Breve Análise do Workstation MSI WT75 8SM (Xeon E-2176G, Quadro P5200)
MSI WT75 8SM
Processador
Intel Xeon E-2176G 6 x 3.7 - 4.7 GHz, Coffee Lake-ER
Placa gráfica
NVIDIA Quadro P5200 - 16 GB VRAM, Análises do: 1582 MHz, Memoría: 1804 MHz, GDDR5, 391.74, Manual graphics switch
Memória
64 GB
, DDR4-2400, 17-17-17-39, Dual-Channel
Pantalha
17.30 polegadas 16:9, 3840 x 2160 pixel 255 PPI, AU Optronics B173ZAN01.0, IPS, AUO109B, Brilhante: não
placa mãe
Intel C246 (Cannon Lake-H)
Disco rígido
Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ, 512 GB
, Secundário: HGST HTS721010A9E630
peso
4.14 kg, Suprimento de energia: 1.368 kg
Preço
5200 USD
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.
| SD Card Reader | |
| average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs) | |
| Gigabyte Aero 15-Y9 (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
| Eurocom Tornado F7W (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
| MSI WT75 8SM (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad P72-20MB000EGE (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
| Fujitsu Celsius H980 (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
| maximum AS SSD Seq Read Test (1GB) | |
| Gigabyte Aero 15-Y9 (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad P72-20MB000EGE (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
| Eurocom Tornado F7W (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
| MSI WT75 8SM (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
| Fujitsu Celsius H980 (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
| Networking | |
| iperf3 transmit AX12 | |
| Fujitsu Celsius H980 | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad P72-20MB000EGE | |
| Dell Precision 7720 | |
| MSI WT75 8SM | |
| iperf3 receive AX12 | |
| Fujitsu Celsius H980 | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad P72-20MB000EGE | |
| MSI WT75 8SM | |
| Dell Precision 7720 | |
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
AU Optronics B173ZAN01.0 tested with X-Rite i1Pro 2
Máximo: 329 cd/m² (Nits) Médio: 311.3 cd/m² Minimum: 16.43 cd/m²iluminação: 88 %
iluminação com acumulador: 327.9 cd/m²
Contraste: 763:1 (Preto: 0.43 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 4.41 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.92, calibrated: 1.43
ΔE Greyscale 2.9 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
99% sRGB (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
84.2% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
95.3% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
98.3% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
80.8% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.17
| MSI WT75 8SM AU Optronics B173ZAN01.0, IPS, 17.3", 3840x2160 | Fujitsu Celsius H980 LG Philips, LP173WF4-SPF5, IPS, 17.3", 1920x1080 | Eurocom Tornado F7W AU Optronics B173ZAN01.0, IPS, 17.3", 3840x2160 | Dell Precision 7720 SHP1446 (LQ173D1), IGZO, 17.3", 3840x2160 | Lenovo ThinkPad P72-20MB000EGE LP173WF4_SPF7, IPS, 17.3", 1920x1080 | MSI WT72-6QM LG Philips LP173WF4-SPF1, IPS, 17.3", 1920x1080 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display | -22% | 4% | 5% | -22% | -21% | |
| Display P3 Coverage | 80.8 | 67.3 -17% | 85.9 6% | 87.6 8% | 67.4 -17% | 67.3 -17% |
| sRGB Coverage | 98.3 | 85 -14% | 100 2% | 100 2% | 85 -14% | 85.4 -13% |
| AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage | 95.3 | 62.2 -35% | 98.3 3% | 99.2 4% | 62.2 -35% | 62.5 -34% |
| Response Times | 0% | -19% | -77% | -15% | -11% | |
| Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% * | 36 ? | 38 ? -6% | 40 ? -11% | 60 ? -67% | 40.8 ? -13% | 42 ? -17% |
| Response Time Black / White * | 24.8 ? | 23.2 ? 6% | 31.6 ? -27% | 46.4 ? -87% | 28.8 ? -16% | 26 ? -5% |
| PWM Frequency | 120500 ? | 1020 ? | 86 ? | |||
| Screen | -25% | -28% | 14% | -8% | -19% | |
| Brightness middle | 327.9 | 400 22% | 328.2 0% | 464 42% | 338 3% | 303 -8% |
| Brightness | 311 | 394 27% | 310 0% | 441 42% | 317 2% | 298 -4% |
| Brightness Distribution | 88 | 92 5% | 92 5% | 89 1% | 86 -2% | 94 7% |
| Black Level * | 0.43 | 0.51 -19% | 0.37 14% | 0.45 -5% | 0.28 35% | 0.46 -7% |
| Contrast | 763 | 784 3% | 887 16% | 1031 35% | 1207 58% | 659 -14% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 4.41 | 5.3 -20% | 6.62 -50% | 3.2 27% | 4.3 2% | 5.77 -31% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 10.07 | 9.3 8% | 9.49 6% | 6.1 39% | 10.2 -1% | |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 calibrated * | 1.43 | 3.8 -166% | 3.93 -175% | 3.7 -159% | ||
| Greyscale dE 2000 * | 2.9 | 5.5 -90% | 6.7 -131% | 4.2 -45% | 2.2 24% | 4.87 -68% |
| Gamma | 2.17 101% | 2.17 101% | 2.44 90% | 2.01 109% | 2.17 101% | 1.99 111% |
| CCT | 6916 94% | 6686 97% | 6462 101% | 6736 96% | 6621 98% | 7363 88% |
| Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998) | 84.2 | 55.8 -34% | 87.9 4% | 88.1 5% | 55.8 -34% | 56.04 -33% |
| Color Space (Percent of sRGB) | 99 | 84.9 -14% | 100 1% | 100 1% | 84.7 -14% | 85.27 -14% |
| Total Average (Program / Settings) | -16% /
-22% | -14% /
-21% | -19% /
0% | -15% /
-11% | -17% /
-18% |
* ... smaller is better
Display Response Times
ℹ
Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.| ↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
|---|---|---|
| 24.8 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 14.8 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 10 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 54 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (21 ms). | ||
| ↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
| 36 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 18.8 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 17.2 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 46 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is similar to the average of all tested devices (32.9 ms). | ||
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
ℹ
To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.| Screen flickering / PWM not detected |  | ||
In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8743 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured. | |||
MSI WT75 8SM Quadro P5200, E-2176G, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ; CPU Multi 64Bit: Ø1282 (1258.46-1324.2)
Eurocom Sky X9C GeForce GTX 1080 SLI (Laptop), i7-8700K, 2x Samsung SSD 960 Pro 1TB m.2 NVMe (RAID 0); CPU Multi 64Bit: Ø1345 (1314.02-1362.31)
SCHENKER XMG Ultra 17 GeForce GTX 1080 Mobile, i7-8700, Samsung SSD 960 Evo 500GB m.2 NVMe; CPU Multi 64Bit: Ø1130 (1100.35-1178.83)
| Cinebench R15 | |
| CPU Single 64Bit | |
| Eurocom Tornado F7W | |
| Alienware Area-51m i9-9900K RTX 2080 | |
| MSI WT75 8SM | |
| Eurocom Sky X9C | |
| SCHENKER XMG Ultra 17 | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad P1-20MD002LUS | |
| Dell Precision 7720 | |
| Fujitsu Celsius H980 | |
| AMD Threadripper 2970WX, AMD Radeon RX Vega 64 | |
| NVIDIA Titan X Pascal | |
| MSI WT72-6QM | |
| CPU Multi 64Bit | |
| AMD Threadripper 2970WX, AMD Radeon RX Vega 64 | |
| NVIDIA Titan X Pascal | |
| Alienware Area-51m i9-9900K RTX 2080 | |
| Eurocom Tornado F7W | |
| Eurocom Sky X9C | |
| MSI WT75 8SM | |
| SCHENKER XMG Ultra 17 | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad P1-20MD002LUS | |
| Fujitsu Celsius H980 | |
| Dell Precision 7720 | |
| MSI WT72-6QM | |
| Cinebench R11.5 | |
| CPU Single 64Bit | |
| Eurocom Tornado F7W | |
| Eurocom Sky X9C | |
| MSI WT75 8SM | |
| SCHENKER XMG Ultra 17 | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad P1-20MD002LUS | |
| Fujitsu Celsius H980 | |
| AMD Threadripper 2970WX, AMD Radeon RX Vega 64 | |
| MSI WT72-6QM | |
| NVIDIA Titan X Pascal | |
| CPU Multi 64Bit | |
| NVIDIA Titan X Pascal | |
| AMD Threadripper 2970WX, AMD Radeon RX Vega 64 | |
| Eurocom Tornado F7W | |
| Eurocom Sky X9C | |
| MSI WT75 8SM | |
| SCHENKER XMG Ultra 17 | |
| Fujitsu Celsius H980 | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad P1-20MD002LUS | |
| MSI WT72-6QM | |
| Cinebench R10 | |
| Rendering Multiple CPUs 32Bit | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad P1-20MD002LUS | |
| NVIDIA Titan X Pascal | |
| Eurocom Sky X9C | |
| MSI WT75 8SM | |
| AMD Threadripper 2970WX, AMD Radeon RX Vega 64 | |
| Eurocom Tornado F7W | |
| Fujitsu Celsius H980 | |
| SCHENKER XMG Ultra 17 | |
| MSI WT72-6QM | |
| Rendering Single 32Bit | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad P1-20MD002LUS | |
| Eurocom Tornado F7W | |
| Eurocom Sky X9C | |
| MSI WT75 8SM | |
| SCHENKER XMG Ultra 17 | |
| Fujitsu Celsius H980 | |
| MSI WT72-6QM | |
| AMD Threadripper 2970WX, AMD Radeon RX Vega 64 | |
| NVIDIA Titan X Pascal | |
| wPrime 2.10 - 1024m | |
| MSI WT75 8SM | |
| Eurocom Sky X9C | |
| Eurocom Tornado F7W | |
| NVIDIA Titan X Pascal | |
| AMD Threadripper 2970WX, AMD Radeon RX Vega 64 | |
* ... smaller is better
| PCMark 10 | |
| Score | |
| Alienware Area-51m i9-9900K RTX 2080 | |
| MSI WT75 8SM | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad P72-20MB000EGE | |
| Dell Precision 7720 | |
| Fujitsu Celsius H980 | |
| Essentials | |
| Alienware Area-51m i9-9900K RTX 2080 | |
| MSI WT75 8SM | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad P72-20MB000EGE | |
| Dell Precision 7720 | |
| Fujitsu Celsius H980 | |
| Productivity | |
| Alienware Area-51m i9-9900K RTX 2080 | |
| MSI WT75 8SM | |
| Dell Precision 7720 | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad P72-20MB000EGE | |
| Fujitsu Celsius H980 | |
| Digital Content Creation | |
| Alienware Area-51m i9-9900K RTX 2080 | |
| MSI WT75 8SM | |
| Fujitsu Celsius H980 | |
| Dell Precision 7720 | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad P72-20MB000EGE | |
| PCMark 8 | |
| Home Score Accelerated v2 | |
| Alienware Area-51m i9-9900K RTX 2080 | |
| MSI WT75 8SM | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad P72-20MB000EGE | |
| Fujitsu Celsius H980 | |
| Dell Precision 7720 | |
| Work Score Accelerated v2 | |
| Alienware Area-51m i9-9900K RTX 2080 | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad P72-20MB000EGE | |
| Fujitsu Celsius H980 | |
| MSI WT75 8SM | |
| Dell Precision 7720 | |
| PCMark 8 Home Score Accelerated v2 | 5006 pontos | |
| PCMark 8 Work Score Accelerated v2 | 4930 pontos | |
| PCMark 10 Score | 6208 pontos | |
Ajuda | ||
| MSI WT75 8SM Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ | Alienware Area-51m i9-9900K RTX 2080 2x SK Hynix PC400 512GB (RAID 0) | Fujitsu Celsius H980 Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ | Eurocom Tornado F7W 3x Samsung SSD 970 Pro 512GB (RAID 0) | MSI WT72-6QM Toshiba NVMe THNSN5256GPU7 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AS SSD | -11% | -6% | 0% | -30% | |
| Seq Read | 1839 | 2082 13% | 1082 -41% | 2139 16% | 2638 43% |
| Seq Write | 1831 | 2335 28% | 1781 -3% | 2447 34% | 810 -56% |
| 4K Read | 47.89 | 24.14 -50% | 46.09 -4% | 29.7 -38% | 37.5 -22% |
| 4K Write | 105.8 | 91.8 -13% | 100.4 -5% | 102.5 -3% | 96.4 -9% |
| 4K-64 Read | 1162 | 1561 34% | 1209 4% | 1299 12% | 935 -20% |
| 4K-64 Write | 1743 | 1350 -23% | 1622 -7% | 1236 -29% | 473.5 -73% |
| Access Time Read * | 0.057 | 0.121 -112% | 0.053 7% | 0.045 21% | 0.092 -61% |
| Access Time Write * | 0.035 | 0.039 -11% | 0.037 -6% | 0.033 6% | 0.04 -14% |
| Score Read | 1394 | 1793 29% | 1363 -2% | 1543 11% | 1237 -11% |
| Score Write | 2032 | 1675 -18% | 1901 -6% | 1583 -22% | 651 -68% |
| Score Total | 4146 | 4390 6% | 4003 -3% | 3928 -5% | 2433 -41% |
| Copy ISO MB/s | 2175 | 1396 | 2320 | 1777 | |
| Copy Program MB/s | 582 | 354.3 | 621 | 554 | |
| Copy Game MB/s | 1479 | 691 | 1585 | 1025 |
* ... smaller is better
Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ
CDM 5/6 Read Seq Q32T1:
3374 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write Seq Q32T1:
1984 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Read 4K Q32T1:
426.1 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write 4K Q32T1:
361.2 MB/s
CDM 5 Read Seq:
1787 MB/s
CDM 5 Write Seq:
1584 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Read 4K:
46.15 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write 4K:
131.4 MB/s
| 3DMark 11 | |
| 1280x720 Performance GPU | |
| Alienware Area-51m i9-9900K RTX 2080 | |
| MSI GT75VR 7RF-012 Titan Pro | |
| AMD Threadripper 2970WX, AMD Radeon RX Vega 64 | |
| NVIDIA Titan X Pascal | |
| MSI GS75 8SG Stealth | |
| MSI WT75 8SM | |
| Eurocom Tornado F7W | |
| Dell Precision 7720 | |
| Fujitsu Celsius H980 | |
| MSI WT72-6QM | |
| Dell Precision 5530 2-in-1 | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad P1-20MD002LUS | |
| 1280x720 Performance Combined | |
| Alienware Area-51m i9-9900K RTX 2080 | |
| Eurocom Tornado F7W | |
| MSI WT75 8SM | |
| NVIDIA Titan X Pascal | |
| Fujitsu Celsius H980 | |
| MSI GS75 8SG Stealth | |
| Dell Precision 7720 | |
| MSI GT75VR 7RF-012 Titan Pro | |
| AMD Threadripper 2970WX, AMD Radeon RX Vega 64 | |
| MSI WT72-6QM | |
| Dell Precision 5530 2-in-1 | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad P1-20MD002LUS | |
| SPECviewperf 13 | |
| Solidworks (sw-04) | |
| Eurocom Tornado F7W | |
| MSI WT75 8SM | |
| Fujitsu Celsius H980 | |
| AMD Threadripper 2970WX, AMD Radeon RX Vega 64 | |
| NVIDIA Titan X Pascal | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad P1-20MD002LUS | |
| Siemens NX (snx-03) | |
| Eurocom Tornado F7W | |
| MSI WT75 8SM | |
| NVIDIA Titan X Pascal | |
| Fujitsu Celsius H980 | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad P1-20MD002LUS | |
| AMD Threadripper 2970WX, AMD Radeon RX Vega 64 | |
| Showcase (showcase-02) | |
| NVIDIA Titan X Pascal | |
| AMD Threadripper 2970WX, AMD Radeon RX Vega 64 | |
| MSI WT75 8SM | |
| Eurocom Tornado F7W | |
| Fujitsu Celsius H980 | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad P1-20MD002LUS | |
| Medical (medical-02) | |
| NVIDIA Titan X Pascal | |
| Eurocom Tornado F7W | |
| MSI WT75 8SM | |
| Fujitsu Celsius H980 | |
| AMD Threadripper 2970WX, AMD Radeon RX Vega 64 | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad P1-20MD002LUS | |
| Maya (maya-05) | |
| Eurocom Tornado F7W | |
| MSI WT75 8SM | |
| NVIDIA Titan X Pascal | |
| AMD Threadripper 2970WX, AMD Radeon RX Vega 64 | |
| Fujitsu Celsius H980 | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad P1-20MD002LUS | |
| Energy (energy-02) | |
| NVIDIA Titan X Pascal | |
| AMD Threadripper 2970WX, AMD Radeon RX Vega 64 | |
| Eurocom Tornado F7W | |
| MSI WT75 8SM | |
| Fujitsu Celsius H980 | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad P1-20MD002LUS | |
| Creo (creo-02) | |
| Eurocom Tornado F7W | |
| MSI WT75 8SM | |
| NVIDIA Titan X Pascal | |
| Fujitsu Celsius H980 | |
| AMD Threadripper 2970WX, AMD Radeon RX Vega 64 | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad P1-20MD002LUS | |
| Catia (catia-05) | |
| Eurocom Tornado F7W | |
| MSI WT75 8SM | |
| AMD Threadripper 2970WX, AMD Radeon RX Vega 64 | |
| Fujitsu Celsius H980 | |
| NVIDIA Titan X Pascal | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad P1-20MD002LUS | |
| 3ds Max (3dsmax-06) | |
| NVIDIA Titan X Pascal | |
| Eurocom Tornado F7W | |
| MSI WT75 8SM | |
| AMD Threadripper 2970WX, AMD Radeon RX Vega 64 | |
| Fujitsu Celsius H980 | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad P1-20MD002LUS | |
| 3DMark 11 Performance | 21204 pontos | |
| 3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score | 39077 pontos | |
| 3DMark Fire Strike Score | 16528 pontos | |
| 3DMark Time Spy Score | 6580 pontos | |
Ajuda | ||
| The Witcher 3 - 1920x1080 Ultra Graphics & Postprocessing (HBAO+) | |
| Eurocom Sky X9C | |
| Alienware Area-51m i9-9900K RTX 2080 | |
| AMD Threadripper 2970WX, AMD Radeon RX Vega 64 | |
| MSI GT75VR 7RF-012 Titan Pro | |
| MSI GS75 8SG Stealth | |
| MSI WT75 8SM | |
| Eurocom Tornado F7W | |
| Dell Precision 7720 | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad P72-20MB000EGE | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad P1-20MD002LUS | |
| Dell Precision 5530 2-in-1 | |
| MSI WT72-6QJ | |
MSI WT75 8SM Quadro P5200, E-2176G, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ: Ø62.8 (59-68)
| baixo | média | alto | ultra | 4K | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BioShock Infinite (2013) | 395 | 341.6 | 315.1 | ||
| The Witcher 3 (2015) | 327.2 | 228.7 | 120.2 | 66.7 | 47.2 |
| Rise of the Tomb Raider (2016) | 289 | 220.6 | 125.5 | 105.2 | 46.6 |
| MSI WT75 8SM Quadro P5200, E-2176G, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ | Alienware Area-51m i9-9900K RTX 2080 GeForce RTX 2080 Mobile, i9-9900K, 2x SK Hynix PC400 512GB (RAID 0) | Fujitsu Celsius H980 Quadro P3200, i7-8750H, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ | Eurocom Tornado F7W Quadro P5200, i9-9900K, 3x Samsung SSD 970 Pro 512GB (RAID 0) | Dell Precision 7720 Quadro P5000, E3-1535M v6, Toshiba NVMe THNSN5512GPU7 | MSI WT72-6QM Quadro M5000M, E3-1505M v5, Toshiba NVMe THNSN5256GPU7 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Noise | -7% | 6% | -5% | 11% | 4% | |
| off / environment * | 28.6 | 28.1 2% | 29.6 -3% | 28.2 1% | 29.5 -3% | |
| Idle Minimum * | 33.4 | 28.1 16% | 29.6 11% | 33.2 1% | 29.5 12% | 33.3 -0% |
| Idle Average * | 33.4 | 28.6 14% | 32.5 3% | 33.2 1% | 29.5 12% | 33.4 -0% |
| Idle Maximum * | 33.4 | 51 -53% | 32.5 3% | 33.2 1% | 29.5 12% | 33.5 -0% |
| Load Average * | 33.5 | 51 -52% | 34.9 -4% | 47 -40% | 35 -4% | 38.8 -16% |
| Witcher 3 ultra * | 51.4 | 51 1% | 52.2 -2% | 41 20% | ||
| Load Maximum * | 64 | 51 20% | 49.1 23% | 64 -0% | 47.8 25% | 40.2 37% |
* ... smaller is better
Barulho
| Ocioso |
| 33.4 / 33.4 / 33.4 dB |
| Carga |
| 33.5 / 64 dB |
 | ||
30 dB silencioso 40 dB(A) audível 50 dB(A) ruidosamente alto |
||
min:  , med:  , max:  Audix TM1, Arta (15 cm de distância) environment noise: 28.6 dB(A) | ||
(+) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 31.2 °C / 88 F, compared to the average of 32 °C / 90 F for the devices in the class Workstation.
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 39.2 °C / 103 F, compared to the average of 38.2 °C / 101 F, ranging from 22.2 to 69.8 °C for the class Workstation.
(-) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 49.2 °C / 121 F, compared to the average of 41.2 °C / 106 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 28.9 °C / 84 F, compared to the device average of 32 °C / 90 F.
(+) Playing The Witcher 3, the average temperature for the upper side is 28.1 °C / 83 F, compared to the device average of 32 °C / 90 F.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are cooler than skin temperature with a maximum of 27.4 °C / 81.3 F and are therefore cool to the touch.
(±) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 27.9 °C / 82.2 F (+0.5 °C / 0.9 F).
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 39.2 °C / 103 F, compared to the average of 38.2 °C / 101 F, ranging from 22.2 to 69.8 °C for the class Workstation.
(-) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 49.2 °C / 121 F, compared to the average of 41.2 °C / 106 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 28.9 °C / 84 F, compared to the device average of 32 °C / 90 F.
(+) Playing The Witcher 3, the average temperature for the upper side is 28.1 °C / 83 F, compared to the device average of 32 °C / 90 F.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are cooler than skin temperature with a maximum of 27.4 °C / 81.3 F and are therefore cool to the touch.
(±) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 27.9 °C / 82.2 F (+0.5 °C / 0.9 F).
Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)
MSI WT75 8SM audio analysis
(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (81.3 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 11.7% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (10.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4% away from median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (7.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 6.1% higher than median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (7.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (18.3% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 54% of all tested devices in this class were better, 11% similar, 34% worse
» The best had a delta of 7%, average was 18%, worst was 35%
Compared to all devices tested
» 36% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 56% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Apple MacBook 12 (Early 2016) 1.1 GHz audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (83.6 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 11.3% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (14.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2.4% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (10.2% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 6% of all tested devices in this class were better, 2% similar, 92% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 19%, worst was 53%
Compared to all devices tested
» 4% of all tested devices were better, 1% similar, 95% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Consumo de energia
| desligado | 1.43 / 2.22 Watt |
| Ocioso | 29 / 37.1 / 39.5 Watt |
| Carga |
133.6 / 310 Watt |
   
| |
Key:
min: ,
med: ,
max: Metrahit Energy | |
| MSI WT75 8SM E-2176G, Quadro P5200, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ, IPS, 3840x2160, 17.3" | Alienware Area-51m i9-9900K RTX 2080 i9-9900K, GeForce RTX 2080 Mobile, 2x SK Hynix PC400 512GB (RAID 0), IPS, 1920x1080, 17.3" | Fujitsu Celsius H980 i7-8750H, Quadro P3200, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ, IPS, 1920x1080, 17.3" | Eurocom Tornado F7W i9-9900K, Quadro P5200, 3x Samsung SSD 970 Pro 512GB (RAID 0), IPS, 3840x2160, 17.3" | Dell Precision 7720 E3-1535M v6, Quadro P5000, Toshiba NVMe THNSN5512GPU7, IGZO, 3840x2160, 17.3" | MSI WT72-6QM E3-1505M v5, Quadro M5000M, Toshiba NVMe THNSN5256GPU7, IPS, 1920x1080, 17.3" | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power Consumption | -9% | 39% | -0% | 43% | 23% | |
| Idle Minimum * | 29 | 23.3 20% | 14.8 49% | 28.5 2% | 9.6 67% | 24.8 14% |
| Idle Average * | 37.1 | 33.5 10% | 20.4 45% | 36.7 1% | 20.5 45% | 29.7 20% |
| Idle Maximum * | 39.5 | 38.4 3% | 21.5 46% | 37.8 4% | 22.9 42% | 30.1 24% |
| Load Average * | 133.6 | 114.1 15% | 98.4 26% | 144.6 -8% | 96.8 28% | 105.2 21% |
| Witcher 3 ultra * | 236.3 | 339.5 -44% | 218.9 7% | |||
| Load Maximum * | 310 | 485.1 -56% | 213.5 31% | 336 -8% | 202.1 35% | 192.2 38% |
* ... smaller is better
| MSI WT75 8SM E-2176G, Quadro P5200, 90 Wh | Alienware Area-51m i9-9900K RTX 2080 i9-9900K, GeForce RTX 2080 Mobile, 90 Wh | Fujitsu Celsius H980 i7-8750H, Quadro P3200, 96 Wh | Eurocom Tornado F7W i9-9900K, Quadro P5200, 90 Wh | Dell Precision 7720 E3-1535M v6, Quadro P5000, 91 Wh | MSI WT72-6QM E3-1505M v5, Quadro M5000M, Wh | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Battery Runtime | -27% | 126% | -19% | 85% | 31% | |
| Reader / Idle | 240 | 155 -35% | 811 238% | 685 185% | 413 72% | |
| WiFi v1.3 | 223 | 127 -43% | 496 122% | 180 -19% | 379 70% | 245 10% |
| Load | 69 | 66 -4% | 82 19% | 70 1% | 76 10% |
Pro
+ CPU LGA 1151 e GPU MXM 3.0 removíveis
+ Alto-falantes internos potentes c/ subwoofer
+ CPU Xeon; Suporte para RAM ECC
+ Fácil acesso ao interior
+ Comutação manual de gráficos
+ Leitor de cartões SD veloz
Contra
- A manutenção exige quebrar um selo de fábrica
- Duração curta da bateria; longo tempo de recarga
- Tela mate granulada
- Adaptador de CA massivo
- Sem porta VGA
O maior motivo para possuir um MSI WT75 em relação a outros workstations é sua facilidade de manutenção. Seus cinco compartimentos de armazenamento, quatro slots SODIMM e CPU e GPU removíveis proporcionam ao computador mais espaço em comparação com a natureza mais "fixa" das soluções da Lenovo, HP ou Dell. Se você planeja mexer em seu workstation com frequência, o WT75 deve atendê-lo bem.
O desempenho é bom com temperaturas razoáveis de ~80 °C e sem afogamentos quando menos de 100% de utilização. No entanto, é uma pena que a CPU Xeon não consiga rodar com velocidades Turbo Boost por longos períodos. A CPU funciona apenas um pouco acima da velocidade base quando estiver sob estresse extremo de processamento.
A garantia é outro fator a considerar. A MSI não consegue se equiparar a ampla gama de opções de garantia e serviço quando comparado com as da Lenovo ThinkPad Série P, HP ZBook, ou Dell Precision que têm a vantagem em economias de escala. Novamente, você estará confortável se fizer alguma manutenção no WT75 se for necessário.
Outras queixas são apenas menores. A qualidade de áudio provavelmente é melhor do que a maioria dos usuários de workstations precisaria e o mesmo vale para os conectores de áudio extra. O painel 4K UHD parece um pouco granulado, as portas traseiras são difíceis de ver, a tampa e as dobradiças poderiam ser mais rígidas e o sistema geral é bastante grande, mesmo para um portátil de 17 polegadas. O desempenho principal e a capacidade de manutenção são, de outra forma, superiores ao que você encontrará nos grandes OEMs.
Poderoso, expansível e grosso - O bestial MSI WT75 funciona melhor para usuários avançados que desejam ter a liberdade de poder “mexer” facilmente no maior número de peças possível nos workstations móveis.
MSI WT75 8SM
- 01/08/2020 v7 (old)
Allen Ngo
Workstation - Médio equilibrado
Price comparison
