Análise do XMG Neo 17 E24 - Laptop rápido para jogos com resfriamento a água opcional

Name: SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 E24
Brand: SCHENKER

Laptop RTX 4080 e teclado mecânico.

Com o XMG Neo 17, o senhor obtém um gamer puro-sangue que pode ser equipado com os componentes mais rápidos do mercado. Um teclado mecânico Cherry e um sistema externo de resfriamento a água também estão disponíveis como opções, o que reduz não apenas as temperaturas, mas também o ruído de fundo.
Andreas Osthoff, 👁 Andreas Osthoff (traduzido por DeepL / Ninh Duy) Published 11/29/2024 🇺🇸 🇩🇪 ...
Geforce Intel Laptop / Notebook Nvidia Thunderbolt Windows

Veredicto - O XMG Neo 17 se concentra no desempenho dos jogos

O XMG Neo 17 se apresenta no teste como um poderoso laptop para jogos com um foco óbvio no desempenho máximo dos componentes. O Intel Core i9-14900HX é usado como processador em todas as configurações, enquanto as GPUs dedicadas da Nvidia podem ter overclock. O resultado é um dos notebooks RTX 4080 mais rápidos que testamos até hoje. Isso proporciona desempenho suficiente para o rápido painel QHD de 240 Hz, que também é muito adequado para jogos. O circuito para o resfriamento a água Oasis externo opcional foi aprimorado e agora também cobre o processador. O resultado são temperaturas significativamente mais baixas e, portanto, um nível de ruído mais baixo durante os jogos.

Test device courtesy of Schenker Technologies

Download your licensed rating image as PNG / SVG

O gamer também faz bonito em outras áreas: há portas suficientes disponíveis, o gabinete é de boa qualidade e o teclado mecânico Cherry opcional é muito bom, mas também muito barulhento. A capacidade de RAM/SSD também pode ser configurada e a atualização posterior não é problema. O notebook de 17 polegadas é relativamente grande e não é leve, pesando pouco menos de 3 kg. A unidade de resfriamento faz um bom trabalho, mesmo sem o resfriamento a água Oasis, mas as ventoinhas fazem muito barulho durante os jogos e o senhor deve usar fones de ouvido.

Em termos de preço, mais de 3.000 euros não é, obviamente, uma pechincha, mas isso se deve principalmente à GPU GeForce. Se o senhor estiver procurando um gamer puro-sangue e também quiser aproveitar o resfriamento a água, o XMG Neo 17 é definitivamente uma boa escolha.

Pro

+ Tela QHD+ (16:10, 240 Hz, G-Sync)

+ alto desempenho do sistema

+ carcaça de metal resistente

+ Optimus avançado

+ 2x SO-DIMM/2x M.2-2280

+ Composto térmico de metal líquido

+ Thunderbolt 4

+ teclado mecânico

+ resfriamento a água opcional disponível

Contra

- ventoinhas barulhentas ao tocar

- ruído ocasional da bobina

- teclado mecânico barulhento

- sem Wi-Fi 7

Preço e disponibilidade

O Schenker Neo 17 E24 pode ser configurado e encomendado diretamente da Bestware. O preço inicial é de 1.949 euros para a configuração com o laptop RTX 4060 e 2.924 euros para o laptop RTX 4080.

Possíveis concorrentes em comparação

Image	Model / Review	Geizhals	Weight	Height	Display
1. 84.6%	SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 E24 Intel Core i9-14900HX ⎘ NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU ⎘ 32 GB Memória, 1024 GB SSD	Listenpreis 3189€	2.9 kg	27 mm	17.00" 2560x1600 178 PPI IPS
2. 89.2% ^{v7 (old)}	Medion Erazer Beast X40 2024 Intel Core i9-14900HX ⎘ NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU ⎘ 32 GB Memória, 1024 GB SSD	Listenpreis 4000 Euro	2.9 kg	36 mm	17.00" 2560x1600 178 PPI IPS
3. 80.4%	HP Omen 17-db0079ng AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS ⎘ NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU ⎘ 32 GB Memória, 1024 GB SSD	Listenpreis 1900€	2.8 kg	30.1 mm	17.30" 2560x1440 170 PPI IPS
4. 85.2% ^{v7 (old)}	Eurocom Raptor X17 Core i9-14900HX Intel Core i9-14900HX ⎘ NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU ⎘ 32 GB Memória, 2048 GB SSD	Listenpreis 4500 USD	3.4 kg	24.9 mm	17.30" 3840x2160 255 PPI IPS
5. 88.3% ^{v7 (old)}	MSI GE78HX 13VH-070US Intel Core i9-13950HX ⎘ NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU ⎘ 32 GB Memória, 2048 GB SSD	Listenpreis 3600 USD	3 kg	23 mm	17.00" 2560x1600 178 PPI IPS

Veredicto - O XMG Neo 17 se concentra no desempenho dos jogos
Especificações
Estojos e equipamentos
Dispositivos de entrada - Teclado mecânico Cherry
Tela - QHD com 240 Hz
Desempenho - Raptor Lake-HX
Emissões e energia
Avaliação geral do Notebookcheck

Com o XMG Neo 17 E24, a Schenker oferece um poderoso notebook para jogos de 17 polegadas com um painel QHD de 240 Hz (G-Sync). O processador é sempre o Core i9-14900HX da Intel e, para a placa de vídeo, o senhor pode escolher entre a Laptop Nvidia GeForce RTX 4060 e todos os outros modelos até o laptop GeForce Laptop RTX 4090. A memória RAM/SSD pode ser amplamente configurada e, além de um teclado mecânico, o sistema externo de resfriamento a água Oasis também está disponível como opção, o que pode aumentar significativamente a capacidade de resfriamento do laptop.

Nosso dispositivo de teste está equipado com o laptop dedicado GeForce Laptop RTX 4080 32 GB de RAM e um SSD de 1 TB da Samsung, o que aumenta o preço, incluindo o teclado mecânico Cherry, para 3.182 euros (preço base de 1.948 euros). Também analisamos alguns benchmarks do Neo 17 com o laptop RTX 4090 em combinação com o sistema de resfriamento a água Oasis (199 euros).

Especificações

SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 E24 (XMG Neo 17 Serie)

Processador

Intel Core i9-14900HX 24 x 1.6 - 5.8 GHz, 160 W PL2 / Short Burst, 140 W PL1 / Sustained, Raptor Lake-HX Refresh

Placa gráfica

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU - 12 MB VRAM, Análises do: 2385 MHz, Memoría: 2375 MHz, 175 W TDP ( including 25 W Dynamic Boost), GDDR6, 565.90, Advanced Optimus

Memória

32 GB

, DDR5-5600, Dual-Channel, max. 64 GB

Pantalha

17.00 polegadas 16:10, 2560 x 1600 pixel 178 PPI, NE170QDM-NZ1, IPS, Brilhante: não, 240 Hz

placa mãe

Intel HM770 (Raptor Lake-S PCH)

Disco rígido

Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB, 1024 GB

, 864 GB livre

Placa de Som

Intel Raptor Lake-S PCH - cAVS

Conexões

3 USB 3.0, 1 USB 4.0 40 Gbps, 1 Thunderbolt, USB-C Power Delivery (PD), 1 HDMI, 1 DisplayPort, Conexões Audio: 3.5 mm Stereo, Card Reader: SDXC

Funcionamento em rede

Realtek RTL8125 2.5GBe Family Ethernet Controller (10/100/1000/2500MBit/s), Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211 (a/b/g/h/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/ax = Wi-Fi 6/ Wi-Fi 6E 6 GHz), Bluetooth 5.2

Tamanho

altura x largura x profundidade (em mm): 27 x 381.7 x 272.8

Bateria

99 Wh, 6450 mAh Lítio-Polímero

Sistema Operativo

Microsoft Windows 11 Home

Camera

Webcam: 1080p + IR
Primary Camera: 2 MPix

Características adicionais

Alto falantes: Stereo, Teclado: Chiclet, mechanical, Cherry MX ULP Tactile, Iluminação do Teclado: sim, 330W PSU, 24 Meses Garantia

peso

2.893 kg, Suprimento de energia: 974 g

Preço

3189 Euro

Links

SCHENKER página inicial
SCHENKER Seção de notebook

Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

see all specifications

Estojos e equipamentos

Já estamos familiarizados com o chassi de metal preto e a unidade de base emborrachada do Medion Erazer Beastque é baseado no mesmo barebone. Há uma faixa de LED na parte traseira e um logotipo XMG na tampa, mas, fora isso, não há adesivos irritantes do fabricante. A estabilidade geral é muito boa, mas com um peso de pouco menos de 2,9 kg e uma altura de 2,7 cm, o Neo 17 também não é leve. A tampa inferior do case pode ser removida com relativa facilidade (os dois parafusos da conexão de resfriamento de água também devem ser soltos) e o senhor pode acessar todos os componentes importantes, incluindo a RAM, 2x SSD M.2-2280 ou o módulo WLAN.

A gama de conexões é muito ampla, pois, além de portas USB suficientes, Thunderbolt 4 e HDMI também estão disponíveis. O leitor de cartões atinge taxas de transferência médias em conjunto com nossa placa de referência (Angelbird AV Pro V60) e a webcam de 1080p tira fotos suficientemente nítidas. O módulo Wi-Fi 6E da Intel (AX211) atinge taxas de transferência muito boas em conjunto com nosso roteador de referência, mas o padrão Wi-Fi 7 mais recente ainda não é suportado.

Comparação de tamanho

HP Omen 17-db0079ng Eurocom Raptor X17 Core i9-14900HX Medion Erazer Beast X40 2024 SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 E24 MSI GE78HX 13VH-070US DIN A4 ❌

Esquerda: trava Kensington, USB-A 3.2 Gen.2 (10 Gbit/s), saída para fone de ouvido, entrada para microfone

À direita: Leitor de cartão SD, 2x USB-A 3.2 Gen.1 (5 Gbit/s)

Traseira: conexão para resfriamento a água Oasis (autovedante), USB-C 4.0 com Thunderbolt 4 (40 Gbit/s, modo DisplayPort ALT 1.4, compatível com G-Sync, Power Delivery)

SD Card Reader
average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs)
Average of class Gaming (19 - 202, n=87, last 2 years)	95.9 MB/s +24%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 E24 Intel Core i9-14900HX (Angelbird AV Pro V60)	77.2 MB/s
Medion Erazer Beast X40 2024 Intel Core i9-14900HX (AV PRO microSD 128 GB V60)	77 MB/s 0%
MSI GE78HX 13VH-070US Intel Core i9-13950HX (Angelibird AV Pro V60)	61.4 MB/s -20%
maximum AS SSD Seq Read Test (1GB)
Average of class Gaming (25.8 - 269, n=88, last 2 years)	120 MB/s +49%
Medion Erazer Beast X40 2024 Intel Core i9-14900HX (AV PRO microSD 128 GB V60)	90 MB/s +12%
MSI GE78HX 13VH-070US Intel Core i9-13950HX (Angelibird AV Pro V60)	88.7 MB/s +10%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 E24 Intel Core i9-14900HX (Angelbird AV Pro V60)	80.5 MB/s

Networking
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 E24 Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211
iperf3 transmit AXE11000	1679 (min: 1606) MBit/s ∼100%
iperf3 receive AXE11000	1715 (min: 1650) MBit/s ∼100%
Medion Erazer Beast X40 2024 Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211
iperf3 transmit AXE11000	636 (min: 501) MBit/s ∼38%
iperf3 receive AXE11000	1650 (min: 1031) MBit/s ∼96%
HP Omen 17-db0079ng Realtek RTL8852BE
iperf3 transmit AXE11000	850 (min: 782) MBit/s ∼51%
iperf3 receive AXE11000	930 (min: 466) MBit/s ∼54%
Eurocom Raptor X17 Core i9-14900HX Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211
iperf3 transmit AXE11000	793 (min: 386) MBit/s ∼47%
iperf3 receive AXE11000	1214 (min: 1011) MBit/s ∼71%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz	691 (min: 640) MBit/s ∼58%
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz	1227 (min: 1158) MBit/s ∼84%
MSI GE78HX 13VH-070US Killer Wi-Fi 6E AX1690i 160MHz
iperf3 transmit AXE11000	1145 (min: 867) MBit/s ∼68%
iperf3 receive AXE11000	1194 (min: 839) MBit/s ∼70%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz	1192 (min: 941) MBit/s ∼100%
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz	1465 (min: 1277) MBit/s ∼100%

SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 E24; iperf3 transmit AXE11000: Ø1679 (1606-1733)

SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 E24; iperf3 receive AXE11000: Ø1715 (1650-1733)

ColorChecker SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 E24: 13.28 ∆E min: 1.76 - max: 22.57 ∆E

Dispositivos de entrada - Teclado mecânico Cherry

O Neo 17 está disponível com um teclado de membrana convencional com 4 zonas de iluminação ou com um teclado mecânico com iluminação individual das teclas (custo adicional de 95 euros). Isso também está instalado em nosso dispositivo de teste, com interruptores táteis da Cherry (MX ULP) sendo usados. Eles fazem jus ao seu nome e oferecem uma sensação de digitação muito tátil e precisa, mas os botões também são muito barulhentos. Isso definitivamente deve ser levado em conta ao fazer sua escolha. O grande ClickPad de vidro (15 x 9,5 cm) funciona sem problemas.

Tela - QHD com 240 Hz

A tela IPS de 17 polegadas com superfície fosca oferece uma resolução de 2.560 x 1.600 pixels (16:10) e é muito adequada para jogos graças aos tempos de resposta rápidos e à frequência de 240 Hz. A qualidade subjetiva da imagem também é muito boa. O PWM não é usado e não há grandes problemas com halos.

O brilho médio é de cerca de 400 cd/m², embora o nível de preto seja um pouco mais alto, com 0,39. Isso resulta em uma taxa de contraste máxima de pouco mais de 1.000:1, o que é ótimo. O painel deve ser ainda mais brilhante em ambientes externos. A calibração de fábrica já é muito boa, mas podemos otimizar ainda mais a tela com a nossa calibração. O perfil correspondente está disponível para download gratuito na caixa à direita. Juntamente com a cobertura sRGB completa, o painel também é adequado para a edição de imagens/vídeos.


425 cd/m²	406 cd/m²	421 cd/m²
387 cd/m²	412 cd/m²	407 cd/m²
373 cd/m²	392 cd/m²	384 cd/m²

Distribuição do brilho

NE170QDM-NZ1 tested with X-Rite i1Pro 2

Máximo: 425 cd/m² (Nits) Médio: 400.8 cd/m² Minimum: 19.9 cd/m²
iluminação: 88 %
iluminação com acumulador: 412 cd/m²
Contraste: 1056:1 (Preto: 0.39 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 1.8 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.91, calibrated: 0.9
ΔE Greyscale 2.5 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
69.6% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
98.4% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
69% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.3

Download Arquivo ICC (X-Rite i1Pro 2)

	SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 E24 NE170QDM-NZ1, IPS, 2560x1600, 17", 240 Hz	Medion Erazer Beast X40 2024 BOE NE170QDM-NZ1, IPS, 2560x1600, 17", 240 Hz	HP Omen 17-db0079ng BOE0B67, IPS, 2560x1440, 17.3", 240 Hz	Eurocom Raptor X17 Core i9-14900HX BOE CQ NE173QUM-NY1, IPS, 3840x2160, 17.3", 144 Hz	MSI GE78HX 13VH-070US AU Optronics B170QAN01.2, IPS, 2560x1600, 17", 240 Hz
Display		-0%	-3%	20%	22%
Display P3 Coverage	69	68.1 -1%	66.2 -4%	95.9 39%	97.6 41%
sRGB Coverage	98.4	99.5 1%	95.5 -3%	99.8 1%	99.9 2%
AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage	69.6	69 -1%	68.1 -2%	84.2 21%	86.5 24%
Response Times		4%	-17%	-40%	38%
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% *	12.1 ?(5.9, 6.2)	11.7 ?(5.7, 6) 3%	14.4 ?(6.8, 7.6) -19%	14.8 ?(7.2, 7.6) -22%	4.2 ?(1.9, 2.3) 65%
Response Time Black / White *	7.2 ?(3, 4.2)	6.9 ?(2.8, 4.1) 4%	8.3 ?(3.5, 4.8) -15%	11.4 ?(6.1, 5.3) -58%	6.4 ?(2.8, 3.6) 11%
PWM Frequency
Screen		14%	-9%	-25%	-51%
Brightness middle	412	422 2%	363 -12%	544.6 32%	398.6 -3%
Brightness	401	388 -3%	341 -15%	507 26%	384 -4%
Brightness Distribution	88	87 -1%	84 -5%	77 -12%	89 1%
Black Level *	0.39	0.42 -8%	0.38 3%	0.48 -23%	0.46 -18%
Contrast	1056	1005 -5%	955 -10%	1135 7%	867 -18%
Colorchecker dE 2000 *	1.8	1.42 21%	1.74 3%	3.38 -88%	4.05 -125%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *	3.9	1.97 49%	5.39 -38%	7.13 -83%	8.68 -123%
Colorchecker dE 2000 calibrated *	0.9	0.7 22%	1.43 -59%	1.03 -14%	1.02 -13%
Greyscale dE 2000 *	2.5	1.2 52%	1.3 48%	4.3 -72%	6.5 -160%
Gamma	2.3 ^96%	2.078 ^106%	2.235 ^98%	2.42 ^91%	2.11 ^104%
CCT	6676 ^97%	6581 ^99%	6346 ^102%	7356 ^88%	7518 ^86%
Total Average (Program / Settings)		6% / 10%	-10% / -9%	-15% / -18%	3% / -23%

* ... smaller is better

Display Response Times

ℹ

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.

↔ Response Time Black to White
7.2 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↗ 3 ms rise
7.2 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↘ 4.2 ms fall
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 18 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (20.9 ms).
↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
12.1 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↗ 5.9 ms rise
12.1 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↘ 6.2 ms fall
The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 22 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (32.8 ms).

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

ℹ

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.

Screen flickering / PWM not detected

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8705 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured.

Ao ar livre (dia claro, sem luz solar direta)

Desempenho - Raptor Lake-HX

O Neo 17 é equipado exclusivamente com o Intel Core i9-14900HX. 16 GB de RAM são instalados como padrão, mas até 96 GB são possíveis graças a dois slots SO-DIMM (sobretaxa de 260 euros).

Condições de teste

O XMG Neo 17 oferece vários perfis de energia, que resumimos na tabela a seguir. Usamos o modo Overboost para nossos benchmarks e medições, pois a diferença de ruído em comparação com o modo Enthusiast é pequena. O fabricante também oferece o site Deep Dive para obter mais informações técnicas básicas sobre o Neo 17 e os perfis de energia.

Perfil de energia	CPU TDP	CB R23 Multi	GPU TDP	Time Spy Gráficos	CP 2077 Ultra QHD	Volume máximo do ventilador
Balanceado	45 W	14.899 pontos	130 W	10.778 pontos	73,9 FPS	43,1 dB(A)
Enthusiast	75 W	22.027 pontos	150 W	18.021 pontos	78,6 FPS	49,9 dB(A)
Overboost	160/140 W	31.740 pontos	175 W	19.155 pontos	80,7 FPS	51,9 dB(A)

Processador - Core i9-14900HX

O Intel Core i9-14900HX ainda é um dos processadores móveis mais rápidos e é improvável que isso mude muito com os próximos chips Arrow Lake. O fornecimento de energia do processador é excelente, pois ele pode consumir 160 watts por períodos curtos e 140 watts continuamente. Para o usuário, isso significa um desempenho muito alto e constante. No entanto, é preciso esperar perdas significativas no modo de bateria, pois a CPU pode consumir no máximo 35 watts, o que corresponde a uma redução de 65% no desempenho nos testes de vários núcleos. Outros benchmarks de CPU estão disponíveis em nossa seção de tecnologia.

Cinebench R15 Multi loop

SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 E24 Intel Core i9-14900HX: Ø4773 (4743.83-4806.54)

Medion Erazer Beast X40 2024 Intel Core i9-14900HX: Ø3224 (3189.54-3263.11)

HP Omen 17-db0079ng AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS: Ø2557 (2454.44-2575)

Eurocom Raptor X17 Core i9-14900HX Intel Core i9-14900HX: Ø4467 (4379.24-4648.46)

MSI GE78HX 13VH-070US Intel Core i9-13950HX: Ø4856 (4818.7-5120.98)

CPU Performance Rating: Percent
Cinebench R23: Multi Core | Single Core
Cinebench R20: CPU (Multi Core) | CPU (Single Core)
Cinebench R15: CPU Multi 64Bit | CPU Single 64Bit
Blender: v2.79 BMW27 CPU
7-Zip 18.03: 7z b 4 | 7z b 4 -mmt1
Geekbench 6.3: Multi-Core | Single-Core
Geekbench 5.5: Multi-Core | Single-Core
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2: 4k Preset
LibreOffice : 20 Documents To PDF
R Benchmark 2.5: Overall mean

CPU Performance Rating
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 E24 Intel Core i9-14900HX	87.3 pt
MSI GE78HX 13VH-070US ^-2! Intel Core i9-13950HX	84.9 pt
Average Intel Core i9-14900HX	81.2 pt
Eurocom Raptor X17 Core i9-14900HX Intel Core i9-14900HX	79.6 pt
Medion Erazer Beast X40 2024 Intel Core i9-14900HX	75 pt
Average of class Gaming	66.3 pt
HP Omen 17-db0079ng AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS	53.4 pt

Cinebench R23 / Multi Core
MSI GE78HX 13VH-070US Intel Core i9-13950HX	32664 (29653.8^min - 32664.5^max) Points +3%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 E24 Intel Core i9-14900HX	31740 Points
Eurocom Raptor X17 Core i9-14900HX Intel Core i9-14900HX	31323 (28572.5^min - 31322.6^max) Points -1%
Average Intel Core i9-14900HX (17078 - 36249, n=36)	28815 Points -9%
Medion Erazer Beast X40 2024 Intel Core i9-14900HX	22238 Points -30%
Average of class Gaming (5668 - 36249, n=188, last 2 years)	21841 Points -31%
HP Omen 17-db0079ng AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS	16494 Points -48%

Cinebench R23 / Single Core
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 E24 Intel Core i9-14900HX	2233 Points
Medion Erazer Beast X40 2024 Intel Core i9-14900HX	2227 Points 0%
Average Intel Core i9-14900HX (1720 - 2245, n=36)	2149 Points -4%
MSI GE78HX 13VH-070US Intel Core i9-13950HX	2113 Points -5%
Eurocom Raptor X17 Core i9-14900HX Intel Core i9-14900HX	2100 Points -6%
Average of class Gaming (1136 - 2235, n=186, last 2 years)	1888 Points -15%
HP Omen 17-db0079ng AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS	1623 Points -27%

Cinebench R20 / CPU (Multi Core)
MSI GE78HX 13VH-070US Intel Core i9-13950HX	12574 Points +4%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 E24 Intel Core i9-14900HX	12083 Points
Eurocom Raptor X17 Core i9-14900HX Intel Core i9-14900HX	11543 Points -4%
Average Intel Core i9-14900HX (6579 - 13832, n=36)	10958 Points -9%
Medion Erazer Beast X40 2024 Intel Core i9-14900HX	8495 Points -30%
Average of class Gaming (2179 - 13832, n=186, last 2 years)	8311 Points -31%
HP Omen 17-db0079ng AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS	6440 Points -47%

Cinebench R20 / CPU (Single Core)
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 E24 Intel Core i9-14900HX	856 Points
Medion Erazer Beast X40 2024 Intel Core i9-14900HX	855 Points 0%
Average Intel Core i9-14900HX (657 - 859, n=36)	824 Points -4%
Eurocom Raptor X17 Core i9-14900HX Intel Core i9-14900HX	804 Points -6%
MSI GE78HX 13VH-070US Intel Core i9-13950HX	803 Points -6%
Average of class Gaming (439 - 856, n=186, last 2 years)	725 Points -15%
HP Omen 17-db0079ng AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS	681 Points -20%

Cinebench R15 / CPU Multi 64Bit
MSI GE78HX 13VH-070US Intel Core i9-13950HX	5121 (4818.7^min - 5120.98^max) Points +7%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 E24 Intel Core i9-14900HX	4807 (4743.83^min - 4806.54^max) Points
Eurocom Raptor X17 Core i9-14900HX Intel Core i9-14900HX	4648 (4379.24^min - 4648.46^max) Points -3%
Average Intel Core i9-14900HX (3263 - 5589, n=37)	4420 Points -8%
Average of class Gaming (905 - 5663, n=193, last 2 years)	3421 Points -29%
Medion Erazer Beast X40 2024 Intel Core i9-14900HX	3263 Points -32%
HP Omen 17-db0079ng AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS	2575 (2454.44^min - 2575^max) Points -46%

Cinebench R15 / CPU Single 64Bit
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 E24 Intel Core i9-14900HX	317 Points
Medion Erazer Beast X40 2024 Intel Core i9-14900HX	314 Points -1%
Average Intel Core i9-14900HX (247 - 323, n=36)	305 Points -4%
MSI GE78HX 13VH-070US Intel Core i9-13950HX	303 Points -4%
Eurocom Raptor X17 Core i9-14900HX Intel Core i9-14900HX	300 Points -5%
Average of class Gaming (191.9 - 318, n=190, last 2 years)	278 Points -12%
HP Omen 17-db0079ng AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS	269 Points -15%

Blender / v2.79 BMW27 CPU
HP Omen 17-db0079ng AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS	200 Seconds * -92%
Average of class Gaming (87 - 555, n=181, last 2 years)	170.7 Seconds * -64%
Medion Erazer Beast X40 2024 Intel Core i9-14900HX	143 Seconds * -38%
Average Intel Core i9-14900HX (91 - 206, n=36)	121.2 Seconds * -17%
Eurocom Raptor X17 Core i9-14900HX Intel Core i9-14900HX	105 Seconds * -1%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 E24 Intel Core i9-14900HX	104 Seconds *
MSI GE78HX 13VH-070US Intel Core i9-13950HX	101 Seconds * +3%

7-Zip 18.03 / 7z b 4
MSI GE78HX 13VH-070US Intel Core i9-13950HX	127033 MIPS +2%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 E24 Intel Core i9-14900HX	124376 MIPS
Eurocom Raptor X17 Core i9-14900HX Intel Core i9-14900HX	121036 MIPS -3%
Average Intel Core i9-14900HX (66769 - 136645, n=36)	111340 MIPS -10%
Medion Erazer Beast X40 2024 Intel Core i9-14900HX	92386 MIPS -26%
Average of class Gaming (23795 - 140932, n=185, last 2 years)	85288 MIPS -31%
HP Omen 17-db0079ng AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS	64759 MIPS -48%

7-Zip 18.03 / 7z b 4 -mmt1
Medion Erazer Beast X40 2024 Intel Core i9-14900HX	7340 MIPS +3%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 E24 Intel Core i9-14900HX	7095 MIPS
MSI GE78HX 13VH-070US Intel Core i9-13950HX	7064 MIPS 0%
Average Intel Core i9-14900HX (5452 - 7545, n=36)	7021 MIPS -1%
Eurocom Raptor X17 Core i9-14900HX Intel Core i9-14900HX	6658 MIPS -6%
Average of class Gaming (4199 - 7581, n=185, last 2 years)	6304 MIPS -11%
HP Omen 17-db0079ng AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS	5197 MIPS -27%

Geekbench 6.3 / Multi-Core
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 E24 Intel Core i9-14900HX	18572 Points
Eurocom Raptor X17 Core i9-14900HX Intel Core i9-14900HX	18291 Points -2%
Average Intel Core i9-14900HX (13158 - 19665, n=36)	17312 Points -7%
Medion Erazer Beast X40 2024 Intel Core i9-14900HX	15849 Points -15%
Average of class Gaming (5340 - 19665, n=109, last 2 years)	14213 Points -23%
HP Omen 17-db0079ng AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS	12697 Points -32%

Geekbench 6.3 / Single-Core
Medion Erazer Beast X40 2024 Intel Core i9-14900HX	3077 Points 0%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 E24 Intel Core i9-14900HX	3074 Points
Average Intel Core i9-14900HX (2419 - 3129, n=36)	2967 Points -3%
Eurocom Raptor X17 Core i9-14900HX Intel Core i9-14900HX	2874 Points -7%
Average of class Gaming (1490 - 3129, n=109, last 2 years)	2650 Points -14%
HP Omen 17-db0079ng AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS	2550 Points -17%

Geekbench 5.5 / Multi-Core
MSI GE78HX 13VH-070US Intel Core i9-13950HX	21853 Points +1%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 E24 Intel Core i9-14900HX	21616 Points
Average Intel Core i9-14900HX (8618 - 23194, n=36)	19403 Points -10%
Medion Erazer Beast X40 2024 Intel Core i9-14900HX	17082 Points -21%
Average of class Gaming (4557 - 23194, n=186, last 2 years)	15012 Points -31%
HP Omen 17-db0079ng AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS	11864 Points -45%
Eurocom Raptor X17 Core i9-14900HX Intel Core i9-14900HX	8618 Points -60%

Geekbench 5.5 / Single-Core
Medion Erazer Beast X40 2024 Intel Core i9-14900HX	2168 Points +2%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 E24 Intel Core i9-14900HX	2116 Points
MSI GE78HX 13VH-070US Intel Core i9-13950HX	2097 Points -1%
Average Intel Core i9-14900HX (1669 - 2210, n=36)	2093 Points -1%
Average of class Gaming (986 - 2210, n=186, last 2 years)	1891 Points -11%
HP Omen 17-db0079ng AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS	1765 Points -17%
Eurocom Raptor X17 Core i9-14900HX Intel Core i9-14900HX	1669 Points -21%

HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 / 4k Preset
MSI GE78HX 13VH-070US Intel Core i9-13950HX	34.5 fps +3%
Eurocom Raptor X17 Core i9-14900HX Intel Core i9-14900HX	33.8 fps +1%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 E24 Intel Core i9-14900HX	33.4 fps
Average Intel Core i9-14900HX (16.8 - 38.9, n=36)	29.3 fps -12%
Medion Erazer Beast X40 2024 Intel Core i9-14900HX	23.7 fps -29%
Average of class Gaming (6.72 - 38.9, n=185, last 2 years)	23.5 fps -30%
HP Omen 17-db0079ng AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS	19.4 fps -42%

LibreOffice / 20 Documents To PDF
HP Omen 17-db0079ng AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS	77 s * -104%
Average of class Gaming (31.4 - 96.6, n=182, last 2 years)	47.3 s * -25%
MSI GE78HX 13VH-070US Intel Core i9-13950HX	46.8 s * -24%
Average Intel Core i9-14900HX (31.4 - 85.1, n=36)	43.3 s * -15%
Medion Erazer Beast X40 2024 Intel Core i9-14900HX	42.8 s * -14%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 E24 Intel Core i9-14900HX	37.7 s *
Eurocom Raptor X17 Core i9-14900HX Intel Core i9-14900HX	37.6 s * -0%

R Benchmark 2.5 / Overall mean
HP Omen 17-db0079ng AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS	0.4935 sec * -31%
Average of class Gaming (0.3609 - 0.759, n=186, last 2 years)	0.438 sec * -16%
Average Intel Core i9-14900HX (0.3604 - 0.4859, n=36)	0.3853 sec * -2%
Eurocom Raptor X17 Core i9-14900HX Intel Core i9-14900HX	0.3845 sec * -2%
MSI GE78HX 13VH-070US Intel Core i9-13950HX	0.3823 sec * -1%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 E24 Intel Core i9-14900HX	0.3772 sec *
Medion Erazer Beast X40 2024 Intel Core i9-14900HX	0.3717 sec * +1%

* ... smaller is better

Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64Bit

4807 Points

Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64Bit

288 fps

Cinebench R15 Ref. Match 64Bit

99.6 %

Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64Bit

317 Points

Cinebench R20 CPU (Single Core)

856 Points

Cinebench R20 CPU (Multi Core)

12083 Points

Cinebench R23 Multi Core

31740 Points

Cinebench R23 Single Core

2233 Points

Cinebench 2024 CPU Single Core

130 Points

Cinebench 2024 CPU Multi Core

1731 Points

Ajuda

... comparado com

Performance Rating
Eurocom Raptor X17 Core i9-14900HX Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU	97.8 pt
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 E24 Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU	94.5 pt
MSI GE78HX 13VH-070US Intel Core i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU	94.5 pt
Average Intel Core i9-14900HX	85.7 pt
HP Omen 17-db0079ng AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	76 pt
Medion Erazer Beast X40 2024 Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU	73.5 pt
Average of class Gaming	72.1 pt

AIDA64 / FP32 Ray-Trace
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 E24 Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU	28521 KRay/s
MSI GE78HX 13VH-070US Intel Core i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU	27883 KRay/s -2%
Eurocom Raptor X17 Core i9-14900HX Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU	26984 KRay/s -5%
HP Omen 17-db0079ng AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	26816 KRay/s -6%
Average Intel Core i9-14900HX (13098 - 33474, n=35)	24776 KRay/s -13%
Average of class Gaming (4986 - 60169, n=182, last 2 years)	21760 KRay/s -24%
Medion Erazer Beast X40 2024 Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU	20114 KRay/s -29%

AIDA64 / FPU Julia
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 E24 Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU	144410 Points
MSI GE78HX 13VH-070US Intel Core i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU	141829 Points -2%
Eurocom Raptor X17 Core i9-14900HX Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU	138436 Points -4%
Average Intel Core i9-14900HX (67573 - 166040, n=35)	124243 Points -14%
HP Omen 17-db0079ng AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	113402 Points -21%
Average of class Gaming (25360 - 252486, n=182, last 2 years)	106366 Points -26%
Medion Erazer Beast X40 2024 Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU	103901 Points -28%

AIDA64 / CPU SHA3
Eurocom Raptor X17 Core i9-14900HX Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU	7026 MB/s +1%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 E24 Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU	6946 MB/s
MSI GE78HX 13VH-070US Intel Core i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU	6905 MB/s -1%
Average Intel Core i9-14900HX (3589 - 7979, n=35)	6137 MB/s -12%
Medion Erazer Beast X40 2024 Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU	4905 MB/s -29%
Average of class Gaming (1339 - 10389, n=182, last 2 years)	4885 MB/s -30%
HP Omen 17-db0079ng AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	4814 MB/s -31%

AIDA64 / CPU Queen
Eurocom Raptor X17 Core i9-14900HX Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU	144137 Points +1%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 E24 Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU	143407 Points
MSI GE78HX 13VH-070US Intel Core i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU	140103 Points -2%
Average Intel Core i9-14900HX (118405 - 148966, n=35)	138178 Points -4%
Medion Erazer Beast X40 2024 Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU	132613 Points -8%
Average of class Gaming (50699 - 200651, n=182, last 2 years)	116755 Points -19%
HP Omen 17-db0079ng AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	116204 Points -19%

AIDA64 / FPU SinJulia
MSI GE78HX 13VH-070US Intel Core i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU	16799 Points +1%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 E24 Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU	16696 Points
Eurocom Raptor X17 Core i9-14900HX Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU	16403 Points -2%
Average Intel Core i9-14900HX (10475 - 18517, n=35)	15240 Points -9%
HP Omen 17-db0079ng AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	15101 Points -10%
Medion Erazer Beast X40 2024 Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU	13541 Points -19%
Average of class Gaming (4800 - 32988, n=182, last 2 years)	13213 Points -21%

AIDA64 / FPU Mandel
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 E24 Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU	70219 Points
MSI GE78HX 13VH-070US Intel Core i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU	69911 Points 0%
Eurocom Raptor X17 Core i9-14900HX Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU	67115 Points -4%
Average Intel Core i9-14900HX (32543 - 83662, n=35)	61114 Points -13%
HP Omen 17-db0079ng AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	60582 Points -14%
Average of class Gaming (12321 - 134044, n=182, last 2 years)	53525 Points -24%
Medion Erazer Beast X40 2024 Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU	50393 Points -28%

AIDA64 / CPU AES
Eurocom Raptor X17 Core i9-14900HX Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU	241777 MB/s +79%
Average Intel Core i9-14900HX (86964 - 241777, n=35)	139720 MB/s +4%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 E24 Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU	134957 MB/s
MSI GE78HX 13VH-070US Intel Core i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU	134830 MB/s 0%
Average of class Gaming (19065 - 328679, n=182, last 2 years)	109308 MB/s -19%
Medion Erazer Beast X40 2024 Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU	99333 MB/s -26%
HP Omen 17-db0079ng AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	87760 MB/s -35%

AIDA64 / CPU ZLib
MSI GE78HX 13VH-070US Intel Core i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU	2069 MB/s +5%
Eurocom Raptor X17 Core i9-14900HX Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU	2037 MB/s +3%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 E24 Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU	1979 MB/s
Average Intel Core i9-14900HX (1054 - 2292, n=35)	1792 MB/s -9%
Medion Erazer Beast X40 2024 Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU	1443 MB/s -27%
Average of class Gaming (373 - 2409, n=182, last 2 years)	1361 MB/s -31%
HP Omen 17-db0079ng AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	1080 MB/s -45%

AIDA64 / FP64 Ray-Trace
MSI GE78HX 13VH-070US Intel Core i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU	15367 KRay/s 0%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 E24 Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU	15367 KRay/s
Eurocom Raptor X17 Core i9-14900HX Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU	14781 KRay/s -4%
HP Omen 17-db0079ng AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	14253 KRay/s -7%
Average Intel Core i9-14900HX (6809 - 18349, n=35)	13343 KRay/s -13%
Average of class Gaming (2540 - 31796, n=182, last 2 years)	11721 KRay/s -24%
Medion Erazer Beast X40 2024 Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU	10990 KRay/s -28%

AIDA64 / CPU PhotoWorxx
Eurocom Raptor X17 Core i9-14900HX Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU	51118 MPixel/s +4%
MSI GE78HX 13VH-070US Intel Core i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU	50323 MPixel/s +2%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 E24 Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU	49116 MPixel/s
Medion Erazer Beast X40 2024 Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU	49089 MPixel/s 0%
Average Intel Core i9-14900HX (23903 - 54702, n=35)	46809 MPixel/s -5%
HP Omen 17-db0079ng AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	41300 MPixel/s -16%
Average of class Gaming (10805 - 60161, n=183, last 2 years)	40119 MPixel/s -18%

Desempenho do sistema

O Neo 17 também impressiona nos benchmarks sintéticos do sistema, embora a concorrência seja geralmente muito próxima. No uso diário, isso significa um sistema extremamente responsivo, embora haja um breve travamento ao trocar a placa de vídeo. No entanto, isso é completamente normal e pode ser evitado desativando completamente a iGPU.

PCMark 10 / Score
Medion Erazer Beast X40 2024 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, i9-14900HX, Phison E18-1TB-PHISON-SSD-BICS5	8963 Points +3%
MSI GE78HX 13VH-070US NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, i9-13950HX, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB	8771 Points +1%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 E24 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, i9-14900HX, Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB	8694 Points
Average Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU (7703 - 9223, n=6)	8687 Points 0%
HP Omen 17-db0079ng NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, R7 8845HS, WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00	7800 Points -10%
Average of class Gaming (5776 - 9852, n=164, last 2 years)	7791 Points -10%

PCMark 10 / Essentials
Average Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU (11255 - 11825, n=6)	11523 Points +2%
MSI GE78HX 13VH-070US NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, i9-13950HX, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB	11488 Points +1%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 E24 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, i9-14900HX, Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB	11348 Points
Medion Erazer Beast X40 2024 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, i9-14900HX, Phison E18-1TB-PHISON-SSD-BICS5	10871 Points -4%
Average of class Gaming (9057 - 12334, n=163, last 2 years)	10841 Points -4%
HP Omen 17-db0079ng NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, R7 8845HS, WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00	10499 Points -7%

PCMark 10 / Productivity
Medion Erazer Beast X40 2024 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, i9-14900HX, Phison E18-1TB-PHISON-SSD-BICS5	11759 Points +6%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 E24 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, i9-14900HX, Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB	11057 Points
MSI GE78HX 13VH-070US NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, i9-13950HX, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB	10474 Points -5%
Average Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU (6662 - 11410, n=6)	10243 Points -7%
HP Omen 17-db0079ng NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, R7 8845HS, WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00	10202 Points -8%
Average of class Gaming (6662 - 14612, n=163, last 2 years)	9900 Points -10%

PCMark 10 / Digital Content Creation
Medion Erazer Beast X40 2024 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, i9-14900HX, Phison E18-1TB-PHISON-SSD-BICS5	15287 Points +8%
Average Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU (14211 - 16246, n=6)	15275 Points +7%
MSI GE78HX 13VH-070US NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, i9-13950HX, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB	15221 Points +7%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 E24 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, i9-14900HX, Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB	14211 Points
Average of class Gaming (6703 - 18475, n=163, last 2 years)	12077 Points -15%
HP Omen 17-db0079ng NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, R7 8845HS, WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00	12023 Points -15%

CrossMark / Overall
Eurocom Raptor X17 Core i9-14900HX NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, i9-14900HX, Corsair MP700 Pro 2TB	2238 Points +12%
Average Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU (1992 - 2334, n=6)	2157 Points +8%
Medion Erazer Beast X40 2024 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, i9-14900HX, Phison E18-1TB-PHISON-SSD-BICS5	2144 Points +8%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 E24 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, i9-14900HX, Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB	1992 Points
Average of class Gaming (1247 - 2344, n=147, last 2 years)	1905 Points -4%
MSI GE78HX 13VH-070US NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, i9-13950HX, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB	1899 Points -5%
HP Omen 17-db0079ng NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, R7 8845HS, WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00	1531 Points -23%

CrossMark / Productivity
Eurocom Raptor X17 Core i9-14900HX NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, i9-14900HX, Corsair MP700 Pro 2TB	2113 Points +17%
Medion Erazer Beast X40 2024 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, i9-14900HX, Phison E18-1TB-PHISON-SSD-BICS5	2070 Points +14%
Average Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU (1812 - 2204, n=6)	2013 Points +11%
MSI GE78HX 13VH-070US NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, i9-13950HX, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB	1846 Points +2%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 E24 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, i9-14900HX, Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB	1812 Points
Average of class Gaming (1299 - 2204, n=147, last 2 years)	1805 Points 0%
HP Omen 17-db0079ng NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, R7 8845HS, WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00	1488 Points -18%

CrossMark / Creativity
Average Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU (2327 - 2500, n=6)	2401 Points 0%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 E24 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, i9-14900HX, Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB	2397 Points
Eurocom Raptor X17 Core i9-14900HX NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, i9-14900HX, Corsair MP700 Pro 2TB	2341 Points -2%
Medion Erazer Beast X40 2024 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, i9-14900HX, Phison E18-1TB-PHISON-SSD-BICS5	2323 Points -3%
Average of class Gaming (1275 - 2660, n=147, last 2 years)	2090 Points -13%
MSI GE78HX 13VH-070US NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, i9-13950HX, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB	2035 Points -15%
HP Omen 17-db0079ng NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, R7 8845HS, WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00	1683 Points -30%

CrossMark / Responsiveness
Eurocom Raptor X17 Core i9-14900HX NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, i9-14900HX, Corsair MP700 Pro 2TB	2327 Points +53%
Average Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU (1520 - 2254, n=6)	1938 Points +28%
Medion Erazer Beast X40 2024 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, i9-14900HX, Phison E18-1TB-PHISON-SSD-BICS5	1874 Points +23%
Average of class Gaming (1030 - 2330, n=147, last 2 years)	1704 Points +12%
MSI GE78HX 13VH-070US NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, i9-13950HX, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB	1681 Points +11%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 E24 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, i9-14900HX, Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB	1520 Points
HP Omen 17-db0079ng NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, R7 8845HS, WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00	1255 Points -17%

WebXPRT 3 / Overall
Eurocom Raptor X17 Core i9-14900HX NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, i9-14900HX, Corsair MP700 Pro 2TB	332 Points 0%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 E24 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, i9-14900HX, Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB	332 Points
Average Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU (310 - 345, n=6)	328 Points -1%
Medion Erazer Beast X40 2024 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, i9-14900HX, Phison E18-1TB-PHISON-SSD-BICS5	326 Points -2%
MSI GE78HX 13VH-070US NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, i9-13950HX, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB	315 Points -5%
Average of class Gaming (215 - 480, n=160, last 2 years)	304 Points -8%
HP Omen 17-db0079ng NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, R7 8845HS, WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00	275 Points -17%

WebXPRT 4 / Overall
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 E24 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, i9-14900HX, Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB	314 Points
Average Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU (300 - 321, n=6)	311 Points -1%
Eurocom Raptor X17 Core i9-14900HX NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, i9-14900HX, Corsair MP700 Pro 2TB	308 Points -2%
Medion Erazer Beast X40 2024 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, i9-14900HX, Phison E18-1TB-PHISON-SSD-BICS5	295 Points -6%
MSI GE78HX 13VH-070US NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, i9-13950HX, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB	291 Points -7%
Average of class Gaming (157.9 - 328, n=148, last 2 years)	267 Points -15%

Mozilla Kraken 1.1 / Total
HP Omen 17-db0079ng NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, R7 8845HS, WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00	564 ms * -28%
Average of class Gaming (421 - 674, n=174, last 2 years)	503 ms * -14%
MSI GE78HX 13VH-070US NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, i9-13950HX, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB	474 ms * -8%
Eurocom Raptor X17 Core i9-14900HX NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, i9-14900HX, Corsair MP700 Pro 2TB	467 ms * -6%
Average Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU (437 - 446, n=6)	441 ms * -0%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 E24 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, i9-14900HX, Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB	440 ms *
Medion Erazer Beast X40 2024 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, i9-14900HX, Phison E18-1TB-PHISON-SSD-BICS5	437 ms * +1%

* ... smaller is better

PCMark 10 Score		8694 pontos
Ajuda

AIDA64: Memory Copy | Memory Read | Memory Write | Memory Latency

AIDA64 / Memory Copy
Medion Erazer Beast X40 2024 Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU	77961 MB/s 0%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 E24 Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU	77775 MB/s
MSI GE78HX 13VH-070US Intel Core i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU	77283 MB/s -1%
Eurocom Raptor X17 Core i9-14900HX Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU	76328 MB/s -2%
Average Intel Core i9-14900HX (38028 - 83392, n=35)	74992 MB/s -4%
HP Omen 17-db0079ng AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	67615 MB/s -13%
Average of class Gaming (21842 - 94222, n=182, last 2 years)	65204 MB/s -16%

AIDA64 / Memory Read
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 E24 Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU	86296 MB/s
MSI GE78HX 13VH-070US Intel Core i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU	85378 MB/s -1%
Medion Erazer Beast X40 2024 Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU	85340 MB/s -1%
Average Intel Core i9-14900HX (43306 - 87568, n=35)	81259 MB/s -6%
Eurocom Raptor X17 Core i9-14900HX Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU	80139 MB/s -7%
Average of class Gaming (23681 - 99713, n=182, last 2 years)	69101 MB/s -20%
HP Omen 17-db0079ng AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	60660 MB/s -30%

AIDA64 / Memory Write
HP Omen 17-db0079ng AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	86590 MB/s +12%
Medion Erazer Beast X40 2024 Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU	77302 MB/s 0%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 E24 Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU	77260 MB/s
MSI GE78HX 13VH-070US Intel Core i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU	76482 MB/s -1%
Eurocom Raptor X17 Core i9-14900HX Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU	76442 MB/s -1%
Average Intel Core i9-14900HX (37146 - 80589, n=35)	72271 MB/s -6%
Average of class Gaming (22986 - 108954, n=182, last 2 years)	66867 MB/s -13%

AIDA64 / Memory Latency
HP Omen 17-db0079ng AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	101 ns * -23%
Average of class Gaming (59.5 - 259, n=182, last 2 years)	94 ns * -14%
Eurocom Raptor X17 Core i9-14900HX Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU	85.5 ns * -4%
Average Intel Core i9-14900HX (76.1 - 105, n=35)	84.8 ns * -3%
MSI GE78HX 13VH-070US Intel Core i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU	84.4 ns * -3%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 E24 Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU	82.3 ns *
Medion Erazer Beast X40 2024 Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU	80.9 ns * +2%

* ... smaller is better

Latências de DPC

Em nosso teste de latência padronizado (navegação na Internet, reprodução de 4K no YouTube, carga da CPU), o sistema com a versão testada do BIOS mostra limitações ao usar aplicativos de áudio em tempo real.

DPC Latencies / LatencyMon - interrupt to process latency (max), Web, Youtube, Prime95
MSI GE78HX 13VH-070US NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, i9-13950HX, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB	3493.7 μs * -66%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 E24 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, i9-14900HX, Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB	2103.7 μs *
HP Omen 17-db0079ng NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, R7 8845HS, WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00	1962 μs * +7%
Medion Erazer Beast X40 2024 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, i9-14900HX, Phison E18-1TB-PHISON-SSD-BICS5	1305.5 μs * +38%
Eurocom Raptor X17 Core i9-14900HX NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, i9-14900HX, Corsair MP700 Pro 2TB	1123.4 μs * +47%

* ... smaller is better

Armazenamento em massa

O Neo 17 oferece dois slots M.2-2280 rápidos que são conectados via PCIe 4.0 x4. A versão de 1 TB do Samsung 990 Pro está instalada no dispositivo de teste, que atinge taxas de transferência rápidas e é um dos SSDs mais rápidos do mercado. Além disso, o desempenho permanece completamente estável, mesmo sob carga constante. Após a inicialização, o usuário tem 864 GB à sua disposição. Outros benchmarks de SSDs podem ser encontrados aqui.

CrystalDiskMark 5.2 / 6

AS SSD

DiskSpd

Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB

CDM 5/6 Read Seq Q32T1: 7106 MB/s

CDM 5/6 Write Seq Q32T1: 6110 MB/s

CDM 5/6 Read 4K Q32T1: 495 MB/s

CDM 5/6 Write 4K Q32T1: 517 MB/s

CDM 5/6 Read 4K: 56.7 MB/s

CDM 5/6 Write 4K: 127.5 MB/s

CDM 6 Write 4K Q8T8: 480 MB/s

CDM 6 Read 4K Q8T8: 1102 MB/s

Drive Performance Rating | DiskSpd | AS SSD

Drive Performance Rating - Percent
Eurocom Raptor X17 Core i9-14900HX Corsair MP700 Pro 2TB	91.1 pt
Average Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB	62.5 pt
Medion Erazer Beast X40 2024 Phison E18-1TB-PHISON-SSD-BICS5	61.9 pt
MSI GE78HX 13VH-070US Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB	59.5 pt
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 E24 Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB	51.7 pt
Average of class Gaming	51.4 pt
HP Omen 17-db0079ng WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00	34.8 pt

DiskSpd
seq read
MSI GE78HX 13VH-070US Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB	4233 (4196.61^min - 4232.61^max) MB/s +31%
Average of class Gaming (1319 - 7045, n=163, last 2 years)	3478 MB/s +7%
Average Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB (2556 - 4234, n=19)	3283 MB/s +1%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 E24 Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB	3241 (3226.94^min - 3241.38^max) MB/s
Medion Erazer Beast X40 2024 Phison E18-1TB-PHISON-SSD-BICS5	3238 (3056.39^min - 3237.58^max) MB/s 0%
HP Omen 17-db0079ng WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00	2760 (2709.34^min - 2760.41^max) MB/s -15%
Eurocom Raptor X17 Core i9-14900HX Corsair MP700 Pro 2TB	2672 (2652.21^min - 2671.88^max) MB/s -18%
seq write
Eurocom Raptor X17 Core i9-14900HX Corsair MP700 Pro 2TB	9307 (5304.83^min - 9307.21^max) MB/s +159%
Average Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB (3598 - 5842, n=19)	4816 MB/s +34%
MSI GE78HX 13VH-070US Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB	4387 (4345.42^min - 4387.07^max) MB/s +22%
Medion Erazer Beast X40 2024 Phison E18-1TB-PHISON-SSD-BICS5	3940 (3577.56^min - 3940.13^max) MB/s +10%
Average of class Gaming (535 - 9307, n=163, last 2 years)	3810 MB/s +6%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 E24 Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB	3598 (3547.33^min - 3597.6^max) MB/s
HP Omen 17-db0079ng WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00	2905 (2803.32^min - 2905.46^max) MB/s -19%
seq q8 t1 read
Eurocom Raptor X17 Core i9-14900HX Corsair MP700 Pro 2TB	12029 (6621.31^min - 12029.1^max) MB/s +71%
MSI GE78HX 13VH-070US Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB	7085 (6214.7^min - 7085.23^max) MB/s 0%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 E24 Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB	7052 (5956.79^min - 7051.62^max) MB/s
Average Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB (4958 - 7148, n=19)	6979 MB/s -1%
Medion Erazer Beast X40 2024 Phison E18-1TB-PHISON-SSD-BICS5	6929 (6183.66^min - 6928.97^max) MB/s -2%
Average of class Gaming (2594 - 16089, n=163, last 2 years)	6322 MB/s -10%
HP Omen 17-db0079ng WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00	4998 (4326.58^min - 4998^max) MB/s -29%
seq q8 t1 write
Eurocom Raptor X17 Core i9-14900HX Corsair MP700 Pro 2TB	11581 (11375.7^min - 11581^max) MB/s +69%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 E24 Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB	6863 (6837.3^min - 6863.35^max) MB/s
Average Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB (6531 - 6898, n=19)	6796 MB/s -1%
Medion Erazer Beast X40 2024 Phison E18-1TB-PHISON-SSD-BICS5	5740 (5704.67^min - 5740.32^max) MB/s -16%
MSI GE78HX 13VH-070US Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB	5219 (5185.74^min - 5219.39^max) MB/s -24%
Average of class Gaming (539 - 14571, n=163, last 2 years)	4867 MB/s -29%
HP Omen 17-db0079ng WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00	3187 (3173.56^min - 3187.38^max) MB/s -54%
4k q1 t1 read
Eurocom Raptor X17 Core i9-14900HX Corsair MP700 Pro 2TB	95.9 (94.45^min - 95.94^max) MB/s +69%
Average Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB (55.3 - 99, n=19)	77.1 MB/s +36%
MSI GE78HX 13VH-070US Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB	76.2 (75.22^min - 76.22^max) MB/s +34%
Average of class Gaming (30.6 - 95.9, n=163, last 2 years)	66 MB/s +16%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 E24 Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB	56.8 (56.66^min - 56.81^max) MB/s
Medion Erazer Beast X40 2024 Phison E18-1TB-PHISON-SSD-BICS5	54.5 (53.38^min - 54.47^max) MB/s -4%
HP Omen 17-db0079ng WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00	44.2 (43.54^min - 44.16^max) MB/s -22%
4k q1 t1 write
Eurocom Raptor X17 Core i9-14900HX Corsair MP700 Pro 2TB	397 (385.91^min - 396.86^max) MB/s +196%
Medion Erazer Beast X40 2024 Phison E18-1TB-PHISON-SSD-BICS5	324 (322.91^min - 324.37^max) MB/s +142%
Average Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB (133.9 - 343, n=19)	235 MB/s +76%
MSI GE78HX 13VH-070US Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB	228 (227.02^min - 228.2^max) MB/s +70%
Average of class Gaming (66.6 - 397, n=163, last 2 years)	222 MB/s +66%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 E24 Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB	133.9 (132.36^min - 133.89^max) MB/s
HP Omen 17-db0079ng WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00	97.6 (96.73^min - 97.61^max) MB/s -27%
4k q32 t16 read
Eurocom Raptor X17 Core i9-14900HX Corsair MP700 Pro 2TB	6172 (6083.33^min - 6171.85^max) MB/s +510%
Medion Erazer Beast X40 2024 Phison E18-1TB-PHISON-SSD-BICS5	3653 (3636.8^min - 3652.63^max) MB/s +261%
MSI GE78HX 13VH-070US Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB	3467 (3436.61^min - 3466.79^max) MB/s +243%
Average Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB (818 - 4926, n=19)	3398 MB/s +236%
Average of class Gaming (417 - 6172, n=163, last 2 years)	2579 MB/s +155%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 E24 Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB	1011 (977.69^min - 1010.73^max) MB/s
HP Omen 17-db0079ng WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00	822 (788.59^min - 821.86^max) MB/s -19%
4k q32 t16 write
Eurocom Raptor X17 Core i9-14900HX Corsair MP700 Pro 2TB	4485 (4443.23^min - 4484.95^max) MB/s +788%
Medion Erazer Beast X40 2024 Phison E18-1TB-PHISON-SSD-BICS5	3447 (3336.65^min - 3446.75^max) MB/s +583%
Average Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB (413 - 4683, n=19)	2584 MB/s +412%
MSI GE78HX 13VH-070US Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB	2354 (2252.28^min - 2353.53^max) MB/s +366%
Average of class Gaming (162.3 - 4869, n=163, last 2 years)	2132 MB/s +322%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 E24 Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB	505 (499.39^min - 505.04^max) MB/s
HP Omen 17-db0079ng WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00	395 (366.26^min - 394.87^max) MB/s -22%

AS SSD
Score Total
Eurocom Raptor X17 Core i9-14900HX Corsair MP700 Pro 2TB	13854 Points +105%
Medion Erazer Beast X40 2024 Phison E18-1TB-PHISON-SSD-BICS5	8462 Points +25%
Average Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB (5405 - 10591, n=19)	8285 Points +22%
MSI GE78HX 13VH-070US Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB	8252 Points +22%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 E24 Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB	6773 Points
Average of class Gaming (2271 - 13854, n=155, last 2 years)	6760 Points 0%
HP Omen 17-db0079ng WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00	4108 Points -39%
Score Read
Eurocom Raptor X17 Core i9-14900HX Corsair MP700 Pro 2TB	4345 Points +158%
MSI GE78HX 13VH-070US Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB	3177 Points +89%
Medion Erazer Beast X40 2024 Phison E18-1TB-PHISON-SSD-BICS5	3033 Points +80%
Average Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB (1349 - 4721, n=19)	2874 Points +71%
Average of class Gaming (776 - 4721, n=155, last 2 years)	2452 Points +46%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 E24 Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB	1683 Points
HP Omen 17-db0079ng WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00	1270 Points -25%
Score Write
Eurocom Raptor X17 Core i9-14900HX Corsair MP700 Pro 2TB	7208 Points +67%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 E24 Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB	4313 Points
Average Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB (2308 - 4852, n=19)	4041 Points -6%
Medion Erazer Beast X40 2024 Phison E18-1TB-PHISON-SSD-BICS5	3948 Points -8%
MSI GE78HX 13VH-070US Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB	3511 Points -19%
Average of class Gaming (515 - 7208, n=155, last 2 years)	3118 Points -28%
HP Omen 17-db0079ng WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00	2264 Points -48%
Seq Read
Eurocom Raptor X17 Core i9-14900HX Corsair MP700 Pro 2TB	7812.91 MB/s +39%
MSI GE78HX 13VH-070US Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB	5638.22 MB/s 0%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 E24 Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB	5630 MB/s
Medion Erazer Beast X40 2024 Phison E18-1TB-PHISON-SSD-BICS5	5459.84 MB/s -3%
Average Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB (4362 - 5760, n=19)	5223 MB/s -7%
Average of class Gaming (2260 - 12763, n=155, last 2 years)	4942 MB/s -12%
HP Omen 17-db0079ng WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00	3717 MB/s -34%
Seq Write
Eurocom Raptor X17 Core i9-14900HX Corsair MP700 Pro 2TB	9485.67 MB/s +149%
Average Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB (3376 - 5651, n=19)	4740 MB/s +25%
MSI GE78HX 13VH-070US Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB	4458.9 MB/s +17%
Medion Erazer Beast X40 2024 Phison E18-1TB-PHISON-SSD-BICS5	3914.76 MB/s +3%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 E24 Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB	3804 MB/s
Average of class Gaming (495 - 11316, n=155, last 2 years)	3756 MB/s -1%
HP Omen 17-db0079ng WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00	1997 MB/s -48%
4K Read
Eurocom Raptor X17 Core i9-14900HX Corsair MP700 Pro 2TB	89.1 MB/s +69%
Medion Erazer Beast X40 2024 Phison E18-1TB-PHISON-SSD-BICS5	82.84 MB/s +57%
Average Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB (52.7 - 90.9, n=19)	71.9 MB/s +36%
MSI GE78HX 13VH-070US Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB	68.69 MB/s +30%
Average of class Gaming (27.8 - 112.1, n=155, last 2 years)	65.3 MB/s +24%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 E24 Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB	52.7 MB/s
HP Omen 17-db0079ng WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00	51.5 MB/s -2%
4K Write
Eurocom Raptor X17 Core i9-14900HX Corsair MP700 Pro 2TB	350.79 MB/s +62%
Medion Erazer Beast X40 2024 Phison E18-1TB-PHISON-SSD-BICS5	237.11 MB/s +10%
Average Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB (172.3 - 306, n=19)	221 MB/s +2%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 E24 Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB	216 MB/s
Average of class Gaming (108.8 - 512, n=155, last 2 years)	212 MB/s -2%
MSI GE78HX 13VH-070US Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB	194.62 MB/s -10%
HP Omen 17-db0079ng WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00	176.5 MB/s -18%
4K-64 Read
Eurocom Raptor X17 Core i9-14900HX Corsair MP700 Pro 2TB	3474.56 MB/s +225%
MSI GE78HX 13VH-070US Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB	2544.4 MB/s +138%
Medion Erazer Beast X40 2024 Phison E18-1TB-PHISON-SSD-BICS5	2404.46 MB/s +125%
Average Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB (787 - 3182, n=19)	2235 MB/s +109%
Average of class Gaming (451 - 3475, n=155, last 2 years)	1887 MB/s +77%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 E24 Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB	1068 MB/s
HP Omen 17-db0079ng WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00	846 MB/s -21%
4K-64 Write
Eurocom Raptor X17 Core i9-14900HX Corsair MP700 Pro 2TB	5908.55 MB/s +59%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 E24 Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB	3717 MB/s
Average Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB (1592 - 4090, n=19)	3352 MB/s -10%
Medion Erazer Beast X40 2024 Phison E18-1TB-PHISON-SSD-BICS5	3319.37 MB/s -11%
MSI GE78HX 13VH-070US Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB	2870.73 MB/s -23%
Average of class Gaming (277 - 5909, n=155, last 2 years)	2533 MB/s -32%
HP Omen 17-db0079ng WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00	1888 MB/s -49%
Access Time Read
HP Omen 17-db0079ng WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00	0.062 ms * -244%
Medion Erazer Beast X40 2024 Phison E18-1TB-PHISON-SSD-BICS5	0.057 ms * -217%
Average of class Gaming (0.016 - 0.379, n=154, last 2 years)	0.05542 ms * -208%
MSI GE78HX 13VH-070US Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB	0.035 ms * -94%
Average Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB (0.018 - 0.074, n=19)	0.03384 ms * -88%
Eurocom Raptor X17 Core i9-14900HX Corsair MP700 Pro 2TB	0.02 ms * -11%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 E24 Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB	0.018 ms *
Access Time Write
Eurocom Raptor X17 Core i9-14900HX Corsair MP700 Pro 2TB	0.1 ms * -488%
MSI GE78HX 13VH-070US Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB	0.064 ms * -276%
Average of class Gaming (0.011 - 1.028, n=155, last 2 years)	0.04837 ms * -185%
HP Omen 17-db0079ng WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00	0.021 ms * -24%
Average Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB (0.012 - 0.053, n=19)	0.01995 ms * -17%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 E24 Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB	0.017 ms *
Medion Erazer Beast X40 2024 Phison E18-1TB-PHISON-SSD-BICS5	0.016 ms * +6%

* ... smaller is better

Continuous read: DiskSpd Read Loop, Queue Depth 8

SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 E24; diskspd 2.0.17 f: Ø6971 (6313.69-6994.9)

Placa de vídeo

Em nosso dispositivo de teste, a placa dedicada Laptop Nvidia GeForce RTX 4080 dedicado com 12 GB de VRAM está instalado. A placa de vídeo pode consumir no máximo 175 watts (150 watts de TGP + 25 watts de Dynamic Boost), de modo que o Neo 17 pode utilizar totalmente a GPU. Graças à comutação de gráficos Advanced Optimus, o desempenho em jogos é excelente e o laptop RTX 4080 é totalmente suficiente para a resolução QHD nativa. Além disso, o desempenho permanece completamente estável, mesmo sob carga constante.

Ao comparar os dados da CPU/GPU em nosso loop do Cyberpunk 2077, a vantagem do resfriamento externo a água fica muito clara, pois as temperaturas da CPU/GPU são cerca de 20 °C mais baixas, razão pela qual as ventoinhas também precisam trabalhar menos.

No modo de bateria, o consumo de energia da GPU é limitado a 52 watts, e é por isso que o desempenho da GPU é cerca de 53% menor. Outros benchmarks de GPU estão disponíveis aqui.

3DMark Performance Rating | 3DMark 11 | 3DMark

3DMark Performance Rating - Percent
Eurocom Raptor X17 Core i9-14900HX NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-14900HX	98.5 pt
SCHENKER Neo 17 2024 Engineering Sample ^-1! NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-14900HX	97.7 pt
Medion Erazer Beast X40 2024 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-14900HX	95.9 pt
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 E24 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-14900HX	90.6 pt
MSI GE78HX 13VH-070US NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13950HX	89.8 pt
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU	84.9 pt
Average of class Gaming	64.6 pt
HP Omen 17-db0079ng NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS	63.6 pt

3DMark 11 - 1280x720 Performance GPU
SCHENKER Neo 17 2024 Engineering Sample NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-14900HX	66129 Points +6%
Medion Erazer Beast X40 2024 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-14900HX	64540 Points +4%
Eurocom Raptor X17 Core i9-14900HX NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-14900HX	63191 Points +2%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 E24 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-14900HX	62207 Points
MSI GE78HX 13VH-070US NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13950HX	59348 Points -5%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU (45199 - 63128, n=24)	56791 Points -9%
Average of class Gaming (1029 - 72178, n=181, last 2 years)	43915 Points -29%
HP Omen 17-db0079ng NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS	43236 Points -30%

3DMark
1920x1080 Fire Strike Graphics
Eurocom Raptor X17 Core i9-14900HX NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-14900HX	46191 Points +10%
Medion Erazer Beast X40 2024 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-14900HX	44366 Points +6%
MSI GE78HX 13VH-070US NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13950HX	42663 Points +2%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 E24 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-14900HX	42022 Points
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU (33058 - 45220, n=22)	40862 Points -3%
HP Omen 17-db0079ng NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS	31765 Points -24%
Average of class Gaming (781 - 53059, n=192, last 2 years)	31443 Points -25%
2560x1440 Time Spy Graphics
Eurocom Raptor X17 Core i9-14900HX NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-14900HX	22104 Points +15%
SCHENKER Neo 17 2024 Engineering Sample NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-14900HX	21074 Points +10%
Medion Erazer Beast X40 2024 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-14900HX	20806 Points +9%
MSI GE78HX 13VH-070US NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13950HX	19299 Points +1%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 E24 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-14900HX	19155 Points
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU (13282 - 19663, n=22)	17777 Points -7%
Average of class Gaming (224 - 22717, n=187, last 2 years)	13142 Points -31%
HP Omen 17-db0079ng NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS	12536 Points -35%

3DMark 11 Performance		45722 pontos
3DMark Fire Strike Score		34851 pontos
3DMark Time Spy Score		18980 pontos
Ajuda

... comparado com

Blender: v3.3 Classroom OPTIX/RTX | v3.3 Classroom CUDA | v3.3 Classroom CPU

Blender / v3.3 Classroom OPTIX/RTX
HP Omen 17-db0079ng NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS	22 Seconds * -69%
Average of class Gaming (9 - 95, n=175, last 2 years)	20.9 Seconds * -61%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU (13 - 20, n=21)	15.1 Seconds * -16%
MSI GE78HX 13VH-070US NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13950HX	15 Seconds * -15%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 E24 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-14900HX	13 Seconds *
Eurocom Raptor X17 Core i9-14900HX NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-14900HX	12 Seconds * +8%
Medion Erazer Beast X40 2024 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-14900HX	11 Seconds * +15%

Blender / v3.3 Classroom CUDA
Average of class Gaming (16 - 175, n=181, last 2 years)	36.5 Seconds * -74%
HP Omen 17-db0079ng NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS	33 Seconds * -57%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU (21 - 28, n=22)	22.8 Seconds * -9%
MSI GE78HX 13VH-070US NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13950HX	22 Seconds * -5%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 E24 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-14900HX	21 Seconds *
Eurocom Raptor X17 Core i9-14900HX NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-14900HX	19 Seconds * +10%
Medion Erazer Beast X40 2024 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-14900HX	17 Seconds * +19%

Blender / v3.3 Classroom CPU
HP Omen 17-db0079ng NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS	318 Seconds * -75%
Average of class Gaming (138 - 962, n=186, last 2 years)	295 Seconds * -62%
Medion Erazer Beast X40 2024 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-14900HX	253 Seconds * -39%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU (177 - 337, n=22)	230 Seconds * -26%
Eurocom Raptor X17 Core i9-14900HX NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-14900HX	185 Seconds * -2%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 E24 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-14900HX	182 Seconds *
MSI GE78HX 13VH-070US NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13950HX	177 Seconds * +3%

* ... smaller is better

Performance Rating - Percent
Eurocom Raptor X17 Core i9-14900HX ^-1! Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU	100 pt
SCHENKER Neo 17 2024 Engineering Sample ^-2! Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU	93.1 pt
Medion Erazer Beast X40 2024 ^-1! Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU	92.7 pt
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 E24 Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU	85.2 pt
MSI GE78HX 13VH-070US ^-2! Intel Core i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU	73.9 pt
Average of class Gaming	65.2 pt
HP Omen 17-db0079ng ^-1! AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	61.5 pt

Cyberpunk 2077 2.1 Phantom Liberty - 1920x1080 Ultra Preset (FSR off)
Eurocom Raptor X17 Core i9-14900HX Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU	144.7 (63.1^min) fps +19%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 E24 Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU	121.3 (96.1^min) fps
Medion Erazer Beast X40 2024 Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU	118.9 (49.7^min) fps -2%
HP Omen 17-db0079ng AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	88.9 (73.4^min) fps -27%
Average of class Gaming (6.76 - 144.7, n=78, last 2 years)	86.8 fps -28%

Baldur's Gate 3 - 1920x1080 Ultra Preset
Eurocom Raptor X17 Core i9-14900HX Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU	200.4 fps +79%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 E24 Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU	111.8 fps
Average of class Gaming (34.5 - 208, n=43, last 2 years)	104 fps -7%

GTA V - 1920x1080 Highest Settings possible AA:4xMSAA + FX AF:16x
Eurocom Raptor X17 Core i9-14900HX Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU	152.2 (3.85^min, 111.1^P1) fps +6%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 E24 Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU	143.4 (5.64^min, 100^P1) fps
SCHENKER Neo 17 2024 Engineering Sample Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU	142.4 (3.92^min, 100^P1) fps -1%
Medion Erazer Beast X40 2024 Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU	141.5 (3.53^min, 100^P1) fps -1%
Average of class Gaming (12.1 - 167.7, n=167, last 2 years)	113.8 fps -21%
HP Omen 17-db0079ng AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	103.9 (5.11^min, 71.4^P1) fps -28%
MSI GE78HX 13VH-070US Intel Core i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU	102.9 (4.87^min, 76.9^P1) fps -28%

Final Fantasy XV Benchmark - 1920x1080 High Quality
SCHENKER Neo 17 2024 Engineering Sample Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU	189.1 fps +9%
Medion Erazer Beast X40 2024 Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU	181.1 fps +4%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 E24 Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU	173.9 fps
MSI GE78HX 13VH-070US Intel Core i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU	148.5 fps -15%
Average of class Gaming (19.2 - 201, n=179, last 2 years)	120 fps -31%
HP Omen 17-db0079ng AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	117.2 fps -33%

Strange Brigade - 1920x1080 ultra AA:ultra AF:16
Eurocom Raptor X17 Core i9-14900HX Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU	402 (69.8^min, 280^P1) fps +16%
SCHENKER Neo 17 2024 Engineering Sample Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU	386 (5.9^min, 291^P1) fps +11%
Medion Erazer Beast X40 2024 Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU	371 (5^min, 273^P1) fps +7%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 E24 Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU	347 fps
MSI GE78HX 13VH-070US Intel Core i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU	258 (51.3^min, 185.4^P1) fps -26%
Average of class Gaming (38.9 - 421, n=177, last 2 years)	229 fps -34%
HP Omen 17-db0079ng AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	213 (103.5^min, 157.8^P1) fps -39%

Dota 2 Reborn - 1920x1080 ultra (3/3) best looking
Eurocom Raptor X17 Core i9-14900HX Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU	195.2 (163.9^min) fps +9%
Medion Erazer Beast X40 2024 Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU	189.9 (162.8^min) fps +6%
SCHENKER Neo 17 2024 Engineering Sample Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU	183.5 (157.1^min) fps +2%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 E24 Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU	179.7 (154.5^min) fps
Average of class Gaming (33.2 - 220, n=185, last 2 years)	150.6 fps -16%
MSI GE78HX 13VH-070US Intel Core i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU	145.6 (127.5^min) fps -19%
HP Omen 17-db0079ng AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	126.3 (102.1^min) fps -30%

X-Plane 11.11 - 1920x1080 high (fps_test=3)
Eurocom Raptor X17 Core i9-14900HX Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU	150.2 fps +8%
Medion Erazer Beast X40 2024 Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU	143.9 fps +4%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 E24 Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU	138.9 fps
MSI GE78HX 13VH-070US Intel Core i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU	126.8 fps -9%
SCHENKER Neo 17 2024 Engineering Sample Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU	123.4 fps -11%
Average of class Gaming (31.5 - 166.2, n=191, last 2 years)	108.4 fps -22%
HP Omen 17-db0079ng AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	89.5 fps -36%

Dados da CPU/GPU Cyberpunk 2077 1080p Ultra (vermelho: Laptop RTX 4080, verde: Laptop RTX 4090, azul: Laptop RTX 4090 + resfriamento a água Oasis)

Cyberpunk 2077 Ultra FPS chart

SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 E24 i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU: Ø110.3 (99-116.6)

	baixo	média	alto	ultra	QHD	4K
GTA V (2015)			181.7	143.4	135.1	163.7
Dota 2 Reborn (2015)	220	197.1	194	179.7
Final Fantasy XV Benchmark (2018)	226	215	173.9		134.4
X-Plane 11.11 (2018)	202	176.8	138.9
Far Cry 5 (2018)			179	162	157
Strange Brigade (2018)			381	347	239	122
Shadow of the Tomb Raider (2018)				212	176
Far Cry 6 (2021)				156	141
F1 23 (2023)			321	111.6	70.7	35.5
Baldur's Gate 3 (2023)	231	143	122.2	111.8	88.3
Cyberpunk 2077 2.1 Phantom Liberty (2023)	101.1	146.9	133.8	121.3	80.7
Assassin's Creed Mirage (2023)			197	153	129
Call of Duty Modern Warfare 3 2023 (2023)			180	171	123
Avatar Frontiers of Pandora (2023)			125	97	66
F1 24 (2024)	304	323	289	112.2	71.2

Emissões e energia

Emissões de ruído

Duas ventoinhas e canais estendidos para resfriamento a água

O resfriamento com duas ventoinhas é basicamente o mesmo do modelo do ano passado, mas as configurações do Neo 17 com o laptop RTX 4080/4090 oferecem um canal modificado para resfriamento a água, que agora também passa diretamente sobre a CPU. As ventoinhas estão sempre funcionando, mas durante tarefas muito simples (navegar na Internet, e-mails, vídeos) o senhor só consegue ouvir um ruído muito baixo. Ao jogar, no entanto, o ruído é significativamente mais alto, chegando a 52 dB(A). Embora existam concorrentes mais barulhentos, o senhor ainda deve usar fones de ouvido ao jogar. Durante os benchmarks/jogos, o senhor também ouviu um leve ruído de chiado da bobina.

Barulho

Ocioso		28.1 / 28.1 / 28.1 dB
HDD		0 dB
Carga		43.1 / 51.9 dB

	30 dB silencioso 40 dB(A) audível 50 dB(A) ruidosamente alto
min: , med: , max: Earthworks M23R, Arta (15 cm de distância) environment noise: 23.3 dB(A)

	SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 E24 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, i9-14900HX, Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB	Medion Erazer Beast X40 2024 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, i9-14900HX, Phison E18-1TB-PHISON-SSD-BICS5	HP Omen 17-db0079ng NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, R7 8845HS, WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00	Eurocom Raptor X17 Core i9-14900HX NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, i9-14900HX, Corsair MP700 Pro 2TB	MSI GE78HX 13VH-070US NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, i9-13950HX, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
Noise		-6%	-2%	-7%	-0%
off / environment *	23.3	25 -7%	25 -7%	23.7 -2%	23.4 -0%
Idle Minimum *	28.1	28 -0%	25 11%	31.7 -13%	24.2 14%
Idle Average *	28.1	29 -3%	29 -3%	31.7 -13%	25.6 9%
Idle Maximum *	28.1	32 -14%	33 -17%	32.9 -17%	31 -10%
Load Average *	43.1	48 -11%	45 -4%	34 21%	43.3 -0%
Cyberpunk 2077 ultra *	51.9		48 8%
Load Maximum *	51.9	52 -0%	52 -0%	61.6 -19%	59.1 -14%
Witcher 3 ultra *		50		61.6	56.3

* ... smaller is better

Temperatura

A Schenker usa uma interface térmica de metal líquido para a CPU e a GPU em configurações a partir do laptop RTX 4080. As temperaturas do gabinete permanecem baixas durante tarefas simples, mas medimos mais de 50 °C na parte inferior em determinados pontos sob carga. No entanto, devido ao seu tamanho, o Neo 17 não será colocado sobre suas coxas, portanto, esses valores não são problemáticos. A área do teclado também esquenta visivelmente, mas não há limitações aqui. No teste de estresse, a placa de vídeo se estabilizou em 160 watts e o processador em cerca de 70 watts.

Carga Máxima

Inatividade

Cyberpunk


45.9 °C	46.2 °C	43 °C
43.6 °C	45.5 °C	40.8 °C
33.5 °C	30.1 °C	32.5 °C

Máximo: 46.2 °C
Médio: 40.1 °C


51.2 °C	56.7 °C	53.9 °C
39.4 °C	41.9 °C	39.4 °C
32.8 °C	33.8 °C	34.2 °C

Máximo: 56.7 °C
Médio: 42.6 °C

alimentação elétrica 50.6 °C | Temperatura do quarto 22.8 °C | Fluke t3000FC (calibrated), Voltcraft IR-900

Carga Máxima

Inatividade

Cyberpunk


29.8 °C	29.4 °C	28.6 °C
29.5 °C	29.5 °C	27.6 °C
26.7 °C	26.2 °C	26.2 °C

Máximo: 29.8 °C
Médio: 28.2 °C


30.8 °C	31.5 °C	31.1 °C
27.8 °C	32 °C	28.1 °C
27 °C	27.2 °C	27.8 °C

Máximo: 32 °C
Médio: 29.3 °C

alimentação elétrica 28.2 °C | Temperatura do quarto 21.9 °C | Fluke t3000FC (calibrated), Voltcraft IR-900

Carga Máxima

Inatividade

Cyberpunk


46.2 °C	46.1 °C	42.3 °C
43.3 °C	45.3 °C	39.2 °C
33.4 °C	30.1 °C	32.3 °C

Máximo: 46.2 °C
Médio: 39.8 °C


52.1 °C	56 °C	52.2 °C
39.9 °C	41.1 °C	39.3 °C
34 °C	35.4 °C	34 °C

Máximo: 56 °C
Médio: 42.7 °C

alimentação elétrica 49.6 °C | Temperatura do quarto 22.8 °C | Fluke t3000FC (calibrated), Voltcraft IR-900

(-) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 40.1 °C / 104 F, compared to the average of 33.9 °C / 93 F for the devices in the class Gaming.
(-) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 46.2 °C / 115 F, compared to the average of 40.5 °C / 105 F, ranging from 21.2 to 68.8 °C for the class Gaming.
(-) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 56.7 °C / 134 F, compared to the average of 43.2 °C / 110 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 28.2 °C / 83 F, compared to the device average of 33.9 °C / 93 F.
(-) 3: The average temperature for the upper side is 39.8 °C / 104 F, compared to the average of 33.9 °C / 93 F for the class Gaming.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are reaching skin temperature as a maximum (33.5 °C / 92.3 F) and are therefore not hot.
(-) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.9 °C / 84 F (-4.6 °C / -8.3 F).

Teste de estresse de temperatura da superfície (lado superior)

Teste de estresse de temperatura da superfície (parte inferior)

	SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 E24 Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU	Medion Erazer Beast X40 2024 Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU	HP Omen 17-db0079ng AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	Eurocom Raptor X17 Core i9-14900HX Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU	MSI GE78HX 13VH-070US Intel Core i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU
Heat		1%	14%	1%	10%
Maximum Upper Side *	46.2	47 -2%	44 5%	52.2 -13%	37.4 19%
Maximum Bottom *	56.7	54 5%	45 21%	53.2 6%	45 21%
Idle Upper Side *	29.8	30 -1%	26 13%	28.6 4%	29.8 -0%
Idle Bottom *	32	32 -0%	27 16%	29.8 7%	32.4 -1%

* ... smaller is better

Alto-falante

Os alto-falantes estéreo não são particularmente bons, mas são suficientes para um vídeo ocasional no YouTube. No entanto, os alto-falantes não são realmente úteis para jogos devido às ventoinhas barulhentas.

Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)

SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 E24 audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (83.7 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 19% lower than median
(+) | bass is linear (6% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 6.6% higher than median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (9.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3.6% away from median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (7.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (18.3% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 56% of all tested devices in this class were better, 8% similar, 36% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 18%, worst was 132%
Compared to all devices tested
» 36% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 56% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Medion Erazer Beast X40 2024 audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (88 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 14.7% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (7.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 3.7% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2.8% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (6.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (12.1% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 11% of all tested devices in this class were better, 4% similar, 85% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 18%, worst was 132%
Compared to all devices tested
» 8% of all tested devices were better, 2% similar, 90% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

HP Omen 17-db0079ng audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (80 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 19.1% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (10.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 1.9% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (4.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3.8% away from median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (7.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (14.3% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 25% of all tested devices in this class were better, 7% similar, 69% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 18%, worst was 132%
Compared to all devices tested
» 15% of all tested devices were better, 4% similar, 81% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Eurocom Raptor X17 Core i9-14900HX audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (74.2 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 13.4% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (10.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 6.6% higher than median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (8.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2% away from median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (8.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (24% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 85% of all tested devices in this class were better, 5% similar, 10% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 18%, worst was 132%
Compared to all devices tested
» 69% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 24% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

MSI GE78HX 13VH-070US audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (84.4 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 8.3% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (9.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 6.8% higher than median
(+) | mids are linear (3.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (2.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (12% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 11% of all tested devices in this class were better, 4% similar, 85% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 18%, worst was 132%
Compared to all devices tested
» 8% of all tested devices were better, 2% similar, 90% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Consumo de energia

O consumo máximo de 13 watts em modo inativo é muito baixo para um notebook grande de 17 polegadas. No entanto, quando o senhor joga, o consumo fica em torno de 300 watts, o que não é surpreendente, considerando os altos valores de TDP/TGP. A fonte de alimentação de 330 watts fornecida tem dimensões adequadas. No entanto, o consumo em modo de espera de 2,1 watts é muito alto.

Consumo de energia

desligado	0.31 / 2.1 Watt
Ocioso	9.1 / 13.3 / 13.7 Watt
Carga	120.6 / 303 Watt


Key: min: , med: , max: Metrahit Energy

Power consumption Cyberpunk / Stresstest

SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 E24; 1280x720 Prime95 28.10 and Furmark 1.25: Ø254 (221-303)

SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 E24; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø9.89 (3.63-18.4)

SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 E24; Cyberpunk 2077 FHD ultra no FSR 150cd: Ø314 (266-350)

Power consumption with external monitor

SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 E24; Prime95 V2810 Stress (external Monitor): Ø225 (215-246)

SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 E24; Cinebench R15 Multi (external Monitor): Ø216 (208-219)

SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 E24; Cinebench R23 Single (external Monitor): Ø78.6 (75.6-89)

SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 E24; Cinebench R23 Multi (external Monitor): Ø223 (220-228)

SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 E24; 1280x720 FurMark 1.19 GPU Stress Test (external Monitor): Ø248 (225-282)

SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 E24; Idle 1min (external Monitor): Ø28.7 (28.1-31.8)

SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 E24; Cyberpunk 2077 FHD ultra no FSR (external Monitor): Ø305 (261-343)

Duração da bateria

O Neo 17 é equipado com uma bateria de 99 Wh, que atinge um tempo de execução decente de cerca de 6 horas no modo WLAN a 150 cd/m² (58% do brilho máximo do dispositivo de teste). Isso coloca o grande gamer no meio do caminho quando comparado à concorrência. Uma carga completa com o dispositivo ligado leva 107 minutos, sendo que 80% da bateria está disponível novamente após cerca de 45 minutos.

Tempo de Execução da Bateria


WiFi Websurfing		6h 16min

Battery Runtime - WiFi Websurfing
HP Omen 17-db0079ng R7 8845HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, 83 Wh	544 min +45%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 E24 i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, 99 Wh	376 min
Average of class Gaming (85 - 889, n=152, last 2 years)	376 min 0%
Medion Erazer Beast X40 2024 i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, 99.8 Wh	374 min -1%
MSI GE78HX 13VH-070US i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, 99 Wh	363 min -3%
Eurocom Raptor X17 Core i9-14900HX i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, 99 Wh	284 min -24%

Avaliação geral do Notebookcheck

O XMG Neo 17 se concentra claramente no desempenho em jogos e o desempenho é muito bom. Graças ao resfriamento a água opcional, as temperaturas e, portanto, também o ruído da ventoinha podem ser significativamente reduzidos mais uma vez. O painel QHD fosco com 240 Hz e tempos de resposta rápidos também é muito adequado para jogos.

Back to the verdict

SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 E24 - 11/27/2024 v8
Andreas Osthoff

Acabamento

84 / 98 → 86%

Teclado

89%

Mouse

86%

Conectividade

69 / 80 → 86%

Peso

57 / 10-68 → 81%

Bateria

66 / 95 → 69%

Pantalha

85%

Desempenho do jogos

88%

Desempenho da aplicação

92%

Temperatura

83 / 95 → 87%

Ruído

69 / 90 → 77%

Audio

77%

Camera

33 / 75 → 44%

Médio

60%

85%

Gaming - Médio equilibrado

CO2 Emissions
No Data

Materials
0%

Packaging
50%

Power Use
73.7%

Repairability
40%

Software Updates
22.3%

Total Sustainability Score: 31%

Cinebench 2024 CPU Multi Core comparado com
HP Spectre x360 16 RTX 4050 (min) Ultra 7 155H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU	28.1
...
Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 G733PY-XS96 R9 7945HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU	1699
MSI Raider 18 HX A14V i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU	1728
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2024 M4 Pro M4 Pro (14 cores), M4 20-core GPU	1729
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 E24 i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU	1731
Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 G733PY-XS96 R9 7945HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU	1733
Lenovo Legion Pro 7 16IRX9H i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU	1749
Eurocom Raptor X17 Core i9-14900HX i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU	1760
...
(max) TR Pro 7995WX, RTX 6000 Ada Generation	5372

3DMark 11 comparado com
Lenovo IdeaPad Flex-1570 81CA000RUS (min) i5-8550U, GeForce MX130	28
...
Lenovo Legion 9 16IRX8 i9-13980HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU	45239
R9 7950X, Radeon RX 7700 XT	45241
TR Pro 7995WX, RTX 6000 Ada Generation	45615
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 E24 i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU	45722
Razer Blade 18 2024 RZ09-0509 i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU	45938
Asus Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650PY-NM006W R9 7945HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU	46207
Asus Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650PY-NM006W R9 7945HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU	46207
...
(max) R7 9800X3D, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090	77609

Veredicto - O XMG Neo 17 se concentra no desempenho dos jogos

Pro

Contra

Preço e disponibilidade

Possíveis concorrentes em comparação

Table of Contents

Especificações

Estojos e equipamentos

Comparação de tamanho

Dispositivos de entrada - Teclado mecânico Cherry

Tela - QHD com 240 Hz

Display Response Times

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

Desempenho - Raptor Lake-HX

Condições de teste

Processador - Core i9-14900HX

Cinebench R15 Multi loop

Desempenho do sistema

Latências de DPC

Armazenamento em massa

Continuous read: DiskSpd Read Loop, Queue Depth 8

Placa de vídeo

Cyberpunk 2077 Ultra FPS chart

Emissões e energia

Emissões de ruído

Temperatura

Alto-falante

SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 E24 audio analysis

Medion Erazer Beast X40 2024 audio analysis

HP Omen 17-db0079ng audio analysis

Eurocom Raptor X17 Core i9-14900HX audio analysis

MSI GE78HX 13VH-070US audio analysis

Consumo de energia

Power consumption Cyberpunk / Stresstest

Power consumption with external monitor

Duração da bateria

Avaliação geral do Notebookcheck

More articles related to this device

Transparency