Notebookcheck Logo

Crosscall Stellar Serie

Crosscall Stellar-M6Processador: unknown, Qualcomm Snapdragon SD 6 Gen 1
Adaptador Gráfico: unknown, Qualcomm Adreno 710
Ecrã: 6.10 polegadas, 6.58 polegadas
Peso: 0.2266kg, 0.249kg
Pontuação Média: 60% - pobre
Média de 1 pontos (das 4 análises)
desempenho: 60%, pantalha: 40%, mobilidade: 60%, processamento: 80%, ergonomia: 80%

 

Crosscall Stellar-X5

Especificações do Portátil

Crosscall Stellar-X5Portátil: Crosscall Stellar-X5
Processador: Qualcomm Snapdragon SD 6 Gen 1
Adaptador Gráfico: Qualcomm Adreno 710
Ecrã: 6.58 polegadas, 20:9, 2408 x 1080 píxeles
Peso: 0.249kg
Links: Crosscall página inicial

Price comparison

 

Análises na língua extrangeira

Crosscall Stellar-X5 Battery test
Origem: DxOMark Inglês EN→PT
The Crosscall Stellar-X5 showed an average overall battery performance with good autonomy, and decent efficiency, but a poor charging experience. When used moderately, the Stellar-X5 managed to last more than two and a half days, which is above average in our database. The Stellar-X5 performed well during our typical usage scenario, but it struggled during our tests when settings such as screen brightness were calibrated. The Stellar-X5’s charging experience was quite slow, with the 20W charger never delivering above 18W. Using a wired charger, the device took more than 3 hours to reach a full charge. A quick 5-minute battery top-up recovered on average a bit more than 2 hours and 30 minutes of autonomy.
Análise única, Disponível online, Longa, Data: 09/17/2024
Crosscall Stellar-X5 Camera test
Origem: DxOMark Inglês EN→PT
The Crosscall Stellar-X5 is the French brand’s entry into the Ultra-premium realm, with a sleeker look and feel as well as better camera specifications than prior models in an aim to bridge the gap between the rugged work phone and the personal phone. The higher-resolution sensor and a better chipset than the previously tested Action-X5 indeed resulted in significant improvements in all aspects of our image quality evaluation. The Stellar-X5’s camera score also improved considerably thanks to images that were consistently well exposed and that showed an extended dynamic range. In addition, the camera has an efficient zero shutter lag capability in most tested conditions, meaning the user is likely to capture the intended moment, particularly fast-action scenarios like sports.
Análise única, Disponível online, Longa, Data: 06/11/2024
Crosscall Stellar-X5 Display test
Origem: DxOMark Inglês EN→PT
The Crosscall Stellar-X5’s screen provided a very uneven performance in our Display protocol, with a screen experience that was affected by a pinkish cast in all conditions. Although the Stellar-X5’s display luminance and contrast levels were able to match most ultra-premium phones in indoor conditions, the device’s display was still difficult to read, especially in bright outdoor environments. In complete darkness, the screen’s luminance remained much too bright to offer a comfortable viewing experience. Watching HDR10 video was also a mixed experience. Although there were no frame drops, it was sometimes hard to make out the dark tones in the video content due to the lack of brightness.
Análise única, Disponível online, Longa, Data: 06/04/2024

 

Crosscall Stellar-M6

Especificações do Portátil

Crosscall Stellar-M6Portátil: Crosscall Stellar-M6
Processador: unknown
Adaptador Gráfico: unknown
Ecrã: 6.10 polegadas, 19.5:9, 1560 x 720 píxeles
Peso: 0.2266kg
Links: Crosscall página inicial

Price comparison

Pontuação Média: 60% - pobre

Média de 1 pontos (das 1 análises)

 

Análises na língua extrangeira

60% Crosscall Stellar-M6
Origem: Les Numeriques Francês FR→PT
Análise única, Disponível online, Longa, Data: 12/14/2024
Pontuação: Pontuação total: 60% desempenho: 60% pantalha: 40% mobilidade: 60% processamento: 80% ergonomia: 80%

 

Comentario

Crosscall:


Alguns jogos atuais não tão exigentes podem ser jogados fluentemente com poucos detalhes.

Qualcomm Adreno 710:

Muitos jogos são dificilmente executados com estes adaptadores gráficos ou se executam muito lentamente.

unknown:


>> Mais informação pode ser encontrada na nossa Comparativa de de Placas de Vídeo e a Benchmark Lista.


Qualcomm Snapdragon:

SD 6 Gen 1: SoC de médio porte com 8 núcleos Kryo (4x ARM Cortex A78 cluster de desempenho de 2,2 GHz, 4x ARM Cortex A55 com cluster de eficiência de 1,8) e um modem X62 5G (até 2900 Mbps de download). O chip é fabricado usando o moderno processo de 4nm.

:


>> Mais informação pode ser encontrada na nossa Comparativa de Processadores Móveis.



>> Para saber quão fina é uma tela, veja nossa lista DPI.


No weight comment found (one expected)!


60%: Uma avaliação tão ruim é rara. Dificilmente existem portáteis, que sejam avaliados pior.

>> Mais informação pode ser encontrada na nossa Laptop Guia da Compra.

Please share our article, every link counts!
Mail Logo

Portáteis de um fabricante diferente e com CPU diferente

Blackview BV8200
unknown, unknown
Vivo X200 Mini
unknown, unknown
Vivo X200 Pro Mini
unknown, unknown

Portáteis com o mesmo GPU

Huawei Mate 70 RS Ultimate
unknown, unknown, 6.90", 0.251 kg
Huawei Mate X6
unknown, unknown, 7.93", 0.239 kg
Realme C75
unknown, unknown, 6.72", 0.196 kg
Xiaomi Redmi A4
unknown, unknown, 6.88", 0.2124 kg
Huawei Mate 70 Pro+
unknown, unknown, 6.90", 0.226 kg
Huawei Mate 70 Pro
unknown, unknown, 6.90", 0.221 kg
Huawei Mate 70
unknown, unknown, 6.70", 0.203 kg
Huawei Nova 13 Pro
unknown, unknown, 6.76", 0.209 kg
Huawei Nova 13
unknown, unknown, 6.70", 0.195 kg
Blackview Shark 9
unknown, unknown, 6.67", 0.2 kg
Blackview BV7300
unknown, unknown, 6.67", 0.528 kg
Cubot KingKong Power 3
unknown, unknown, 6.72", 0.425 kg
HMD Barbie Phone
unknown, T107, 2.80", 0.1235 kg
Huawei Nova Flip
unknown, unknown, 6.94", 0.195 kg
Comparação de preços
Stefan Hinum (Update: 2025-01- 5)