Breve análise do Smartphone OnePlus Nord – Retorno do Campeão do Valor?
Competing Devices
Rating | Date | Model | Weight | Drive | Size | Resolution | Price |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 83.6 % v7 (old) | 08/2020 | OnePlus Nord SD 765G, Adreno 620 | 184 g | 256 GB UFS 2.1 Flash | 6.44" | 2440x1080 | |
| 85.2 % v7 (old) | 05/2020 | Apple iPhone SE 2020 A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU | 148 g | 128 GB NVMe | 4.70" | 1334x750 | |
| 82.3 % v7 (old) | 07/2020 | Huawei P40 Lite 5G Kirin 820, Mali-G57 MP6 | 189 g | 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash | 6.50" | 2400x1080 | |
| 86 % v7 (old) | 03/2020 | Samsung Galaxy S10 Lite SD 855, Adreno 640 | 186 g | 128 GB UFS 3.0 Flash | 6.70" | 2400x1080 | |
| 83.3 % v7 (old) | 12/2019 | Xiaomi Mi Note 10 SD 730G, Adreno 618 | 208 g | 128 GB UFS 2.0 Flash | 6.47" | 2340x1080 |
| Networking | |
| iperf3 transmit AX12 | |
| Apple iPhone SE 2020 | |
| OnePlus Nord | |
| Xiaomi Mi Note 10 | |
| Samsung Galaxy S10 Lite | |
| Huawei P40 Lite 5G | |
| iperf3 receive AX12 | |
| OnePlus Nord | |
| Apple iPhone SE 2020 | |
| Samsung Galaxy S10 Lite | |
| Huawei P40 Lite 5G | |
| Xiaomi Mi Note 10 | |
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
iluminação: 94 %
iluminação com acumulador: 529 cd/m²
Contraste: ∞:1 (Preto: 0 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 2.53 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.91
ΔE Greyscale 1.7 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
100% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.249
| OnePlus Nord AMOLED, 2440x1080, 6.4" | Apple iPhone SE 2020 IPS, 1334x750, 4.7" | Huawei P40 Lite 5G IPS, 2400x1080, 6.5" | Samsung Galaxy S10 Lite Super AMOLED Plus, 2400x1080, 6.7" | Xiaomi Mi Note 10 AMOLED, 2340x1080, 6.5" | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen | 27% | -13% | -13% | -40% | |
| Brightness middle | 529 | 688 30% | 466 -12% | 622 18% | 625 18% |
| Brightness | 531 | 659 24% | 457 -14% | 630 19% | 607 14% |
| Brightness Distribution | 94 | 92 -2% | 91 -3% | 96 2% | 89 -5% |
| Black Level * | 0.28 | 0.61 | |||
| Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 2.53 | 1 60% | 2.2 13% | 2.7 -7% | 4.38 -73% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 4.52 | 2.2 51% | 4.6 -2% | 5.9 -31% | 6.83 -51% |
| Greyscale dE 2000 * | 1.7 | 1.7 -0% | 2.7 -59% | 3 -76% | 4.1 -141% |
| Gamma | 2.249 98% | 2.25 98% | 2.24 98% | 2.09 105% | 2.251 98% |
| CCT | 6462 101% | 6790 96% | 6633 98% | 6246 104% | 7251 90% |
| Contrast | 2457 | 764 |
* ... smaller is better
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
| Screen flickering / PWM detected | 367.6 Hz |  | |
The display backlight flickers at 367.6 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) . The frequency of 367.6 Hz is relatively high, so most users sensitive to PWM should not notice any flickering. However, there are reports that some users are still sensitive to PWM at 500 Hz and above, so be aware. In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8706 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured. | |||
Display Response Times
| ↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
|---|---|---|
| 7 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 3 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 4 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 17 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (20.9 ms). | ||
| ↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
| 6 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 3 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 3 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 15 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (32.8 ms). | ||
| PCMark for Android | |
| Work performance score (sort by value) | |
| OnePlus Nord | |
| Huawei P40 Lite 5G | |
| Samsung Galaxy S10 Lite | |
| Xiaomi Mi Note 10 | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G (8687 - 11041, n=16) | |
| Work 2.0 performance score (sort by value) | |
| OnePlus Nord | |
| Huawei P40 Lite 5G | |
| Samsung Galaxy S10 Lite | |
| Xiaomi Mi Note 10 | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G (7245 - 9989, n=17) | |
| AnTuTu v8 - Total Score (sort by value) | |
| OnePlus Nord | |
| Apple iPhone SE 2020 | |
| Huawei P40 Lite 5G | |
| Samsung Galaxy S10 Lite | |
| Xiaomi Mi Note 10 | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G (285731 - 332305, n=14) | |
| Jetstream 2 - Total Score | |
| Apple iPhone SE 2020 (Safari Mobile 13.1) | |
| Average of class Smartphone (13.8 - 387, n=169, last 2 years) | |
| Samsung Galaxy S10 Lite (Chrome 80) | |
| OnePlus Nord (Chrome 84) | |
| Huawei P40 Lite 5G (Huawei Browser 10.0.2.331) | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G (15.8 - 60.5, n=12) | |
| Xiaomi Mi Note 10 (Chrome 78) | |
| JetStream 1.1 - Total Score | |
| Apple iPhone SE 2020 (Safari Mobile 13.1) | |
| Samsung Galaxy S10 Lite (Chrome 80) | |
| Huawei P40 Lite 5G (Huawei Browser 10.0.2.331) | |
| OnePlus Nord (Chrome 84) | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G (10.8 - 96.9, n=11) | |
| Xiaomi Mi Note 10 (Chrome 78) | |
| Speedometer 2.0 - Result | |
| Apple iPhone SE 2020 (Safari Mobile 13.1) | |
| Average of class Smartphone (15.2 - 569, n=152, last 2 years) | |
| Samsung Galaxy S10 Lite (Chrome 80) | |
| OnePlus Nord (Chome 84) | |
| Huawei P40 Lite 5G (Huawei Browser 10.0.2.331) | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G (9 - 54.9, n=9) | |
| Xiaomi Mi Note 10 (Chrome 78) | |
| WebXPRT 3 - Overall | |
| Average of class Smartphone (38 - 347, n=79, last 2 years) | |
| Apple iPhone SE 2020 (Safari Mobile 13.1) | |
| Huawei P40 Lite 5G (Huawei Browser 10.0.2.331) | |
| OnePlus Nord (Chrome 84) | |
| Samsung Galaxy S10 Lite (Chrome 80) | |
| Xiaomi Mi Note 10 (Chrome 78) | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G (20 - 101, n=13) | |
| Octane V2 - Total Score | |
| Apple iPhone SE 2020 (Safari Mobile 13.1) | |
| Average of class Smartphone (2228 - 100368, n=210, last 2 years) | |
| Samsung Galaxy S10 Lite (Chrome 80) | |
| Huawei P40 Lite 5G (Huawei Browser 10.0.2.331) | |
| OnePlus Nord (Chrome 84) | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G (3592 - 19143, n=14) | |
| Xiaomi Mi Note 10 (Chrome 78) | |
| Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G (2359 - 15230, n=14) | |
| OnePlus Nord (Chrome 84) | |
| Xiaomi Mi Note 10 (Chrome 78) | |
| Huawei P40 Lite 5G (Huawei Browser 10.0.2.331) | |
| Samsung Galaxy S10 Lite (Chrome 80) | |
| Average of class Smartphone (277 - 28190, n=167, last 2 years) | |
| Apple iPhone SE 2020 (Safari Mobile 13.1) | |
* ... smaller is better
| OnePlus Nord | Huawei P40 Lite 5G | Samsung Galaxy S10 Lite | Xiaomi Mi Note 10 | OnePlus 8 | Average 256 GB UFS 2.1 Flash | Average of class Smartphone | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AndroBench 3-5 | 22% | 46% | -25% | 76% | 9% | 157% | |
| Sequential Read 256KB | 956 | 905 -5% | 1489 56% | 480.5 -50% | 1707 79% | 829 ? -13% | 1894 ? 98% |
| Sequential Write 256KB | 473.1 | 188 -60% | 525 11% | 243.6 -49% | 748 58% | 376 ? -21% | 1476 ? 212% |
| Random Read 4KB | 126.7 | 146.1 15% | 191.7 51% | 106.2 -16% | 215 70% | 168.8 ? 33% | 278 ? 119% |
| Random Write 4KB | 104.5 | 249.7 139% | 173.5 66% | 118.9 14% | 203.9 95% | 143.6 ? 37% | 312 ? 199% |
| Sequential Read 256KB SDCard | 83.3 ? | 76 ? | 66.8 ? | ||||
| Sequential Write 256KB SDCard | 67.7 ? | 61 ? | 56.3 ? |
(-) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 45.8 °C / 114 F, compared to the average of 35.1 °C / 95 F, ranging from 21.9 to 63.7 °C for the class Smartphone.
(±) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 43 °C / 109 F, compared to the average of 33.9 °C / 93 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 27.9 °C / 82 F, compared to the device average of 32.8 °C / 91 F.
OnePlus Nord audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (84.9 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 74.7% lower than median
(+) | bass is linear (0% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(-) | nearly no mids - on average 74.7% lower than median
(+) | mids are linear (0% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(-) | nearly no highs - on average 74.7% lower than median
(+) | highs are linear (0% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(-) | overall sound is not linear (113.3% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 86% of all tested devices in this class were better, 2% similar, 12% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 37%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 96% of all tested devices were better, 1% similar, 4% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Samsung Galaxy S10 Lite audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (88.9 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 30% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (11.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 3.4% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (3.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 6.9% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (4% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (22% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 41% of all tested devices in this class were better, 7% similar, 51% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 37%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 60% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 33% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
| desligado |   0.1 / 0.3 Watt |
| Ocioso |  1.8 / 2.1 / 2.3 Watt |
| Carga |
3.4 / 5.2 Watt |
    
| |
Key:
min: ,
med: ,
max: Metrahit Energy | |
| OnePlus Nord 4115 mAh | Apple iPhone SE 2020 1822 mAh | Huawei P40 Lite 5G 4000 mAh | Samsung Galaxy S10 Lite 4500 mAh | Xiaomi Mi Note 10 5260 mAh | Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G | Average of class Smartphone | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power Consumption | 37% | 5% | 9% | -4% | 6% | -15% | |
| Idle Minimum * | 1.8 | 0.44 76% | 0.65 64% | 0.58 68% | 0.7 61% | 0.965 ? 46% | 0.883 ? 51% |
| Idle Average * | 2.1 | 1.56 26% | 2.25 -7% | 1.55 26% | 1.8 14% | 1.899 ? 10% | 1.467 ? 30% |
| Idle Maximum * | 2.3 | 1.63 29% | 2.29 -0% | 1.64 29% | 2.2 4% | 2.07 ? 10% | 1.621 ? 30% |
| Load Average * | 3.4 | 2.32 32% | 3.7 -9% | 4.29 -26% | 5.2 -53% | 3.98 ? -17% | 6.58 ? -94% |
| Load Maximum * | 5.2 | 4.12 21% | 6.46 -24% | 8.03 -54% | 7.5 -44% | 6.19 ? -19% | 9.91 ? -91% |
* ... smaller is better
| OnePlus Nord 4115 mAh | Apple iPhone SE 2020 1822 mAh | Huawei P40 Lite 5G 4000 mAh | Samsung Galaxy S10 Lite 4500 mAh | Xiaomi Mi Note 10 5260 mAh | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Battery Runtime | -26% | 20% | 4% | 30% | |
| Reader / Idle | 2003 | 1938 -3% | 2504 25% | 2134 7% | |
| H.264 | 1064 | 681 -36% | 1183 11% | 1423 34% | |
| WiFi v1.3 | 869 | 694 -20% | 1047 20% | 823 -5% | 1127 30% |
| Load | 261 | 143 -45% | 222 -15% | 387 48% |
Pro
Contra
Veredicto – OnePlus cumpre
Em nossa análise do OnePlus One, escrevemos que ele tinha uma "excelente relação preço-desempenho, que permanece incomparável".
Agora, cinco anos depois, o OnePlus Nord também possui uma excelente relação preço-desempenho, embora não seja mais incomparável. Isso se deve em grande parte ao fato de que dispositivos mais antigos, que costumavam ser mais caros, como o Samsung Galaxy S10 Lite, agora chegaram à faixa de preços do OnePlus Nord.
Considerando os preços de lançamento de outros dispositivos, o OnePlus Nord é certamente impressionante: Com 5G, Wi-Fi rápido, muito armazenamento, um SoC rápido, câmeras boas e flexíveis, além de uma carcaça elegante e robusta, estabeleceu um novo padrão para futuros dispositivos de gama média.
Quase não temos críticas: A tela poderia ser um pouco mais brilhante, a câmera só funciona bem em situações de pouca luz quando o modo paisagem noturna está ativado e o dispositivo pode ficar bastante quente.
O OnePlus Nord cumpre suas próprias aspirações: Com ele, o fabricante volta às suas raízes e vende um ótimo smartphone a um preço barato.
Os usuários que frequentemente usam aplicativos muito exigentes ou executam várias tarefas em segundo plano enquanto outros aplicativos exigentes estão em execução poderão notar uma desvantagem de desempenho em comparação com telefones carros-chefes mais caros. Além disso, faltam alguns recursos comumente encontrados em carros-chefes, como carregamento sem fio, Wi-Fi 6 ou suporte para velocidades LTE extremamente altas.
No entanto, ainda é um smartphone excelente e barato para quem deseja aceitar esses pequenos compromissos.
OnePlus Nord
- 08/31/2022 v7 (old)
Florian Schmitt
Price comparison
