Notebookcheck Logo

Avaliação do Acer Swift Go 14 - O Meteor Lake Core Ultra 7 impressiona com seu núcleo de IA

CPU, GPU e agora NPU

Pelo menos desde o Pixel 6, os coprocessadores para aplicativos de IA chegaram aos smartphones. Agora, os aceleradores de rede neural também podem ser encontrados em notebooks Windows, como o Acer Swift Go 14 com o Intel Core Ultra 7 155H. Esse é um dos primeiros processadores para laptops com uma NPU.

Ainda não se passaram dois meses desde que analisamos o Acer Swift Go 14. Ele nos impressionou pelo bom desempenho a um preço acessível. Nosso dispositivo de análise atual vem com a última geração de processadores da Intel. O Acer Swift Go 14 - que estará disponível na próxima primavera - possui um processador Intel Core Ultra 155H. Do ponto de vista do hardware, a Acer nos forneceu um laptop baseado em um dispositivo com especificações padrão. No entanto, até a primavera, ainda haverá pequenas melhorias no software que o acompanha, no gerenciamento de desempenho e no BIOS. Por esse motivo, não atribuiremos uma classificação até vermos quais melhorias futuras a última geração de processadores da Intel trará para esse modelo premium com tela OLED.

Em alguns benchmarks, registramos mais do que o dobro do desempenho em comparação com o antecessor, que tinha um Intel Core i5-1335U. Além disso, a nova Arc iGPU da Intel, sem dúvida, agradará a muitos gamers com os gráficos da Intel agora, pelo menos, no mesmo nível da Radeon RX 780M.

Acer Swift Go 14 SFG14-72 (Swift Go 14 Serie)
Processador
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H 16 x 3.8 - 4.8 GHz, 55 W PL2 / Short Burst, 45 W PL1 / Sustained, Meteor Lake-H
Placa gráfica
Memória
32 GB 
, LPDDR5
Pantalha
14.00 polegadas 16:10, 2880 x 1800 pixel 243 PPI, ATNA40YK11-0, OLED, Brilhante: sim, 90 Hz
placa mãe
Intel Meteor Lake-U/P/H PCH
Disco rígido
SK hynix HFS001TEJ9X110NA, 1024 GB 
, 850 GB livre
Placa de Som
Intel Meteor Lake-U/P/H PCH - cAVS (Audio, Voice, Speech)
Conexões
1 USB 3.0, 2 USB 4.0 40 Gbps, 2 Thunderbolt, USB-C Power Delivery (PD), 2 DisplayPort, 1 Kensington Lock, Conexões Audio: 3.5 mm Headset, Card Reader: microSD, 1 Leitor de Impressões Digitais
Funcionamento em rede
Killer Wi-Fi 6E AX1675i 160MHz Wireless Network Adapter (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/ax = Wi-Fi 6/), Bluetooth 5.1
Tamanho
altura x largura x profundidade (em mm): 14.9 x 312.9 x 217.9
Bateria
65 Wh Lítio-Ion
Sistema Operativo
Microsoft Windows 11 Home
Camera
Webcam: QHD
Primary Camera: 3.7 MPix
Características adicionais
Alto falantes: 2, Iluminação do Teclado: sim
peso
1.3338 kg, Suprimento de energia: 360 g
Preço
999 Euro
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

A própria Intel costuma comparar seus novos processadores com o Ryzen R7 7840U da AMD e, por esse motivo, daremos uma olhada no HP Pavillon Plus 14, que vem com variantes de processador Intel e AMD, como parte de nossa comparação. Um representante bastante incomum poderia ser o Ayaneo Air 1S, mas esse dispositivo também vem com o poderoso chip concorrente da AMD. E, finalmente, o LG Gram 2in1 e o Acer Swift Go 14 SFG14-71 e seu processador de 13ª geração concluem nosso ilustre grupo.

Possíveis concorrentes em comparação

Rating
Date
Model
Weight
Height
Size
Resolution
Price

v (old)
12/2023
Acer Swift Go 14 SFG14-72
Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core
1.3 kg14.9 mm14.00"2880x1800
85.6 %
v7 (old)
11/2023
Acer Swift Go 14 SFG14-71
i5-1335U, Iris Xe G7 80EUs
1.3 kg14.9 mm14.00"2880x1800
85.8 %
v7 (old)
11/2023
LG Gram 2in1 16 16T90R - G.AA78G
i7-1360P, Iris Xe G7 96EUs
1.5 kg17.2 mm16.00"2560x1600
87.5 %
v7 (old)
12/2023
HP Pavilion Plus 14-ew0153TU
i7-1355U, Iris Xe G7 96EUs
1.4 kg17.5 mm14.00"2880x1800
90.4 %
v7 (old)
12/2023
Lenovo ThinkPad T14 G4 21K4S02000
R7 PRO 7840U, Radeon 780M
1.5 kg17.9 mm14.00"1920x1200
88.2 %
v7 (old)
10/2023
Ayaneo Air 1S Retro Power
R7 7840U, Radeon 780M
443.8 g21 mm5.50"1920x1080
87.8 %
v7 (old)
11/2023
HP Pavilion Plus 14-ey0095cl
R7 7840U, Radeon 780M
1.4 kg18.8 mm14.00"2880x1800

Caixa - Alumínio angular

Embora as primeiras impressões sugiram que o dispositivo não sofreu nenhuma alteração, ainda assim notamos que a Acer realizou melhorias detalhadas na estrutura de alumínio. O design angular da estrutura não revela nenhuma falha de fabricação e isso significa que poderíamos quase copiar e colar toda a descrição do antecessor. No entanto, a Acer conseguiu instalar um touchpad significativamente maior, resultando em uma melhoria notável na usabilidade do laptop.

Comparação de tamanho

355 mm 248 mm 17.2 mm 1.5 kg317.7 mm 226.9 mm 17.9 mm 1.5 kg314 mm 227 mm 18.8 mm 1.4 kg314 mm 227 mm 17.5 mm 1.4 kg312.9 mm 217.9 mm 14.9 mm 1.3 kg224 mm 90 mm 21 mm 443.8 g297 mm 210 mm 1 mm 5.7 g

Recursos - Wi-Fi incrível e uma excelente webcam

É possível conectar até três monitores ao pequeno laptop via HDMI 2.1 e ambas as portas Thunderbolt 4. O atual processador Intel Meteor Lake suporta a saída para até quatro monitores simultaneamente. Da mesma forma, a Acer conseguiu abrigar um leitor de cartão microSD e até mesmo um slot mini Kensington Lock.

Leitor de cartão de memória (MicroSD), conector de áudio de 3,5 mm, USB 3.2 Gen 1 (USB-A), slot para trava Kensington
Leitor de cartão de memória (MicroSD), conector de áudio de 3,5 mm, USB 3.2 Gen 1 (USB-A), slot para trava Kensington
2x Thunderbolt 4/USB 4 (USB-C; PowerDelivery, Displayport), HDMI, USB 3.2 Gen 1 (USB-A)
2x Thunderbolt 4/USB 4 (USB-C; PowerDelivery, Displayport), HDMI, USB 3.2 Gen 1 (USB-A)

Leitor de cartão SD

Não há melhorias no leitor de cartão microSD. Com sua lenta velocidade de leitura de 28 MB/s, ele é comparável ao modelo do ano passado e é adequado apenas para pequenas quantidades de dados. Nosso microSD AV Pro é até dez vezes mais rápido.

SD Card Reader
average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs)
Average of class Subnotebook
  (18.4 - 142, n=14, last 2 years)
54.3 MB/s +99%
Acer Swift Go 14 SFG14-72
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
27.29 MB/s
maximum AS SSD Seq Read Test (1GB)
Average of class Subnotebook
  (22.5 - 207, n=14, last 2 years)
72.6 MB/s +192%
Acer Swift Go 14 SFG14-72
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
24.85 MB/s

Comunicação

Usando o iPerf3 e o Asus GT-AXE11000, em nosso teste de Wi-Fi, o Acer Swift Go demonstrou velocidades de transferência consideravelmente mais altas nas redes de 5 GHz e 6 GHz. Com até 1,9 GBit/s, os uploads e downloads para uma rede doméstica se movem em um ritmo acelerado.

Networking
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
Average Killer Wi-Fi 6E AX1675i 160MHz Wireless Network Adapter
  (942 - 1622, n=26)
1358 MBit/s +3%
Acer Swift Go 14 SFG14-72
Killer Wi-Fi 6E AX1675i 160MHz Wireless Network Adapter
1319 (961min - 1533max) MBit/s
Average of class Subnotebook
  (467 - 1824, n=58, last 2 years)
1257 MBit/s -5%
iperf3 receive AXE11000
Average Killer Wi-Fi 6E AX1675i 160MHz Wireless Network Adapter
  (872 - 1714, n=28)
1473 MBit/s +2%
Acer Swift Go 14 SFG14-72
Killer Wi-Fi 6E AX1675i 160MHz Wireless Network Adapter
1441 (726min - 1755max) MBit/s
Average of class Subnotebook
  (772 - 1775, n=58, last 2 years)
1423 MBit/s -1%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz
Acer Swift Go 14 SFG14-72
Killer Wi-Fi 6E AX1675i 160MHz Wireless Network Adapter
1569 (1027min - 1730max) MBit/s
Average Killer Wi-Fi 6E AX1675i 160MHz Wireless Network Adapter
  (1229 - 1693, n=19)
1519 MBit/s -3%
Average of class Subnotebook
  (642 - 1792, n=28, last 2 years)
1269 MBit/s -19%
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz
Acer Swift Go 14 SFG14-72
Killer Wi-Fi 6E AX1675i 160MHz Wireless Network Adapter
1742 (1441min - 1819max) MBit/s
Average Killer Wi-Fi 6E AX1675i 160MHz Wireless Network Adapter
  (1327 - 1788, n=20)
1553 MBit/s -11%
Average of class Subnotebook
  (951 - 1784, n=28, last 2 years)
1523 MBit/s -13%
05010015020025030035040045050055060065070075080085090095010001050110011501200125013001350140014501500155016001650170017501800Tooltip
Acer Swift Go 14 SFG14-72; iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1569 (1027-1730)
Acer Swift Go 14 SFG14-72; iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1741 (1441-1819)
Acer Swift Go 14 SFG14-72; iperf3 transmit AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1319 (961-1533)
Acer Swift Go 14 SFG14-72; iperf3 receive AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1440 (726-1755)

Webcam

Windows Studio Effects e Gerenciador de Tarefas
Windows Studio Effects e Gerenciador de Tarefas

A webcam QHD do Acer Swift Go apresentou resultados muito impressionantes. A qualidade da imagem pode até ser melhorada um pouco mais graças à NPU da Intel e ao Windows Studio Effects. No entanto, isso sobrecarrega a iGPU e, como seria de esperar, os ventiladores do Acer Swift Go fazem sentir sua presença de forma rápida e barulhenta.

ColorChecker
9.5 ∆E
9 ∆E
13.1 ∆E
9.8 ∆E
12.9 ∆E
9.7 ∆E
9.4 ∆E
15.8 ∆E
12.7 ∆E
6.1 ∆E
9 ∆E
6.3 ∆E
9.7 ∆E
4.8 ∆E
13.6 ∆E
7.4 ∆E
14.2 ∆E
10.2 ∆E
2.9 ∆E
5.6 ∆E
7.6 ∆E
9.8 ∆E
5 ∆E
4.6 ∆E
ColorChecker Acer Swift Go 14 SFG14-72: 9.11 ∆E min: 2.9 - max: 15.8 ∆E

Segurança

Um sensor de impressão digital, um slot Kensington Lock e um TPM 2.0 estão integrados. Isso significa que todos os requisitos básicos de segurança relativos a roubo físico e proteção de acesso são atendidos.

Manutenção

Foi necessária uma chave de fenda TX5 e uma ventosa para abrir o Acer Swift Go. Assim como no o antecessormuitas opções de manutenção podem ser encontradas no interior do laptop. Estão disponíveis dois slots M.2 (um ocupado), bem como um módulo Wi-Fi instalado. As ventoinhas podem ser facilmente removidas para fins de limpeza. Somente a memória RAM de 32 GB, de tamanho generoso, é soldada. A propósito, o slot M.2 livre pode ser encontrado sob o cabo de fita ao lado das ventoinhas.

Dispositivos de entrada - Um touchpad grande


Teclado

Acima de tudo, o ponto de pressão da tecla retroiluminada poderia ser um pouco mais nítido. Fora isso, o teclado oferece uma experiência de digitação agradável. Em ambientes escuros, a luz de fundo das teclas pode ser ajustada em dois níveis. Da mesma forma que o antecessor, o revestimento superior também pode ser ligeiramente dobrado e isso pode irritar alguns usuários ao pressionar as teclas com firmeza.

Touchpad

Na nova versão, a Acer aumentou significativamente o tamanho do touchpad do Swift Go 14, mas os raios nos cantos permanecem. Essa mudança não beneficia apenas a aparência. Na prática, muitas coisas, como arrastar e soltar e copiar, são mais fáceis de executar. Agora com 12 x 8 cm, o clickpad oferece muito mais espaço para entradas e controle por gestos.

A unidade base com o teclado retroiluminado
A unidade base com o teclado retroiluminado

Tela - 2.8K, 90Hz OLED e HDR500

Subpixels
Subpixels

O modelo Acer Swift Go com processador Meteor Lake agora possui um painel OLED muito mais brilhante. Ele pode atingir 400 cd/m², e ainda mais, ao exibir conteúdo HDR. Pretos profundos e altos níveis de contraste são padrão para esse tipo de tecnologia de tela. O brilho é uniforme e, com uma resolução de 2,8K, em uma proporção de aspecto 16:10 de 14 polegadas (cerca de 36 cm), quase não é possível ver pixels individuais a olho nu. Isso tudo garante que possamos desfrutar de uma qualidade de imagem maravilhosa que pode brilhar tanto em ambientes externos quanto sob luzes de estúdio.

O novo aplicativo AcerSense do Swift Go oferece mais perfis de tela. No entanto, ainda não observamos nenhuma alteração nos valores medidos nos vários perfis. Como mencionado no início, a Acer ainda está trabalhando nos detalhes finais do laptop.

395
cd/m²
390
cd/m²
392
cd/m²
391
cd/m²
388
cd/m²
389
cd/m²
392
cd/m²
388
cd/m²
396
cd/m²
Distribuição do brilho
ATNA40YK11-0 tested with X-Rite i1Pro 2
Máximo: 396 cd/m² (Nits) Médio: 391.2 cd/m² Minimum: 20.7 cd/m²
iluminação: 98 %
iluminação com acumulador: 385 cd/m²
Contraste: 9440:1 (Preto: 0.0411 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 6.32 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.91, calibrated: 4.79
ΔE Greyscale 2.61 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
98.56% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
99.99% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
99.75% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 1.772
Acer Swift Go 14 SFG14-72
ATNA40YK11-0, OLED, 2880x1800, 14"
LG Gram 2in1 16 16T90R - G.AA78G
LP160WQ1-SPB2, IPS, 2560x1600, 16"
HP Pavilion Plus 14-ew0153TU
Samsung SDC4197, OLED, 2880x1800, 14"
Lenovo ThinkPad T14 G4 21K4S02000
MNE007JA1-1, IPS LED, 1920x1200, 14"
Ayaneo Air 1S Retro Power
Ayaneo-OLED, OLED, 1920x1080, 5.5"
HP Pavilion Plus 14-ey0095cl
Samsung SDC4197, OLED, 2880x1800, 14"
Display
-6%
-3%
-22%
0%
-1%
Display P3 Coverage
99.75
96.5
-3%
97.9
-2%
67.1
-33%
99.85
0%
99.8
0%
sRGB Coverage
99.99
99.9
0%
99.6
0%
97.8
-2%
100
0%
100
0%
AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage
98.56
84.6
-14%
92.1
-7%
69.4
-30%
99.71
1%
95.8
-3%
Response Times
-856%
-141%
-871%
-20%
75%
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% *
2.2 ?(1, 1.2)
38.4 ?(18.6, 19.8)
-1645%
10.8 ?(9.4, 1.4)
-391%
38.4 ?(18, 20.4)
-1645%
4.4 ?(2.6, 1.8)
-100%
0.82 ?(0.43, 0.39)
63%
Response Time Black / White *
12.8 ?(11.8, 1)
21.4 ?(9.8, 11.6)
-67%
9.29 ?(8.79, 0.5)
27%
25.1 ?(11.5, 13.6)
-96%
5 ?(2.5, 2.5)
61%
0.95 ?(0.44, 0.51)
93%
PWM Frequency
300
120 ?(100)
-60%
240 ?(300)
-20%
504.7 ?(100)
68%
Screen
-107%
65%
-32%
-42%
29%
Brightness middle
388
329
-15%
387
0%
398
3%
331
-15%
384
-1%
Brightness
391
310
-21%
387
-1%
379
-3%
339
-13%
386
-1%
Brightness Distribution
98
88
-10%
97
-1%
90
-8%
90
-8%
98
0%
Black Level *
0.0411
0.39
-849%
0.01
76%
0.23
-460%
0.07
-70%
Contrast
9440
844
-91%
38700
310%
1730
-82%
4729
-50%
Colorchecker dE 2000 *
6.32
3.52
44%
2.03
68%
1.3
79%
4.76
25%
4.06
36%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *
8.82
6.96
21%
3.86
56%
3.1
65%
9.2
-4%
6.73
24%
Colorchecker dE 2000 calibrated *
4.79
1.15
76%
1.6
67%
1.2
75%
5.04
-5%
0.49
90%
Greyscale dE 2000 *
2.61
5.75
-120%
2.3
12%
1.4
46%
8.79
-237%
1.1
58%
Gamma
1.772 124%
2.137 103%
2.23 99%
2.26 97%
2.155 102%
2.26 97%
CCT
6202 105%
7584 86%
6523 100%
6448 101%
7571 86%
6331 103%
Total Average (Program / Settings)
-323% / -192%
-26% / 10%
-308% / -149%
-21% / -29%
34% / 33%

* ... smaller is better

90 % de brilho
90 % de brilho
80 % de brilho
80 % de brilho
70 % de brilho
70 % de brilho
60 % de brilho
60 % de brilho
50 % de brilho
50 % de brilho
40 % de brilho
40 % de brilho
30 % de brilho
30 % de brilho
20 % de brilho
20 % de brilho
10 % de brilho
10 % de brilho
0 % de brilho
0 % de brilho

Todos os três espaços de cores são quase completamente cobertos pelo excelente OLED. Apenas o espaço de cores Adobe RGB fica 3% aquém da perfeição.

Até o momento, os vários perfis de exibição não mostraram melhorias nos desvios de cores medidos que, em seu estado atual, ainda são muito altos. Por exemplo, no espaço de cores Adobe RGB, nosso próprio perfil ICC oferece pequenas melhorias na reprodução de cores. Também podemos presumir que a Acer fará melhorias nessa área no software finalizado.

Calman ColorChecker não calibrado
Calman ColorChecker não calibrado
Saturação de Calman não calibrada
Saturação de Calman não calibrada
Escalas de cinza Calman não calibradas
Escalas de cinza Calman não calibradas
Calman ColorChecker calibrado
Calman ColorChecker calibrado
Calman saturation calibrado
Calman saturation calibrado
Escalas de cinza Calman calibradas
Escalas de cinza Calman calibradas

Display Response Times

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
       Response Time Black to White
12.8 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 11.8 ms rise
↘ 1 ms fall
The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 30 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (20.9 ms).
       Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
2.2 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 1 ms rise
↘ 1.2 ms fall
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 8 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (32.8 ms).

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM detected 300 Hz

The display backlight flickers at 300 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) .

The frequency of 300 Hz is relatively high, so most users sensitive to PWM should not notice any flickering. However, there are reports that some users are still sensitive to PWM at 500 Hz and above, so be aware.

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8705 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured.

Graças ao seu alto brilho, o Acer Swift Go tem um bom desempenho em situações externas, apesar de possuir uma tela brilhante. A análise do ângulo de visão também não revelou nenhuma anormalidade.

Desempenho - O Meteor Lake transforma o Swift Go em uma pequena máquina de jogos

O novo Acer Swift Go 14 oferece um processador Intel Meteor Lake. Pela primeira vez, o Intel Core Ultra 7 155H também abriga uma Arc iGPU com oito núcleos e uma NPU. O dispositivo é complementado com 32 GB de RAM DDR5 e um SSD SK Hynix NVMe de 1 TB.

 
 
 

Condições de teste

Como mencionado no início, o Acer Swift Go 14 com o qual estamos lidando é um dispositivo que corresponde às especificações padrão de hardware. O software e o firmware da nossa máquina de análise ainda não estão totalmente aperfeiçoados. Por exemplo, em nosso Swift Go 14, os valores para o desempenho de aumento foram inicialmente configurados um pouco altos demais. No decorrer do teste, também tivemos problemas com o AlterView pré-instalado, que cria fundos 3D visualmente atraentes. Depois de uma animada conversa com a Acer, decidimos remover o software. Também conseguimos reduzir o PL2 para 55 watts e deixar o PL1 em 45 watts, tudo com a ajuda do Throttle Stop da TechPowerUp. Isso ajudou o laptop a funcionar consideravelmente melhor e mais estável. A Acer realizará um ajuste fino significativamente mais detalhado quando se tratar do gerenciamento final do desempenho. Isso deve fazer com que o laptop tenha um desempenho melhor do que o atual.

Processador

O novo processador da Intel traz consigo algumas mudanças há muito esperadas. Pela primeira vez, o chip com processo de fabricação de 7 nm agora oferece uma NPU e a nova Arc iGPU. O Core Ultra 7 155H abriga seis núcleos P, oito núcleos E e dois núcleos LP E adicionais que são considerados particularmente eficientes em termos de energia. Isso significa que há um total de 22 threads disponíveis.

A mais recente geração de processadores da Intel não apresenta uma clara vantagem de desempenho em relação ao seu antecessor de 13ª geração mais semelhante. Aqui estamos lidando com dois dispositivos com o Intel Core i7-13700H. Da mesma forma, ele oferece seis núcleos P e oito núcleos E. Faltam apenas os dois núcleos E de baixo consumo de energia. O mais novo processador da Intel geralmente se sai bem em comparação com seu concorrente direto, o AMD Ryzen 7 7840U. Nos últimos tempos (e surpreendentemente), a equipe vermelha agora está na frente quando se trata de desempenho de núcleo único no Cinebench R23. Já publicamos uma análise detalhada da nova geração de processadores.

Cinebench R15 Multi Continuous Test

0125250375500625750875100011251250137515001625175018752000212522502375Tooltip
Acer Swift Go 14 SFG14-72 Intel Core Ultra 7 155H: Ø2151 (2090.3-2474.79)
Acer Swift Go 14 SFG14-71 Intel Core i5-1335U: Ø1179 (1105.64-1379.98)
LG Gram 2in1 16 16T90R - G.AA78G Intel Core i7-1360P: Ø1547 (1472-2214.1)
HP Pavilion Plus 14-ew0153TU Intel Core i7-1355U: Ø884 (855.52-1252.31)
Lenovo ThinkPad T14 G4 21K4S02000 AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 7840U: Ø1965 (1946.38-2013.69)
Ayaneo Air 1S Retro Power AMD Ryzen 7 7840U: Ø1855 (1830.91-1873.89)
HP Pavilion Plus 14-ey0095cl AMD Ryzen 7 7840U: Ø1746 (1507.22-1962.23)
SCHENKER Vision 14 2023 Intel Core i7-13700H: Ø1949 (1907.49-1999.5)
CPU Performance Rating: Percent
Cinebench R23: Multi Core | Single Core
Cinebench R20: CPU (Multi Core) | CPU (Single Core)
Cinebench R15: CPU Multi 64Bit | CPU Single 64Bit
Blender: v2.79 BMW27 CPU
7-Zip 18.03: 7z b 4 | 7z b 4 -mmt1
Geekbench 5.5: Multi-Core | Single-Core
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2: 4k Preset
LibreOffice : 20 Documents To PDF
R Benchmark 2.5: Overall mean
CPU Performance Rating
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
 
82.1 pt
Acer Swift Go 14 SFG14-72
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
80.6 pt
Lenovo ThinkPad T14 G4 21K4S02000
AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 7840U
79.4 pt
HP Pavilion Plus 14-ey0095cl
AMD Ryzen 7 7840U
75.4 pt
Ayaneo Air 1S Retro Power
AMD Ryzen 7 7840U
73.8 pt
Average of class Subnotebook
 
70.5 pt
LG Gram 2in1 16 16T90R - G.AA78G
Intel Core i7-1360P
68.1 pt
HP Pavilion Plus 14-ew0153TU
Intel Core i7-1355U
57.8 pt
Acer Swift Go 14 SFG14-71
Intel Core i5-1335U
56.7 pt
Cinebench R23 / Multi Core
Acer Swift Go 14 SFG14-72
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
15043 Points
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
  (9769 - 19007, n=48)
14932 Points -1%
Lenovo ThinkPad T14 G4 21K4S02000
AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 7840U
12929 Points -14%
Ayaneo Air 1S Retro Power
AMD Ryzen 7 7840U
11829 Points -21%
HP Pavilion Plus 14-ey0095cl
AMD Ryzen 7 7840U
11739 (8847.85min - 11739.4max) Points -22%
LG Gram 2in1 16 16T90R - G.AA78G
Intel Core i7-1360P
11676 Points -22%
Average of class Subnotebook
  (1555 - 21812, n=64, last 2 years)
11654 Points -23%
Acer Swift Go 14 SFG14-71
Intel Core i5-1335U
7747 Points -49%
HP Pavilion Plus 14-ew0153TU
Intel Core i7-1355U
6936 Points -54%
Cinebench R23 / Single Core
Acer Swift Go 14 SFG14-72
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
1779 Points
Lenovo ThinkPad T14 G4 21K4S02000
AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 7840U
1747 Points -2%
HP Pavilion Plus 14-ew0153TU
Intel Core i7-1355U
1740 Points -2%
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
  (1496 - 1815, n=48)
1725 Points -3%
Ayaneo Air 1S Retro Power
AMD Ryzen 7 7840U
1721 Points -3%
LG Gram 2in1 16 16T90R - G.AA78G
Intel Core i7-1360P
1705 Points -4%
Average of class Subnotebook
  (358 - 2001, n=64, last 2 years)
1668 Points -6%
HP Pavilion Plus 14-ey0095cl
AMD Ryzen 7 7840U
1644 Points -8%
Acer Swift Go 14 SFG14-71
Intel Core i5-1335U
1532 Points -14%
Cinebench R20 / CPU (Multi Core)
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
  (3798 - 7409, n=46)
5794 Points +12%
Acer Swift Go 14 SFG14-72
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
5169 Points
Lenovo ThinkPad T14 G4 21K4S02000
AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 7840U
4970 Points -4%
Ayaneo Air 1S Retro Power
AMD Ryzen 7 7840U
4722 Points -9%
Average of class Subnotebook
  (579 - 8541, n=60, last 2 years)
4530 Points -12%
LG Gram 2in1 16 16T90R - G.AA78G
Intel Core i7-1360P
4506 Points -13%
HP Pavilion Plus 14-ey0095cl
AMD Ryzen 7 7840U
4469 Points -14%
HP Pavilion Plus 14-ew0153TU
Intel Core i7-1355U
2972 Points -43%
Acer Swift Go 14 SFG14-71
Intel Core i5-1335U
2899 Points -44%
Cinebench R20 / CPU (Single Core)
Lenovo ThinkPad T14 G4 21K4S02000
AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 7840U
684 Points +1%
Acer Swift Go 14 SFG14-72
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
678 Points
Ayaneo Air 1S Retro Power
AMD Ryzen 7 7840U
669 Points -1%
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
  (601 - 696, n=46)
664 Points -2%
HP Pavilion Plus 14-ew0153TU
Intel Core i7-1355U
660 Points -3%
LG Gram 2in1 16 16T90R - G.AA78G
Intel Core i7-1360P
658 Points -3%
HP Pavilion Plus 14-ey0095cl
AMD Ryzen 7 7840U
655 Points -3%
Average of class Subnotebook
  (128 - 790, n=60, last 2 years)
636 Points -6%
Acer Swift Go 14 SFG14-71
Intel Core i5-1335U
593 Points -13%
Cinebench R15 / CPU Multi 64Bit
Acer Swift Go 14 SFG14-72
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
2475 (2090.3min - 2474.79max) Points
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
  (1932 - 2880, n=52)
2446 Points -1%
LG Gram 2in1 16 16T90R - G.AA78G
Intel Core i7-1360P
2214 (1472min - 2214.1max) Points -11%
Lenovo ThinkPad T14 G4 21K4S02000
AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 7840U
2014 (1946.38min - 2013.69max) Points -19%
Average of class Subnotebook
  (327 - 3345, n=66, last 2 years)
1978 Points -20%
HP Pavilion Plus 14-ey0095cl
AMD Ryzen 7 7840U
1962 (1507.22min - 1962.23max) Points -21%
Ayaneo Air 1S Retro Power
AMD Ryzen 7 7840U
1874 (1830.91min - 1873.89max) Points -24%
Acer Swift Go 14 SFG14-71
Intel Core i5-1335U
1380 Points -44%
HP Pavilion Plus 14-ew0153TU
Intel Core i7-1355U
1252 (855.52min - 1252.31max) Points -49%
Cinebench R15 / CPU Single 64Bit
Lenovo ThinkPad T14 G4 21K4S02000
AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 7840U
273 Points +7%
HP Pavilion Plus 14-ey0095cl
AMD Ryzen 7 7840U
266 Points +4%
Ayaneo Air 1S Retro Power
AMD Ryzen 7 7840U
264 Points +4%
Acer Swift Go 14 SFG14-72
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
255 Points
Average of class Subnotebook
  (72.4 - 307, n=61, last 2 years)
250 Points -2%
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
  (99.6 - 268, n=48)
249 Points -2%
LG Gram 2in1 16 16T90R - G.AA78G
Intel Core i7-1360P
244 Points -4%
HP Pavilion Plus 14-ew0153TU
Intel Core i7-1355U
240 Points -6%
Acer Swift Go 14 SFG14-71
Intel Core i5-1335U
236 Points -7%
Blender / v2.79 BMW27 CPU
HP Pavilion Plus 14-ew0153TU
Intel Core i7-1355U
502 Seconds * -123%
Acer Swift Go 14 SFG14-71
Intel Core i5-1335U
404 Seconds * -80%
Average of class Subnotebook
  (159 - 2271, n=64, last 2 years)
359 Seconds * -60%
LG Gram 2in1 16 16T90R - G.AA78G
Intel Core i7-1360P
324 Seconds * -44%
HP Pavilion Plus 14-ey0095cl
AMD Ryzen 7 7840U
266 Seconds * -18%
Ayaneo Air 1S Retro Power
AMD Ryzen 7 7840U
262 Seconds * -16%
Lenovo ThinkPad T14 G4 21K4S02000
AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 7840U
248 Seconds * -10%
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
  (175 - 381, n=44)
233 Seconds * -4%
Acer Swift Go 14 SFG14-72
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
225 Seconds *
7-Zip 18.03 / 7z b 4
Acer Swift Go 14 SFG14-72
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
59660 MIPS
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
  (41739 - 70254, n=46)
59045 MIPS -1%
Lenovo ThinkPad T14 G4 21K4S02000
AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 7840U
57056 MIPS -4%
Ayaneo Air 1S Retro Power
AMD Ryzen 7 7840U
53198 MIPS -11%
HP Pavilion Plus 14-ey0095cl
AMD Ryzen 7 7840U
52555 MIPS -12%
Average of class Subnotebook
  (11775 - 77867, n=57, last 2 years)
48297 MIPS -19%
LG Gram 2in1 16 16T90R - G.AA78G
Intel Core i7-1360P
42886 MIPS -28%
Acer Swift Go 14 SFG14-71
Intel Core i5-1335U
34186 MIPS -43%
HP Pavilion Plus 14-ew0153TU
Intel Core i7-1355U
30592 MIPS -49%
7-Zip 18.03 / 7z b 4 -mmt1
HP Pavilion Plus 14-ey0095cl
AMD Ryzen 7 7840U
6110 MIPS +19%
Lenovo ThinkPad T14 G4 21K4S02000
AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 7840U
5988 MIPS +16%
Ayaneo Air 1S Retro Power
AMD Ryzen 7 7840U
5782 MIPS +12%
HP Pavilion Plus 14-ew0153TU
Intel Core i7-1355U
5513 MIPS +7%
Average of class Subnotebook
  (2669 - 6403, n=59, last 2 years)
5478 MIPS +6%
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
  (4795 - 5621, n=46)
5345 MIPS +4%
Acer Swift Go 14 SFG14-72
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
5156 MIPS
Acer Swift Go 14 SFG14-71
Intel Core i5-1335U
5093 MIPS -1%
LG Gram 2in1 16 16T90R - G.AA78G
Intel Core i7-1360P
4651 MIPS -10%
Geekbench 5.5 / Multi-Core
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
  (10017 - 13556, n=48)
12022 Points +2%
Acer Swift Go 14 SFG14-72
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
11781 Points
LG Gram 2in1 16 16T90R - G.AA78G
Intel Core i7-1360P
10450 Points -11%
Average of class Subnotebook
  (2557 - 14728, n=59, last 2 years)
10099 Points -14%
Lenovo ThinkPad T14 G4 21K4S02000
AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 7840U
9663 Points -18%
HP Pavilion Plus 14-ey0095cl
AMD Ryzen 7 7840U
9248 Points -22%
HP Pavilion Plus 14-ew0153TU
Intel Core i7-1355U
7776 Points -34%
Acer Swift Go 14 SFG14-71
Intel Core i5-1335U
7675 Points -35%
Ayaneo Air 1S Retro Power
AMD Ryzen 7 7840U
7399 Points -37%
Geekbench 5.5 / Single-Core
Lenovo ThinkPad T14 G4 21K4S02000
AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 7840U
1881 Points +10%
HP Pavilion Plus 14-ey0095cl
AMD Ryzen 7 7840U
1857 Points +8%
HP Pavilion Plus 14-ew0153TU
Intel Core i7-1355U
1822 Points +6%
Average of class Subnotebook
  (621 - 2350, n=59, last 2 years)
1790 Points +4%
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
  (1462 - 1824, n=48)
1752 Points +2%
Acer Swift Go 14 SFG14-72
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
1714 Points
Ayaneo Air 1S Retro Power
AMD Ryzen 7 7840U
1652 Points -4%
LG Gram 2in1 16 16T90R - G.AA78G
Intel Core i7-1360P
1648 Points -4%
Acer Swift Go 14 SFG14-71
Intel Core i5-1335U
1647 Points -4%
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 / 4k Preset
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
  (9.93 - 21.2, n=46)
16.4 fps +2%
Acer Swift Go 14 SFG14-72
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
16.1 fps
Lenovo ThinkPad T14 G4 21K4S02000
AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 7840U
15.9 fps -1%
HP Pavilion Plus 14-ey0095cl
AMD Ryzen 7 7840U
15 fps -7%
Ayaneo Air 1S Retro Power
AMD Ryzen 7 7840U
14.6 fps -9%
Average of class Subnotebook
  (0.97 - 25.1, n=59, last 2 years)
12.9 fps -20%
LG Gram 2in1 16 16T90R - G.AA78G
Intel Core i7-1360P
11.2 fps -30%
Acer Swift Go 14 SFG14-71
Intel Core i5-1335U
9.2 fps -43%
HP Pavilion Plus 14-ew0153TU
Intel Core i7-1355U
8.99 fps -44%
LibreOffice / 20 Documents To PDF
Acer Swift Go 14 SFG14-71
Intel Core i5-1335U
57.4 s * -3%
LG Gram 2in1 16 16T90R - G.AA78G
Intel Core i7-1360P
57.2 s * -3%
HP Pavilion Plus 14-ew0153TU
Intel Core i7-1355U
55.7 s * -0%
Acer Swift Go 14 SFG14-72
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
55.5 s *
Average of class Subnotebook
  (38.5 - 220, n=58, last 2 years)
54.5 s * +2%
HP Pavilion Plus 14-ey0095cl
AMD Ryzen 7 7840U
50.9 s * +8%
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
  (37.5 - 79.2, n=45)
48.8 s * +12%
Ayaneo Air 1S Retro Power
AMD Ryzen 7 7840U
48.1 s * +13%
Lenovo ThinkPad T14 G4 21K4S02000
AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 7840U
46.9 s * +15%
R Benchmark 2.5 / Overall mean
LG Gram 2in1 16 16T90R - G.AA78G
Intel Core i7-1360P
0.583 sec * -20%
Acer Swift Go 14 SFG14-71
Intel Core i5-1335U
0.524 sec * -8%
Average of class Subnotebook
  (0.413 - 1.456, n=59, last 2 years)
0.519 sec * -7%
Acer Swift Go 14 SFG14-72
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
0.4865 sec *
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
  (0.4457 - 0.53, n=45)
0.4825 sec * +1%
HP Pavilion Plus 14-ew0153TU
Intel Core i7-1355U
0.4777 sec * +2%
Lenovo ThinkPad T14 G4 21K4S02000
AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 7840U
0.4676 sec * +4%
Ayaneo Air 1S Retro Power
AMD Ryzen 7 7840U
0.4651 sec * +4%
HP Pavilion Plus 14-ey0095cl
AMD Ryzen 7 7840U
0.4559 sec * +6%

* ... smaller is better

Cinebench R10 Rendering Multiple CPUs 32Bit
56242
Cinebench R10 Rendering Single 32Bit
9919
Cinebench R10 Rendering Single CPUs 64Bit
82102 Points
Cinebench R10 Rendering Multiple CPUs 64Bit
13726 Points
Cinebench R10 Shading 64Bit
18324 Points
Cinebench R10 Shading 32Bit
17440
Cinebench R11.5 OpenGL 64Bit
101.92 fps
Cinebench R11.5 CPU Single 64Bit
3.07 Points
Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 64Bit
29.98 Points
Cinebench R15 Ref. Match 64Bit
97.8 %
Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64Bit
149.1 fps
Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64Bit
2475 Points
Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64Bit
255 Points
Cinebench R20 CPU (Single Core)
678 Points
Cinebench R20 CPU (Multi Core)
5169 Points
Cinebench R23 Multi Core
15043 Points
Cinebench R23 Single Core
1779 Points
Cinebench 2024 CPU Single Core
102.5 Points
Cinebench 2024 CPU Multi Core
747 Points
Ajuda
Performance Rating
Lenovo ThinkPad T14 G4 21K4S02000
AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 7840U, Radeon 780M
97.2 pt
HP Pavilion Plus 14-ey0095cl
AMD Ryzen 7 7840U, Radeon 780M
85 pt
Ayaneo Air 1S Retro Power
AMD Ryzen 7 7840U, Radeon 780M
84.4 pt
Acer Swift Go 14 SFG14-72
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core
78.7 pt
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
 
78.3 pt
Average of class Subnotebook
 
69.1 pt
LG Gram 2in1 16 16T90R - G.AA78G
Intel Core i7-1360P, Iris Xe G7 96EUs
64.7 pt
Acer Swift Go 14 SFG14-71
Intel Core i5-1335U, Iris Xe G7 80EUs
42 pt
HP Pavilion Plus 14-ew0153TU
Intel Core i7-1355U, Iris Xe G7 96EUs
40.7 pt
AIDA64 / FP32 Ray-Trace
Lenovo ThinkPad T14 G4 21K4S02000
AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 7840U, Radeon 780M
20130 KRay/s +48%
Ayaneo Air 1S Retro Power
AMD Ryzen 7 7840U, Radeon 780M
18736 KRay/s +38%
HP Pavilion Plus 14-ey0095cl
AMD Ryzen 7 7840U, Radeon 780M
18678 KRay/s +38%
Acer Swift Go 14 SFG14-72
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core
13563 KRay/s
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
  (6670 - 18470, n=46)
13107 KRay/s -3%
Average of class Subnotebook
  (1141 - 32888, n=59, last 2 years)
12716 KRay/s -6%
LG Gram 2in1 16 16T90R - G.AA78G
Intel Core i7-1360P, Iris Xe G7 96EUs
9693 KRay/s -29%
LG Gram 2in1 16 16T90R - G.AA78G
Intel Core i7-1360P, Iris Xe G7 96EUs
8619 KRay/s -36%
Acer Swift Go 14 SFG14-71
Intel Core i5-1335U, Iris Xe G7 80EUs
6963 KRay/s -49%
HP Pavilion Plus 14-ew0153TU
Intel Core i7-1355U, Iris Xe G7 96EUs
5673 KRay/s -58%
AIDA64 / FPU Julia
Lenovo ThinkPad T14 G4 21K4S02000
AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 7840U, Radeon 780M
84324 Points +21%
HP Pavilion Plus 14-ey0095cl
AMD Ryzen 7 7840U, Radeon 780M
79716 Points +14%
Ayaneo Air 1S Retro Power
AMD Ryzen 7 7840U, Radeon 780M
78607 Points +13%
Acer Swift Go 14 SFG14-72
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core
69767 Points
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
  (40905 - 93181, n=46)
69549 Points 0%
Average of class Subnotebook
  (6838 - 123315, n=59, last 2 years)
60467 Points -13%
LG Gram 2in1 16 16T90R - G.AA78G
Intel Core i7-1360P, Iris Xe G7 96EUs
50702 Points -27%
Acer Swift Go 14 SFG14-71
Intel Core i5-1335U, Iris Xe G7 80EUs
32828 Points -53%
HP Pavilion Plus 14-ew0153TU
Intel Core i7-1355U, Iris Xe G7 96EUs
29580 Points -58%
AIDA64 / CPU SHA3
Lenovo ThinkPad T14 G4 21K4S02000
AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 7840U, Radeon 780M
3970 MB/s +22%
Ayaneo Air 1S Retro Power
AMD Ryzen 7 7840U, Radeon 780M
3691 MB/s +13%
HP Pavilion Plus 14-ey0095cl
AMD Ryzen 7 7840U, Radeon 780M
3555 MB/s +9%
Acer Swift Go 14 SFG14-72
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core
3263 MB/s
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
  (1940 - 4436, n=46)
3249 MB/s 0%
Average of class Subnotebook
  (444 - 5287, n=59, last 2 years)
2890 MB/s -11%
LG Gram 2in1 16 16T90R - G.AA78G
Intel Core i7-1360P, Iris Xe G7 96EUs
2522 MB/s -23%
Acer Swift Go 14 SFG14-71
Intel Core i5-1335U, Iris Xe G7 80EUs
1687 MB/s -48%
HP Pavilion Plus 14-ew0153TU
Intel Core i7-1355U, Iris Xe G7 96EUs
1529 MB/s -53%
AIDA64 / CPU Queen
Lenovo ThinkPad T14 G4 21K4S02000
AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 7840U, Radeon 780M
95384 Points +12%
HP Pavilion Plus 14-ey0095cl
AMD Ryzen 7 7840U, Radeon 780M
93769 Points +10%
Ayaneo Air 1S Retro Power
AMD Ryzen 7 7840U, Radeon 780M
91289 Points +8%
Acer Swift Go 14 SFG14-72
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core
84870 Points
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
  (64698 - 94181, n=46)
83603 Points -1%
LG Gram 2in1 16 16T90R - G.AA78G
Intel Core i7-1360P, Iris Xe G7 96EUs
82121 Points -3%
Average of class Subnotebook
  (11579 - 115682, n=59, last 2 years)
79151 Points -7%
HP Pavilion Plus 14-ew0153TU
Intel Core i7-1355U, Iris Xe G7 96EUs
60719 Points -28%
Acer Swift Go 14 SFG14-71
Intel Core i5-1335U, Iris Xe G7 80EUs
53839 Points -37%
AIDA64 / FPU SinJulia
Lenovo ThinkPad T14 G4 21K4S02000
AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 7840U, Radeon 780M
12858 Points +36%
Ayaneo Air 1S Retro Power
AMD Ryzen 7 7840U, Radeon 780M
12286 Points +30%
HP Pavilion Plus 14-ey0095cl
AMD Ryzen 7 7840U, Radeon 780M
12132 Points +28%
Acer Swift Go 14 SFG14-72
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core
9475 Points
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
  (5639 - 10647, n=46)
9130 Points -4%
Average of class Subnotebook
  (744 - 18418, n=59, last 2 years)
7967 Points -16%
LG Gram 2in1 16 16T90R - G.AA78G
Intel Core i7-1360P, Iris Xe G7 96EUs
6679 Points -30%
HP Pavilion Plus 14-ew0153TU
Intel Core i7-1355U, Iris Xe G7 96EUs
4045 Points -57%
Acer Swift Go 14 SFG14-71
Intel Core i5-1335U, Iris Xe G7 80EUs
3873 Points -59%
AIDA64 / FPU Mandel
Lenovo ThinkPad T14 G4 21K4S02000
AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 7840U, Radeon 780M
44731 Points +28%
HP Pavilion Plus 14-ey0095cl
AMD Ryzen 7 7840U, Radeon 780M
41822 Points +20%
Ayaneo Air 1S Retro Power
AMD Ryzen 7 7840U, Radeon 780M
41726 Points +19%
Acer Swift Go 14 SFG14-72
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core
34945 Points
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
  (18236 - 47685, n=46)
33785 Points -3%
Average of class Subnotebook
  (3366 - 65433, n=59, last 2 years)
31473 Points -10%
LG Gram 2in1 16 16T90R - G.AA78G
Intel Core i7-1360P, Iris Xe G7 96EUs
24392 Points -30%
Acer Swift Go 14 SFG14-71
Intel Core i5-1335U, Iris Xe G7 80EUs
16256 Points -53%
HP Pavilion Plus 14-ew0153TU
Intel Core i7-1355U, Iris Xe G7 96EUs
14596 Points -58%
AIDA64 / CPU AES
Lenovo ThinkPad T14 G4 21K4S02000
AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 7840U, Radeon 780M
142329 MB/s +107%
LG Gram 2in1 16 16T90R - G.AA78G
Intel Core i7-1360P, Iris Xe G7 96EUs
92044 MB/s +34%
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
  (45713 - 152179, n=46)
78103 MB/s +14%
Acer Swift Go 14 SFG14-72
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core
68795 MB/s
Ayaneo Air 1S Retro Power
AMD Ryzen 7 7840U, Radeon 780M
65903 MB/s -4%
Average of class Subnotebook
  (638 - 161430, n=59, last 2 years)
59846 MB/s -13%
HP Pavilion Plus 14-ey0095cl
AMD Ryzen 7 7840U, Radeon 780M
53018 MB/s -23%
Acer Swift Go 14 SFG14-71
Intel Core i5-1335U, Iris Xe G7 80EUs
33466 MB/s -51%
HP Pavilion Plus 14-ew0153TU
Intel Core i7-1355U, Iris Xe G7 96EUs
31432 MB/s -54%
AIDA64 / CPU ZLib
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
  (557 - 1250, n=46)
962 MB/s 0%
Acer Swift Go 14 SFG14-72
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core
960 MB/s
Lenovo ThinkPad T14 G4 21K4S02000
AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 7840U, Radeon 780M
858 MB/s -11%
HP Pavilion Plus 14-ey0095cl
AMD Ryzen 7 7840U, Radeon 780M
808 MB/s -16%
Ayaneo Air 1S Retro Power
AMD Ryzen 7 7840U, Radeon 780M
807 MB/s -16%
LG Gram 2in1 16 16T90R - G.AA78G
Intel Core i7-1360P, Iris Xe G7 96EUs
752 MB/s -22%
Average of class Subnotebook
  (166.9 - 1379, n=59, last 2 years)
741 MB/s -23%
Acer Swift Go 14 SFG14-71
Intel Core i5-1335U, Iris Xe G7 80EUs
493 MB/s -49%
HP Pavilion Plus 14-ew0153TU
Intel Core i7-1355U, Iris Xe G7 96EUs
454 MB/s -53%
AIDA64 / FP64 Ray-Trace
Lenovo ThinkPad T14 G4 21K4S02000
AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 7840U, Radeon 780M
10555 KRay/s +50%
HP Pavilion Plus 14-ey0095cl
AMD Ryzen 7 7840U, Radeon 780M
9874 KRay/s +40%
Ayaneo Air 1S Retro Power
AMD Ryzen 7 7840U, Radeon 780M
9738 KRay/s +38%
Acer Swift Go 14 SFG14-72
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core
7057 KRay/s
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
  (3569 - 9802, n=46)
6853 KRay/s -3%
Average of class Subnotebook
  (610 - 17495, n=59, last 2 years)
6591 KRay/s -7%
LG Gram 2in1 16 16T90R - G.AA78G
Intel Core i7-1360P, Iris Xe G7 96EUs
5266 KRay/s -25%
Acer Swift Go 14 SFG14-71
Intel Core i5-1335U, Iris Xe G7 80EUs
3482 KRay/s -51%
HP Pavilion Plus 14-ew0153TU
Intel Core i7-1355U, Iris Xe G7 96EUs
2991 KRay/s -58%
AIDA64 / CPU PhotoWorxx
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
  (32719 - 54223, n=46)
46590 MPixel/s +1%
Acer Swift Go 14 SFG14-72
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core
46137 MPixel/s
LG Gram 2in1 16 16T90R - G.AA78G
Intel Core i7-1360P, Iris Xe G7 96EUs
42905 MPixel/s -7%
Average of class Subnotebook
  (6569 - 54881, n=59, last 2 years)
40471 MPixel/s -12%
Lenovo ThinkPad T14 G4 21K4S02000
AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 7840U, Radeon 780M
38442 MPixel/s -17%
HP Pavilion Plus 14-ew0153TU
Intel Core i7-1355U, Iris Xe G7 96EUs
37141 MPixel/s -19%
Acer Swift Go 14 SFG14-71
Intel Core i5-1335U, Iris Xe G7 80EUs
34266 MPixel/s -26%
HP Pavilion Plus 14-ey0095cl
AMD Ryzen 7 7840U, Radeon 780M
33689 MPixel/s -27%
Ayaneo Air 1S Retro Power
AMD Ryzen 7 7840U, Radeon 780M
26903 MPixel/s -42%

Desempenho do sistema

De acordo com a Intel, a nova Arc iGPU é a principal responsável por melhorias significativas no desempenho gráfico. Isso fica claro assim que damos uma olhada na seção de criação de conteúdo digital no PCMark 10. Nessa área, o Swift Go 14 e sua Arc iGPU são impressionantes. No geral, o desempenho do sistema do Acer Swift Go 14 é muito superior ao de seu antecessor e à maioria dos dispositivos de comparação. Isso significa que estamos lidando com um dispositivo potente que não tem motivos para recuar, mesmo quando confrontado com aplicativos 3D.

PCMark 10 / Score
Lenovo ThinkPad T14 G4 21K4S02000
Radeon 780M, R7 PRO 7840U, Samsung PM9A1a MZVL21T0HDLU
6973 Points +5%
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU
  (5159 - 7529, n=32)
6732 Points +2%
Acer Swift Go 14 SFG14-72
Arc 8-Core, Ultra 7 155H, SK hynix HFS001TEJ9X110NA
6625 Points
HP Pavilion Plus 14-ey0095cl
Radeon 780M, R7 7840U, WDC PC SN810 1TB
6480 Points -2%
Average of class Subnotebook
  (4993 - 7788, n=51, last 2 years)
6447 Points -3%
Ayaneo Air 1S Retro Power
Radeon 780M, R7 7840U, Ayaneo CyberThunder-2TB
5866 Points -11%
LG Gram 2in1 16 16T90R - G.AA78G
Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-1360P, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
5781 Points -13%
HP Pavilion Plus 14-ew0153TU
Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-1355U, SK hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X101N
5455 Points -18%
Acer Swift Go 14 SFG14-71
Iris Xe G7 80EUs, i5-1335U, WD PC SN740 SDDQNQD-512G-1014
5328 Points -20%
PCMark 10 / Essentials
LG Gram 2in1 16 16T90R - G.AA78G
Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-1360P, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
11359 Points +11%
Lenovo ThinkPad T14 G4 21K4S02000
Radeon 780M, R7 PRO 7840U, Samsung PM9A1a MZVL21T0HDLU
10803 Points +6%
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU
  (8580 - 11289, n=32)
10563 Points +3%
Average of class Subnotebook
  (9476 - 11331, n=51, last 2 years)
10480 Points +3%
Acer Swift Go 14 SFG14-72
Arc 8-Core, Ultra 7 155H, SK hynix HFS001TEJ9X110NA
10212 Points
HP Pavilion Plus 14-ew0153TU
Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-1355U, SK hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X101N
10203 Points 0%
Acer Swift Go 14 SFG14-71
Iris Xe G7 80EUs, i5-1335U, WD PC SN740 SDDQNQD-512G-1014
10111 Points -1%
HP Pavilion Plus 14-ey0095cl
Radeon 780M, R7 7840U, WDC PC SN810 1TB
9781 Points -4%
Ayaneo Air 1S Retro Power
Radeon 780M, R7 7840U, Ayaneo CyberThunder-2TB
9068 Points -11%
PCMark 10 / Productivity
Lenovo ThinkPad T14 G4 21K4S02000
Radeon 780M, R7 PRO 7840U, Samsung PM9A1a MZVL21T0HDLU
9933 Points +17%
HP Pavilion Plus 14-ey0095cl
Radeon 780M, R7 7840U, WDC PC SN810 1TB
9647 Points +13%
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU
  (7822 - 10591, n=32)
8749 Points +3%
Average of class Subnotebook
  (6440 - 10623, n=51, last 2 years)
8633 Points +2%
Acer Swift Go 14 SFG14-72
Arc 8-Core, Ultra 7 155H, SK hynix HFS001TEJ9X110NA
8500 Points
Ayaneo Air 1S Retro Power
Radeon 780M, R7 7840U, Ayaneo CyberThunder-2TB
8386 Points -1%
Acer Swift Go 14 SFG14-71
Iris Xe G7 80EUs, i5-1335U, WD PC SN740 SDDQNQD-512G-1014
6966 Points -18%
HP Pavilion Plus 14-ew0153TU
Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-1355U, SK hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X101N
6763 Points -20%
LG Gram 2in1 16 16T90R - G.AA78G
Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-1360P, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
6572 Points -23%
PCMark 10 / Digital Content Creation
Acer Swift Go 14 SFG14-72
Arc 8-Core, Ultra 7 155H, SK hynix HFS001TEJ9X110NA
9090 Points
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU
  (4985 - 10709, n=32)
9011 Points -1%
Lenovo ThinkPad T14 G4 21K4S02000
Radeon 780M, R7 PRO 7840U, Samsung PM9A1a MZVL21T0HDLU
8575 Points -6%
Average of class Subnotebook
  (5305 - 10983, n=51, last 2 years)
8124 Points -11%
HP Pavilion Plus 14-ey0095cl
Radeon 780M, R7 7840U, WDC PC SN810 1TB
7827 Points -14%
Ayaneo Air 1S Retro Power
Radeon 780M, R7 7840U, Ayaneo CyberThunder-2TB
7204 Points -21%
LG Gram 2in1 16 16T90R - G.AA78G
Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-1360P, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
7027 Points -23%
HP Pavilion Plus 14-ew0153TU
Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-1355U, SK hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X101N
6386 Points -30%
Acer Swift Go 14 SFG14-71
Iris Xe G7 80EUs, i5-1335U, WD PC SN740 SDDQNQD-512G-1014
5826 Points -36%
CrossMark / Overall
Lenovo ThinkPad T14 G4 21K4S02000
Radeon 780M, R7 PRO 7840U, Samsung PM9A1a MZVL21T0HDLU
1669 Points +6%
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU
  (1366 - 1903, n=32)
1655 Points +5%
Acer Swift Go 14 SFG14-72
Arc 8-Core, Ultra 7 155H, SK hynix HFS001TEJ9X110NA
1579 Points
Average of class Subnotebook
  (365 - 1971, n=57, last 2 years)
1578 Points 0%
HP Pavilion Plus 14-ew0153TU
Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-1355U, SK hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X101N
1543 Points -2%
LG Gram 2in1 16 16T90R - G.AA78G
Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-1360P, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
1527 Points -3%
HP Pavilion Plus 14-ey0095cl
Radeon 780M, R7 7840U, WDC PC SN810 1TB
1523 Points -4%
Acer Swift Go 14 SFG14-71
Iris Xe G7 80EUs, i5-1335U, WD PC SN740 SDDQNQD-512G-1014
1470 Points -7%
Ayaneo Air 1S Retro Power
Radeon 780M, R7 7840U, Ayaneo CyberThunder-2TB
1256 Points -20%
CrossMark / Productivity
Lenovo ThinkPad T14 G4 21K4S02000
Radeon 780M, R7 PRO 7840U, Samsung PM9A1a MZVL21T0HDLU
1624 Points +8%
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU
  (1291 - 1798, n=31)
1581 Points +5%
HP Pavilion Plus 14-ew0153TU
Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-1355U, SK hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X101N
1551 Points +3%
Average of class Subnotebook
  (364 - 1875, n=57, last 2 years)
1520 Points +1%
HP Pavilion Plus 14-ey0095cl
Radeon 780M, R7 7840U, WDC PC SN810 1TB
1513 Points 0%
Acer Swift Go 14 SFG14-72
Arc 8-Core, Ultra 7 155H, SK hynix HFS001TEJ9X110NA
1510 Points
LG Gram 2in1 16 16T90R - G.AA78G
Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-1360P, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
1503 Points 0%
Acer Swift Go 14 SFG14-71
Iris Xe G7 80EUs, i5-1335U, WD PC SN740 SDDQNQD-512G-1014
1489 Points -1%
Ayaneo Air 1S Retro Power
Radeon 780M, R7 7840U, Ayaneo CyberThunder-2TB
1326 Points -12%
CrossMark / Creativity
Lenovo ThinkPad T14 G4 21K4S02000
Radeon 780M, R7 PRO 7840U, Samsung PM9A1a MZVL21T0HDLU
1824 Points +5%
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU
  (1519 - 1929, n=31)
1817 Points +5%
Average of class Subnotebook
  (385 - 2210, n=57, last 2 years)
1732 Points 0%
Acer Swift Go 14 SFG14-72
Arc 8-Core, Ultra 7 155H, SK hynix HFS001TEJ9X110NA
1730 Points
HP Pavilion Plus 14-ey0095cl
Radeon 780M, R7 7840U, WDC PC SN810 1TB
1646 Points -5%
HP Pavilion Plus 14-ew0153TU
Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-1355U, SK hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X101N
1603 Points -7%
LG Gram 2in1 16 16T90R - G.AA78G
Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-1360P, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
1558 Points -10%
Acer Swift Go 14 SFG14-71
Iris Xe G7 80EUs, i5-1335U, WD PC SN740 SDDQNQD-512G-1014
1445 Points -16%
Ayaneo Air 1S Retro Power
Radeon 780M, R7 7840U, Ayaneo CyberThunder-2TB
1251 Points -28%
CrossMark / Responsiveness
LG Gram 2in1 16 16T90R - G.AA78G
Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-1360P, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
1508 Points +10%
Acer Swift Go 14 SFG14-71
Iris Xe G7 80EUs, i5-1335U, WD PC SN740 SDDQNQD-512G-1014
1491 Points +9%
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU
  (939 - 1802, n=31)
1396 Points +2%
Lenovo ThinkPad T14 G4 21K4S02000
Radeon 780M, R7 PRO 7840U, Samsung PM9A1a MZVL21T0HDLU
1389 Points +1%
Acer Swift Go 14 SFG14-72
Arc 8-Core, Ultra 7 155H, SK hynix HFS001TEJ9X110NA
1372 Points
HP Pavilion Plus 14-ew0153TU
Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-1355U, SK hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X101N
1356 Points -1%
Average of class Subnotebook
  (312 - 1899, n=57, last 2 years)
1345 Points -2%
HP Pavilion Plus 14-ey0095cl
Radeon 780M, R7 7840U, WDC PC SN810 1TB
1231 Points -10%
Ayaneo Air 1S Retro Power
Radeon 780M, R7 7840U, Ayaneo CyberThunder-2TB
1082 Points -21%
WebXPRT 3 / Overall
Lenovo ThinkPad T14 G4 21K4S02000
Radeon 780M, R7 PRO 7840U, Samsung PM9A1a MZVL21T0HDLU
317 Points +10%
Average of class Subnotebook
  (156 - 448, n=58, last 2 years)
306 Points +7%
HP Pavilion Plus 14-ey0095cl
Radeon 780M, R7 7840U, WDC PC SN810 1TB
293 Points +2%
Acer Swift Go 14 SFG14-72
Arc 8-Core, Ultra 7 155H, SK hynix HFS001TEJ9X110NA
287 Points
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU
  (252 - 299, n=32)
276 Points -4%
HP Pavilion Plus 14-ew0153TU
Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-1355U, SK hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X101N
275 Points -4%
LG Gram 2in1 16 16T90R - G.AA78G
Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-1360P, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
251 Points -13%
Acer Swift Go 14 SFG14-71
Iris Xe G7 80EUs, i5-1335U, WD PC SN740 SDDQNQD-512G-1014
244 Points -15%
Ayaneo Air 1S Retro Power
Radeon 780M, R7 7840U, Ayaneo CyberThunder-2TB
235 Points -18%
WebXPRT 4 / Overall
Average of class Subnotebook
  (132 - 325, n=57, last 2 years)
256 Points
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU
  (234 - 309, n=27)
254 Points
HP Pavilion Plus 14-ew0153TU
Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-1355U, SK hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X101N
253 Points
HP Pavilion Plus 14-ey0095cl
Radeon 780M, R7 7840U, WDC PC SN810 1TB
231 Points
Ayaneo Air 1S Retro Power
Radeon 780M, R7 7840U, Ayaneo CyberThunder-2TB
196.4 Points
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 / Total
LG Gram 2in1 16 16T90R - G.AA78G
Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-1360P, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
633 ms * -18%
HP Pavilion Plus 14-ey0095cl
Radeon 780M, R7 7840U, WDC PC SN810 1TB
562 ms * -5%
Acer Swift Go 14 SFG14-71
Iris Xe G7 80EUs, i5-1335U, WD PC SN740 SDDQNQD-512G-1014
559 ms * -4%
Acer Swift Go 14 SFG14-71
Iris Xe G7 80EUs, i5-1335U, WD PC SN740 SDDQNQD-512G-1014
559 ms * -4%
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU
  (517 - 614, n=33)
541 ms * -1%
Acer Swift Go 14 SFG14-72
Arc 8-Core, Ultra 7 155H, SK hynix HFS001TEJ9X110NA
535 ms *
Lenovo ThinkPad T14 G4 21K4S02000
Radeon 780M, R7 PRO 7840U, Samsung PM9A1a MZVL21T0HDLU
526 ms * +2%
Average of class Subnotebook
  (363 - 1104, n=66, last 2 years)
526 ms * +2%
Ayaneo Air 1S Retro Power
Radeon 780M, R7 7840U, Ayaneo CyberThunder-2TB
516 ms * +4%
HP Pavilion Plus 14-ew0153TU
Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-1355U, SK hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X101N
514 ms * +4%

* ... smaller is better

PCMark 10 Score
6625 pontos
Ajuda
AIDA64 / Memory Copy
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
  (62397 - 96791, n=46)
83126 MB/s +3%
Acer Swift Go 14 SFG14-72
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core
80515 MB/s
Average of class Subnotebook
  (14916 - 108756, n=59, last 2 years)
71417 MB/s -11%
AIDA64 / Memory Read
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
  (60544 - 90647, n=46)
80035 MB/s +11%
Acer Swift Go 14 SFG14-72
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core
72244 MB/s
Average of class Subnotebook
  (15948 - 122210, n=59, last 2 years)
68938 MB/s -5%
AIDA64 / Memory Write
Acer Swift Go 14 SFG14-72
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core
75291 MB/s
Average of class Subnotebook
  (16513 - 117898, n=59, last 2 years)
74273 MB/s -1%
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
  (58692 - 93451, n=46)
72600 MB/s -4%
AIDA64 / Memory Latency
Acer Swift Go 14 SFG14-72
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core
147.1 ns *
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
  (116.2 - 233, n=46)
143.6 ns * +2%
Average of class Subnotebook
  (7.2 - 187.8, n=59, last 2 years)
105.2 ns * +28%

* ... smaller is better

Armazenamento em massa

No Swift Go 14, um novo SSD NVMe da SK Hynix faz seu trabalho e consegue atingir velocidades de transferência médias a altas em todos os benchmarks. No loop DiskSpd, no qual o desempenho do armazenamento é analisado por um período mais longo, a velocidade de leitura cai ligeiramente.

SK hynix HFS001TEJ9X110NA
Sequential Read: 4224.68MB/s
Sequential Write: 3544.16MB/s
4K Read: 55.15MB/s
4K Write: 205.42MB/s
4K-64 Read: 1586.68MB/s
4K-64 Write: 2176.61MB/s
Access Time Read: 0.039ms
Access Time Write: 0.101ms
Score Read: 2064Points
Score Write: 3039Points
Score Total: 6129Points
Drive Performance Rating - Percent
LG Gram 2in1 16 16T90R - G.AA78G
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
88.9 pt
Acer Swift Go 14 SFG14-71
WD PC SN740 SDDQNQD-512G-1014
77.2 pt
Lenovo ThinkPad T14 G4 21K4S02000
Samsung PM9A1a MZVL21T0HDLU
75.1 pt
Acer Swift Go 14 SFG14-72
SK hynix HFS001TEJ9X110NA
71.6 pt
Average SK hynix HFS001TEJ9X110NA
 
71.6 pt
HP Pavilion Plus 14-ew0153TU
SK hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X101N
68.6 pt
HP Pavilion Plus 14-ey0095cl -11!
WDC PC SN810 1TB
67.3 pt
Average of class Subnotebook
 
62.9 pt
Ayaneo Air 1S Retro Power
Ayaneo CyberThunder-2TB
34.6 pt
DiskSpd
seq read
Lenovo ThinkPad T14 G4 21K4S02000
Samsung PM9A1a MZVL21T0HDLU
3417 (3399.9min - 3416.77max) MB/s +48%
HP Pavilion Plus 14-ey0095cl
WDC PC SN810 1TB
3265 (3244.93min - 3265.06max) MB/s +42%
Average of class Subnotebook
  (38.2 - 4852, n=59, last 2 years)
2962 MB/s +29%
LG Gram 2in1 16 16T90R - G.AA78G
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
2882 (2725.88min - 2882.22max) MB/s +25%
Acer Swift Go 14 SFG14-71
WD PC SN740 SDDQNQD-512G-1014
2763 (2353.54min - 2762.92max) MB/s +20%
HP Pavilion Plus 14-ew0153TU
SK hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X101N
2700 (2683.01min - 2699.82max) MB/s +17%
Acer Swift Go 14 SFG14-72
SK hynix HFS001TEJ9X110NA
2305 (2283.64min - 2304.98max) MB/s
Average SK hynix HFS001TEJ9X110NA
  ()
2305 MB/s 0%
Ayaneo Air 1S Retro Power
Ayaneo CyberThunder-2TB
2154 (2143.71min - 2153.78max) MB/s -7%
seq write
HP Pavilion Plus 14-ey0095cl
WDC PC SN810 1TB
3465 (3398.98min - 3464.7max) MB/s +15%
LG Gram 2in1 16 16T90R - G.AA78G
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
3431 (3289.51min - 3431.36max) MB/s +14%
Acer Swift Go 14 SFG14-71
WD PC SN740 SDDQNQD-512G-1014
3373 (2885.36min - 3372.81max) MB/s +12%
Lenovo ThinkPad T14 G4 21K4S02000
Samsung PM9A1a MZVL21T0HDLU
3233 (3089.31min - 3233.18max) MB/s +8%
Acer Swift Go 14 SFG14-72
SK hynix HFS001TEJ9X110NA
3001 (2954.22min - 3001.02max) MB/s
Average SK hynix HFS001TEJ9X110NA
  ()
3001 MB/s 0%
Average of class Subnotebook
  (38.2 - 5344, n=59, last 2 years)
2933 MB/s -2%
HP Pavilion Plus 14-ew0153TU
SK hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X101N
2792 (2724.62min - 2792.15max) MB/s -7%
Ayaneo Air 1S Retro Power
Ayaneo CyberThunder-2TB
1524 (244.88min - 1523.68max) MB/s -49%
seq q8 t1 read
Lenovo ThinkPad T14 G4 21K4S02000
Samsung PM9A1a MZVL21T0HDLU
7027 (5699.29min - 7026.72max) MB/s +121%
HP Pavilion Plus 14-ey0095cl
WDC PC SN810 1TB
6948 (6424.99min - 6948.07max) MB/s +119%
LG Gram 2in1 16 16T90R - G.AA78G
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
6562 (5825.59min - 6561.57max) MB/s +106%
HP Pavilion Plus 14-ew0153TU
SK hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X101N
6508 (5678.88min - 6508.32max) MB/s +105%
Average of class Subnotebook
  (38.5 - 13544, n=59, last 2 years)
5252 MB/s +65%
Acer Swift Go 14 SFG14-71
WD PC SN740 SDDQNQD-512G-1014
4714 (3899.2min - 4714.2max) MB/s +48%
Acer Swift Go 14 SFG14-72
SK hynix HFS001TEJ9X110NA
3179 (2816.5min - 3179.49max) MB/s
Average SK hynix HFS001TEJ9X110NA
  ()
3179 MB/s 0%
Ayaneo Air 1S Retro Power
Ayaneo CyberThunder-2TB
2553 (2224.87min - 2553.07max) MB/s -20%
seq q8 t1 write
HP Pavilion Plus 14-ey0095cl
WDC PC SN810 1TB
5153 (5061.06min - 5153.12max) MB/s +37%
LG Gram 2in1 16 16T90R - G.AA78G
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
4947 (4921.79min - 4946.59max) MB/s +32%
Lenovo ThinkPad T14 G4 21K4S02000
Samsung PM9A1a MZVL21T0HDLU
4924 (4892.94min - 4924.33max) MB/s +31%
HP Pavilion Plus 14-ew0153TU
SK hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X101N
4271 (4073.72min - 4270.7max) MB/s +14%
Average of class Subnotebook
  (38.2 - 9702, n=59, last 2 years)
4111 MB/s +10%
Acer Swift Go 14 SFG14-72
SK hynix HFS001TEJ9X110NA
3752 (3716.27min - 3752.48max) MB/s
Average SK hynix HFS001TEJ9X110NA
  ()
3752 MB/s 0%
Acer Swift Go 14 SFG14-71
WD PC SN740 SDDQNQD-512G-1014
3431 (3083.15min - 3431max) MB/s -9%
Ayaneo Air 1S Retro Power
Ayaneo CyberThunder-2TB
1698 (1529.75min - 1697.81max) MB/s -55%
4k q1 t1 read
LG Gram 2in1 16 16T90R - G.AA78G
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
81.6 (74.82min - 81.55max) MB/s +34%
Acer Swift Go 14 SFG14-71
WD PC SN740 SDDQNQD-512G-1014
79.4 (78.48min - 79.38max) MB/s +30%
Lenovo ThinkPad T14 G4 21K4S02000
Samsung PM9A1a MZVL21T0HDLU
70 (69.61min - 70max) MB/s +15%
HP Pavilion Plus 14-ew0153TU
SK hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X101N
68.3 (67.74min - 68.25max) MB/s +12%
Average of class Subnotebook
  (8.27 - 87.4, n=59, last 2 years)
61.4 MB/s +1%
Acer Swift Go 14 SFG14-72
SK hynix HFS001TEJ9X110NA
60.9 (60.46min - 60.93max) MB/s
Average SK hynix HFS001TEJ9X110NA
  ()
60.9 MB/s 0%
HP Pavilion Plus 14-ey0095cl
WDC PC SN810 1TB
57.8 (56.71min - 57.8max) MB/s -5%
Ayaneo Air 1S Retro Power
Ayaneo CyberThunder-2TB
43.5 (42.13min - 43.46max) MB/s -29%
4k q1 t1 write
Acer Swift Go 14 SFG14-71
WD PC SN740 SDDQNQD-512G-1014
273 (263.1min - 272.82max) MB/s +20%
Acer Swift Go 14 SFG14-72
SK hynix HFS001TEJ9X110NA
227 (221.95min - 227.04max) MB/s
Average SK hynix HFS001TEJ9X110NA
  ()
227 MB/s 0%
LG Gram 2in1 16 16T90R - G.AA78G
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
226 (219.95min - 225.84max) MB/s 0%
Average of class Subnotebook
  (12 - 360, n=59, last 2 years)
158.9 MB/s -30%
HP Pavilion Plus 14-ew0153TU
SK hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X101N
154.6 (151.31min - 154.61max) MB/s -32%
Lenovo ThinkPad T14 G4 21K4S02000
Samsung PM9A1a MZVL21T0HDLU
151 (149.72min - 151.04max) MB/s -33%
Ayaneo Air 1S Retro Power
Ayaneo CyberThunder-2TB
113.9 (109.63min - 113.92max) MB/s -50%
HP Pavilion Plus 14-ey0095cl
WDC PC SN810 1TB
100.6 (98.29min - 100.62max) MB/s -56%
4k q32 t16 read
LG Gram 2in1 16 16T90R - G.AA78G
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
3881 (3853min - 3881.23max) MB/s +44%
Acer Swift Go 14 SFG14-72
SK hynix HFS001TEJ9X110NA
2700 (2252.61min - 2700.15max) MB/s
Average SK hynix HFS001TEJ9X110NA
  ()
2700 MB/s 0%
Acer Swift Go 14 SFG14-71
WD PC SN740 SDDQNQD-512G-1014
1945 (1930.8min - 1944.66max) MB/s -28%
Lenovo ThinkPad T14 G4 21K4S02000
Samsung PM9A1a MZVL21T0HDLU
1347 (1309.66min - 1347.08max) MB/s -50%
Average of class Subnotebook
  (11.1 - 4286, n=59, last 2 years)
1267 MB/s -53%
HP Pavilion Plus 14-ey0095cl
WDC PC SN810 1TB
1000 (938.41min - 999.95max) MB/s -63%
Ayaneo Air 1S Retro Power
Ayaneo CyberThunder-2TB
666 (656.44min - 665.61max) MB/s -75%
HP Pavilion Plus 14-ew0153TU
SK hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X101N
594 (466.98min - 594.27max) MB/s -78%
4k q32 t16 write
LG Gram 2in1 16 16T90R - G.AA78G
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
3537 (3009.8min - 3536.52max) MB/s +101%
Acer Swift Go 14 SFG14-71
WD PC SN740 SDDQNQD-512G-1014
2151 (1983.74min - 2151.37max) MB/s +22%
Acer Swift Go 14 SFG14-72
SK hynix HFS001TEJ9X110NA
1760 (1708.14min - 1759.52max) MB/s
Average SK hynix HFS001TEJ9X110NA
  ()
1760 MB/s 0%
Average of class Subnotebook
  (14.2 - 4189, n=59, last 2 years)
870 MB/s -51%
Lenovo ThinkPad T14 G4 21K4S02000
Samsung PM9A1a MZVL21T0HDLU
502 (495.8min - 501.89max) MB/s -71%
HP Pavilion Plus 14-ey0095cl
WDC PC SN810 1TB
364 (331.19min - 364.14max) MB/s -79%
Ayaneo Air 1S Retro Power
Ayaneo CyberThunder-2TB
344 (235.14min - 343.5max) MB/s -80%
HP Pavilion Plus 14-ew0153TU
SK hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X101N
295 (241.31min - 294.53max) MB/s -83%
AS SSD
Score Total
LG Gram 2in1 16 16T90R - G.AA78G
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
6136 Points 0%
Acer Swift Go 14 SFG14-72
SK hynix HFS001TEJ9X110NA
6129 Points
Average SK hynix HFS001TEJ9X110NA
  ()
6129 Points 0%
Lenovo ThinkPad T14 G4 21K4S02000
Samsung PM9A1a MZVL21T0HDLU
5803 Points -5%
Acer Swift Go 14 SFG14-71
WD PC SN740 SDDQNQD-512G-1014
5486 Points -10%
HP Pavilion Plus 14-ew0153TU
SK hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X101N
4390 Points -28%
Average of class Subnotebook
  (515 - 8892, n=58, last 2 years)
4325 Points -29%
Ayaneo Air 1S Retro Power
Ayaneo CyberThunder-2TB
2412 Points -61%
Score Read
LG Gram 2in1 16 16T90R - G.AA78G
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
2943 Points +43%
Acer Swift Go 14 SFG14-72
SK hynix HFS001TEJ9X110NA
2064 Points
Average SK hynix HFS001TEJ9X110NA
  ()
2064 Points 0%
Acer Swift Go 14 SFG14-71
WD PC SN740 SDDQNQD-512G-1014
2056 Points 0%
Lenovo ThinkPad T14 G4 21K4S02000
Samsung PM9A1a MZVL21T0HDLU
1712 Points -17%
Average of class Subnotebook
  (246 - 3307, n=58, last 2 years)
1372 Points -34%
HP Pavilion Plus 14-ew0153TU
SK hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X101N
1186 Points -43%
Ayaneo Air 1S Retro Power
Ayaneo CyberThunder-2TB
842 Points -59%
Score Write
Lenovo ThinkPad T14 G4 21K4S02000
Samsung PM9A1a MZVL21T0HDLU
3300 Points +9%
Acer Swift Go 14 SFG14-72
SK hynix HFS001TEJ9X110NA
3039 Points
Average SK hynix HFS001TEJ9X110NA
  ()
3039 Points 0%
HP Pavilion Plus 14-ew0153TU
SK hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X101N
2690 Points -11%
Acer Swift Go 14 SFG14-71
WD PC SN740 SDDQNQD-512G-1014
2413 Points -21%
Average of class Subnotebook
  (153 - 4469, n=58, last 2 years)
2309 Points -24%
LG Gram 2in1 16 16T90R - G.AA78G
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
1731 Points -43%
Ayaneo Air 1S Retro Power
Ayaneo CyberThunder-2TB
1161 Points -62%
Seq Read
LG Gram 2in1 16 16T90R - G.AA78G
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
4943.25 MB/s +17%
HP Pavilion Plus 14-ew0153TU
SK hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X101N
4778.49 MB/s +13%
Lenovo ThinkPad T14 G4 21K4S02000
Samsung PM9A1a MZVL21T0HDLU
4589.8 MB/s +9%
Acer Swift Go 14 SFG14-71
WD PC SN740 SDDQNQD-512G-1014
4291.89 MB/s +2%
Average SK hynix HFS001TEJ9X110NA
  ()
4225 MB/s 0%
Acer Swift Go 14 SFG14-72
SK hynix HFS001TEJ9X110NA
4224.68 MB/s
Average of class Subnotebook
  (448 - 8075, n=58, last 2 years)
4057 MB/s -4%
Ayaneo Air 1S Retro Power
Ayaneo CyberThunder-2TB
2183.33 MB/s -48%
Seq Write
LG Gram 2in1 16 16T90R - G.AA78G
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
3967.06 MB/s +12%
Acer Swift Go 14 SFG14-72
SK hynix HFS001TEJ9X110NA
3544.16 MB/s
Average SK hynix HFS001TEJ9X110NA
  ()
3544 MB/s 0%
Acer Swift Go 14 SFG14-71
WD PC SN740 SDDQNQD-512G-1014
3362.08 MB/s -5%
Average of class Subnotebook
  (99 - 5120, n=58, last 2 years)
2631 MB/s -26%
Lenovo ThinkPad T14 G4 21K4S02000
Samsung PM9A1a MZVL21T0HDLU
2622.82 MB/s -26%
HP Pavilion Plus 14-ew0153TU
SK hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X101N
2489.13 MB/s -30%
Ayaneo Air 1S Retro Power
Ayaneo CyberThunder-2TB
1602.26 MB/s -55%
4K Read
LG Gram 2in1 16 16T90R - G.AA78G
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
78.02 MB/s +41%
Acer Swift Go 14 SFG14-71
WD PC SN740 SDDQNQD-512G-1014
71.67 MB/s +30%
HP Pavilion Plus 14-ew0153TU
SK hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X101N
69.2 MB/s +25%
Lenovo ThinkPad T14 G4 21K4S02000
Samsung PM9A1a MZVL21T0HDLU
64.68 MB/s +17%
Average of class Subnotebook
  (19.8 - 96.2, n=58, last 2 years)
58.5 MB/s +6%
Average SK hynix HFS001TEJ9X110NA
  ()
55.2 MB/s 0%
Acer Swift Go 14 SFG14-72
SK hynix HFS001TEJ9X110NA
55.15 MB/s
Ayaneo Air 1S Retro Power
Ayaneo CyberThunder-2TB
34.04 MB/s -38%
4K Write
Acer Swift Go 14 SFG14-71
WD PC SN740 SDDQNQD-512G-1014
235.83 MB/s +15%
HP Pavilion Plus 14-ew0153TU
SK hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X101N
234.99 MB/s +14%
Acer Swift Go 14 SFG14-72
SK hynix HFS001TEJ9X110NA
205.42 MB/s
Average SK hynix HFS001TEJ9X110NA
  ()
205 MB/s 0%
LG Gram 2in1 16 16T90R - G.AA78G
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
196.81 MB/s -4%
Average of class Subnotebook
  (37.4 - 256, n=58, last 2 years)
176 MB/s -14%
Lenovo ThinkPad T14 G4 21K4S02000
Samsung PM9A1a MZVL21T0HDLU
159.91 MB/s -22%
Ayaneo Air 1S Retro Power
Ayaneo CyberThunder-2TB
90.74 MB/s -56%
4K-64 Read
LG Gram 2in1 16 16T90R - G.AA78G
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
2370.92 MB/s +49%
Average SK hynix HFS001TEJ9X110NA
  ()
1587 MB/s 0%
Acer Swift Go 14 SFG14-72
SK hynix HFS001TEJ9X110NA
1586.68 MB/s
Acer Swift Go 14 SFG14-71
WD PC SN740 SDDQNQD-512G-1014
1554.73 MB/s -2%
Lenovo ThinkPad T14 G4 21K4S02000
Samsung PM9A1a MZVL21T0HDLU
1188.59 MB/s -25%
Average of class Subnotebook
  (181.8 - 2682, n=58, last 2 years)
908 MB/s -43%
HP Pavilion Plus 14-ew0153TU
SK hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X101N
639.2 MB/s -60%
Ayaneo Air 1S Retro Power
Ayaneo CyberThunder-2TB
589.89 MB/s -63%
4K-64 Write
Lenovo ThinkPad T14 G4 21K4S02000
Samsung PM9A1a MZVL21T0HDLU
2878.08 MB/s +32%
HP Pavilion Plus 14-ew0153TU
SK hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X101N
2206.45 MB/s +1%
Average SK hynix HFS001TEJ9X110NA
  ()
2177 MB/s 0%
Acer Swift Go 14 SFG14-72
SK hynix HFS001TEJ9X110NA
2176.61 MB/s
Average of class Subnotebook
  (105.9 - 3905, n=58, last 2 years)
1867 MB/s -14%
Acer Swift Go 14 SFG14-71
WD PC SN740 SDDQNQD-512G-1014
1841.19 MB/s -15%
LG Gram 2in1 16 16T90R - G.AA78G
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
1137.26 MB/s -48%
Ayaneo Air 1S Retro Power
Ayaneo CyberThunder-2TB
910.02 MB/s -58%
Access Time Read
Ayaneo Air 1S Retro Power
Ayaneo CyberThunder-2TB
0.151 ms * -287%
Acer Swift Go 14 SFG14-71
WD PC SN740 SDDQNQD-512G-1014
0.09 ms * -131%
Lenovo ThinkPad T14 G4 21K4S02000
Samsung PM9A1a MZVL21T0HDLU
0.058 ms * -49%
Average of class Subnotebook
  (0.02 - 0.167, n=58, last 2 years)
0.05717 ms * -47%
Acer Swift Go 14 SFG14-72
SK hynix HFS001TEJ9X110NA
0.039 ms *
Average SK hynix HFS001TEJ9X110NA
  ()
0.039 ms * -0%
HP Pavilion Plus 14-ew0153TU
SK hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X101N
0.036 ms * +8%
LG Gram 2in1 16 16T90R - G.AA78G
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
0.028 ms * +28%
Access Time Write
Acer Swift Go 14 SFG14-72
SK hynix HFS001TEJ9X110NA
0.101 ms *
Average SK hynix HFS001TEJ9X110NA
  ()
0.101 ms * -0%
Average of class Subnotebook
  (0.017 - 0.352, n=58, last 2 years)
0.07341 ms * +27%
Ayaneo Air 1S Retro Power
Ayaneo CyberThunder-2TB
0.067 ms * +34%
Lenovo ThinkPad T14 G4 21K4S02000
Samsung PM9A1a MZVL21T0HDLU
0.026 ms * +74%
LG Gram 2in1 16 16T90R - G.AA78G
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
0.023 ms * +77%
Acer Swift Go 14 SFG14-71
WD PC SN740 SDDQNQD-512G-1014
0.019 ms * +81%
HP Pavilion Plus 14-ew0153TU
SK hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X101N
0.017 ms * +83%

* ... smaller is better

Continuous Performance Read: DiskSpd Read Loop, Queue Depth 8

035571010651420177521302485284031953550390542604615497053255680603563906745Tooltip
Acer Swift Go 14 SFG14-72 SK hynix HFS001TEJ9X110NA; diskspd 2.0.17 f: Ø3223 (2898.68-3275.12)
Acer Swift Go 14 SFG14-71 WD PC SN740 SDDQNQD-512G-1014: Ø4849 (4447.13-4884.48)
LG Gram 2in1 16 16T90R - G.AA78G Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR: Ø6206 (5714.21-6585.65)
HP Pavilion Plus 14-ew0153TU SK hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X101N; diskspd 2.0.17 f: Ø4259 (3371.17-6487.78)
Lenovo ThinkPad T14 G4 21K4S02000 Samsung PM9A1a MZVL21T0HDLU; diskspd 2.0.17 f: Ø7003 (6443.82-7032.38)
Ayaneo Air 1S Retro Power Ayaneo CyberThunder-2TB: Ø2546 (2208.3-2562.21)
HP Pavilion Plus 14-ey0095cl WDC PC SN810 1TB: Ø4588 (313.32-6954.37)

Placa de vídeo

De acordo com a Intel, o desempenho gráfico do novo processador para laptop é o dobro do desempenho da 13ª geração. De qualquer forma, nossos primeiros benchmarks confirmam um desempenho muito alto com o arc iGPU de oito núcleos de oito núcleos, conseguiu até mesmo superar a AMD Radeon 780M de forma convincente. As GPUs dedicadas para laptops da Intel ficam aquém em nossa análise. Mesmo deixando de lado o desempenho 3D, o desempenho da iGPU do Acer Swift Go é surpreendentemente alto.

3DMark Performance Rating - Percent
Acer Swift Go 14 SFG14-72
Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU, Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
98.5 pt
Average Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU
 
95.1 pt
Lenovo ThinkPad T14 G4 21K4S02000
AMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 7840U
85.9 pt
Ayaneo Air 1S Retro Power
AMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen 7 7840U
82.7 pt
HP Pavilion Plus 14-ey0095cl -1!
AMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen 7 7840U
78.2 pt
Average of class Subnotebook
 
78.1 pt
LG Gram 2in1 16 16T90R - G.AA78G
Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, Intel Core i7-1360P
60 pt
HP Pavilion Plus 14-ew0153TU
Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, Intel Core i7-1355U
55.6 pt
Acer Swift Go 14 SFG14-71
Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs, Intel Core i5-1335U
46.4 pt
3DMark 11 - 1280x720 Performance GPU
Acer Swift Go 14 SFG14-72
Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU, Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
12866 Points
Average Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU
  (8064 - 13716, n=35)
11984 Points -7%
HP Pavilion Plus 14-ey0095cl
AMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen 7 7840U
11840 Points -8%
Lenovo ThinkPad T14 G4 21K4S02000
AMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 7840U
10862 Points -16%
Ayaneo Air 1S Retro Power
AMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen 7 7840U
10671 Points -17%
Average of class Subnotebook
  (968 - 16296, n=56, last 2 years)
9532 Points -26%
LG Gram 2in1 16 16T90R - G.AA78G
Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, Intel Core i7-1360P
7098 Points -45%
HP Pavilion Plus 14-ew0153TU
Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, Intel Core i7-1355U
6355 Points -51%
Acer Swift Go 14 SFG14-71
Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs, Intel Core i5-1335U
5449 Points -58%
3DMark
1280x720 Cloud Gate Standard Graphics
Lenovo ThinkPad T14 G4 21K4S02000
AMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 7840U
45874 Points +4%
Acer Swift Go 14 SFG14-72
Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU, Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
43941 Points
Average Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU
  (31876 - 52200, n=22)
43407 Points -1%
Ayaneo Air 1S Retro Power
AMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen 7 7840U
38676 Points -12%
Average of class Subnotebook
  (5577 - 58319, n=30, last 2 years)
37354 Points -15%
LG Gram 2in1 16 16T90R - G.AA78G
Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, Intel Core i7-1360P
31618 Points -28%
HP Pavilion Plus 14-ew0153TU
Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, Intel Core i7-1355U
30249 Points -31%
Acer Swift Go 14 SFG14-71
Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs, Intel Core i5-1335U
24783 Points -44%
1920x1080 Fire Strike Graphics
Acer Swift Go 14 SFG14-72
Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU, Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
8971 Points
Average Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU
  (5568 - 9692, n=39)
8302 Points -7%
Ayaneo Air 1S Retro Power
AMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen 7 7840U
7410 Points -17%
Lenovo ThinkPad T14 G4 21K4S02000
AMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 7840U
7197 Points -20%
Average of class Subnotebook
  (832 - 11887, n=60, last 2 years)
6964 Points -22%
HP Pavilion Plus 14-ey0095cl
AMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen 7 7840U
6341 Points -29%
LG Gram 2in1 16 16T90R - G.AA78G
Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, Intel Core i7-1360P
5779 Points -36%
HP Pavilion Plus 14-ew0153TU
Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, Intel Core i7-1355U
5263 Points -41%
Acer Swift Go 14 SFG14-71
Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs, Intel Core i5-1335U
4468 Points -50%
2560x1440 Time Spy Graphics
Average Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU
  (2018 - 3770, n=42)
3231 Points +2%
Acer Swift Go 14 SFG14-72
Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU, Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
3172 Points
Ayaneo Air 1S Retro Power
AMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen 7 7840U
2622 Points -17%
Average of class Subnotebook
  (804 - 4501, n=61, last 2 years)
2566 Points -19%
Lenovo ThinkPad T14 G4 21K4S02000
AMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 7840U
2551 Points -20%
HP Pavilion Plus 14-ey0095cl
AMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen 7 7840U
2321 Points -27%
LG Gram 2in1 16 16T90R - G.AA78G
Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, Intel Core i7-1360P
1662 Points -48%
HP Pavilion Plus 14-ew0153TU
Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, Intel Core i7-1355U
1566 Points -51%
Acer Swift Go 14 SFG14-71
Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs, Intel Core i5-1335U
1279 Points -60%
3DMark 06 Standard Score
 pontos
3DMark Vantage P Result
43185 pontos
3DMark 11 Performance
13075 pontos
3DMark Ice Storm Standard Score
157591 pontos
3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score
29783 pontos
3DMark Fire Strike Score
8314 pontos
3DMark Time Spy Score
3471 pontos
Ajuda
Blender - v3.3 Classroom CPU
HP Pavilion Plus 14-ew0153TU
Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, Intel Core i7-1355U
946 Seconds * -138%
Acer Swift Go 14 SFG14-71
Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs, Intel Core i5-1335U
737 Seconds * -86%
LG Gram 2in1 16 16T90R - G.AA78G
Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, Intel Core i7-1360P
607 Seconds * -53%
Average of class Subnotebook
  (241 - 1127, n=61, last 2 years)
561 Seconds * -41%
HP Pavilion Plus 14-ey0095cl
AMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen 7 7840U
503 Seconds * -27%
Ayaneo Air 1S Retro Power
AMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen 7 7840U
434 Seconds * -9%
Average Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU
  (294 - 692, n=38)
430 Seconds * -8%
Lenovo ThinkPad T14 G4 21K4S02000
AMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 7840U
410 Seconds * -3%
Acer Swift Go 14 SFG14-72
Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU, Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
397 Seconds *

* ... smaller is better

Desempenho em jogos

Com seus gráficos bastante aprimorados, o Intel Core Ultra 7 155H impressiona nos jogos, desde que o senhor não exagere nas configurações de qualidade ou na resolução. Os jogos em Full HD com qualidade média ou alta podem ser jogados a mais de 60 fps, na maioria dos jogos que testamos. Isso significa que o senhor pode dispensar o tipo de dGPU encontrado em muitos notebooks, como a GeForce RTX 2050 ou a Arc 530M.

Performance Rating - Percent
Lenovo ThinkPad T14 G4 21K4S02000
AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 7840U, AMD Radeon 780M
92.6 pt
Ayaneo Air 1S Retro Power
AMD Ryzen 7 7840U, AMD Radeon 780M
91.1 pt
HP Pavilion Plus 14-ey0095cl
AMD Ryzen 7 7840U, AMD Radeon 780M
85.9 pt
Average of class Subnotebook
 
84.9 pt
Acer Swift Go 14 SFG14-72
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU
83 pt
LG Gram 2in1 16 16T90R - G.AA78G
Intel Core i7-1360P, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs
67.4 pt
HP Pavilion Plus 14-ew0153TU
Intel Core i7-1355U, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs
54.3 pt
Acer Swift Go 14 SFG14-71
Intel Core i5-1335U, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs
54.1 pt
The Witcher 3 - 1920x1080 Ultra Graphics & Postprocessing (HBAO+)
Ayaneo Air 1S Retro Power
AMD Ryzen 7 7840U, AMD Radeon 780M
26.3 (24min, 24P1) fps +13%
HP Pavilion Plus 14-ey0095cl
AMD Ryzen 7 7840U, AMD Radeon 780M
26.1 (25min) fps +12%
Lenovo ThinkPad T14 G4 21K4S02000
AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 7840U, AMD Radeon 780M
25.3 (20min) fps +9%
Acer Swift Go 14 SFG14-72
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU
23.3 (22min, 22P1) fps
Average of class Subnotebook
  (8.5 - 43.7, n=53, last 2 years)
21.8 fps -6%
LG Gram 2in1 16 16T90R - G.AA78G
Intel Core i7-1360P, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs
13.9 (13min, 13P1) fps -40%
HP Pavilion Plus 14-ew0153TU
Intel Core i7-1355U, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs
13.2 (12min, 12P1) fps -43%
Acer Swift Go 14 SFG14-71
Intel Core i5-1335U, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs
13.1 (6.5min, 7.63P0.1, 8.62P1) fps -44%
GTA V - 1920x1080 Highest Settings possible AA:4xMSAA + FX AF:16x
Ayaneo Air 1S Retro Power
AMD Ryzen 7 7840U, AMD Radeon 780M
26 (3.2min, 16.4P1) fps +98%
Lenovo ThinkPad T14 G4 21K4S02000
AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 7840U, AMD Radeon 780M
25.1 (2.96min, 17.2P1) fps +92%
HP Pavilion Plus 14-ey0095cl
AMD Ryzen 7 7840U, AMD Radeon 780M
20.4 (1.148min, 12.8P1) fps +56%
Average of class Subnotebook
  (7.81 - 53, n=56, last 2 years)
19.6 fps +50%
Acer Swift Go 14 SFG14-72
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU
13.1 (2.12min, 9.35P1) fps
LG Gram 2in1 16 16T90R - G.AA78G
Intel Core i7-1360P, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs
9.85 (1.911min, 5.46P1) fps -25%
HP Pavilion Plus 14-ew0153TU
Intel Core i7-1355U, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs
9.38 (3.42min, 6.02P1) fps -28%
Acer Swift Go 14 SFG14-71
Intel Core i5-1335U, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs
9.23 (4.42min, 5.41P1) fps -30%
Final Fantasy XV Benchmark - 1920x1080 High Quality
Lenovo ThinkPad T14 G4 21K4S02000
AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 7840U, AMD Radeon 780M
26.5 fps +46%
Ayaneo Air 1S Retro Power
AMD Ryzen 7 7840U, AMD Radeon 780M
24.4 fps +34%
HP Pavilion Plus 14-ey0095cl
AMD Ryzen 7 7840U, AMD Radeon 780M
24.1 fps +32%
Average of class Subnotebook
  (11.9 - 44.2, n=62, last 2 years)
23.4 fps +29%
Acer Swift Go 14 SFG14-72
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU
18.2 fps
LG Gram 2in1 16 16T90R - G.AA78G
Intel Core i7-1360P, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs
17.2 fps -5%
HP Pavilion Plus 14-ew0153TU
Intel Core i7-1355U, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs
16.8 fps -8%
Acer Swift Go 14 SFG14-71
Intel Core i5-1335U, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs
15.1 fps -17%
Strange Brigade - 1920x1080 ultra AA:ultra AF:16
Ayaneo Air 1S Retro Power
AMD Ryzen 7 7840U, AMD Radeon 780M
45.4 (33.1min, 36.3P1) fps +5%
Lenovo ThinkPad T14 G4 21K4S02000
AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 7840U, AMD Radeon 780M
44.6 (14.6min, 22.9P1) fps +3%
HP Pavilion Plus 14-ey0095cl
AMD Ryzen 7 7840U, AMD Radeon 780M
43.4 (7.3min, 9.3P1) fps 0%
Acer Swift Go 14 SFG14-72
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU
43.2 (5.5min, 11.5P1) fps
Average of class Subnotebook
  (17.7 - 70.7, n=61, last 2 years)
40.1 fps -7%
LG Gram 2in1 16 16T90R - G.AA78G
Intel Core i7-1360P, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs
28.5 (5.7min, 7.83P1) fps -34%
HP Pavilion Plus 14-ew0153TU
Intel Core i7-1355U, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs
23.4 (5.4min, 6.24P1) fps -46%
Acer Swift Go 14 SFG14-71
Intel Core i5-1335U, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs
22.2 (5min, 6.24P1) fps -49%
Dota 2 Reborn - 1920x1080 ultra (3/3) best looking
Acer Swift Go 14 SFG14-72
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU
73.4 (47.4min) fps
Lenovo ThinkPad T14 G4 21K4S02000
AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 7840U, AMD Radeon 780M
67 (58.8min) fps -9%
LG Gram 2in1 16 16T90R - G.AA78G
Intel Core i7-1360P, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs
62.9 (53.2min) fps -14%
Average of class Subnotebook
  (13 - 99.5, n=64, last 2 years)
62.5 fps -15%
HP Pavilion Plus 14-ey0095cl
AMD Ryzen 7 7840U, AMD Radeon 780M
62 (50.9min) fps -16%
Ayaneo Air 1S Retro Power
AMD Ryzen 7 7840U, AMD Radeon 780M
57 (50min) fps -22%
Acer Swift Go 14 SFG14-71
Intel Core i5-1335U, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs
56.5 (49.9min) fps -23%
HP Pavilion Plus 14-ew0153TU
Intel Core i7-1355U, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs
47.1 (38.4min) fps -36%
X-Plane 11.11 - 1920x1080 high (fps_test=3)
LG Gram 2in1 16 16T90R - G.AA78G
Intel Core i7-1360P, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs
37.95 fps +5%
Acer Swift Go 14 SFG14-72
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU
36.1 fps
Average of class Subnotebook
  (20.7 - 97.1, n=57, last 2 years)
34 fps -6%
Ayaneo Air 1S Retro Power
AMD Ryzen 7 7840U, AMD Radeon 780M
29.1 fps -19%
Lenovo ThinkPad T14 G4 21K4S02000
AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 7840U, AMD Radeon 780M
27.9 fps -23%
HP Pavilion Plus 14-ey0095cl
AMD Ryzen 7 7840U, AMD Radeon 780M
25.4 fps -30%
HP Pavilion Plus 14-ew0153TU
Intel Core i7-1355U, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs
23 fps -36%
Acer Swift Go 14 SFG14-71
Intel Core i5-1335U, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs
21.4 fps -41%
The Witcher 3
1024x768 Low Graphics & Postprocessing
Average Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU
  (92 - 160, n=25)
137.9 fps
Lenovo ThinkPad T14 G4 21K4S02000
AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 7840U, AMD Radeon 780M
119.8 (102min) fps
Average of class Subnotebook
  (48 - 187, n=48, last 2 years)
118 fps
HP Pavilion Plus 14-ey0095cl
AMD Ryzen 7 7840U, AMD Radeon 780M
117.3 (97min) fps
SCHENKER Vision 14 2023
Intel Core i7-13700H, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs
94 fps
Acer Swift Go 14 SFG14-71
Intel Core i5-1335U, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs
79.8 (3.84min, 10.1P0.1, 36.8P1) fps
HP Pavilion Plus 14-ew0153TU
Intel Core i7-1355U, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs
73.5 (46min, 52.56P1) fps
1366x768 Medium Graphics & Postprocessing
HP Pavilion Plus 14-ey0095cl
AMD Ryzen 7 7840U, AMD Radeon 780M
85.9 (74min) fps
Average Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU
  (59 - 100, n=23)
84.8 fps
Lenovo ThinkPad T14 G4 21K4S02000
AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 7840U, AMD Radeon 780M
82 (74min) fps
Ayaneo Air 1S Retro Power
AMD Ryzen 7 7840U, AMD Radeon 780M
75.3 (44min, 55.16P1) fps
Average of class Subnotebook
  (33 - 118, n=36, last 2 years)
70.4 fps
SCHENKER Vision 14 2023
Intel Core i7-13700H, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs
63 fps
Acer Swift Go 14 SFG14-71
Intel Core i5-1335U, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs
52.3 (7.14min, 25.6P0.1, 30.6P1) fps
HP Pavilion Plus 14-ew0153TU
Intel Core i7-1355U, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs
50.8 (43min, 43P1) fps
LG Gram 2in1 16 16T90R - G.AA78G
Intel Core i7-1360P, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs
37.2 (10min) fps
1920x1080 High Graphics & Postprocessing (Nvidia HairWorks Off)
Average Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU
  (36 - 58, n=25)
48.3 fps
HP Pavilion Plus 14-ey0095cl
AMD Ryzen 7 7840U, AMD Radeon 780M
45 (40min) fps
Average of class Subnotebook
  (11.2 - 71, n=51, last 2 years)
41.2 fps
Lenovo ThinkPad T14 G4 21K4S02000
AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 7840U, AMD Radeon 780M
40.7 (34min) fps
SCHENKER Vision 14 2023
Intel Core i7-13700H, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs
36 fps
Ayaneo Air 1S Retro Power
AMD Ryzen 7 7840U, AMD Radeon 780M
34.9 (32min, 32P1) fps
Acer Swift Go 14 SFG14-71
Intel Core i5-1335U, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs
28.1 (2.43min, 10.4P0.1, 16.1P1) fps
HP Pavilion Plus 14-ew0153TU
Intel Core i7-1355U, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs
28 (24min, 24P1) fps
1920x1080 Ultra Graphics & Postprocessing (HBAO+)
Ayaneo Air 1S Retro Power
AMD Ryzen 7 7840U, AMD Radeon 780M
26.3 (24min, 24P1) fps +13%
HP Pavilion Plus 14-ey0095cl
AMD Ryzen 7 7840U, AMD Radeon 780M
26.1 (25min) fps +12%
Lenovo ThinkPad T14 G4 21K4S02000
AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 7840U, AMD Radeon 780M
25.3 (20min) fps +9%
Average Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU
  (14.5 - 43.1, n=31)
23.7 fps +2%
Acer Swift Go 14 SFG14-72
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU
23.3 (22min, 22P1) fps
Average of class Subnotebook
  (8.5 - 43.7, n=53, last 2 years)
21.8 fps -6%
SCHENKER Vision 14 2023
Intel Core i7-13700H, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs
14.8 (13min, 14P1) fps -36%
LG Gram 2in1 16 16T90R - G.AA78G
Intel Core i7-1360P, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs
13.9 (13min, 13P1) fps -40%
HP Pavilion Plus 14-ew0153TU
Intel Core i7-1355U, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs
13.2 (12min, 12P1) fps -43%
Acer Swift Go 14 SFG14-71
Intel Core i5-1335U, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs
13.1 (6.5min, 7.63P0.1, 8.62P1) fps -44%

A quase duplicação do desempenho gráfico fica evidente quando se observam as taxas de quadros no site Witcher 3 em configurações de ultraqualidade. O Swift Go 14 oferece quase o dobro de quadros por segundo que o Schenker Vision 14.

Witcher 3 FPS diagram

0510152025Tooltip
Acer Swift Go 14 SFG14-72 Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core: Ø23.3 (22-26)
SCHENKER Vision 14 2023 i7-13700H, Iris Xe G7 96EUs: Ø14.8 (13-16)
baixomédiaaltoultraQHD
GTA V (2015) 124.1 120.8 34.8 13.1
The Witcher 3 (2015) 23.3
Dota 2 Reborn (2015) 99.4 90.4 76 73.4
Final Fantasy XV Benchmark (2018) 42.8 32.1 18.2 14
X-Plane 11.11 (2018) 54.5 42.5 36.1
Far Cry 5 (2018) 35 33
Strange Brigade (2018) 141.9 60.6 52 43.2
Horizon Zero Dawn (2020) 33 28 () 26
Dying Light 2 (2022) 31.1 29.9
Hogwarts Legacy (2023) 25.7 19.3 15.6
F1 23 (2023) 64.6 59 35.9 12.2
Ratchet & Clank Rift Apart (2023) 28.4 29 25.9 21.1
Starfield (2023) 11.5
Baldur's Gate 3 (2023) 22.8 20.6 19.1
Cyberpunk 2077 2.1 Phantom Liberty (2023) 34.1 29.6 24 13.1
EA Sports WRC (2023) 35.8 26.6 24.7 22.4

Desempenho da NPU

Uma unidade de processamento neural pode ser encontrada dentro do Intel Core Ultra 7 155H. Essa parte do processador tem a tarefa de processar aplicativos de IA com muita eficiência. Isso significa que modelos como o Stable Diffusion ou modelos de linguagem já podem ser executados no dispositivo. Usando o benchmark UL Procyon AI Interface, colocamos a GPU frente a frente com a NPU e verificamos simultaneamente o consumo de energia. Em ambos os cenários, rapidamente ficou claro que o desempenho da NPU estava apenas um pouco abaixo do desempenho da Arc iGPU quando se tratava de processar redes neurais, mas os requisitos de energia foram reduzidos quase pela metade. Isso definitivamente torna o acelerador de IA mais eficiente do que o chip gráfico para os mesmos aplicativos.

Portanto, é possível que muitos dos aplicativos de IA que atualmente são executados por meio da nuvem possam, em breve, ser executados localmente no próprio laptop, de maneira eficiente em termos de energia, sem a necessidade de uma conexão com a Internet.

Power consumption UL Procyon Ai Inference benchmark on an external monitor

0510152025303540455055606570Tooltip
Acer Swift Go 14 SFG14-72; UL Procyon AI GPU Integer Power Consumption - external Monitor: Ø32.9 (7.31-73.5)
Acer Swift Go 14 SFG14-72; UL Procyon AI NPU Integer Power Consumption - external Monitor: Ø17.1 (6.15-71.5)
UL Procyon for Windows
Acer Swift Go 14 SFG14-72
Arc 8-Core, Ultra 7 155H, SK hynix HFS001TEJ9X110NA
Overall Score Integer NPU
493 Points ∼100%
Overall Score Integer GPU
541 Points ∼100%

A Intel gentilmente nos forneceu uma versão do Gimp que já inclui o Stable Diffusion com suporte a OpenVINO e NPU. Depois de uma longa configuração, o programa de conversão de texto em imagem funcionou de forma surpreendentemente rápida. Até o momento, era possível executar o Stable Diffusion em placas de vídeo Arc.

É certo que nem todas as imagens criadas pela rede neural são particularmente úteis. O Stable Diffusion tem uma capacidade limitada de lidar com rostos, pés e mãos vistos à distância. Mas as tarefas que o senhor define para o programa também devem ser definidas da forma mais clara possível. É necessário ter alguma experiência nessa área para garantir que o senhor obtenha o que pediu.

Emissões - Permanecem praticamente silenciosas

Emissões de ruído

Apesar do desempenho de alto nível, o novo Acer Swift Go não ficou mais barulhento. Com quase 45 dB(A) sob carga total, não se pode dizer que seja realmente silencioso, mas é tolerável. O Acer Swift Go lida com tarefas de pequeno e médio porte normalmente sem a presença audível da ventoinha.

Barulho

Ocioso
25 / 25 / 26.2 dB
Carga
35.7 / 45.5 dB
  red to green bar
 
 
30 dB
silencioso
40 dB(A)
audível
50 dB(A)
ruidosamente alto
 
min: dark, med: mid, max: light   Earthworks M23R, Arta (15 cm de distância)   environment noise: 25 dB(A)
dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2037.841.74040.4253332.13429.83131.227.828.532.24033.737.134.235.55032.132.532.634.56337.233.632.234.78030.22835.828.110024.519.828.523.112519.217.320.617.116018.116.718.117.520019.515.717.721.72501920.317.621.33152418.715.122.340023.816.21624.150024.316.615.225.963027.113.713.227.880034.415.211.535.6100038.418.211.239.1125034.917.110.836.2160034.814.611.2362000341411.435.6250034.414.212.135.2315034.713.61235.9400033.813.51235.7500033.614.41234.9630033.814.412.635.4800026.614.312.327.71000023.513.812.824.21250019.913.912.319.61600017.613.111.415.2SPL45.827.32547N4.60.80.65.1median 26.6median 14.6median 12.3median 27.7Delta7.41.42.57.643.844.841.436.139.53838.340.142.539.442.639.736.739.939.427.831.732.218.518.120.218.22021.917.218.620.420.517.618.623.918.922.416.413.719.213.912.12115.711.625.514.611.922.717.111.924.516.311.224.220.611.626.719.911.627.720.711.831.820.411.831.318.512.230.321.912.633.621.41333.41913.234.721.613.633.817.913.630.417.113.722.217.913.719.317.713.116.131.92543.21.40.53.8median 18.2median 13median 24.52.32.15.3hearing rangehide median Fan NoiseAcer Swift Go 14 SFG14-72Acer Swift Go 14 SFG14-71
Acer Swift Go 14 SFG14-72
Arc 8-Core, Ultra 7 155H, SK hynix HFS001TEJ9X110NA
Acer Swift Go 14 SFG14-71
Iris Xe G7 80EUs, i5-1335U, WD PC SN740 SDDQNQD-512G-1014
LG Gram 2in1 16 16T90R - G.AA78G
Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-1360P, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
HP Pavilion Plus 14-ew0153TU
Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-1355U, SK hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X101N
Lenovo ThinkPad T14 G4 21K4S02000
Radeon 780M, R7 PRO 7840U, Samsung PM9A1a MZVL21T0HDLU
Ayaneo Air 1S Retro Power
Radeon 780M, R7 7840U, Ayaneo CyberThunder-2TB
HP Pavilion Plus 14-ey0095cl
Radeon 780M, R7 7840U, WDC PC SN810 1TB
Noise
4%
5%
20%
14%
3%
6%
off / environment *
25
24.9
-0%
25.1
-0%
19.35
23%
23.1
8%
23
8%
23.4
6%
Idle Minimum *
25
24.9
-0%
25.1
-0%
20.57
18%
23.1
8%
24.7
1%
24.1
4%
Idle Average *
25
24.9
-0%
25.1
-0%
20.57
18%
23.1
8%
25.2
-1%
24.1
4%
Idle Maximum *
26.2
24.9
5%
26.1
-0%
20.57
21%
23.1
12%
25.2
4%
25.3
3%
Load Average *
35.7
31.9
11%
31.4
12%
32.18
10%
26.5
26%
32.1
10%
33.4
6%
Load Maximum *
45.5
43.2
5%
36.6
20%
32.26
29%
35.78
21%
47.1
-4%
39.4
13%
Witcher 3 ultra *
43.2
41.1
29.44
35.7
39.4

* ... smaller is better

Temperatura

Infelizmente, o que não mudou foram as temperaturas muito altas da superfície do laptop, que medimos durante os testes. A barra atrás do teclado chegou a atingir 40 °C. No entanto, a área que mais aquece é a tela, para a qual o ar expelido pelo ventilador é direcionado. Apesar disso, em operação normal, ao navegar na Internet ou usar aplicativos de escritório, a superfície do laptop aquece apenas um pouco acima da temperatura ambiente.

Carga Máxima
 34.2 °C36.5 °C27.5 °C 
 33.1 °C34.5 °C22.7 °C 
 26.2 °C22.5 °C22.7 °C 
Máximo: 36.5 °C
Médio: 28.9 °C
25.3 °C49.5 °C45.2 °C
25.5 °C37.8 °C37.4 °C
22.5 °C27.2 °C30.1 °C
Máximo: 49.5 °C
Médio: 33.4 °C
alimentação elétrica  45.5 °C | Temperatura do quarto 21.1 °C | Fluke t3000FC (calibrated), FIRT 550-Pocket
(+) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 28.9 °C / 84 F, compared to the average of 30.8 °C / 87 F for the devices in the class Subnotebook.
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 36.5 °C / 98 F, compared to the average of 35.9 °C / 97 F, ranging from 21.4 to 59 °C for the class Subnotebook.
(-) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 49.5 °C / 121 F, compared to the average of 39.4 °C / 103 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 22.6 °C / 73 F, compared to the device average of 30.8 °C / 87 F.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are cooler than skin temperature with a maximum of 26.2 °C / 79.2 F and are therefore cool to the touch.
(+) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.3 °C / 82.9 F (+2.1 °C / 3.7 F).
Topo ocioso
Topo ocioso
Fundo ocioso
Fundo ocioso
Carregar topo
Carregar topo
Fundo de carga
Fundo de carga
Acer Swift Go 14 SFG14-72
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU
Acer Swift Go 14 SFG14-71
Intel Core i5-1335U, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs
LG Gram 2in1 16 16T90R - G.AA78G
Intel Core i7-1360P, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs
HP Pavilion Plus 14-ew0153TU
Intel Core i7-1355U, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs
Lenovo ThinkPad T14 G4 21K4S02000
AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 7840U, AMD Radeon 780M
Ayaneo Air 1S Retro Power
AMD Ryzen 7 7840U, AMD Radeon 780M
HP Pavilion Plus 14-ey0095cl
AMD Ryzen 7 7840U, AMD Radeon 780M
Heat
-2%
-22%
4%
3%
-30%
12%
Maximum Upper Side *
36.5
44.8
-23%
55
-51%
36.6
-0%
43.5
-19%
55
-51%
39
-7%
Maximum Bottom *
49.5
34.8
30%
55.4
-12%
37.2
25%
47.4
4%
53.2
-7%
35.8
28%
Idle Upper Side *
25.5
30.7
-20%
34.9
-37%
31.6
-24%
24.9
2%
37.1
-45%
25.2
1%
Idle Bottom *
35
32.5
7%
30
14%
30
14%
26
26%
40.1
-15%
25.6
27%

* ... smaller is better

Teste de estresse

Como já foi mencionado, definimos o desempenho de aumento do processador em um nível ligeiramente abaixo do valor definido pela Acer. Nosso teste de estresse revelou que a configuração de desempenho contínuo do Core Ultra 7 (PL1) está um pouco alta demais. Depois de algum tempo, ele se estabiliza em torno de 43 watts em vez de 45, mas consegue manter seu nível de desempenho a longo prazo.

Alto-falantes

No geral, os alto-falantes do Acer Swift Go têm um bom som. Apenas os graves poderiam ter um pouco mais de força. Não conseguimos perceber uma diferença em relação ao antecessor.

dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2042.94037.92535.63429.63133.628.529.94038.834.240.8503732.635.46334.432.229.88027.735.82710021.128.521.512518.820.616.516032.418.123.22004717.736.425051.217.641.331555.415.144.340060165050068.115.258.163069.313.25980074.111.564.1100073.611.263.4125075.710.865.2160076.311.265.920007811.467.5250074.612.164.1315078.41268.34000771266.6500067.31256.9630069.512.659.3800063.612.353.31000061.312.8511250059.412.349.11600058.411.448SPL86.72576.3N62.50.633.4median 67.3median 12.3median 56.9Delta11.62.512.144.84239.536.940.137.642.640.739.938.131.728.518.1192018.918.62117.633.818.944.513.747.112.15411.665.811.966.511.967.211.267.211.671.911.674.511.875.411.869.412.270.812.6671368.113.262.713.66713.665.313.764.513.760.913.156.82582.10.548.2median 13median 65.82.18.1hearing rangehide median Pink NoiseAcer Swift Go 14 SFG14-72Acer Swift Go 14 SFG14-71
Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)
Acer Swift Go 14 SFG14-72 audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (86.7 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 29.6% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (13.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 6.4% higher than median
(+) | mids are linear (5.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 5.7% higher than median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (7.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (22.6% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 75% of all tested devices in this class were better, 5% similar, 20% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 19%, worst was 53%
Compared to all devices tested
» 63% of all tested devices were better, 6% similar, 31% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Acer Swift Go 14 SFG14-71 audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (82.1 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 29.2% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (11.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 3.9% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (6.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2.1% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (20.4% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 40% of all tested devices in this class were better, 10% similar, 49% worse
» The best had a delta of 7%, average was 22%, worst was 53%
Compared to all devices tested
» 50% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 42% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Gerenciamento de energia - o Meteor Lake pode ser econômico

Consumo de energia

Diz-se que os novos processadores Meteor Lake da Intel são significativamente mais eficientes em termos de energia do que seus antecessores. Isso não foi totalmente óbvio para nós em nossos testes, mas, mais uma vez, isso destaca o status beta do software instalado. Fortes flutuações são aparentes em quase todas as medições de energia, o que indica picos de carga menores.

Consumo de energia
desligadodarklight 0.4 / 0.4 Watt
Ociosodarkmidlight 5.5 / 10.1 / 11.2 Watt
Carga midlight 45.9 / 104.1 Watt
 color bar
Key: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
Acer Swift Go 14 SFG14-72
Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core, SK hynix HFS001TEJ9X110NA, OLED, 2880x1800, 14"
LG Gram 2in1 16 16T90R - G.AA78G
i7-1360P, Iris Xe G7 96EUs, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR, IPS, 2560x1600, 16"
HP Pavilion Plus 14-ew0153TU
i7-1355U, Iris Xe G7 96EUs, SK hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X101N, OLED, 2880x1800, 14"
Lenovo ThinkPad T14 G4 21K4S02000
R7 PRO 7840U, Radeon 780M, Samsung PM9A1a MZVL21T0HDLU, IPS LED, 1920x1200, 14"
Ayaneo Air 1S Retro Power
R7 7840U, Radeon 780M, Ayaneo CyberThunder-2TB, OLED, 1920x1080, 5.5"
HP Pavilion Plus 14-ey0095cl
R7 7840U, Radeon 780M, WDC PC SN810 1TB, OLED, 2880x1800, 14"
Average Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU
 
Average of class Subnotebook
 
Power Consumption
9%
14%
38%
22%
15%
2%
18%
Idle Minimum *
5.5
5.5
-0%
6.7
-22%
3.3
40%
7.01
-27%
6
-9%
Idle Average *
10.1
7.2
29%
7.16
29%
5.6
45%
7.91
22%
6.5
36%
8.64 ?(4.2 - 16, n=37)
14%
Idle Maximum *
11.2
12.9
-15%
11.17
-0%
6.1
46%
12.3
-10%
13.9
-24%
12.1 ?(4.5 - 49, n=37)
-8%
Load Average *
45.9
55
-20%
46.5
-1%
40.1
13%
19.66
57%
41.9
9%
54.2 ?(31.3 - 76.2, n=36)
-18%
Witcher 3 ultra *
60.9
47
23%
37.2
39%
41.4
32%
38.2
37%
43.9
28%
Load Maximum *
104.1
63.6
39%
64.36
38%
51.8
50%
50
52%
50.8
51%

* ... smaller is better

Power consumption Witcher 3 / stress test

0102030405060708090100Tooltip
Acer Swift Go 14 SFG14-72; Witcher 3 ultra: Ø60.9 (57.3-79.5)
Acer Swift Go 14 SFG14-72; 1280x720 Prime95 28.10 and Furmark 1.25: Ø77.1 (51-104.1)

Power consumption with an external monitor

0102030405060708090100Tooltip
Acer Swift Go 14 SFG14-72; Prime95 V2810 Stress (external Monitor): Ø67.6 (61.8-103.4)
Acer Swift Go 14 SFG14-72; Cinebench R23 Single (external Monitor): Ø40.9 (35.7-59.5)
Acer Swift Go 14 SFG14-72; Cinebench R23 Multi (external Monitor): Ø79.3 (68-83.8)
Acer Swift Go 14 SFG14-72; 1920x1080 The Witcher 3 ultra (external Monitor): Ø50.4 (47.7-84)
Acer Swift Go 14 SFG14-72; Idle 1min (external Monitor): Ø8.35 (6.24-16.6)

Duração da bateria

O Acer Swift Go 14, com seu processador Intel Meteor Lake e bateria de 65 Wh, ficou um pouco abaixo da marca de oito horas no teste de navegação na Internet por Wi-Fi. De acordo com nossas medições de energia, é o painel OLED que consome mais energia durante a navegação. A visita a sites e a execução de aplicativos no modo escuro devem melhorar consideravelmente os tempos de execução. Com o antecessor, era possível obter quase 45 minutos adicionais de tempo de execução.

Tempo de Execução da Bateria
WiFi Websurfing
7h 59min
Carga (máximo brilho)
1h 14min
Acer Swift Go 14 SFG14-72
Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core, 65 Wh
Acer Swift Go 14 SFG14-71
i5-1335U, Iris Xe G7 80EUs, 54.6 Wh
LG Gram 2in1 16 16T90R - G.AA78G
i7-1360P, Iris Xe G7 96EUs, 80 Wh
HP Pavilion Plus 14-ew0153TU
i7-1355U, Iris Xe G7 96EUs, 68 Wh
Lenovo ThinkPad T14 G4 21K4S02000
R7 PRO 7840U, Radeon 780M, 52.5 Wh
Ayaneo Air 1S Retro Power
R7 7840U, Radeon 780M, 37.5 Wh
HP Pavilion Plus 14-ey0095cl
R7 7840U, Radeon 780M, 68 Wh
Average of class Subnotebook
 
Battery Runtime
-5%
57%
21%
44%
-21%
36%
54%
WiFi v1.3
479
453
-5%
716
49%
578
21%
729
52%
355
-26%
510
6%
Load
74
121
64%
100
35%
63
-15%
122
65%
H.264
720
185
Gaming
74
Reader / Idle
1011

Pro

+ iGPU significativamente aprimorada
+ Tela OLED com alta gama de cores
+ leve e compacto
+ um slot SSD m.2 NVMe livre
+ moderadamente silencioso
+ Webcam QHD
+ 32 GB de RAM

Contra

- tela brilhante
- leitor de cartões lento
- rAM soldada

Veredicto - Não apenas no escritório

O Acer Swift Go 14 (2024) - fornecido pela Acer
O Acer Swift Go 14 (2024) - fornecido pela Acer

A Acer nos apresentou o Swift Go 14 um pouco antes de o dispositivo chegar ao mercado e isso significa que nem tudo funciona perfeitamente. Mas já tivemos a oportunidade de experimentar a mais recente geração de processadores da Intel e ficamos impressionados com o desempenho gráfico de alto nível do chip Meteor Lake. Ficaremos atentos às mudanças no dispositivo até a primavera do próximo ano e, então, daremos nosso veredicto final sobre o Swift Go 14 (2024). No entanto, já percebemos que a máquina compacta se beneficia do consideravelmente mais potente Core Ultra 7. O maior desempenho gráfico permite que o laptop e sua excelente tela OLED desfrutem de um espectro mais amplo de aplicativos. Isso, pelo menos, torna os jogos e a edição de vídeo uma possibilidade. O núcleo NPU no processador Processador Meteor Lake também foi capaz de demonstrar seu poder em nossos testes.

Pesando 1,3 kg, o Acer Swift Go 14 é um equipamento leve e potente que tem um impacto considerável dentro de seu elegante gabinete. O processador Meteor Lake da Intel garante uma gama significativamente maior de casos de uso de aplicativos.

Não há dúvida de que o Swift Go 14 é um dispositivo móvel. Graças ao Thunderbolt 4, HDMI 2.1 e algumas portas adicionais, não falta conectividade. Em breve, haverá outras alternativas com processadores Meteor Lake, com a Asus já oferecendo esse chipset em seu ZenBook 14. Quem estiver impaciente demais para esperar por laptops com processadores Intel deve dar uma olhada nas máquinas de 14 polegadas com o AMD Ryzen 7 7840U, como o HP Pavilion Plus 14.

Preço e disponibilidade

Espera-se que o Swift Go 14 esteja disponível a partir de fevereiro de 2024. Até o momento, foi anunciado um preço de compra antecipado de pouco menos de 1.000 euros para a Alemanha.

Transparency

The selection of devices to be reviewed is made by our editorial team. The test sample was provided to the author as a loan by the manufacturer or retailer for the purpose of this review. The lender had no influence on this review, nor did the manufacturer receive a copy of this review before publication. There was no obligation to publish this review. We never accept compensation or payment in return for our reviews. As an independent media company, Notebookcheck is not subjected to the authority of manufacturers, retailers or publishers.

This is how Notebookcheck is testing

Every year, Notebookcheck independently reviews hundreds of laptops and smartphones using standardized procedures to ensure that all results are comparable. We have continuously developed our test methods for around 20 years and set industry standards in the process. In our test labs, high-quality measuring equipment is utilized by experienced technicians and editors. These tests involve a multi-stage validation process. Our complex rating system is based on hundreds of well-founded measurements and benchmarks, which maintains objectivity. Further information on our test methods can be found here.

Price comparison

Please share our article, every link counts!
Mail Logo
> Análises e revisões de portáteis e celulares > Análises > Análises > Avaliação do Acer Swift Go 14 - O Meteor Lake Core Ultra 7 impressiona com seu núcleo de IA
Marc Herter, 2023-12-18 (Update: 2023-12-18)