Breve Análise do Workstation Fujitsu Celsius H760
Fujitsu Celsius H760 (Celsius H Serie)
Processador
Intel Xeon E3-1505M v5 4 x 2.8 - 3.7 GHz, Skylake
Placa gráfica
NVIDIA Quadro M2000M - 4 GB VRAM, 10.18.13.5459 - nVIDIA ForceWare 354.59, Nvidia Optimus mit Nvidia Quadro M2000M und Intel P530
Memória
16 GB
, Samsung DDR4 2x 8 GB, SO DIMM 2133 MHz / PC4-17000 ECC (M474A1G43EB1-CPB), 2 Slots livres
Pantalha
15.60 polegadas 16:9, 1920 x 1080 pixel 141 PPI, LGD046F LP156WF6-SPP1, IPS LED, 88 % sRGB, Brilhante: não
placa mãe
Intel CM236 (Skylake PCH-H)
Disco rígido
Samsung SM951 MZVPV512 m.2 PCI-e, 512 GB
, + 1 TB HDD Seagate ST1000LM 014-1EJ164
peso
2.98 kg
Preço
3700 Euro
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.
| SD Card Reader | |
| average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs) | |
| Fujitsu Celsius H760 | |
| maximum AS SSD Seq Read Test (1GB) | |
| Fujitsu Celsius H760 | |
| Networking | |
| WiFi Speed Client 1m | |
| WiFi Speed Server 1m |
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
LGD046F LP156WF6-SPP1 tested with X-Rite i1Pro 2
Máximo: 341 cd/m² (Nits) Médio: 310 cd/m² Minimum: 17.5 cd/m²iluminação: 82 %
iluminação com acumulador: 342 cd/m²
Contraste: 1003:1 (Preto: 0.34 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 3.8 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.92
ΔE Greyscale 2 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
88% sRGB (Calman 2D)
82.2% sRGB (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
54% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
60.3% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
82.4% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
63.9% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.17
| Fujitsu Celsius H760 LGD046F LP156WF6-SPP1, , 1920x1080, 15.6" | HP ZBook 15 G3 Samsung SDC5344, , 1920x1080, 15.6" | Lenovo ThinkPad P50 LP156WF6-SPK1, , 1920x1080, 15.6" | Dell Precision 7510 (4K IGZO) Sharp LQ156D1, , 3840x2160, 15.6" | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display | 12% | -34% | 40% | |
| Display P3 Coverage | 63.9 | 66.8 5% | 39.13 -39% | 86.2 35% |
| sRGB Coverage | 82.4 | 95.5 16% | 58.5 -29% | 99.7 21% |
| AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage | 60.3 | 69 14% | 40.45 -33% | 99 64% |
| Response Times | -40% | -11% | -6% | |
| Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% * | 38 ? | 54 ? -42% | 46 ? -21% | 40.4 ? -6% |
| Response Time Black / White * | 26 ? | 35.6 ? -37% | 26 ? -0% | 27.6 ? -6% |
| PWM Frequency | 198 ? | 198.4 ? | ||
| Screen | -29% | -18% | 4% | |
| Brightness middle | 341 | 306 -10% | 263 -23% | 279.2 -18% |
| Brightness | 310 | 289 -7% | 236 -24% | 271 -13% |
| Brightness Distribution | 82 | 85 4% | 78 -5% | 83 1% |
| Black Level * | 0.34 | 0.34 -0% | 0.34 -0% | 0.266 22% |
| Contrast | 1003 | 900 -10% | 774 -23% | 1050 5% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 3.8 | 5.1 -34% | 2.35 38% | 4.14 -9% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 10.8 | 9.9 8% | 6.56 39% | |
| Greyscale dE 2000 * | 2 | 7.4 -270% | 3.33 -67% | 3.26 -63% |
| Gamma | 2.17 101% | 2.37 93% | 2.38 92% | 2.19 100% |
| CCT | 6581 99% | 7263 89% | 6917 94% | 6375 102% |
| Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998) | 54 | 63 17% | 37 -31% | 85.68 59% |
| Color Space (Percent of sRGB) | 82.2 | 95 16% | 58 -29% | 99.72 21% |
| Total Average (Program / Settings) | -19% /
-22% | -21% /
-20% | 13% /
10% |
* ... smaller is better
Display Response Times
ℹ
Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.| ↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
|---|---|---|
| 26 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 7 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 19 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows relatively slow response rates in our tests and may be too slow for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 59 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (21 ms). | ||
| ↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
| 38 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 15 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 23 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 51 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (32.9 ms). | ||
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
ℹ
To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.| Screen flickering / PWM not detected |  | ||
In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8743 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured. | |||
| Cinebench R15 | |
| CPU Single 64Bit | |
| MSI WS60-6QJE316H11 | |
| Fujitsu Celsius H760 | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad P50 | |
| HP ZBook Studio G3 | |
| Dell Precision 3510 | |
| CPU Multi 64Bit | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad P50 | |
| Fujitsu Celsius H760 | |
| HP ZBook Studio G3 | |
| MSI WS60-6QJE316H11 | |
| Dell Precision 3510 | |
| Cinebench R11.5 | |
| CPU Single 64Bit | |
| Fujitsu Celsius H760 | |
| MSI WS60-6QJE316H11 | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad P50 | |
| HP ZBook Studio G3 | |
| Dell Precision 3510 | |
| CPU Multi 64Bit | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad P50 | |
| Fujitsu Celsius H760 | |
| HP ZBook Studio G3 | |
| MSI WS60-6QJE316H11 | |
| Dell Precision 3510 | |
| PCMark 8 | |
| Home Score Accelerated v2 | |
| Fujitsu Celsius H760 | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad P50 | |
| Dell Precision 7510 (4K IGZO) | |
| HP ZBook 15 G3 | |
| Creative Score Accelerated v2 | |
| Dell Precision 7510 (4K IGZO) | |
| HP ZBook 15 G3 | |
| Fujitsu Celsius H760 | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad P50 | |
| Work Score Accelerated v2 | |
| Fujitsu Celsius H760 | |
| HP ZBook 15 G3 | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad P50 | |
| Dell Precision 7510 (4K IGZO) | |
| Fujitsu Celsius H760 Samsung SM951 MZVPV512 m.2 PCI-e | Dell Precision 7510 (4K IGZO) Samsung SSD SM951a 512GB M.2 PCIe 3.0 x4 NVMe (MZVKV512) | Lenovo ThinkPad P50 Samsung SSD PM871 MZNLN256HCHP | HP ZBook Studio G3 Samsung SM951 MZVPV512HDGL m.2 PCI-e | Dell Precision 5510 SK hynix SC920 512 GB | MSI WS60 6QJ-535VPL 2x Plextor PX512M6GV-2280 (RAID 0) | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AS SSD | 3% | -69% | -10% | -515% | -48% | |
| Copy Game MB/s | 978 | 1045 7% | 206.7 -79% | 1104 13% | 349 -64% | |
| Copy Program MB/s | 571 | 480.1 -16% | 171.3 -70% | 593 4% | 221 -61% | |
| Copy ISO MB/s | 1325 | 1391 5% | 269.3 -80% | 1280 -3% | 387 -71% | |
| Access Time Read * | 0.036 | 0.036 -0% | 0.058 -61% | 0.046 -28% | 0.111 -208% | 0.054 -50% |
| Access Time Write * | 0.018 | 0.025 -39% | 0.038 -111% | 0.025 -39% | 0.74 -4011% | 0.041 -128% |
| 4K-64 Read | 801 | 1067 33% | 381.2 -52% | 1050 31% | 327 -59% | 437.1 -45% |
| 4K-64 Write | 285 | 375.7 32% | 258.3 -9% | 230.6 -19% | 257 -10% | 375.8 32% |
| Seq Read | 1916 | 1953 2% | 515 -73% | 1713 -11% | 474 -75% | 880 -54% |
| Seq Write | 1492 | 1484 -1% | 272.8 -82% | 947 -37% | 389 -74% | 821 -45% |
* ... smaller is better
Samsung SM951 MZVPV512 m.2 PCI-e
Sequential Read:
1916MB/s
Sequential Write:
1492MB/s
4K Read:
34MB/s
4K Write:
188MB/s
4K-64 Read:
801MB/s
4K-64 Write:
285MB/s
Access Time Read:
0.036ms
Access Time Write:
0.018ms
Copy ISO:
1325MB/s
Copy Program:
571MB/s
Copy Game:
978MB/s
Score Read:
1048Points
Score Write:
623Points
Score Total:
2201Points
| 3DMark | |
| 1280x720 Cloud Gate Standard Graphics | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad P50 | |
| Fujitsu Celsius H760 | |
| HP ZBook 15 G3 | |
| Dell Precision 7510 (4K IGZO) | |
| 1920x1080 Fire Strike Graphics | |
| Dell Precision 7510 (4K IGZO) | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad P50 | |
| HP ZBook 15 G3 | |
| Fujitsu Celsius H760 | |
| LuxMark v2.0 64Bit | |
| Sala GPUs-only | |
| HP ZBook 15 G3 | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad P50 | |
| Fujitsu Celsius H760 | |
| Room GPUs-only | |
| HP ZBook 15 G3 | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad P50 | |
| Fujitsu Celsius H760 | |
| Cinebench R11.5 - OpenGL 64Bit | |
| Fujitsu Celsius H760 | |
| HP ZBook 15 G3 | |
| Dell Precision 7510 (4K IGZO) | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad P50 | |
| 3DMark Ice Storm Standard Score | 90607 pontos | |
| 3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score | 18192 pontos | |
| 3DMark Fire Strike Score | 3794 pontos | |
Ajuda | ||
| baixo | média | alto | ultra | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Metro: Last Light (2013) | 118.9 | 94.8 | 55.3 | 29.5 |
| Dirt Rally (2015) | 272 | 136 | 76 | 33 |
| The Witcher 3 (2015) | 68 | 49 | 22 | 15 |
Barulho
| Ocioso |
| 29 / 29 / 29 dB |
| HDD |
| 29 dB |
| Carga |
| 43.1 / 49.2 dB |
 | ||
30 dB silencioso 40 dB(A) audível 50 dB(A) ruidosamente alto |
||
min:  , med:  , max:  Audix TM1 Arta (15 cm de distância) environment noise: 29 dB(A) | ||
(+) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 29.2 °C / 85 F, compared to the average of 32 °C / 90 F for the devices in the class Workstation.
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 38.5 °C / 101 F, compared to the average of 38.2 °C / 101 F, ranging from 22.2 to 69.8 °C for the class Workstation.
(±) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 42.8 °C / 109 F, compared to the average of 41.2 °C / 106 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 30 °C / 86 F, compared to the device average of 32 °C / 90 F.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are reaching skin temperature as a maximum (32.1 °C / 89.8 F) and are therefore not hot.
(-) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 27.9 °C / 82.2 F (-4.2 °C / -7.6 F).
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 38.5 °C / 101 F, compared to the average of 38.2 °C / 101 F, ranging from 22.2 to 69.8 °C for the class Workstation.
(±) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 42.8 °C / 109 F, compared to the average of 41.2 °C / 106 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 30 °C / 86 F, compared to the device average of 32 °C / 90 F.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are reaching skin temperature as a maximum (32.1 °C / 89.8 F) and are therefore not hot.
(-) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 27.9 °C / 82.2 F (-4.2 °C / -7.6 F).
Consumo de energia
| desligado | 0.3 / 0.4 Watt |
| Ocioso | 7.7 / 11.8 / 12.9 Watt |
| Carga |
90.2 / 130.8 Watt |
   
| |
Key:
min: ,
med: ,
max: Metrahit Energy | |
| Fujitsu Celsius H760 E3-1505M v5, Quadro M2000M, Samsung SM951 MZVPV512 m.2 PCI-e, IPS LED, 1920x1080, 15.6" | Dell Precision 7510 (4K IGZO) E3-1535M v5, Quadro M2000M, Samsung SSD SM951a 512GB M.2 PCIe 3.0 x4 NVMe (MZVKV512), IGZO IPS, 3840x2160, 15.6" | HP ZBook 15 G3 E3-1505M v5, Quadro M2000M, Samsung SM951 MZVPV512HDGL m.2 PCI-e, UWVA-IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6" | Lenovo ThinkPad P50 6820HQ, Quadro M2000M, Samsung SSD PM871 MZNLN256HCHP, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6" | Dell Precision 3510 6700HQ, FirePro W5130M, Samsung SM951 MZVPV256HDGL m.2 PCI-e, TN LED, 1366x768, 15.6" | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power Consumption | -103% | 5% | 21% | 36% | |
| Idle Minimum * | 7.7 | 23.9 -210% | 5.7 26% | 5.6 27% | 4.2 45% |
| Idle Average * | 11.8 | 28.9 -145% | 12.2 -3% | 8.6 27% | 6.5 45% |
| Idle Maximum * | 12.9 | 30 -133% | 12.6 2% | 9.3 28% | 7.1 45% |
| Load Average * | 90.2 | 95.2 -6% | 83.1 8% | 89.5 1% | 74.6 17% |
| Load Maximum * | 130.8 | 157.1 -20% | 138.2 -6% | 105 20% | 92.2 30% |
* ... smaller is better
| Fujitsu Celsius H760 E3-1505M v5, Quadro M2000M, 72 Wh | Dell Precision 7510 (4K IGZO) E3-1535M v5, Quadro M2000M, 91 Wh | HP ZBook 15 G3 E3-1505M v5, Quadro M2000M, 90 Wh | Lenovo ThinkPad P50 6820HQ, Quadro M2000M, 90 Wh | Dell Precision 3510 6700HQ, FirePro W5130M, 84 Wh | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Battery Runtime | -38% | 33% | 52% | 79% | |
| Reader / Idle | 557 | 268 -52% | 822 48% | 860 54% | 1168 110% |
| H.264 | 273 | 449 64% | 533 95% | 605 122% | |
| WiFi v1.3 | 333 | 239 -28% | 386 16% | 498 50% | 591 77% |
| Load | 106 | 70 -34% | 110 4% | 113 7% | 111 5% |
Pro
+ Estabilidade da carcaça
+ Qualidade de construção
+ Desempenho da CPU
+ Desempenho da GPU
+ Desempenho do sistema
+ Estabilidade do desempenho sob uso intenso
+ Variedade de portas
+ Configurável
+ Baia modular
+ Opções de garantia e suporte
+ Acessórios disponíveis
+ Emissões
Contra
- Redução do desempenho com a bateria
- Gama de cores e precisão de cores da tela
- Webcam e alto falantes
- Ruído do sistema sob carga máxima
O Fujitsu Celsius H760 é um avanço lógico do anterior Celsius H740 e convence em quase todas as seções. O chassi é rígido, bem construído, e o design também não é tão ruim.
Sob o capô, gostamos das portas atualizadas, as configurações flexíveis e o nível de desempenho adequado.
Que você não tenha que renunciar a quaisquer recursos tipicamente empresarial com esta ferramenta poderosa, é claro, é uma questão não dita neste segmento exclusivo de workstations. Um conjunto completo de recursos de segurança, bons dispositivos de entrada e a garantia opcional e opções de serviços completam a impressão geral muito boa.
A pequena, mas importante cereja no topo do bolo é a baia modular integrada. Graças aos módulos correspondentes, você recebe mais flexibilidade, o que pode fazer uma importante diferença em comparação com alguns dos rivais.
Embora você poderia viver com uma webcam de qualidade média, o alto ruído sob carga máxima e o afogamento do desempenho utilizando a energia da bateria, a tela Full HD testada provavelmente será o maior problema. É uma boa tela IPS com amplos ângulos de visão, mas não combina muito com esta categoria cara de aparelhos. A gama de cores, precisão de cores e a grade notória afetam o bom desempenho e evitam o uso em cenários profissionais onde são precisas cores precisas.
Em resumo, os workstations móveis Fujitsu Celsius H760 são uma bela alternativa para concorrentes similares, e também pode ser um pacote com preço atraente, dependendo da configuração.
Fujitsu Celsius H760
- 10/12/2016 v5.1 (old)
Tobias Winkler
Workstation - Médio equilibrado
Price comparison
