Deutsch
English
Español
Français
Italiano
Nederlands
Polski
Русский
Türkçe
Svenska
Chinese
MagyarVista Prévia do Portátil Xiaomi Mi Notebook Pro i5
| SD Card Reader | |
| average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs) | |
| Dell XPS 15 9560 (i7-7700HQ, UHD) (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
| Asus ZenBook Pro UX550VD (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501) | |
| Xiaomi Mi Notebook Pro i5 | |
| maximum AS SSD Seq Read Test (1GB) | |
| Dell XPS 15 9560 (i7-7700HQ, UHD) (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
| Xiaomi Mi Notebook Pro i5 | |
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
iluminação: 89 %
iluminação com acumulador: 277 cd/m²
Contraste: 925:1 (Preto: 0.32 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 4.3 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.93
ΔE Greyscale 3 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
86.86% sRGB (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
56.83% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
63.5% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
86.9% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
66.5% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.1
| Xiaomi Mi Notebook Pro i5 BOE0747 NV156FHM-N61, , 1920x1080, 15.6" | Apple MacBook Pro 15 2017 (2.8 GHz, 555) APPA031, , 2880x1800, 15.4" | Asus ZenBook Pro UX550VD CMN15E8 (N156HCE-EN1), , 1920x1080, 15.6" | Dell XPS 15 9560 (i7-7700HQ, UHD) 3840x2160, 15.6" | Apple MacBook 12 (Early 2016) 1.1 GHz APPA027, , 2304x1440, 12" | Asus VivoBook Pro 15 N580VD-DM028T INNOLUX N156HGA-EAB, , 1920x1080, 15.6" | Huawei MateBook X Chi Mei CMN8201 / P130ZDZ-EF1, , 2160x1440, 13.3" | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display | 32% | 2% | 36% | 6% | -35% | 5% | |
| Display P3 Coverage | 66.5 | 97.9 47% | 65.7 -1% | 89.7 35% | 66.8 0% | 39.92 -40% | 65.8 -1% |
| sRGB Coverage | 86.9 | 99.9 15% | 90.3 4% | 100 15% | 95.4 10% | 59.8 -31% | 96.2 11% |
| AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage | 63.5 | 85.9 35% | 65.9 4% | 100 57% | 68 7% | 41.27 -35% | 66.8 5% |
| Response Times | 149% | 19% | -44% | 12% | 28% | 30% | |
| Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% * | 47.9 ? | 48 ? -0% | 38.8 ? 19% | 57.2 ? -19% | 41.2 ? 14% | 44 ? 8% | 33 ? 31% |
| Response Time Black / White * | 33.7 ? | 33.8 ? -0% | 27.2 ? 19% | 39.2 ? -16% | 30.4 ? 10% | 13 ? 61% | 24 ? 29% |
| PWM Frequency | 21800 ? | 119000 ? 446% | 25910 ? 19% | 962 -96% | 25000 ? 15% | ||
| Screen | 39% | -2% | 2% | 18% | -29% | 22% | |
| Brightness middle | 296 | 545 84% | 335 13% | 370.1 25% | 387 31% | 247 -17% | 408 38% |
| Brightness | 288 | 523 82% | 313 9% | 356 24% | 358 24% | 224 -22% | 395 37% |
| Brightness Distribution | 89 | 86 -3% | 83 -7% | 87 -2% | 88 -1% | 85 -4% | 88 -1% |
| Black Level * | 0.32 | 0.44 -38% | 0.27 16% | 0.37 -16% | 0.47 -47% | 0.48 -50% | 0.45 -41% |
| Contrast | 925 | 1239 34% | 1241 34% | 1000 8% | 823 -11% | 515 -44% | 907 -2% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 4.3 | 1.6 63% | 4.7 -9% | 5.3 -23% | 1.6 63% | 5.39 -25% | 1.55 64% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 8.7 | 3.8 56% | 8.1 7% | 9.9 -14% | 4 54% | 7.98 8% | 2.19 75% |
| Greyscale dE 2000 * | 3 | 1.9 37% | 5.8 -93% | 4.6 -53% | 1 67% | 5.25 -75% | 1.91 36% |
| Gamma | 2.1 105% | 2.26 97% | 2.06 107% | 2.31 95% | 2.26 97% | 2.48 89% | 2.34 94% |
| CCT | 7100 92% | 6834 95% | 6518 100% | 6284 103% | 6680 97% | 7609 85% | 6491 100% |
| Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998) | 56.83 | 58.7 3% | 88.3 55% | 61.6 8% | 38 -33% | 61 7% | |
| Color Space (Percent of sRGB) | 86.86 | 90.1 4% | 100 15% | 82.2 -5% | 60 -31% | 96 11% | |
| Total Average (Program / Settings) | 73% /
61% | 6% /
3% | -2% /
-0% | 12% /
15% | -12% /
-20% | 19% /
20% |
* ... smaller is better
Display Response Times
| ↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
|---|---|---|
| 33.7 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 19.2 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 14.5 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 90 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (21 ms). | ||
| ↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
| 47.9 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 22.4 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 25.5 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 80 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (32.9 ms). | ||
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
| Screen flickering / PWM detected | 21800 Hz | ≤ 99 % brightness setting |  |
The display backlight flickers at 21800 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) Flickering detected at a brightness setting of 99 % and below. There should be no flickering or PWM above this brightness setting. The frequency of 21800 Hz is quite high, so most users sensitive to PWM should not notice any flickering. In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8774 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured. | |||
| PCMark 8 Home Score Accelerated v2 | 3766 pontos | |
| PCMark 8 Creative Score Accelerated v2 | 5354 pontos | |
| PCMark 8 Work Score Accelerated v2 | 4746 pontos | |
| PCMark 10 Score | 3686 pontos | |
Ajuda | ||
| Xiaomi Mi Notebook Pro i5 Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP | Apple MacBook Pro 15 2017 (2.8 GHz, 555) Apple SSD SM0256L | Asus ZenBook Pro UX550VD Samsung PM961 NVMe MZVLW512HMJP | Asus VivoBook Pro 15 N580VD-DM028T Micron 1100 MTFDDAV256TBN | Lenovo Yoga 920-13IKB-80Y7 Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CrystalDiskMark 5.2 / 6 | 16% | 40% | -53% | 32% | |
| Read Seq | 1074 | 1572 46% | 1878 75% | 493.8 -54% | 1884 75% |
| Write Seq | 1057 | 1473 39% | 1378 30% | 413.3 -61% | 1112 5% |
| Read Seq Q32T1 | 1838 | 2993 63% | 3267 78% | 525 -71% | 3400 85% |
| Write Seq Q32T1 | 1283 | 1546 20% | 1587 24% | 430.7 -66% | 1255 -2% |
| Read 4K Q32T1 | 441 | 573 30% | 583 32% | 213.5 -52% | 446.8 1% |
| Write 4K Q32T1 | 429 | 470.5 10% | 516 20% | 245.1 -43% | 747 74% |
| Read 4K | 36 | 23.33 -35% | 48.96 36% | 25.89 -28% | 44.19 23% |
| Write 4K | 150 | 86.7 -42% | 187 25% | 82.8 -45% | 142.1 -5% |
| 3DMark 11 Performance | 4521 pontos | |
| 3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score | 13662 pontos | |
| 3DMark Fire Strike Score | 2954 pontos | |
| 3DMark Time Spy Score | 1084 pontos | |
Ajuda | ||
Barulho
| Ocioso |
| 31 / 31 / 32.6 dB |
| Carga |
| 41.6 / 44.7 dB |
 | ||
30 dB silencioso 40 dB(A) audível 50 dB(A) ruidosamente alto |
||
min:  , med:  , max:  Audix TM1, Arta (15 cm de distância) environment noise: 31 dB(A) | ||
(±) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 43.8 °C / 111 F, compared to the average of 36.9 °C / 98 F, ranging from 21.1 to 71 °C for the class Multimedia.
(±) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 44.9 °C / 113 F, compared to the average of 39.2 °C / 103 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 25.1 °C / 77 F, compared to the device average of 31.3 °C / 88 F.
(±) Playing The Witcher 3, the average temperature for the upper side is 33.9 °C / 93 F, compared to the device average of 31.3 °C / 88 F.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are cooler than skin temperature with a maximum of 29.2 °C / 84.6 F and are therefore cool to the touch.
(±) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.8 °C / 83.8 F (-0.4 °C / -0.8 F).
Xiaomi Mi Notebook Pro i5 audio analysis
(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (81.6 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 7.8% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (10.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 3.3% away from median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (7.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | reduced highs - on average 5.4% lower than median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (7.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (11.2% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 12% of all tested devices in this class were better, 4% similar, 84% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 18%, worst was 45%
Compared to all devices tested
» 5% of all tested devices were better, 2% similar, 93% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Apple MacBook Pro 15 2017 (2.8 GHz, 555) audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (87 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 8.7% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (11.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2.5% away from median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (7.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 1.7% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (7.9% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 5% of all tested devices in this class were better, 1% similar, 94% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 18%, worst was 45%
Compared to all devices tested
» 1% of all tested devices were better, 0% similar, 99% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
| desligado | 0.9 / 1.1 Watt |
| Ocioso | 3.7 / 7.5 / 8 Watt |
| Carga |
49 / 55.2 Watt |
   
| |
Key:
min: ,
med: ,
max: Metrahit Energy | |
| Xiaomi Mi Notebook Pro i5 i5-8250U, GeForce MX150, Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP, IPS LED, 1920x1080, 15.6" | Apple MacBook Pro 15 2017 (2.8 GHz, 555) i7-7700HQ, Radeon Pro 555, Apple SSD SM0256L, IPS, 2880x1800, 15.4" | Asus ZenBook Pro UX550VD i7-7700HQ, GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile, Samsung PM961 NVMe MZVLW512HMJP, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6" | Dell XPS 15 9560 (i7-7700HQ, UHD) i7-7700HQ, GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile, Lite-On CX2-8B512-Q11, IGZO IPS, 3840x2160, 15.6" | Asus VivoBook Pro 15 N580VD-DM028T i7-7700HQ, GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile, Micron 1100 MTFDDAV256TBN, TN, 1920x1080, 15.6" | Dell Inspiron 15 7570 i5-8550U, GeForce 940MX, Samsung PM961 NVMe MZVLW512HMJP, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6" | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power Consumption | -53% | -61% | -131% | -61% | -5% | |
| Idle Minimum * | 3.7 | 3.4 8% | 5.05 -36% | 11.9 -222% | 4.7 -27% | 3.6 3% |
| Idle Average * | 7.5 | 13.9 -85% | 8.2 -9% | 17.1 -128% | 7.7 -3% | 6.7 11% |
| Idle Maximum * | 8 | 17.6 -120% | 12.2 -53% | 17.3 -116% | 10.9 -36% | 9.2 -15% |
| Load Average * | 49 | 71.1 -45% | 82 -67% | 94.7 -93% | 82 -67% | 59 -20% |
| Witcher 3 ultra * | 50.6 | 57.9 -14% | 93.1 -84% | 104.8 -107% | 109 -115% | |
| Load Maximum * | 55.2 | 88.5 -60% | 120 -117% | 122 -121% | 120 -117% | 58 -5% |
* ... smaller is better
| Xiaomi Mi Notebook Pro i5 i5-8250U, GeForce MX150, 60 Wh | Apple MacBook Pro 15 2017 (2.8 GHz, 555) i7-7700HQ, Radeon Pro 555, 76 Wh | Asus ZenBook Pro UX550VD i7-7700HQ, GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile, 73 Wh | Dell XPS 15 9560 (i7-7700HQ, UHD) i7-7700HQ, GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile, 97 Wh | Asus VivoBook Pro 15 N580VD-DM028T i7-7700HQ, GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile, 47 Wh | Apple MacBook Pro 13 2017 i5-7360U, Iris Plus Graphics 640, 54.5 Wh | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Battery Runtime | -14% | -24% | -22% | -37% | -5% | |
| H.264 | 632 | 511 -19% | 465 -26% | 352 -44% | 683 8% | |
| WiFi v1.3 | 597 | 644 8% | 535 -10% | 434 -27% | 392 -34% | 681 14% |
| Witcher 3 ultra | 83 | 87 5% | 68 -18% | |||
| Load | 122 | 60 -51% | 70 -43% | 103 -16% | 82 -33% | 78 -36% |
| Reader / Idle | 1061 | 831 | 609 |
O que vimos do Xiaomi Mi Notebook Pro até agora, deixa uma impressão muito positiva. O design e a qualidade da carcaça estão em um nível alto, existem bons dispositivos de entrada, uma tela boa, desempenho no nível esperado, emissões que não são problemáticas e, como a cereja em cima do sorvete, oferece uma boa duração da bateria. Mas como diz o dito, ainda é muito cedo para tirar conclusões.
Nos dias seguintes, continuaremos nossos testes e procuraremos quaisquer áreas problemáticas no portátil chinês. Até agora, não houve muitos: há apenas uma porta Tipo-C de carregamento e o desempenho do leitor de cartões SD é inferior. Estamos particularmente curiosos como a CPU ULV quad-core em combinação com a GPU Geforce MX150 se sairá durante os jogos.