Deutsch
English
Español
Français
Italiano
Nederlands
Polski
Русский
Türkçe
Svenska
Chinese
MagyarNexoc GH5 515IG (Clevo NH50DB): Portátil básico para jogos que oferece espaço para três unidades de armazenamento
Nexoc GH5 515IG
Processador
Intel Core i5-10300H 4 x 2.5 - 4.5 GHz, Comet Lake-H
Placa gráfica
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile - 4 GB VRAM, Análises do: 1380 MHz, Memoría: 1500 MHz, GDDR6, interface de 128-bits, 27.21.14.5167 (Nvidia 451.67), Optimus
Memória
16 GB
, DDR4 3200, modo dual-channel, dois slots de memória (ambos ocupados)
Pantalha
15.60 polegadas 16:9, 1920 x 1080 pixel 141 PPI, LG Philips LP156WFC-SPD1, IPS, Brilhante: não, 60 Hz
placa mãe
Intel HM470
Disco rígido
Samsung SSD 860 Evo 512GB, 512 GB
, 2x M.2 (1x NVMe/SATA, 1x NVMe), 1x 2,5 polegadas
peso
2.074 kg, Suprimento de energia: 410 g
Preço
1040 Euro
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.
Rating | Date | Model | Weight | Height | Size | Resolution | Price |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 81.2 % v7 (old) | 08/2020 | Nexoc GH5 515IG i5-10300H, GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile | 2.1 kg | 24.9 mm | 15.60" | 1920x1080 | |
| 78.4 % v7 (old) | 07/2020 | Lenovo IdeaPad Gaming 3i 15IMH05 i5-10300H, GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile | 2.2 kg | 24.9 mm | 15.60" | 1920x1080 | |
| 80.4 % v6 (old) | 07/2019 | Asus TUF FX505DT-EB73 R7 3750H, GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile | 2.2 kg | 26.8 mm | 15.60" | 1920x1080 | |
| 79.3 % v7 (old) | 10/2019 | Dell G3 3590 i5-9300H, GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile | 2.5 kg | 21.6 mm | 15.60" | 1920x1080 | |
| 75.4 % v7 (old) | HP Pavilion Gaming 15-ec0002ng R5 3550H, GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile | 2.3 kg | 23.5 mm | 15.60" | 1920x1080 | ||
| 79.8 % v7 (old) | 07/2020 | Acer Nitro 5 AN515-44-R5FT R5 4600H, GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Mobile | 2.2 kg | 24 mm | 15.60" | 1920x1080 | |
| 79.5 % v7 (old) | 07/2020 | MSI Bravo 15 A4DCR R7 4800H, Radeon RX 5300M | 2 kg | 22 mm | 15.60" | 1920x1080 |
| SD Card Reader | |
| average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs) | |
| Average of class Gaming (19 - 202, n=90, last 2 years) | |
| Nexoc GH5 515IG (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
| HP Pavilion Gaming 15-ec0002ng (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
| Dell G3 3590 (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
| maximum AS SSD Seq Read Test (1GB) | |
| Average of class Gaming (25.8 - 269, n=91, last 2 years) | |
| Nexoc GH5 515IG (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
| HP Pavilion Gaming 15-ec0002ng (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
| Dell G3 3590 (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
| Networking | |
| iperf3 transmit AX12 | |
| Nexoc GH5 515IG | |
| Acer Nitro 5 AN515-44-R5FT | |
| MSI Bravo 15 A4DCR | |
| HP Pavilion Gaming 15-ec0002ng | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Gaming 3i 15IMH05 | |
| Asus TUF FX505DT-EB73 | |
| Dell G3 3590 | |
| iperf3 receive AX12 | |
| Nexoc GH5 515IG | |
| Acer Nitro 5 AN515-44-R5FT | |
| MSI Bravo 15 A4DCR | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Gaming 3i 15IMH05 | |
| HP Pavilion Gaming 15-ec0002ng | |
| Asus TUF FX505DT-EB73 | |
| Dell G3 3590 | |
20.1 ∆E
16.9 ∆E
21.8 ∆E
20 ∆E
20.5 ∆E
17.5 ∆E
17.4 ∆E
27.3 ∆E
21.1 ∆E
22.7 ∆E
15.3 ∆E
14.4 ∆E
26.3 ∆E
19.2 ∆E
23.8 ∆E
11 ∆E
23.5 ∆E
23.5 ∆E
2.3 ∆E
11.9 ∆E
18 ∆E
20.6 ∆E
21.9 ∆E
7.3 ∆E
15.4 ∆E
20 ∆E
20.2 ∆E
16.6 ∆E
22 ∆E
17.2 ∆E
15.1 ∆E
26.9 ∆E
17.7 ∆E
12.1 ∆E
15.7 ∆E
14.1 ∆E
21.2 ∆E
17.2 ∆E
21.3 ∆E
12.8 ∆E
20.3 ∆E
22.1 ∆E
2.5 ∆E
11.9 ∆E
19.4 ∆E
15.9 ∆E
9.4 ∆E
8.6 ∆E
18.7 ∆E
16.7 ∆E
23.8 ∆E
18.8 ∆E
21.3 ∆E
15.2 ∆E
12.1 ∆E
28 ∆E
16 ∆E
17.9 ∆E
15.4 ∆E
12.1 ∆E
22.8 ∆E
16.9 ∆E
14.5 ∆E
7.7 ∆E
18.8 ∆E
22.4 ∆E
2.5 ∆E
12.1 ∆E
18.2 ∆E
18.6 ∆E
14.3 ∆E
5.4 ∆E
20.3 ∆E
13.4 ∆E
15.1 ∆E
16 ∆E
12.6 ∆E
11.4 ∆E
10.1 ∆E
17.9 ∆E
14.1 ∆E
10 ∆E
11.9 ∆E
7.1 ∆E
16.9 ∆E
13.3 ∆E
15.7 ∆E
3.7 ∆E
13.5 ∆E
15.3 ∆E
1.8 ∆E
7.9 ∆E
11.1 ∆E
10.5 ∆E
7 ∆E
5.6 ∆E
13.1 ∆E
11.8 ∆E
16.6 ∆E
10 ∆E
12.8 ∆E
10.6 ∆E
10.8 ∆E
20.5 ∆E
13.9 ∆E
5.6 ∆E
9.2 ∆E
6.4 ∆E
14.4 ∆E
11.2 ∆E
13.3 ∆E
5.9 ∆E
12.1 ∆E
14.4 ∆E
3.8 ∆E
13.7 ∆E
13.4 ∆E
10.6 ∆E
7.9 ∆E
9 ∆E
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
LG Philips LP156WFC-SPD1 tested with X-Rite i1Pro 2
Máximo: 261 cd/m² (Nits) Médio: 253.6 cd/m² Minimum: 12 cd/m²iluminação: 93 %
iluminação com acumulador: 261 cd/m²
Contraste: 1135:1 (Preto: 0.23 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 4.71 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.93, calibrated: 3.67
ΔE Greyscale 2.76 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
56% sRGB (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
36% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
39.19% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
57% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
37.91% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.42
| Nexoc GH5 515IG LG Philips LP156WFC-SPD1, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6" | Lenovo IdeaPad Gaming 3i 15IMH05 BOE CQ NV156FHM-NX1, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6" | Asus TUF FX505DT-EB73 Panda LM156LF-GL, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6" | Dell G3 3590 BOE NV15N3D, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6" | HP Pavilion Gaming 15-ec0002ng Chi Mei N156HGA-EA3, TN LED, 1920x1080, 15.6" | Acer Nitro 5 AN515-44-R5FT Panda LM156LF-2F01 (NCP004D), IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6" | MSI Bravo 15 A4DCR AU Optronics B156HAN08.0 (AUO80ED), IPS-Level, 1920x1080, 15.6" | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display | -0% | 4% | 6% | 9% | 9% | 59% | |
| Display P3 Coverage | 37.91 | 38.04 0% | 39.56 4% | 40.13 6% | 41.22 9% | 41.16 9% | 62 64% |
| sRGB Coverage | 57 | 56.6 -1% | 59.5 4% | 59.8 5% | 61.8 8% | 61.8 8% | 86.8 52% |
| AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage | 39.19 | 39.3 0% | 40.91 4% | 41.47 6% | 42.62 9% | 42.56 9% | 62.7 60% |
| Response Times | 31% | 2% | -31% | 7% | -18% | 57% | |
| Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% * | 34.8 ? | 25 ? 28% | 30.4 ? 13% | 46 ? -32% | 44 ? -26% | 40.8 ? -17% | 16 ? 54% |
| Response Time Black / White * | 25.2 ? | 17 ? 33% | 27.6 ? -10% | 32.4 ? -29% | 15 ? 40% | 30 ? -19% | 10.4 ? 59% |
| PWM Frequency | 200 ? | 250 ? | |||||
| Screen | -34% | -29% | -24% | -63% | -9% | 5% | |
| Brightness middle | 261 | 305 17% | 286.2 10% | 276.2 6% | 233 -11% | 287 10% | 311 19% |
| Brightness | 254 | 294 16% | 267 5% | 261 3% | 211 -17% | 271 7% | 313 23% |
| Brightness Distribution | 93 | 70 -25% | 84 -10% | 86 -8% | 82 -12% | 88 -5% | 88 -5% |
| Black Level * | 0.23 | 0.405 -76% | 0.33 -43% | 0.24 -4% | 0.405 -76% | 0.25 -9% | 0.43 -87% |
| Contrast | 1135 | 753 -34% | 867 -24% | 1151 1% | 575 -49% | 1148 1% | 723 -36% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 4.71 | 6.01 -28% | 5.45 -16% | 5.56 -18% | 8.22 -75% | 4.77 -1% | 4.5 4% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 7.6 | 21.9 -188% | 18.08 -138% | 23.45 -209% | 18.6 -145% | 17.15 -126% | 7.97 -5% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 calibrated * | 3.67 | 5.12 -40% | 4.47 -22% | 5.23 -43% | 3.73 -2% | 2.65 28% | |
| Greyscale dE 2000 * | 2.76 | 3.23 -17% | 5.3 -92% | 2.8 -1% | 10.13 -267% | 2.7 2% | 3.3 -20% |
| Gamma | 2.42 91% | 2.43 91% | 2.1 105% | 2.37 93% | 2.27 97% | 2.115 104% | 2.129 103% |
| CCT | 7090 92% | 6818 95% | 7679 85% | 6710 97% | 11323 57% | 7187 90% | 7227 90% |
| Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998) | 36 | 36 0% | 37.6 4% | 37.8 5% | 39 8% | 43 19% | 63 75% |
| Color Space (Percent of sRGB) | 56 | 56 0% | 59.1 6% | 59 5% | 62 11% | 61 9% | 86 54% |
| Total Average (Program / Settings) | -1% /
-20% | -8% /
-19% | -16% /
-19% | -16% /
-40% | -6% /
-7% | 40% /
21% |
* ... smaller is better
Display Response Times
ℹ
Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.| ↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
|---|---|---|
| 25.2 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 15.2 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 10 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows relatively slow response rates in our tests and may be too slow for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 57 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (21 ms). | ||
| ↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
| 34.8 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 17.6 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 17.2 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 44 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is similar to the average of all tested devices (32.9 ms). | ||
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
ℹ
To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.| Screen flickering / PWM not detected |  | ||
In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8774 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured. | |||
Nexoc GH5 515IG Intel Core i5-10300H, Intel Core i5-10300H: Ø836 (815.48-892.15)
Nexoc GH5 515IG Intel Core i5-10300H, Intel Core i5-10300H; Leistungsmodus: Ø901 (896.88-906.74)
Lenovo IdeaPad Gaming 3i 15IMH05 Intel Core i5-10300H, Intel Core i5-10300H: Ø894 (885.9-902.04)
Asus TUF FX505DT-EB73 AMD Ryzen 7 3750H, AMD Ryzen 7 3750H: Ø741 (732.32-778.15)
Dell G3 3590 Intel Core i5-9300H, Intel Core i5-9300H: Ø740 (702.49-787.7)
HP Pavilion Gaming 15-ec0002ng AMD Ryzen 5 3550H, AMD Ryzen 5 3550H: Ø756 (748.04-769.36)
Acer Nitro 5 AN515-44-R5FT AMD Ryzen 5 4600H, AMD Ryzen 5 4600H: Ø1341 (1313.46-1397.77)
MSI Bravo 15 A4DCR AMD Ryzen 7 4800H, AMD Ryzen 7 4800H: Ø1697 (1664.03-1741.33)
Cinebench R15 | Blender | 7-Zip 18.03 | Cinebench R20 | Geekbench 5.5 | HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 | LibreOffice | R Benchmark 2.5
| Cinebench R15 | |
| CPU Single 64Bit | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Gaming 3i 15IMH05 | |
| MSI Bravo 15 A4DCR | |
| Nexoc GH5 515IG | |
| Nexoc GH5 515IG (Leistungsmodus) | |
| Acer Nitro 5 AN515-44-R5FT | |
| Dell G3 3590 | |
| Asus TUF FX505DT-EB73 | |
| HP Pavilion Gaming 15-ec0002ng | |
| CPU Multi 64Bit | |
| MSI Bravo 15 A4DCR | |
| Acer Nitro 5 AN515-44-R5FT | |
| Nexoc GH5 515IG (Leistungsmodus) | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Gaming 3i 15IMH05 | |
| Nexoc GH5 515IG | |
| Asus TUF FX505DT-EB73 | |
| Dell G3 3590 | |
| HP Pavilion Gaming 15-ec0002ng | |
| Blender - v2.79 BMW27 CPU | |
| Nexoc GH5 515IG | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Gaming 3i 15IMH05 | |
| Acer Nitro 5 AN515-44-R5FT | |
| MSI Bravo 15 A4DCR | |
| Cinebench R20 | |
| CPU (Single Core) | |
| MSI Bravo 15 A4DCR | |
| Nexoc GH5 515IG | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Gaming 3i 15IMH05 | |
| Acer Nitro 5 AN515-44-R5FT | |
| Dell G3 3590 | |
| Asus TUF FX505DT-EB73 | |
| HP Pavilion Gaming 15-ec0002ng | |
| CPU (Multi Core) | |
| MSI Bravo 15 A4DCR | |
| Acer Nitro 5 AN515-44-R5FT | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Gaming 3i 15IMH05 | |
| Nexoc GH5 515IG | |
| Dell G3 3590 | |
| Asus TUF FX505DT-EB73 | |
| HP Pavilion Gaming 15-ec0002ng | |
| Geekbench 5.5 | |
| Single-Core | |
| Nexoc GH5 515IG | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Gaming 3i 15IMH05 | |
| MSI Bravo 15 A4DCR | |
| Acer Nitro 5 AN515-44-R5FT | |
| HP Pavilion Gaming 15-ec0002ng | |
| Multi-Core | |
| MSI Bravo 15 A4DCR | |
| Acer Nitro 5 AN515-44-R5FT | |
| Nexoc GH5 515IG | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Gaming 3i 15IMH05 | |
| HP Pavilion Gaming 15-ec0002ng | |
| HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 - 4k Preset | |
| MSI Bravo 15 A4DCR | |
| Acer Nitro 5 AN515-44-R5FT | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Gaming 3i 15IMH05 | |
| Nexoc GH5 515IG | |
| LibreOffice - 20 Documents To PDF | |
| MSI Bravo 15 A4DCR | |
| Acer Nitro 5 AN515-44-R5FT | |
| Nexoc GH5 515IG | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Gaming 3i 15IMH05 | |
| R Benchmark 2.5 - Overall mean | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Gaming 3i 15IMH05 | |
| Acer Nitro 5 AN515-44-R5FT | |
| Nexoc GH5 515IG | |
| MSI Bravo 15 A4DCR | |
* ... smaller is better
| PCMark 8 Home Score Accelerated v2 | 3971 pontos | |
| PCMark 8 Creative Score Accelerated v2 | 4576 pontos | |
| PCMark 8 Work Score Accelerated v2 | 5179 pontos | |
| PCMark 10 Score | 4936 pontos | |
Ajuda | ||
| PCMark 10 - Score | |
| MSI Bravo 15 A4DCR | |
| Nexoc GH5 515IG | |
| Acer Nitro 5 AN515-44-R5FT | |
| Dell G3 3590 | |
| Asus TUF FX505DT-EB73 | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Gaming 3i 15IMH05 | |
| HP Pavilion Gaming 15-ec0002ng | |
| PCMark 8 | |
| Home Score Accelerated v2 | |
| Nexoc GH5 515IG | |
| Asus TUF FX505DT-EB73 | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Gaming 3i 15IMH05 | |
| Dell G3 3590 | |
| HP Pavilion Gaming 15-ec0002ng | |
| Work Score Accelerated v2 | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Gaming 3i 15IMH05 | |
| Nexoc GH5 515IG | |
| Dell G3 3590 | |
| HP Pavilion Gaming 15-ec0002ng | |
| Asus TUF FX505DT-EB73 | |
| DPC Latencies / LatencyMon - interrupt to process latency (max), Web, Youtube, Prime95 | |
| MSI Bravo 15 A4DCR | |
| Acer Nitro 5 AN515-44-R5FT | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Gaming 3i 15IMH05 | |
| Nexoc GH5 515IG | |
* ... smaller is better
Samsung SSD 860 Evo 512GB
CDM 5/6 Read Seq Q32T1:
561 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write Seq Q32T1:
529 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Read 4K Q32T1:
329 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write 4K Q32T1:
304 MB/s
CDM 5 Read Seq:
539 MB/s
CDM 5 Write Seq:
518 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Read 4K:
40.88 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write 4K:
89.6 MB/s
| Nexoc GH5 515IG Samsung SSD 860 Evo 512GB | Lenovo IdeaPad Gaming 3i 15IMH05 SK hynix BC511 HFM512GDHTNI-87A0B | Asus TUF FX505DT-EB73 Intel SSD 660p SSDPEKNW512G8 | Dell G3 3590 Toshiba BG4 KBG40ZNS128G | HP Pavilion Gaming 15-ec0002ng Intel SSD 660p SSDPEKNW512G8 | Acer Nitro 5 AN515-44-R5FT SK Hynix BC511 HFM512GDJTNI | MSI Bravo 15 A4DCR Samsung PM981a MZVLB1T0HBLR | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CrystalDiskMark 5.2 / 6 | 90% | 81% | 85% | 88% | 240% | ||
| Write 4K | 89.6 | 130 45% | 137.5 53% | 136.9 53% | 94.7 6% | 118.3 32% | |
| Read 4K | 40.88 | 44.44 9% | 57 39% | 57 39% | 38.91 -5% | 43.73 7% | |
| Write Seq | 518 | 1059 104% | 984 90% | 968 87% | 1056 104% | 2854 451% | |
| Read Seq | 539 | 1105 105% | 1564 190% | 1631 203% | 1183 119% | 2302 327% | |
| Write 4K Q32T1 | 304 | 490.3 61% | 237.4 -22% | 237 -22% | 445.3 46% | 418.5 38% | |
| Read 4K Q32T1 | 329 | 309.2 -6% | 340.7 4% | 337.1 2% | 477.7 45% | 517 57% | |
| Write Seq Q32T1 | 529 | 1053 99% | 959 81% | 963 82% | 1063 101% | 3008 469% | |
| Read Seq Q32T1 | 561 | 2261 303% | 1732 209% | 1863 232% | 2154 284% | 3568 536% | |
| AS SSD | 71% | 58% | -194% | -2% | 82% | 269% | |
| Seq Read | 524 | 1348 157% | 1019 94% | 1174 124% | 1623 210% | 1504 187% | 2730 421% |
| Seq Write | 495 | 1000 102% | 889 80% | 186 -62% | 891 80% | 1064 115% | 2513 408% |
| 4K Read | 38.93 | 48.04 23% | 48.22 24% | 34.01 -13% | 48.06 23% | 51.5 32% | 61.4 58% |
| 4K Write | 87.3 | 103.3 18% | 115.5 32% | 69.4 -21% | 102.1 17% | 123.2 41% | 156.1 79% |
| 4K-64 Read | 380 | 755 99% | 321.5 -15% | 424 12% | 325.6 -14% | 703 85% | 1780 368% |
| 4K-64 Write | 335.7 | 749 123% | 787 134% | 68.8 -80% | 94.1 -72% | 730 117% | 1920 472% |
| Access Time Read * | 0.073 | 0.061 16% | 0.065 11% | 0.168 -130% | 0.171 -134% | 0.064 12% | 0.063 14% |
| Access Time Write * | 0.039 | 0.036 8% | 0.047 -21% | 0.94 -2310% | 0.048 -23% | 0.031 21% | 0.025 36% |
| Score Read | 471 | 938 99% | 472 0% | 575 22% | 536 14% | 905 92% | 2114 349% |
| Score Write | 472 | 952 102% | 992 110% | 157 -67% | 285 -40% | 960 103% | 2327 393% |
| Score Total | 1198 | 2365 97% | 1717 43% | 987 -18% | 1077 -10% | 2321 94% | 5518 361% |
| Copy ISO MB/s | 500 | 749 50% | 942 88% | 215.7 -57% | 566 13% | ||
| Copy Program MB/s | 283.8 | 342.5 21% | 444.5 57% | 108.2 -62% | 223.8 -21% | ||
| Copy Game MB/s | 319.6 | 571 79% | 867 171% | 165.9 -48% | 104.3 -67% | ||
| Total Average (Program / Settings) | 81% /
78% | 70% /
66% | -194% /
-194% | 42% /
30% | 85% /
84% | 255% /
257% |
* ... smaller is better
Continuous load read: DiskSpd Read Loop, Queue Depth 8
No graph data
| 3DMark 06 Standard Score | 36299 pontos | |
| 3DMark 11 Performance | 11799 pontos | |
| 3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score | 27676 pontos | |
| 3DMark Fire Strike Score | 8410 pontos | |
| 3DMark Time Spy Score | 3552 pontos | |
Ajuda | ||
| 3DMark 11 - 1280x720 Performance GPU | |
| MSI Bravo 15 A4DCR | |
| Acer Nitro 5 AN515-44-R5FT | |
| Asus TUF FX505DT-EB73 | |
| Dell G3 3590 | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Gaming 3i 15IMH05 | |
| Nexoc GH5 515IG | |
| HP Pavilion Gaming 15-ec0002ng | |
| 3DMark | |
| 1280x720 Cloud Gate Standard Graphics | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Gaming 3i 15IMH05 | |
| Nexoc GH5 515IG | |
| Dell G3 3590 | |
| MSI Bravo 15 A4DCR | |
| Acer Nitro 5 AN515-44-R5FT | |
| Asus TUF FX505DT-EB73 | |
| HP Pavilion Gaming 15-ec0002ng | |
| 1920x1080 Fire Strike Graphics | |
| MSI Bravo 15 A4DCR | |
| Acer Nitro 5 AN515-44-R5FT | |
| Nexoc GH5 515IG (Leistungsmodus) | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Gaming 3i 15IMH05 | |
| Asus TUF FX505DT-EB73 | |
| Dell G3 3590 | |
| Nexoc GH5 515IG | |
| HP Pavilion Gaming 15-ec0002ng | |
| 2560x1440 Time Spy Graphics | |
| Acer Nitro 5 AN515-44-R5FT | |
| Asus TUF FX505DT-EB73 | |
| MSI Bravo 15 A4DCR | |
| Nexoc GH5 515IG (Leistungsmodus) | |
| Dell G3 3590 | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Gaming 3i 15IMH05 | |
| Nexoc GH5 515IG | |
| HP Pavilion Gaming 15-ec0002ng | |
Shadow of the Tomb Raider | The Witcher 3 | BioShock Infinite | Star Wars Jedi Fallen Order | Gears Tactics | Doom Eternal | F1 2020
| Shadow of the Tomb Raider - 1920x1080 Highest Preset AA:T | |
| Acer Nitro 5 AN515-44-R5FT | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Gaming 3i 15IMH05 | |
| Nexoc GH5 515IG (Leistungsmodus) | |
| Nexoc GH5 515IG | |
| Asus TUF FX505DT-EB73 | |
| MSI Bravo 15 A4DCR | |
| HP Pavilion Gaming 15-ec0002ng | |
| The Witcher 3 - 1920x1080 Ultra Graphics & Postprocessing (HBAO+) | |
| Nexoc GH5 515IG | |
| Acer Nitro 5 AN515-44-R5FT | |
| MSI Bravo 15 A4DCR | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Gaming 3i 15IMH05 | |
| Nexoc GH5 515IG (Leistungsmodus) | |
| Asus TUF FX505DT-EB73 | |
| Dell G3 3590 | |
| HP Pavilion Gaming 15-ec0002ng | |
| BioShock Infinite - 1920x1080 Ultra Preset, DX11 (DDOF) | |
| Nexoc GH5 515IG (Leistungsmodus) | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Gaming 3i 15IMH05 | |
| Nexoc GH5 515IG | |
| Dell G3 3590 | |
| Asus TUF FX505DT-EB73 | |
| HP Pavilion Gaming 15-ec0002ng | |
| Star Wars Jedi Fallen Order - 1920x1080 Epic Preset | |
| MSI Bravo 15 A4DCR | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Gaming 3i 15IMH05 | |
| Nexoc GH5 515IG | |
| HP Pavilion Gaming 15-ec0002ng | |
| Gears Tactics - 1920x1080 Ultra Preset | |
| Acer Nitro 5 AN515-44-R5FT | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Gaming 3i 15IMH05 | |
| MSI Bravo 15 A4DCR | |
| Nexoc GH5 515IG (Leistungsmodus) | |
| Nexoc GH5 515IG | |
| Doom Eternal - 1920x1080 High Preset | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Gaming 3i 15IMH05 | |
| Nexoc GH5 515IG | |
| MSI Bravo 15 A4DCR | |
| F1 2020 - 1920x1080 Ultra High Preset AA:T AF:16x | |
| Nexoc GH5 515IG | |
Nexoc GH5 515IG GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile, i5-10300H, Samsung SSD 860 Evo 512GB: Ø34.1 (31-36)
Nexoc GH5 515IG GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile, i5-10300H; Leistungsmodus: Ø38.6 (35-41)
Lenovo IdeaPad Gaming 3i 15IMH05 GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile, i5-10300H, SK hynix BC511 HFM512GDHTNI-87A0B: Ø35.1 (30-38)
HP Pavilion Gaming 15-ec0002ng GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile, R5 3550H, Intel SSD 660p SSDPEKNW512G8: Ø23 (21-25)
Acer Nitro 5 AN515-44-R5FT GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Mobile, R5 4600H, SK Hynix BC511 HFM512GDJTNI: Ø38.9 (36-41)
MSI Bravo 15 A4DCR Radeon RX 5300M, R7 4800H, Samsung PM981a MZVLB1T0HBLR: Ø38.5 (34-41)
| baixo | média | alto | ultra | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| BioShock Infinite (2013) | 332.4 | 250.2 | 226.1 | 95.2 |
| The Witcher 3 (2015) | 187.9 | 118.4 | 67.2 | 38.5 |
| Shadow of the Tomb Raider (2018) | 115 | 61 | 51 | 44 |
| Call of Duty Modern Warfare 2019 (2019) | 97.5 | 61.5 | 51.1 | 43.3 |
| Star Wars Jedi Fallen Order (2019) | 78.3 | 61.1 | 51.8 | |
| Doom Eternal (2020) | 148.6 | 81.4 | 62.6 | |
| Gears Tactics (2020) | 230.8 | 89.7 | 61 | 41.9 |
| F1 2020 (2020) | 182 | 104 | 81 | 57 |
| Death Stranding (2020) | 104.9 | 62.8 | 57.3 | 56.5 |
| Horizon Zero Dawn (2020) | 95 | 54 | 45 | 34 |
Barulho
| Ocioso |
| 25 / 31 / 33 dB |
| Carga |
| 53 / 53 dB |
 | ||
30 dB silencioso 40 dB(A) audível 50 dB(A) ruidosamente alto |
||
min:  , med:  , max:  Earthworks M23R, Arta (15 cm de distância) environment noise: 25 dB(A) | ||
| Nexoc GH5 515IG i5-10300H, GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile | Lenovo IdeaPad Gaming 3i 15IMH05 i5-10300H, GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile | Asus TUF FX505DT-EB73 R7 3750H, GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile | Dell G3 3590 i5-9300H, GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile | HP Pavilion Gaming 15-ec0002ng R5 3550H, GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile | Acer Nitro 5 AN515-44-R5FT R5 4600H, GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Mobile | MSI Bravo 15 A4DCR R7 4800H, Radeon RX 5300M | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Noise | -4% | 3% | 2% | 3% | -3% | -9% | |
| off / environment * | 25 | 30.7 -23% | 28.2 -13% | 28.4 -14% | 30.3 -21% | 30 -20% | 30 -20% |
| Idle Minimum * | 25 | 30.7 -23% | 28.2 -13% | 29.2 -17% | 30.3 -21% | 30 -20% | 31 -24% |
| Idle Average * | 31 | 30.7 1% | 28.2 9% | 29.4 5% | 30.3 2% | 32 -3% | 32 -3% |
| Idle Maximum * | 33 | 30.7 7% | 31.4 5% | 29.4 11% | 31 6% | 34 -3% | 40 -21% |
| Load Average * | 53 | 49.7 6% | 39.8 25% | 39 26% | 39.3 26% | 46 13% | 48 9% |
| Witcher 3 ultra * | 48 | 47 2% | 47 2% | 49.5 -3% | 42.9 11% | 47 2% | 48 -0% |
| Load Maximum * | 53 | 50.3 5% | 50.2 5% | 49.7 6% | 43.3 18% | 49 8% | 54 -2% |
* ... smaller is better
(-) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 40.9 °C / 106 F, compared to the average of 33.9 °C / 93 F for the devices in the class Gaming.
(-) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 48 °C / 118 F, compared to the average of 40.5 °C / 105 F, ranging from 21.2 to 68.8 °C for the class Gaming.
(-) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 47 °C / 117 F, compared to the average of 43.2 °C / 110 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 27.6 °C / 82 F, compared to the device average of 33.9 °C / 93 F.
(-) Playing The Witcher 3, the average temperature for the upper side is 38.1 °C / 101 F, compared to the device average of 33.9 °C / 93 F.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are reaching skin temperature as a maximum (34 °C / 93.2 F) and are therefore not hot.
(-) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.9 °C / 84 F (-5.1 °C / -9.2 F).
(-) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 48 °C / 118 F, compared to the average of 40.5 °C / 105 F, ranging from 21.2 to 68.8 °C for the class Gaming.
(-) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 47 °C / 117 F, compared to the average of 43.2 °C / 110 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 27.6 °C / 82 F, compared to the device average of 33.9 °C / 93 F.
(-) Playing The Witcher 3, the average temperature for the upper side is 38.1 °C / 101 F, compared to the device average of 33.9 °C / 93 F.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are reaching skin temperature as a maximum (34 °C / 93.2 F) and are therefore not hot.
(-) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.9 °C / 84 F (-5.1 °C / -9.2 F).
| Nexoc GH5 515IG i5-10300H, GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile | Lenovo IdeaPad Gaming 3i 15IMH05 i5-10300H, GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile | Asus TUF FX505DT-EB73 R7 3750H, GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile | Dell G3 3590 i5-9300H, GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile | HP Pavilion Gaming 15-ec0002ng R5 3550H, GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile | Acer Nitro 5 AN515-44-R5FT R5 4600H, GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Mobile | MSI Bravo 15 A4DCR R7 4800H, Radeon RX 5300M | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Heat | 2% | -5% | -13% | 11% | -2% | -8% | |
| Maximum Upper Side * | 48 | 43 10% | 41.2 14% | 49 -2% | 41 15% | 49 -2% | 51 -6% |
| Maximum Bottom * | 47 | 50.6 -8% | 40 15% | 49.8 -6% | 39.1 17% | 50 -6% | 50 -6% |
| Idle Upper Side * | 28 | 27.2 3% | 34.6 -24% | 32.4 -16% | 26 7% | 28 -0% | 30 -7% |
| Idle Bottom * | 28 | 27.5 2% | 34.4 -23% | 35.6 -27% | 26.5 5% | 28 -0% | 31 -11% |
* ... smaller is better
Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)
Nexoc GH5 515IG audio analysis
(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (81 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 24.4% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (13% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.3% away from median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (7.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 5% higher than median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (8.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (20.2% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 69% of all tested devices in this class were better, 6% similar, 25% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 18%, worst was 132%
Compared to all devices tested
» 48% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 43% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Consumo de energia
| desligado | 0.4 / 1.1 Watt |
| Ocioso | 3 / 7 / 16 Watt |
| Carga |
85 / 134 Watt |
   
| |
Key:
min: ,
med: ,
max: Metrahit Energy | |
| Nexoc GH5 515IG i5-10300H, GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile | Lenovo IdeaPad Gaming 3i 15IMH05 i5-10300H, GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile | Asus TUF FX505DT-EB73 R7 3750H, GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile | Dell G3 3590 i5-9300H, GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile | HP Pavilion Gaming 15-ec0002ng R5 3550H, GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile | Acer Nitro 5 AN515-44-R5FT R5 4600H, GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Mobile | MSI Bravo 15 A4DCR R7 4800H, Radeon RX 5300M | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power Consumption | -24% | -23% | -36% | 18% | -5% | -74% | |
| Idle Minimum * | 3 | 5.1 -70% | 7 -133% | 6.2 -107% | 1.9 37% | 5 -67% | 11 -267% |
| Idle Average * | 7 | 8.2 -17% | 9.9 -41% | 8.4 -20% | 7.2 -3% | 8 -14% | 14 -100% |
| Idle Maximum * | 16 | 10.6 34% | 12 25% | 27.7 -73% | 9.6 40% | 13 19% | 25 -56% |
| Load Average * | 85 | 128 -51% | 68.4 20% | 91 -7% | 74 13% | 69 19% | 72 15% |
| Witcher 3 ultra * | 86 | 109 -27% | 94.9 -10% | 94.4 -10% | 75 13% | 78 9% | 100 -16% |
| Load Maximum * | 134 | 150 -12% | 130.9 2% | 131.5 2% | 124 7% | 124 7% | 163 -22% |
* ... smaller is better
| Nexoc GH5 515IG i5-10300H, GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile, 48.96 Wh | Lenovo IdeaPad Gaming 3i 15IMH05 i5-10300H, GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile, 45 Wh | Asus TUF FX505DT-EB73 R7 3750H, GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile, 48 Wh | Dell G3 3590 i5-9300H, GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile, 51 Wh | HP Pavilion Gaming 15-ec0002ng R5 3550H, GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile, 52.5 Wh | Acer Nitro 5 AN515-44-R5FT R5 4600H, GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Mobile, 57.48 Wh | MSI Bravo 15 A4DCR R7 4800H, Radeon RX 5300M, 51 Wh | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Battery Runtime | 10% | -18% | 4% | 32% | 13% | -37% | |
| Reader / Idle | 893 | 744 -17% | 466 -48% | 810 -9% | 828 -7% | 418 -53% | |
| H.264 | 388 | 435 12% | |||||
| WiFi v1.3 | 384 | 379 -1% | 285 -26% | 403 5% | 505 32% | 520 35% | 268 -30% |
| Load | 73 | 106 45% | 87 19% | 85 16% | 82 12% | 53 -27% |
Pro
+ Tela IPS
+ Individualmente configurável
+ Bom desempenho do sistema
+ Espaço para dois SSDs M.2 e uma unidade de armazenamento de 2,5 polegadas
+ Teclado retro iluminado (RGB)
+ Leitor de cartões de memória veloz
+ Excelentes velocidades de transferência WLAN
+ Boa duração da bateria
+ USB 3.2 Gen 2
Contra
- Tela escura
- Baixa cobertura do espaço de cores
- Barulhento sob uso intenso
- Sem Thunderbolt 3
O portátil de jogos da Nexoc roda todos os jogos de computador mais recentes fluentemente na tela graças ao seu processador Core i5-1030NG7 e núcleo gráfico GeForce GTX 1650. No entanto, as configurações de qualidade máxima estão fora do alcance dos proprietários do dispositivo. Positivo: A CPU e a GPU podem funcionar em altas velocidades por longos períodos de tempo.
Com o GH5 515IG, a Nexoc oferece um portátil para jogos completo do segmento de nível básico que pode ser personalizado de acordo com as necessidades dos usuários.
O portátil pode ser configurado individualmente na loja online da Nexoc. Enquanto a versão básica está disponível por cerca de 850 Euros (~$ 1.001), cerca de 1.040 Euros (~ $ 1.225) devem ser pagos pela variante de configuração fornecida a nós. É também a possibilidade de escolher uma configuração que nos permite viver com o SSD SATA integrado (500 GB, M.2 2280). Um SSD NVMe é recomendado como uma unidade de sistema para todos os compradores em potencial.
O portátil tem espaço para dois SSDs M.2 (1x NVMe / SATA, 1x NVMe; RAID 0/1) e uma unidade de armazenamento de 2,5 polegadas. Se o espaço de armazenamento do SSD de 500 GB acabar, pode ser facilmente expandido. Para fazer isso, a tampa inferior do portátil teria que ser removida, pois não há escotilha de manutenção.
A tela Full HD IPS oferece ângulos de visão estáveis, uma superfície mate, bom contraste e uma reprodução de cores decente. Mas o brilho máximo é muito baixo. A cobertura do espaço de cores não causa entusiasmo. Além disso, o teclado embutido (iluminação RGB) provou ser adequado para o uso diário, enquanto a duração da bateria acabou sendo muito decente.
Nexoc GH5 515IG
-
08/19/2020 v7 (old)
Sascha Mölck
Gaming - Médio equilibrado
Price comparison
