Um verdadeiro poli funcional: Breve Análise do Portátil MSI PS63 Modern 8SC

Name: MSI PS63 Modern 8SC
Brand: MSI

Poli funcional.

O MSI PS63 Modern 8SC é destinado a criadores de conteúdo e usuários de multimídia, que estão procurando por um portátil elegante, leve e compacto com muito desempenho e uma bateria de longa duração. Nesta análise, estamos tentando determinar se esse sistema de 15 polegadas é capaz de cumprir todas essas promessas.

Florian Glaser, 👁 Florian Glaser (traduzido por Ricardo Soto), Published 07/23/2019 🇺🇸 🇩🇪 ...

Geforce Laptop / Notebook MSI Whiskey Lake

Test device courtesy of notebooksbilliger.de

Download your licensed rating image as PNG / SVG

MSI PS63 Modern 8SC (PS63 Serie)

Processador

Intel Core i7-8565U 4 x 1.8 - 4.6 GHz, Whiskey Lake-U

Placa gráfica

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q - 4 GB VRAM, Análises do: 1020 MHz, Memoría: 7000 MHz, GDDR5, ForceWare 417.88, Optimus

Memória

16 GB

, 2x 8 GB SO-DIMM DDR4-2666, Dual-Channel, todos os slots ocupados, máx. 32 GB

Pantalha

15.60 polegadas 16:9, 1920 x 1080 pixel 141 PPI, CMN N156HCE-EN1 (CMN15E8), IPS, 60 Hz, Full-HD, Brilhante: não

placa mãe

Intel Cannon Lake-U PCH-LP Premium

Disco rígido

WDC PC SN520 SDAPNUW-512G, 512 GB

, Steckplätze: 2x M.2 type 2280

Placa de Som

Realtek ALC298 @ Intel Cannon Point PCH - cAVS (Audio, Voice, Speech)

Conexões

3 USB 3.0, 1 USB 3.1 Gen2, 1 HDMI, 1 DisplayPort, Conexões Audio: Conector de áudio combinado de 3,5 mm, Card Reader: microSD, 1 Leitor de Impressões Digitais

Funcionamento em rede

Intel Wireless-AC 9560 (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/), Bluetooth 5

Tamanho

altura x largura x profundidade (em mm): 16 x 357 x 234

Bateria

82 Wh Lítio-Polímero, 4 células

Sistema Operativo

Microsoft Windows 10 Home 64 Bit

Camera

Webcam: HD (720p)

Características adicionais

Alto falantes: Estéreo 2.0, Teclado: Chiclet, Iluminação do Teclado: sim, Adaptador de CA de 90 watts, Guia de início rápido, cartão de garantia, guia de recuperação, Creator Center, 24 Meses Garantia

peso

1.67 kg, Suprimento de energia: 242 g

Preço

1700 EUR

Links

MSI página inicial
MSI Seção de notebook

Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

see all specifications

Size Comparison

Acer Aspire 5 A515-52G-723L MSI PS63 Modern 8SC MSI PS63 Modern 8RC Asus ZenBook 15 UX533FD DIN A4 ❌

Networking
iperf3 transmit AX12
MSI PS63 Modern 8SC Intel Wireless-AC 9560	679 MBit/s
Acer Aspire 5 A515-52G-723L Intel Wireless-AC 9560	648 (626^min - 667^max) MBit/s -5%
Asus ZenBook 15 UX533FD Intel Wireless-AC 9560	644 (499^min - 661^max) MBit/s -5%
MSI PS63 Modern 8RC Intel Wireless-AC 9560	634 (613^min - 649^max) MBit/s -7%
iperf3 receive AX12
MSI PS63 Modern 8SC Intel Wireless-AC 9560	674 MBit/s
Asus ZenBook 15 UX533FD Intel Wireless-AC 9560	651 (547^min - 681^max) MBit/s -3%
MSI PS63 Modern 8RC Intel Wireless-AC 9560	648 (578^min - 676^max) MBit/s -4%
Acer Aspire 5 A515-52G-723L Intel Wireless-AC 9560	522 (371^min - 601^max) MBit/s -23%


207 cd/m²	215 cd/m²	213 cd/m²
195 cd/m²	207 cd/m²	199 cd/m²
186 cd/m²	186 cd/m²	181 cd/m²

Distribuição do brilho

CMN N156HCE-EN1 (CMN15E8) tested with X-Rite i1Pro 2

Máximo: 215 cd/m² (Nits) Médio: 198.8 cd/m² Minimum: 11 cd/m²
iluminação: 84 %
iluminação com acumulador: 207 cd/m²
Contraste: 941:1 (Preto: 0.22 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 3.77 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.91, calibrated: 2.59
ΔE Greyscale 3.22 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
88% sRGB (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
57% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
64% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
87.7% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
63.7% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.42

Download Arquivo ICC (X-Rite i1Pro 2)

	MSI PS63 Modern 8SC CMN N156HCE-EN1 (CMN15E8), IPS, 1920x1080	MSI PS63 Modern 8RC Chi Mei CMN15E8 N156HCE/EN1, IPS, 1920x1080	Asus ZenBook 15 UX533FD BOE07D8, IPS, 1920x1080	Acer Aspire 5 A515-52G-723L BOE NV156FHM-N48, IPS, 1920x1080
Display		0%	2%	-35%
Display P3 Coverage	63.7	63.5 0%	67.2 5%	40.02 -37%
sRGB Coverage	87.7	87.9 0%	88.4 1%	58.5 -33%
AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage	64	63.9 0%	64.6 1%	41.34 -35%
Response Times		-0%	-11%	-36%
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% *	41.6 ?(23.6, 18)	42 ?(23, 19) -1%	45 ?(21, 24) -8%	45 ?(23, 22) -8%
Response Time Black / White *	32.8 ?(22.8, 10)	32 ?(20, 12) 2%	37 ?(23, 14) -13%	33 ?(18, 15) -1%
PWM Frequency	25510 ?(28)	25000 ?(20) -2%		250 ?(90) -99%
Screen		12%	-0%	-13%
Brightness middle	207	289 40%	311 50%	278 34%
Brightness	199	262 32%	303 52%	271 36%
Brightness Distribution	84	75 -11%	81 -4%	89 6%
Black Level *	0.22	0.26 -18%	0.24 -9%	0.26 -18%
Contrast	941	1112 18%	1296 38%	1069 14%
Colorchecker dE 2000 *	3.77	2.9 23%	5.1 -35%	4.73 -25%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *	5.98	5.71 5%	8.91 -49%	8.38 -40%
Colorchecker dE 2000 calibrated *	2.59	2.88 -11%	2.48 4%	5.17 -100%
Greyscale dE 2000 *	3.22	1.42 56%	4.93 -53%	2.59 20%
Gamma	2.42 ^91%	2.39 ^92%	2.44 ^90%	2.38 ^92%
CCT	7072 ^92%	6705 ^97%	7641 ^85%	6160 ^106%
Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998)	57	57 0%	58 2%	36 -37%
Color Space (Percent of sRGB)	88	87 -1%	88 0%	58 -34%
Total Average (Program / Settings)		4% / 8%	-3% / -1%	-28% / -21%

* ... smaller is better

Display Response Times

ℹ

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.

↔ Response Time Black to White
32.8 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↗ 22.8 ms rise
32.8 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↘ 10 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 87 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (20.9 ms).
↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
41.6 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↗ 23.6 ms rise
41.6 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↘ 18 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 64 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (32.8 ms).

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

ℹ

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.

Screen flickering / PWM detected

25510 Hz

≤ 28 % brightness setting

The display backlight flickers at 25510 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) Flickering detected at a brightness setting of 28 % and below. There should be no flickering or PWM above this brightness setting.

The frequency of 25510 Hz is quite high, so most users sensitive to PWM should not notice any flickering.

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8710 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured.

MSI PS63 Modern 8SC Intel Core i7-8565U, Intel Core i7-8565U: Ø639 (616.5-695)

MSI PS63 Modern 8RC Intel Core i7-8565U, Intel Core i7-8565U: Ø529 (524.25-571.63)

Asus ZenBook 15 UX533FD Intel Core i7-8565U, Intel Core i7-8565U: Ø704 (683.27-815.1)

Acer Aspire 5 A515-52G-723L Intel Core i7-8565U, Intel Core i7-8565U: Ø470 (467.49-492.88)

Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64Bit

183 Points

Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64Bit

695 Points

Cinebench R20 CPU (Multi Core)

1523 Points

Cinebench R20 CPU (Single Core)

437 Points

Ajuda

... comparado com

Cinebench R15 | Cinebench R20

Cinebench R15
CPU Single 64Bit
Average of class Multimedia (99.6 - 323, n=89, last 2 years)	258 Points +41%
Asus ZenBook 15 UX533FD Intel Core i7-8565U	191 Points +4%
MSI PS63 Modern 8SC Intel Core i7-8565U	183 Points
MSI PS63 Modern 8RC Intel Core i7-8565U	173 Points -5%
Acer Aspire 5 A515-52G-723L Intel Core i7-8565U	165 Points -10%
CPU Multi 64Bit
Average of class Multimedia (1252 - 4774, n=94, last 2 years)	2445 Points +252%
Asus ZenBook 15 UX533FD Intel Core i7-8565U	815 Points +17%
MSI PS63 Modern 8SC Intel Core i7-8565U	695 Points
MSI PS63 Modern 8RC Intel Core i7-8565U	572 Points -18%
Acer Aspire 5 A515-52G-723L Intel Core i7-8565U	493 Points -29%

Cinebench R20
CPU (Single Core)
Average of class Multimedia (341 - 853, n=87, last 2 years)	651 Points +49%
MSI PS63 Modern 8SC Intel Core i7-8565U	437 Points
Acer Aspire 5 A515-52G-723L Intel Core i7-8565U	390 Points -11%
CPU (Multi Core)
Average of class Multimedia (2681 - 11768, n=87, last 2 years)	5687 Points +273%
MSI PS63 Modern 8SC Intel Core i7-8565U	1523 Points
Acer Aspire 5 A515-52G-723L Intel Core i7-8565U	1035 Points -32%

PCMark 10 - Score
Average of class Multimedia (4542 - 8670, n=72, last 2 years)	6789 Points +40%
MSI PS63 Modern 8SC GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q, i7-8565U, WDC PC SN520 SDAPNUW-512G	4851 Points
Asus ZenBook 15 UX533FD GeForce GTX 1050 Max-Q, i7-8565U, WDC PC SN520 SDAPNUW-512G	4443 Points -8%
Acer Aspire 5 A515-52G-723L GeForce MX250, i7-8565U, WDC PC SN520 SDAPNUW-512G	4236 Points -13%
MSI PS63 Modern 8RC GeForce GTX 1050 Max-Q, i7-8565U, WDC PC SN520 SDAPNUW-512G	4020 Points -17%

	MSI PS63 Modern 8SC WDC PC SN520 SDAPNUW-512G	MSI PS63 Modern 8RC WDC PC SN520 SDAPNUW-512G	Asus ZenBook 15 UX533FD WDC PC SN520 SDAPNUW-512G	Acer Aspire 5 A515-52G-723L WDC PC SN520 SDAPNUW-512G
CrystalDiskMark 5.2 / 6		-13%	-10%	-10%
Write 4K	139.8	121.3 -13%	126.2 -10%	130.1 -7%
Read 4K	46.24	44.07 -5%	41.2 -11%	27.64 -40%
Write Seq	1346	1176 -13%	1055 -22%	1438 7%
Read Seq	1446	1139 -21%	884 -39%	1319 -9%
Write 4K Q32T1	346.8	257.8 -26%	445.5 28%	323.3 -7%
Read 4K Q32T1	451.2	325.9 -28%	338.8 -25%	359.9 -20%
Write Seq Q32T1	1456	1455 0%	1453 0%	1454 0%
Read Seq Q32T1	1748	1741 0%	1734 -1%	1740 0%

CrystalDiskMark 5.2 / 6

AS SSD

WDC PC SN520 SDAPNUW-512G

CDM 5/6 Read Seq Q32T1: 1748 MB/s

CDM 5/6 Write Seq Q32T1: 1456 MB/s

CDM 5/6 Read 4K Q32T1: 451.2 MB/s

CDM 5/6 Write 4K Q32T1: 346.8 MB/s

CDM 5 Read Seq: 1446 MB/s

CDM 5 Write Seq: 1346 MB/s

CDM 5/6 Read 4K: 46.24 MB/s

CDM 5/6 Write 4K: 139.8 MB/s

3DMark 06 Standard Score		31487 pontos
3DMark Vantage P Result		30957 pontos
3DMark 11 Performance		10471 pontos
3DMark Ice Storm Standard Score		78312 pontos
3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score		21701 pontos
3DMark Fire Strike Score		6850 pontos
3DMark Time Spy Score		3004 pontos
Ajuda

... comparado com

3DMark | 3DMark 11

3DMark
1920x1080 Fire Strike Graphics
Average of class Multimedia (1835 - 46022, n=81, last 2 years)	14739 Points +90%
MSI PS63 Modern 8SC NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q	7740 Points
MSI PS63 Modern 8RC NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Max-Q	5792 Points -25%
Asus ZenBook 15 UX533FD NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Max-Q	5622 Points -27%
Acer Aspire 5 A515-52G-723L NVIDIA GeForce MX250	3616 Points -53%
2560x1440 Time Spy Graphics
Average of class Multimedia (622 - 17620, n=82, last 2 years)	5566 Points +92%
MSI PS63 Modern 8SC NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q	2896 Points
Acer Aspire 5 A515-52G-723L NVIDIA GeForce MX250	1090 Points -62%

3DMark 11 - 1280x720 Performance GPU
Average of class Multimedia (3505 - 60250, n=78, last 2 years)	20510 Points +86%
MSI PS63 Modern 8SC NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q	11046 Points
MSI PS63 Modern 8RC NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Max-Q	7385 Points -33%
Asus ZenBook 15 UX533FD NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Max-Q	7016 Points -36%
Acer Aspire 5 A515-52G-723L NVIDIA GeForce MX250	4633 Points -58%

MSI PS63 Modern 8SC GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q, i7-8565U, WDC PC SN520 SDAPNUW-512G: Ø28.5 (26-30)

Asus ZenBook 15 UX533FD GeForce GTX 1050 Max-Q, i7-8565U, WDC PC SN520 SDAPNUW-512G: Ø27.5 (26-30)

The Witcher 3
1920x1080 High Graphics & Postprocessing (Nvidia HairWorks Off)
Average of class Multimedia (11.2 - 290, n=73, last 2 years)	101.2 fps +110%
MSI PS63 Modern 8SC GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q, i7-8565U	48.1 (39^min) fps
Asus ZenBook 15 UX533FD GeForce GTX 1050 Max-Q, i7-8565U	41 fps -15%
Acer Aspire 5 A515-52G-723L GeForce MX250, i7-8565U	20.4 fps -58%
1920x1080 Ultra Graphics & Postprocessing (HBAO+)
Average of class Multimedia (8 - 143.2, n=80, last 2 years)	54.6 fps +90%
Asus ZenBook 15 UX533FD GeForce GTX 1050 Max-Q, i7-8565U	30 fps +4%
MSI PS63 Modern 8SC GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q, i7-8565U	28.8 (23^min) fps
Acer Aspire 5 A515-52G-723L GeForce MX250, i7-8565U	11.4 fps -60%

	média	alto	ultra	QHD	4K
The Witcher 3 (2015)		48.1	28.8		17.6
Rainbow Six Siege (2015)		115	101		40
Doom (2016)		79.6	77.4		23.9
Overwatch (2016)		119	69.5		39.1
Mirror's Edge Catalyst (2016)		54.7	49.9		17.5
Deus Ex Mankind Divided (2016)		43	22.9		14.1
Dishonored 2 (2016)		53.9	44.8		21.2
Resident Evil 7 (2017)	146	78.8	65.2		21.5
For Honor (2017)	66.8	63.8	49.4		19.1
Ghost Recon Wildlands (2017)	48.5	44.4	21.7		14.6
Prey (2017)	97.5	77.3	67.1		23.6
Rocket League (2017)	128	86.5			42.7
Playerunknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG) (2017)	84.6	70.8	52.6		16.6
Middle-earth: Shadow of War (2017)	64	47	35		14
ELEX (2017)	61.1	48.6	37.3	24.5	12.2
Need for Speed Payback (2017)	72.3	61.8	58.9	38.6	19.1
Star Wars Battlefront 2 (2017)	72.2	62.3	46.5	29.4	5.6
Fortnite (2018)	138	79.9	59.1	36.2	10.9
Final Fantasy XV Benchmark (2018)	41.7	29.4			9.6
Kingdom Come: Deliverance (2018)	48.1	38	26.4	18.5	9.4
The Crew 2 (2018)	59.3	49.1	42	26.4	13
Monster Hunter World (2018)	46.3	40.1	31.4	19.2	8.9
Shadow of the Tomb Raider (2018)	47	43	38	24	12
FIFA 19 (2018)	195	179	173	124	64.8
Assassin´s Creed Odyssey (2018)	49	41	20	17	8
Call of Duty Black Ops 4 (2018)	62.7	58.5	50.9	32.7	10.9
Hitman 2 (2018)	53.1	47.6	44.4	28.6	14.1
Battlefield V (2018)	63.6	54.1	49.3	36.1	19.4
Farming Simulator 19 (2018)	136	84	60.6	40.7
Darksiders III (2018)	67.4	53.4	47.1	29.3	9.7
Just Cause 4 (2018)	59	42.6	39.7	26.2	13.2
Apex Legends (2019)	69.7	57.6	54.3	39.7	21.9
Far Cry New Dawn (2019)	53	50	46	32	16
Metro Exodus (2019)	35.4	26.4	21.6	16.4	9.9
Anthem (2019)	49.4	42.6	34.9	22.6	13.1
Dirt Rally 2.0 (2019)	64	51.1	31.7	23.1
The Division 2 (2019)	51	41	30	20	9
Anno 1800 (2019)	56.8	36.2	19.2	13.8	8.4
Rage 2 (2019)	43	36.6	35.8	22.4	7.4
F1 2019 (2019)	84	65	41	35	20

Barulho

Ocioso		32 / 33 / 34 dB
Carga		44 / 45 dB

	30 dB silencioso 40 dB(A) audível 50 dB(A) ruidosamente alto
min: , med: , max: Audix TM1, Arta (15 cm de distância) environment noise: 30 dB(A)

	MSI PS63 Modern 8SC i7-8565U, GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q	MSI PS63 Modern 8RC i7-8565U, GeForce GTX 1050 Max-Q	Asus ZenBook 15 UX533FD i7-8565U, GeForce GTX 1050 Max-Q	Acer Aspire 5 A515-52G-723L i7-8565U, GeForce MX250	Average of class Multimedia
Noise		11%	6%	7%	17%
off / environment *	30	30.4 -1%	30.5 -2%	29.9 -0%	24 ?(19.4 - 26.5, n=87, last 2 years) 20%
Idle Minimum *	32	30.7 4%	30.5 5%	29.9 7%	24.3 ?(20.1 - 30.9, n=87, last 2 years) 24%
Idle Average *	33	30.7 7%	30.5 8%	29.9 9%	24.8 ?(20.1 - 31.8, n=87, last 2 years) 25%
Idle Maximum *	34	30.7 10%	30.5 10%	29.9 12%	26.3 ?(20.1 - 36.8, n=87, last 2 years) 23%
Load Average *	44	34 23%	40.8 7%	41.7 5%	38.1 ?(23.7 - 59.7, n=86, last 2 years) 13%
Witcher 3 ultra *	41
Load Maximum *	45	33.7 25%	41.8 7%	41.7 7%	46.5 ?(29.6 - 62.6, n=87, last 2 years) -3%

* ... smaller is better

Carga Máxima

Inatividade

Witcher 3


54 °C	55 °C	56 °C
48 °C	50 °C	47 °C
36 °C	38 °C	38 °C

Máximo: 56 °C
Médio: 46.9 °C


59 °C	60 °C	53 °C
54 °C	57 °C	49 °C
39 °C	40 °C	38 °C

Máximo: 60 °C
Médio: 49.9 °C

alimentação elétrica 53 °C | Temperatura do quarto 23 °C | Voltcraft IR-900

Carga Máxima

Inatividade

Witcher 3


28 °C	28 °C	27 °C
28 °C	29 °C	27 °C
26 °C	26 °C	26 °C

Máximo: 29 °C
Médio: 27.2 °C


26 °C	27 °C	27 °C
27 °C	27 °C	27 °C
26 °C	26 °C	26 °C

Máximo: 27 °C
Médio: 26.6 °C

alimentação elétrica 31 °C | Temperatura do quarto 23 °C | Voltcraft IR-900

Carga Máxima

Inatividade

Witcher 3


46 °C	52 °C	52 °C
43 °C	47 °C	43 °C
34 °C	34 °C	36 °C

Máximo: 52 °C
Médio: 43 °C


53 °C	54 °C	45 °C
50 °C	52 °C	41 °C
37 °C	36 °C	35 °C

Máximo: 54 °C
Médio: 44.8 °C

alimentação elétrica 48 °C | Temperatura do quarto 23 °C | Voltcraft IR-900

(-) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 46.9 °C / 116 F, compared to the average of 31.3 °C / 88 F for the devices in the class Multimedia.
(-) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 56 °C / 133 F, compared to the average of 36.9 °C / 98 F, ranging from 21.1 to 71 °C for the class Multimedia.
(-) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 60 °C / 140 F, compared to the average of 39.2 °C / 103 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 27.2 °C / 81 F, compared to the device average of 31.3 °C / 88 F.
(-) Playing The Witcher 3, the average temperature for the upper side is 43 °C / 109 F, compared to the device average of 31.3 °C / 88 F.
(±) The palmrests and touchpad can get very hot to the touch with a maximum of 38 °C / 100.4 F.
(-) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.8 °C / 83.8 F (-9.2 °C / -16.6 F).

	MSI PS63 Modern 8SC i7-8565U, GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q	MSI PS63 Modern 8RC i7-8565U, GeForce GTX 1050 Max-Q	Asus ZenBook 15 UX533FD i7-8565U, GeForce GTX 1050 Max-Q	Acer Aspire 5 A515-52G-723L i7-8565U, GeForce MX250	Average of class Multimedia
Heat		3%	13%	2%	11%
Maximum Upper Side *	56	58.6 -5%	47.2 16%	53.7 4%	43.2 ?(33.4 - 59, n=88, last 2 years) 23%
Maximum Bottom *	60	60 -0%	43.2 28%	56 7%	46.1 ?(31.8 - 62.4, n=88, last 2 years) 23%
Idle Upper Side *	29	26 10%	27.7 4%	28.4 2%	28.1 ?(21.2 - 41.7, n=87, last 2 years) 3%
Idle Bottom *	27	25.2 7%	25.6 5%	28.9 -7%	28.8 ?(21.4 - 39.8, n=87, last 2 years) -7%

* ... smaller is better

Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)

MSI PS63 Modern 8SC audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (82 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 24.3% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (10.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.2% away from median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (9.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2.3% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (5.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (19.1% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 58% of all tested devices in this class were better, 7% similar, 35% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 18%, worst was 45%
Compared to all devices tested
» 42% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 51% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

MSI P65 Creator 9SF-657 audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (77.4 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 23.6% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (9.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 8.4% higher than median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (7.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 6% higher than median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (9.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (28.3% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 93% of all tested devices in this class were better, 2% similar, 5% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 18%, worst was 45%
Compared to all devices tested
» 84% of all tested devices were better, 3% similar, 13% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Consumo de energia

desligado	0.6 / 0.8 Watt
Ocioso	6 / 8 / 12 Watt
Carga	76 / 102 Watt


Key: min: , med: , max: Metrahit Energy

	MSI PS63 Modern 8SC i7-8565U, GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q	MSI PS63 Modern 8RC i7-8565U, GeForce GTX 1050 Max-Q	Asus ZenBook 15 UX533FD i7-8565U, GeForce GTX 1050 Max-Q	Acer Aspire 5 A515-52G-723L i7-8565U, GeForce MX250	Average of class Multimedia
Power Consumption		-4%	17%	25%	-14%
Idle Minimum *	6	6.8 -13%	2.7 55%	4.4 27%	6.54 ?(2.1 - 21.1, n=88, last 2 years) -9%
Idle Average *	8	9.8 -23%	8 -0%	6.9 14%	11.3 ?(4.6 - 30, n=88, last 2 years) -41%
Idle Maximum *	12	11.4 5%	10.6 12%	9.9 17%	13.3 ?(5.6 - 30.4, n=88, last 2 years) -11%
Load Average *	76	76 -0%	74 3%	55 28%	70.7 ?(14.3 - 147, n=86, last 2 years) 7%
Witcher 3 ultra *	60
Load Maximum *	102	93 9%	89 13%	63.4 38%	116.1 ?(47.7 - 270, n=88, last 2 years) -14%

* ... smaller is better

Tempo de Execução da Bateria

Ocioso (sem WLAN, min brilho)		12h 04min
WiFi Websurfing		9h 02min
Carga (máximo brilho)		2h 17min

	MSI PS63 Modern 8SC i7-8565U, GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q, 82 Wh	MSI PS63 Modern 8RC i7-8565U, GeForce GTX 1050 Max-Q, 82 Wh	Asus ZenBook 15 UX533FD i7-8565U, GeForce GTX 1050 Max-Q, 73 Wh	Acer Aspire 5 A515-52G-723L i7-8565U, GeForce MX250, 48 Wh	Average of class Multimedia
Battery Runtime		22%	47%	-11%	17%
Reader / Idle	724	838 16%	1587 119%	773 7%	1168 ?(612 - 2760, n=17, last 2 years) 61%
WiFi v1.3	542	683 26%	519 -4%	414 -24%	640 ?(279 - 1204, n=88, last 2 years) 18%
Load	137	168 23%	171 25%	117 -15%	97.1 ?(39 - 212, n=65, last 2 years) -29%
H.264				388	847 ?(319 - 1481, n=53, last 2 years)

Pro

+ Bom desempenho geral

+ Adaptador de CA compacto

+ Longa duração da bateria

+ Leve

+ Design de marcos finos

Contra

- Falta estabilidade da carcaça

- A tela não é muito brilhante

- Sem Thunderbolt 3

MSI PS63 Modern 8SC, test device courtesy of:

Olhando além da rigidez abaixo do ideal da carcaça e algumas desvantagens da tela (brilho, tempo de resposta, ...), o MSI PS63 8SC é um dos melhores e mais equilibrados portáteis multimídia, além de ser bem adequado para os criadores de conteúdo.

O chassi ultrafino e agradavelmente leve, com design de marcos finos e a longa duração da bateria, tornam o sistema de 15 polegadas um companheiro ideal.

O PS63 8SC não sofre de falta de desempenho. A combinação de um Core i7-8550U, GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q, 16 GB RAM e SSD PCIe se desempenha muito bem, no geral.

MSI PS63 Modern 8SC - 05/14/2020 v7 ^(old)
Florian Glaser

Acabamento

78 / 98 → 79%

Teclado

85%

Mouse

86%

Conectividade

60 / 80 → 75%

Peso

67 / 20-72 → 90%

Bateria

85 / 95 → 90%

Pantalha

84%

Desempenho do jogos

81 / 90 → 90%

Desempenho da aplicação

90 / 90 → 100%

Temperatura

77%

Ruído

78 / 95 → 82%

Audio

70%

Camera

38 / 85 → 44%

Médio

75%

84%

Multimedia - Médio equilibrado

Price comparison

Editor of the original article: Marius Schell - Tech Writer and translator - 398 articles published on Notebookcheck since 2020

contact me via: LinkedIn

Please share our article, every link counts!

> Análises e revisões de portáteis e celulares > Análises > Análises > Um verdadeiro poli funcional: Breve Análise do Portátil MSI PS63 Modern 8SC

Florian Glaser, 2019-07-23 (Update: 2024-11- 4)

Size Comparison

Display Response Times

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

MSI PS63 Modern 8SC audio analysis

MSI P65 Creator 9SF-657 audio analysis

Pro

Contra

More articles related to this device

Price comparison