Breve Análise do Smartphone Realme X50 Pro - Campeão do preço-desempenho?

Name: Realme X50 Pro
Brand: Realme

Picos e vales.

O X50 Pro brilha com um ótimo design da carcaça e boas especificações. No entanto, o smartphone carro-chefe da Realme carece de alguns recursos premium em comparação com a concorrência de gama alta. Nesta análise, examinaremos as desvantagens que os compradores do X50 Pro terão que enfrentar.

Marcus Herbrich, 👁 Daniel Schmidt (traduzido por Ricardo Soto), Published 06/16/2020 🇺🇸 🇩🇪 ...

5G Smartphone Touchscreen

Test device courtesy of realme Deutschland

Download your licensed rating image as PNG / SVG

Realme X50 Pro (X Serie)

Processador

Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 8 x 2.4 - 2.8 GHz, Cortex-A77 / A55 (Kryo 585)

Placa gráfica

Qualcomm Adreno 650

Memória

12 GB

Pantalha

6.44 polegadas 20:9, 2400 x 1080 pixel 409 PPI, Tela táctil capacitiva, OLED, Brilhante: sim, HDR, 90 Hz

Disco rígido

256 GB UFS 3.0 Flash, 256 GB

, 227 GB livre

Conexões

1 USB 2.0, Conexões Audio: USB Type-C, 1 Leitor de Impressões Digitais, NFC, Brightness Sensor, Sensores: Acelerômetro, giroscópio, sensor de proximidade, bússola, OTG, Miracast

Funcionamento em rede

802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/ax = Wi-Fi 6/), Bluetooth 5.1, 5G NR: n77/78/38/40/41/1/3/5/7/28; FDD-LTE: Bands 1/2/3/4/5/7/8/12/17/18/19/20/26/28/32/66; TD-LTE: Bands 38/39/40/41/42; WCDMA: B1/2/4/5/6/8/19; GSM: 850/900/1800/1900, LTE, 5G, GPS

Tamanho

altura x largura x profundidade (em mm): 8.9 x 158.96 x 74.24

Bateria

4200 mAh Lítio-Ion

Charging

fast charging / Quickcharge

Sistema Operativo

Android 10

Camera

Primary Camera: 64 MPix (26mm, FOV 78.6°, f/1.8, 6P lens Samsung GW1, 1/1.72”) + 12 MP (54.0mm, f/2.5, 5P lens) + 8 MP (15.7mm, FOV 119°) + 2MP (FOV 88.8°, f/2.4), Camera2 API: Level 3
Secondary Camera: 32 MPix (FOV 80.4°, f/2.5, 5P lens Sony IMX 616) + 8 MP (FOV 105°, f/2.2, 5P lens)

Características adicionais

Alto falantes: Estéreo, Teclado: Onscreen, Cabo USB, carregador modular, capa protetora, protetor de tela, realme UI, 24 Meses Garantia, Widevine L1, fanless

peso

205 g, Suprimento de energia: 115 g

Preço

750 Euro

Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

see all specifications

Competing Devices

Rating	Date	Model	Weight	Drive	Size	Resolution
86.1 % v7 ^(old)	06/2020	Realme X50 Pro SD 865, Adreno 650	205 g	256 GB UFS 3.0 Flash	6.44"	2400x1080
87.8 % v7 ^(old)	06/2020	Xiaomi Mi 10 SD 865, Adreno 650	208 g	128 GB UFS 3.0 Flash	6.67"	2340x1080
88.4 % v7 ^(old)	06/2020	OnePlus 8 SD 865, Adreno 650	180 g	256 GB UFS 3.0 Flash	6.55"	2400x1080
87.4 % v7 ^(old)	04/2020	Huawei P40 Kirin 990 5G, Mali-G76 MP16	175 g	128 GB UFS 3.0 Flash	6.10"	2340x1080
81 % v7 ^(old)	06/2020	Motorola Edge SD 765, Adreno 620	190 g	128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	6.70"	2340x1080
87.7 % v7 ^(old)	03/2020	Samsung Galaxy S20 Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11	163 g	128 GB UFS 3.0 Flash	6.20"	3200x1440

Size Comparison

Networking
iperf3 transmit AX12
Huawei P40 Mali-G76 MP16, Kirin 990 5G, 128 GB UFS 3.0 Flash	1296 (1095^min - 1376^max) MBit/s +53%
OnePlus 8 Adreno 650, SD 865, 256 GB UFS 3.0 Flash	937 (466^min - 960^max) MBit/s +10%
Samsung Galaxy S20 Mali-G77 MP11, Exynos 990, 128 GB UFS 3.0 Flash	882 (847^min - 902^max) MBit/s +4%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Adreno 650, SD 865, 128 GB UFS 3.0 Flash	867 (440^min - 907^max) MBit/s +2%
Realme X50 Pro Adreno 650, SD 865, 256 GB UFS 3.0 Flash	849 (414^min - 930^max) MBit/s
Motorola Edge Adreno 620, SD 765, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	657 (608^min - 667^max) MBit/s -23%
iperf3 receive AX12
Huawei P40 Mali-G76 MP16, Kirin 990 5G, 128 GB UFS 3.0 Flash	1368 (1104^min - 1442^max) MBit/s +50%
Realme X50 Pro Adreno 650, SD 865, 256 GB UFS 3.0 Flash	914 (888^min - 928^max) MBit/s
Xiaomi Mi 10 Adreno 650, SD 865, 128 GB UFS 3.0 Flash	903 (881^min - 916^max) MBit/s -1%
OnePlus 8 Adreno 650, SD 865, 256 GB UFS 3.0 Flash	894 (864^min - 925^max) MBit/s -2%
Samsung Galaxy S20 Mali-G77 MP11, Exynos 990, 128 GB UFS 3.0 Flash	827 (791^min - 846^max) MBit/s -10%
Motorola Edge Adreno 620, SD 765, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	561 (216^min - 668^max) MBit/s -39%

Realme X50 Pro; iperf3 receive AX12; iperf 3.1.3: Ø912 (888-928)

Realme X50 Pro; iperf3 transmit AX12; iperf 3.1.3: Ø836 (414-930)

Picture taken with the X50 Pro: Ultra-wide-angle

Picture taken with the X50 Pro: Wide-angle

Image Comparison

Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.

Scene 1 Scene 2 Scene 3 Scene 4 Scene 5

click to load images

realme X50 Pro (Weitwinkel)

Huawei Mate 30 Pro

Apple iPhone 11 Pro

Canon EOS 70D

click to load images

realme X50 Pro (Low-Light)

Huawei Mate 30 Pro

Apple iPhone 11 Pro

Canon EOS 70D

click to load images

realme X50 Pro (Ultra-Weitwinkel)

Huawei Mate 30 Pro

Apple iPhone 11 Pro

Canon EOS 70D

click to load images

realme X50 Pro (5-facher Zoom)

Huawei Mate 30 Pro

Apple iPhone 11 Pro

Canon EOS 70D

click to load images

realme X50 Pro (Weitwinkel)

Huawei Mate 30 Pro

Apple iPhone 11 Pro

Canon EOS 70D

ColorChecker Realme X50 Pro: 11.42 ∆E min: 2.33 - max: 24.46 ∆E


686 cd/m²	688 cd/m²	700 cd/m²
689 cd/m²	679 cd/m²	695 cd/m²
689 cd/m²	683 cd/m²	703 cd/m²

Distribuição do brilho

tested with X-Rite i1Pro 2

Máximo: 703 cd/m² (Nits) Médio: 690.2 cd/m² Minimum: 3.85 cd/m²
iluminação: 97 %
iluminação com acumulador: 679 cd/m²
Contraste: ∞:1 (Preto: 0 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 3.2 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.92
ΔE Greyscale 4.1 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
92.8% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.28

	Realme X50 Pro OLED, 2400x1080, 6.4"	Xiaomi Mi 10 Super AMOLED, 2340x1080, 6.7"	OnePlus 8 AMOLED, 2400x1080, 6.6"	Huawei P40 AMOLED, 2340x1080, 6.1"	Motorola Edge AMOLED, 2340x1080, 6.7"	Samsung Galaxy S20 AMOLED, 3200x1440, 6.2"
Screen		36%	37%	7%	-32%	19%
Brightness middle	679	786 16%	778 15%	583 -14%	427 -37%	745 10%
Brightness	690	791 15%	783 13%	593 -14%	438 -37%	740 7%
Brightness Distribution	97	96 -1%	95 -2%	94 -3%	94 -3%	97 0%
Black Level *
Colorchecker dE 2000 *	3.2	1.1 66%	0.9 72%	3.03 5%	5.34 -67%	2.67 17%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *	6.2	2.2 65%	2.2 65%	5.33 14%	9.33 -50%	4.52 27%
Greyscale dE 2000 *	4.1	1.8 56%	1.7 59%	2 51%	4 2%	2 51%
Gamma	2.28 ^96%	2.26 ^97%	2.25 ^98%	2.301 ^96%	2.315 ^95%	2.092 ^105%
CCT	6604 ^98%	6315 ^103%	6481 ^100%	6621 ^98%	7221 ^90%	6240 ^104%

* ... smaller is better

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

ℹ

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.

Screen flickering / PWM detected

367.6 Hz

≤ 99 % brightness setting

The display backlight flickers at 367.6 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) Flickering detected at a brightness setting of 99 % and below. There should be no flickering or PWM above this brightness setting.

The frequency of 367.6 Hz is relatively high, so most users sensitive to PWM should not notice any flickering. However, there are reports that some users are still sensitive to PWM at 500 Hz and above, so be aware.

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8746 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured.

Display Response Times

ℹ

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.

↔ Response Time Black to White
2.4 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↗ 1.2 ms rise
2.4 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↘ 1.2 ms fall
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 9 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (21 ms).
↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
3.2 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↗ 2 ms rise
3.2 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↘ 1.2 ms fall
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 10 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (32.9 ms).

Geekbench 5.5
Single-Core (sort by value)
Realme X50 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288	915 Points
Xiaomi Mi 10 Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192	910 Points -1%
OnePlus 8 Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288	919 Points 0%
Huawei P40 HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192	755 Points -17%
Motorola Edge Qualcomm Snapdragon 765, Adreno 620, 6144	589 Points -36%
Samsung Galaxy S20 Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 8192	903 Points -1%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 (764 - 924, n=23)	903 Points -1%
Average of class Smartphone (126 - 2437, n=172, last 2 years)	995 Points +9%
Multi-Core (sort by value)
Realme X50 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288	3087 Points
Xiaomi Mi 10 Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192	3309 Points +7%
OnePlus 8 Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288	3427 Points +11%
Huawei P40 HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192	2988 Points -3%
Motorola Edge Qualcomm Snapdragon 765, Adreno 620, 6144	1869 Points -39%
Samsung Galaxy S20 Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 8192	2731 Points -12%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 (2687 - 3449, n=23)	3268 Points +6%
Average of class Smartphone (473 - 6687, n=172, last 2 years)	3312 Points +7%
OpenCL Score 5.1 (sort by value)
Realme X50 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288	3067 Points
Xiaomi Mi 10 Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192	2829 Points -8%
OnePlus 8 Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288	3001 Points -2%
Huawei P40 HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192	3606 Points +18%
Motorola Edge Qualcomm Snapdragon 765, Adreno 620, 6144	1054 Points -66%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 (2829 - 3080, n=8)	2981 Points -3%
Average of class Smartphone (516 - 18876, n=48, last 2 years)	7481 Points +144%
Vulkan Score 5.1 (sort by value)
Realme X50 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288	3259 Points
Xiaomi Mi 10 Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192	2549 Points -22%
OnePlus 8 Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288	2663 Points -18%
Huawei P40 HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192	2693 Points -17%
Motorola Edge Qualcomm Snapdragon 765, Adreno 620, 6144	977 Points -70%
Samsung Galaxy S20 Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 8192	3670 Points +13%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 (2487 - 3259, n=8)	2723 Points -16%
Average of class Smartphone (281 - 18656, n=54, last 2 years)	7952 Points +144%

Geekbench 4.4
64 Bit Single-Core Score (sort by value)
Realme X50 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288	4304 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 (4261 - 4304, n=5)	4281 Points -1%
Average of class Smartphone (844 - 9574, n=82, last 2 years)	5486 Points +27%
64 Bit Multi-Core Score (sort by value)
Realme X50 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288	13589 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 (13186 - 13589, n=5)	13396 Points -1%
Average of class Smartphone (2630 - 30323, n=82, last 2 years)	15064 Points +11%
Compute RenderScript Score (sort by value)
Realme X50 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288	9576 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 (9443 - 9739, n=5)	9559 Points 0%
Average of class Smartphone (5192 - 18534, n=58, last 2 years)	11998 Points +25%

PCMark for Android
Work performance score (sort by value)
Realme X50 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288	19711 Points
Xiaomi Mi 10 Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192	11850 Points -40%
OnePlus 8 Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288	13079 Points -34%
Huawei P40 HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192	11268 Points -43%
Motorola Edge Qualcomm Snapdragon 765, Adreno 620, 6144	10045 Points -49%
Samsung Galaxy S20 Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 8192	14708 Points -25%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 (10990 - 19989, n=22)	13584 Points -31%
Work 2.0 performance score (sort by value)
Realme X50 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288	13202 Points
Xiaomi Mi 10 Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192	10613 Points -20%
OnePlus 8 Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288	10800 Points -18%
Huawei P40 HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192	8736 Points -34%
Motorola Edge Qualcomm Snapdragon 765, Adreno 620, 6144	8336 Points -37%
Samsung Galaxy S20 Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 8192	10431 Points -21%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 (9202 - 15299, n=23)	11246 Points -15%

3DMark
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Score (sort by value)
Realme X50 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288	83917 Points
Xiaomi Mi 10 Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192	Points -100%
OnePlus 8 Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288	72524 Points -14%
Huawei P40 HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192	46552 Points -45%
Motorola Edge Qualcomm Snapdragon 765, Adreno 620, 6144	42752 Points -49%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 (56045 - 112989, n=20)	84555 Points +1%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Graphics Score (sort by value)
Realme X50 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288	145603 Points
Xiaomi Mi 10 Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192	Points -100%
OnePlus 8 Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288	144611 Points -1%
Huawei P40 HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192	66142 Points -55%
Motorola Edge Qualcomm Snapdragon 765, Adreno 620, 6144	62819 Points -57%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 (110875 - 180392, n=20)	147707 Points +1%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
Realme X50 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288	33793 Points
Xiaomi Mi 10 Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192	Points -100%
OnePlus 8 Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288	27026 Points -20%
Huawei P40 HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192	22857 Points -32%
Motorola Edge Qualcomm Snapdragon 765, Adreno 620, 6144	20185 Points -40%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 (17817 - 58293, n=20)	35224 Points +4%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 (sort by value)
Realme X50 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288	8947 Points
Xiaomi Mi 10 Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192	8581 Points -4%
OnePlus 8 Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288	8810 Points -2%
Huawei P40 HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192	3973 Points -56%
Motorola Edge Qualcomm Snapdragon 765, Adreno 620, 6144	4325 Points -52%
Samsung Galaxy S20 Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 8192	5646 Points -37%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 (8215 - 9611, n=20)	8915 Points 0%
Average of class Smartphone (812 - 7285, n=26, last 2 years)	4204 Points -53%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Graphics (sort by value)
Realme X50 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288	11533 Points
Xiaomi Mi 10 Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192	12234 Points +6%
OnePlus 8 Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288	11540 Points 0%
Huawei P40 HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192	3894 Points -66%
Motorola Edge Qualcomm Snapdragon 765, Adreno 620, 6144	4671 Points -59%
Samsung Galaxy S20 Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 8192	6388 Points -45%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 (10599 - 13305, n=20)	11750 Points +2%
Average of class Smartphone (756 - 9451, n=26, last 2 years)	4740 Points -59%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Physics (sort by value)
Realme X50 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288	5034 Points
Xiaomi Mi 10 Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192	4196 Points -17%
OnePlus 8 Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288	4819 Points -4%
Huawei P40 HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192	4279 Points -15%
Motorola Edge Qualcomm Snapdragon 765, Adreno 620, 6144	3435 Points -32%
Samsung Galaxy S20 Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 8192	4015 Points -20%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 (3965 - 5274, n=20)	4844 Points -4%
Average of class Smartphone (1093 - 4349, n=26, last 2 years)	3303 Points -34%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited (sort by value)
Realme X50 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288	9910 Points
Xiaomi Mi 10 Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192	8499 Points -14%
OnePlus 8 Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288	9850 Points -1%
Huawei P40 HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192	4432 Points -55%
Motorola Edge Qualcomm Snapdragon 765, Adreno 620, 6144	4435 Points -55%
Samsung Galaxy S20 Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 8192	7981 Points -19%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 (8499 - 11492, n=22)	9645 Points -3%
Average of class Smartphone (883 - 23024, n=73, last 2 years)	11109 Points +12%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited Graphics (sort by value)
Realme X50 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288	12895 Points
Xiaomi Mi 10 Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192	12601 Points -2%
OnePlus 8 Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288	12873 Points 0%
Huawei P40 HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192	4293 Points -67%
Motorola Edge Qualcomm Snapdragon 765, Adreno 620, 6144	4829 Points -63%
Samsung Galaxy S20 Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 8192	11301 Points -12%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 (11956 - 16809, n=22)	12921 Points 0%
Average of class Smartphone (840 - 45492, n=73, last 2 years)	19708 Points +53%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
Realme X50 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288	5478 Points
Xiaomi Mi 10 Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192	3973 Points -27%
OnePlus 8 Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288	5406 Points -1%
Huawei P40 HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192	4998 Points -9%
Motorola Edge Qualcomm Snapdragon 765, Adreno 620, 6144	3449 Points -37%
Samsung Galaxy S20 Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 8192	3935 Points -28%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 (3956 - 5765, n=22)	5138 Points -6%
Average of class Smartphone (1075 - 8749, n=73, last 2 years)	5001 Points -9%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) (sort by value)
Realme X50 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288	7293 Points
Xiaomi Mi 10 Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192	7190 Points -1%
OnePlus 8 Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288	7174 Points -2%
Huawei P40 HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192	5651 Points -23%
Motorola Edge Qualcomm Snapdragon 765, Adreno 620, 6144	3001 Points -59%
Samsung Galaxy S20 Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 8192	6732 Points -8%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 (5996 - 7653, n=21)	7103 Points -3%
Average of class Smartphone (286 - 17553, n=73, last 2 years)	3084 Points -58%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Graphics (sort by value)
Realme X50 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288	8345 Points
Xiaomi Mi 10 Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192	8371 Points 0%
OnePlus 8 Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288	8288 Points -1%
Huawei P40 HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192	6244 Points -25%
Motorola Edge Qualcomm Snapdragon 765, Adreno 620, 6144	2897 Points -65%
Samsung Galaxy S20 Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 8192	8411 Points +1%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 (6500 - 9167, n=20)	8128 Points -3%
Average of class Smartphone (240 - 29890, n=73, last 2 years)	3263 Points -61%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Physics (sort by value)
Realme X50 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288	5068 Points
Xiaomi Mi 10 Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192	4813 Points -5%
OnePlus 8 Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288	4879 Points -4%
Huawei P40 HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192	4242 Points -16%
Motorola Edge Qualcomm Snapdragon 765, Adreno 620, 6144	3435 Points -32%
Samsung Galaxy S20 Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 8192	3963 Points -22%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 (4582 - 5209, n=20)	4941 Points -3%
Average of class Smartphone (858 - 7180, n=73, last 2 years)	3286 Points -35%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited (sort by value)
Realme X50 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288	8204 Points
Xiaomi Mi 10 Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192	7957 Points -3%
OnePlus 8 Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288	8153 Points -1%
Huawei P40 HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192	6140 Points -25%
Motorola Edge Qualcomm Snapdragon 765, Adreno 620, 6144	3223 Points -61%
Samsung Galaxy S20 Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 8192	6638 Points -19%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 (7517 - 8947, n=23)	8073 Points -2%
Average of class Smartphone (317 - 20131, n=160, last 2 years)	7767 Points -5%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Graphics (sort by value)
Realme X50 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288	9567 Points
Xiaomi Mi 10 Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192	9389 Points -2%
OnePlus 8 Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288	9542 Points 0%
Huawei P40 HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192	6606 Points -31%
Motorola Edge Qualcomm Snapdragon 765, Adreno 620, 6144	3165 Points -67%
Samsung Galaxy S20 Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 8192	8106 Points -15%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 (8633 - 11999, n=22)	9501 Points -1%
Average of class Smartphone (267 - 33376, n=160, last 2 years)	11536 Points +21%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
Realme X50 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288	5523 Points
Xiaomi Mi 10 Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192	5187 Points -6%
OnePlus 8 Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288	5401 Points -2%
Huawei P40 HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192	4924 Points -11%
Motorola Edge Qualcomm Snapdragon 765, Adreno 620, 6144	3442 Points -38%
Samsung Galaxy S20 Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 8192	4063 Points -26%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 (4733 - 5780, n=22)	5319 Points -4%
Average of class Smartphone (877 - 8480, n=160, last 2 years)	4613 Points -16%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (Vulkan) Unlimited (sort by value)
Realme X50 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288	6644 Points
Xiaomi Mi 10 Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192	6182 Points -7%
OnePlus 8 Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288	6543 Points -2%
Huawei P40 HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192	5456 Points -18%
Motorola Edge Qualcomm Snapdragon 765, Adreno 620, 6144	2791 Points -58%
Samsung Galaxy S20 Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 8192	5139 Points -23%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 (4582 - 6961, n=20)	6202 Points -7%
Average of class Smartphone (365 - 6635, n=72, last 2 years)	2846 Points -57%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (Vulkan) Unlimited Graphics (sort by value)
Realme X50 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288	8263 Points
Xiaomi Mi 10 Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192	8175 Points -1%
OnePlus 8 Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288	8294 Points 0%
Huawei P40 HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192	6326 Points -23%
Motorola Edge Qualcomm Snapdragon 765, Adreno 620, 6144	2786 Points -66%
Samsung Galaxy S20 Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 8192	6315 Points -24%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 (7618 - 9104, n=19)	8249 Points 0%
Average of class Smartphone (298 - 8601, n=72, last 2 years)	3095 Points -63%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (Vulkan) Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
Realme X50 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288	3947 Points
Xiaomi Mi 10 Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192	3336 Points -15%
OnePlus 8 Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288	3763 Points -5%
Huawei P40 HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192	3684 Points -7%
Motorola Edge Qualcomm Snapdragon 765, Adreno 620, 6144	2810 Points -29%
Samsung Galaxy S20 Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 8192	3112 Points -21%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 (1786 - 4061, n=19)	3414 Points -14%
Average of class Smartphone (1667 - 4198, n=72, last 2 years)	2704 Points -31%

GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7
T-Rex Onscreen (sort by value)
Realme X50 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288	60 fps
Xiaomi Mi 10 Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192	90 fps +50%
OnePlus 8 Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288	60 fps 0%
Huawei P40 HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192	60 fps 0%
Motorola Edge Qualcomm Snapdragon 765, Adreno 620, 6144	78 fps +30%
Samsung Galaxy S20 Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 8192	60 fps 0%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 (50 - 138, n=23)	75.4 fps +26%
Average of class Smartphone (23 - 165, n=169, last 2 years)	86.3 fps +44%
1920x1080 T-Rex Offscreen (sort by value)
Realme X50 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288	204 fps
Xiaomi Mi 10 Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192	202 fps -1%
OnePlus 8 Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288	207 fps +1%
Huawei P40 HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192	151 fps -26%
Motorola Edge Qualcomm Snapdragon 765, Adreno 620, 6144	87 fps -57%
Samsung Galaxy S20 Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 8192	199 fps -2%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 (168 - 266, n=23)	206 fps +1%
Average of class Smartphone (19 - 791, n=169, last 2 years)	280 fps +37%

GFXBench 3.0
on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL (sort by value)
Realme X50 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288	60 fps
Xiaomi Mi 10 Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192	88 fps +47%
OnePlus 8 Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288	60 fps 0%
Huawei P40 HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192	46 fps -23%
Motorola Edge Qualcomm Snapdragon 765, Adreno 620, 6144	48 fps -20%
Samsung Galaxy S20 Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 8192	60 fps 0%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 (50 - 111, n=23)	71.7 fps +20%
Average of class Smartphone (6.8 - 165, n=169, last 2 years)	75.5 fps +26%
1920x1080 1080p Manhattan Offscreen (sort by value)
Realme X50 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288	124 fps
Xiaomi Mi 10 Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192	123 fps -1%
OnePlus 8 Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288	125 fps +1%
Huawei P40 HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192	100 fps -19%
Motorola Edge Qualcomm Snapdragon 765, Adreno 620, 6144	50 fps -60%
Samsung Galaxy S20 Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 8192	108 fps -13%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 (96 - 151, n=23)	123.6 fps 0%
Average of class Smartphone (12 - 482, n=169, last 2 years)	165.3 fps +33%

GFXBench 3.1
on screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen (sort by value)
Realme X50 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288	60 fps
Xiaomi Mi 10 Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192	75 fps +25%
OnePlus 8 Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288	60 fps 0%
Huawei P40 HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192	57 fps -5%
Motorola Edge Qualcomm Snapdragon 765, Adreno 620, 6144	32 fps -47%
Samsung Galaxy S20 Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 8192	59 fps -2%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 (43 - 83, n=24)	60.1 fps 0%
Average of class Smartphone (3.7 - 158, n=169, last 2 years)	65.7 fps +10%
1920x1080 Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen (sort by value)
Realme X50 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288	86 fps
Xiaomi Mi 10 Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192	86 fps 0%
OnePlus 8 Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288	88 fps +2%
Huawei P40 HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192	33 fps -62%
Motorola Edge Qualcomm Snapdragon 765, Adreno 620, 6144	33 fps -62%
Samsung Galaxy S20 Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 8192	85 fps -1%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 (67 - 103, n=24)	86 fps 0%
Average of class Smartphone (8.3 - 341, n=169, last 2 years)	117.2 fps +36%

GFXBench
on screen Car Chase Onscreen (sort by value)
Realme X50 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288	44 fps
Xiaomi Mi 10 Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192	42 fps -5%
OnePlus 8 Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288	46 fps +5%
Huawei P40 HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192	36 fps -18%
Motorola Edge Qualcomm Snapdragon 765, Adreno 620, 6144	18 fps -59%
Samsung Galaxy S20 Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 8192	43 fps -2%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 (25 - 54, n=24)	40.5 fps -8%
Average of class Smartphone (5 - 119, n=170, last 2 years)	47.8 fps +9%
1920x1080 Car Chase Offscreen (sort by value)
Realme X50 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288	51 fps
Xiaomi Mi 10 Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192	50 fps -2%
OnePlus 8 Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288	52 fps +2%
Huawei P40 HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192	43 fps -16%
Motorola Edge Qualcomm Snapdragon 765, Adreno 620, 6144	19 fps -63%
Samsung Galaxy S20 Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 8192	50 fps -2%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 (39 - 62, n=24)	51.1 fps 0%
Average of class Smartphone (3.1 - 216, n=169, last 2 years)	70.6 fps +38%
on screen Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Onscreen (sort by value)
Realme X50 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288	46 fps
Xiaomi Mi 10 Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192	46 fps 0%
OnePlus 8 Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288	48 fps +4%
Huawei P40 HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192	42 fps -9%
Motorola Edge Qualcomm Snapdragon 765, Adreno 620, 6144	20 fps -57%
Samsung Galaxy S20 Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 8192	50 fps +9%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 (28 - 57, n=25)	43.2 fps -6%
Average of class Smartphone (3.6 - 123, n=201, last 2 years)	49.5 fps +8%
1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen (sort by value)
Realme X50 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288	53 fps
Xiaomi Mi 10 Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192	53 fps 0%
OnePlus 8 Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288	54 fps +2%
Huawei P40 HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192	49 fps -8%
Motorola Edge Qualcomm Snapdragon 765, Adreno 620, 6144	21 fps -60%
Samsung Galaxy S20 Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 8192	54 fps +2%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 (27 - 67, n=25)	52.7 fps -1%
Average of class Smartphone (2.3 - 261, n=201, last 2 years)	79.8 fps +51%
on screen Aztec Ruins High Tier Onscreen (sort by value)
Realme X50 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288	30 fps
Xiaomi Mi 10 Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192	29 fps -3%
OnePlus 8 Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288	31 fps +3%
Huawei P40 HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192	27 fps -10%
Motorola Edge Qualcomm Snapdragon 765, Adreno 620, 6144	12 fps -60%
Samsung Galaxy S20 Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 8192	22 fps -27%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 (18 - 40, n=25)	27.8 fps -7%
Average of class Smartphone (0.85 - 119, n=201, last 2 years)	37.4 fps +25%
2560x1440 Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen (sort by value)
Realme X50 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288	20 fps
Xiaomi Mi 10 Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192	20 fps 0%
OnePlus 8 Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288	20 fps 0%
Huawei P40 HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192	29 fps +45%
Motorola Edge Qualcomm Snapdragon 765, Adreno 620, 6144	7.5 fps -62%
Samsung Galaxy S20 Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 8192	20 fps 0%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 (20 - 27, n=25)	20.5 fps +3%
Average of class Smartphone (0.85 - 104, n=201, last 2 years)	32 fps +60%

AnTuTu v8 - Total Score (sort by value)
Realme X50 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288	593933 Points
Xiaomi Mi 10 Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192	566256 Points -5%
OnePlus 8 Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288	563466 Points -5%
Huawei P40 HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192	450373 Points -24%
Motorola Edge Qualcomm Snapdragon 765, Adreno 620, 6144	304120 Points -49%
Samsung Galaxy S20 Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 8192	504192 Points -15%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 (527301 - 631025, n=24)	579049 Points -3%

BaseMark OS II
Overall (sort by value)
Realme X50 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288	6205 Points
Xiaomi Mi 10 Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192	5752 Points -7%
OnePlus 8 Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288	5897 Points -5%
Huawei P40 HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192	5105 Points -18%
Motorola Edge Qualcomm Snapdragon 765, Adreno 620, 6144	3742 Points -40%
Samsung Galaxy S20 Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 8192	4764 Points -23%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 (5264 - 6402, n=23)	5871 Points -5%
Average of class Smartphone (1196 - 11976, n=151, last 2 years)	6297 Points +1%
System (sort by value)
Realme X50 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288	10147 Points
Xiaomi Mi 10 Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192	9810 Points -3%
OnePlus 8 Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288	10021 Points -1%
Huawei P40 HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192	8992 Points -11%
Motorola Edge Qualcomm Snapdragon 765, Adreno 620, 6144	6612 Points -35%
Samsung Galaxy S20 Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 8192	8843 Points -13%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 (8412 - 10147, n=23)	9660 Points -5%
Average of class Smartphone (2368 - 16475, n=151, last 2 years)	10163 Points 0%
Memory (sort by value)
Realme X50 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288	8204 Points
Xiaomi Mi 10 Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192	7450 Points -9%
OnePlus 8 Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288	6912 Points -16%
Huawei P40 HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192	6942 Points -15%
Motorola Edge Qualcomm Snapdragon 765, Adreno 620, 6144	4528 Points -45%
Samsung Galaxy S20 Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 8192	4271 Points -48%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 (5304 - 8874, n=23)	7073 Points -14%
Average of class Smartphone (962 - 12716, n=151, last 2 years)	6767 Points -18%
Graphics (sort by value)
Realme X50 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288	11688 Points
Xiaomi Mi 10 Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192	11730 Points 0%
OnePlus 8 Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288	11654 Points 0%
Huawei P40 HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192	8634 Points -26%
Motorola Edge Qualcomm Snapdragon 765, Adreno 620, 6144	4681 Points -60%
Samsung Galaxy S20 Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 8192	10703 Points -8%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 (11366 - 13833, n=23)	11779 Points +1%
Average of class Smartphone (1017 - 58651, n=151, last 2 years)	16908 Points +45%
Web (sort by value)
Realme X50 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288	1576 Points
Xiaomi Mi 10 Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192	1276 Points -19%
OnePlus 8 Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288	1498 Points -5%
Huawei P40 HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192	1260 Points -20%
Motorola Edge Qualcomm Snapdragon 765, Adreno 620, 6144	1399 Points -11%
Samsung Galaxy S20 Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 8192	1274 Points -19%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 (1276 - 2169, n=23)	1497 Points -5%
Average of class Smartphone (841 - 2145, n=151, last 2 years)	1564 Points -1%

Jetstream 2 - Total Score
Average of class Smartphone (13.8 - 387, n=161, last 2 years)	120.4 Points +73%
Realme X50 Pro (Chrome 83)	69.5 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 (45.2 - 77, n=20)	63.6 Points -8%
Huawei P40 (Huawei Browser 10.1)	55.6 Points -20%
Samsung Galaxy S20 (Chrome 80)	53.9 Points -22%
OnePlus 8 (Chrome 83)	51.3 Points -26%
Xiaomi Mi 10 (Xiaomi Browser V11.4.23)	50.9 Points -27%
Motorola Edge (Chrome 81)	48.34 Points -30%

JetStream 1.1 - Total Score
Realme X50 Pro (Chrome 83)	116.7 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 (74.2 - 145.1, n=21)	113.1 Points -3%
Xiaomi Mi 10 (Xiaomi Browser V11.4.23)	109.2 Points -6%
Huawei P40 (Huawei Browser 10.1)	103.2 Points -12%
Samsung Galaxy S20 (Chrome 80)	93.5 Points -20%
Motorola Edge (Chrome 81)	87.8 Points -25%
OnePlus 8 (Chrome 83)	79.1 Points -32%

Speedometer 2.0 - Result
Average of class Smartphone (15.2 - 569, n=146, last 2 years)	136.2 runs/min +102%
Realme X50 Pro (Chrome 83)	67.3 runs/min
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 (30.6 - 74.5, n=19)	63.9 runs/min -5%
Huawei P40 (Huawei Browser 10.1)	63 runs/min -6%
Xiaomi Mi 10 (Xiaomi Browser V11.4.23)	56.2 runs/min -16%
Samsung Galaxy S20 (Chome 80)	50.8 runs/min -25%
OnePlus 8 (Chrome 83)	50.8 runs/min -25%
Motorola Edge (Chome 81)	26.8 runs/min -60%

WebXPRT 3 - Overall
Average of class Smartphone (38 - 347, n=79, last 2 years)	148.7 Points +46%
Xiaomi Mi 10 (Xiaomi Browser V11.4.23)	118 Points +16%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 (97 - 127, n=23)	106.7 Points +5%
Realme X50 Pro (Chrome 83)	102 Points
OnePlus 8 (Chrome 83)	99 Points -3%
Samsung Galaxy S20 (Chrome 80)	97 Points -5%
Huawei P40 (Huawei Browser 10.1)	95 Points -7%
Motorola Edge (Chrome 81)	72 Points -29%

Octane V2 - Total Score
Average of class Smartphone (2228 - 100368, n=203, last 2 years)	37161 Points +56%
Realme X50 Pro	23768 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 (14606 - 31224, n=23)	22518 Points -5%
Xiaomi Mi 10 (Xiaomi Browser V11.4.23)	22016 Points -7%
Huawei P40 (Huawei Browser 10.1)	21348 Points -10%
Samsung Galaxy S20 (Chrome 80)	18162 Points -24%
Motorola Edge (Chrome 81)	17700 Points -26%
OnePlus 8 (Chrome 83)	15745 Points -34%

Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total
Motorola Edge (Chrome 81)	2754 ms * -38%
OnePlus 8 (Chrome 83)	2538 ms * -27%
Samsung Galaxy S20 (Chrome 80)	2511 ms * -26%
Huawei P40 (Huawei Browser 10.1)	2287 ms * -14%
Xiaomi Mi 10 (Xiaomi Browser V11.4.23)	2104 ms * -5%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 (1623 - 2911, n=24)	2031 ms * -2%
Realme X50 Pro (Chrome 83)	2000 ms *
Realme X50 Pro	0 ms * +100%
Average of class Smartphone (277 - 28190, n=160, last 2 years)	1568 ms * +22%

* ... smaller is better

	Realme X50 Pro	Xiaomi Mi 10	OnePlus 8	Huawei P40	Motorola Edge	Samsung Galaxy S20	Average 256 GB UFS 3.0 Flash	Average of class Smartphone
AndroBench 3-5		-12%	-7%	-30%	-41%	-11%	-17%	34%
Sequential Read 256KB	1756	1498 -15%	1707 -3%	1592 -9%	941 -46%	1542 -12%	1547 ?(983 - 1789, n=22) -12%	1839 ?(226 - 4512, n=192, last 2 years) 5%
Sequential Write 256KB	756	680 -10%	748 -1%	212.9 -72%	451.7 -40%	670 -11%	575 ?(387 - 915, n=22) -24%	1425 ?(57.5 - 3908, n=192, last 2 years) 88%
Random Read 4KB	229.4	207 -10%	215 -6%	189.4 -17%	150.5 -34%	205.3 -11%	210 ?(168.5 - 265, n=22) -8%	277 ?(22.2 - 483, n=192, last 2 years) 21%
Random Write 4KB	252	215.9 -14%	203.9 -19%	197 -22%	145.2 -42%	228.1 -9%	188.5 ?(24.8 - 272, n=22) -25%	309 ?(9.4 - 753, n=192, last 2 years) 23%

PUBG mobile

Realme X50 Pro; Balanced: Ø59.8 (53-60)

Realme X50 Pro; HD: Ø59.8 (57-60)

Asphalt 9 Legends

Realme X50 Pro: Ø29.5 (17-31)

Carga Máxima

Inatividade


31 °C	30.8 °C	29 °C
31.5 °C	31 °C	28.9 °C
30.8 °C	31.8 °C	29 °C

Máximo: 31.8 °C
Médio: 30.4 °C


27.9 °C	28.9 °C	29.3 °C
27.5 °C	28.5 °C	29.9 °C
27.5 °C	29.1 °C	29.9 °C

Máximo: 29.9 °C
Médio: 28.7 °C

alimentação elétrica 23.2 °C | Temperatura do quarto 22 °C | Fluke t3000FC (calibrated) & Voltcraft IR-260

(+) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 30.4 °C / 87 F, compared to the average of 32.8 °C / 91 F for the devices in the class Smartphone.
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 31.8 °C / 89 F, compared to the average of 35.1 °C / 95 F, ranging from 21.9 to 63.2 °C for the class Smartphone.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 29.9 °C / 86 F, compared to the average of 33.9 °C / 93 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 28.3 °C / 83 F, compared to the device average of 32.8 °C / 91 F.

Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)

Realme X50 Pro audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (87.7 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 25.9% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (12.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (3.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 6.1% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (4.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (20.7% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 32% of all tested devices in this class were better, 8% similar, 59% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 37%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 52% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 40% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Xiaomi Mi 10 audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (83.5 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 23.2% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (11.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 3.5% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (4.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 5.2% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (2.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (19.8% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 26% of all tested devices in this class were better, 8% similar, 66% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 37%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 47% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 46% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Consumo de energia

desligado	0.03 / 0.49 Watt
Ocioso	1 / 1.77 / 1.86 Watt
Carga	4.23 / 9.13 Watt


Key: min: , med: , max: Metrahit Energy

	Realme X50 Pro 4200 mAh	Xiaomi Mi 10 4780 mAh	OnePlus 8 4300 mAh	Huawei P40 3800 mAh	Motorola Edge 4500 mAh	Samsung Galaxy S20 4000 mAh	Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865	Average of class Smartphone
Power Consumption		19%	-2%	1%	4%	-4%	-20%	-3%
Idle Minimum *	1	0.53 47%	0.9 10%	1 -0%	1 -0%	0.9 10%	1.133 ?(0.52 - 2.2, n=22) -13%	0.894 ?(0.4 - 2.37, n=152, last 2 years) 11%
Idle Average *	1.77	1.46 18%	2.3 -30%	1.9 -7%	1.4 21%	1.5 15%	2.23 ?(1.19 - 5.37, n=22) -26%	1.456 ?(0.6 - 4.26, n=152, last 2 years) 18%
Idle Maximum *	1.86	1.52 18%	2.33 -25%	2.4 -29%	2 -8%	2 -8%	2.45 ?(1.23 - 5.41, n=22) -32%	1.616 ?(0.83 - 4.45, n=152, last 2 years) 13%
Load Average *	4.23	3.83 9%	3.5 17%	3.5 17%	4.8 -13%	4.8 -13%	5.26 ?(3.5 - 7.4, n=22) -24%	6.45 ?(2.3 - 16.5, n=147, last 2 years) -52%
Load Maximum *	9.13	8.89 3%	7.68 16%	6.9 24%	7.3 20%	11.5 -26%	9.68 ?(7.67 - 12.3, n=22) -6%	9.8 ?(3.53 - 20.8, n=147, last 2 years) -7%

* ... smaller is better

Tempo de Execução da Bateria

Ocioso (sem WLAN, min brilho)		25h 07min
WiFi Websurfing		12h 55min
Big Buck Bunny H.264 1080p		17h 9min
Carga (máximo brilho)		3h 14min

	Realme X50 Pro 4200 mAh	Xiaomi Mi 10 4780 mAh	OnePlus 8 4300 mAh	Huawei P40 3800 mAh	Motorola Edge 4500 mAh	Samsung Galaxy S20 4000 mAh
Battery Runtime		7%	5%	16%	31%	14%
Reader / Idle	1507	1789 19%	1374 -9%	2063 37%	2515 67%	2105 40%
H.264	1029	1126 9%	1096 7%	1052 2%	1197 16%	809 -21%
WiFi v1.3	775	662 -15%	1045 35%	806 4%	888 15%	726 -6%
Load	194	226 16%	168 -13%	236 22%	240 24%	279 44%

Pro

+ Impressionante painel OLED

+ 90 Hz

+ Armazenamento veloz

+ Boa duração da bateria

+ Desempenho veloz

+ 5G e carregador de 65-W

Contra

- Limitado a USB 2.0

- Sem slot para cartão SD/fone de ouvido de 3,5 mm

- Sem dual SIM

- Buraco grande

- Sem carregamento sem fio/certificação IP

- Quedas ocasionais de desempenho

- Qualidade de lente de grande angular

- Posição do sensor de digitais

- Sem LED de status/modo sempre ativo

Veredicto Realme X50 Pro - Smartphone topo de gama elegante

In review: Realme X50 Pro. Test device courtesy of Realme Germany

O X50 Pro é um smartphone muito agradável esteticamente e o design mate e com várias camadas da parte traseira oferece um visual particularmente bonito. No entanto, a excelente aparência é manchada pelo módulo de câmera muito grande. Devido à qualidade das selfies de grande angular, a praticidade da segunda lente na frente está em questão e um furo mais sutil na tela poderia ter sido uma solução mais elegante. Semelhante à ótica grande angular na frente, o módulo ultra grande angular na parte traseira decepciona e não pode ser igual ao dos smartphones concorrentes em termos de qualidade. O mesmo vale para a lente telefoto e, em menor grau, para a câmera principal. Por 750 Euros (~US$ 844), os compradores merecem mais quando se trata da qualidade geral das câmeras.

Embora exista muito o que gostar sobre o smartphone Realme X50 Pro, o preço sugerido pelo fabricante chinês é muito alto devido à forte concorrência.

Com bons alto-falantes estéreo, um belo painel OLED de 90 Hz e hardware poderoso, que traz suas próprias desvantagens na forma de quedas esporádicas de desempenho que não ocorrem com alternativas de gama alta, o X50 Pro ainda é um bom telefone.

Realme X50 Pro - 08/31/2022 v7 ^(old)
Marcus Herbrich

Acabamento

86%

Teclado

67 / 75 → 89%

Mouse

93%

Conectividade

53 / 70 → 75%

Peso

88%

Bateria

90%

Pantalha

89%

Desempenho do jogos

61 / 64 → 96%

Desempenho da aplicação

84 / 86 → 97%

Temperatura

94%

Ruído

100%

Audio

76 / 90 → 85%

Camera

67%

Médio

81%

86%

Smartphone - Médio equilibrado

Price comparison

Editor of the original article: Marius Schell - Tech Writer and translator - 398 articles published on Notebookcheck since 2020

contact me via: LinkedIn

Please share our article, every link counts!

> Análises e revisões de portáteis e celulares > Análises > Análises > Breve Análise do Smartphone Realme X50 Pro - Campeão do preço-desempenho?

Marcus Herbrich, 2020-06-16 (Update: 2020-06-22)

Competing Devices

Size Comparison

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

Display Response Times

PUBG mobile

Asphalt 9 Legends

Realme X50 Pro audio analysis

Xiaomi Mi 10 audio analysis

Pro

Contra

Veredicto Realme X50 Pro - Smartphone topo de gama elegante

More articles related to this device

Price comparison