Como o Apple Touch Bar, só que melhor: Breve Análise do Portátil Asus ZenBook Duo UX481
Asus ZenBook Duo UX481FL (ZenBook Duo UX481 Serie)
Processador
Intel Core i7-10510U 4 x 1.8 - 4.9 GHz, Comet Lake-U
Placa gráfica
NVIDIA GeForce MX250 - 2048 MB VRAM, Análises do: 937 MHz, Memoría: 1502 MHz, GDDR5, 445.87, Optimus
Memória
16 GB
, 1333.3 MHz, 16-20-20-45, Dual-Channel
Pantalha
14.00 polegadas 16:9, 1920 x 1080 pixel 157 PPI, Capacitiva de 10-pontos, Chi Mei N140HCE-EN2, IPS, CMN14D5, 60 Hz
placa mãe
Intel Comet Lake-U PCH-LP Premium
Disco rígido
Intel SSD 660p 1TB SSDPEKNW010T8, 1024 GB
peso
1.8 kg, Suprimento de energia: 329 g
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.
Rating | Date | Model | Weight | Height | Size | Resolution | Price |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 82.7 % v7 (old) | 05/2020 | Asus ZenBook Duo UX481FL i7-10510U, GeForce MX250 | 1.8 kg | 19 mm | 14.00" | 1920x1080 | |
| 84.2 % v7 (old) | 02/2020 | MSI Prestige 14 A10SC-009 i7-10710U, GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q | 1.3 kg | 16 mm | 14.00" | 3840x2160 | |
| 85 % v6 (old) | 07/2019 | Lenovo IdeaPad S940-14IWL i7-8565U, UHD Graphics 620 | 1.2 kg | 12 mm | 14.00" | 3840x2160 | |
| 84 % v7 (old) | 03/2020 | Microsoft Surface Laptop 3 13 Core i5-1035G7 i5-1035G7, Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU) | 1.3 kg | 14.5 mm | 13.50" | 2256x1504 | |
| 81.2 % v7 (old) | 02/2020 | Asus ZenBook 14 UM431DA-AM020T R7 3700U, Vega 10 | 1.4 kg | 16 mm | 14.00" | 1920x1080 |
| SD Card Reader | |
| average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs) | |
| MSI Prestige 14 A10SC-009 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501 microSDXC 64GB) | |
| Dell XPS 13 9300 Core i7-1065G7 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501 64 GB UHS-II) | |
| Asus ZenBook Duo UX481FL (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501 microSDXC 64GB) | |
| Asus ZenBook 14 UM431DA-AM020T (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
| maximum AS SSD Seq Read Test (1GB) | |
| Dell XPS 13 9300 Core i7-1065G7 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501 64 GB UHS-II) | |
| MSI Prestige 14 A10SC-009 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501 microSDXC 64GB) | |
| Asus ZenBook Duo UX481FL (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501 microSDXC 64GB) | |
| Asus ZenBook 14 UM431DA-AM020T (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
2 ∆E
3.9 ∆E
11.6 ∆E
7.3 ∆E
15.3 ∆E
8.6 ∆E
5.6 ∆E
11.2 ∆E
12.2 ∆E
14.6 ∆E
9.7 ∆E
8.8 ∆E
8.6 ∆E
8 ∆E
13.8 ∆E
7.1 ∆E
17.5 ∆E
13.5 ∆E
4.8 ∆E
3.6 ∆E
6.9 ∆E
10.2 ∆E
7.6 ∆E
3.4 ∆E
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Chi Mei N140HCE-EN2 tested with X-Rite i1Pro 2
Máximo: 301 cd/m² (Nits) Médio: 284.9 cd/m² Minimum: 17 cd/m²iluminação: 89 %
iluminação com acumulador: 301 cd/m²
Contraste: 717:1 (Preto: 0.42 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 1.01 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.91, calibrated: 0.97
ΔE Greyscale 2.2 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
99.5% sRGB (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
63.2% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
68.9% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
99.5% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
67.1% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.19
| Asus ZenBook Duo UX481FL Chi Mei N140HCE-EN2, IPS, 14", 1920x1080 | Asus ZenBook 14 UM431DA-AM020T CEC PA LM140LF-3L03, IPS, 14", 1920x1080 | Huawei Matebook X Pro i5 Tianma XM, IPS, 13.9", 3000x2000 | Lenovo IdeaPad S940-14IWL B140ZAN01.3, IPS, 14", 3840x2160 | Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G7 20R1-000YUS BOE NV140QUM-N53, IPS, 14", 3840x2160 | MSI Prestige 14 A10SC-009 IPS, 14", 3840x2160 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display | -3% | -3% | 16% | 15% | ||
| Display P3 Coverage | 67.1 | 66.7 -1% | 65.9 -2% | 87.5 30% | 83 24% | |
| sRGB Coverage | 99.5 | 92.3 -7% | 95.2 -4% | 99.7 0% | 99.7 0% | |
| AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage | 68.9 | 67.5 -2% | 67.6 -2% | 81.1 18% | 83.1 21% | |
| Response Times | -39% | -15% | -54% | -61% | -59% | |
| Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% * | 31.2 ? | 36 ? -15% | 40.4 ? -29% | 57.2 ? -83% | 49.2 ? -58% | 55 ? -76% |
| Response Time Black / White * | 25.6 ? | 26 ? -2% | 25.6 ? -0% | 32 ? -25% | 32.2 ? -26% | 36 ? -41% |
| PWM Frequency | 24750 ? | 44 ? -100% | 201.6 ? -99% | |||
| Screen | -124% | -34% | -57% | -103% | 16% | |
| Brightness middle | 301 | 253 -16% | 442.7 47% | 594.5 98% | 532 77% | 567 88% |
| Brightness | 285 | 245 -14% | 428 50% | 536 88% | 513 80% | 516 81% |
| Brightness Distribution | 89 | 78 -12% | 84 -6% | 83 -7% | 90 1% | 86 -3% |
| Black Level * | 0.42 | 0.225 46% | 0.31 26% | 0.43 -2% | 0.41 2% | 0.445 -6% |
| Contrast | 717 | 1124 57% | 1428 99% | 1383 93% | 1298 81% | 1274 78% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 1.01 | 8.89 -780% | 2.24 -122% | 4.87 -382% | 6.88 -581% | 1.55 -53% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 3.42 | 4.56 -33% | 7.19 -110% | 7.9 -131% | 12.65 -270% | 5.14 -50% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 calibrated * | 0.97 | 4.9 -405% | 1.11 -14% | 2.83 -192% | 2.52 -160% | 1.24 -28% |
| Greyscale dE 2000 * | 2.2 | 6.33 -188% | 9.7 -341% | 6.7 -205% | 10.5 -377% | 1.48 33% |
| Gamma | 2.19 100% | 2.52 87% | 1.42 155% | 2.091 105% | 1.98 111% | 2.19 100% |
| CCT | 6605 98% | 6745 96% | 6227 104% | 6891 94% | 7394 88% | 6741 96% |
| Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998) | 63.2 | 60 -5% | 61.6 -3% | 72 14% | 74.1 17% | |
| Color Space (Percent of sRGB) | 99.5 | 91 -9% | 95 -5% | 100 1% | 99.7 0% | |
| Total Average (Program / Settings) | -55% /
-87% | -17% /
-26% | -32% /
-43% | -50% /
-75% | -22% /
2% |
* ... smaller is better
Display Response Times
ℹ
Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.| ↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
|---|---|---|
| 25.6 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 14.8 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 10.8 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows relatively slow response rates in our tests and may be too slow for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 58 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (20.9 ms). | ||
| ↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
| 31.2 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 15.6 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 15.6 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 38 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is similar to the average of all tested devices (32.8 ms). | ||
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
ℹ
To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.| Screen flickering / PWM detected | 24750 Hz | ≤ 29 % brightness setting |  |
The display backlight flickers at 24750 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) Flickering detected at a brightness setting of 29 % and below. There should be no flickering or PWM above this brightness setting. The frequency of 24750 Hz is quite high, so most users sensitive to PWM should not notice any flickering. In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8705 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured. | |||
Asus ZenBook Duo UX481FL GeForce MX250, i7-10510U, Intel SSD 660p 1TB SSDPEKNW010T8; CPU Multi 64Bit: Ø546 (533.24-766.64)
Asus ZenBook 15 UX534FT-DB77 GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q, i7-8565U, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB1T0HALR; CPU Multi 64Bit: Ø669 (651.9-718.51)
Microsoft Surface Laptop 3 15 i7-1065G7 Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU), i7-1065G7, Toshiba KBG40ZNS256G NVMe; CPU Multi 64Bit: Ø717 (684.67-772.41)
Asus ZenBook 15 UX534FTC-A8190T GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q, i7-10510U, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB1T0HALR; CPU Multi 64Bit: Ø729 (708.72-835.15)
Acer Aspire 5 A514-52 UHD Graphics 620, i5-10210U, WDC PC SN520 SDAPNUW-512G; CPU Multi 64Bit: Ø431 (399.28-488)
Cinebench R20: CPU (Multi Core) | CPU (Single Core)
Cinebench R15: CPU Single 64Bit | CPU Multi 64Bit
Blender: v2.79 BMW27 CPU
7-Zip 18.03: 7z b 4 -mmt1 | 7z b 4
Geekbench 5.5: Single-Core | Multi-Core
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2: 4k Preset
LibreOffice : 20 Documents To PDF
R Benchmark 2.5: Overall mean
Cinebench R15: CPU Single 64Bit | CPU Multi 64Bit
Blender: v2.79 BMW27 CPU
7-Zip 18.03: 7z b 4 -mmt1 | 7z b 4
Geekbench 5.5: Single-Core | Multi-Core
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2: 4k Preset
LibreOffice : 20 Documents To PDF
R Benchmark 2.5: Overall mean
| Cinebench R20 / CPU (Multi Core) | |
| Dell XPS 13 7390 Core i7-10710U | |
| Dell XPS 13 9300 Core i7-1065G7 | |
| MSI GF63 Thin 9SC | |
| Asus ZenBook 15 UX534FT-DB77 | |
| Microsoft Surface Laptop 3 13 Core i5-1035G7 | |
| Dell Inspiron 15 5000 5585 | |
| Asus ZenBook Duo UX481FL | |
| Average Intel Core i7-10510U (1015 - 1897, n=38) | |
| Dynabook Portege A30-E-174 | |
| HP Elite Dragonfly-8MK79EA | |
| Cinebench R20 / CPU (Single Core) | |
| Dell XPS 13 7390 Core i7-10710U | |
| Dell XPS 13 9300 Core i7-1065G7 | |
| Asus ZenBook 15 UX534FT-DB77 | |
| Asus ZenBook Duo UX481FL | |
| Microsoft Surface Laptop 3 13 Core i5-1035G7 | |
| Average Intel Core i7-10510U (362 - 497, n=37) | |
| MSI GF63 Thin 9SC | |
| Dynabook Portege A30-E-174 | |
| HP Elite Dragonfly-8MK79EA | |
| Dell Inspiron 15 5000 5585 | |
| Cinebench R15 / CPU Single 64Bit | |
| Asus ZenBook 15 UX534FT-DB77 | |
| Dell XPS 13 7390 Core i7-10710U | |
| Dell XPS 13 9300 Core i7-1065G7 | |
| Average Intel Core i7-10510U (113 - 202, n=42) | |
| Asus ZenBook Duo UX481FL | |
| MSI GF63 Thin 9SC | |
| Microsoft Surface Laptop 3 13 Core i5-1035G7 | |
| Dynabook Portege A30-E-174 | |
| HP Elite Dragonfly-8MK79EA | |
| Dell Inspiron 15 5000 5585 | |
| Cinebench R15 / CPU Multi 64Bit | |
| Dell XPS 13 7390 Core i7-10710U | |
| MSI GF63 Thin 9SC | |
| Asus ZenBook Duo UX481FL | |
| Dell XPS 13 9300 Core i7-1065G7 | |
| Microsoft Surface Laptop 3 13 Core i5-1035G7 | |
| Asus ZenBook 15 UX534FT-DB77 | |
| Dell Inspiron 15 5000 5585 | |
| Average Intel Core i7-10510U (482 - 856, n=45) | |
| HP Elite Dragonfly-8MK79EA | |
| Dynabook Portege A30-E-174 | |
| Blender / v2.79 BMW27 CPU | |
| HP Elite Dragonfly-8MK79EA | |
| Average Intel Core i7-10510U (628 - 1051, n=31) | |
| Asus ZenBook Duo UX481FL | |
| Microsoft Surface Laptop 3 13 Core i5-1035G7 | |
| Dell XPS 13 7390 Core i7-10710U | |
| 7-Zip 18.03 / 7z b 4 -mmt1 | |
| Asus ZenBook Duo UX481FL | |
| Average Intel Core i7-10510U (3747 - 4981, n=31) | |
| Dell XPS 13 7390 Core i7-10710U | |
| Microsoft Surface Laptop 3 13 Core i5-1035G7 | |
| HP Elite Dragonfly-8MK79EA | |
| 7-Zip 18.03 / 7z b 4 | |
| Dell XPS 13 7390 Core i7-10710U | |
| Asus ZenBook Duo UX481FL | |
| Microsoft Surface Laptop 3 13 Core i5-1035G7 | |
| Average Intel Core i7-10510U (12196 - 21298, n=31) | |
| HP Elite Dragonfly-8MK79EA | |
| Geekbench 5.5 / Single-Core | |
| Asus ZenBook Duo UX481FL | |
| Average Intel Core i7-10510U (977 - 1287, n=31) | |
| Geekbench 5.5 / Multi-Core | |
| Asus ZenBook Duo UX481FL | |
| Average Intel Core i7-10510U (2474 - 4484, n=31) | |
| HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 / 4k Preset | |
| Dell XPS 13 7390 Core i7-10710U | |
| Asus ZenBook Duo UX481FL | |
| Average Intel Core i7-10510U (3.41 - 6.04, n=31) | |
| Microsoft Surface Laptop 3 13 Core i5-1035G7 | |
| HP Elite Dragonfly-8MK79EA | |
| LibreOffice / 20 Documents To PDF | |
| Asus ZenBook Duo UX481FL | |
| Average Intel Core i7-10510U (50.7 - 77.8, n=27) | |
| R Benchmark 2.5 / Overall mean | |
| Asus ZenBook Duo UX481FL | |
| Average Intel Core i7-10510U (0.637 - 0.81, n=28) | |
* ... smaller is better
| PCMark 8 Home Score Accelerated v2 | 3747 pontos | |
| PCMark 8 Work Score Accelerated v2 | 5266 pontos | |
| PCMark 10 Score | 4246 pontos | |
Ajuda | ||
| DPC Latencies / LatencyMon - interrupt to process latency (max), Web, Youtube, Prime95 | |
| Asus ZenBook Duo UX481FL | |
* ... smaller is better
| Asus ZenBook Duo UX481FL Intel SSD 660p 1TB SSDPEKNW010T8 | Asus ZenBook 14 UM431DA-AM020T SK hynix BC501 HFM512GDHTNG-8310A | Huawei Matebook X Pro i5 Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP | Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G7 20R1-000YUS WDC PC SN730 SDBPNTY-512G | MSI Prestige 14 A10SC-009 Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB1T0HALR | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AS SSD | 0% | 3% | 14% | 74% | |
| Seq Read | 1237 | 1417 15% | 2416 95% | 1786 44% | 2300 86% |
| Seq Write | 1069 | 781 -27% | 1170 9% | 1259 18% | 2051 92% |
| 4K Read | 52.1 | 37.03 -29% | 48.33 -7% | 45.86 -12% | 46.23 -11% |
| 4K Write | 134.7 | 80.1 -41% | 103.1 -23% | 147.9 10% | 84.6 -37% |
| 4K-64 Read | 585 | 740 26% | 1039 78% | 885 51% | 1552 165% |
| 4K-64 Write | 854 | 748 -12% | 399.6 -53% | 950 11% | 1789 109% |
| Access Time Read * | 0.05 | 0.047 6% | 0.058 -16% | 0.058 -16% | 0.049 2% |
| Access Time Write * | 0.117 | 0.045 62% | 0.036 69% | 0.074 37% | 0.045 62% |
| Score Read | 761 | 918 21% | 1329 75% | 1110 46% | 1828 140% |
| Score Write | 1095 | 906 -17% | 620 -43% | 1224 12% | 2079 90% |
| Score Total | 2255 | 2270 1% | 2575 14% | 2885 28% | 4831 114% |
| Copy ISO MB/s | 1714 | 739 -57% | 1384 -19% | ||
| Copy Program MB/s | 511 | 312.3 -39% | 525 3% | ||
| Copy Game MB/s | 1187 | 486.3 -59% | 1008 -15% | ||
| CrystalDiskMark 5.2 / 6 | -32% | -17% | 24% | 20% | |
| Write 4K | 140.7 | 118.8 -16% | 116.5 -17% | 151.5 8% | 163.8 16% |
| Read 4K | 55.6 | 41.62 -25% | 42.18 -24% | 45.83 -18% | 48.6 -13% |
| Write Seq | 1415 | 796 -44% | 1079 -24% | 2060 46% | 2269 60% |
| Read Seq | 1516 | 1101 -27% | 1030 -32% | 1973 30% | 1963 29% |
| Write 4K Q32T1 | 474.5 | 234.7 -51% | 225.7 -52% | 489.8 3% | 289.8 -39% |
| Read 4K Q32T1 | 403.4 | 313.8 -22% | 302.9 -25% | 386.2 -4% | 373.6 -7% |
| Write Seq Q32T1 | 1796 | 842 -53% | 1174 -35% | 2703 51% | 2395 33% |
| Read Seq Q32T1 | 1913 | 1645 -14% | 3394 77% | 3376 76% | 3479 82% |
| Total Average (Program / Settings) | -16% /
-13% | -7% /
-4% | 19% /
18% | 47% /
51% |
* ... smaller is better
Intel SSD 660p 1TB SSDPEKNW010T8
CDM 5/6 Read Seq Q32T1:
1913 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write Seq Q32T1:
1796 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Read 4K Q32T1:
403.4 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write 4K Q32T1:
474.5 MB/s
CDM 5 Read Seq:
1516 MB/s
CDM 5 Write Seq:
1415 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Read 4K:
55.6 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write 4K:
140.7 MB/s
| 3DMark | |
| 1280x720 Cloud Gate Standard Graphics | |
| Dell G5 15 5587 | |
| Asus ZenBook 15 UX534FTC-A8190T | |
| Asus ZenBook Flip 15 UX563FD-A1027T | |
| Average NVIDIA GeForce MX250 (13805 - 23863, n=25) | |
| Dell Inspiron 15 5000 5585 | |
| Asus ZenBook Duo UX481FL | |
| Asus Zenbook 14 UX433FN-A6023T | |
| Lenovo Yoga C940-14IIL 81Q9 | |
| Asus VivoBook 15 X510UQ-BQ534T | |
| 1920x1080 Fire Strike Graphics | |
| Dell G5 15 5587 | |
| Asus ZenBook 15 UX534FTC-A8190T | |
| Asus ZenBook Flip 15 UX563FD-A1027T | |
| Average NVIDIA GeForce MX250 (2939 - 3885, n=29) | |
| Dell Inspiron 15 5000 5585 | |
| Lenovo Yoga C940-14IIL 81Q9 | |
| Asus ZenBook Duo UX481FL | |
| Asus Zenbook 14 UX433FN-A6023T | |
| Asus VivoBook 15 X510UQ-BQ534T | |
| 2560x1440 Time Spy Graphics | |
| Dell G5 15 5587 | |
| Asus ZenBook 15 UX534FTC-A8190T | |
| Asus ZenBook Flip 15 UX563FD-A1027T | |
| Average NVIDIA GeForce MX250 (881 - 1169, n=22) | |
| Asus ZenBook Duo UX481FL | |
| Asus Zenbook 14 UX433FN-A6023T | |
| Dell Inspiron 15 5000 5585 | |
| Lenovo Yoga C940-14IIL 81Q9 | |
| Asus VivoBook 15 X510UQ-BQ534T | |
| 3DMark 11 | |
| 1280x720 Performance GPU | |
| Dell G5 15 5587 | |
| Asus ZenBook 15 UX534FTC-A8190T | |
| Asus ZenBook Flip 15 UX563FD-A1027T | |
| Lenovo Yoga C940-14IIL 81Q9 | |
| Average NVIDIA GeForce MX250 (3585 - 4942, n=29) | |
| Dell Inspiron 15 5000 5585 | |
| Asus ZenBook Duo UX481FL | |
| Asus Zenbook 14 UX433FN-A6023T | |
| Asus VivoBook 15 X510UQ-BQ534T | |
| 1280x720 Performance Combined | |
| Dell G5 15 5587 | |
| Asus ZenBook 15 UX534FTC-A8190T | |
| Asus ZenBook Flip 15 UX563FD-A1027T | |
| Average NVIDIA GeForce MX250 (3532 - 4638, n=29) | |
| Lenovo Yoga C940-14IIL 81Q9 | |
| Asus ZenBook Duo UX481FL | |
| Asus Zenbook 14 UX433FN-A6023T | |
| Dell Inspiron 15 5000 5585 | |
| Asus VivoBook 15 X510UQ-BQ534T | |
| 3DMark 11 Performance | 3991 pontos | |
| 3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score | 12710 pontos | |
| 3DMark Fire Strike Score | 2758 pontos | |
| 3DMark Time Spy Score | 995 pontos | |
Ajuda | ||
Asus ZenBook Duo UX481FL GeForce MX250, i7-10510U, Intel SSD 660p 1TB SSDPEKNW010T8: Ø33.2 (31-35)
| baixo | média | alto | ultra | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| The Witcher 3 (2015) | 58.3 | 33.8 | 18 | 9.8 |
| Dota 2 Reborn (2015) | 114 | 102 | 62.3 | 56 |
| X-Plane 11.11 (2018) | 64.8 | 45.5 | 42.5 |
| Asus ZenBook Duo UX481FL GeForce MX250, i7-10510U, Intel SSD 660p 1TB SSDPEKNW010T8 | Asus ZenBook 14 UM431DA-AM020T Vega 10, R7 3700U, SK hynix BC501 HFM512GDHTNG-8310A | Huawei Matebook X Pro i5 GeForce MX150, i5-8250U, Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP | MSI Prestige 14 A10SC-009 GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q, i7-10710U, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB1T0HALR | Asus Zenbook 14 UX433FN-A6023T GeForce MX150, i7-8565U, Intel SSD 660p SSDPEKNW512G8 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Noise | 1% | -3% | -7% | -5% | |
| off / environment * | 28.3 | 29.8 -5% | 27.9 1% | 30.3 -7% | 30.7 -8% |
| Idle Minimum * | 28.3 | 28 1% | 27.9 1% | 30.3 -7% | 30.7 -8% |
| Idle Average * | 28.3 | 28 1% | 27.9 1% | 30.3 -7% | 30.7 -8% |
| Idle Maximum * | 28.3 | 28 1% | 27.9 1% | 30.3 -7% | 30.7 -8% |
| Load Average * | 39.1 | 36.8 6% | 36.2 7% | 40.2 -3% | 38.8 1% |
| Witcher 3 ultra * | 39.1 | 45 -15% | |||
| Load Maximum * | 39.1 | 39 -0% | 45.2 -16% | 43.5 -11% | 39.3 -1% |
* ... smaller is better
Barulho
| Ocioso |
| 28.3 / 28.3 / 28.3 dB |
| Carga |
| 39.1 / 39.1 dB |
 | ||
30 dB silencioso 40 dB(A) audível 50 dB(A) ruidosamente alto |
||
min:  , med:  , max:  BK Precision 732A (15 cm de distância) environment noise: 28.3 dB(A) | ||
(±) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 33.4 °C / 92 F, compared to the average of 31.3 °C / 88 F for the devices in the class Multimedia.
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 38.4 °C / 101 F, compared to the average of 36.9 °C / 98 F, ranging from 21.1 to 71 °C for the class Multimedia.
(-) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 48 °C / 118 F, compared to the average of 39.2 °C / 103 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 27.8 °C / 82 F, compared to the device average of 31.3 °C / 88 F.
(±) Playing The Witcher 3, the average temperature for the upper side is 32.6 °C / 91 F, compared to the device average of 31.3 °C / 88 F.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are cooler than skin temperature with a maximum of 28 °C / 82.4 F and are therefore cool to the touch.
(±) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.8 °C / 83.8 F (+0.8 °C / 1.4 F).
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 38.4 °C / 101 F, compared to the average of 36.9 °C / 98 F, ranging from 21.1 to 71 °C for the class Multimedia.
(-) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 48 °C / 118 F, compared to the average of 39.2 °C / 103 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 27.8 °C / 82 F, compared to the device average of 31.3 °C / 88 F.
(±) Playing The Witcher 3, the average temperature for the upper side is 32.6 °C / 91 F, compared to the device average of 31.3 °C / 88 F.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are cooler than skin temperature with a maximum of 28 °C / 82.4 F and are therefore cool to the touch.
(±) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.8 °C / 83.8 F (+0.8 °C / 1.4 F).
Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)
Asus ZenBook Duo UX481FL audio analysis
(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (78.7 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 9.8% lower than median
(-) | bass is not linear (16.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 5.5% higher than median
(+) | mids are linear (6.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 1.9% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (18.9% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 56% of all tested devices in this class were better, 8% similar, 36% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 18%, worst was 45%
Compared to all devices tested
» 40% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 52% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Apple MacBook 12 (Early 2016) 1.1 GHz audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (83.6 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 11.3% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (14.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2.4% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (10.2% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 6% of all tested devices in this class were better, 2% similar, 92% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 19%, worst was 53%
Compared to all devices tested
» 4% of all tested devices were better, 1% similar, 95% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Consumo de energia
| desligado | 0.27 / 1.07 Watt |
| Ocioso | 3.5 / 10 / 11 Watt |
| Carga |
53 / 63.6 Watt |
   
| |
Key:
min: ,
med: ,
max: Metrahit Energy | |
| Asus ZenBook Duo UX481FL i7-10510U, GeForce MX250, Intel SSD 660p 1TB SSDPEKNW010T8, IPS, 1920x1080, 14" | Asus ZenBook 14 UM431DA-AM020T R7 3700U, Vega 10, SK hynix BC501 HFM512GDHTNG-8310A, IPS, 1920x1080, 14" | Huawei Matebook X Pro i5 i5-8250U, GeForce MX150, Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP, IPS, 3000x2000, 13.9" | Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G7 20R1-000YUS i7-10510U, UHD Graphics 620, WDC PC SN730 SDBPNTY-512G, IPS, 3840x2160, 14" | MSI Prestige 14 A10SC-009 i7-10710U, GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB1T0HALR, IPS, 3840x2160, 14" | Lenovo IdeaPad S940-14IWL i7-8565U, UHD Graphics 620, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ, IPS, 3840x2160, 14" | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power Consumption | 17% | -1% | -4% | -26% | -4% | |
| Idle Minimum * | 3.5 | 3.6 -3% | 3.5 -0% | 3.5 -0% | 5.2 -49% | 5.2 -49% |
| Idle Average * | 10 | 7.2 28% | 8.9 11% | 10.8 -8% | 12.2 -22% | 10.2 -2% |
| Idle Maximum * | 11 | 10.8 2% | 12.3 -12% | 12.5 -14% | 14.3 -30% | 11.9 -8% |
| Load Average * | 53 | 38 28% | 54.2 -2% | 47.2 11% | 67 -26% | 42.1 21% |
| Witcher 3 ultra * | 35.6 | 42.4 -19% | ||||
| Load Maximum * | 63.6 | 45.2 29% | 52.1 18% | 68.8 -8% | 67 -5% | 53.6 16% |
* ... smaller is better
| Asus ZenBook Duo UX481FL i7-10510U, GeForce MX250, 70 Wh | Asus ZenBook 14 UM431DA-AM020T R7 3700U, Vega 10, 47 Wh | Huawei Matebook X Pro i5 i5-8250U, GeForce MX150, 57.4 Wh | Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G7 20R1-000YUS i7-10510U, UHD Graphics 620, 51 Wh | MSI Prestige 14 A10SC-009 i7-10710U, GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q, 52 Wh | Lenovo IdeaPad S940-14IWL i7-8565U, UHD Graphics 620, 52 Wh | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Battery Runtime | -30% | -16% | 5% | -46% | -54% | |
| Reader / Idle | 1323 | 1068 -19% | 1243 -6% | 596 -55% | 506 -62% | |
| WiFi v1.3 | 571 | 404 -29% | 557 -2% | 598 5% | 351 -39% | 299 -48% |
| Load | 220 | 125 -43% | 133 -40% | 125 -43% | 103 -53% |
Pro
+ Tela principal pré-calibrada; cobertura sRGB de 100 por cento
+ Segunda tela incrivelmente útil para multitarefa
+ Silencioso durante cargas baixas a médias
+ Longa duração da bateria; Grande bateria de 70 Wh
+ Teclas silenciosas e com boa resposta
+ Formato portável de 14 polegadas
+ Chassi rígido e de alta qualidade
+ Leitor de MicroSD
Contra
- No início leva algum tempo para se acostumar ao teclado; difícil digitar confortavelmente sem uma mesa grande
- O desempenho da CPU poderia ser melhor; incapaz de sustentar altas velocidades do Turbo Boost
- A segunda tela tende a sofrer de mais reflexos e obstáculos no ângulo de visão
- A segunda tela tem uma gama de cores mais estreita que a tela principal
- Visivelmente mais grosso e mais pesado que outros portáteis de 14 polegadas
- Sem suporte para Thunderbolt 3 ou DisplayPort
- RAM soldada
Como qualquer usuário de desktop pode atestar, ter duas telas em vez de uma pode realmente aumentar a produtividade e o ZenBook Duo não é diferente a esse respeito. É difícil voltar para uma só tela depois de se acostumar com as configurações espaçosas de tela dupla e esta é a principal vantagem na qual a Asus está apostando.
Para ter um formato de portátil, no entanto, os usuários terão que aceitar alguns compromissos. Em primeiro lugar, o peso é a desvantagem mais óbvia, pois o sistema é várias centenas de gramas mais pesado que um ZenBook 14 normal. Em segundo lugar, as cores na segunda tela não serão tão vivas quanto na tela principal certificada pela Pantone. Em terceiro lugar, o amplo ângulo de visão entre o usuário e a segunda tela acentua os reflexos e reduz o brilho aparente de forma mais perceptível, a menos que as condições ambientais sejam perfeitas. Em quarto lugar, o posicionamento incomum do teclado pode ser uma curva de aprendizado, especialmente se você digitar em espaços de trabalho apertados. E, por fim, as telas não se saem muito bem quando estão em exteriores, apesar do tamanho compacto de 14 polegadas e da bateria surpreendentemente longa. OLED poderia ter potencialmente resolvido muitas dessas questões, mas essa abordagem provavelmente elevaria os preços significativamente.
Existem alguns outros recursos ausentes que gostaríamos de ver em futuras revisões. Um obturador físico de privacidade da webcam e a capacidade de carregar via USB Tipo C, por exemplo, não estão disponíveis aqui, mesmo que tenham se tornado padrão na maioria dos outros portáteis carros-chefes.
Se as desvantagens acima não o incomodam ou se você acha que pode superá-las, o ZenBook Duo portátil e sua segunda tela são inestimáveis para suas necessidades de multitarefa.
O Asus ZenBook Duo está no seu melhor quando trabalha em um ambiente com iluminação controlada e um mouse externo para maximizar a visibilidade e ergonomia da tela secundária. Se você viaja e gosta de economizar espaço, o ZenBook Duo faz muito sentido. No entanto, se você tiver espaço de mesa disponível, um ZenBook 14 padrão e um monitor externo adequado o levarão mais longe.
Asus ZenBook Duo UX481FL
- 05/01/2020 v7 (old)
Allen Ngo
Multimedia - Médio equilibrado
Price comparison
