Análise do notebook Schenker XMG Evo 14 (M24) - Um bom notebook versátil com Ryzen 8000 e até 96 GB de RAM
O novo XMG Evo 14 da Schenker é um laptop compacto de 14 polegadas que pretende se destacar da multidão com sua grande variedade de conexões e boas opções de manutenção. Como usuário, o senhor tem a opção de escolher entre um AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS (a partir de aproximadamente US$ 1.060) ou um Intel Core Ultra 7 155H (a partir de aproximadamente US$ 1.223) juntamente com suas iGPUs correspondentes. Nosso dispositivo de teste é a variante AMD com 32 GB de RAM, um SSD de 1 TB e Windows pré-instalado, que pode ser adquirido por cerca de US$ 1.335. Além disso, a Schenker publicou um artigo extremamente detalhado em https://www.xmg.gg/en/news-deep-dive-xmg-evo-m24/ com todas as informações sobre o Evo 14 e o Evo 15.
Como alternativa, a Tuxedo oferece o InfinityBook Pro 14 Gen9, que são dispositivos de construção idêntica com Linux. O modelo AMD pode ser adquirido por cerca de US$ 1.345, enquanto a variante Intel custa aproximadamente US$ 1.470.
Possíveis concorrentes em comparação
Rating | Version | Date | Model | Weight | Height | Size | Resolution | Price |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
84.9 % | v8 | 09/2024 | SCHENKER XMG Evo 14 (M24) R7 8845HS, Radeon 780M | 1.5 kg | 17 mm | 14.00" | 2880x1800 | |
84.9 % | v8 | 08/2024 | Asus VivoBook S 14 OLED M5406WA Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, Radeon 890M | 1.3 kg | 15.9 mm | 14.00" | 1920x1200 | |
85.5 % | v8 | 07/2024 | Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2024 Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core | 1.4 kg | 15.9 mm | 14.00" | 2880x1800 | |
85.1 % | v8 | 07/2024 | SCHENKER VIA 14 Pro (M24) R7 8845HS, Radeon 780M | 1.4 kg | 18.5 mm | 14.00" | 2880x1800 | |
83.5 % | v8 | 06/2024 | Huawei MateBook 14 FLMH-W7611T Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core | 1.3 kg | 17.08 mm | 14.20" | 2880x1920 | |
85.3 % | v8 | 09/2024 | Lenovo ThinkPad L14 G5 21L50014GE R5 7535U, Radeon 660M | 1.6 kg | 23 mm | 14.00" | 1920x1200 | |
88.1 % v7 (old) | v7 (old) | 03/2024 | Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AHP9 R7 8845HS, Radeon 780M | 1.5 kg | 16 mm | 14.00" | 2880x1800 |
Os Top 10
» Os Top 10 Portáteis Multimídia
» Os Top 10 Portáteis de Jogos
» Os Top 10 Portáteis Leves para Jogos
» Os Top 10 Portáteis Acessíveis de Escritório/Empresariais
» Os Top 10 Portáteis Premium de Escritório/Empresariais
» Os Top 10 dos Portáteis Workstation
» Os Top 10 Subportáteis
» Os Top 10 Ultrabooks
» Os Top 10 Conversíveis
» Os Top 10 Tablets
» Os Top 10 Smartphones
» A melhores Telas de Portáteis Analisadas Pela Notebookcheck
» Top 10 dos portáteis abaixo dos 500 Euros da Notebookcheck
» Top 10 dos Portáteis abaixo dos 300 Euros
Observação: Atualizamos recentemente nosso sistema de classificação e os resultados da versão 8 não são comparáveis aos resultados da versão 7. Mais informações estão disponíveis aqui.
Estojo e conectividade
Da mesma forma que o maior XMG Evo 15o fabricante optou por usar uma caixa de alumínio resistente - só que o Evo 14 não é preto, mas sim cinza escuro. Portanto, é muito menos sensível a marcas de impressões digitais. Sua estabilidade geral é muito boa e as dobradiças também são bem ajustadas, o que faz com que haja apenas um mínimo de oscilação ao ajustar o ângulo da tampa. Seu ângulo máximo de abertura é de quase 180 graus.
Em comparação com a maioria dos outros notebooks atuais de 14 polegadas, o Evo 14 apresenta um grande número de conexões, incluindo Gigabit Ethernet e um leitor de cartão completo. No entanto, é um mistério para nós por que uma das três portas USB-A regulares suporta apenas o antigo padrão 2.0. Suas opções de manutenção também são excelentes, pois há dois slots para RAM (máximo de 96 GB) e dois slots para SSDs M.2 2280. No entanto, o gabinete permanece bastante compacto em geral e, pesando 1,46 kg, também não é muito pesado.
O módulo WLAN (Intel AX210) oferece taxas de transferência muito boas e estáveis, mas ainda não é compatível com Wi-Fi 7. A webcam, que suporta o Studio Effects da Microsoft, tira fotos decentes e, graças ao seu sensor IR, o reconhecimento facial via Windows Hello também está disponível. O leitor de cartões completo não pareceu gostar muito do nosso cartão de referência (máx. 90 MB/s); ele conseguiu mais de 250 MB/s usando outro cartão (ADATA V90). Isso significa que o senhor pode esperar diferenças bastante significativas, dependendo do cartão que usar.
O teclado retroiluminado preto oferece um bom contraste com o gabinete cinza e é de tamanho médio para digitar, mas suas teclas maiores emitem um ruído bastante alto. O clickpad de vidro (12,3 x 7,7 cm) geralmente funciona bem, mas recomendamos que o senhor toque apenas no pad para fazer entradas. Os cliques mecânicos emitem um ruído alto, que não parece ser de alta qualidade.
SD Card Reader | |
average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs) | |
SCHENKER XMG Evo 14 (M24) (ADATA V90) | |
SCHENKER XMG Evo 14 (M24) (Angelbird AV Pro V60) | |
Average of class Multimedia (18.4 - 201, n=59, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AHP9 (Angelbird AV Pro V60) | |
Asus VivoBook S 14 OLED M5406WA (AV PRO microSD 128 GB V60) | |
SCHENKER VIA 14 Pro (M24) (Angelbird AV Pro V60) | |
maximum AS SSD Seq Read Test (1GB) | |
SCHENKER XMG Evo 14 (M24) (ADATA V90) | |
SCHENKER XMG Evo 14 (M24) (Angelbird AV Pro V60) | |
Average of class Multimedia (25.8 - 266, n=59, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AHP9 (Angelbird AV Pro V60) | |
Asus VivoBook S 14 OLED M5406WA (AV PRO microSD 128 GB V60) | |
SCHENKER VIA 14 Pro (M24) (Angelbird AV Pro V60) |
Networking | |
SCHENKER XMG Evo 14 (M24) | |
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 | |
iperf3 receive AXE11000 | |
Asus VivoBook S 14 OLED M5406WA | |
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 | |
iperf3 receive AXE11000 | |
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2024 | |
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 | |
iperf3 receive AXE11000 | |
SCHENKER VIA 14 Pro (M24) | |
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 | |
iperf3 receive AXE11000 | |
Huawei MateBook 14 FLMH-W7611T | |
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 | |
iperf3 receive AXE11000 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad L14 G5 21L50014GE | |
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 | |
iperf3 receive AXE11000 | |
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz | |
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AHP9 | |
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 | |
iperf3 receive AXE11000 | |
Tela - IPS com 400 nits e 100 % sRGB
A tela IPS de 14 polegadas do Evo 14 exibe uma imagem muito nítida graças aos seus 2.880 x 1.800 pixels em uma proporção de 16:10. Sua superfície fosca ajuda a evitar reflexos, mas a imagem, felizmente, não parece granulada. As cores são vivas, mas não comparáveis às dos painéis OLED. Por sua vez, não é usado PWM e sua taxa de atualização de 120 Hz garante movimentos suaves. Seu brilho é superior a 400 cd/m² e, juntamente com seu nível de preto decente, resulta em uma taxa de contraste máxima de mais de 1.300:1. Entretanto, nem o brilho nem a temperatura da cor podem ser ajustados automaticamente.
Um perfil pré-calibrado pode ser baixado do Control Center, o que causou uma ótima impressão durante nosso teste. Em nossa análise usando o software profissional CalMAN, seus desvios de cor e escala de cinza já estavam abaixo do importante limite de 3. Poderíamos melhorar ainda mais a tela com nossa própria calibração (disponível para download gratuito na caixa à direita), mas isso não é estritamente necessário. Juntamente com sua cobertura sRGB completa, o painel é adequado para editar imagens sem nenhuma restrição.
|
iluminação: 90 %
iluminação com acumulador: 421 cd/m²
Contraste: 1316:1 (Preto: 0.32 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 1.3 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.91, calibrated: 1.1
ΔE Greyscale 1.4 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
72.8% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
99.9% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
71% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.14
SCHENKER XMG Evo 14 (M24) MNE007ZA3-2, IPS, 2880x1800, 14", 120 Hz | Asus VivoBook S 14 OLED M5406WA ATNA40CT02-0 (SDC41A0), OLED, 1920x1200, 14", 60 Hz | Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2024 MNE007ZA3-2, IPS, 2880x1800, 14", 120 Hz | SCHENKER VIA 14 Pro (M24) TL140ADXP24-0, IPS, 2880x1800, 14", 120 Hz | Huawei MateBook 14 FLMH-W7611T EDO0142, OLED, 2880x1920, 14.2", 120 Hz | Lenovo ThinkPad L14 G5 21L50014GE NV140WUM-N49, IPS LED, 1920x1200, 14", Hz | Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AHP9 LEN140WQ+, OLED, 2880x1800, 14", 120 Hz | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Display | 25% | -1% | -1% | 1% | -46% | 26% | |
Display P3 Coverage | 71 | 99.9 41% | 70.3 -1% | 70.1 -1% | 72.42 2% | 37.7 -47% | 99.9 41% |
sRGB Coverage | 99.9 | 100 0% | 99.7 0% | 97.7 -2% | 99.79 0% | 56.1 -44% | 100 0% |
AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage | 72.8 | 97.2 34% | 72.1 -1% | 72.3 -1% | 73.94 2% | 39 -46% | 98.9 36% |
Response Times | 93% | -19% | -23% | 5% | -15% | 97% | |
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% * | 26.3 ? | 1.3 ? 95% | 32.7 ? -24% | 31.1 ? -18% | 7 ? 73% | 23.5 ? 11% | 0.61 ? 98% |
Response Time Black / White * | 13.4 ? | 1.2 ? 91% | 15.2 ? -13% | 17.1 ? -28% | 22 ? -64% | 18.8 ? -40% | 0.67 ? 95% |
PWM Frequency | 240 ? | 238 ? | 240 ? | ||||
Screen | 92% | -7% | -44% | 197% | -250% | -52% | |
Brightness middle | 421 | 385 -9% | 418 -1% | 466 11% | 373 -11% | 419 0% | 411 -2% |
Brightness | 412 | 382 -7% | 408 -1% | 467 13% | 377 -8% | 399 -3% | 414 0% |
Brightness Distribution | 90 | 95 6% | 90 0% | 94 4% | 94 4% | 89 -1% | 99 10% |
Black Level * | 0.32 | 0.03 91% | 0.3 6% | 0.29 9% | 0.015 95% | 0.31 3% | |
Contrast | 1316 | 12833 875% | 1393 6% | 1607 22% | 24867 1790% | 1352 3% | |
Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 1.3 | 1.99 -53% | 1.6 -23% | 2.5 -92% | 1.47 -13% | 7.5 -477% | 2.8 -115% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 2.4 | 3.69 -54% | 2.5 -4% | 6.1 -154% | 2.49 -4% | 28.3 -1079% | 5.5 -129% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 calibrated * | 1.1 | 1.79 -63% | 1.1 -0% | 1.3 -18% | 1.78 -62% | 6.2 -464% | 2.2 -100% |
Greyscale dE 2000 * | 1.4 | 0.8 43% | 2 -43% | 4.1 -193% | 1.7 -21% | 4.6 -229% | 1.8 -29% |
Gamma | 2.14 103% | 2.204 100% | 2.14 103% | 2.24 98% | 2.179 101% | 2.02 109% | 2.21 100% |
CCT | 6446 101% | 6474 100% | 6851 95% | 7386 88% | 6556 99% | 6057 107% | 6319 103% |
Total Average (Program / Settings) | 70% /
78% | -9% /
-7% | -23% /
-32% | 68% /
127% | -104% /
-172% | 24% /
-8% |
* ... smaller is better
Display Response Times
↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
---|---|---|
13.4 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 5.3 ms rise | |
↘ 8.1 ms fall | ||
The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 31 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (20.9 ms). | ||
↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
26.3 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 11.9 ms rise | |
↘ 14.4 ms fall | ||
The screen shows relatively slow response rates in our tests and may be too slow for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 33 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (32.8 ms). |
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
Screen flickering / PWM not detected | |||
In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8702 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured. |
Desempenho - Ryzen 7 8845HS e até 96 GB de RAM
O XMG Evo 14 tem três perfis de desempenho para escolher(Balanced, Enthusiast, Overboost) e resumimos os dados na tabela a seguir. O modo padrão Enthusiast foi usado para nossos benchmarks e medições.
Perfil de energia | CPU TDP | CPU TDP bateria | CB R23 Multi | Time Spy Gráficos | emissões máximas de ruído do ventilador |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Balanceado | 25 watts | 25 watts | 12,318 pontos | 2,661 pontos | 29 dB(A) |
Enthusiast | 45 watts | 35 watts | 15.494 pontos | 2.860 pontos | 37,6 dB(A) |
Overboost | 60 watts | 50 watts | 16.315 pontos | 2.914 pontos | 44,6 dB(A) |
O XMG Evo 14 é um laptop super rápido e o AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS (Zen 4) apresentou um desempenho muito bom e estável no geral, embora não tenha conseguido acompanhar o novo Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 (Zen 5). Mesmo assim, as CPUs Zen 5 só estão disponíveis atualmente com RAM integrada. Durante nosso teste, o Evo 14 sempre foi um dispositivo responsivo e não notamos nenhum problema com a estabilidade do sistema - além disso, suas latências também foram muito baixas. Nosso dispositivo de teste usa a versão de 1 TB do Samsung 990 Pro, que conseguiu taxas de transferência muito altas. Elas também se mantiveram estáveis sob carga prolongada, o que não é uma coisa natural.
A placa de vídeo integrada Radeon 780M iGPU alcançou valores de desempenho decentes e provou ser particularmente impressionante em jogos, ficando atrás apenas da Intel Arc Graphics com 8 núcleos Xeque ainda estava claramente na liderança durante os testes sintéticos. No entanto, a nova Radeon 890M foi visivelmente mais rápida em nossos benchmarks de jogos padrão. Seu desempenho gráfico permaneceu estável sob carga prolongada.
Cinebench R15 Multi continuous test
Cinebench R23: Multi Core | Single Core
Cinebench R20: CPU (Multi Core) | CPU (Single Core)
Cinebench R15: CPU Multi 64Bit | CPU Single 64Bit
Blender: v2.79 BMW27 CPU
7-Zip 18.03: 7z b 4 | 7z b 4 -mmt1
Geekbench 6.3: Multi-Core | Single-Core
Geekbench 5.5: Multi-Core | Single-Core
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2: 4k Preset
LibreOffice : 20 Documents To PDF
R Benchmark 2.5: Overall mean
CPU Performance Rating | |
Asus VivoBook S 14 OLED M5406WA | |
SCHENKER VIA 14 Pro (M24) | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS | |
SCHENKER XMG Evo 14 (M24) | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AHP9 | |
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2024 | |
Huawei MateBook 14 FLMH-W7611T | |
Average of class Multimedia | |
Lenovo ThinkPad L14 G5 21L50014GE |
Cinebench R23 / Multi Core | |
Asus VivoBook S 14 OLED M5406WA | |
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2024 | |
SCHENKER VIA 14 Pro (M24) | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS (14895 - 18037, n=11) | |
Huawei MateBook 14 FLMH-W7611T | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AHP9 | |
Average of class Multimedia (6936 - 30789, n=103, last 2 years) | |
SCHENKER XMG Evo 14 (M24) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad L14 G5 21L50014GE |
Cinebench R23 / Single Core | |
Asus VivoBook S 14 OLED M5406WA | |
SCHENKER VIA 14 Pro (M24) | |
SCHENKER XMG Evo 14 (M24) | |
Average of class Multimedia (878 - 2290, n=94, last 2 years) | |
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2024 | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS (1623 - 1783, n=11) | |
Huawei MateBook 14 FLMH-W7611T | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AHP9 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad L14 G5 21L50014GE |
Cinebench R20 / CPU (Multi Core) | |
Asus VivoBook S 14 OLED M5406WA | |
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2024 | |
SCHENKER VIA 14 Pro (M24) | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS (5808 - 7026, n=11) | |
Huawei MateBook 14 FLMH-W7611T | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AHP9 | |
SCHENKER XMG Evo 14 (M24) | |
Average of class Multimedia (2681 - 11924, n=87, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad L14 G5 21L50014GE |
Cinebench R20 / CPU (Single Core) | |
Asus VivoBook S 14 OLED M5406WA | |
SCHENKER XMG Evo 14 (M24) | |
SCHENKER VIA 14 Pro (M24) | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS (673 - 698, n=11) | |
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2024 | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AHP9 | |
Huawei MateBook 14 FLMH-W7611T | |
Average of class Multimedia (341 - 853, n=87, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad L14 G5 21L50014GE |
Cinebench R15 / CPU Multi 64Bit | |
Asus VivoBook S 14 OLED M5406WA | |
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2024 | |
Huawei MateBook 14 FLMH-W7611T | |
SCHENKER VIA 14 Pro (M24) | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS (2342 - 2908, n=11) | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AHP9 | |
Average of class Multimedia (1252 - 5224, n=94, last 2 years) | |
SCHENKER XMG Evo 14 (M24) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad L14 G5 21L50014GE |
Cinebench R15 / CPU Single 64Bit | |
Asus VivoBook S 14 OLED M5406WA | |
SCHENKER XMG Evo 14 (M24) | |
SCHENKER VIA 14 Pro (M24) | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS (269 - 283, n=11) | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AHP9 | |
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2024 | |
Average of class Multimedia (99.6 - 323, n=89, last 2 years) | |
Huawei MateBook 14 FLMH-W7611T | |
Lenovo ThinkPad L14 G5 21L50014GE |
Blender / v2.79 BMW27 CPU | |
Lenovo ThinkPad L14 G5 21L50014GE | |
Average of class Multimedia (100 - 502, n=85, last 2 years) | |
Huawei MateBook 14 FLMH-W7611T | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AHP9 | |
SCHENKER XMG Evo 14 (M24) | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS (179 - 216, n=11) | |
SCHENKER VIA 14 Pro (M24) | |
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2024 | |
Asus VivoBook S 14 OLED M5406WA |
7-Zip 18.03 / 7z b 4 | |
Asus VivoBook S 14 OLED M5406WA | |
SCHENKER VIA 14 Pro (M24) | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS (62669 - 74664, n=11) | |
SCHENKER XMG Evo 14 (M24) | |
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2024 | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AHP9 | |
Huawei MateBook 14 FLMH-W7611T | |
Average of class Multimedia (30592 - 130368, n=79, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad L14 G5 21L50014GE |
7-Zip 18.03 / 7z b 4 -mmt1 | |
SCHENKER XMG Evo 14 (M24) | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS (5197 - 6714, n=11) | |
SCHENKER VIA 14 Pro (M24) | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AHP9 | |
Asus VivoBook S 14 OLED M5406WA | |
Average of class Multimedia (3398 - 7545, n=79, last 2 years) | |
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2024 | |
Huawei MateBook 14 FLMH-W7611T | |
Lenovo ThinkPad L14 G5 21L50014GE |
Geekbench 6.3 / Multi-Core | |
Asus VivoBook S 14 OLED M5406WA | |
Average of class Multimedia (7592 - 25760, n=68, last 2 years) | |
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2024 | |
SCHENKER XMG Evo 14 (M24) | |
SCHENKER VIA 14 Pro (M24) | |
SCHENKER VIA 14 Pro (M24) | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS (11073 - 14014, n=15) | |
Huawei MateBook 14 FLMH-W7611T | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AHP9 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad L14 G5 21L50014GE |
Geekbench 6.3 / Single-Core | |
Asus VivoBook S 14 OLED M5406WA | |
Average of class Multimedia (1534 - 3927, n=64, last 2 years) | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS (2510 - 2698, n=13) | |
SCHENKER VIA 14 Pro (M24) | |
SCHENKER VIA 14 Pro (M24) | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AHP9 | |
SCHENKER XMG Evo 14 (M24) | |
Huawei MateBook 14 FLMH-W7611T | |
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2024 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad L14 G5 21L50014GE |
Geekbench 5.5 / Multi-Core | |
Asus VivoBook S 14 OLED M5406WA | |
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2024 | |
Average of class Multimedia (4990 - 23059, n=86, last 2 years) | |
Huawei MateBook 14 FLMH-W7611T | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS (11256 - 12726, n=12) | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AHP9 | |
SCHENKER VIA 14 Pro (M24) | |
SCHENKER XMG Evo 14 (M24) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad L14 G5 21L50014GE |
Geekbench 5.5 / Single-Core | |
Asus VivoBook S 14 OLED M5406WA | |
SCHENKER VIA 14 Pro (M24) | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS (1765 - 2004, n=12) | |
SCHENKER XMG Evo 14 (M24) | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AHP9 | |
Average of class Multimedia (891 - 2555, n=86, last 2 years) | |
Huawei MateBook 14 FLMH-W7611T | |
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2024 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad L14 G5 21L50014GE |
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 / 4k Preset | |
Asus VivoBook S 14 OLED M5406WA | |
SCHENKER VIA 14 Pro (M24) | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS (18.6 - 22.7, n=11) | |
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2024 | |
SCHENKER XMG Evo 14 (M24) | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AHP9 | |
Huawei MateBook 14 FLMH-W7611T | |
Average of class Multimedia (5.26 - 34.3, n=78, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad L14 G5 21L50014GE |
LibreOffice / 20 Documents To PDF | |
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2024 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad L14 G5 21L50014GE | |
Asus VivoBook S 14 OLED M5406WA | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS (44.4 - 77, n=11) | |
Average of class Multimedia (6.7 - 146.7, n=81, last 2 years) | |
SCHENKER XMG Evo 14 (M24) | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AHP9 | |
SCHENKER VIA 14 Pro (M24) | |
Huawei MateBook 14 FLMH-W7611T |
R Benchmark 2.5 / Overall mean | |
Lenovo ThinkPad L14 G5 21L50014GE | |
Average of class Multimedia (0.3604 - 0.947, n=79, last 2 years) | |
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2024 | |
Huawei MateBook 14 FLMH-W7611T | |
SCHENKER VIA 14 Pro (M24) | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS (0.4304 - 0.4935, n=11) | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AHP9 | |
SCHENKER XMG Evo 14 (M24) | |
Asus VivoBook S 14 OLED M5406WA |
* ... smaller is better
AIDA64: FP32 Ray-Trace | FPU Julia | CPU SHA3 | CPU Queen | FPU SinJulia | FPU Mandel | CPU AES | CPU ZLib | FP64 Ray-Trace | CPU PhotoWorxx
Performance Rating | |
Asus VivoBook S 14 OLED M5406WA | |
SCHENKER VIA 14 Pro (M24) | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS | |
SCHENKER XMG Evo 14 (M24) | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AHP9 | |
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2024 | |
Huawei MateBook 14 FLMH-W7611T | |
Average of class Multimedia | |
Lenovo ThinkPad L14 G5 21L50014GE |
AIDA64 / FP32 Ray-Trace | |
Asus VivoBook S 14 OLED M5406WA | |
SCHENKER VIA 14 Pro (M24) | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AHP9 | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS (23708 - 29544, n=11) | |
SCHENKER XMG Evo 14 (M24) | |
Average of class Multimedia (4906 - 50388, n=76, last 2 years) | |
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2024 | |
Huawei MateBook 14 FLMH-W7611T | |
Lenovo ThinkPad L14 G5 21L50014GE |
AIDA64 / FPU Julia | |
Asus VivoBook S 14 OLED M5406WA | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AHP9 | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS (99659 - 125873, n=11) | |
SCHENKER VIA 14 Pro (M24) | |
SCHENKER XMG Evo 14 (M24) | |
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2024 | |
Average of class Multimedia (14528 - 201874, n=77, last 2 years) | |
Huawei MateBook 14 FLMH-W7611T | |
Lenovo ThinkPad L14 G5 21L50014GE |
AIDA64 / CPU SHA3 | |
Asus VivoBook S 14 OLED M5406WA | |
SCHENKER VIA 14 Pro (M24) | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS (4332 - 5180, n=11) | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AHP9 | |
SCHENKER XMG Evo 14 (M24) | |
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2024 | |
Average of class Multimedia (1529 - 8623, n=77, last 2 years) | |
Huawei MateBook 14 FLMH-W7611T | |
Lenovo ThinkPad L14 G5 21L50014GE |
AIDA64 / CPU Queen | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS (109458 - 124695, n=11) | |
SCHENKER VIA 14 Pro (M24) | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AHP9 | |
SCHENKER XMG Evo 14 (M24) | |
Average of class Multimedia (21547 - 181505, n=77, last 2 years) | |
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2024 | |
Asus VivoBook S 14 OLED M5406WA | |
Huawei MateBook 14 FLMH-W7611T | |
Lenovo ThinkPad L14 G5 21L50014GE |
AIDA64 / FPU SinJulia | |
Asus VivoBook S 14 OLED M5406WA | |
SCHENKER VIA 14 Pro (M24) | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AHP9 | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS (14062 - 15519, n=11) | |
SCHENKER XMG Evo 14 (M24) | |
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2024 | |
Average of class Multimedia (1240 - 28794, n=77, last 2 years) | |
Huawei MateBook 14 FLMH-W7611T | |
Lenovo ThinkPad L14 G5 21L50014GE |
AIDA64 / FPU Mandel | |
Asus VivoBook S 14 OLED M5406WA | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AHP9 | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS (53436 - 67367, n=11) | |
SCHENKER VIA 14 Pro (M24) | |
SCHENKER XMG Evo 14 (M24) | |
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2024 | |
Average of class Multimedia (9903 - 105740, n=76, last 2 years) | |
Huawei MateBook 14 FLMH-W7611T | |
Lenovo ThinkPad L14 G5 21L50014GE |
AIDA64 / CPU AES | |
Huawei MateBook 14 FLMH-W7611T | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS (64515 - 172642, n=11) | |
SCHENKER VIA 14 Pro (M24) | |
SCHENKER XMG Evo 14 (M24) | |
Asus VivoBook S 14 OLED M5406WA | |
Average of class Multimedia (31432 - 169946, n=77, last 2 years) | |
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2024 | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AHP9 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad L14 G5 21L50014GE |
AIDA64 / CPU ZLib | |
Asus VivoBook S 14 OLED M5406WA | |
Huawei MateBook 14 FLMH-W7611T | |
SCHENKER VIA 14 Pro (M24) | |
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2024 | |
SCHENKER XMG Evo 14 (M24) | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS (627 - 1080, n=11) | |
Average of class Multimedia (454 - 2022, n=77, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AHP9 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad L14 G5 21L50014GE |
AIDA64 / FP64 Ray-Trace | |
Asus VivoBook S 14 OLED M5406WA | |
SCHENKER VIA 14 Pro (M24) | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AHP9 | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS (12361 - 15911, n=11) | |
SCHENKER XMG Evo 14 (M24) | |
Average of class Multimedia (2738 - 26875, n=77, last 2 years) | |
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2024 | |
Huawei MateBook 14 FLMH-W7611T | |
Lenovo ThinkPad L14 G5 21L50014GE |
AIDA64 / CPU PhotoWorxx | |
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2024 | |
Asus VivoBook S 14 OLED M5406WA | |
SCHENKER XMG Evo 14 (M24) | |
Huawei MateBook 14 FLMH-W7611T | |
Average of class Multimedia (7419 - 53918, n=77, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AHP9 | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS (33192 - 41668, n=11) | |
SCHENKER VIA 14 Pro (M24) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad L14 G5 21L50014GE |
CrossMark: Overall | Productivity | Creativity | Responsiveness
WebXPRT 3: Overall
WebXPRT 4: Overall
Mozilla Kraken 1.1: Total
PCMark 10 / Score | |
Asus VivoBook S 14 OLED M5406WA | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS, AMD Radeon 780M (7120 - 7641, n=7) | |
SCHENKER XMG Evo 14 (M24) | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AHP9 | |
SCHENKER VIA 14 Pro (M24) | |
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2024 | |
Huawei MateBook 14 FLMH-W7611T | |
Average of class Multimedia (4542 - 8670, n=72, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad L14 G5 21L50014GE |
PCMark 10 / Essentials | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS, AMD Radeon 780M (10685 - 11570, n=7) | |
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2024 | |
Huawei MateBook 14 FLMH-W7611T | |
SCHENKER XMG Evo 14 (M24) | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AHP9 | |
SCHENKER VIA 14 Pro (M24) | |
Asus VivoBook S 14 OLED M5406WA | |
Average of class Multimedia (8480 - 12420, n=72, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad L14 G5 21L50014GE |
PCMark 10 / Productivity | |
Asus VivoBook S 14 OLED M5406WA | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS, AMD Radeon 780M (9787 - 10482, n=7) | |
SCHENKER XMG Evo 14 (M24) | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AHP9 | |
SCHENKER VIA 14 Pro (M24) | |
Average of class Multimedia (6089 - 10742, n=72, last 2 years) | |
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2024 | |
Huawei MateBook 14 FLMH-W7611T | |
Lenovo ThinkPad L14 G5 21L50014GE |
PCMark 10 / Digital Content Creation | |
Asus VivoBook S 14 OLED M5406WA | |
Huawei MateBook 14 FLMH-W7611T | |
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2024 | |
SCHENKER XMG Evo 14 (M24) | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS, AMD Radeon 780M (9009 - 10009, n=7) | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AHP9 | |
SCHENKER VIA 14 Pro (M24) | |
Average of class Multimedia (3651 - 13548, n=72, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad L14 G5 21L50014GE |
CrossMark / Overall | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AHP9 | |
Huawei MateBook 14 FLMH-W7611T | |
SCHENKER VIA 14 Pro (M24) | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS, AMD Radeon 780M (1633 - 1939, n=7) | |
Average of class Multimedia (978 - 2255, n=90, last 2 years) | |
SCHENKER XMG Evo 14 (M24) | |
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2024 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad L14 G5 21L50014GE |
CrossMark / Productivity | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AHP9 | |
Huawei MateBook 14 FLMH-W7611T | |
SCHENKER VIA 14 Pro (M24) | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS, AMD Radeon 780M (1562 - 1872, n=7) | |
SCHENKER XMG Evo 14 (M24) | |
Average of class Multimedia (913 - 2042, n=90, last 2 years) | |
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2024 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad L14 G5 21L50014GE |
CrossMark / Creativity | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AHP9 | |
SCHENKER VIA 14 Pro (M24) | |
Average of class Multimedia (1054 - 2795, n=90, last 2 years) | |
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2024 | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS, AMD Radeon 780M (1734 - 2040, n=7) | |
Huawei MateBook 14 FLMH-W7611T | |
SCHENKER XMG Evo 14 (M24) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad L14 G5 21L50014GE |
CrossMark / Responsiveness | |
Huawei MateBook 14 FLMH-W7611T | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AHP9 | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS, AMD Radeon 780M (1437 - 1849, n=7) | |
SCHENKER VIA 14 Pro (M24) | |
SCHENKER XMG Evo 14 (M24) | |
Average of class Multimedia (869 - 2094, n=90, last 2 years) | |
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2024 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad L14 G5 21L50014GE |
WebXPRT 3 / Overall | |
Average of class Multimedia (136.4 - 545, n=86, last 2 years) | |
SCHENKER VIA 14 Pro (M24) | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS, AMD Radeon 780M (295 - 334, n=7) | |
SCHENKER XMG Evo 14 (M24) | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AHP9 | |
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2024 | |
Huawei MateBook 14 FLMH-W7611T | |
Lenovo ThinkPad L14 G5 21L50014GE |
WebXPRT 4 / Overall | |
SCHENKER XMG Evo 14 (M24) | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS, AMD Radeon 780M (245 - 314, n=7) | |
Average of class Multimedia (133.2 - 353, n=78, last 2 years) | |
Asus VivoBook S 14 OLED M5406WA | |
Huawei MateBook 14 FLMH-W7611T | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AHP9 | |
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2024 | |
SCHENKER VIA 14 Pro (M24) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad L14 G5 21L50014GE |
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 / Total | |
Lenovo ThinkPad L14 G5 21L50014GE | |
SCHENKER XMG Evo 14 (M24) | |
Huawei MateBook 14 FLMH-W7611T | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS, AMD Radeon 780M (501 - 664, n=7) | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AHP9 | |
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2024 | |
SCHENKER VIA 14 Pro (M24) | |
Average of class Multimedia (254 - 1016, n=90, last 2 years) | |
Asus VivoBook S 14 OLED M5406WA | |
Asus VivoBook S 14 OLED M5406WA |
* ... smaller is better
PCMark 10 Score | 7284 pontos | |
Ajuda |
AIDA64 / Memory Copy | |
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2024 | |
Asus VivoBook S 14 OLED M5406WA | |
Huawei MateBook 14 FLMH-W7611T | |
SCHENKER XMG Evo 14 (M24) | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AHP9 | |
SCHENKER VIA 14 Pro (M24) | |
Average of class Multimedia (20549 - 104459, n=77, last 2 years) | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS (61459 - 71873, n=11) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad L14 G5 21L50014GE |
AIDA64 / Memory Read | |
Asus VivoBook S 14 OLED M5406WA | |
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2024 | |
Huawei MateBook 14 FLMH-W7611T | |
Average of class Multimedia (22917 - 125604, n=77, last 2 years) | |
SCHENKER XMG Evo 14 (M24) | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS (49866 - 61976, n=11) | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AHP9 | |
SCHENKER VIA 14 Pro (M24) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad L14 G5 21L50014GE |
AIDA64 / Memory Write | |
Asus VivoBook S 14 OLED M5406WA | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AHP9 | |
SCHENKER VIA 14 Pro (M24) | |
SCHENKER XMG Evo 14 (M24) | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS (68425 - 93239, n=11) | |
Average of class Multimedia (20226 - 117933, n=77, last 2 years) | |
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2024 | |
Huawei MateBook 14 FLMH-W7611T | |
Lenovo ThinkPad L14 G5 21L50014GE |
AIDA64 / Memory Latency | |
Huawei MateBook 14 FLMH-W7611T | |
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2024 | |
Asus VivoBook S 14 OLED M5406WA | |
SCHENKER VIA 14 Pro (M24) | |
Average of class Multimedia (7 - 346, n=77, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AHP9 | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS (82.5 - 117, n=11) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad L14 G5 21L50014GE | |
SCHENKER XMG Evo 14 (M24) |
* ... smaller is better
DPC Latencies / LatencyMon - interrupt to process latency (max), Web, Youtube, Prime95 | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AHP9 | |
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2024 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad L14 G5 21L50014GE | |
Asus VivoBook S 14 OLED M5406WA | |
SCHENKER VIA 14 Pro (M24) | |
SCHENKER XMG Evo 14 (M24) |
* ... smaller is better
* ... smaller is better
Reading continuous performance: DiskSpd Read Loop, Queue Depth 8
3DMark 11 Performance | 13295 pontos | |
3DMark Fire Strike Score | 7728 pontos | |
3DMark Time Spy Score | 3215 pontos | |
3DMark Steel Nomad Score | 500 pontos | |
3DMark Steel Nomad Light Score | 2816 pontos | |
Ajuda |
Blender / v3.3 Classroom HIP/AMD | |
Lenovo ThinkPad L14 G5 21L50014GE | |
Average of class Multimedia (308 - 683, n=5, last 2 years) |
Blender / v3.3 Classroom CPU | |
Lenovo ThinkPad L14 G5 21L50014GE | |
Average of class Multimedia (160 - 946, n=87, last 2 years) | |
Huawei MateBook 14 FLMH-W7611T | |
Average AMD Radeon 780M (300 - 664, n=54) | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AHP9 | |
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2024 | |
SCHENKER XMG Evo 14 (M24) | |
SCHENKER VIA 14 Pro (M24) | |
Asus VivoBook S 14 OLED M5406WA |
Blender / v3.3 Classroom oneAPI/Intel | |
Huawei MateBook 14 FLMH-W7611T | |
Average of class Multimedia (203 - 215, n=3, last 2 years) |
* ... smaller is better
The Witcher 3 - 1920x1080 Ultra Graphics & Postprocessing (HBAO+) | |
Average of class Multimedia (8 - 143.2, n=79, last 2 years) | |
SCHENKER XMG Evo 14 (M24) | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AHP9 | |
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2024 | |
Huawei MateBook 14 FLMH-W7611T |
GTA V - 1920x1080 Highest Settings possible AA:4xMSAA + FX AF:16x | |
Average of class Multimedia (5.09 - 141.6, n=82, last 2 years) | |
Asus VivoBook S 14 OLED M5406WA | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AHP9 | |
SCHENKER XMG Evo 14 (M24) | |
SCHENKER VIA 14 Pro (M24) | |
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2024 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad L14 G5 21L50014GE |
Cyberpunk 2077 ultra FPS diagram
baixo | média | alto | ultra | |
---|---|---|---|---|
GTA V (2015) | 164.4 | 152.9 | 65 | 27.1 |
The Witcher 3 (2015) | 147 | 47 | 36 | |
Dota 2 Reborn (2015) | 160.1 | 127.5 | 85.9 | 78.6 |
Final Fantasy XV Benchmark (2018) | 78 | 38.3 | 27.6 | |
X-Plane 11.11 (2018) | 65.6 | 46.7 | 39.8 | |
Far Cry 5 (2018) | 83 | 49 | 45 | 43 |
Strange Brigade (2018) | 161.3 | 66.7 | 56 | 48.2 |
Cyberpunk 2077 2.1 Phantom Liberty (2023) | 41.4 | 32.6 | 26.3 | 23 |
Emissões e energia
O Evo 14 usa duas ventoinhas e é um dispositivo muito silencioso durante o uso diário. Mesmo em jogos ou no teste de estresse, medimos um máximo de 37,6 dB(A) no modo Enthusiast. Ao usar o modo Balanced, no entanto, o dispositivo fica ainda mais silencioso (máx. 29 dB(A)) se essa for sua prioridade. No modo Overboost, notamos um alto nível de 44,6 dB(A), o que não vale a pena, pois o senhor não obtém muito mais potência. Não houve outros ruídos eletrônicos provenientes do nosso dispositivo de teste.
As temperaturas da superfície foram completamente inofensivas, com exceção de um ponto de aquecimento na parte inferior. A área do teclado, em particular, sempre permaneceu em uma temperatura agradável. Ainda assim, o contato da pele com a parte inferior deve ser evitado durante o uso intenso.
Apesar de seu painel de alta resolução de 120 Hz, o consumo ocioso do laptop é muito baixo e também não notamos problemas sob carga. Medimos um máximo de 83 watts, com o valor se estabilizando rapidamente em ~76 watts durante o teste de estresse. A fonte de alimentação de 100 watts é perfeitamente adequada. A bateria de 80 Wh do dispositivo permite uma boa duração da bateria, mas ela foi superada até mesmo por alguns concorrentes. No teste WLAN, medimos pouco menos de 12 horas (150 cd/m²) e 9:40 horas (brilho máximo). A 120 Hz, foram cerca de 60 minutos a menos em cada caso. No teste de vídeo, ele durou muito bem 15,5 horas.
Barulho
Ocioso |
| 24.7 / 24.7 / 26.3 dB |
Carga |
| 37.6 / 37.6 dB |
| ||
30 dB silencioso 40 dB(A) audível 50 dB(A) ruidosamente alto |
||
min: , med: , max: Earthworks M23R, Arta (15 cm de distância) environment noise: 24.7 dB(A) |
SCHENKER XMG Evo 14 (M24) Radeon 780M, R7 8845HS, Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB | Asus VivoBook S 14 OLED M5406WA Radeon 890M, Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM | Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2024 Arc 8-Core, Ultra 7 155H, YMTC PC300-1TB | SCHENKER VIA 14 Pro (M24) Radeon 780M, R7 8845HS, Samsung 990 Pro 2 TB MZVL72T0HDLB | Huawei MateBook 14 FLMH-W7611T Arc 8-Core, Ultra 7 155H, WD PC SN740 SDDPNQD-1T00 | Lenovo ThinkPad L14 G5 21L50014GE Radeon 660M, R5 7535U, Lenovo UMIS AM6A0 RPETJ512MKP1QDQ | Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AHP9 Radeon 780M, R7 8845HS, SK hynix BC901 HFS001TEJ4X164N | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Noise | -2% | -2% | -5% | -3% | -2% | -3% | |
off / environment * | 24.7 | 24 3% | 23.8 4% | 25.7 -4% | 25.11 -2% | 24.5 1% | 23.9 3% |
Idle Minimum * | 24.7 | 24 3% | 23.8 4% | 25.7 -4% | 25.11 -2% | 24.5 1% | 23.9 3% |
Idle Average * | 24.7 | 25 -1% | 23.8 4% | 25.7 -4% | 25.11 -2% | 24.5 1% | 23.9 3% |
Idle Maximum * | 26.3 | 27 -3% | 27.1 -3% | 25.7 2% | 27.2 -3% | 24.5 7% | 23.9 9% |
Load Average * | 37.6 | 40 -6% | 34.9 7% | 36.2 4% | 31.3 17% | 38 -1% | 44.3 -18% |
Cyberpunk 2077 ultra * | 37.6 | 39 -4% | 43.7 -16% | 43.6 -16% | 41.4 -10% | ||
Load Maximum * | 37.6 | 40 -6% | 43.7 -16% | 43.6 -16% | 46.61 -24% | 41.5 -10% | 44.3 -18% |
Witcher 3 ultra * | 41.3 |
* ... smaller is better
(±) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 41.7 °C / 107 F, compared to the average of 36.9 °C / 98 F, ranging from 21.1 to 71 °C for the class Multimedia.
(-) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 50.1 °C / 122 F, compared to the average of 39.2 °C / 103 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 26.2 °C / 79 F, compared to the device average of 31.3 °C / 88 F.
(±) 3: The average temperature for the upper side is 33.8 °C / 93 F, compared to the average of 31.3 °C / 88 F for the class Multimedia.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are cooler than skin temperature with a maximum of 30 °C / 86 F and are therefore cool to the touch.
(±) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.8 °C / 83.8 F (-1.2 °C / -2.2 F).
SCHENKER XMG Evo 14 (M24) AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS, AMD Radeon 780M | Asus VivoBook S 14 OLED M5406WA AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, AMD Radeon 890M | Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2024 Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU | SCHENKER VIA 14 Pro (M24) AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS, AMD Radeon 780M | Huawei MateBook 14 FLMH-W7611T Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU | Lenovo ThinkPad L14 G5 21L50014GE AMD Ryzen 5 7535U, AMD Radeon 660M | Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AHP9 AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS, AMD Radeon 780M | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Heat | -11% | -2% | -1% | -6% | 0% | 11% | |
Maximum Upper Side * | 41.7 | 49 -18% | 43.7 -5% | 44.6 -7% | 45.2 -8% | 43.1 -3% | 39.6 5% |
Maximum Bottom * | 50.1 | 59 -18% | 49.4 1% | 50.9 -2% | 49.2 2% | 45.7 9% | 38.6 23% |
Idle Upper Side * | 27.1 | 28 -3% | 27.7 -2% | 26.5 2% | 29.6 -9% | 27.9 -3% | 24.8 8% |
Idle Bottom * | 27.7 | 29 -5% | 28.6 -3% | 26.3 5% | 30.2 -9% | 28.3 -2% | 25.3 9% |
* ... smaller is better
SCHENKER XMG Evo 14 (M24) audio analysis
(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (81.7 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 18.1% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (10.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 5.2% higher than median
(+) | mids are linear (5.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3.6% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (5.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (16% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 37% of all tested devices in this class were better, 6% similar, 58% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 18%, worst was 45%
Compared to all devices tested
» 22% of all tested devices were better, 5% similar, 73% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Asus VivoBook S 14 OLED M5406WA audio analysis
(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (81 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 14% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (13.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.3% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3.4% away from median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (7.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (14.2% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 24% of all tested devices in this class were better, 6% similar, 70% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 19%, worst was 53%
Compared to all devices tested
» 15% of all tested devices were better, 4% similar, 82% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2024 audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (83.3 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 14.4% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (10.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 5% higher than median
(+) | mids are linear (5.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 1.9% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (5.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (12.6% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 16% of all tested devices in this class were better, 3% similar, 81% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 19%, worst was 53%
Compared to all devices tested
» 9% of all tested devices were better, 2% similar, 88% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
SCHENKER VIA 14 Pro (M24) audio analysis
(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (80.9 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 27.9% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (8% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | reduced mids - on average 6.2% lower than median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (7.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2.6% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (20.7% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 65% of all tested devices in this class were better, 8% similar, 27% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 19%, worst was 53%
Compared to all devices tested
» 52% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 40% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Huawei MateBook 14 FLMH-W7611T audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (83.1 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 6.4% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (10.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 6.1% higher than median
(+) | mids are linear (6.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 1.7% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (10.6% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 7% of all tested devices in this class were better, 3% similar, 90% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 19%, worst was 53%
Compared to all devices tested
» 5% of all tested devices were better, 1% similar, 94% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Lenovo ThinkPad L14 G5 21L50014GE audio analysis
(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (80.5 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 16.5% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (11.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2.3% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (3.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 5.6% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (5.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (15.6% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 13% of all tested devices in this class were better, 4% similar, 83% worse
» The best had a delta of 7%, average was 21%, worst was 53%
Compared to all devices tested
» 21% of all tested devices were better, 4% similar, 75% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AHP9 audio analysis
(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (81.5 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 15.6% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (8.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 3.9% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2% away from median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (7.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (13.4% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 19% of all tested devices in this class were better, 6% similar, 75% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 19%, worst was 53%
Compared to all devices tested
» 12% of all tested devices were better, 3% similar, 85% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
desligado | 0.46 / 1.39 Watt |
Ocioso | 4.6 / 7.8 / 8 Watt |
Carga |
71.7 / 83 Watt |
Key:
min: ,
med: ,
max: Metrahit Energy |
Power consumption Cyberpunk / stress test
Power consumption with external monitor
SCHENKER XMG Evo 14 (M24) R7 8845HS, Radeon 780M, 80 Wh | Asus VivoBook S 14 OLED M5406WA Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, Radeon 890M, 75 Wh | Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2024 Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core, 80 Wh | SCHENKER VIA 14 Pro (M24) R7 8845HS, Radeon 780M, 60 Wh | Huawei MateBook 14 FLMH-W7611T Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core, 70 Wh | Lenovo ThinkPad L14 G5 21L50014GE R5 7535U, Radeon 660M, 57 Wh | Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AHP9 R7 8845HS, Radeon 780M, 84 Wh | Average of class Multimedia | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Battery Runtime | 53% | 20% | -30% | 51% | -8% | 7% | -8% | |
H.264 | 929 | 1251 35% | 612 -34% | 1031 11% | 847 ? -9% | |||
WiFi v1.3 | 715 | 990 38% | 888 24% | 571 -20% | 758 6% | 748 5% | 710 -1% | 636 ? -11% |
Load | 99 | 165 67% | 101 2% | 64 -35% | 194 96% | 79 -20% | 110 11% | 96.4 ? -3% |
Reader / Idle | 1902 | 1168 ? | ||||||
Gaming | 85 | 92 ? |
Pro
Contra
Veredicto - O XMG Evo 14 é um bom pacote completo sem os compromissos habituais
O XMG Evo 14 da Schenker prova que mesmo os laptops modernos não precisam prescindir de muitas conexões e opções de manutenção abrangentes. Usando os dois slots de RAM, o senhor pode obter até 96 GB, sua capacidade de SSD pode ser expandida com muita facilidade e há uma grande quantidade de conexões a bordo. Além disso, o dispositivo pode ser amplamente configurado.
O processador AMD oferece um desempenho bom e, acima de tudo, estável - o mesmo pode ser dito sobre a Radeon 780M. A tela IPS do dispositivo apresenta uma alta resolução, uma taxa de atualização de 120 Hz e cores precisas, o que significa que o senhor pode editar imagens sem esforço no espaço de cores sRGB.
O novo Schenker XMG Evo 14 oferece um bom pacote completo, incluindo um gabinete de metal por um preço inicial de pouco mais de US$ 1.000. Apesar de seu gabinete relativamente compacto, o senhor não precisa prescindir de valores de desempenho sólidos, várias conexões e boas opções de manutenção.
O tempo de execução é bom em geral, mesmo que alguns concorrentes ofereçam resistência ainda melhor. O senhor deve dar uma olhada no novo XMG Evo 14, especialmente devido ao seu preço inicial de aproximadamente US$ 1.000. Embora o modelo Intel ofereça suporte a Thunderbolt 4, seu aumento limitado de desempenho não vale a pena o custo adicional.
Preço e disponibilidade
O XMG Evo 14 AMD não está disponível nos Estados Unidos, mas pode ser adquirido em lojas internacionais, como a bestware.com, com preços a partir de cerca de US$ 1.000.
Observação: Atualizamos recentemente nosso sistema de classificação e os resultados da versão 8 não são comparáveis aos resultados da versão 7. Mais informações estão disponíveis aqui.
SCHENKER XMG Evo 14 (M24)
- 09/22/2024 v8
Andreas Osthoff
Transparency
The selection of devices to be reviewed is made by our editorial team. The test sample was provided to the author as a loan by the manufacturer or retailer for the purpose of this review. The lender had no influence on this review, nor did the manufacturer receive a copy of this review before publication. There was no obligation to publish this review. We never accept compensation or payment in return for our reviews. As an independent media company, Notebookcheck is not subjected to the authority of manufacturers, retailers or publishers.
This is how Notebookcheck is testing
Every year, Notebookcheck independently reviews hundreds of laptops and smartphones using standardized procedures to ensure that all results are comparable. We have continuously developed our test methods for around 20 years and set industry standards in the process. In our test labs, high-quality measuring equipment is utilized by experienced technicians and editors. These tests involve a multi-stage validation process. Our complex rating system is based on hundreds of well-founded measurements and benchmarks, which maintains objectivity. Further information on our test methods can be found here.