Breve análise do Portátil MSI GT73VR 7RF Titan Pro
SD Card Reader | |
average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs) | |
MSI GT73VR 7RF-296 | |
MSI GT83VR-6RE32SR451 | |
MSI GT72VR 7RE-433 | |
Acer Predator 17 G9-793-77LG | |
Aorus X7 v6 | |
Asus G752VS-XB78K | |
maximum AS SSD Seq Read Test (1GB) | |
MSI GT73VR 7RF-296 | |
MSI GT72VR 7RE-433 | |
MSI GT83VR-6RE32SR451 | |
Acer Predator 17 G9-793-77LG | |
Aorus X7 v6 | |
Asus G752VS-XB78K |
Os Top 10
» Os Top 10 Portáteis Multimídia
» Os Top 10 Portáteis de Jogos
» Os Top 10 Portáteis Leves para Jogos
» Os Top 10 Portáteis Acessíveis de Escritório/Empresariais
» Os Top 10 Portáteis Premium de Escritório/Empresariais
» Os Top 10 dos Portáteis Workstation
» Os Top 10 Subportáteis
» Os Top 10 Ultrabooks
» Os Top 10 Conversíveis
» Os Top 10 Tablets
» Os Top 10 Smartphones
» A melhores Telas de Portáteis Analisadas Pela Notebookcheck
» Top 10 dos portáteis abaixo dos 500 Euros da Notebookcheck
» Top 10 dos Portáteis abaixo dos 300 Euros
Networking | |
iperf3 transmit AX12 | |
MSI GT73VR 7RF-296 | |
MSI GT72VR 7RE-433 | |
MSI GT83VR-6RE32SR451 | |
Aorus X7 v6 | |
iperf3 receive AX12 | |
MSI GT73VR 7RF-296 | |
MSI GT83VR-6RE32SR451 | |
MSI GT72VR 7RE-433 | |
Aorus X7 v6 |
|
iluminação: 85 %
iluminação com acumulador: 307 cd/m²
Contraste: 1228:1 (Preto: 0.25 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 9.65 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.93
ΔE Greyscale 10.07 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
100% sRGB (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
75% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
84.7% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
99.9% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
90.6% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.12
MSI GT73VR 7RF-296 N173HHE-G32 (CMN1747), 1920x1080 | Acer Predator 17 G9-793-77LG AU Optronics B173ZAN01.0 (AUO109B), 3840x2160 | Aorus X7 v6 B173QTN01.0 (AUO1096), 2560x1440 | Asus G752VS-XB78K LG Philips LP173WF4-SPF3 (LGD04E8), 1920x1080 | MSI GT72VR 7RE-433 Chi Mei N173HHE-G32 (CMN1747), 1920x1080 | MSI GT83VR-6RE32SR451 Samsung 184HL (SDC4C48), 1920x1080 | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Display | 4% | -26% | -22% | -21% | -20% | |
Display P3 Coverage | 90.6 | 86.9 -4% | 60.9 -33% | 66.9 -26% | 68.3 -25% | 65.8 -27% |
sRGB Coverage | 99.9 | 100 0% | 84.2 -16% | 85.2 -15% | 86.7 -13% | 90.3 -10% |
AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage | 84.7 | 99.4 17% | 61.2 -28% | 62.3 -26% | 63.4 -25% | 66.1 -22% |
Response Times | -143% | -31% | -130% | -6% | -121% | |
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% * | 26 ? | 37 ? -42% | 31 ? -19% | 38 ? -46% | 29 ? -12% | 37 ? -42% |
Response Time Black / White * | 7 ? | 24 ? -243% | 10 ? -43% | 22 ? -214% | 7 ? -0% | 21 ? -200% |
PWM Frequency | 250 ? | |||||
Screen | 23% | -9% | 13% | -1% | 11% | |
Brightness middle | 307 | 336 9% | 343 12% | 328 7% | 299 -3% | 310 1% |
Brightness | 284 | 320 13% | 312 10% | 317 12% | 277 -2% | 277 -2% |
Brightness Distribution | 85 | 88 4% | 80 -6% | 88 4% | 87 2% | 84 -1% |
Black Level * | 0.25 | 0.25 -0% | 0.5 -100% | 0.3 -20% | 0.27 -8% | 0.4 -60% |
Contrast | 1228 | 1344 9% | 686 -44% | 1093 -11% | 1107 -10% | 775 -37% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 9.65 | 3.61 63% | 7.33 24% | 3.74 61% | 9.65 -0% | 1.83 81% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 16.36 | 6.02 63% | 10.79 34% | 8.97 45% | 15.43 6% | 3.92 76% |
Greyscale dE 2000 * | 10.07 | 4.78 53% | 7.6 25% | 2.67 73% | 9.68 4% | 1.38 86% |
Gamma | 2.12 104% | 2.32 95% | 2.19 100% | 2.41 91% | 1.89 116% | 2.44 90% |
CCT | 12145 54% | 6185 105% | 9024 72% | 6861 95% | 11652 56% | 6723 97% |
Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998) | 75 | 88 17% | 55 -27% | 56 -25% | 75 0% | 59 -21% |
Color Space (Percent of sRGB) | 100 | 100 0% | 84 -16% | 85 -15% | 100 0% | 90 -10% |
Total Average (Program / Settings) | -39% /
-3% | -22% /
-15% | -46% /
-13% | -9% /
-6% | -43% /
-13% |
* ... smaller is better
Display Response Times
↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
---|---|---|
7 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 4 ms rise | |
↘ 3 ms fall | ||
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 17 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (21 ms). | ||
↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
26 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 12 ms rise | |
↘ 14 ms fall | ||
The screen shows relatively slow response rates in our tests and may be too slow for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 32 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (32.9 ms). |
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
Screen flickering / PWM not detected | |||
In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8774 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured. |
Cinebench R11.5 | |
CPU Single 64Bit | |
MSI GT73VR 7RF-296 | |
Aorus X7 v6 | |
MSI GT83VR-6RE32SR451 | |
MSI GT72VR 7RE-433 | |
Asus G752VS-XB78K | |
CPU Multi 64Bit | |
MSI GT73VR 7RF-296 | |
MSI GT83VR-6RE32SR451 | |
Aorus X7 v6 | |
Asus G752VS-XB78K | |
MSI GT72VR 7RE-433 |
PCMark 7 Score | 7635 pontos | |
Ajuda |
MSI GT73VR 7RF-296 2x Samsung SM951 MZVPV256HDGL (RAID 0) | Aorus X7 v6 Toshiba NVMe THNSN5512GPU7 | Asus G752VS-XB78K Toshiba NVMe THNSN5512GPU7 | MSI GT72VR 7RE-433 Kingston RBU-SNS8152S3256GG5 | MSI GT83VR-6RE32SR451 2x Samsung SM951 MZVPV256HDGL (RAID 0) | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
CrystalDiskMark 3.0 | -34% | -29% | -65% | -2% | |
Read Seq | 3219 | 1499 -53% | 1718 -47% | 521 -84% | 3284 2% |
Write Seq | 2572 | 1411 -45% | 1305 -49% | 311.8 -88% | 2548 -1% |
Read 512 | 1776 | 966 -46% | 1250 -30% | 403.1 -77% | 1728 -3% |
Write 512 | 2445 | 1103 -55% | 1438 -41% | 332.3 -86% | 2352 -4% |
Read 4k | 51.1 | 44.33 -13% | 44.42 -13% | 33.35 -35% | 50.1 -2% |
Write 4k | 141.3 | 155.5 10% | 154.4 9% | 111.1 -21% | 137.6 -3% |
3DMark 11 Performance | 20510 pontos | |
3DMark Ice Storm Standard Score | 181787 pontos | |
3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score | 31711 pontos | |
3DMark Fire Strike Score | 16478 pontos | |
Ajuda |
3DMark - 1920x1080 Fire Strike Graphics | |
MSI GT83VR-6RE32SR451 | |
MSI GT73VR 7RF-296 | |
MSI GT72VR 7RE-433 | |
Aorus X7 v6 | |
Asus G752VS-XB78K | |
Acer Predator 17 G9-793-77LG |
3DMark 11 - 1280x720 Performance GPU | |
MSI GT83VR-6RE32SR451 | |
MSI GT73VR 7RF-296 | |
Aorus X7 v6 | |
MSI GT72VR 7RE-433 | |
Asus G752VS-XB78K | |
Acer Predator 17 G9-793-77LG |
Battlefield 1 - 1920x1080 Ultra Preset AA:T | |
MSI GT73VR 7RF-296 | |
Aorus X7 v6 | |
MSI GT72VR 7RE-433 |
Titanfall 2 - 1920x1080 Very High (Insane Texture Quality) / Enabled AA:TS AF:16x | |
MSI GT73VR 7RF-296 | |
MSI GT72VR 7RE-433 |
Call of Duty Infinite Warfare - 1920x1080 Ultra / On AA:T2X SM | |
MSI GT73VR 7RF-296 |
Dishonored 2 - 1920x1080 Ultra Preset AA:TX | |
MSI GT73VR 7RF-296 |
Watch Dogs 2 - 1920x1080 Ultra Preset | |
MSI GT73VR 7RF-296 |
Deus Ex Mankind Divided - 1920x1080 Ultra Preset AA:2xMS AF:8x | |
MSI GT73VR 7RF-296 | |
MSI GT83VR-6RE32SR451 | |
MSI GT72VR 7RE-433 | |
Aorus X7 v6 |
FIFA 17 - 1920x1080 Ultra Preset AA:4xMS | |
MSI GT73VR 7RF-296 | |
MSI GT83VR-6RE32SR451 |
baixo | média | alto | ultra | 4K | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Deus Ex Mankind Divided (2016) | 103 | 57.1 | 35.5 | ||
FIFA 17 (2016) | 378 | 360 | 208 | ||
Battlefield 1 (2016) | 152 | 135 | 57.9 | ||
Titanfall 2 (2016) | 144 | 141 | 58.4 | ||
Call of Duty Infinite Warfare (2016) | 125 | 125 | 75.7 | ||
Dishonored 2 (2016) | 100 | 79.9 | 49.2 | ||
Watch Dogs 2 (2016) | 105 | 71.7 | 41.4 |
Barulho
Ocioso |
| 34 / 35 / 37 dB |
Carga |
| 39 / 56 dB |
| ||
30 dB silencioso 40 dB(A) audível 50 dB(A) ruidosamente alto |
||
min: , med: , max: Audix TM1, Arta (15 cm de distância) environment noise: 30 dB(A) |
MSI GT73VR 7RF-296 i7-7820HK, GeForce GTX 1080 Mobile | Acer Predator 17 G9-793-77LG 6700HQ, GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile | Aorus X7 v6 6820HK, GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile | Asus G752VS-XB78K 6820HK, GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile | MSI GT72VR 7RE-433 i7-7700HQ, GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile | MSI GT83VR-6RE32SR451 6820HK, GeForce GTX 1070 SLI (Laptop) | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Noise | -1% | -2% | 7% | 4% | -2% | |
off / environment * | 30 | 31 -3% | 30 -0% | 30 -0% | 31 -3% | 30 -0% |
Idle Minimum * | 34 | 33 3% | 33 3% | 31 9% | 34 -0% | 33 3% |
Idle Average * | 35 | 34 3% | 35 -0% | 32 9% | 35 -0% | 34 3% |
Idle Maximum * | 37 | 40 -8% | 40 -8% | 33 11% | 37 -0% | 35 5% |
Load Average * | 39 | 44 -13% | 43 -10% | 40 -3% | 37 5% | 48 -23% |
Load Maximum * | 56 | 50 11% | 54 4% | 47 16% | 44 21% | 57 -2% |
* ... smaller is better
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 39.8 °C / 104 F, compared to the average of 40.5 °C / 105 F, ranging from 21.2 to 68.8 °C for the class Gaming.
(-) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 47.8 °C / 118 F, compared to the average of 43.2 °C / 110 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 25.4 °C / 78 F, compared to the device average of 33.9 °C / 93 F.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are cooler than skin temperature with a maximum of 28.4 °C / 83.1 F and are therefore cool to the touch.
(±) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.9 °C / 84 F (+0.5 °C / 0.9 F).
MSI GT73VR 7RF-296 i7-7820HK, GeForce GTX 1080 Mobile | Acer Predator 17 G9-793-77LG 6700HQ, GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile | Aorus X7 v6 6820HK, GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile | Asus G752VS-XB78K 6820HK, GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile | MSI GT72VR 7RE-433 i7-7700HQ, GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile | MSI GT83VR-6RE32SR451 6820HK, GeForce GTX 1070 SLI (Laptop) | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Heat | -7% | -11% | -5% | 0% | 12% | |
Maximum Upper Side * | 39.8 | 42.6 -7% | 47.5 -19% | 42.9 -8% | 41.5 -4% | 35.8 10% |
Maximum Bottom * | 47.8 | 44.9 6% | 54.5 -14% | 41.5 13% | 50.6 -6% | 42.8 10% |
Idle Upper Side * | 27.1 | 33.1 -22% | 28.6 -6% | 31.6 -17% | 26.4 3% | 24.7 9% |
Idle Bottom * | 27.4 | 28.9 -5% | 28.8 -5% | 29.5 -8% | 25.4 7% | 22.8 17% |
* ... smaller is better
MSI GT73VR 7RF-296 audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (93 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 11.7% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (9% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 3% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (3.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 4% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (3.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (13.6% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 19% of all tested devices in this class were better, 6% similar, 74% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 18%, worst was 132%
Compared to all devices tested
» 12% of all tested devices were better, 4% similar, 84% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Asus G752VS-XB78K audio analysis
(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (76 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 9.6% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (10.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.7% away from median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (10.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | reduced highs - on average 8.3% lower than median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (9.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (22.4% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 78% of all tested devices in this class were better, 6% similar, 16% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 18%, worst was 132%
Compared to all devices tested
» 62% of all tested devices were better, 6% similar, 32% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
desligado | 0.4 / 0.7 Watt |
Ocioso | 29 / 35 / 40 Watt |
Carga |
94 / 315 Watt |
Key:
min: ,
med: ,
max: Voltcraft VC 940 |
MSI GT73VR 7RF-296 i7-7820HK, GeForce GTX 1080 Mobile | Acer Predator 17 G9-793-77LG 6700HQ, GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile | Aorus X7 v6 6820HK, GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile | Asus G752VS-XB78K 6820HK, GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile | MSI GT72VR 7RE-433 i7-7700HQ, GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile | MSI GT83VR-6RE32SR451 6820HK, GeForce GTX 1070 SLI (Laptop) | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Power Consumption | 4% | 4% | 15% | 25% | -30% | |
Idle Minimum * | 29 | 25 14% | 29 -0% | 24 17% | 20 31% | 32 -10% |
Idle Average * | 35 | 35 -0% | 31 11% | 31 11% | 27 23% | 47 -34% |
Idle Maximum * | 40 | 46 -15% | 38 5% | 36 10% | 31 22% | 52 -30% |
Load Average * | 94 | 103 -10% | 111 -18% | 94 -0% | 86 9% | 152 -62% |
Load Maximum * | 315 | 223 29% | 253 20% | 204 35% | 184 42% | 366 -16% |
* ... smaller is better
MSI GT73VR 7RF-296 75.2 Wh | Acer Predator 17 G9-793-77LG 88 Wh | Aorus X7 v6 94 Wh | Asus G752VS-XB78K 90 Wh | MSI GT72VR 7RE-433 83 Wh | MSI GT83VR-6RE32SR451 75 Wh | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Battery Runtime | 25% | 14% | 30% | 51% | -25% | |
H.264 | 145 | 186 28% | 228 57% | |||
WiFi v1.3 | 160 | 200 25% | 182 14% | 210 31% | 230 44% | 120 -25% |
Pro
Contra
Error: More than one (2) Pro / Contra Item for this review found!
O veredicto é bastante sóbrio se você esperava grandes melhorias da Kaby Lake. A nova arquitetura da CPU da Intel não perece reduzir a temperatura ou o ruído de acordo com as análises iniciais. As medições do consumo e o desempenho com velocidades iguais dificilmente se diferenciam de outros portáteis Skylake similares.
A versão atual do GT73VR é, mais uma vez um substituto de desktop muito bem sucedido (embora seja bastante pesado e robusto) que não revela sérias desvantagens em qualquer seção. Ele também roda os jogos mais exigentes sem esforço.
MSI GT73VR 7RF-296
-
12/27/2016 v6 (old)
Florian Glaser