Breve Análise do Xiaomi Mi Notebook Air 13.3 2018 (i5-8250U MX150)
Os Top 10
» Os Top 10 Portáteis Multimídia
» Os Top 10 Portáteis de Jogos
» Os Top 10 Portáteis Leves para Jogos
» Os Top 10 Portáteis Acessíveis de Escritório/Empresariais
» Os Top 10 Portáteis Premium de Escritório/Empresariais
» Os Top 10 dos Portáteis Workstation
» Os Top 10 Subportáteis
» Os Top 10 Ultrabooks
» Os Top 10 Conversíveis
» Os Top 10 Tablets
» Os Top 10 Smartphones
» A melhores Telas de Portáteis Analisadas Pela Notebookcheck
» Top 10 dos portáteis abaixo dos 500 Euros da Notebookcheck
» Top 10 dos Portáteis abaixo dos 300 Euros
Size Comparison
|
iluminação: 90 %
iluminação com acumulador: 370 cd/m²
Contraste: 1609:1 (Preto: 0.23 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 6.9 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.92, calibrated: 1.4
ΔE Greyscale 7.4 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
69.8% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
91.6% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
67.8% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 1.76
Xiaomi Mi Notebook Air 13.3 2018 SHARP LQ133M1JW15, , 1920x1080, 13.3" | Asus ZenBook 13 UX331UN AU Optronics B133HAN04.9, , 1920x1080, 13.3" | Lenovo Ideapad 720S-13IKB LG Philips LGD04EF, , 1920x1080, 13.3" | HP Envy 13-ad006ng BOE070E, , 1920x1080, 13.3" | Apple MacBook Pro 13 2017 Touchbar i5 APPA034, , 2560x1600, 13.3" | Xiaomi Mi Notebook Pro i7 BOEhydis NV156FHM-N61, , 1920x1080, 15.6" | Xiaomi Mi Notebook Air 13.3 2016 Samsung LTN133HL09-M01, , 1920x1080, 13.3" | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Display | -7% | -10% | -6% | 26% | -1% | ||
Display P3 Coverage | 67.8 | 63.3 -7% | 64.3 -5% | 66.8 -1% | 98.6 45% | 66 -3% | |
sRGB Coverage | 91.6 | 86.7 -5% | 82.3 -10% | 86.3 -6% | 100 9% | 95.5 4% | |
AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage | 69.8 | 63.4 -9% | 60.2 -14% | 63.1 -10% | 86.5 24% | 67.8 -3% | |
Response Times | 4% | 19824% | 108% | 17985% | -31% | ||
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% * | 39.6 ? | 44 ? -11% | 35 ? 12% | 48 ? -21% | 48 ? -21% | 49 ? -24% | |
Response Time Black / White * | 29.3 ? | 24 ? 18% | 25 ? 15% | 32 ? -9% | 33.6 ? -15% | 27 ? 8% | |
PWM Frequency | 220 ? | 131000 ? 59445% | 1000 ? 355% | 119000 ? 53991% | 50 ? -77% | ||
Screen | 7% | -13% | -2% | 27% | -0% | 13% | |
Brightness middle | 370 | 329 -11% | 335 -9% | 281 -24% | 551 49% | 317 -14% | 347 -6% |
Brightness | 355 | 306 -14% | 303 -15% | 264 -26% | 514 45% | 334 -6% | |
Brightness Distribution | 90 | 86 -4% | 85 -6% | 83 -8% | 88 -2% | 80 -11% | |
Black Level * | 0.23 | 0.3 -30% | 0.46 -100% | 0.23 -0% | 0.48 -109% | 0.352 -53% | 0.27 -17% |
Contrast | 1609 | 1097 -32% | 728 -55% | 1222 -24% | 1148 -29% | 901 -44% | 1285 -20% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 6.9 | 4.07 41% | 5.09 26% | 4.83 30% | 0.8 88% | 4.5 35% | 3.29 52% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 12.2 | 7.05 42% | 11.92 2% | 8.89 27% | 1.4 89% | 9 26% | 4.69 62% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 calibrated * | 1.4 | ||||||
Greyscale dE 2000 * | 7.4 | 2.76 63% | 3.23 56% | 6.63 10% | 1 86% | 3.8 49% | 3.62 51% |
Gamma | 1.76 125% | 2.56 86% | 2.18 101% | 1.85 119% | 2.16 102% | 2.17 101% | 2.23 99% |
CCT | 7529 86% | 6915 94% | 6214 105% | 6794 96% | 6672 97% | 7307 89% | |
Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998) | 56 | 54 | 56 | 62 | |||
Color Space (Percent of sRGB) | 86 | 82 | 86 | 95 | |||
Total Average (Program / Settings) | 1% /
3% | 6600% /
4239% | 33% /
21% | 6013% /
3875% | 0% /
-0% | -6% /
1% |
* ... smaller is better
Display Response Times
↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
---|---|---|
29.3 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 14.8 ms rise | |
↘ 14.5 ms fall | ||
The screen shows relatively slow response rates in our tests and may be too slow for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 77 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (21 ms). | ||
↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
39.6 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 18.4 ms rise | |
↘ 21.2 ms fall | ||
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 57 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (32.9 ms). |
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
Screen flickering / PWM detected | 220 Hz | ≤ 18 % brightness setting | |
≤ 100 cd/m² brightness | |||
The display backlight flickers at 220 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) Flickering detected at a brightness setting of 18 % (100 cd/m²) and below. There should be no flickering or PWM above this brightness setting. The frequency of 220 Hz is relatively low, so sensitive users will likely notice flickering and experience eyestrain at the stated brightness setting and below. Flickering occurs at relatively low brightness settings, so extended use at this brightness setting or lower can cause eyestrain. In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8746 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured. |
PCMark 8 Home Score Accelerated v2 | 3656 pontos | |
PCMark 8 Creative Score Accelerated v2 | 5244 pontos | |
PCMark 8 Work Score Accelerated v2 | 4811 pontos | |
PCMark 10 Score | 3467 pontos | |
Ajuda |
Xiaomi Mi Notebook Air 13.3 2018 Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP | Asus ZenBook 13 UX331UN SK Hynix HFS256G39TND-N210A | Lenovo IdeaPad 320S-13IKB Samsung PM961 NVMe MZVLW512HMJP | HP Envy 13-ad006ng Toshiba NVMe THNSN5256GPUK | Dell XPS 13 9370 FHD i5 Toshiba XG5 KXG50ZNV256G | Xiaomi Mi Notebook Air 13.3 2016 Samsung PM951 NVMe MZVLV256 | Average Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CrystalDiskMark 3.0 | -51% | 5% | -36% | -16% | -15% | 3% | |
Read Seq | 1288 | 435.6 -66% | 1372 7% | 1019 -21% | 1875 46% | 1209 -6% | 1627 ? 26% |
Write Seq | 1160 | 263 -77% | 1010 -13% | 195.4 -83% | 352.7 -70% | 314 -73% | 1136 ? -2% |
Read 512 | 751 | 258.1 -66% | 821 9% | 735 -2% | 840 12% | 887 ? 18% | |
Write 512 | 843 | 256.6 -70% | 636 -25% | 172.3 -80% | 353.9 -58% | 781 ? -7% | |
Read 4k | 59.2 | 30.37 -49% | 56.8 -4% | 34.5 -42% | 34.18 -42% | 43.4 -27% | 53 ? -10% |
Write 4k | 146.9 | 78.6 -46% | 142.6 -3% | 109.4 -26% | 127.5 -13% | 153.4 4% | 126.7 ? -14% |
Read 4k QD32 | 425.9 | 356.8 -16% | 537 26% | 494.6 16% | 381.8 -10% | 487.6 14% | 419 ? -2% |
Write 4k QD32 | 325 | 257.2 -21% | 475 46% | 161.3 -50% | 339.9 5% | 312.2 -4% | 384 ? 18% |
3DMark 11 - 1280x720 Performance GPU | |
Average of class Subnotebook (968 - 16296, n=53, last 2 years) | |
Average NVIDIA GeForce MX150 (2796 - 4905, n=47) | |
Xiaomi Mi Notebook Air 13.3 2018 |
3DMark | |
1280x720 Cloud Gate Standard Graphics | |
Average of class Subnotebook (5577 - 58319, n=29, last 2 years) | |
Average NVIDIA GeForce MX150 (16227 - 22183, n=43) | |
Xiaomi Mi Notebook Air 13.3 2018 | |
1920x1080 Fire Strike Graphics | |
Average of class Subnotebook (832 - 11887, n=57, last 2 years) | |
Average NVIDIA GeForce MX150 (2323 - 3739, n=44) | |
Xiaomi Mi Notebook Air 13.3 2018 |
3DMark 06 Standard Score | 19210 pontos | |
3DMark 11 Performance | 3820 pontos | |
3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score | 12569 pontos | |
3DMark Fire Strike Score | 2617 pontos | |
Ajuda |
Clock Speed | |
1280x720 GPU Clock Speed Furmark 1.19 GPU Stress Test | |
Xiaomi Mi Notebook Pro i5 | |
Xiaomi Mi Notebook Pro i7 | |
Xiaomi Mi Notebook Air 13.3 2018 | |
GPU Clock Witcher 3 ultra | |
Xiaomi Mi Notebook Pro i7 | |
Xiaomi Mi Notebook Pro i5 | |
Xiaomi Mi Notebook Air 13.3 2018 | |
GPU Clock Speed GPU-Z Render Test (max.) | |
Xiaomi Mi Notebook Pro i7 | |
Xiaomi Mi Notebook Pro i5 | |
Xiaomi Mi Notebook Air 13.3 2018 |
Temperatures | |
GPU Temperature Witcher 3 ultra | |
Xiaomi Mi Notebook Air 13.3 2018 | |
Xiaomi Mi Notebook Pro i7 | |
Xiaomi Mi Notebook Pro i5 | |
1280x720 GPU Temperature Furmark 1.19 | |
Xiaomi Mi Notebook Air 13.3 2018 | |
Xiaomi Mi Notebook Pro i7 | |
Xiaomi Mi Notebook Pro i5 |
Final Fantasy XV Benchmark - 1280x720 Lite Quality | |
Average of class Subnotebook (29.9 - 111.6, n=59, last 2 years) | |
Xiaomi Mi Notebook Pro i7 | |
Average NVIDIA GeForce MX150 (23 - 36.9, n=7) | |
Xiaomi Mi Notebook Air 13.3 2018 | |
Asus ZenBook 13 UX331UN |
Rainbow Six Siege | |
1366x768 Medium Preset AA:T AF:2x | |
Average NVIDIA GeForce MX150 (69.7 - 87, n=4) | |
Xiaomi Mi Notebook Air 13.3 2018 | |
1920x1080 High Preset AA:T AF:4x | |
Average NVIDIA GeForce MX150 (37.9 - 45.8, n=4) | |
Xiaomi Mi Notebook Air 13.3 2018 | |
1920x1080 Ultra Preset AA:T AF:16x | |
Average NVIDIA GeForce MX150 (18.3 - 31.3, n=4) | |
Xiaomi Mi Notebook Air 13.3 2018 |
The Division | |
1920x1080 High Preset AF:8x | |
Average NVIDIA GeForce MX150 (17.5 - 22.4, n=3) | |
Xiaomi Mi Notebook Air 13.3 2018 | |
1280x720 Low Preset AF:1x | |
Average NVIDIA GeForce MX150 (59.5 - 75, n=3) | |
Xiaomi Mi Notebook Air 13.3 2018 | |
1366x768 Medium Preset AF:4x | |
Average NVIDIA GeForce MX150 (38.1 - 47.1, n=3) | |
Xiaomi Mi Notebook Air 13.3 2018 |
Overwatch | |
1920x1080 High (Render Scale 100 %) AA:SM AF:4x | |
Acer Swift 3 SF315-51G-57E5 | |
Average NVIDIA GeForce MX150 (38.2 - 74.5, n=9) | |
Xiaomi Mi Notebook Pro i7 | |
Samsung Notebook 9 NP900X5T-X01US | |
Xiaomi Mi Notebook Pro i5 | |
Xiaomi Mi Notebook Air 13.3 2018 | |
1920x1080 Epic (Render Scale 100 %) AA:SM AF:16x | |
Acer Swift 3 SF315-51G-57E5 | |
Average NVIDIA GeForce MX150 (25.1 - 41.9, n=9) | |
Xiaomi Mi Notebook Pro i7 | |
Xiaomi Mi Notebook Pro i5 | |
Samsung Notebook 9 NP900X5T-X01US | |
Xiaomi Mi Notebook Air 13.3 2018 |
For Honor | |
1280x720 Low Preset | |
Average NVIDIA GeForce MX150 (60 - 91, n=4) | |
Xiaomi Mi Notebook Air 13.3 2018 | |
1920x1080 High Preset AA:T AF:8x | |
Average NVIDIA GeForce MX150 (25.2 - 30.7, n=3) | |
Xiaomi Mi Notebook Air 13.3 2018 | |
1920x1080 Extreme Preset AA:T AF:16x | |
Average NVIDIA GeForce MX150 (19.4 - 22.5, n=3) | |
Xiaomi Mi Notebook Air 13.3 2018 |
Ghost Recon Wildlands - 1280x720 Low Preset | |
Average NVIDIA GeForce MX150 (39.5 - 54, n=3) | |
Xiaomi Mi Notebook Air 13.3 2018 |
Rocket League | |
1280x720 Performance | |
Xiaomi Mi Notebook Air 13.3 2018 | |
Average NVIDIA GeForce MX150 (127.6 - 160, n=4) | |
1920x1080 Quality AA:Medium FX | |
Average NVIDIA GeForce MX150 (54.3 - 76.1, n=5) | |
Xiaomi Mi Notebook Air 13.3 2018 | |
1920x1080 High Quality AA:High FX | |
Average NVIDIA GeForce MX150 (37.8 - 59.8, n=6) | |
Xiaomi Mi Notebook Air 13.3 2018 |
Destiny 2 | |
1280x720 Low Preset | |
Xiaomi Mi Notebook Air 13.3 2018 | |
Asus ZenBook 13 UX331UN | |
Average NVIDIA GeForce MX150 (29.1 - 62.2, n=4) | |
Samsung Notebook 9 NP900X5T-X01US | |
1920x1080 Medium Preset AA:FX AF:2x | |
Xiaomi Mi Notebook Air 13.3 2018 | |
Asus ZenBook 13 UX331UN | |
Average NVIDIA GeForce MX150 (10.8 - 34.7, n=4) | |
Samsung Notebook 9 NP900X5T-X01US |
Assassin´s Creed Origins | |
1280x720 Very Low Preset | |
Average NVIDIA GeForce MX150 (42 - 47, n=3) | |
Xiaomi Mi Notebook Air 13.3 2018 | |
Xiaomi Mi Notebook Pro i7 | |
Average of class Subnotebook (last 2 years) | |
1920x1080 Medium Preset | |
Xiaomi Mi Notebook Pro i7 | |
Average NVIDIA GeForce MX150 (18 - 22, n=3) | |
Xiaomi Mi Notebook Air 13.3 2018 | |
Average of class Subnotebook (last 2 years) |
Kingdom Come: Deliverance | |
1280x720 Low Preset | |
Average NVIDIA GeForce MX150 (40.1 - 51.6, n=2) | |
Xiaomi Mi Notebook Air 13.3 2018 | |
1920x1080 Medium Preset | |
Average NVIDIA GeForce MX150 (18.4 - 22.1, n=2) | |
Xiaomi Mi Notebook Air 13.3 2018 |
baixo | média | alto | ultra | |
---|---|---|---|---|
BioShock Infinite (2013) | 29.7 | |||
The Witcher 3 (2015) | 9.7 | |||
World of Warships (2015) | 42.1 | |||
Rainbow Six Siege (2015) | 74 | 38 | 24.3 | |
The Division (2016) | 59.5 | 38.1 | 17 | |
Overwatch (2016) | 42.9 | 26.9 | ||
Civilization VI (2016) | 76 | 44.8 | 20.3 | |
For Honor (2017) | 60 | 26.5 | 25.2 | 19.4 |
Ghost Recon Wildlands (2017) | 39.5 | 18.8 | ||
Warhammer 40.000: Dawn of War III (2017) | 60 | |||
Rocket League (2017) | 156 | 57.1 | 39.9 | |
Middle-earth: Shadow of War (2017) | 56.3 | 27.7 | 14.6 | 11.1 |
Destiny 2 (2017) | 51.6 | 29.7 | ||
Assassin´s Creed Origins (2017) | 44 | 18 | ||
Final Fantasy XV Benchmark (2018) | 29.3 | |||
Kingdom Come: Deliverance (2018) | 40.1 | 18.4 | ||
X-Plane 11.11 (2018) | 57 | 46 | 41.8 |
Barulho
Ocioso |
| 30.6 / 30.6 / 31.4 dB |
Carga |
| 43.6 / 44.2 dB |
| ||
30 dB silencioso 40 dB(A) audível 50 dB(A) ruidosamente alto |
||
min: , med: , max: Audix TM1, Arta (15 cm de distância) environment noise: 30.6 dB(A) |
(-) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 50 °C / 122 F, compared to the average of 36.1 °C / 97 F, ranging from 21.4 to 281 °C for the class Subnotebook.
(-) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 47 °C / 117 F, compared to the average of 39.4 °C / 103 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 25.8 °C / 78 F, compared to the device average of 30.8 °C / 87 F.
(±) Playing The Witcher 3, the average temperature for the upper side is 36.3 °C / 97 F, compared to the device average of 30.8 °C / 87 F.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are reaching skin temperature as a maximum (34 °C / 93.2 F) and are therefore not hot.
(-) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.3 °C / 82.9 F (-5.7 °C / -10.3 F).
Xiaomi Mi Notebook Air 13.3 2018 audio analysis
(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (79.3 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 21.5% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (13.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2.2% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (3.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2.4% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (3% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (20.4% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 62% of all tested devices in this class were better, 8% similar, 29% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 19%, worst was 53%
Compared to all devices tested
» 50% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 42% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Apple MacBook 12 (Early 2016) 1.1 GHz audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (83.6 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 11.3% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (14.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2.4% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (10.2% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 6% of all tested devices in this class were better, 2% similar, 92% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 19%, worst was 53%
Compared to all devices tested
» 4% of all tested devices were better, 1% similar, 95% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Xiaomi Mi Notebook Air 13.3 2018 i5-8250U, GeForce MX150, Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP, IPS, 1920x1080, 13.3" | Asus ZenBook 13 UX331UN i5-8550U, GeForce MX150, SK Hynix HFS256G39TND-N210A, IPS, 1920x1080, 13.3" | Lenovo IdeaPad 320S-13IKB i5-8250U, GeForce MX150, Samsung PM961 NVMe MZVLW512HMJP, IPS LED, 1920x1080, 13.3" | HP Envy 13-ad006ng i7-7500U, GeForce MX150, Toshiba NVMe THNSN5256GPUK, IPS LED, 1920x1080, 13.3" | Apple MacBook Pro 13 2017 Touchbar i5 i5-7267U, Iris Plus Graphics 650, Apple SSD AP0256, IPS, 2560x1600, 13.3" | Dell XPS 13 9370 FHD i5 i5-8250U, UHD Graphics 620, Toshiba XG5 KXG50ZNV256G, IPS, 1920x1080, 13.3" | Xiaomi Mi Notebook Air 13.3 2016 6200U, GeForce 940MX, Samsung PM951 NVMe MZVLV256, IPS, 1920x1080, 13.3" | Average Intel Core i5-8250U, NVIDIA GeForce MX150 | Average of class Subnotebook | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Power Consumption | 20% | -0% | 7% | -22% | 17% | 3% | -11% | -16% | |
Idle Minimum * | 3.9 | 2.2 44% | 3.4 13% | 2.8 28% | 2.8 28% | 3.14 19% | 4 -3% | 3.97 ? -2% | 4.49 ? -15% |
Idle Average * | 7 | 5 29% | 6.1 13% | 5.8 17% | 10.9 -56% | 5.22 25% | 6.6 6% | 7.34 ? -5% | 7.66 ? -9% |
Idle Maximum * | 7.5 | 8 -7% | 7.7 -3% | 7.7 -3% | 11.4 -52% | 6 20% | 7.4 1% | 9.14 ? -22% | 9.56 ? -27% |
Load Average * | 44.4 | 33 26% | 44.2 -0% | 48 -8% | 55.4 -25% | 38.5 13% | 41.7 6% | 50.2 ? -13% | 46.6 ? -5% |
Witcher 3 ultra * | 32.8 | 37.6 -15% | 35 -7% | ||||||
Load Maximum * | 55.1 | 49.4 10% | 60.3 -9% | 48 13% | 57.5 -4% | 50.4 9% | 52.4 5% | 61.2 ? -11% | 68.6 ? -25% |
* ... smaller is better
Xiaomi Mi Notebook Air 13.3 2018 i5-8250U, GeForce MX150, 39 Wh | Asus ZenBook 13 UX331UN i5-8550U, GeForce MX150, 50 Wh | Lenovo IdeaPad 320S-13IKB i5-8250U, GeForce MX150, 36 Wh | HP Envy 13-ad006ng i7-7500U, GeForce MX150, 51 Wh | Apple MacBook Pro 13 2017 Touchbar i5 i5-7267U, Iris Plus Graphics 650, 49.2 Wh | Dell XPS 13 9370 FHD i5 i5-8250U, UHD Graphics 620, 52 Wh | Xiaomi Mi Notebook Air 13.3 2016 6200U, GeForce 940MX, 40 Wh | Average of class Subnotebook | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Battery Runtime | 38% | -11% | 31% | 6% | 72% | -1% | 90% | |
Reader / Idle | 779 | 1240 59% | 736 -6% | 1198 54% | 1417 82% | 718 -8% | 1750 ? 125% | |
H.264 | 477 | 534 12% | 346 -27% | 476 0% | 415 -13% | 831 74% | 423 -11% | 896 ? 88% |
WiFi v1.3 | 368 | 538 46% | 344 -7% | 425 15% | 519 41% | 644 75% | 389 6% | 719 ? 95% |
Witcher 3 ultra | 81 | |||||||
Load | 77 | 105 36% | 73 -5% | 118 53% | 70 -9% | 119 55% | 83 8% | 116.6 ? 51% |
Pro
Contra
Ao importar um dispositivo diretamente da China, uma das justificativas mais importantes é geralmente o baixo preço do dispositivo. Dado que o portátil ainda não está disponível fora da China, deve se superar vários obstáculos ao longo do caminho, entre outros, o fato de toda a decisão de compra se basear unicamente nos comentários de outras pessoas, pois não há maneira de olhar mais de perto dispositivo em uma loja próxima. Pelo menos no que diz respeito à qualidade, podemos garantir que nossa unidade de análise foi muito mais do que apenas aceitável. Tenha em mente que os custos de envio, alfândega e impostos de importação podem tornar o dispositivo muito mais caro no final e que a uma reivindicação de garantia desde outro continente tem o potencial de se transformar em um pesadelo em um piscar de olhos. Uma vez comprado, enviado e recebido, os compradores são encaram uma versão chinesa do Windows que, a menos que estejam confortáveis com o mandarim, deve ser substituída por uma versão em inglês do sistema operacional.
De um modo geral, o Mi Notebook Air equipado com MX150 é bastante decente. Apesar do carcaça fina e compacta, é capaz de curtos períodos de alto desempenho de CPU, e o desempenho da GPU é adequado para muitos jogos atuais.
Infelizmente, o calor e o ruído sob carga eram muito altos, e o Mi Notebook Air certamente teria se beneficiado de uma carcaça atualizada e modificada. As altas temperaturas da superfície, o afogamento térmico e as quedas rápidas no desempenho da CPU são indicações claras de uma carcaça sobrecarregada por seus poderosos componentes internos. Optar pelo SKW MX150 de 10 W também não ajudou muito, e se você precisar de mais desempenho, o modelo de 15 polegadas provavelmente seria a melhor opção.
A tela brilhante de 13 polegadas era muito boa, embora também fosse altamente refletiva pelo design. Aqueles de nossos leitores que planejam usar o portátil principalmente de forma estacionária, conectado a um monitor externo devem manter a limitação de 30 Hz da porta HDMI em mente. Embora a porta USB-C suporte 60 Hz, é mais provável que ela seja conectada na tomada neste cenário. A duração da bateria estava abaixo do padrão e mais ou menos a par com o antecessor mais lento do dispositivo.
Alternativas de 13 polegadas equipadas com um MX150 são raras na faixa de preços do Mi Air, o que torna este portátil muito mais interessante. O Lenovo IdeaPad 320S (13 polegadas, Core i5-8250U) foi consideravelmente mais lento em todos os benchmarks de CPU e GPU, e o HP Envy 13 ao mesmo tempo em que consegue acompanhar o desempenho da GPU (graças à sua GPU MX150) quando comparado ao desempenho da CPU obteve 32% menos no teste multicore do Cinebench devido ao seu processador dual-core Core i7-7500U mais antigo. Por outro lado, suas pontuações PCMark foram semelhantes às do Air. No entanto, o chip de sétima geração da Intel com apenas dois núcleos, é uma notícia antiga em 2018.
Por isso, se você estiver procurando por um subportátil de 13 polegadas acessível e um pouco receptivo a jogos e não se importar com a importação potencialmente aventureira da China, o Xiaomi Mi Notebook Air pode ser a combinação perfeita. No entanto, aconselhamos aos compradores em potencial que também analisem o Xiaomi Mi Notebook Pro de 15 polegadas (Core i5-8250U, GeForce MX150) com um sistema de resfriamento muito mais potente.
Xiaomi Mi Notebook Air 13.3 2018
- 03/20/2018 v6 (old)
Klaus Hinum, Daniel Puschina