Breve Análise do Desktop Tudo-em-um Lenovo ThinkCentre M910z
Os Top 10
» Os Top 10 Portáteis Multimídia
» Os Top 10 Portáteis de Jogos
» Os Top 10 Portáteis Leves para Jogos
» Os Top 10 Portáteis Acessíveis de Escritório/Empresariais
» Os Top 10 Portáteis Premium de Escritório/Empresariais
» Os Top 10 dos Portáteis Workstation
» Os Top 10 Subportáteis
» Os Top 10 Ultrabooks
» Os Top 10 Conversíveis
» Os Top 10 Tablets
» Os Top 10 Smartphones
» A melhores Telas de Portáteis Analisadas Pela Notebookcheck
» Top 10 dos portáteis abaixo dos 500 Euros da Notebookcheck
» Top 10 dos Portáteis abaixo dos 300 Euros
SD Card Reader | |
average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs) | |
Dell Latitude 5580 | |
HP Z1 G2 G1X47EA | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T470p-20J7S00000 | |
Lenovo ThinkCentre M910z-10NR000KUS | |
maximum AS SSD Seq Read Test (1GB) | |
Dell Latitude 5580 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T470p-20J7S00000 | |
HP Z1 G2 G1X47EA | |
Lenovo ThinkCentre M910z-10NR000KUS |
Networking | |
iperf3 transmit AX12 | |
Lenovo ThinkCentre M910z-10NR000KUS | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T470p-20J7S00000 | |
Dell Latitude 5580 | |
iperf3 receive AX12 | |
Lenovo ThinkCentre M910z-10NR000KUS | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T470p-20J7S00000 | |
Dell Latitude 5580 |
|
iluminação: 93 %
Contraste: 961:1 (Preto: 0.23 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 3.8 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.92
ΔE Greyscale 3.7 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
90.3% sRGB (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
58.44% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
65.6% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
90.3% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
64.4% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.38
Lenovo ThinkCentre M910z-10NR000KUS LEN-M910z-B, IPS, 23.8", 1920x1080 | HP Z1 G2 G1X47EA HWP192F, IPS LED, 27", 2560x1440 | Apple iMac Retina 5K 27 Late 2015 3.2 GHz M390 MK472D/A 27", 5120x2880 | |
---|---|---|---|
Display | 14% | 33% | |
Display P3 Coverage | 64.4 | 76.8 19% | 99.3 54% |
sRGB Coverage | 90.3 | 99.7 10% | 100 11% |
AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage | 65.6 | 74.4 13% | 88.2 34% |
Response Times | -66% | -2% | |
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% * | 35.2 ? | 44.4 ? -26% | 30.4 ? 14% |
Response Time Black / White * | 17.6 ? | 30.2 ? -72% | 20.8 ? -18% |
PWM Frequency | 21740 ? | 200 ? -99% | |
Screen | -3% | 15% | |
Brightness middle | 221 | 365 65% | 429 94% |
Brightness | 214 | 367 71% | 424 98% |
Brightness Distribution | 93 | 87 -6% | 95 2% |
Black Level * | 0.23 | 0.4 -74% | 0.58 -152% |
Contrast | 961 | 913 -5% | 740 -23% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 3.8 | 4.68 -23% | 2.8 26% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 7.3 | ||
Greyscale dE 2000 * | 3.7 | 6.6 -78% | 1.97 47% |
Gamma | 2.38 92% | 2.34 94% | 2.13 103% |
CCT | 6701 97% | 6094 107% | 6889 94% |
Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998) | 58.44 | 66.26 13% | 79 35% |
Color Space (Percent of sRGB) | 90.3 | 99.69 10% | 99.97 11% |
Total Average (Program / Settings) | -18% /
-12% | 15% /
17% |
* ... smaller is better
Display Response Times
↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
---|---|---|
17.6 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 10.8 ms rise | |
↘ 6.8 ms fall | ||
The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 36 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (21 ms). | ||
↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
35.2 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 15.2 ms rise | |
↘ 20 ms fall | ||
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 45 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is similar to the average of all tested devices (32.9 ms). |
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
Screen flickering / PWM detected | 21740 Hz | ≤ 20 % brightness setting | |
The display backlight flickers at 21740 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) Flickering detected at a brightness setting of 20 % and below. There should be no flickering or PWM above this brightness setting. The frequency of 21740 Hz is quite high, so most users sensitive to PWM should not notice any flickering. In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8746 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured. |
Cinebench R11.5 | |
CPU Single 64Bit | |
Lenovo ThinkCentre M910z-10NR000KUS | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T470p-20J7S00000 | |
CPU Multi 64Bit | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T470p-20J7S00000 | |
Lenovo ThinkCentre M910z-10NR000KUS |
wPrime 2.10 - 1024m | |
HP Z1 G2 G1X47EA | |
Lenovo ThinkCentre M910z-10NR000KUS |
* ... smaller is better
PCMark 8 | |
Home Score Accelerated v2 | |
Lenovo ThinkCentre M910z-10NR000KUS | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T470p-20J7S00000 | |
HP Z1 G2 G1X47EA | |
Dell Latitude 5580 | |
Work Score Accelerated v2 | |
Lenovo ThinkCentre M910z-10NR000KUS | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T470p-20J7S00000 | |
HP Z1 G2 G1X47EA | |
Creative Score Accelerated v2 | |
Lenovo ThinkCentre M910z-10NR000KUS | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T470p-20J7S00000 | |
HP Z1 G2 G1X47EA |
PCMark 8 Home Score Accelerated v2 | 3916 pontos | |
PCMark 8 Creative Score Accelerated v2 | 5077 pontos | |
PCMark 8 Work Score Accelerated v2 | 5053 pontos | |
PCMark 10 Score | 3910 pontos | |
Ajuda |
3DMark 11 | |
1280x720 Performance GPU | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T470p-20J7S00000 | |
Lenovo ThinkCentre M910z-10NR000KUS | |
Dell Latitude 5580 | |
1280x720 Performance Combined | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T470p-20J7S00000 | |
Lenovo ThinkCentre M910z-10NR000KUS | |
Dell Latitude 5580 |
3DMark | |
1280x720 Cloud Gate Standard Graphics | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T470p-20J7S00000 | |
HP Z1 G2 G1X47EA | |
Lenovo ThinkCentre M910z-10NR000KUS | |
1920x1080 Fire Strike Graphics | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T470p-20J7S00000 | |
HP Z1 G2 G1X47EA | |
Lenovo ThinkCentre M910z-10NR000KUS | |
1920x1080 Ice Storm Extreme Graphics | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T470p-20J7S00000 |
3DMark 06 Standard Score | 10165 pontos | |
3DMark 11 Performance | 1782 pontos | |
3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score | 7160 pontos | |
3DMark Fire Strike Score | 907 pontos | |
Ajuda |
baixo | média | alto | ultra | |
---|---|---|---|---|
BioShock Infinite (2013) | 52 | 35 | 23 | 8 |
Barulho
Ocioso |
| 34.5 / 34.6 / 34.6 dB |
Carga |
| 34.6 / 34.6 dB |
| ||
30 dB silencioso 40 dB(A) audível 50 dB(A) ruidosamente alto |
||
min: , med: , max: BK Precision 732A (15 cm de distância) environment noise: 28 dB(A) |
Lenovo ThinkCentre M910z-10NR000KUS HD Graphics 630, i5-7500, Toshiba NVMe THNSF5512GPUK | HP Z1 G2 G1X47EA Quadro K2100M, E3-1226 v3, Micron M600 MTFDDAT256MBF mSATA | Apple iMac Retina 5K 27 Late 2015 3.2 GHz M390 MK472D/A Radeon R9 M390, 6500, Apple Fusion Drive 1TB (24 GB SSD + 1 TB HDD) | Lenovo ThinkPad T470p-20J7S00000 GeForce 940MX, i7-7700HQ, Samsung PM961 NVMe MZVLW512HMJP | Dell Latitude 5580 HD Graphics 620, i5-7300U, Toshiba MQ01ACF050 | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Noise | 5% | -7% | 4% | -2% | |
off / environment * | 28 | 30 -7% | 29 -4% | 30.6 -9% | |
Idle Minimum * | 34.5 | 32.4 6% | 32.5 6% | 29 16% | 32.8 5% |
Idle Average * | 34.6 | 32.4 6% | 32.5 6% | 29 16% | 32.8 5% |
Idle Maximum * | 34.6 | 32.4 6% | 32.5 6% | 29 16% | 33.6 3% |
Load Average * | 34.6 | 33.7 3% | 39 -13% | 35.6 -3% | 37.6 -9% |
Load Maximum * | 34.6 | 33.7 3% | 48.2 -39% | 39.7 -15% | 37.6 -9% |
* ... smaller is better
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 39.8 °C / 104 F, compared to the average of 34.4 °C / 94 F, ranging from 25 to 47 °C for the class Desktop.
(-) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 54.8 °C / 131 F, compared to the average of 34 °C / 93 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 26.6 °C / 80 F, compared to the device average of 29.7 °C / 85 F.
Lenovo ThinkCentre M910z-10NR000KUS audio analysis
(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (79.4 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(+) | good bass - only 4.7% away from median
(-) | bass is not linear (15.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 5.7% higher than median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (9.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | reduced highs - on average 6.8% lower than median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (11% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (19.9% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 63% of all tested devices in this class were better, 25% similar, 13% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 17%, worst was 46%
Compared to all devices tested
» 47% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 45% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Lenovo ThinkPad T470p-20J7S00000 audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (83.1 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 18.1% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (14.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.2% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3.3% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (6.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (19.6% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 35% of all tested devices in this class were better, 8% similar, 57% worse
» The best had a delta of 7%, average was 22%, worst was 53%
Compared to all devices tested
» 45% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 47% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
desligado | 0.1 / 1.7 Watt |
Ocioso | 14.4 / 29.4 / 29.7 Watt |
Carga |
64.1 / 88.4 Watt |
Key:
min: ,
med: ,
max: Metrahit Energy |
Lenovo ThinkCentre M910z-10NR000KUS i5-7500, HD Graphics 630, Toshiba NVMe THNSF5512GPUK, IPS, 1920x1080, 23.8" | HP Z1 G2 G1X47EA E3-1226 v3, Quadro K2100M, Micron M600 MTFDDAT256MBF mSATA, IPS LED, 2560x1440, 27" | Apple iMac Retina 5K 27 Late 2015 3.2 GHz M390 MK472D/A 6500, Radeon R9 M390, Apple Fusion Drive 1TB (24 GB SSD + 1 TB HDD), , 5120x2880, 27" | Lenovo ThinkPad T470p-20J7S00000 i7-7700HQ, GeForce 940MX, Samsung PM961 NVMe MZVLW512HMJP, IPS, 2560x1440, 14" | Dell Latitude 5580 i5-7300U, HD Graphics 620, Toshiba MQ01ACF050, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6" | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Power Consumption | -109% | -119% | 43% | 63% | |
Idle Minimum * | 14.4 | 36.8 -156% | 29.5 -105% | 3.8 74% | 4.3 70% |
Idle Average * | 29.4 | 65.3 -122% | 59.2 -101% | 6.5 78% | 10.1 66% |
Idle Maximum * | 29.7 | 67 -126% | 68 -129% | 7.2 76% | 11.8 60% |
Load Average * | 64.1 | 114 -78% | 126 -97% | 62.5 2% | 32 50% |
Load Maximum * | 88.4 | 142 -61% | 231 -161% | 99.6 -13% | 29 67% |
* ... smaller is better
Pro
Contra
Os desktops empresariais, incluindo o todo-em-um, fazem parte de um mercado que é mais fácil de analisar do que o mercado lotado e diverso de portáteis de negócios. Aliás, não há nada particularmente interessante sobre o ThinkCentre M910z (nossa configuração: $1.285), que vai com segurança com um design funcional e discreto e verifica todas as caixas de uma máquina de escritório convencional.
Mas isso não é ruim: de acordo com sua herança, o ThinkCentre faz o trabalho com um design de função sobre formato que oferece recursos tão apreciados quanto a manutenção e atualizações (relativamente) fáceis e um design de suporte de articulação versátil e robusto. Mas também é silencioso (mesmo sob carga), rápido em operação geral, graças à sua CPU quad-core e ao SSD NVMe, e possui um conjunto de alto-falantes que acreditam a reputação tipicamente pobre de seus irmãos empresariais com um bom som na maior parte do espectro (depois de um pouco de ajustes). A tela é um saco misto, graças principalmente a um brilho geral fraco e a uma camada de tela sensível ao toque (que coloca em questão se o comprador deve incomodar com interface de toque quando provavelmente é culpado por essa deficiência), mas pelo menos ela permanece anti refletiva mesmo quando configurado para tocar! Finalmente, o consumo de energia é confortavelmente baixo, então qualquer pessoa que considere a implantação em massa de uma frota de máquinas M910z deve estar tranquilo, pois a conta elétrica não aumentará terrivelmente.
Não há nada particularmente interessante sobre o ThinkCentre M910z, mas isso não é ruim; ele joga com segurança com um design funcional e discreto e verifica todas as caixas de verificação de uma máquina de escritório convencional.
Em última análise, não há grandes pontos negativos associados ao ThinkCentre M910z; é um desktop de negócios capaz que, apesar de não ter um design excitante, abrange todas as suas bases no mercado de negócios e é fácil de manter e implantar que deveria aproveitar o suporte de muitos departamentos de TI.
Lenovo ThinkCentre M910z-10NR000KUS
- 09/22/2017 v6 (old)
Steve Schardein