Breve Análise do Smartphone BlackBerry DTEK60
| Networking | |
| iperf3 transmit AX12 | |
| Google Pixel XL 2016 | |
| Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge | |
| OnePlus 3 | |
| BlackBerry DTEK60 | |
| iperf3 receive AX12 | |
| Google Pixel XL 2016 | |
| OnePlus 3 | |
| BlackBerry DTEK60 | |
| Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge | |
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
iluminação: 88 %
iluminação com acumulador: 590 cd/m²
Contraste: ∞:1 (Preto: 0 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 6.6 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.91
ΔE Greyscale 4.3 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
Gamma: 1.88
| BlackBerry DTEK60 AMOLED, 2560x1440, 5.5" | Google Pixel XL 2016 AMOLED, 2560x1440, 5.5" | OnePlus 3 Optic-AMOLED, 1920x1080, 5.5" | Apple iPhone 7 Plus IPS, 1920x1080, 5.5" | Huawei P9 Plus AMOLED, 1920x1080, 5.5" | Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge Super AMOLED, 2560x1440, 5.5" | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen | 4% | 2% | 37% | -9% | 34% | |
| Brightness middle | 590 | 402 -32% | 419 -29% | 557 -6% | 361 -39% | 554 -6% |
| Brightness | 608 | 408 -33% | 431 -29% | 553 -9% | 366 -40% | 552 -9% |
| Brightness Distribution | 88 | 85 -3% | 84 -5% | 97 10% | 87 -1% | 96 9% |
| Black Level * | 0.35 | |||||
| Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 6.6 | 4 39% | 4.1 38% | 1.4 79% | 5.1 23% | 1.59 76% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 14.3 | 10.1 29% | 12 16% | 3.1 78% | 10 30% | 2.56 82% |
| Greyscale dE 2000 * | 4.3 | 3.2 26% | 3.3 23% | 1.3 70% | 5.5 -28% | 2.01 53% |
| Gamma | 1.88 117% | 2.19 100% | 2.1 105% | 2.21 100% | 2.24 98% | 2.01 109% |
| CCT | 6966 93% | 7037 92% | 6550 99% | 6667 97% | 7388 88% | 6321 103% |
| Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998) | 89.38 | 63.1 | 82.12 | |||
| Color Space (Percent of sRGB) | 100 | 99.83 | 99.98 | |||
| Contrast | 1591 |
* ... smaller is better
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
| Screen flickering / PWM detected | 238.1 Hz | ≤ 100 % brightness setting |  |
The display backlight flickers at 238.1 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) Flickering detected at a brightness setting of 100 % and below. There should be no flickering or PWM above this brightness setting. The frequency of 238.1 Hz is relatively low, so sensitive users will likely notice flickering and experience eyestrain at the stated brightness setting and below. In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8719 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured. | |||
Display Response Times
| ↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
|---|---|---|
| 6 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 3 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 3 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 15 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (20.9 ms). | ||
| ↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
| 33 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 3 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 30 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 41 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is similar to the average of all tested devices (32.8 ms). | ||
| AnTuTu v6 - Total Score (sort by value) | |
| BlackBerry DTEK60 | |
| Google Pixel XL 2016 | |
| OnePlus 3 | |
| Apple iPhone 7 Plus | |
| Huawei P9 Plus | |
| Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge | |
| Geekbench 4.0 | |
| 64 Bit Single-Core Score (sort by value) | |
| BlackBerry DTEK60 | |
| Google Pixel XL 2016 | |
| OnePlus 3 | |
| Apple iPhone 7 Plus | |
| Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge | |
| 64 Bit Multi-Core Score (sort by value) | |
| BlackBerry DTEK60 | |
| Google Pixel XL 2016 | |
| OnePlus 3 | |
| Apple iPhone 7 Plus | |
| Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge | |
| PCMark for Android - Work performance score (sort by value) | |
| BlackBerry DTEK60 | |
| Google Pixel XL 2016 | |
| OnePlus 3 | |
| Huawei P9 Plus | |
| Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge | |
| Octane V2 - Total Score (sort by value) | |
| BlackBerry DTEK60 | |
| Google Pixel XL 2016 | |
| OnePlus 3 | |
| Apple iPhone 7 Plus | |
| Huawei P9 Plus | |
| Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge | |
| Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total (sort by value) | |
| BlackBerry DTEK60 | |
| Google Pixel XL 2016 | |
| OnePlus 3 | |
| Apple iPhone 7 Plus | |
| Huawei P9 Plus | |
| Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge | |
| WebXPRT 2015 - Overall (sort by value) | |
| BlackBerry DTEK60 | |
| Google Pixel XL 2016 | |
| OnePlus 3 | |
| Apple iPhone 7 Plus | |
| Huawei P9 Plus | |
| Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge | |
| JetStream 1.1 - Total Score (sort by value) | |
| BlackBerry DTEK60 | |
| Google Pixel XL 2016 | |
| OnePlus 3 | |
| Apple iPhone 7 Plus | |
| Huawei P9 Plus | |
| Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge | |
* ... smaller is better
| AndroBench 3-5 | |
| Sequential Read 256KB (sort by value) | |
| BlackBerry DTEK60 | |
| Google Pixel XL 2016 | |
| OnePlus 3 | |
| Huawei P9 Plus | |
| Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge | |
| Sequential Write 256KB (sort by value) | |
| BlackBerry DTEK60 | |
| Google Pixel XL 2016 | |
| OnePlus 3 | |
| Huawei P9 Plus | |
| Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge | |
| Random Read 4KB (sort by value) | |
| BlackBerry DTEK60 | |
| Google Pixel XL 2016 | |
| OnePlus 3 | |
| Huawei P9 Plus | |
| Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge | |
| Random Write 4KB (sort by value) | |
| BlackBerry DTEK60 | |
| Google Pixel XL 2016 | |
| OnePlus 3 | |
| Huawei P9 Plus | |
| Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge | |
| Sequential Read 256KB SDCard (sort by value) | |
| BlackBerry DTEK60 | |
| Huawei P9 Plus | |
| Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge | |
| Sequential Write 256KB SDCard (sort by value) | |
| BlackBerry DTEK60 | |
| Huawei P9 Plus | |
| Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge | |
(±) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 42.6 °C / 109 F, compared to the average of 35.1 °C / 95 F, ranging from 21.9 to 63.7 °C for the class Smartphone.
(±) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 42.5 °C / 109 F, compared to the average of 33.9 °C / 93 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 28.4 °C / 83 F, compared to the device average of 32.8 °C / 91 F.
BlackBerry DTEK60 audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (84.4 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 21.5% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (8.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 5.4% higher than median
(+) | mids are linear (5.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 6.5% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (5.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (22% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 41% of all tested devices in this class were better, 7% similar, 52% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 37%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 60% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 33% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
OnePlus 3 audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (88.6 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 30.9% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (11.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.2% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (4.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 5.6% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (3.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (21.8% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 40% of all tested devices in this class were better, 8% similar, 52% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 37%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 59% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 34% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Apple iPhone 7 Plus audio analysis
(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (81.4 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 24.1% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (7.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.7% away from median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (7.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 4.3% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (6.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (22% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 41% of all tested devices in this class were better, 7% similar, 52% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 37%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 60% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 33% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
| desligado |   0.03 / 0.24 Watt |
| Ocioso |  0.7 / 1.13 / 1.2 Watt |
| Carga |
6.52 / 9.75 Watt |
    
| |
Key:
min: ,
med: ,
max: Metrahit Energy | |
| BlackBerry DTEK60 3000 mAh | Google Pixel XL 2016 3450 mAh | OnePlus 3 3000 mAh | Apple iPhone 7 Plus 2915 mAh | Huawei P9 Plus 3400 mAh | Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge 3600 mAh | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power Consumption | 17% | -1% | -28% | 7% | 5% | |
| Idle Minimum * | 0.7 | 0.53 24% | 0.57 19% | 0.77 -10% | 0.87 -24% | 0.63 10% |
| Idle Average * | 1.13 | 1.07 5% | 1.24 -10% | 2.04 -81% | 1.2 -6% | 1.1 3% |
| Idle Maximum * | 1.2 | 1.12 7% | 1.36 -13% | 2.24 -87% | 1.27 -6% | 1.56 -30% |
| Load Average * | 6.52 | 5.53 15% | 5.92 9% | 4.69 28% | 4.69 28% | 5.95 9% |
| Load Maximum * | 9.75 | 6.26 36% | 10.53 -8% | 8.66 11% | 5.63 42% | 6.7 31% |
* ... smaller is better
| BlackBerry DTEK60 3000 mAh | Google Pixel XL 2016 3450 mAh | OnePlus 3 3000 mAh | Apple iPhone 7 Plus 2915 mAh | Huawei P9 Plus 3400 mAh | Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge 3600 mAh | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Battery Runtime | -17% | 9% | 3% | -2% | 28% | |
| Reader / Idle | 1356 | 1333 -2% | 1338 -1% | 1835 35% | 1446 7% | 1663 23% |
| H.264 | 809 | 505 -38% | 847 5% | 813 0% | 776 -4% | 914 13% |
| WiFi v1.3 | 779 | 505 -35% | 840 8% | 587 -25% | 530 -32% | 732 -6% |
| Load | 218 | 230 6% | 268 23% | 225 3% | 263 21% | 392 80% |
Pro
Contra
Aprendendo de seus recentes erros, a BlackBerry introduz o novo DTEK60, que oferece um smartphone mais adequado a um preço razoável. O recurso estrela do produto são suas melhorias na segurança, que na era dos ataques cibernéticos é fundamental, tanto para empresas como para usuários privados.
Que a empresa tenha transicionado para Android - optando por não usar mais o seu próprio SO - pode decepcionar aos puristas e fanáticos, mas é um movimento razoável, particularmente em vista da rápida queda da marca no mercado. A BlackBerry faz modificações pequenas no SO nativo, oferecendo pouco bloatware e apenas algumas melhorias bem implementadas.
O telefone por si mesmo oferece um desempenho que sem dúvida é de gama alta, uma carcaça sólida e atraente, e um volume impressionantes do alto falante. Além disso, a bateria é completamente apta para seu uso durante o dia todo, as câmeras tiram fotos de qualidade e a tela AMOLED muito brilhante com sua notável cobertura de cores, é um verdadeiro destaque.
Por outro lado, a velocidade de acesso da memória e do Wi-Fi poderiam ser mais velozes, mas esse é um problema menor. Mais preocupante é o uso limitado de alguns aplicativos, dado que as medidas de segurança aprimoradas tendem a restringir as permissões necessárias, resultando em que alguns programas falhem.
O DTEK60, de fato, tem o potencial de se tornar o bote salva-vidas para a BlackBerry, dado que empresa entrega um aparelho bem equipado a um preço razoável com uma série de destaques.
Além dos mercado corporativo, este smartphone também pode atrair consumidores individuais, particularmente aqueles que procuram recursos multimídia respeitáveis junto com segurança extra. Depois das ofertas pouco espetaculares da BlackBerry do últimos anos, as coisas definitivamente estão melhorando com o lançamento do DTEK60 – resta ver se isso irá se refletir na melhoria das vendas.
BlackBerry DTEK60
- 12/05/2016 v5.1 (old)
Florian Wimmer
Price comparison
