Breve Análise do Smartphone BlackBerry DTEK50

Name: BlackBerry DTEK50
Brand: BlackBerry

Forte Knox. A BlackBerry anuncia o seu DTEK50 de 5,2-polegadas como o smartphone Android mais seguro do mundo. Consequentemente, o aparelho de gama média vem com uma seleção impressionante de recursos de segurança; apesar de tudo o seu manuseio é igual ao de qualquer aparelho Android.

Manuel Masiero, ✓ Sven Kloevekorn (traduzido por Ricardo Soto), Published 09/16/2016 🇺🇸 🇩🇪 ...

Android Business Smartphone Touchscreen

Test device courtesy of notebooksbilliger.de

Download your licensed rating image as PNG / SVG

BlackBerry DTEK50 (Blackberry Serie)

Processador

Qualcomm Snapdragon 617 MSM8952 8 x 1.5 GHz, Cortex-A53

Placa gráfica

Qualcomm Adreno 405

Memória

3 GB

Pantalha

5.20 polegadas 16:9, 1920 x 1080 pixel 424 PPI, Tela táctil de 5-pontos, modo luvas, kratzfest, IPS, Profundidade de cores de 24-bit, Brilhante: sim

Disco rígido

16 GB eMMC Flash, 16 GB

, 9.1 GB livre

Conexões

1 USB 2.0, Conexões Audio: Conector para fones, Card Reader: micro-SD máx. 2 TB, NFC, Brightness Sensor, Sensores: acelerômetro, magnetômetro, giroscópio, sensor de proximidade, sensor de luz ambiente, sensor de efeito Hall, 4G Mobile Hotspot, App2SD, WiFi Direct

Funcionamento em rede

802.11 a/b/g/n/ac (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/), Bluetooth 4.2, GSM (850, 900, 1800, 1900 MHz), UMTS (850, 900, 1900, 2100 MHz), LTE (banda 1, 2, 3, 7, 8, 20, 28A, 38, 40, 41), Dual SIM, GPS

Tamanho

altura x largura x profundidade (em mm): 7.4 x 147 x 72.5

Bateria

11.48 Wh, 2610 mAh Lítio-Ion, Qualcomm Quick Charge 2.0, Duração da bateria (de acordo com o fabricante): 17 h, Tempo de conversação 2G (de acordo com o fabricante): 17 h, Tempo de conversação 3G (de acordo com o fabricante): 17 h, Standby 3G (de acordo com o fabricante): 576 h

Sistema Operativo

Android 6.0 Marshmallow

Camera

Primary Camera: 13 MPix Lentes f2.0, autofoco, flash LED, reconhecimento de rosto, estabilizador de imagem
Secondary Camera: 8 MPix Lentes f2.0, 84-Grad wide-angle objective, 1.125 μm pixel size, flash de selfie, estabilizador de imagens e vídeos

Características adicionais

Alto falantes: Alto falantes estéreo, Teclado: virtual, USB cable, modular power supply, in-ear headphones, quick-start guide, 24 Meses Garantia, fanless

peso

135 g, Suprimento de energia: 35 g

Preço

300 Euro

Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

see all specifications

Size Comparison

Acer Liquid Jade Primo Lenovo Moto G4 Plus BlackBerry DTEK50 HTC One A9 Samsung Galaxy A5 2016 DIN A6 ❌

SD Card Reader
maximum SDCardreader Maximum Transfer Rate
average SDCardreader Average Transfer Rate

Networking
iperf Server (receive) TCP 1 m
Acer Liquid Jade Primo Adreno 418, 808 MSM8992, 32 GB eMMC Flash	551 MBit/s +1774%
BlackBerry DTEK50 Adreno 405, 617 MSM8952, 16 GB eMMC Flash	29.4 MBit/s
iperf Client (transmit) TCP 1 m
Acer Liquid Jade Primo Adreno 418, 808 MSM8992, 32 GB eMMC Flash	451 MBit/s +1109%
BlackBerry DTEK50 Adreno 405, 617 MSM8952, 16 GB eMMC Flash	37.3 MBit/s

Image Comparison

Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.

Scene 1 Scene 2 Scene 3

click to load images

click to load images

click to load images


523 cd/m²	522 cd/m²	508 cd/m²
522 cd/m²	535 cd/m²	485 cd/m²
520 cd/m²	514 cd/m²	474 cd/m²

Distribuição do brilho

kratzfest tested with X-Rite i1Pro 2

Máximo: 535 cd/m² (Nits) Médio: 511.4 cd/m² Minimum: 16.33 cd/m²
iluminação: 89 %
iluminação com acumulador: 535 cd/m²
Contraste: 601:1 (Preto: 0.89 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 4.3 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.93
ΔE Greyscale 3.6 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
Gamma: 2.21

	BlackBerry DTEK50 IPS, 1920x1080, 5.2"	Acer Liquid Jade Primo AMOLED, 1920x1080, 5.5"	HTC One A9 AMOLED, 1920x1080, 5"	Lenovo Moto G4 Plus IPS, 1920x1080, 5.5"	Samsung Galaxy A5 2016 Super AMOLED, 1920x1080, 5.2"
Screen		1%	9%	18%	19%
Brightness middle	535	355 -34%	346 -35%	609 14%	378 -29%
Brightness	511	356 -30%	349 -32%	589 15%	380 -26%
Brightness Distribution	89	88 -1%	93 4%	87 -2%	91 2%
Black Level *	0.89			0.63 29%
Contrast	601			967 61%
Colorchecker dE 2000 *	4.3	2.9 33%	1.55 64%	3.8 12%	1.95 55%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *	8.2	10.5 -28%		8.3 -1%	3.09 62%
Greyscale dE 2000 *	3.6	1.2 67%	2.05 43%	3.1 14%	1.86 48%
Gamma	2.21 ^100%	2.26 ^97%	2.15 ^102%	2.06 ^107%	2.13 ^103%
CCT	6352 ^102%	6381 ^102%	6267 ^104%	6725 ^97%	6376 ^102%

* ... smaller is better

Display Response Times

ℹ

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.

↔ Response Time Black to White
26 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↗ 9 ms rise
26 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↘ 17 ms fall
The screen shows relatively slow response rates in our tests and may be too slow for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 59 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (21 ms).
↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
44 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↗ 22 ms rise
44 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↘ 22 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 71 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (32.9 ms).

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

ℹ

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.

Screen flickering / PWM not detected

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8774 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured.

AnTuTu v6 - Total Score (sort by value)
BlackBerry DTEK50	40876 Points
Acer Liquid Jade Primo	75225 Points +84%
Lenovo Moto G4 Plus	45232 Points +11%
Samsung Galaxy A5 2016	41676 Points +2%

Geekbench 3
64 Bit Single-Core Score (sort by value)
HTC One A9	747 Points
Lenovo Moto G4 Plus	717 Points
64 Bit Multi-Core Score (sort by value)
HTC One A9	3032 Points
Lenovo Moto G4 Plus	3057 Points

3DMark
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Score (sort by value)
HTC One A9	9163 Points
Lenovo Moto G4 Plus	9717 Points
Samsung Galaxy A5 2016	7903 Points
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Graphics Score (sort by value)
HTC One A9	9015 Points
Lenovo Moto G4 Plus	9773 Points
Samsung Galaxy A5 2016	7542 Points
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
HTC One A9	9423 Points
Lenovo Moto G4 Plus	9527 Points
Samsung Galaxy A5 2016	9495 Points
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 (sort by value)
BlackBerry DTEK50	624 Points
HTC One A9	680 Points +9%
Lenovo Moto G4 Plus	667 Points +7%
Samsung Galaxy A5 2016	336 Points -46%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Graphics (sort by value)
BlackBerry DTEK50	568 Points
HTC One A9	618 Points +9%
Lenovo Moto G4 Plus	605 Points +7%
Samsung Galaxy A5 2016	275 Points -52%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Physics (sort by value)
BlackBerry DTEK50	957 Points
HTC One A9	1051 Points +10%
Lenovo Moto G4 Plus	1042 Points +9%
Samsung Galaxy A5 2016	1479 Points +55%

GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7
T-Rex Onscreen (sort by value)
Acer Liquid Jade Primo	20.38 fps
HTC One A9	16 fps
Lenovo Moto G4 Plus	18 fps
Samsung Galaxy A5 2016	14 fps
1920x1080 T-Rex Offscreen (sort by value)
Acer Liquid Jade Primo	22.1 fps
HTC One A9	16 fps
Lenovo Moto G4 Plus	17 fps
Samsung Galaxy A5 2016	14 fps

GFXBench 3.0
on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL (sort by value)
Acer Liquid Jade Primo	10.7 fps
HTC One A9	6.7 fps
Lenovo Moto G4 Plus	7 fps
Samsung Galaxy A5 2016	3.8 fps
1920x1080 1080p Manhattan Offscreen (sort by value)
Acer Liquid Jade Primo	12.33 fps
HTC One A9	6.4 fps
Lenovo Moto G4 Plus	6.6 fps
Samsung Galaxy A5 2016	3.8 fps

GFXBench 3.1
on screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen (sort by value)
HTC One A9	4 fps
Lenovo Moto G4 Plus	4.6 fps
1920x1080 Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen (sort by value)
HTC One A9	3.8 fps
Lenovo Moto G4 Plus	4.2 fps

PCMark for Android - Work performance score (sort by value)
BlackBerry DTEK50	5234 Points
HTC One A9	4293 Points -18%
Lenovo Moto G4 Plus	Points -100%
Samsung Galaxy A5 2016	4008 Points -23%

BaseMark OS II
Overall (sort by value)
BlackBerry DTEK50	276 Points
Acer Liquid Jade Primo	1264 Points +358%
HTC One A9	981 Points +255%
Lenovo Moto G4 Plus	283 Points +3%
Samsung Galaxy A5 2016	810 Points +193%
System (sort by value)
BlackBerry DTEK50	1310 Points
Acer Liquid Jade Primo	1301 Points -1%
HTC One A9	1595 Points +22%
Lenovo Moto G4 Plus	1359 Points +4%
Samsung Galaxy A5 2016	2153 Points +64%
Memory (sort by value)
BlackBerry DTEK50	675 Points
Acer Liquid Jade Primo	1679 Points +149%
HTC One A9	1018 Points +51%
Lenovo Moto G4 Plus	604 Points -11%
Samsung Galaxy A5 2016	554 Points -18%
Graphics (sort by value)
BlackBerry DTEK50	696 Points
Acer Liquid Jade Primo	1427 Points +105%
HTC One A9	726 Points +4%
Lenovo Moto G4 Plus	805 Points +16%
Samsung Galaxy A5 2016	488 Points -30%
Web (sort by value)
BlackBerry DTEK50	9 Points
Acer Liquid Jade Primo	820 Points +9011%
HTC One A9	786 Points +8633%
Lenovo Moto G4 Plus	10 Points +11%
Samsung Galaxy A5 2016	741 Points +8133%

Legend

BlackBerry DTEK50 Qualcomm Snapdragon 617 MSM8952, Qualcomm Adreno 405, 16 GB eMMC Flash

Acer Liquid Jade Primo Qualcomm Snapdragon 808 MSM8992, Qualcomm Adreno 418, 32 GB eMMC Flash

HTC One A9 Qualcomm Snapdragon 617 MSM8952, Qualcomm Adreno 405, 16 GB eMMC Flash

Lenovo Moto G4 Plus Qualcomm Snapdragon 617 MSM8952, Qualcomm Adreno 405, 16 GB eMMC Flash

Samsung Galaxy A5 2016 Samsung Exynos 7580 Octa, ARM Mali-T720 MP2, 16 GB eMMC Flash

Octane V2 | Mozilla Kraken 1.1 | WebXPRT 2015 | JetStream 1.1

Octane V2 - Total Score (sort by value)
BlackBerry DTEK50	3527 Points
Acer Liquid Jade Primo	7141 Points +102%
HTC One A9	3911 Points +11%
Lenovo Moto G4 Plus	3656 Points +4%
Samsung Galaxy A5 2016	3611 Points +2%

Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total (sort by value)
BlackBerry DTEK50	10420 ms *
Acer Liquid Jade Primo	6376 ms * +39%
HTC One A9	11054 ms * -6%
Lenovo Moto G4 Plus	11102 ms * -7%
Samsung Galaxy A5 2016	11887 ms * -14%

WebXPRT 2015 - Overall (sort by value)
BlackBerry DTEK50	64 Points
HTC One A9	69 Points +8%
Lenovo Moto G4 Plus	61 Points -5%
Samsung Galaxy A5 2016	64 Points 0%

JetStream 1.1 - Total Score (sort by value)
BlackBerry DTEK50	22.69 Points
Acer Liquid Jade Primo	40 Points +76%
HTC One A9	24.79 Points +9%
Lenovo Moto G4 Plus	22.8 Points 0%
Samsung Galaxy A5 2016	22 Points -3%

Legend

BlackBerry DTEK50 Qualcomm Snapdragon 617 MSM8952, Qualcomm Adreno 405, 16 GB eMMC Flash

Acer Liquid Jade Primo Qualcomm Snapdragon 808 MSM8992, Qualcomm Adreno 418, 32 GB eMMC Flash

HTC One A9 Qualcomm Snapdragon 617 MSM8952, Qualcomm Adreno 405, 16 GB eMMC Flash

Lenovo Moto G4 Plus Qualcomm Snapdragon 617 MSM8952, Qualcomm Adreno 405, 16 GB eMMC Flash

Samsung Galaxy A5 2016 Samsung Exynos 7580 Octa, ARM Mali-T720 MP2, 16 GB eMMC Flash

* ... smaller is better

AndroBench 3-5
Sequential Read 256KB (sort by value)
BlackBerry DTEK50	226.6 MB/s
HTC One A9	187.6 MB/s -17%
Lenovo Moto G4 Plus	271.4 MB/s +20%
Samsung Galaxy A5 2016	209.4 MB/s -8%
Sequential Write 256KB (sort by value)
BlackBerry DTEK50	72.8 MB/s
HTC One A9	39.61 MB/s -46%
Lenovo Moto G4 Plus	43.48 MB/s -40%
Samsung Galaxy A5 2016	60.4 MB/s -17%
Random Read 4KB (sort by value)
BlackBerry DTEK50	15.76 MB/s
HTC One A9	10 MB/s -37%
Lenovo Moto G4 Plus	36.32 MB/s +130%
Samsung Galaxy A5 2016	22.9 MB/s +45%
Random Write 4KB (sort by value)
BlackBerry DTEK50	8.12 MB/s
HTC One A9	3.61 MB/s -56%
Lenovo Moto G4 Plus	35.79 MB/s +341%
Samsung Galaxy A5 2016	11.2 MB/s +38%
Sequential Read 256KB SDCard (sort by value)
BlackBerry DTEK50	74.1 MB/s
Lenovo Moto G4 Plus	74.4 MB/s 0%
Sequential Write 256KB SDCard (sort by value)
BlackBerry DTEK50	48.87 MB/s
Lenovo Moto G4 Plus	46.92 MB/s -4%

Legend

BlackBerry DTEK50 Qualcomm Snapdragon 617 MSM8952, Qualcomm Adreno 405, 16 GB eMMC Flash

Acer Liquid Jade Primo Qualcomm Snapdragon 808 MSM8992, Qualcomm Adreno 418, 32 GB eMMC Flash

HTC One A9 Qualcomm Snapdragon 617 MSM8952, Qualcomm Adreno 405, 16 GB eMMC Flash

Lenovo Moto G4 Plus Qualcomm Snapdragon 617 MSM8952, Qualcomm Adreno 405, 16 GB eMMC Flash

Samsung Galaxy A5 2016 Samsung Exynos 7580 Octa, ARM Mali-T720 MP2, 16 GB eMMC Flash

Carga Máxima

Inatividade


41.7 °C	43 °C	45.9 °C
41.1 °C	41.2 °C	45.7 °C
39.4 °C	40.5 °C	45.1 °C

Máximo: 45.9 °C
Médio: 42.6 °C


40.8 °C	42.5 °C	43.4 °C
40.5 °C	41.2 °C	40.7 °C
40.1 °C	40.6 °C	39.8 °C

Máximo: 43.4 °C
Médio: 41.1 °C

alimentação elétrica 38.6 °C | Temperatura do quarto 21.9 °C | Voltcraft IR-260

(-) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 42.6 °C / 109 F, compared to the average of 32.8 °C / 91 F for the devices in the class Smartphone.
(-) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 45.9 °C / 115 F, compared to the average of 35.1 °C / 95 F, ranging from 21.9 to 63.2 °C for the class Smartphone.
(±) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 43.4 °C / 110 F, compared to the average of 33.9 °C / 93 F
(±) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 36.2 °C / 97 F, compared to the device average of 32.8 °C / 91 F.

BlackBerry DTEK50 audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (86 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 23.7% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (12.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.7% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (6.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 7.7% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (6.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (20.9% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 33% of all tested devices in this class were better, 8% similar, 58% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 37%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 53% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 39% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Acer Liquid Jade Primo audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (87.2 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 39.3% lower than median
(+) | bass is linear (6.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | reduced mids - on average 6.9% lower than median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (8.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3.5% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (3.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (24.7% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 56% of all tested devices in this class were better, 7% similar, 37% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 37%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 72% of all tested devices were better, 6% similar, 22% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Samsung Galaxy A5 2016 audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (87.7 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 33.7% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (11.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.2% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 4.7% away from median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (8.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (22.1% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 41% of all tested devices in this class were better, 7% similar, 51% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 37%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 60% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 33% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Consumo de energia

desligado	0.08 / 0.13 Watt
Ocioso	0.78 / 1.72 / 1.77 Watt
Carga	4.33 / 8.21 Watt


Key: min: , med: , max: Gossen Metrahit Energy

	BlackBerry DTEK50 2610 mAh	Acer Liquid Jade Primo 2870 mAh	HTC One A9 mAh	Lenovo Moto G4 Plus 3000 mAh	Samsung Galaxy A5 2016 2900 mAh
Power Consumption		-39%	15%	0%	11%
Idle Minimum *	0.78	1.22 -56%	0.9 -15%	0.63 19%	0.96 -23%
Idle Average *	1.72	2.25 -31%	1.2 30%	1.91 -11%	1.64 5%
Idle Maximum *	1.77	2.32 -31%	1.4 21%	1.96 -11%	1.71 3%
Load Average *	4.33	7.84 -81%	3.8 12%	3.88 10%	2.98 31%
Load Maximum *	8.21	8.07 2%	5.9 28%	8.74 -6%	5.08 38%

* ... smaller is better

Tempo de Execução da Bateria

Ocioso (sem WLAN, min brilho)		17h 00min
WiFi Websurfing		6h 44min
Big Buck Bunny H.264 1080p		7h 52min
Carga (máximo brilho)		4h 04min

	BlackBerry DTEK50 2610 mAh	Acer Liquid Jade Primo 2870 mAh	HTC One A9 mAh	Lenovo Moto G4 Plus 3000 mAh	Samsung Galaxy A5 2016 2900 mAh
Battery Runtime		-17%	-6%	37%	81%
Reader / Idle	1020		1154 13%	1226 20%	2323 128%
H.264	472		465 -1%	775 64%	672 42%
WiFi v1.3	404	334 -17%	368 -9%	735 82%	626 55%
Load	244		176 -28%	201 -18%	483 98%

Pro

+ Smartphone Android mais seguro

+ Tela Full HD brilhante

+ LTE

+ GPS preciso

+ Bons alto falantes

+ Longa duração da bateria

Contra

- Sem leitor de digitais

- Apenas 9 GB de armazenamento disponível

- Péssimas taxas de dados WiFi

- Câmera apenas medíocres

- Alta produção de calor

- Incompatível com diversos benchmarks

In review: BlackBerry DTEK50. Review sample courtesy of Notebooksbilliger.de

Com o seu incomum nome DTEK50, a BlackBerry provavelmente tenha o smartphone Android mais seguro na linha de partida. O Android 6.0 Marshmallow reforçado funciona encriptado, não permite a aplicação de nenhum código, e é executado somente quando o bootloader não foi comprometido. Adicionalmente, o app chamado DTEK para atividades suspeitas no smartphone e fornece sugestões sobre como fazer com que o aparelho seja ainda mais seguro. A política de atualização do fabricante também mostra quão sério a BlackBerry leva a abordagem da sua segurança. A BlackBerry tem como alvo reagir a ameaças cibernéticas de forma muito mais rápida que a concorrência e demonstrou isso recentemente com o patch lançado rapidamente pela vulnerabilidade de segurança "QuadRooter". No entanto, o por quê o DTEK50 não está equipado com um leitor de digitais permanecerá como segredo do fabricante.

Nenhum outro smartphone Android atualmente protege tão bem os usuários contra vulnerabilidades de segurança e ameaças cibernéticas quanto o BlackBerry's DTEK50.

Além desses extensos recursos de segurança, o BlackBerry DTEK50 permanece como um sólido smartphone de gama média. Ele convence com um painel brilhante, painel Full HD, bom desempenho do SoC, os poderosos alto falantes estéreo, e uma boa duração da bateria. Apesar de seus extras de segurança e com um preço de 300 Euros (~$337), não custa mais que um aparelho Android padrão equipado de forma similar. No entanto, a BlackBerry recorta o armazenamento, apenas 9 GB dos 16 GB estão disponíveis para o usuário. As câmeras também não empolgarão a ninguém - eles não são nem muito bons, nem muito ruins, simplesmente enjoadamente médios. O smartphone falhou absolutamente no desempenho do Wi-Fi dado que não excedeu os lentos 40 MBit/s apesar do suporte para 802.11ac no teste. Também temos que criticar o DTEK50 por pequenas incompatibilidades: Três benchmarks não rodaram no teste, o qual provavelmente se deve aos mecanismos de segurança do smartphone.

BlackBerry DTEK50 - 2016-09-12 09/12/2016 v5.1 ^(old)
Manuel Masiero

Acabamento

85%

Teclado

74 / 75 → 98%

Mouse

89%

Conectividade

42 / 60 → 70%

Peso

94%

Bateria

89%

Pantalha

84%

Desempenho do jogos

37 / 63 → 59%

Desempenho da aplicação

39 / 70 → 55%

Temperatura

82%

Ruído

100%

Audio

76 / 91 → 83%

Camera

78%

Médio

74%

85%

Smartphone - Médio equilibrado

Price comparison

Please share our article, every link counts!

> Análises e revisões de portáteis e celulares > Análises > Análises > Breve Análise do Smartphone BlackBerry DTEK50

Manuel Masiero, 2016-09-16 (Update: 2016-09-21)