Notebookcheck Logo

Corsair One i300 PC desktop domestica Core i9-12900K e RTX 3080 Ti em um estojo de 12 litros

Jogos sem concessões!

A série Corsair One está disponível há vários anos e agora recebe outra atualização de hardware novamente. A atual carro-chefe Alder Lake da Intel é combinada com a segunda placa gráfica Ampere mais rápida da Nvidia na caixa compacta de 12 litros. Descubra nesta revisão com inúmeros testes e benchmarks o que o sistema pode fazer e como a geração deste modelo se comporta no funcionamento diário.

Corsair tem vendido a série One desde 2018, embalando hardware de jogos atuais em uma caixa compacta que inclui refrigeração a água. Nós já vimos noCorsair One i160que este sistema funciona.

No CES deste ano, o Corsair anunciou uma atualização para o Corsair One que está equipado com a atual série Alder Lake, que agora recuperou a coroa de desempenho como a CPU de jogo mais rápida. Além da Intel Core i9-12900Kcorsair também inclui umNvidia GeForce RTX 3080 Ti. Ambos os componentes fornecem uma excelente base para jogos 4K sem compromissos. Após nossos testes iniciais, também pudemos confirmar isto, embora o fabricante ainda mantenha o Intel Core i9-12900K um pouco à trela. Mais sobre isto mais tarde no teste. Em termos de componentes potentes, existem também amplos 64 GB de memória de trabalho e um SSD de 2-TB rápido como um raio, incluindo a versão profissional do Windows 11.

Corsair pede 5100 euros (~$5724) para o sistema como equipado em nosso teste. Se você estiver satisfeito com 32 GB de memória de trabalho e umNvidia GeForce RTX 3080você tem que pagar exatamente 1000 euros (~$1122) a menos.

Corsair One i300
Processador
Intel Core i9-12900K 16 x 3.2 - 5.2 GHz, 175 W PL2 / Short Burst, 165 W PL1 / Sustained, Alder Lake
Placa gráfica
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti - 12 GB VRAM, Análises do: 1665 MHz, Memoría: 1188 MHz, 350 W TDP, GDDR6, 511.79
Memória
64 GB 
, DDR5-4800
placa mãe
Intel Z690 (Alder Lake-S PCH)
Disco rígido
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB, 2048 GB 
, M.2 2280, NVMe, 1900 GB livre
Placa de Som
Nvidia GA102 - High Definition Audio Controller
Conexões
6 USB 3.1 Gen2, 5 USB 3.2 Gen 2x2 20Gbps, 1 HDMI, 3 DisplayPort, Conexões Audio: 7.1 Audio
Funcionamento em rede
Intel Ethernet Controller I225-V (10/100/1000/2500MBit/s), Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211 (a/b/g/h/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/ax = Wi-Fi 6/ Wi-Fi 6E 6 GHz), Bluetooth 5.2
Sistema Operativo
Microsoft Windows 11 Pro
Preço
5099 EUR
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

Caso

Corsair One i300 (fonte: Corsair)
Corsair One i300 (fonte: Corsair)

Visualmente, o caso do Corsair One i300 dificilmente pode ser distinguido doCorsair One i160e em termos de escolha de materiais, o fabricante também manteve o mesmo conceito com todas as superfícies feitas de metal que oferece uma impressão de alta qualidade não apenas em termos de aparência. O design preto e modesto é marcado por duas barras de luz RGB na frente, que podem ser ajustadas de acordo com suas preferências usando o software iCUE. O acabamento é de primeira, e não vimos nenhuma falha. O design dos interiores oferece espaço para dois sistemas independentes de resfriamento de água para CPU e GPU.

Apesar de ser compacto, o pequeno PC traz 7,5 kg para a balança. Você não esperaria isto à primeira vista, mas isto também confirma os materiais utilizados, já que em um caso tão pequeno, tudo o que for possível precisa ser utilizado para transferir o calor criado

Corsair One i300
Corsair One i300
Corsair One i300
Corsair One i300 (fonte: Corsair)
Corsair One i300 (fonte: Corsair)
Corsair One i300 (fonte: Corsair)
Corsair One i300 (fonte: Corsair)
Corsair One i300 (fonte: Corsair)
Corsair One i300 (fonte: Corsair)
Corsair One i300

Equipamentos - Os mais atuais

Portos externos na parte traseira do Corsair One i300
Portos externos na parte de trás

No One i300, Corsair utiliza uma placa principal Mini-ITX convencional da MSI. Para ser exato, a Corsair utiliza a MSI MEG Z690I Unify em nossa unidade de teste. Com isto, o PC de mesa também está bem equipado com conexões externas. Há um total de 8 portas USB na parte traseira, duas das quais também suportam o Thunderbolt 4. A frente abriga 3 portas USB adicionais. A própria Nvidia GeForce RTX 3080 Ti também adiciona 3x DisplayPort e uma conexão HDMI.

Em termos de conexões de rede, o usuário pode escolher entre WLAN no padrão mais atual ou Ethernet (2,5G).

Comunicação

O módulo Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211 incorporado na placa principal é o mais atual disponível, portanto você também pode usar redes Wi-Fi 6G. Usando nosso roteador de teste atual, que também suporta o mais novo padrão, o Corsair One i300 oferece taxas de transferência rápidas e estáveis em nosso teste WLAN.

Nota: Como infelizmente nossa unidade de teste foi enviada para nós sem as antenas WLAN originais, realizamos este teste usando antenas alternativas. Atualmente, não podemos dizer se as taxas de transferência são ainda ligeiramente melhores quando usamos as antenas originais.

Networking
iperf3 transmit AX12
Asus ROG Flow Z13 GZ301ZE
Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX210
1444 (776min - 1663max) MBit/s
Average Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211
  (1003 - 1501, n=4)
1320 MBit/s
Huawei MateBook 13s i5 11300H
Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201
909 (814min - 1010max) MBit/s
iperf3 receive AX12
Average Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211
  (1178 - 1623, n=4)
1409 MBit/s
Asus ROG Flow Z13 GZ301ZE
Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX210
1366 (853min - 1480max) MBit/s
Huawei MateBook 13s i5 11300H
Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201
1258 (1143min - 1362max) MBit/s
iperf3 receive AXE11000
MSI Stealth GS66 12UGS
Killer Wi-Fi 6E AX1675i 160MHz Wireless Network Adapter
1569 (622min - 1690max) MBit/s +19%
Average Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211
  (582 - 1890, n=242)
1382 MBit/s +5%
Corsair One i300
Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211
1318 (1292min - 1332max) MBit/s
Average of class Desktop
  (801 - 1478, n=3, last 2 years)
1042 MBit/s -21%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
Corsair One i300
Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211
1861 (1819min - 1912max) MBit/s
Average Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211
  (64 - 1921, n=242)
1231 MBit/s -34%
Average of class Desktop
  (629 - 835, n=2, last 2 years)
732 MBit/s -61%
0501001502002503003504004505005506006507007508008509009501000105011001150120012501300135014001450150015501600165017001750180018501900Tooltip
Corsair One i300 Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211; iperf3 receive AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1318 (1292-1332)
MSI Stealth GS66 12UGS Killer Wi-Fi 6E AX1675i 160MHz Wireless Network Adapter; iperf3 receive AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1541 (622-1690)
Asus ROG Flow Z13 GZ301ZE Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX210; iperf3 receive AX12; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1365 (853-1480)
Huawei MateBook 13s i5 11300H Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201; iperf3 receive AX12; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1257 (1143-1362)
Corsair One i300 Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211; iperf3 transmit AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1861 (1819-1912)
Asus ROG Flow Z13 GZ301ZE Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX210; iperf3 transmit AX12; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1418 (776-1663)
Huawei MateBook 13s i5 11300H Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201; iperf3 transmit AX12; iperf 3.1.3: Ø909 (814-1010)

Manutenção

Caso o desempenho do Corsair One i300 seja insuficiente ou a solução de armazenamento se torne muito pequena, você também pode atualizar o computador. No entanto, você deve ter cuidado, já que o espaço interno é muito limitado. O PC desktop pode ser aberto facilmente. A tampa da caixa superior com o ventilador de 140 mm é rapidamente removida e as tampas laterais são fixadas apenas com dois parafusos. Mas então as mangueiras dos AiOs impedirão uma rápida substituição dos componentes. Embora você ainda possa acessar a memória de trabalho com bastante facilidade, as coisas parecem mais difíceis se você quiser chegar à solução de armazenamento. Por este motivo, gostaríamos de ter outra opção nas configurações disponíveis, já que há um total de três slots M.2 na placa principal. Entretanto, o sistema já está bem equipado com 2 TB de armazenamento.

Corsair One i300
Corsair One i300
Corsair One i300
Corsair One i300
Corsair One i300
Corsair One i300
Corsair One i300
Corsair One i300

Desempenho

Olhando puramente em termos dos componentes utilizados, o Corsair One i300 oferece processadores muito rápidos para jogos com o Intel Core i9-12900Ke oNvidia GeForce RTX 3080 Ti. Atualmente, a GeForce RTX 3080 Ti é a segunda placa gráfica mais rápida da Nvidia, permanecendo apenas alguns pontos percentuais atrás da GeForce RTX 3090. Embora isso também possa ter cabido no caso se você considerar apenas o tamanho físico, o resfriamento dos chips VRAM provavelmente levou a Corsair a usar "apenas" um GeForce RTX 3080 Ti. O modelo ligeiramente mais fraco do Corsair One i300 está equipado com um GeForce RTX 3080, que pode ser a escolha mais razoável por causa de seu preço de compra mais baixo.

CPU-Z
CPU-Z
CPU-Z
CPU-Z
CPU-Z
CPU-Z
CPU-Z
GPU-Z
GPU-Z
HWiNFO

Processador

O Corsair One i300 está equipado com o processador mais rápido da Intel que está atualmente disponível para jogos. Para ser exato, o Corsair utiliza oIntel Core i9-12900Kcom base em uma placa Z690 da MSI. Já pudemos ver com antecedência qual desempenho pode ser entregue pela nova nave-chefe da Intel. Para mais detalhes sobre a Intel Core i9-12900Kreferimo-nos a isto página. Entretanto, há uma pequena limitação no Corsair One i300 em termos de consumo máximo de energia. PL1 e também PL2 são limitados aos valores de 165 e 175 watts respectivamente, o que significa que o processador é ligeiramente estrangulado sob carga. Sem esta limitação, o Intel Core i9-12900Kdeve ser capaz de consumir até 241 watts. Por outro lado, esta opção pode ser modificada na BIOS. Mas isto também resultaria em um volume de ruído e temperaturas mais altas.

No benchmark que estamos executando, o Intel Core i9-12900K se sai muito bem, mesmo que não seja capaz de usar seu desempenho total sob carga. O desempenho aumenta em comparação com o Corsair One i160 é imensa. Na classificação geral, o sistema atual oferece 48% a mais de desempenho.

Para comparações e benchmarks adicionais, nós o encaminhamos para nosso Gráfico de comparação de CPU.

Cinebench R15
Cinebench R15
Cinebench R20
Cinebench R20
Cinebench R23
Cinebench R23
CPU Performance Rating: Percent
Cinebench R23: Multi Core | Single Core
Cinebench R20: CPU (Multi Core) | CPU (Single Core)
Cinebench R15: CPU Multi 64Bit | CPU Single 64Bit
Blender: v2.79 BMW27 CPU
7-Zip 18.03: 7z b 4 | 7z b 4 -mmt1
Geekbench 5.5: Multi-Core | Single-Core
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2: 4k Preset
LibreOffice : 20 Documents To PDF
R Benchmark 2.5: Overall mean
CPU Performance Rating
Average of class Desktop
 
84.4 pt
Intel Core i9-12900K
Intel Core i9-12900K, NVIDIA Titan RTX
80.9 pt
Average Intel Core i9-12900K
 
80.2 pt
AMD Ryzen 9 5950X
AMD Ryzen 9 5950X, NVIDIA Titan RTX
79.4 pt
Intel Core i9-12900K
Intel Core i9-12900K, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti
79.2 pt
AMD Ryzen 9 5900X
AMD Ryzen 9 5900X, NVIDIA Titan RTX
68.9 pt
Intel Core i9-11900K
Intel Core i9-11900K, NVIDIA Titan RTX
56.6 pt
Intel Core i9-10900K
Intel Core i9-10900K, NVIDIA Titan RTX
52.6 pt
Intel Core i9-9900K -6!
Intel Core i9-9900K, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Ti (Desktop)
47.8 pt
Cinebench R23 / Multi Core
AMD Ryzen 9 5950X
AMD Ryzen 9 5950X, NVIDIA Titan RTX
27062 Points +7%
Intel Core i9-12900K
Intel Core i9-12900K, NVIDIA Titan RTX
27005 Points +7%
Average Intel Core i9-12900K
  (25245 - 27005, n=2)
26125 Points +3%
Intel Core i9-12900K
Intel Core i9-12900K, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti
25245 Points
Average of class Desktop
  (277 - 42705, n=16, last 2 years)
24671 Points -2%
AMD Ryzen 9 5900X
AMD Ryzen 9 5900X, NVIDIA Titan RTX
20634 Points -18%
Intel Core i9-10900K
Intel Core i9-10900K, NVIDIA Titan RTX
15821 Points -37%
Intel Core i9-11900K
Intel Core i9-11900K, NVIDIA Titan RTX
15519 Points -39%
Cinebench R23 / Single Core
Average of class Desktop
  (1662 - 2353, n=14, last 2 years)
2032 Points +1%
Intel Core i9-12900K
Intel Core i9-12900K, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti
2011 Points
Average Intel Core i9-12900K
  (1998 - 2011, n=2)
2005 Points 0%
Intel Core i9-12900K
Intel Core i9-12900K, NVIDIA Titan RTX
1998 Points -1%
Intel Core i9-11900K
Intel Core i9-11900K, NVIDIA Titan RTX
1693 Points -16%
AMD Ryzen 9 5950X
AMD Ryzen 9 5950X, NVIDIA Titan RTX
1649 Points -18%
AMD Ryzen 9 5900X
AMD Ryzen 9 5900X, NVIDIA Titan RTX
1568 Points -22%
Intel Core i9-10900K
Intel Core i9-10900K, NVIDIA Titan RTX
1374 Points -32%
Cinebench R20 / CPU (Multi Core)
AMD Ryzen 9 5950X
AMD Ryzen 9 5950X, NVIDIA Titan RTX
10482 Points +9%
Intel Core i9-12900K
Intel Core i9-12900K, NVIDIA Titan RTX
10240 Points +6%
Average of class Desktop
  (4085 - 16722, n=13, last 2 years)
10221 Points +6%
Average Intel Core i9-12900K
  (9630 - 10240, n=2)
9935 Points +3%
Intel Core i9-12900K
Intel Core i9-12900K, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti
9630 Points
AMD Ryzen 9 5900X
AMD Ryzen 9 5900X, NVIDIA Titan RTX
8629 Points -10%
Intel Core i9-10900K
Intel Core i9-10900K, NVIDIA Titan RTX
6381 Points -34%
Intel Core i9-11900K
Intel Core i9-11900K, NVIDIA Titan RTX
5997 Points -38%
Intel Core i9-9900K
Intel Core i9-9900K, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Ti (Desktop)
4816 Points -50%
Cinebench R20 / CPU (Single Core)
Intel Core i9-12900K
Intel Core i9-12900K, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti
777 Points
Average Intel Core i9-12900K
  (766 - 777, n=2)
772 Points -1%
Average of class Desktop
  (451 - 902, n=13, last 2 years)
771 Points -1%
Intel Core i9-12900K
Intel Core i9-12900K, NVIDIA Titan RTX
766 Points -1%
Intel Core i9-11900K
Intel Core i9-11900K, NVIDIA Titan RTX
647 Points -17%
AMD Ryzen 9 5950X
AMD Ryzen 9 5950X, NVIDIA Titan RTX
641 Points -18%
AMD Ryzen 9 5900X
AMD Ryzen 9 5900X, NVIDIA Titan RTX
639 Points -18%
Intel Core i9-10900K
Intel Core i9-10900K, NVIDIA Titan RTX
532 Points -32%
Intel Core i9-9900K
Intel Core i9-9900K, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Ti (Desktop)
495 Points -36%
Cinebench R15 / CPU Multi 64Bit
AMD Ryzen 9 5950X
AMD Ryzen 9 5950X, NVIDIA Titan RTX
4492 Points +29%
Average of class Desktop
  (2005 - 6588, n=18, last 2 years)
4403 Points +27%
Intel Core i9-12900K
Intel Core i9-12900K, NVIDIA Titan RTX
4057 Points +17%
Average Intel Core i9-12900K
  (3473 - 4102, n=3)
3877 Points +12%
AMD Ryzen 9 5900X
AMD Ryzen 9 5900X, NVIDIA Titan RTX
3717 Points +7%
Intel Core i9-12900K
Intel Core i9-12900K, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti
3473 Points
Intel Core i9-10900K
Intel Core i9-10900K, NVIDIA Titan RTX
2620 Points -25%
Intel Core i9-11900K
Intel Core i9-11900K, NVIDIA Titan RTX
2436 Points -30%
Intel Core i9-9900K
Intel Core i9-9900K, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Ti (Desktop)
1987 Points -43%
Cinebench R15 / CPU Single 64Bit
Average of class Desktop
  (233 - 356, n=18, last 2 years)
305 Points +4%
Intel Core i9-12900K
Intel Core i9-12900K, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti
292 Points
Average Intel Core i9-12900K
  (286 - 292, n=3)
289 Points -1%
Intel Core i9-12900K
Intel Core i9-12900K, NVIDIA Titan RTX
286 Points -2%
AMD Ryzen 9 5950X
AMD Ryzen 9 5950X, NVIDIA Titan RTX
272 Points -7%
AMD Ryzen 9 5900X
AMD Ryzen 9 5900X, NVIDIA Titan RTX
271 Points -7%
Intel Core i9-11900K
Intel Core i9-11900K, NVIDIA Titan RTX
262 Points -10%
Intel Core i9-10900K
Intel Core i9-10900K, NVIDIA Titan RTX
224 Points -23%
Intel Core i9-9900K
Intel Core i9-9900K, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Ti (Desktop)
203 Points -30%
Blender / v2.79 BMW27 CPU
Intel Core i9-9900K
Intel Core i9-9900K, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Ti (Desktop)
223.8 Seconds * -74%
Intel Core i9-11900K
Intel Core i9-11900K, NVIDIA Titan RTX
190.3 Seconds * -48%
Intel Core i9-10900K
Intel Core i9-10900K, NVIDIA Titan RTX
167.3 Seconds * -30%
Average of class Desktop
  (77 - 333, n=15, last 2 years)
142.7 Seconds * -11%
AMD Ryzen 9 5900X
AMD Ryzen 9 5900X, NVIDIA Titan RTX
141 Seconds * -10%
Intel Core i9-12900K
Intel Core i9-12900K, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti
128.3 Seconds *
Average Intel Core i9-12900K
  (121.1 - 128.3, n=2)
124.7 Seconds * +3%
Intel Core i9-12900K
Intel Core i9-12900K, NVIDIA Titan RTX
121.1 Seconds * +6%
AMD Ryzen 9 5950X
AMD Ryzen 9 5950X, NVIDIA Titan RTX
112.8 Seconds * +12%
7-Zip 18.03 / 7z b 4
AMD Ryzen 9 5950X
AMD Ryzen 9 5950X, NVIDIA Titan RTX
127792 MIPS +32%
Average of class Desktop
  (45947 - 160423, n=12, last 2 years)
109321 MIPS +13%
Intel Core i9-12900K
Intel Core i9-12900K, NVIDIA Titan RTX
97671 MIPS +1%
Average Intel Core i9-12900K
  (96960 - 97671, n=2)
97316 MIPS 0%
Intel Core i9-12900K
Intel Core i9-12900K, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti
96960 MIPS
AMD Ryzen 9 5900X
AMD Ryzen 9 5900X, NVIDIA Titan RTX
95123 MIPS -2%
Intel Core i9-10900K
Intel Core i9-10900K, NVIDIA Titan RTX
70968 MIPS -27%
Intel Core i9-11900K
Intel Core i9-11900K, NVIDIA Titan RTX
62746 MIPS -35%
Intel Core i9-9900K
Intel Core i9-9900K, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Ti (Desktop)
53166 MIPS -45%
7-Zip 18.03 / 7z b 4 -mmt1
Average of class Desktop
  (5262 - 8020, n=12, last 2 years)
7447 MIPS +13%
AMD Ryzen 9 5950X
AMD Ryzen 9 5950X, NVIDIA Titan RTX
6974 MIPS +6%
AMD Ryzen 9 5900X
AMD Ryzen 9 5900X, NVIDIA Titan RTX
6785 MIPS +3%
Intel Core i9-11900K
Intel Core i9-11900K, NVIDIA Titan RTX
6652 MIPS +1%
Intel Core i9-12900K
Intel Core i9-12900K, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti
6580 MIPS
Average Intel Core i9-12900K
  (6571 - 6580, n=2)
6576 MIPS 0%
Intel Core i9-12900K
Intel Core i9-12900K, NVIDIA Titan RTX
6571 MIPS 0%
Intel Core i9-10900K
Intel Core i9-10900K, NVIDIA Titan RTX
5954 MIPS -10%
Intel Core i9-9900K
Intel Core i9-9900K, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Ti (Desktop)
5311 MIPS -19%
Geekbench 5.5 / Multi-Core
Average of class Desktop
  (11095 - 26186, n=13, last 2 years)
19132 Points +8%
Intel Core i9-12900K
Intel Core i9-12900K, NVIDIA Titan RTX
17854 Points +1%
Average Intel Core i9-12900K
  (17698 - 17854, n=2)
17776 Points 0%
Intel Core i9-12900K
Intel Core i9-12900K, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti
17698 Points
AMD Ryzen 9 5950X
AMD Ryzen 9 5950X, NVIDIA Titan RTX
16891 Points -5%
AMD Ryzen 9 5900X
AMD Ryzen 9 5900X, NVIDIA Titan RTX
12990 Points -27%
Intel Core i9-10900K
Intel Core i9-10900K, NVIDIA Titan RTX
11414 Points -36%
Intel Core i9-11900K
Intel Core i9-11900K, NVIDIA Titan RTX
11035 Points -38%
Geekbench 5.5 / Single-Core
Average of class Desktop
  (1967 - 2559, n=13, last 2 years)
2272 Points +15%
Intel Core i9-12900K
Intel Core i9-12900K, NVIDIA Titan RTX
2042 Points +4%
Average Intel Core i9-12900K
  (1969 - 2042, n=2)
2006 Points +2%
Intel Core i9-12900K
Intel Core i9-12900K, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti
1969 Points
Intel Core i9-11900K
Intel Core i9-11900K, NVIDIA Titan RTX
1885 Points -4%
AMD Ryzen 9 5950X
AMD Ryzen 9 5950X, NVIDIA Titan RTX
1682 Points -15%
AMD Ryzen 9 5900X
AMD Ryzen 9 5900X, NVIDIA Titan RTX
1669 Points -15%
Intel Core i9-10900K
Intel Core i9-10900K, NVIDIA Titan RTX
1449 Points -26%
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 / 4k Preset
Average of class Desktop
  (12.9 - 45.7, n=12, last 2 years)
32 fps +10%
AMD Ryzen 9 5950X
AMD Ryzen 9 5950X, NVIDIA Titan RTX
31.8 fps +10%
Intel Core i9-12900K
Intel Core i9-12900K, NVIDIA Titan RTX
30 fps +3%
Average Intel Core i9-12900K
  (29 - 30, n=2)
29.5 fps +2%
Intel Core i9-12900K
Intel Core i9-12900K, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti
29 fps
AMD Ryzen 9 5900X
AMD Ryzen 9 5900X, NVIDIA Titan RTX
25.5 fps -12%
Intel Core i9-10900K
Intel Core i9-10900K, NVIDIA Titan RTX
21 fps -28%
Intel Core i9-11900K
Intel Core i9-11900K, NVIDIA Titan RTX
19.8 fps -32%
Intel Core i9-9900K
Intel Core i9-9900K, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Ti (Desktop)
15.8 fps -46%
LibreOffice / 20 Documents To PDF
Intel Core i9-10900K
Intel Core i9-10900K, NVIDIA Titan RTX
76 s * -99%
Intel Core i9-11900K
Intel Core i9-11900K, NVIDIA Titan RTX
72.5 s * -90%
AMD Ryzen 9 5900X
AMD Ryzen 9 5900X, NVIDIA Titan RTX
47.65 s * -25%
AMD Ryzen 9 5950X
AMD Ryzen 9 5950X, NVIDIA Titan RTX
45.97 s * -21%
Average of class Desktop
  (35.5 - 49.1, n=12, last 2 years)
40.7 s * -7%
Intel Core i9-12900K
Intel Core i9-12900K, NVIDIA Titan RTX
40.6 s * -7%
Average Intel Core i9-12900K
  (38.1 - 40.6, n=2)
39.4 s * -3%
Intel Core i9-12900K
Intel Core i9-12900K, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti
38.1 s *
R Benchmark 2.5 / Overall mean
Intel Core i9-10900K
Intel Core i9-10900K, NVIDIA Titan RTX
0.528 sec * -34%
Intel Core i9-11900K
Intel Core i9-11900K, NVIDIA Titan RTX
0.4733 sec * -20%
AMD Ryzen 9 5950X
AMD Ryzen 9 5950X, NVIDIA Titan RTX
0.4556 sec * -15%
AMD Ryzen 9 5900X
AMD Ryzen 9 5900X, NVIDIA Titan RTX
0.4513 sec * -14%
Intel Core i9-12900K
Intel Core i9-12900K, NVIDIA Titan RTX
0.4216 sec * -7%
Average Intel Core i9-12900K
  (0.3946 - 0.4216, n=2)
0.4081 sec * -3%
Intel Core i9-12900K
Intel Core i9-12900K, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti
0.3946 sec *
Average of class Desktop
  (0.3307 - 0.4987, n=12, last 2 years)
0.3853 sec * +2%

* ... smaller is better

Performance Rating
Average of class Desktop
 
94.8 pt
AMD Ryzen 9 5950X, NVIDIA Titan RTX
AMD Ryzen 9 5950X, NVIDIA Titan RTX
82.4 pt
AMD Ryzen 9 5900X, NVIDIA Titan RTX
AMD Ryzen 9 5900X, NVIDIA Titan RTX
65.4 pt
Intel Core i9-11900K, NVIDIA Titan RTX
Intel Core i9-11900K, NVIDIA Titan RTX
60.1 pt
Intel Core i9-12900K, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti
Intel Core i9-12900K, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti
59.5 pt
Average Intel Core i9-12900K
 
58.7 pt
Intel Core i9-12900K, NVIDIA Titan RTX
Intel Core i9-12900K, NVIDIA Titan RTX
58.4 pt
AIDA64 / FP32 Ray-Trace
Average of class Desktop
  (6011 - 83214, n=12, last 2 years)
40104 KRay/s +215%
AMD Ryzen 9 5950X, NVIDIA Titan RTX
AMD Ryzen 9 5950X, NVIDIA Titan RTX
28150 KRay/s +121%
AMD Ryzen 9 5900X, NVIDIA Titan RTX
AMD Ryzen 9 5900X, NVIDIA Titan RTX
23391 KRay/s +84%
Intel Core i9-11900K, NVIDIA Titan RTX
Intel Core i9-11900K, NVIDIA Titan RTX
20134 KRay/s +58%
Intel Core i9-12900K, NVIDIA Titan RTX
Intel Core i9-12900K, NVIDIA Titan RTX
13266 KRay/s +4%
Average Intel Core i9-12900K
  (12739 - 13345, n=3)
13117 KRay/s +3%
Intel Core i9-12900K, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti
Intel Core i9-12900K, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti
12739 KRay/s
AIDA64 / FPU Julia
Average of class Desktop
  (27835 - 242692, n=12, last 2 years)
156419 Points +168%
AMD Ryzen 9 5950X, NVIDIA Titan RTX
AMD Ryzen 9 5950X, NVIDIA Titan RTX
144072 Points +147%
AMD Ryzen 9 5900X, NVIDIA Titan RTX
AMD Ryzen 9 5900X, NVIDIA Titan RTX
114330 Points +96%
Intel Core i9-11900K, NVIDIA Titan RTX
Intel Core i9-11900K, NVIDIA Titan RTX
80516 Points +38%
Intel Core i9-12900K, NVIDIA Titan RTX
Intel Core i9-12900K, NVIDIA Titan RTX
59419 Points +2%
Average Intel Core i9-12900K
  (58406 - 59419, n=3)
58991 Points +1%
Intel Core i9-12900K, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti
Intel Core i9-12900K, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti
58406 Points
AIDA64 / CPU SHA3
Average of class Desktop
  (2019 - 10804, n=12, last 2 years)
6997 MB/s +46%
Intel Core i9-11900K, NVIDIA Titan RTX
Intel Core i9-11900K, NVIDIA Titan RTX
5511 MB/s +15%
Average Intel Core i9-12900K
  (4796 - 5127, n=3)
4958 MB/s +3%
Intel Core i9-12900K, NVIDIA Titan RTX
Intel Core i9-12900K, NVIDIA Titan RTX
4952 MB/s +3%
Intel Core i9-12900K, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti
Intel Core i9-12900K, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti
4796 MB/s
AMD Ryzen 9 5950X, NVIDIA Titan RTX
AMD Ryzen 9 5950X, NVIDIA Titan RTX
4569 MB/s -5%
AMD Ryzen 9 5900X, NVIDIA Titan RTX
AMD Ryzen 9 5900X, NVIDIA Titan RTX
3591 MB/s -25%
AIDA64 / CPU Queen
AMD Ryzen 9 5950X, NVIDIA Titan RTX
AMD Ryzen 9 5950X, NVIDIA Titan RTX
164437 Points +47%
Average of class Desktop
  (75592 - 187912, n=12, last 2 years)
141341 Points +26%
AMD Ryzen 9 5900X, NVIDIA Titan RTX
AMD Ryzen 9 5900X, NVIDIA Titan RTX
138724 Points +24%
Intel Core i9-12900K, NVIDIA Titan RTX
Intel Core i9-12900K, NVIDIA Titan RTX
112694 Points +1%
Average Intel Core i9-12900K
  (112066 - 112694, n=3)
112400 Points 0%
Intel Core i9-12900K, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti
Intel Core i9-12900K, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti
112066 Points
Intel Core i9-11900K, NVIDIA Titan RTX
Intel Core i9-11900K, NVIDIA Titan RTX
104650 Points -7%
AIDA64 / FPU SinJulia
AMD Ryzen 9 5950X, NVIDIA Titan RTX
AMD Ryzen 9 5950X, NVIDIA Titan RTX
26364 Points +80%
Average of class Desktop
  (6540 - 35251, n=12, last 2 years)
19667 Points +35%
AMD Ryzen 9 5900X, NVIDIA Titan RTX
AMD Ryzen 9 5900X, NVIDIA Titan RTX
19353 Points +32%
Intel Core i9-12900K, NVIDIA Titan RTX
Intel Core i9-12900K, NVIDIA Titan RTX
14664 Points 0%
Average Intel Core i9-12900K
  (14590 - 14664, n=3)
14623 Points 0%
Intel Core i9-12900K, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti
Intel Core i9-12900K, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti
14614 Points
Intel Core i9-11900K, NVIDIA Titan RTX
Intel Core i9-11900K, NVIDIA Titan RTX
11205 Points -23%
AIDA64 / FPU Mandel
Average of class Desktop
  (16325 - 127572, n=12, last 2 years)
81586 Points +128%
AMD Ryzen 9 5950X, NVIDIA Titan RTX
AMD Ryzen 9 5950X, NVIDIA Titan RTX
78269 Points +119%
AMD Ryzen 9 5900X, NVIDIA Titan RTX
AMD Ryzen 9 5900X, NVIDIA Titan RTX
62547 Points +75%
Intel Core i9-11900K, NVIDIA Titan RTX
Intel Core i9-11900K, NVIDIA Titan RTX
49018 Points +37%
Intel Core i9-12900K, NVIDIA Titan RTX
Intel Core i9-12900K, NVIDIA Titan RTX
38042 Points +6%
Average Intel Core i9-12900K
  (35801 - 39323, n=3)
37722 Points +5%
Intel Core i9-12900K, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti
Intel Core i9-12900K, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti
35801 Points
AIDA64 / CPU AES
Average of class Desktop
  (67922 - 513073, n=12, last 2 years)
207368 MB/s +51%
Intel Core i9-11900K, NVIDIA Titan RTX
Intel Core i9-11900K, NVIDIA Titan RTX
172028 MB/s +25%
AMD Ryzen 9 5950X, NVIDIA Titan RTX
AMD Ryzen 9 5950X, NVIDIA Titan RTX
153484 MB/s +12%
Intel Core i9-12900K, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti
Intel Core i9-12900K, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti
137321 MB/s
Average Intel Core i9-12900K
  (94062 - 140055, n=3)
123813 MB/s -10%
AMD Ryzen 9 5900X, NVIDIA Titan RTX
AMD Ryzen 9 5900X, NVIDIA Titan RTX
118228 MB/s -14%
Intel Core i9-12900K, NVIDIA Titan RTX
Intel Core i9-12900K, NVIDIA Titan RTX
94062 MB/s -32%
AIDA64 / CPU ZLib
AMD Ryzen 9 5950X, NVIDIA Titan RTX
AMD Ryzen 9 5950X, NVIDIA Titan RTX
1727 MB/s +12%
Average of class Desktop
  (812 - 2632, n=12, last 2 years)
1727 MB/s +12%
Average Intel Core i9-12900K
  (1537 - 1608, n=3)
1568 MB/s +2%
Intel Core i9-12900K, NVIDIA Titan RTX
Intel Core i9-12900K, NVIDIA Titan RTX
1560 MB/s +1%
Intel Core i9-12900K, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti
Intel Core i9-12900K, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti
1537 MB/s
AMD Ryzen 9 5900X, NVIDIA Titan RTX
AMD Ryzen 9 5900X, NVIDIA Titan RTX
1345 MB/s -12%
Intel Core i9-11900K, NVIDIA Titan RTX
Intel Core i9-11900K, NVIDIA Titan RTX
936 MB/s -39%
AIDA64 / FP64 Ray-Trace
Average of class Desktop
  (3442 - 44013, n=12, last 2 years)
21597 KRay/s +185%
AMD Ryzen 9 5950X, NVIDIA Titan RTX
AMD Ryzen 9 5950X, NVIDIA Titan RTX
15213 KRay/s +101%
AMD Ryzen 9 5900X, NVIDIA Titan RTX
AMD Ryzen 9 5900X, NVIDIA Titan RTX
12613 KRay/s +66%
Intel Core i9-11900K, NVIDIA Titan RTX
Intel Core i9-11900K, NVIDIA Titan RTX
10997 KRay/s +45%
Intel Core i9-12900K, NVIDIA Titan RTX
Intel Core i9-12900K, NVIDIA Titan RTX
8078 KRay/s +6%
Average Intel Core i9-12900K
  (7586 - 8283, n=3)
7982 KRay/s +5%
Intel Core i9-12900K, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti
Intel Core i9-12900K, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti
7586 KRay/s
AIDA64 / CPU PhotoWorxx
Intel Core i9-12900K, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti
Intel Core i9-12900K, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti
49236 MPixel/s
Intel Core i9-12900K, NVIDIA Titan RTX
Intel Core i9-12900K, NVIDIA Titan RTX
48307 MPixel/s -2%
Average Intel Core i9-12900K
  (33311 - 49236, n=3)
43618 MPixel/s -11%
Average of class Desktop
  (27809 - 54680, n=12, last 2 years)
43129 MPixel/s -12%
Intel Core i9-11900K, NVIDIA Titan RTX
Intel Core i9-11900K, NVIDIA Titan RTX
32488 MPixel/s -34%
AMD Ryzen 9 5950X, NVIDIA Titan RTX
AMD Ryzen 9 5950X, NVIDIA Titan RTX
27530 MPixel/s -44%
AMD Ryzen 9 5900X, NVIDIA Titan RTX
AMD Ryzen 9 5900X, NVIDIA Titan RTX
21433 MPixel/s -56%
Cinebench R10 Rendering Single 32Bit
9906
Cinebench R10 Shading 64Bit
6830 Points
Cinebench R10 Rendering Multiple CPUs 64Bit
112893 Points
Cinebench R10 Rendering Single CPUs 64Bit
16397 Points
Cinebench R10 Shading 32Bit
6828
Cinebench R10 Rendering Multiple CPUs 32Bit
70420
Cinebench R11.5 CPU Single 32Bit
3.08 Points
Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 32Bit
39.83 Points
Cinebench R11.5 OpenGL 32Bit
179.7 fps
Cinebench R11.5 CPU Single 64Bit
3.5 Points
Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 64Bit
44.18 Points
Cinebench R11.5 OpenGL 64Bit
198.8 fps
Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64Bit
292 Points
Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64Bit
3473 Points
Cinebench R15 Ref. Match 64Bit
99.6 %
Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64Bit
339.9 fps
Cinebench R20 CPU (Multi Core)
9630 Points
Cinebench R20 CPU (Single Core)
777 Points
Cinebench R23 Multi Core
25245 Points
Cinebench R23 Single Core
2011 Points
Ajuda

Teste de carga multi-constante Cinebench R15

Damos uma olhada no sistema sob carga constante usando o Cinebench-R15 Multi loop. Desta forma, podemos determinar se o sistema de resfriamento é suficientemente potente para resfriar o processador de forma eficaz. No Corsair One i300, o trabalho do AiO é muito confiável, e o resultado permanece constante mesmo depois de 50 corridas. No entanto, o TDP ligeiramente inferior doIntel Core i9-12900K é claramente perceptível aqui. Se você deixar o Core i9-12900K funcionar sem as limitações, ele pode alcançar quase 500 pontos a mais.

0230460690920115013801610184020702300253027602990322034503680391041404370Tooltip
Corsair One i300 Intel Core i9-12900K: Ø3491 (3392.13-3530.45)
Corsair One i160 Intel Core i9-9900K: Ø1835 (1804.48-1919.48)
Intel Core i9-11900K Intel Core i9-11900K: Ø2414 (2368.69-2445.74)
Intel Core i9-10900K Intel Core i9-10900K: Ø2598 (2576.32-2623.98)
AMD Ryzen 9 5950X AMD Ryzen 9 5950X: Ø4467 (4442.47-4510.09)
AMD Ryzen 9 5900X AMD Ryzen 9 5900X: Ø3681 (3663.67-3707.14)
Intel Core i9-12900K Intel Core i9-12900K: Ø3987 (3920.42-4037.55)

Desempenho do sistema

Durante nosso período de testes, o sistema inteiro funcionou muito rápido. Isto também se reflete nos benchmarks do sistema. Nos testes do PCMark 10, o Corsair One i300 assume a liderança em todos os testes individuais. Somente nos testes de renderização, o Corsair One i300 não é capaz de acompanhar o ritmo devido à placa gráfica. O Nvidia Titan RTXdos sistemas de comparação é a melhor escolha aqui, o que se deve à proximidade com a série quad.

PCMark 10
Score
Intel Core i9-12900K
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti, i9-12900K, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
8897 Points
AMD Ryzen 9 5950X
NVIDIA Titan RTX, R9 5950X, Intel Optane 905P 480GB 2.5
8778 Points -1%
Intel Core i9-12900K
NVIDIA Titan RTX, i9-12900K, Intel Optane 905P 480GB 2.5
8604 Points -3%
AMD Ryzen 9 5900X
NVIDIA Titan RTX, R9 5900X, Intel Optane 905P 480GB 2.5
8480 Points -5%
Intel Core i9-11900K
NVIDIA Titan RTX, i9-11900K, Intel Optane 905P 480GB 2.5
7745 Points -13%
Intel Core i9-10900K
NVIDIA Titan RTX, i9-10900K, WDC PC SN720 SDAQNTW-512G
7641 Points -14%
Intel Core i9-9900K
GeForce RTX 2080 Ti (Desktop), i9-9900K, Samsung PM961 NVMe MZVLW512HMJP
7329 Points -18%
Essentials
Intel Core i9-12900K
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti, i9-12900K, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
11660 Points
AMD Ryzen 9 5950X
NVIDIA Titan RTX, R9 5950X, Intel Optane 905P 480GB 2.5
11255 Points -3%
Intel Core i9-12900K
NVIDIA Titan RTX, i9-12900K, Intel Optane 905P 480GB 2.5
11086 Points -5%
AMD Ryzen 9 5900X
NVIDIA Titan RTX, R9 5900X, Intel Optane 905P 480GB 2.5
10964 Points -6%
Intel Core i9-9900K
GeForce RTX 2080 Ti (Desktop), i9-9900K, Samsung PM961 NVMe MZVLW512HMJP
10598 Points -9%
Intel Core i9-11900K
NVIDIA Titan RTX, i9-11900K, Intel Optane 905P 480GB 2.5
10585 Points -9%
Intel Core i9-10900K
NVIDIA Titan RTX, i9-10900K, WDC PC SN720 SDAQNTW-512G
10483 Points -10%
Productivity
AMD Ryzen 9 5950X
NVIDIA Titan RTX, R9 5950X, Intel Optane 905P 480GB 2.5
11163 Points +7%
Intel Core i9-12900K
NVIDIA Titan RTX, i9-12900K, Intel Optane 905P 480GB 2.5
10699 Points +2%
Intel Core i9-12900K
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti, i9-12900K, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
10470 Points
AMD Ryzen 9 5900X
NVIDIA Titan RTX, R9 5900X, Intel Optane 905P 480GB 2.5
10079 Points -4%
Intel Core i9-11900K
NVIDIA Titan RTX, i9-11900K, Intel Optane 905P 480GB 2.5
10039 Points -4%
Intel Core i9-10900K
NVIDIA Titan RTX, i9-10900K, WDC PC SN720 SDAQNTW-512G
9057 Points -13%
Intel Core i9-9900K
GeForce RTX 2080 Ti (Desktop), i9-9900K, Samsung PM961 NVMe MZVLW512HMJP
8412 Points -20%
Digital Content Creation
Intel Core i9-12900K
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti, i9-12900K, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
15657 Points
AMD Ryzen 9 5950X
NVIDIA Titan RTX, R9 5950X, Intel Optane 905P 480GB 2.5
14607 Points -7%
Intel Core i9-12900K
NVIDIA Titan RTX, i9-12900K, Intel Optane 905P 480GB 2.5
14573 Points -7%
AMD Ryzen 9 5900X
NVIDIA Titan RTX, R9 5900X, Intel Optane 905P 480GB 2.5
13801 Points -12%
Intel Core i9-10900K
NVIDIA Titan RTX, i9-10900K, WDC PC SN720 SDAQNTW-512G
12754 Points -19%
Intel Core i9-9900K
GeForce RTX 2080 Ti (Desktop), i9-9900K, Samsung PM961 NVMe MZVLW512HMJP
11987 Points -23%
Intel Core i9-11900K
NVIDIA Titan RTX, i9-11900K, Intel Optane 905P 480GB 2.5
11863 Points -24%
SPECviewperf 12
1900x1060 Solidworks (sw-03)
AMD Ryzen 9 5950X
NVIDIA Titan RTX, R9 5950X, Intel Optane 905P 480GB 2.5
196.8 fps +97%
Intel Core i9-11900K
NVIDIA Titan RTX, i9-11900K, Intel Optane 905P 480GB 2.5
182 fps +82%
AMD Ryzen 9 5900X
NVIDIA Titan RTX, R9 5900X, Intel Optane 905P 480GB 2.5
174.9 fps +75%
Intel Core i9-12900K
NVIDIA Titan RTX, i9-12900K, Intel Optane 905P 480GB 2.5
174 fps +74%
Intel Core i9-10900K
NVIDIA Titan RTX, i9-10900K, WDC PC SN720 SDAQNTW-512G
172.2 fps +72%
Intel Core i9-12900K
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti, i9-12900K, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
100 fps
Intel Core i9-9900K
GeForce RTX 2080 Ti (Desktop), i9-9900K, Samsung PM961 NVMe MZVLW512HMJP
83.7 fps -16%
1900x1060 Siemens NX (snx-02)
Intel Core i9-12900K
NVIDIA Titan RTX, i9-12900K, Intel Optane 905P 480GB 2.5
287 fps +1639%
AMD Ryzen 9 5900X
NVIDIA Titan RTX, R9 5900X, Intel Optane 905P 480GB 2.5
273.2 fps +1556%
AMD Ryzen 9 5950X
NVIDIA Titan RTX, R9 5950X, Intel Optane 905P 480GB 2.5
264.7 fps +1504%
Intel Core i9-10900K
NVIDIA Titan RTX, i9-10900K, WDC PC SN720 SDAQNTW-512G
263.3 fps +1496%
Intel Core i9-11900K
NVIDIA Titan RTX, i9-11900K, Intel Optane 905P 480GB 2.5
245 fps +1385%
Intel Core i9-12900K
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti, i9-12900K, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
16.5 fps
Intel Core i9-9900K
GeForce RTX 2080 Ti (Desktop), i9-9900K, Samsung PM961 NVMe MZVLW512HMJP
12.72 fps -23%
1900x1060 Showcase (showcase-01)
Intel Core i9-12900K
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti, i9-12900K, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
252 fps
Intel Core i9-11900K
NVIDIA Titan RTX, i9-11900K, Intel Optane 905P 480GB 2.5
203 fps -19%
Intel Core i9-12900K
NVIDIA Titan RTX, i9-12900K, Intel Optane 905P 480GB 2.5
200 fps -21%
Intel Core i9-10900K
NVIDIA Titan RTX, i9-10900K, WDC PC SN720 SDAQNTW-512G
192.4 fps -24%
AMD Ryzen 9 5900X
NVIDIA Titan RTX, R9 5900X, Intel Optane 905P 480GB 2.5
191.1 fps -24%
AMD Ryzen 9 5950X
NVIDIA Titan RTX, R9 5950X, Intel Optane 905P 480GB 2.5
190.8 fps -24%
Intel Core i9-9900K
GeForce RTX 2080 Ti (Desktop), i9-9900K, Samsung PM961 NVMe MZVLW512HMJP
182.3 fps -28%
1900x1060 Medical (medical-01)
Intel Core i9-12900K
NVIDIA Titan RTX, i9-12900K, Intel Optane 905P 480GB 2.5
108 fps +21%
Intel Core i9-10900K
NVIDIA Titan RTX, i9-10900K, WDC PC SN720 SDAQNTW-512G
94.5 fps +6%
AMD Ryzen 9 5900X
NVIDIA Titan RTX, R9 5900X, Intel Optane 905P 480GB 2.5
90.7 fps +1%
Intel Core i9-12900K
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti, i9-12900K, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
89.4 fps
AMD Ryzen 9 5950X
NVIDIA Titan RTX, R9 5950X, Intel Optane 905P 480GB 2.5
87.8 fps -2%
Intel Core i9-11900K
NVIDIA Titan RTX, i9-11900K, Intel Optane 905P 480GB 2.5
87.8 fps -2%
Intel Core i9-9900K
GeForce RTX 2080 Ti (Desktop), i9-9900K, Samsung PM961 NVMe MZVLW512HMJP
56.6 fps -37%
1900x1060 Maya (maya-04)
Intel Core i9-12900K
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti, i9-12900K, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
283 fps
Intel Core i9-12900K
NVIDIA Titan RTX, i9-12900K, Intel Optane 905P 480GB 2.5
211 fps -25%
Intel Core i9-11900K
NVIDIA Titan RTX, i9-11900K, Intel Optane 905P 480GB 2.5
199 fps -30%
Intel Core i9-9900K
GeForce RTX 2080 Ti (Desktop), i9-9900K, Samsung PM961 NVMe MZVLW512HMJP
190.9 fps -33%
AMD Ryzen 9 5950X
NVIDIA Titan RTX, R9 5950X, Intel Optane 905P 480GB 2.5
189.7 fps -33%
Intel Core i9-10900K
NVIDIA Titan RTX, i9-10900K, WDC PC SN720 SDAQNTW-512G
188.7 fps -33%
AMD Ryzen 9 5900X
NVIDIA Titan RTX, R9 5900X, Intel Optane 905P 480GB 2.5
188.3 fps -33%
1900x1060 Energy (energy-01)
Intel Core i9-12900K
NVIDIA Titan RTX, i9-12900K, Intel Optane 905P 480GB 2.5
30.1 fps +21%
Intel Core i9-10900K
NVIDIA Titan RTX, i9-10900K, WDC PC SN720 SDAQNTW-512G
28.72 fps +15%
AMD Ryzen 9 5900X
NVIDIA Titan RTX, R9 5900X, Intel Optane 905P 480GB 2.5
28.31 fps +14%
Intel Core i9-11900K
NVIDIA Titan RTX, i9-11900K, Intel Optane 905P 480GB 2.5
28.2 fps +13%
AMD Ryzen 9 5950X
NVIDIA Titan RTX, R9 5950X, Intel Optane 905P 480GB 2.5
27.88 fps +12%
Intel Core i9-12900K
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti, i9-12900K, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
24.9 fps
Intel Core i9-9900K
GeForce RTX 2080 Ti (Desktop), i9-9900K, Samsung PM961 NVMe MZVLW512HMJP
16.72 fps -33%
1900x1060 Creo (creo-01)
Intel Core i9-12900K
NVIDIA Titan RTX, i9-12900K, Intel Optane 905P 480GB 2.5
187 fps +98%
AMD Ryzen 9 5900X
NVIDIA Titan RTX, R9 5900X, Intel Optane 905P 480GB 2.5
173 fps +83%
Intel Core i9-11900K
NVIDIA Titan RTX, i9-11900K, Intel Optane 905P 480GB 2.5
173 fps +83%
Intel Core i9-10900K
NVIDIA Titan RTX, i9-10900K, WDC PC SN720 SDAQNTW-512G
157.2 fps +67%
AMD Ryzen 9 5950X
NVIDIA Titan RTX, R9 5950X, Intel Optane 905P 480GB 2.5
141.9 fps +50%
Intel Core i9-12900K
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti, i9-12900K, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
94.3 fps
Intel Core i9-9900K
GeForce RTX 2080 Ti (Desktop), i9-9900K, Samsung PM961 NVMe MZVLW512HMJP
72.2 fps -23%
1900x1060 Catia (catia-04)
Intel Core i9-12900K
NVIDIA Titan RTX, i9-12900K, Intel Optane 905P 480GB 2.5
290 fps +74%
Intel Core i9-11900K
NVIDIA Titan RTX, i9-11900K, Intel Optane 905P 480GB 2.5
269 fps +61%
AMD Ryzen 9 5900X
NVIDIA Titan RTX, R9 5900X, Intel Optane 905P 480GB 2.5
262.7 fps +57%
AMD Ryzen 9 5950X
NVIDIA Titan RTX, R9 5950X, Intel Optane 905P 480GB 2.5
237.7 fps +42%
Intel Core i9-10900K
NVIDIA Titan RTX, i9-10900K, WDC PC SN720 SDAQNTW-512G
225.2 fps +35%
Intel Core i9-12900K
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti, i9-12900K, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
167 fps
Intel Core i9-9900K
GeForce RTX 2080 Ti (Desktop), i9-9900K, Samsung PM961 NVMe MZVLW512HMJP
120.8 fps -28%
1900x1060 3ds Max (3dsmax-05)
Intel Core i9-12900K
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti, i9-12900K, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
363 fps
Intel Core i9-10900K
NVIDIA Titan RTX, i9-10900K, WDC PC SN720 SDAQNTW-512G
297.4 fps -18%
AMD Ryzen 9 5900X
NVIDIA Titan RTX, R9 5900X, Intel Optane 905P 480GB 2.5
292.6 fps -19%
AMD Ryzen 9 5950X
NVIDIA Titan RTX, R9 5950X, Intel Optane 905P 480GB 2.5
291.3 fps -20%
Intel Core i9-11900K
NVIDIA Titan RTX, i9-11900K, Intel Optane 905P 480GB 2.5
289 fps -20%
Intel Core i9-9900K
GeForce RTX 2080 Ti (Desktop), i9-9900K, Samsung PM961 NVMe MZVLW512HMJP
271.8 fps -25%
Intel Core i9-12900K
NVIDIA Titan RTX, i9-12900K, Intel Optane 905P 480GB 2.5
262 fps -28%
SPECviewperf 13
Solidworks (sw-04)
Intel Core i9-12900K
NVIDIA Titan RTX, i9-12900K, Intel Optane 905P 480GB 2.5
199 fps +36%
Intel Core i9-11900K
NVIDIA Titan RTX, i9-11900K, Intel Optane 905P 480GB 2.5
198 fps +36%
AMD Ryzen 9 5900X
NVIDIA Titan RTX, R9 5900X, Intel Optane 905P 480GB 2.5
196.4 fps +35%
AMD Ryzen 9 5950X
NVIDIA Titan RTX, R9 5950X, Intel Optane 905P 480GB 2.5
174.6 fps +20%
Intel Core i9-10900K
NVIDIA Titan RTX, i9-10900K, WDC PC SN720 SDAQNTW-512G
166.2 fps +14%
Intel Core i9-12900K
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti, i9-12900K, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
146 fps
Intel Core i9-9900K
GeForce RTX 2080 Ti (Desktop), i9-9900K, Samsung PM961 NVMe MZVLW512HMJP
116.3 fps -20%
Siemens NX (snx-03)
Intel Core i9-12900K
NVIDIA Titan RTX, i9-12900K, Intel Optane 905P 480GB 2.5
516 fps +1643%
AMD Ryzen 9 5900X
NVIDIA Titan RTX, R9 5900X, Intel Optane 905P 480GB 2.5
493.4 fps +1567%
AMD Ryzen 9 5950X
NVIDIA Titan RTX, R9 5950X, Intel Optane 905P 480GB 2.5
478.5 fps +1517%
Intel Core i9-10900K
NVIDIA Titan RTX, i9-10900K, WDC PC SN720 SDAQNTW-512G
472.9 fps +1498%
Intel Core i9-11900K
NVIDIA Titan RTX, i9-11900K, Intel Optane 905P 480GB 2.5
450 fps +1420%
Intel Core i9-12900K
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti, i9-12900K, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
29.6 fps
Intel Core i9-9900K
GeForce RTX 2080 Ti (Desktop), i9-9900K, Samsung PM961 NVMe MZVLW512HMJP
23.03 fps -22%
Showcase (showcase-02)
Intel Core i9-12900K
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti, i9-12900K, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
254 fps
Intel Core i9-12900K
NVIDIA Titan RTX, i9-12900K, Intel Optane 905P 480GB 2.5
199 fps -22%
Intel Core i9-10900K
NVIDIA Titan RTX, i9-10900K, WDC PC SN720 SDAQNTW-512G
194.1 fps -24%
Intel Core i9-11900K
NVIDIA Titan RTX, i9-11900K, Intel Optane 905P 480GB 2.5
194 fps -24%
AMD Ryzen 9 5950X
NVIDIA Titan RTX, R9 5950X, Intel Optane 905P 480GB 2.5
191.1 fps -25%
AMD Ryzen 9 5900X
NVIDIA Titan RTX, R9 5900X, Intel Optane 905P 480GB 2.5
190.5 fps -25%
Intel Core i9-9900K
GeForce RTX 2080 Ti (Desktop), i9-9900K, Samsung PM961 NVMe MZVLW512HMJP
182.6 fps -28%
Medical (medical-02)
Intel Core i9-12900K
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti, i9-12900K, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
106 fps
Intel Core i9-12900K
NVIDIA Titan RTX, i9-12900K, Intel Optane 905P 480GB 2.5
93.6 fps -12%
AMD Ryzen 9 5900X
NVIDIA Titan RTX, R9 5900X, Intel Optane 905P 480GB 2.5
90.8 fps -14%
AMD Ryzen 9 5950X
NVIDIA Titan RTX, R9 5950X, Intel Optane 905P 480GB 2.5
90.6 fps -15%
Intel Core i9-11900K
NVIDIA Titan RTX, i9-11900K, Intel Optane 905P 480GB 2.5
90 fps -15%
Intel Core i9-10900K
NVIDIA Titan RTX, i9-10900K, WDC PC SN720 SDAQNTW-512G
88.7 fps -16%
Intel Core i9-9900K
GeForce RTX 2080 Ti (Desktop), i9-9900K, Samsung PM961 NVMe MZVLW512HMJP
85 fps -20%
Maya (maya-05)
Intel Core i9-12900K
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti, i9-12900K, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
567 fps
Intel Core i9-12900K
NVIDIA Titan RTX, i9-12900K, Intel Optane 905P 480GB 2.5
505 fps -11%
AMD Ryzen 9 5950X
NVIDIA Titan RTX, R9 5950X, Intel Optane 905P 480GB 2.5
460.3 fps -19%
AMD Ryzen 9 5900X
NVIDIA Titan RTX, R9 5900X, Intel Optane 905P 480GB 2.5
458 fps -19%
Intel Core i9-11900K
NVIDIA Titan RTX, i9-11900K, Intel Optane 905P 480GB 2.5
454 fps -20%
Intel Core i9-10900K
NVIDIA Titan RTX, i9-10900K, WDC PC SN720 SDAQNTW-512G
405.9 fps -28%
Intel Core i9-9900K
GeForce RTX 2080 Ti (Desktop), i9-9900K, Samsung PM961 NVMe MZVLW512HMJP
402 fps -29%
Energy (energy-02)
Intel Core i9-11900K
NVIDIA Titan RTX, i9-11900K, Intel Optane 905P 480GB 2.5
53.7 fps +50%
Intel Core i9-10900K
NVIDIA Titan RTX, i9-10900K, WDC PC SN720 SDAQNTW-512G
53.2 fps +49%
Intel Core i9-12900K
NVIDIA Titan RTX, i9-12900K, Intel Optane 905P 480GB 2.5
52.7 fps +47%
AMD Ryzen 9 5900X
NVIDIA Titan RTX, R9 5900X, Intel Optane 905P 480GB 2.5
52 fps +45%
AMD Ryzen 9 5950X
NVIDIA Titan RTX, R9 5950X, Intel Optane 905P 480GB 2.5
52 fps +45%
Intel Core i9-12900K
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti, i9-12900K, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
35.8 fps
Intel Core i9-9900K
GeForce RTX 2080 Ti (Desktop), i9-9900K, Samsung PM961 NVMe MZVLW512HMJP
31.93 fps -11%
Creo (creo-02)
Intel Core i9-12900K
NVIDIA Titan RTX, i9-12900K, Intel Optane 905P 480GB 2.5
389 fps 0%
Intel Core i9-12900K
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti, i9-12900K, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
389 fps
Intel Core i9-11900K
NVIDIA Titan RTX, i9-11900K, Intel Optane 905P 480GB 2.5
355 fps -9%
AMD Ryzen 9 5900X
NVIDIA Titan RTX, R9 5900X, Intel Optane 905P 480GB 2.5
346.5 fps -11%
AMD Ryzen 9 5950X
NVIDIA Titan RTX, R9 5950X, Intel Optane 905P 480GB 2.5
336.6 fps -13%
Intel Core i9-10900K
NVIDIA Titan RTX, i9-10900K, WDC PC SN720 SDAQNTW-512G
336.3 fps -14%
Intel Core i9-9900K
GeForce RTX 2080 Ti (Desktop), i9-9900K, Samsung PM961 NVMe MZVLW512HMJP
286.1 fps -26%
Catia (catia-05)
Intel Core i9-12900K
NVIDIA Titan RTX, i9-12900K, Intel Optane 905P 480GB 2.5
467 fps +94%
AMD Ryzen 9 5950X
NVIDIA Titan RTX, R9 5950X, Intel Optane 905P 480GB 2.5
430 fps +78%
Intel Core i9-11900K
NVIDIA Titan RTX, i9-11900K, Intel Optane 905P 480GB 2.5
415 fps +72%
AMD Ryzen 9 5900X
NVIDIA Titan RTX, R9 5900X, Intel Optane 905P 480GB 2.5
374.8 fps +56%
Intel Core i9-10900K
NVIDIA Titan RTX, i9-10900K, WDC PC SN720 SDAQNTW-512G
362.1 fps +50%
Intel Core i9-12900K
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti, i9-12900K, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
241 fps
Intel Core i9-9900K
GeForce RTX 2080 Ti (Desktop), i9-9900K, Samsung PM961 NVMe MZVLW512HMJP
177.3 fps -26%
3ds Max (3dsmax-06)
Intel Core i9-12900K
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti, i9-12900K, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
364 fps
Intel Core i9-10900K
NVIDIA Titan RTX, i9-10900K, WDC PC SN720 SDAQNTW-512G
292.5 fps -20%
AMD Ryzen 9 5900X
NVIDIA Titan RTX, R9 5900X, Intel Optane 905P 480GB 2.5
291.3 fps -20%
AMD Ryzen 9 5950X
NVIDIA Titan RTX, R9 5950X, Intel Optane 905P 480GB 2.5
290.5 fps -20%
Intel Core i9-11900K
NVIDIA Titan RTX, i9-11900K, Intel Optane 905P 480GB 2.5
287 fps -21%
Intel Core i9-9900K
GeForce RTX 2080 Ti (Desktop), i9-9900K, Samsung PM961 NVMe MZVLW512HMJP
265.9 fps -27%
Intel Core i9-12900K
NVIDIA Titan RTX, i9-12900K, Intel Optane 905P 480GB 2.5
265 fps -27%
LuxMark v2.0 64Bit
Room GPUs-only
Intel Core i9-12900K
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti, i9-12900K, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
6464 Samples/s
Intel Core i9-9900K
GeForce RTX 2080 Ti (Desktop), i9-9900K, Samsung PM961 NVMe MZVLW512HMJP
4425 Samples/s -32%
Sala GPUs-only
Intel Core i9-12900K
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti, i9-12900K, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
16025 Samples/s
Intel Core i9-9900K
GeForce RTX 2080 Ti (Desktop), i9-9900K, Samsung PM961 NVMe MZVLW512HMJP
10178 Samples/s -36%
ComputeMark v2.1
1024x600 Normal, Score
Intel Core i9-12900K
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti, i9-12900K, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
48047 Points
Intel Core i9-9900K
GeForce RTX 2080 Ti (Desktop), i9-9900K, Samsung PM961 NVMe MZVLW512HMJP
28047 Points -42%
1024x600 Normal, Fluid 3DTex
Intel Core i9-12900K
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti, i9-12900K, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
5319 Points
Intel Core i9-9900K
GeForce RTX 2080 Ti (Desktop), i9-9900K, Samsung PM961 NVMe MZVLW512HMJP
3634 Points -32%
1024x600 Normal, Fluid 2DTexArr
Intel Core i9-12900K
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti, i9-12900K, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
4455 Points
Intel Core i9-9900K
GeForce RTX 2080 Ti (Desktop), i9-9900K, Samsung PM961 NVMe MZVLW512HMJP
3514 Points -21%
1024x600 Normal, Mandel Vector
Intel Core i9-12900K
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti, i9-12900K, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
9729 Points
Intel Core i9-9900K
GeForce RTX 2080 Ti (Desktop), i9-9900K, Samsung PM961 NVMe MZVLW512HMJP
5092 Points -48%
1024x600 Normal, Mandel Scalar
Intel Core i9-12900K
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti, i9-12900K, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
11138 Points
Intel Core i9-9900K
GeForce RTX 2080 Ti (Desktop), i9-9900K, Samsung PM961 NVMe MZVLW512HMJP
6124 Points -45%
1024x600 Normal, QJuliaRayTrace
Intel Core i9-12900K
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti, i9-12900K, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
17405 Points
Intel Core i9-9900K
GeForce RTX 2080 Ti (Desktop), i9-9900K, Samsung PM961 NVMe MZVLW512HMJP
9683 Points -44%
PCMark 10 Score
8897 pontos
Ajuda

Solução de armazenamento

Como já mencionado acima, o Corsair One i160 está equipado com dois módulos de armazenamento. O sistema é instalado em um SSD PCIe rápido com 512 GB da Samsung, e há também um disco rígido convencional que oferece 2 TB de armazenamento.

No teste, o SSD da Samsung ofereceu um desempenho muito bom, beneficiando todo o sistema. Entretanto, para um desempenho geral ainda melhor, a Corsair deveria ter equipado o PC somente com SSDs. A taxa média de transferência do disco rígido da Seagate foi de 107 MB/s. Embora este valor não seja ruim, comparado a um SSD, um disco rígido tem desvantagens significativas em termos de desempenho.

Infelizmente, a caixa compacta não oferece nenhum espaço para módulos de armazenamento adicionais.

AS SSD
AS SSD
MDL 3
MDL 3
MDL 5
MDL 5
MDL 6
MDL 6
CDI
CDI
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
Sequential Read: 3967 MB/s
Sequential Write: 3650 MB/s
512K Read: 1933 MB/s
512K Write: 2041 MB/s
4K Read: 46.02 MB/s
4K Write: 296.5 MB/s
4K QD32 Read: 1008 MB/s
4K QD32 Write: 751 MB/s
Drive Performance Rating - Percent
Corsair One i300
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
80.2 pt
Average Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
 
77.6 pt
Average of class Desktop
 
77.5 pt
AMD Ryzen 9 5950X
Intel Optane 905P 480GB 2.5
70.4 pt
Intel Beast Canyon NUC
Sabrent Rocket 4.0 500GB
61.3 pt
Corsair One i160 -8!
Samsung PM961 NVMe MZVLW512HMJP
38.2 pt
Zotac Magnus One (ECM73070C)
Phison 512GB PA6620060U
37.2 pt
DiskSpd
seq read
Corsair One i300
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
3903 (3884.75min - 3902.54max) MB/s
Average Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
  (2376 - 5676, n=32)
3898 MB/s 0%
Average of class Desktop
  (938 - 4547, n=7, last 2 years)
3203 MB/s -18%
AMD Ryzen 9 5950X
Intel Optane 905P 480GB 2.5
2589 (2584.25min - 2589.08max) MB/s -34%
Intel Beast Canyon NUC
Sabrent Rocket 4.0 500GB
1936 (1755.26min - 1936.41max) MB/s -50%
Zotac Magnus One (ECM73070C)
Phison 512GB PA6620060U
824 (549.82min - 823.58max) MB/s -79%
seq write
Average Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
  (2370 - 7628, n=32)
4122 MB/s +5%
Average of class Desktop
  (1128 - 6288, n=7, last 2 years)
3994 MB/s +2%
Corsair One i300
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
3926 (3865.92min - 3925.78max) MB/s
AMD Ryzen 9 5950X
Intel Optane 905P 480GB 2.5
2319 (2312.54min - 2319.27max) MB/s -41%
Intel Beast Canyon NUC
Sabrent Rocket 4.0 500GB
1744 (525.75min - 1743.78max) MB/s -56%
Zotac Magnus One (ECM73070C)
Phison 512GB PA6620060U
665 (240.27min - 665.08max) MB/s -83%
seq q8 t1 read
Average Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
  (3471 - 12556, n=32)
7102 MB/s +5%
Corsair One i300
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
6756 (5986.3min - 6756.18max) MB/s
Average of class Desktop
  (3170 - 7378, n=7, last 2 years)
6015 MB/s -11%
Intel Beast Canyon NUC
Sabrent Rocket 4.0 500GB
4996 (4330.97min - 4996.25max) MB/s -26%
AMD Ryzen 9 5950X
Intel Optane 905P 480GB 2.5
2775 (2628.37min - 2774.84max) MB/s -59%
Zotac Magnus One (ECM73070C)
Phison 512GB PA6620060U
2635 (2212.29min - 2635.07max) MB/s -61%
seq q8 t1 write
Average Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
  (3537 - 10261, n=32)
5469 MB/s +10%
Average of class Desktop
  (1482 - 6920, n=7, last 2 years)
5172 MB/s +4%
Corsair One i300
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
4979 (4960.54min - 4978.96max) MB/s
Intel Beast Canyon NUC
Sabrent Rocket 4.0 500GB
2524 (535.17min - 2524.36max) MB/s -49%
AMD Ryzen 9 5950X
Intel Optane 905P 480GB 2.5
2456 (2450.6min - 2455.64max) MB/s -51%
Zotac Magnus One (ECM73070C)
Phison 512GB PA6620060U
2002 (577.14min - 2001.94max) MB/s -60%
4k q1 t1 read
AMD Ryzen 9 5950X
Intel Optane 905P 480GB 2.5
276 (274.69min - 275.98max) MB/s +217%
Corsair One i300
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
87.2 (87.01min - 87.2max) MB/s
Average Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
  (56.2 - 91.2, n=32)
77.5 MB/s -11%
Average of class Desktop
  (38.7 - 91.9, n=7, last 2 years)
68.2 MB/s -22%
Intel Beast Canyon NUC
Sabrent Rocket 4.0 500GB
45.7 (45.38min - 45.71max) MB/s -48%
Zotac Magnus One (ECM73070C)
Phison 512GB PA6620060U
42.2 (41.94min - 42.15max) MB/s -52%
4k q1 t1 write
Intel Beast Canyon NUC
Sabrent Rocket 4.0 500GB
320 (298.75min - 319.53max) MB/s +8%
Corsair One i300
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
295 (288.34min - 294.77max) MB/s
Average of class Desktop
  (160.7 - 364, n=7, last 2 years)
268 MB/s -9%
AMD Ryzen 9 5950X
Intel Optane 905P 480GB 2.5
250.1 (248.83min - 250.15max) MB/s -15%
Average Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
  (115.5 - 295, n=32)
214 MB/s -27%
Zotac Magnus One (ECM73070C)
Phison 512GB PA6620060U
120 (119.43min - 119.96max) MB/s -59%
4k q32 t16 read
Corsair One i300
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
4073 (4068.14min - 4073.28max) MB/s
Average Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
  (658 - 4075, n=32)
2876 MB/s -29%
Average of class Desktop
  (569 - 4319, n=7, last 2 years)
2761 MB/s -32%
AMD Ryzen 9 5950X
Intel Optane 905P 480GB 2.5
2429 (2428.93min - 2429.48max) MB/s -40%
Zotac Magnus One (ECM73070C)
Phison 512GB PA6620060U
1311 (1269.74min - 1311.13max) MB/s -68%
Intel Beast Canyon NUC
Sabrent Rocket 4.0 500GB
970 (966.45min - 970.29max) MB/s -76%
4k q32 t16 write
Corsair One i300
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
3528 (3508.87min - 3527.71max) MB/s
Average of class Desktop
  (446 - 5015, n=7, last 2 years)
2700 MB/s -23%
AMD Ryzen 9 5950X
Intel Optane 905P 480GB 2.5
2469 (2465.19min - 2468.66max) MB/s -30%
Average Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
  (387 - 3548, n=32)
2190 MB/s -38%
Intel Beast Canyon NUC
Sabrent Rocket 4.0 500GB
1119 (483.18min - 1119.3max) MB/s -68%
Zotac Magnus One (ECM73070C)
Phison 512GB PA6620060U
937 (473.07min - 936.52max) MB/s -73%
AS SSD
Score Total
Average of class Desktop
  (3592 - 11756, n=4, last 2 years)
7981 Points +19%
Average Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
  (3537 - 9031, n=31)
7222 Points +8%
AMD Ryzen 9 5950X
Intel Optane 905P 480GB 2.5
6730 Points +1%
Corsair One i300
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
6693 Points
Intel Beast Canyon NUC
Sabrent Rocket 4.0 500GB
6467 Points -3%
Zotac Magnus One (ECM73070C)
Phison 512GB PA6620060U
4893 Points -27%
Corsair One i160
Samsung PM961 NVMe MZVLW512HMJP
3633 Points -46%
Score Read
Average of class Desktop
  (1233 - 3960, n=4, last 2 years)
2883 Points +4%
Corsair One i300
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
2777 Points
AMD Ryzen 9 5950X
Intel Optane 905P 480GB 2.5
2733 Points -2%
Average Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
  (1224 - 3399, n=31)
2666 Points -4%
Intel Beast Canyon NUC
Sabrent Rocket 4.0 500GB
2462 Points -11%
Zotac Magnus One (ECM73070C)
Phison 512GB PA6620060U
1911 Points -31%
Corsair One i160
Samsung PM961 NVMe MZVLW512HMJP
1499 Points -46%
Score Write
Average of class Desktop
  (1784 - 5774, n=4, last 2 years)
3683 Points +44%
Average Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
  (1081 - 3999, n=31)
3262 Points +28%
Intel Beast Canyon NUC
Sabrent Rocket 4.0 500GB
2827 Points +11%
Corsair One i300
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
2556 Points
AMD Ryzen 9 5950X
Intel Optane 905P 480GB 2.5
2536 Points -1%
Zotac Magnus One (ECM73070C)
Phison 512GB PA6620060U
2041 Points -20%
Corsair One i160
Samsung PM961 NVMe MZVLW512HMJP
1397 Points -45%
Seq Read
Average Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
  (2591 - 9971, n=31)
5479 MB/s +2%
Corsair One i300
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
5397 MB/s
Average of class Desktop
  (2903 - 6331, n=4, last 2 years)
5279 MB/s -2%
Intel Beast Canyon NUC
Sabrent Rocket 4.0 500GB
4274 MB/s -21%
Zotac Magnus One (ECM73070C)
Phison 512GB PA6620060U
2361 MB/s -56%
AMD Ryzen 9 5950X
Intel Optane 905P 480GB 2.5
2317 MB/s -57%
Corsair One i160
Samsung PM961 NVMe MZVLW512HMJP
2117 MB/s -61%
Seq Write
Corsair One i300
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
4006 MB/s
Average Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
  (1900 - 8590, n=31)
3992 MB/s 0%
Average of class Desktop
  (1487 - 6117, n=4, last 2 years)
3959 MB/s -1%
Intel Beast Canyon NUC
Sabrent Rocket 4.0 500GB
2382 MB/s -41%
AMD Ryzen 9 5950X
Intel Optane 905P 480GB 2.5
1834 MB/s -54%
Zotac Magnus One (ECM73070C)
Phison 512GB PA6620060U
1690 MB/s -58%
Corsair One i160
Samsung PM961 NVMe MZVLW512HMJP
1469 MB/s -63%
4K Read
AMD Ryzen 9 5950X
Intel Optane 905P 480GB 2.5
237.8 MB/s +187%
Intel Beast Canyon NUC
Sabrent Rocket 4.0 500GB
83.9 MB/s +1%
Corsair One i300
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
83 MB/s
Average of class Desktop
  (59.7 - 98.1, n=4, last 2 years)
79.5 MB/s -4%
Average Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
  (49.8 - 86.4, n=31)
72.4 MB/s -13%
Corsair One i160
Samsung PM961 NVMe MZVLW512HMJP
40.04 MB/s -52%
Zotac Magnus One (ECM73070C)
Phison 512GB PA6620060U
38.25 MB/s -54%
4K Write
Intel Beast Canyon NUC
Sabrent Rocket 4.0 500GB
308.4 MB/s +30%
Corsair One i300
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
236.7 MB/s
Average of class Desktop
  (216 - 249, n=4, last 2 years)
235 MB/s -1%
AMD Ryzen 9 5950X
Intel Optane 905P 480GB 2.5
211.5 MB/s -11%
Average Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
  (112.6 - 254, n=31)
197.6 MB/s -17%
Corsair One i160
Samsung PM961 NVMe MZVLW512HMJP
145.7 MB/s -38%
Zotac Magnus One (ECM73070C)
Phison 512GB PA6620060U
100.2 MB/s -58%
4K-64 Read
Average of class Desktop
  (883 - 3236, n=4, last 2 years)
2275 MB/s +6%
AMD Ryzen 9 5950X
Intel Optane 905P 480GB 2.5
2263 MB/s +5%
Corsair One i300
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
2154 MB/s
Average Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
  (662 - 2811, n=31)
2045 MB/s -5%
Intel Beast Canyon NUC
Sabrent Rocket 4.0 500GB
1950 MB/s -9%
Zotac Magnus One (ECM73070C)
Phison 512GB PA6620060U
1637 MB/s -24%
Corsair One i160
Samsung PM961 NVMe MZVLW512HMJP
1248 MB/s -42%
4K-64 Write
Average of class Desktop
  (1418 - 4913, n=4, last 2 years)
3052 MB/s +59%
Average Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
  (567 - 3414, n=31)
2665 MB/s +39%
Intel Beast Canyon NUC
Sabrent Rocket 4.0 500GB
2281 MB/s +19%
AMD Ryzen 9 5950X
Intel Optane 905P 480GB 2.5
2141 MB/s +12%
Corsair One i300
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
1918 MB/s
Zotac Magnus One (ECM73070C)
Phison 512GB PA6620060U
1772 MB/s -8%
Corsair One i160
Samsung PM961 NVMe MZVLW512HMJP
1104 MB/s -42%
Access Time Read
Corsair One i160
Samsung PM961 NVMe MZVLW512HMJP
0.1 ms * -47%
Zotac Magnus One (ECM73070C)
Phison 512GB PA6620060U
0.099 ms * -46%
Intel Beast Canyon NUC
Sabrent Rocket 4.0 500GB
0.071 ms * -4%
Corsair One i300
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
0.068 ms *
Average of class Desktop
  (0.031 - 0.066, n=4, last 2 years)
0.0435 ms * +36%
Average Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
  (0.018 - 0.078, n=31)
0.03406 ms * +50%
AMD Ryzen 9 5950X
Intel Optane 905P 480GB 2.5
0.014 ms * +79%
Access Time Write
Average of class Desktop
  (0.016 - 0.129, n=4, last 2 years)
0.05425 ms * -219%
Zotac Magnus One (ECM73070C)
Phison 512GB PA6620060U
0.035 ms * -106%
Average Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
  (0.017 - 0.092, n=31)
0.03371 ms * -98%
Corsair One i160
Samsung PM961 NVMe MZVLW512HMJP
0.025 ms * -47%
AMD Ryzen 9 5950X
Intel Optane 905P 480GB 2.5
0.02 ms * -18%
Corsair One i300
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
0.017 ms *
Intel Beast Canyon NUC
Sabrent Rocket 4.0 500GB
0.012 ms * +29%

* ... smaller is better

Placa Gráfica

No sistema de jogo compacto, Corsair utiliza umNvidia GeForce RTX 3080 Tique é quase idêntica a uma Nvidia GeForce RTX 3090 em termos de desempenho. Entretanto, com 12 GB de VRAM, ela oferece apenas metade da RAM do modelo top da Nvidia, mas isso não importa muito com os jogos atuais. Com isto, o sistema oferece desempenho absoluto em termos de jogos. O resfriamento da placa gráfica é muito bem projetado, já que um AiO é usado como na CPU. Além disso, há também dois pequenos ventiladores na placa gráfica, a fim de fornecer algum resfriamento ativo adicional ao transformador e à VRAM. Você pode ver que este projeto funciona bem, se você der uma olhada nos benchmarks sintéticos. O Corsair One i300 também atinge os melhores valores devido ao Intel Core i9-12900K.

Em comparação com o Corsair One i160você pode esperar um aumento de desempenho de 20 a 30%.

3DMark 11 - 1280x720 Performance GPU
Average of class Desktop
  (3347 - 104464, n=19, last 2 years)
72410 Points +19%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti
  (59799 - 62189, n=4)
60987 Points 0%
Corsair One i300
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti, Intel Core i9-12900K
60716 Points
Nvidia GeForce RTX 3090 Founders Edition
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090, AMD Ryzen 9 5900X
55144 Points -9%
AMD Radeon RX 6800
AMD Radeon RX 6800, AMD Ryzen 9 5900X
52384 Points -14%
Intel Core i9-12900K
NVIDIA Titan RTX, Intel Core i9-12900K
50224 Points -17%
MSI GeForce RTX 3080 Gaming X Trio
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080, AMD Ryzen 9 5900X
50087 Points -18%
Corsair One i160
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Ti (Desktop), Intel Core i9-9900K
49282 Points -19%
AMD Radeon RX 6700 XT
AMD Radeon RX 6700 XT, AMD Ryzen 9 5900X
43888 Points -28%
MSI GeForce RTX 3070 Ventus 3X
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070, AMD Ryzen 9 5900X
43005 Points -29%
3DMark
2560x1440 Time Spy Graphics
Average of class Desktop
  (636 - 37589, n=18, last 2 years)
25908 Points +36%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti
  (19041 - 19460, n=4)
19237 Points +1%
Corsair One i300
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti, Intel Core i9-12900K
19041 Points
Nvidia GeForce RTX 3090 Founders Edition
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090, AMD Ryzen 9 5900X
18685 Points -2%
MSI GeForce RTX 3080 Gaming X Trio
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080, AMD Ryzen 9 5900X
17604 Points -8%
AMD Radeon RX 6800
AMD Radeon RX 6800, AMD Ryzen 9 5900X
16033 Points -16%
Intel Core i9-12900K
NVIDIA Titan RTX, Intel Core i9-12900K
15202 Points -20%
Corsair One i160
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Ti (Desktop), Intel Core i9-9900K
14249 Points -25%
MSI GeForce RTX 3070 Ventus 3X
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070, AMD Ryzen 9 5900X
13111 Points -31%
AMD Radeon RX 6700 XT
AMD Radeon RX 6700 XT, AMD Ryzen 9 5900X
11473 Points -40%
3840x2160 Fire Strike Ultra Graphics
Corsair One i300
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti, Intel Core i9-12900K
12227 Points
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti
  (12050 - 12341, n=4)
12173 Points 0%
Average of class Desktop
  (473 - 24650, n=10, last 2 years)
11904 Points -3%
Nvidia GeForce RTX 3090 Founders Edition
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090, AMD Ryzen 9 5900X
11613 Points -5%
MSI GeForce RTX 3080 Gaming X Trio
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080, AMD Ryzen 9 5900X
10645 Points -13%
AMD Radeon RX 6800
AMD Radeon RX 6800, AMD Ryzen 9 5900X
10547 Points -14%
Intel Core i9-12900K
NVIDIA Titan RTX, Intel Core i9-12900K
9020 Points -26%
AMD Radeon RX 6700 XT
AMD Radeon RX 6700 XT, AMD Ryzen 9 5900X
8325 Points -32%
MSI GeForce RTX 3070 Ventus 3X
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070, AMD Ryzen 9 5900X
8227 Points -33%
Corsair One i160
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Ti (Desktop), Intel Core i9-9900K
8202 Points -33%
Fire Strike Extreme Graphics
Corsair One i300
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti, Intel Core i9-12900K
23835 Points
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti
  (23127 - 24250, n=4)
23668 Points -1%
Nvidia GeForce RTX 3090 Founders Edition
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090, AMD Ryzen 9 5900X
22075 Points -7%
AMD Radeon RX 6800
AMD Radeon RX 6800, AMD Ryzen 9 5900X
21510 Points -10%
Average of class Desktop
  (1053 - 44549, n=11, last 2 years)
21284 Points -11%
MSI GeForce RTX 3080 Gaming X Trio
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080, AMD Ryzen 9 5900X
20007 Points -16%
Intel Core i9-12900K
NVIDIA Titan RTX, Intel Core i9-12900K
18131 Points -24%
AMD Radeon RX 6700 XT
AMD Radeon RX 6700 XT, AMD Ryzen 9 5900X
17009 Points -29%
Corsair One i160
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Ti (Desktop), Intel Core i9-9900K
16856 Points -29%
MSI GeForce RTX 3070 Ventus 3X
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070, AMD Ryzen 9 5900X
15722 Points -34%
3DMark 05 Standard
63621 pontos
3DMark 06 Standard Score
66161 pontos
3DMark Vantage P Result
120236 pontos
3DMark 11 Performance
47170 pontos
3DMark Ice Storm Standard Score
336443 pontos
3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score
81921 pontos
3DMark Fire Strike Score
40079 pontos
3DMark Fire Strike Extreme Score
23109 pontos
3DMark Time Spy Score
18985 pontos
Ajuda

Desempenho nos jogos

Como o Corsair utiliza o hardware mais atual do One i300, ficou claro que o desempenho de jogo do sistema também está no nível superior. Atualmente, você pode desfrutar de todos os jogos sem nenhum compromisso em 2160p. Em comparação com as outras GPUs de mesa que testamos anteriormente, o desempenho de nossa unidade de teste se mostra significativamente melhor. A vantagem relativamente alta em comparação com as Nvidia GeForce RTX 3090 é devido à melhor CPU do Corsair One i300. Nosso sistema de teste de GPU é baseado em um AMD Ryzen 9 5900Xo que tem uma desvantagem significativa para a Intel Core i9-12900K.

Como já nos testes da CPU, também colocamos a placa gráfica sob carga por um período de tempo mais longo. Para isso, usamos o "The Witcher 3" com o Ultra preset. Durante o teste, o desempenho da Nvidia GeForce RTX 3080 Tipermanece estável durante todo o tempo, e não notamos nenhuma queda de desempenho. Com uma média de 189 quadros por segundo, o jogo funciona muito bem, permitindo que você também utilize monitores com 165 Hz.

Performance Rating - Percent
Corsair One i300
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti, i9-12900K, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
98.5 pt
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090
 
97.3 pt
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080
 
80.5 pt
Average AMD Radeon RX 6800
 
76.8 pt
Average NVIDIA Titan RTX
 
73.7 pt
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070
 
67 pt
Average AMD Radeon RX 6700 XT
 
63.4 pt
GTA V
1920x1080 Highest Settings possible AA:4xMSAA + FX AF:16x
Corsair One i300
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti, i9-12900K, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
149 (8.57min, 100P1 - 295max) fps
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090
  (104 - 169.8, n=17)
147.5 fps -1%
Average AMD Radeon RX 6800
  (118 - 160.4, n=3)
137.4 fps -8%
Average AMD Radeon RX 6700 XT
  (115 - 137.1, n=3)
129.7 fps -13%
Average NVIDIA Titan RTX
  (92.4 - 156.6, n=14)
123.5 fps -17%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080
  (104 - 130, n=2)
117 fps -21%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070
  (91.1 - 122.4, n=5)
105.7 fps -29%
3840x2160 High/On (Advanced Graphics Off) AA:FX AF:8x
Corsair One i300
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti, i9-12900K, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
180 (2.49min, 143P1 - 329max) fps
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090
  (151 - 184.2, n=15)
176.5 fps -2%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080
  (136 - 150, n=2)
143 fps -21%
Average NVIDIA Titan RTX
  (125 - 140.8, n=13)
134.2 fps -25%
Average AMD Radeon RX 6800
  (119 - 136.4, n=3)
129.1 fps -28%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070
  (110 - 129, n=5)
118.8 fps -34%
Average AMD Radeon RX 6700 XT
  (96.5 - 102.5, n=3)
100.2 fps -44%
The Witcher 3
1920x1080 Ultra Graphics & Postprocessing (HBAO+)
Corsair One i300
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti, i9-12900K, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
183 (62.1min, 107P0.1, 149P1 - 431max) fps
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090
  (160 - 192.6, n=17)
180.3 fps -1%
Average AMD Radeon RX 6800
  (152.1 - 156, n=3)
153.4 fps -16%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080
  (145 - 152, n=2)
148.5 fps -19%
Average NVIDIA Titan RTX
  (124 - 150, n=28)
137.7 fps -25%
Average AMD Radeon RX 6700 XT
  (117 - 130.4, n=3)
124.9 fps -32%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070
  (52.8 - 132.2, n=7)
106.1 fps -42%
3840x2160 High Graphics & Postprocessing (Nvidia HairWorks Off)
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090
  (128 - 160.2, n=13)
151.8 fps +2%
Corsair One i300
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti, i9-12900K, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
149 (41.5min, 102P0.1, 127P1 - 584max) fps
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080
  (114 - 115, n=2)
114.5 fps -23%
Average NVIDIA Titan RTX
  (94 - 107.1, n=28)
102.4 fps -31%
Average AMD Radeon RX 6800
  (96.8 - 100.7, n=3)
98.8 fps -34%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070
  (84 - 93.9, n=5)
89.3 fps -40%
Average AMD Radeon RX 6700 XT
  (63 - 75.7, n=3)
70.9 fps -52%
Rise of the Tomb Raider
1920x1080 Very High Preset AA:FX AF:16x
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090
  (240 - 254, n=2)
247 fps +12%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080
  (217 - 233, n=2)
225 fps +2%
Corsair One i300
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti, i9-12900K, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
221 (147min, 165P0.1, 180P1 - 343max) fps
Average NVIDIA Titan RTX
  ()
188 fps -15%
Average AMD Radeon RX 6800
  ()
165 fps -25%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070
  (151 - 169, n=3)
157.9 fps -29%
Average AMD Radeon RX 6700 XT
  ()
149 fps -33%
3840x2160 High Preset AA:FX AF:4x
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090
  (128 - 128.1, n=2)
128.1 fps +12%
Corsair One i300
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti, i9-12900K, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
114 (91.8min, 94.4P0.1, 99.3P1 - 176max) fps
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080
  (107 - 114, n=2)
110.5 fps -3%
Average NVIDIA Titan RTX
  ()
99 fps -13%
Average AMD Radeon RX 6800
  ()
86.6 fps -24%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070
  (76.7 - 83.8, n=3)
80.5 fps -29%
Average AMD Radeon RX 6700 XT
  ()
73 fps -36%
Final Fantasy XV Benchmark
3840x2160 High Quality
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090
  (81.5 - 92.4, n=15)
87.5 fps +4%
Corsair One i300
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti, i9-12900K, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
84 fps
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080
  (66 - 76.1, n=2)
71.1 fps -15%
Average AMD Radeon RX 6800
  (62.2 - 64.7, n=3)
63.6 fps -24%
Average NVIDIA Titan RTX
  (57.4 - 66.7, n=32)
62.3 fps -26%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070
  (54.8 - 61.5, n=5)
57.8 fps -31%
Average AMD Radeon RX 6700 XT
  (47.7 - 49.6, n=3)
48.5 fps -42%
1920x1080 High Quality
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090
  (153 - 229, n=16)
184.1 fps +5%
Corsair One i300
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti, i9-12900K, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
175 fps
Average AMD Radeon RX 6800
  (139 - 151.1, n=3)
146.9 fps -16%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080
  (113 - 156, n=2)
134.5 fps -23%
Average NVIDIA Titan RTX
  (84.7 - 150.5, n=32)
126.9 fps -27%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070
  (112 - 138.7, n=5)
123.5 fps -29%
Average AMD Radeon RX 6700 XT
  (113 - 122.9, n=3)
119.3 fps -32%
X-Plane 11.11
3840x2160 high (fps_test=3)
Corsair One i300
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti, i9-12900K, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
118 fps
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090
  (83 - 141.5, n=15)
116 fps -2%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080
  (104.8 - 105, n=2)
104.9 fps -11%
Average NVIDIA Titan RTX
  (52.9 - 131.4, n=30)
89.5 fps -24%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070
  (78.8 - 98.4, n=5)
84.4 fps -28%
Average AMD Radeon RX 6800
  (39.5 - 84.8, n=3)
65.8 fps -44%
Average AMD Radeon RX 6700 XT
  (45.5 - 58, n=3)
50.5 fps -57%
1920x1080 high (fps_test=3)
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090
  (96.8 - 167.9, n=16)
137.4 fps +2%
Corsair One i300
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti, i9-12900K, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
135 fps
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080
  (122.5 - 123, n=2)
122.8 fps -9%
Average NVIDIA Titan RTX
  (58.5 - 157.5, n=30)
103.6 fps -23%
Average AMD Radeon RX 6800
  (54.2 - 119, n=3)
92.4 fps -32%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070
  (53.7 - 111.3, n=7)
89.2 fps -34%
Average AMD Radeon RX 6700 XT
  (54.5 - 85.3, n=3)
66.8 fps -51%
Far Cry 5
1920x1080 Ultra Preset AA:T
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090
  (121 - 210, n=17)
176.1 fps +1%
Corsair One i300
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti, i9-12900K, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
175 (134min - 238max) fps
Average AMD Radeon RX 6800
  (126 - 178, n=3)
159.3 fps -9%
Average AMD Radeon RX 6700 XT
  (139 - 169, n=3)
155.7 fps -11%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080
  (135 - 145, n=2)
140 fps -20%
Average NVIDIA Titan RTX
  (89 - 184, n=28)
137.7 fps -21%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070
  (117 - 143, n=5)
134 fps -23%
3840x2160 Ultra Preset AA:T
Corsair One i300
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti, i9-12900K, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
108 (97min - 128max) fps
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090
  (101 - 115, n=15)
107.7 fps 0%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080
  (93 - 95, n=2)
94 fps -13%
Average AMD Radeon RX 6800
  (90 - 92, n=3)
91 fps -16%
Average NVIDIA Titan RTX
  (72 - 84, n=28)
79.3 fps -27%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070
  (69 - 75, n=5)
71.2 fps -34%
Average AMD Radeon RX 6700 XT
  (70 - 72, n=3)
71 fps -34%
Far Cry New Dawn
1920x1080 Ultra Preset
Corsair One i300
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti, i9-12900K, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
141 (98min - 229max) fps
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090
  (104 - 172, n=13)
140.7 fps 0%
Average AMD Radeon RX 6800
  (107 - 145, n=3)
131.3 fps -7%
Average AMD Radeon RX 6700 XT
  (115 - 143, n=3)
129.7 fps -8%
Average NVIDIA Titan RTX
  (72 - 151, n=28)
112.3 fps -20%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080
  (108 - 115, n=2)
111.5 fps -21%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070
  (95 - 121, n=4)
107.3 fps -24%
3840x2160 Ultra Preset
Corsair One i300
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti, i9-12900K, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
107 (85min - 127max) fps
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090
  (92 - 111, n=13)
104.8 fps -2%
Average AMD Radeon RX 6800
  (86 - 99, n=3)
94.7 fps -11%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080
  (88 - 89, n=2)
88.5 fps -17%
Average NVIDIA Titan RTX
  (68 - 85, n=28)
80.1 fps -25%
Average AMD Radeon RX 6700 XT
  (70 - 78, n=3)
74.7 fps -30%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070
  (70 - 74, n=4)
71.5 fps -33%
Far Cry 6
1920x1080 Ultra Graphics Quality + HD Textures AA:T
Corsair One i300
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti, i9-12900K, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
149 (125min - 185max) fps
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090
  (94 - 177.6, n=10)
144.7 fps -3%
Average AMD Radeon RX 6800
  (116 - 152.5, n=3)
136.8 fps -8%
Average NVIDIA Titan RTX
  (94.7 - 138.9, n=6)
126.2 fps -15%
Average AMD Radeon RX 6700 XT
  (102 - 136.6, n=3)
125 fps -16%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070
  (91 - 114.2, n=2)
102.6 fps -31%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080
  ()
92 fps -38%
3840x2160 Ultra Graphics Quality + HD Textures AA:T
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090
  (77 - 86.7, n=10)
83.3 fps +2%
Corsair One i300
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti, i9-12900K, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
81.6 (74min - 88max) fps
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080
  ()
72 fps -12%
Average AMD Radeon RX 6800
  (68.1 - 69.7, n=3)
68.8 fps -16%
Average NVIDIA Titan RTX
  (52.8 - 64.2, n=6)
61.8 fps -24%
Average AMD Radeon RX 6700 XT
  (50 - 52.7, n=3)
51.4 fps -37%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070
  (26.4 - 57, n=2)
41.7 fps -49%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider
1920x1080 Highest Preset AA:T
Corsair One i300
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti, i9-12900K, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
212 fps
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090
  (145 - 240, n=14)
204 fps -4%
Average AMD Radeon RX 6800
  (182 - 198.6, n=3)
192.9 fps -9%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080
  (177 - 185, n=2)
181 fps -15%
Average AMD Radeon RX 6700 XT
  (150 - 161.4, n=3)
157.5 fps -26%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070
  (138 - 160, n=4)
151.3 fps -29%
Average NVIDIA Titan RTX
  (106 - 178.8, n=24)
149.5 fps -29%
3840x2160 Highest Preset AA:T
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090
  (89.3 - 99.7, n=12)
96.4 fps +3%
Corsair One i300
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti, i9-12900K, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
93.7 fps
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080
  (83.9 - 87.9, n=2)
85.9 fps -8%
Average AMD Radeon RX 6800
  (69.6 - 72.7, n=3)
71.6 fps -24%
Average NVIDIA Titan RTX
  (59 - 71.1, n=24)
66.9 fps -29%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070
  (61 - 63.5, n=4)
62.3 fps -34%
Average AMD Radeon RX 6700 XT
  (54 - 56.9, n=3)
55.8 fps -40%
Metro Exodus
1920x1080 Ultra Quality AF:16x
Corsair One i300
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti, i9-12900K, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
137 (66.86min - 244.08max) fps
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090
  (108 - 145, n=12)
135.3 fps -1%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080
  (111 - 116, n=2)
113.5 fps -17%
Average AMD Radeon RX 6800
  (103 - 110.4, n=3)
107.1 fps -22%
Average NVIDIA Titan RTX
  (73 - 116, n=27)
102.2 fps -25%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070
  (91.3 - 97.7, n=5)
93.9 fps -31%
Average AMD Radeon RX 6700 XT
  (85.3 - 91.6, n=3)
88.7 fps -35%
3840x2160 Ultra Quality AF:16x
Corsair One i300
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti, i9-12900K, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
75 (46.62min - 125.88max) fps
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090
  (70.6 - 77.3, n=12)
75 fps 0%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080
  (64.1 - 65.9, n=2)
65 fps -13%
Average AMD Radeon RX 6800
  (54.6 - 56.4, n=3)
55.4 fps -26%
Average NVIDIA Titan RTX
  (51.3 - 57.9, n=27)
54.9 fps -27%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070
  (48.3 - 49.7, n=5)
48.9 fps -35%
Average AMD Radeon RX 6700 XT
  (42.3 - 43.7, n=3)
42.9 fps -43%
Anno 1800
1920x1080 Ultra Graphics Quality (DX11)
Corsair One i300
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti, i9-12900K, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
69.4 (28.1min, 29P0.1, 51P1 - 92max) fps
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090
  (51.5 - 85.5, n=4)
61.6 fps -11%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070
  (46.5 - 74.7, n=3)
57.7 fps -17%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080
  (54 - 54.1, n=2)
54.1 fps -22%
Average AMD Radeon RX 6800
  ()
48.5 fps -30%
Average AMD Radeon RX 6700 XT
  ()
45 fps -35%
Average NVIDIA Titan RTX
  (33.9 - 54.5, n=2)
44.2 fps -36%
3840x2160 Ultra Graphics Quality (DX11)
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090
  (51.3 - 87.4, n=4)
61.1 fps +9%
Corsair One i300
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti, i9-12900K, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
55.9 (28.6min, 33P0.1, 44.1P1 - 87.9max) fps
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080
  (43.2 - 46.3, n=2)
44.8 fps -20%
Average AMD Radeon RX 6800
  ()
41.7 fps -25%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070
  (34.3 - 41.8, n=3)
37 fps -34%
Average NVIDIA Titan RTX
  (33 - 40.4, n=2)
36.7 fps -34%
Average AMD Radeon RX 6700 XT
  ()
29 fps -48%
Control
1920x1080 High Quality Preset (DX11)
Corsair One i300
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti, i9-12900K, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
187 (63.4min, 119P0.1, 150P1 - 624max) fps
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090
  (172.2 - 189.2, n=5)
179.9 fps -4%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080
  (151 - 155, n=2)
153 fps -18%
Average AMD Radeon RX 6800
  ()
145 fps -22%
Average NVIDIA Titan RTX
  (135 - 141.9, n=3)
137.3 fps -27%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070
  (117 - 124.9, n=3)
121.3 fps -35%
Average AMD Radeon RX 6700 XT
  ()
115 fps -39%
3840x2160 High Quality Preset (DX11)
Corsair One i300
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti, i9-12900K, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
63.9 (32.5min, 50.8P0.1, 54.5P1 - 99.9max) fps
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090
  (61.3 - 66, n=5)
62.9 fps -2%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080
  (56.2 - 56.7, n=2)
56.5 fps -12%
Average NVIDIA Titan RTX
  (45.2 - 47.3, n=3)
46.5 fps -27%
Average AMD Radeon RX 6800
  ()
43.8 fps -31%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070
  (40.6 - 42.3, n=3)
41.3 fps -35%
Average AMD Radeon RX 6700 XT
  ()
34 fps -47%
Borderlands 3
3840x2160 Badass Overall Quality (DX11)
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090
  (68 - 75.3, n=13)
72.8 fps +1%
Corsair One i300
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti, i9-12900K, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
72 fps
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080
  (61.5 - 61.9, n=2)
61.7 fps -14%
Average AMD Radeon RX 6800
  (48.6 - 49.2, n=3)
49 fps -32%
Average NVIDIA Titan RTX
  (46 - 52.8, n=29)
47.3 fps -34%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070
  (42.7 - 46.3, n=5)
44.3 fps -38%
Average AMD Radeon RX 6700 XT
  (36.1 - 38.1, n=3)
37.4 fps -48%
1920x1080 Badass Overall Quality (DX11)
Corsair One i300
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti, i9-12900K, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
152 fps
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090
  (117 - 170.1, n=13)
150.7 fps -1%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080
  (117 - 128, n=2)
122.5 fps -19%
Average AMD Radeon RX 6800
  (100 - 129.4, n=3)
118.7 fps -22%
Average NVIDIA Titan RTX
  (77.2 - 128.7, n=29)
112 fps -26%
Average AMD Radeon RX 6700 XT
  (94.2 - 104.7, n=3)
101.2 fps -33%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070
  (95.3 - 108.9, n=5)
100.6 fps -34%
F1 2020
1920x1080 Ultra High Preset AA:T AF:16x
Corsair One i300
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti, i9-12900K, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
298 (238min - 364max) fps
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090
  (227 - 312, n=11)
282 fps -5%
Average AMD Radeon RX 6800
  (222 - 243, n=3)
234 fps -21%
Average NVIDIA Titan RTX
  (194 - 231, n=7)
216 fps -28%
Average AMD Radeon RX 6700 XT
  (190 - 201, n=3)
194.8 fps -35%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070
  (179 - 215, n=3)
191.7 fps -36%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080
  (179 - 185, n=2)
182 fps -39%
3840x2160 Ultra High Preset AA:T AF:16x
Corsair One i300
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti, i9-12900K, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
143 (122min - 169max) fps
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090
  (133 - 149.6, n=11)
142.3 fps 0%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080
  (114 - 118, n=2)
116 fps -19%
Average AMD Radeon RX 6800
  (107 - 112.6, n=3)
110.4 fps -23%
Average NVIDIA Titan RTX
  (97.4 - 103.4, n=6)
101.5 fps -29%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070
  (88.7 - 92.7, n=3)
90.2 fps -37%
Average AMD Radeon RX 6700 XT
  (83 - 85, n=3)
83.8 fps -41%
F1 2021
1920x1080 Ultra High Preset + Raytracing AA:T AF:16x
Corsair One i300
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti, i9-12900K, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
219 fps
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090
  (154 - 244, n=13)
218 fps 0%
Average AMD Radeon RX 6800
  (167 - 175.5, n=3)
172.1 fps -21%
Average NVIDIA Titan RTX
  (160 - 172, n=6)
166.1 fps -24%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070
  (148 - 158, n=2)
153 fps -30%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080
  ()
152 fps -31%
Average AMD Radeon RX 6700 XT
  (143 - 145.2, n=3)
144.5 fps -34%
3840x2160 Ultra High Preset + Raytracing AA:T AF:16x
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090
  (100.4 - 110, n=13)
103.5 fps +2%
Corsair One i300
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti, i9-12900K, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
101 (88min, 87P1 - 114max) fps
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080
  ()
91 fps -10%
Average NVIDIA Titan RTX
  (71.9 - 74.5, n=6)
73.3 fps -27%
Average AMD Radeon RX 6800
  (71.8 - 74, n=3)
73 fps -28%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070
  (64 - 67.3, n=2)
65.7 fps -35%
Average AMD Radeon RX 6700 XT
  (56.3 - 56.9, n=3)
56.7 fps -44%
New World
1920x1080 Very High Video Quality
Corsair One i300
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti, i9-12900K, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
142 (39.9min, 64.8P0.1, 84.5P1 - 296max) fps
Average NVIDIA Titan RTX
  ()
123 fps -13%
Average AMD Radeon RX 6700 XT
  ()
95.8 fps -33%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070
  (68.6 - 117.5, n=2)
93.1 fps -34%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090
  (70.1 - 126, n=3)
90.5 fps -36%
Average AMD Radeon RX 6800
  ()
83.3 fps -41%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080
  ()
70.6 fps -50%
3840x2160 Very High Video Quality
Corsair One i300
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti, i9-12900K, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
79.2 (27.9min, 51.3P0.1, 60.7P1 - 228max) fps
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090
  ()
69.1 fps -13%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080
  ()
68.1 fps -14%
Average NVIDIA Titan RTX
  ()
54.5 fps -31%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070
  (48.9 - 52.6, n=2)
50.8 fps -36%
Average AMD Radeon RX 6800
  ()
49.5 fps -37%
Average AMD Radeon RX 6700 XT
  ()
39.6 fps -50%
Forza Horizon 5
1920x1080 Extreme Preset
Corsair One i300
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti, i9-12900K, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
126 fps
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090
  (106 - 143, n=6)
124.2 fps -1%
Average AMD Radeon RX 6800
  (118 - 127, n=3)
123.7 fps -2%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070
  (97 - 115, n=2)
106 fps -16%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080
  ()
100 fps -21%
Average NVIDIA Titan RTX
  (96 - 100, n=2)
98 fps -22%
Average AMD Radeon RX 6700 XT
  (81 - 107, n=3)
97.7 fps -22%
3840x2160 Extreme Preset
Corsair One i300
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti, i9-12900K, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
84 fps
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090
  (77 - 90, n=6)
83.5 fps -1%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080
  ()
75 fps -11%
Average AMD Radeon RX 6800
  (70 - 76, n=3)
73.7 fps -12%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070
  (62 - 73, n=2)
67.5 fps -20%
Average NVIDIA Titan RTX
  (62 - 65, n=2)
63.5 fps -24%
Average AMD Radeon RX 6700 XT
  (51 - 59, n=3)
56.3 fps -33%

The Witcher 3 FPS Chart

0153045607590105120135150165180195210225240255270285Tooltip
Corsair One i300 i9-12900K, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti: Ø189.1 (167.081-288)
baixomédiaaltoultraQHD4K
GTA V (2015) 187 187 187 149 147 180
The Witcher 3 (2015) 681 554 365 183 149
Dota 2 Reborn (2015) 240.3 214.8 207.6 196.1 191.5
Rise of the Tomb Raider (2016) 487 340 257 221 114
Final Fantasy XV Benchmark (2018) 232 227 175 136 84
X-Plane 11.11 (2018) 205 178 135 118
Far Cry 5 (2018) 230 200 190 175 168 108
Strange Brigade (2018) 667 484 392 345 260 156
Shadow of the Tomb Raider (2018) 245 226 226 212 164 93.7
Far Cry New Dawn (2019) 190 165 157 141 137 107
Metro Exodus (2019) 258 212 169 137 113 75
Anno 1800 (2019) 159 163 124 69.4 66.1 55.9
Control (2019) 240 233 187 124 63.9
Borderlands 3 (2019) 208 181 167 152 125 72
F1 2020 (2020) 478 379 397 298 233 143
F1 2021 (2021) 534 498 410 219 170 101
New World (2021) 194 165 153 142 133 79.2
Far Cry 6 (2021) 200 176 155 149 129 81.6
Guardians of the Galaxy (2021) 194 196 191 191 186 110
Riders Republic (2021) 284 220 188 176 136 80
Forza Horizon 5 (2021) 292 200 188 126 111 84
Battlefield 2042 (2021) 216 194 169 150 123 83
Farming Simulator 22 (2021) 349 270 226 203 201 157
Halo Infinite (2021) 229 198 188 142 83.1
God of War (2022) 209 181 163 117 98.7 64.7
Rainbow Six Extraction (2022) 365 353 348 282 194 104
Dying Light 2 (2022) 189 164 149 109 61.5

Emissões

Emissões sonoras

O resfriamento do Corsair One i300 é baseado no mesmo método que o do Corsair One i160. Em operação 2D, o sistema funciona relativamente silenciosamente a cerca de 32,6 dB(A). Neste ponto, o grande ventilador de 140 mm ainda não funciona, mas pode-se ouvir as duas bombas da AiO e seu som permanece sempre presente. Infelizmente, isto não é muito agradável a longo prazo. Deve haver também algumas bombas que podem fazer seu trabalho enquanto permanecem significativamente mais silenciosas. Sob carga, o ventilador de 140 mm na tampa da caixa também começará a funcionar após um curto período de tempo. A 44 dB(A) durante o teste de esforço, o sistema pode então ser ouvido claramente. Enquanto joga, ele ainda fica um pouco mais alto a um pouco mais de 46 dB(A).

Emissões sonoras (operação ociosa)
Emissões sonoras (operação ociosa)
Emissões sonoras (teste de estresse: FurMark+Prime95)
Emissões sonoras (teste de estresse: FurMark+Prime95)
Emissões sonoras (The Witcher 3 Ultra preset)
Emissões sonoras (The Witcher 3 Ultra preset)

Barulho

Ocioso
32.4 / 32.5 / 32.6 dB
Carga
/ 44.13 dB
  red to green bar
 
 
30 dB
silencioso
40 dB(A)
audível
50 dB(A)
ruidosamente alto
 
min: dark, med: mid, max: light   Earthworks M23R, Arta (15 cm de distância)

Temperatura e consumo de energia

Teste de estresse Prime95 + FurMark
Teste de estresse Prime95 + FurMark

A caixa maciça oferece uma área de superfície muito grande para permitir a transferência de calor. Sob carga, isto aquece notavelmente, e o chamado efeito chaminé assegura que o ar frio seja puxado para dentro pelos lados e guiado diretamente pelas aletas de resfriamento dos dois AiOs para depois ser empurrado para fora da caixa pelo grande ventilador de 140 mm no topo. Para um resfriamento efetivo da placa gráfica, este é equipado adicionalmente com dois ventiladores menores para resfriar o transformador e a VRAM.

Este conceito de resfriamento funciona bem, e todos os componentes são resfriados efetivamente, sem superaquecimento sob carga total. Entretanto, a CPU ainda atingiu 100 °C (212 °F) durante o teste de esforço. Isto mostra porque o Corsair estrangula seu desempenho a um máximo de 175 watts. Aqueles para os quais os 100 °C ainda estão muito quentes também podem reduzir ainda mais o desempenho na BIOS. No entanto, as temperaturas do Intel Core i9-12900Kainda não apresentam nenhum problema, como já descobrimos durante o Cinebench R15 Multi loop. O teste de estresse com FurMark e Prime95 funcionando ao mesmo tempo representa um cenário extremo que dificilmente deveria acontecer no dia-a-dia da operação

Em termos de consumo de energia, o sistema se destaca com um baixo consumo durante a operação ociosa. Apenas 56 watts é um bom valor. Enquanto o jogo, a fonte de energia compacta de 750 watts (construída pela SFF) tem que fornecer 489 watts em média, com os picos atingindo até 544 watts. Durante o teste de estresse, medimos até mesmo brevemente 635 watts. A fonte de alimentação sempre foi capaz de lidar com isso, e não notamos nenhum problema.

Consumo de energia (operação ociosa)
Consumo de energia (operação ociosa)
Consumo de energia (Prime95)
Consumo de energia (Prime95)
Consumo de energia (FurMark PT100)
Consumo de energia (FurMark PT100)
Consumo de energia (FurMark + Prime95)
Consumo de energia (FurMark + Prime95)
Consumo de energia (The Witcher 3 Ultra preset)
Consumo de energia (The Witcher 3 Ultra preset)
Power Consumption - 1920x1080 The Witcher 3 ultra (external Monitor)
Intel Core i9-12900K, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti, i9-12900K, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
490 (482min, 484P1 - 544max) Watt *
Intel Core i9-12900K, NVIDIA Titan RTX
NVIDIA Titan RTX, i9-12900K, Intel Optane 905P 480GB 2.5 (Idle: 70.5 W)
463 (439min - 490max) Watt * +6%
AMD Ryzen 9 5950X, NVIDIA Titan RTX
NVIDIA Titan RTX, R9 5950X, Intel Optane 905P 480GB 2.5 (Idle: 78 W)
440.5 (420min - 466max) Watt * +10%
AMD Ryzen 9 5900X, NVIDIA Titan RTX
NVIDIA Titan RTX, R9 5900X, Intel Optane 905P 480GB 2.5 (Idle: 78.1 W)
439.6 (419min - 497max) Watt * +10%
Intel Core i5-11600K, NVIDIA Titan RTX
NVIDIA Titan RTX, i5-11600K, Intel Optane 905P 480GB 2.5 (Idle: 69.49 W)
435 (427min - 463max) Watt * +11%
Intel Core i5-12600K, NVIDIA Titan RTX
NVIDIA Titan RTX, i5-12600K, Intel Optane 905P 480GB 2.5 (Idle: 70.45 W)
408.9 (401min - 460max) Watt * +17%
Intel Core i9-11900K, NVIDIA Titan RTX
NVIDIA Titan RTX, i9-11900K, Intel Optane 905P 480GB 2.5 (Idle: 57.3 W)
387 (380min - 410max) Watt * +21%

* ... smaller is better

Power Consumption - 1280x720 FurMark 1.19 GPU Stress Test (external Monitor)
AMD Ryzen 9 5900X, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090, R9 5900X, Intel Optane 905P 480GB 2.5 (Idle: 105.9 W)
551 (521min - 582max) Watt * -22%
AMD Ryzen 9 5900X, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080, R9 5900X, Intel Optane 905P 480GB 2.5 (Idle: 88.3 W)
505 (493min - 541max) Watt * -11%
Intel Core i9-12900K, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti, i9-12900K, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
453 (421min, 431P1 - 486max) Watt *
AMD Ryzen 9 5950X, AMD Radeon RX 6800 XT
Radeon RX 6800 XT, R9 5950X, Intel Optane 905P 480GB 2.5 (Idle: 99.5 W)
447.9 (413min - 484max) Watt * +1%
AMD Ryzen 9 5900X, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070, R9 5900X, Intel Optane 905P 480GB 2.5 (Idle: 95.1 W)
376.9 (369min - 433max) Watt * +17%
AMD Ryzen 9 5900X, AMD Radeon RX 6800
Radeon RX 6800, R9 5900X, Corsair MP600 (Idle: 81.4 W)
363 (337min, 347P1 - 379max) Watt * +20%
AMD Ryzen 9 5900X, AMD Radeon RX 6700 XT
Radeon RX 6700 XT, R9 5900X, Corsair MP600 (Idle: 77.1 W)
335.2 (317min - 376max) Watt * +26%

* ... smaller is better

Power consumption The Witcher 3 / stress test

03570105140175210245280315350385420455490525560595Tooltip
Corsair One i300: Ø374 (0.531-607)

Power consumption with external monitor

0306090120150180210240270300330360390420450480510540Tooltip
Corsair One i300; Prime95 V2810 Stress (external Monitor): Ø257 (252-364)
Corsair One i300; Cinebench R15 Multi (external Monitor): Ø265 (253-318)
Corsair One i300; 1280x720 FurMark 1.19 GPU Stress Test (external Monitor): Ø453 (421-486)
Corsair One i300; 1920x1080 The Witcher 3 ultra (external Monitor): Ø490 (482-544)

Veredicto - Um PC de jogo 4K perfeito

Pro

+ Intel Core i9-12900K, a CPU de jogos mais rápida
+ Nvidia GeForce RTX 3080 Ti
+ 64 GB DE CARNEIRO (DDR5)
+ design elegante com RGB refinado
+ caixa de alumínio de alta qualidade
+ muito compacto
+ bom resfriamento da CPU e GPU
+ muitas conexões externas modernas

Contra

- O bombeamento AiO é sempre audível
- opções limitadas de atualização
- preço alto
O Corsair One i300, unidade de teste fornecida pela Corsair Alemanha
O Corsair One i300, unidade de teste fornecida pela Corsair Alemanha

Embora o Corsair One i300 não seja uma novidade completa, isto não é absolutamente necessário. O visual do PC Premium compacto é simples e moderno. Além disso, o design interno permite o uso de componentes convencionais em termos de placa principal e fonte de alimentação. Somente o sistema de resfriamento é um projeto interno. Em nosso modelo de teste, infelizmente, ele não faz justiça ao segmento premium. No entanto, os dois AiOs funcionam bem, resfriando o sistema de forma confiável. No entanto, as duas bombas se tornaram acusticamente perceptíveis. A longo prazo, isto é desagradável e considerando o preço de compra de 5099 euros (~$5722), também não é algo que se tenha que aceitar. Mas o projeto do sistema de resfriamento ainda é o destaque, além dos componentes mais atuais. Com o Intel Core i9-12900Khá a CPU de jogos mais rápida, que combinada com uma placa principal atual, incluindo DDR5 RAM e umNvidia GeForce RTX 3080 Tipermite jogos 4K sem qualquer tipo de compromisso. Além disso, há também um SSD de 2 TB com taxas de transferência muito boas.

Graças a um Intel Core i9-12900K e Nvidia GeForce RTX 3080 Ti, oCorsair One i300 ofereceum desempenho de jogo de4K

utilizando a menor quantidade de espaço.

Um produto premium também tem, naturalmente, seu preço. Com 5099 euros (~5722) para nossa unidade de teste, isto não é exatamente barato, e ainda assim não devemos falar mal dos componentes separados. O estojo não está pronto para venda e não pode ser adquirido separadamente. Além disso, a disponibilidade de várias placas gráficas e outros componentes atuais ainda é um problema, o que quase torna o preço globalmente justificável. O sistema também está equipado com dois AiOs que foram especificamente desenvolvidos para a série Corsair One. Isto tem que ser levado em consideração ao considerar o preço. Entretanto, em nossa opinião, o Corsair One i300 com um Intel Core i9-12900K e Nvidia GeForce RTX 3080 seria o sistema mais razoável em termos de preço. Mas então a RAM e o SSD seriam apenas metade do tamanho com 32 GB e 1 TB respectivamente. Um sistema com esses componentes está disponível por 4099 euros ($4562). O déficit de desempenho do Nvidia GeForce RTX 3080 em comparação com o modelo Ti é limitado e aceitável.

Preço e Disponibilidade

No momento deste teste, o dispositivo pode ser adquirido diretamente de Corsair por $5000. Alternativamente, o modelo menor também pode ser adquirido em Amazon por $4000.

Please share our article, every link counts!
Mail Logo
> Análises e revisões de portáteis e celulares > Análises > Análises > Corsair One i300 PC desktop domestica Core i9-12900K e RTX 3080 Ti em um estojo de 12 litros
Sebastian Bade, 2022-03- 2 (Update: 2022-03- 2)