Análise do Schenker VIA 14 Pro (M24) - Subnotebook compacto da AMD agora com Ryzen 8000 e tela mais brilhante

Name: SCHENKER VIA 14 Pro (M24)
Brand: SCHENKER

Muitas portas e boas opções de manutenção. O Schenker VIA 14 Pro foi atualizado e agora vem com o AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS e uma tela IPS mais brilhante. O fabricante também levou a sério as críticas sobre a carcaça propensa à sujeira e agora usa um revestimento diferente. A ampla conectividade e os dois slots para SSDs M.2 foram mantidos.

Andreas Osthoff, 👁 Andreas Osthoff (traduzido por DeepL / Ninh Duy), Published 07/13/2024 🇺🇸 🇩🇪 ...

AMD AI Laptop / Notebook Ultrabook Windows Zen 4

A Schenker atualizou seu subnotebook compacto AMD VIA 14 Pro e, em comparação com o modelo antigo (testamos a versão Linux - Tuxedo Pulse 14), um novo processador, uma tela mais brilhante e um novo revestimento para o gabinete, que deve ser menos suscetível à sujeira.

O preço base do Schenker VIA 14 Pro (M24) é de 1.099 euros com uma garantia de três anos (sem sistema operacional). Para isso, ele vem de fábrica com o AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS32 GB de RAM, um SSD de 500 GB e o painel IPS fosco de 2,8K como padrão. Nossa configuração de teste está configurada com a versão de 2 TB do Samsung 990 Pro e a pré-instalação do Windows, o que eleva o preço para 1.275 euros.

Neste artigo, vamos nos concentrar nas diferenças em relação ao modelo antigo, na tela mais brilhante e, é claro, no desempenho e nos efeitos sobre as emissões. Informações completas sobre o gabinete, os recursos e os dispositivos de entrada podem ser encontradas em nossa análise do Tuxedo Pulse 14.

Test device courtesy of Schenker Technologies

Download your licensed rating image as PNG / SVG

VIA 14 Pro (M24) Performance 54W

Processador

AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS 8 x 3.8 - 5.1 GHz, 54 W PL2 / Short Burst, 54 W PL1 / Sustained, Hawk Point-HS (Zen 4)

Placa gráfica

AMD Radeon 780M, Análises do: 2700 MHz, Memoría: 1067 MHz, Adrenalin 24.5.1

Memória

32 GB

, LPDDR5x-6400, Dual-Channel. onboard

Pantalha

14.00 polegadas 16:10, 2880 x 1800 pixel 243 PPI, TL140ADXP24-0, IPS, Brilhante: não, 120 Hz

placa mãe

AMD Promontory/Bixby FCH

Disco rígido

Samsung 990 Pro 2 TB MZVL72T0HDLB, 2048 GB

, 1802 GB livre

Placa de Som

AMD Zen - Audio Processor - HD Audio Controller

Conexões

1 USB 3.0, 2 USB 3.1 Gen2, USB-C Power Delivery (PD), 1 HDMI, 2 DisplayPort, 1 Kensington Lock, Conexões Audio: 3.5 mm Stereo, Card Reader: microSD

Funcionamento em rede

Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX210 (a/b/g/h/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/ax = Wi-Fi 6/), Bluetooth 5.1

Tamanho

altura x largura x profundidade (em mm): 18.5 x 313.5 x 222

Bateria

60 Wh Lítio-Polímero

Sistema Operativo

Microsoft Windows 11 Pro

Camera

Webcam: HD + IR
Primary Camera: 0.9 MPix

Características adicionais

Alto falantes: Stereo, Teclado: Chiclet, Iluminação do Teclado: sim, 100W PSU, 36 Meses Garantia

peso

1.4 kg, Suprimento de energia: 260 g

Preço

1275 Euro

Links

SCHENKER página inicial
SCHENKER Seção de notebook

Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

see all specifications

Possíveis concorrentes em comparação

Rating	Version	Date	Model	Weight	Height	Size	Resolution
85.1 %	v8	07/2024	SCHENKER VIA 14 Pro (M24) R7 8845HS, Radeon 780M	1.4 kg	18.5 mm	14.00"	2880x1800
83.5 %	v8	06/2024	Huawei MateBook 14 FLMH-W7611T Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core	1.3 kg	17.08 mm	14.20"	2880x1920
85.5 %	v8	07/2024	Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2024 Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core	1.4 kg	15.9 mm	14.00"	2880x1800
88.6 %	v7 ^(old)	05/2024	Asus Zenbook 14 OLED UM3406HA R7 8840HS, Radeon 780M	1.2 kg	14.9 mm	14.00"	1920x1200
88.1 %	v7 ^(old)	03/2024	Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AHP9 R7 8845HS, Radeon 780M	1.5 kg	16 mm	14.00"	2880x1800
89 %	v7 ^(old)	01/2024	Tuxedo Pulse 14 Gen3 R7 7840HS, Radeon 780M	1.4 kg	18 mm	14.00"	2880x1800

Observação: Atualizamos recentemente nosso sistema de classificação e os resultados da versão 8 não são comparáveis aos resultados da versão 7. Mais informações podem ser encontradas aqui.

Diferenças em relação ao antecessor

Mesmo o novo revestimento não consegue evitar completamente as impressões digitais.

Basicamente, nada mudou na carcaça. Um ponto de crítica que fizemos ao testar o Tuxedo Pulse 14 foram as superfícies muito sensíveis, nas quais as impressões digitais e a sujeira eram rapidamente visíveis e a limpeza também não era fácil. Para combater esse problema, agora está sendo usado um novo revestimento para reduzir as impressões digitais. O resultado também é um pouco melhor, mas as impressões digitais ainda são melhores e o senhor terá que limpar o gabinete com frequência. Ainda assim, gostaríamos de ver uma versão adicional na cor prata.

Notamos o LED de status verde da webcam no Tuxedo Pulse 14, o que também levou a um leve brilho verde nas fotos. O Via 14 Pro, por outro lado, usa um LED branco, que também não é perceptível nas fotos. No entanto, a qualidade da imagem da webcam de 720p continua ruim no geral.

Comparação de tamanho

SCHENKER VIA 14 Pro (M24) Tuxedo Pulse 14 Gen3 Huawei MateBook 14 FLMH-W7611T Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AHP9 Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2024 Asus Zenbook 14 OLED UM3406HA DIN A4 ❌

Esquerda: USB-C 3.2 Gen.2 (10 GBit/s, DisplayPort ALT modo 1.4a, Power Delivery), HDMI 2.0b, USB-A 3.2 Gen.1 (5 GBit/s), USB-C 3.2 Gen.2 (10 GBit/s, DisplayPort ALT modo 1.4a)

Direito: Trava Kensington (Nano Saver), leitor microSD, USB-A 3.2 Gen.1 (5 Gbit/s), áudio de 3,5 mm

SD Card Reader
average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs)
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AHP9 AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS (Angelbird AV Pro V60)	76.2 MB/s +314%
Average of class Subnotebook (18.4 - 142, n=14, last 2 years)	53.2 MB/s +189%
Tuxedo Pulse 14 Gen3 AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS	19.5 MB/s +6%
SCHENKER VIA 14 Pro (M24) AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS (Angelbird AV Pro V60)	18.4 MB/s
maximum AS SSD Seq Read Test (1GB)
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AHP9 AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS (Angelbird AV Pro V60)	90.8 MB/s +304%
Average of class Subnotebook (22.5 - 207, n=14, last 2 years)	65.4 MB/s +191%
Tuxedo Pulse 14 Gen3 AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS	23.6 MB/s +5%
SCHENKER VIA 14 Pro (M24) AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS (Angelbird AV Pro V60)	22.5 MB/s

Networking
SCHENKER VIA 14 Pro (M24) Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX210
iperf3 transmit AXE11000	1257 (min: 1208) MBit/s ∼72%
iperf3 receive AXE11000	1625 (min: 1557) MBit/s ∼95%
Huawei MateBook 14 FLMH-W7611T Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201
iperf3 transmit AXE11000	968 (min: 936) MBit/s ∼55%
iperf3 receive AXE11000	951 (min: 782) MBit/s ∼56%
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2024
iperf3 transmit AXE11000	1416 (min: 1302) MBit/s ∼81%
iperf3 receive AXE11000	1667 (min: 1606) MBit/s ∼97%
Asus Zenbook 14 OLED UM3406HA MediaTek Wi-Fi 6E MT7922 160MHz Wireless LAN Card
iperf3 transmit AXE11000	1737 (min: 1638) MBit/s ∼99%
iperf3 receive AXE11000	1712 (min: 1684) MBit/s ∼100%
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AHP9 MediaTek RZ616
iperf3 transmit AXE11000	1746 (min: 1647) MBit/s ∼100%
iperf3 receive AXE11000	1706 (min: 1678) MBit/s ∼100%
Tuxedo Pulse 14 Gen3 MediaTek RZ608
iperf3 transmit AXE11000	943 (min: 884) MBit/s ∼54%
iperf3 receive AXE11000	949 (min: 932) MBit/s ∼55%

SCHENKER VIA 14 Pro (M24); iperf3 transmit AXE11000: Ø1257 (1208-1302)

SCHENKER VIA 14 Pro (M24); iperf3 receive AXE11000: Ø1625 (1557-1675)

ColorChecker SCHENKER VIA 14 Pro (M24): 14.94 ∆E min: 2.33 - max: 24.35 ∆E

Tela - O painel IPS agora é mais brilhante

O VIA 14 Pro ainda conta com um painel IPS fosco com uma resolução de 2.880 x 1.800 pixels no formato 16:10 e uma frequência de 120 Hz. É a mesma identificação de painel do Tuxedo Pulse 14, mas o brilho foi aumentado. A Schenker especifica 400 cd/m², mas nosso dispositivo de teste excede claramente essa especificação com uma média de 467 cd/m². Isso também o torna mais de 100 cd/m² mais brilhante do que o Tuxedo Pulse 14 Gen3. O nível de preto é de bons 0,29 cd/m², o que resulta em uma relação de contraste muito boa de cerca de 1.600:1.

A impressão subjetiva da imagem do painel é decente no geral e as áreas claras ainda parecem ligeiramente granuladas, além de halos leves. O PWM não é usado e os tempos de resposta são discretos, mas não particularmente rápidos.


474 cd/m²	478 cd/m²	483 cd/m²
462 cd/m²	466 cd/m²	469 cd/m²
452 cd/m²	467 cd/m²	454 cd/m²

Distribuição do brilho

TL140ADXP24-0 tested with X-Rite i1Pro 2

Máximo: 483 cd/m² (Nits) Médio: 467.2 cd/m² Minimum: 16.2 cd/m²
iluminação: 94 %
iluminação com acumulador: 466 cd/m²
Contraste: 1607:1 (Preto: 0.29 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 2.5 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.95, calibrated: 1.3
ΔE Greyscale 4.1 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
72.3% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
97.7% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
70.1% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.24

Download Arquivo ICC (X-Rite i1Pro 2)

	SCHENKER VIA 14 Pro (M24) TL140ADXP24-0, IPS, 2880x1800, 14"	Huawei MateBook 14 FLMH-W7611T EDO0142, OLED, 2880x1920, 14.2"	Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2024 MNE007ZA3-2, IPS, 2880x1800, 14"	Asus Zenbook 14 OLED UM3406HA ATNA40CT02-0, OLED, 1920x1200, 14"	Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AHP9 LEN140WQ+, OLED, 2880x1800, 14"	Tuxedo Pulse 14 Gen3 TL140ADXP24-0, IPS, 2880x1800, 14"
Display		2%	1%	21%	27%	1%
Display P3 Coverage	70.1	72.42 3%	70.3 0%	98.6 41%	99.9 43%	71.1 1%
sRGB Coverage	97.7	99.79 2%	99.7 2%	99.9 2%	100 2%	98.7 1%
AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage	72.3	73.94 2%	72.1 0%	87.3 21%	98.9 37%	73.2 1%
Response Times		24%	3%	95%	97%	-29%
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% *	31.1 ?(14.9, 16.2)	7 ?(3.5, 3.5) 77%	32.7 ?(14.8, 17.9) -5%	1.31 ?(0.69, 0.62) 96%	0.61 ?(0.31, 0.3) 98%	37.9 ?(17.4, 20.5) -22%
Response Time Black / White *	17.1 ?(7, 10.1)	22 ?(18.5, 3.5) -29%	15.2 ?(5.1, 10.1) 11%	1.2 ?(0.61, 0.59) 93%	0.67 ?(0.34, 0.33) 96%	23.1 ?(11.4, 11.7) -35%
PWM Frequency		238 ?(100)		480 ?(99)	240 ?(99)
Screen		181%	13%	320%	-5%	14%
Brightness middle	466	373 -20%	418 -10%	387 -17%	411 -12%	340 -27%
Brightness	467	377 -19%	408 -13%	386 -17%	414 -11%	338 -28%
Brightness Distribution	94	94 0%	90 -4%	98 4%	99 5%	84 -11%
Black Level *	0.29	0.015 95%	0.3 -3%	0.01 97%		0.16 45%
Contrast	1607	24867 1447%	1393 -13%	38700 2308%		2125 32%
Colorchecker dE 2000 *	2.5	1.47 41%	1.6 36%	1 60%	2.8 -12%	1.7 32%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *	6.1	2.49 59%	2.5 59%	2.4 61%	5.5 10%	3 51%
Colorchecker dE 2000 calibrated *	1.3	1.78 -37%	1.1 15%		2.2 -69%	1.3 -0%
Greyscale dE 2000 *	4.1	1.7 59%	2 51%	1.4 66%	1.8 56%	2.9 29%
Gamma	2.24 ^98%	2.179 ^101%	2.14 ^103%	2.24 ^98%	2.21 ^100%	2.22 ^99%
CCT	7386 ^88%	6556 ^99%	6851 ^95%	6466 ^101%	6319 ^103%	6729 ^97%
Total Average (Program / Settings)		69% / 120%	6% / 9%	145% / 217%	40% / 20%	-5% / 5%

* ... smaller is better

Medimos o painel com o software profissional CalMAN e, de fábrica, o painel tem uma projeção azul visível em conjunto com uma temperatura de cor muito fria, embora isso tenha um efeito positivo no brilho máximo. No entanto, a exibição das cores já está boa. Com a nossa calibração (o perfil está disponível para download gratuito acima), podemos melhorar significativamente a exibição, mas o brilho máximo cai para cerca de 425 cd/m². Juntamente com a cobertura sRGB completa, o notebook também é adequado para a edição de imagens/vídeos.

Display Response Times

ℹ

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.

↔ Response Time Black to White
17.1 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↗ 7 ms rise
17.1 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↘ 10.1 ms fall
The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 35 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (21.1 ms).
↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
31.1 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↗ 14.9 ms rise
31.1 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↘ 16.2 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 37 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is similar to the average of all tested devices (33.2 ms).

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

ℹ

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.

Screen flickering / PWM not detected

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 17365 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 3846000) Hz was measured.

Ao ar livre (dia claro, sem luz solar direta)

Além da luz solar direta, o painel fosco também pode ser usado ao ar livre em dias claros. A estabilidade do ângulo de visão da tela IPS é boa.

Desempenho - AMD Ryzen 8000 e 32 GB de RAM

Condições de teste

O VIA 14 Pro (M24) é o primeiro notebook da Schenker sem uma central de comando; em vez disso, os perfis de energia podem ser alternados por meio da tecla F3. O perfil de energia ativo é então exibido brevemente na tela. Há um total de três perfis disponíveis: Silencioso, Equilibrado e Desempenho. Resumimos os valores de TDP correspondentes e os dados de desempenho na tabela a seguir. Realizamos os seguintes benchmarks e medições com o perfil Performance.

Perfil de energia	CPU TDP	CB R23 Multi	Time Spy Gráficos	max. Volume do ventilador
Silencioso	25 -> 15 watts	10.593 pontos	2.492 pontos	30,6 dB(A)
Equilibrado	45 -> 35 watts	15.250 pontos	2.877 pontos	36,2 dB(A)
Potência	54 watts	16.330 pontos	2.915 pontos	43,6 dB(A)

Processador - Ryzen 7 8845HS

O processador foi alterado do AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS para o Ryzen 7 8845HS, que ainda usa 8 núcleos Zen4 (16 threads) com uma velocidade de clock máxima de 5,1 GHz. Como era de se esperar, o desempenho também é comparável e todos os dispositivos de comparação estão muito próximos no geral. O desempenho é muito bom nos testes de vários núcleos e de um único núcleo e não há gargalos aqui, mesmo com tarefas exigentes. No modo de bateria, o consumo máximo é limitado a 35 watts, razão pela qual o desempenho de vários núcleos é 12% menor.

Outros benchmarks de CPU podem ser encontrados aqui.

Cinebench R15 Multi loop

SCHENKER VIA 14 Pro (M24) AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS: Ø2543 (2508.31-2568.38)

Huawei MateBook 14 FLMH-W7611T Intel Core Ultra 7 155H: Ø2224 (2132.08-2595.21)

Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2024 Intel Core Ultra 7 155H: Ø2436 (2302.42-2731.12)

Asus Zenbook 14 OLED UM3406HA AMD Ryzen 7 8840HS: Ø2166 (2149.96-2176.16)

Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AHP9 AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS: Ø2535 (2513.19-2555.42)

Tuxedo Pulse 14 Gen3 AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS: Ø2424 (2389.2-2482.31)

CPU Performance Rating: Percent
Cinebench R23: Multi Core | Single Core
Cinebench R20: CPU (Multi Core) | CPU (Single Core)
Cinebench R15: CPU Multi 64Bit | CPU Single 64Bit
Blender: v2.79 BMW27 CPU
7-Zip 18.03: 7z b 4 | 7z b 4 -mmt1
Geekbench 6.2: Multi-Core | Single-Core
Geekbench 5.5: Multi-Core | Single-Core
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2: 4k Preset
LibreOffice : 20 Documents To PDF
R Benchmark 2.5: Overall mean

CPU Performance Rating
SCHENKER VIA 14 Pro (M24) AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS	84.8 pt
Average AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS	84.8 pt
Tuxedo Pulse 14 Gen3 AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS	83.3 pt
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AHP9 AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS	82.4 pt
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2024 Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	80.6 pt
Huawei MateBook 14 FLMH-W7611T Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	79.7 pt
Asus Zenbook 14 OLED UM3406HA AMD Ryzen 7 8840HS	77.5 pt
Average of class Subnotebook	68.2 pt

Cinebench R23 / Multi Core
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2024 Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	17077 Points +4%
Average AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS (15889 - 18037, n=6)	16600 Points +1%
SCHENKER VIA 14 Pro (M24) AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS	16387 Points
Huawei MateBook 14 FLMH-W7611T Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	16145 Points -1%
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AHP9 AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS	15889 Points -3%
Tuxedo Pulse 14 Gen3 AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS	15515 Points -5%
Asus Zenbook 14 OLED UM3406HA AMD Ryzen 7 8840HS	13888 Points -15%
Average of class Subnotebook (2485 - 21058, n=59, last 2 years)	11568 Points -29%

Cinebench R23 / Single Core
Tuxedo Pulse 14 Gen3 AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS	1776 Points 0%
SCHENKER VIA 14 Pro (M24) AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS	1774 Points
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2024 Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	1755 Points -1%
Asus Zenbook 14 OLED UM3406HA AMD Ryzen 7 8840HS	1746 Points -2%
Huawei MateBook 14 FLMH-W7611T Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	1742 Points -2%
Average AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS (1623 - 1783, n=6)	1742 Points -2%
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AHP9 AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS	1716 Points -3%
Average of class Subnotebook (1111 - 2001, n=59, last 2 years)	1672 Points -6%

Cinebench R20 / CPU (Multi Core)
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2024 Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	6575 Points +2%
Average AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS (6231 - 7026, n=6)	6483 Points +1%
SCHENKER VIA 14 Pro (M24) AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS	6424 Points
Huawei MateBook 14 FLMH-W7611T Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	6251 Points -3%
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AHP9 AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS	6231 Points -3%
Tuxedo Pulse 14 Gen3 AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS	6061 Points -6%
Asus Zenbook 14 OLED UM3406HA AMD Ryzen 7 8840HS	5414 Points -16%
Average of class Subnotebook (2234 - 8233, n=55, last 2 years)	4537 Points -29%

Cinebench R20 / CPU (Single Core)
Tuxedo Pulse 14 Gen3 AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS	690 Points +1%
Average AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS (677 - 698, n=6)	687 Points 0%
SCHENKER VIA 14 Pro (M24) AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS	685 Points
Asus Zenbook 14 OLED UM3406HA AMD Ryzen 7 8840HS	679 Points -1%
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2024 Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	678 Points -1%
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AHP9 AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS	677 Points -1%
Huawei MateBook 14 FLMH-W7611T Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	674 Points -2%
Average of class Subnotebook (408 - 790, n=55, last 2 years)	640 Points -7%

Cinebench R15 / CPU Multi 64Bit
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2024 Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	2731 (2302.42^min - 2731.12^max) Points +6%
Average AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS (2537 - 2908, n=6)	2628 Points +2%
Huawei MateBook 14 FLMH-W7611T Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	2595 (2132.08^min - 2595.21^max) Points +1%
SCHENKER VIA 14 Pro (M24) AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS	2568 (2508.31^min - 2568.38^max) Points
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AHP9 AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS	2555 (2513.19^min - 2555.42^max) Points -1%
Tuxedo Pulse 14 Gen3 AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS	2482 (2389.2^min - 2482.31^max) Points -3%
Asus Zenbook 14 OLED UM3406HA AMD Ryzen 7 8840HS	2176 (2149.96^min - 2176.16^max) Points -15%
Average of class Subnotebook (953 - 3345, n=61, last 2 years)	1991 Points -22%

Cinebench R15 / CPU Single 64Bit
Tuxedo Pulse 14 Gen3 AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS	280 Points +1%
SCHENKER VIA 14 Pro (M24) AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS	277 Points
Average AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS (269 - 283, n=6)	277 Points 0%
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AHP9 AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS	274 Points -1%
Asus Zenbook 14 OLED UM3406HA AMD Ryzen 7 8840HS	268 Points -3%
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2024 Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	258 Points -7%
Huawei MateBook 14 FLMH-W7611T Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	250 Points -10%
Average of class Subnotebook (151.5 - 307, n=56, last 2 years)	247 Points -11%

Blender / v2.79 BMW27 CPU
Average of class Subnotebook (163 - 597, n=59, last 2 years)	328 Seconds * -67%
Asus Zenbook 14 OLED UM3406HA AMD Ryzen 7 8840HS	226 Seconds * -15%
Huawei MateBook 14 FLMH-W7611T Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	218 Seconds * -11%
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AHP9 AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS	216 Seconds * -10%
Tuxedo Pulse 14 Gen3 AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS	208 Seconds * -6%
Average AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS (179 - 216, n=6)	196.5 Seconds * -0%
SCHENKER VIA 14 Pro (M24) AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS	196 Seconds *
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2024 Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	193 Seconds * +2%

7-Zip 18.03 / 7z b 4
Average AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS (64759 - 74664, n=6)	69087 MIPS +1%
SCHENKER VIA 14 Pro (M24) AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS	68354 MIPS
Tuxedo Pulse 14 Gen3 AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS	67444 MIPS -1%
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2024 Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	66807 MIPS -2%
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AHP9 AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS	65072 MIPS -5%
Huawei MateBook 14 FLMH-W7611T Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	61780 MIPS -10%
Asus Zenbook 14 OLED UM3406HA AMD Ryzen 7 8840HS	61047 MIPS -11%
Average of class Subnotebook (26799 - 75402, n=52, last 2 years)	49488 MIPS -28%

7-Zip 18.03 / 7z b 4 -mmt1
Tuxedo Pulse 14 Gen3 AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS	6403 MIPS +2%
Average AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS (5197 - 6714, n=6)	6280 MIPS 0%
SCHENKER VIA 14 Pro (M24) AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS	6278 MIPS
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AHP9 AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS	6274 MIPS 0%
Asus Zenbook 14 OLED UM3406HA AMD Ryzen 7 8840HS	6205 MIPS -1%
Average of class Subnotebook (4341 - 6403, n=54, last 2 years)	5505 MIPS -12%
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2024 Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	5372 MIPS -14%
Huawei MateBook 14 FLMH-W7611T Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	5245 MIPS -16%

Geekbench 6.2 / Multi-Core
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2024 Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	13417 Points +4%
SCHENKER VIA 14 Pro (M24) AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS	12940 Points
SCHENKER VIA 14 Pro (M24) AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS	12700 Points -2%
Average AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS (11073 - 14014, n=10)	12844 Points -1%
Tuxedo Pulse 14 Gen3 AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS	12796 Points -1%
Huawei MateBook 14 FLMH-W7611T Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	12643 Points -2%
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AHP9 AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS	12578 Points -3%
Average of class Subnotebook (6796 - 15059, n=48, last 2 years)	11789 Points -9%
Asus Zenbook 14 OLED UM3406HA AMD Ryzen 7 8840HS	11279 Points -13%

Geekbench 6.2 / Single-Core
Average AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS (2540 - 2698, n=8)	2625 Points 0%
SCHENKER VIA 14 Pro (M24) AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS	2612 Points
SCHENKER VIA 14 Pro (M24) AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS	2555 Points -2%
Tuxedo Pulse 14 Gen3 AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS	2604 Points 0%
Asus Zenbook 14 OLED UM3406HA AMD Ryzen 7 8840HS	2552 Points -2%
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AHP9 AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS	2540 Points -3%
Average of class Subnotebook (2003 - 3130, n=43, last 2 years)	2500 Points -4%
Huawei MateBook 14 FLMH-W7611T Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	2372 Points -9%
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2024 Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	2369 Points -9%

Geekbench 5.5 / Multi-Core
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2024 Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	13137 Points +12%
Huawei MateBook 14 FLMH-W7611T Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	12189 Points +4%
Average AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS (11754 - 12726, n=7)	12070 Points +3%
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AHP9 AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS	11802 Points 0%
Tuxedo Pulse 14 Gen3 AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS	11780 Points 0%
SCHENKER VIA 14 Pro (M24) AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS	11754 Points
Average of class Subnotebook (5688 - 14608, n=55, last 2 years)	10159 Points -14%
Asus Zenbook 14 OLED UM3406HA AMD Ryzen 7 8840HS	9897 Points -16%

Geekbench 5.5 / Single-Core
SCHENKER VIA 14 Pro (M24) AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS	1965 Points
Tuxedo Pulse 14 Gen3 AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS	1945 Points -1%
Asus Zenbook 14 OLED UM3406HA AMD Ryzen 7 8840HS	1942 Points -1%
Average AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS (1765 - 2004, n=7)	1933 Points -2%
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AHP9 AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS	1875 Points -5%
Average of class Subnotebook (1426 - 2350, n=55, last 2 years)	1767 Points -10%
Huawei MateBook 14 FLMH-W7611T Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	1754 Points -11%
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2024 Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	1750 Points -11%

HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 / 4k Preset
SCHENKER VIA 14 Pro (M24) AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS	20.7 fps
Average AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS (18.6 - 22.7, n=6)	20.5 fps -1%
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2024 Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	19.5 fps -6%
Tuxedo Pulse 14 Gen3 AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS	19.4 fps -6%
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AHP9 AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS	18.6 fps -10%
Huawei MateBook 14 FLMH-W7611T Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	17.3 fps -16%
Asus Zenbook 14 OLED UM3406HA AMD Ryzen 7 8840HS	17 fps -18%
Average of class Subnotebook (6.2 - 21.3, n=54, last 2 years)	12.9 fps -38%

LibreOffice / 20 Documents To PDF
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2024 Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	79.2 s * -78%
Average AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS (44.5 - 77, n=6)	51.9 s * -17%
Average of class Subnotebook (38.5 - 98.5, n=54, last 2 years)	50.5 s * -13%
Tuxedo Pulse 14 Gen3 AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS	50.4 s * -13%
Asus Zenbook 14 OLED UM3406HA AMD Ryzen 7 8840HS	47.8 s * -7%
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AHP9 AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS	47.1 s * -6%
SCHENKER VIA 14 Pro (M24) AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS	44.5 s *
Huawei MateBook 14 FLMH-W7611T Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	43.9 s * +1%

R Benchmark 2.5 / Overall mean
Average of class Subnotebook (0.413 - 0.77, n=54, last 2 years)	0.506 sec * -7%
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2024 Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	0.478 sec * -1%
Huawei MateBook 14 FLMH-W7611T Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	0.4753 sec * -1%
SCHENKER VIA 14 Pro (M24) AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS	0.4716 sec *
Average AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS (0.4336 - 0.4935, n=6)	0.4538 sec * +4%
Asus Zenbook 14 OLED UM3406HA AMD Ryzen 7 8840HS	0.4521 sec * +4%
Tuxedo Pulse 14 Gen3 AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS	0.4477 sec * +5%
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AHP9 AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS	0.4464 sec * +5%

* ... smaller is better

Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64Bit

2568 Points

Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64Bit

176.4 fps

Cinebench R15 Ref. Match 64Bit

97.9 %

Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64Bit

277 Points

Ajuda

... comparado com

Performance Rating
Average AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS	92.6 pt
Tuxedo Pulse 14 Gen3 AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS, Radeon 780M	92.4 pt
SCHENKER VIA 14 Pro (M24) AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS, Radeon 780M	90.9 pt
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AHP9 AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS, Radeon 780M	85.6 pt
Asus Zenbook 14 OLED UM3406HA AMD Ryzen 7 8840HS, Radeon 780M	75 pt
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2024 Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core	68.7 pt
Huawei MateBook 14 FLMH-W7611T Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core	67.1 pt
Average of class Subnotebook	55.9 pt

AIDA64 / FP32 Ray-Trace
Average AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS (25916 - 29544, n=6)	26817 KRay/s +2%
SCHENKER VIA 14 Pro (M24) AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS, Radeon 780M	26362 KRay/s
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AHP9 AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS, Radeon 780M	25961 KRay/s -2%
Tuxedo Pulse 14 Gen3 AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS, Radeon 780M	24712 KRay/s -6%
Asus Zenbook 14 OLED UM3406HA AMD Ryzen 7 8840HS, Radeon 780M	22269 KRay/s -16%
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2024 Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core	14196 KRay/s -46%
Huawei MateBook 14 FLMH-W7611T Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core	13188 KRay/s -50%
Average of class Subnotebook (4588 - 32888, n=54, last 2 years)	12168 KRay/s -54%

AIDA64 / FPU Julia
Average AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS (107613 - 125873, n=6)	113028 Points +5%
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AHP9 AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS, Radeon 780M	110027 Points +2%
SCHENKER VIA 14 Pro (M24) AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS, Radeon 780M	107613 Points
Tuxedo Pulse 14 Gen3 AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS, Radeon 780M	103755 Points -4%
Asus Zenbook 14 OLED UM3406HA AMD Ryzen 7 8840HS, Radeon 780M	93550 Points -13%
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2024 Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core	75664 Points -30%
Huawei MateBook 14 FLMH-W7611T Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core	69098 Points -36%
Average of class Subnotebook (20465 - 123315, n=54, last 2 years)	59365 Points -45%

AIDA64 / CPU SHA3
Average AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS (4627 - 5180, n=6)	4830 MB/s +2%
SCHENKER VIA 14 Pro (M24) AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS, Radeon 780M	4732 MB/s
Tuxedo Pulse 14 Gen3 AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS, Radeon 780M	4646 MB/s -2%
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AHP9 AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS, Radeon 780M	4627 MB/s -2%
Asus Zenbook 14 OLED UM3406HA AMD Ryzen 7 8840HS, Radeon 780M	4132 MB/s -13%
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2024 Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core	3507 MB/s -26%
Huawei MateBook 14 FLMH-W7611T Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core	3348 MB/s -29%
Average of class Subnotebook (1238 - 5287, n=54, last 2 years)	2835 MB/s -40%

AIDA64 / CPU Queen
Average AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS (114899 - 124695, n=6)	117185 Points +1%
SCHENKER VIA 14 Pro (M24) AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS, Radeon 780M	115682 Points
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AHP9 AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS, Radeon 780M	114899 Points -1%
Tuxedo Pulse 14 Gen3 AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS, Radeon 780M	114236 Points -1%
Asus Zenbook 14 OLED UM3406HA AMD Ryzen 7 8840HS, Radeon 780M	99874 Points -14%
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2024 Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core	89759 Points -22%
Average of class Subnotebook (47816 - 115682, n=54, last 2 years)	83106 Points -28%
Huawei MateBook 14 FLMH-W7611T Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core	82364 Points -29%

AIDA64 / FPU SinJulia
SCHENKER VIA 14 Pro (M24) AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS, Radeon 780M	15226 Points
Average AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS (14876 - 15519, n=6)	15181 Points 0%
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AHP9 AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS, Radeon 780M	14941 Points -2%
Tuxedo Pulse 14 Gen3 AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS, Radeon 780M	14385 Points -6%
Asus Zenbook 14 OLED UM3406HA AMD Ryzen 7 8840HS, Radeon 780M	13731 Points -10%
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2024 Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core	9873 Points -35%
Huawei MateBook 14 FLMH-W7611T Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core	9291 Points -39%
Average of class Subnotebook (1518 - 18418, n=54, last 2 years)	8170 Points -46%

AIDA64 / FPU Mandel
Average AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS (57671 - 67367, n=6)	60417 Points +5%
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AHP9 AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS, Radeon 780M	58765 Points +2%
SCHENKER VIA 14 Pro (M24) AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS, Radeon 780M	57671 Points
Tuxedo Pulse 14 Gen3 AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS, Radeon 780M	55540 Points -4%
Asus Zenbook 14 OLED UM3406HA AMD Ryzen 7 8840HS, Radeon 780M	49687 Points -14%
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2024 Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core	37090 Points -36%
Huawei MateBook 14 FLMH-W7611T Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core	33802 Points -41%
Average of class Subnotebook (11546 - 65433, n=54, last 2 years)	30747 Points -47%

AIDA64 / CPU AES
Tuxedo Pulse 14 Gen3 AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS, Radeon 780M	161430 MB/s +87%
Huawei MateBook 14 FLMH-W7611T Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core	124284 MB/s +44%
Average AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS (67393 - 172642, n=6)	98619 MB/s +14%
SCHENKER VIA 14 Pro (M24) AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS, Radeon 780M	86256 MB/s
Asus Zenbook 14 OLED UM3406HA AMD Ryzen 7 8840HS, Radeon 780M	76247 MB/s -12%
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2024 Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core	73336 MB/s -15%
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AHP9 AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS, Radeon 780M	67393 MB/s -22%
Average of class Subnotebook (24950 - 161430, n=54, last 2 years)	61931 MB/s -28%

AIDA64 / CPU ZLib
Huawei MateBook 14 FLMH-W7611T Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core	1085 MB/s +3%
SCHENKER VIA 14 Pro (M24) AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS, Radeon 780M	1058 MB/s
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2024 Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core	1021 MB/s -3%
Tuxedo Pulse 14 Gen3 AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS, Radeon 780M	1005 MB/s -5%
Average AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS (627 - 1080, n=6)	946 MB/s -11%
Average of class Subnotebook (406 - 1379, n=54, last 2 years)	747 MB/s -29%
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AHP9 AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS, Radeon 780M	627 MB/s -41%
Asus Zenbook 14 OLED UM3406HA AMD Ryzen 7 8840HS, Radeon 780M	468 MB/s -56%

AIDA64 / FP64 Ray-Trace
Average AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS (13875 - 15911, n=6)	14329 KRay/s +2%
SCHENKER VIA 14 Pro (M24) AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS, Radeon 780M	13999 KRay/s
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AHP9 AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS, Radeon 780M	13896 KRay/s -1%
Tuxedo Pulse 14 Gen3 AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS, Radeon 780M	13100 KRay/s -6%
Asus Zenbook 14 OLED UM3406HA AMD Ryzen 7 8840HS, Radeon 780M	11637 KRay/s -17%
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2024 Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core	7521 KRay/s -46%
Huawei MateBook 14 FLMH-W7611T Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core	6835 KRay/s -51%
Average of class Subnotebook (1459 - 17495, n=54, last 2 years)	6293 KRay/s -55%

AIDA64 / CPU PhotoWorxx
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2024 Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core	51390 MPixel/s +33%
Huawei MateBook 14 FLMH-W7611T Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core	40779 MPixel/s +6%
Average AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS (38580 - 41668, n=6)	40214 MPixel/s +4%
Average of class Subnotebook (14337 - 53954, n=54, last 2 years)	39210 MPixel/s +2%
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AHP9 AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS, Radeon 780M	39002 MPixel/s +1%
Tuxedo Pulse 14 Gen3 AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS, Radeon 780M	38837 MPixel/s +1%
SCHENKER VIA 14 Pro (M24) AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS, Radeon 780M	38580 MPixel/s
Asus Zenbook 14 OLED UM3406HA AMD Ryzen 7 8840HS, Radeon 780M	35861 MPixel/s -7%

Desempenho do sistema

Os resultados nos benchmarks do sistema são bons no geral e o VIA 14 Pro sempre foi um companheiro ágil no uso diário. Embora a RAM não possa ser atualizada, 32 GB já estão instalados como padrão, o que deve ser suficiente para a grande maioria dos usuários nos próximos anos.

PCMark 10 / Score
Tuxedo Pulse 14 Gen3 Radeon 780M, R7 7840HS, Samsung SSD 980 Pro 2TB MZ-V8P2T0	7428 Points +4%
Average AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS, AMD Radeon 780M (7120 - 7641, n=4)	7352 Points +3%
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AHP9 Radeon 780M, R7 8845HS, SK hynix BC901 HFS001TEJ4X164N	7216 Points +1%
Asus Zenbook 14 OLED UM3406HA Radeon 780M, R7 8840HS, Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM	7157 Points +1%
SCHENKER VIA 14 Pro (M24) Radeon 780M, R7 8845HS, Samsung 990 Pro 2 TB MZVL72T0HDLB	7120 Points
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2024 Arc 8-Core, Ultra 7 155H, YMTC PC300-1TB	7045 Points -1%
Huawei MateBook 14 FLMH-W7611T Arc 8-Core, Ultra 7 155H, WD PC SN740 SDDPNQD-1T00	7028 Points -1%
Average of class Subnotebook (4528 - 7646, n=48, last 2 years)	6285 Points -12%

PCMark 10 / Essentials
Tuxedo Pulse 14 Gen3 Radeon 780M, R7 7840HS, Samsung SSD 980 Pro 2TB MZ-V8P2T0	11168 Points +5%
Average AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS, AMD Radeon 780M (10685 - 11570, n=4)	10983 Points +3%
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2024 Arc 8-Core, Ultra 7 155H, YMTC PC300-1TB	10946 Points +2%
Huawei MateBook 14 FLMH-W7611T Arc 8-Core, Ultra 7 155H, WD PC SN740 SDDPNQD-1T00	10894 Points +2%
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AHP9 Radeon 780M, R7 8845HS, SK hynix BC901 HFS001TEJ4X164N	10855 Points +2%
Asus Zenbook 14 OLED UM3406HA Radeon 780M, R7 8840HS, Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM	10732 Points 0%
SCHENKER VIA 14 Pro (M24) Radeon 780M, R7 8845HS, Samsung 990 Pro 2 TB MZVL72T0HDLB	10685 Points
Average of class Subnotebook (9143 - 11331, n=48, last 2 years)	10489 Points -2%

PCMark 10 / Productivity
Asus Zenbook 14 OLED UM3406HA Radeon 780M, R7 8840HS, Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM	10449 Points +7%
Tuxedo Pulse 14 Gen3 Radeon 780M, R7 7840HS, Samsung SSD 980 Pro 2TB MZ-V8P2T0	10279 Points +5%
Average AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS, AMD Radeon 780M (9787 - 10482, n=4)	10174 Points +4%
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AHP9 Radeon 780M, R7 8845HS, SK hynix BC901 HFS001TEJ4X164N	9969 Points +2%
SCHENKER VIA 14 Pro (M24) Radeon 780M, R7 8845HS, Samsung 990 Pro 2 TB MZVL72T0HDLB	9787 Points
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2024 Arc 8-Core, Ultra 7 155H, YMTC PC300-1TB	8837 Points -10%
Huawei MateBook 14 FLMH-W7611T Arc 8-Core, Ultra 7 155H, WD PC SN740 SDDPNQD-1T00	8804 Points -10%
Average of class Subnotebook (6440 - 10449, n=48, last 2 years)	8380 Points -14%

PCMark 10 / Digital Content Creation
Huawei MateBook 14 FLMH-W7611T Arc 8-Core, Ultra 7 155H, WD PC SN740 SDDPNQD-1T00	9823 Points +5%
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2024 Arc 8-Core, Ultra 7 155H, YMTC PC300-1TB	9812 Points +5%
Tuxedo Pulse 14 Gen3 Radeon 780M, R7 7840HS, Samsung SSD 980 Pro 2TB MZ-V8P2T0	9691 Points +3%
Average AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS, AMD Radeon 780M (9367 - 10009, n=4)	9654 Points +3%
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AHP9 Radeon 780M, R7 8845HS, SK hynix BC901 HFS001TEJ4X164N	9423 Points +1%
SCHENKER VIA 14 Pro (M24) Radeon 780M, R7 8845HS, Samsung 990 Pro 2 TB MZVL72T0HDLB	9367 Points
Asus Zenbook 14 OLED UM3406HA Radeon 780M, R7 8840HS, Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM	8873 Points -5%
Average of class Subnotebook (4220 - 10983, n=48, last 2 years)	7744 Points -17%

CrossMark / Overall
Average AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS, AMD Radeon 780M (1779 - 1939, n=4)	1861 Points +5%
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AHP9 Radeon 780M, R7 8845HS, SK hynix BC901 HFS001TEJ4X164N	1852 Points +4%
Tuxedo Pulse 14 Gen3 Radeon 780M, R7 7840HS, Samsung SSD 980 Pro 2TB MZ-V8P2T0	1840 Points +3%
Huawei MateBook 14 FLMH-W7611T Arc 8-Core, Ultra 7 155H, WD PC SN740 SDDPNQD-1T00	1810 Points +2%
SCHENKER VIA 14 Pro (M24) Radeon 780M, R7 8845HS, Samsung 990 Pro 2 TB MZVL72T0HDLB	1779 Points
Asus Zenbook 14 OLED UM3406HA Radeon 780M, R7 8840HS, Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM	1698 Points -5%
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2024 Arc 8-Core, Ultra 7 155H, YMTC PC300-1TB	1694 Points -5%
Average of class Subnotebook (1027 - 1971, n=54, last 2 years)	1593 Points -10%

CrossMark / Productivity
Average AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS, AMD Radeon 780M (1716 - 1872, n=4)	1794 Points +5%
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AHP9 Radeon 780M, R7 8845HS, SK hynix BC901 HFS001TEJ4X164N	1784 Points +4%
Tuxedo Pulse 14 Gen3 Radeon 780M, R7 7840HS, Samsung SSD 980 Pro 2TB MZ-V8P2T0	1770 Points +3%
Huawei MateBook 14 FLMH-W7611T Arc 8-Core, Ultra 7 155H, WD PC SN740 SDDPNQD-1T00	1745 Points +2%
SCHENKER VIA 14 Pro (M24) Radeon 780M, R7 8845HS, Samsung 990 Pro 2 TB MZVL72T0HDLB	1716 Points
Asus Zenbook 14 OLED UM3406HA Radeon 780M, R7 8840HS, Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM	1658 Points -3%
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2024 Arc 8-Core, Ultra 7 155H, YMTC PC300-1TB	1598 Points -7%
Average of class Subnotebook (980 - 1875, n=54, last 2 years)	1540 Points -10%

CrossMark / Creativity
Tuxedo Pulse 14 Gen3 Radeon 780M, R7 7840HS, Samsung SSD 980 Pro 2TB MZ-V8P2T0	1999 Points +3%
Average AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS, AMD Radeon 780M (1942 - 2040, n=4)	1992 Points +3%
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AHP9 Radeon 780M, R7 8845HS, SK hynix BC901 HFS001TEJ4X164N	1978 Points +2%
SCHENKER VIA 14 Pro (M24) Radeon 780M, R7 8845HS, Samsung 990 Pro 2 TB MZVL72T0HDLB	1942 Points
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2024 Arc 8-Core, Ultra 7 155H, YMTC PC300-1TB	1925 Points -1%
Huawei MateBook 14 FLMH-W7611T Arc 8-Core, Ultra 7 155H, WD PC SN740 SDDPNQD-1T00	1909 Points -2%
Asus Zenbook 14 OLED UM3406HA Radeon 780M, R7 8840HS, Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM	1842 Points -5%
Average of class Subnotebook (1102 - 2210, n=54, last 2 years)	1732 Points -11%

CrossMark / Responsiveness
Huawei MateBook 14 FLMH-W7611T Arc 8-Core, Ultra 7 155H, WD PC SN740 SDDPNQD-1T00	1721 Points +13%
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AHP9 Radeon 780M, R7 8845HS, SK hynix BC901 HFS001TEJ4X164N	1703 Points +12%
Average AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS, AMD Radeon 780M (1523 - 1849, n=4)	1698 Points +11%
Tuxedo Pulse 14 Gen3 Radeon 780M, R7 7840HS, Samsung SSD 980 Pro 2TB MZ-V8P2T0	1612 Points +6%
SCHENKER VIA 14 Pro (M24) Radeon 780M, R7 8845HS, Samsung 990 Pro 2 TB MZVL72T0HDLB	1523 Points
Asus Zenbook 14 OLED UM3406HA Radeon 780M, R7 8840HS, Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM	1428 Points -6%
Average of class Subnotebook (958 - 1899, n=54, last 2 years)	1382 Points -9%
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2024 Arc 8-Core, Ultra 7 155H, YMTC PC300-1TB	1377 Points -10%

WebXPRT 3 / Overall
Asus Zenbook 14 OLED UM3406HA Radeon 780M, R7 8840HS, Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM	440 Points +43%
Tuxedo Pulse 14 Gen3 Radeon 780M, R7 7840HS, Samsung SSD 980 Pro 2TB MZ-V8P2T0	324 Points +5%
Average AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS, AMD Radeon 780M (295 - 334, n=4)	309 Points 0%
SCHENKER VIA 14 Pro (M24) Radeon 780M, R7 8845HS, Samsung 990 Pro 2 TB MZVL72T0HDLB	308 Points
Average of class Subnotebook (225 - 448, n=56, last 2 years)	304 Points -1%
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AHP9 Radeon 780M, R7 8845HS, SK hynix BC901 HFS001TEJ4X164N	295 Points -4%
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2024 Arc 8-Core, Ultra 7 155H, YMTC PC300-1TB	278 Points -10%
Huawei MateBook 14 FLMH-W7611T Arc 8-Core, Ultra 7 155H, WD PC SN740 SDDPNQD-1T00	276 Points -10%

WebXPRT 4 / Overall
Tuxedo Pulse 14 Gen3 Radeon 780M, R7 7840HS, Samsung SSD 980 Pro 2TB MZ-V8P2T0	319 Points +30%
Huawei MateBook 14 FLMH-W7611T Arc 8-Core, Ultra 7 155H, WD PC SN740 SDDPNQD-1T00	254 Points +4%
Average AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS, AMD Radeon 780M (245 - 266, n=4)	254 Points +4%
Average of class Subnotebook (176.4 - 325, n=53, last 2 years)	253 Points +3%
Asus Zenbook 14 OLED UM3406HA Radeon 780M, R7 8840HS, Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM	248 Points +1%
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AHP9 Radeon 780M, R7 8845HS, SK hynix BC901 HFS001TEJ4X164N	247 Points +1%
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2024 Arc 8-Core, Ultra 7 155H, YMTC PC300-1TB	247 Points +1%
SCHENKER VIA 14 Pro (M24) Radeon 780M, R7 8845HS, Samsung 990 Pro 2 TB MZVL72T0HDLB	245 Points

Mozilla Kraken 1.1 / Total
Huawei MateBook 14 FLMH-W7611T Arc 8-Core, Ultra 7 155H, WD PC SN740 SDDPNQD-1T00	544 ms * -5%
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AHP9 Radeon 780M, R7 8845HS, SK hynix BC901 HFS001TEJ4X164N	531 ms * -3%
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2024 Arc 8-Core, Ultra 7 155H, YMTC PC300-1TB	530 ms * -3%
Average of class Subnotebook (363 - 707, n=61, last 2 years)	526 ms * -2%
Asus Zenbook 14 OLED UM3406HA Radeon 780M, R7 8840HS, Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM	518 ms * -0%
SCHENKER VIA 14 Pro (M24) Radeon 780M, R7 8845HS, Samsung 990 Pro 2 TB MZVL72T0HDLB	516 ms *
Average AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS, AMD Radeon 780M (501 - 531, n=4)	516 ms * -0%
Tuxedo Pulse 14 Gen3 Radeon 780M, R7 7840HS, Samsung SSD 980 Pro 2TB MZ-V8P2T0	508 ms * +2%

* ... smaller is better

PCMark 10 Score		7120 pontos
Ajuda

AIDA64: Memory Copy | Memory Read | Memory Write | Memory Latency

AIDA64 / Memory Copy
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2024 Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core	93396 MB/s +35%
Asus Zenbook 14 OLED UM3406HA AMD Ryzen 7 8840HS, Radeon 780M	76766 MB/s +11%
Huawei MateBook 14 FLMH-W7611T Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core	76483 MB/s +11%
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AHP9 AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS, Radeon 780M	69522 MB/s +1%
SCHENKER VIA 14 Pro (M24) AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS, Radeon 780M	69160 MB/s
Average AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS (67615 - 69523, n=6)	68647 MB/s -1%
Tuxedo Pulse 14 Gen3 AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS, Radeon 780M	67660 MB/s -2%
Average of class Subnotebook (22781 - 96791, n=54, last 2 years)	67537 MB/s -2%

AIDA64 / Memory Read
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2024 Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core	84853 MB/s +70%
Huawei MateBook 14 FLMH-W7611T Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core	70384 MB/s +41%
Average of class Subnotebook (23831 - 122210, n=54, last 2 years)	65254 MB/s +31%
Asus Zenbook 14 OLED UM3406HA AMD Ryzen 7 8840HS, Radeon 780M	58321 MB/s +17%
Average AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS (49866 - 61976, n=6)	57529 MB/s +15%
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AHP9 AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS, Radeon 780M	50572 MB/s +1%
Tuxedo Pulse 14 Gen3 AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS, Radeon 780M	49971 MB/s 0%
SCHENKER VIA 14 Pro (M24) AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS, Radeon 780M	49866 MB/s

AIDA64 / Memory Write
Asus Zenbook 14 OLED UM3406HA AMD Ryzen 7 8840HS, Radeon 780M	107658 MB/s +15%
Tuxedo Pulse 14 Gen3 AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS, Radeon 780M	93323 MB/s 0%
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AHP9 AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS, Radeon 780M	93239 MB/s 0%
SCHENKER VIA 14 Pro (M24) AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS, Radeon 780M	93229 MB/s
Average AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS (85464 - 93239, n=6)	88778 MB/s -5%
Average of class Subnotebook (23474 - 107658, n=54, last 2 years)	69128 MB/s -26%
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2024 Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core	67847 MB/s -27%
Huawei MateBook 14 FLMH-W7611T Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core	58692 MB/s -37%

AIDA64 / Memory Latency
Huawei MateBook 14 FLMH-W7611T Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core	187.8 ns * -75%
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2024 Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core	139.4 ns * -30%
Asus Zenbook 14 OLED UM3406HA AMD Ryzen 7 8840HS, Radeon 780M	114.5 ns * -7%
SCHENKER VIA 14 Pro (M24) AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS, Radeon 780M	107.1 ns *
Tuxedo Pulse 14 Gen3 AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS, Radeon 780M	106 ns * +1%
Average of class Subnotebook (7.4 - 187.8, n=54, last 2 years)	106 ns * +1%
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AHP9 AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS, Radeon 780M	101.8 ns * +5%
Average AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS (85.6 - 107.1, n=6)	95.5 ns * +11%

* ... smaller is better

Latências de DPC

Em nosso teste de latência padronizado (navegação na Internet, reprodução de 4K no YouTube, carga da CPU), o dispositivo de teste com a versão atual do BIOS não apresenta limitações. Embora um driver falhe um pouco, o valor importante de latência de interrupção para processo é muito baixo.

DPC Latencies / LatencyMon - interrupt to process latency (max), Web, Youtube, Prime95
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AHP9 Radeon 780M, R7 8845HS, SK hynix BC901 HFS001TEJ4X164N	1219.5 μs * -156%
Asus Zenbook 14 OLED UM3406HA Radeon 780M, R7 8840HS, Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM	1102.5 μs * -131%
Tuxedo Pulse 14 Gen3 Radeon 780M, R7 7840HS, Samsung SSD 980 Pro 2TB MZ-V8P2T0	1045.4 μs * -119%
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2024 Arc 8-Core, Ultra 7 155H, YMTC PC300-1TB	848.9 μs * -78%
SCHENKER VIA 14 Pro (M24) Radeon 780M, R7 8845HS, Samsung 990 Pro 2 TB MZVL72T0HDLB	476.5 μs *

* ... smaller is better

Armazenamento em massa

O VIA 14 Pro oferece dois slots PCIe 4.0 rápidos para SSDs M.2 2280. Um SSD de 500 GB é instalado na configuração básica, mas nosso dispositivo de teste contém a versão de 2 TB do Samsung 990 Pro (sobretaxa de 138 euros). O 990 Pro atinge altas taxas de transferência e o desempenho permanece completamente estável, mesmo sob carga prolongada. Após a inicialização, o usuário tem 1,76 TB à sua disposição. Outros benchmarks de SSDs podem ser encontrados aqui.

CrystalDiskMark 5.2 / 6

AS SSD

DiskSpd

Samsung 990 Pro 2 TB MZVL72T0HDLB

CDM 5/6 Read Seq Q32T1: 7124 MB/s

CDM 5/6 Write Seq Q32T1: 6890 MB/s

CDM 5/6 Read 4K Q32T1: 459 MB/s

CDM 5/6 Write 4K Q32T1: 463 MB/s

CDM 5/6 Read 4K: 55.8 MB/s

CDM 5/6 Write 4K: 118.2 MB/s

CDM 6 Write 4K Q8T8: 388 MB/s

CDM 6 Read 4K Q8T8: 1211 MB/s

Drive Performance Rating | DiskSpd | AS SSD

Drive Performance Rating - Percent
Tuxedo Pulse 14 Gen3 Samsung SSD 980 Pro 2TB MZ-V8P2T0	89.7 pt
Average Samsung 990 Pro 2 TB MZVL72T0HDLB	87.6 pt
SCHENKER VIA 14 Pro (M24) Samsung 990 Pro 2 TB MZVL72T0HDLB	71.2 pt
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AHP9 SK hynix BC901 HFS001TEJ4X164N	70.9 pt
Huawei MateBook 14 FLMH-W7611T WD PC SN740 SDDPNQD-1T00	69.6 pt
Average of class Subnotebook	54.4 pt
Asus Zenbook 14 OLED UM3406HA Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM	45.1 pt
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2024 YMTC PC300-1TB	44.9 pt

DiskSpd
seq read
Huawei MateBook 14 FLMH-W7611T WD PC SN740 SDDPNQD-1T00	4269 (4234.28^min - 4269.44^max) MB/s +29%
Tuxedo Pulse 14 Gen3 Samsung SSD 980 Pro 2TB MZ-V8P2T0	4057 (4023.18^min - 4057.01^max) MB/s +22%
SCHENKER VIA 14 Pro (M24) Samsung 990 Pro 2 TB MZVL72T0HDLB	3322 (3294.63^min - 3322.45^max) MB/s
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AHP9 SK hynix BC901 HFS001TEJ4X164N	3300 (3279.05^min - 3299.87^max) MB/s -1%
Average Samsung 990 Pro 2 TB MZVL72T0HDLB (2985 - 3322, n=2)	3154 MB/s -5%
Average of class Subnotebook (1147 - 4501, n=54, last 2 years)	2977 MB/s -10%
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2024 YMTC PC300-1TB	2498 (2465.72^min - 2497.5^max) MB/s -25%
Asus Zenbook 14 OLED UM3406HA Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM	2379 (2365.59^min - 2378.73^max) MB/s -28%
seq write
Huawei MateBook 14 FLMH-W7611T WD PC SN740 SDDPNQD-1T00	4695 (4542.57^min - 4694.68^max) MB/s +13%
Average Samsung 990 Pro 2 TB MZVL72T0HDLB (4138 - 5099, n=2)	4619 MB/s +12%
Tuxedo Pulse 14 Gen3 Samsung SSD 980 Pro 2TB MZ-V8P2T0	4317 (4288.28^min - 4317.37^max) MB/s +4%
SCHENKER VIA 14 Pro (M24) Samsung 990 Pro 2 TB MZVL72T0HDLB	4138 (4046.54^min - 4137.79^max) MB/s
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AHP9 SK hynix BC901 HFS001TEJ4X164N	3660 (3614.13^min - 3659.97^max) MB/s -12%
Average of class Subnotebook (1000 - 5344, n=54, last 2 years)	3031 MB/s -27%
Asus Zenbook 14 OLED UM3406HA Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM	2604 (2525.41^min - 2604.03^max) MB/s -37%
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2024 YMTC PC300-1TB	2211 (2136.92^min - 2210.59^max) MB/s -47%
seq q8 t1 read
Tuxedo Pulse 14 Gen3 Samsung SSD 980 Pro 2TB MZ-V8P2T0	6844 (6027.53^min - 6843.85^max) MB/s +19%
Average Samsung 990 Pro 2 TB MZVL72T0HDLB (5761 - 7102, n=2)	6432 MB/s +12%
SCHENKER VIA 14 Pro (M24) Samsung 990 Pro 2 TB MZVL72T0HDLB	5761 (5244.77^min - 5760.67^max) MB/s
Huawei MateBook 14 FLMH-W7611T WD PC SN740 SDDPNQD-1T00	5251 (4849.66^min - 5251.27^max) MB/s -9%
Average of class Subnotebook (2450 - 7134, n=54, last 2 years)	5155 MB/s -11%
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AHP9 SK hynix BC901 HFS001TEJ4X164N	4911 (4608.27^min - 4910.87^max) MB/s -15%
Asus Zenbook 14 OLED UM3406HA Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM	4504 (3696.49^min - 4504.05^max) MB/s -22%
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2024 YMTC PC300-1TB	3857 (3120.3^min - 3857.29^max) MB/s -33%
seq q8 t1 write
SCHENKER VIA 14 Pro (M24) Samsung 990 Pro 2 TB MZVL72T0HDLB	6810 (6778.41^min - 6809.87^max) MB/s
Average Samsung 990 Pro 2 TB MZVL72T0HDLB (6801 - 6810, n=2)	6806 MB/s 0%
Tuxedo Pulse 14 Gen3 Samsung SSD 980 Pro 2TB MZ-V8P2T0	4955 (4919.92^min - 4955.1^max) MB/s -27%
Huawei MateBook 14 FLMH-W7611T WD PC SN740 SDDPNQD-1T00	4676 (4556.48^min - 4675.9^max) MB/s -31%
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AHP9 SK hynix BC901 HFS001TEJ4X164N	4467 (4437.85^min - 4466.6^max) MB/s -34%
Average of class Subnotebook (1469 - 6810, n=54, last 2 years)	4112 MB/s -40%
Asus Zenbook 14 OLED UM3406HA Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM	3105 (3076.1^min - 3105.46^max) MB/s -54%
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2024 YMTC PC300-1TB	2871 (2734.06^min - 2871.34^max) MB/s -58%
4k q1 t1 read
Tuxedo Pulse 14 Gen3 Samsung SSD 980 Pro 2TB MZ-V8P2T0	82.2 (81.81^min - 82.16^max) MB/s +22%
Huawei MateBook 14 FLMH-W7611T WD PC SN740 SDDPNQD-1T00	77.8 (73.1^min - 77.81^max) MB/s +16%
Average Samsung 990 Pro 2 TB MZVL72T0HDLB (67.3 - 80.7, n=2)	74 MB/s +10%
SCHENKER VIA 14 Pro (M24) Samsung 990 Pro 2 TB MZVL72T0HDLB	67.3 (66.81^min - 67.29^max) MB/s
Average of class Subnotebook (29.4 - 88.6, n=54, last 2 years)	63.7 MB/s -5%
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2024 YMTC PC300-1TB	62.2 (61.77^min - 62.19^max) MB/s -8%
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AHP9 SK hynix BC901 HFS001TEJ4X164N	58.8 (58.1^min - 58.81^max) MB/s -13%
Asus Zenbook 14 OLED UM3406HA Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM	34.6 (34.41^min - 34.64^max) MB/s -49%
4k q1 t1 write
Average Samsung 990 Pro 2 TB MZVL72T0HDLB (159.4 - 352, n=2)	256 MB/s +61%
Huawei MateBook 14 FLMH-W7611T WD PC SN740 SDDPNQD-1T00	245 (242.81^min - 244.56^max) MB/s +54%
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AHP9 SK hynix BC901 HFS001TEJ4X164N	221 (220.34^min - 221.44^max) MB/s +39%
Tuxedo Pulse 14 Gen3 Samsung SSD 980 Pro 2TB MZ-V8P2T0	205 (203.95^min - 205.23^max) MB/s +29%
Average of class Subnotebook (22.5 - 360, n=54, last 2 years)	166.5 MB/s +4%
SCHENKER VIA 14 Pro (M24) Samsung 990 Pro 2 TB MZVL72T0HDLB	159.4 (155.73^min - 159.37^max) MB/s
Asus Zenbook 14 OLED UM3406HA Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM	157.7 (151.37^min - 157.68^max) MB/s -1%
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2024 YMTC PC300-1TB	112.5 (111.01^min - 112.51^max) MB/s -29%
4k q32 t16 read
Tuxedo Pulse 14 Gen3 Samsung SSD 980 Pro 2TB MZ-V8P2T0	4286 (4274.43^min - 4286.07^max) MB/s +313%
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AHP9 SK hynix BC901 HFS001TEJ4X164N	3460 (3433.29^min - 3460.15^max) MB/s +234%
Average Samsung 990 Pro 2 TB MZVL72T0HDLB (1037 - 5735, n=2)	3386 MB/s +227%
Huawei MateBook 14 FLMH-W7611T WD PC SN740 SDDPNQD-1T00	3048 (2829.43^min - 3047.69^max) MB/s +194%
Average of class Subnotebook (283 - 4286, n=54, last 2 years)	1402 MB/s +35%
SCHENKER VIA 14 Pro (M24) Samsung 990 Pro 2 TB MZVL72T0HDLB	1037 (1017.69^min - 1037.34^max) MB/s
Asus Zenbook 14 OLED UM3406HA Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM	909 (848.35^min - 908.51^max) MB/s -12%
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2024 YMTC PC300-1TB	850 (824.69^min - 850.28^max) MB/s -18%
4k q32 t16 write
Tuxedo Pulse 14 Gen3 Samsung SSD 980 Pro 2TB MZ-V8P2T0	4189 (4136.14^min - 4188.97^max) MB/s +769%
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AHP9 SK hynix BC901 HFS001TEJ4X164N	3266 (3227.93^min - 3265.61^max) MB/s +578%
Huawei MateBook 14 FLMH-W7611T WD PC SN740 SDDPNQD-1T00	2980 (2752.98^min - 2980.38^max) MB/s +518%
Average Samsung 990 Pro 2 TB MZVL72T0HDLB (482 - 4869, n=2)	2676 MB/s +455%
Average of class Subnotebook (213 - 4189, n=54, last 2 years)	1003 MB/s +108%
SCHENKER VIA 14 Pro (M24) Samsung 990 Pro 2 TB MZVL72T0HDLB	482 (476.35^min - 481.55^max) MB/s
Asus Zenbook 14 OLED UM3406HA Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM	435 (416.7^min - 435.33^max) MB/s -10%
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2024 YMTC PC300-1TB	375 (355.65^min - 375.1^max) MB/s -22%

AS SSD
Score Total
Tuxedo Pulse 14 Gen3 Samsung SSD 980 Pro 2TB MZ-V8P2T0	8892 Points +36%
Average Samsung 990 Pro 2 TB MZVL72T0HDLB (6556 - 10745, n=2)	8651 Points +32%
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AHP9 SK hynix BC901 HFS001TEJ4X164N	7325 Points +12%
SCHENKER VIA 14 Pro (M24) Samsung 990 Pro 2 TB MZVL72T0HDLB	6556 Points
Huawei MateBook 14 FLMH-W7611T WD PC SN740 SDDPNQD-1T00	4927 Points -25%
Average of class Subnotebook (2229 - 8892, n=53, last 2 years)	4625 Points -29%
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2024 YMTC PC300-1TB	3819 Points -42%
Asus Zenbook 14 OLED UM3406HA Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM	3408 Points -48%
Score Read
Tuxedo Pulse 14 Gen3 Samsung SSD 980 Pro 2TB MZ-V8P2T0	3307 Points +138%
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AHP9 SK hynix BC901 HFS001TEJ4X164N	2782 Points +100%
Average Samsung 990 Pro 2 TB MZVL72T0HDLB (1391 - 3980, n=2)	2686 Points +93%
Huawei MateBook 14 FLMH-W7611T WD PC SN740 SDDPNQD-1T00	1784 Points +28%
Average of class Subnotebook (780 - 3307, n=53, last 2 years)	1490 Points +7%
SCHENKER VIA 14 Pro (M24) Samsung 990 Pro 2 TB MZVL72T0HDLB	1391 Points
Asus Zenbook 14 OLED UM3406HA Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM	1217 Points -13%
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2024 YMTC PC300-1TB	1195 Points -14%
Score Write
Average Samsung 990 Pro 2 TB MZVL72T0HDLB (4469 - 4734, n=2)	4602 Points +3%
SCHENKER VIA 14 Pro (M24) Samsung 990 Pro 2 TB MZVL72T0HDLB	4469 Points
Tuxedo Pulse 14 Gen3 Samsung SSD 980 Pro 2TB MZ-V8P2T0	3972 Points -11%
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AHP9 SK hynix BC901 HFS001TEJ4X164N	3203 Points -28%
Average of class Subnotebook (549 - 4469, n=53, last 2 years)	2427 Points -46%
Huawei MateBook 14 FLMH-W7611T WD PC SN740 SDDPNQD-1T00	2223 Points -50%
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2024 YMTC PC300-1TB	2070 Points -54%
Asus Zenbook 14 OLED UM3406HA Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM	1632 Points -63%
Seq Read
Tuxedo Pulse 14 Gen3 Samsung SSD 980 Pro 2TB MZ-V8P2T0	5525 MB/s +27%
Average Samsung 990 Pro 2 TB MZVL72T0HDLB (4336 - 5066, n=2)	4701 MB/s +8%
SCHENKER VIA 14 Pro (M24) Samsung 990 Pro 2 TB MZVL72T0HDLB	4336 MB/s
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AHP9 SK hynix BC901 HFS001TEJ4X164N	4310 MB/s -1%
Huawei MateBook 14 FLMH-W7611T WD PC SN740 SDDPNQD-1T00	4109 MB/s -5%
Average of class Subnotebook (1903 - 5525, n=53, last 2 years)	4013 MB/s -7%
Asus Zenbook 14 OLED UM3406HA Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM	3675 MB/s -15%
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2024 YMTC PC300-1TB	3304 MB/s -24%
Seq Write
Average Samsung 990 Pro 2 TB MZVL72T0HDLB (3714 - 5119, n=2)	4416 MB/s +19%
Huawei MateBook 14 FLMH-W7611T WD PC SN740 SDDPNQD-1T00	4104 MB/s +11%
Tuxedo Pulse 14 Gen3 Samsung SSD 980 Pro 2TB MZ-V8P2T0	4004 MB/s +8%
SCHENKER VIA 14 Pro (M24) Samsung 990 Pro 2 TB MZVL72T0HDLB	3714 MB/s
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AHP9 SK hynix BC901 HFS001TEJ4X164N	2791 MB/s -25%
Average of class Subnotebook (1108 - 4961, n=53, last 2 years)	2665 MB/s -28%
Asus Zenbook 14 OLED UM3406HA Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM	2172 MB/s -42%
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2024 YMTC PC300-1TB	1828 MB/s -51%
4K Read
Tuxedo Pulse 14 Gen3 Samsung SSD 980 Pro 2TB MZ-V8P2T0	72.3 MB/s +13%
Average Samsung 990 Pro 2 TB MZVL72T0HDLB (64.2 - 77.8, n=2)	71 MB/s +11%
SCHENKER VIA 14 Pro (M24) Samsung 990 Pro 2 TB MZVL72T0HDLB	64.2 MB/s
Average of class Subnotebook (19.9 - 96.2, n=53, last 2 years)	60.2 MB/s -6%
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2024 YMTC PC300-1TB	58.5 MB/s -9%
Huawei MateBook 14 FLMH-W7611T WD PC SN740 SDDPNQD-1T00	57.8 MB/s -10%
Asus Zenbook 14 OLED UM3406HA Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM	51 MB/s -21%
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AHP9 SK hynix BC901 HFS001TEJ4X164N	49.9 MB/s -22%
4K Write
Average Samsung 990 Pro 2 TB MZVL72T0HDLB (192.8 - 307, n=2)	250 MB/s +30%
SCHENKER VIA 14 Pro (M24) Samsung 990 Pro 2 TB MZVL72T0HDLB	192.8 MB/s
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AHP9 SK hynix BC901 HFS001TEJ4X164N	180.6 MB/s -6%
Average of class Subnotebook (100.6 - 256, n=53, last 2 years)	180.2 MB/s -7%
Asus Zenbook 14 OLED UM3406HA Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM	177.1 MB/s -8%
Huawei MateBook 14 FLMH-W7611T WD PC SN740 SDDPNQD-1T00	173.1 MB/s -10%
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2024 YMTC PC300-1TB	167.9 MB/s -13%
Tuxedo Pulse 14 Gen3 Samsung SSD 980 Pro 2TB MZ-V8P2T0	161 MB/s -16%
4K-64 Read
Tuxedo Pulse 14 Gen3 Samsung SSD 980 Pro 2TB MZ-V8P2T0	2682 MB/s +200%
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AHP9 SK hynix BC901 HFS001TEJ4X164N	2301 MB/s +158%
Average Samsung 990 Pro 2 TB MZVL72T0HDLB (893 - 3395, n=2)	2144 MB/s +140%
Huawei MateBook 14 FLMH-W7611T WD PC SN740 SDDPNQD-1T00	1315 MB/s +47%
Average of class Subnotebook (349 - 2682, n=53, last 2 years)	1029 MB/s +15%
SCHENKER VIA 14 Pro (M24) Samsung 990 Pro 2 TB MZVL72T0HDLB	893 MB/s
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2024 YMTC PC300-1TB	806 MB/s -10%
Asus Zenbook 14 OLED UM3406HA Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM	798 MB/s -11%
4K-64 Write
Average Samsung 990 Pro 2 TB MZVL72T0HDLB (3905 - 3915, n=2)	3910 MB/s 0%
SCHENKER VIA 14 Pro (M24) Samsung 990 Pro 2 TB MZVL72T0HDLB	3905 MB/s
Tuxedo Pulse 14 Gen3 Samsung SSD 980 Pro 2TB MZ-V8P2T0	3410 MB/s -13%
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AHP9 SK hynix BC901 HFS001TEJ4X164N	2743 MB/s -30%
Average of class Subnotebook (242 - 3905, n=53, last 2 years)	1977 MB/s -49%
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2024 YMTC PC300-1TB	1719 MB/s -56%
Huawei MateBook 14 FLMH-W7611T WD PC SN740 SDDPNQD-1T00	1639 MB/s -58%
Asus Zenbook 14 OLED UM3406HA Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM	1238 MB/s -68%
Access Time Read
Huawei MateBook 14 FLMH-W7611T WD PC SN740 SDDPNQD-1T00	0.058 ms * -190%
Average of class Subnotebook (0.02 - 0.16, n=53, last 2 years)	0.0536 ms * -168%
Average Samsung 990 Pro 2 TB MZVL72T0HDLB (0.02 - 0.052, n=2)	0.036 ms * -80%
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2024 YMTC PC300-1TB	0.027 ms * -35%
Tuxedo Pulse 14 Gen3 Samsung SSD 980 Pro 2TB MZ-V8P2T0	0.024 ms * -20%
Asus Zenbook 14 OLED UM3406HA Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM	0.023 ms * -15%
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AHP9 SK hynix BC901 HFS001TEJ4X164N	0.022 ms * -10%
SCHENKER VIA 14 Pro (M24) Samsung 990 Pro 2 TB MZVL72T0HDLB	0.02 ms *
Access Time Write
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2024 YMTC PC300-1TB	0.11 ms * -450%
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AHP9 SK hynix BC901 HFS001TEJ4X164N	0.108 ms * -440%
Asus Zenbook 14 OLED UM3406HA Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM	0.1 ms * -400%
Average of class Subnotebook (0.017 - 0.352, n=53, last 2 years)	0.07657 ms * -283%
Tuxedo Pulse 14 Gen3 Samsung SSD 980 Pro 2TB MZ-V8P2T0	0.025 ms * -25%
Huawei MateBook 14 FLMH-W7611T WD PC SN740 SDDPNQD-1T00	0.022 ms * -10%
SCHENKER VIA 14 Pro (M24) Samsung 990 Pro 2 TB MZVL72T0HDLB	0.02 ms *
Average Samsung 990 Pro 2 TB MZVL72T0HDLB (0.013 - 0.02, n=2)	0.0165 ms * +17%

* ... smaller is better

Continuous reading: DiskSpd Read Loop, Queue Depth 8

SCHENKER VIA 14 Pro (M24); diskspd 2.0.17 f: Ø5739 (4853.38-5771.79)

Placa de vídeo

A série Ryzen 8000 ainda conta com a conhecida Radeon 780Mque se beneficia da configuração de canal duplo da RAM. A iGPU é muito adequada para o uso diário e também é possível jogar, embora muitas vezes o senhor tenha que se contentar com poucos detalhes nos títulos atuais. Nos benchmarks sintéticos, a nova Intel Arc Graphics iGPU (com 8 núcleos Xe) pode superar ligeiramente a 780M, mas o desempenho em jogos está no mesmo nível.

O desempenho gráfico permanece completamente estável, mesmo sob carga prolongada, e nosso teste Cyberpunk 2077 (30 minutos) também não mostra perda de desempenho. No entanto, no modo de bateria, o desempenho da GPU é minimamente reduzido (~11%). Outros benchmarks de GPU estão disponíveis em nossa seção de tecnologia.

3DMark Performance Rating | 3DMark 11 | 3DMark | Geekbench 6.2

3DMark Performance Rating - Percent
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2024 Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU, Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	95.3 pt
Huawei MateBook 14 FLMH-W7611T Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU, Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	93 pt
Tuxedo Pulse 14 Gen3 AMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS	90 pt
SCHENKER VIA 14 Pro (M24) AMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS	87.7 pt
Asus Zenbook 14 OLED UM3406HA AMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen 7 8840HS	85.9 pt
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AHP9 AMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS	84.5 pt
Average AMD Radeon 780M	81.9 pt
Average of class Subnotebook	70.6 pt

3DMark 11 - 1280x720 Performance GPU
SCHENKER VIA 14 Pro (M24) AMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS	13734 Points
Tuxedo Pulse 14 Gen3 AMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS	13524 Points -2%
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2024 Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU, Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	13321 Points -3%
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AHP9 AMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS	13316 Points -3%
Asus Zenbook 14 OLED UM3406HA AMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen 7 8840HS	12999 Points -5%
Average AMD Radeon 780M (7868 - 14249, n=48)	12419 Points -10%
Huawei MateBook 14 FLMH-W7611T Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU, Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	12375 Points -10%
Average of class Subnotebook (4823 - 16904, n=51, last 2 years)	9486 Points -31%

3DMark
1920x1080 Fire Strike Graphics
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2024 Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU, Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	9548 Points +14%
Tuxedo Pulse 14 Gen3 AMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS	8538 Points +2%
Huawei MateBook 14 FLMH-W7611T Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU, Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	8513 Points +2%
Asus Zenbook 14 OLED UM3406HA AMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen 7 8840HS	8441 Points +1%
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AHP9 AMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS	8438 Points +1%
SCHENKER VIA 14 Pro (M24) AMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS	8345 Points
Average AMD Radeon 780M (4550 - 8816, n=48)	7703 Points -8%
Average of class Subnotebook (3006 - 12349, n=55, last 2 years)	6874 Points -18%
2560x1440 Time Spy Graphics
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2024 Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU, Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	3671 Points +26%
Huawei MateBook 14 FLMH-W7611T Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU, Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	3411 Points +17%
Tuxedo Pulse 14 Gen3 AMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS	3027 Points +4%
SCHENKER VIA 14 Pro (M24) AMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS	2915 Points
Asus Zenbook 14 OLED UM3406HA AMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen 7 8840HS	2876 Points -1%
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AHP9 AMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS	2847 Points -2%
Average AMD Radeon 780M (1496 - 3196, n=48)	2702 Points -7%
Average of class Subnotebook (999 - 4773, n=54, last 2 years)	2375 Points -19%

Geekbench 6.2 - GPU OpenCL
Huawei MateBook 14 FLMH-W7611T Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU, Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	34669 Points +12%
Tuxedo Pulse 14 Gen3 AMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS	31025 Points +1%
SCHENKER VIA 14 Pro (M24) AMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS	30818 Points
SCHENKER VIA 14 Pro (M24) AMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS	27410 Points -11%
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2024 Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU, Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	29233 Points -5%
Average AMD Radeon 780M (15316 - 33077, n=45)	28695 Points -7%
Asus Zenbook 14 OLED UM3406HA AMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen 7 8840HS	28473 Points -8%
Average of class Subnotebook (10340 - 52427, n=43, last 2 years)	26535 Points -14%
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AHP9 AMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS	26058 Points -15%

3DMark 11 Performance		13077 pontos
3DMark Fire Strike Score		7731 pontos
3DMark Time Spy Score		3234 pontos
3DMark Steel Nomad Light Score		2788 pontos
Ajuda

... comparado com

Blender: v3.3 Classroom CPU | v3.3 Classroom oneAPI/Intel

Blender / v3.3 Classroom CPU
Average of class Subnotebook (256 - 1127, n=57, last 2 years)	564 Seconds * -80%
Huawei MateBook 14 FLMH-W7611T Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU, Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	385 Seconds * -23%
Average AMD Radeon 780M (305 - 664, n=46)	377 Seconds * -20%
Asus Zenbook 14 OLED UM3406HA AMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen 7 8840HS	369 Seconds * -18%
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AHP9 AMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS	352 Seconds * -12%
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2024 Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU, Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	341 Seconds * -9%
Tuxedo Pulse 14 Gen3 AMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS	336 Seconds * -7%
SCHENKER VIA 14 Pro (M24) AMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS	314 Seconds *

Blender / v3.3 Classroom oneAPI/Intel
Average of class Subnotebook (223 - 364, n=2, last 2 years)	294 Seconds *
Huawei MateBook 14 FLMH-W7611T Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU, Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	223 Seconds *

* ... smaller is better

Performance Rating - Percent
Tuxedo Pulse 14 Gen3 AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS, AMD Radeon 780M	93.6 pt
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2024 Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU	92.5 pt
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AHP9 AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS, AMD Radeon 780M	88.3 pt
SCHENKER VIA 14 Pro (M24) AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS, AMD Radeon 780M	87.6 pt
Asus Zenbook 14 OLED UM3406HA AMD Ryzen 7 8840HS, AMD Radeon 780M	87.2 pt
Huawei MateBook 14 FLMH-W7611T ^-1! Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU	72.4 pt
Average of class Subnotebook	72.3 pt

GTA V - 1920x1080 Highest Settings possible AA:4xMSAA + FX AF:16x
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AHP9 AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS, AMD Radeon 780M	27.2 (3.56^min, 19.2^P1) fps +4%
Tuxedo Pulse 14 Gen3 AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS, AMD Radeon 780M	27.1 (3.98^min, 18.9^P1) fps +4%
SCHENKER VIA 14 Pro (M24) AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS, AMD Radeon 780M	26.1 (3.05^min, 18.2^P1) fps
Asus Zenbook 14 OLED UM3406HA AMD Ryzen 7 8840HS, AMD Radeon 780M	25.7 (2.69^min, 16.4^P1) fps -2%
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2024 Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU	20.6 (2.88^min, 15.9^P1) fps -21%
Average of class Subnotebook (7.81 - 67.5, n=47, last 2 years)	18.4 fps -30%

Final Fantasy XV Benchmark - 1920x1080 High Quality
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2024 Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU	31.6 fps +10%
Tuxedo Pulse 14 Gen3 AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS, AMD Radeon 780M	29.4 fps +2%
SCHENKER VIA 14 Pro (M24) AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS, AMD Radeon 780M	28.8 fps
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AHP9 AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS, AMD Radeon 780M	28.4 fps -1%
Asus Zenbook 14 OLED UM3406HA AMD Ryzen 7 8840HS, AMD Radeon 780M	27.6 fps -4%
Huawei MateBook 14 FLMH-W7611T Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU	26.5 fps -8%
Average of class Subnotebook (11.9 - 50.1, n=53, last 2 years)	22.2 fps -23%

Strange Brigade - 1920x1080 ultra AA:ultra AF:16
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2024 Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU	58 fps +18%
Tuxedo Pulse 14 Gen3 AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS, AMD Radeon 780M	49.6 (35.6^min, 39^P1) fps +1%
Asus Zenbook 14 OLED UM3406HA AMD Ryzen 7 8840HS, AMD Radeon 780M	49 fps 0%
SCHENKER VIA 14 Pro (M24) AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS, AMD Radeon 780M	49 fps
Huawei MateBook 14 FLMH-W7611T Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU	48.9 (6.3^min, 16.2^P1) fps 0%
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AHP9 AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS, AMD Radeon 780M	48.1 (10.9^min, 15.3^P1) fps -2%
Average of class Subnotebook (17.7 - 86, n=53, last 2 years)	37.2 fps -24%

Dota 2 Reborn - 1920x1080 ultra (3/3) best looking
Tuxedo Pulse 14 Gen3 AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS, AMD Radeon 780M	85.1 (75.2^min) fps +13%
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AHP9 AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS, AMD Radeon 780M	76.8 (67.2^min) fps +2%
SCHENKER VIA 14 Pro (M24) AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS, AMD Radeon 780M	75.1 (65.6^min) fps
Asus Zenbook 14 OLED UM3406HA AMD Ryzen 7 8840HS, AMD Radeon 780M	75 (63.4^min) fps 0%
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2024 Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU	74 (46.7^min) fps -1%
Average of class Subnotebook (32.8 - 109.1, n=54, last 2 years)	61.4 fps -18%
Huawei MateBook 14 FLMH-W7611T Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU	35.2 (33.9^min) fps -53%

X-Plane 11.11 - 1920x1080 high (fps_test=3)
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2024 Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU	39.5 fps +28%
Tuxedo Pulse 14 Gen3 AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS, AMD Radeon 780M	35.4 fps +15%
Average of class Subnotebook (22.1 - 97.1, n=49, last 2 years)	34.5 fps +12%
Asus Zenbook 14 OLED UM3406HA AMD Ryzen 7 8840HS, AMD Radeon 780M	32.3 fps +5%
Huawei MateBook 14 FLMH-W7611T Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU	31.7 fps +3%
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AHP9 AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS, AMD Radeon 780M	31 fps 0%
SCHENKER VIA 14 Pro (M24) AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS, AMD Radeon 780M	30.9 fps

Cyberpunk 2077 FPS chart

SCHENKER VIA 14 Pro (M24) R7 8845HS, Radeon 780M: Ø21.6 (19.5-22)

	baixo	média	alto	ultra	QHD
GTA V (2015)	147.5	133.8	64.1	26.1
Dota 2 Reborn (2015)	122.9	102.7	84.1	75.1
Final Fantasy XV Benchmark (2018)	75.6	38.2	28.8		20.9
X-Plane 11.11 (2018)	53	38.1	30.9
Strange Brigade (2018)	155	66	57	49
F1 23 (2023)	85.9	76.7	53	11.6
Baldur's Gate 3 (2023)	40.1	31.5	25.8	25.4
Cyberpunk 2077 2.1 Phantom Liberty (2023)	41.5	32.2	25.8	22.4
F1 24 (2024)	85.9	71.9	51.4	11.1

Emissões e energia

Emissões de ruído

O resfriamento do VIA 14 Pro usa duas ventoinhas e o volume depende muito do perfil de energia selecionado. No modo inativo e em tarefas simples, o dispositivo permanece praticamente silencioso, mesmo no modo de desempenho. No entanto, sob carga mais alta, as duas ventoinhas são claramente perceptíveis e um máximo de 43,6 dB(A) não é particularmente silencioso. Os resultados nos outros perfis de energia estão listados na tabela a seguir. Os ventiladores permanecem desativados por muito tempo, especialmente no perfil Quiet. Não houve outros ruídos eletrônicos em nosso dispositivo de teste.

Perfil de energia	3DMark 06	Cyberpunk 2077	Teste de estresse
Silencioso	Ventilador desligado	28,8 dB(A)	30,6 dB(A)
Balanceado	36,2 dB(A)	36,2 dB(A)	36,2 dB(A)
Alimentação	36,2 dB(A)	43,6 dB(A)	43,6 dB(A)

Barulho

Ocioso		25.7 / 25.7 / 25.7 dB
Carga		36.2 / 43.6 dB

	30 dB silencioso 40 dB(A) audível 50 dB(A) ruidosamente alto
min: , med: , max: Earthworks M23R, Arta (15 cm de distância) environment noise: 25.7 dB(A)

	SCHENKER VIA 14 Pro (M24) Radeon 780M, R7 8845HS, Samsung 990 Pro 2 TB MZVL72T0HDLB	Huawei MateBook 14 FLMH-W7611T Arc 8-Core, Ultra 7 155H, WD PC SN740 SDDPNQD-1T00	Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2024 Arc 8-Core, Ultra 7 155H, YMTC PC300-1TB	Asus Zenbook 14 OLED UM3406HA Radeon 780M, R7 8840HS, Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM	Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AHP9 Radeon 780M, R7 8845HS, SK hynix BC901 HFS001TEJ4X164N	Tuxedo Pulse 14 Gen3 Radeon 780M, R7 7840HS, Samsung SSD 980 Pro 2TB MZ-V8P2T0
Noise		1%	3%	2%	1%	9%
off / environment *	25.7	25.11 2%	23.8 7%	25.1 2%	23.9 7%	23.5 9%
Idle Minimum *	25.7	25.11 2%	23.8 7%	25.1 2%	23.9 7%	23.5 9%
Idle Average *	25.7	25.11 2%	23.8 7%	25.1 2%	23.9 7%	23.5 9%
Idle Maximum *	25.7	27.2 -6%	27.1 -5%	25.1 2%	23.9 7%	25.1 2%
Load Average *	36.2	31.3 14%	34.9 4%	35.9 1%	44.3 -22%	32.4 10%
Cyberpunk 2077 ultra *	43.6		43.7 -0%
Load Maximum *	43.6	46.61 -7%	43.7 -0%	42.2 3%	44.3 -2%	37.3 14%
Witcher 3 ultra *				39.3	41.3	34.9

* ... smaller is better

Temperatura

A carcaça do VIA 14 Pro quase não esquenta no modo inativo e durante tarefas leves, mas isso muda sob carga. Na parte inferior, medimos quase 50 °C na área central durante os jogos e no teste de estresse, e é por isso que o senhor não deve colocar o dispositivo sobre as coxas nesse cenário. A área do teclado também fica visivelmente quente, chegando a 43 °C, mas não há limitações aqui. No teste de estresse, o processador opera a uma potência constante de 54 watts.

Do lado negativo, notamos a fonte de alimentação de 100 watts, que difere um pouco da fonte de alimentação do Tuxedo Pulse 14 Gen3. Embora o consumo total do notebook durante o teste de estresse seja de cerca de 92 watts e, portanto, ainda não esteja no limite da fonte de alimentação, as temperaturas de pouco menos de 60 °C são definitivamente muito altas.

Carga Máxima

Inatividade

Cyberpunk


44.1 °C	44.6 °C	43.2 °C
41.7 °C	43.6 °C	40.1 °C
31.9 °C	33 °C	32.8 °C

Máximo: 44.6 °C
Médio: 39.4 °C


44.6 °C	50.9 °C	42.2 °C
39.3 °C	50 °C	34.4 °C
34.3 °C	35.5 °C	32.6 °C

Máximo: 50.9 °C
Médio: 40.4 °C

alimentação elétrica 59.5 °C | Temperatura do quarto 22.4 °C | Fluke t3000FC (calibrated), Voltcraft IR-900

Carga Máxima

Inatividade

Cyberpunk


26.3 °C	26.5 °C	26.3 °C
25.7 °C	26.2 °C	26 °C
25.2 °C	25.5 °C	25.3 °C

Máximo: 26.5 °C
Médio: 25.9 °C


26.1 °C	26.3 °C	25.8 °C
25.7 °C	26.3 °C	25.3 °C
25.6 °C	25.6 °C	25.5 °C

Máximo: 26.3 °C
Médio: 25.8 °C

alimentação elétrica 28.7 °C | Temperatura do quarto 22 °C | Fluke t3000FC (calibrated), Voltcraft IR-900

Carga Máxima

Inatividade

Cyberpunk


42.3 °C	42.9 °C	41.4 °C
38.1 °C	42.8 °C	38.2 °C
32.3 °C	33.8 °C	30.7 °C

Máximo: 42.9 °C
Médio: 38.1 °C


43.1 °C	49.5 °C	38.6 °C
37.2 °C	48.3 °C	33.2 °C
32.4 °C	33.5 °C	31.5 °C

Máximo: 49.5 °C
Médio: 38.6 °C

alimentação elétrica 57.8 °C | Temperatura do quarto 22 °C | Fluke t3000FC (calibrated), Voltcraft IR-900

(-) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 39.4 °C / 103 F, compared to the average of 30.8 °C / 87 F for the devices in the class Subnotebook.
(±) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 44.6 °C / 112 F, compared to the average of 35.9 °C / 97 F, ranging from 21.4 to 59 °C for the class Subnotebook.
(-) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 50.9 °C / 124 F, compared to the average of 39.4 °C / 103 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 25.9 °C / 79 F, compared to the device average of 30.8 °C / 87 F.
(-) 3: The average temperature for the upper side is 38.1 °C / 101 F, compared to the average of 30.8 °C / 87 F for the class Subnotebook.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are reaching skin temperature as a maximum (33.8 °C / 92.8 F) and are therefore not hot.
(-) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.3 °C / 82.9 F (-5.5 °C / -9.9 F).

Teste de estresse de temperatura da superfície (lado superior)

Teste de estresse de temperatura da superfície (parte inferior)

	SCHENKER VIA 14 Pro (M24) AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS, AMD Radeon 780M	Huawei MateBook 14 FLMH-W7611T Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU	Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2024 Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU	Asus Zenbook 14 OLED UM3406HA AMD Ryzen 7 8840HS, AMD Radeon 780M	Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AHP9 AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS, AMD Radeon 780M	Tuxedo Pulse 14 Gen3 AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS, AMD Radeon 780M
Heat		-6%	-2%	2%	11%	7%
Maximum Upper Side *	44.6	45.2 -1%	43.7 2%	43.1 3%	39.6 11%	41.5 7%
Maximum Bottom *	50.9	49.2 3%	49.4 3%	50.2 1%	38.6 24%	45.7 10%
Idle Upper Side *	26.5	29.6 -12%	27.7 -5%	25.8 3%	24.8 6%	24.7 7%
Idle Bottom *	26.3	30.2 -15%	28.6 -9%	26.4 -0%	25.3 4%	24.9 5%

* ... smaller is better

Alto-falante

Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)

SCHENKER VIA 14 Pro (M24) audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (80.9 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 27.9% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (8% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | reduced mids - on average 6.2% lower than median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (7.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2.6% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (20.7% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 65% of all tested devices in this class were better, 7% similar, 28% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 19%, worst was 53%
Compared to all devices tested
» 51% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 41% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Huawei MateBook 14 FLMH-W7611T audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (83.1 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 6.4% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (10.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 6.1% higher than median
(+) | mids are linear (6.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 1.7% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (10.6% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 7% of all tested devices in this class were better, 3% similar, 91% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 19%, worst was 53%
Compared to all devices tested
» 4% of all tested devices were better, 1% similar, 95% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Consumo de energia

O maior brilho do painel não é negativamente perceptível em comparação com o Tuxedo Pulse 14 e o consumo máximo de 94 watts também é um pouco menor. Em suma, não há surpresas aqui e a fonte de alimentação de 100 watts fornecida é suficientemente dimensionada. No entanto, o consumo quando desligado ainda não melhorou e 0,8 watts é um pouco alto.

Consumo de energia

desligado	0.8 / 0.86 Watt
Ocioso	4.8 / 8.7 / 9.2 Watt
Carga	63.2 / 94.5 Watt


Key: min: , med: , max: Metrahit Energy Currently we use the Metrahit Energy, a professional single phase power quality and energy measurement digital multimeter, for our measurements. Find out more about it here. All of our test methods can be found here.

	SCHENKER VIA 14 Pro (M24) Radeon 780M, R7 8845HS, Samsung 990 Pro 2 TB MZVL72T0HDLB	Huawei MateBook 14 FLMH-W7611T Arc 8-Core, Ultra 7 155H, WD PC SN740 SDDPNQD-1T00	Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2024 Arc 8-Core, Ultra 7 155H, YMTC PC300-1TB	Asus Zenbook 14 OLED UM3406HA Radeon 780M, R7 8840HS, Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM	Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AHP9 Radeon 780M, R7 8845HS, SK hynix BC901 HFS001TEJ4X164N	Tuxedo Pulse 14 Gen3 Radeon 780M, R7 7840HS, Samsung SSD 980 Pro 2TB MZ-V8P2T0
Power Consumption		11%	2%	27%	5%	-8%
Idle Minimum *	4.8	4.4 8%	4.4 8%	3.6 25%	5.3 -10%	5.6 -17%
Idle Average *	8.7	5.6 36%	9.2 -6%	6.6 24%	7.2 17%	9.2 -6%
Idle Maximum *	9.2	12.5 -36%	9.6 -4%	7.4 20%	7.5 18%	9.7 -5%
Load Average *	63.2	52.1 18%	62.6 1%	47.1 25%	65.6 -4%	65.2 -3%
Cyberpunk 2077 ultra *	81.3		71.5 12%
Cyberpunk 2077 ultra external monitor *	80.2		71.9 10%
Load Maximum *	94.5	67.3 29%	101.7 -8%	54.3 43%	89.6 5%	101 -7%
Witcher 3 ultra *		46.7		47.4	73	70

* ... smaller is better

Power consumption Cyberpunk 2077 / Stress test

SCHENKER VIA 14 Pro (M24); 1280x720 Prime95 28.10 and Furmark 1.25: Ø91.9 (88.9-94.5)

SCHENKER VIA 14 Pro (M24); Idle 150cd/m2: Ø7.24 (6.23-10.7)

SCHENKER VIA 14 Pro (M24); Cyberpunk 2077 FHD ultra no FSR 150cd: Ø81.3 (78.4-83.4)

Power consumption with external monitor

SCHENKER VIA 14 Pro (M24); Prime95 V2810 Stress (external Monitor): Ø81.1 (78.4-83.8)

SCHENKER VIA 14 Pro (M24); Cinebench R15 Multi (external Monitor): Ø80.7 (80-81.3)

SCHENKER VIA 14 Pro (M24); Cinebench R23 Single (external Monitor): Ø31.3 (28.2-39)

SCHENKER VIA 14 Pro (M24); Cinebench R23 Multi (external Monitor): Ø80.6 (78.6-82.8)

SCHENKER VIA 14 Pro (M24); 1280x720 FurMark 1.19 GPU Stress Test (external Monitor): Ø68.1 (56.6-72.3)

SCHENKER VIA 14 Pro (M24); Idle 1min (external Monitor): Ø8.14 (6.7-11.7)

SCHENKER VIA 14 Pro (M24); Cyberpunk 2077 FHD ultra no FSR - external Monitor: Ø80.2 (78.5-83.1)

Duração da bateria

Os tempos de duração da bateria em conjunto com a bateria de 60 Wh não são ruins em si, mas o VIA 14 Pro é superado pela concorrência. A frequência tem apenas uma influência mínima sobre a duração da bateria, o que também pode ser visto na tabela a seguir. O brilho de 150 cd/m² para o teste de WLAN e vídeo corresponde a 32% do brilho máximo no dispositivo de teste.

Frequência	Teste de WLAN 150 cd/m²	Brilho máximo do teste de WLAN
60 Hz	9:31 horas	6:16 horas
120 Hz	9:28 horas	6:06 horas

Uma carga completa com o dispositivo ligado leva 141 minutos. 80% da capacidade está disponível novamente após cerca de 55 minutos.

Tempo de Execução da Bateria

WiFi Websurfing		9h 31min
WiFi Websurfing max. Brightness		6h 16min
Big Buck Bunny H.264 1080p		10h 12min
Carga (máximo brilho)		1h 04min

	SCHENKER VIA 14 Pro (M24) R7 8845HS, Radeon 780M, 60 Wh	Huawei MateBook 14 FLMH-W7611T Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core, 70 Wh	Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2024 Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core, 80 Wh	Asus Zenbook 14 OLED UM3406HA R7 8840HS, Radeon 780M, 75 Wh	Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AHP9 R7 8845HS, Radeon 780M, 84 Wh	Tuxedo Pulse 14 Gen3 R7 7840HS, Radeon 780M, 60 Wh	Average of class Subnotebook
Battery Runtime		118%	73%	66%	55%	6%	47%
H.264	612		1251 104%	1046 71%	1031 68%	595 -3%	858 ?(426 - 1251, n=27, last 2 years) 40%
WiFi v1.3	571	758 33%	888 56%	774 36%	710 24%	620 9%	690 ?(312 - 1585, n=57, last 2 years) 21%
Load	64	194 203%	101 58%	123 92%	110 72%	72 13%	114.3 ?(57 - 197, n=46, last 2 years) 79%

Pro

+ desempenho muito alto do sistema

+ boa tela IPS de 120 Hz sem PWM

+ 32 GB de RAM como padrão

+ 2x PCIe-4.0-x4 para armazenamento de até 8 TB

+ teclado confortável

+ boa variedade de conexões

Contra

- sem USB 4.0

- leitor de cartão microSD lento

- Capa sensível a impressões digitais

- webcam 720p ruim

- RAM soldada

- altas temperaturas da fonte de alimentação

Veredicto - Schenker VIA 14 Pro agora com uma tela mais brilhante

Em análise: Schenker Via 14 Pro (M24). Dispositivo de teste fornecido pelo senhor: Schenker Alemanha

Com o VIA 14 Pro, a Schenker oferece um dispositivo rápido e compacto de 14 polegadas que, além do potente processador Ryzen e da configuração padrão de 32 GB de RAM, caracteriza-se sobretudo pelas boas opções de expansão (2x M.2-2280). Há também um número suficiente de portas disponíveis, mesmo que o senhor tenha que prescindir dos padrões modernos, como o USB 4.0. No entanto, o leitor de cartões microSD é muito lento e a fraca webcam 720p não está mais atualizada. Apesar da nova superfície, as impressões digitais ainda são um problema.

O novo processador Ryzen oferece muito desempenho e a rápida GPU Radeon 780M, mas não há nenhuma vantagem sobre o antigo Ryzen 7 7840HS do modelo anterior. A grande atualização para o ano modelo 2024 é a tela IPS, que agora é significativamente mais brilhante. A especificação do fabricante aumenta de 300 para 400 cd/m², sendo que o nosso dispositivo de teste chegou a atingir uma média de pouco menos de 470 cd/m². Após a calibração, a qualidade da imagem também é muito boa.

O Schenker VIA Pro 14 é um notebook rápido de 14 polegadas e agora oferece uma tela IPS mais brilhante, o que é muito adequado para atividades produtivas. A relação preço-desempenho é decente, mas há algumas áreas em que o senhor precisa fazer sacrifícios (sem USB 4.0, webcam fraca, leitor de cartão lento).

Comparado com a concorrência, o VIA 14 Pro se sai particularmente bem com seus 32 GB de RAM e dois slots SSD, o que é uma raridade para modelos de 14 polegadas. No entanto, alguns dos concorrentes oferecem painéis OLED e também têm vantagens em termos de duração da bateria. A Tuxedo agora também oferece o Pulse 14 Gen4 idêntico com Linux a partir de 1.230 euros.

SCHENKER VIA 14 Pro (M24) - 2024-07-12 07/12/2024 v8
Andreas Osthoff

Acabamento

85 / 98 → 87%

Teclado

88%

Mouse

93%

Conectividade

60 / 74 → 81%

Peso

70 / 20-77 → 88%

Bateria

87%

Pantalha

85%

Desempenho do jogos

53 / 75 → 70%

Desempenho da aplicação

86 / 92 → 93%

Temperatura

81%

Ruído

85%

Audio

70 / 91 → 77%

Camera

23 / 75 → 31%

Médio

62%

85%

Subnotebook - Médio equilibrado

CO2 Emissions
No Data

Materials
50%

Packaging
0%

Power Use
76.9%

Repairability
90%

Software Updates
22.3%

Total Sustainability Score: 39.9%

Transparency

The present review sample was made available to the author as a loan by the manufacturer or a shop for the purposes of review. The lender had no influence on this review, nor did the manufacturer receive a copy of this review before publication. There was no obligation to publish this review.

Price comparison

Editor of the original article: Ninh Ngoc Duy - Editorial Assistant - 431587 articles published on Notebookcheck since 2008

contact me via: Facebook

Please share our article, every link counts!

> Análises e revisões de portáteis e celulares > Análises > Análises > Análise do Schenker VIA 14 Pro (M24) - Subnotebook compacto da AMD agora com Ryzen 8000 e tela mais brilhante

Andreas Osthoff, 2024-07-13 (Update: 2024-07-13)

Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64 Bit comparado com
Toshiba Satellite W30Dt-A-100 (min) A4-1200, Radeon HD 8180	33
...
Lenovo Legion Slim 7 16APH8 R7 7840HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU	2564
Beelink SER7 R7 7840HS, Radeon 780M	2565
SCHENKER Uniwill Technology GM7AG8P i9-12900H, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU	2567
SCHENKER VIA 14 Pro (M24) R7 8845HS, Radeon 780M	2568
HP Omen 17-db0079ng R7 8845HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	2575
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Ultra Ultra 7 155H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU	2576
HP Omen 17-ck1075ng i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU	2580
...
(max) TR Pro 7995WX, RTX 6000 Ada Generation	15842

3DMark 11 comparado com
Lenovo IdeaPad Flex-1570 81CA000RUS (min) i5-8550U, GeForce MX130	28
...
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 14IMH9 Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core	13052
Acer Swift Go 14 SFG14-72 Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core	13075
Acer Swift Go 14 SFG14-72 Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core	13075
SCHENKER VIA 14 Pro (M24) R7 8845HS, Radeon 780M	13077
Asus ROG GU501GM-BI7N8 i7-8750H, GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile	13082
Lenovo ThinkBook 15p Gen1 4K i7-10750H, GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q	13121
Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14APH G8 R7 7840HS, Radeon 780M	13131
...
(max) R7 7800X3D, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090	72163