Deutsch
English
Español
Français
Italiano
Nederlands
Polski
Русский
Türkçe
Svenska
Chinese
MagyarSem RTX? Sem Problema — Breve Análise do Portátil Razer Blade 15 GTX 1660 Ti Modelo Básico
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
iluminação: 90 %
iluminação com acumulador: 312.7 cd/m²
Contraste: 1158:1 (Preto: 0.27 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 4.57 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.93, calibrated: 2.91
ΔE Greyscale 4.3 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
91.3% sRGB (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
59.4% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
66.5% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
91.8% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
65.3% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.29
| Razer Blade 15 GTX 1660 Ti BOE NV156FHM-N4K, IPS, 15.6", 1920x1080 | Razer Blade 15 RTX 2080 Max-Q Sharp LQ156M1JW03 (SHP14C5), IPS, 15.6", 1920x1080 | Razer Blade 15 RTX 2070 Max-Q LG Philips LGD05C0, IPS, 15.6", 1920x1080 | Alienware m15 R2 P87F Sharp LQ156M1, IPS, 15.6", 1920x1080 | Dell XPS 15 7590 9980HK GTX 1650 Samsung 156WR04, SDCA029, OLED, 15.6", 3840x2160 | Gigabyte Aero 15 Classic-XA Sharp LQ156M1JW03 (SHP14C5), IGZO, 15.6", 1920x1080 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display | 4% | 1% | 1% | 27% | 1% | |
| Display P3 Coverage | 65.3 | 66.9 2% | 65.3 0% | 65.3 0% | 88.1 35% | 65.3 0% |
| sRGB Coverage | 91.8 | 98.1 7% | 94.9 3% | 95.1 4% | 99.6 8% | 95.5 4% |
| AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage | 66.5 | 68.5 3% | 66.3 0% | 65.9 -1% | 91.8 38% | 66.5 0% |
| Response Times | 3936% | -20% | 3932% | 30% | 3889% | |
| Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% * | 13.6 ? | 12.8 ? 6% | 16.8 ? -24% | 16.4 ? -21% | 2.3 ? 83% | 15.2 ? -12% |
| Response Time Black / White * | 10 ? | 10.4 ? -4% | 11.6 ? -16% | 8.8 ? 12% | 2.4 ? 76% | 11.2 ? -12% |
| PWM Frequency | 200 ? | 23810 ? 11805% | 23810 ? 11805% | 59.5 ? -70% | 23580 ? 11690% | |
| Screen | 17% | 7% | -17% | 6% | 6% | |
| Brightness middle | 312.7 | 293 -6% | 314.7 1% | 324.2 4% | 421.2 35% | 266 -15% |
| Brightness | 305 | 270 -11% | 312 2% | 304 0% | 417 37% | 248 -19% |
| Brightness Distribution | 90 | 87 -3% | 90 0% | 90 0% | 94 4% | 89 -1% |
| Black Level * | 0.27 | 0.29 -7% | 0.38 -41% | 0.38 -41% | 0.31 -15% | |
| Contrast | 1158 | 1010 -13% | 828 -28% | 853 -26% | 858 -26% | |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 4.57 | 1.69 63% | 2.56 44% | 5.01 -10% | 6.06 -33% | 2.78 39% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 6.81 | 3.37 51% | 4.89 28% | 12.7 -86% | 11.89 -75% | 5.96 12% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 calibrated * | 2.91 | 1.24 57% | 1.71 41% | 1.64 44% | 0.91 69% | |
| Greyscale dE 2000 * | 4.3 | 2.3 47% | 3.4 21% | 7.9 -84% | 2.8 35% | 3.58 17% |
| Gamma | 2.29 96% | 2.3 96% | 2.3 96% | 2.35 94% | 2.15 102% | 2.46 89% |
| CCT | 7098 92% | 6758 96% | 6435 101% | 8455 77% | 6235 104% | 7186 90% |
| Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998) | 59.4 | 63 6% | 60.7 2% | 60.8 2% | 81 36% | 62 4% |
| Color Space (Percent of sRGB) | 91.3 | 98.5 8% | 94.6 4% | 95.5 5% | 99.6 9% | 96 5% |
| Total Average (Program / Settings) | 1319% /
707% | -4% /
2% | 1305% /
683% | 21% /
16% | 1299% /
691% |
* ... smaller is better
Display Response Times
| ↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
|---|---|---|
| 10 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 6 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 4 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 23 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (21 ms). | ||
| ↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
| 13.6 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 7.2 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 6.4 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 23 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (32.9 ms). | ||
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
| Screen flickering / PWM detected | 200 Hz | ≤ 99 % brightness setting |  |
The display backlight flickers at 200 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) Flickering detected at a brightness setting of 99 % and below. There should be no flickering or PWM above this brightness setting. The frequency of 200 Hz is relatively low, so sensitive users will likely notice flickering and experience eyestrain at the stated brightness setting and below. In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8774 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured. | |||
| Cinebench R15 | |
| CPU Single 64Bit | |
| SCHENKER XMG Ultra 15 Turing | |
| Eurocom Nightsky RX15 | |
| MSI GE75 9SG | |
| Average Intel Core i7-9750H (170 - 194, n=82) | |
| Razer Blade Stealth i7-8565U | |
| MSI GF63 8RC-040XPL | |
| Lenovo Legion Y540-17IRH | |
| SCHENKER Key 16 | |
| Razer Blade 15 GTX 1660 Ti | |
| Asus FX503VM-EH73 | |
| Asus ROG Zephyrus G15 GA502DU | |
| CPU Multi 64Bit | |
| Eurocom Nightsky RX15 | |
| MSI GE75 9SG | |
| SCHENKER XMG Ultra 15 Turing | |
| Average Intel Core i7-9750H (952 - 1306, n=85) | |
| SCHENKER Key 16 | |
| Razer Blade 15 GTX 1660 Ti | |
| Lenovo Legion Y540-17IRH | |
| MSI GF63 8RC-040XPL | |
| Asus ROG Zephyrus G15 GA502DU | |
| Asus FX503VM-EH73 | |
| Razer Blade Stealth i7-8565U | |
| Cinebench R11.5 | |
| CPU Single 64Bit | |
| MSI GE75 9SG | |
| Average Intel Core i7-9750H (1.96 - 2.19, n=10) | |
| Asus FX503VM-EH73 | |
| Asus ROG Zephyrus G15 GA502DU | |
| CPU Multi 64Bit | |
| MSI GE75 9SG | |
| Average Intel Core i7-9750H (11.3 - 14.1, n=10) | |
| Asus ROG Zephyrus G15 GA502DU | |
| Asus FX503VM-EH73 | |
| Cinebench R10 | |
| Rendering Multiple CPUs 32Bit | |
| Eurocom Nightsky RX15 | |
| SCHENKER XMG Ultra 15 Turing | |
| MSI GE75 9SG | |
| Average Intel Core i7-9750H (28251 - 36304, n=13) | |
| SCHENKER Key 16 | |
| Lenovo Legion Y540-17IRH | |
| Asus FX503VM-EH73 | |
| Asus ROG Zephyrus G15 GA502DU | |
| Rendering Single 32Bit | |
| Eurocom Nightsky RX15 | |
| SCHENKER XMG Ultra 15 Turing | |
| MSI GE75 9SG | |
| Average Intel Core i7-9750H (6659 - 7214, n=13) | |
| SCHENKER Key 16 | |
| Lenovo Legion Y540-17IRH | |
| Asus FX503VM-EH73 | |
| Asus ROG Zephyrus G15 GA502DU | |
| wPrime 2.10 - 1024m | |
| MSI GF63 8RC-040XPL | |
| Asus FX503VM-EH73 | |
| Asus ROG Zephyrus G15 GA502DU | |
| Average Intel Core i7-9750H () | |
| MSI GE75 9SG | |
| Eurocom Nightsky RX15 | |
* ... smaller is better
| PCMark 8 Home Score Accelerated v2 | 4074 pontos | |
| PCMark 8 Work Score Accelerated v2 | 5480 pontos | |
| PCMark 10 Score | 5301 pontos | |
Ajuda | ||
| Razer Blade 15 GTX 1660 Ti Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB256HAHQ | Razer Blade 15 RTX 2080 Max-Q Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ | Alienware m15 R2 P87F 2x Toshiba XG6 KXG60ZNV512G (RAID 0) | Dell XPS 15 7590 9980HK GTX 1650 Toshiba XG6 KXG60ZNV1T02 | Gigabyte Aero 15 Classic-XA Intel SSD 760p SSDPEKKW512G8 | MSI GS65 Stealth Thin 8RE-051US Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB256HAHQ | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AS SSD | 23% | 13% | 29% | 6% | -17% | |
| Seq Read | 1829 | 1832 0% | 1925 5% | 1723 -6% | 2517 38% | 1612 -12% |
| Seq Write | 1315 | 1864 42% | 2371 80% | 1386 5% | 924 -30% | 1475 12% |
| 4K Read | 51.3 | 52.1 2% | 37.2 -27% | 43.25 -16% | 59.1 15% | 43.09 -16% |
| 4K Write | 106 | 108.3 2% | 108.9 3% | 98.3 -7% | 126.5 19% | 83.8 -21% |
| 4K-64 Read | 917 | 1159 26% | 1177 28% | 1078 18% | 876 -4% | 611 -33% |
| 4K-64 Write | 1212 | 1807 49% | 1135 -6% | 1456 20% | 922 -24% | 570 -53% |
| Access Time Read * | 0.063 | 0.05 21% | 0.065 -3% | 0.05 21% | 0.042 33% | 0.071 -13% |
| Access Time Write * | 0.104 | 0.034 67% | 0.108 -4% | 0.039 62% | 0.065 37% | 0.045 57% |
| Score Read | 1152 | 1394 21% | 1407 22% | 1294 12% | 1186 3% | 815 -29% |
| Score Write | 1450 | 2102 45% | 1481 2% | 1693 17% | 1141 -21% | 802 -45% |
| Score Total | 3177 | 4221 33% | 3633 14% | 3638 15% | 2870 -10% | 2039 -36% |
| Copy ISO MB/s | 1539 | 2083 35% | 2073 35% | 3182 107% | 2086 36% | |
| Copy Program MB/s | 513 | 496.5 -3% | 576 12% | 984 92% | 454.2 -11% | |
| Copy Game MB/s | 1150 | 977 -15% | 1426 24% | 1824 59% | 1141 -1% |
* ... smaller is better
| 3DMark 11 | |
| 1280x720 Performance GPU | |
| Razer Blade 15 RTX 2080 Max-Q | |
| MSI RTX 2060 Gaming Z 6G | |
| Razer Blade Pro 2017 | |
| Razer Blade 15 RTX 2070 Max-Q | |
| Zotac GeForce GTX 1660 Ti 6 GB | |
| Asus Strix Hero III G731GV | |
| Average NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile (18610 - 22670, n=24) | |
| Razer Blade 15 GTX 1660 Ti | |
| MSI P65 8RF-451 - Creator | |
| MSI GF75 Thin 9SC | |
| Asus TUF FX705GE-EW096T | |
| 1280x720 Performance Combined | |
| Zotac GeForce GTX 1660 Ti 6 GB | |
| MSI RTX 2060 Gaming Z 6G | |
| Razer Blade 15 RTX 2080 Max-Q | |
| Asus Strix Hero III G731GV | |
| Average NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile (9500 - 13311, n=23) | |
| MSI GF75 Thin 9SC | |
| Razer Blade 15 GTX 1660 Ti | |
| Razer Blade 15 RTX 2070 Max-Q | |
| Razer Blade Pro 2017 | |
| MSI P65 8RF-451 - Creator | |
| Asus TUF FX705GE-EW096T | |
| 3DMark 11 Performance | 16594 pontos | |
| 3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score | 31563 pontos | |
| 3DMark Fire Strike Score | 12926 pontos | |
| 3DMark Time Spy Score | 5406 pontos | |
Ajuda | ||
| Shadow of the Tomb Raider - 1920x1080 Highest Preset AA:T | |
| SCHENKER XMG Ultra 17 Coffee Lake Refresh | |
| Alienware m15 R2 P87F | |
| HP Omen X 2S 15-dg0075cl | |
| Zotac GeForce GTX 1660 Ti 6 GB | |
| Asus G752VS | |
| Asus Strix Hero III G731GV | |
| Average NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile (62 - 73, n=8) | |
| Razer Blade 15 GTX 1660 Ti | |
| Asus TUF FX705GM | |
| Dell XPS 15 7590 9980HK GTX 1650 | |
| Asus TUF FX705GE-EW096T | |
| HP Envy 13-ah0003ng | |
| The Witcher 3 - 1920x1080 Ultra Graphics & Postprocessing (HBAO+) | |
| Alienware m15 R2 P87F | |
| HP Omen X 2S 15-dg0075cl | |
| Zotac GeForce GTX 1660 Ti 6 GB | |
| SCHENKER XMG Ultra 17 Coffee Lake Refresh | |
| Average NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile (51.6 - 65.1, n=21) | |
| Asus Strix Hero III G731GV | |
| Razer Blade 15 GTX 1660 Ti | |
| Asus TUF FX705GM | |
| Dell XPS 15 7590 9980HK GTX 1650 | |
| Asus TUF FX705GE-EW096T | |
| HP Envy 13-ah0003ng | |
| baixo | média | alto | ultra | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| BioShock Infinite (2013) | 291.2 | 259.6 | 241.3 | 132.5 |
| The Witcher 3 (2015) | 247.6 | 169.7 | 97.5 | 51.6 |
| Shadow of the Tomb Raider (2018) | 115 | 83 | 75 | 67 |
| Razer Blade 15 GTX 1660 Ti GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile, i7-9750H, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB256HAHQ | Razer Blade 15 RTX 2080 Max-Q GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, i7-9750H, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ | Alienware m15 R2 P87F GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, i7-9750H, 2x Toshiba XG6 KXG60ZNV512G (RAID 0) | Dell XPS 15 7590 9980HK GTX 1650 GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile, i9-9980HK, Toshiba XG6 KXG60ZNV1T02 | Gigabyte Aero 15 Classic-XA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, i7-9750H, Intel SSD 760p SSDPEKKW512G8 | MSI GS65 Stealth Thin 8RE-051US GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, i7-8750H, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB256HAHQ | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Noise | 8% | -11% | 3% | -11% | 4% | |
| off / environment * | 28.5 | 28.3 1% | 28.3 1% | 28.2 1% | 30 -5% | 28.4 -0% |
| Idle Minimum * | 30.3 | 28.8 5% | 28.5 6% | 28.2 7% | 31 -2% | 28.4 6% |
| Idle Average * | 30.5 | 28.8 6% | 28.5 7% | 28.2 8% | 34 -11% | 28.4 7% |
| Idle Maximum * | 30.5 | 29 5% | 49 -61% | 30.4 -0% | 39 -28% | 29.6 3% |
| Load Average * | 41 | 33.5 18% | 49 -20% | 43.8 -7% | 46 -12% | 43.5 -6% |
| Witcher 3 ultra * | 48 | 45 6% | 49 -2% | 47.2 2% | 53 -10% | 45.7 5% |
| Load Maximum * | 51.9 | 45.2 13% | 55 -6% | 47.2 9% | 55 -6% | 45.7 12% |
* ... smaller is better
Barulho
| Ocioso |
| 30.3 / 30.5 / 30.5 dB |
| Carga |
| 41 / 51.9 dB |
 | ||
30 dB silencioso 40 dB(A) audível 50 dB(A) ruidosamente alto |
||
min:  , med:  , max:  Audix TM1, Arta (15 cm de distância) environment noise: 28.5 dB(A) | ||
(-) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 52 °C / 126 F, compared to the average of 40.5 °C / 105 F, ranging from 21.2 to 68.8 °C for the class Gaming.
(-) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 52.2 °C / 126 F, compared to the average of 43.2 °C / 110 F
(±) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 34.3 °C / 94 F, compared to the device average of 33.9 °C / 93 F.
(-) Playing The Witcher 3, the average temperature for the upper side is 39.2 °C / 103 F, compared to the device average of 33.9 °C / 93 F.
(±) The palmrests and touchpad can get very hot to the touch with a maximum of 39.6 °C / 103.3 F.
(-) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.9 °C / 84 F (-10.7 °C / -19.3 F).
Razer Blade 15 GTX 1660 Ti audio analysis
(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (80.1 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 13.5% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (13.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 5.3% higher than median
(+) | mids are linear (4.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | reduced highs - on average 5.1% lower than median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (7.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (25.2% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 89% of all tested devices in this class were better, 3% similar, 8% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 18%, worst was 132%
Compared to all devices tested
» 74% of all tested devices were better, 5% similar, 20% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Apple MacBook 12 (Early 2016) 1.1 GHz audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (83.6 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 11.3% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (14.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2.4% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (10.2% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 6% of all tested devices in this class were better, 2% similar, 92% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 19%, worst was 53%
Compared to all devices tested
» 4% of all tested devices were better, 1% similar, 95% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
| desligado | 0.56 / 1.14 Watt |
| Ocioso | 18.7 / 30.7 / 33.9 Watt |
| Carga |
93.4 / 195.3 Watt |
   
| |
Key:
min: ,
med: ,
max: Metrahit Energy | |
| Razer Blade 15 GTX 1660 Ti i7-9750H, GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB256HAHQ, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6" | Razer Blade 15 RTX 2080 Max-Q i7-9750H, GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6" | Dell XPS 15 7590 9980HK GTX 1650 i9-9980HK, GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile, Toshiba XG6 KXG60ZNV1T02, OLED, 3840x2160, 15.6" | Gigabyte Aero 15 Classic-XA i7-9750H, GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, Intel SSD 760p SSDPEKKW512G8, IGZO, 1920x1080, 15.6" | MSI GS65 Stealth Thin 8RE-051US i7-8750H, GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB256HAHQ, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6" | MSI GP65 Leopard 9SE-225US i7-9750H, GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile, Toshiba KBG30ZMT512G, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6" | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power Consumption | 19% | 39% | 2% | 33% | 16% | |
| Idle Minimum * | 18.7 | 12.5 33% | 6.2 67% | 21 -12% | 8.7 53% | 13.6 27% |
| Idle Average * | 30.7 | 15.3 50% | 9.6 69% | 23 25% | 13 58% | 17.9 42% |
| Idle Maximum * | 33.9 | 20.7 39% | 21.2 37% | 32 6% | 14.3 58% | 20.6 39% |
| Load Average * | 93.4 | 90.2 3% | 104.3 -12% | 97 -4% | 107.4 -15% | 96 -3% |
| Witcher 3 ultra * | 158.9 | 162 -2% | 91.7 42% | 148 7% | 129 19% | 154.6 3% |
| Load Maximum * | 195.3 | 209.3 -7% | 135.3 31% | 213 -9% | 151.5 22% | 218.6 -12% |
* ... smaller is better
| Razer Blade 15 GTX 1660 Ti i7-9750H, GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile, 65 Wh | Razer Blade 15 RTX 2080 Max-Q i7-9750H, GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, 80 Wh | MSI GP65 Leopard 9SE-225US i7-9750H, GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile, 51 Wh | Alienware m15 R2 P87F i7-9750H, GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, 76 Wh | Dell XPS 15 7590 9980HK GTX 1650 i9-9980HK, GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile, 97 Wh | Gigabyte Aero 15 Classic-XA i7-9750H, GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, 94.24 Wh | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Battery Runtime | 19% | -29% | 1% | 42% | 28% | |
| WiFi v1.3 | 330 | 393 19% | 234 -29% | 332 1% | 467 42% | 421 28% |
| Reader / Idle | 953 | 359 | 554 | 910 | 545 | |
| Load | 102 | 65 | 44 | 199 | 181 |
Pro
Contra
No mundo dos portáteis, a GeForce RTX 2060 é somente cerca de 5 a 10 porcento mais rápido que a GTX 1660 Ti quando recursos específicos da RTX, como RT ou DLSS estão inabilitados. Se você não tiver interesse em tais opções, poderá economizar US$ 400 sem afetar muito a experiência de jogos com o Blade 15 GTX 1660 Ti. Isso por si só torna a nova configuração mais atraente para jogadores preocupados com o orçamento.
Embora o Blade 15 GTX 1660 Ti seja a opção Blade 15 Turing mais econômica, na verdade é mais rápida que a última geração GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q mais rápida por cerca de 10 a 15 porcento durante os jogos. Os usuários ainda estão tendo uma experiência de jogo superior ao que a melhor série Blade 15 Pascal tinha a oferecer nesse sentido.
Existem algumas desvantagens ocultas no Blade 15 GTX 1660 Ti, além do que mencionamos sobre a carcaça. Em primeiro lugar, o PWM está presente em quase todos os níveis de brilho a uma frequência baixa o suficiente para afetar alguns usuários sensíveis à oscilação na tela. Em segundo lugar, a tela não está calibrada, assim como as telas da série Blade 15 RTX. A temperatura da cor, por exemplo, é um pouco mais fria do que deveria, de fábrica. Em terceiro lugar, o ruído do ventilador e a temperatura serão um pouco mais altos e mais quentes, respectivamente, uma vez que o Blade 15 GTX 1660 Ti não possui resfriamento avançado de câmara de vapor. Em quarto lugar, os jogos parecem rodar um pouco mais rápido no modo Creator do que no modo Gaming, já que o desempenho da CPU é mais alto no modo Creator. Você também pode pular o modo Gaming por completo e ficar no modo Creator para obter o máximo desempenho.
A desvantagem mais notável é o desempenho da CPU, pois é mais lento do que no Blade 15 RTX 2070 Max-Q ou 2080 Max-Q, embora todos eles alojem o mesmo processador Core i7-9750H. O déficit de ~15% não afetará muito o desempenho dos jogos, especialmente se o seu objetivo for apenas 60 FPS, mas é lamentável para entusiastas ou criadores de conteúdo que desejam cada gota de desempenho possível do Core i7-9750H.
Além das notas especiais acima, a maioria de nossos existing comments sobre a série Blade 15 se aplica aqui na configuração GTX 1660 Ti. As temperaturas da superfície, brilho, cores e até mesmo o consumo de energia estão muito próximos entre esses SKUs Blade 15 Turing, apesar das diferenças de desempenho.
Razer Blade 15 GTX 1660 Ti
-
09/19/2019 v7 (old)
Allen Ngo
Price comparison
