Breve Análise do Workstation MSI WT72-6QME

Name: MSI WT72-6QM
Brand: MSI

Behemoth for Professionals. MSI’s WT72 now sports updated hardware in the form of a Skylake Xeon processor and a more powerful Nvidia Quadro GPU. The other specs remain largely the same and the workstation thus remains a solid choice for CAD work and 3D modelling.

Bernie Pechlaner, Published 02/03/2016 🇺🇸 🇩🇪 ...

Windows Workstation Skylake

Download your licensed rating image as PNG / SVG

MSI WT72-6QM (WT72 Serie)

Processador

Intel Xeon E3-1505M v5 4 x 2.8 - 3.7 GHz, Skylake

Placa gráfica

NVIDIA Quadro M5000M - 8 GB VRAM, 10.18.13.5396, manuell

Memória

32 GB

, DDR4

Pantalha

17.30 polegadas 16:9, 1920 x 1080 pixel, no, LG Philips LP173WF4-SPF1, IPS, Brilhante: não

placa mãe

Intel CM236 (Skylake PCH-H)

Disco rígido

Toshiba NVMe THNSN5256GPU7, 256 GB

, 128GB*2 SSD (PCIe Gen3x4)

Placa de Som

Intel Skylake PCH-H High Definition Audio Controller

Conexões

6 USB 3.0, 1 USB 3.1 Gen2, 1 Thunderbolt, 1 HDMI, 1 DisplayPort, 1 Kensington Lock, Conexões Audio: Mikrofon + Kopfhörer, Card Reader: SD (XC/HC)

Funcionamento em rede

Killer E2400 Gigabit Ethernet Controller (10/100/1000MBit/s), Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 8260 (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/), Bluetooth 4.1

Unidade ótica

Matshita BD-MLT UJ272

Tamanho

altura x largura x profundidade (em mm): 48 x 428 x 293.3

Bateria

86580 mAh Lítio-Ion, 9 Zellen

Sistema Operativo

Microsoft Windows 10 Pro 64 Bit

Camera

Webcam: 1080p FullHD

Características adicionais

Alto falantes: Dynaudio Tech Speakers 3W*2 + Subwoofer*1, Teclado: Chiclet, Iluminação do Teclado: sim, 24 Meses Garantia

peso

3.852 kg, Suprimento de energia: 1.072 kg

Preço

5000 USD

Links

MSI página inicial
MSI Seção de notebook

Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

see all specifications

MSI WT72-6QM Bullman E-Klasse 5 SCHENKER XMG U705 Dell Precision M6800 HP ZBook 17 G2 J8Z55ET Razer Blade Pro 17 inch 2015 DIN A4 ❌


290 cd/m²	291 cd/m²	303 cd/m²
295 cd/m²	303 cd/m²	309 cd/m²
289 cd/m²	294 cd/m²	305 cd/m²

Distribuição do brilho

LG Philips LP173WF4-SPF1 tested with X-Rite i1Pro 2

Máximo: 309 cd/m² (Nits) Médio: 297.7 cd/m²
iluminação: 94 %
iluminação com acumulador: 301 cd/m²
Contraste: 659:1 (Preto: 0.46 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 5.77 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.93
ΔE Greyscale 4.87 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
85.27% sRGB (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
56.04% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
62.5% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
85.4% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
67.3% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 1.99

Download Arquivo ICC (X-Rite i1Pro 2)

	MSI WT72-6QM 17.3", 1920x1080	Bullman E-Klasse 5 17.3", 1920x1080	Dell Precision M6800 17.3", 1920x1080	HP ZBook 17 E9X11AA-ABA 17.3", 1920x1080	SCHENKER XMG U705 17.3", 1920x1080	Razer Blade Pro 17 inch 2015 17.3", 1920x1080	Lenovo ThinkPad P70 17.3", 3840x2160
Display		-1%	10%	34%	-2%	6%	30%
Display P3 Coverage	67.3	66.5 -1%	71.8 7%	85.7 27%	66.3 -1%	69.7 4%	90.8 35%
sRGB Coverage	85.4	84.5 -1%	95.8 12%	100 17%	83.4 -2%	90.4 6%	100 17%
AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage	62.5	61.8 -1%	70.2 12%	99.2 59%	61 -2%	66.8 7%	85.4 37%
Response Times							51%
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% *	42 ?(13, 29)						44 ?(17.2, 26.8) -5%
Response Time Black / White *	26 ?(7, 19)						27.6 ?(4.8, 22.8) -6%
PWM Frequency	86 ?(10, 15)						228 ?(95) 165%
Screen		14%	-39%	29%	14%	-45%	15%
Brightness middle	303	355 17%	250 -17%	320 6%	333 10%	315.5 4%	365 20%
Brightness	298	335 12%	247 -17%	311 4%	317 6%	295 -1%	341 14%
Brightness Distribution	94	89 -5%	83 -12%	88 -6%	86 -9%	87 -7%	85 -10%
Black Level *	0.46	0.44 4%	0.477 -4%	0.359 22%	0.3 35%	0.822 -79%	0.4 13%
Contrast	659	807 22%	524 -20%	891 35%	1110 68%	384 -42%	913 39%
Colorchecker dE 2000 *	5.77	3.73 35%	11.4 -98%	2.04 65%	5.24 9%	12.21 -112%	3.8 34%
Greyscale dE 2000 *	4.87	2.84 42%	12.97 -166%	2.45 50%	4.33 11%	13.4 -175%	6.09 -25%
Gamma	1.99 ^111%	2.12 ^104%	2.65 ^83%	2.28 ^96%	2.14 ^103%	2.39 ^92%	2.3 ^96%
CCT	7363 ^88%	6457 ^101%	18595 ^35%	6518 ^100%	6437 ^101%	19530 ^33%	6332 ^103%
Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998)	56.04	55.45 -1%	68 21%	93 66%	55 -2%	59 5%	76.01 36%
Color Space (Percent of sRGB)	85.27	84.39 -1%		100 17%	83.3 -2%	90.3 6%	99.97 17%
Total Average (Program / Settings)		7% / 10%	-15% / -26%	32% / 30%	6% / 10%	-20% / -32%	32% / 25%

* ... smaller is better

Display Response Times

ℹ

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.

↔ Response Time Black to White
26 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↗ 7 ms rise
26 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↘ 19 ms fall
The screen shows relatively slow response rates in our tests and may be too slow for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 59 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (21 ms).
↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
42 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↗ 13 ms rise
42 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↘ 29 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 64 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (33 ms).

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

ℹ

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.

Screen flickering / PWM detected

86 Hz

≤ 10 % brightness setting

≤ 15 cd/m² brightness

The display backlight flickers at 86 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) Flickering detected at a brightness setting of 10 % (15 cd/m²) and below. There should be no flickering or PWM above this brightness setting.

The frequency of 86 Hz is very low, so the flickering may cause eyestrain and headaches after extended use.

As the flickering occurs only on very low brightness settings, it should not be an issue in typical office settings. Nonetheless, use in low light conditions may be straining to the eyes.

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8774 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured.

Cinebench R11.5 | Cinebench R15 | Super Pi Mod 1.5 XS 32M

Cinebench R11.5
CPU Single 64Bit (sort by value)
MSI WT72-6QM	1.77 Points
HP ZBook 17 G2 J8Z55ET	1.54 Points -13%
Bullman E-Klasse 5	1.95 Points +10%
Dell Precision M6800	1.55 Points -12%
CPU Multi 64Bit (sort by value)
MSI WT72-6QM	7.85 Points
HP ZBook 17 G2 J8Z55ET	7.11 Points -9%
Bullman E-Klasse 5	9.14 Points +16%
Dell Precision M6800	5.49 Points -30%

Cinebench R15
CPU Single 64Bit (sort by value)
MSI WT72-6QM	157 Points
HP ZBook 17 G2 J8Z55ET	135 Points -14%
Bullman E-Klasse 5	174 Points +11%
Dell Precision M6800	139 Points -11%
CPU Multi 64Bit (sort by value)
MSI WT72-6QM	724 Points
HP ZBook 17 G2 J8Z55ET	657 Points -9%
Bullman E-Klasse 5	843 Points +16%
Dell Precision M6800	529 Points -27%

Super Pi Mod 1.5 XS 32M - 32M (sort by value)
MSI WT72-6QM	529 s *
Dell Precision M6800	534 s * -1%

Legend

MSI WT72-6QM Intel Xeon E3-1505M v5, NVIDIA Quadro M5000M, Toshiba NVMe THNSN5256GPU7

HP ZBook 17 G2 J8Z55ET Intel Core i7-4710MQ, AMD FirePro M6100, HGST Travelstar 7K1000 HTS721075A9E630

Bullman E-Klasse 5 Intel Core i7-4790K, NVIDIA Quadro K3100M, Samsung SSD SM951 256GB MZHPV256HDGL

Dell Precision M6800 Intel Core i7-4800MQ, NVIDIA Quadro K3100M, WDC Scorpio Black WD7500BPKT-80PK4T0

* ... smaller is better

Cinebench R10 Shading 64Bit

8529 Points

Cinebench R10 Rendering Multiple CPUs 64Bit

27938 Points

Cinebench R10 Rendering Single CPUs 64Bit

7421 Points

Cinebench R10 Shading 32Bit

8525

Cinebench R10 Rendering Multiple CPUs 32Bit

21475

Cinebench R10 Rendering Single 32Bit

5627

Cinebench R11.5 OpenGL 64Bit

95 fps

Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 64Bit

7.85 Points

Cinebench R11.5 CPU Single 64Bit

1.77 Points

Cinebench R15 Ref. Match 64Bit

99.6 %

Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64Bit

109.6 fps

Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64Bit

724 Points

Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64Bit

157 Points

Ajuda

... comparado com

PCMark 7 Score		6657 pontos
PCMark 8 Home Score Accelerated v2		4731 pontos
PCMark 8 Work Score Accelerated v2		5655 pontos
Ajuda

... comparado com

HD Tune

CrystalDiskMark 3.0

AS SSD

Toshiba NVMe THNSN5256GPU7

Velocidade de Transferência Mínima: 71.7 MB/s

Velocidade de Transferência Máxima: 153.4 MB/s

Velocidade de Transferência Média: 114.8 MB/s

Tempo de Acesso: 15.4 ms

Índice de Explosão: 309.7 MB/s

Uso da CPU: 3 %

3DMark 11 | 3DMark

3DMark 11 - 1280x720 Performance (sort by value)
MSI WT72-6QM Quadro M5000M, E3-1505M v5, Toshiba NVMe THNSN5256GPU7	11110 Points
HP ZBook 17 G2 J8Z55ET FirePro M6100, 4710MQ, HGST Travelstar 7K1000 HTS721075A9E630	6167 Points -44%
Bullman E-Klasse 5 Quadro K3100M, 4790K, Samsung SSD SM951 256GB MZHPV256HDGL	4074 Points -63%
Dell Precision M6800 Quadro K3100M, 4800MQ, WDC Scorpio Black WD7500BPKT-80PK4T0	3662 Points -67%
MSI GT72S 6QF GeForce GTX 980 (Laptop), 6820HK, 2x Micron M600 MTFDDAV128MBF NVMe (RAID 0)	12645 Points +14%

3DMark
1920x1080 Fire Strike Score (sort by value)
MSI WT72-6QM Quadro M5000M, E3-1505M v5, Toshiba NVMe THNSN5256GPU7	7979 Points
MSI WT72-2OL32SR311BW Quadro K4100M, 4980HQ, 4x Toshiba HG6 THNSNJ256G8NU (RAID 0)	3579 Points -55%
HP ZBook 17 G2 J8Z55ET FirePro M6100, 4710MQ, HGST Travelstar 7K1000 HTS721075A9E630	3644 Points -54%
Bullman E-Klasse 5 Quadro K3100M, 4790K, Samsung SSD SM951 256GB MZHPV256HDGL	2731 Points -66%
Dell Precision M6800 Quadro K3100M, 4800MQ, WDC Scorpio Black WD7500BPKT-80PK4T0	2259 Points -72%
MSI GT72S 6QF GeForce GTX 980 (Laptop), 6820HK, 2x Micron M600 MTFDDAV128MBF NVMe (RAID 0)	11066 Points +39%
1280x720 Cloud Gate Standard Score (sort by value)
MSI WT72-6QM Quadro M5000M, E3-1505M v5, Toshiba NVMe THNSN5256GPU7	22786 Points
MSI WT72-2OL32SR311BW Quadro K4100M, 4980HQ, 4x Toshiba HG6 THNSNJ256G8NU (RAID 0)	17342 Points -24%
HP ZBook 17 G2 J8Z55ET FirePro M6100, 4710MQ, HGST Travelstar 7K1000 HTS721075A9E630	16199 Points -29%
Bullman E-Klasse 5 Quadro K3100M, 4790K, Samsung SSD SM951 256GB MZHPV256HDGL	15497 Points -32%
Dell Precision M6800 Quadro K3100M, 4800MQ, WDC Scorpio Black WD7500BPKT-80PK4T0	12079 Points -47%
MSI GT72S 6QF GeForce GTX 980 (Laptop), 6820HK, 2x Micron M600 MTFDDAV128MBF NVMe (RAID 0)	25302 Points +11%
1280x720 Ice Storm Standard Score (sort by value)
MSI WT72-6QM Quadro M5000M, E3-1505M v5, Toshiba NVMe THNSN5256GPU7	137273 Points
MSI WT72-2OL32SR311BW Quadro K4100M, 4980HQ, 4x Toshiba HG6 THNSNJ256G8NU (RAID 0)	126937 Points -8%
HP ZBook 17 G2 J8Z55ET FirePro M6100, 4710MQ, HGST Travelstar 7K1000 HTS721075A9E630	123260 Points -10%
Bullman E-Klasse 5 Quadro K3100M, 4790K, Samsung SSD SM951 256GB MZHPV256HDGL	118906 Points -13%
Dell Precision M6800 Quadro K3100M, 4800MQ, WDC Scorpio Black WD7500BPKT-80PK4T0	81160 Points -41%
MSI GT72S 6QF GeForce GTX 980 (Laptop), 6820HK, 2x Micron M600 MTFDDAV128MBF NVMe (RAID 0)	125241 Points -9%

3DMark 06 Standard Score		29317 pontos
3DMark 11 Performance		11110 pontos
3DMark Ice Storm Standard Score		137273 pontos
3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score		22786 pontos
3DMark Fire Strike Score		7979 pontos
3DMark Fire Strike Extreme Score		4205 pontos
Ajuda

... comparado com

SPECviewperf 11 | SPECviewperf 12

SPECviewperf 11
1920x1080 Siemens NX (sort by value)
MSI WT72-6QM Quadro M5000M, E3-1505M v5, Toshiba NVMe THNSN5256GPU7	61.8 fps
MSI WT72-2OL32SR311BW Quadro K4100M, 4980HQ, 4x Toshiba HG6 THNSNJ256G8NU (RAID 0)	45 fps -27%
HP ZBook 17 G2 J8Z55ET FirePro M6100, 4710MQ, HGST Travelstar 7K1000 HTS721075A9E630	47.84 fps -23%
Bullman E-Klasse 5 Quadro K3100M, 4790K, Samsung SSD SM951 256GB MZHPV256HDGL	39 fps -37%
Dell Precision M6800 Quadro K3100M, 4800MQ, WDC Scorpio Black WD7500BPKT-80PK4T0	38.53 fps -38%
1920x1080 Tcvis (sort by value)
MSI WT72-6QM Quadro M5000M, E3-1505M v5, Toshiba NVMe THNSN5256GPU7	55.9 fps
MSI WT72-2OL32SR311BW Quadro K4100M, 4980HQ, 4x Toshiba HG6 THNSNJ256G8NU (RAID 0)	50 fps -11%
HP ZBook 17 G2 J8Z55ET FirePro M6100, 4710MQ, HGST Travelstar 7K1000 HTS721075A9E630	28.37 fps -49%
Bullman E-Klasse 5 Quadro K3100M, 4790K, Samsung SSD SM951 256GB MZHPV256HDGL	42 fps -25%
Dell Precision M6800 Quadro K3100M, 4800MQ, WDC Scorpio Black WD7500BPKT-80PK4T0	41.83 fps -25%
1920x1080 SolidWorks (sort by value)
MSI WT72-6QM Quadro M5000M, E3-1505M v5, Toshiba NVMe THNSN5256GPU7	49.26 fps
MSI WT72-2OL32SR311BW Quadro K4100M, 4980HQ, 4x Toshiba HG6 THNSNJ256G8NU (RAID 0)	54 fps +10%
HP ZBook 17 G2 J8Z55ET FirePro M6100, 4710MQ, HGST Travelstar 7K1000 HTS721075A9E630	68.7 fps +39%
Bullman E-Klasse 5 Quadro K3100M, 4790K, Samsung SSD SM951 256GB MZHPV256HDGL	52 fps +6%
Dell Precision M6800 Quadro K3100M, 4800MQ, WDC Scorpio Black WD7500BPKT-80PK4T0	48.25 fps -2%
1920x1080 Pro/ENGINEER (sort by value)
MSI WT72-6QM Quadro M5000M, E3-1505M v5, Toshiba NVMe THNSN5256GPU7	17.87 fps
MSI WT72-2OL32SR311BW Quadro K4100M, 4980HQ, 4x Toshiba HG6 THNSNJ256G8NU (RAID 0)	24 fps +34%
HP ZBook 17 G2 J8Z55ET FirePro M6100, 4710MQ, HGST Travelstar 7K1000 HTS721075A9E630	10.66 fps -40%
Bullman E-Klasse 5 Quadro K3100M, 4790K, Samsung SSD SM951 256GB MZHPV256HDGL	21 fps +18%
Dell Precision M6800 Quadro K3100M, 4800MQ, WDC Scorpio Black WD7500BPKT-80PK4T0	18.27 fps +2%
1920x1080 Maya (sort by value)
MSI WT72-6QM Quadro M5000M, E3-1505M v5, Toshiba NVMe THNSN5256GPU7	71.6 fps
MSI WT72-2OL32SR311BW Quadro K4100M, 4980HQ, 4x Toshiba HG6 THNSNJ256G8NU (RAID 0)	58 fps -19%
HP ZBook 17 G2 J8Z55ET FirePro M6100, 4710MQ, HGST Travelstar 7K1000 HTS721075A9E630	99.7 fps +39%
Bullman E-Klasse 5 Quadro K3100M, 4790K, Samsung SSD SM951 256GB MZHPV256HDGL	55 fps -23%
Dell Precision M6800 Quadro K3100M, 4800MQ, WDC Scorpio Black WD7500BPKT-80PK4T0	54.9 fps -23%
1920x1080 Lightwave (sort by value)
MSI WT72-6QM Quadro M5000M, E3-1505M v5, Toshiba NVMe THNSN5256GPU7	59.6 fps
MSI WT72-2OL32SR311BW Quadro K4100M, 4980HQ, 4x Toshiba HG6 THNSNJ256G8NU (RAID 0)	53 fps -11%
HP ZBook 17 G2 J8Z55ET FirePro M6100, 4710MQ, HGST Travelstar 7K1000 HTS721075A9E630	77.8 fps +31%
Bullman E-Klasse 5 Quadro K3100M, 4790K, Samsung SSD SM951 256GB MZHPV256HDGL	56 fps -6%
Dell Precision M6800 Quadro K3100M, 4800MQ, WDC Scorpio Black WD7500BPKT-80PK4T0	51 fps -14%
1920x1080 Ensight (sort by value)
MSI WT72-6QM Quadro M5000M, E3-1505M v5, Toshiba NVMe THNSN5256GPU7	74 fps
MSI WT72-2OL32SR311BW Quadro K4100M, 4980HQ, 4x Toshiba HG6 THNSNJ256G8NU (RAID 0)	52 fps -30%
HP ZBook 17 G2 J8Z55ET FirePro M6100, 4710MQ, HGST Travelstar 7K1000 HTS721075A9E630	55.7 fps -25%
Bullman E-Klasse 5 Quadro K3100M, 4790K, Samsung SSD SM951 256GB MZHPV256HDGL	39 fps -47%
Dell Precision M6800 Quadro K3100M, 4800MQ, WDC Scorpio Black WD7500BPKT-80PK4T0	34.18 fps -54%
1920x1080 Catia (sort by value)
MSI WT72-6QM Quadro M5000M, E3-1505M v5, Toshiba NVMe THNSN5256GPU7	55.3 fps
MSI WT72-2OL32SR311BW Quadro K4100M, 4980HQ, 4x Toshiba HG6 THNSNJ256G8NU (RAID 0)	57 fps +3%
HP ZBook 17 G2 J8Z55ET FirePro M6100, 4710MQ, HGST Travelstar 7K1000 HTS721075A9E630	49.28 fps -11%
Bullman E-Klasse 5 Quadro K3100M, 4790K, Samsung SSD SM951 256GB MZHPV256HDGL	47 fps -15%
Dell Precision M6800 Quadro K3100M, 4800MQ, WDC Scorpio Black WD7500BPKT-80PK4T0	50.3 fps -9%

SPECviewperf 12
1900x1060 Solidworks (sw-03) (sort by value)
MSI WT72-6QM Quadro M5000M, E3-1505M v5, Toshiba NVMe THNSN5256GPU7	101 fps
MSI WT72-2OL32SR311BW Quadro K4100M, 4980HQ, 4x Toshiba HG6 THNSNJ256G8NU (RAID 0)	83 fps -18%
HP ZBook 17 G2 J8Z55ET FirePro M6100, 4710MQ, HGST Travelstar 7K1000 HTS721075A9E630	66.5 fps -34%
Bullman E-Klasse 5 Quadro K3100M, 4790K, Samsung SSD SM951 256GB MZHPV256HDGL	62 fps -39%
1900x1060 Siemens NX (snx-02) (sort by value)
MSI WT72-6QM Quadro M5000M, E3-1505M v5, Toshiba NVMe THNSN5256GPU7	86.9 fps
MSI WT72-2OL32SR311BW Quadro K4100M, 4980HQ, 4x Toshiba HG6 THNSNJ256G8NU (RAID 0)	45 fps -48%
HP ZBook 17 G2 J8Z55ET FirePro M6100, 4710MQ, HGST Travelstar 7K1000 HTS721075A9E630	50.7 fps -42%
Bullman E-Klasse 5 Quadro K3100M, 4790K, Samsung SSD SM951 256GB MZHPV256HDGL	32 fps -63%
1900x1060 Showcase (showcase-01) (sort by value)
MSI WT72-6QM Quadro M5000M, E3-1505M v5, Toshiba NVMe THNSN5256GPU7	44.14 fps
MSI WT72-2OL32SR311BW Quadro K4100M, 4980HQ, 4x Toshiba HG6 THNSNJ256G8NU (RAID 0)	23 fps -48%
HP ZBook 17 G2 J8Z55ET FirePro M6100, 4710MQ, HGST Travelstar 7K1000 HTS721075A9E630	26.31 fps -40%
Bullman E-Klasse 5 Quadro K3100M, 4790K, Samsung SSD SM951 256GB MZHPV256HDGL	19 fps -57%
1900x1060 Medical (medical-01) (sort by value)
MSI WT72-6QM Quadro M5000M, E3-1505M v5, Toshiba NVMe THNSN5256GPU7	31.35 fps
MSI WT72-2OL32SR311BW Quadro K4100M, 4980HQ, 4x Toshiba HG6 THNSNJ256G8NU (RAID 0)	14 fps -55%
HP ZBook 17 G2 J8Z55ET FirePro M6100, 4710MQ, HGST Travelstar 7K1000 HTS721075A9E630	16.27 fps -48%
Bullman E-Klasse 5 Quadro K3100M, 4790K, Samsung SSD SM951 256GB MZHPV256HDGL	10 fps -68%
1900x1060 Maya (maya-04) (sort by value)
MSI WT72-6QM Quadro M5000M, E3-1505M v5, Toshiba NVMe THNSN5256GPU7	69.6 fps
MSI WT72-2OL32SR311BW Quadro K4100M, 4980HQ, 4x Toshiba HG6 THNSNJ256G8NU (RAID 0)	39 fps -44%
HP ZBook 17 G2 J8Z55ET FirePro M6100, 4710MQ, HGST Travelstar 7K1000 HTS721075A9E630	39.17 fps -44%
Bullman E-Klasse 5 Quadro K3100M, 4790K, Samsung SSD SM951 256GB MZHPV256HDGL	28 fps -60%
1900x1060 Energy (energy-01) (sort by value)
MSI WT72-6QM Quadro M5000M, E3-1505M v5, Toshiba NVMe THNSN5256GPU7	6.86 fps
MSI WT72-2OL32SR311BW Quadro K4100M, 4980HQ, 4x Toshiba HG6 THNSNJ256G8NU (RAID 0)	2.12 fps -69%
HP ZBook 17 G2 J8Z55ET FirePro M6100, 4710MQ, HGST Travelstar 7K1000 HTS721075A9E630	0.59 fps -91%
Bullman E-Klasse 5 Quadro K3100M, 4790K, Samsung SSD SM951 256GB MZHPV256HDGL	2.1 fps -69%
1900x1060 Creo (creo-01) (sort by value)
MSI WT72-6QM Quadro M5000M, E3-1505M v5, Toshiba NVMe THNSN5256GPU7	81.3 fps
MSI WT72-2OL32SR311BW Quadro K4100M, 4980HQ, 4x Toshiba HG6 THNSNJ256G8NU (RAID 0)	38 fps -53%
HP ZBook 17 G2 J8Z55ET FirePro M6100, 4710MQ, HGST Travelstar 7K1000 HTS721075A9E630	42.61 fps -48%
Bullman E-Klasse 5 Quadro K3100M, 4790K, Samsung SSD SM951 256GB MZHPV256HDGL	29 fps -64%
1900x1060 Catia (catia-04) (sort by value)
MSI WT72-6QM Quadro M5000M, E3-1505M v5, Toshiba NVMe THNSN5256GPU7	94.4 fps
MSI WT72-2OL32SR311BW Quadro K4100M, 4980HQ, 4x Toshiba HG6 THNSNJ256G8NU (RAID 0)	48 fps -49%
HP ZBook 17 G2 J8Z55ET FirePro M6100, 4710MQ, HGST Travelstar 7K1000 HTS721075A9E630	44.02 fps -53%
Bullman E-Klasse 5 Quadro K3100M, 4790K, Samsung SSD SM951 256GB MZHPV256HDGL	33 fps -65%

	baixo	média	alto	ultra
Dirt 3 (2011)	211	202.7	171.4	158.2
Hitman: Absolution (2012)	83.5	75.9	67.2	50.3
Tomb Raider (2013)	406.8	319.6	227.9	107
Metro: Last Light (2013)	127.5	125.3	104.3	60.8
GRID 2 (2013)	176.3	145.6	134.5	102.7
Company of Heroes 2 (2013)	53.4	52	51.4	34.4
Thief (2014)	97.6	92.3	89.4	80.5
Middle-earth: Shadow of Mordor (2014)	167.8	143.2	87.4	63.6

Barulho

Ocioso		33.3 / 33.4 / 33.5 dB
DVD		34 / dB
Carga		38.8 / 40.2 dB

	30 dB silencioso 40 dB(A) audível 50 dB(A) ruidosamente alto
min: , med: , max: Audix TM1 Arta (15 cm de distância)

Carga Máxima

Inatividade


32.4 °C	40.6 °C	34.8 °C
28.8 °C	35.2 °C	28.8 °C
23.6 °C	22.8 °C	25.6 °C

Máximo: 40.6 °C
Médio: 30.3 °C


42.6 °C	34 °C	34.4 °C
25.4 °C	22.2 °C	23 °C
22.8 °C	23.2 °C	23.8 °C

Máximo: 42.6 °C
Médio: 27.9 °C

alimentação elétrica 46 °C | Temperatura do quarto 19 °C | Raytek Raynger ST

(+) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 30.3 °C / 87 F, compared to the average of 32 °C / 90 F for the devices in the class Workstation.
(±) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 40.6 °C / 105 F, compared to the average of 38.2 °C / 101 F, ranging from 22.2 to 69.8 °C for the class Workstation.
(±) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 42.6 °C / 109 F, compared to the average of 41.2 °C / 106 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 25.5 °C / 78 F, compared to the device average of 32 °C / 90 F.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are cooler than skin temperature with a maximum of 26.4 °C / 79.5 F and are therefore cool to the touch.
(±) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 27.8 °C / 82 F (+1.4 °C / 2.5 F).

	MSI WT72-6QM 87 Wh	HP ZBook 17 G2 J8Z55ET 75 Wh	Bullman E-Klasse 5 83 Wh	Dell Precision M6800 97 Wh	SCHENKER XMG U705 82 Wh
Battery Runtime		-49%	-30%	9%	-24%
Reader / Idle	413	162 -61%	166 -60%	492 19%	138 -67%
WiFi v1.3	245		144 -41%
Load	76	49 -36%	85 12%	75 -1%	91 20%
WiFi		149		352

Tempo de Execução da Bateria

Ocioso (sem WLAN, min brilho)		6h 53min
WiFi Websurfing		4h 05min
Carga (máximo brilho)		1h 16min

Pro

+ Muito bom desempenho geral e de CAD/3D

+ Excelente gerenciamento da temperatura

+ USB Tipo-C (Thunderbolt 3)

+ Fácil de manter com muitos slots e interfaces

+ Boa tela IPS

Contra

- Bastante caro

- Grande e pesado

- Alternação de GPU requer reinicialização

- Desempenho muito afogado com a bateria

- A cobertura do espaço de cores poderia ser melhor

- Baseado em plataforma de jogos

Com o workstation WT72-6QME, a MSI fornece uma atualização sólida para um produto que já era bom. Embora o desempenho da CPU Xeon E3-1505M não é inovador, oferece suporte para RAM ECC, que por sua vez aumenta a confiabilidade. Por falar em confiabilidade: embora um array RAID 0 posa fazer muito sentido para um portátil de jogos, ainda temos a dúvida de se não seria melhor incluir tolerância para falhas em um sistema onde a estabilidade e confiabilidade são peças chave. Originalmente projetado para jogos, o chassi tem uma solução de resfriamento bem projetada e inclusive é possível usar o aparelho o dia todo com uso intenso, sem afogamentos. No entanto, ativar o recurso "Cooler Boost" poderia incomodar os colegas de trabalho, dado que o nível de ruído é bastante substancial. A tela - usada em muitos sistemas de jogos de 17-polegadas - também é bom, embora desejaríamos uma melhor cobertura dos espaços de cor profissionais.

O workstation WT72 atualizado da MSI é mais uma vez uma opção sólida neste segmento - embora a configuração topo de linha pareça quase proibitivamente cara para um portátil de jogos modificado.

Esta é uma versão reduzida da análise original. Você pode ler a análise completa em inglês aqui.

MSI WT72-6QM - 2016-03-17 03/17/2016 v5 ^(old)
Bernie Pechlaner

Acabamento

83 / 98 → 85%

Teclado

81%

Mouse

89%

Conectividade

68 / 81 → 83%

Peso

51 / 10-66 → 73%

Bateria

76%

Pantalha

84%

Desempenho do jogos

99%

Desempenho da aplicação

98%

Workstation

91%

Temperatura

91 / 95 → 96%

Ruído

83 / 90 → 92%

Audio

82%

Camera

50 / 85 → 59%

Médio

80%

88%

Workstation - Médio equilibrado

Read about the changes in the new rating version 5

Price comparison

Editor of the original article: Bernie Pechlaner - Senior Tech Writer - 276 articles published on Notebookcheck since 2012

Please share our article, every link counts!

> Análises e revisões de portáteis e celulares > Análises > Análises > Breve Análise do Workstation MSI WT72-6QME

Bernie Pechlaner, 2016-02- 3 (Update: 2020-06- 8)