Notebookcheck Logo

Breve análise do Portátil MSI GS73VR 6RF

O Pascal mais fino. Esta completa atualização do chassi fornece um desempenho gráfico do nível da GTX 980M em um pacote menor, mais leve, e mais frio. O barulho da ventoinha ainda é uM obstáculo para uma série que se equilibra delicadamente entre uma filosofia de design fino e GPUs GTX GPUs de nível de entusiastas.
MSI GS73VR 6RF (GS73VR Serie)
Processador
Intel Core i7-6700HQ 4 x 2.6 - 3.5 GHz, Skylake
Placa gráfica
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile - 6 GB VRAM, Análises do: 1404 MHz, Memoría: 8008 MHz, GDDR5, 368.79, Optimus
Memória
32 GB 
, 2400 MHz, dual-channel, 15-15-15-36, 2x SODIMM
Pantalha
17.30 polegadas 16:9, 1920 x 1080 pixel 127 PPI, TN LED, Name: Chi Mei N173HHE-G32, ID: CMN1747, Brilhante: não
placa mãe
Intel HM170 (Skylake PCH-H)
Disco rígido
SanDisk SD8SN8U1T001122, 1024 GB 
, Secundário: 2 TB Seagate ST2000LM007-1R8174
Placa de Som
Intel Skylake PCH-H High Definition Audio Controller
Conexões
1 USB 2.0, 3 USB 3.0, 1 USB 3.1 Gen2, 1 Thunderbolt, 1 HDMI, 1 DisplayPort, 1 Kensington Lock, Conexões Audio: 1x Mic-in, 1x Headphone-out (HiFi/SPDIF), Card Reader: Leitor SD
Funcionamento em rede
Qualcomm/Atheros e2400 PCI-E Gigabit Ethernet Controller (10/100/1000MBit/s), Killer Wireless-n/a/ac 1535 Wireless Network Adapter (b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/), Bluetooth 4.1
Tamanho
altura x largura x profundidade (em mm): 19.6 x 411.8 x 284.9
Bateria
65 Wh Lítio-Polímero
Sistema Operativo
Microsoft Windows 10 Home 64 Bit
Camera
Webcam: FHD (30fps@1080p)
Características adicionais
Alto falantes: 4x 2 W + 1x 3 W subwoofer, Teclado: SteelSeries Chiclet, Iluminação do Teclado: sim, Pano de limpeza, cartão de garantia, Guia de início rápido, Dragon Center, MSI True Color, Nahimic 2, SteelSeries Engine 3, Killer Network Manager, 24 Meses Garantia
peso
2.429 kg, Suprimento de energia: 732 g
Preço
1800 USD
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

428 mm 333 mm 51 mm 4.5 kg428 mm 305 mm 25 mm 3.3 kg427 mm 277 mm 22.4 mm 3.1 kg421 mm 290 mm 25 mm 3.2 kg419 mm 287 mm 22 mm 2.7 kg408 mm 295.5 mm 26.6 mm 4 kg411.8 mm 284.9 mm 19.6 mm 2.4 kg297 mm 210 mm 1 mm 5.7 g
Front: No connectivity
Front: No connectivity
Right: USB 2.0, USB Type-C w/ Thunderbolt 3, HDMI 2.0, mini DisplayPort 1.2, AC adapter
Right: USB 2.0, USB Type-C w/ Thunderbolt 3, HDMI 2.0, mini DisplayPort 1.2, AC adapter
Rear: No connectivity
Rear: No connectivity
Left: Kensington Lock, SD reader, 3x USB 3.0, 3.5 mm earphones, 3.5 mm microphone
Left: Kensington Lock, SD reader, 3x USB 3.0, 3.5 mm earphones, 3.5 mm microphone
SD Card Reader
average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs)
MSI GT72VR 6RE-015US
 
135.3 MB/s +468%
Dell XPS 13 2016 9350 (FHD, i7-6560U)
 
135 MB/s +467%
Alienware 17 R3 (A17-9935)
 
78 MB/s +228%
MSI GS73VR 6RF
 
23.8 MB/s
maximum AS SSD Seq Read Test (1GB)
Dell XPS 13 2016 9350 (FHD, i7-6560U)
 
210 MB/s +661%
MSI GT72VR 6RE-015US
 
186.3 MB/s +575%
Alienware 17 R3 (A17-9935)
 
87 MB/s +215%
MSI GS73VR 6RF
 
27.6 MB/s
Networking
iperf Server (receive) TCP 1 m
Dell XPS 13 2016 9350 (FHD, i7-6560U)
Dell Wireless 1820A 802.11ac
579 MBit/s +13%
MSI GS73VR 6RF
Killer Wireless-n/a/ac 1535 Wireless Network Adapter
512 MBit/s
iperf Client (transmit) TCP 1 m
MSI GS73VR 6RF
Killer Wireless-n/a/ac 1535 Wireless Network Adapter
536 MBit/s
Dell XPS 13 2016 9350 (FHD, i7-6560U)
Dell Wireless 1820A 802.11ac
461 MBit/s -14%
304.2
cd/m²
330.8
cd/m²
291.6
cd/m²
308.8
cd/m²
337.2
cd/m²
291.3
cd/m²
324.7
cd/m²
331.6
cd/m²
314.7
cd/m²
Distribuição do brilho
tested with X-Rite i1Pro Basic 2
Máximo: 337.2 cd/m² (Nits) Médio: 315 cd/m² Minimum: 6.45 cd/m²
iluminação: 86 %
iluminação com acumulador: 337.2 cd/m²
Contraste: 1095:1 (Preto: 0.308 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 2.96 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.93
ΔE Greyscale 2.57 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
100% sRGB (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
74.3% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
83.6% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
99.9% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
90% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.25
MSI GS73VR 6RF
TN LED, 17.3", 1920x1080
Aorus X7 Pro v5
LG Philips LP173WF4-SPD1 (LGD046C), IPS, 17.3", 1920x1080
MSI GS70-6QE16H21
Chi Mei N173HGE-E11 (CMN1735), TN LED, 17.3", 1920x1080
Asus G752VS-XB78K
LG Philips LP173WF4-SPF3 (LGD04E8), IPS, 17.3", 1920x1080
Alienware 17 R3 (A17-9935)
CV69H_173WF4 (LGD0459), IPS, 17.3", 1920x1080
Display
-24%
-16%
-22%
-23%
Display P3 Coverage
90
66
-27%
67
-26%
66.9
-26%
66.9
-26%
sRGB Coverage
99.9
83.4
-17%
97.3
-3%
85.2
-15%
83.9
-16%
AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage
83.6
61
-27%
67.6
-19%
62.3
-25%
61.4
-27%
Response Times
-77%
-83%
-79%
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% *
28 ?(13.2, 14.8)
35 ?(13, 22)
-25%
38 ?(14, 24)
-36%
33 ?(13, 20)
-18%
Response Time Black / White *
9.6 ?(5.2, 4.4)
22 ?(4, 18)
-129%
22 ?(4, 18)
-129%
23 ?(5, 18)
-140%
PWM Frequency
Screen
-19%
-12%
-13%
-29%
Brightness middle
337.2
271
-20%
172
-49%
328
-3%
360
7%
Brightness
315
257
-18%
161
-49%
317
1%
336
7%
Brightness Distribution
86
91
6%
85
-1%
88
2%
90
5%
Black Level *
0.308
0.23
25%
0.26
16%
0.3
3%
0.44
-43%
Contrast
1095
1178
8%
662
-40%
1093
0%
818
-25%
Colorchecker dE 2000 *
2.96
4.14
-40%
2.06
30%
3.74
-26%
4.76
-61%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *
5.45
8.11
-49%
8.97
-65%
10.8
-98%
Greyscale dE 2000 *
2.57
4
-56%
2.42
6%
2.67
-4%
3.69
-44%
Gamma
2.25 98%
2.43 91%
2.45 90%
2.41 91%
2.24 98%
CCT
7114 91%
6558 99%
6855 95%
6861 95%
6091 107%
Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998)
74.3
55
-26%
62
-17%
56
-25%
55
-26%
Color Space (Percent of sRGB)
100
83
-17%
97
-3%
85
-15%
84
-16%
Total Average (Program / Settings)
-40% / -27%
-14% / -13%
-39% / -24%
-44% / -35%

* ... smaller is better

Display Response Times

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
       Response Time Black to White
9.6 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 5.2 ms rise
↘ 4.4 ms fall
The screen shows fast response rates in our tests and should be suited for gaming.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 22 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (21 ms).
       Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
28 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 13.2 ms rise
↘ 14.8 ms fall
The screen shows relatively slow response rates in our tests and may be too slow for gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 33 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (32.9 ms).

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM not detected

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8774 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured.

Cinebench R15
CPU Single 64Bit
Eurocom Sky DLX7
Intel Core i7-6700K
177 Points +32%
MSI PX60 QD-034US
Intel Core i7-5700HQ
144 Points +7%
Lenovo ThinkPad P40 Yoga 20GQ-000EUS
Intel Core i7-6600U
141 Points +5%
MSI GS73VR 6RF
Intel Core i7-6700HQ
134 Points
Toshiba Satellite S70-B-106
Intel Core i7-4700HQ
131 Points -2%
CPU Multi 64Bit
Eurocom Sky DLX7
Intel Core i7-6700K
878 Points +31%
MSI PX60 QD-034US
Intel Core i7-5700HQ
723 Points +8%
MSI GS73VR 6RF
Intel Core i7-6700HQ
671 Points
Toshiba Satellite S70-B-106
Intel Core i7-4700HQ
566 Points -16%
Lenovo ThinkPad P40 Yoga 20GQ-000EUS
Intel Core i7-6600U
308 Points -54%
Cinebench R11.5
CPU Single 64Bit
Eurocom Sky DLX7
Intel Core i7-6700K
1.97 Points +31%
MSI PX60 QD-034US
Intel Core i7-5700HQ
1.67 Points +11%
MSI GS73VR 6RF
Intel Core i7-6700HQ
1.5 Points
Toshiba Satellite S70-B-106
Intel Core i7-4700HQ
1.49 Points -1%
Lenovo ThinkPad P40 Yoga 20GQ-000EUS
Intel Core i7-6600U
1.19 Points -21%
CPU Multi 64Bit
Eurocom Sky DLX7
Intel Core i7-6700K
9.7 Points +31%
MSI PX60 QD-034US
Intel Core i7-5700HQ
7.86 Points +6%
MSI GS73VR 6RF
Intel Core i7-6700HQ
7.41 Points
Toshiba Satellite S70-B-106
Intel Core i7-4700HQ
6.02 Points -19%
Lenovo ThinkPad P40 Yoga 20GQ-000EUS
Intel Core i7-6600U
3.25 Points -56%
Cinebench R10
Rendering Multiple CPUs 32Bit
Eurocom Sky DLX7
Intel Core i7-6700K
26040 Points +30%
MSI PX60 QD-034US
Intel Core i7-5700HQ
21568 Points +7%
MSI GS73VR 6RF
Intel Core i7-6700HQ
20090 Points
Lenovo ThinkPad P40 Yoga 20GQ-000EUS
Intel Core i7-6600U
9140 Points -55%
Rendering Single 32Bit
Eurocom Sky DLX7
Intel Core i7-6700K
6604 Points +34%
MSI PX60 QD-034US
Intel Core i7-5700HQ
5539 Points +12%
Lenovo ThinkPad P40 Yoga 20GQ-000EUS
Intel Core i7-6600U
5085 Points +3%
MSI GS73VR 6RF
Intel Core i7-6700HQ
4926 Points
wPrime 2.10 - 1024m
Lenovo ThinkPad P40 Yoga 20GQ-000EUS
Intel Core i7-6600U
526 s * -126%
MSI GS73VR 6RF
Intel Core i7-6700HQ
233.1 s *
MSI PX60 QD-034US
Intel Core i7-5700HQ
205.8 s * +12%
Eurocom Sky DLX7
Intel Core i7-6700K
178 s * +24%
Super Pi Mod 1.5 XS 32M - 32M
MSI GS73VR 6RF
Intel Core i7-6700HQ
658 s *
Lenovo ThinkPad P40 Yoga 20GQ-000EUS
Intel Core i7-6600U
610 s * +7%
MSI PX60 QD-034US
Intel Core i7-5700HQ
570 s * +13%
Eurocom Sky DLX7
Intel Core i7-6700K
463.8 s * +30%

* ... smaller is better

Cinebench R10 Shading 32Bit
8182
Cinebench R10 Rendering Multiple CPUs 32Bit
20090
Cinebench R10 Rendering Single 32Bit
4926
Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 64Bit
7.41 Points
Cinebench R11.5 OpenGL 64Bit
53.8 fps
Cinebench R11.5 CPU Single 64Bit
1.5 Points
Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64Bit
134 Points
Cinebench R15 Ref. Match 64Bit
99.6 %
Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64Bit
82.1 fps
Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64Bit
671 Points
Ajuda
PCMark 8
Home Score Accelerated v2
Asus G752VY-RH71
GeForce GTX 980M, 6700HQ, Samsung SSD 950 Pro 512GB m.2 NVMe
5026 Points +25%
MSI GS73VR 6RF
GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, 6700HQ, SanDisk SD8SN8U1T001122
4012 Points
MSI GS70-6QE16H21
GeForce GTX 970M, 6700HQ, Toshiba HG6 THNSNJ256G8NU
4002 Points 0%
Razer Blade Pro 17 inch 2015
GeForce GTX 960M, 4720HQ, Samsung PM851 Series MZMTE256HMHP
3741 Points -7%
Aorus X5S v5
GeForce GTX 980M, 6700HQ, Samsung SM951 MZVPV256 m.2
3260 Points -19%
Work Score Accelerated v2
Asus G752VY-RH71
GeForce GTX 980M, 6700HQ, Samsung SSD 950 Pro 512GB m.2 NVMe
5535 Points +16%
MSI GS70-6QE16H21
GeForce GTX 970M, 6700HQ, Toshiba HG6 THNSNJ256G8NU
5043 Points +6%
MSI GS73VR 6RF
GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, 6700HQ, SanDisk SD8SN8U1T001122
4774 Points
Razer Blade Pro 17 inch 2015
GeForce GTX 960M, 4720HQ, Samsung PM851 Series MZMTE256HMHP
4448 Points -7%
Aorus X5S v5
GeForce GTX 980M, 6700HQ, Samsung SM951 MZVPV256 m.2
3937 Points -18%
Creative Score Accelerated v2
Asus G752VY-RH71
GeForce GTX 980M, 6700HQ, Samsung SSD 950 Pro 512GB m.2 NVMe
7127 Points +41%
MSI GS73VR 6RF
GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, 6700HQ, SanDisk SD8SN8U1T001122
5062 Points
MSI GS70-6QE16H21
GeForce GTX 970M, 6700HQ, Toshiba HG6 THNSNJ256G8NU
4873 Points -4%
Aorus X5S v5
GeForce GTX 980M, 6700HQ, Samsung SM951 MZVPV256 m.2
4747 Points -6%
Razer Blade Pro 17 inch 2015
GeForce GTX 960M, 4720HQ, Samsung PM851 Series MZMTE256HMHP
4528 Points -11%
PCMark 8 Home Score Accelerated v2
4012 pontos
PCMark 8 Creative Score Accelerated v2
5062 pontos
PCMark 8 Work Score Accelerated v2
4774 pontos
Ajuda
MSI GS73VR 6RF
SanDisk SD8SN8U1T001122
Aorus X5S v5
Samsung SM951 MZVPV256 m.2
MSI GT72S-6QEG16SR421BW
Toshiba NVMe THNSN5256GPU7
Asus G752VY-RH71
Samsung SSD 950 Pro 512GB m.2 NVMe
Razer Blade Pro 17 inch 2015
Samsung PM851 Series MZMTE256HMHP
CrystalDiskMark 3.0
263%
256%
298%
62%
Read Seq
334.3
1748
423%
1602
379%
2007
500%
527
58%
Write Seq
319
1272
299%
1062
233%
1536
382%
265.9
-17%
Read 512
242.3
993
310%
1110
358%
1022
322%
445.9
84%
Write 512
254.4
1263
396%
1095
330%
1510
494%
265.9
5%
Read 4k
20.3
51.9
156%
44.74
120%
51.6
154%
36.83
81%
Write 4k
42.51
146.5
245%
162.3
282%
150.2
253%
116
173%
Read 4k QD32
251.6
628
150%
682
171%
576
129%
389
55%
Write 4k QD32
167.1
370.4
122%
459.5
175%
413.7
148%
266.5
59%
SanDisk SD8SN8U1T001122
Sequential Read: 334.3 MB/s
Sequential Write: 319 MB/s
512K Read: 242.3 MB/s
512K Write: 254.4 MB/s
4K Read: 20.3 MB/s
4K Write: 42.51 MB/s
4K QD32 Read: 251.6 MB/s
4K QD32 Write: 167.1 MB/s
3DMark
1920x1080 Fire Strike Graphics
Asus G752VS-XB78K
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, 6820HK
16757 Points +46%
Aorus X7 Pro v5
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 970M SLI, 6820HK
14231 Points +24%
Asus G701VO-CS74K
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980 (Laptop), 6820HK
13018 Points +13%
MSI GS73VR 6RF
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, 6700HQ
11506 Points
Aorus X5S v5
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980M, 6700HQ
9441 Points -18%
HP Pavilion 15 UHD T9Y85AV
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 960M, 6700HQ
4249 Points -63%
Fire Strike Extreme Graphics
Asus G752VS-XB78K
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, 6820HK
8104 Points +51%
Asus G701VO-CS74K
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980 (Laptop), 6820HK
6123 Points +14%
MSI GS73VR 6RF
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, 6700HQ
5375 Points
Aorus X5S v5
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980M, 6700HQ
4426 Points -18%
HP Pavilion 15 UHD T9Y85AV
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 960M, 6700HQ
2004 Points -63%
3840x2160 Fire Strike Ultra Graphics
Asus G752VS-XB78K
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, 6820HK
4030 Points +55%
Asus G701VO-CS74K
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980 (Laptop), 6820HK
3009 Points +16%
MSI GS73VR 6RF
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, 6700HQ
2596 Points
Aorus X5S v5
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980M, 6700HQ
2212 Points -15%
HP Pavilion 15 UHD T9Y85AV
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 960M, 6700HQ
942 Points -64%
3DMark 11
1280x720 Performance GPU
Asus G752VS-XB78K
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, 6820HK
22282 Points +50%
Aorus X7 Pro v5
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 970M SLI, 6820HK
19252 Points +29%
Asus G701VO-CS74K
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980 (Laptop), 6820HK
16946 Points +14%
MSI GS73VR 6RF
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, 6700HQ
14904 Points
Aorus X5S v5
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980M, 6700HQ
12197 Points -18%
HP Pavilion 15 UHD T9Y85AV
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 960M, 6700HQ
5452 Points -63%
1280x720 Performance Combined
Asus G752VS-XB78K
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, 6820HK
9914 Points +23%
Asus G701VO-CS74K
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980 (Laptop), 6820HK
9017 Points +12%
Aorus X7 Pro v5
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 970M SLI, 6820HK
8622 Points +7%
MSI GS73VR 6RF
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, 6700HQ
8083 Points
Aorus X5S v5
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980M, 6700HQ
5960 Points -26%
HP Pavilion 15 UHD T9Y85AV
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 960M, 6700HQ
5472 Points -32%
3DMark 11 Performance
12423 pontos
3DMark Ice Storm Standard Score
88271 pontos
3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score
22781 pontos
3DMark Fire Strike Score
9609 pontos
3DMark Fire Strike Extreme Score
5062 pontos
Ajuda
Batman: Arkham Knight - 1920x1080 High / On AA:SM AF:16x
Asus G752VS-XB78K
GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, 6820HK, Toshiba NVMe THNSN5512GPU7
117 fps +105%
Asus G701VO-CS74K
GeForce GTX 980 (Laptop), 6820HK, 2x Samsung SM951 MZVPV512HDGL (RAID 0)
63 fps +11%
MSI GS73VR 6RF
GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, 6700HQ, SanDisk SD8SN8U1T001122
57 fps
Aorus X5S v5
GeForce GTX 980M, 6700HQ, Samsung SM951 MZVPV256 m.2
48 fps -16%
HP Pavilion 15 UHD T9Y85AV
GeForce GTX 960M, 6700HQ, SanDisk Z400s SD8SNAT-128G
22 fps -61%
BioShock Infinite - 1920x1080 Ultra Preset, DX11 (DDOF)
Asus G752VS-XB78K
GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, 6820HK, Toshiba NVMe THNSN5512GPU7
137.1 (34.5min - 271.3max) fps +37%
Asus G701VO-CS74K
GeForce GTX 980 (Laptop), 6820HK, 2x Samsung SM951 MZVPV512HDGL (RAID 0)
106.2 fps +6%
MSI GS73VR 6RF
GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, 6700HQ, SanDisk SD8SN8U1T001122
100 fps
Aorus X5S v5
GeForce GTX 980M, 6700HQ, Samsung SM951 MZVPV256 m.2
87 fps -13%
Aorus X3 Plus v5
GeForce GTX 970M, 6700HQ, Samsung SM951 MZVPV512HDGL m.2 PCI-e
71.8 fps -28%
HP Pavilion 15 UHD T9Y85AV
GeForce GTX 960M, 6700HQ, SanDisk Z400s SD8SNAT-128G
45.8 fps -54%
Metro: Last Light - 1920x1080 Very High (DX11) AF:16x
Asus G701VO-CS74K
GeForce GTX 980 (Laptop), 6820HK, 2x Samsung SM951 MZVPV512HDGL (RAID 0)
88.3 fps +14%
MSI GS73VR 6RF
GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, 6700HQ, SanDisk SD8SN8U1T001122
77.4 fps
Aorus X5S v5
GeForce GTX 980M, 6700HQ, Samsung SM951 MZVPV256 m.2
66.5 fps -14%
Aorus X3 Plus v5
GeForce GTX 970M, 6700HQ, Samsung SM951 MZVPV512HDGL m.2 PCI-e
53.6 fps -31%
HP Pavilion 15 UHD T9Y85AV
GeForce GTX 960M, 6700HQ, SanDisk Z400s SD8SNAT-128G
31.4 fps -59%
Thief - 1920x1080 Very High Preset AA:FXAA & High SS AF:8x
Asus G752VS-XB78K
GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, 6820HK, Toshiba NVMe THNSN5512GPU7
101.6 (73.9min - 128.7max) fps +55%
Asus G701VO-CS74K
GeForce GTX 980 (Laptop), 6820HK, 2x Samsung SM951 MZVPV512HDGL (RAID 0)
67.9 fps +3%
MSI GS73VR 6RF
GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, 6700HQ, SanDisk SD8SN8U1T001122
65.7 fps
Aorus X5S v5
GeForce GTX 980M, 6700HQ, Samsung SM951 MZVPV256 m.2
62.1 fps -5%
Aorus X3 Plus v5
GeForce GTX 970M, 6700HQ, Samsung SM951 MZVPV512HDGL m.2 PCI-e
46.5 fps -29%
HP Pavilion 15 UHD T9Y85AV
GeForce GTX 960M, 6700HQ, SanDisk Z400s SD8SNAT-128G
28.2 fps -57%
Metal Gear Solid V - 1920x1080 Extra High / On
Aorus X5S v5
GeForce GTX 980M, 6700HQ, Samsung SM951 MZVPV256 m.2
60 fps 0%
Asus G701VO-CS74K
GeForce GTX 980 (Laptop), 6820HK, 2x Samsung SM951 MZVPV512HDGL (RAID 0)
60 fps 0%
MSI GS73VR 6RF
GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, 6700HQ, SanDisk SD8SN8U1T001122
60 fps
Aorus X3 Plus v5
GeForce GTX 970M, 6700HQ, Samsung SM951 MZVPV512HDGL m.2 PCI-e
59.1 fps -1%
HP Pavilion 15 UHD T9Y85AV
GeForce GTX 960M, 6700HQ, SanDisk Z400s SD8SNAT-128G
32.1 fps -46%
Fallout 4 - 1920x1080 Ultra Preset AA:T AF:16x
Asus G701VO-CS74K
GeForce GTX 980 (Laptop), 6820HK, 2x Samsung SM951 MZVPV512HDGL (RAID 0)
79.3 fps +39%
MSI GS73VR 6RF
GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, 6700HQ, SanDisk SD8SN8U1T001122
57.1 fps
Aorus X5S v5
GeForce GTX 980M, 6700HQ, Samsung SM951 MZVPV256 m.2
55.3 fps -3%
Aorus X3 Plus v5
GeForce GTX 970M, 6700HQ, Samsung SM951 MZVPV512HDGL m.2 PCI-e
42.4 fps -26%
HP Pavilion 15 UHD T9Y85AV
GeForce GTX 960M, 6700HQ, SanDisk Z400s SD8SNAT-128G
24.1 fps -58%
Rise of the Tomb Raider - 1920x1080 Very High Preset AA:FX AF:16x
Asus G752VS-XB78K
GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, 6820HK, Toshiba NVMe THNSN5512GPU7
92.8 (80min - 103max) fps +51%
MSI GS73VR 6RF
GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, 6700HQ, SanDisk SD8SN8U1T001122
61.4 fps
Asus G701VO-CS74K
GeForce GTX 980 (Laptop), 6820HK, 2x Samsung SM951 MZVPV512HDGL (RAID 0)
60.4 fps -2%
Aorus X5S v5
GeForce GTX 980M, 6700HQ, Samsung SM951 MZVPV256 m.2
47.1 fps -23%
HP Pavilion 15 UHD T9Y85AV
GeForce GTX 960M, 6700HQ, SanDisk Z400s SD8SNAT-128G
23.5 fps -62%
Doom - 1920x1080 Ultra Preset AA:SM
Asus G701VO-CS74K
GeForce GTX 980 (Laptop), 6820HK, 2x Samsung SM951 MZVPV512HDGL (RAID 0)
84.3 fps +10%
MSI GS73VR 6RF
GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, 6700HQ, SanDisk SD8SN8U1T001122
76.3 fps
Overwatch - 1920x1080 Epic (Render Scale 100 %) AA:SM AF:16x
Asus G701VO-CS74K
GeForce GTX 980 (Laptop), 6820HK, 2x Samsung SM951 MZVPV512HDGL (RAID 0)
118.2 fps +16%
MSI GS73VR 6RF
GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, 6700HQ, SanDisk SD8SN8U1T001122
102.1 fps
HP Pavilion 15 UHD T9Y85AV
GeForce GTX 960M, 6700HQ, SanDisk Z400s SD8SNAT-128G
40.2 fps -61%
baixomédiaaltoultra
Guild Wars 2 (2012) 51.4
BioShock Infinite (2013) 156.9 100
Metro: Last Light (2013) 116 77.4
Thief (2014) 77.5 65.7
Batman: Arkham Knight (2015) 78 57
Metal Gear Solid V (2015) 60
Fallout 4 (2015) 57.1
Rise of the Tomb Raider (2016) 72.4 61.4
Doom (2016) 84.1 76.3
Overwatch (2016) 102.1

Barulho

Ocioso
31.9 / 32 / 34 dB
Carga
47 / 49.4 dB
  red to green bar
 
 
30 dB
silencioso
40 dB(A)
audível
50 dB(A)
ruidosamente alto
 
min: dark, med: mid, max: light   BK Precision 732A (15 cm de distância)   environment noise: 28.4 dB(A)
MSI GS73VR 6RF
GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, 6700HQ, SanDisk SD8SN8U1T001122
Aorus X7 Pro v5
GeForce GTX 970M SLI, 6820HK, Samsung SM951 MZVPV512 m.2 PCI-e
MSI GT72S 6QF
GeForce GTX 980 (Laptop), 6820HK, 2x Micron M600 MTFDDAV128MBF NVMe (RAID 0)
MSI GS70 6QE-036XPL
GeForce GTX 970M, 6700HQ, Toshiba HG6 THNSNJ128G8NU
Razer Blade Pro 17 inch 2015
GeForce GTX 960M, 4720HQ, Samsung PM851 Series MZMTE256HMHP
Noise
-5%
-1%
-6%
7%
off / environment *
28.4
30
-6%
Idle Minimum *
31.9
34
-7%
33.1
-4%
32.5
-2%
30.6
4%
Idle Average *
32
35
-9%
33.3
-4%
34.2
-7%
30.7
4%
Idle Maximum *
34
39
-15%
37
-9%
36.1
-6%
32.6
4%
Load Average *
47
39
17%
39
17%
50.3
-7%
38.8
17%
Load Maximum *
49.4
54
-9%
52.2
-6%
54.5
-10%
46.2
6%

* ... smaller is better

Carga Máxima
 37.6 °C50.6 °C50.8 °C 
 31.8 °C44.2 °C40.6 °C 
 28 °C29.2 °C34.4 °C 
Máximo: 50.8 °C
Médio: 38.6 °C
48.4 °C60 °C37.2 °C
47.2 °C44.4 °C34.6 °C
39.6 °C36.2 °C30.4 °C
Máximo: 60 °C
Médio: 42 °C
alimentação elétrica  48.8 °C | Temperatura do quarto 20 °C | Fluke 62 Mini IR Thermometer
(-) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 38.6 °C / 101 F, compared to the average of 33.9 °C / 93 F for the devices in the class Gaming.
(-) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 50.8 °C / 123 F, compared to the average of 40.5 °C / 105 F, ranging from 21.2 to 68.8 °C for the class Gaming.
(-) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 60 °C / 140 F, compared to the average of 43.2 °C / 110 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 26.4 °C / 80 F, compared to the device average of 33.9 °C / 93 F.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are reaching skin temperature as a maximum (34.4 °C / 93.9 F) and are therefore not hot.
(-) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.9 °C / 84 F (-5.5 °C / -9.9 F).
dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2034.832.42535.233.43131.635.94031.932.55030.931.86332.333.58030.130.310030.129.712529.530.616028.64120026.553.525026.457.431525.557.640025.560.950025.265.563024.366.980024.760100025.362.7125023.865.4160023.670.4200023.569.925002366.6315022.867.2400022.672.1500022.471.4630022.472.3800022.670.21000022.465.61250022.461.61600022.556.5SPL35.780.9N2.549.6median 23.8median 65.4Delta1.56.235.335.132.931.831.83236.535.132.428.93328.936.328.848.32761.52752.924.860.92462.822.763.32269.521.267.82174.82075.919.472.718.97117.770.117.86917.671.817.668.117.671.417.673.717.670.417.571.617.671.617.669.617.459.717.583.630.662.51.5median 69.6median 17.84.72.445.635.736.945.643.135.635.343.143.441.140.543.442.141.139.142.138.236.435.638.232.93230.432.92827.328.42827.827.927.427.828.428.330.828.427.63135.227.629.134.43829.140.946.150.340.944.550.554.644.547.453.557.647.448.454.558.648.454.260.864.554.26267.871.76258.563.968.258.550.256.160.250.252.858.562.552.855.761.565.555.752.258.16252.255.761.565.255.755.961.865.555.947.453.25747.452.258.462.952.254.760.66554.755.962.166.255.955.661.665.155.652.558.36152.567.373.177.167.321.831.440.121.8median 52.2median 58.3median 62median 52.27.68.58.17.6hearing rangehide median Pink NoiseMSI GS73VR 6RFApple MacBook 12 (Early 2016) 1.1 GHzSCHENKER F516 Flex
MSI GS73VR 6RF audio analysis

(-) | not very loud speakers (68.5 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 20.4% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (11.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 3% away from median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (8.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 4% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (5.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (21% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 74% of all tested devices in this class were better, 4% similar, 22% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 18%, worst was 132%
Compared to all devices tested
» 54% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 39% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Apple MacBook 12 (Early 2016) 1.1 GHz audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (83.6 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 11.3% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (14.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2.4% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (10.2% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 6% of all tested devices in this class were better, 2% similar, 92% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 19%, worst was 53%
Compared to all devices tested
» 4% of all tested devices were better, 1% similar, 95% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

SCHENKER F516 Flex audio analysis

(-) | not very loud speakers (69 dB)
Analysis not possible as minimum curve is missing or too high

Consumo de energia
desligadodarklight 0.98 / 1.83 Watt
Ociosodarkmidlight 22.6 / 32.7 / 32.8 Watt
Carga midlight 114.7 / 167.9 Watt
 color bar
Key: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
MSI GS73VR 6RF
6700HQ, GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, SanDisk SD8SN8U1T001122, TN LED, 1920x1080, 17.3"
Asus Strix GL502VY-DS71
6700HQ, GeForce GTX 980M, SanDisk SD8SN8U1T001122, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6"
Asus G701VO-CS74K
6820HK, GeForce GTX 980 (Laptop), 2x Samsung SM951 MZVPV512HDGL (RAID 0), IPS, 1920x1080, 17.3"
MSI GS70 6QE-036XPL
6700HQ, GeForce GTX 970M, Toshiba HG6 THNSNJ128G8NU, , 1920x1080, 17.3"
MSI GT72VR 6RE-015US
6700HQ, GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, SanDisk SD8SNAT256G1122, IPS, 1920x1080, 17.3"
Power Consumption
10%
-13%
12%
-6%
Idle Minimum *
22.6
20.6
9%
28.2
-25%
14.1
38%
22.3
1%
Idle Average *
32.7
22.1
32%
32
2%
22.6
31%
27.3
17%
Idle Maximum *
32.8
22.5
31%
32.6
1%
30.5
7%
30
9%
Load Average *
114.7
130.6
-14%
162.2
-41%
143.1
-25%
152.2
-33%
Load Maximum *
167.9
177.2
-6%
173.5
-3%
150
11%
204.2
-22%

* ... smaller is better

Tempo de Execução da Bateria
Ocioso (sem WLAN, min brilho)
5h 53min
WiFi Websurfing
3h 33min
Carga (máximo brilho)
1h 06min
MSI GS73VR 6RF
6700HQ, GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, 65 Wh
Asus Strix GL502VY-DS71
6700HQ, GeForce GTX 980M, 64 Wh
Asus G701VO-CS74K
6820HK, GeForce GTX 980 (Laptop), 93 Wh
MSI GS70-6QE16H21
6700HQ, GeForce GTX 970M, 56 Wh
MSI GT72VR 6RE-015US
6700HQ, GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, 83 Wh
Battery Runtime
-7%
-0%
-17%
9%
Reader / Idle
353
273
-23%
242
-31%
238
-33%
322
-9%
WiFi v1.3
213
187
-12%
202
-5%
180
-15%
224
5%
Load
66
76
15%
89
35%
64
-3%
86
30%

Pro

+ Completa cobertura sRGB ou AdobeRGB (opcional)
+ Tempos de respostas rápido da tela, 120 Hz (opcional)
+ Módulo WLAN acessível e HD secundário
+ Quase sem bleeding irregular da retro iluminação
+ Teclado iluminado RGB confortável
+ Escala de cinzas precisa de fábrica
+ Potente desempenho da CPU e GPU
+ Leve e fino, portável
+ USB Tipo-C c/ Thunderbolt 3
+ Suporte para NVMe (opcional)
+ Boa qualidade de construção
+ Sem PWM

Contra

- SSD M.2 e acesso SODIMM requer desmontagem adicional
- Sem teclas iluminadas individualmente; sem teclas Macro ou auxiliares
- Ventoinhas sempre ativas; ruído forte das ventoinhas sob uso intenso
- Remover o painel inferior anulará a garantia
- O centro da tampa exterior poderia ser mais rígida
- Ruído de alta frequência da ventoinha durante os jogos
- Resposta esponjosa do clickpad
- Sem opções para RAID ou G-Sync
- Bobina barulhenta na nossa unidade de teste
- Posicionamento apertado das portas
- Leitor SDXC lento
In review: MSI GS73VR (6RF) Stealth Pro-025. Test model provided by CUKUSA.com
In review: MSI GS73VR (6RF) Stealth Pro-025. Test model provided by CUKUSA.com

O GS73VR é a grande atualização que a série GS Stealth precisava. O GS70 permaneceu quase igual desde a sua origem em 2013 e suas pequenas atualizações desde então, fizeram muito pouco para resolver seus maiores problemas. O GS73VR finalmente é mais fino, melhor construído, mais frio, e muito mais poderoso com pontos quentes mais localizados. A Pascal continua impressionando em todas as frentes, dado que a GTX 1060 oferece um desempenho um pouco melhor que a GTX 980M em um chassi que é de uma fração do tamanho, em comparação com os carros chefe Maxwell como o MSI GT72S, Asus G752VY, Alienware 17, e Acer Predator 17.

O desempenho claramente não é um problema para a série, mas suas principais desvantagens continuam a ser o ruído de alta frequência e a curta duração de sua bateria. É mais silencioso, sim, mas apenas um pouco mais que o GS70 e a duração da bateria não melhor de forma significativa. Os reclamos menores incluem as portas que estão um pouco perto demais e alguns componentes internos inacessíveis, incluindo o SSD M.2 principal e slots SODIMM. Também é um apenas que a remoção do painel inferior automaticamente anule a garantia, dado que os usuários poderiam trocar a unidade secundária à vontade. O lento leitor de cartões SDXC é outro ponto negativo, com taxas de leitura que são muitas vezes mais lentas que no GT72VR. Algumas teclas Macro dedicadas ou 4K com G-Sync teriam tornado o sistema uma experiência de jogo mais "completa".

O sistema é um passo significante para frente para a série como um todo com Pascal e opções de tela de 120 Hz/5 ms sendo as alternativas na categoria. Os usuários à procura de portáteis Maxwell mais grossos deveriam considerar seriamente a série GS73 dado que não sacrifica desempenho, apesar do que o seu design muito fino e baixo peso poderiam sugerir. Ruído do sistema e opções capacidade de expansibilidade e de manutenção mais limitada ainda são os principais motivos para considerar os portáteis maiores e mais pesados.

MSI GS73VR 6RF - 09/13/2016 v5.1 (old)
Allen Ngo

Acabamento
80 / 98 → 81%
Teclado
81%
Mouse
82%
Conectividade
61 / 81 → 75%
Peso
60 / 10-66 → 89%
Bateria
72%
Pantalha
89%
Desempenho do jogos
94%
Desempenho da aplicação
88%
Temperatura
84 / 95 → 88%
Ruído
70 / 90 → 78%
Audio
74%
Camera
45 / 85 → 53%
Médio
75%
84%
Gaming - Médio equilibrado

Price comparison

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Análises e revisões de portáteis e celulares > Análises > Análises > Breve análise do Portátil MSI GS73VR 6RF
Allen Ngo, 2016-09- 9 (Update: 2020-06- 8)