Notebookcheck Logo

Breve Análise do Smartphone BlackBerry DTEK50

Forte Knox. A BlackBerry anuncia o seu DTEK50 de 5,2-polegadas como o smartphone Android mais seguro do mundo. Consequentemente, o aparelho de gama média vem com uma seleção impressionante de recursos de segurança; apesar de tudo o seu manuseio é igual ao de qualquer aparelho Android.
BlackBerry DTEK50 (Blackberry Serie)
Processador
Qualcomm Snapdragon 617 MSM8952 8 x 1.5 GHz, Cortex-A53
Placa gráfica
Qualcomm Adreno 405
Memória
3 GB 
Pantalha
5.20 polegadas 16:9, 1920 x 1080 pixel 424 PPI, Tela táctil de 5-pontos, modo luvas, kratzfest, IPS, Profundidade de cores de 24-bit, Brilhante: sim
Disco rígido
16 GB eMMC Flash, 16 GB 
, 9.1 GB livre
Conexões
1 USB 2.0, Conexões Audio: Conector para fones, Card Reader: micro-SD máx. 2 TB, NFC, Brightness Sensor, Sensores: acelerômetro, magnetômetro, giroscópio, sensor de proximidade, sensor de luz ambiente, sensor de efeito Hall, 4G Mobile Hotspot, App2SD, WiFi Direct
Funcionamento em rede
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/), Bluetooth 4.2, GSM (850, 900, 1800, 1900 MHz), UMTS (850, 900, 1900, 2100 MHz), LTE (banda 1, 2, 3, 7, 8, 20, 28A, 38, 40, 41), Dual SIM, GPS
Tamanho
altura x largura x profundidade (em mm): 7.4 x 147 x 72.5
Bateria
11.48 Wh, 2610 mAh Lítio-Ion, Qualcomm Quick Charge 2.0, Duração da bateria (de acordo com o fabricante): 17 h, Tempo de conversação 2G (de acordo com o fabricante): 17 h, Tempo de conversação 3G (de acordo com o fabricante): 17 h, Standby 3G (de acordo com o fabricante): 576 h
Sistema Operativo
Android 6.0 Marshmallow
Camera
Primary Camera: 13 MPix Lentes f2.0, autofoco, flash LED, reconhecimento de rosto, estabilizador de imagem
Secondary Camera: 8 MPix Lentes f2.0, 84-Grad wide-angle objective, 1.125 μm pixel size, flash de selfie, estabilizador de imagens e vídeos
Características adicionais
Alto falantes: Alto falantes estéreo, Teclado: virtual, USB cable, modular power supply, in-ear headphones, quick-start guide, 24 Meses Garantia, fanless
peso
135 g, Suprimento de energia: 35 g
Preço
300 Euro
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

Size Comparison

156.6 mm 76.8 mm 8.5 mm 150 g153 mm 76.6 mm 9.8 mm 155 g147 mm 72.5 mm 7.4 mm 135 g146 mm 71 mm 7.3 mm 143 g144.8 mm 71 mm 7.3 mm 155 g148 mm 105 mm 1 mm 1.5 g
SD Card Reader
maximum SDCardreader Maximum Transfer Rate
average SDCardreader Average Transfer Rate
Networking
iperf Server (receive) TCP 1 m
Acer Liquid Jade Primo
Adreno 418, 808 MSM8992, 32 GB eMMC Flash
551 MBit/s +1774%
BlackBerry DTEK50
Adreno 405, 617 MSM8952, 16 GB eMMC Flash
29.4 MBit/s
iperf Client (transmit) TCP 1 m
Acer Liquid Jade Primo
Adreno 418, 808 MSM8992, 32 GB eMMC Flash
451 MBit/s +1109%
BlackBerry DTEK50
Adreno 405, 617 MSM8952, 16 GB eMMC Flash
37.3 MBit/s
BlackBerry DTEK50 - total route
BlackBerry DTEK50 - total route
BlackBerry DTEK50 - turning point
BlackBerry DTEK50 - turning point
BlackBerry DTEK50 - forest track
BlackBerry DTEK50 - forest track
Garmin Edge 500 - total route
Garmin Edge 500 - total route
Garmin Edge 500 - turning point
Garmin Edge 500 - turning point
Garmin Edge 500 - forest track
Garmin Edge 500 - forest track

Image Comparison

Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.

Scene 1Scene 2Scene 3
orginal image
click to load images
523
cd/m²
522
cd/m²
508
cd/m²
522
cd/m²
535
cd/m²
485
cd/m²
520
cd/m²
514
cd/m²
474
cd/m²
Distribuição do brilho
kratzfest tested with X-Rite i1Pro 2
Máximo: 535 cd/m² (Nits) Médio: 511.4 cd/m² Minimum: 16.33 cd/m²
iluminação: 89 %
iluminação com acumulador: 535 cd/m²
Contraste: 601:1 (Preto: 0.89 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 4.3 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.92
ΔE Greyscale 3.6 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
Gamma: 2.21
BlackBerry DTEK50
IPS, 1920x1080, 5.2"
Acer Liquid Jade Primo
AMOLED, 1920x1080, 5.5"
HTC One A9
AMOLED, 1920x1080, 5"
Lenovo Moto G4 Plus
IPS, 1920x1080, 5.5"
Samsung Galaxy A5 2016
Super AMOLED, 1920x1080, 5.2"
Screen
1%
9%
18%
19%
Brightness middle
535
355
-34%
346
-35%
609
14%
378
-29%
Brightness
511
356
-30%
349
-32%
589
15%
380
-26%
Brightness Distribution
89
88
-1%
93
4%
87
-2%
91
2%
Black Level *
0.89
0.63
29%
Contrast
601
967
61%
Colorchecker dE 2000 *
4.3
2.9
33%
1.55
64%
3.8
12%
1.95
55%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *
8.2
10.5
-28%
8.3
-1%
3.09
62%
Greyscale dE 2000 *
3.6
1.2
67%
2.05
43%
3.1
14%
1.86
48%
Gamma
2.21 100%
2.26 97%
2.15 102%
2.06 107%
2.13 103%
CCT
6352 102%
6381 102%
6267 104%
6725 97%
6376 102%

* ... smaller is better

Display Response Times

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
       Response Time Black to White
26 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 9 ms rise
↘ 17 ms fall
The screen shows relatively slow response rates in our tests and may be too slow for gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 59 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (21 ms).
       Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
44 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 22 ms rise
↘ 22 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 71 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (32.9 ms).

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM not detected

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8746 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured.

AnTuTu v6 - Total Score (sort by value)
BlackBerry DTEK50
40876 Points
Acer Liquid Jade Primo
75225 Points +84%
Lenovo Moto G4 Plus
45232 Points +11%
Samsung Galaxy A5 2016
41676 Points +2%
Geekbench 3
64 Bit Single-Core Score (sort by value)
HTC One A9
747 Points
Lenovo Moto G4 Plus
717 Points
64 Bit Multi-Core Score (sort by value)
HTC One A9
3032 Points
Lenovo Moto G4 Plus
3057 Points
3DMark
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Score (sort by value)
HTC One A9
9163 Points
Lenovo Moto G4 Plus
9717 Points
Samsung Galaxy A5 2016
7903 Points
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Graphics Score (sort by value)
HTC One A9
9015 Points
Lenovo Moto G4 Plus
9773 Points
Samsung Galaxy A5 2016
7542 Points
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
HTC One A9
9423 Points
Lenovo Moto G4 Plus
9527 Points
Samsung Galaxy A5 2016
9495 Points
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 (sort by value)
BlackBerry DTEK50
624 Points
HTC One A9
680 Points +9%
Lenovo Moto G4 Plus
667 Points +7%
Samsung Galaxy A5 2016
336 Points -46%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Graphics (sort by value)
BlackBerry DTEK50
568 Points
HTC One A9
618 Points +9%
Lenovo Moto G4 Plus
605 Points +7%
Samsung Galaxy A5 2016
275 Points -52%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Physics (sort by value)
BlackBerry DTEK50
957 Points
HTC One A9
1051 Points +10%
Lenovo Moto G4 Plus
1042 Points +9%
Samsung Galaxy A5 2016
1479 Points +55%
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7
T-Rex Onscreen (sort by value)
Acer Liquid Jade Primo
20.38 fps
HTC One A9
16 fps
Lenovo Moto G4 Plus
18 fps
Samsung Galaxy A5 2016
14 fps
1920x1080 T-Rex Offscreen (sort by value)
Acer Liquid Jade Primo
22.1 fps
HTC One A9
16 fps
Lenovo Moto G4 Plus
17 fps
Samsung Galaxy A5 2016
14 fps
GFXBench 3.0
on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL (sort by value)
Acer Liquid Jade Primo
10.7 fps
HTC One A9
6.7 fps
Lenovo Moto G4 Plus
7 fps
Samsung Galaxy A5 2016
3.8 fps
1920x1080 1080p Manhattan Offscreen (sort by value)
Acer Liquid Jade Primo
12.33 fps
HTC One A9
6.4 fps
Lenovo Moto G4 Plus
6.6 fps
Samsung Galaxy A5 2016
3.8 fps
GFXBench 3.1
on screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen (sort by value)
HTC One A9
4 fps
Lenovo Moto G4 Plus
4.6 fps
1920x1080 Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen (sort by value)
HTC One A9
3.8 fps
Lenovo Moto G4 Plus
4.2 fps
PCMark for Android - Work performance score (sort by value)
BlackBerry DTEK50
5234 Points
HTC One A9
4293 Points -18%
Lenovo Moto G4 Plus
Points -100%
Samsung Galaxy A5 2016
4008 Points -23%
BaseMark OS II
Overall (sort by value)
BlackBerry DTEK50
276 Points
Acer Liquid Jade Primo
1264 Points +358%
HTC One A9
981 Points +255%
Lenovo Moto G4 Plus
283 Points +3%
Samsung Galaxy A5 2016
810 Points +193%
System (sort by value)
BlackBerry DTEK50
1310 Points
Acer Liquid Jade Primo
1301 Points -1%
HTC One A9
1595 Points +22%
Lenovo Moto G4 Plus
1359 Points +4%
Samsung Galaxy A5 2016
2153 Points +64%
Memory (sort by value)
BlackBerry DTEK50
675 Points
Acer Liquid Jade Primo
1679 Points +149%
HTC One A9
1018 Points +51%
Lenovo Moto G4 Plus
604 Points -11%
Samsung Galaxy A5 2016
554 Points -18%
Graphics (sort by value)
BlackBerry DTEK50
696 Points
Acer Liquid Jade Primo
1427 Points +105%
HTC One A9
726 Points +4%
Lenovo Moto G4 Plus
805 Points +16%
Samsung Galaxy A5 2016
488 Points -30%
Web (sort by value)
BlackBerry DTEK50
9 Points
Acer Liquid Jade Primo
820 Points +9011%
HTC One A9
786 Points +8633%
Lenovo Moto G4 Plus
10 Points +11%
Samsung Galaxy A5 2016
741 Points +8133%

Legend

 
BlackBerry DTEK50 Qualcomm Snapdragon 617 MSM8952, Qualcomm Adreno 405, 16 GB eMMC Flash
 
Acer Liquid Jade Primo Qualcomm Snapdragon 808 MSM8992, Qualcomm Adreno 418, 32 GB eMMC Flash
 
HTC One A9 Qualcomm Snapdragon 617 MSM8952, Qualcomm Adreno 405, 16 GB eMMC Flash
 
Lenovo Moto G4 Plus Qualcomm Snapdragon 617 MSM8952, Qualcomm Adreno 405, 16 GB eMMC Flash
 
Samsung Galaxy A5 2016 Samsung Exynos 7580 Octa, ARM Mali-T720 MP2, 16 GB eMMC Flash
Octane V2 - Total Score (sort by value)
BlackBerry DTEK50
3527 Points
Acer Liquid Jade Primo
7141 Points +102%
HTC One A9
3911 Points +11%
Lenovo Moto G4 Plus
3656 Points +4%
Samsung Galaxy A5 2016
3611 Points +2%
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total (sort by value)
BlackBerry DTEK50
10420 ms *
Acer Liquid Jade Primo
6376 ms * +39%
HTC One A9
11054 ms * -6%
Lenovo Moto G4 Plus
11102 ms * -7%
Samsung Galaxy A5 2016
11887 ms * -14%
WebXPRT 2015 - Overall (sort by value)
BlackBerry DTEK50
64 Points
HTC One A9
69 Points +8%
Lenovo Moto G4 Plus
61 Points -5%
Samsung Galaxy A5 2016
64 Points 0%
JetStream 1.1 - Total Score (sort by value)
BlackBerry DTEK50
22.69 Points
Acer Liquid Jade Primo
40 Points +76%
HTC One A9
24.79 Points +9%
Lenovo Moto G4 Plus
22.8 Points 0%
Samsung Galaxy A5 2016
22 Points -3%

Legend

 
BlackBerry DTEK50 Qualcomm Snapdragon 617 MSM8952, Qualcomm Adreno 405, 16 GB eMMC Flash
 
Acer Liquid Jade Primo Qualcomm Snapdragon 808 MSM8992, Qualcomm Adreno 418, 32 GB eMMC Flash
 
HTC One A9 Qualcomm Snapdragon 617 MSM8952, Qualcomm Adreno 405, 16 GB eMMC Flash
 
Lenovo Moto G4 Plus Qualcomm Snapdragon 617 MSM8952, Qualcomm Adreno 405, 16 GB eMMC Flash
 
Samsung Galaxy A5 2016 Samsung Exynos 7580 Octa, ARM Mali-T720 MP2, 16 GB eMMC Flash

* ... smaller is better

AndroBench 3-5
Sequential Read 256KB (sort by value)
BlackBerry DTEK50
226.6 MB/s
HTC One A9
187.6 MB/s -17%
Lenovo Moto G4 Plus
271.4 MB/s +20%
Samsung Galaxy A5 2016
209.4 MB/s -8%
Sequential Write 256KB (sort by value)
BlackBerry DTEK50
72.8 MB/s
HTC One A9
39.61 MB/s -46%
Lenovo Moto G4 Plus
43.48 MB/s -40%
Samsung Galaxy A5 2016
60.4 MB/s -17%
Random Read 4KB (sort by value)
BlackBerry DTEK50
15.76 MB/s
HTC One A9
10 MB/s -37%
Lenovo Moto G4 Plus
36.32 MB/s +130%
Samsung Galaxy A5 2016
22.9 MB/s +45%
Random Write 4KB (sort by value)
BlackBerry DTEK50
8.12 MB/s
HTC One A9
3.61 MB/s -56%
Lenovo Moto G4 Plus
35.79 MB/s +341%
Samsung Galaxy A5 2016
11.2 MB/s +38%
Sequential Read 256KB SDCard (sort by value)
BlackBerry DTEK50
74.1 MB/s
Lenovo Moto G4 Plus
74.4 MB/s 0%
Sequential Write 256KB SDCard (sort by value)
BlackBerry DTEK50
48.87 MB/s
Lenovo Moto G4 Plus
46.92 MB/s -4%

Legend

 
BlackBerry DTEK50 Qualcomm Snapdragon 617 MSM8952, Qualcomm Adreno 405, 16 GB eMMC Flash
 
Acer Liquid Jade Primo Qualcomm Snapdragon 808 MSM8992, Qualcomm Adreno 418, 32 GB eMMC Flash
 
HTC One A9 Qualcomm Snapdragon 617 MSM8952, Qualcomm Adreno 405, 16 GB eMMC Flash
 
Lenovo Moto G4 Plus Qualcomm Snapdragon 617 MSM8952, Qualcomm Adreno 405, 16 GB eMMC Flash
 
Samsung Galaxy A5 2016 Samsung Exynos 7580 Octa, ARM Mali-T720 MP2, 16 GB eMMC Flash
Carga Máxima
 41.7 °C43 °C45.9 °C 
 41.1 °C41.2 °C45.7 °C 
 39.4 °C40.5 °C45.1 °C 
Máximo: 45.9 °C
Médio: 42.6 °C
40.8 °C42.5 °C43.4 °C
40.5 °C41.2 °C40.7 °C
40.1 °C40.6 °C39.8 °C
Máximo: 43.4 °C
Médio: 41.1 °C
alimentação elétrica  38.6 °C | Temperatura do quarto 21.9 °C | Voltcraft IR-260
(-) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 42.6 °C / 109 F, compared to the average of 32.8 °C / 91 F for the devices in the class Smartphone.
(-) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 45.9 °C / 115 F, compared to the average of 35.1 °C / 95 F, ranging from 21.9 to 63.2 °C for the class Smartphone.
(±) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 43.4 °C / 110 F, compared to the average of 33.9 °C / 93 F
(±) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 36.2 °C / 97 F, compared to the device average of 32.8 °C / 91 F.
dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2032.440.82531.336.43131.733.1402635.65039.438.86336.2368028.626.210025.424.412521.332.616023.340.420022.550.725022.456.231521.36140018.46350017.569.363017.570.380017.265.5100016.872.2125017.375.6160017.474.7200016.675.5250017.376.9315017.676.4400017.675.9500017.775.4630017.470.3800017.762.11000017.955.51250018.161.91600018.167.9SPL29.886N1.363.3median 17.7median 67.9Delta1.78.540.932.440.936.331.336.333.831.733.838.42638.440.639.440.633.936.233.930.128.630.127.425.427.430.821.330.832.323.332.33122.53136.622.436.64321.34349.818.449.85917.55963.817.563.869.117.269.174.416.874.475.217.375.273.117.473.174.416.674.475.717.375.772.817.672.874.117.674.174.117.774.179.217.479.280.517.780.577.817.977.869.418.169.474.118.174.187.229.887.266.61.366.6median 72.8median 17.7median 72.812.21.712.236.634.435.736.63032.332.43031.235.627.531.230.530.927.530.537.739.235.437.733.240.129.733.228.53029.228.526.32725.326.324.42724.124.430.926.42330.939.222.923.139.247.927.618.547.955.633.520.555.655.837.918.755.862.444.618.162.469.250.618.269.271.255.719.171.272.356.31772.371.156.617.371.172.753.317.472.775.95217.575.979.155.617.379.174.452.417.274.4714817.27171.348.217.271.382.458.717.682.478.555.317.778.573.849.817.873.866.543.11866.572.248.817.972.287.76629.987.768.919.11.368.9median 71.1median 48.8median 17.9median 71.18.710.61.68.7hearing rangehide median Pink NoiseBlackBerry DTEK50Acer Liquid Jade PrimoSamsung Galaxy A5 2016
BlackBerry DTEK50 audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (86 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 23.7% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (12.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.7% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (6.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 7.7% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (6.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (20.9% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 34% of all tested devices in this class were better, 8% similar, 58% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 37%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 53% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 39% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Acer Liquid Jade Primo audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (87.2 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 39.3% lower than median
(+) | bass is linear (6.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | reduced mids - on average 6.9% lower than median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (8.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3.5% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (3.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (24.7% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 56% of all tested devices in this class were better, 7% similar, 37% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 37%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 72% of all tested devices were better, 6% similar, 22% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Samsung Galaxy A5 2016 audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (87.7 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 33.7% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (11.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.2% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 4.7% away from median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (8.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (22.1% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 41% of all tested devices in this class were better, 7% similar, 51% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 37%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 60% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 33% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Consumo de energia
desligadodarklight 0.08 / 0.13 Watt
Ociosodarkmidlight 0.78 / 1.72 / 1.77 Watt
Carga midlight 4.33 / 8.21 Watt
 color bar
Key: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Gossen Metrahit Energy
BlackBerry DTEK50
2610 mAh
Acer Liquid Jade Primo
2870 mAh
HTC One A9
 mAh
Lenovo Moto G4 Plus
3000 mAh
Samsung Galaxy A5 2016
2900 mAh
Power Consumption
-39%
15%
0%
11%
Idle Minimum *
0.78
1.22
-56%
0.9
-15%
0.63
19%
0.96
-23%
Idle Average *
1.72
2.25
-31%
1.2
30%
1.91
-11%
1.64
5%
Idle Maximum *
1.77
2.32
-31%
1.4
21%
1.96
-11%
1.71
3%
Load Average *
4.33
7.84
-81%
3.8
12%
3.88
10%
2.98
31%
Load Maximum *
8.21
8.07
2%
5.9
28%
8.74
-6%
5.08
38%

* ... smaller is better

Tempo de Execução da Bateria
Ocioso (sem WLAN, min brilho)
17h 00min
WiFi Websurfing
6h 44min
Big Buck Bunny H.264 1080p
7h 52min
Carga (máximo brilho)
4h 04min
BlackBerry DTEK50
2610 mAh
Acer Liquid Jade Primo
2870 mAh
HTC One A9
 mAh
Lenovo Moto G4 Plus
3000 mAh
Samsung Galaxy A5 2016
2900 mAh
Battery Runtime
-17%
-6%
37%
81%
Reader / Idle
1020
1154
13%
1226
20%
2323
128%
H.264
472
465
-1%
775
64%
672
42%
WiFi v1.3
404
334
-17%
368
-9%
735
82%
626
55%
Load
244
176
-28%
201
-18%
483
98%

Pro

+ Smartphone Android mais seguro
+ Tela Full HD brilhante
+ LTE
+ GPS preciso
+ Bons alto falantes
+ Longa duração da bateria

Contra

- Sem leitor de digitais
- Apenas 9 GB de armazenamento disponível
- Péssimas taxas de dados WiFi
- Câmera apenas medíocres
- Alta produção de calor
- Incompatível com diversos benchmarks
In review: BlackBerry DTEK50. Review sample courtesy of Notebooksbilliger.de
In review: BlackBerry DTEK50. Review sample courtesy of Notebooksbilliger.de

Com o seu incomum nome DTEK50, a BlackBerry provavelmente tenha o smartphone Android mais seguro na linha de partida. O Android 6.0 Marshmallow reforçado funciona encriptado, não permite a aplicação de nenhum código, e é executado somente quando o bootloader não foi comprometido. Adicionalmente, o app chamado DTEK para atividades suspeitas no smartphone e fornece sugestões sobre como fazer com que o aparelho seja ainda mais seguro. A política de atualização do fabricante também mostra quão sério a BlackBerry leva a abordagem da sua segurança. A BlackBerry tem como alvo reagir a ameaças cibernéticas de forma muito mais rápida que a concorrência e demonstrou isso recentemente com o patch lançado rapidamente pela vulnerabilidade de segurança "QuadRooter". No entanto, o por quê o DTEK50 não está equipado com um leitor de digitais permanecerá como segredo do fabricante.

Nenhum outro smartphone Android atualmente protege tão bem os usuários contra vulnerabilidades de segurança e ameaças cibernéticas quanto o BlackBerry's DTEK50.

Além desses extensos recursos de segurança, o BlackBerry DTEK50 permanece como um sólido smartphone de gama média. Ele convence com um painel brilhante, painel Full HD, bom desempenho do SoC, os poderosos alto falantes estéreo, e uma boa duração da bateria. Apesar de seus extras de segurança e com um preço de 300 Euros (~$337), não custa mais que um aparelho Android padrão equipado de forma similar. No entanto, a BlackBerry recorta o armazenamento, apenas 9 GB dos 16 GB estão disponíveis para o usuário. As câmeras também não empolgarão a ninguém - eles não são nem muito bons, nem muito ruins, simplesmente enjoadamente médios. O smartphone falhou absolutamente no desempenho do Wi-Fi dado que não excedeu os lentos 40 MBit/s apesar do suporte para 802.11ac no teste. Também temos que criticar o DTEK50 por pequenas incompatibilidades: Três benchmarks não rodaram no teste, o qual provavelmente se deve aos mecanismos de segurança do smartphone.

BlackBerry DTEK50 - 09/12/2016 v5.1 (old)
Manuel Masiero

Acabamento
85%
Teclado
74 / 75 → 98%
Mouse
89%
Conectividade
42 / 60 → 70%
Peso
94%
Bateria
89%
Pantalha
84%
Desempenho do jogos
37 / 63 → 59%
Desempenho da aplicação
39 / 70 → 55%
Temperatura
82%
Ruído
100%
Audio
76 / 91 → 83%
Camera
78%
Médio
74%
85%
Smartphone - Médio equilibrado

Price comparison

Please share our article, every link counts!
Mail Logo
> Análises e revisões de portáteis e celulares > Análises > Análises > Breve Análise do Smartphone BlackBerry DTEK50
Manuel Masiero, 2016-09-16 (Update: 2016-09-21)