Deutsch
English
Español
Français
Italiano
Nederlands
Polski
Русский
Türkçe
Svenska
Chinese
MagyarBreve Análise do Workstation MSI WE72 7RJ (7700HQ, FHD, M2200)
MSI WE72 7RJ (WE72 Serie)
Processador
Intel Core i7-7700HQ 4 x 2.8 - 3.8 GHz, Kaby Lake
Placa gráfica
NVIDIA Quadro M2200 - 4 GB VRAM, Análises do: 1037 MHz, Memoría: 1377 MHz, GDDR5, 377.11, Optimus
Memória
32 GB
, 2x 16 GB DDR4-2400, Dual-Channel, 2/2 slots em uso, até 32 GB
Pantalha
17.30 polegadas 16:9, 1920 x 1080 pixel 127 PPI, LP173WF4-SPF1, IPS, Brilhante: não
placa mãe
Intel HM175
Disco rígido
Samsung SM961 MZVPW256 m.2 PCI-e, 256 GB
, (+1 TB HDD HTS721010A9E630), 1100 GB livre
peso
2.924 kg, Suprimento de energia: 593 g
Preço
1799 Euro
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.
| SD Card Reader | |
| average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs) | |
| Dell Precision 7710 | |
| HP ZBook 17 G3 TZV66eA | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad P70 | |
| MSI WE72 7RJ | |
| maximum AS SSD Seq Read Test (1GB) | |
| HP ZBook 17 G3 TZV66eA | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad P70 | |
| Dell Precision 7710 | |
| MSI WE72 7RJ | |
| Networking | |
| iperf3 transmit AX12 | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad T570-20HAS01E00 | |
| MSI GE72 7RE-046 | |
| MSI WE72 7RJ | |
| iperf3 receive AX12 | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad T570-20HAS01E00 | |
| MSI WE72 7RJ | |
| MSI GE72 7RE-046 | |
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
LP173WF4-SPF1 tested with X-Rite i1Pro 2
Máximo: 317 cd/m² (Nits) Médio: 305.7 cd/m² Minimum: 4.9 cd/m²iluminação: 93 %
iluminação com acumulador: 301 cd/m²
Contraste: 974:1 (Preto: 0.31 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 6.2 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.92
ΔE Greyscale 7.3 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
85.2% sRGB (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
56% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
62.4% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
85.3% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
67.4% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.08
| MSI WE72 7RJ LP173WF4-SPF1, , 1920x1080, 17.3" | Dell Precision 7710 SDC8151, VHN17_173HL, , 1920x1080, 17.3" | Lenovo ThinkPad P70 LEN4123, , 3840x2160, 17.3" | HP ZBook 17 G3 TZV66eA SDC3854, , 1920x1080, 17.3" | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display | 8% | 30% | 8% | |
| Display P3 Coverage | 67.4 | 66.6 -1% | 90.8 35% | 67.3 0% |
| sRGB Coverage | 85.3 | 96.9 14% | 100 17% | 95.9 12% |
| AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage | 62.4 | 68.6 10% | 85.4 37% | 69 11% |
| Response Times | -24% | -1% | -10% | |
| Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% * | 45.2 ? | 50 ? -11% | 44 ? 3% | 50.4 ? -12% |
| Response Time Black / White * | 26.4 ? | 36 ? -36% | 27.6 ? -5% | 28.4 ? -8% |
| PWM Frequency | 198 ? | 228 ? | 200 ? | |
| Screen | 13% | 11% | 23% | |
| Brightness middle | 302 | 332 10% | 365 21% | 252 -17% |
| Brightness | 306 | 307 0% | 341 11% | 243 -21% |
| Brightness Distribution | 93 | 83 -11% | 85 -9% | 86 -8% |
| Black Level * | 0.31 | 0.33 -6% | 0.4 -29% | 0.21 32% |
| Contrast | 974 | 1006 3% | 913 -6% | 1200 23% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 6.2 | 3 52% | 3.8 39% | 2.2 65% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 10.6 | 3.8 64% | ||
| Greyscale dE 2000 * | 7.3 | 4 45% | 6.09 17% | 2.7 63% |
| Gamma | 2.08 106% | 2 110% | 2.3 96% | 2.28 96% |
| CCT | 7020 93% | 7089 92% | 6332 103% | 6686 97% |
| Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998) | 56 | 62 11% | 76.01 36% | 62 11% |
| Color Space (Percent of sRGB) | 85.2 | 97 14% | 99.97 17% | 96 13% |
| Total Average (Program / Settings) | -1% /
7% | 13% /
13% | 7% /
15% |
* ... smaller is better
Display Response Times
ℹ
Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.| ↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
|---|---|---|
| 26.4 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 14.8 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 11.6 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows relatively slow response rates in our tests and may be too slow for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 62 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (21 ms). | ||
| ↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
| 45.2 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 27.2 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 18 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 75 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (32.9 ms). | ||
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
ℹ
To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.| Screen flickering / PWM not detected |  | ||
In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8747 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured. | |||
Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64 Bit
| PCMark 8 | |
| Home Score Accelerated v2 | |
| Dell Precision 7710 | |
| MSI WE72 7RJ | |
| HP ZBook 17 G3 TZV66eA | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad P70 | |
| Work Score Accelerated v2 | |
| Dell Precision 7710 | |
| HP ZBook 17 G3 TZV66eA | |
| MSI WE72 7RJ | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad P70 | |
| PCMark 8 Home Score Accelerated v2 | 4295 pontos | |
| PCMark 8 Work Score Accelerated v2 | 5150 pontos | |
Ajuda | ||
| MSI WE72 7RJ Samsung SM961 MZVPW256 m.2 PCI-e | Lenovo ThinkPad P70 Samsung SSD PM871 MZNLN512HCJH | HP ZBook 17 G3 TZV66eA Samsung SM951 MZVPV256HDGL m.2 PCI-e | MSI GE72 7RE-046 Toshiba HG6 THNSNJ256G8NY | Dell Precision 5520 UHD Samsung SM961 MZVKW512HMJP m.2 PCI-e | MSI GS63VR 7RF-228US Samsung SM961 MZVKW512HMJP m.2 PCI-e | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CrystalDiskMark 3.0 | -44% | 30% | -45% | 10% | 9% | |
| Read Seq | 1492 | 509 -66% | 1481 -1% | 540 -64% | 2253 51% | 2141 43% |
| Write Seq | 1512 | 457.8 -70% | 1243 -18% | 495.7 -67% | 1662 10% | 1621 7% |
| Read 512 | 312.6 | 420.3 34% | 1202 285% | 455.1 46% | 459.1 47% | 499.7 60% |
| Write 512 | 1483 | 420.5 -72% | 1163 -22% | 481.4 -68% | 1611 9% | 1531 3% |
| Read 4k | 59.9 | 29.88 -50% | 58.7 -2% | 22.7 -62% | 56.1 -6% | 54.2 -10% |
| Write 4k | 184.2 | 104.1 -43% | 207.4 13% | 112.9 -39% | 169.4 -8% | 158.2 -14% |
| Read 4k QD32 | 681 | 391.8 -42% | 832 22% | 372.5 -45% | 633 -7% | 632 -7% |
| Write 4k QD32 | 590 | 350.4 -41% | 377.9 -36% | 212.9 -64% | 506 -14% | 527 -11% |
Samsung SM961 MZVPW256 m.2 PCI-e
Sequential Read:
1492 MB/s
Sequential Write:
1512 MB/s
512K Read:
312.6 MB/s
512K Write:
1483 MB/s
4K Read:
59.9 MB/s
4K Write:
184.2 MB/s
4K QD32 Read:
681 MB/s
4K QD32 Write:
590 MB/s
| 3DMark - 1920x1080 Fire Strike Graphics | |
| MSI GE72VR-6RF16H21 | |
| MSI GE72 7RE-046 | |
| Acer Predator 15 G9-592-7925 | |
| Dell Precision 7710 | |
| HP ZBook 17 G3 TZV66eA | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad P70 | |
| MSI GE72 965M Ti | |
| Asus FX553VD-DM249T | |
| MSI WE72 7RJ | |
| HP Omen 17-w010ng | |
| Dell Precision 5520 UHD | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad P50 | |
| Unigine Heaven 4.0 | |
| Extreme Preset DX11 | |
| MSI GE72VR-6RF16H21 | |
| MSI GE72 7RE-046 | |
| MSI WE72 7RJ | |
| MSI GE72 965M Ti | |
| HP Omen 17-w010ng | |
| Extreme Preset OpenGL | |
| MSI WE72 7RJ | |
| Unigine Valley 1.0 | |
| 1920x1080 Extreme HD DirectX AA:x8 | |
| MSI GE72VR-6RF16H21 | |
| HP ZBook 17 G3 TZV66eA | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad P70 | |
| Dell Precision 7710 | |
| MSI WE72 7RJ | |
| MSI GE72 965M Ti | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad P50 | |
| 1920x1080 Extreme HD Preset OpenGL AA:x8 | |
| HP ZBook 17 G3 TZV66eA | |
| Dell Precision 7710 | |
| MSI WE72 7RJ | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad P70 | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad P50 | |
| 3DMark 06 Standard Score | 26834 pontos | |
| 3DMark Vantage P Result | 24622 pontos | |
| 3DMark 11 Performance | 7453 pontos | |
| 3DMark Ice Storm Standard Score | 93770 pontos | |
| 3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score | 20388 pontos | |
| 3DMark Fire Strike Score | 5252 pontos | |
| 3DMark Fire Strike Extreme Score | 2627 pontos | |
| 3DMark Time Spy Score | 1845 pontos | |
Ajuda | ||
| Ghost Recon Wildlands - 1920x1080 High Preset AA:T AF:4x | |
| Gigabyte Aero 15 | |
| Acer Aspire VX5-591G-75C4 VX15 | |
| MSI WE72 7RJ | |
| MSI GL62M 7RD-077 | |
| Apple MacBook Pro 15 2016 (2.6 GHz, 450) | |
| For Honor - 1920x1080 High Preset AA:T AF:8x | |
| Gigabyte Aero 15 | |
| Razer Blade (2017) | |
| MSI WE72 7RJ | |
| MSI GE72 965M Ti | |
| Acer Aspire VX5-591G-75C4 VX15 | |
| Apple MacBook Pro 15 2016 (2.6 GHz, 450) | |
| Battlefield 1 - 1920x1080 High Preset AA:T | |
| SCHENKER XMG P407 | |
| Acer Aspire VN7-593G-73HP V15 Nitro BE | |
| MSI GE72 965M Ti | |
| Dell XPS 15 2017 9560 (7300HQ, Full-HD) | |
| MSI GL62M 7RD-077 | |
| MSI WE72 7RJ | |
| Apple MacBook Pro 15 2016 (2.9 GHz, 460) | |
| Apple MacBook Pro 15 2016 (2.6 GHz, 450) | |
| baixo | média | alto | ultra | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Tomb Raider (2013) | 381.4 | 238.8 | 149.3 | 70.2 |
| BioShock Infinite (2013) | 229.4 | 177.2 | 155.5 | 58.6 |
| Battlefield 4 (2013) | 171.5 | 148.3 | 115.9 | 47.8 |
| Thief (2014) | 108.8 | 88.6 | 74.8 | 39.6 |
| The Witcher 3 (2015) | 116.6 | 68.4 | 37.8 | 20.3 |
| Star Wars Battlefront (2015) | 148.8 | 119 | 56.4 | 48.2 |
| Rainbow Six Siege (2015) | 214.2 | 131.2 | 70.4 | 52.4 |
| Rise of the Tomb Raider (2016) | 128.7 | 72.8 | 40.7 | 34.4 |
| Battlefield 1 (2016) | 139.4 | 105.3 | 47.1 | 42 |
| For Honor (2017) | 78 | 52.3 | 50.5 | 36.2 |
| Ghost Recon Wildlands (2017) | 83.4 | 37.1 | 33.7 | 17.6 |
Barulho
| Ocioso |
| 36.3 / 36.3 / 36.6 dB |
| Carga |
| 40.4 / 46.6 dB |
 | ||
30 dB silencioso 40 dB(A) audível 50 dB(A) ruidosamente alto |
||
min:  , med:  , max:  Audix TM1, Arta (15 cm de distância) environment noise: 29.3 dB(A) | ||
(-) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 39.6 °C / 103 F, compared to the average of 32 °C / 90 F for the devices in the class Workstation.
(-) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 45.7 °C / 114 F, compared to the average of 38.2 °C / 101 F, ranging from 22.2 to 69.8 °C for the class Workstation.
(-) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 48.4 °C / 119 F, compared to the average of 41.2 °C / 106 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 26.7 °C / 80 F, compared to the device average of 32 °C / 90 F.
(-) The palmrests and touchpad can get very hot to the touch with a maximum of 40.4 °C / 104.7 F.
(-) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 27.9 °C / 82.2 F (-12.5 °C / -22.5 F).
(-) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 45.7 °C / 114 F, compared to the average of 38.2 °C / 101 F, ranging from 22.2 to 69.8 °C for the class Workstation.
(-) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 48.4 °C / 119 F, compared to the average of 41.2 °C / 106 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 26.7 °C / 80 F, compared to the device average of 32 °C / 90 F.
(-) The palmrests and touchpad can get very hot to the touch with a maximum of 40.4 °C / 104.7 F.
(-) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 27.9 °C / 82.2 F (-12.5 °C / -22.5 F).
Consumo de energia
| desligado | 0.57 / 1 Watt |
| Ocioso | 15 / 20.1 / 23.8 Watt |
| Carga |
85.6 / 128 Watt |
   
| |
Key:
min: ,
med: ,
max: Metrahit Energy | |
| MSI WE72 7RJ i7-7700HQ, Quadro M2200, Samsung SM961 MZVPW256 m.2 PCI-e, IPS, 1920x1080, 17.3" | Dell Precision 7710 E3-1535M v5, FirePro W7170M, Samsung SM951 MZVPV256HDGL m.2 PCI-e, IPS LED, 1920x1080, 17.3" | Lenovo ThinkPad P70 6820HQ, Quadro M3000M, Samsung SSD PM871 MZNLN512HCJH, IPS, 3840x2160, 17.3" | HP ZBook 17 G3 TZV66eA E3-1535M v5, Quadro M3000M, Samsung SM951 MZVPV256HDGL m.2 PCI-e, IPS, 1920x1080, 17.3" | MSI GE72 7RE-046 i7-7700HQ, GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile, Toshiba HG6 THNSNJ256G8NY, TN LED, 1920x1080, 17.3" | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power Consumption | -14% | 3% | 13% | 0% | |
| Idle Minimum * | 15 | 6.04 60% | 12.1 19% | 6.7 55% | 14 7% |
| Idle Average * | 20.1 | 15.2 24% | 19.7 2% | 12.5 38% | 20 -0% |
| Idle Maximum * | 23.8 | 42.3 -78% | 20.5 14% | 13.2 45% | 25 -5% |
| Load Average * | 85.6 | 112.8 -32% | 94.3 -10% | 128.2 -50% | 82 4% |
| Load Maximum * | 128 | 182.2 -42% | 139.6 -9% | 158.9 -24% | 135 -5% |
* ... smaller is better
| MSI WE72 7RJ i7-7700HQ, Quadro M2200, 51 Wh | Dell Precision 7710 E3-1535M v5, FirePro W7170M, 72 Wh | Lenovo ThinkPad P70 6820HQ, Quadro M3000M, 96 Wh | HP ZBook 17 G3 TZV66eA E3-1535M v5, Quadro M3000M, 96 Wh | MSI GE72 7RE-046 i7-7700HQ, GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile, 51.4 Wh | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Battery Runtime | 113% | 95% | 137% | 6% | |
| Reader / Idle | 268 | 775 189% | 464 73% | 956 257% | |
| H.264 | 181 | 283 56% | 452 150% | 299 65% | 195 8% |
| WiFi v1.3 | 177 | 365 106% | 361 104% | 290 64% | 184 4% |
| Load | 42 | 85 102% | 64 52% | 110 162% |
Pro
+ Boa qualidade de construção
+ Boa tela IPS FHD
+ Bom teclado com iluminação
+ Alto desempenho do sistema
+ Diversas ferramentas úteis (controle da ventoinha)
Contra
- Leitor de cartões muito lento
- Altas temperaturas da CPU
- Afogamentos da CPU sob uso intenso (carga apenas da CPU)
- Adaptador de força insuficiente
- Ventoinhas barulhentas e pulsantes
- Bateria pequena e com curtas durações
- Sem Thunderbolt 3
- Quase sem recursos empresariais
O MSI GE72 é um bom portátil de jogos, mas será que a implementação de uma placa de vídeo profissional é suficiente para criar um bom workstation móvel? Não ficamos convencidos após a análise, e o MSI WE72 tem muitas dificuldades em contra dos rivais estabelecidos. Muitas vezes você é lembrado de suas raízes de gamer. Não há uma porta docking, nem um Thunderbolt 3, portanto, você não pode usar boas estações docking.
Este pode não ser um grande problema dependendo do cenário de uso, mas também há limitações em termos de desempenho, bem como nas emissões. O resfriamento tem problemas com o calor do processador, porque a velocidade irá cair abaixo da velocidade básica (afogamento), mesmo quando apenas colocamos a CPU sob estresse, com o Cinebench. O adaptador de energia de 120 watts é outro fator limitante quando você estressa ambos os componentes. As ventoinhas também podem ser otimizadas, o qual é possível graças ao controle pré-instalados. No entanto, não há muita liberdade graças às altas temperaturas.
Recursos empresariais limitados e resfriamento fraco: A impressão do novo workstation móvel da MSI não é particularmente convincente. O WE72 ainda pode fazer sentido dependendo da carga de trabalho, especialmente quando você considera o preço atraente.
Uma vantagem do MSI WE72 é o preço competitivo ($1799), porque a familiar concorrência da série Precision da Dell ou os modelos ThinkPad P custam facilmente mais que $3000. Se você usar o MSI WE72 principalmente para aplicativos CAD e pode viver com as limitações mencionadas, definitivamente pode coloca-lo em sua lista de desejos.
MSI WE72 7RJ
- 05/09/2017 v6 (old)
Andreas Osthoff
Workstation - Médio equilibrado
Price comparison
