Crosscall Stellar-X5
Especificações do Portátil
Secondary Camera: 16 MPix
Price comparison
Análises para o Crosscall Stellar-X5
Origem: DxOMark
EN→PTThe Crosscall Stellar-X5 showed an average overall battery performance with good autonomy, and decent efficiency, but a poor charging experience. When used moderately, the Stellar-X5 managed to last more than two and a half days, which is above average in our database. The Stellar-X5 performed well during our typical usage scenario, but it struggled during our tests when settings such as screen brightness were calibrated. The Stellar-X5’s charging experience was quite slow, with the 20W charger never delivering above 18W. Using a wired charger, the device took more than 3 hours to reach a full charge. A quick 5-minute battery top-up recovered on average a bit more than 2 hours and 30 minutes of autonomy.
Análise única, Disponível online, Longa, Data: 09/17/2024
Origem: DxOMark
EN→PTThe Crosscall Stellar-X5 is the French brand’s entry into the Ultra-premium realm, with a sleeker look and feel as well as better camera specifications than prior models in an aim to bridge the gap between the rugged work phone and the personal phone. The higher-resolution sensor and a better chipset than the previously tested Action-X5 indeed resulted in significant improvements in all aspects of our image quality evaluation. The Stellar-X5’s camera score also improved considerably thanks to images that were consistently well exposed and that showed an extended dynamic range. In addition, the camera has an efficient zero shutter lag capability in most tested conditions, meaning the user is likely to capture the intended moment, particularly fast-action scenarios like sports.
Análise única, Disponível online, Longa, Data: 06/11/2024
Origem: DxOMark
EN→PTThe Crosscall Stellar-X5’s screen provided a very uneven performance in our Display protocol, with a screen experience that was affected by a pinkish cast in all conditions. Although the Stellar-X5’s display luminance and contrast levels were able to match most ultra-premium phones in indoor conditions, the device’s display was still difficult to read, especially in bright outdoor environments. In complete darkness, the screen’s luminance remained much too bright to offer a comfortable viewing experience. Watching HDR10 video was also a mixed experience. Although there were no frame drops, it was sometimes hard to make out the dark tones in the video content due to the lack of brightness.
Análise única, Disponível online, Longa, Data: 06/04/2024
Comentario
Qualcomm Adreno 710:
Alguns jogos atuais não tão exigentes podem ser jogados fluentemente com poucos detalhes.
>> Mais informação pode ser encontrada na nossa Comparativa de de Placas de Vídeo e a Benchmark Lista.
SD 6 Gen 1: SoC de médio porte com 8 núcleos Kryo (4x ARM Cortex A78 cluster de desempenho de 2,2 GHz, 4x ARM Cortex A55 com cluster de eficiência de 1,8) e um modem X62 5G (até 2900 Mbps de download). O chip é fabricado usando o moderno processo de 4nm.
>> Mais informação pode ser encontrada na nossa Comparativa de Processadores Móveis.
6.58": Apenas alguns smartphones têm telas maiores.
Grandes tamanhos de tela permitem maiores resoluções. Portanto, detalhes como letras são maiores. Por outro lado, o consumo de energia é menor com diagonais de tela menores e os aparelhos são menores, mais leves e mais econômicos.
>> Para saber quão fina é uma tela, veja nossa lista DPI.
>> Mais informação pode ser encontrada na nossa Laptop Guia da Compra.
