Breve Análise do tablet Samsung Galaxy Tab S7 - Sem dúvida, o melhor tablet Android de 11 polegadas
Rating | Date | Model | Weight | Height | Size | Resolution | Price |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 90.1 % v7 (old) | 10/2020 | Samsung Galaxy Tab S7 SD 865+ (Plus), Adreno 650 | 500 g | 6.3 mm | 11.00" | 2560x1600 | |
| 90.4 % v7 (old) | 04/2020 | Apple iPad Pro 11 2020 A12Z Bionic, A12Z Bionic GPU | 471 g | 5.9 mm | 11.00" | 2388x1668 | |
| 88.4 % v7 (old) | 08/2020 | Huawei MatePad Pro 10.8 Kirin 990, Mali-G76 MP16 | 460 g | 7.2 mm | 10.80" | 2560x1600 | |
| 88.1 % v7 (old) | 10/2020 | Samsung Galaxy Tab S7 Plus SD 865+ (Plus), Adreno 650 | 575 g | 5.7 mm | 12.40" | 2800x1752 |
| Networking | |
| iperf3 transmit AX12 | |
| Huawei MatePad Pro 10.8 | |
| Apple iPad Pro 11 2020 | |
| Samsung Galaxy Tab S7 | |
| Samsung Galaxy Tab S7 Plus | |
| iperf3 receive AX12 | |
| Huawei MatePad Pro 10.8 | |
| Samsung Galaxy Tab S7 | |
| Samsung Galaxy Tab S7 Plus | |
| Apple iPad Pro 11 2020 | |
Image Comparison
Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.
Wide-angle lensWide-angle lens5X zoomLow-light photographyUltra wide-angle lens
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
iluminação: 91 %
iluminação com acumulador: 554 cd/m²
Contraste: 1679:1 (Preto: 0.33 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 2.1 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.91
ΔE Greyscale 1.6 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
97% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.32
| Samsung Galaxy Tab S7 LTPS, 2560x1600, 11" | Apple iPad Pro 11 2020 IPS, 2388x1668, 11" | Huawei MatePad Pro 10.8 IPS, 2560x1600, 10.8" | Samsung Galaxy Tab S7 Plus Super AMOLED, 2800x1752, 12.4" | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen | 18% | -20% | -14% | |
| Brightness middle | 554 | 617 11% | 606 9% | 441 -20% |
| Brightness | 535 | 585 9% | 579 8% | 447 -16% |
| Brightness Distribution | 91 | 84 -8% | 89 -2% | 98 8% |
| Black Level * | 0.33 | 0.36 -9% | 0.32 3% | |
| Contrast | 1679 | 1714 2% | 1894 13% | |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 2.1 | 0.94 55% | 2.9 -38% | 2.4 -14% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 7.1 | 1.87 74% | 6 15% | 4.1 42% |
| Greyscale dE 2000 * | 1.6 | 1.4 12% | 4.3 -169% | 2.9 -81% |
| Gamma | 2.32 95% | 2.156 102% | 2.22 99% | 2.01 109% |
| CCT | 6623 98% | 6733 97% | 7272 89% | 6469 100% |
* ... smaller is better
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
| Screen flickering / PWM detected | 59520 Hz | ≤ 21 % brightness setting |  |
The display backlight flickers at 59520 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) Flickering detected at a brightness setting of 21 % and below. There should be no flickering or PWM above this brightness setting. The frequency of 59520 Hz is quite high, so most users sensitive to PWM should not notice any flickering. In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8715 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured. | |||
Display Response Times
| ↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
|---|---|---|
| 20.8 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 6.8 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 14 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 42 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is similar to the average of all tested devices (20.9 ms). | ||
| ↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
| 45.6 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 22 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 23.6 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 76 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (32.8 ms). | ||
| PCMark for Android | |
| Work performance score | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ (Plus) (13629 - 19824, n=5) | |
| Samsung Galaxy Tab S7 | |
| Samsung Galaxy Tab S7 Plus | |
| Xiaomi Mi 10 Pro | |
| Huawei MatePad Pro 10.8 | |
| Work 2.0 performance score | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ (Plus) (12355 - 14979, n=6) | |
| Samsung Galaxy Tab S7 | |
| Samsung Galaxy Tab S7 Plus | |
| Xiaomi Mi 10 Pro | |
| Huawei MatePad Pro 10.8 | |
| GFXBench 3.1 | |
| on screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen | |
| Xiaomi Mi 10 Pro | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ (Plus) (41 - 82, n=5) | |
| Samsung Galaxy Tab S7 | |
| Samsung Galaxy Tab S7 Plus | |
| Average of class Tablet (4.8 - 120, n=68, last 2 years) | |
| Huawei MatePad Pro 10.8 | |
| 1920x1080 Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen | |
| Samsung Galaxy Tab S7 | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ (Plus) (75 - 93, n=5) | |
| Samsung Galaxy Tab S7 Plus | |
| Xiaomi Mi 10 Pro | |
| Average of class Tablet (5 - 400, n=68, last 2 years) | |
| Huawei MatePad Pro 10.8 | |
| AnTuTu v8 - Total Score | |
| Apple iPad Pro 11 2020 | |
| Xiaomi Mi 10 Pro | |
| Samsung Galaxy Tab S7 | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ (Plus) (490260 - 622888, n=4) | |
| Samsung Galaxy Tab S7 Plus | |
| Huawei MatePad Pro 10.8 | |
| Jetstream 2 - Total Score | |
| Apple iPad Pro 11 2020 (Safari 14.1) | |
| Apple iPad Pro 11 2020 (Chrome 80) | |
| Average of class Tablet (19.9 - 334, n=70, last 2 years) | |
| Samsung Galaxy Tab S7 Plus (Samsung Browser 12.1) | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ (Plus) (69.8 - 75.5, n=4) | |
| Samsung Galaxy Tab S7 (Chrome86) | |
| Huawei MatePad Pro 10.8 (Huawei Browser V10.1.2) | |
| JetStream 1.1 - Total Score | |
| Apple iPad Pro 11 2020 (Chrome 80) | |
| Samsung Galaxy Tab S7 Plus (Samsung Browser 12.1) | |
| Samsung Galaxy Tab S7 (Chrome86) | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ (Plus) (121.7 - 131.5, n=4) | |
| Huawei MatePad Pro 10.8 (Huawei Browser V10.1.2) | |
| WebXPRT 3 - Overall | |
| Apple iPad Pro 11 2020 (Safari 14.1) | |
| Apple iPad Pro 11 2020 (Chrome 80) | |
| Average of class Tablet (34 - 435, n=45, last 2 years) | |
| Samsung Galaxy Tab S7 Plus (Samsung Browser 12.1) | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ (Plus) (114 - 126, n=4) | |
| Samsung Galaxy Tab S7 (Chrome86) | |
| Huawei MatePad Pro 10.8 (Huawei Browser V10.1.2) | |
| Speedometer 2.0 - Result | |
| Apple iPad Pro 11 2020 (Safari 14.1) | |
| Average of class Tablet (2.59 - 572, n=64, last 2 years) | |
| Samsung Galaxy Tab S7 Plus (Samsung Browser 12.1) | |
| Samsung Galaxy Tab S7 (Chrome86) | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ (Plus) (41.2 - 73.3, n=4) | |
| Huawei MatePad Pro 10.8 (Huawei Browser V10.1.2) | |
| Octane V2 - Total Score | |
| Apple iPad Pro 11 2020 (Safari 14.1) | |
| Apple iPad Pro 11 2020 (Chrome 80) | |
| Average of class Tablet (763 - 105178, n=87, last 2 years) | |
| Samsung Galaxy Tab S7 Plus (Samsung Browser 12.1) | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ (Plus) (25953 - 27360, n=4) | |
| Samsung Galaxy Tab S7 (Chrome86) | |
| Huawei MatePad Pro 10.8 (Huawei Browser V10.1.2) | |
| Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total | |
| Average of class Tablet (319 - 34733, n=75, last 2 years) | |
| Huawei MatePad Pro 10.8 (Huawei Browser V10.1.2) | |
| Samsung Galaxy Tab S7 Plus (Samsung Browser 12.1) | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ (Plus) (1854 - 1947, n=4) | |
| Samsung Galaxy Tab S7 (Chrome86) | |
| Apple iPad Pro 11 2020 (Chrome 80) | |
* ... smaller is better
| Samsung Galaxy Tab S7 | Huawei MatePad Pro 10.8 | Samsung Galaxy Tab S7 Plus | Average 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash | Average of class Tablet | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AndroBench 3-5 | 1% | 4% | 7% | -14% | |
| Sequential Read 256KB | 1512 | 1789 18% | 1675 11% | 1602 ? 6% | 1045 ? -31% |
| Sequential Write 256KB | 680 | 399 -41% | 732 8% | 748 ? 10% | 686 ? 1% |
| Random Read 4KB | 219 | 224.6 3% | 230.1 5% | 243 ? 11% | 189.4 ? -14% |
| Random Write 4KB | 211.5 | 262.4 24% | 205 -3% | 244 ? 15% | 189.9 ? -10% |
| Sequential Read 256KB SDCard | 86 ? | 82.4 ? -4% | 85.8 ? 0% | 85.9 ? 0% | |
| Sequential Write 256KB SDCard | 69 ? | 71.7 ? 4% | 69.3 ? 0% | 68.8 ? 0% |
PUBG
Asphalt 9 Legends
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 33.5 °C / 92 F, compared to the average of 33.7 °C / 93 F, ranging from 20.7 to 53.2 °C for the class Tablet.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 29.8 °C / 86 F, compared to the average of 33.2 °C / 92 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 25.8 °C / 78 F, compared to the device average of 30 °C / 86 F.
Samsung Galaxy Tab S7 audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (88.4 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 15% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (9.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 1.6% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (2.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 1.7% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (10.4% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 6% of all tested devices in this class were better, 3% similar, 91% worse
» The best had a delta of 7%, average was 22%, worst was 129%
Compared to all devices tested
» 4% of all tested devices were better, 1% similar, 95% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Apple iPad Pro 11 2020 audio analysis
(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (78.5 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 6.3% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (7.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 6.4% higher than median
(+) | mids are linear (6% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 1.9% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (6.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (13% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 19% of all tested devices in this class were better, 3% similar, 77% worse
» The best had a delta of 7%, average was 22%, worst was 129%
Compared to all devices tested
» 11% of all tested devices were better, 2% similar, 87% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
| desligado |   0.01 / 0.11 Watt |
| Ocioso |  1.16 / 4.42 / 4.43 Watt |
| Carga |
8.86 / 11.6 Watt |
    
| |
Key:
min: ,
med: ,
max: Metrahit Energy | |
| Samsung Galaxy Tab S7 8000 mAh | Apple iPad Pro 11 2020 7538 mAh | Huawei MatePad Pro 10.8 7250 mAh | Samsung Galaxy Tab S7 Plus 10090 mAh | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power Consumption | -25% | -13% | -5% | |
| Idle Minimum * | 1.16 | 1.3 -12% | 1.98 -71% | 2.41 -108% |
| Idle Average * | 4.42 | 3.5 21% | 5.66 -28% | 3.4 23% |
| Idle Maximum * | 4.43 | 5.6 -26% | 5.69 -28% | 3.43 23% |
| Load Average * | 8.86 | 12.5 -41% | 6.96 21% | 6.63 25% |
| Load Maximum * | 11.6 | 19.2 -66% | 6.98 40% | 10.29 11% |
* ... smaller is better
| Samsung Galaxy Tab S7 8000 mAh | Apple iPad Pro 11 2020 7538 mAh | Huawei MatePad Pro 10.8 7250 mAh | Samsung Galaxy Tab S7 Plus 10090 mAh | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Battery Runtime | 2% | 4% | -18% | |
| Reader / Idle | 1963 | 2001 2% | 1877 -4% | 898 -54% |
| H.264 | 885 | 936 6% | 909 3% | 620 -30% |
| WiFi v1.3 | 811 | 902 11% | 891 10% | 425 -48% |
| Load | 221 | 197 -11% | 233 5% | 355 61% |
Pro
Contra
Veredicto do Galaxy Tab S7: A Samsung acertou muito, mas nem em tudo
O Samsung Galaxy Tab S7 é um tablet Android atraente que é capaz de dar ao resto da concorrência de ponta, mas ainda um tanto econômica, uma corrida pelo seu dinheiro. Na verdade, o único concorrente real no espaço do Android é o Huawei MatePad Pro, que tem alguns pontos fracos que o Tab S7 não tem. O dispositivo da Samsung tem um sensor de digitais, um painel de 120 Hz e nenhum orifício para câmera, o que escurece a parte da tela ao redor. Além disso, o Tab S7 é compatível com o Google Play Services e o Huawei não.
Além dos ótimos alto-falantes, armazenamento UFS rápido e o poderoso SoC da Qualcomm, também gostamos da S Pen incluída e da funcionalidade que ela oferece. A qualidade de construção está em um nível muito bom. No entanto, as superfícies mate não oferecem muita aderência.
O Galaxy Tab S7 é um excelente tablet Android, que não foi tratado tão bem como merece.
Em suma, o tablet premium se abre para mais críticas do que os smartphones Galaxy S20. Por exemplo, ele não possui recursos premium como certificação IP, chip NFC ou carregamento sem fio. O fato de a carcaça não incluir o carregador rápido de 45 W é difícil de entender por causa do alto preço recomendado do dispositivo. Também é difícil entender por que o Tab S7 tem apenas 6 GB de RAM quando havia uma versão de 8 GB do Tab S6 e o Note 20 Ultra inclusive vem com até 16 GB de RAM. O fato de a versão celular do Tab S7 vir apenas com um modem 4G também é um tanto intrigante.
Samsung Galaxy Tab S7
- 10/15/2020 v7 (old)
Marcus Herbrich
Price comparison
