Breve Análise do Workstation Fujitsu Celsius H970 (E3-1535M v6, P4000)
| SD Card Reader | |
| average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs) | |
| Dell Precision 7710 | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad P71-20HK0004GE | |
| Fujitsu Celsius H970 | |
| HP ZBook 17 G3 TZV66eA | |
| maximum AS SSD Seq Read Test (1GB) | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad P71-20HK0004GE | |
| HP ZBook 17 G3 TZV66eA | |
| Fujitsu Celsius H970 | |
| Dell Precision 7710 | |
| Networking | |
| iperf3 transmit AX12 | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad P71-20HK0004GE | |
| Fujitsu Celsius H970 | |
| MSI WE72 7RJ | |
| iperf3 receive AX12 | |
| Fujitsu Celsius H970 | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad P71-20HK0004GE | |
| MSI WE72 7RJ | |
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
iluminação: 91 %
iluminação com acumulador: 373 cd/m²
Contraste: 1227:1 (Preto: 0.3 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 6.4 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.91
ΔE Greyscale 7.2 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
84.4% sRGB (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
55.5% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
61.8% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
84.6% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
66.8% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.02
| Fujitsu Celsius H970 LP173WF4-SPF3, , 1920x1080, 17.3" | Lenovo ThinkPad P71-20HK0004GE LEN4123, VVX17P051J00, , 3840x2160, 17.3" | HP ZBook 17 G3 TZV66eA SDC3854, , 1920x1080, 17.3" | Dell Precision 7710 SDC8151, VHN17_173HL, , 1920x1080, 17.3" | MSI WE72 7RJ LP173WF4-SPF1, , 1920x1080, 17.3" | SCHENKER W706 LP173WF4-SPD1, LGD046C, , 1920x1080, 17.3" | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display | 9% | 9% | 1% | -0% | ||
| Display P3 Coverage | 66.8 | 67.3 1% | 66.6 0% | 67.4 1% | 66.2 -1% | |
| sRGB Coverage | 84.6 | 95.9 13% | 96.9 15% | 85.3 1% | 84.2 0% | |
| AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage | 61.8 | 69 12% | 68.6 11% | 62.4 1% | 61.5 0% | |
| Response Times | -6% | -33% | -46% | -21% | -25% | |
| Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% * | 32 ? | 39.2 ? -23% | 50.4 ? -58% | 50 ? -56% | 45.2 ? -41% | 44 ? -38% |
| Response Time Black / White * | 26.4 ? | 23.2 ? 12% | 28.4 ? -8% | 36 ? -36% | 26.4 ? -0% | 29.2 ? -11% |
| PWM Frequency | 1412 ? | 200 ? | 198 ? | |||
| Screen | 23% | 18% | 7% | -6% | -5% | |
| Brightness middle | 368 | 358 -3% | 252 -32% | 332 -10% | 302 -18% | 356 -3% |
| Brightness | 360 | 338 -6% | 243 -32% | 307 -15% | 306 -15% | 331 -8% |
| Brightness Distribution | 91 | 83 -9% | 86 -5% | 83 -9% | 93 2% | 86 -5% |
| Black Level * | 0.3 | 0.31 -3% | 0.21 30% | 0.33 -10% | 0.31 -3% | 0.48 -60% |
| Contrast | 1227 | 1155 -6% | 1200 -2% | 1006 -18% | 974 -21% | 742 -40% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 6.4 | 2.1 67% | 2.2 66% | 3 53% | 6.2 3% | 4.64 27% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 10.1 | 3.6 64% | 3.8 62% | 10.6 -5% | ||
| Greyscale dE 2000 * | 7.2 | 2 72% | 2.7 62% | 4 44% | 7.3 -1% | 3.65 49% |
| Gamma | 2.02 109% | 2.16 102% | 2.28 96% | 2 110% | 2.08 106% | 2.02 109% |
| CCT | 6882 94% | 6216 105% | 6686 97% | 7089 92% | 7020 93% | 6393 102% |
| Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998) | 55.5 | 77 39% | 62 12% | 62 12% | 56 1% | 55 -1% |
| Color Space (Percent of sRGB) | 84.4 | 99.97 18% | 96 14% | 97 15% | 85.2 1% | 84 0% |
| Total Average (Program / Settings) | 9% /
19% | -2% /
9% | -10% /
-0% | -9% /
-6% | -10% /
-7% |
* ... smaller is better
Display Response Times
| ↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
|---|---|---|
| 26.4 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 14.8 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 11.6 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows relatively slow response rates in our tests and may be too slow for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 62 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (20.9 ms). | ||
| ↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
| 32 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 14.8 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 17.2 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 39 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is similar to the average of all tested devices (32.8 ms). | ||
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
| Screen flickering / PWM not detected |  | ||
In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8715 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured. | |||
| Cinebench R15 | |
| CPU Single 64Bit | |
| Fujitsu Celsius H970 | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad P71-20HK0004GE | |
| Dell Precision 7710 | |
| MSI WE72 7RJ | |
| HP ZBook 17 G3 TZV66eA | |
| SCHENKER W706 | |
| CPU Multi 64Bit | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad P71-20HK0004GE | |
| Dell Precision 7710 | |
| SCHENKER W706 | |
| MSI WE72 7RJ | |
| HP ZBook 17 G3 TZV66eA | |
| Fujitsu Celsius H970 | |
| PCMark 8 | |
| Work Score Accelerated v2 | |
| Dell Precision 7710 | |
| Fujitsu Celsius H970 | |
| HP ZBook 17 G3 TZV66eA | |
| SCHENKER W706 | |
| MSI WE72 7RJ | |
| Creative Score Accelerated v2 | |
| Fujitsu Celsius H970 | |
| SCHENKER W706 | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad P71-20HK0004GE | |
| Dell Precision 7710 | |
| HP ZBook 17 G3 TZV66eA | |
| PCMark 8 Creative Score Accelerated v2 | 7135 pontos | |
| PCMark 8 Work Score Accelerated v2 | 5277 pontos | |
| PCMark 10 Score | 5041 pontos | |
Ajuda | ||
| Fujitsu Celsius H970 Samsung SM961 MZVKW512HMJP m.2 PCI-e | HP ZBook 17 G3 TZV66eA Samsung SM951 MZVPV256HDGL m.2 PCI-e | MSI WE72 7RJ Samsung SM961 MZVPW256 m.2 PCI-e | Lenovo ThinkPad P71-20HK0004GE Samsung PM961 NVMe MZVLW512HMJP | Dell Precision 7710 Samsung SM951 MZVPV256HDGL m.2 PCI-e | SCHENKER W706 Samsung SM951 MZVPV512HDGL m.2 PCI-e | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AS SSD | -15% | 18% | 14% | -7% | -2% | |
| Seq Read | 2726 | 1596 -41% | 2586 -5% | 2447 -10% | 1886 -31% | 1915 -30% |
| Seq Write | 1609 | 703 -56% | 1441 -10% | 1596 -1% | 626 -61% | 1511 -6% |
| 4K Read | 38.88 | 51.1 31% | 53 36% | 53.3 37% | 51 31% | 49.71 28% |
| 4K Write | 78.1 | 148.2 90% | 148.1 90% | 144.1 85% | 179 129% | 146.2 87% |
| 4K-64 Read | 1246 | 1037 -17% | 1517 22% | 1362 9% | 1064 -15% | 1115 -11% |
| 4K-64 Write | 971 | 230.4 -76% | 826 -15% | 740 -24% | 275 -72% | 375 -61% |
| Score Total | 3509 | 2302 -34% | 3831 9% | 3517 0% | 2435 -31% | 2712 -23% |
| 3DMark 11 - 1280x720 Performance GPU | |
| Fujitsu Celsius H970 | |
| SCHENKER W706 | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad P71-20HK0004GE | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad P70-20ER000XUS | |
| Dell Precision 7710 | |
| HP ZBook 17 G3 TZV66eA | |
| MSI WE72 7RJ | |
| 3DMark | |
| 1280x720 Cloud Gate Standard Graphics | |
| SCHENKER W706 | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad P71-20HK0004GE | |
| Fujitsu Celsius H970 | |
| HP ZBook 17 G3 TZV66eA | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad P70-20ER000XUS | |
| Dell Precision 7710 | |
| MSI WE72 7RJ | |
| 1920x1080 Fire Strike Graphics | |
| Fujitsu Celsius H970 | |
| SCHENKER W706 | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad P71-20HK0004GE | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad P70-20ER000XUS | |
| Dell Precision 7710 | |
| HP ZBook 17 G3 TZV66eA | |
| MSI WE72 7RJ | |
| LuxMark v2.0 64Bit | |
| Room GPUs-only | |
| Fujitsu Celsius H970 | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad P71-20HK0004GE | |
| SCHENKER W706 | |
| HP ZBook 17 G3 TZV66eA | |
| MSI WE72 7RJ | |
| Dell Precision 7710 | |
| Sala GPUs-only | |
| Fujitsu Celsius H970 | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad P71-20HK0004GE | |
| HP ZBook 17 G3 TZV66eA | |
| SCHENKER W706 | |
| MSI WE72 7RJ | |
| Dell Precision 7710 | |
| ComputeMark v2.1 - 1024x600 Normal, Score | |
| Fujitsu Celsius H970 | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad P71-20HK0004GE | |
| SCHENKER W706 | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad P70-20ER000XUS | |
| MSI WE72 7RJ | |
| Dell Precision 7710 | |
| GFXBench | |
| 1920x1080 Car Chase Offscreen | |
| Fujitsu Celsius H970 | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad P71-20HK0004GE | |
| MSI WE72 7RJ | |
| on screen Car Chase Onscreen | |
| MSI WE72 7RJ | |
| Fujitsu Celsius H970 | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad P71-20HK0004GE | |
| 3DMark Vantage - 1280x1024 P Result | |
| Fujitsu Celsius H970 | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad P71-20HK0004GE | |
| Dell Precision 7710 | |
| MSI WE72 7RJ | |
| 3DMark 06 Standard Score | 29155 pontos | |
| 3DMark Vantage P Result | 36260 pontos | |
| 3DMark 11 Performance | 12346 pontos | |
| 3DMark Ice Storm Standard Score | 68394 pontos | |
| 3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score | 18726 pontos | |
| 3DMark Fire Strike Score | 10158 pontos | |
| 3DMark Fire Strike Extreme Score | 5526 pontos | |
| 3DMark Time Spy Score | 3825 pontos | |
Ajuda | ||
| Rise of the Tomb Raider - 1920x1080 Very High Preset AA:FX AF:16x | |
| MSI GT62VR-6RE16H21 | |
| Fujitsu Celsius H970 | |
| SCHENKER XMG P507 | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad P71-20HK0004GE | |
| MSI GE72 7RE-046 | |
| MSI WE72 7RJ | |
| HP ZBook 17 G3 TZV66eA | |
| baixo | média | alto | ultra | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| BioShock Infinite (2013) | 196.9 | 174.4 | 162.4 | 96 |
| Company of Heroes 2 (2013) | 67.6 | 61.1 | 59.7 | 44.94 |
| Total War: Rome II (2013) | 236.7 | 184.1 | 151.4 | 63.3 |
| GRID: Autosport (2014) | 153.8 | 106.3 | 96.9 | 84.5 |
| The Witcher 3 (2015) | 159.7 | 113.6 | 77.2 | 41.09 |
| Star Wars Battlefront (2015) | 122.5 | 116.4 | 89.2 | 85.7 |
| Rise of the Tomb Raider (2016) | 115.9 | 103.2 | 76.8 | 65.5 |
| Doom (2016) | 119.5 | 112.4 | 91 | 87.1 |
| Civilization VI (2016) | 66.7 | 55.2 | 45.13 | 43.7 |
| Warhammer 40.000: Dawn of War III (2017) | 70.3 | 61.6 | 58.8 | 54 |
Barulho
| Ocioso |
| 30.2 / 32.8 / 32.8 dB |
| Carga |
| 47.3 / 47.3 dB |
 | ||
30 dB silencioso 40 dB(A) audível 50 dB(A) ruidosamente alto |
||
min:  , med:  , max:  Audix TM1, Arta (15 cm de distância) environment noise: 30.2 dB(A) | ||
(±) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 41.4 °C / 107 F, compared to the average of 38.2 °C / 101 F, ranging from 22.2 to 69.8 °C for the class Workstation.
(-) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 48.7 °C / 120 F, compared to the average of 41.3 °C / 106 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 25.9 °C / 79 F, compared to the device average of 32 °C / 90 F.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are cooler than skin temperature with a maximum of 26.6 °C / 79.9 F and are therefore cool to the touch.
(±) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 27.8 °C / 82 F (+1.2 °C / 2.1 F).
Fujitsu Celsius H970 audio analysis
(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (73.8 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 26.7% lower than median
(+) | bass is linear (5.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | reduced mids - on average 5.4% lower than median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (8.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 4.1% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (6.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (29.1% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 95% of all tested devices in this class were better, 2% similar, 3% worse
» The best had a delta of 7%, average was 18%, worst was 35%
Compared to all devices tested
» 85% of all tested devices were better, 3% similar, 12% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Lenovo ThinkPad P71-20HK0004GE audio analysis
(-) | not very loud speakers (70.9 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 12.4% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (10.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 5.9% higher than median
(+) | mids are linear (6.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | reduced highs - on average 5% lower than median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (13.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (26.6% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 89% of all tested devices in this class were better, 4% similar, 7% worse
» The best had a delta of 7%, average was 18%, worst was 35%
Compared to all devices tested
» 80% of all tested devices were better, 4% similar, 16% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
| desligado | 0.66 / 1.1 Watt |
| Ocioso | 10.7 / 15.8 / 17.8 Watt |
| Carga |
92 / 137 Watt |
   
| |
Key:
min: ,
med: ,
max: Metrahit Energy | |
| Fujitsu Celsius H970 E3-1535M v6, Quadro P4000, Samsung SM961 MZVKW512HMJP m.2 PCI-e, IPS LED, 1920x1080, 17.3" | HP ZBook 17 G3 TZV66eA E3-1535M v5, Quadro M3000M, Samsung SM951 MZVPV256HDGL m.2 PCI-e, IPS, 1920x1080, 17.3" | Dell Precision 7710 E3-1535M v5, FirePro W7170M, Samsung SM951 MZVPV256HDGL m.2 PCI-e, IPS LED, 1920x1080, 17.3" | MSI WE72 7RJ i7-7700HQ, Quadro M2200, Samsung SM961 MZVPW256 m.2 PCI-e, IPS, 1920x1080, 17.3" | SCHENKER W706 6700, Quadro M5000M, Samsung SM951 MZVPV512HDGL m.2 PCI-e, IPS LED, 1920x1080, 17.3" | Lenovo ThinkPad P71-20HK0004GE i7-7820HQ, Quadro P3000, Samsung PM961 NVMe MZVLW512HMJP, IPS, 3840x2160, 17.3" | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power Consumption | 6% | -29% | -17% | -74% | 0% | |
| Idle Minimum * | 10.7 | 6.7 37% | 6.04 44% | 15 -40% | 25.9 -142% | 7.44 30% |
| Idle Average * | 15.8 | 12.5 21% | 15.2 4% | 20.1 -27% | 31 -96% | 18 -14% |
| Idle Maximum * | 17.8 | 13.2 26% | 42.3 -138% | 23.8 -34% | 31.9 -79% | 21.8 -22% |
| Load Average * | 92 | 128.2 -39% | 112.8 -23% | 85.6 7% | 104.7 -14% | 77.1 16% |
| Load Maximum * | 137 | 158.9 -16% | 182.2 -33% | 128 7% | 193 -41% | 150.5 -10% |
* ... smaller is better
| Fujitsu Celsius H970 E3-1535M v6, Quadro P4000, 96 Wh | HP ZBook 17 G3 TZV66eA E3-1535M v5, Quadro M3000M, 96 Wh | Dell Precision 7710 E3-1535M v5, FirePro W7170M, 72 Wh | MSI WE72 7RJ i7-7700HQ, Quadro M2200, 51 Wh | SCHENKER W706 6700, Quadro M5000M, 82 Wh | Lenovo ThinkPad P71-20HK0004GE i7-7820HQ, Quadro P3000, 96 Wh | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Battery Runtime | -13% | -23% | -63% | -48% | -17% | |
| Reader / Idle | 1002 | 956 -5% | 775 -23% | 268 -73% | 205 -80% | 872 -13% |
| H.264 | 573 | 299 -48% | 283 -51% | 181 -68% | 151 -74% | 517 -10% |
| WiFi v1.3 | 542 | 290 -46% | 365 -33% | 177 -67% | 177 -67% | 358 -34% |
| Load | 74 | 110 49% | 85 15% | 42 -43% | 96 30% | 66 -11% |
Pro
Contra
Não é fácil agradar no mercado dos workstations. Existem apenas alguns fabricantes com experiência e reputação suficientes para entrar neste jogo de classe "alta" de portáteis. A Fujitsu quer ser um desses fabricantes - pelo menos por enquanto. No entanto, o Fujitsu Celsius H970 não consegue nos convencer. A Fujitsu entrega um workstation móvel que é surpreendentemente bom em algumas áreas, mas muito fraco em outras. As boas áreas certamente incluem a duração da bateria, que é mais que decente para um workstation. Mostra-se aqui que, com as novas gerações de CPU mais eficientes, os processadores quad-core não precisam necessariamente ser um motivo para uma duração de bateria ruim. O brilho da tela também é atraente e, como a duração da bateria, o Celsius é o melhor da classe aqui. O desempenho da GPU é de primeira classe, o que se deve ao efetivo sistema de resfriamento da GPU. E, finalmente, precisamos mencionar a excelente capacidade de manutenção como uma das vantagens do Celsius. Ele é apenas um pouco prejudicado pelo fato de que você precisa de cabos especiais para inserir unidades de 2,5 polegadas.
A duração da bateria e o brilho da tela são os valores mais importantes para um portátil que você provavelmente só o moverá de um espaço de trabalho estacionário para outro, devido ao seu tamanho e peso? Provavelmente não! Infelizmente, a Fujitsu falha em lugares mais importantes, como no sistema de resfriamento da CPU. Onde o sistema de resfriamento da GPU é bem-sucedido, o sistema de resfriamento da CPU falha. É simplesmente muito pequeno. Isso torna o dispositivo muito barulhento, dado que a ventoinha tem que funcionar muito para resfriar a CPU. E, no entanto, apesar disso, o afogamento térmico não pode ser evitado. Isso já ocorre no teste Cinebench, que nem sequer fornece muita carga, de modo que, no cotidiano, o Celsius está longe de poder usar todo o potencial da CPU incorporada. Neste sentido, o caro Xeon E3-1535M V6, que é realmente a CPU móvel Kaby-Lake mais veloz, se trona o chip mais lento, em nossa comparação. Como se isso não fosse ruim o suficiente, a Fujitsu cometeu um grande erro com o teclado saltitante. E, embora a tela seja brilhante, as cores não são particularmente fortes e nem cobrem o espaço de cores sRGB. A Fujitsu não oferece uma tela com maior resolução e cobertura de espaço de cores.
Não passa: Enquanto o Fujitsu Celsius H970 tem suas qualidades, em particular o sistema de resfriamento de CPU deficiente está fora de lugar em um workstation móvel.
Devido a estes problemas, o Celsius tem dificuldades em enfrentar a concorrência estabelecida, como o ThinkPad P71, ZBook 17 G3, ou Precision 7710. O fator que ainda é suficiente para uma obter uma boa avaliação é p é o alto desempenho da nova placa de vídeo profissional.
Fujitsu Celsius H970
- 07/07/2017 v6 (old)
Benjamin Herzig
Price comparison
