Breve análise do Tablet Asus ZenPad 8.0 Z380M-6B026A
| AndroBench 3-5 | |
| Sequential Write 256KB SDCard | |
| Asus ZenPad 8.0 Z380M-6B026A | |
| Sequential Read 256KB SDCard | |
| Asus ZenPad 8.0 Z380M-6B026A | |
| SD Card Reader | |
| maximum SDCardreader Maximum Transfer Rate | |
| average SDCardreader Average Transfer Rate |
| Networking | |
| iperf Server (receive) TCP 1 m (sort by value) | |
| Asus ZenPad 8.0 Z380M-6B026A | |
| Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.1 2016 SM-T585 | |
| iperf Client (transmit) TCP 1 m (sort by value) | |
| Asus ZenPad 8.0 Z380M-6B026A | |
| Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.1 2016 SM-T585 | |
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
iluminação: 90 %
iluminação com acumulador: 363 cd/m²
Contraste: 1396:1 (Preto: 0.26 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 5.8 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.91
ΔE Greyscale 5.5 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
78.5% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.24
| Asus ZenPad 8.0 Z380M-6B026A IPS, 1280x800, 8" | Xiaomi MiPad 2 IPS, 2048x1536, 7.9" | Amazon Fire HD 8 inch 2015 IPS, 1280x800, 8" | Huawei MediaPad M2 IPS LCD, 1920x1200, 8" | Samsung Galaxy Tab S2 8.0 LTE Super AMOLED, 2048x1536, 8" | Asus ZenPad S 8.0 Z580CA IPS, 2048x1536, 8" | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen | 5% | -14% | -10% | 27% | -8% | |
| Brightness middle | 363 | 425 17% | 550 52% | 463 28% | 347 -4% | 369 2% |
| Brightness | 348 | 402 16% | 523 50% | 445 28% | 348 0% | 346 -1% |
| Brightness Distribution | 90 | 91 1% | 88 -2% | 92 2% | 88 -2% | 86 -4% |
| Black Level * | 0.26 | 0.4 -54% | 0.53 -104% | 0.47 -81% | 0.37 -42% | |
| Contrast | 1396 | 1063 -24% | 1038 -26% | 985 -29% | 997 -29% | |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 5.8 | 4.98 14% | 7.77 -34% | 6.25 -8% | 1.67 71% | 5.58 4% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 17.8 | 6.61 63% | ||||
| Greyscale dE 2000 * | 5.5 | 5.2 5% | 7.48 -36% | 6.16 -12% | 1.75 68% | 4.67 15% |
| Gamma | 2.24 98% | 2.65 83% | 1.8 122% | 2.43 91% | 2.27 97% | 2.25 98% |
| CCT | 7388 88% | 7249 90% | 6633 98% | 7921 82% | 6361 102% | 7927 82% |
| Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998) | 95.4 | 70 | ||||
| Color Space (Percent of sRGB) | 86 |
* ... smaller is better
Display Response Times
| ↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
|---|---|---|
| 36 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 14 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 22 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 93 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (20.9 ms). | ||
| ↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
| 80 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 22 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 58 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 99 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (32.8 ms). | ||
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
| Screen flickering / PWM detected | 357 Hz | ≤ 50 % brightness setting |  |
| ≤ 120 cd/m² brightness | |||
The display backlight flickers at 357 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) Flickering detected at a brightness setting of 50 % (120 cd/m²) and below. There should be no flickering or PWM above this brightness setting. The frequency of 357 Hz is relatively high, so most users sensitive to PWM should not notice any flickering. However, there are reports that some users are still sensitive to PWM at 500 Hz and above, so be aware. Flickering occurs at relatively low brightness settings, so extended use at this brightness setting or lower can cause eyestrain. In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8715 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured. | |||
| Geekbench 3 | |
| 64 Bit Single-Core Score (sort by value) | |
| Asus ZenPad 8.0 Z380M-6B026A | |
| Xiaomi MiPad 2 | |
| Samsung Galaxy Tab S2 8.0 LTE | |
| 64 Bit Multi-Core Score (sort by value) | |
| Asus ZenPad 8.0 Z380M-6B026A | |
| Xiaomi MiPad 2 | |
| Samsung Galaxy Tab S2 8.0 LTE | |
| GFXBench 3.0 | |
| on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL (sort by value) | |
| Asus ZenPad 8.0 Z380M-6B026A | |
| Xiaomi MiPad 2 | |
| Amazon Fire HD 8 inch 2015 | |
| Huawei MediaPad M2 | |
| Samsung Galaxy Tab S2 8.0 LTE | |
| Asus ZenPad S 8.0 Z580CA | |
| 1920x1080 1080p Manhattan Offscreen (sort by value) | |
| Asus ZenPad 8.0 Z380M-6B026A | |
| Xiaomi MiPad 2 | |
| Amazon Fire HD 8 inch 2015 | |
| Huawei MediaPad M2 | |
| Samsung Galaxy Tab S2 8.0 LTE | |
| Asus ZenPad S 8.0 Z580CA | |
| GFXBench 3.1 | |
| on screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen (sort by value) | |
| Asus ZenPad 8.0 Z380M-6B026A | |
| Xiaomi MiPad 2 | |
| Amazon Fire HD 8 inch 2015 | |
| Huawei MediaPad M2 | |
| Asus ZenPad S 8.0 Z580CA | |
| 1920x1080 Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen (sort by value) | |
| Asus ZenPad 8.0 Z380M-6B026A | |
| Xiaomi MiPad 2 | |
| Amazon Fire HD 8 inch 2015 | |
| Huawei MediaPad M2 | |
| Asus ZenPad S 8.0 Z580CA | |
| PCMark for Android - Work performance score (sort by value) | |
| Asus ZenPad 8.0 Z380M-6B026A | |
| Xiaomi MiPad 2 | |
| Amazon Fire HD 8 inch 2015 | |
| Huawei MediaPad M2 | |
| Samsung Galaxy Tab S2 8.0 LTE | |
| Asus ZenPad S 8.0 Z580CA | |
| AnTuTu v6 - Total Score (sort by value) | |
| Asus ZenPad 8.0 Z380M-6B026A | |
| Xiaomi MiPad 2 | |
| Octane V2 - Total Score (sort by value) | |
| Asus ZenPad 8.0 Z380M-6B026A | |
| Xiaomi MiPad 2 | |
| Amazon Fire HD 8 inch 2015 | |
| Huawei MediaPad M2 | |
| Samsung Galaxy Tab S2 8.0 LTE | |
| Asus ZenPad S 8.0 Z580CA | |
| Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total (sort by value) | |
| Asus ZenPad 8.0 Z380M-6B026A | |
| Xiaomi MiPad 2 | |
| Amazon Fire HD 8 inch 2015 | |
| Huawei MediaPad M2 | |
| Samsung Galaxy Tab S2 8.0 LTE | |
| Asus ZenPad S 8.0 Z580CA | |
| WebXPRT 2015 - Overall (sort by value) | |
| Asus ZenPad 8.0 Z380M-6B026A | |
| Amazon Fire HD 8 inch 2015 | |
| Huawei MediaPad M2 | |
| Samsung Galaxy Tab S2 8.0 LTE | |
| Asus ZenPad S 8.0 Z580CA | |
| JetStream 1.1 - Total Score (sort by value) | |
| Asus ZenPad 8.0 Z380M-6B026A | |
| Xiaomi MiPad 2 | |
| Amazon Fire HD 8 inch 2015 | |
| Huawei MediaPad M2 | |
| Samsung Galaxy Tab S2 8.0 LTE | |
* ... smaller is better
| Dead Trigger 2 - high | |
| Asus ZenPad 8.0 Z380M-6B026A | |
| Asphalt 8: Airborne - high | |
| Asus ZenPad 8.0 Z380M-6B026A | |
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 37.2 °C / 99 F, compared to the average of 33.7 °C / 93 F, ranging from 20.7 to 53.2 °C for the class Tablet.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 38.4 °C / 101 F, compared to the average of 33.2 °C / 92 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 29.1 °C / 84 F, compared to the device average of 30 °C / 86 F.
Asus ZenPad 8.0 Z380M-6B026A audio analysis
(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (75.1 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 28.5% lower than median
(-) | bass is not linear (18.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 3.9% away from median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (9.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2.5% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (5.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (23.9% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 70% of all tested devices in this class were better, 6% similar, 23% worse
» The best had a delta of 7%, average was 22%, worst was 129%
Compared to all devices tested
» 69% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 24% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Apple MacBook 12 (Early 2016) 1.1 GHz audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (83.6 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 11.3% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (14.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2.4% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (10.2% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 6% of all tested devices in this class were better, 2% similar, 92% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 19%, worst was 53%
Compared to all devices tested
» 4% of all tested devices were better, 1% similar, 95% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
| desligado |   0.16 / 0.17 Watt |
| Ocioso |  1.32 / 2.71 / 2.83 Watt |
| Carga |
4.24 / 5.01 Watt |
    
| |
Key:
min: ,
med: ,
max: Metrahit Energy | |
| Asus ZenPad 8.0 Z380M-6B026A 4000 mAh | Xiaomi MiPad 2 6190 mAh | Amazon Fire HD 8 inch 2015 mAh | Huawei MediaPad M2 mAh | Samsung Galaxy Tab S2 8.0 LTE mAh | Asus ZenPad S 8.0 Z580CA mAh | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Battery Runtime | -11% | -29% | 17% | 5% | -30% | |
| Reader / Idle | 1305 | 832 -36% | 1546 18% | 1399 7% | 677 -48% | |
| H.264 | 624 | 541 -13% | 727 17% | 780 25% | 450 -28% | |
| WiFi v1.3 | 472 | 421 -11% | 388 -18% | 525 11% | 442 -6% | 340 -28% |
| Load | 287 | 144 -50% | 343 20% | 265 -8% | 240 -16% |
Pro
Contra
A Asus entrega um aparelho muito impressionante com o seu ZenPad 8.0 Z380M. O acessível tablet apresenta resultados bons, até muito bons em todos os setores significantes e normalmente ofusca rivais consideravelmente mais caros.
Especialmente a tela convence em sua totalidade, e a longa duração da bateria torna o ZenPad 8.0 em um excelente companheiro do dia a dia. O sistema compensa a sua falta de desempenho de hardware puro em detalhe com a boa interação dos componentes individuais como um todo.
Nosso modelo de teste inclusive pode ser recomendado para algumas tarefas especiais graças á sua expansibilidade: O Audio Cover se transforma em um jukebox portátil, e a combinação de uma unidade GPS altamente receptiva e Battery Cover opcional definitivamente poderia substituir um sistema de navegação completo em escaladas longas.
O ZenPad 8.0 dificilmente comete erros graves. O desempenho do Wi-Fi sofre pela falta de suporte para 802.11ac (mas apenas em relação com as taxas de transmissão; sua potência de transmissão é satisfatória). De outra forma, apenas a câmera frontal de 2 MP deve ser mencionada aqui, dado que poderia ter sido omitida em vista de seu desempenho.
Em resumo: Com um preço a partir de cerca de 150 Euros (~$169), o comprador não cometerá um erro ao comprar o ZenPad 8.0. Se for importante uma maior resolução da tela ou mais poder de cômputo, pode valer a pena dar uma olhada em oponentes como o Xiaomi MiPad 2 ou inclusive no Galaxy Tab S2 8.0 da Samsung que custa o dobro.
Esta é uma versão reduzida da análise original. Você pode ler a análise completa em inglês aqui.
Asus ZenPad 8.0 Z380M-6B026A
- 08/15/2016 v5.1 (old)
Oliver Moebel
Price comparison
