Breve Análise do Xiaomi Mi Air (13,3-polegadas)
| Networking | |
| iperf Server (receive) TCP 1 m | |
| Xiaomi Mi Notebook Air 13.3 2016 | |
| Acer TravelMate X3 X349-M-7261 (jseb) | |
| Medion Akoya S3409-MD60234 (jseb) | |
| iperf Client (transmit) TCP 1 m | |
| Acer TravelMate X3 X349-M-7261 (jseb) | |
| Xiaomi Mi Notebook Air 13.3 2016 | |
| Medion Akoya S3409-MD60234 (jseb) | |
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
iluminação: 80 %
iluminação com acumulador: 347 cd/m²
Contraste: 1285:1 (Preto: 0.27 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 3.29 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.91
ΔE Greyscale 3.62 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
95% sRGB (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
62% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
67.8% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
95.5% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
66% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.23
| Xiaomi Mi Notebook Air 13.3 2016 Samsung LTN133HL09-M01, , 1920x1080, 13.3" | Dell XPS 13 2016 9350 (FHD, i7-6560U) Sharp SHP1449 LQ133M1, , 1920x1080, 13.3" | Dell XPS 13 9360 QHD+ i5 Sharp SHP144A, , 3200x1800, 13.3" | Apple MacBook Air 13 inch 2015-03 Apple APP9CF0, , 1440x900, 13.3" | Apple MacBook Pro Retina 13 inch 2015-03 APPA02A, , 2560x1600, 13.3" | Lenovo IdeaPad 710S-13ISK 80SW0031US Sharp SHP 1447 / LQ133M1JW15, , 1920x1080, 13.3" | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display | -16% | -3% | -38% | 0% | 1% | |
| Display P3 Coverage | 66 | 54.8 -17% | 64.6 -2% | 40.1 -39% | 65.9 0% | 65.9 0% |
| sRGB Coverage | 95.5 | 82.3 -14% | 91.6 -4% | 59.8 -37% | 97 2% | 97 2% |
| AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage | 67.8 | 56.6 -17% | 66.5 -2% | 41.51 -39% | 67.4 -1% | 68 0% |
| Response Times | 11% | 11% | 87% | |||
| Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% * | 49 ? | 42.8 ? 13% | 31 ? 37% | 56 ? -14% | ||
| Response Time Black / White * | 27 ? | 24.8 ? 8% | 31.2 ? -16% | 44 ? -63% | ||
| PWM Frequency | 50 ? | 219.3 ? 339% | ||||
| Screen | 1% | -4% | -25% | 8% | -37% | |
| Brightness middle | 347 | 385 11% | 444 28% | 329 -5% | 361 4% | 349 1% |
| Brightness | 334 | 350 5% | 393 18% | 310 -7% | 342 2% | 339 1% |
| Brightness Distribution | 80 | 86 8% | 82 3% | 82 3% | 81 1% | 88 10% |
| Black Level * | 0.27 | 0.17 37% | 0.33 -22% | 0.405 -50% | 0.361 -34% | 0.393 -46% |
| Contrast | 1285 | 2265 76% | 1345 5% | 812 -37% | 1000 -22% | 888 -31% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 3.29 | 4.17 -27% | 4 -22% | 3.96 -20% | 1.82 45% | 6.85 -108% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 4.69 | 7.61 -62% | 7.7 -64% | 7.51 -60% | 3.26 30% | 10.27 -119% |
| Greyscale dE 2000 * | 3.62 | 5.39 -49% | 2.83 22% | 3.51 3% | 1.8 50% | 6.43 -78% |
| Gamma | 2.23 99% | 2.12 104% | 2.05 107% | 3.83 57% | 2.49 88% | 1.83 120% |
| CCT | 7307 89% | 7404 88% | 6963 93% | 6711 97% | 6417 101% | 7820 83% |
| Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998) | 62 | 62.7 1% | 59.3 -4% | 38.4 -38% | 61.9 0% | 61.9 0% |
| Color Space (Percent of sRGB) | 95 | 99.8 5% | 91.4 -4% | 59.8 -37% | 96.9 2% | 97.3 2% |
| Total Average (Program / Settings) | -1% /
-1% | 1% /
-2% | -32% /
-28% | 4% /
6% | 17% /
-7% |
* ... smaller is better
Display Response Times
| ↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
|---|---|---|
| 27 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 8 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 19 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows relatively slow response rates in our tests and may be too slow for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 64 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (20.9 ms). | ||
| ↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
| 49 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 20 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 29 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 83 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (32.8 ms). | ||
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
| Screen flickering / PWM detected | 50 Hz | ≤ 30 % brightness setting |  |
The display backlight flickers at 50 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) Flickering detected at a brightness setting of 30 % and below. There should be no flickering or PWM above this brightness setting. The frequency of 50 Hz is very low, so the flickering may cause eyestrain and headaches after extended use. In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8705 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured. | |||
| Cinebench R15 | |
| CPU Single 64Bit | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad T460s 20FA003FPB | |
| Xiaomi Mi Notebook Air 13.3 2016 | |
| Dell XPS 13-9350 | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad T460s-20F9003SGE | |
| Apple MacBook Air 13 inch 2015-03 | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad 710S-13ISK 80SW0031US | |
| CPU Multi 64Bit | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad T460s 20FA003FPB | |
| Apple MacBook Air 13 inch 2015-03 | |
| Xiaomi Mi Notebook Air 13.3 2016 | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad T460s-20F9003SGE | |
| Dell XPS 13-9350 | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad 710S-13ISK 80SW0031US | |
| PCMark 8 | |
| Home Score Accelerated v2 | |
| Apple MacBook Air 13 inch 2015-03 | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad 710S-13ISK 80SW0031US | |
| Xiaomi Mi Notebook Air 13.3 2016 | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad T460s-20F9003SGE | |
| Lenovo Yoga 900-13ISK 80MK | |
| Dell XPS 13 9360 QHD+ i5 | |
| Work Score Accelerated v2 | |
| Apple MacBook Air 13 inch 2015-03 | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad 710S-13ISK 80SW0031US | |
| Xiaomi Mi Notebook Air 13.3 2016 | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad T460s-20F9003SGE | |
| Lenovo Yoga 900-13ISK 80MK | |
| PCMark 8 Home Score Accelerated v2 | 3144 pontos | |
| PCMark 8 Work Score Accelerated v2 | 4274 pontos | |
Ajuda | ||
| Xiaomi Mi Notebook Air 13.3 2016 Samsung PM951 NVMe MZVLV256 | Dell XPS 13 9360 QHD+ i5 Toshiba NVMe THNSN5256GPUK | Lenovo Yoga 900-13ISK 80MK Samsung SSD PM871 MZNLN512HCJH | Lenovo ThinkPad T460s-20F9003SGE Samsung CM871 MZ7LF192HCGS | Lenovo IdeaPad 710S-13ISK 80SW0031US Samsung MZNLN128HCGR-000L2 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CrystalDiskMark 3.0 | -4% | -28% | -74% | -38% | |
| Read Seq | 1209 | 1168 -3% | 514 -57% | 446.5 -63% | 524 -57% |
| Write Seq | 314 | 329 5% | 459.5 46% | 171.1 -46% | 157.5 -50% |
| Read 512 | 1015 | 413.4 | 259.2 | 398.9 | |
| Write 512 | 307 | 424.5 | 167.2 | 157.7 | |
| Read 4k | 43.4 | 33 -24% | 36.34 -16% | 5.78 -87% | 36.57 -16% |
| Write 4k | 153.4 | 132 -14% | 100.1 -35% | 35.47 -77% | 99.4 -35% |
| Read 4k QD32 | 487.6 | 525 8% | 313.8 -36% | 94.9 -81% | 397.5 -18% |
| Write 4k QD32 | 312.2 | 325 4% | 96.8 -69% | 36.43 -88% | 157 -50% |
| 3DMark 11 Performance | 2578 pontos | |
| 3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score | 7168 pontos | |
| 3DMark Fire Strike Score | 1832 pontos | |
Ajuda | ||
| BioShock Infinite | |
| 1920x1080 Ultra Preset, DX11 (DDOF) | |
| Xiaomi Mi Notebook Air 13.3 2016 | |
| Dell Inspiron 17 7778 | |
| Lenovo Yoga 710-14ISK | |
| 1366x768 High Preset | |
| Xiaomi Mi Notebook Air 13.3 2016 | |
| Dell Inspiron 17 7778 | |
| Lenovo Yoga 710-14ISK | |
| 1366x768 Medium Preset | |
| Xiaomi Mi Notebook Air 13.3 2016 | |
| Dell Inspiron 17 7778 | |
| Lenovo Yoga 710-14ISK | |
| 1280x720 Very Low Preset | |
| Dell Inspiron 17 7778 | |
| Xiaomi Mi Notebook Air 13.3 2016 | |
| Lenovo Yoga 710-14ISK | |
| baixo | média | alto | ultra | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Civilization 5 (2010) | 70.9 | 20.7 | ||
| BioShock Infinite (2013) | 106.5 | 65.6 | 57.1 | 19.82 |
| Company of Heroes 2 (2013) | 37.1 | 29.3 | 16.46 | |
| Total War: Rome II (2013) | 82.7 | 64.8 | 56 | 14.1 |
| Rise of the Tomb Raider (2016) | 35.7 | 23.2 | 13.2 | |
| Ashes of the Singularity (2016) | 23.5 | |||
| Doom (2016) | 26.75 | 11.97 |
Barulho
| Ocioso |
| 31.15 / 31.15 / 31.15 dB |
| HDD |
| 31.15 dB |
| Carga |
| 38.2 / 41.7 dB |
 | ||
30 dB silencioso 40 dB(A) audível 50 dB(A) ruidosamente alto |
||
min:  , med:  , max:  Audix TM1, Arta (15 cm de distância) environment noise: 31.15 dB(A) | ||
(-) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 51 °C / 124 F, compared to the average of 35.9 °C / 97 F, ranging from 21.4 to 59 °C for the class Subnotebook.
(-) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 47 °C / 117 F, compared to the average of 39.4 °C / 103 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 23.8 °C / 75 F, compared to the device average of 30.8 °C / 87 F.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are cooler than skin temperature with a maximum of 29.9 °C / 85.8 F and are therefore cool to the touch.
(±) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.3 °C / 82.9 F (-1.6 °C / -2.9 F).
| desligado | 0.2 / 0.7 Watt |
| Ocioso | 4 / 6.6 / 7.4 Watt |
| Carga |
41.7 / 52.4 Watt |
   
| |
Key:
min: ,
med: ,
max: Metrahit Energy | |
| Xiaomi Mi Notebook Air 13.3 2016 6200U, GeForce 940MX, Samsung PM951 NVMe MZVLV256, IPS, 1920x1080, 13.3" | Dell XPS 13 9360 QHD+ i5 i5-7200U, HD Graphics 620, Toshiba NVMe THNSN5256GPUK, , 3200x1800, 13.3" | Lenovo IdeaPad 710S-13ISK 6560U, Iris Graphics 540, Samsung PM951 NVMe MZVLV256, IPS, 1920x1080, 13.3" | Microsoft Surface Book Core i7 6600U, Maxwell GPU (940M, GDDR5), Samsung MZFLV512 NVMe, IPS, 3000x2000, 13.5" | Apple MacBook Pro Retina 13 inch 2015-03 5257U, Iris Graphics 6100, Apple SSD SM0128G, IPS-Panel, 2560x1600, 13.3" | Lenovo ThinkPad T460s-20F9003SGE 6200U, HD Graphics 520, Samsung CM871 MZ7LF192HCGS, IPS, 1920x1080, 14" | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power Consumption | 19% | 5% | -29% | -9% | 15% | |
| Idle Minimum * | 4 | 3.7 7% | 3.3 17% | 4.5 -13% | 2.8 30% | 3.7 7% |
| Idle Average * | 6.6 | 6.1 8% | 7.4 -12% | 9.8 -48% | 7.8 -18% | 6.8 -3% |
| Idle Maximum * | 7.4 | 6.5 12% | 8.2 -11% | 12.2 -65% | 8.1 -9% | 7.3 1% |
| Load Average * | 41.7 | 29.5 29% | 36.5 12% | 46 -10% | 52.4 -26% | 26.3 37% |
| Load Maximum * | 52.4 | 33 37% | 43.7 17% | 56 -7% | 62.8 -20% | 34.6 34% |
* ... smaller is better
| Xiaomi Mi Notebook Air 13.3 2016 6200U, GeForce 940MX, 40 Wh | Lenovo IdeaPad 710S-13ISK 6560U, Iris Graphics 540, 46 Wh | Lenovo Yoga 900-13ISK 80MK 6500U, HD Graphics 520, 66 Wh | Lenovo ThinkPad T460s-20F9003SGE 6200U, HD Graphics 520, 49 Wh | Dell XPS 13 9360 QHD+ i5 i5-7200U, HD Graphics 620, 60 Wh | Apple MacBook Air 13 inch 2015-03 5650U, HD Graphics 6000, 54 Wh | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Battery Runtime | 11% | 25% | 24% | 43% | 65% | |
| Reader / Idle | 718 | 810 13% | 844 18% | 915 27% | 1572 119% | |
| H.264 | 423 | 486 15% | 534 26% | 547 29% | ||
| WiFi v1.3 | 389 | 418 7% | 403 4% | 395 2% | 526 35% | 620 59% |
| Load | 83 | 89 7% | 128 54% | 116 40% | 137 65% | 97 17% |
O Mi Notebook Air representa um debuto bem-sucedido para a Xiaomi. O mais decisivo é que o fabricante evita cometer grandes erros com o aparelho. Entre os pontos positivos há uma tela muito boa, uma carcaça monobloco com excelente processamento, um bom sistema de resfriamento (com uma pequena restrição), bons dispositivos de entrada e um portátil que oferece reservas de potência imediatamente, quando necessário - e inclui uma placa de vídeo Nvidia dedicada, uma vantagem quase exclusiva neste segmento do mercado.
os pontos negativos estão nos detalhes: O aparelho não conta com um leitor de cartões SD, infelizmente a tela é refletiva, e a carcaça esquenta bastante sob uso intenso. A maior decepção é a bateria: O Mi Notebook Air é entregue com durações de bateria, no máximo, médias. Outros fabricantes se saem muito melhor neste ponto, por exemplo, a Dell com o XPS 13. Além disso, os compradores prospectos provavelmente deveriam dar uma olhada nos futuros Ultrabooks Kaby Lake, como o HP Spectre x360 e Lenovo Yoga 910. No entanto, esses são verdadeiros conversíveis, que podem não ser atraentes para todos. Eles também são maiores e mais pesados que o XPS e o Mi Notebook Air.
A debutante da Xiaomi oferece bom desempenho; o fabricante não cometeu grandes erros. Apenas o fato de que deve ser importado poderia ser um obstáculo para que tenha um sucesso ainda maior.
Provavelmente o melhor argumento possível para o Mi Notebook Air seja o preço. Todos os concorrentes mencionados são muito mais caros. O Lenovo IdeaPad 710S em uma faixa de preços similar também poderia ter sido uma opção interessante.
Será que o Mi Notebook Air recebe uma recomendação? Sim, embora precise ser indicado que ainda não está disponível oficialmente na Alemanha. Isto leva a outras dificuldades como o teclado americano, a etiqueta CE não existente ou o difícil processo de garantia. Mais informação poder ser encontrada em nosso artigo sobre "Etiqueta CE e importação". Se a Xiaomi colocar à venda o Mi Notebook Air oficialmente no mercado alemão, certamente seria um aparelho de grande sucesso.
Pro
Contra
The Mi Notebook Air represents a successful debut for Xiaomi. Most decisive is that the manufacturer avoids big mistakes with the device. On the pro side, there is a very good display, a unibody case with excellent processing, a good cooling system (with one small restriction), good input devices and a laptop that offers power reserves immediately when needed - and it includes a dedicated Nvidia graphics card, almost a unique selling point in this market segment.
The negative points lie in the details: The device is missing an SD-card reader, unfortunately the display is glossy, and the case gets quite warm in load operation. The greatest disappointment is the battery: The Mi Notebook Air delivers at most average runtimes. Other manufacturers do much better regarding this point, for example, Dell with the XPS 13. Apart from that, prospective buyers should probably have a look at the upcoming Kaby Lake Ultrabooks, like HP's Spectre x360 and Lenovo's Yoga 910. Those are actually convertibles though, which might not appeal to everyone. Also, they are bigger and heavier than the XPS and the Mi Notebook Air.
Xiaomi's debut delivers good performance; the manufacturer did not make any big mistakes. Only the fact that it has to be imported could stand in the way of greater success.
Probably the best possible argument for the Mi Notebook Air is the price. All of the just-mentioned competitors are much more expensive. The Lenovo IdeaPad 710S in a similar price range could also be an interesting option.
Does the Mi Notebook Air get a recommendation? Yes, although it needs to be pointed out that it is not officially available in Germany. This leads to further difficulties like the American keyboard, the non-existent CE-label or the difficult warranty processing. Further information can be found in our article about "CE-labeling and Import". If Xiaomi officially put the Mi Notebook Air into the German market it would certainly be a successful device.
Xiaomi Mi Notebook Air 13.3 2016
- 10/15/2016 v5.1 (old)
Benjamin Herzig
Price comparison
