Em Análise Samsung Galaxy A70: Gigante da Gama Média

Name: Samsung Galaxy A70
Brand: Samsung

Ataque completo.

Câmera tripla de 32 MP, 128 GB de armazenamento interno, uma bateria de 4.500 mAh e uma tela de 6,7 polegadas - a Samsung está prestes a redefinir o smartphone de gama média com seu mais recente Galaxy A70, que pode ser confundido com um candidato de alta qualidade . Descubra em nossa análise se vale a pena comprar ou não o smartphone de menos de $ 400.

Manuel Masiero, 👁 Daniel Schmidt (traduzido por Ricardo Soto), Published 06/15/2019 🇺🇸 🇩🇪 ...

Android Touchscreen Smartphone

Test device courtesy of notebooksbilliger.de

Download your licensed rating image as PNG / SVG

Samsung Galaxy A70 (Galaxy A70 Serie)

Processador

Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 8 x 1.6 - 2 GHz, Kryo 460 Gold (Cortex-A76) / Silver (Cortex-A55)

Placa gráfica

Qualcomm Adreno 612

Memória

6 GB

, LPDDR4X, 1,866 MHz

Pantalha

6.70 polegadas 20:9, 2400 x 1080 pixel 393 PPI, capacitiva, Super AMOLED, FHD+, 16 million colors, Gorilla Glass 3, Brilhante: sim

Disco rígido

128 GB UFS 2.0 Flash, 128 GB

, 106.9 GB livre

Conexões

1 USB 2.0, Conexões Audio: Áudio de 3,5-mm e via adaptador USB-C, Card Reader: Cartões microSD de até 512 GB (FAT, FAT32, exFAT), 1 Leitor de Impressões Digitais, NFC, Brightness Sensor, Sensores: giroscópio, acelerômetro, sensor geomagnético, sensor hall, sensor de proximidade, DRM Widevine L1, Camera2 API Level 3, Voice over LTE, Voice over Wi-Fi, Wi-Fi Direct

Funcionamento em rede

802.11a/b/g (a/b/g/), Bluetooth 5.0, GSM (850, 900, 1,800, 1,900 MHz), 3G (850, 900, 1,900, 2,100 MHz), LTE Cat.11 (B1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 38, 40, 41), downloads/uploads up to 600/75 MBit/s, Dual-SIM, head SAR 0,349 W/kg, body SAR 1,475 W/kg, Dual SIM, LTE, GPS

Tamanho

altura x largura x profundidade (em mm): 7.9 x 164.3 x 76.7

Bateria

4500 mAh Lítio-Ion, Tempo de conversação 3G (de acordo com o fabricante): 28 h

Sistema Operativo

Android 9.0 Pie

Camera

Primary Camera: 32 MPix Câmera tripla: 32 MP wide-angle (1/2.8"/F1.7), 5 MP bokeh camera (1/5.0"/F2.2), 8 MP ultra-wide-angle (1/4.0"/F2.2), autofocus, 8x optical zoom, video stabilizer, videos up to 4K@30fps
Secondary Camera: 32 MPix 1/2.8", F/2.0, wide-angle, selfie light

Características adicionais

Alto falantes: Um só alto-falante voltado para baixo, Teclado: virtual, Fonte de alimentação modular, cabo USB (Type-C para Type-C), adaptador de 3,5-mm USB-C, headset, SIM tool, Android 9, One UI 1.1, 24 Meses Garantia, fanless

peso

183 g, Suprimento de energia: 35 g

Preço

399 Euro

Links

Samsung página inicial
Samsung Seção de notebook

Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

see all specifications

Size Comparison

Sony Xperia 10 Plus Samsung Galaxy A70 Wiko View 3 Pro Samsung Galaxy A7 2018 Huawei P30 Lite Xiaomi Mi 9 SE DIN A6 ❌

Networking
iperf3 transmit AX12
Samsung Galaxy A7 2018 Mali-G71 MP2, Exynos 7885, 64 GB eMMC Flash	320 (164^min - 362^max) MBit/s +21%
Wiko View 3 Pro Mali-G72 MP3, Helio P60, 128 GB eMMC Flash	308 (302^min - 312^max) MBit/s +17%
Xiaomi Mi 9 SE Adreno 616, SD 712, 128 GB UFS 2.0 Flash	279 (229^min - 303^max) MBit/s +6%
Samsung Galaxy A70 Adreno 612, SD 675, 128 GB UFS 2.0 Flash	264 (221^min - 293^max) MBit/s
Huawei P30 Lite Mali-G51 MP4, Kirin 710, 128 GB eMMC Flash	218 (95^min - 239^max) MBit/s -17%
Sony Xperia 10 Plus Adreno 509, SD 636, 64 GB eMMC Flash	153 (133^min - 180^max) MBit/s -42%
iperf3 receive AX12
Samsung Galaxy A70 Adreno 612, SD 675, 128 GB UFS 2.0 Flash	338 (302^min - 356^max) MBit/s
Wiko View 3 Pro Mali-G72 MP3, Helio P60, 128 GB eMMC Flash	335 (267^min - 343^max) MBit/s -1%
Sony Xperia 10 Plus Adreno 509, SD 636, 64 GB eMMC Flash	317 (163^min - 343^max) MBit/s -6%
Xiaomi Mi 9 SE Adreno 616, SD 712, 128 GB UFS 2.0 Flash	311 (214^min - 346^max) MBit/s -8%
Samsung Galaxy A7 2018 Mali-G71 MP2, Exynos 7885, 64 GB eMMC Flash	279 (265^min - 284^max) MBit/s -17%
Huawei P30 Lite Mali-G51 MP4, Kirin 710, 128 GB eMMC Flash	188 (45^min - 237^max) MBit/s -44%

Samsung Galaxy A70; iperf3 receive AX12; iperf 3.1.3: Ø337 (302-356)

Samsung Galaxy A70; iperf3 transmit AX12; iperf 3.1.3: Ø264 (221-293)

Image Comparison

Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.

Scene 1 Scene 2 Scene 3

click to load images

click to load images

click to load images


545 cd/m²	552 cd/m²	551 cd/m²
551 cd/m²	554 cd/m²	556 cd/m²
555 cd/m²	551 cd/m²	557 cd/m²

Distribuição do brilho

tested with X-Rite i1Pro 2

Máximo: 557 cd/m² (Nits) Médio: 552.4 cd/m² Minimum: 1.72 cd/m²
iluminação: 98 %
iluminação com acumulador: 554 cd/m²
Contraste: ∞:1 (Preto: 0 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 3.3 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.92
ΔE Greyscale 3.4 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
98% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.08

	Samsung Galaxy A70 Super AMOLED, 2400x1080, 6.7"	Huawei P30 Lite IPS LCD, 2312x1080, 6.2"	Sony Xperia 10 Plus IPS, 2520x1080, 6.5"	Wiko View 3 Pro IPS, 2340x1080, 6.3"	Xiaomi Mi 9 SE AMOLED, 2340x1080, 6"	Samsung Galaxy A7 2018 Super AMOLED, 2220x1080, 6"
Screen		15%	-33%	-25%	23%	30%
Brightness middle	554	451 -19%	572 3%	459 -17%	583 5%	570 3%
Brightness	552	430 -22%	580 5%	450 -18%	577 5%	565 2%
Brightness Distribution	98	90 -8%	96 -2%	90 -8%	97 -1%	93 -5%
Black Level *		0.55	0.4	0.39
Colorchecker dE 2000 *	3.3	1.4 58%	4.5 -36%	4.8 -45%	1.6 52%	1.5 55%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *	9.2	4.4 52%	12.2 -33%	9.2 -0%	3.9 58%	3.6 61%
Greyscale dE 2000 *	3.4	2.5 26%	7.9 -132%	5.5 -62%	2.7 21%	1.2 65%
Gamma	2.08 ^106%	2.22 ^99%	2.16 ^102%	2.26 ^97%	2.27 ^97%	2.07 ^106%
CCT	6606 ^98%	6422 ^101%	8726 ^74%	7494 ^87%	6267 ^104%	6504 ^100%
Contrast		820	1430	1177

* ... smaller is better

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

ℹ

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.

Screen flickering / PWM detected

240.4 Hz

≤ 99 % brightness setting

The display backlight flickers at 240.4 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) Flickering detected at a brightness setting of 99 % and below. There should be no flickering or PWM above this brightness setting.

The frequency of 240.4 Hz is relatively low, so sensitive users will likely notice flickering and experience eyestrain at the stated brightness setting and below.

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8743 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured.

Display Response Times

ℹ

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.

↔ Response Time Black to White
4 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↗ 2 ms rise
4 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↘ 2 ms fall
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 12 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (21 ms).
↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
4 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↗ 2 ms rise
4 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↘ 2 ms fall
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 11 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (32.9 ms).

Geekbench 4.4
64 Bit Single-Core Score (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy A70 Qualcomm Snapdragon 675, Adreno 612, 6144	2380 Points
Huawei P30 Lite HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096	1544 Points -35%
Sony Xperia 10 Plus Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096	1346 Points -43%
Wiko View 3 Pro Mediatek Helio P60, Mali-G72 MP3, 6144	1487 Points -38%
Xiaomi Mi 9 SE Qualcomm Snapdragon 712, Adreno 616, 6144	1875 Points -21%
Samsung Galaxy A7 2018 Samsung Exynos 7885, Mali-G71 MP2, 4096	1525 Points -36%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 (2266 - 2380, n=2)	2323 Points -2%
Average of class Smartphone (844 - 9574, n=82, last 2 years)	5486 Points +131%
64 Bit Multi-Core Score (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy A70 Qualcomm Snapdragon 675, Adreno 612, 6144	6446 Points
Huawei P30 Lite HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096	5429 Points -16%
Sony Xperia 10 Plus Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096	4804 Points -25%
Wiko View 3 Pro Mediatek Helio P60, Mali-G72 MP3, 6144	5743 Points -11%
Xiaomi Mi 9 SE Qualcomm Snapdragon 712, Adreno 616, 6144	5975 Points -7%
Samsung Galaxy A7 2018 Samsung Exynos 7885, Mali-G71 MP2, 4096	4429 Points -31%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 (5998 - 6446, n=2)	6222 Points -3%
Average of class Smartphone (2630 - 30323, n=82, last 2 years)	15064 Points +134%
Compute RenderScript Score (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy A70 Qualcomm Snapdragon 675, Adreno 612, 6144	6104 Points
Huawei P30 Lite HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096	3551 Points -42%
Sony Xperia 10 Plus Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096	4278 Points -30%
Wiko View 3 Pro Mediatek Helio P60, Mali-G72 MP3, 6144	5309 Points -13%
Xiaomi Mi 9 SE Qualcomm Snapdragon 712, Adreno 616, 6144	7282 Points +19%
Samsung Galaxy A7 2018 Samsung Exynos 7885, Mali-G71 MP2, 4096	4026 Points -34%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 (5466 - 6104, n=2)	5785 Points -5%
Average of class Smartphone (5192 - 18534, n=58, last 2 years)	11998 Points +97%

PCMark for Android
Work performance score (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy A70 Qualcomm Snapdragon 675, Adreno 612, 6144	9288 Points
Huawei P30 Lite HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096	8125 Points -13%
Sony Xperia 10 Plus Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096	7181 Points -23%
Wiko View 3 Pro Mediatek Helio P60, Mali-G72 MP3, 6144	10757 Points +16%
Xiaomi Mi 9 SE Qualcomm Snapdragon 712, Adreno 616, 6144	8346 Points -10%
Samsung Galaxy A7 2018 Samsung Exynos 7885, Mali-G71 MP2, 4096	5625 Points -39%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 (9288 - 9522, n=3)	9371 Points +1%
Work 2.0 performance score (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy A70 Qualcomm Snapdragon 675, Adreno 612, 6144	7315 Points
Huawei P30 Lite HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096	6483 Points -11%
Sony Xperia 10 Plus Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096	6018 Points -18%
Wiko View 3 Pro Mediatek Helio P60, Mali-G72 MP3, 6144	7486 Points +2%
Xiaomi Mi 9 SE Qualcomm Snapdragon 712, Adreno 616, 6144	6832 Points -7%
Samsung Galaxy A7 2018 Samsung Exynos 7885, Mali-G71 MP2, 4096	5387 Points -26%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 (7315 - 7950, n=4)	7660 Points +5%

3DMark
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Score (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy A70 Qualcomm Snapdragon 675, Adreno 612, 6144	23013 Points
Huawei P30 Lite HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096	18377 Points -20%
Sony Xperia 10 Plus Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096	Points -100%
Wiko View 3 Pro Mediatek Helio P60, Mali-G72 MP3, 6144	22323 Points -3%
Xiaomi Mi 9 SE Qualcomm Snapdragon 712, Adreno 616, 6144	29316 Points +27%
Samsung Galaxy A7 2018 Samsung Exynos 7885, Mali-G71 MP2, 4096	15167 Points -34%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 (22767 - 26910, n=4)	24192 Points +5%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Graphics Score (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy A70 Qualcomm Snapdragon 675, Adreno 612, 6144	26348 Points
Huawei P30 Lite HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096	21643 Points -18%
Sony Xperia 10 Plus Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096	Points -100%
Wiko View 3 Pro Mediatek Helio P60, Mali-G72 MP3, 6144	21847 Points -17%
Xiaomi Mi 9 SE Qualcomm Snapdragon 712, Adreno 616, 6144	43514 Points +65%
Samsung Galaxy A7 2018 Samsung Exynos 7885, Mali-G71 MP2, 4096	15567 Points -41%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 (26320 - 30180, n=4)	27396 Points +4%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy A70 Qualcomm Snapdragon 675, Adreno 612, 6144	15948 Points
Huawei P30 Lite HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096	12023 Points -25%
Sony Xperia 10 Plus Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096	Points -100%
Wiko View 3 Pro Mediatek Helio P60, Mali-G72 MP3, 6144	24165 Points +52%
Xiaomi Mi 9 SE Qualcomm Snapdragon 712, Adreno 616, 6144	13686 Points -14%
Samsung Galaxy A7 2018 Samsung Exynos 7885, Mali-G71 MP2, 4096	13914 Points -13%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 (15461 - 19511, n=4)	17199 Points +8%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy A70 Qualcomm Snapdragon 675, Adreno 612, 6144	1606 Points
Huawei P30 Lite HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096	1414 Points -12%
Sony Xperia 10 Plus Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096	1469 Points -9%
Wiko View 3 Pro Mediatek Helio P60, Mali-G72 MP3, 6144	1755 Points +9%
Xiaomi Mi 9 SE Qualcomm Snapdragon 712, Adreno 616, 6144	2073 Points +29%
Samsung Galaxy A7 2018 Samsung Exynos 7885, Mali-G71 MP2, 4096	960 Points -40%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 (1606 - 1989, n=4)	1740 Points +8%
Average of class Smartphone (812 - 7285, n=26, last 2 years)	4204 Points +162%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Graphics (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy A70 Qualcomm Snapdragon 675, Adreno 612, 6144	1427 Points
Huawei P30 Lite HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096	1256 Points -12%
Sony Xperia 10 Plus Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096	1327 Points -7%
Wiko View 3 Pro Mediatek Helio P60, Mali-G72 MP3, 6144	1593 Points +12%
Xiaomi Mi 9 SE Qualcomm Snapdragon 712, Adreno 616, 6144	1980 Points +39%
Samsung Galaxy A7 2018 Samsung Exynos 7885, Mali-G71 MP2, 4096	845 Points -41%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 (1427 - 1814, n=4)	1601 Points +12%
Average of class Smartphone (756 - 9451, n=26, last 2 years)	4740 Points +232%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Physics (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy A70 Qualcomm Snapdragon 675, Adreno 612, 6144	2869 Points
Huawei P30 Lite HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096	2490 Points -13%
Sony Xperia 10 Plus Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096	2349 Points -18%
Wiko View 3 Pro Mediatek Helio P60, Mali-G72 MP3, 6144	2720 Points -5%
Xiaomi Mi 9 SE Qualcomm Snapdragon 712, Adreno 616, 6144	2480 Points -14%
Samsung Galaxy A7 2018 Samsung Exynos 7885, Mali-G71 MP2, 4096	1829 Points -36%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 (1708 - 3000, n=4)	2580 Points -10%
Average of class Smartphone (1093 - 4349, n=26, last 2 years)	3303 Points +15%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy A70 Qualcomm Snapdragon 675, Adreno 612, 6144	1734 Points
Huawei P30 Lite HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096	1494 Points -14%
Sony Xperia 10 Plus Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096	1536 Points -11%
Wiko View 3 Pro Mediatek Helio P60, Mali-G72 MP3, 6144	1784 Points +3%
Xiaomi Mi 9 SE Qualcomm Snapdragon 712, Adreno 616, 6144	2217 Points +28%
Samsung Galaxy A7 2018 Samsung Exynos 7885, Mali-G71 MP2, 4096	1071 Points -38%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 (1621 - 2047, n=4)	1785 Points +3%
Average of class Smartphone (883 - 23024, n=73, last 2 years)	11109 Points +541%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited Graphics (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy A70 Qualcomm Snapdragon 675, Adreno 612, 6144	1571 Points
Huawei P30 Lite HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096	1336 Points -15%
Sony Xperia 10 Plus Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096	1397 Points -11%
Wiko View 3 Pro Mediatek Helio P60, Mali-G72 MP3, 6144	1605 Points +2%
Xiaomi Mi 9 SE Qualcomm Snapdragon 712, Adreno 616, 6144	2146 Points +37%
Samsung Galaxy A7 2018 Samsung Exynos 7885, Mali-G71 MP2, 4096	954 Points -39%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 (1571 - 1878, n=4)	1669 Points +6%
Average of class Smartphone (840 - 45492, n=73, last 2 years)	19708 Points +1154%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy A70 Qualcomm Snapdragon 675, Adreno 612, 6144	2727 Points
Huawei P30 Lite HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096	2578 Points -5%
Sony Xperia 10 Plus Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096	2352 Points -14%
Wiko View 3 Pro Mediatek Helio P60, Mali-G72 MP3, 6144	2924 Points +7%
Xiaomi Mi 9 SE Qualcomm Snapdragon 712, Adreno 616, 6144	2506 Points -8%
Samsung Galaxy A7 2018 Samsung Exynos 7885, Mali-G71 MP2, 4096	1871 Points -31%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 (1657 - 2984, n=4)	2433 Points -11%
Average of class Smartphone (1075 - 8749, n=73, last 2 years)	5001 Points +83%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy A70 Qualcomm Snapdragon 675, Adreno 612, 6144	978 Points
Huawei P30 Lite HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096	963 Points -2%
Sony Xperia 10 Plus Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096	946 Points -3%
Wiko View 3 Pro Mediatek Helio P60, Mali-G72 MP3, 6144	1141 Points +17%
Xiaomi Mi 9 SE Qualcomm Snapdragon 712, Adreno 616, 6144	2073 Points +112%
Samsung Galaxy A7 2018 Samsung Exynos 7885, Mali-G71 MP2, 4096	741 Points -24%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 (937 - 1175, n=4)	1015 Points +4%
Average of class Smartphone (286 - 17553, n=73, last 2 years)	3084 Points +215%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Graphics (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy A70 Qualcomm Snapdragon 675, Adreno 612, 6144	823 Points
Huawei P30 Lite HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096	819 Points 0%
Sony Xperia 10 Plus Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096	808 Points -2%
Wiko View 3 Pro Mediatek Helio P60, Mali-G72 MP3, 6144	986 Points +20%
Xiaomi Mi 9 SE Qualcomm Snapdragon 712, Adreno 616, 6144	1980 Points +141%
Samsung Galaxy A7 2018 Samsung Exynos 7885, Mali-G71 MP2, 4096	634 Points -23%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 (823 - 1000, n=4)	869 Points +6%
Average of class Smartphone (240 - 29890, n=73, last 2 years)	3263 Points +296%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Physics (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy A70 Qualcomm Snapdragon 675, Adreno 612, 6144	2886 Points
Huawei P30 Lite HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096	2489 Points -14%
Sony Xperia 10 Plus Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096	2351 Points -19%
Wiko View 3 Pro Mediatek Helio P60, Mali-G72 MP3, 6144	2528 Points -12%
Xiaomi Mi 9 SE Qualcomm Snapdragon 712, Adreno 616, 6144	2480 Points -14%
Samsung Galaxy A7 2018 Samsung Exynos 7885, Mali-G71 MP2, 4096	1821 Points -37%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 (1724 - 3026, n=4)	2551 Points -12%
Average of class Smartphone (858 - 7180, n=73, last 2 years)	3286 Points +14%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy A70 Qualcomm Snapdragon 675, Adreno 612, 6144	1110 Points
Huawei P30 Lite HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096	981 Points -12%
Sony Xperia 10 Plus Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096	1003 Points -10%
Wiko View 3 Pro Mediatek Helio P60, Mali-G72 MP3, 6144	1164 Points +5%
Xiaomi Mi 9 SE Qualcomm Snapdragon 712, Adreno 616, 6144	2217 Points +100%
Samsung Galaxy A7 2018 Samsung Exynos 7885, Mali-G71 MP2, 4096	737 Points -34%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 (1057 - 1274, n=4)	1135 Points +2%
Average of class Smartphone (317 - 20131, n=160, last 2 years)	7767 Points +600%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Graphics (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy A70 Qualcomm Snapdragon 675, Adreno 612, 6144	949 Points
Huawei P30 Lite HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096	843 Points -11%
Sony Xperia 10 Plus Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096	862 Points -9%
Wiko View 3 Pro Mediatek Helio P60, Mali-G72 MP3, 6144	993 Points +5%
Xiaomi Mi 9 SE Qualcomm Snapdragon 712, Adreno 616, 6144	2146 Points +126%
Samsung Galaxy A7 2018 Samsung Exynos 7885, Mali-G71 MP2, 4096	629 Points -34%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 (851 - 1094, n=4)	962 Points +1%
Average of class Smartphone (267 - 33376, n=160, last 2 years)	11536 Points +1116%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy A70 Qualcomm Snapdragon 675, Adreno 612, 6144	2719 Points
Huawei P30 Lite HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096	2550 Points -6%
Sony Xperia 10 Plus Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096	2345 Points -14%
Wiko View 3 Pro Mediatek Helio P60, Mali-G72 MP3, 6144	2918 Points +7%
Xiaomi Mi 9 SE Qualcomm Snapdragon 712, Adreno 616, 6144	2506 Points -8%
Samsung Galaxy A7 2018 Samsung Exynos 7885, Mali-G71 MP2, 4096	1845 Points -32%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 (1684 - 3011, n=4)	2448 Points -10%
Average of class Smartphone (877 - 8480, n=160, last 2 years)	4613 Points +70%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (Vulkan) Unlimited (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy A70 Qualcomm Snapdragon 675, Adreno 612, 6144	1063 Points
Huawei P30 Lite HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096	Points -100%
Sony Xperia 10 Plus Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096	944 Points -11%
Wiko View 3 Pro Mediatek Helio P60, Mali-G72 MP3, 6144	1152 Points +8%
Xiaomi Mi 9 SE Qualcomm Snapdragon 712, Adreno 616, 6144	1988 Points +87%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 (1038 - 1189, n=4)	1089 Points +2%
Average of class Smartphone (365 - 6635, n=72, last 2 years)	2846 Points +168%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (Vulkan) Unlimited Graphics (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy A70 Qualcomm Snapdragon 675, Adreno 612, 6144	914 Points
Sony Xperia 10 Plus Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096	809 Points -11%
Wiko View 3 Pro Mediatek Helio P60, Mali-G72 MP3, 6144	997 Points +9%
Xiaomi Mi 9 SE Qualcomm Snapdragon 712, Adreno 616, 6144	1907 Points +109%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 (914 - 1029, n=4)	943 Points +3%
Average of class Smartphone (298 - 8601, n=72, last 2 years)	3095 Points +239%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (Vulkan) Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy A70 Qualcomm Snapdragon 675, Adreno 612, 6144	2482 Points
Sony Xperia 10 Plus Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096	2282 Points -8%
Wiko View 3 Pro Mediatek Helio P60, Mali-G72 MP3, 6144	2518 Points +1%
Xiaomi Mi 9 SE Qualcomm Snapdragon 712, Adreno 616, 6144	2338 Points -6%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 (1952 - 2605, n=4)	2341 Points -6%
Average of class Smartphone (1667 - 4198, n=72, last 2 years)	2704 Points +9%

GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7
T-Rex Onscreen (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy A70 Qualcomm Snapdragon 675, Adreno 612, 6144	37 fps
Huawei P30 Lite HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096	31 fps -16%
Sony Xperia 10 Plus Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096	30 fps -19%
Wiko View 3 Pro Mediatek Helio P60, Mali-G72 MP3, 6144	34 fps -8%
Xiaomi Mi 9 SE Qualcomm Snapdragon 712, Adreno 616, 6144	58 fps +57%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 (37 - 37, n=2)	37 fps 0%
Average of class Smartphone (23 - 165, n=169, last 2 years)	86.3 fps +133%
1920x1080 T-Rex Offscreen (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy A70 Qualcomm Snapdragon 675, Adreno 612, 6144	41 fps
Huawei P30 Lite HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096	33 fps -20%
Sony Xperia 10 Plus Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096	35 fps -15%
Wiko View 3 Pro Mediatek Helio P60, Mali-G72 MP3, 6144	38 fps -7%
Xiaomi Mi 9 SE Qualcomm Snapdragon 712, Adreno 616, 6144	74 fps +80%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 (41 - 41, n=2)	41 fps 0%
Average of class Smartphone (19 - 791, n=169, last 2 years)	280 fps +583%

GFXBench 3.0
on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy A70 Qualcomm Snapdragon 675, Adreno 612, 6144	19 fps
Huawei P30 Lite HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096	16 fps -16%
Sony Xperia 10 Plus Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096	13 fps -32%
Wiko View 3 Pro Mediatek Helio P60, Mali-G72 MP3, 6144	19 fps 0%
Xiaomi Mi 9 SE Qualcomm Snapdragon 712, Adreno 616, 6144	33 fps +74%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 (19 - 19, n=2)	19 fps 0%
Average of class Smartphone (6.8 - 165, n=169, last 2 years)	75.5 fps +297%
1920x1080 1080p Manhattan Offscreen (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy A70 Qualcomm Snapdragon 675, Adreno 612, 6144	20 fps
Huawei P30 Lite HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096	17 fps -15%
Sony Xperia 10 Plus Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096	16 fps -20%
Wiko View 3 Pro Mediatek Helio P60, Mali-G72 MP3, 6144	20 fps 0%
Xiaomi Mi 9 SE Qualcomm Snapdragon 712, Adreno 616, 6144	36 fps +80%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 (20 - 21, n=2)	20.5 fps +3%
Average of class Smartphone (12 - 482, n=169, last 2 years)	165.3 fps +727%

GFXBench 3.1
on screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy A70 Qualcomm Snapdragon 675, Adreno 612, 6144	13 fps
Huawei P30 Lite HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096	11 fps -15%
Sony Xperia 10 Plus Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096	8.4 fps -35%
Wiko View 3 Pro Mediatek Helio P60, Mali-G72 MP3, 6144	11 fps -15%
Xiaomi Mi 9 SE Qualcomm Snapdragon 712, Adreno 616, 6144	24 fps +85%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 (8.4 - 13, n=2)	10.7 fps -18%
Average of class Smartphone (3.7 - 158, n=169, last 2 years)	65.7 fps +405%
1920x1080 Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy A70 Qualcomm Snapdragon 675, Adreno 612, 6144	15 fps
Huawei P30 Lite HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096	12 fps -20%
Sony Xperia 10 Plus Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096	10 fps -33%
Wiko View 3 Pro Mediatek Helio P60, Mali-G72 MP3, 6144	12 fps -20%
Xiaomi Mi 9 SE Qualcomm Snapdragon 712, Adreno 616, 6144	26 fps +73%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 (14 - 15, n=2)	14.5 fps -3%
Average of class Smartphone (8.3 - 341, n=169, last 2 years)	117.2 fps +681%

GFXBench
on screen Car Chase Onscreen (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy A70 Qualcomm Snapdragon 675, Adreno 612, 6144	7 fps
Huawei P30 Lite HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096	6.5 fps -7%
Sony Xperia 10 Plus Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096	5.1 fps -27%
Wiko View 3 Pro Mediatek Helio P60, Mali-G72 MP3, 6144	6.8 fps -3%
Xiaomi Mi 9 SE Qualcomm Snapdragon 712, Adreno 616, 6144	13 fps +86%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 (7 - 7.1, n=2)	7.05 fps +1%
Average of class Smartphone (5 - 119, n=170, last 2 years)	47.8 fps +583%
1920x1080 Car Chase Offscreen (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy A70 Qualcomm Snapdragon 675, Adreno 612, 6144	8 fps
Huawei P30 Lite HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096	6.9 fps -14%
Sony Xperia 10 Plus Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096	6.3 fps -21%
Wiko View 3 Pro Mediatek Helio P60, Mali-G72 MP3, 6144	7.4 fps -7%
Xiaomi Mi 9 SE Qualcomm Snapdragon 712, Adreno 616, 6144	15 fps +88%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 (8 - 8.2, n=2)	8.1 fps +1%
Average of class Smartphone (3.1 - 216, n=169, last 2 years)	70.6 fps +783%
on screen Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Onscreen (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy A70 Qualcomm Snapdragon 675, Adreno 612, 6144	8 fps
Huawei P30 Lite HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096	6.4 fps -20%
Sony Xperia 10 Plus Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096	4.9 fps -39%
Wiko View 3 Pro Mediatek Helio P60, Mali-G72 MP3, 6144	7 fps -12%
Xiaomi Mi 9 SE Qualcomm Snapdragon 712, Adreno 616, 6144	14 fps +75%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 (8 - 8.9, n=4)	8.38 fps +5%
Average of class Smartphone (3.6 - 123, n=201, last 2 years)	49.5 fps +519%
1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy A70 Qualcomm Snapdragon 675, Adreno 612, 6144	9 fps
Huawei P30 Lite HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096	7 fps -22%
Sony Xperia 10 Plus Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096	6.1 fps -32%
Wiko View 3 Pro Mediatek Helio P60, Mali-G72 MP3, 6144	7.5 fps -17%
Xiaomi Mi 9 SE Qualcomm Snapdragon 712, Adreno 616, 6144	16 fps +78%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 (9 - 9.9, n=4)	9.28 fps +3%
Average of class Smartphone (2.3 - 261, n=201, last 2 years)	79.8 fps +787%
on screen Aztec Ruins High Tier Onscreen (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy A70 Qualcomm Snapdragon 675, Adreno 612, 6144	4.7 fps
Huawei P30 Lite HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096	4.2 fps -11%
Sony Xperia 10 Plus Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096	3.2 fps -32%
Wiko View 3 Pro Mediatek Helio P60, Mali-G72 MP3, 6144	4.3 fps -9%
Xiaomi Mi 9 SE Qualcomm Snapdragon 712, Adreno 616, 6144	9.1 fps +94%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 (3.1 - 5.2, n=4)	4.48 fps -5%
Average of class Smartphone (0.85 - 119, n=201, last 2 years)	37.4 fps +696%
2560x1440 Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy A70 Qualcomm Snapdragon 675, Adreno 612, 6144	3 fps
Huawei P30 Lite HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096	2.6 fps -13%
Sony Xperia 10 Plus Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096	2.2 fps -27%
Wiko View 3 Pro Mediatek Helio P60, Mali-G72 MP3, 6144	2.7 fps -10%
Xiaomi Mi 9 SE Qualcomm Snapdragon 712, Adreno 616, 6144	5.8 fps +93%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 (3 - 4.8, n=4)	3.53 fps +18%
Average of class Smartphone (0.85 - 104, n=201, last 2 years)	32 fps +967%

Basemark GPU 1.1
1920x1080 Vulkan Medium Offscreen (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy A70 Qualcomm Snapdragon 675, Adreno 612, 6144	7.52 fps
Xiaomi Mi 9 SE Qualcomm Snapdragon 712, Adreno 616, 6144	14.18 (8.4^min - 36.6^max) fps +89%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 ()	7.52 fps 0%
Vulkan Medium Native (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy A70 Qualcomm Snapdragon 675, Adreno 612, 6144	6.56 fps
Xiaomi Mi 9 SE Qualcomm Snapdragon 712, Adreno 616, 6144	12.76 (7.68^min - 27.7^max) fps +95%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 ()	6.56 fps 0%
1920x1080 OpenGL Medium Offscreen (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy A70 Qualcomm Snapdragon 675, Adreno 612, 6144	8.51 fps
Xiaomi Mi 9 SE Qualcomm Snapdragon 712, Adreno 616, 6144	14.23 (8.05^min - 26.52^max) fps +67%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 ()	8.51 fps 0%

AnTuTu v7 - Total Score (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy A70 Qualcomm Snapdragon 675, Adreno 612, 6144	167836 Points
Huawei P30 Lite HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096	132834 Points -21%
Sony Xperia 10 Plus Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096	117574 Points -30%
Wiko View 3 Pro Mediatek Helio P60, Mali-G72 MP3, 6144	138589 Points -17%
Xiaomi Mi 9 SE Qualcomm Snapdragon 712, Adreno 616, 6144	179353 Points +7%
Samsung Galaxy A7 2018 Samsung Exynos 7885, Mali-G71 MP2, 4096	122826 Points -27%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 (159646 - 167836, n=2)	163741 Points -2%

VRMark - Amber Room (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy A70 Qualcomm Snapdragon 675, Adreno 612, 6144	1262 Score
Xiaomi Mi 9 SE Qualcomm Snapdragon 712, Adreno 616, 6144	1966 Score +56%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 ()	1262 Score 0%
Average of class Smartphone (2523 - 10071, n=6, last 2 years)	5819 Score +361%

BaseMark OS II
Overall (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy A70 Qualcomm Snapdragon 675, Adreno 612, 6144	2756 Points
Huawei P30 Lite HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096	2201 Points -20%
Sony Xperia 10 Plus Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096	1734 Points -37%
Wiko View 3 Pro Mediatek Helio P60, Mali-G72 MP3, 6144	1933 Points -30%
Xiaomi Mi 9 SE Qualcomm Snapdragon 712, Adreno 616, 6144	2906 Points +5%
Samsung Galaxy A7 2018 Samsung Exynos 7885, Mali-G71 MP2, 4096	2009 Points -27%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 (2756 - 2860, n=2)	2808 Points +2%
Average of class Smartphone (1196 - 11976, n=151, last 2 years)	6297 Points +128%
System (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy A70 Qualcomm Snapdragon 675, Adreno 612, 6144	6137 Points
Huawei P30 Lite HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096	5146 Points -16%
Sony Xperia 10 Plus Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096	4342 Points -29%
Wiko View 3 Pro Mediatek Helio P60, Mali-G72 MP3, 6144	3915 Points -36%
Xiaomi Mi 9 SE Qualcomm Snapdragon 712, Adreno 616, 6144	5932 Points -3%
Samsung Galaxy A7 2018 Samsung Exynos 7885, Mali-G71 MP2, 4096	4506 Points -27%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 (5940 - 6137, n=2)	6039 Points -2%
Average of class Smartphone (2368 - 16475, n=151, last 2 years)	10163 Points +66%
Memory (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy A70 Qualcomm Snapdragon 675, Adreno 612, 6144	3285 Points
Huawei P30 Lite HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096	3036 Points -8%
Sony Xperia 10 Plus Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096	1236 Points -62%
Wiko View 3 Pro Mediatek Helio P60, Mali-G72 MP3, 6144	1958 Points -40%
Xiaomi Mi 9 SE Qualcomm Snapdragon 712, Adreno 616, 6144	2969 Points -10%
Samsung Galaxy A7 2018 Samsung Exynos 7885, Mali-G71 MP2, 4096	2445 Points -26%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 (3285 - 4068, n=2)	3677 Points +12%
Average of class Smartphone (962 - 12716, n=151, last 2 years)	6767 Points +106%
Graphics (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy A70 Qualcomm Snapdragon 675, Adreno 612, 6144	2272 Points
Huawei P30 Lite HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096	1478 Points -35%
Sony Xperia 10 Plus Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096	1611 Points -29%
Wiko View 3 Pro Mediatek Helio P60, Mali-G72 MP3, 6144	1590 Points -30%
Xiaomi Mi 9 SE Qualcomm Snapdragon 712, Adreno 616, 6144	3453 Points +52%
Samsung Galaxy A7 2018 Samsung Exynos 7885, Mali-G71 MP2, 4096	1356 Points -40%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 (2272 - 2278, n=2)	2275 Points 0%
Average of class Smartphone (1017 - 58651, n=151, last 2 years)	16908 Points +644%
Web (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy A70 Qualcomm Snapdragon 675, Adreno 612, 6144	1259 Points
Huawei P30 Lite HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096	1024 Points -19%
Sony Xperia 10 Plus Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096	1046 Points -17%
Wiko View 3 Pro Mediatek Helio P60, Mali-G72 MP3, 6144	1146 Points -9%
Xiaomi Mi 9 SE Qualcomm Snapdragon 712, Adreno 616, 6144	1172 Points -7%
Samsung Galaxy A7 2018 Samsung Exynos 7885, Mali-G71 MP2, 4096	1090 Points -13%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 (1216 - 1259, n=2)	1238 Points -2%
Average of class Smartphone (841 - 2145, n=151, last 2 years)	1564 Points +24%

Basemark ES 3.1 / Metal - offscreen Overall Score (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy A70 Qualcomm Snapdragon 675, Adreno 612, 6144	322 Points
Xiaomi Mi 9 SE Qualcomm Snapdragon 712, Adreno 616, 6144	517 Points +61%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 ()	322 Points 0%
Average of class Smartphone (205 - 7616, n=56, last 2 years)	2316 Points +619%

Jetstream 2 | Speedometer 2.0 | WebXPRT 3 | Octane V2 | Mozilla Kraken 1.1

Jetstream 2 - Total Score
Average of class Smartphone (13.8 - 387, n=161, last 2 years)	120.4 Points +177%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 (43.4 - 44.9, n=2)	44.2 Points +2%
Samsung Galaxy A70 (Chrome 74.0.3729.157)	43.42 Points
Xiaomi Mi 9 SE (Chrome 73)	37.21 Points -14%
Huawei P30 Lite (Chrome 74)	31.78 Points -27%
Sony Xperia 10 Plus (Chrome 73)	25.96 Points -40%

Speedometer 2.0 - Result
Average of class Smartphone (15.2 - 569, n=146, last 2 years)	136.2 runs/min +229%
Samsung Galaxy A70 (Chrome 74.0.3729.157)	41.4 runs/min
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 ()	41.4 runs/min 0%
Xiaomi Mi 9 SE (Chrome 73)	37.5 runs/min -9%
Huawei P30 Lite (Chrome 74)	31.7 runs/min -23%
Sony Xperia 10 Plus (Chrome 73)	27.4 runs/min -34%

WebXPRT 3 - Overall
Average of class Smartphone (38 - 347, n=79, last 2 years)	148.7 Points +81%
Samsung Galaxy A70 (Chrome 74.0.3729.157)	82 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 (70 - 82, n=2)	76 Points -7%
Xiaomi Mi 9 SE (Chrome 73)	72 Points -12%
Huawei P30 Lite (Chrome 74)	66 Points -20%
Samsung Galaxy A7 2018 (Chrome 70)	57 Points -30%
Sony Xperia 10 Plus (Chrome 73)	54 Points -34%
Wiko View 3 Pro (Chrome 74)	53 Points -35%

Octane V2 - Total Score
Average of class Smartphone (2228 - 100368, n=203, last 2 years)	37161 Points +136%
Samsung Galaxy A70 (Chrome 74.0.3729.157)	15716 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 (15689 - 15716, n=2)	15703 Points 0%
Xiaomi Mi 9 SE (Chrome 73)	13562 Points -14%
Huawei P30 Lite (Chrome 74)	9779 Points -38%
Samsung Galaxy A7 2018 (Chrome 70)	9165 Points -42%
Wiko View 3 Pro (Chrome 74)	8778 Points -44%
Sony Xperia 10 Plus (Chrome 73)	8163 Points -48%

Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total
Sony Xperia 10 Plus (Chrome 73)	4739 ms * -69%
Wiko View 3 Pro (Chrome 74)	4448 ms * -58%
Huawei P30 Lite (Chrome 74)	4138 ms * -47%
Samsung Galaxy A7 2018 (Chrome 70)	4123 ms * -47%
Xiaomi Mi 9 SE (Chrome 73)	2912 ms * -4%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 (2807 - 2890, n=2)	2849 ms * -1%
Samsung Galaxy A70 (Chrome 74.0.3729.157)	2807 ms *
Average of class Smartphone (277 - 28190, n=160, last 2 years)	1568 ms * +44%

* ... smaller is better

	Samsung Galaxy A70	Huawei P30 Lite	Sony Xperia 10 Plus	Wiko View 3 Pro	Xiaomi Mi 9 SE	Samsung Galaxy A7 2018	Average 128 GB UFS 2.0 Flash	Average of class Smartphone
AndroBench 3-5		37%	-13%	-3%	2%	-21%	63%	593%
Sequential Read 256KB	508	293.2 -42%	280.3 -45%	302.7 -40%	492.5 -3%	295.8 -42%	530 ?(286 - 948, n=37) 4%	1839 ?(226 - 4512, n=192, last 2 years) 262%
Sequential Write 256KB	194	158.6 -18%	205.2 6%	171.6 -12%	190.1 -2%	104.9 -46%	212 ?(103.4 - 466, n=37) 9%	1425 ?(57.5 - 3908, n=192, last 2 years) 635%
Random Read 4KB	103.8	71.6 -31%	77.7 -25%	89.7 -14%	115.8 12%	84 -19%	130.6 ?(65 - 233, n=37) 26%	277 ?(22.2 - 483, n=192, last 2 years) 167%
Random Write 4KB	21.95	87.3 298%	16.77 -24%	31.2 42%	21.86 0%	15.45 -30%	101.2 ?(13.5 - 187.4, n=37) 361%	309 ?(9.4 - 753, n=192, last 2 years) 1308%
Sequential Read 256KB SDCard	76.2 ?(Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)	76.8 ?(Toshiba Exceria Pro M501) 1%	83.9 ?(Toshiba Exceria Pro M501) 10%	77.4 ?(Toshiba Exceria Pro M401) 2%		78.2 ?(Toshiba Exceria Pro M501) 3%	68.3 ?(30.2 - 86, n=20) -10%
Sequential Write 256KB SDCard	58.8 ?(Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)	67.8 ?(Toshiba Exceria Pro M501) 15%	58.4 ?(Toshiba Exceria Pro M501) -1%	60.5 ?(Toshiba Exceria Pro M401) 3%		64.4 ?(Toshiba Exceria Pro M501) 10%	53.2 ?(28.6 - 70.2, n=20) -10%

Asphalt 9 (High)

Samsung Galaxy A70; 1.5.4a: Ø15.2 (9-23)

Asphalt 9 (Standard)

Samsung Galaxy A70; 1.5.4a: Ø19.6 (14-29)

Shadow Fight 3

Samsung Galaxy A70; 1.18.5: Ø59.2 (12-60)

Dead Trigger 2

Samsung Galaxy A70; 1.5.5: Ø59.6 (30-60)

Carga Máxima

Inatividade


37.4 °C	37 °C	33.4 °C
36.9 °C	34.8 °C	32.6 °C
36.3 °C	36.2 °C	33 °C

Máximo: 37.4 °C
Médio: 35.3 °C


32.4 °C	34.2 °C	35.5 °C
31.8 °C	33.1 °C	36 °C
32.1 °C	33.3 °C	36 °C

Máximo: 36 °C
Médio: 33.8 °C

alimentação elétrica 27.4 °C | Temperatura do quarto 22 °C | Voltcraft IR-260

(±) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 35.3 °C / 96 F, compared to the average of 32.8 °C / 91 F for the devices in the class Smartphone.
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 37.4 °C / 99 F, compared to the average of 35.1 °C / 95 F, ranging from 21.9 to 63.2 °C for the class Smartphone.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 36 °C / 97 F, compared to the average of 33.9 °C / 93 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 30 °C / 86 F, compared to the device average of 32.8 °C / 91 F.

Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)

Samsung Galaxy A70 audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (85.3 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 33.5% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (13.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 3.7% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (4.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 6.2% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (3.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (22.9% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 46% of all tested devices in this class were better, 7% similar, 47% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 37%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 64% of all tested devices were better, 6% similar, 29% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Samsung Galaxy A7 2018 audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (85.5 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 27.5% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (10.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 3.6% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (4.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 8.2% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (3.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (22.3% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 42% of all tested devices in this class were better, 7% similar, 51% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 37%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 61% of all tested devices were better, 6% similar, 32% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Consumo de energia

desligado	0.01 / 0.14 Watt
Ocioso	0.66 / 1.69 / 1.8 Watt
Carga	3.42 / 5.88 Watt


Key: min: , med: , max: Metrahit Energy

	Samsung Galaxy A70 4500 mAh	Huawei P30 Lite 3340 mAh	Sony Xperia 10 Plus 3000 mAh	Wiko View 3 Pro 4000 mAh	Xiaomi Mi 9 SE 3070 mAh	Samsung Galaxy A7 2018 3300 mAh	Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 675	Average of class Smartphone
Power Consumption		-36%	-14%	0%	22%	-11%	-6%	-33%
Idle Minimum *	0.66	0.91 -38%	0.68 -3%	0.77 -17%	0.53 20%	0.71 -8%	0.693 ?(0.66 - 0.73, n=3) -5%	0.894 ?(0.4 - 2.37, n=152, last 2 years) -35%
Idle Average *	1.69	2.41 -43%	2.12 -25%	1.79 -6%	1.18 30%	1.36 20%	1.8 ?(1.54 - 2.17, n=3) -7%	1.456 ?(0.6 - 4.26, n=152, last 2 years) 14%
Idle Maximum *	1.8	2.43 -35%	2.17 -21%	1.86 -3%	1.2 33%	1.47 18%	1.867 ?(1.57 - 2.23, n=3) -4%	1.616 ?(0.83 - 4.45, n=152, last 2 years) 10%
Load Average *	3.42	4.57 -34%	3.82 -12%	2.74 20%	3.04 11%	5.13 -50%	4.03 ?(3.42 - 4.56, n=3) -18%	6.45 ?(2.3 - 16.5, n=147, last 2 years) -89%
Load Maximum *	5.88	7.57 -29%	6.44 -10%	5.53 6%	4.83 18%	7.89 -34%	5.63 ?(5.22 - 5.88, n=3) 4%	9.8 ?(3.53 - 20.8, n=147, last 2 years) -67%

* ... smaller is better

Tempo de Execução da Bateria

Ocioso (sem WLAN, min brilho)		43h 20min
WiFi Websurfing		12h 16min
Big Buck Bunny H.264 1080p		18h 37min
Carga (máximo brilho)		3h 53min

	Samsung Galaxy A70 4500 mAh	Huawei P30 Lite 3340 mAh	Sony Xperia 10 Plus 3000 mAh	Wiko View 3 Pro 4000 mAh	Xiaomi Mi 9 SE 3070 mAh	Samsung Galaxy A7 2018 3300 mAh
Battery Runtime		-34%	-33%	20%	-27%	-18%
Reader / Idle	2600	1248 -52%	1400 -46%		1374 -47%	1467 -44%
H.264	1117	685 -39%	701 -37%		853 -24%	836 -25%
WiFi v1.3	736	515 -30%	635 -14%	886 20%	510 -31%	605 -18%
Load	233	198 -15%	154 -34%		218 -6%	273 17%

Pro

+ Carcaça robusta e fina

+ Conector para fones de 3,5 mm

+ Dual SIM, VoLTE, VoWifi, LTE Cat. 11

+ Bom GPS

+ 128 GB de armazenamento interno

+ Wi-Fi rápido

+ Tela Super AMOLED brilhante

+ Boa duração da bateria

+ Fonte de alimentação de carga rápida

Contra

- Sem certificação IP

- Câmera tripla apenas medíocre na melhor das hipóteses

- PWM flickering

- Desempenho medíocre dos jogos

- Afogamento sob uso intenso

In review: Samsung Galaxy A70. Review unit courtesy of notebooksbilliger.de

O Samsung Galaxy A70 é um smartphone decente. No entanto, está tendo muitas dificuldade em se destacar entre a enorme variedade de smartphones de gama média, apesar de seu hardware impressionante.

Sua elegante carcaça com a tela Super AMOLED de alta resolução 20:9 de 6,7 polegadas é certamente uma grande vantagem, assim como seus recursos de conectividade, sua longa duração de bateria, seus recursos de Dual SIM e seu espaçoso armazenamento interno.

Ótimo hardware com desempenho e qualidade de câmera medíocres - esperamos mais de um smartphone de $ 400.

O que nos leva a suas desvantagens. O desempenho do A70 é decente o suficiente para aplicativos e tarefas cotidianas, mas é muito lento para os jogos atuais. Na sua faixa de preço de aproximadamente $ 400, teríamos esperado mais do A70. A câmera tripla também foi um pouco decepcionante, já que se mostrou bastante decente comente em plena luz do dia.

Uma boa alternativa para o Samsung Galaxy A70 é o Xiaomi's Mi 9 SE. Com sua tela AMOLED de 5,97 polegadas, ele pode ser um pouco menor, mas é mais barato, mais rápido e oferece uma melhor câmera tripla, para começar.

Samsung Galaxy A70 - 06/14/2019 v6 ^(old)
Manuel Masiero

Acabamento

85%

Teclado

67 / 75 → 90%

Mouse

88%

Conectividade

40 / 60 → 67%

Peso

90%

Bateria

97%

Pantalha

86%

Desempenho do jogos

50 / 63 → 80%

Desempenho da aplicação

68 / 70 → 97%

Temperatura

91%

Ruído

100%

Audio

65 / 91 → 71%

Camera

76%

Médio

77%

86%

Smartphone - Médio equilibrado

Price comparison

Editor of the original article: Finn D Boerne - Translator - 450 articles published on Notebookcheck since 2017

Please share our article, every link counts!

> Análises e revisões de portáteis e celulares > Análises > Análises > Em Análise Samsung Galaxy A70: Gigante da Gama Média

Manuel Masiero, 2019-06-15 (Update: 2019-06-18)

Size Comparison

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

Display Response Times

Asphalt 9 (High)

Asphalt 9 (Standard)

Shadow Fight 3

Dead Trigger 2

Samsung Galaxy A70 audio analysis

Samsung Galaxy A7 2018 audio analysis

Pro

Contra

More articles related to this device

Price comparison