upper Side *
41
53
-29%
40
2%
48
-17%
54
-32%
31.3
24%
Maximum Bottom *
51
56
-10%
37.6
26%
49
4%
55
-8%
43.3
15%
Idle Upper Side *
24
30
-25%
32.4
-35%
40
-67%
29
-21%
31.3
-30%
Idle Bottom *
25
29
-16%
31.4
-26%
33
-32%
33
-32%
43.3
-73%

* ... smaller is better

Teste de estresse

Nosso teste de estresse com Prime95 e Furmark funcionando constantemente representa um cenário extremo que usamos para avaliar a estabilidade do sistema sob carga total. A CPU (P: 3,8 GHz, E: 3,2 GHz) e a GPU (2 a 2,1 GHz) iniciam o teste com altas velocidades de clock. Depois de pouco tempo, a velocidade da CPU cai para cerca de 1,8 GHz (P núcleos) e 2 GHz (E núcleos), com a velocidade da GPU aumentando para 2,3 - 2,4 GHz ao mesmo tempo.

Teste de estresse
Teste de estresse
Teste de estresse
Teste de estresse
Teste de estresse
Teste de estresse
O Witcher 3
O Witcher 3
O Witcher 3
O Witcher 3
O Witcher 3
O Witcher 3

Oradores

Os alto-falantes estéreos produzem um som decente, mas quase não tem graves.

dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2039.143.42542.3443146.1484028.633.75030.132.26327.832.78021.626.810013.323.112514.527.816017.943.120019.156.125016.164.631512.86240010.663.950011.965.563010.567.180010.765.9100010.668.8125010.768.2160011.167.4200011.669.3250011.967.1315012.469.5400012.768.950001369630013.466.6800013.169.61000012.973.31250012.471.11600011.864SPL24.480.6N0.651.5median 12.4median 67.1Delta1.45.929.232.329.829.621.824.325.427.128.726.327.230.818.641.419.148.719.552.517.352.618.456.117.151.515.553.112.656.610.858.612.362.81162.410.959.81060.510.260.610.559.411.162.611.666.711.858.91257.812.259.712.561.412.451.212.241.211.735.623.973.30.533.1median 12.2median 58.62.14.5hearing rangehide median Pink NoiseHP Omen 17-ck2097ngAsus ROG Strix Scar 17 SE G733CX-LL014W
Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)
HP Omen 17-ck2097ng audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (81 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 21% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (14.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 1.4% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (2.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2.2% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (3.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (13.8% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 20% of all tested devices in this class were better, 6% similar, 73% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 18%, worst was 132%
Compared to all devices tested
» 13% of all tested devices were better, 4% similar, 83% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 SE G733CX-LL014W audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (73.3 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 6.2% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (7.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (3.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3.5% away from median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (9.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (13.6% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 19% of all tested devices in this class were better, 6% similar, 74% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 18%, worst was 132%
Compared to all devices tested
» 12% of all tested devices were better, 4% similar, 84% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Gerenciamento de energia - laptop para jogos com uma fonte de alimentação de 330 watts

Consumo de energia

O consumo de energia varia em níveis normais para o hardware utilizado. Durante nosso teste Witcher 3 o consumo de energia permanece constante, e durante o teste de estresse o consumo cai após alguns minutos - a CPU é estrangulada. A fonte de alimentação incluída (330 watts) é suficientemente dimensionada.

Consumo de energia
desligadodarklight 0.1 /  Watt
Ociosodarkmidlight 16 / 20 / 26 Watt
Carga midlight 135 / 299 Watt
 color bar
Key: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
HP Omen 17-ck2097ng
i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU
Alienware m17 R5 (R9 6900HX, RX 6850M XT)
R9 6900HX, Radeon RX 6850M XT
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023
i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU
Lenovo Legion Pro 7 16IRX8H
i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU
Asus ROG Strix G16 G614JZ
i9-13980HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU
HP Omen 17-ck1075ng
i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU
 
Average of class Gaming
 
Power Consumption
18%
-16%
-13%
5%
13%
-7%
11%
Idle Minimum *
16
13
19%
15.2
5%
18
-13%
10
37%
12.2
24%
16.9 ?(8 - 39, n=20)
-6%
Idle Average *
20
16.5
17%
22.8
-14%
24
-20%
16
20%
18
10%
Idle Maximum *
26
17
35%
49.8
-92%
32
-23%
27
-4%
19.4
25%
34.1 ?(13.7 - 68.1, n=20)
-31%
Load Average *
135
93
31%
121.2
10%
130
4%
129
4%
128
5%
117.9 ?(77 - 135, n=19)
13%
Witcher 3 ultra *
215
239
-11%
242
-13%
260
-21%
247
-15%
209
3%
Load Maximum *
299
251
16%
273.7
8%
320
-7%
342
-14%
266
11%

* ... smaller is better

Power Consumption The Witcher 3 / Stress Test

0153045607590105120135150165180195210225240255270Tooltip
HP Omen 17-ck2097ng; Witcher 3 ultra: Ø215 (206-224)
HP Omen 17-ck2097ng; 1280x720 Prime95 28.10 and Furmark 1.25: Ø232 (197.1-285)
HP Omen 17-ck2097ng; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø18.6 (17.9-20.9)

Power Consumption with External Monitor

0153045607590105120135150165180195210Tooltip
HP Omen 17-ck2097ng; Prime95 V2810 Stress (external Monitor): Ø106.1 (92.1-177.9)
HP Omen 17-ck2097ng; Cinebench R15 Multi (external Monitor): Ø193.5 (190.2-205)
HP Omen 17-ck2097ng; 1280x720 FurMark 1.19 GPU Stress Test (external Monitor): Ø198 (185.7-205)
HP Omen 17-ck2097ng; 1920x1080 The Witcher 3 ultra (external Monitor): Ø203 (194.4-211)
HP Omen 17-ck2097ng; Idle 1min (external Monitor): Ø25.8 (21.1-33.5)

Vida útil da bateria

A vida útil da bateria do Omen não é satisfatória. Mesmo um poderoso laptop para jogos tem que ser capaz de durar mais em operação Optimus com uma bateria de 83-Wh. Não conseguimos determinar até agora se isto se deve a um problema de hardware ou software.

Os arquivos de registro dão uma indicação do problema: durante os testes de baixa carga (WiFi, ocioso, vídeo), a GPU GeForce deve estar inativa e deixar todo o trabalho para a iGPU. No entanto, a GPU GeForce freqüentemente roda em velocidade máxima aqui - com uma carga de 0%. De acordo com a GPU-Z, isto leva a um consumo de energia de até 45 watts.

Por esta razão, pedimos uma nova unidade de teste da HP para verificar isso, mas ainda não recebemos nenhuma. Assim que pudermos obtê-la, testaremos isto novamente.

Medidas de GPU durante o teste WLAN
Medidas de GPU durante o teste WLAN
Tempo de Execução da Bateria
Ocioso (sem WLAN, min brilho)
4h 9min
WiFi Websurfing (Edge 111)
3h 37min
Big Buck Bunny H.264 1080p
3h 40min
Carga (máximo brilho)
1h 26min
HP Omen 17-ck2097ng
i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, 83 Wh
Alienware m17 R5 (R9 6900HX, RX 6850M XT)
R9 6900HX, Radeon RX 6850M XT, 97 Wh
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023
i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, 95.2 Wh
Lenovo Legion Pro 7 16IRX8H
i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, 99.9 Wh
Asus ROG Strix G16 G614JZ
i9-13980HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, 90 Wh
HP Omen 17-ck1075ng
i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, 78 Wh
Average of class Gaming
 
Battery Runtime
31%
59%
46%
73%
79%
72%
Reader / Idle
249
533
114%
385
55%
532
114%
H.264
220
294
34%
WiFi v1.3
217
290
34%
365
68%
303
40%
583
169%
371
71%
Load
86
107
24%
81
-6%
124
44%
65
-24%
131
52%
Gaming
62

Pro

+ Display QHD com 165 Hz
+ optimus avançado
+ memória de trabalho expansível
+ SSD PCIe-4 (espaço para um segundo SSD)
+ iluminação de chave individual
+ Thunderbolt 4 com fornecimento de energia
+ sub-voltagem via software

Contra

- desempenho ligeiramente abaixo da média para um RTX 4080
- alto nível de ruído
- estojo de clattery
- vida útil da bateria

Veredicto - Um sólido laptop de alta tecnologia para jogos

A HP Omen 17-ck2097ng, unidade de teste fornecida pela HP Alemanha.
A HP Omen 17-ck2097ng, unidade de teste fornecida pela HP Alemanha.

Com o Omen 17, a HP fornece um poderoso portátil para jogos QHD do segmento high-end. Com seuNúcleo i9-13900HXprocessador e GeForce RTX 4080gPU para laptop, o laptop também deve funcionar bem em outras áreas de aplicação, como processamento e renderização de vídeo. Um rápido PCIe 4 SSD (1 TB) fornece o espaço de armazenamento necessário e garante curtos tempos de carga. Há também um espaço para um segundo SSD.

O HP Omen 17 (2023) representa um sólido laptop para jogos, mas não faz pleno uso de seu potencial.

O processador e o núcleo gráfico são capazes de funcionar a velocidades de relógio constantemente altas. O desenvolvimento de ruído e calor está nos níveis altos que são normais para esta classe de laptops. No entanto, o laptop produz muito ruído no funcionamento diário.

O visor mate de 17,3 polegadas (QHD, IPS, 165 Hz, sRGB) deixa uma impressão sólida. Ele tem um desempenho geral ligeiramente melhor do que o painel FHD do painel de construção similar Predecessor de Omenmas pior que a maioria dos concorrentes. Uma conexão Thunderbolt 4 oferece algumas opções de expansão (solução de ancoragem, GPU externo). Além disso, ela também pode ser usada para carregar a bateria com um carregador USB-C (mín. 65 watts, 20 V), e o fornecimento de energia é suportado.

Devido a um possível defeito, somos incapazes de fazer um julgamento final sobre a duração da bateria neste ponto. Iremos medir novamente a vida útil da bateria assim que tivermos uma unidade de reposição da HP. Como a duração da bateria dificilmente tem qualquer impacto na avaliação final de um laptop para jogos, a avaliação mudará, no máximo, apenas ligeiramente.

Como alternativa, você poderia dar uma olhada no Lenovo Legion Pro 7 16IRX8Hque é capaz de obter um desempenho superior com a mesma combinação CPU/GPU. Além disso, ele pontua com uma tela mais brilhante no formato 16:10.

Preço e Disponibilidade

O Omen 17 (2023) está disponível na HP a partir de $1499,99. Um modelo similar à nossa configuração testada, exceto por ter um i7-13700, custaria $2.429,99 nos EUA.

HP Omen 17-ck2097ng - 03/28/2023 v7 (old)
Sascha Mölck

Acabamento
79 / 98 → 80%
Teclado
81%
Mouse
81%
Conectividade
67 / 80 → 84%
Peso
58 / 10-66 → 86%
Bateria
54 / 95 → 57%
Pantalha
90%
Desempenho do jogos
99%
Desempenho da aplicação
85%
Temperatura
83 / 95 → 87%
Ruído
69 / 90 → 77%
Audio
79%
Camera
40 / 85 → 47%
Médio
74%
85%
Gaming - Médio equilibrado

Transparency

The selection of devices to be reviewed is made by our editorial team. The test sample was provided to the author as a loan by the manufacturer or retailer for the purpose of this review. The lender had no influence on this review, nor did the manufacturer receive a copy of this review before publication. There was no obligation to publish this review. We never accept compensation or payment in return for our reviews. As an independent media company, Notebookcheck is not subjected to the authority of manufacturers, retailers or publishers.

This is how Notebookcheck is testing

Every year, Notebookcheck independently reviews hundreds of laptops and smartphones using standardized procedures to ensure that all results are comparable. We have continuously developed our test methods for around 20 years and set industry standards in the process. In our test labs, high-quality measuring equipment is utilized by experienced technicians and editors. These tests involve a multi-stage validation process. Our complex rating system is based on hundreds of well-founded measurements and benchmarks, which maintains objectivity. Further information on our test methods can be found here.

Price comparison

Please share our article, every link counts!
Mail Logo
> Análises e revisões de portáteis e celulares > Análises > Análises > Revisão HP Omen 17 (2023): O laptop para jogos usa RTX 4080
Sascha Mölck, 2023-03-31 (Update: 2023-03-31)