Face Off: Microsoft Surface Pro 4 Core i7 vs. Surface Pro 4 Core i5 vs. Surface Pro 4 Core m3
Microsoft CQ9-00003 (Surface Serie)
Processador
Intel Core i7-6650U 2 x 2.2 - 3.4 GHz, Skylake
Placa gráfica
Memória
8 GB
, Dual Channel 1866 MHz
Pantalha
12.30 polegadas 3:2, 2736 x 1824 pixel, Multitouch de 10 dedos, Samsung 123YL01-001 ID: SDC3853, IPS, Brilhante: sim
placa mãe
Intel Skylake-U Premium PCH
Disco rígido
Samsung MZFLV256 NVMe, 256 GB
, 87 GB livre
peso
1.092 kg, Suprimento de energia: 204 g
Preço
1249 Euro
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Samsung 123YL01-001 ID: SDC3853 tested with X-Rite i1Pro Basic 2
Máximo: 474.6 cd/m² (Nits) Médio: 433.2 cd/m²iluminação: 87 %
iluminação com acumulador: 436.7 cd/m²
Contraste: 1340:1 (Preto: 0.326 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 1.82 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.91
ΔE Greyscale 1.44 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
97.5% sRGB (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
62.3% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
68.6% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
97.5% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
66.9% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.1
| Microsoft Surface Pro 4 Core i7 12.3", 2736x1824 | Microsoft Surface Pro 4, Core i5, 128GB 12.3", 2736x1824 | Microsoft Surface Pro 4, Core m3 12.3", 2736x1824 | Microsoft Surface Pro 3 12", 2160x1440 | Microsoft Surface 3 10.8", 1920x1280 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display | -2% | 0% | -6% | 2% | |
| Display P3 Coverage | 66.9 | 65 -3% | 67.5 1% | 63.6 -5% | 68.8 3% |
| sRGB Coverage | 97.5 | 96.5 -1% | 96.6 -1% | 88.8 -9% | 98.7 1% |
| AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage | 68.6 | 67 -2% | 69 1% | 65.6 -4% | 70.4 3% |
| Response Times | -28% | -27% | |||
| Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% * | 48.4 ? | 46 ? 5% | 46 ? 5% | ||
| Response Time Black / White * | 35.6 ? | 31.2 ? 12% | 31 ? 13% | ||
| PWM Frequency | 10420 | 50 ? -100% | 50 ? -100% | ||
| Screen | -31% | -28% | -72% | -21% | |
| Brightness middle | 436.7 | 413 -5% | 389.2 -11% | 355.3 -19% | 399 -9% |
| Brightness | 433 | 396 -9% | 392 -9% | 338 -22% | 380 -12% |
| Brightness Distribution | 87 | 87 0% | 92 6% | 91 5% | 90 3% |
| Black Level * | 0.326 | 0.36 -10% | 0.27 17% | 0.33 -1% | 0.49 -50% |
| Contrast | 1340 | 1147 -14% | 1441 8% | 1077 -20% | 814 -39% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 1.82 | 3.09 -70% | 3.61 -98% | 4.72 -159% | 1.66 9% |
| Greyscale dE 2000 * | 1.44 | 3.92 -172% | 3.8 -164% | 6.53 -353% | 2.75 -91% |
| Gamma | 2.1 105% | 2.3 96% | 2.16 102% | 2.17 101% | 2.22 99% |
| CCT | 6560 99% | 7333 89% | 5969 109% | 6707 97% | 6358 102% |
| Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998) | 62.3 | 61 -2% | 63 1% | 59.37 -5% | 64.4 3% |
| Color Space (Percent of sRGB) | 97.5 | 97 -1% | 97 -1% | 98.8 1% | |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 3.24 | ||||
| Total Average (Program / Settings) | -20% /
-25% | -18% /
-22% | -39% /
-54% | -10% /
-15% |
* ... smaller is better
Display Response Times
ℹ
Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.| ↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
|---|---|---|
| 35.6 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 8 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 27.6 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 93 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (20.9 ms). | ||
| ↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
| 48.4 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 20.4 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 28 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 82 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (32.8 ms). | ||
| wPrime 2.10 - 1024m (sort by value) | |
| Microsoft Surface Pro 4 Core i7 | |
| Microsoft Surface Pro 3 | |
| Microsoft Surface Pro 4, Core m3 | |
| Super Pi Mod 1.5 XS 32M - 32M (sort by value) | |
| Microsoft Surface Pro 4 Core i7 | |
| Microsoft Surface Pro 3 | |
| Microsoft Surface Pro 4, Core m3 | |
* ... smaller is better
| Microsoft Surface Pro 4 Core i7 | Microsoft Surface Pro 4, Core i5, 128GB | Microsoft Surface Pro 4, Core m3 | Microsoft Surface Pro 3 | Microsoft Surface 3 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CrystalDiskMark 3.0 | -30% | -36% | -16% | -84% | |
| Write 4k QD32 | 292.3 | 153.6 -47% | 149.2 -49% | 294.4 1% | 11.2 -96% |
| Read 4k QD32 | 393.1 | 368.3 -6% | 243.7 -38% | 345 -12% | 27.94 -93% |
| Write 4k | 106.3 | 101.5 -5% | 68 -36% | 76.2 -28% | 9.52 -91% |
| Read 4k | 40.75 | 28.51 -30% | 30.14 -26% | 20.81 -49% | 12.64 -69% |
| Write 512 | 304.3 | 154.2 -49% | 158.2 -48% | 324.6 7% | 39.9 -87% |
| Read 512 | 396.7 | 266.3 -33% | 313.1 -21% | 357.8 -10% | 133.7 -66% |
| Write Seq | 304 | 154.2 -49% | 158.2 -48% | 324 7% | 47.99 -84% |
| Read Seq | 834 | 666 -20% | 663 -21% | 501 -40% | 149.3 -82% |
| AS SSD | -44% | -44% | -49% | ||
| Copy Game MB/s | 273.9 | 105.6 -61% | 101.3 -63% | ||
| Copy Program MB/s | 209.8 | 63.5 -70% | 65.8 -69% | ||
| Copy ISO MB/s | 409.9 | 121.9 -70% | 120.9 -71% | ||
| Score Total | 2518 | 1190 -53% | 1759 -30% | 965 -62% | |
| Score Write | 385 | 239 -38% | 189 -51% | 319 -17% | |
| Score Read | 1445 | 645 -55% | 1060 -27% | 430 -70% | |
| Access Time Write * | 0.036 | 0.037 -3% | 0.043 -19% | 0.075 -108% | |
| Access Time Read * | 0.047 | 0.079 -68% | 0.083 -77% | 0.087 -85% | |
| 4K-64 Write | 268.7 | 138.5 -48% | 112 -58% | 215 -20% | |
| 4K-64 Read | 1280 | 528 -59% | 944 -26% | 358.3 -72% | |
| 4K Write | 89.2 | 86.5 -3% | 63.2 -29% | 73.7 -17% | |
| 4K Read | 33.47 | 34.24 2% | 31.39 -6% | 22 -34% | |
| Seq Write | 274.8 | 142.5 -48% | 138.1 -50% | 303 10% | |
| Seq Read | 1312 | 832 -37% | 845 -36% | 493.7 -62% | |
| Total Average (Program / Settings) | -37% /
-39% | -40% /
-41% | -33% /
-35% | -84% /
-84% |
* ... smaller is better
| ComputeMark v2.1 - 1024x600 Normal, Score (sort by value) | |
| Microsoft Surface Pro 4 Core i7 | |
| Microsoft Surface Book Core i5 | |
| Microsoft Surface Pro 4, Core m3 | |
| 3DMark 11 Performance | 2624 pontos | |
| 3DMark Ice Storm Standard Score | 73990 pontos | |
| 3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score | 7822 pontos | |
| 3DMark Fire Strike Score | 1395 pontos | |
| 3DMark Fire Strike Extreme Score | 598 pontos | |
Ajuda | ||
| Microsoft Surface Pro 4 Core i7 | Microsoft Surface Pro 4, Core i5, 128GB | Microsoft Surface Pro 4, Core m3 | Microsoft Surface Pro 3 | Microsoft Surface Book Core i5 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Noise | -6% | -1% | -0% | ||
| Idle Minimum * | 28.4 | 31.5 -11% | 30.1 -6% | 29.5 -4% | |
| Idle Average * | 28.6 | 31.5 -10% | 30.2 -6% | 29.6 -3% | |
| Idle Maximum * | 28.7 | 31.5 -10% | 30.4 -6% | 29.7 -3% | |
| Load Average * | 40.8 | 40.5 1% | 31.9 22% | 37.5 8% | |
| Load Maximum * | 41.4 | 40.7 2% | 44.4 -7% | 40.9 1% |
* ... smaller is better
Barulho
| Ocioso |
| 28.4 / 28.6 / 28.7 dB |
| Carga |
| 40.8 / 41.4 dB |
 | ||
30 dB silencioso 40 dB(A) audível 50 dB(A) ruidosamente alto |
||
min:  , med:  , max:  Fluke 62 Mini IR Thermometer (15 cm de distância) | ||
(-) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 40.6 °C / 105 F, compared to the average of 30.3 °C / 87 F for the devices in the class Convertible.
(-) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 45.4 °C / 114 F, compared to the average of 35.4 °C / 96 F, ranging from 19.6 to 60 °C for the class Convertible.
(±) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 43.2 °C / 110 F, compared to the average of 36.8 °C / 98 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 23.5 °C / 74 F, compared to the device average of 30.3 °C / 87 F.
(±) The palmrests and touchpad can get very hot to the touch with a maximum of 39.8 °C / 103.6 F.
(-) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28 °C / 82.4 F (-11.8 °C / -21.2 F).
(-) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 45.4 °C / 114 F, compared to the average of 35.4 °C / 96 F, ranging from 19.6 to 60 °C for the class Convertible.
(±) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 43.2 °C / 110 F, compared to the average of 36.8 °C / 98 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 23.5 °C / 74 F, compared to the device average of 30.3 °C / 87 F.
(±) The palmrests and touchpad can get very hot to the touch with a maximum of 39.8 °C / 103.6 F.
(-) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28 °C / 82.4 F (-11.8 °C / -21.2 F).
| Microsoft Surface Pro 4 Core i7 38 Wh | Microsoft Surface Pro 4, Core i5, 128GB 38 Wh | Microsoft Surface Pro 4, Core m3 38 Wh | Microsoft Surface Pro 3 42 Wh | Microsoft Surface 3 28 Wh | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Battery Runtime | 41% | 54% | 63% | 65% | |
| Reader / Idle | 654 | 899 37% | 791 21% | 1096 68% | 828 27% |
| WiFi v1.3 | 293 | 427 46% | 488 67% | 437 49% | |
| Load | 79 | 111 41% | 138 75% | 124 57% | 173 119% |
| WiFi | 504 | 425 |
Pro
+ Sem problemas de afogamento
+ Desempenho da GPU mais potente
+ Tela calibrada
+ Desempenho mais veloz do SSD
Contra
- Apenas um pequeno aumento do desempenho da CPU sobre o Core i5
- Duração da bateria mais curta
- Sistema de resfriamento ativo
- Pequeno "bleeding" da retro iluminação
O Surface Pro 4 Core i7 SKU oferece um desempenho de CPU apenas marginalmente mais veloz sobre sua contraparte, o Core i5. Para o processamento de textos e navegação, a diferença do desempenho será insignificante para a maioria dos usuários.
A configuração Core i7 deve trair os "power users" que podem fazer uso do poder extra da GPU fornecido pela Iris 540 sobre a HD 520. O seu desempenho gráfico bruto não é suficiente para rodar jogos modernos fluentemente com a resolução nativa, mas o overhead adicional certamente será de muita ajuda para trabalhos de Photoshop leves a moderados, ou para a edição de vídeos. A tela pré-calibrada e o desempenho mais veloz do SSD da unidade de 256 GB, em comparação com o Core i5 ou SKUs Core m3 fazem com que o modelo Core i7 seja mais profissional que apenas uma atualização da CPU.
A tela mais precisa, desempenho mais veloz do SSD e a ausência de sérios problemas de afogamento sobre configurações mais econômicas iram atrair "power users", mas são vantagens insignificantes para usuários mais convencionais.
Microsoft Surface Pro 4 Core i7
- 04/18/2016 v5.1 (old)
Allen Ngo
Convertible - Médio equilibrado
Price comparison
