Em Análise Samsung Galaxy A70: Gigante da Gama Média
Os Top 10
» Os Top 10 Portáteis Multimídia
» Os Top 10 Portáteis de Jogos
» Os Top 10 Portáteis Leves para Jogos
» Os Top 10 Portáteis Acessíveis de Escritório/Empresariais
» Os Top 10 Portáteis Premium de Escritório/Empresariais
» Os Top 10 dos Portáteis Workstation
» Os Top 10 Subportáteis
» Os Top 10 Ultrabooks
» Os Top 10 Conversíveis
» Os Top 10 Tablets
» Os Top 10 Smartphones
» A melhores Telas de Portáteis Analisadas Pela Notebookcheck
» Top 10 dos portáteis abaixo dos 500 Euros da Notebookcheck
» Top 10 dos Portáteis abaixo dos 300 Euros
Networking | |
iperf3 transmit AX12 | |
Samsung Galaxy A7 2018 | |
Wiko View 3 Pro | |
Xiaomi Mi 9 SE | |
Samsung Galaxy A70 | |
Huawei P30 Lite | |
Sony Xperia 10 Plus | |
iperf3 receive AX12 | |
Samsung Galaxy A70 | |
Wiko View 3 Pro | |
Sony Xperia 10 Plus | |
Xiaomi Mi 9 SE | |
Samsung Galaxy A7 2018 | |
Huawei P30 Lite |
|
iluminação: 98 %
iluminação com acumulador: 554 cd/m²
Contraste: ∞:1 (Preto: 0 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 3.3 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.93
ΔE Greyscale 3.4 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
98% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.08
Samsung Galaxy A70 Super AMOLED, 2400x1080, 6.7" | Huawei P30 Lite IPS LCD, 2312x1080, 6.2" | Sony Xperia 10 Plus IPS, 2520x1080, 6.5" | Wiko View 3 Pro IPS, 2340x1080, 6.3" | Xiaomi Mi 9 SE AMOLED, 2340x1080, 6" | Samsung Galaxy A7 2018 Super AMOLED, 2220x1080, 6" | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Screen | 15% | -33% | -25% | 23% | 30% | |
Brightness middle | 554 | 451 -19% | 572 3% | 459 -17% | 583 5% | 570 3% |
Brightness | 552 | 430 -22% | 580 5% | 450 -18% | 577 5% | 565 2% |
Brightness Distribution | 98 | 90 -8% | 96 -2% | 90 -8% | 97 -1% | 93 -5% |
Black Level * | 0.55 | 0.4 | 0.39 | |||
Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 3.3 | 1.4 58% | 4.5 -36% | 4.8 -45% | 1.6 52% | 1.5 55% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 9.2 | 4.4 52% | 12.2 -33% | 9.2 -0% | 3.9 58% | 3.6 61% |
Greyscale dE 2000 * | 3.4 | 2.5 26% | 7.9 -132% | 5.5 -62% | 2.7 21% | 1.2 65% |
Gamma | 2.08 106% | 2.22 99% | 2.16 102% | 2.26 97% | 2.27 97% | 2.07 106% |
CCT | 6606 98% | 6422 101% | 8726 74% | 7494 87% | 6267 104% | 6504 100% |
Contrast | 820 | 1430 | 1177 |
* ... smaller is better
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
Screen flickering / PWM detected | 240.4 Hz | ≤ 99 % brightness setting | |
The display backlight flickers at 240.4 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) Flickering detected at a brightness setting of 99 % and below. There should be no flickering or PWM above this brightness setting. The frequency of 240.4 Hz is relatively low, so sensitive users will likely notice flickering and experience eyestrain at the stated brightness setting and below. In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8774 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured. |
Display Response Times
↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
---|---|---|
4 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 2 ms rise | |
↘ 2 ms fall | ||
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 12 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (21 ms). | ||
↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
4 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 2 ms rise | |
↘ 2 ms fall | ||
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 11 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (32.9 ms). |
Basemark GPU 1.1 | |
1920x1080 Vulkan Medium Offscreen (sort by value) | |
Samsung Galaxy A70 | |
Xiaomi Mi 9 SE | |
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 () | |
Vulkan Medium Native (sort by value) | |
Samsung Galaxy A70 | |
Xiaomi Mi 9 SE | |
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 () | |
1920x1080 OpenGL Medium Offscreen (sort by value) | |
Samsung Galaxy A70 | |
Xiaomi Mi 9 SE | |
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 () |
AnTuTu v7 - Total Score (sort by value) | |
Samsung Galaxy A70 | |
Huawei P30 Lite | |
Sony Xperia 10 Plus | |
Wiko View 3 Pro | |
Xiaomi Mi 9 SE | |
Samsung Galaxy A7 2018 | |
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 (159646 - 167836, n=2) |
VRMark - Amber Room (sort by value) | |
Samsung Galaxy A70 | |
Xiaomi Mi 9 SE | |
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 () | |
Average of class Smartphone (2523 - 10071, n=6, last 2 years) |
Basemark ES 3.1 / Metal - offscreen Overall Score (sort by value) | |
Samsung Galaxy A70 | |
Xiaomi Mi 9 SE | |
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 () | |
Average of class Smartphone (205 - 7616, n=56, last 2 years) |
Jetstream 2 - Total Score | |
Average of class Smartphone (13.8 - 387, n=162, last 2 years) | |
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 (43.4 - 44.9, n=2) | |
Samsung Galaxy A70 (Chrome 74.0.3729.157) | |
Xiaomi Mi 9 SE (Chrome 73) | |
Huawei P30 Lite (Chrome 74) | |
Sony Xperia 10 Plus (Chrome 73) |
Speedometer 2.0 - Result | |
Average of class Smartphone (15.2 - 569, n=148, last 2 years) | |
Samsung Galaxy A70 (Chrome 74.0.3729.157) | |
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 () | |
Xiaomi Mi 9 SE (Chrome 73) | |
Huawei P30 Lite (Chrome 74) | |
Sony Xperia 10 Plus (Chrome 73) |
WebXPRT 3 - Overall | |
Average of class Smartphone (38 - 347, n=82, last 2 years) | |
Samsung Galaxy A70 (Chrome 74.0.3729.157) | |
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 (70 - 82, n=2) | |
Xiaomi Mi 9 SE (Chrome 73) | |
Huawei P30 Lite (Chrome 74) | |
Samsung Galaxy A7 2018 (Chrome 70) | |
Sony Xperia 10 Plus (Chrome 73) | |
Wiko View 3 Pro (Chrome 74) |
Octane V2 - Total Score | |
Average of class Smartphone (2228 - 100368, n=204, last 2 years) | |
Samsung Galaxy A70 (Chrome 74.0.3729.157) | |
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 (15689 - 15716, n=2) | |
Xiaomi Mi 9 SE (Chrome 73) | |
Huawei P30 Lite (Chrome 74) | |
Samsung Galaxy A7 2018 (Chrome 70) | |
Wiko View 3 Pro (Chrome 74) | |
Sony Xperia 10 Plus (Chrome 73) |
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total | |
Sony Xperia 10 Plus (Chrome 73) | |
Wiko View 3 Pro (Chrome 74) | |
Huawei P30 Lite (Chrome 74) | |
Samsung Galaxy A7 2018 (Chrome 70) | |
Xiaomi Mi 9 SE (Chrome 73) | |
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 (2807 - 2890, n=2) | |
Samsung Galaxy A70 (Chrome 74.0.3729.157) | |
Average of class Smartphone (277 - 28190, n=161, last 2 years) |
* ... smaller is better
Samsung Galaxy A70 | Huawei P30 Lite | Sony Xperia 10 Plus | Wiko View 3 Pro | Xiaomi Mi 9 SE | Samsung Galaxy A7 2018 | Average 128 GB UFS 2.0 Flash | Average of class Smartphone | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AndroBench 3-5 | 37% | -13% | -3% | 2% | -21% | 63% | 594% | |
Sequential Read 256KB | 508 | 293.2 -42% | 280.3 -45% | 302.7 -40% | 492.5 -3% | 295.8 -42% | 530 ? 4% | 1834 ? 261% |
Sequential Write 256KB | 194 | 158.6 -18% | 205.2 6% | 171.6 -12% | 190.1 -2% | 104.9 -46% | 212 ? 9% | 1426 ? 635% |
Random Read 4KB | 103.8 | 71.6 -31% | 77.7 -25% | 89.7 -14% | 115.8 12% | 84 -19% | 130.6 ? 26% | 278 ? 168% |
Random Write 4KB | 21.95 | 87.3 298% | 16.77 -24% | 31.2 42% | 21.86 0% | 15.45 -30% | 101.2 ? 361% | 310 ? 1312% |
Sequential Read 256KB SDCard | 76.2 ? | 76.8 ? 1% | 83.9 ? 10% | 77.4 ? 2% | 78.2 ? 3% | 68.3 ? -10% | ||
Sequential Write 256KB SDCard | 58.8 ? | 67.8 ? 15% | 58.4 ? -1% | 60.5 ? 3% | 64.4 ? 10% | 53.2 ? -10% |
Asphalt 9 (High)
Asphalt 9 (Standard)
Shadow Fight 3
Dead Trigger 2
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 37.4 °C / 99 F, compared to the average of 35.1 °C / 95 F, ranging from 21.9 to 63.2 °C for the class Smartphone.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 36 °C / 97 F, compared to the average of 33.9 °C / 93 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 30 °C / 86 F, compared to the device average of 32.8 °C / 91 F.
Samsung Galaxy A70 audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (85.3 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 33.5% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (13.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 3.7% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (4.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 6.2% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (3.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (22.9% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 46% of all tested devices in this class were better, 7% similar, 47% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 37%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 64% of all tested devices were better, 6% similar, 30% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Samsung Galaxy A7 2018 audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (85.5 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 27.5% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (10.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 3.6% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (4.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 8.2% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (3.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (22.3% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 42% of all tested devices in this class were better, 7% similar, 51% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 37%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 61% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 32% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
desligado | 0.01 / 0.14 Watt |
Ocioso | 0.66 / 1.69 / 1.8 Watt |
Carga |
3.42 / 5.88 Watt |
Key:
min: ,
med: ,
max: Metrahit Energy |
Samsung Galaxy A70 4500 mAh | Huawei P30 Lite 3340 mAh | Sony Xperia 10 Plus 3000 mAh | Wiko View 3 Pro 4000 mAh | Xiaomi Mi 9 SE 3070 mAh | Samsung Galaxy A7 2018 3300 mAh | Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 | Average of class Smartphone | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Power Consumption | -36% | -14% | 0% | 22% | -11% | -6% | -32% | |
Idle Minimum * | 0.66 | 0.91 -38% | 0.68 -3% | 0.77 -17% | 0.53 20% | 0.71 -8% | 0.693 ? -5% | 0.895 ? -36% |
Idle Average * | 1.69 | 2.41 -43% | 2.12 -25% | 1.79 -6% | 1.18 30% | 1.36 20% | 1.8 ? -7% | 1.447 ? 14% |
Idle Maximum * | 1.8 | 2.43 -35% | 2.17 -21% | 1.86 -3% | 1.2 33% | 1.47 18% | 1.867 ? -4% | 1.608 ? 11% |
Load Average * | 3.42 | 4.57 -34% | 3.82 -12% | 2.74 20% | 3.04 11% | 5.13 -50% | 4.03 ? -18% | 6.41 ? -87% |
Load Maximum * | 5.88 | 7.57 -29% | 6.44 -10% | 5.53 6% | 4.83 18% | 7.89 -34% | 5.63 ? 4% | 9.61 ? -63% |
* ... smaller is better
Samsung Galaxy A70 4500 mAh | Huawei P30 Lite 3340 mAh | Sony Xperia 10 Plus 3000 mAh | Wiko View 3 Pro 4000 mAh | Xiaomi Mi 9 SE 3070 mAh | Samsung Galaxy A7 2018 3300 mAh | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Battery Runtime | -34% | -33% | 20% | -27% | -18% | |
Reader / Idle | 2600 | 1248 -52% | 1400 -46% | 1374 -47% | 1467 -44% | |
H.264 | 1117 | 685 -39% | 701 -37% | 853 -24% | 836 -25% | |
WiFi v1.3 | 736 | 515 -30% | 635 -14% | 886 20% | 510 -31% | 605 -18% |
Load | 233 | 198 -15% | 154 -34% | 218 -6% | 273 17% |
Pro
Contra
O Samsung Galaxy A70 é um smartphone decente. No entanto, está tendo muitas dificuldade em se destacar entre a enorme variedade de smartphones de gama média, apesar de seu hardware impressionante.
Sua elegante carcaça com a tela Super AMOLED de alta resolução 20:9 de 6,7 polegadas é certamente uma grande vantagem, assim como seus recursos de conectividade, sua longa duração de bateria, seus recursos de Dual SIM e seu espaçoso armazenamento interno.
Ótimo hardware com desempenho e qualidade de câmera medíocres - esperamos mais de um smartphone de $ 400.
O que nos leva a suas desvantagens. O desempenho do A70 é decente o suficiente para aplicativos e tarefas cotidianas, mas é muito lento para os jogos atuais. Na sua faixa de preço de aproximadamente $ 400, teríamos esperado mais do A70. A câmera tripla também foi um pouco decepcionante, já que se mostrou bastante decente comente em plena luz do dia.
Uma boa alternativa para o Samsung Galaxy A70 é o Xiaomi's Mi 9 SE. Com sua tela AMOLED de 5,97 polegadas, ele pode ser um pouco menor, mas é mais barato, mais rápido e oferece uma melhor câmera tripla, para começar.
Samsung Galaxy A70
-
06/14/2019 v6 (old)
Manuel Masiero