Breve Análise do Workstation HP ZBook 14u G5 (i7-8550U, Pro WX 3100)
Os Top 10
» Os Top 10 Portáteis Multimídia
» Os Top 10 Portáteis de Jogos
» Os Top 10 Portáteis Leves para Jogos
» Os Top 10 Portáteis Acessíveis de Escritório/Empresariais
» Os Top 10 Portáteis Premium de Escritório/Empresariais
» Os Top 10 dos Portáteis Workstation
» Os Top 10 Subportáteis
» Os Top 10 Ultrabooks
» Os Top 10 Conversíveis
» Os Top 10 Tablets
» Os Top 10 Smartphones
» A melhores Telas de Portáteis Analisadas Pela Notebookcheck
» Top 10 dos portáteis abaixo dos 500 Euros da Notebookcheck
» Top 10 dos Portáteis abaixo dos 300 Euros
|
iluminação: 85 %
iluminação com acumulador: 234 cd/m²
Contraste: 1463:1 (Preto: 0.16 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 5.7 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.91, calibrated: 4.2
ΔE Greyscale 4.7 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
60.4% sRGB (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
38.3% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
41.59% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
60.6% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
40.25% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.38
HP ZBook 14u G5-2ZB99EA LG Philips, LGD0599, IPS, 1920x1080, 14" | HP ZBook 15u G5 2ZC05EA CMN15E7, IPS LED, 1920x1080, 15.6" | Dell Precision 5520 UHD SHP1476, IPS, 3840x2160, 15.6" | Lenovo ThinkPad T480s-20L8S02E00 LP140QH2-SPB1, IPS LED, 2560x1440, 14" | HP ZBook 14u G4 AU Optronics AUO123D, TN, 1920x1080, 14" | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Display | 7% | 65% | 70% | 39% | |
Display P3 Coverage | 40.25 | 43.05 7% | 67.4 67% | 71.4 77% | 56.6 41% |
sRGB Coverage | 60.6 | 64.7 7% | 98.5 63% | 96.6 59% | 82.4 36% |
AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage | 41.59 | 44.5 7% | 68.9 66% | 72.1 73% | 58.5 41% |
Response Times | -6% | -51% | 3% | -4% | |
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% * | 39.6 ? | 41.6 ? -5% | 59.2 ? -49% | 36 ? 9% | 47 ? -19% |
Response Time Black / White * | 27.2 ? | 28.8 ? -6% | 41.6 ? -53% | 28 ? -3% | 24 ? 12% |
PWM Frequency | 25770 ? | ||||
Screen | 2% | 16% | 22% | -51% | |
Brightness middle | 234 | 229 -2% | 372.4 59% | 311 33% | 338 44% |
Brightness | 215 | 212 -1% | 368 71% | 302 40% | 307 43% |
Brightness Distribution | 85 | 88 4% | 90 6% | 91 7% | 81 -5% |
Black Level * | 0.16 | 0.23 -44% | 0.48 -200% | 0.36 -125% | 0.85 -431% |
Contrast | 1463 | 996 -32% | 776 -47% | 864 -41% | 398 -73% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 5.7 | 4.2 26% | 2.6 54% | 3 47% | 8.53 -50% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 18.4 | 18 2% | 5.6 70% | 6.1 67% | 14 24% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 calibrated * | 4.2 | 4.2 -0% | 1.7 60% | ||
Greyscale dE 2000 * | 4.7 | 2 57% | 3.7 21% | 4 15% | 11.12 -137% |
Gamma | 2.38 92% | 2.23 99% | 2.14 103% | 2.17 101% | 2.5 88% |
CCT | 6730 97% | 6292 103% | 7096 92% | 6961 93% | 12193 53% |
Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998) | 38.3 | 41 7% | 63 64% | 66.7 74% | 53 38% |
Color Space (Percent of sRGB) | 60.4 | 64.5 7% | 99 64% | 96.7 60% | 82 36% |
Total Average (Program / Settings) | 1% /
2% | 10% /
17% | 32% /
28% | -5% /
-27% |
* ... smaller is better
Display Response Times
↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
---|---|---|
27.2 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 16.4 ms rise | |
↘ 10.8 ms fall | ||
The screen shows relatively slow response rates in our tests and may be too slow for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 66 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (20.9 ms). | ||
↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
39.6 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 20.4 ms rise | |
↘ 19.2 ms fall | ||
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 57 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (32.8 ms). |
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
Screen flickering / PWM not detected | |||
In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8705 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured. |
Cinebench R10 | |
Rendering Single CPUs 64Bit | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T480s-20L8S02E00 | |
HP ZBook 15u G5 2ZC05EA | |
HP ZBook 14u G5-2ZB99EA | |
Average Intel Core i7-8550U (6737 - 8436, n=12) | |
Rendering Multiple CPUs 64Bit | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T480s-20L8S02E00 | |
Average Intel Core i7-8550U (12279 - 31667, n=12) | |
HP ZBook 14u G5-2ZB99EA | |
HP ZBook 15u G5 2ZC05EA |
JetStream 1.1 - Total Score | |
Dell Precision 5520 UHD | |
HP ZBook 14u G5-2ZB99EA | |
Average Intel Core i7-8550U (141.9 - 288, n=61) | |
HP ZBook 14u G4 | |
HP ZBook 15u G5 2ZC05EA | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T480s-20L8S02E00 |
* ... smaller is better
PCMark 8 Home Score Accelerated v2 | 4438 pontos | |
PCMark 8 Creative Score Accelerated v2 | 5376 pontos | |
PCMark 8 Work Score Accelerated v2 | 5183 pontos | |
PCMark 10 Score | 3464 pontos | |
Ajuda |
HP ZBook 14u G5-2ZB99EA Toshiba XG5 KXG50ZNV256G | HP ZBook 15u G5 2ZC05EA Toshiba XG5 KXG50ZNV256G | Dell Precision 5520 UHD Samsung SM961 MZVKW512HMJP m.2 PCI-e | Lenovo ThinkPad T480s-20L8S02E00 Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ | HP ZBook 14u G4 Samsung SSD PM871a MZNLN256HMHQ | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
CrystalDiskMark 3.0 | |||||
Read Seq | 2014 | 2040 1% | 2253 12% | 2588 29% | 517 -74% |
Write Seq | 375.5 | 917 144% | 1662 343% | 1858 395% | 502 34% |
Read 512 | 921 | 912 -1% | 459.1 -50% | 1799 95% | 467 -49% |
Write 512 | 370.4 | 488.9 32% | 1611 335% | 1863 403% | 83.2 -78% |
Read 4k | 33.24 | 35.5 7% | 56.1 69% | 62.7 89% | 30.9 -7% |
Write 4k | 100.7 | 99.1 -2% | 169.4 68% | 146.8 46% | 91.3 -9% |
Read 4k QD32 | 270.9 | 276.7 2% | 633 134% | 446.6 65% | 298.4 10% |
Write 4k QD32 | 350.5 | 351.5 0% | 506 44% | 706 101% | 222.3 -37% |
SiSoft Sandra 2016 | |
Image Processing | |
HP ZBook 15u G5 2ZC05EA | |
HP ZBook 14u G5-2ZB99EA | |
HP ZBook 14u G4 | |
Dell Precision 3520 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad P52s-20LB000HGE | |
GP Cryptography (Higher Security AES256+SHA2-512) | |
Dell Precision 3520 | |
HP ZBook 14u G5-2ZB99EA | |
Lenovo ThinkPad P52s-20LB000HGE | |
HP ZBook 15u G5 2ZC05EA | |
HP ZBook 14u G4 | |
GP Financial Analysis (FP High/Double Precision) | |
HP ZBook 14u G4 | |
HP ZBook 14u G5-2ZB99EA | |
HP ZBook 15u G5 2ZC05EA | |
Dell Precision 3520 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad P52s-20LB000HGE |
Unigine Valley 1.0 | |
1920x1080 Extreme HD DirectX AA:x8 | |
Average of class Workstation (34.1 - 59.2, n=2, last 2 years) | |
HP ZBook 15u G5 2ZC05EA | |
Average AMD Radeon Pro WX 3100 (9.4 - 10.8, n=2) | |
HP ZBook 14u G5-2ZB99EA | |
HP ZBook 14u G4 | |
1920x1080 Extreme HD Preset OpenGL AA:x8 | |
Average of class Workstation (26.8 - 49.9, n=2, last 2 years) | |
HP ZBook 15u G5 2ZC05EA | |
HP ZBook 14u G4 | |
Average AMD Radeon Pro WX 3100 (5.6 - 6.3, n=2) | |
HP ZBook 14u G5-2ZB99EA |
3DMark 11 Performance | 4123 pontos | |
3DMark Ice Storm Standard Score | 48101 pontos | |
3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score | 12174 pontos | |
3DMark Fire Strike Score | 2513 pontos | |
3DMark Fire Strike Extreme Score | 1242 pontos | |
3DMark Time Spy Score | 918 pontos | |
Ajuda |
baixo | média | alto | ultra | |
---|---|---|---|---|
BioShock Infinite (2013) | 160.7 | 74.7 | 47 | 14.7 |
The Witcher 3 (2015) | 26.8 | 16.7 | 8.7 | 6.8 |
Rise of the Tomb Raider (2016) | 50.4 | 30 | 15.3 | 12.2 |
Far Cry Primal (2016) | 30 | 11 | 10 | 7 |
The Division (2016) | 37.3 | 20.4 | 9.2 | |
Deus Ex Mankind Divided (2016) | 31.2 | 15.6 | 8.4 | 3.2 |
For Honor (2017) | 37.8 | 14.9 | 11.5 | 9.2 |
Ghost Recon Wildlands (2017) | 25.4 | 10.4 | 9.1 | 8.1 |
F1 2017 (2017) | 60 | 21 | 21 | 13 |
Assassin´s Creed Origins (2017) | 28 | 11 | 9 |
Barulho
Ocioso |
| 29.8 / 29.8 / 29.8 dB |
Carga |
| 33.5 / 37.3 dB |
| ||
30 dB silencioso 40 dB(A) audível 50 dB(A) ruidosamente alto |
||
min: , med: , max: Audix TM1, Arta (15 cm de distância) environment noise: 29.8 dB(A) |
HP ZBook 14u G5-2ZB99EA Radeon Pro WX 3100, i5-8550U, Toshiba XG5 KXG50ZNV256G | HP ZBook 15u G5 2ZC05EA Radeon Pro WX 3100, i5-8550U, Toshiba XG5 KXG50ZNV256G | Dell Precision 5520 UHD Quadro M1200, E3-1505M v6, Samsung SM961 MZVKW512HMJP m.2 PCI-e | Lenovo ThinkPad T480s-20L8S02E00 GeForce MX150, i5-8550U, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ | HP ZBook 14u G4 FirePro W4190M, i7-7500U, Samsung SSD PM871a MZNLN256HMHQ | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Noise | -1% | -12% | 1% | -4% | |
off / environment * | 29.8 | 29.8 -0% | 28.7 4% | 29 3% | 30.4 -2% |
Idle Minimum * | 29.8 | 29.8 -0% | 28.7 4% | 29 3% | 30.4 -2% |
Idle Average * | 29.8 | 29.8 -0% | 32.1 -8% | 29 3% | 30.4 -2% |
Idle Maximum * | 29.8 | 30.8 -3% | 32.1 -8% | 29 3% | 30.4 -2% |
Load Average * | 33.5 | 32.9 2% | 41.3 -23% | 36.5 -9% | 37 -10% |
Witcher 3 ultra * | 34.2 | 36.5 -7% | 45.5 -33% | 32.8 4% | |
Load Maximum * | 37.3 | 36.5 2% | 45.5 -22% | 38.2 -2% | 40 -7% |
* ... smaller is better
HP ZBook 14u G5-2ZB99EA Radeon Pro WX 3100, i5-8550U, Toshiba XG5 KXG50ZNV256G | HP ZBook 15u G5 2ZC05EA Radeon Pro WX 3100, i5-8550U, Toshiba XG5 KXG50ZNV256G | Dell Precision 5520 UHD Quadro M1200, E3-1505M v6, Samsung SM961 MZVKW512HMJP m.2 PCI-e | Lenovo ThinkPad T480s-20L8S02E00 GeForce MX150, i5-8550U, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ | HP ZBook 14u G4 FirePro W4190M, i7-7500U, Samsung SSD PM871a MZNLN256HMHQ | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Heat | 1% | -12% | -7% | -12% | |
Maximum Upper Side * | 39.7 | 39.8 -0% | 51.6 -30% | 49.2 -24% | 48 -21% |
Maximum Bottom * | 42.7 | 43.1 -1% | 43.6 -2% | 48.2 -13% | 48.6 -14% |
Idle Upper Side * | 24.2 | 23.3 4% | 26.6 -10% | 23.2 4% | 25.4 -5% |
Idle Bottom * | 24.6 | 24.6 -0% | 26.2 -7% | 23 7% | 26.1 -6% |
* ... smaller is better
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 39.7 °C / 103 F, compared to the average of 38.2 °C / 101 F, ranging from 22.2 to 69.8 °C for the class Workstation.
(±) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 42.7 °C / 109 F, compared to the average of 41.3 °C / 106 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 23.8 °C / 75 F, compared to the device average of 32 °C / 90 F.
(±) Playing The Witcher 3, the average temperature for the upper side is 34.9 °C / 95 F, compared to the device average of 32 °C / 90 F.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are cooler than skin temperature with a maximum of 30 °C / 86 F and are therefore cool to the touch.
(-) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 27.8 °C / 82 F (-2.2 °C / -4 F).
HP ZBook 14u G5-2ZB99EA audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (85 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 25.8% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (10.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (4.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 4.3% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (3.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (18.2% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 54% of all tested devices in this class were better, 11% similar, 35% worse
» The best had a delta of 7%, average was 18%, worst was 35%
Compared to all devices tested
» 35% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 57% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Lenovo ThinkPad T480s-20L8S02E00 audio analysis
(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (78.9 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 19.4% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (12.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 6.5% higher than median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (9.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3.5% away from median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (7.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (22.1% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 54% of all tested devices in this class were better, 9% similar, 37% worse
» The best had a delta of 7%, average was 22%, worst was 53%
Compared to all devices tested
» 60% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 33% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
desligado | 0.29 / 0.44 Watt |
Ocioso | 3.4 / 5.6 / 8.5 Watt |
Carga |
55.2 / 71.4 Watt |
Key:
min: ,
med: ,
max: Metrahit Energy |
HP ZBook 14u G5-2ZB99EA i5-8550U, Radeon Pro WX 3100, Toshiba XG5 KXG50ZNV256G, IPS, 1920x1080, 14" | HP ZBook 15u G5 2ZC05EA i5-8550U, Radeon Pro WX 3100, Toshiba XG5 KXG50ZNV256G, IPS LED, 1920x1080, 15.6" | Dell Precision 5520 UHD E3-1505M v6, Quadro M1200, Samsung SM961 MZVKW512HMJP m.2 PCI-e, IPS, 3840x2160, 15.6" | Lenovo ThinkPad T480s-20L8S02E00 i5-8550U, GeForce MX150, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ, IPS LED, 2560x1440, 14" | HP ZBook 14u G4 i7-7500U, FirePro W4190M, Samsung SSD PM871a MZNLN256HMHQ, TN, 1920x1080, 14" | Average AMD Radeon Pro WX 3100 | Average of class Workstation | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Power Consumption | -5% | -108% | -6% | 12% | -3% | -115% | |
Idle Minimum * | 3.4 | 3.2 6% | 8.9 -162% | 3.4 -0% | 2.4 29% | 3.3 ? 3% | 8.2 ? -141% |
Idle Average * | 5.6 | 6.1 -9% | 13.6 -143% | 7.5 -34% | 5.3 5% | 5.85 ? -4% | 12.6 ? -125% |
Idle Maximum * | 8.5 | 9.7 -14% | 14.1 -66% | 10.8 -27% | 8.8 -4% | 9.1 ? -7% | 18.2 ? -114% |
Load Average * | 55.2 | 62 -12% | 100.3 -82% | 55.4 -0% | 45 18% | 58.6 ? -6% | 93.2 ? -69% |
Witcher 3 ultra * | 46 | 48 -4% | 100.2 -118% | 34 26% | |||
Load Maximum * | 71.4 | 71 1% | 126.3 -77% | 70.3 2% | 64 10% | 71.2 ? -0% | 160.7 ? -125% |
* ... smaller is better
HP ZBook 14u G5-2ZB99EA i5-8550U, Radeon Pro WX 3100, 50 Wh | HP ZBook 15u G5 2ZC05EA i5-8550U, Radeon Pro WX 3100, 56 Wh | Dell Precision 5520 UHD E3-1505M v6, Quadro M1200, 97 Wh | Lenovo ThinkPad T480s-20L8S02E00 i5-8550U, GeForce MX150, 57 Wh | HP ZBook 14u G4 i7-7500U, FirePro W4190M, 51 Wh | Average of class Workstation | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Battery Runtime | 8% | -54% | -10% | 1% | -14% | |
Reader / Idle | 1152 | 1301 13% | 724 -37% | 1366 19% | 1418 23% | 927 ? -20% |
H.264 | 504 | 623 24% | 550 9% | 575 14% | 671 ? 33% | |
WiFi v1.3 | 574 | 514 -10% | 254 -56% | 530 -8% | 643 12% | 509 ? -11% |
Load | 188 | 200 6% | 61 -68% | 76 -60% | 104 -45% | 80.3 ? -57% |
Pro
Contra
O HP ZBook 14u G5 é um workstation móvel de 14 polegadas que cumpre o critério de ser um workstation graças à sua veloz CPU e sua GPU profissional padrão. O pacote é completado com muitos recursos de segurança e um SSD NVMe veloz. No geral, a HP criou um workstation móvel relativamente acessível a €1.680 (~$1.937) que levanta a questão de se vale a penas gastar mais por um workstation de gama superior.
No entanto, há algumas desvantagens, isto é, a tela. O brilho máximo de215 cd/m² é inaceitável nesta faixa de preços, assim como a pobre cobertura do espaço de cores. Até mesmo os dispositivos dr escritório econômicos contam com telas melhores que a do ZBook 14u G5. Enquanto na prática o dispositivo possa ser conectado a uma estação docking e a monitores externos, esperávamos uma melhor tela padrão para um workstation móvel. Não entendemos a falta de um leitor de cartões.
O desempenho do sistema de resfriamento, CPU e GPU deixa muito a desejar. O sistema de resfriamento atinge seu limite sob uso intenso, enquanto a CPU se desempenha pior que o processador equivalente em dispositivos comparáveis. Pior ainda, a GPU normalmente fica atrás da antiga GPU AMD FirePro W4190M. Isto significa que o ZBook 14u G5 é superado pelo seu predecessor em algumas aplicações profissionais.
O HP ZBook 14u G5 é mais fino que o seu predecessor que possui um chassi de alta qualidade. A HP criou um impressionante workstation móvel que garante a atenção de potenciais compradores.
Positivamente, a HP oferece uma variedade de opções de configuração. Infelizmente, não há alternativas para a AMD Radeon Pro WX 3100. No geral, o desempenho do sistema é decente, enquanto a duração da bateria é um bônus. Além disso, o futuro da porta Thunderbolt USB Type-C garante o dispositivo até certo grau.
HP ZBook 14u G5-2ZB99EA
- 05/18/2018 v6 (old)
Sebastian Bade