Breve Análise do Workstation HP ZBook Studio G4 (Xeon, Quadro M1200, DreamColor)
HP ZBook Studio G4-Y6K17EA (ZBook Studio Serie)
Processador
Intel Xeon E3-1505M v6 4 x 3 - 4 GHz, Kaby Lake
Placa gráfica
NVIDIA Quadro M1200 - 4 GB VRAM, Análises do: 1148 MHz, Memoría: 1253 MHz, GDDR5, ForceWare 382.16
Memória
32 GB
, DDR4-2400 (ECC), Dual-Channel
Pantalha
15.60 polegadas 16:9, 3840 x 2160 pixel 282 PPI, SHP1445, IPS, Brilhante: não
placa mãe
Intel CM236 (Skylake PCH-H)
Disco rígido
Samsung SM961 MZVKW512HMJP m.2 PCI-e, 512 GB
, 412 GB livre
peso
2.058 kg, Suprimento de energia: 451 g
Preço
3500 Euro
Links
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.
| SD Card Reader | |
| average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs) | |
| HP ZBook Studio G4-Y6K17EA (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
| Dell Precision 5520 UHD (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad P51 20HH0016GE (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
| HP ZBook Studio G3 (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad P51s 20HB000SGE (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
| maximum AS SSD Seq Read Test (1GB) | |
| Dell Precision 5520 UHD (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad P51 20HH0016GE (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
| HP ZBook Studio G3 (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
| HP ZBook Studio G4-Y6K17EA (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad P51s 20HB000SGE (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
SHP1445 tested with X-Rite i1Pro 2
Máximo: 386 cd/m² (Nits) Médio: 338.3 cd/m² Minimum: 13.7 cd/m²iluminação: 78 %
iluminação com acumulador: 324 cd/m²
Contraste: 1080:1 (Preto: 0.3 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 1.6 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.91
ΔE Greyscale 2.5 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
98.9% sRGB (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
85.7% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
98% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
98.9% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
82.6% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.21
| HP ZBook Studio G4-Y6K17EA SHP1445, , 3840x2160, 15.6" | HP ZBook Studio G3 Sharp SPH1445, , 3840x2160, 15.6" | Dell Precision 5520 UHD SHP1476, , 3840x2160, 15.6" | Lenovo ThinkPad P51 20HH0016GE LEN40BD, B156ZAN02.1, , 3840x2160, 15.6" | Lenovo ThinkPad P51s 20HB000SGE BOE NV156QUM-N44, , 3840x2160, 15.6" | Apple MacBook Pro 15 2017 (2.9 GHz, 560) 2880x1800, 15.4" | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display | 1% | -16% | 2% | -19% | ||
| Display P3 Coverage | 82.6 | 86 4% | 67.4 -18% | 86.3 4% | 69.7 -16% | |
| sRGB Coverage | 98.9 | 98.9 0% | 98.5 0% | 99.5 1% | 91.2 -8% | |
| AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage | 98 | 98 0% | 68.9 -30% | 99.3 1% | 66.8 -32% | |
| Response Times | -21% | -36% | 13% | -1% | 6% | |
| Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% * | 44.8 ? | 44 ? 2% | 59.2 ? -32% | 40.8 ? 9% | 38.4 ? 14% | 42.4 ? 5% |
| Response Time Black / White * | 30 ? | 23.2 ? 23% | 41.6 ? -39% | 25.2 ? 16% | 24.8 ? 17% | 28 ? 7% |
| PWM Frequency | 1497 ? | 200 ? -87% | 980 ? -35% | |||
| Screen | -53% | -21% | -11% | -30% | 18% | |
| Brightness middle | 324 | 310 -4% | 372.4 15% | 317 -2% | 317 -2% | 534 65% |
| Brightness | 338 | 299 -12% | 368 9% | 309 -9% | 290 -14% | 502 49% |
| Brightness Distribution | 78 | 86 10% | 90 15% | 89 14% | 85 9% | 86 10% |
| Black Level * | 0.3 | 0.29 3% | 0.48 -60% | 0.36 -20% | 0.32 -7% | 0.31 -3% |
| Contrast | 1080 | 1069 -1% | 776 -28% | 881 -18% | 991 -8% | 1723 60% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 1.6 | 5.9 -269% | 2.6 -63% | 2.7 -69% | 3.6 -125% | 1.8 -13% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 4.6 | 10.7 -133% | 5.6 -22% | 4.1 11% | 6.6 -43% | 3.8 17% |
| Greyscale dE 2000 * | 2.5 | 5.5 -120% | 3.7 -48% | 3 -20% | 4.2 -68% | 2.4 4% |
| Gamma | 2.21 100% | 2.09 105% | 2.14 103% | 2.27 97% | 2.24 98% | 2.27 97% |
| CCT | 6273 104% | 5980 109% | 7096 92% | 6077 107% | 6740 96% | 6563 99% |
| Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998) | 85.7 | 85 -1% | 63 -26% | 87.6 2% | 59.5 -31% | 77.92 -9% |
| Color Space (Percent of sRGB) | 98.9 | 99 0% | 99 0% | 99.5 1% | 91.1 -8% | 99.94 1% |
| Total Average (Program / Settings) | -24% /
-37% | -24% /
-22% | 1% /
-5% | -17% /
-22% | 12% /
16% |
* ... smaller is better
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
ℹ
To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.| Screen flickering / PWM detected | 1497 Hz | ≤ 50 % brightness setting |  |
The display backlight flickers at 1497 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) Flickering detected at a brightness setting of 50 % and below. There should be no flickering or PWM above this brightness setting. The frequency of 1497 Hz is quite high, so most users sensitive to PWM should not notice any flickering. In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8705 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured. | |||
Display Response Times
ℹ
Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.| ↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
|---|---|---|
| 30 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 17.2 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 12.8 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 78 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (20.9 ms). | ||
| ↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
| 44.8 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 22 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 22.8 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 74 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (32.8 ms). | ||
Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64 Bit
| PCMark 10 - Score | |
| Apple MacBook Pro 15 2017 (2.9 GHz, 560) | |
| HP ZBook Studio G4-Y6K17EA | |
| PCMark 8 Home Score Accelerated v2 | 4093 pontos | |
| PCMark 8 Creative Score Accelerated v2 | 5487 pontos | |
| PCMark 8 Work Score Accelerated v2 | 4408 pontos | |
| PCMark 10 Score | 4323 pontos | |
Ajuda | ||
| HP ZBook Studio G4-Y6K17EA Samsung SM961 MZVKW512HMJP m.2 PCI-e | Dell Precision 5520 UHD Samsung SM961 MZVKW512HMJP m.2 PCI-e | Lenovo ThinkPad P51 20HH0016GE Samsung PM961 NVMe MZVLW512HMJP | Lenovo ThinkPad P51s 20HB000SGE Samsung SSD PM961 1TB M.2 PCIe 3.0 x4 NVMe (MZVLW1T0) | HP ZBook Studio G3 Samsung SM951 MZVPV512HDGL m.2 PCI-e | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AS SSD | 5% | -2% | -23% | -25% | |
| Score Total | 3693 | 3681 0% | 3424 -7% | 2771 -25% | 2367 -36% |
| Score Write | 1412 | 1379 -2% | 917 -35% | 1271 -10% | 470 -67% |
| Score Read | 1544 | 1554 1% | 1690 9% | 990 -36% | 1273 -18% |
| Access Time Write * | 0.026 | 0.023 12% | 0.025 4% | 0.027 -4% | 0.025 4% |
| Access Time Read * | 0.053 | 0.038 28% | 0.032 40% | 0.082 -55% | 0.046 13% |
| 4K-64 Write | 1108 | 1055 -5% | 623 -44% | 1018 -8% | 230.6 -79% |
| 4K-64 Read | 1213 | 1223 1% | 1372 13% | 792 -35% | 1050 -13% |
| 4K Write | 145.3 | 155.3 7% | 143.1 -2% | 130.8 -10% | 144.8 0% |
| 4K Read | 51.2 | 51.5 1% | 55.6 9% | 52.8 3% | 51.7 1% |
| Seq Write | 1588 | 1694 7% | 1506 -5% | 1217 -23% | 947 -40% |
| Seq Read | 2799 | 2799 0% | 2624 -6% | 1450 -48% | 1713 -39% |
* ... smaller is better
Samsung SM961 MZVKW512HMJP m.2 PCI-e
Sequential Read:
2229 MB/s
Sequential Write:
1562 MB/s
512K Read:
391.4 MB/s
512K Write:
1279 MB/s
4K Read:
56.5 MB/s
4K Write:
182 MB/s
4K QD32 Read:
645 MB/s
4K QD32 Write:
595 MB/s
| 3DMark 11 - 1280x720 Performance GPU | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad P51 20HH0016GE | |
| HP ZBook Studio G4-Y6K17EA | |
| Apple MacBook Pro 15 2017 (2.9 GHz, 560) | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad P50 20ENV509PB | |
| Dell Precision 5520 UHD | |
| HP ZBook Studio G3 | |
| Dell Precision 3520 | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad P51s 20HB000SGE | |
| 3DMark - 1920x1080 Fire Strike Graphics | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad P51 20HH0016GE | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad P50 20ENV509PB | |
| Dell Precision 5520 UHD | |
| HP ZBook Studio G4-Y6K17EA | |
| Apple MacBook Pro 15 2017 (2.9 GHz, 560) | |
| HP ZBook Studio G3 | |
| Dell Precision 3520 | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad P51s 20HB000SGE | |
| Unigine Valley 1.0 | |
| 1920x1080 Extreme HD DirectX AA:x8 | |
| HP ZBook Studio G4-Y6K17EA | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad P51 20HH0016GE | |
| HP ZBook Studio G3 | |
| Apple MacBook Pro 15 2017 (2.9 GHz, 560) | |
| Dell Precision 3520 | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad P51s 20HB000SGE | |
| 1920x1080 Extreme HD Preset OpenGL AA:x8 | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad P51 20HH0016GE | |
| HP ZBook Studio G4-Y6K17EA | |
| HP ZBook Studio G3 | |
| Dell Precision 3520 | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad P51s 20HB000SGE | |
| Apple MacBook Pro 15 2017 (2.9 GHz, 560) | |
| 3DMark 11 Performance | 5516 pontos | |
| 3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score | 17884 pontos | |
| 3DMark Fire Strike Score | 3878 pontos | |
Ajuda | ||
The Witcher 3 ultra
| baixo | média | alto | ultra | 4K | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BioShock Infinite (2013) | 224.7 | 130.8 | 113.1 | 42.61 | |
| Thief (2014) | 93.3 | 58.9 | 50.1 | 26.2 | |
| The Witcher 3 (2015) | 73.6 | 45.9 | 26.3 | 13 | |
| Rise of the Tomb Raider (2016) | 88.1 | 49.15 | 28.36 | 23.92 | 9.88 |
Barulho
| Ocioso |
| 29.7 / 29.7 / 31.6 dB |
| Carga |
| 42.3 / 42.3 dB |
 | ||
30 dB silencioso 40 dB(A) audível 50 dB(A) ruidosamente alto |
||
min:  , med:  , max:  Audix TM1, Arta (15 cm de distância) environment noise: 29.4 dB(A) | ||
| HP ZBook Studio G4-Y6K17EA E3-1505M v6, Quadro M1200 | HP ZBook Studio G3 6820HQ, Quadro M1000M | Dell Precision 5520 UHD E3-1505M v6, Quadro M1200 | Apple MacBook Pro 15 2017 (2.9 GHz, 560) i7-7820HQ, Radeon Pro 560 | Lenovo ThinkPad P51 20HH0016GE E3-1505M v6, Quadro M2200 | Lenovo ThinkPad P51s 20HB000SGE i7-7600U, Quadro M520 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Noise | -8% | -3% | 3% | 7% | 5% | |
| off / environment * | 29.4 | 30 -2% | 28.7 2% | 30.8 -5% | 29.6 -1% | 29.2 1% |
| Idle Minimum * | 29.7 | 30 -1% | 28.7 3% | 31 -4% | 29.6 -0% | 29.2 2% |
| Idle Average * | 29.7 | 30 -1% | 32.1 -8% | 31 -4% | 29.6 -0% | 29.2 2% |
| Idle Maximum * | 31.6 | 30 5% | 32.1 -2% | 31 2% | 29.6 6% | 31.1 2% |
| Load Average * | 42.3 | 51 -21% | 41.3 2% | 31.3 26% | 32.2 24% | 36.7 13% |
| Witcher 3 ultra * | 42.3 | 45.5 -8% | ||||
| Load Maximum * | 42.3 | 52.8 -25% | 45.5 -8% | 41.8 1% | 36.6 13% | 39.4 7% |
* ... smaller is better
(-) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 39.8 °C / 104 F, compared to the average of 32 °C / 90 F for the devices in the class Workstation.
(-) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 46.3 °C / 115 F, compared to the average of 38.2 °C / 101 F, ranging from 22.2 to 69.8 °C for the class Workstation.
(-) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 55.4 °C / 132 F, compared to the average of 41.3 °C / 106 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 27.4 °C / 81 F, compared to the device average of 32 °C / 90 F.
(-) Playing The Witcher 3, the average temperature for the upper side is 41.5 °C / 107 F, compared to the device average of 32 °C / 90 F.
(±) The palmrests and touchpad can get very hot to the touch with a maximum of 37.7 °C / 99.9 F.
(-) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 27.8 °C / 82 F (-9.9 °C / -17.9 F).
(-) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 46.3 °C / 115 F, compared to the average of 38.2 °C / 101 F, ranging from 22.2 to 69.8 °C for the class Workstation.
(-) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 55.4 °C / 132 F, compared to the average of 41.3 °C / 106 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 27.4 °C / 81 F, compared to the device average of 32 °C / 90 F.
(-) Playing The Witcher 3, the average temperature for the upper side is 41.5 °C / 107 F, compared to the device average of 32 °C / 90 F.
(±) The palmrests and touchpad can get very hot to the touch with a maximum of 37.7 °C / 99.9 F.
(-) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 27.8 °C / 82 F (-9.9 °C / -17.9 F).
Consumo de energia
| desligado | 0.34 / 1.1 Watt |
| Ocioso | 12.6 / 17.1 / 19.3 Watt |
| Carga |
88.3 / 147.3 Watt |
   
| |
Key:
min: ,
med: ,
max: Metrahit Energy | |
| HP ZBook Studio G4-Y6K17EA E3-1505M v6, Quadro M1200, Samsung SM961 MZVKW512HMJP m.2 PCI-e, IPS, 3840x2160, 15.6" | Dell Precision 5520 UHD E3-1505M v6, Quadro M1200, Samsung SM961 MZVKW512HMJP m.2 PCI-e, IPS, 3840x2160, 15.6" | Apple MacBook Pro 15 2017 (2.9 GHz, 560) i7-7820HQ, Radeon Pro 560, , , 2880x1800, 15.4" | Lenovo ThinkPad P51 20HH0016GE E3-1505M v6, Quadro M2200, Samsung PM961 NVMe MZVLW512HMJP, IPS, 3840x2160, 15.6" | Lenovo ThinkPad P51s 20HB000SGE i7-7600U, Quadro M520, Samsung SSD PM961 1TB M.2 PCIe 3.0 x4 NVMe (MZVLW1T0), IPS, 3840x2160, 15.6" | HP ZBook Studio G3 6820HQ, Quadro M1000M, Samsung SM951 MZVPV512HDGL m.2 PCI-e, IPS, 3840x2160, 15.6" | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power Consumption | 7% | 31% | 8% | 40% | 18% | |
| Idle Minimum * | 12.6 | 8.9 29% | 3.7 71% | 8.6 32% | 5.8 54% | 8.7 31% |
| Idle Average * | 17.1 | 13.6 20% | 16.2 5% | 15.9 7% | 10.4 39% | 14.2 17% |
| Idle Maximum * | 19.3 | 14.1 27% | 18 7% | 22.1 -15% | 13.5 30% | 14.4 25% |
| Load Average * | 88.3 | 100.3 -14% | 58.4 34% | 84.4 4% | 62.4 29% | 85.6 3% |
| Witcher 3 ultra * | 74.8 | 100.2 -34% | ||||
| Load Maximum * | 147.3 | 126.3 14% | 89.6 39% | 130.6 11% | 73.1 50% | 129.7 12% |
* ... smaller is better
| HP ZBook Studio G4-Y6K17EA E3-1505M v6, Quadro M1200, 64 Wh | Dell Precision 5520 UHD E3-1505M v6, Quadro M1200, 97 Wh | Apple MacBook Pro 15 2017 (2.9 GHz, 560) i7-7820HQ, Radeon Pro 560, Wh | Lenovo ThinkPad P51 20HH0016GE E3-1505M v6, Quadro M2200, 90 Wh | Lenovo ThinkPad P51s 20HB000SGE i7-7600U, Quadro M520, 104 Wh | HP ZBook Studio G3 6820HQ, Quadro M1000M, 64 Wh | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Battery Runtime | 42% | 136% | 111% | 362% | 19% | |
| Reader / Idle | 410 | 724 77% | 981 139% | 1581 286% | 511 25% | |
| WiFi v1.3 | 201 | 254 26% | 677 237% | 413 105% | 712 254% | 208 3% |
| Load | 50 | 61 22% | 67 34% | 95 90% | 323 546% | 65 30% |
| H.264 | 682 | 455 | 700 | 228 | ||
| Witcher 3 ultra | 76 |
Pro
+ Chassi muito bom
+ Muitas portas
+ Bons dispositivos de entrada
+ Muito boa tela,...
Contra
- ...porém, PWM e sem suporte para Optimus
- Curta duração da bateria
- Sem WWAN
- Sem leitor de SmartCard
- Sem Pointstick
- Preço alto
O ZBook Studio G4 - semelhante aos outros workstations móveis da HP - só recebeu uma pequena atualização este ano. No entanto, a carcaça já era muito boa. Além de alguns componentes atualizados, o fabricante também cuidou do maior problema do Studio G3, o aquecimento. Determinamos temperaturas da superfície extremamente altas no antigo Studio G3, mas agora estão em linha com outros dispositivos finos. Essa melhoria é alcançada principalmente por limitações de desempenho, porque a CPU é afogada a 35 W por padrão e esse valor diminui ainda mais sob cargas de trabalho prolongadas. O processador Xeon móvel do nosso modelo de teste não é, portanto, a melhor escolha e está a par com o (muito mais acessível) Core i7-7700HQ.
O controle da ventoinha também foi melhorado e deixa uma melhor impressão. O painel DreamColor (que é muito bom), no entanto, não pode nos convencer em todas as disciplinas. A única diferença com o painel UHD normal parece ser o software adicional, mas também resulta na desativação da GPU integrada. Isso, obviamente, afeta o consumo de energia e as durações da bateria. Apenas 3,5 horas em nosso teste WLAN não é um bom resultado para um aparelho móvel. Você pode obter o irmão maior e mais rápido do ZBook 15 G4 se não precisar de um chassi fino.
A HP melhora o ZBook Studio G4 em pontos importantes, mas também sacrifica algum desempenho por temperaturas mais baixas. A duração da bateria é, infelizmente, muito decepcionante para um sistema em um "design móvel elegante, leve e deslumbrante".
O Studio G4 ainda é um bom sistema, apesar de todos os problemas mencionados, porque outros fabricantes também têm problemas com o desempenho ou o resfriamento em dispositivos finos. O principal rival da Dell (Precision 5520) tem a vantagem em termos de mobilidade, mas também tem problemas próprios. Acreditamos que um SKU diferente do Studio G4 (Core i7, UHD sem DreamColor, mas sem suporte Optimus) poderia ser o melhor pacote geral.
HP ZBook Studio G4-Y6K17EA
- 10/19/2017 v6 (old)
Andreas Osthoff, Mike Wobker
Workstation - Médio equilibrado
Price comparison
