Notebookcheck Logo

Revisão Schenker XMG Core 17 (Tongfang GM7MG0R): Laptop de jogo configurável com tela WQHD

Implementação bem sucedida.

O poderoso hardware do Schenker XMG Core 17 é capaz de trazer todos os jogos de computador atuais suavemente para a tela responsiva (WQHD, IPS, 165 Hz, 17,3 polegadas). O Centro de Controle pré-instalado permite ajustar o desenvolvimento da performance da CPU e da GPU.
Comet Lake Gaming Geforce Laptop / Notebook Windows

Com o XMG Core 17 (início de 2021), a Schenker está adicionando um laptop de jogos de gama média superior a suas ofertas. A unidade de teste que nos é fornecida é administrada por um Núcleo i7-10870Hprocessador e umGeForce RTX-3060 laptopGPU. Os concorrentes incluem dispositivos tais como a MSI Alfa 17 A4DEKoAcer Predator Helios 300 PH317-54e o Medion Erazer Beast X10.

Como a construção do laptop é em grande parte idêntica à de seus dois predecessores, não discutiremos o caso, equipamentos de conexão, dispositivos de entrada e alto-falantes, exceto quando houver diferenças. Você pode encontrar as informações correspondentes sobre estas características em nossa revisão doXMG Core 17 (2019).

SCHENKER XMG Core 17 (Early 2021)
Processador
Intel Core i7-10870H 8 x 2.2 - 5 GHz, 60 W PL2 / Short Burst, 60 W PL1 / Sustained, Comet Lake-H
Placa gráfica
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU - 6 GB VRAM, Análises do: 1425 MHz, Memoría: 1750 MHz, 130 W TDP ( including 15 W Dynamic Boost), GDDR6, 27.21.14.6647, Optimus
Memória
16 GB 
, DDR4-3200, dual-channel mode, two memory slots (both in use), max. 64 GB
Pantalha
17.30 polegadas 16:9, 2560 x 1440 pixel 170 PPI, BOE CQ NE173QHM-NY2, IPS, Brilhante: não, 165 Hz
placa mãe
Intel HM470
Disco rígido
Samsung SSD 970 EVO Plus 1TB, 1024 GB 
, 2 M.2-2280 slots, NVMe; RAID-0 support, 883 GB livre
Placa de Som
Realtek ALC274 @ Intel Comet Point-H PCH - cAVS
Conexões
1 USB 2.0, 2 USB 3.0, 1 USB 3.1 Gen2, 1 HDMI, 1 DisplayPort, 1 Kensington Lock, Conexões Audio: headset out, microphone in, Card Reader: SD, SDHC, SDXC, TPM 2.0
Funcionamento em rede
Realtek RTL8125 2.5GBe Family Ethernet Controller (10/100/1000/2500MBit/s), Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201 (a/b/g/h/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/ax = Wi-Fi 6/), Bluetooth 5.1
Tamanho
altura x largura x profundidade (em mm): 30.05 x 395.7 x 260.8
Bateria
62 Wh, 4100 mAh Lítio-Polímero
Sistema Operativo
Microsoft Windows 10 Pro 64 Bit
Camera
Webcam: HD
Primary Camera: 0.9 MPix
Características adicionais
Alto falantes: stereo, Teclado: chiclet, Iluminação do Teclado: sim, sticker, 24 Meses Garantia
peso
2.546 kg, Suprimento de energia: 428 g
Preço
1814 Euro
Links
SCHENKER página inicial
SCHENKER Seção de notebook
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

Possible Competitors in the Comparison

Rating
Date
Model
Weight
Height
Size
Resolution
Price
83.9 %
v7 (old)
06/2021
SCHENKER XMG Core 17 (Early 2021)
i7-10870H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU		2.5 kg30.05 mm17.30"2560x1440
83.3 %
v7 (old)
02/2021
MSI Alpha 17 A4DEK
R7 4800H, Radeon RX 5600M		2.6 kg28 mm17.30"1920x1080
83.6 %
v7 (old)
10/2020
Acer Predator Helios 300 PH317-54-75G8
i7-10750H, GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile		2.8 kg25 mm17.30"1920x1080
84.7 %
v7 (old)
11/2020
Medion Erazer Beast X10 MD61804
i7-10750H, GeForce RTX 2070 Super Max-Q		2.3 kg24.6 mm17.30"1920x1080

Size Comparison

❌
404 mm 280 mm 25 mm 2.8 kg399 mm 272 mm 28 mm 2.6 kg395.7 mm 260.8 mm 30.05 mm 2.5 kg394.8 mm 261.8 mm 24.6 mm 2.3 kg297 mm 210 mm 1 mm 5.7 g

Conexões - O portátil Schenker não oferece Thunderbolt

Em termos de conexões, algo mudou em comparação com os predecessores: As duas conexões Mini-DisplayPort foram removidas, e a porta USB-C agora suporta o padrão USB 3.2 Gen 2 (antes: USB 3.2 Gen 1) e também DisplayPort via USB-C.

Lado direito: leitor de cartões de armazenamento (SD), 2x USB 3.2 Gen 1 (Tipo A)
Lado direito: leitor de cartões de armazenamento (SD), 2x USB 3.2 Gen 1 (Tipo A)
Lado esquerdo: slot para trava de cabo, USB 2.0 (Tipo A), entrada de microfone, saída de fones de ouvido
Lado esquerdo: slot para trava de cabo, USB 2.0 (Tipo A), entrada de microfone, saída de fones de ouvido
Voltar: USB 3.2 Gen 2 (Tipo C; DisplayPort 1.4, compatível com G-Sync), HDMI 2.1 (HDCP 2.3), Gigabit Ethernet, alimentação
Voltar: USB 3.2 Gen 2 (Tipo C; DisplayPort 1.4, compatível com G-Sync), HDMI 2.1 (HDCP 2.3), Gigabit Ethernet, alimentação
SD Card Reader
average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs)
Average of class Gaming
  (19 - 202, n=89, last 2 years)
95.5 MB/s +417%
MSI Alpha 17 A4DEK
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
77 MB/s +317%
SCHENKER XMG Core 17
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
25 MB/s +35%
SCHENKER XMG Core 17 Comet Lake
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
25 MB/s +35%
SCHENKER XMG Core 17 (Early 2021)
  (AV PRO microSD 128 GB V60)
18.46 MB/s
maximum AS SSD Seq Read Test (1GB)
Average of class Gaming
  (25.8 - 269, n=90, last 2 years)
119.3 MB/s +481%
MSI Alpha 17 A4DEK
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
86 MB/s +319%
SCHENKER XMG Core 17
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
27 MB/s +31%
SCHENKER XMG Core 17 Comet Lake
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
26 MB/s +27%
SCHENKER XMG Core 17 (Early 2021)
  (AV PRO microSD 128 GB V60)
20.54 MB/s
Networking
iperf3 transmit AX12
SCHENKER XMG Core 17 (Early 2021)
Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201
1541 (1418min - 1606max) MBit/s
Acer Predator Helios 300 PH317-54-75G8
Killer Wi-Fi 6 AX1650i 160MHz Wireless Network Adapter (201NGW)
1340 MBit/s -13%
SCHENKER XMG Core 17 Comet Lake
Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201
1230 MBit/s -20%
Medion Erazer Beast X10 MD61804
Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201
1180 MBit/s -23%
Average Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201
  (49.8 - 1775, n=324)
1161 MBit/s -25%
MSI Alpha 17 A4DEK
Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX200
1010 MBit/s -34%
SCHENKER XMG Core 17
Intel Wireless-AC 9560
670 MBit/s -57%
iperf3 receive AX12
SCHENKER XMG Core 17 (Early 2021)
Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201
1711 (861min - 1776max) MBit/s
Medion Erazer Beast X10 MD61804
Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201
1480 MBit/s -14%
SCHENKER XMG Core 17 Comet Lake
Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201
1450 MBit/s -15%
Acer Predator Helios 300 PH317-54-75G8
Killer Wi-Fi 6 AX1650i 160MHz Wireless Network Adapter (201NGW)
1420 MBit/s -17%
Average Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201
  (136 - 1743, n=324)
1261 MBit/s -26%
MSI Alpha 17 A4DEK
Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX200
1100 MBit/s -36%
SCHENKER XMG Core 17
Intel Wireless-AC 9560
689 MBit/s -60%
0501001502002503003504004505005506006507007508008509009501000105011001150120012501300135014001450150015501600165017001750Tooltip
SCHENKER XMG Core 17 (Early 2021) Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201; iperf3 receive AX12; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1682 (861-1776)
SCHENKER XMG Core 17 (Early 2021) Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201; iperf3 transmit AX12; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1541 (1418-1606)

Display - 165 Hz WQHD IPS

Enquanto o valor de brilho (332,7 cd/m²) do visor mate de 17,3 polegadas (2560 x 1440 pixels) se revela bom, o contraste (974:1) poderia usar alguma melhoria, mal faltando o alvo (> 1000:1). O painel de 165-Hz oferece tempos de resposta rápidos e não produz nenhum PWM cintilante. Alternativamente, a Schenker também oferece a opção de um display FHD (IPS, 144 Hz)

323
cd/m²		337
cd/m²		311
cd/m²
330
cd/m²		370
cd/m²		337
cd/m²
319
cd/m²		344
cd/m²		323
cd/m²
Distribuição do brilho
BOE CQ NE173QHM-NY2 tested with X-Rite i1Pro 2
Máximo: 370 cd/m² (Nits) Médio: 332.7 cd/m² Minimum: 10 cd/m²
iluminação: 84 %
iluminação com acumulador: 370 cd/m²
Contraste: 974:1 (Preto: 0.38 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 2.41 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.92, calibrated: 1.19
ΔE Greyscale 3.9 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
93% sRGB (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
69% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
69.3% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
98.5% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
68.1% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.287
SCHENKER XMG Core 17 (Early 2021)
BOE CQ NE173QHM-NY2, IPS, 2560x1440, 17.3"		MSI Alpha 17 A4DEK
AU Optronics AUO978F, IPS, 1920x1080, 17.3"		Acer Predator Helios 300 PH317-54-75G8
Chi Mei N173HCE-G33, IPS, 1920x1080, 17.3"		Medion Erazer Beast X10 MD61804
LG Phillips LP173WFG-SPB3, IPS, 1920x1080, 17.3"		SCHENKER XMG Core 17
LG Philips LP173WFG-SPB1 (LGD0615), IPS, 1920x1080, 17.3"		SCHENKER XMG Core 17 Comet Lake
BOE HF NV173FHM-N44, IPS, 1920x1080, 17.3"
Display
-41%
-6%
-4%
-4%
-5%
Display P3 Coverage
68.1
39.55
-42%
62.6
-8%
64.5
-5%
64.4
-5%
65.3
-4%
sRGB Coverage
98.5
59.2
-40%
94.3
-4%
95.6
-3%
95.6
-3%
92.6
-6%
AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage
69.3
40.86
-41%
64.7
-7%
65.6
-5%
65.6
-5%
66.5
-4%
Response Times
-165%
-3%
7%
9%
-3%
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% *
16.8 ?(8.4, 8.4)
40 ?(19.6, 20.4)
-138%
16.4 ?(8, 8.4)
2%
14.4 ?(7.6, 6.8)
14%
14.4 ?(7.6, 6.8)
14%
17.6 ?(8.4, 9.2)
-5%
Response Time Black / White *
10 ?(4.8, 5.2)
29.2 ?(15.6, 13.6)
-192%
10.8 ?(5.6, 5.2)
-8%
10 ?(5.2, 4.8)
-0%
9.6 ?(5.2, 4.4)
4%
10 ?(5.2, 4.8)
-0%
PWM Frequency
24510 ?(19)
1000 ?(99)
Screen
-46%
27%
-5%
1%
-16%
Brightness middle
370
254
-31%
322
-13%
313
-15%
329
-11%
315
-15%
Brightness
333
254
-24%
308
-8%
297
-11%
286
-14%
298
-11%
Brightness Distribution
84
93
11%
92
10%
88
5%
79
-6%
88
5%
Black Level *
0.38
0.23
39%
0.18
53%
0.27
29%
0.3
21%
0.29
24%
Contrast
974
1104
13%
1789
84%
1159
19%
1097
13%
1086
11%
Colorchecker dE 2000 *
2.41
4.12
-71%
1.53
37%
2.96
-23%
2.52
-5%
4.3
-78%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *
7.32
19.66
-169%
3.14
57%
9.83
-34%
6.9
6%
7.3
-0%
Colorchecker dE 2000 calibrated *
1.19
3.78
-218%
0.74
38%
1.03
13%
1.31
-10%
2.29
-92%
Greyscale dE 2000 *
3.9
3.2
18%
1.9
51%
4.9
-26%
2.98
24%
4.3
-10%
Gamma
2.287 96%
2.179 101%
2.144 103%
2.187 101%
2.38 92%
2.084 106%
CCT
7302 89%
6754 96%
6809 95%
7559 86%
6738 96%
7434 87%
Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998)
69
41
-41%
65
-6%
66
-4%
60
-13%
66
-4%
Color Space (Percent of sRGB)
93
59
-37%
87
-6%
89
-4%
95
2%
92
-1%
Total Average (Program / Settings)
-84% / -60%
6% / 17%
-1% / -3%
2% / 1%
-8% / -12%

* ... smaller is better

No estado de entrega, o visor oferece uma boa reprodução de cores, atendendo ao alvo (Delta E < 3) com um desvio de cor de 2,41. O mostrador não sofre de uma coloração azul. Através da calibração, é possível obter algumas melhorias, com o desvio de cor caindo para 1,19 e o display em escala de cinza se tornando mais equilibrado. Os espaços de cor AdobeRGB (69%) e sRGB (93%) não são totalmente cobertos

CalMAN: Escala de cinza
CalMAN: Escala de cinza
CalMAN: Saturação
CalMAN: Saturação
CalMAN: ColorChecker
CalMAN: ColorChecker
CalMAN: Escala de cinza (calibrada)
CalMAN: Escala de cinza (calibrada)
CalMAN: Saturação (calibrada)
CalMAN: Saturação (calibrada)
CalMAN: ColorChecker (calibrado)
CalMAN: ColorChecker (calibrado)
Schenker XMG Core 17 vs sRGB (93%)
Schenker XMG Core 17 vs sRGB (93%)
Grelha subpixel
Grelha subpixel
Schenker XMG Core 17 vs AdobeRGB (69%)
Schenker XMG Core 17 vs AdobeRGB (69%)

Display Response Times

ℹ
Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
   ↔    Response Time Black to White
10 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 4.8 ms rise
↘ 5.2 ms fall
The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 23 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (21 ms).
   ↔    Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
16.8 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 8.4 ms rise
↘ 8.4 ms fall
The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 27 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (32.9 ms).

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

ℹ
To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM not detected

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8743 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured.

Os ângulos de visualização do painel IPS são estáveis e o conteúdo do display pode ser lido de qualquer posição. Ao ar livre, o conteúdo do display pode ser lido se o sol não estiver muito claro

O núcleo 17 ao ar livre (céu encoberto)
O núcleo 17 ao ar livre (céu encoberto)
Ângulos de visualização
Ângulos de visualização

Desempenho - Suficiente para os próximos anos

O XMG Core 17 é capaz de trazer cada jogo atual para a tela suavemente e também atinge uma boa figura em todas as outras áreas de aplicação

CPU-Z
CPU-Z
CPU-Z
CPU-Z
CPU-Z
GPU-Z
GPU-Z
HWInfo
HWInfo
 

Condições de teste

Você pode alternar entre os três perfis de desempenho "Balanceado", "Enthusiast" e "Overboost" através do Centro de Controle pré-instalado ou da chave de comutação de perfil (ao lado do botão de alimentação). Para nosso teste, usamos o perfil "Enthusiast" (PL1/PL2: 60 watts) e o controle automático do ventilador. Vários pontos de referência também foram executados com o perfil "Overboost" (PL1/PL2: 75 watts) ativado. Durante os testes de bateria, utilizamos o perfil "Balanceado" (PL1/PL2: 35 watts).

Processador

ONúcleo i7-10870HO processador octa-core (Comet Lake) funciona a uma velocidade de relógio básica de 2,2 GHz. Através do Turbo, isto pode ser aumentado até um máximo de 4,2 GHz (oito núcleos) e 5 GHz (um núcleo). Suporta hiperthreading (dois fios por núcleo).

O processador passa pelos testes de CPU do benchmark Cinebench R15 em 3 a 3,8 GHz (multi-thread) e 4 a 4,8 GHz (single thread). Na operação por bateria, a CPU opera em velocidades de relógio entre 2,6 e 2,9 GHz (multifios) e entre 2,4 e 4,2 GHz (rosca única).

Multifios (operação em rede)
Multifios (operação em rede)
Rosca única (operação de rede)
Rosca única (operação de rede)

Avaliamos se a CPU Turbo também é utilizada constantemente na operação de rede elétrica executando o teste multi-tarefa do benchmark Cinebench R15 por pelo menos 30 minutos em um loop constante. O Turbo é usado em um nível médio. O perfil de desempenho "Overboost" só faz com que a velocidade do relógio aumente ligeiramente.

Em geral, o Core i7 não faz pleno uso de suas capacidades nos benchmarks multi-tarefas. Para obter mais desempenho dele, os limites de potência da CPU precisariam ser aumentados, o que seria possível através do Centro de Controle pré-instalado, onde o máximo configurável seria 120 watts (PL1/PL2). Também executamos o loop CB15 com esta configuração de desempenho a fim de testá-lo - sem encontrar nenhum problema.

01002003004005006007008009001000110012001300140015001600170018001900Tooltip
SCHENKER XMG Core 17 (Early 2021) Intel Core i7-10870H: Ø1367 (1316.83-1382.98)
SCHENKER XMG Core 17 (Early 2021) Intel Core i7-10870H; Overboost: Ø1463 (1432.51-1477.1)
SCHENKER XMG Core 17 (Early 2021) Intel Core i7-10870H; Overboost, PL1/2 120 Watt: Ø1651 (1639.14-1677.08)
MSI Alpha 17 A4DEK AMD Ryzen 7 4800H: Ø1926 (1876.79-1982.55)
Acer Predator Helios 300 PH317-54-75G8 Intel Core i7-10750H: Ø1290 (1277.75-1322.62)
Medion Erazer Beast X10 MD61804 Intel Core i7-10750H: Ø1347 (1332.27-1364.11)
SCHENKER XMG Core 17 Intel Core i7-9750H: Ø1010 (998.28-1099.87)
SCHENKER XMG Core 17 Comet Lake Intel Core i7-10750H: Ø1200 (1187.65-1299.17)
Velocidades do relógio da CPU durante a execução do loop CB15
Velocidades do relógio da CPU durante a execução do loop CB15
Velocidades do relógio da CPU durante a execução do loop CB15 (Overboost)
Velocidades do relógio da CPU durante a execução do loop CB15 (Overboost)
Velocidades do relógio da CPU durante o funcionamento do loop CB15 (Overboost, PL1/2: 120 watts)
Velocidades do relógio da CPU durante o funcionamento do loop CB15 (Overboost, PL1/2: 120 watts)
Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64Bit
196 Points
Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64Bit
1382 Points
Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64Bit
147.3 fps
Cinebench R15 Ref. Match 64Bit
99.6 %
Cinebench R20 CPU (Multi Core)
3244 Points
Cinebench R20 CPU (Single Core)
476 Points
Cinebench R23 Single Core
1225 Points
Cinebench R23 Multi Core
8408 Points
Ajuda
Cinebench R15 | Blender | 7-Zip 18.03 | Cinebench R20 | Geekbench 5.5 | HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 | LibreOffice | R Benchmark 2.5
Cinebench R15
CPU Single 64Bit
Average of class Gaming
  (176.6 - 318, n=195, last 2 years)
276 Points +41%
SCHENKER XMG Core 17 Comet Lake
Intel Core i7-10750H
209 Points +7%
Average Intel Core i7-10870H
  (196 - 204, n=11)
199.8 Points +2%
Medion Erazer Beast X10 MD61804
Intel Core i7-10750H
196 Points 0%
SCHENKER XMG Core 17 (Early 2021)
Intel Core i7-10870H
196 Points
Acer Predator Helios 300 PH317-54-75G8
Intel Core i7-10750H
195 Points -1%
MSI Alpha 17 A4DEK
AMD Ryzen 7 4800H
190 Points -3%
SCHENKER XMG Core 17
Intel Core i7-9750H
180 Points -8%
CPU Multi 64Bit
Average of class Gaming
  (905 - 5663, n=198, last 2 years)
3394 Points +146%
MSI Alpha 17 A4DEK
AMD Ryzen 7 4800H
1983 (1876.79min - 1982.55max) Points +43%
SCHENKER XMG Core 17 (Early 2021)
Intel Core i7-10870H (Overboost, PL1/2 120 Watt)
1677 Points +21%
Average Intel Core i7-10870H
  (1336 - 1740, n=14)
1614 Points +17%
SCHENKER XMG Core 17 (Early 2021)
Intel Core i7-10870H (Overboost)
1477 Points +7%
SCHENKER XMG Core 17 (Early 2021)
Intel Core i7-10870H
1382 Points
Medion Erazer Beast X10 MD61804
Intel Core i7-10750H
1364 Points -1%
Acer Predator Helios 300 PH317-54-75G8
Intel Core i7-10750H
1323 Points -4%
SCHENKER XMG Core 17 Comet Lake
Intel Core i7-10750H
1299 (1187.65min - 1299max) Points -6%
SCHENKER XMG Core 17
Intel Core i7-9750H
1100 Points -20%
Blender - v2.79 BMW27 CPU
SCHENKER XMG Core 17 Comet Lake
Intel Core i7-10750H
358 Seconds * -10%
Acer Predator Helios 300 PH317-54-75G8
Intel Core i7-10750H
351 Seconds * -8%
SCHENKER XMG Core 17 (Early 2021)
Intel Core i7-10870H
326 Seconds *
Medion Erazer Beast X10 MD61804
Intel Core i7-10750H
322 Seconds * +1%
SCHENKER XMG Core 17 (Early 2021)
Intel Core i7-10870H (Overboost)
315 Seconds * +3%
Average Intel Core i7-10870H
  (272 - 333, n=12)
298 Seconds * +9%
MSI Alpha 17 A4DEK
AMD Ryzen 7 4800H
254 Seconds * +22%
Average of class Gaming
  (87 - 555, n=186, last 2 years)
172.1 Seconds * +47%
7-Zip 18.03
7z b 4 -mmt1
Average of class Gaming
  (4168 - 7581, n=190, last 2 years)
6281 MIPS +16%
SCHENKER XMG Core 17 Comet Lake
Intel Core i7-10750H
5438 MIPS +1%
SCHENKER XMG Core 17 (Early 2021)
Intel Core i7-10870H
5393 MIPS
SCHENKER XMG Core 17 (Early 2021)
Intel Core i7-10870H (Overboost)
5297 MIPS -2%
Average Intel Core i7-10870H
  (5145 - 5429, n=12)
5293 MIPS -2%
Medion Erazer Beast X10 MD61804
Intel Core i7-10750H
5191 MIPS -4%
Acer Predator Helios 300 PH317-54-75G8
Intel Core i7-10750H
5190 MIPS -4%
MSI Alpha 17 A4DEK
AMD Ryzen 7 4800H
4686 MIPS -13%
7z b 4
Average of class Gaming
  (23795 - 140932, n=190, last 2 years)
84653 MIPS +107%
MSI Alpha 17 A4DEK
AMD Ryzen 7 4800H
52364 MIPS +28%
Average Intel Core i7-10870H
  (39581 - 46708, n=12)
44452 MIPS +9%
SCHENKER XMG Core 17 (Early 2021)
Intel Core i7-10870H (Overboost)
44110 MIPS +8%
SCHENKER XMG Core 17 (Early 2021)
Intel Core i7-10870H
40876 MIPS
Medion Erazer Beast X10 MD61804
Intel Core i7-10750H
37082 MIPS -9%
SCHENKER XMG Core 17 Comet Lake
Intel Core i7-10750H
36771 MIPS -10%
Acer Predator Helios 300 PH317-54-75G8
Intel Core i7-10750H
31612 MIPS -23%
Cinebench R20
CPU (Single Core)
Average of class Gaming
  (427 - 856, n=191, last 2 years)
722 Points +52%
SCHENKER XMG Core 17 Comet Lake
Intel Core i7-10750H
491 Points +3%
MSI Alpha 17 A4DEK
AMD Ryzen 7 4800H
485 Points +2%
SCHENKER XMG Core 17 (Early 2021)
Intel Core i7-10870H
476 Points
Average Intel Core i7-10870H
  (460 - 484, n=12)
474 Points 0%
SCHENKER XMG Core 17 (Early 2021)
Intel Core i7-10870H (Overboost)
471 Points -1%
Acer Predator Helios 300 PH317-54-75G8
Intel Core i7-10750H
463 Points -3%
SCHENKER XMG Core 17
Intel Core i7-9750H
441 Points -7%
CPU (Multi Core)
Average of class Gaming
  (2179 - 13832, n=191, last 2 years)
8240 Points +154%
MSI Alpha 17 A4DEK
AMD Ryzen 7 4800H
4497 Points +39%
Average Intel Core i7-10870H
  (3027 - 4020, n=12)
3588 Points +11%
SCHENKER XMG Core 17 (Early 2021)
Intel Core i7-10870H (Overboost)
3354 Points +3%
SCHENKER XMG Core 17 (Early 2021)
Intel Core i7-10870H
3244 Points
Acer Predator Helios 300 PH317-54-75G8
Intel Core i7-10750H
3144 Points -3%
SCHENKER XMG Core 17 Comet Lake
Intel Core i7-10750H
2968 Points -9%
SCHENKER XMG Core 17
Intel Core i7-9750H
2434 Points -25%
Geekbench 5.5
Single-Core
Average of class Gaming
  (986 - 2210, n=191, last 2 years)
1882 Points +49%
SCHENKER XMG Core 17 Comet Lake
Intel Core i7-10750H
1333 Points +5%
Medion Erazer Beast X10 MD61804
Intel Core i7-10750H
1331 Points +5%
Average Intel Core i7-10870H
  (1191 - 1295, n=12)
1273 Points +1%
SCHENKER XMG Core 17 (Early 2021)
Intel Core i7-10870H (Overboost)
1268 Points 0%
SCHENKER XMG Core 17 (Early 2021)
Intel Core i7-10870H
1264 Points
Acer Predator Helios 300 PH317-54-75G8
Intel Core i7-10750H
1262 Points 0%
MSI Alpha 17 A4DEK
AMD Ryzen 7 4800H
1201 Points -5%
Multi-Core
Average of class Gaming
  (4557 - 23194, n=191, last 2 years)
14891 Points +123%
MSI Alpha 17 A4DEK
AMD Ryzen 7 4800H
8047 Points +20%
Average Intel Core i7-10870H
  (6403 - 7882, n=12)
7482 Points +12%
SCHENKER XMG Core 17 (Early 2021)
Intel Core i7-10870H (Overboost)
7025 Points +5%
SCHENKER XMG Core 17 (Early 2021)
Intel Core i7-10870H
6688 Points
Medion Erazer Beast X10 MD61804
Intel Core i7-10750H
6652 Points -1%
SCHENKER XMG Core 17 Comet Lake
Intel Core i7-10750H
6394 Points -4%
Acer Predator Helios 300 PH317-54-75G8
Intel Core i7-10750H
6349 Points -5%
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 - 4k Preset
Average of class Gaming
  (6.72 - 38.9, n=190, last 2 years)
23.3 fps +110%
MSI Alpha 17 A4DEK
AMD Ryzen 7 4800H
13.3 fps +20%
Average Intel Core i7-10870H
  (10.7 - 13.5, n=12)
12.2 fps +10%
Medion Erazer Beast X10 MD61804
Intel Core i7-10750H
11.6 fps +5%
SCHENKER XMG Core 17 (Early 2021)
Intel Core i7-10870H (Overboost)
11.6 fps +5%
SCHENKER XMG Core 17 (Early 2021)
Intel Core i7-10870H
11.1 fps
Acer Predator Helios 300 PH317-54-75G8
Intel Core i7-10750H
10.4 fps -6%
SCHENKER XMG Core 17 Comet Lake
Intel Core i7-10750H
10.2 fps -8%
LibreOffice - 20 Documents To PDF
MSI Alpha 17 A4DEK
AMD Ryzen 7 4800H
59.2 s * -6%
SCHENKER XMG Core 17 (Early 2021)
Intel Core i7-10870H
56.1 s *
Acer Predator Helios 300 PH317-54-75G8
Intel Core i7-10750H
54.3 s * +3%
SCHENKER XMG Core 17 Comet Lake
Intel Core i7-10750H
54.1 s * +4%
Average Intel Core i7-10870H
  (46 - 64.4, n=12)
53.7 s * +4%
Medion Erazer Beast X10 MD61804
Intel Core i7-10750H
48.36 s * +14%
Average of class Gaming
  (31.4 - 96.6, n=187, last 2 years)
47.6 s * +15%
SCHENKER XMG Core 17 (Early 2021)
Intel Core i7-10870H (Overboost)
46 s * +18%
R Benchmark 2.5 - Overall mean
Acer Predator Helios 300 PH317-54-75G8
Intel Core i7-10750H
0.614 sec * -6%
Medion Erazer Beast X10 MD61804
Intel Core i7-10750H
0.593 sec * -3%
SCHENKER XMG Core 17 (Early 2021)
Intel Core i7-10870H (Overboost)
0.593 sec * -3%
Average Intel Core i7-10870H
  (0.573 - 0.614, n=12)
0.591 sec * -2%
SCHENKER XMG Core 17 Comet Lake
Intel Core i7-10750H
0.578 sec * -0%
SCHENKER XMG Core 17 (Early 2021)
Intel Core i7-10870H
0.577 sec *
MSI Alpha 17 A4DEK
AMD Ryzen 7 4800H
0.574 sec * +1%
Average of class Gaming
  (0.3609 - 0.759, n=191, last 2 years)
0.4402 sec * +24%

* ... smaller is better

Desempenho do sistema

O sistema de funcionamento rápido e suave também oferecerá desempenho suficiente para os próximos anos para áreas de aplicação exigentes, como jogos e processamento de vídeo e imagem. Os resultados do PC-Mark também são bons.

A memória de trabalho (DDR4-3200, 2x 8 GB, máx. 64 GB) funciona em modo de canal duplo.
A memória de trabalho (DDR4-3200, 2x 8 GB, máx. 64 GB) funciona em modo de canal duplo.
PCMark 8 Home Score Accelerated v2
4073 pontos
PCMark 8 Creative Score Accelerated v2
5816 pontos
PCMark 8 Work Score Accelerated v2
5375 pontos
PCMark 10 Score
5685 pontos
Ajuda
PCMark 10 | PCMark 8
PCMark 10
Score
Average of class Gaming
  (5776 - 9852, n=168, last 2 years)
7774 Points +37%
MSI Alpha 17 A4DEK
Radeon RX 5600M, R7 4800H, Kingston OM8PCP3512F-AB
5911 Points +4%
SCHENKER XMG Core 17 (Early 2021)
GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, i7-10870H, Samsung SSD 970 EVO Plus 1TB
5685 Points
Average Intel Core i7-10870H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
  ()
5685 Points 0%
SCHENKER XMG Core 17
GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile, i7-9750H, Samsung SSD 970 EVO Plus 500GB
5657 Points 0%
Medion Erazer Beast X10 MD61804
GeForce RTX 2070 Super Max-Q, i7-10750H, Samsung PM981a MZVLB1T0HBLR
5581 Points -2%
SCHENKER XMG Core 17 Comet Lake
GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Mobile, i7-10750H, Samsung SSD 970 EVO Plus 1TB
5185 Points -9%
Acer Predator Helios 300 PH317-54-75G8
GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile, i7-10750H, WDC PC SN730 SDBQNTY-1T00
5109 Points -10%
Essentials
Average of class Gaming
  (9057 - 12334, n=167, last 2 years)
10836 Points +18%
SCHENKER XMG Core 17
GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile, i7-9750H, Samsung SSD 970 EVO Plus 500GB
9728 Points +6%
Acer Predator Helios 300 PH317-54-75G8
GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile, i7-10750H, WDC PC SN730 SDBQNTY-1T00
9555 Points +4%
Medion Erazer Beast X10 MD61804
GeForce RTX 2070 Super Max-Q, i7-10750H, Samsung PM981a MZVLB1T0HBLR
9209 Points 0%
SCHENKER XMG Core 17 (Early 2021)
GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, i7-10870H, Samsung SSD 970 EVO Plus 1TB
9182 Points
Average Intel Core i7-10870H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
  ()
9182 Points 0%
SCHENKER XMG Core 17 Comet Lake
GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Mobile, i7-10750H, Samsung SSD 970 EVO Plus 1TB
9096 Points -1%
MSI Alpha 17 A4DEK
Radeon RX 5600M, R7 4800H, Kingston OM8PCP3512F-AB
8873 Points -3%
Productivity
Average of class Gaming
  (6662 - 14612, n=167, last 2 years)
9878 Points +37%
Acer Predator Helios 300 PH317-54-75G8
GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile, i7-10750H, WDC PC SN730 SDBQNTY-1T00
8057 Points +12%
SCHENKER XMG Core 17
GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile, i7-9750H, Samsung SSD 970 EVO Plus 500GB
7735 Points +7%
SCHENKER XMG Core 17 Comet Lake
GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Mobile, i7-10750H, Samsung SSD 970 EVO Plus 1TB
7557 Points +5%
Medion Erazer Beast X10 MD61804
GeForce RTX 2070 Super Max-Q, i7-10750H, Samsung PM981a MZVLB1T0HBLR
7415 Points +3%
MSI Alpha 17 A4DEK
Radeon RX 5600M, R7 4800H, Kingston OM8PCP3512F-AB
7318 Points +1%
SCHENKER XMG Core 17 (Early 2021)
GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, i7-10870H, Samsung SSD 970 EVO Plus 1TB
7217 Points
Average Intel Core i7-10870H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
  ()
7217 Points 0%
Digital Content Creation
Average of class Gaming
  (6703 - 18475, n=167, last 2 years)
12030 Points +60%
MSI Alpha 17 A4DEK
Radeon RX 5600M, R7 4800H, Kingston OM8PCP3512F-AB
8632 Points +15%
SCHENKER XMG Core 17 (Early 2021)
GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, i7-10870H, Samsung SSD 970 EVO Plus 1TB
7526 Points
Average Intel Core i7-10870H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
  ()
7526 Points 0%
Medion Erazer Beast X10 MD61804
GeForce RTX 2070 Super Max-Q, i7-10750H, Samsung PM981a MZVLB1T0HBLR
6912 Points -8%
SCHENKER XMG Core 17
GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile, i7-9750H, Samsung SSD 970 EVO Plus 500GB
6530 Points -13%
SCHENKER XMG Core 17 Comet Lake
GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Mobile, i7-10750H, Samsung SSD 970 EVO Plus 1TB
5504 Points -27%
Acer Predator Helios 300 PH317-54-75G8
GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile, i7-10750H, WDC PC SN730 SDBQNTY-1T00
4702 Points -38%
PCMark 8
Home Score Accelerated v2
Average of class Gaming
  (4560 - 5937, n=20, last 2 years)
5223 Points +28%
SCHENKER XMG Core 17
GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile, i7-9750H, Samsung SSD 970 EVO Plus 500GB
4401 Points +8%
Medion Erazer Beast X10 MD61804
GeForce RTX 2070 Super Max-Q, i7-10750H, Samsung PM981a MZVLB1T0HBLR
4350 Points +7%
Acer Predator Helios 300 PH317-54-75G8
GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile, i7-10750H, WDC PC SN730 SDBQNTY-1T00
4291 Points +5%
SCHENKER XMG Core 17 Comet Lake
GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Mobile, i7-10750H, Samsung SSD 970 EVO Plus 1TB
4136 Points +2%
SCHENKER XMG Core 17 (Early 2021)
GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, i7-10870H, Samsung SSD 970 EVO Plus 1TB
4073 Points
Average Intel Core i7-10870H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
  ()
4073 Points 0%
Work Score Accelerated v2
Average of class Gaming
  (5520 - 6853, n=18, last 2 years)
6102 Points +14%
Acer Predator Helios 300 PH317-54-75G8
GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile, i7-10750H, WDC PC SN730 SDBQNTY-1T00
5817 Points +8%
Medion Erazer Beast X10 MD61804
GeForce RTX 2070 Super Max-Q, i7-10750H, Samsung PM981a MZVLB1T0HBLR
5792 Points +8%
SCHENKER XMG Core 17
GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile, i7-9750H, Samsung SSD 970 EVO Plus 500GB
5697 Points +6%
SCHENKER XMG Core 17 Comet Lake
GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Mobile, i7-10750H, Samsung SSD 970 EVO Plus 1TB
5610 Points +4%
SCHENKER XMG Core 17 (Early 2021)
GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, i7-10870H, Samsung SSD 970 EVO Plus 1TB
5375 Points
Average Intel Core i7-10870H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
  ()
5375 Points 0%

Latências DPC

Em nosso teste padronizado de Monitor de Latência (navegação na web, reprodução de vídeo 4K, Prime95 de alta carga), pudemos observar algum comportamento conspícuo em termos das latências do DPC. Isto significa que o sistema não parece ser adequado para o processamento de vídeo e áudio em tempo real

Monitor de latência
Monitor de latência
Monitor de latência
Monitor de latência
DPC Latencies / LatencyMon - interrupt to process latency (max), Web, Youtube, Prime95
MSI Alpha 17 A4DEK
Radeon RX 5600M, R7 4800H, Kingston OM8PCP3512F-AB
8655 μs * -1065%
SCHENKER XMG Core 17 Comet Lake
GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Mobile, i7-10750H, Samsung SSD 970 EVO Plus 1TB
1000 μs * -35%
Medion Erazer Beast X10 MD61804
GeForce RTX 2070 Super Max-Q, i7-10750H, Samsung PM981a MZVLB1T0HBLR
787 μs * -6%
SCHENKER XMG Core 17 (Early 2021)
GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, i7-10870H, Samsung SSD 970 EVO Plus 1TB
743 μs *
Acer Predator Helios 300 PH317-54-75G8
GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile, i7-10750H, WDC PC SN730 SDBQNTY-1T00
506 μs * +32%

* ... smaller is better

Solução de armazenamento

Um SSD NVMe (M.2-2280) da Samsung serve como a unidade do sistema. Ele oferece 1 TB de armazenamento e oferece boas taxas de transferência. O laptop é capaz de aceitar um total de dois NVMe SSDs, e o RAID-0 é suportado.

O laptop oferece espaço para duas SSDs NVMe.
O laptop oferece espaço para duas SSDs NVMe.
CrystalDiskMark 5.2 / 6
AS SSD
DiskSpd
hddimg
Samsung SSD 970 EVO Plus 1TB
CDM 5/6 Read Seq Q32T1: 3522 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write Seq Q32T1: 3294 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Read 4K Q32T1: 582 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write 4K Q32T1: 511 MB/s
CDM 5 Read Seq: 2837 MB/s
CDM 5 Write Seq: 3036 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Read 4K: 51.3 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write 4K: 145.7 MB/s
SCHENKER XMG Core 17 (Early 2021)
Samsung SSD 970 EVO Plus 1TB		MSI Alpha 17 A4DEK
Kingston OM8PCP3512F-AB		Acer Predator Helios 300 PH317-54-75G8
WDC PC SN730 SDBQNTY-1T00		Medion Erazer Beast X10 MD61804
Samsung PM981a MZVLB1T0HBLR		SCHENKER XMG Core 17
Samsung SSD 970 EVO Plus 500GB		SCHENKER XMG Core 17 Comet Lake
Samsung SSD 970 EVO Plus 1TB
CrystalDiskMark 5.2 / 6
-31%
-12%
-17%
-29%
4%
Write 4K
145.7
204.7
40%
141.9
-3%
151
4%
99.3
-32%
169.5
16%
Read 4K
51.3
50.4
-2%
48.75
-5%
49.29
-4%
38.47
-25%
51.5
0%
Write Seq
3036
985
-68%
2734
-10%
1109
-63%
1449
-52%
3009
-1%
Read Seq
2837
1193
-58%
1921
-32%
1049
-63%
1237
-56%
2959
4%
Write 4K Q32T1
511
537
5%
422.6
-17%
494.4
-3%
364.4
-29%
536
5%
Read 4K Q32T1
582
300
-48%
509
-13%
569
-2%
421.9
-28%
621
7%
Write Seq Q32T1
3294
982
-70%
3055
-7%
3017
-8%
3276
-1%
3339
1%
Read Seq Q32T1
3522
1985
-44%
3257
-8%
3542
1%
3338
-5%
3561
1%
AS SSD
-43%
-11%
-3%
-20%
11%
Seq Read
2876
251.9
-91%
2828
-2%
2470
-14%
2283
-21%
2937
2%
Seq Write
2803
925
-67%
2677
-4%
2473
-12%
2779
-1%
2858
2%
4K Read
55.3
58.2
5%
39.94
-28%
50.2
-9%
29.99
-46%
50.3
-9%
4K Write
106.9
98
-8%
100.9
-6%
124.4
16%
99.1
-7%
130.6
22%
4K-64 Read
1662
461.4
-72%
1562
-6%
1711
3%
1156
-30%
1710
3%
4K-64 Write
2101
924
-56%
1867
-11%
1848
-12%
2333
11%
2355
12%
Access Time Read *
0.067
0.09
-34%
0.039
42%
0.092
-37%
0.037
45%
Access Time Write *
0.037
0.022
41%
0.037
-0%
0.029
22%
0.037
-0%
0.028
24%
Score Read
2005
545
-73%
1885
-6%
2008
0%
1414
-29%
2054
2%
Score Write
2488
1114
-55%
2236
-10%
2220
-11%
2710
9%
2771
11%
Score Total
5520
1994
-64%
5076
-8%
5257
-5%
4871
-12%
5873
6%
Copy ISO MB/s
2029
1870
-8%
1909
-6%
1394
-31%
2225
10%
Copy Program MB/s
691
545
-21%
588
-15%
379.8
-45%
779
13%
Copy Game MB/s
1513
1083
-28%
975
-36%
976
-35%
1590
5%
Total Average (Program / Settings)
-37% / -38%
-12% / -11%
-10% / -8%
-25% / -23%
8% / 8%

* ... smaller is better

Constant Performance Reads: DiskSpd Read Loop, Queue Depth 8

No graph data

Placa Gráfica

OGeForce RTX-3060O núcleo gráfico do laptop representa o atual modelo básico da Nvidia para a GPU high end. A GPU é capaz de usar o rápido armazenamento gráfico GDDR6 (6144 MB). O UHD Graphics-630O núcleo gráfico integrado ao processador está ativo, e o laptop usa a solução de comutação gráfica Optimus da Nvidia. A GPU GeForce pode ser desativada na BIOS.

Os fabricantes de laptops são capazes de configurar o TGP e com isso o máximo desempenho computacional disponível de um núcleo gráfico RTX 3000 de forma bastante livre, desde que se mantenham dentro dos limites definidos pela Nvidia (Visão geral de todos os computadores portáteis RTX 3060 incluindo seus TGPsA Schenker estende esta opção aos usuários, permitindo-lhes ajustar livremente o TGP até o máximo de 130 watts (115 watts + 15 watts de Dynamic Boost).

Entretanto, a uma alta TGP, o aumento de desempenho acaba sendo limitado: Ainda que o perfil "Overboost" (115 watts + 5 watts Dynamic Boost) usa um TGP que é cerca de 26% maior do que o perfil "Enthusiast" (90 watts + 5 watts Dynamic Boost)Os resultados alcançados nos testes são apenas até 10% mais altos. Isto vale tanto para os testes de GPU quanto para os benchmarks de jogos.

Fire Strike
Fire Strike
Fire Strike (Overboost)
Fire Strike (Overboost)
Fire Strike (Overboost, TGP: 130 watts)
Fire Strike (Overboost, TGP: 130 watts)
Fire Strike (funcionamento por bateria)
Fire Strike (funcionamento por bateria)
Fire Strike Ultra
Fire Strike Ultra
Time Spy
Time Spy
Porto Royal
Porto Royal
Fire Strike Ultra (Overboost)
Fire Strike Ultra (Overboost)
Time Spy (Overboost)
Time Spy (Overboost)
Porto Royal (Overboost)
Porto Royal (Overboost)
Fire Strike Ultra (Overboost, TGP: 130 watts)
Fire Strike Ultra (Overboost, TGP: 130 watts)
Time Spy (Overboost, TGP: 130 watts)
Time Spy (Overboost, TGP: 130 watts)
Porto Royal (Overboost, TGP: 130 watts)
Porto Royal (Overboost, TGP: 130 watts)
3DMark 11 Performance
21813 pontos
3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score
41707 pontos
3DMark Fire Strike Score
17355 pontos
3DMark Time Spy Score
7758 pontos
Ajuda
3DMark | 3DMark 11
3DMark
1920x1080 Fire Strike Graphics
Average of class Gaming
  (781 - 53059, n=196, last 2 years)
31245 Points +53%
SCHENKER XMG Core 17 (Early 2021)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-10870H (Overboost, TGP: 130 Watt)
21937 Points +8%
SCHENKER XMG Core 17 (Early 2021)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-10870H (Overboost)
21683 Points +6%
Medion Erazer Beast X10 MD61804
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Super Max-Q, Intel Core i7-10750H
21446 Points +5%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
  (16354 - 23109, n=49)
20436 Points 0%
SCHENKER XMG Core 17 (Early 2021)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-10870H
20381 Points
MSI Alpha 17 A4DEK
AMD Radeon RX 5600M, AMD Ryzen 7 4800H
16498 Points -19%
Acer Predator Helios 300 PH317-54-75G8
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile, Intel Core i7-10750H
16408 Points -19%
SCHENKER XMG Core 17
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile, Intel Core i7-9750H
14537 Points -29%
SCHENKER XMG Core 17 Comet Lake
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Mobile, Intel Core i7-10750H
9818 Points -52%
2560x1440 Time Spy Graphics
Average of class Gaming
  (224 - 22717, n=191, last 2 years)
13034 Points +69%
SCHENKER XMG Core 17 (Early 2021)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-10870H (Overboost, TGP: 130 Watt)
8495 Points +10%
SCHENKER XMG Core 17 (Early 2021)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-10870H (Overboost)
8333 Points +8%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
  (6285 - 9235, n=49)
8057 Points +4%
Medion Erazer Beast X10 MD61804
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Super Max-Q, Intel Core i7-10750H
7837 Points +2%
SCHENKER XMG Core 17 (Early 2021)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-10870H
7716 Points
Acer Predator Helios 300 PH317-54-75G8
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile, Intel Core i7-10750H
6219 Points -19%
MSI Alpha 17 A4DEK
AMD Radeon RX 5600M, AMD Ryzen 7 4800H
5555 Points -28%
SCHENKER XMG Core 17
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile, Intel Core i7-9750H
5464 Points -29%
SCHENKER XMG Core 17 Comet Lake
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Mobile, Intel Core i7-10750H
3554 Points -54%
3DMark 11 - 1280x720 Performance GPU
Average of class Gaming
  (1029 - 72178, n=186, last 2 years)
43521 Points +62%
Medion Erazer Beast X10 MD61804
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Super Max-Q, Intel Core i7-10750H
27153 Points +1%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
  (13799 - 30772, n=43)
26816 Points 0%
SCHENKER XMG Core 17 (Early 2021)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-10870H
26790 Points
MSI Alpha 17 A4DEK
AMD Radeon RX 5600M, AMD Ryzen 7 4800H
22720 Points -15%
Acer Predator Helios 300 PH317-54-75G8
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile, Intel Core i7-10750H
20697 Points -23%
SCHENKER XMG Core 17
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile, Intel Core i7-9750H
19156 Points -28%
SCHENKER XMG Core 17 Comet Lake
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Mobile, Intel Core i7-10750H
13256 Points -51%

Desempenho nos jogos

O hardware é capaz de trazer todos os jogos atuais para a tela com suavidade. Geralmente, pode-se usar a resolução total da tela (2560 x 1440 pixels, WQHD) e configurações de alta a máxima qualidade enquanto se joga. A resolução FHD permitiria um nível máximo de qualidade durante todo o jogo.

Em comparação com todos os computadores portáteis RTX 3060 que testamos até agora, o Core 17 se sai muito bem. Geralmente as diferenças nas taxas de quadros entre os dispositivos não se tornam muito grandes, apesar das diferentes configurações TGP. Como mostram os resultados do Core 17, mesmo um aumento significativo do valor do TGP só levará a um ligeiro aumento nas taxas de quadros

The Witcher 3 | Dota 2 Reborn | X-Plane 11.11 | Final Fantasy XV Benchmark | Strange Brigade | Shadow of the Tomb Raider | Far Cry 5 | GTA V
The Witcher 3 - 1920x1080 Ultra Graphics & Postprocessing (HBAO+)
Average of class Gaming
  (18.4 - 216, n=168, last 2 years)
126.9 fps +60%
Medion Erazer Beast X10 MD61804
Intel Core i7-10750H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Super Max-Q
92.5 fps +16%
SCHENKER XMG Core 15 Ampere
AMD Ryzen 7 4800H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
88.5 (77min - 102max) fps +11%
SCHENKER XMG Core 17 (Early 2021)
Intel Core i7-10870H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU (Overboost)
85.7 (38.8min, 41.6P0.1, 55.9P1 - 178max) fps +8%
Razer Blade 15 Base Edition 2021, i7-10750H RTX 3060
Intel Core i7-10750H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
80.3 (76min - 86max) fps +1%
SCHENKER XMG Core 17 (Early 2021)
Intel Core i7-10870H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
79.5 (30.1min, 37.6P0.1, 42.6P1 - 167max) fps
SCHENKER XMG Core 17 (Early 2021, RTX 3060, 5800H)
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
79.4 (63min) fps 0%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
  (58.2 - 91.5, n=48)
76.9 fps -3%
Acer Aspire Nitro 5 AN515-55-57GF
Intel Core i5-10300H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
72.9 (62min) fps -8%
MSI GF65 Thin 10UE
Intel Core i7-10750H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
68.7 (63min - 74max) fps -14%
Acer Predator Helios 300 PH317-54-75G8
Intel Core i7-10750H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile
68.5 (52min) fps -14%
MSI Alpha 17 A4DEK
AMD Ryzen 7 4800H, AMD Radeon RX 5600M
61 (50min) fps -23%
SCHENKER XMG Core 17
Intel Core i7-9750H, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile
53.3 fps -33%
SCHENKER XMG Core 17 Comet Lake
Intel Core i7-10750H, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Mobile
42.3 fps -47%
Dota 2 Reborn - 1920x1080 ultra (3/3) best looking
Average of class Gaming
  (30.8 - 220, n=190, last 2 years)
149.3 fps +27%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
  (90.7 - 154.8, n=49)
125.9 fps +7%
SCHENKER XMG Core 17 (Early 2021, RTX 3060, 5800H)
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
123 (108.1min) fps +4%
Razer Blade 15 Base Edition 2021, i7-10750H RTX 3060
Intel Core i7-10750H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
121 (104.1min) fps +3%
SCHENKER XMG Core 17 (Early 2021)
Intel Core i7-10870H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
118 (102.7min) fps
Acer Aspire Nitro 5 AN515-55-57GF
Intel Core i5-10300H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
113 (97.5min) fps -4%
SCHENKER XMG Core 17 Comet Lake
Intel Core i7-10750H, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Mobile
112 (99min) fps -5%
SCHENKER XMG Core 17 (Early 2021)
Intel Core i7-10870H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU (Overboost)
111 (97.6min) fps -6%
MSI Alpha 17 A4DEK
AMD Ryzen 7 4800H, AMD Radeon RX 5600M
105 (93.1min) fps -11%
SCHENKER XMG Core 15 Ampere
AMD Ryzen 7 4800H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
105 (93min) fps -11%
MSI GF65 Thin 10UE
Intel Core i7-10750H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
90.7 (76.9min) fps -23%
X-Plane 11.11 - 1920x1080 high (fps_test=3)
Average of class Gaming
  (31.5 - 166.2, n=196, last 2 years)
107.2 fps +56%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
  (61.9 - 109.3, n=48)
82 fps +19%
Razer Blade 15 Base Edition 2021, i7-10750H RTX 3060
Intel Core i7-10750H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
78.9 fps +15%
SCHENKER XMG Core 17 (Early 2021, RTX 3060, 5800H)
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
77.9 fps +13%
SCHENKER XMG Core 17 Comet Lake
Intel Core i7-10750H, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Mobile
75.7 fps +10%
SCHENKER XMG Core 17 (Early 2021)
Intel Core i7-10870H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU (Overboost)
69.3 fps +1%
SCHENKER XMG Core 17 (Early 2021)
Intel Core i7-10870H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
68.7 fps
Acer Aspire Nitro 5 AN515-55-57GF
Intel Core i5-10300H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
66.2 fps -4%
SCHENKER XMG Core 15 Ampere
AMD Ryzen 7 4800H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
64.4 fps -6%
MSI GF65 Thin 10UE
Intel Core i7-10750H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
62.2 fps -9%
MSI Alpha 17 A4DEK
AMD Ryzen 7 4800H, AMD Radeon RX 5600M
33.3 fps -52%
Final Fantasy XV Benchmark
2560x1440 High Quality
Average of class Gaming
  (32.5 - 169.2, n=134, last 2 years)
104 fps +74%
SCHENKER XMG Core 17 (Early 2021)
Intel Core i7-10870H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU (1.3, Overboost, TGP: 130 Watt)
65.4 fps +10%
SCHENKER XMG Core 17 (Early 2021)
Intel Core i7-10870H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU (1.3, Overboost)
64.6 fps +8%
SCHENKER XMG Core 17 (Early 2021)
Intel Core i7-10870H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU (1.3)
59.6 fps
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
  (41.1 - 73.7, n=25)
59.5 fps 0%
MSI GF65 Thin 10UE
Intel Core i7-10750H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU (1.3)
53.6 fps -10%
1920x1080 High Quality
Average of class Gaming
  (19.2 - 201, n=184, last 2 years)
119 fps +49%
SCHENKER XMG Core 17 (Early 2021)
Intel Core i7-10870H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU (1.3, Overboost, TGP: 130 Watt)
87.2 fps +9%
SCHENKER XMG Core 17 (Early 2021)
Intel Core i7-10870H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU (1.3, Overboost)
84.7 fps +6%
Razer Blade 15 Base Edition 2021, i7-10750H RTX 3060
Intel Core i7-10750H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU (1.3)
81.2 fps +2%
SCHENKER XMG Core 17 (Early 2021)
Intel Core i7-10870H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU (1.3)
79.9 fps
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
  (55 - 100.9, n=42)
79.4 fps -1%
Acer Aspire Nitro 5 AN515-55-57GF
Intel Core i5-10300H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU (1.3)
72.5 fps -9%
MSI GF65 Thin 10UE
Intel Core i7-10750H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU (1.3)
70.3 fps -12%
SCHENKER XMG Core 17
Intel Core i7-9750H, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile
57.2 fps -28%
MSI Alpha 17 A4DEK
AMD Ryzen 7 4800H, AMD Radeon RX 5600M
51.1 fps -36%
Strange Brigade
2560x1440 ultra AA:ultra AF:16
Average of class Gaming
  (52.8 - 322, n=123, last 2 years)
189.9 fps +88%
SCHENKER XMG Core 17 (Early 2021)
Intel Core i7-10870H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU (1.47.22.14 D3D12, Overboost)
107 (78.6min, 84.6P1 - 184max) fps +6%
SCHENKER XMG Core 17 (Early 2021)
Intel Core i7-10870H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU (1.47.22.14 D3D12, Overboost, TGP: 130 Watt)
107 (74.1min, 82.9P1 - 201max) fps +6%
SCHENKER XMG Core 17 (Early 2021)
Intel Core i7-10870H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU (1.47.22.14 D3D12)
101 (64.3min, 80.2P1 - 156max) fps
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
  (75.4 - 118.4, n=17)
99.7 fps -1%
1920x1080 ultra AA:ultra AF:16
Average of class Gaming
  (38.9 - 421, n=182, last 2 years)
227 fps +69%
SCHENKER XMG Core 17 (Early 2021)
Intel Core i7-10870H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU (1.47.22.14 D3D12, Overboost, TGP: 130 Watt)
144 (94.8min, 106P1 - 243max) fps +7%
SCHENKER XMG Core 17 (Early 2021)
Intel Core i7-10870H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU (1.47.22.14 D3D12, Overboost)
142 (99.8min, 108P1 - 238max) fps +6%
Razer Blade 15 Base Edition 2021, i7-10750H RTX 3060
Intel Core i7-10750H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU (1.47.22.14 D3D12)
141 (76.6min, 107P1 - 221max) fps +5%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
  (102.2 - 166.3, n=43)
137.6 fps +3%
SCHENKER XMG Core 17 (Early 2021)
Intel Core i7-10870H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU (1.47.22.14 D3D12)
134 (89.3min, 99.7P1 - 237max) fps
Acer Aspire Nitro 5 AN515-55-57GF
Intel Core i5-10300H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU (1.47.22.14 D3D12)
124 (84.1min, 93.4P1 - 196max) fps -7%
MSI GF65 Thin 10UE
Intel Core i7-10750H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU (1.47.22.14 D3D12)
121 (82.8min, 89.6P1 - 197max) fps -10%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider
1920x1080 Highest Preset AA:T
Average of class Gaming
  (27 - 271, n=29, last 2 years)
165.6 fps +74%
SCHENKER XMG Core 17 (Early 2021)
Intel Core i7-10870H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
95 fps
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
  (84 - 95, n=4)
88.8 fps -7%
SCHENKER XMG Core 17 (Early 2021, RTX 3060, 5800H)
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
85 (42min) fps -11%
SCHENKER XMG Core 15 Ampere
AMD Ryzen 7 4800H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
84 fps -12%
Acer Predator Helios 300 PH317-54-75G8
Intel Core i7-10750H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile
79 fps -17%
2560x1440 Highest Preset AA:T
Average of class Gaming
  (60 - 199, n=29, last 2 years)
136 fps +106%
SCHENKER XMG Core 15 Ampere
AMD Ryzen 7 4800H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
71 fps +8%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
  (66 - 71, n=3)
68.3 fps +3%
SCHENKER XMG Core 17 (Early 2021, RTX 3060, 5800H)
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
68 (42min) fps +3%
SCHENKER XMG Core 17 (Early 2021)
Intel Core i7-10870H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
66 fps
Far Cry 5
1920x1080 Ultra Preset AA:T
Average of class Gaming
  (34 - 218, n=103, last 2 years)
130.5 fps +28%
SCHENKER XMG Core 17 (Early 2021)
Intel Core i7-10870H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU (Overboost, TGP: 130 Watt)
106 (84min - 134max) fps +4%
SCHENKER XMG Core 17 (Early 2021)
Intel Core i7-10870H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
102 (80min - 128max) fps
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
  (80 - 120, n=31)
101.6 fps 0%
SCHENKER XMG Core 17 (Early 2021)
Intel Core i7-10870H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU (Overboost)
101 (81min - 126max) fps -1%
SCHENKER XMG Core 15 Ampere
AMD Ryzen 7 4800H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
98 (75min - 124max) fps -4%
MSI GF65 Thin 10UE
Intel Core i7-10750H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
97 (78min - 115max) fps -5%
Acer Aspire Nitro 5 AN515-55-57GF
Intel Core i5-10300H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
91 (65min - 110max) fps -11%
SCHENKER XMG Core 17
Intel Core i7-9750H, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile
83 fps -19%
2560x1440 Ultra Preset AA:T
Average of class Gaming
  (71 - 194, n=82, last 2 years)
118.9 fps +45%
SCHENKER XMG Core 17 (Early 2021)
Intel Core i7-10870H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU (Overboost, TGP: 130 Watt)
86 (74min - 98max) fps +5%
SCHENKER XMG Core 15 Ampere
AMD Ryzen 7 4800H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
84 (71min - 96max) fps +2%
SCHENKER XMG Core 17 (Early 2021)
Intel Core i7-10870H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU (Overboost)
84 (71min - 95max) fps +2%
SCHENKER XMG Core 17 (Early 2021)
Intel Core i7-10870H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
82 (73min - 94max) fps
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
  (58 - 92, n=12)
79.8 fps -3%
GTA V
1920x1080 Highest Settings possible AA:4xMSAA + FX AF:16x
Average of class Gaming
  (12.1 - 167.7, n=171, last 2 years)
113 fps +30%
SCHENKER XMG Core 17 (Early 2021, RTX 3060, 5800H)
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
92.5 (9.14min, 62.5P1 - 184max) fps +6%
SCHENKER XMG Core 17 (Early 2021)
Intel Core i7-10870H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU (Overboost)
91.6 (20.2min, 62.5P1 - 183max) fps +5%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
  (69.2 - 109.8, n=46)
89.7 fps +3%
SCHENKER XMG Core 17 (Early 2021)
Intel Core i7-10870H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU (Overboost, TGP: 130 Watt)
89.4 (19.9min, 58.8P1 - 173max) fps +3%
SCHENKER XMG Core 17 (Early 2021)
Intel Core i7-10870H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
86.9 (19.6min, 58.8P1 - 169max) fps
Razer Blade 15 Base Edition 2021, i7-10750H RTX 3060
Intel Core i7-10750H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
84.5 (4.51min, 55.6P1 - 164max) fps -3%
Acer Aspire Nitro 5 AN515-55-57GF
Intel Core i5-10300H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
74 (5.27min, 47.6P1 - 151max) fps -15%
MSI GF65 Thin 10UE
Intel Core i7-10750H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
69.2 (4.86min, 47.6P1 - 137max) fps -20%
2560x1440 Highest Settings possible AA:4xMSAA + FX AF:16x
Average of class Gaming
  (36.9 - 160.6, n=113, last 2 years)
106.5 fps +43%
SCHENKER XMG Core 17 (Early 2021)
Intel Core i7-10870H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU (Overboost, TGP: 130 Watt)
75.9 (18.2min, 52.6P1 - 142max) fps +2%
SCHENKER XMG Core 17 (Early 2021)
Intel Core i7-10870H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU (Overboost)
75.2 (18.1min, 52.6P1 - 134max) fps +1%
SCHENKER XMG Core 17 (Early 2021)
Intel Core i7-10870H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
74.3 (18.9min, 50P1 - 127max) fps
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
  (52 - 86.5, n=23)
74.3 fps 0%
The Witcher 3 | Dota 2 Reborn | X-Plane 11.11 | Final Fantasy XV Benchmark | Strange Brigade | Shadow of the Tomb Raider | Far Cry 5 | GTA V
Performance Rating | The Witcher 3 | Dota 2 Reborn | X-Plane 11.11 | Final Fantasy XV Benchmark | Strange Brigade | Shadow of the Tomb Raider | Far Cry 5 | GTA V
Performance Rating - Percent
Average of class Gaming
 
100 pt
Medion Erazer Beast X10 MD61804 -12!
Intel Core i7-10750H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Super Max-Q
72.9 pt
Razer Blade 15 Base Edition 2021, i7-10750H RTX 3060 -7!
Intel Core i7-10750H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
70.5 pt
SCHENKER XMG Core 17 (Early 2021) -5!
Intel Core i7-10870H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
70 pt
SCHENKER XMG Core 17 (Early 2021) -2!
Intel Core i7-10870H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
68.9 pt
SCHENKER XMG Core 17 (Early 2021, RTX 3060, 5800H) -7!
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
66.8 pt
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
 
65.9 pt
SCHENKER XMG Core 17 (Early 2021)
Intel Core i7-10870H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
64.8 pt
SCHENKER XMG Core 15 Ampere -6!
AMD Ryzen 7 4800H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
64.1 pt
Acer Aspire Nitro 5 AN515-55-57GF -6!
Intel Core i5-10300H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
63.7 pt
SCHENKER XMG Core 17 Comet Lake -10!
Intel Core i7-10750H, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Mobile
59.7 pt
MSI GF65 Thin 10UE -5!
Intel Core i7-10750H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
59 pt
SCHENKER XMG Core 17 -10!
Intel Core i7-9750H, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile
51.2 pt
Acer Predator Helios 300 PH317-54-75G8 -11!
Intel Core i7-10750H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile
50.8 pt
MSI Alpha 17 A4DEK -9!
AMD Ryzen 7 4800H, AMD Radeon RX 5600M
48.1 pt
The Witcher 3 - 1920x1080 Ultra Graphics & Postprocessing (HBAO+)
Average of class Gaming
  (18.4 - 216, n=168, last 2 years)
126.9 fps +60%
Medion Erazer Beast X10 MD61804
Intel Core i7-10750H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Super Max-Q
92.5 fps +16%
SCHENKER XMG Core 15 Ampere
AMD Ryzen 7 4800H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
88.5 (77min - 102max) fps +11%
SCHENKER XMG Core 17 (Early 2021)
Intel Core i7-10870H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU (Overboost)
85.7 (38.8min, 41.6P0.1, 55.9P1 - 178max) fps +8%
Razer Blade 15 Base Edition 2021, i7-10750H RTX 3060
Intel Core i7-10750H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
80.3 (76min - 86max) fps +1%
SCHENKER XMG Core 17 (Early 2021)
Intel Core i7-10870H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
79.5 (30.1min, 37.6P0.1, 42.6P1 - 167max) fps
SCHENKER XMG Core 17 (Early 2021, RTX 3060, 5800H)
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
79.4 (63min) fps 0%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
  (58.2 - 91.5, n=48)
76.9 fps -3%
Acer Aspire Nitro 5 AN515-55-57GF
Intel Core i5-10300H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
72.9 (62min) fps -8%
MSI GF65 Thin 10UE
Intel Core i7-10750H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
68.7 (63min - 74max) fps -14%
Acer Predator Helios 300 PH317-54-75G8
Intel Core i7-10750H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile
68.5 (52min) fps -14%
MSI Alpha 17 A4DEK
AMD Ryzen 7 4800H, AMD Radeon RX 5600M
61 (50min) fps -23%
SCHENKER XMG Core 17
Intel Core i7-9750H, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile
53.3 fps -33%
SCHENKER XMG Core 17 Comet Lake
Intel Core i7-10750H, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Mobile
42.3 fps -47%
Dota 2 Reborn - 1920x1080 ultra (3/3) best looking
Average of class Gaming
  (30.8 - 220, n=190, last 2 years)
149.3 fps +27%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
  (90.7 - 154.8, n=49)
125.9 fps +7%
SCHENKER XMG Core 17 (Early 2021, RTX 3060, 5800H)
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
123 (108.1min) fps +4%
Razer Blade 15 Base Edition 2021, i7-10750H RTX 3060
Intel Core i7-10750H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
121 (104.1min) fps +3%
SCHENKER XMG Core 17 (Early 2021)
Intel Core i7-10870H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
118 (102.7min) fps
Acer Aspire Nitro 5 AN515-55-57GF
Intel Core i5-10300H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
113 (97.5min) fps -4%
SCHENKER XMG Core 17 Comet Lake
Intel Core i7-10750H, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Mobile
112 (99min) fps -5%
SCHENKER XMG Core 17 (Early 2021)
Intel Core i7-10870H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU (Overboost)
111 (97.6min) fps -6%
MSI Alpha 17 A4DEK
AMD Ryzen 7 4800H, AMD Radeon RX 5600M
105 (93.1min) fps -11%
SCHENKER XMG Core 15 Ampere
AMD Ryzen 7 4800H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
105 (93min) fps -11%
MSI GF65 Thin 10UE
Intel Core i7-10750H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
90.7 (76.9min) fps -23%
X-Plane 11.11 - 1920x1080 high (fps_test=3)
Average of class Gaming
  (31.5 - 166.2, n=196, last 2 years)
107.2 fps +56%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
  (61.9 - 109.3, n=48)
82 fps +19%
Razer Blade 15 Base Edition 2021, i7-10750H RTX 3060
Intel Core i7-10750H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
78.9 fps +15%
SCHENKER XMG Core 17 (Early 2021, RTX 3060, 5800H)
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
77.9 fps +13%
SCHENKER XMG Core 17 Comet Lake
Intel Core i7-10750H, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Mobile
75.7 fps +10%
SCHENKER XMG Core 17 (Early 2021)
Intel Core i7-10870H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU (Overboost)
69.3 fps +1%
SCHENKER XMG Core 17 (Early 2021)
Intel Core i7-10870H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
68.7 fps
Acer Aspire Nitro 5 AN515-55-57GF
Intel Core i5-10300H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
66.2 fps -4%
SCHENKER XMG Core 15 Ampere
AMD Ryzen 7 4800H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
64.4 fps -6%
MSI GF65 Thin 10UE
Intel Core i7-10750H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
62.2 fps -9%
MSI Alpha 17 A4DEK
AMD Ryzen 7 4800H, AMD Radeon RX 5600M
33.3 fps -52%
Final Fantasy XV Benchmark
2560x1440 High Quality
Average of class Gaming
  (32.5 - 169.2, n=134, last 2 years)
104 fps +74%
SCHENKER XMG Core 17 (Early 2021)
Intel Core i7-10870H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU (1.3, Overboost, TGP: 130 Watt)
65.4 fps +10%
SCHENKER XMG Core 17 (Early 2021)
Intel Core i7-10870H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU (1.3, Overboost)
64.6 fps +8%
SCHENKER XMG Core 17 (Early 2021)
Intel Core i7-10870H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU (1.3)
59.6 fps
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
  (41.1 - 73.7, n=25)
59.5 fps 0%
MSI GF65 Thin 10UE
Intel Core i7-10750H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU (1.3)
53.6 fps -10%
1920x1080 High Quality
Average of class Gaming
  (19.2 - 201, n=184, last 2 years)
119 fps +49%
SCHENKER XMG Core 17 (Early 2021)
Intel Core i7-10870H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU (1.3, Overboost, TGP: 130 Watt)
87.2 fps +9%
SCHENKER XMG Core 17 (Early 2021)
Intel Core i7-10870H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU (1.3, Overboost)
84.7 fps +6%
Razer Blade 15 Base Edition 2021, i7-10750H RTX 3060
Intel Core i7-10750H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU (1.3)
81.2 fps +2%
SCHENKER XMG Core 17 (Early 2021)
Intel Core i7-10870H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU (1.3)
79.9 fps
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
  (55 - 100.9, n=42)
79.4 fps -1%
Acer Aspire Nitro 5 AN515-55-57GF
Intel Core i5-10300H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU (1.3)
72.5 fps -9%
MSI GF65 Thin 10UE
Intel Core i7-10750H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU (1.3)
70.3 fps -12%
SCHENKER XMG Core 17
Intel Core i7-9750H, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile
57.2 fps -28%
MSI Alpha 17 A4DEK
AMD Ryzen 7 4800H, AMD Radeon RX 5600M
51.1 fps -36%
Strange Brigade
2560x1440 ultra AA:ultra AF:16
Average of class Gaming
  (52.8 - 322, n=123, last 2 years)
189.9 fps +88%
SCHENKER XMG Core 17 (Early 2021)
Intel Core i7-10870H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU (1.47.22.14 D3D12, Overboost)
107 (78.6min, 84.6P1 - 184max) fps +6%
SCHENKER XMG Core 17 (Early 2021)
Intel Core i7-10870H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU (1.47.22.14 D3D12, Overboost, TGP: 130 Watt)
107 (74.1min, 82.9P1 - 201max) fps +6%
SCHENKER XMG Core 17 (Early 2021)
Intel Core i7-10870H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU (1.47.22.14 D3D12)
101 (64.3min, 80.2P1 - 156max) fps
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
  (75.4 - 118.4, n=17)
99.7 fps -1%
1920x1080 ultra AA:ultra AF:16
Average of class Gaming
  (38.9 - 421, n=182, last 2 years)
227 fps +69%
SCHENKER XMG Core 17 (Early 2021)
Intel Core i7-10870H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU (1.47.22.14 D3D12, Overboost, TGP: 130 Watt)
144 (94.8min, 106P1 - 243max) fps +7%
SCHENKER XMG Core 17 (Early 2021)
Intel Core i7-10870H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU (1.47.22.14 D3D12, Overboost)
142 (99.8min, 108P1 - 238max) fps +6%
Razer Blade 15 Base Edition 2021, i7-10750H RTX 3060
Intel Core i7-10750H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU (1.47.22.14 D3D12)
141 (76.6min, 107P1 - 221max) fps +5%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
  (102.2 - 166.3, n=43)
137.6 fps +3%
SCHENKER XMG Core 17 (Early 2021)
Intel Core i7-10870H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU (1.47.22.14 D3D12)
134 (89.3min, 99.7P1 - 237max) fps
Acer Aspire Nitro 5 AN515-55-57GF
Intel Core i5-10300H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU (1.47.22.14 D3D12)
124 (84.1min, 93.4P1 - 196max) fps -7%
MSI GF65 Thin 10UE
Intel Core i7-10750H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU (1.47.22.14 D3D12)
121 (82.8min, 89.6P1 - 197max) fps -10%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider
1920x1080 Highest Preset AA:T
Average of class Gaming
  (27 - 271, n=29, last 2 years)
165.6 fps +74%
SCHENKER XMG Core 17 (Early 2021)
Intel Core i7-10870H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
95 fps
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
  (84 - 95, n=4)
88.8 fps -7%
SCHENKER XMG Core 17 (Early 2021, RTX 3060, 5800H)
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
85 (42min) fps -11%
SCHENKER XMG Core 15 Ampere
AMD Ryzen 7 4800H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
84 fps -12%
Acer Predator Helios 300 PH317-54-75G8
Intel Core i7-10750H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile
79 fps -17%
2560x1440 Highest Preset AA:T
Average of class Gaming
  (60 - 199, n=29, last 2 years)
136 fps +106%
SCHENKER XMG Core 15 Ampere
AMD Ryzen 7 4800H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
71 fps +8%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
  (66 - 71, n=3)
68.3 fps +3%
SCHENKER XMG Core 17 (Early 2021, RTX 3060, 5800H)
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
68 (42min) fps +3%
SCHENKER XMG Core 17 (Early 2021)
Intel Core i7-10870H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
66 fps
Far Cry 5
1920x1080 Ultra Preset AA:T
Average of class Gaming
  (34 - 218, n=103, last 2 years)
130.5 fps +28%
SCHENKER XMG Core 17 (Early 2021)
Intel Core i7-10870H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU (Overboost, TGP: 130 Watt)
106 (84min - 134max) fps +4%
SCHENKER XMG Core 17 (Early 2021)
Intel Core i7-10870H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
102 (80min - 128max) fps
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
  (80 - 120, n=31)
101.6 fps 0%
SCHENKER XMG Core 17 (Early 2021)
Intel Core i7-10870H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU (Overboost)
101 (81min - 126max) fps -1%
SCHENKER XMG Core 15 Ampere
AMD Ryzen 7 4800H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
98 (75min - 124max) fps -4%
MSI GF65 Thin 10UE
Intel Core i7-10750H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
97 (78min - 115max) fps -5%
Acer Aspire Nitro 5 AN515-55-57GF
Intel Core i5-10300H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
91 (65min - 110max) fps -11%
SCHENKER XMG Core 17
Intel Core i7-9750H, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile
83 fps -19%
2560x1440 Ultra Preset AA:T
Average of class Gaming
  (71 - 194, n=82, last 2 years)
118.9 fps +45%
SCHENKER XMG Core 17 (Early 2021)
Intel Core i7-10870H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU (Overboost, TGP: 130 Watt)
86 (74min - 98max) fps +5%
SCHENKER XMG Core 15 Ampere
AMD Ryzen 7 4800H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
84 (71min - 96max) fps +2%
SCHENKER XMG Core 17 (Early 2021)
Intel Core i7-10870H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU (Overboost)
84 (71min - 95max) fps +2%
SCHENKER XMG Core 17 (Early 2021)
Intel Core i7-10870H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
82 (73min - 94max) fps
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
  (58 - 92, n=12)
79.8 fps -3%
GTA V
1920x1080 Highest Settings possible AA:4xMSAA + FX AF:16x
Average of class Gaming
  (12.1 - 167.7, n=171, last 2 years)
113 fps +30%
SCHENKER XMG Core 17 (Early 2021, RTX 3060, 5800H)
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
92.5 (9.14min, 62.5P1 - 184max) fps +6%
SCHENKER XMG Core 17 (Early 2021)
Intel Core i7-10870H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU (Overboost)
91.6 (20.2min, 62.5P1 - 183max) fps +5%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
  (69.2 - 109.8, n=46)
89.7 fps +3%
SCHENKER XMG Core 17 (Early 2021)
Intel Core i7-10870H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU (Overboost, TGP: 130 Watt)
89.4 (19.9min, 58.8P1 - 173max) fps +3%
SCHENKER XMG Core 17 (Early 2021)
Intel Core i7-10870H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
86.9 (19.6min, 58.8P1 - 169max) fps
Razer Blade 15 Base Edition 2021, i7-10750H RTX 3060
Intel Core i7-10750H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
84.5 (4.51min, 55.6P1 - 164max) fps -3%
Acer Aspire Nitro 5 AN515-55-57GF
Intel Core i5-10300H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
74 (5.27min, 47.6P1 - 151max) fps -15%
MSI GF65 Thin 10UE
Intel Core i7-10750H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
69.2 (4.86min, 47.6P1 - 137max) fps -20%
2560x1440 Highest Settings possible AA:4xMSAA + FX AF:16x
Average of class Gaming
  (36.9 - 160.6, n=113, last 2 years)
106.5 fps +43%
SCHENKER XMG Core 17 (Early 2021)
Intel Core i7-10870H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU (Overboost, TGP: 130 Watt)
75.9 (18.2min, 52.6P1 - 142max) fps +2%
SCHENKER XMG Core 17 (Early 2021)
Intel Core i7-10870H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU (Overboost)
75.2 (18.1min, 52.6P1 - 134max) fps +1%
SCHENKER XMG Core 17 (Early 2021)
Intel Core i7-10870H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
74.3 (18.9min, 50P1 - 127max) fps
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
  (52 - 86.5, n=23)
74.3 fps 0%
Performance Rating | The Witcher 3 | Dota 2 Reborn | X-Plane 11.11 | Final Fantasy XV Benchmark | Strange Brigade | Shadow of the Tomb Raider | Far Cry 5 | GTA V

A fim de avaliar se as taxas de quadros também permanecem em sua maioria constantes durante um período de tempo mais longo, executamos o jogo"The Witcher 3" por cerca de 60 minutos com resolução Full HD e configurações de qualidade máxima, sem mover o personagem do jogo. Não notamos nenhuma queda nas taxas de quadros.

05101520253035404550556065707580859095100Tooltip
SCHENKER XMG Core 17 (Early 2021) GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, i7-10870H, Samsung SSD 970 EVO Plus 1TB: Ø88.8 (83-97)
SCHENKER XMG Core 17 (Early 2021) GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, i7-10870H; Overboost: Ø98.5 (92-105)
MSI Alpha 17 A4DEK Radeon RX 5600M, R7 4800H, Kingston OM8PCP3512F-AB: Ø60.3 (57-67)
Acer Predator Helios 300 PH317-54-75G8 GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile, i7-10750H, WDC PC SN730 SDBQNTY-1T00: Ø68.8 (62-74)
Medion Erazer Beast X10 MD61804 GeForce RTX 2070 Super Max-Q, i7-10750H, Samsung PM981a MZVLB1T0HBLR: Ø86 (78-91)
SCHENKER XMG Core 17 GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile, i7-9750H, Samsung SSD 970 EVO Plus 500GB: Ø54.5 (52-58)
SCHENKER XMG Core 17 Comet Lake GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Mobile, i7-10750H, Samsung SSD 970 EVO Plus 1TB: Ø41.3 (36-45)
Medidas da GPU durante o teste Witcher 3
Medidas da GPU durante o teste Witcher 3
Medidas de GPU durante o teste Witcher 3 (Overboost)
Medidas de GPU durante o teste Witcher 3 (Overboost)
baixomédiaaltoultraQHD
GTA V (2015) 179 172 150 86.9 74.3
The Witcher 3 (2015) 302 229 144 79.5
Dota 2 Reborn (2015) 146 136 124 118
Final Fantasy XV Benchmark (2018) 141 105 79.9 59.6
X-Plane 11.11 (2018) 89.5 81.7 68.7
Far Cry 5 (2018) 145 113 108 102 82
Strange Brigade (2018) 345 191 154 134 101
Shadow of the Tomb Raider (2018) 113 106 102 95 66
Watch Dogs Legion (2020) 82.1 77 70.7 50.8 33.9
Dirt 5 (2020) 140 102 89.1 71.5 56.1
Yakuza Like a Dragon (2020) 127 106 105 92.2 61.8
Outriders (2021) 122 103 98.9 90.1 65.1
Resident Evil Village (2021) 160 140 136 121 81.6
Mass Effect Legendary Edition (2021) 109 92.9 91.9
Days Gone (2021) 173 121 107 81.1 58.9

Emissões - O computador Schenker pode produzir muito ruído

Emissões sonoras

Durante a operação ociosa e sob cargas baixas, o desenvolvimento do ruído permanece dentro dos limites. Os ventiladores então geralmente funcionam a baixas velocidades. Sob carga, eles irão se recuperar, e registramos um nível máximo de ruído de 54 dB(A) (teste de estresse) e 51 dB(A) (" Witcher 3teste "), o que torna o uso de um fone de ouvido quase um requisito

Barulho

Ocioso
30 / 32 / 36 dB
Carga
53 / 54 dB
  red to green bar
 
 
30 dB
silencioso
40 dB(A)
audível
50 dB(A)
ruidosamente alto
  
min: dark, med: mid, max: light   Earthworks M23R, Arta (15 cm de distância)   environment noise: 25 dB(A)
dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2039.538.137.638.738.237.32534.636.933.437.537.833.53146.84245.343.844.841.64030.928.530.728.828.731.1502932.13232.734.433.66343.634.932.629.126.742.28031.530.526.927.825.932.210027.323.424.223.723.328.312530.228.928.627.828.332.616032.127.629.828.825.632.920032.826.826.626.121.13325035.42730.831.121.437.131537.226.524.921.517.738.940038.326.824.620.313.838.550038.725.822.720.513.93963040.526.123.32114.840.880040.524.920.518.11142100042.725.821.619.111.443.6125043.926.32218.410.644.7160042.623.92018.510.943.8200042.725.621.318.511.443.9250042.624.818.31811.643.631504221.417.617.312.442.740004217.715.214.213.242.8500038.614.713.613.612.839.9630031.913.513.313.112.934.5800027.113.71413.71329.91000025.513.513.413.312.727.11250021.11414.313.512.523.21600019.513.914.91311.922.6SPL5335.632.430.725.554N8.62.21.71.50.79.2median 38.3median 24.9median 21.3median 18.5median 12.9median 38.9Delta74.84.94.83.46.7hearing rangehide median Fan NoiseSCHENKER XMG Core 17 (Early 2021)
SCHENKER XMG Core 17 (Early 2021)
i7-10870H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU		MSI Alpha 17 A4DEK
R7 4800H, Radeon RX 5600M		Acer Predator Helios 300 PH317-54-75G8
i7-10750H, GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile		Medion Erazer Beast X10 MD61804
i7-10750H, GeForce RTX 2070 Super Max-Q		SCHENKER XMG Core 17
i7-9750H, GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile		SCHENKER XMG Core 17 Comet Lake
i7-10750H, GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Mobile		Average of class Gaming
 
Noise
6%
6%
3%
1%
9%
12%
off / environment *
25
25
-0%
24
4%
25
-0%
30
-20%
25
-0%
24 ?(19.5 - 27.9, n=157, last 2 years)
4%
Idle Minimum *
30
31
-3%
25
17%
26
13%
30
-0%
25
17%
25.5 ?(22.8 - 35, n=158, last 2 years)
15%
Idle Average *
32
32
-0%
30
6%
29
9%
32
-0%
31
3%
27.2 ?(23 - 37.5, n=158, last 2 years)
15%
Idle Maximum *
36
33
8%
37
-3%
35
3%
35
3%
32
11%
30.2 ?(23 - 47, n=158, last 2 years)
16%
Load Average *
53
38
28%
48
9%
52
2%
47
11%
48
9%
42.5 ?(25.2 - 62.9, n=158, last 2 years)
20%
Witcher 3 ultra *
51
46
10%
50
2%
53
-4%
48
6%
44
14%
Load Maximum *
54
54
-0%
52
4%
55
-2%
51
6%
51
6%
53.4 ?(43 - 67.5, n=158, last 2 years)
1%

* ... smaller is better

Temperaturas

A CPU e a GPU passam por nosso teste de estresse (Prime95 e Furmark funcionando por pelo menos uma hora) a 3,2 GHz e 1327 MHz, respectivamente. O teste de estresse representa um cenário extremo, e usamos este teste para avaliar se o sistema também permanece estável sob carga total

O Witcher 3
O Witcher 3
O Witcher 3
O Witcher 3
O Witcher 3
O Witcher 3
Teste de estresse
Teste de estresse
Teste de estresse
Teste de estresse
Teste de estresse
Teste de estresse

Considerando o hardware dentro do laptop, ele não esquenta muito durante o teste de estresse. O desenvolvimento do calor se torna minimamente maior quando executamos nosso teste"The Witcher 3". Em ambos os casos, você não deve executar o laptop no seu colo.

Carga Máxima
 44 °C40 °C40 °C 
 39 °C39 °C38 °C 
 29 °C31 °C30 °C 
Máximo: 44 °C
Médio: 36.7 °C
43 °C49 °C50 °C
41 °C42 °C40 °C
30 °C30 °C25 °C
Máximo: 50 °C
Médio: 38.9 °C
alimentação elétrica  52 °C | Temperatura do quarto 22 °C | Fluke t3000FC (calibrated), Voltcraft IR-900
(±) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 36.7 °C / 98 F, compared to the average of 33.9 °C / 93 F for the devices in the class Gaming.
(±) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 44 °C / 111 F, compared to the average of 40.5 °C / 105 F, ranging from 21.2 to 68.8 °C for the class Gaming.
(-) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 50 °C / 122 F, compared to the average of 43.2 °C / 110 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 28.9 °C / 84 F, compared to the device average of 33.9 °C / 93 F.
(±) Playing The Witcher 3, the average temperature for the upper side is 37.3 °C / 99 F, compared to the device average of 33.9 °C / 93 F.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are reaching skin temperature as a maximum (32 °C / 89.6 F) and are therefore not hot.
(-) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.9 °C / 84 F (-3.1 °C / -5.6 F).
SCHENKER XMG Core 17 (Early 2021)
i7-10870H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU		MSI Alpha 17 A4DEK
R7 4800H, Radeon RX 5600M		Acer Predator Helios 300 PH317-54-75G8
i7-10750H, GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile		Medion Erazer Beast X10 MD61804
i7-10750H, GeForce RTX 2070 Super Max-Q		SCHENKER XMG Core 17
i7-9750H, GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile		SCHENKER XMG Core 17 Comet Lake
i7-10750H, GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Mobile		Average of class Gaming
 
Heat
16%
-6%
-4%
-2%
7%
1%
Maximum Upper Side *
44
44
-0%
53
-20%
51
-16%
47
-7%
45
-2%
46.1 ?(28.2 - 60, n=156, last 2 years)
-5%
Maximum Bottom *
50
43
14%
59
-18%
56
-12%
50
-0%
48
4%
49.2 ?(33.6 - 66, n=156, last 2 years)
2%
Idle Upper Side *
30
25
17%
29
3%
31
-3%
34
-13%
27
10%
31.2 ?(22.4 - 42.8, n=156, last 2 years)
-4%
Idle Bottom *
36
24
33%
32
11%
30
17%
32
11%
30
17%
32.2 ?(22.6 - 43.6, n=156, last 2 years)
11%

* ... smaller is better

Oradores

dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2038.239.62537.836.53144.842.94028.730.15034.433.76326.735.28025.93110023.325.212528.33016025.630.620021.139.925021.454.431517.761.340013.86850013.971.863014.872.48001168.9100011.467.7125010.666.1160010.969.2200011.472.5250011.668.6315012.467400013.272.3500012.867.3630012.958.980001371.71000012.772.91250012.564.61600011.968.9SPL25.581.7N0.754median 12.9median 67.7Delta3.47.6hearing rangehide median Pink NoiseSCHENKER XMG Core 17 (Early 2021)
Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)
SCHENKER XMG Core 17 (Early 2021) audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (82 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 27.5% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (12.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2.3% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3.5% away from median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (9.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (17.5% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 46% of all tested devices in this class were better, 12% similar, 42% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 18%, worst was 132%
Compared to all devices tested
» 30% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 62% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Gerenciamento de energia - O Core 17 proporciona uma vida útil aceitável da bateria

Consumo de energia

Não há nada que se destaque em termos de consumo de energia. Em toda a gama de cargas, os valores permanecem em um nível normal para o hardware utilizado aqui. O fornecimento de energia é avaliado em 180 watts

Consumo de energia
desligadodarklight 0.4 / 1.8 Watt
Ociosodarkmidlight 13 / 16 / 29 Watt
Carga midlight 100 / 213 Watt
 color bar
Key: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
SCHENKER XMG Core 17 (Early 2021)
i7-10870H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU		MSI Alpha 17 A4DEK
R7 4800H, Radeon RX 5600M		Acer Predator Helios 300 PH317-54-75G8
i7-10750H, GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile		Medion Erazer Beast X10 MD61804
i7-10750H, GeForce RTX 2070 Super Max-Q		SCHENKER XMG Core 17
i7-9750H, GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile		SCHENKER XMG Core 17 Comet Lake
i7-10750H, GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Mobile		Average of class Gaming
 
Power Consumption
23%
25%
-23%
21%
16%
-8%
Idle Minimum *
13
9
31%
6
54%
19
-46%
10
23%
12
8%
13.5 ?(2 - 39, n=157, last 2 years)
-4%
Idle Average *
16
12
25%
11
31%
22
-38%
13
19%
15
6%
18.9 ?(8 - 55.6, n=157, last 2 years)
-18%
Idle Maximum *
29
18
38%
19
34%
30
-3%
21
28%
24
17%
26.7 ?(9 - 101.1, n=157, last 2 years)
8%
Load Average *
100
76
24%
96
4%
118
-18%
89
11%
105
-5%
106.6 ?(32.1 - 201, n=155, last 2 years)
-7%
Witcher 3 ultra *
173
136
21%
144
17%
176
-2%
128
26%
93
46%
Load Maximum *
213
222
-4%
197
8%
274
-29%
177
17%
168
21%
249 ?(55.3 - 418, n=157, last 2 years)
-17%

* ... smaller is better

0102030405060708090100110120130140150160170Tooltip
SCHENKER XMG Core 17 (Early 2021) GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, i7-10870H, Samsung SSD 970 EVO Plus 1TB; Cinebench R15 Multi (external Monitor): Ø98.6 (97.9-99.4)
SCHENKER XMG Core 17 (Early 2021) GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, i7-10870H, Samsung SSD 970 EVO Plus 1TB; Prime95 V2810 Stress (external Monitor): Ø98.4 (96.3-101)
SCHENKER XMG Core 17 (Early 2021) GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, i7-10870H, Samsung SSD 970 EVO Plus 1TB; 1280x720 FurMark 1.19 GPU Stress Test (external Monitor): Ø168.5 (163-172)
SCHENKER XMG Core 17 (Early 2021) GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, i7-10870H, Samsung SSD 970 EVO Plus 1TB; 1920x1080 The Witcher 3 ultra (external Monitor): Ø169.8 (161-178)

Vida útil da bateria

No teste WLAN (carregamento de sites via roteiro) e no teste de vídeo (curta-metragem Big Buck Bunny running in a loop; codificação H.264, FHD), o Core 17 dura 4:53 horas e 4:43 horas, respectivamente. Durante ambos os testes, as funções de economia de energia do laptop são desativadas, e o brilho da tela é reduzido para cerca de 150 cd/m². Durante a execução do teste de vídeo, os módulos de comunicação também foram desligados

A bateria tem uma capacidade de 62-Wh.
A bateria tem uma capacidade de 62-Wh.
Tempo de Execução da Bateria
Ocioso (sem WLAN, min brilho)
7h 42min
WiFi Websurfing (Edge 90)
4h 53min
Big Buck Bunny H.264 1080p
4h 43min
Carga (máximo brilho)
1h 20min
SCHENKER XMG Core 17 (Early 2021)
i7-10870H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, 62 Wh		MSI Alpha 17 A4DEK
R7 4800H, Radeon RX 5600M, 65 Wh		Acer Predator Helios 300 PH317-54-75G8
i7-10750H, GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile, 59 Wh		Medion Erazer Beast X10 MD61804
i7-10750H, GeForce RTX 2070 Super Max-Q, 91.2 Wh		SCHENKER XMG Core 17
i7-9750H, GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile, 46.74 Wh		SCHENKER XMG Core 17 Comet Lake
i7-10750H, GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Mobile, 62.3 Wh		Average of class Gaming
 
Battery Runtime
33%
26%
54%
3%
4%
25%
Reader / Idle
462
629
36%
493
7%
684
48%
486
5%
565 ?(155 - 1290, n=69, last 2 years)
22%
H.264
283
353
25%
509
80%
316
12%
408 ?(129 - 837, n=80, last 2 years)
44%
WiFi v1.3
293
438
49%
306
4%
410
40%
279
-5%
306
4%
376 ?(85 - 889, n=157, last 2 years)
28%
Load
80
91
14%
133
66%
117
46%
80
0%
85.3 ?(41 - 173, n=121, last 2 years)
7%

Pro

+ Display 165-Hz
+ alto desempenho do sistema
+ NMVe SSD
+ 2 ranhuras M.2-2280
+ Iluminação RGB
+ excelentes taxas de transferência WLAN
+ o Centro de Controle oferece muitas opções de desempenho

Contra

- sem Thunderbolt
- leitor de cartões de armazenamento lento
- alto sob carga

Veredicto

O Schenker XMG Core 17 (início de 2021), fornecido pela Schenker.
O Schenker XMG Core 17 (início de 2021), fornecido pela Schenker.

A CPUCore i7-10870H(maxPL1/2: 120 watts) eGeForce RTX-3060 GPU para laptop (maxTGP:130 watts) trazem todos os jogos atuais para a tela com suavidade. Você não terá que se preocupar com oestrangulamento, e a CPU e a GPU são sempre capazes de manter seu desempenho constante.

Com o XMG Core 17 (Início de 2021), a Schenker fornece um computador portátil para jogos de médio alcance bem arredondado.

Enquanto o controle automático do ventilador torna o laptop muito barulhento sob carga, você pode fazer alguns ajustes aqui, e o Centro de Controle oferece controle manual das curvas do ventilador. Particularmente durante os jogos ("O Witcher 3 teste "), ainda há algum potencial de otimização em comparação com outros laptops RTX 3060.

A tela (WQHD, IPS, 165 Hz) oferece um bom valor de brilho, ângulos de visão estáveis, tempos de resposta curtos, uma boa reprodução de cores e uma cobertura de espaço de cores muito decente. Entretanto, o contraste poderia ser maior e a vida útil da bateria também não é muito inspiradora para ninguém.

Observe que algumas das avaliações das categorias únicas são diferentes das do Core 17 a partir de 2019, uma vez que atualizamos o sistema de avaliação. Isto significa que as avaliações de ambos os modelos do Core 17 não são comparáveis.

Preço e Disponibilidade

O Schenker XMG Core 17 (Início de 2021) pode ser configurado individualmente no site Schenker (Bestware) loja online a partir de cerca de 1450 Euros (~$1773). A configuração do equipamento fornecido para testes está disponível por cerca de 1840 Euros (~$2250)

SCHENKER XMG Core 17 (Early 2021) - 05/31/2021 v7 (old)
Sascha Mölck

Acabamento
79 / 98 → 80%
Teclado
83%
Mouse
81%
Conectividade
63 / 80 → 78%
Peso
60 / 10-66 → 88%
Bateria
61 / 95 → 64%
Pantalha
88%
Desempenho do jogos
95%
Desempenho da aplicação
92%
Temperatura
86 / 95 → 90%
Ruído
61 / 90 → 67%
Audio
74%
Camera
38 / 85 → 45%
Médio
74%
84%
Gaming - Médio equilibrado

More articles related to this device

SCHENKER XMG Core 17 (Early 2021) (XMG Core 17 Serie)
Notícias
•
O Schenker XMG Core 17 (início...
|
Notícias
•
O Schenker XMG Core 17 (2020) ...
|
Análise
•
Schenker XMG Core 17 (Tongfang...
|
Análise
•
Breve Análise do Portátil Sche...

Price comparison

Please share our article, every link counts!
Mail Logo
> Análises e revisões de portáteis e celulares > Análises > Análises > Revisão Schenker XMG Core 17 (Tongfang GM7MG0R): Laptop de jogo configurável com tela WQHD
Sascha Mölck, 2021-06- 1 (Update: 2024-11- 4)