Primeiras Impressões do Microsoft Surface Pro 4 (Core m3)
Microsoft Surface Pro 4
|
iluminação: 87 %
iluminação com acumulador: 413 cd/m²
Contraste: 1147:1 (Preto: 0.36 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 3.09 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.92
ΔE Greyscale 3.92 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
97% sRGB (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
61% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
67% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
96.5% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
65% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.3
Os Top 10
» Os Top 10 Portáteis Multimídia
» Os Top 10 Portáteis de Jogos
» Os Top 10 Portáteis Leves para Jogos
» Os Top 10 Portáteis Acessíveis de Escritório/Empresariais
» Os Top 10 Portáteis Premium de Escritório/Empresariais
» Os Top 10 dos Portáteis Workstation
» Os Top 10 Subportáteis
» Os Top 10 Ultrabooks
» Os Top 10 Conversíveis
» Os Top 10 Tablets
» Os Top 10 Smartphones
» A melhores Telas de Portáteis Analisadas Pela Notebookcheck
» Top 10 dos portáteis abaixo dos 500 Euros da Notebookcheck
» Top 10 dos Portáteis abaixo dos 300 Euros
Microsoft Surface Pro 3
|
iluminação: 91 %
iluminação com acumulador: 355.3 cd/m²
Contraste: 1077:1 (Preto: 0.33 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 4.72 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.92
ΔE Greyscale 6.53 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
59.37% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
65.6% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
88.8% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
63.6% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.17
Microsoft Surface Book
|
iluminação: 93 %
iluminação com acumulador: 430.9 cd/m²
Contraste: 1696:1 (Preto: 0.254 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 2.06 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.92
ΔE Greyscale 2.22 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
96% sRGB (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
64% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
68.9% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
95.8% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
67% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.13
Microsoft Surface Pro 4, Core i5, 128GB HD Graphics 520, 6300U, Samsung MZFLV128 NVMe | Microsoft Surface Pro 3 HD Graphics 4400, 4300U, Hynix HFS128G3MNM | Microsoft Surface 3 HD Graphics (Cherry Trail), Z8700, 128 GB eMMC Flash | Microsoft Surface Book Core i5 Maxwell GPU (940M, GDDR5), 6300U, Samsung MZFLV256 NVMe | |
---|---|---|---|---|
Display | -4% | 4% | 2% | |
Display P3 Coverage | 65 | 63.6 -2% | 68.8 6% | 67 3% |
sRGB Coverage | 96.5 | 88.8 -8% | 98.7 2% | 95.8 -1% |
AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage | 67 | 65.6 -2% | 70.4 5% | 68.9 3% |
Response Times | -5% | |||
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% * | 46 ? | 48.4 ? -5% | ||
Response Time Black / White * | 31.2 ? | 32.8 ? -5% | ||
PWM Frequency | 50 ? | |||
Screen | -18% | 2% | 19% | |
Brightness middle | 413 | 355.3 -14% | 399 -3% | 430.9 4% |
Brightness | 396 | 338 -15% | 380 -4% | 410 4% |
Brightness Distribution | 87 | 91 5% | 90 3% | 93 7% |
Black Level * | 0.36 | 0.33 8% | 0.49 -36% | 0.254 29% |
Contrast | 1147 | 1077 -6% | 814 -29% | 1696 48% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 3.09 | 4.72 -53% | 1.66 46% | 2.06 33% |
Greyscale dE 2000 * | 3.92 | 6.53 -67% | 2.75 30% | 2.22 43% |
Gamma | 2.3 96% | 2.17 101% | 2.22 99% | 2.13 103% |
CCT | 7333 89% | 6707 97% | 6358 102% | 6520 100% |
Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998) | 61 | 59.37 -3% | 64.4 6% | 64 5% |
Color Space (Percent of sRGB) | 97 | 98.8 2% | 96 -1% | |
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 3.24 | |||
Total Average (Program / Settings) | -11% /
-14% | 3% /
2% | 5% /
12% |
* ... smaller is better
Display Response Times
↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
---|---|---|
31.2 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 6 ms rise | |
↘ 25.2 ms fall | ||
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 83 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (21 ms). | ||
↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
46 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 17.2 ms rise | |
↘ 28.8 ms fall | ||
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 77 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (32.9 ms). |
Microsoft Surface Pro 4
(-) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 52.3 °C / 126 F, compared to the average of 35.3 °C / 96 F, ranging from 19.6 to 55.7 °C for the class Convertible.
(-) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 51.4 °C / 125 F, compared to the average of 36.8 °C / 98 F
(±) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 36 °C / 97 F, compared to the device average of 30.2 °C / 86 F.
(-) The palmrests and touchpad can get very hot to the touch with a maximum of 52.3 °C / 126.1 F.
(-) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.1 °C / 82.6 F (-24.2 °C / -43.5 F).
Microsoft Surface Pro 3
(-) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 45.2 °C / 113 F, compared to the average of 35.3 °C / 96 F, ranging from 19.6 to 55.7 °C for the class Convertible.
(-) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 46.4 °C / 116 F, compared to the average of 36.8 °C / 98 F
(±) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 33.8 °C / 93 F, compared to the device average of 30.2 °C / 86 F.
(-) The palmrests and touchpad can get very hot to the touch with a maximum of 42.4 °C / 108.3 F.
(-) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.1 °C / 82.6 F (-14.3 °C / -25.7 F).
Temos apenas algumas medições do Surface Pro 4 disponíveis, mas a tela e as emissões são um pouco melhores que os do predecessor. Será interessante ver como o dispositivo se sairá em nossos testes de desempenho e qual será sua duração de bateria realista. A análise completa estará disponível em cerca de 1-2 semanas. Fique ligado!