Breve análise do Smartphone OnePlus Nord – Retorno do Campeão do Valor?

Name: OnePlus Nord
Brand: OnePlus

Challenger azul ártico.

A OnePlus demanda menos de 400 Euros (~US$ 470) pelo OnePlus Nord: Um smartphone com tela de 90 Hz, 5G, SoC rápido, muito armazenamento interno e um exterior premium. O OnePlus finalmente conseguiu voltar a oferecer o telefone de melhor valor?

Florian Schmitt, 👁 Florian Schmitt, ✓ Andrea Grüblinger (traduzido por Ricardo Soto), Published 08/01/2020 🇺🇸 🇩🇪 ...

ARM Android 5G OnePlus Smartphone

Test device courtesy of OnePlus Deutschland

Download your licensed rating image as PNG / SVG

OnePlus Nord (Nord Serie)

Processador

Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G 8 x 1.8 - 2.4 GHz, Kryo 475 Gold / Silver

Placa gráfica

Qualcomm Adreno 620

Memória

12 GB

Pantalha

6.44 polegadas 20:9, 2440 x 1080 pixel 414 PPI, Tela táctil capacitiva, AMOLED, Brilhante: sim, 90 Hz

Disco rígido

256 GB UFS 2.1 Flash, 256 GB

, 234 GB livre

Conexões

1 USB 2.0, Conexões Audio: Saída de áudio via USB-C, 1 Leitor de Impressões Digitais, NFC, Brightness Sensor, Sensores: Acelerômetro, bússola, giroscópio, sensor de proximidade

Funcionamento em rede

802.11 a/b/g/n/ac (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/), Bluetooth 5.1, 2G, 3G, 4G (Banda 1,2,3,4,5,7,8,12,17,18,19,20,26,28,32,34,38,39,40,41,66); 5G (N1,3,7,28,78), Dual SIM, LTE, 5G, GPS

Tamanho

altura x largura x profundidade (em mm): 8.2 x 158.3 x 73.3

Bateria

4115 mAh Lítio-Polímero, Warp Charge 30T

Charging

fast charging / Quickcharge

Sistema Operativo

Android 10

Camera

Primary Camera: 48 MPix 0.8μm/48MP, 1.6μm(4in1)/12MP; 6 lenses, f/1.75, OIS (main camera); 8 MP, f/2.25, 119° field of view (wide-angle lens); 2 MP, f/2.4 (macro lens); 5 MP, f/2.4 (depth of field camera)
Secondary Camera: 32 MPix 0.8μm/32MP, 1.6μm(4in1)/8MP, f/2.45, fixed-focus lens (câmera principal); 8 MP, f/2.45, 105° field of view (lente grande angular)

Características adicionais

Alto falantes: Alto-falante mono na borda inferior, Teclado: Teclado virtual, Carregador, cabo USB, protetor de silicone, SIM tool, 24 Meses Garantia, LTE 4x4 MIMO Cat. 18 / Cat. 13 (1.2 Gb/s download, 150 Mb/s upload); SAR value: 0.90 W/kg (head), 1,27 W/kg (body), fanless

peso

184 g, Suprimento de energia: 139 g

Preço

499 Euro

Links

OnePlus página inicial

Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

see all specifications

Competing Devices

Rating	Date	Model	Weight	Drive	Size	Resolution
83.6 % v7 ^(old)	08/2020	OnePlus Nord SD 765G, Adreno 620	184 g	256 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	6.44"	2440x1080
85.2 % v7 ^(old)	05/2020	Apple iPhone SE 2020 A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU	148 g	128 GB NVMe	4.70"	1334x750
82.3 % v7 ^(old)	07/2020	Huawei P40 Lite 5G Kirin 820, Mali-G57 MP6	189 g	128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	6.50"	2400x1080
86 % v7 ^(old)	03/2020	Samsung Galaxy S10 Lite SD 855, Adreno 640	186 g	128 GB UFS 3.0 Flash	6.70"	2400x1080
83.3 % v7 ^(old)	12/2019	Xiaomi Mi Note 10 SD 730G, Adreno 618	208 g	128 GB UFS 2.0 Flash	6.47"	2340x1080

Size Comparison

Huawei P40 Lite 5G Samsung Galaxy S10 Lite Xiaomi Mi Note 10 OnePlus Nord Apple iPhone SE 2020 DIN A6 ❌

Networking
iperf3 transmit AX12
Apple iPhone SE 2020 A13 Bionic GPU, A13 Bionic, 128 GB NVMe	818 (400^min - 892^max) MBit/s +45%
OnePlus Nord Adreno 620, SD 765G, 256 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	563 (275^min - 666^max) MBit/s
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Adreno 618, SD 730G, 128 GB UFS 2.0 Flash	327 (321^min - 333^max) MBit/s -42%
Samsung Galaxy S10 Lite Adreno 640, SD 855, 128 GB UFS 3.0 Flash	327 (155^min - 377^max) MBit/s -42%
Huawei P40 Lite 5G Mali-G57 MP6, Kirin 820, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	255 (234^min - 277^max) MBit/s -55%
iperf3 receive AX12
OnePlus Nord Adreno 620, SD 765G, 256 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	650 (563^min - 668^max) MBit/s
Apple iPhone SE 2020 A13 Bionic GPU, A13 Bionic, 128 GB NVMe	618 (321^min - 653^max) MBit/s -5%
Samsung Galaxy S10 Lite Adreno 640, SD 855, 128 GB UFS 3.0 Flash	612 (473^min - 652^max) MBit/s -6%
Huawei P40 Lite 5G Mali-G57 MP6, Kirin 820, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	333 (319^min - 345^max) MBit/s -49%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Adreno 618, SD 730G, 128 GB UFS 2.0 Flash	331 (317^min - 341^max) MBit/s -49%

OnePlus Nord; iperf3 receive AX12; iperf 3.1.3: Ø650 (563-668)

OnePlus Nord; iperf3 transmit AX12; iperf 3.1.3: Ø580 (406-666)

Image Comparison

Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.

Scene 1 Scene 2 Scene 3 Scene 4

click to load images

OnePlus Nord

Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max

OnePlus 8 Pro

Canon 600D

click to load images

OnePlus Nord

Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max

OnePlus 8 Pro

Canon 600D

click to load images

OnePlus Nord

Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max

OnePlus 8 Pro

Canon 600D

click to load images

OnePlus Nord

Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max

OnePlus 8 Pro

Canon 600D

ColorChecker OnePlus Nord: 12.3 ∆E min: 3.58 - max: 19.57 ∆E


550 cd/m²	532 cd/m²	516 cd/m²
523 cd/m²	529 cd/m²	519 cd/m²
549 cd/m²	536 cd/m²	524 cd/m²

Distribuição do brilho

tested with X-Rite i1Pro 2

Máximo: 550 cd/m² (Nits) Médio: 530.9 cd/m² Minimum: 3.8 cd/m²
iluminação: 94 %
iluminação com acumulador: 529 cd/m²
Contraste: ∞:1 (Preto: 0 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 2.53 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.93
ΔE Greyscale 1.7 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
100% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.249

	OnePlus Nord AMOLED, 2440x1080, 6.4"	Apple iPhone SE 2020 IPS, 1334x750, 4.7"	Huawei P40 Lite 5G IPS, 2400x1080, 6.5"	Samsung Galaxy S10 Lite Super AMOLED Plus, 2400x1080, 6.7"	Xiaomi Mi Note 10 AMOLED, 2340x1080, 6.5"
Screen		27%	-13%	-13%	-40%
Brightness middle	529	688 30%	466 -12%	622 18%	625 18%
Brightness	531	659 24%	457 -14%	630 19%	607 14%
Brightness Distribution	94	92 -2%	91 -3%	96 2%	89 -5%
Black Level *		0.28	0.61
Colorchecker dE 2000 *	2.53	1 60%	2.2 13%	2.7 -7%	4.38 -73%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *	4.52	2.2 51%	4.6 -2%	5.9 -31%	6.83 -51%
Greyscale dE 2000 *	1.7	1.7 -0%	2.7 -59%	3 -76%	4.1 -141%
Gamma	2.249 ^98%	2.25 ^98%	2.24 ^98%	2.09 ^105%	2.251 ^98%
CCT	6462 ^101%	6790 ^96%	6633 ^98%	6246 ^104%	7251 ^90%
Contrast		2457	764

* ... smaller is better

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

ℹ

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.

Screen flickering / PWM detected

367.6 Hz

The display backlight flickers at 367.6 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) .

The frequency of 367.6 Hz is relatively high, so most users sensitive to PWM should not notice any flickering. However, there are reports that some users are still sensitive to PWM at 500 Hz and above, so be aware.

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8774 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured.

Display Response Times

ℹ

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.

↔ Response Time Black to White
7 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↗ 3 ms rise
7 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↘ 4 ms fall
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 17 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (21 ms).
↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
6 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↗ 3 ms rise
6 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↘ 3 ms fall
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 15 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (32.9 ms).

Geekbench 5.5
Single-Core (sort by value)
OnePlus Nord Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 12288	611 Points
Apple iPhone SE 2020 Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 3072	1336 Points +119%
Huawei P40 Lite 5G HiSilicon Kirin 820, Mali-G57 MP6, 6144	642 Points +5%
Samsung Galaxy S10 Lite Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 8192	740 Points +21%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144	543 Points -11%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G (554 - 673, n=17)	603 Points -1%
Average of class Smartphone (126 - 2437, n=173, last 2 years)	989 Points +62%
Multi-Core (sort by value)
OnePlus Nord Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 12288	1966 Points
Apple iPhone SE 2020 Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 3072	3281 Points +67%
Huawei P40 Lite 5G HiSilicon Kirin 820, Mali-G57 MP6, 6144	2434 Points +24%
Samsung Galaxy S10 Lite Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 8192	2722 Points +38%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144	1727 Points -12%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G (1520 - 1966, n=17)	1781 Points -9%
Average of class Smartphone (473 - 6687, n=173, last 2 years)	3298 Points +68%
OpenCL Score (sort by value)
OnePlus Nord Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 12288	1242 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G (1231 - 1302, n=10)	1265 Points +2%
Average of class Smartphone (459 - 13578, n=37, last 2 years)	6909 Points +456%
Vulkan Score 5.5 (sort by value)
OnePlus Nord Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 12288	1169 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G (168 - 1278, n=12)	1060 Points -9%
Average of class Smartphone (79 - 16883, n=43, last 2 years)	6769 Points +479%

PCMark for Android
Work performance score (sort by value)
OnePlus Nord Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 12288	10876 Points
Huawei P40 Lite 5G HiSilicon Kirin 820, Mali-G57 MP6, 6144	13099 Points +20%
Samsung Galaxy S10 Lite Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 8192	11718 Points +8%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144	9052 Points -17%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G (8687 - 11041, n=16)	9734 Points -11%
Work 2.0 performance score (sort by value)
OnePlus Nord Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 12288	9427 Points
Huawei P40 Lite 5G HiSilicon Kirin 820, Mali-G57 MP6, 6144	9527 Points +1%
Samsung Galaxy S10 Lite Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 8192	10093 Points +7%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144	7558 Points -20%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G (7245 - 9989, n=17)	8308 Points -12%

3DMark
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Score (sort by value)
OnePlus Nord Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 12288	45872 Points
Apple iPhone SE 2020 Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 3072	97290 Points +112%
Huawei P40 Lite 5G HiSilicon Kirin 820, Mali-G57 MP6, 6144	52715 Points +15%
Samsung Galaxy S10 Lite Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 8192	78551 Points +71%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144	39608 Points -14%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G (38137 - 48201, n=17)	44398 Points -3%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Graphics Score (sort by value)
OnePlus Nord Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 12288	69285 Points
Apple iPhone SE 2020 Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 3072	209431 Points +202%
Huawei P40 Lite 5G HiSilicon Kirin 820, Mali-G57 MP6, 6144	57067 Points -18%
Samsung Galaxy S10 Lite Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 8192	108114 Points +56%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144	51267 Points -26%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G (56690 - 70216, n=17)	67538 Points -3%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
OnePlus Nord Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 12288	21016 Points
Apple iPhone SE 2020 Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 3072	33851 Points +61%
Huawei P40 Lite 5G HiSilicon Kirin 820, Mali-G57 MP6, 6144	41610 Points +98%
Samsung Galaxy S10 Lite Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 8192	40137 Points +91%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144	22054 Points +5%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G (14891 - 28331, n=17)	20632 Points -2%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 (sort by value)
OnePlus Nord Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 12288	4665 Points
Apple iPhone SE 2020 Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 3072	6168 Points +32%
Huawei P40 Lite 5G HiSilicon Kirin 820, Mali-G57 MP6, 6144	5516 Points +18%
Samsung Galaxy S10 Lite Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 8192	7500 Points +61%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144	3425 Points -27%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G (2972 - 4693, n=17)	4318 Points -7%
Average of class Smartphone (812 - 7285, n=26, last 2 years)	4204 Points -10%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Graphics (sort by value)
OnePlus Nord Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 12288	5171 Points
Apple iPhone SE 2020 Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 3072	9218 Points +78%
Huawei P40 Lite 5G HiSilicon Kirin 820, Mali-G57 MP6, 6144	6158 Points +19%
Samsung Galaxy S10 Lite Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 8192	9670 Points +87%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144	3498 Points -32%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G (2844 - 5832, n=17)	4882 Points -6%
Average of class Smartphone (756 - 9451, n=26, last 2 years)	4740 Points -8%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Physics (sort by value)
OnePlus Nord Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 12288	3476 Points
Apple iPhone SE 2020 Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 3072	2857 Points -18%
Huawei P40 Lite 5G HiSilicon Kirin 820, Mali-G57 MP6, 6144	4042 Points +16%
Samsung Galaxy S10 Lite Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 8192	4201 Points +21%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144	3191 Points -8%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G (1689 - 3529, n=17)	3237 Points -7%
Average of class Smartphone (1093 - 4349, n=26, last 2 years)	3303 Points -5%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited (sort by value)
OnePlus Nord Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 12288	4815 Points
Apple iPhone SE 2020 Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 3072	10699 Points +122%
Huawei P40 Lite 5G HiSilicon Kirin 820, Mali-G57 MP6, 6144	5853 Points +22%
Samsung Galaxy S10 Lite Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 8192	7842 Points +63%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144	3535 Points -27%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G (3678 - 4893, n=17)	4562 Points -5%
Average of class Smartphone (883 - 23024, n=74, last 2 years)	11160 Points +132%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited Graphics (sort by value)
OnePlus Nord Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 12288	5357 Points
Apple iPhone SE 2020 Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 3072	20135 Points +276%
Huawei P40 Lite 5G HiSilicon Kirin 820, Mali-G57 MP6, 6144	6327 Points +18%
Samsung Galaxy S10 Lite Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 8192	10410 Points +94%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144	3646 Points -32%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G (4036 - 5437, n=17)	5181 Points -3%
Average of class Smartphone (840 - 45492, n=74, last 2 years)	19815 Points +270%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
OnePlus Nord Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 12288	3555 Points
Apple iPhone SE 2020 Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 3072	4052 Points +14%
Huawei P40 Lite 5G HiSilicon Kirin 820, Mali-G57 MP6, 6144	4637 Points +30%
Samsung Galaxy S10 Lite Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 8192	4208 Points +18%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144	3193 Points -10%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G (1790 - 3651, n=17)	3275 Points -8%
Average of class Smartphone (1075 - 8749, n=74, last 2 years)	5009 Points +41%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) (sort by value)
OnePlus Nord Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 12288	3330 Points
Apple iPhone SE 2020 Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 3072	4050 Points +22%
Huawei P40 Lite 5G HiSilicon Kirin 820, Mali-G57 MP6, 6144	4608 Points +38%
Samsung Galaxy S10 Lite Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 8192	5727 Points +72%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144	2394 Points -28%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G (2261 - 3346, n=17)	3162 Points -5%
Average of class Smartphone (286 - 17553, n=74, last 2 years)	3077 Points -8%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Graphics (sort by value)
OnePlus Nord Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 12288	3284 Points
Apple iPhone SE 2020 Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 3072	4573 Points +39%
Huawei P40 Lite 5G HiSilicon Kirin 820, Mali-G57 MP6, 6144	4804 Points +46%
Samsung Galaxy S10 Lite Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 8192	6312 Points +92%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144	2237 Points -32%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G (2048 - 3342, n=17)	3137 Points -4%
Average of class Smartphone (240 - 29890, n=74, last 2 years)	3252 Points -1%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Physics (sort by value)
OnePlus Nord Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 12288	3503 Points
Apple iPhone SE 2020 Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 3072	2892 Points -17%
Huawei P40 Lite 5G HiSilicon Kirin 820, Mali-G57 MP6, 6144	4031 Points +15%
Samsung Galaxy S10 Lite Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 8192	4324 Points +23%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144	3171 Points -9%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G (2964 - 3556, n=17)	3331 Points -5%
Average of class Smartphone (858 - 7180, n=74, last 2 years)	3288 Points -6%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited (sort by value)
OnePlus Nord Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 12288	3553 Points
Apple iPhone SE 2020 Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 3072	5688 Points +60%
Huawei P40 Lite 5G HiSilicon Kirin 820, Mali-G57 MP6, 6144	4845 Points +36%
Samsung Galaxy S10 Lite Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 8192	6285 Points +77%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144	2561 Points -28%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G (2934 - 3605, n=17)	3413 Points -4%
Average of class Smartphone (317 - 20131, n=160, last 2 years)	7682 Points +116%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Graphics (sort by value)
OnePlus Nord Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 12288	3556 Points
Apple iPhone SE 2020 Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 3072	7847 Points +121%
Huawei P40 Lite 5G HiSilicon Kirin 820, Mali-G57 MP6, 6144	4906 Points +38%
Samsung Galaxy S10 Lite Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 8192	7148 Points +101%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144	2425 Points -32%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G (2814 - 3592, n=17)	3467 Points -3%
Average of class Smartphone (267 - 33376, n=160, last 2 years)	11410 Points +221%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
OnePlus Nord Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 12288	3544 Points
Apple iPhone SE 2020 Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 3072	2898 Points -18%
Huawei P40 Lite 5G HiSilicon Kirin 820, Mali-G57 MP6, 6144	4642 Points +31%
Samsung Galaxy S10 Lite Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 8192	4418 Points +25%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144	3188 Points -10%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G (1898 - 3765, n=17)	3288 Points -7%
Average of class Smartphone (877 - 8480, n=160, last 2 years)	4587 Points +29%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (Vulkan) Unlimited (sort by value)
OnePlus Nord Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 12288	3108 Points
Huawei P40 Lite 5G HiSilicon Kirin 820, Mali-G57 MP6, 6144	4204 Points +35%
Samsung Galaxy S10 Lite Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 8192	4962 Points +60%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144	2265 Points -27%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G (2287 - 3130, n=17)	2966 Points -5%
Average of class Smartphone (365 - 6635, n=73, last 2 years)	2841 Points -9%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (Vulkan) Unlimited Graphics (sort by value)
OnePlus Nord Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 12288	3185 Points
Huawei P40 Lite 5G HiSilicon Kirin 820, Mali-G57 MP6, 6144	4544 Points +43%
Samsung Galaxy S10 Lite Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 8192	5817 Points +83%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144	2153 Points -32%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G (2145 - 3198, n=17)	3053 Points -4%
Average of class Smartphone (298 - 8601, n=73, last 2 years)	3085 Points -3%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (Vulkan) Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
OnePlus Nord Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 12288	2867 Points
Huawei P40 Lite 5G HiSilicon Kirin 820, Mali-G57 MP6, 6144	3331 Points +16%
Samsung Galaxy S10 Lite Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 8192	3276 Points +14%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144	2768 Points -3%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G (2145 - 2979, n=17)	2742 Points -4%
Average of class Smartphone (1667 - 4198, n=73, last 2 years)	2706 Points -6%

GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7
T-Rex Onscreen (sort by value)
OnePlus Nord Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 12288	60 fps
Apple iPhone SE 2020 Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 3072	60 fps 0%
Huawei P40 Lite 5G HiSilicon Kirin 820, Mali-G57 MP6, 6144	60 fps 0%
Samsung Galaxy S10 Lite Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 8192	60 fps 0%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144	60 fps 0%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G (43 - 86, n=15)	62.5 fps +4%
Average of class Smartphone (23 - 165, n=170, last 2 years)	85.7 fps +43%
1920x1080 T-Rex Offscreen (sort by value)
OnePlus Nord Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 12288	97 fps
Apple iPhone SE 2020 Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 3072	250 fps +158%
Huawei P40 Lite 5G HiSilicon Kirin 820, Mali-G57 MP6, 6144	112 fps +15%
Samsung Galaxy S10 Lite Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 8192	166 fps +71%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144	84 fps -13%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G (48 - 97, n=15)	88.7 fps -9%
Average of class Smartphone (19 - 791, n=170, last 2 years)	279 fps +188%

GFXBench 3.0
on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL (sort by value)
OnePlus Nord Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 12288	50 fps
Apple iPhone SE 2020 Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 3072	60 fps +20%
Huawei P40 Lite 5G HiSilicon Kirin 820, Mali-G57 MP6, 6144	55 fps +10%
Samsung Galaxy S10 Lite Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 8192	60 fps +20%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144	38 fps -24%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G (30 - 55, n=15)	46.5 fps -7%
Average of class Smartphone (6.8 - 165, n=170, last 2 years)	75 fps +50%
1920x1080 1080p Manhattan Offscreen (sort by value)
OnePlus Nord Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 12288	55 fps
Apple iPhone SE 2020 Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 3072	149 fps +171%
Huawei P40 Lite 5G HiSilicon Kirin 820, Mali-G57 MP6, 6144	69 fps +25%
Samsung Galaxy S10 Lite Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 8192	99 fps +80%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144	41 fps -25%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G (31 - 56, n=15)	51.1 fps -7%
Average of class Smartphone (12 - 482, n=170, last 2 years)	164.1 fps +198%

GFXBench 3.1
on screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen (sort by value)
OnePlus Nord Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 12288	34 fps
Apple iPhone SE 2020 Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 3072	60 fps +76%
Huawei P40 Lite 5G HiSilicon Kirin 820, Mali-G57 MP6, 6144	40 fps +18%
Samsung Galaxy S10 Lite Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 8192	57 fps +68%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144	27 fps -21%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G (21 - 37, n=15)	31.5 fps -7%
Average of class Smartphone (3.7 - 158, n=170, last 2 years)	65.2 fps +92%
1920x1080 Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen (sort by value)
OnePlus Nord Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 12288	38 fps
Apple iPhone SE 2020 Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 3072	93 fps +145%
Huawei P40 Lite 5G HiSilicon Kirin 820, Mali-G57 MP6, 6144	47 fps +24%
Samsung Galaxy S10 Lite Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 8192	69 fps +82%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144	30 fps -21%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G (22 - 38, n=15)	35.3 fps -7%
Average of class Smartphone (8.3 - 341, n=170, last 2 years)	116.5 fps +207%

GFXBench
on screen Car Chase Onscreen (sort by value)
OnePlus Nord Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 12288	19 fps
Apple iPhone SE 2020 Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 3072	60 fps +216%
Huawei P40 Lite 5G HiSilicon Kirin 820, Mali-G57 MP6, 6144	23 fps +21%
Samsung Galaxy S10 Lite Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 8192	37 fps +95%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144	15 fps -21%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G (11 - 21, n=15)	17.7 fps -7%
Average of class Smartphone (5 - 119, n=171, last 2 years)	47.5 fps +150%
1920x1080 Car Chase Offscreen (sort by value)
OnePlus Nord Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 12288	21 fps
Apple iPhone SE 2020 Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 3072	59 fps +181%
Huawei P40 Lite 5G HiSilicon Kirin 820, Mali-G57 MP6, 6144	27 fps +29%
Samsung Galaxy S10 Lite Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 8192	43 fps +105%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144	17 fps -19%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G (12 - 21, n=15)	19.7 fps -6%
Average of class Smartphone (3.1 - 216, n=170, last 2 years)	70.3 fps +235%
on screen Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Onscreen (sort by value)
OnePlus Nord Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 12288	21 fps
Apple iPhone SE 2020 Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 3072	60 fps +186%
Huawei P40 Lite 5G HiSilicon Kirin 820, Mali-G57 MP6, 6144	26 fps +24%
Samsung Galaxy S10 Lite Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 8192	38 fps +81%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144	16 fps -24%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G (13 - 23, n=17)	20.2 fps -4%
Average of class Smartphone (3.6 - 123, n=202, last 2 years)	49.3 fps +135%
1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen (sort by value)
OnePlus Nord Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 12288	24 fps
Apple iPhone SE 2020 Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 3072	72 fps +200%
Huawei P40 Lite 5G HiSilicon Kirin 820, Mali-G57 MP6, 6144	31 fps +29%
Samsung Galaxy S10 Lite Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 8192	42 fps +75%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144	18 fps -25%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G (12 - 24, n=17)	21.6 fps -10%
Average of class Smartphone (2.3 - 261, n=202, last 2 years)	79.4 fps +231%
on screen Aztec Ruins High Tier Onscreen (sort by value)
OnePlus Nord Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 12288	13 fps
Apple iPhone SE 2020 Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 3072	60 fps +362%
Huawei P40 Lite 5G HiSilicon Kirin 820, Mali-G57 MP6, 6144	17 fps +31%
Samsung Galaxy S10 Lite Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 8192	25 fps +92%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144	10 fps -23%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G (8.8 - 15, n=17)	12.3 fps -5%
Average of class Smartphone (0.85 - 119, n=202, last 2 years)	37.1 fps +185%
2560x1440 Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen (sort by value)
OnePlus Nord Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 12288	8.5 fps
Apple iPhone SE 2020 Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 3072	31 fps +265%
Huawei P40 Lite 5G HiSilicon Kirin 820, Mali-G57 MP6, 6144	12 fps +41%
Samsung Galaxy S10 Lite Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 8192	17 fps +100%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144	10 fps +18%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G (5.3 - 13, n=17)	8.38 fps -1%
Average of class Smartphone (0.85 - 104, n=202, last 2 years)	31.6 fps +272%

AnTuTu v8 - Total Score (sort by value)
OnePlus Nord Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 12288	332074 Points
Apple iPhone SE 2020 Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 3072	489463 Points +47%
Huawei P40 Lite 5G HiSilicon Kirin 820, Mali-G57 MP6, 6144	369207 Points +11%
Samsung Galaxy S10 Lite Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 8192	451559 Points +36%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144	266417 Points -20%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G (285731 - 332305, n=14)	312767 Points -6%

BaseMark OS II
Overall (sort by value)
OnePlus Nord Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 12288	4054 Points
Apple iPhone SE 2020 Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 3072	Points -100%
Huawei P40 Lite 5G HiSilicon Kirin 820, Mali-G57 MP6, 6144	4371 Points +8%
Samsung Galaxy S10 Lite Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 8192	4837 Points +19%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144	3392 Points -16%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G (3237 - 4094, n=14)	3813 Points -6%
Average of class Smartphone (1196 - 11976, n=152, last 2 years)	6257 Points +54%
System (sort by value)
OnePlus Nord Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 12288	6801 Points
Huawei P40 Lite 5G HiSilicon Kirin 820, Mali-G57 MP6, 6144	8619 Points +27%
Samsung Galaxy S10 Lite Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 8192	8515 Points +25%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144	6445 Points -5%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G (5411 - 6936, n=14)	6506 Points -4%
Average of class Smartphone (2368 - 16475, n=152, last 2 years)	10131 Points +49%
Memory (sort by value)
OnePlus Nord Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 12288	5296 Points
Huawei P40 Lite 5G HiSilicon Kirin 820, Mali-G57 MP6, 6144	4609 Points -13%
Samsung Galaxy S10 Lite Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 8192	5287 Points 0%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144	4281 Points -19%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G (4556 - 5683, n=14)	5099 Points -4%
Average of class Smartphone (962 - 12716, n=152, last 2 years)	6714 Points +27%
Graphics (sort by value)
OnePlus Nord Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 12288	5203 Points
Huawei P40 Lite 5G HiSilicon Kirin 820, Mali-G57 MP6, 6144	6754 Points +30%
Samsung Galaxy S10 Lite Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 8192	8598 Points +65%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144	3878 Points -25%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G (2525 - 5247, n=14)	4732 Points -9%
Average of class Smartphone (1017 - 58651, n=152, last 2 years)	16761 Points +222%
Web (sort by value)
OnePlus Nord Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 12288	1441 Points
Huawei P40 Lite 5G HiSilicon Kirin 820, Mali-G57 MP6, 6144	1361 Points -6%
Samsung Galaxy S10 Lite Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 8192	1414 Points -2%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144	1237 Points -14%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G (1139 - 1462, n=14)	1372 Points -5%
Average of class Smartphone (841 - 2145, n=152, last 2 years)	1557 Points +8%

Jetstream 2 - Total Score
Apple iPhone SE 2020 (Safari Mobile 13.1)	139.7 Points +138%
Average of class Smartphone (13.8 - 387, n=162, last 2 years)	119.3 Points +103%
Samsung Galaxy S10 Lite (Chrome 80)	63.8 Points +9%
OnePlus Nord (Chrome 84)	58.7 Points
Huawei P40 Lite 5G (Huawei Browser 10.0.2.331)	54.8 Points -7%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G (15.8 - 60.5, n=12)	47.7 Points -19%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 (Chrome 78)	46.04 Points -22%

JetStream 1.1 - Total Score
Apple iPhone SE 2020 (Safari Mobile 13.1)	278.6 Points +195%
Samsung Galaxy S10 Lite (Chrome 80)	112.3 Points +19%
Huawei P40 Lite 5G (Huawei Browser 10.0.2.331)	96.3 Points +2%
OnePlus Nord (Chrome 84)	94.5 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G (10.8 - 96.9, n=11)	81.1 Points -14%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 (Chrome 78)	79.2 Points -16%

Speedometer 2.0 - Result
Apple iPhone SE 2020 (Safari Mobile 13.1)	158 runs/min +195%
Average of class Smartphone (15.2 - 569, n=148, last 2 years)	133.6 runs/min +149%
Samsung Galaxy S10 Lite (Chrome 80)	62.2 runs/min +16%
OnePlus Nord (Chome 84)	53.6 runs/min
Huawei P40 Lite 5G (Huawei Browser 10.0.2.331)	49.5 runs/min -8%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G (9 - 54.9, n=9)	46.1 runs/min -14%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 (Chrome 78)	43.3 runs/min -19%

WebXPRT 3 - Overall
Average of class Smartphone (38 - 347, n=82, last 2 years)	147.1 Points +46%
Apple iPhone SE 2020 (Safari Mobile 13.1)	146 Points +45%
Huawei P40 Lite 5G (Huawei Browser 10.0.2.331)	115 Points +14%
OnePlus Nord (Chrome 84)	101 Points
Samsung Galaxy S10 Lite (Chrome 80)	95 Points -6%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 (Chrome 78)	77 Points -24%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G (20 - 101, n=13)	71.5 Points -29%

Octane V2 - Total Score
Apple iPhone SE 2020 (Safari Mobile 13.1)	48991 Points +156%
Average of class Smartphone (2228 - 100368, n=204, last 2 years)	36733 Points +92%
Samsung Galaxy S10 Lite (Chrome 80)	22942 Points +20%
Huawei P40 Lite 5G (Huawei Browser 10.0.2.331)	19727 Points +3%
OnePlus Nord (Chrome 84)	19143 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G (3592 - 19143, n=14)	16671 Points -13%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 (Chrome 78)	16241 Points -15%

Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G (2359 - 15230, n=14)	3721 ms * -31%
OnePlus Nord (Chrome 84)	2835 ms *
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 (Chrome 78)	2770 ms * +2%
Huawei P40 Lite 5G (Huawei Browser 10.0.2.331)	2254 ms * +20%
Samsung Galaxy S10 Lite (Chrome 80)	2139 ms * +25%
Average of class Smartphone (277 - 28190, n=161, last 2 years)	1583 ms * +44%
Apple iPhone SE 2020 (Safari Mobile 13.1)	550 ms * +81%

* ... smaller is better

	OnePlus Nord	Huawei P40 Lite 5G	Samsung Galaxy S10 Lite	Xiaomi Mi Note 10	OnePlus 8	Average 256 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	Average of class Smartphone
AndroBench 3-5		22%	46%	-25%	76%	7%	152%
Sequential Read 256KB	956	905 -5%	1489 56%	480.5 -50%	1707 79%	826 ?(496 - 984, n=22) -14%	1834 ?(226 - 4512, n=193, last 2 years) 92%
Sequential Write 256KB	473.1	188 -60%	525 11%	243.6 -49%	748 58%	358 ?(198.5 - 914, n=22) -24%	1426 ?(57.5 - 3908, n=193, last 2 years) 201%
Random Read 4KB	126.7	146.1 15%	191.7 51%	106.2 -16%	215 70%	166.6 ?(108.4 - 265, n=22) 31%	278 ?(22.2 - 543, n=193, last 2 years) 119%
Random Write 4KB	104.5	249.7 139%	173.5 66%	118.9 14%	203.9 95%	141.5 ?(22.1 - 280, n=22) 35%	310 ?(9.4 - 753, n=193, last 2 years) 197%
Sequential Read 256KB SDCard		83.3 ?(NM Card)	76 ?(Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)			66.8 ?(25.5 - 82.6, n=4)
Sequential Write 256KB SDCard		67.7 ?(NM Card)	61 ?(Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)			56.3 ?(16.7 - 73.3, n=4)

Carga Máxima

Inatividade


45.7 °C	42.8 °C	40.7 °C
45.8 °C	43 °C	40.3 °C
45.2 °C	42.7 °C	40.5 °C

Máximo: 45.8 °C
Médio: 43 °C


39 °C	40.7 °C	42.7 °C
38.9 °C	40.7 °C	43 °C
39 °C	41.2 °C	42.7 °C

Máximo: 43 °C
Médio: 40.9 °C

alimentação elétrica 38.9 °C | Temperatura do quarto 21.8 °C | Fluke t3000FC (calibrated), Voltcraft IR-260

(-) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 43 °C / 109 F, compared to the average of 32.8 °C / 91 F for the devices in the class Smartphone.
(-) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 45.8 °C / 114 F, compared to the average of 35.1 °C / 95 F, ranging from 21.9 to 63.2 °C for the class Smartphone.
(±) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 43 °C / 109 F, compared to the average of 33.9 °C / 93 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 27.9 °C / 82 F, compared to the device average of 32.8 °C / 91 F.

Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)

OnePlus Nord audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (84.9 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 74.7% lower than median
(+) | bass is linear (0% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(-) | nearly no mids - on average 74.7% lower than median
(+) | mids are linear (0% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(-) | nearly no highs - on average 74.7% lower than median
(+) | highs are linear (0% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(-) | overall sound is not linear (113.3% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 86% of all tested devices in this class were better, 2% similar, 12% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 37%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 96% of all tested devices were better, 1% similar, 4% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Samsung Galaxy S10 Lite audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (88.9 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 30% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (11.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 3.4% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (3.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 6.9% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (4% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (22% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 40% of all tested devices in this class were better, 7% similar, 52% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 37%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 60% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 34% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Consumo de energia

desligado	0.1 / 0.3 Watt
Ocioso	1.8 / 2.1 / 2.3 Watt
Carga	3.4 / 5.2 Watt


Key: min: , med: , max: Metrahit Energy

	OnePlus Nord 4115 mAh	Apple iPhone SE 2020 1822 mAh	Huawei P40 Lite 5G 4000 mAh	Samsung Galaxy S10 Lite 4500 mAh	Xiaomi Mi Note 10 5260 mAh	Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G	Average of class Smartphone
Power Consumption		37%	5%	9%	-4%	6%	-13%
Idle Minimum *	1.8	0.44 76%	0.65 64%	0.58 68%	0.7 61%	0.965 ?(0.66 - 1.8, n=15) 46%	0.895 ?(0.4 - 2.37, n=153, last 2 years) 50%
Idle Average *	2.1	1.56 26%	2.25 -7%	1.55 26%	1.8 14%	1.899 ?(0.82 - 2.55, n=15) 10%	1.447 ?(0.6 - 4.26, n=153, last 2 years) 31%
Idle Maximum *	2.3	1.63 29%	2.29 -0%	1.64 29%	2.2 4%	2.07 ?(0.85 - 2.9, n=15) 10%	1.608 ?(0.83 - 4.45, n=153, last 2 years) 30%
Load Average *	3.4	2.32 32%	3.7 -9%	4.29 -26%	5.2 -53%	3.98 ?(2.73 - 6.8, n=15) -17%	6.41 ?(2.3 - 16.5, n=148, last 2 years) -89%
Load Maximum *	5.2	4.12 21%	6.46 -24%	8.03 -54%	7.5 -44%	6.19 ?(4.4 - 10.3, n=15) -19%	9.61 ?(3.53 - 20.8, n=148, last 2 years) -85%

* ... smaller is better

Tempo de Execução da Bateria

Ocioso (sem WLAN, min brilho)		33h 23min
WiFi Websurfing		14h 29min
Big Buck Bunny H.264 1080p		17h 44min
Carga (máximo brilho)		4h 21min

	OnePlus Nord 4115 mAh	Apple iPhone SE 2020 1822 mAh	Huawei P40 Lite 5G 4000 mAh	Samsung Galaxy S10 Lite 4500 mAh	Xiaomi Mi Note 10 5260 mAh
Battery Runtime		-26%	20%	4%	30%
Reader / Idle	2003	1938 -3%		2504 25%	2134 7%
H.264	1064	681 -36%		1183 11%	1423 34%
WiFi v1.3	869	694 -20%	1047 20%	823 -5%	1127 30%
Load	261	143 -45%		222 -15%	387 48%

Pro

+ Ótima relação preço-desempenho

+ Armazenamento enorme

+ Tela de 90 Hz com cores suficientemente precisas

+ Configuração de câmera de alta qualidade e flexível

+ Boa duração da bateria

+ Sem afogamentos

+ Wi-Fi rápido

+ Boas capacidades de localização

Contra

- Sem certificação IP

- A tela poderia ser mais brilhante

- Sem Wi-Fi 6

- esempenho pobre da câmera com pouca luz

- Esquenta bastante sob uso intenso

Veredicto – OnePlus cumpre

In review: OnePlus Nord. Test device courtesy of OnePlus Germany

Em nossa análise do OnePlus One, escrevemos que ele tinha uma "excelente relação preço-desempenho, que permanece incomparável".

Agora, cinco anos depois, o OnePlus Nord também possui uma excelente relação preço-desempenho, embora não seja mais incomparável. Isso se deve em grande parte ao fato de que dispositivos mais antigos, que costumavam ser mais caros, como o Samsung Galaxy S10 Lite, agora chegaram à faixa de preços do OnePlus Nord.

Considerando os preços de lançamento de outros dispositivos, o OnePlus Nord é certamente impressionante: Com 5G, Wi-Fi rápido, muito armazenamento, um SoC rápido, câmeras boas e flexíveis, além de uma carcaça elegante e robusta, estabeleceu um novo padrão para futuros dispositivos de gama média.

Quase não temos críticas: A tela poderia ser um pouco mais brilhante, a câmera só funciona bem em situações de pouca luz quando o modo paisagem noturna está ativado e o dispositivo pode ficar bastante quente.

O OnePlus Nord cumpre suas próprias aspirações: Com ele, o fabricante volta às suas raízes e vende um ótimo smartphone a um preço barato.

Os usuários que frequentemente usam aplicativos muito exigentes ou executam várias tarefas em segundo plano enquanto outros aplicativos exigentes estão em execução poderão notar uma desvantagem de desempenho em comparação com telefones carros-chefes mais caros. Além disso, faltam alguns recursos comumente encontrados em carros-chefes, como carregamento sem fio, Wi-Fi 6 ou suporte para velocidades LTE extremamente altas.

No entanto, ainda é um smartphone excelente e barato para quem deseja aceitar esses pequenos compromissos.

OnePlus Nord - 2022-08-31 08/31/2022 v7 ^(old)
Florian Schmitt

Acabamento

83%

Teclado

67 / 75 → 89%

Mouse

94%

Conectividade

47 / 70 → 67%

Peso

89%

Bateria

90%

Pantalha

90%

Desempenho do jogos

36 / 64 → 57%

Desempenho da aplicação

77 / 86 → 89%

Temperatura

86%

Ruído

100%

Audio

76 / 90 → 84%

Camera

71%

Médio

77%

84%

Smartphone - Médio equilibrado

Price comparison

Editor of the original article: Marius Schell - Tech Writer and translator - 398 articles published on Notebookcheck since 2020

contact me via: LinkedIn

Please share our article, every link counts!

> Análises e revisões de portáteis e celulares > Análises > Análises > Breve análise do Smartphone OnePlus Nord – Retorno do Campeão do Valor?

Florian Schmitt, 2020-08- 1 (Update: 2020-08- 2)

Competing Devices

Size Comparison

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

Display Response Times

OnePlus Nord audio analysis

Samsung Galaxy S10 Lite audio analysis

Pro

Contra

Veredicto – OnePlus cumpre

More articles related to this device

Price comparison