Breve análise do Portátil MSI CX62 7QL
| SD Card Reader | |
| average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs) | |
| HP Pavilion 15t-au100 CTO (W0P31AV) | |
| MSI CX62 7QL | |
| Asus Zenbook UX510UW-CN044T | |
| maximum AS SSD Seq Read Test (1GB) | |
| HP Pavilion 15t-au100 CTO (W0P31AV) | |
| Asus Zenbook UX510UW-CN044T | |
| MSI CX62 7QL | |
| Networking | |
| iperf3 transmit AX12 | |
| MSI GT73VR 6RF | |
| MSI CX62 7QL | |
| HP Pavilion 15t-au100 CTO (W0P31AV) | |
| iperf3 receive AX12 | |
| MSI GT73VR 6RF | |
| MSI CX62 7QL | |
| HP Pavilion 15t-au100 CTO (W0P31AV) | |
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
iluminação: 85 %
iluminação com acumulador: 196.1 cd/m²
Contraste: 261:1 (Preto: 0.75 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 10.9 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.91
ΔE Greyscale 12.6 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
60.6% sRGB (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
38.4% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
41.56% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
60.5% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
40.22% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.18
| MSI CX62 7QL TN LED, 15.6", 1366x768 | HP Pavilion 15t-au100 CTO (W0P31AV) BOE0693, IPS, 15.6", 1920x1080 | Lenovo Yoga 510-15IKB 80VC000XGE BOE HF NV156FHM-N42, IPS, 15.6", 1920x1080 | Asus Zenbook UX510UW-CN044T LG Philips LP156WF6-SPB6, IPS, 15.6", 1920x1080 | MSI GL62-6QFi781H11 CMN N156HGE-EAL (CMN15D2), TN LED, 15.6", 1920x1080 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display | 8% | 4% | 42% | 93% | |
| Display P3 Coverage | 40.22 | 43.27 8% | 41.92 4% | 61.5 53% | 85.8 113% |
| sRGB Coverage | 60.5 | 64.9 7% | 62.9 4% | 80.4 33% | 99.8 65% |
| AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage | 41.56 | 44.71 8% | 43.32 4% | 58.8 41% | 84.1 102% |
| Response Times | -2% | 1% | 14% | 17% | |
| Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% * | 50.4 ? | 42 ? 17% | 53 ? -5% | 40 ? 21% | 43 ? 15% |
| Response Time Black / White * | 28 ? | 33.6 ? -20% | 26 ? 7% | 26 ? 7% | 23 ? 18% |
| PWM Frequency | 198.4 | 50 ? | 1000 ? | ||
| Screen | 46% | 70% | 65% | 31% | |
| Brightness middle | 196.1 | 186.5 -5% | 236 20% | 326 66% | 216 10% |
| Brightness | 196 | 174 -11% | 212 8% | 316 61% | 202 3% |
| Brightness Distribution | 85 | 69 -19% | 78 -8% | 80 -6% | 83 -2% |
| Black Level * | 0.75 | 0.18 76% | 0.18 76% | 0.35 53% | 0.48 36% |
| Contrast | 261 | 1036 297% | 1311 402% | 931 257% | 450 72% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 10.9 | 5.7 48% | 3.92 64% | 5.49 50% | 9.98 8% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 19 | 22.5 -18% | 9.2 52% | 11.36 40% | 17.12 10% |
| Greyscale dE 2000 * | 12.6 | 4.4 65% | 2.35 81% | 4.84 62% | 10.91 13% |
| Gamma | 2.18 101% | 2.35 94% | 2.34 94% | 2.23 99% | 2.31 95% |
| CCT | 14195 46% | 6963 93% | 6161 106% | 5971 109% | 13185 49% |
| Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998) | 38.4 | 44.71 16% | 40 4% | 53 38% | 75 95% |
| Color Space (Percent of sRGB) | 60.6 | 64.95 7% | 63 4% | 80 32% | 100 65% |
| Total Average (Program / Settings) | 17% /
32% | 25% /
48% | 40% /
54% | 47% /
42% |
* ... smaller is better
Display Response Times
| ↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
|---|---|---|
| 28 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 10 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 18 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows relatively slow response rates in our tests and may be too slow for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 68 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (20.9 ms). | ||
| ↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
| 50.4 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 24 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 26.4 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 85 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (32.8 ms). | ||
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
| Screen flickering / PWM not detected |  | ||
In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8715 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured. | |||
| Cinebench R15 | |
| CPU Single 64Bit | |
| HP Envy x360 15t-w200 | |
| Asus GL702VM-GC102D | |
| Asus Zenbook UX510UW-CN044T | |
| MSI CX62 7QL | |
| HP ProBook 640 G2-T9X60ET | |
| HP 250 G4 T6P08ES | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Z40-59422614 | |
| CPU Multi 64Bit | |
| Asus GL702VM-GC102D | |
| HP Envy x360 15t-w200 | |
| MSI CX62 7QL | |
| Asus Zenbook UX510UW-CN044T | |
| HP ProBook 640 G2-T9X60ET | |
| HP 250 G4 T6P08ES | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Z40-59422614 | |
| Cinebench R11.5 | |
| CPU Single 64Bit | |
| HP Envy x360 15t-w200 | |
| Asus GL702VM-GC102D | |
| Asus Zenbook UX510UW-CN044T | |
| MSI CX62 7QL | |
| HP ProBook 640 G2-T9X60ET | |
| HP 250 G4 T6P08ES | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Z40-59422614 | |
| CPU Multi 64Bit | |
| Asus GL702VM-GC102D | |
| HP Envy x360 15t-w200 | |
| MSI CX62 7QL | |
| Asus Zenbook UX510UW-CN044T | |
| HP ProBook 640 G2-T9X60ET | |
| HP 250 G4 T6P08ES | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Z40-59422614 | |
| Cinebench R10 | |
| Rendering Multiple CPUs 32Bit | |
| Asus GL702VM-GC102D | |
| MSI CX62 7QL | |
| Asus Zenbook UX510UW-CN044T | |
| HP ProBook 640 G2-T9X60ET | |
| HP 250 G4 T6P08ES | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Z40-59422614 | |
| Rendering Single 32Bit | |
| Asus GL702VM-GC102D | |
| MSI CX62 7QL | |
| Asus Zenbook UX510UW-CN044T | |
| HP ProBook 640 G2-T9X60ET | |
| HP 250 G4 T6P08ES | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Z40-59422614 | |
| wPrime 2.10 - 1024m | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Z40-59422614 | |
| HP Envy x360 15t-w200 | |
| Super Pi Mod 1.5 XS 32M - 32M | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Z40-59422614 | |
| HP Envy x360 15t-w200 | |
* ... smaller is better
| PCMark 8 | |
| Home Score Accelerated v2 | |
| Lenovo Yoga 510-15IKB 80VC000XGE | |
| MSI GL62-6QFi781H11 | |
| MSI CX62 7QL | |
| HP Pavilion 15t-au100 CTO (W0P31AV) | |
| Asus Zenbook UX510UW-CN044T | |
| Work Score Accelerated v2 | |
| MSI GL62-6QFi781H11 | |
| MSI CX62 7QL | |
| Asus Zenbook UX510UW-CN044T | |
| HP Pavilion 15t-au100 CTO (W0P31AV) | |
| Creative Score Accelerated v2 | |
| MSI GL62-6QFi781H11 | |
| Asus Zenbook UX510UW-CN044T | |
| HP Pavilion 15t-au100 CTO (W0P31AV) | |
| MSI CX62 7QL | |
| PCMark 8 Home Score Accelerated v2 | 3594 pontos | |
| PCMark 8 Creative Score Accelerated v2 | 4035 pontos | |
| PCMark 8 Work Score Accelerated v2 | 4364 pontos | |
Ajuda | ||
| MSI CX62 7QL WDC Scorpio Blue WD10JPVX-22JC3T0 | HP Pavilion 15t-au100 CTO (W0P31AV) Toshiba MQ01ABD100 | Lenovo Yoga 510-15IKB 80VC000XGE Samsung MZYTY256HDHP | Asus Zenbook UX510UW-CN044T SanDisk SD8SNAT256G1002 | MSI GL62-6QFi781H11 Toshiba HG6 THNSNJ128G8NY | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CrystalDiskMark 3.0 | -18% | 8589% | 5301% | 6073% | |
| Read Seq | 113.7 | 109.5 -4% | 529 365% | 459.3 304% | 530 366% |
| Write Seq | 113.3 | 105.2 -7% | 508 348% | 325.5 187% | 442.7 291% |
| Read 512 | 38.42 | 34.08 -11% | 409.8 967% | 279.2 627% | 409.1 965% |
| Write 512 | 55.8 | 40.02 -28% | 316.5 467% | 280.1 402% | 417.3 648% |
| Read 4k | 0.48 | 0.429 -11% | 36.01 7402% | 22.43 4573% | 21.81 4444% |
| Write 4k | 1.282 | 1.008 -21% | 106.7 8223% | 74.9 5742% | 93 7154% |
| Read 4k QD32 | 1.172 | 0.81 -31% | 384.8 32733% | 149 12613% | 257 21828% |
| Write 4k QD32 | 1.296 | 0.893 -31% | 237.3 18210% | 234 17956% | 168.3 12886% |
| 3DMark | |
| 1280x720 Cloud Gate Standard Graphics | |
| Asus Zenbook UX510UW-CN044T | |
| Acer Aspire E5-575G-549D | |
| Intel Skull Canyon NUC6i7KYK | |
| MSI CX62 7QL | |
| HP ProBook 440 G4-Y8B51EA | |
| Dell Latitude 15 3550-0123 | |
| HP Pavilion x360 13t-u100 | |
| 1920x1080 Fire Strike Graphics | |
| Asus Zenbook UX510UW-CN044T | |
| Acer Aspire E5-575G-549D | |
| Intel Skull Canyon NUC6i7KYK | |
| MSI CX62 7QL | |
| HP ProBook 440 G4-Y8B51EA | |
| Dell Latitude 15 3550-0123 | |
| HP Pavilion x360 13t-u100 | |
| 3DMark 11 | |
| 1280x720 Performance GPU | |
| Asus Zenbook UX510UW-CN044T | |
| Acer Aspire E5-575G-549D | |
| Intel Skull Canyon NUC6i7KYK | |
| MSI CX62 7QL | |
| HP ProBook 440 G4-Y8B51EA | |
| Dell Latitude 15 3550-0123 | |
| HP Pavilion x360 13t-u100 | |
| 1280x720 Performance Combined | |
| Asus Zenbook UX510UW-CN044T | |
| Acer Aspire E5-575G-549D | |
| Intel Skull Canyon NUC6i7KYK | |
| MSI CX62 7QL | |
| HP ProBook 440 G4-Y8B51EA | |
| Dell Latitude 15 3550-0123 | |
| HP Pavilion x360 13t-u100 | |
| 3DMark 11 Performance | 2529 pontos | |
| 3DMark Ice Storm Standard Score | 65002 pontos | |
| 3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score | 6847 pontos | |
| 3DMark Fire Strike Score | 1473 pontos | |
| 3DMark Fire Strike Extreme Score | 753 pontos | |
Ajuda | ||
| baixo | média | alto | ultra | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| BioShock Infinite (2013) | 97.2 | 54.3 | 44 | |
| Metro: Last Light (2013) | 51.3 | 39.5 | 28.5 | |
| Thief (2014) | 50.7 | 29.3 | ||
| Batman: Arkham Knight (2015) | 28 | |||
| Metal Gear Solid V (2015) | 60 | 58 | ||
| Fallout 4 (2015) | 34.6 | |||
| Rise of the Tomb Raider (2016) | 40.1 | 23.2 | ||
| Ashes of the Singularity (2016) | 19.4 | |||
| Overwatch (2016) | 73.5 | 51.4 |
Barulho
| Ocioso |
| 32.1 / 32.2 / 32.2 dB |
| Carga |
| 37.4 / 51.4 dB |
 | ||
30 dB silencioso 40 dB(A) audível 50 dB(A) ruidosamente alto |
||
min:  , med:  , max:  BK Precision 732A (15 cm de distância) environment noise: 29 dB(A) | ||
| MSI CX62 7QL GeForce 940MX, i5-7200U, WDC Scorpio Blue WD10JPVX-22JC3T0 | HP Pavilion 15t-au100 CTO (W0P31AV) GeForce 940MX, i7-7500U, Toshiba MQ01ABD100 | Lenovo Yoga 510-15IKB 80VC000XGE Radeon R7 M460, i5-7200U, Samsung MZYTY256HDHP | Asus Zenbook UX510UW-CN044T GeForce GTX 960M, 6500U, SanDisk SD8SNAT256G1002 | MSI GL62-6QFi781H11 GeForce GTX 960M, 6700HQ, Toshiba HG6 THNSNJ128G8NY | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Noise | 2% | 6% | -1% | -6% | |
| off / environment * | 29 | 30.15 -4% | 31.6 -9% | 30 -3% | |
| Idle Minimum * | 32.1 | 32.2 -0% | 30.2 6% | 31.6 2% | 35 -9% |
| Idle Average * | 32.2 | 32.2 -0% | 30.2 6% | 31.6 2% | 36 -12% |
| Idle Maximum * | 32.2 | 33.7 -5% | 31 4% | 33.4 -4% | 37 -15% |
| Load Average * | 37.4 | 39.4 -5% | 38 -2% | 41.7 -11% | 41 -10% |
| Load Maximum * | 51.4 | 42.2 18% | 38.6 25% | 44.8 13% | 46 11% |
* ... smaller is better
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 38.4 °C / 101 F, compared to the average of 36.9 °C / 98 F, ranging from 21.1 to 71 °C for the class Multimedia.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 35.8 °C / 96 F, compared to the average of 39.2 °C / 103 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 24 °C / 75 F, compared to the device average of 31.3 °C / 88 F.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are reaching skin temperature as a maximum (32.2 °C / 90 F) and are therefore not hot.
(-) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.8 °C / 83.8 F (-3.4 °C / -6.2 F).
MSI CX62 7QL audio analysis
(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (74.8 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 19.6% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (11.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 9.5% higher than median
(-) | mids are not linear (15.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 7.4% higher than median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (9.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(-) | overall sound is not linear (38.2% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 99% of all tested devices in this class were better, 1% similar, 1% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 18%, worst was 45%
Compared to all devices tested
» 94% of all tested devices were better, 1% similar, 5% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Apple MacBook 12 (Early 2016) 1.1 GHz audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (83.6 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 11.3% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (14.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2.4% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (10.2% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 6% of all tested devices in this class were better, 2% similar, 92% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 19%, worst was 53%
Compared to all devices tested
» 4% of all tested devices were better, 1% similar, 95% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
| desligado | 0.32 / 0.5 Watt |
| Ocioso | 6.3 / 7 / 7.2 Watt |
| Carga |
35.1 / 61.2 Watt |
   
| |
Key:
min: ,
med: ,
max: Metrahit Energy | |
| MSI CX62 7QL i5-7200U, GeForce 940MX, WDC Scorpio Blue WD10JPVX-22JC3T0, TN LED, 1366x768, 15.6" | HP Pavilion 15t-au100 CTO (W0P31AV) i7-7500U, GeForce 940MX, Toshiba MQ01ABD100, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6" | Lenovo Yoga 510-15IKB 80VC000XGE i5-7200U, Radeon R7 M460, Samsung MZYTY256HDHP, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6" | Asus Zenbook UX510UW-CN044T 6500U, GeForce GTX 960M, SanDisk SD8SNAT256G1002, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6" | MSI GL62-6QFi781H11 6700HQ, GeForce GTX 960M, Toshiba HG6 THNSNJ128G8NY, TN LED, 1920x1080, 15.6" | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power Consumption | -15% | 6% | -36% | -110% | |
| Idle Minimum * | 6.3 | 6.16 2% | 3.9 38% | 5 21% | 10 -59% |
| Idle Average * | 7 | 8.48 -21% | 7.8 -11% | 8.9 -27% | 14 -100% |
| Idle Maximum * | 7.2 | 9.62 -34% | 8.4 -17% | 11.8 -64% | 19 -164% |
| Load Average * | 35.1 | 41.63 -19% | 37 -5% | 55 -57% | 82 -134% |
| Load Maximum * | 61.2 | 63.22 -3% | 46 25% | 93 -52% | 118 -93% |
* ... smaller is better
| MSI CX62 7QL i5-7200U, GeForce 940MX, 41 Wh | HP Pavilion 15t-au100 CTO (W0P31AV) i7-7500U, GeForce 940MX, 41 Wh | Lenovo Yoga 510-15IKB 80VC000XGE i5-7200U, Radeon R7 M460, 35 Wh | Asus Zenbook UX510UW-CN044T 6500U, GeForce GTX 960M, 48 Wh | MSI GL62-6QFi781H11 6700HQ, GeForce GTX 960M, 41.4 Wh | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Battery Runtime | -22% | 13% | 20% | -44% | |
| Reader / Idle | 613 | 438 -29% | 816 33% | 339 -45% | |
| WiFi v1.3 | 283 | 220 -22% | 320 13% | 430 52% | 158 -44% |
| Load | 125 | 106 -15% | 95 -24% | 71 -43% |
Pro
Contra
O desempenho do CX62 é insuficiente quando consideramos o tamanho robusto e o peso. A CPU ULV Kaby Lake e a GeForce 940MX de nível de entrada são uma má combinação para qualquer trabalho exigente, fora da multitarefas do navegador e do streaming multimídia. Os jogos são bastante limitados para configurações muito baixas a 768p, especialmente para títulos 3D modernos enquanto a ventoinha do sistema tem uma irritante tendência para pulsar quando está sob uso intenso. O chassi, embora seja visualmente igual ao respeitável GE62, se sente mais flexível e barato ao toque. Para finalizar, a tela TN está mal calibrada na condição de fábrica, com níveis de contraste fracos e uma iluminação escura.
As poucas qualidades redentoras do portátil são o seu slot NVMe M.2 e as baixas temperaturas de operação. Esta última deve acelerar a resposta do sistema imensamente sobre a nossa configuração com HD, embora uma atualização feita pelo usuário final, infelizmente, iria anular a garantia. Enquanto isso, as baixas temperaturas do núcleo não deveriam ser surpreendentes, dado que o chassi grosso vem da série G para jogos, onde as CPUs e GPUs de níveis de TDP muito mais altos são comuns. Isto permite que o CX62 mantenha velocidades Turbo Boost e rode com temperaturas mais frias que a maioria dos sistemas com processadores ULV similares.
O CX62 é essencialmente um portátil para jogos enfraquecido com hardware de um portátil multimídia econômico. Existem muito recortes e os usuários estarão melhor gastando um pouco mais em um verdadeiro Ultrabook com desempenho de CPU e opções de tela iguais ou melhores.
MSI CX62 7QL
- 01/16/2017 v6 (old)
Allen Ngo
Price comparison
