Breve Análise do Workstation MSI WS66 10TMT: Mais rápido que o Razer Blade 15 Studio Edition
Rating | Date | Model | Weight | Height | Size | Resolution | Price |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
83.4 % v7 (old) | 09/2020 | MSI WS66 10TMT-207US i9-10980HK, Quadro RTX 5000 Max-Q | 2.3 kg | 19.8 mm | 15.60" | 1920x1080 | |
87.8 % v7 (old) | 08/2020 | Dell Precision 7550 W-10885M, Quadro RTX 5000 Max-Q | 2.8 kg | 27.36 mm | 15.60" | 3840x2160 | |
86.3 % v7 (old) | 08/2020 | Dell Precision 5550 P91F i7-10875H, Quadro T2000 Max-Q | 2 kg | 18 mm | 15.60" | 3840x2400 | |
87 % v7 (old) | 08/2020 | Razer Blade 15 Studio Edition 2020 i7-10875H, Quadro RTX 5000 Max-Q | 2.2 kg | 13.98 mm | 15.60" | 3840x2160 | |
85.6 % v6 (old) | 09/2017 | MSI WS63VR 7RL-023US i7-7700HQ, Quadro P4000 Max-Q | 1.9 kg | 18 mm | 15.60" | 3840x2160 | |
82.1 % v7 (old) | 03/2020 | Acer ConceptD 3 Pro CN315-71P-73W1 i7-9750H, Quadro T1000 (Laptop) | 2.4 kg | 23.4 mm | 15.60" | 1920x1080 |
Os Top 10
» Os Top 10 Portáteis Multimídia
» Os Top 10 Portáteis de Jogos
» Os Top 10 Portáteis Leves para Jogos
» Os Top 10 Portáteis Acessíveis de Escritório/Empresariais
» Os Top 10 Portáteis Premium de Escritório/Empresariais
» Os Top 10 dos Portáteis Workstation
» Os Top 10 Subportáteis
» Os Top 10 Ultrabooks
» Os Top 10 Conversíveis
» Os Top 10 Tablets
» Os Top 10 Smartphones
» A melhores Telas de Portáteis Analisadas Pela Notebookcheck
» Top 10 dos portáteis abaixo dos 500 Euros da Notebookcheck
» Top 10 dos Portáteis abaixo dos 300 Euros
SD Card Reader | |
average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs) | |
MSI WS66 10TMT-207US (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
Razer Blade 15 RTX 2070 Super Max-Q (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
Dell Precision 5550 P91F (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
Dell Precision 7550 (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
MSI WS63VR 7RL-023US | |
MSI WE75 9TK (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
maximum AS SSD Seq Read Test (1GB) | |
MSI WS63VR 7RL-023US | |
MSI WS66 10TMT-207US (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
Razer Blade 15 RTX 2070 Super Max-Q (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
Dell Precision 5550 P91F (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
Dell Precision 7550 (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
MSI WE75 9TK (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) |
|
iluminação: 91 %
iluminação com acumulador: 374.5 cd/m²
Contraste: 892:1 (Preto: 0.42 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 4.05 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.91, calibrated: 4.36
ΔE Greyscale 2.6 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
86.3% sRGB (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
56.4% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
63.6% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
86.9% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
62.8% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.21
MSI WS66 10TMT-207US AU Optronics B156HAB03.0, IPS, 15.6", 1920x1080 | Dell Precision 7550 AU Optronics B156ZAN, IPS, 15.6", 3840x2160 | Dell Precision 5550 P91F Sharp LQ156R1, IPS, 15.6", 3840x2400 | Razer Blade 15 Studio Edition 2020 Samsung SDCA029, OLED, 15.6", 3840x2160 | MSI WS63VR 7RL-023US SAMSUNG LƒFL156FL02-101 , IPS, 15.6", 3840x2160 | Acer ConceptD 3 Pro CN315-71P-73W1 Chi Mei N156HCE-EN2, IPS, 15.6", 1920x1080 | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Display | 33% | 38% | 42% | -22% | 36% | |
Display P3 Coverage | 62.8 | 82.1 31% | 89.9 43% | 99.9 59% | 47.43 -24% | 97.9 56% |
sRGB Coverage | 86.9 | 99.6 15% | 100 15% | 100 15% | 71.4 -18% | 99.9 15% |
AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage | 63.6 | 96.8 52% | 99.9 57% | 97.3 53% | 49 -23% | 87.2 37% |
Response Times | -16% | -11% | 89% | 10% | 25% | |
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% * | 44.8 ? | 51.2 ? -14% | 46 ? -3% | 4 ? 91% | 36.8 ? 18% | 33 ? 26% |
Response Time Black / White * | 28.8 ? | 34 ? -18% | 34 ? -18% | 4 ? 86% | 28.4 ? 1% | 22 ? 24% |
PWM Frequency | 1351 ? | |||||
Screen | -2% | 1% | 212% | -27% | 16% | |
Brightness middle | 374.5 | 473.5 26% | 469.8 25% | 380 1% | 259.4 -31% | 343 -8% |
Brightness | 363 | 461 27% | 464 28% | 388 7% | 247 -32% | 309 -15% |
Brightness Distribution | 91 | 90 -1% | 85 -7% | 93 2% | 85 -7% | 85 -7% |
Black Level * | 0.42 | 0.55 -31% | 0.42 -0% | 0.018 96% | 0.43 -2% | 0.22 48% |
Contrast | 892 | 861 -3% | 1119 25% | 21111 2267% | 603 -32% | 1559 75% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 4.05 | 4.8 -19% | 5.16 -27% | 5.47 -35% | 5.5 -36% | 3.73 8% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 8.17 | 8.73 -7% | 9.33 -14% | 8.19 -0% | 12.7 -55% | 6.51 20% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 calibrated * | 4.36 | 3.08 29% | 3.75 14% | 3.04 30% | 1.43 67% | |
Greyscale dE 2000 * | 2.6 | 5.6 -115% | 5.5 -112% | 5.3 -104% | 3.6 -38% | 4.24 -63% |
Gamma | 2.21 100% | 2.34 94% | 2 110% | 2.15 102% | 2.24 98% | 2.2 100% |
CCT | 7027 93% | 7549 86% | 6198 105% | 6128 106% | 7163 91% | 6329 103% |
Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998) | 56.4 | 86.4 53% | 89.2 58% | 86 52% | 45 -20% | 78 38% |
Color Space (Percent of sRGB) | 86.3 | 99.7 16% | 100 16% | 100 16% | 71 -18% | 100 16% |
Total Average (Program / Settings) | 5% /
3% | 9% /
6% | 114% /
165% | -13% /
-21% | 26% /
21% |
* ... smaller is better
Display Response Times
↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
---|---|---|
28.8 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 17.2 ms rise | |
↘ 11.6 ms fall | ||
The screen shows relatively slow response rates in our tests and may be too slow for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 74 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (20.9 ms). | ||
↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
44.8 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 21.2 ms rise | |
↘ 23.6 ms fall | ||
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 74 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (32.8 ms). |
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
Screen flickering / PWM not detected | |||
In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8715 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured. |
Cinebench R15: CPU Single 64Bit | CPU Multi 64Bit
Blender: v2.79 BMW27 CPU
7-Zip 18.03: 7z b 4 -mmt1 | 7z b 4
Geekbench 5.5: Single-Core | Multi-Core
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2: 4k Preset
LibreOffice : 20 Documents To PDF
R Benchmark 2.5: Overall mean
Cinebench R20 / CPU (Multi Core) | |
Intel Core i9-9900KS, Nvidia Titan RTX | |
Eluktronics RP-15 | |
MSI WS66 10TMT-207US | |
Average Intel Core i9-10980HK (3526 - 4487, n=13) | |
Dell Precision 7550 | |
Dell Precision 5550 P91F | |
Razer Blade 15 RTX 2070 Super Max-Q | |
HP Envy 15-ep0098nr | |
Acer ConceptD 9 Pro | |
Acer ConceptD 3 Pro CN315-71P-73W1 |
Cinebench R20 / CPU (Single Core) | |
Intel Core i9-9900KS, Nvidia Titan RTX | |
Acer ConceptD 9 Pro | |
MSI WS66 10TMT-207US | |
Dell Precision 5550 P91F | |
Eluktronics RP-15 | |
Razer Blade 15 RTX 2070 Super Max-Q | |
Dell Precision 7550 | |
Average Intel Core i9-10980HK (465 - 507, n=13) | |
Acer ConceptD 3 Pro CN315-71P-73W1 | |
HP Envy 15-ep0098nr |
Cinebench R15 / CPU Single 64Bit | |
Intel Core i9-9900KS, Nvidia Titan RTX | |
MSI WS66 10TMT-207US | |
Dell Precision 7550 | |
Average Intel Core i9-10980HK (198 - 219, n=15) | |
Dell Precision 5550 P91F | |
Razer Blade 15 RTX 2070 Super Max-Q | |
Acer ConceptD 9 Pro | |
HP Envy 15-ep0098nr | |
Eluktronics RP-15 | |
Acer ConceptD 3 Pro CN315-71P-73W1 |
Cinebench R15 / CPU Multi 64Bit | |
Intel Core i9-9900KS, Nvidia Titan RTX | |
Eluktronics RP-15 | |
Average Intel Core i9-10980HK (1606 - 1862, n=15) | |
MSI WS66 10TMT-207US | |
Dell Precision 7550 | |
Acer ConceptD 9 Pro | |
Dell Precision 5550 P91F | |
Razer Blade 15 RTX 2070 Super Max-Q | |
HP Envy 15-ep0098nr | |
Acer ConceptD 3 Pro CN315-71P-73W1 |
Blender / v2.79 BMW27 CPU | |
Acer ConceptD 3 Pro CN315-71P-73W1 | |
HP Envy 15-ep0098nr | |
Dell Precision 5550 P91F | |
Razer Blade 15 RTX 2070 Super Max-Q | |
Dell Precision 7550 | |
Average Intel Core i9-10980HK (239 - 299, n=13) | |
MSI WS66 10TMT-207US | |
Eluktronics RP-15 | |
Intel Core i9-9900KS, Nvidia Titan RTX |
7-Zip 18.03 / 7z b 4 -mmt1 | |
Intel Core i9-9900KS, Nvidia Titan RTX | |
Dell Precision 7550 | |
Acer ConceptD 9 Pro | |
Average Intel Core i9-10980HK (5081 - 5542, n=13) | |
Dell Precision 5550 P91F | |
MSI WS66 10TMT-207US | |
Razer Blade 15 RTX 2070 Super Max-Q | |
Eluktronics RP-15 | |
Acer ConceptD 3 Pro CN315-71P-73W1 | |
HP Envy 15-ep0098nr |
7-Zip 18.03 / 7z b 4 | |
Intel Core i9-9900KS, Nvidia Titan RTX | |
Eluktronics RP-15 | |
MSI WS66 10TMT-207US | |
Dell Precision 7550 | |
Average Intel Core i9-10980HK (43786 - 49275, n=13) | |
Dell Precision 5550 P91F | |
Acer ConceptD 9 Pro | |
Razer Blade 15 RTX 2070 Super Max-Q | |
HP Envy 15-ep0098nr | |
Acer ConceptD 3 Pro CN315-71P-73W1 |
Geekbench 5.5 / Single-Core | |
MSI WS66 10TMT-207US | |
Average Intel Core i9-10980HK (1283 - 1401, n=12) | |
Dell Precision 7550 | |
Dell Precision 5550 P91F | |
Acer ConceptD 9 Pro | |
Razer Blade 15 RTX 2070 Super Max-Q | |
HP Envy 15-ep0098nr | |
Eluktronics RP-15 | |
Acer ConceptD 3 Pro CN315-71P-73W1 |
Geekbench 5.5 / Multi-Core | |
Eluktronics RP-15 | |
Dell Precision 5550 P91F | |
Dell Precision 7550 | |
MSI WS66 10TMT-207US | |
Average Intel Core i9-10980HK (7634 - 8666, n=12) | |
Acer ConceptD 9 Pro | |
Razer Blade 15 RTX 2070 Super Max-Q | |
HP Envy 15-ep0098nr | |
Acer ConceptD 3 Pro CN315-71P-73W1 |
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 / 4k Preset | |
Intel Core i9-9900KS, Nvidia Titan RTX | |
Eluktronics RP-15 | |
Dell Precision 7550 | |
MSI WS66 10TMT-207US | |
Average Intel Core i9-10980HK (12 - 14.6, n=13) | |
Razer Blade 15 RTX 2070 Super Max-Q | |
Dell Precision 5550 P91F | |
HP Envy 15-ep0098nr | |
Acer ConceptD 3 Pro CN315-71P-73W1 |
LibreOffice / 20 Documents To PDF | |
Eluktronics RP-15 | |
Acer ConceptD 9 Pro | |
Acer ConceptD 3 Pro CN315-71P-73W1 | |
Average Intel Core i9-10980HK (44 - 89, n=13) | |
HP Envy 15-ep0098nr | |
Dell Precision 7550 | |
Razer Blade 15 RTX 2070 Super Max-Q | |
MSI WS66 10TMT-207US | |
Dell Precision 5550 P91F |
R Benchmark 2.5 / Overall mean | |
Acer ConceptD 3 Pro CN315-71P-73W1 | |
HP Envy 15-ep0098nr | |
Dell Precision 5550 P91F | |
Razer Blade 15 RTX 2070 Super Max-Q | |
Average Intel Core i9-10980HK (0.561 - 0.596, n=13) | |
Eluktronics RP-15 | |
MSI WS66 10TMT-207US | |
Dell Precision 7550 |
* ... smaller is better
PCMark 8 Home Score Accelerated v2 | 4418 pontos | |
PCMark 8 Work Score Accelerated v2 | 5629 pontos | |
PCMark 10 Score | 5846 pontos | |
Ajuda |
DPC Latencies / LatencyMon - interrupt to process latency (max), Web, Youtube, Prime95 | |
Dell Precision 7550 | |
MSI WS66 10TMT-207US | |
Razer Blade 15 RTX 2070 Super Max-Q | |
Acer ConceptD 3 Pro CN315-71P-73W1 | |
Razer Blade 15 Studio Edition 2020 | |
Dell Precision 5550 P91F |
* ... smaller is better
MSI WS66 10TMT-207US WDC PC SN730 SDBPNTY-1T00 | Dell Precision 7550 SK Hynix PC601A NVMe 1TB | Dell Precision 5550 P91F SK Hynix PC601A NVMe 1TB | Razer Blade 15 Studio Edition 2020 Samsung PM981a MZVLB1T0HBLR | MSI WS63VR 7RL-023US Toshiba NVMe THNSN5512GPU7 | Acer ConceptD 3 Pro CN315-71P-73W1 WDC PC SN720 SDAPNTW-512G | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AS SSD | -30% | -117% | -18% | -47% | -22% | |
Seq Read | 2321 | 2028 -13% | 2039 -12% | 1982 -15% | 2133 -8% | 2973 28% |
Seq Write | 2620 | 1193 -54% | 1376 -47% | 2252 -14% | 1287 -51% | 2429 -7% |
4K Read | 48.57 | 42.31 -13% | 44.11 -9% | 47.13 -3% | 40.2 -17% | 24.7 -49% |
4K Write | 165.1 | 105.5 -36% | 113.3 -31% | 88.2 -47% | 114.6 -31% | 115.3 -30% |
4K-64 Read | 1712 | 1128 -34% | 1094 -36% | 1481 -13% | 710 -59% | 1243 -27% |
4K-64 Write | 2174 | 1537 -29% | 1630 -25% | 1842 -15% | 314 -86% | 835 -62% |
Access Time Read * | 0.057 | 0.069 -21% | 0.059 -4% | 0.087 -53% | 0.128 -125% | |
Access Time Write * | 0.068 | 0.106 -56% | 0.99 -1356% | 0.04 41% | 0.033 51% | 0.034 50% |
Score Read | 1993 | 1373 -31% | 1342 -33% | 1726 -13% | 962 -52% | 1565 -21% |
Score Write | 2601 | 1762 -32% | 1881 -28% | 2155 -17% | 557 -79% | 1193 -54% |
Score Total | 5630 | 3801 -32% | 3883 -31% | 4781 -15% | 1979 -65% | 3525 -37% |
Copy ISO MB/s | 2589 | 1768 -32% | 2489 -4% | 1982 -23% | 2136 -17% | |
Copy Program MB/s | 791 | 627 -21% | 682 -14% | 501 -37% | 489.6 -38% | |
Copy Game MB/s | 1625 | 1477 -9% | 1515 -7% | 1140 -30% | 1163 -28% | |
CrystalDiskMark 5.2 / 6 | -16% | -17% | -6% | -27% | -19% | |
Write 4K | 185.8 | 121 -35% | 122.6 -34% | 132.9 -28% | 157.1 -15% | 113.2 -39% |
Read 4K | 47.21 | 42.16 -11% | 42.4 -10% | 46.73 -1% | 43.82 -7% | 31.1 -34% |
Write Seq | 2874 | 2150 -25% | 2167 -25% | 2214 -23% | 1110 -61% | 2540 -12% |
Read Seq | 1786 | 1755 -2% | 1747 -2% | 2018 13% | 1162 -35% | 2005 12% |
Write 4K Q32T1 | 466.8 | 395.3 -15% | 388.8 -17% | 478.9 3% | 361.3 -23% | 331.4 -29% |
Read 4K Q32T1 | 563 | 381.8 -32% | 367.3 -35% | 540 -4% | 563 0% | 368.3 -35% |
Write Seq Q32T1 | 3091 | 2730 -12% | 2629 -15% | 2975 -4% | 1558 -50% | 2535 -18% |
Read Seq Q32T1 | 3395 | 3468 2% | 3460 2% | 3195 -6% | 2635 -22% | 3427 1% |
Total Average (Program / Settings) | -23% /
-25% | -67% /
-81% | -12% /
-14% | -37% /
-39% | -21% /
-21% |
* ... smaller is better
Disk Throttling: DiskSpd Read Loop, Queue Depth 8
3DMark 11 | |
1280x720 Performance GPU | |
Acer ConceptD 9 Pro | |
MSI WS66 10TMT-207US | |
Average NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Max-Q (24156 - 28524, n=9) | |
MSI RTX 2060 Gaming Z 6G | |
MSI WS75 9TL-636 | |
Dell Precision 7720 | |
Asus ProArt StudioBook Pro 17 W700G3T | |
Fujitsu Celsius H980 | |
Acer ConceptD 3 Pro CN315-71P-73W1 | |
Dell Precision 5540 | |
Dell Precision 5550 P91F | |
MSI WP65 | |
Dell Latitude 5420 Rugged-P85G | |
HP ZBook 15u G6 6TP54EA | |
1280x720 Performance Combined | |
MSI WS66 10TMT-207US | |
Acer ConceptD 9 Pro | |
MSI RTX 2060 Gaming Z 6G | |
MSI WS75 9TL-636 | |
Average NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Max-Q (11312 - 16451, n=9) | |
Dell Precision 5550 P91F | |
Fujitsu Celsius H980 | |
Acer ConceptD 3 Pro CN315-71P-73W1 | |
Dell Precision 7720 | |
Asus ProArt StudioBook Pro 17 W700G3T | |
Dell Precision 5540 | |
MSI WP65 | |
Dell Latitude 5420 Rugged-P85G | |
HP ZBook 15u G6 6TP54EA |
3DMark 11 Performance | 23789 pontos | |
3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score | 52005 pontos | |
3DMark Fire Strike Score | 18226 pontos | |
3DMark Time Spy Score | 7920 pontos | |
Ajuda |
baixo | média | alto | ultra | |
---|---|---|---|---|
The Witcher 3 (2015) | 353.2 | 249.8 | 158.2 | 81.1 |
Dota 2 Reborn (2015) | 161 | 143 | 130 | 122 |
Final Fantasy XV Benchmark (2018) | 177 | 103 | 80.8 | |
X-Plane 11.11 (2018) | 113 | 98.9 | 82 |
MSI WS66 10TMT-207US Quadro RTX 5000 Max-Q, i9-10980HK, WDC PC SN730 SDBPNTY-1T00 | Dell Precision 7550 Quadro RTX 5000 Max-Q, W-10885M, SK Hynix PC601A NVMe 1TB | Dell Precision 5550 P91F Quadro T2000 Max-Q, i7-10875H, SK Hynix PC601A NVMe 1TB | Razer Blade 15 Studio Edition 2020 Quadro RTX 5000 Max-Q, i7-10875H, Samsung PM981a MZVLB1T0HBLR | MSI WS63VR 7RL-023US Quadro P4000 Max-Q, i7-7700HQ, Toshiba NVMe THNSN5512GPU7 | Acer ConceptD 3 Pro CN315-71P-73W1 Quadro T1000 (Laptop), i7-9750H, WDC PC SN720 SDAPNTW-512G | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Noise | 6% | 13% | 4% | 4% | 7% | |
off / environment * | 26 | 25.8 1% | 26.2 -1% | 30.1 -16% | 28 -8% | 31.2 -20% |
Idle Minimum * | 32 | 25.8 19% | 26.2 18% | 30.1 6% | 33.2 -4% | 31.2 2% |
Idle Average * | 32 | 25.8 19% | 26.2 18% | 30.1 6% | 33.2 -4% | 31.2 2% |
Idle Maximum * | 32 | 25.9 19% | 26.2 18% | 30.1 6% | 33.2 -4% | 31.5 2% |
Load Average * | 42 | 51.2 -22% | 39.2 7% | 42.3 -1% | 41.4 1% | 38.4 9% |
Witcher 3 ultra * | 47.4 | 51.9 -9% | 39 18% | 48.2 -2% | 38.4 19% | 36.9 22% |
Load Maximum * | 59.7 | 51.9 13% | 50.6 15% | 42.1 29% | 43.5 27% | 41.2 31% |
* ... smaller is better
Barulho
Ocioso |
| 32 / 32 / 32 dB |
Carga |
| 42 / 59.7 dB |
| ||
30 dB silencioso 40 dB(A) audível 50 dB(A) ruidosamente alto |
||
min: , med: , max: Earthworks M23R, Arta (15 cm de distância) environment noise: 26 dB(A) |
(±) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 44.2 °C / 112 F, compared to the average of 38.2 °C / 101 F, ranging from 22.2 to 69.8 °C for the class Workstation.
(-) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 46.2 °C / 115 F, compared to the average of 41.3 °C / 106 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 29 °C / 84 F, compared to the device average of 32 °C / 90 F.
(±) Playing The Witcher 3, the average temperature for the upper side is 36.8 °C / 98 F, compared to the device average of 32 °C / 90 F.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are reaching skin temperature as a maximum (32 °C / 89.6 F) and are therefore not hot.
(-) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 27.8 °C / 82 F (-4.2 °C / -7.6 F).
MSI WS66 10TMT-207US audio analysis
(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (80.5 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 22.6% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (9.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 7.5% higher than median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (11.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3.4% away from median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (8.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (26.1% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 87% of all tested devices in this class were better, 6% similar, 7% worse
» The best had a delta of 7%, average was 18%, worst was 35%
Compared to all devices tested
» 78% of all tested devices were better, 4% similar, 18% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Apple MacBook 12 (Early 2016) 1.1 GHz audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (83.6 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 11.3% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (14.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2.4% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (10.2% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 6% of all tested devices in this class were better, 2% similar, 92% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 19%, worst was 53%
Compared to all devices tested
» 4% of all tested devices were better, 1% similar, 95% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
desligado | 1.12 / 2.1 Watt |
Ocioso | 13.8 / 18.4 / 41.5 Watt |
Carga |
110.5 / 227.1 Watt |
Key:
min: ,
med: ,
max: Metrahit Energy |
MSI WS66 10TMT-207US i9-10980HK, Quadro RTX 5000 Max-Q, WDC PC SN730 SDBPNTY-1T00, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6" | Dell Precision 7550 W-10885M, Quadro RTX 5000 Max-Q, SK Hynix PC601A NVMe 1TB, IPS, 3840x2160, 15.6" | Dell Precision 5550 P91F i7-10875H, Quadro T2000 Max-Q, SK Hynix PC601A NVMe 1TB, IPS, 3840x2400, 15.6" | Razer Blade 15 Studio Edition 2020 i7-10875H, Quadro RTX 5000 Max-Q, Samsung PM981a MZVLB1T0HBLR, OLED, 3840x2160, 15.6" | MSI WS63VR 7RL-023US i7-7700HQ, Quadro P4000 Max-Q, Toshiba NVMe THNSN5512GPU7, IPS, 3840x2160, 15.6" | Acer ConceptD 3 Pro CN315-71P-73W1 i7-9750H, Quadro T1000 (Laptop), WDC PC SN720 SDAPNTW-512G, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6" | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Power Consumption | 13% | 40% | 12% | 29% | 58% | |
Idle Minimum * | 13.8 | 8.2 41% | 5.6 59% | 13.4 3% | 13.3 4% | 2.9 79% |
Idle Average * | 18.4 | 16.8 9% | 11.2 39% | 18 2% | 17.2 7% | 5.5 70% |
Idle Maximum * | 41.5 | 24.4 41% | 18.4 56% | 26.1 37% | 17.9 57% | 10.6 74% |
Load Average * | 110.5 | 131 -19% | 114 -3% | 115 -4% | 83.7 24% | 86 22% |
Witcher 3 ultra * | 151.6 | 156.6 -3% | 76.7 49% | 145 4% | 101.9 33% | 83 45% |
Load Maximum * | 227.1 | 201.8 11% | 134.2 41% | 165 27% | 114.3 50% | 100.7 56% |
* ... smaller is better
MSI WS66 10TMT-207US i9-10980HK, Quadro RTX 5000 Max-Q, 99.99 Wh | Dell Precision 7550 W-10885M, Quadro RTX 5000 Max-Q, 95 Wh | Dell Precision 5550 P91F i7-10875H, Quadro T2000 Max-Q, 86 Wh | Razer Blade 15 Studio Edition 2020 i7-10875H, Quadro RTX 5000 Max-Q, 80 Wh | MSI WS63VR 7RL-023US i7-7700HQ, Quadro P4000 Max-Q, 48 Wh | Acer ConceptD 3 Pro CN315-71P-73W1 i7-9750H, Quadro T1000 (Laptop), 58.7 Wh | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Battery Runtime | 11% | 67% | 16% | -47% | 3% | |
Reader / Idle | 499 | 666 33% | 1354 171% | 527 6% | 235 -53% | |
WiFi v1.3 | 469 | 534 14% | 540 15% | 341 -27% | 175 -63% | 484 3% |
Load | 71 | 62 -13% | 82 15% | 119 68% | 54 -24% |
Pro
Contra
Se você deseja o desempenho mais rápido possível com um design de chassi superfino, o MSI WS66 não o decepcionará. Seu CPU Core i9 é consistentemente mais rápido do que o Razer Blade 15 Studio, especialmente porque o último é limitado a um Core i7.
A mentalidade de "desempenho a todo custo" do WS66 tem seu quinhão de desvantagens. Mais notavelmente, o ruído do ventilador é significativamente mais alto do que o já mencionado Razer e a maioria dos outros workstations. Além disso, as origens de jogos do WS66 ultrafino significam que o sistema exclui muitos recursos básicos que os workstations tradicionais possuem. Você vai ter que dar uma olhada em modelos mais volumosos como o Dell Precision 7550, Lenovo ThinkPad P53, ou HP ZBook 15 se recursos como leitores de cartão inteligente, ampla gama de cores, botões do mouse, teclado numérico, NFC, SIM ou opções de painel mate são importantes para sua linha de trabalho.
O MSI WS66 é focado a laser para maximizar o desempenho para ser mais rápido do que o que seu design fino pode sugerir. Os recursos auxiliares são eliminados e o ruído do ventilador será muito alto se você quiser o máximo do sistema.
MSI WS66 10TMT-207US
- 08/30/2020 v7 (old)
Allen Ngo