Notebookcheck Logo

Breve Análise do Workstation Eurocom Tornado F7W (i9-9900K, Quadro P5200)

Core i9-9900K and Quadro P5200 in one laptop.

Por cerca de mais de $5000, os usuários profissionais podem obter o que é essencialmente um desktop de gama alta empacotado em um chassi de 17,3 polegadas. O desempenho é indubitavelmente rápido, mas não tão rápido quanto poderia ser em relação à CPU.
Business Coffee Lake Desktop Laptop / Notebook Thunderbolt Workstation
Eurocom Tornado F7W
Processador
Intel Core i9-9900K 8 x 3.6 - 5 GHz, Coffee Lake-R
Placa gráfica
NVIDIA Quadro P5200 - 16 GB VRAM, Análises do: 1582 MHz, Memoría: 7214 MHz, GDDR5, 411.95
Memória
64 GB 
, 1333.3 MHz, 15-17-27-32, Dual-Channel
Pantalha
17.30 polegadas 16:9, 3840 x 2160 pixel 255 PPI, AU Optronics B173ZAN01.0, IPS, AUO109B, Brilhante: não
placa mãe
Intel C246 (Cannon Lake-H)
Disco rígido
3x Samsung SSD 970 Pro 512GB (RAID 0), 1536 GB 
Placa de Som
Intel Cannon Lake-H/S - cAVS (Audio, Voice, Speech)
Conexões
5 USB 3.0, 1 USB 3.1 Gen2, 1 Thunderbolt, 1 HDMI, 1 DisplayPort, 1 Kensington Lock, Conexões Audio: Mic in; Headphone S/PDIF out; Line-in; Line out, Card Reader: Leitor SD, 1 Leitor de Impressões Digitais
Funcionamento em rede
Intel Ethernet Connection I219-LM (10/100/1000MBit/s), Intel Wireless-AC 9260 (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/), Bluetooth 5
Tamanho
altura x largura x profundidade (em mm): 51 x 428 x 314
Bateria
90 Wh, 6250 mAh Lítio-Ion, 8 células
Sistema Operativo
Microsoft Windows 10 Pro 64 Bit
Camera
Webcam: 2 MP
Características adicionais
Alto falantes: 2 W stereo, Teclado: Chiclet, Iluminação do Teclado: sim, 12 Meses Garantia
peso
4.2 kg, Suprimento de energia: 1.9 kg
Preço
8000 USD
Links
Eurocom página inicial
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

❌
428 mm 314 mm 58 mm 4.6 kg428 mm 314 mm 51 mm 4.2 kg425 mm 319 mm 51 mm 4.7 kg428 mm 308 mm 47.2 mm 5.6 kg428 mm 298 mm 38.7 mm 4 kg425 mm 327 mm 36.3 mm 4.9 kg418 mm 295 mm 39.9 mm 4.4 kg297 mm 210 mm 1 mm 5.7 g
Right: Smartcard reader, 2x USB 3.1, SD reader, Kensington Lock
Right: Smartcard reader, 2x USB 3.1, SD reader, Kensington Lock
Rear: Gigabit RJ-45, mini DisplayPort, Thunderbolt 3, HDMI 2.0, AC adapter
Rear: Gigabit RJ-45, mini DisplayPort, Thunderbolt 3, HDMI 2.0, AC adapter
Left: 3x USB 3.1, Mic in, Headphone S/PDIF out, Line-in, Line out
Left: 3x USB 3.1, Mic in, Headphone S/PDIF out, Line-in, Line out
SD Card Reader
average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs)
Asus Chimera G703GI
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
198 MB/s +6%
Eurocom Sky X7C
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
194.3 MB/s +4%
Eurocom Sky X9C
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
191.1 MB/s +2%
Eurocom Tornado F7W
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
186.9 MB/s
HP Omen X 17-ap0xx
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
73 MB/s -61%
maximum AS SSD Seq Read Test (1GB)
Asus Chimera G703GI
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
246 MB/s +23%
Eurocom Sky X7C
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
209.5 MB/s +5%
Eurocom Sky X9C
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
207.9 MB/s +4%
Eurocom Tornado F7W
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
200 MB/s
HP Omen X 17-ap0xx
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
87.3 MB/s -56%
Networking
iperf3 transmit AX12
Asus Chimera G703GI
Intel Wireless-AC 9560
690 MBit/s +731%
Eurocom Sky X7C
Killer Wireless-AC 1550 Wireless Network Adapter
679 MBit/s +718%
Acer Predator Helios 500 PH517-51-93LS
Killer Wireless-AC 1550 Wireless Network Adapter
640 MBit/s +671%
Eurocom Sky X9C
Intel Wireless-AC 9260
594 MBit/s +616%
Eurocom Tornado F7W
Intel Wireless-AC 9260
83 MBit/s
iperf3 receive AX12
Asus Chimera G703GI
Intel Wireless-AC 9560
681 MBit/s +14%
Eurocom Sky X7C
Killer Wireless-AC 1550 Wireless Network Adapter
670 MBit/s +12%
Eurocom Sky X9C
Intel Wireless-AC 9260
668 MBit/s +12%
Acer Predator Helios 500 PH517-51-93LS
Killer Wireless-AC 1550 Wireless Network Adapter
637 MBit/s +6%
Eurocom Tornado F7W
Intel Wireless-AC 9260
599 MBit/s
306.2
cd/m²		315.2
cd/m²		314.4
cd/m²
307.3
cd/m²		328.2
cd/m²		317.1
cd/m²
301.5
cd/m²		303.6
cd/m²		300.9
cd/m²
Distribuição do brilho
AU Optronics B173ZAN01.0 tested with X-Rite i1Pro 2
Máximo: 328.2 cd/m² (Nits) Médio: 310.5 cd/m² Minimum: 16.41 cd/m²
iluminação: 92 %
iluminação com acumulador: 328.2 cd/m²
Contraste: 887:1 (Preto: 0.37 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 6.62 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.93, calibrated: 3.93
ΔE Greyscale 6.7 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
100% sRGB (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
87.9% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
98.3% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
100% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
85.9% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.44
Eurocom Tornado F7W
AU Optronics B173ZAN01.0, IPS, 17.3", 3840x2160		Eurocom Sky X7C
AU Optronics B173ZAN01.0, IPS, 17.3", 3840x2160		Asus Chimera G703GI
B173HAN03.2 (AUO329D), IPS, 17.3", 1920x1080		HP Omen X 17-ap0xx
AU Optronics B173HW01, IPS, 17.3", 1920x1080		Eurocom Sky X9C
ID: AUO109B, Name: AU Optronics B173ZAN01.0, IPS, 17.3", 3840x2160		MSI GT75 8RG-090 Titan
CMN N173HHE-G32 (CMN1747), TN, 17.3", 1920x1080
Display
0%
-21%
-24%
1%
-2%
Display P3 Coverage
85.9
86
0%
65.8
-23%
63.7
-26%
86.6
1%
90.9
6%
sRGB Coverage
100
99.9
0%
92.6
-7%
88.2
-12%
100
0%
100
0%
AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage
98.3
98.9
1%
67
-32%
64.2
-35%
99.4
1%
86.2
-12%
Response Times
10%
75%
-5%
0%
81%
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% *
40 ?(18.8, 21.2)
38.4 ?(18, 20.4)
4%
6.4 ?(3.4, 3)
84%
44 ?(22, 22)
-10%
43.6 ?(24, 19.6)
-9%
8 ?(4.4, 3.6)
80%
Response Time Black / White *
31.6 ?(18, 13.6)
26.8 ?(15.6, 11.2)
15%
10.8 ?(6, 4.8)
66%
31.6 ?(16, 15.6)
-0%
28.8 ?(17.2, 11.6)
9%
5.6 ?(3.8, 1.8)
82%
PWM Frequency
26000 ?(19)
Screen
1%
19%
15%
2%
22%
Brightness middle
328.2
333
1%
285
-13%
343
5%
347.7
6%
240
-27%
Brightness
310
330
6%
275
-11%
332
7%
324
5%
248
-20%
Brightness Distribution
92
88
-4%
82
-11%
83
-10%
87
-5%
83
-10%
Black Level *
0.37
0.4
-8%
0.22
41%
0.35
5%
0.4
-8%
0.22
41%
Contrast
887
833
-6%
1295
46%
980
10%
869
-2%
1091
23%
Colorchecker dE 2000 *
6.62
5.87
11%
3.18
52%
3.35
49%
6.39
3%
2.14
68%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *
9.49
9.74
-3%
5.99
37%
5.62
41%
9.69
-2%
5.04
47%
Colorchecker dE 2000 calibrated *
3.93
4.59
-17%
1.73
56%
2.5
36%
1.54
61%
Greyscale dE 2000 *
6.7
4.5
33%
2.93
56%
2.4
64%
5.4
19%
1.62
76%
Gamma
2.44 90%
2.34 94%
2.45 90%
2.35 94%
2.4 92%
2.28 96%
CCT
6462 101%
6384 102%
7165 91%
6495 100%
6271 104%
6846 95%
Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998)
87.9
88
0%
60
-32%
57
-35%
87.8
0%
77
-12%
Color Space (Percent of sRGB)
100
100
0%
93
-7%
88
-12%
100
0%
100
0%
Total Average (Program / Settings)
4% / 2%
24% / 19%
-5% / 5%
1% / 1%
34% / 25%

* ... smaller is better

Display Response Times

ℹ
Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
   ↔    Response Time Black to White
31.6 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 18 ms rise
↘ 13.6 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 84 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (21 ms).
   ↔    Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
40 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 18.8 ms rise
↘ 21.2 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 57 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (32.9 ms).

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

ℹ
To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM not detected

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8774 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured.

01002003004005006007008009001000110012001300140015001600170018001900Tooltip
Eurocom Tornado F7W Quadro P5200, i9-9900K, 3x Samsung SSD 970 Pro 512GB (RAID 0); CPU Multi 64Bit: Ø1615 (1590.08-1643.59)
SCHENKER XMG Ultra 17 Coffee Lake Refresh GeForce GTX 1080 Mobile, i9-9900K, Samsung SSD 970 Pro 1TB; CPU Multi 64Bit: Ø1747 (1697.29-1865)
Intel Core i9-9900K, AMD Radeon RX Vega 64 RX Vega 64, i9-9900K; CPU Multi 64Bit: Ø1944 (1919.48-1969.76)
Cinebench R15 | Cinebench R11.5 | Cinebench R10 | wPrime 2.10
Cinebench R15
CPU Single 64Bit
Eurocom Tornado F7W
Intel Core i9-9900K
214 Points
Intel Core i9-9900K, AMD Radeon RX Vega 64
Intel Core i9-9900K
213 Points 0%
Average Intel Core i9-9900K
  (203 - 218, n=9)
211 Points -1%
Eurocom Sky X7C
Intel Core i7-8086K
207 Points -3%
MSI GT75 8RG-090 Titan
Intel Core i9-8950HK
205 Points -4%
Eurocom Tornado F5
Intel Core i7-7700K
190 Points -11%
Eurocom Sky X9C
Intel Core i7-8700K
190 Points -11%
Eurocom Q6
Intel Core i7-8750H
170 Points -21%
Eurocom Tornado F5W
Intel Xeon E3-1280 v5
163 Points -24%
Eurocom Sky MX5 R3
Intel Core i7-7820HK
156 Points -27%
Asus GL702ZC-GC104T
AMD Ryzen 7 1700
144 Points -33%
CPU Multi 64Bit
Intel Core i9-9900K, AMD Radeon RX Vega 64
Intel Core i9-9900K
2040 Points +26%
Average Intel Core i9-9900K
  (1623 - 2040, n=9)
1939 Points +19%
Eurocom Tornado F7W
Intel Core i9-9900K
1623 Points
Asus GL702ZC-GC104T
AMD Ryzen 7 1700
1408 Points -13%
Eurocom Sky X7C
Intel Core i7-8086K
1408 Points -13%
MSI GT75 8RG-090 Titan
Intel Core i9-8950HK
1378 Points -15%
Eurocom Sky X9C
Intel Core i7-8700K
1362 Points -16%
Eurocom Q6
Intel Core i7-8750H
1070 Points -34%
Eurocom Tornado F5
Intel Core i7-7700K
897 Points -45%
Eurocom Tornado F5W
Intel Xeon E3-1280 v5
815 Points -50%
Eurocom Sky MX5 R3
Intel Core i7-7820HK
772 Points -52%
Cinebench R11.5
CPU Single 64Bit
Intel Core i9-9900K, AMD Radeon RX Vega 64
Intel Core i9-9900K
2.44 Points 0%
Eurocom Tornado F7W
Intel Core i9-9900K
2.43 Points
Average Intel Core i9-9900K
  (2.33 - 2.44, n=5)
2.39 Points -2%
MSI GT75 8RG-090 Titan
Intel Core i9-8950HK
2.33 Points -4%
Eurocom Sky X9C
Intel Core i7-8700K
2.23 Points -8%
Eurocom Sky X7C
Intel Core i7-8086K
2.2 Points -9%
Eurocom Tornado F5
Intel Core i7-7700K
2.19 Points -10%
Eurocom Q6
Intel Core i7-8750H
1.95 Points -20%
Eurocom Tornado F5W
Intel Xeon E3-1280 v5
1.92 Points -21%
Eurocom Sky MX5 R3
Intel Core i7-7820HK
1.84 Points -24%
Asus GL702ZC-GC104T
AMD Ryzen 7 1700
1.63 Points -33%
CPU Multi 64Bit
Intel Core i9-9900K, AMD Radeon RX Vega 64
Intel Core i9-9900K
21.63 Points +25%
Average Intel Core i9-9900K
  (17.4 - 21.8, n=5)
20.7 Points +19%
Eurocom Tornado F7W
Intel Core i9-9900K
17.37 Points
Asus GL702ZC-GC104T
AMD Ryzen 7 1700
15.76 Points -9%
Eurocom Sky X7C
Intel Core i7-8086K
15.41 Points -11%
MSI GT75 8RG-090 Titan
Intel Core i9-8950HK
15.05 Points -13%
Eurocom Sky X9C
Intel Core i7-8700K
15.02 Points -14%
Eurocom Q6
Intel Core i7-8750H
11.62 Points -33%
Eurocom Tornado F5
Intel Core i7-7700K
9.78 Points -44%
Eurocom Tornado F5W
Intel Xeon E3-1280 v5
8.91 Points -49%
Eurocom Sky MX5 R3
Intel Core i7-7820HK
8.44 Points -51%
Cinebench R10
Rendering Multiple CPUs 32Bit
Intel Core i9-9900K, AMD Radeon RX Vega 64
Intel Core i9-9900K
48749 Points +33%
Average Intel Core i9-9900K
  (36683 - 49142, n=4)
45846 Points +25%
Eurocom Sky X9C
Intel Core i7-8700K
39382 Points +7%
Eurocom Tornado F7W
Intel Core i9-9900K
36683 Points
Eurocom Sky X7C
Intel Core i7-8086K
33064 Points -10%
Asus GL702ZC-GC104T
AMD Ryzen 7 1700
29330 Points -20%
Eurocom Tornado F5
Intel Core i7-7700K
28189 Points -23%
Eurocom Sky MX5 R3
Intel Core i7-7820HK
23041 Points -37%
Rendering Single 32Bit
Eurocom Tornado F7W
Intel Core i9-9900K
8042 Points
Average Intel Core i9-9900K
  (7786 - 8042, n=4)
7924 Points -1%
Intel Core i9-9900K, AMD Radeon RX Vega 64
Intel Core i9-9900K
7832 Points -3%
Eurocom Sky X9C
Intel Core i7-8700K
7423 Points -8%
Eurocom Tornado F5
Intel Core i7-7700K
7222 Points -10%
Eurocom Sky X7C
Intel Core i7-8086K
6541 Points -19%
Eurocom Sky MX5 R3
Intel Core i7-7820HK
6182 Points -23%
Asus GL702ZC-GC104T
AMD Ryzen 7 1700
4286 Points -47%
wPrime 2.10 - 1024m
Eurocom Tornado F5W
Intel Xeon E3-1280 v5
299 s * -203%
Eurocom Sky MX5 R3
Intel Core i7-7820HK
213.2 s * -116%
Eurocom Tornado F5
Intel Core i7-7700K
176.3 s * -79%
Eurocom Sky X7C
Intel Core i7-8086K
119.7 s * -21%
Eurocom Sky X9C
Intel Core i7-8700K
116.6 s * -18%
Eurocom Tornado F7W
Intel Core i9-9900K
98.7 s *
Average Intel Core i9-9900K
  (85.6 - 98.7, n=3)
91.9 s * +7%
Intel Core i9-9900K, AMD Radeon RX Vega 64
Intel Core i9-9900K
85.6 s * +13%

* ... smaller is better

Cinebench R10 Shading 32Bit
6836
Cinebench R10 Rendering Multiple CPUs 32Bit
36683
Cinebench R10 Rendering Single 32Bit
8042
Cinebench R11.5 OpenGL 64Bit
170.5 fps
Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 64Bit
17.37 Points
Cinebench R11.5 CPU Single 64Bit
2.43 Points
Cinebench R15 Ref. Match 64Bit
99.6 %
Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64Bit
249.6 fps
Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64Bit
1623 Points
Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64Bit
214 Points
Ajuda
PCMark 10 | PCMark 8
PCMark 10
Score
Average of class Workstation
  (5953 - 8587, n=30, last 2 years)
7219 Points +15%
SCHENKER XMG Ultra 17 Coffee Lake Refresh
GeForce GTX 1080 Mobile, i9-9900K, Samsung SSD 970 Pro 1TB
6959 Points +11%
Asus Chimera G703GI
GeForce GTX 1080 Mobile, i9-8950HK, 2x Intel 760p 512 GB + 1x Samsung SM961 512 GB (RAID)
6607 Points +6%
MSI GT75 8RG-090 Titan
GeForce GTX 1080 Mobile, i9-8950HK, 2x Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP (RAID 0)
6558 Points +5%
Eurocom Sky X9C
GeForce GTX 1080 SLI (Laptop), i7-8700K, 2x Samsung SSD 960 Pro 1TB m.2 NVMe (RAID 0)
6495 Points +4%
Eurocom Tornado F7W
Quadro P5200, i9-9900K, 3x Samsung SSD 970 Pro 512GB (RAID 0)
6255 Points
Eurocom Tornado F5W
Quadro P5000, E3-1280 v5, Samsung SSD 960 Pro 512 GB m.2
5340 Points -15%
Acer Predator Helios 500 PH517-51-93LS
GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, i9-8950HK, Liteon CA1-8D512
4576 Points -27%
Essentials
SCHENKER XMG Ultra 17 Coffee Lake Refresh
GeForce GTX 1080 Mobile, i9-9900K, Samsung SSD 970 Pro 1TB
10668 Points +8%
Average of class Workstation
  (9151 - 12197, n=30, last 2 years)
10628 Points +8%
Asus Chimera G703GI
GeForce GTX 1080 Mobile, i9-8950HK, 2x Intel 760p 512 GB + 1x Samsung SM961 512 GB (RAID)
9982 Points +1%
Eurocom Tornado F7W
Quadro P5200, i9-9900K, 3x Samsung SSD 970 Pro 512GB (RAID 0)
9847 Points
MSI GT75 8RG-090 Titan
GeForce GTX 1080 Mobile, i9-8950HK, 2x Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP (RAID 0)
9776 Points -1%
Eurocom Sky X9C
GeForce GTX 1080 SLI (Laptop), i7-8700K, 2x Samsung SSD 960 Pro 1TB m.2 NVMe (RAID 0)
9775 Points -1%
Acer Predator Helios 500 PH517-51-93LS
GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, i9-8950HK, Liteon CA1-8D512
9366 Points -5%
Eurocom Tornado F5W
Quadro P5000, E3-1280 v5, Samsung SSD 960 Pro 512 GB m.2
8293 Points -16%
Productivity
Average of class Workstation
  (7846 - 10820, n=30, last 2 years)
9390 Points +13%
MSI GT75 8RG-090 Titan
GeForce GTX 1080 Mobile, i9-8950HK, 2x Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP (RAID 0)
8968 Points +8%
Asus Chimera G703GI
GeForce GTX 1080 Mobile, i9-8950HK, 2x Intel 760p 512 GB + 1x Samsung SM961 512 GB (RAID)
8877 Points +7%
Eurocom Sky X9C
GeForce GTX 1080 SLI (Laptop), i7-8700K, 2x Samsung SSD 960 Pro 1TB m.2 NVMe (RAID 0)
8657 Points +4%
SCHENKER XMG Ultra 17 Coffee Lake Refresh
GeForce GTX 1080 Mobile, i9-9900K, Samsung SSD 970 Pro 1TB
8625 Points +4%
Eurocom Tornado F7W
Quadro P5200, i9-9900K, 3x Samsung SSD 970 Pro 512GB (RAID 0)
8307 Points
Eurocom Tornado F5W
Quadro P5000, E3-1280 v5, Samsung SSD 960 Pro 512 GB m.2
7236 Points -13%
Acer Predator Helios 500 PH517-51-93LS
GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, i9-8950HK, Liteon CA1-8D512
5828 Points -30%
Digital Content Creation
Average of class Workstation
  (6918 - 15093, n=30, last 2 years)
10348 Points +27%
SCHENKER XMG Ultra 17 Coffee Lake Refresh
GeForce GTX 1080 Mobile, i9-9900K, Samsung SSD 970 Pro 1TB
9940 Points +22%
Asus Chimera G703GI
GeForce GTX 1080 Mobile, i9-8950HK, 2x Intel 760p 512 GB + 1x Samsung SM961 512 GB (RAID)
8836 Points +9%
Eurocom Sky X9C
GeForce GTX 1080 SLI (Laptop), i7-8700K, 2x Samsung SSD 960 Pro 1TB m.2 NVMe (RAID 0)
8786 Points +8%
MSI GT75 8RG-090 Titan
GeForce GTX 1080 Mobile, i9-8950HK, 2x Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP (RAID 0)
8732 Points +8%
Eurocom Tornado F7W
Quadro P5200, i9-9900K, 3x Samsung SSD 970 Pro 512GB (RAID 0)
8122 Points
Eurocom Tornado F5W
Quadro P5000, E3-1280 v5, Samsung SSD 960 Pro 512 GB m.2
6889 Points -15%
Acer Predator Helios 500 PH517-51-93LS
GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, i9-8950HK, Liteon CA1-8D512
4765 Points -41%
PCMark 8 - Home Score Accelerated v2
Asus Chimera G703GI
GeForce GTX 1080 Mobile, i9-8950HK, 2x Intel 760p 512 GB + 1x Samsung SM961 512 GB (RAID)
6093 Points +19%
MSI GT75 8RG-090 Titan
GeForce GTX 1080 Mobile, i9-8950HK, 2x Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP (RAID 0)
5720 Points +12%
Eurocom Tornado F5W
Quadro P5000, E3-1280 v5, Samsung SSD 960 Pro 512 GB m.2
5273 Points +3%
SCHENKER XMG Ultra 17 Coffee Lake Refresh
GeForce GTX 1080 Mobile, i9-9900K, Samsung SSD 970 Pro 1TB
5243 Points +2%
Eurocom Tornado F7W
Quadro P5200, i9-9900K, 3x Samsung SSD 970 Pro 512GB (RAID 0)
5130 Points
Eurocom Sky X9C
GeForce GTX 1080 SLI (Laptop), i7-8700K, 2x Samsung SSD 960 Pro 1TB m.2 NVMe (RAID 0)
5005 Points -2%
Acer Predator Helios 500 PH517-51-93LS
GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, i9-8950HK, Liteon CA1-8D512
4882 Points -5%
PCMark 8 Home Score Accelerated v2
5130 pontos
PCMark 10 Score
6255 pontos
Ajuda
Eurocom Tornado F7W
3x Samsung SSD 970 Pro 512GB (RAID 0)		Eurocom Sky X7C
2x Samsung SSD 970 Pro 512GB (RAID 0)		Asus Chimera G703GI
2x Intel 760p 512 GB + 1x Samsung SM961 512 GB (RAID)		MSI GT75 8RG-090 Titan
2x Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP (RAID 0)		Eurocom Tornado F5
Samsung SSD 960 Pro 512 GB m.2
AS SSD
11%
43%
3%
11%
Seq Read
2139
3147
47%
4886
128%
3058
43%
2819
32%
Seq Write
2447
2866
17%
4110
68%
2196
-10%
2046
-16%
4K Read
29.7
48.74
64%
57.4
93%
38.37
29%
51
72%
4K Write
102.5
116.7
14%
141.3
38%
97.7
-5%
150.5
47%
4K-64 Read
1299
1348
4%
1453
12%
1347
4%
1179
-9%
4K-64 Write
1236
1203
-3%
1303
5%
1236
0%
1334
8%
Access Time Read *
0.045
0.034
24%
0.03
33%
0.056
-24%
0.03
33%
Access Time Write *
0.033
0.032
3%
0.026
21%
0.038
-15%
0.024
27%
Score Read
1543
1712
11%
1999
30%
1691
10%
1512
-2%
Score Write
1583
1606
1%
1855
17%
1553
-2%
1689
7%
Score Total
3928
4184
7%
4843
23%
4066
4%
3943
0%
Copy ISO MB/s
2320
2330
0%
1614
-30%
Copy Program MB/s
621
518
-17%
635
2%
Copy Game MB/s
1585
1321
-17%
1310
-17%
CrystalDiskMark 5.2 / 6
11%
44%
-11%
Write 4K
116.3
152.2
31%
130.2
12%
111.8
-4%
Read 4K
52.7
60.4
15%
57.3
9%
42.09
-20%
Write Seq
2539
3002
18%
4049
59%
2288
-10%
Read Seq
2972
3329
12%
5325
79%
3321
12%
Write 4K Q32T1
454.6
432.9
-5%
383.2
-16%
308.3
-32%
Read 4K Q32T1
515
494
-4%
424.9
-17%
364.9
-29%
Write Seq Q32T1
3101
3391
9%
4316
39%
2440
-21%
Read Seq Q32T1
3078
3405
11%
8905
189%
3485
13%
Total Average (Program / Settings)
11% / 11%
44% / 43%
-4% / -3%
11% / 11%

* ... smaller is better

CrystalDiskMark 5.2 / 6
AS SSD
hddimg
3x Samsung SSD 970 Pro 512GB (RAID 0)
CDM 5/6 Read Seq Q32T1: 3078 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write Seq Q32T1: 3101 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Read 4K Q32T1: 515 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write 4K Q32T1: 454.6 MB/s
CDM 5 Read Seq: 2972 MB/s
CDM 5 Write Seq: 2539 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Read 4K: 52.7 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write 4K: 116.3 MB/s
3DMark 11 | 3DMark | SPECviewperf 12 | SPECviewperf 13
3DMark 11
1280x720 Performance GPU
Eurocom Sky X9C
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 SLI (Laptop), i7-8700K
46773 Points +88%
Eurocom Sky X7C
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 Mobile, i7-8086K
27275 Points +9%
Eurocom Tornado F7W
NVIDIA Quadro P5200, i9-9900K
24934 Points
Eurocom Tornado F5W
NVIDIA Quadro P5000, E3-1280 v5
20623 Points -17%
Dell Precision 7720
NVIDIA Quadro P5000, E3-1535M v6
19569 Points -22%
Lenovo ThinkPad P72-20MB000EGE
NVIDIA Quadro P3200, i7-8850H
17021 Points -32%
MSI WS63VR 7RL-023US
NVIDIA Quadro P4000 Max-Q, i7-7700HQ
15837 Points -36%
Dell Precision 5530 2-in-1
AMD Radeon Pro WX Vega M GL, i7-8706G
10020 Points -60%
Dell Precision 5530 Xeon E-2176M
NVIDIA Quadro P2000, E-2176M
8201 Points -67%
1280x720 Performance Combined
Eurocom Tornado F7W
NVIDIA Quadro P5200, i9-9900K
16418 Points
Eurocom Sky X7C
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 Mobile, i7-8086K
14228 Points -13%
Eurocom Sky X9C
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 SLI (Laptop), i7-8700K
14119 Points -14%
Lenovo ThinkPad P72-20MB000EGE
NVIDIA Quadro P3200, i7-8850H
10960 Points -33%
Dell Precision 7720
NVIDIA Quadro P5000, E3-1535M v6
10778 Points -34%
Eurocom Tornado F5W
NVIDIA Quadro P5000, E3-1280 v5
10428 Points -36%
MSI WS63VR 7RL-023US
NVIDIA Quadro P4000 Max-Q, i7-7700HQ
9296 Points -43%
Dell Precision 5530 2-in-1
AMD Radeon Pro WX Vega M GL, i7-8706G
8166 Points -50%
Dell Precision 5530 Xeon E-2176M
NVIDIA Quadro P2000, E-2176M
8059 Points -51%
3DMark
1920x1080 Fire Strike Graphics
Eurocom Sky X9C
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 SLI (Laptop), i7-8700K
40582 Points +121%
Eurocom Tornado F7W
NVIDIA Quadro P5200, i9-9900K
18390 Points
Eurocom Tornado F5W
NVIDIA Quadro P5000, E3-1280 v5
14990 Points -18%
Dell Precision 7720
NVIDIA Quadro P5000, E3-1535M v6
14666 Points -20%
Lenovo ThinkPad P72-20MB000EGE
NVIDIA Quadro P3200, i7-8850H
12555 Points -32%
MSI WS63VR 7RL-023US
NVIDIA Quadro P4000 Max-Q, i7-7700HQ
12312 Points -33%
Dell Precision 5530 2-in-1
AMD Radeon Pro WX Vega M GL, i7-8706G
7333 Points -60%
Dell Precision 5530 Xeon E-2176M
NVIDIA Quadro P2000, E-2176M
6741 Points -63%
2560x1440 Time Spy Graphics
Eurocom Tornado F7W
NVIDIA Quadro P5200, i9-9900K
6390 Points
Lenovo ThinkPad P72-20MB000EGE
NVIDIA Quadro P3200, i7-8850H
4378 Points -31%
Dell Precision 7720
NVIDIA Quadro P5000, E3-1535M v6
2898 Points -55%
Dell Precision 5530 2-in-1
AMD Radeon Pro WX Vega M GL, i7-8706G
2062 Points -68%
Dell Precision 5530 Xeon E-2176M
NVIDIA Quadro P2000, E-2176M
2046 Points -68%
SPECviewperf 12
1900x1060 Catia (catia-04)
Eurocom Tornado F7W
NVIDIA Quadro P5200, i9-9900K
196.6 fps
Eurocom Tornado F5W
NVIDIA Quadro P5000, E3-1280 v5
155.4 fps -21%
Dell Precision 7720
NVIDIA Quadro P5000, E3-1535M v6
139.9 fps -29%
Lenovo ThinkPad P72-20MB000EGE
NVIDIA Quadro P3200, i7-8850H
126.8 fps -36%
MSI WS63VR 7RL-023US
NVIDIA Quadro P4000 Max-Q, i7-7700HQ
110 fps -44%
Eurocom Sky X9C
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 SLI (Laptop), i7-8700K
79.9 fps -59%
Dell Precision 5530 Xeon E-2176M
NVIDIA Quadro P2000, E-2176M
69.6 fps -65%
Dell Precision 5530 2-in-1
AMD Radeon Pro WX Vega M GL, i7-8706G
64.4 fps -67%
1900x1060 Creo (creo-01)
Eurocom Tornado F7W
NVIDIA Quadro P5200, i9-9900K
160 fps
Eurocom Tornado F5W
NVIDIA Quadro P5000, E3-1280 v5
126.6 fps -21%
Dell Precision 7720
NVIDIA Quadro P5000, E3-1535M v6
117.2 fps -27%
Lenovo ThinkPad P72-20MB000EGE
NVIDIA Quadro P3200, i7-8850H
112.6 fps -30%
MSI WS63VR 7RL-023US
NVIDIA Quadro P4000 Max-Q, i7-7700HQ
91.9 fps -43%
Dell Precision 5530 Xeon E-2176M
NVIDIA Quadro P2000, E-2176M
65 fps -59%
Dell Precision 5530 2-in-1
AMD Radeon Pro WX Vega M GL, i7-8706G
57.4 fps -64%
Eurocom Sky X9C
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 SLI (Laptop), i7-8700K
57.2 fps -64%
1900x1060 Energy (energy-01)
Eurocom Tornado F7W
NVIDIA Quadro P5200, i9-9900K
16.88 fps
Eurocom Tornado F5W
NVIDIA Quadro P5000, E3-1280 v5
14.95 fps -11%
Dell Precision 7720
NVIDIA Quadro P5000, E3-1535M v6
14.22 fps -16%
Lenovo ThinkPad P72-20MB000EGE
NVIDIA Quadro P3200, i7-8850H
10.61 fps -37%
MSI WS63VR 7RL-023US
NVIDIA Quadro P4000 Max-Q, i7-7700HQ
10.6 fps -37%
Eurocom Sky X9C
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 SLI (Laptop), i7-8700K
8.9 fps -47%
Dell Precision 5530 Xeon E-2176M
NVIDIA Quadro P2000, E-2176M
5.27 fps -69%
Dell Precision 5530 2-in-1
AMD Radeon Pro WX Vega M GL, i7-8706G
2.94 fps -83%
1900x1060 Maya (maya-04)
Eurocom Sky X9C
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 SLI (Laptop), i7-8700K
160.1 fps +8%
Eurocom Tornado F7W
NVIDIA Quadro P5200, i9-9900K
147.9 fps
Eurocom Tornado F5W
NVIDIA Quadro P5000, E3-1280 v5
102.1 fps -31%
Lenovo ThinkPad P72-20MB000EGE
NVIDIA Quadro P3200, i7-8850H
92.7 fps -37%
Dell Precision 7720
NVIDIA Quadro P5000, E3-1535M v6
88.8 fps -40%
MSI WS63VR 7RL-023US
NVIDIA Quadro P4000 Max-Q, i7-7700HQ
73 fps -51%
Dell Precision 5530 Xeon E-2176M
NVIDIA Quadro P2000, E-2176M
59.2 fps -60%
Dell Precision 5530 2-in-1
AMD Radeon Pro WX Vega M GL, i7-8706G
42.84 fps -71%
1900x1060 Medical (medical-01)
Eurocom Tornado F7W
NVIDIA Quadro P5200, i9-9900K
79.4 fps
Eurocom Tornado F5W
NVIDIA Quadro P5000, E3-1280 v5
71.5 fps -10%
Dell Precision 7720
NVIDIA Quadro P5000, E3-1535M v6
62.7 fps -21%
Eurocom Sky X9C
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 SLI (Laptop), i7-8700K
48.93 fps -38%
Lenovo ThinkPad P72-20MB000EGE
NVIDIA Quadro P3200, i7-8850H
47.28 fps -40%
MSI WS63VR 7RL-023US
NVIDIA Quadro P4000 Max-Q, i7-7700HQ
41.8 fps -47%
Dell Precision 5530 Xeon E-2176M
NVIDIA Quadro P2000, E-2176M
22.84 fps -71%
Dell Precision 5530 2-in-1
AMD Radeon Pro WX Vega M GL, i7-8706G
19.94 fps -75%
1900x1060 Showcase (showcase-01)
Eurocom Sky X9C
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 SLI (Laptop), i7-8700K
101 fps +35%
Eurocom Tornado F7W
NVIDIA Quadro P5200, i9-9900K
75 fps
Dell Precision 7720
NVIDIA Quadro P5000, E3-1535M v6
68.8 fps -8%
MSI WS63VR 7RL-023US
NVIDIA Quadro P4000 Max-Q, i7-7700HQ
62.6 fps -17%
Eurocom Tornado F5W
NVIDIA Quadro P5000, E3-1280 v5
62.3 fps -17%
Lenovo ThinkPad P72-20MB000EGE
NVIDIA Quadro P3200, i7-8850H
58.5 fps -22%
Dell Precision 5530 2-in-1
AMD Radeon Pro WX Vega M GL, i7-8706G
38.31 fps -49%
Dell Precision 5530 Xeon E-2176M
NVIDIA Quadro P2000, E-2176M
30.73 fps -59%
1900x1060 Siemens NX (snx-02)
Eurocom Tornado F7W
NVIDIA Quadro P5200, i9-9900K
217.9 fps
Eurocom Tornado F5W
NVIDIA Quadro P5000, E3-1280 v5
183.6 fps -16%
Dell Precision 7720
NVIDIA Quadro P5000, E3-1535M v6
157.4 fps -28%
Lenovo ThinkPad P72-20MB000EGE
NVIDIA Quadro P3200, i7-8850H
130.1 fps -40%
MSI WS63VR 7RL-023US
NVIDIA Quadro P4000 Max-Q, i7-7700HQ
111.7 fps -49%
Dell Precision 5530 Xeon E-2176M
NVIDIA Quadro P2000, E-2176M
65.8 fps -70%
Dell Precision 5530 2-in-1
AMD Radeon Pro WX Vega M GL, i7-8706G
60 fps -72%
Eurocom Sky X9C
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 SLI (Laptop), i7-8700K
14.98 fps -93%
1900x1060 Solidworks (sw-03)
Eurocom Tornado F7W
NVIDIA Quadro P5200, i9-9900K
212 fps
Eurocom Tornado F5W
NVIDIA Quadro P5000, E3-1280 v5
166.2 fps -22%
Lenovo ThinkPad P72-20MB000EGE
NVIDIA Quadro P3200, i7-8850H
148.4 fps -30%
Dell Precision 7720
NVIDIA Quadro P5000, E3-1535M v6
142.3 fps -33%
MSI WS63VR 7RL-023US
NVIDIA Quadro P4000 Max-Q, i7-7700HQ
119.9 fps -43%
Dell Precision 5530 Xeon E-2176M
NVIDIA Quadro P2000, E-2176M
103.8 fps -51%
Dell Precision 5530 2-in-1
AMD Radeon Pro WX Vega M GL, i7-8706G
75.2 fps -65%
Eurocom Sky X9C
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 SLI (Laptop), i7-8700K
66.1 fps -69%
SPECviewperf 13
3ds Max (3dsmax-06)
Eurocom Tornado F7W
NVIDIA Quadro P5200, i9-9900K
149.6 fps
Lenovo ThinkPad P72-20MB000EGE
NVIDIA Quadro P3200, i7-8850H
105.9 fps -29%
Catia (catia-05)
Eurocom Tornado F7W
NVIDIA Quadro P5200, i9-9900K
302.4 fps
Lenovo ThinkPad P72-20MB000EGE
NVIDIA Quadro P3200, i7-8850H
200.5 fps -34%
Creo (creo-02)
Eurocom Tornado F7W
NVIDIA Quadro P5200, i9-9900K
247.7 fps
Lenovo ThinkPad P72-20MB000EGE
NVIDIA Quadro P3200, i7-8850H
165.3 fps -33%
Energy (energy-02)
Eurocom Tornado F7W
NVIDIA Quadro P5200, i9-9900K
17.28 fps
Lenovo ThinkPad P72-20MB000EGE
NVIDIA Quadro P3200, i7-8850H
8.41 fps -51%
Maya (maya-05)
Eurocom Tornado F7W
NVIDIA Quadro P5200, i9-9900K
255 fps
Lenovo ThinkPad P72-20MB000EGE
NVIDIA Quadro P3200, i7-8850H
163.9 fps -36%
Medical (medical-02)
Eurocom Tornado F7W
NVIDIA Quadro P5200, i9-9900K
61.7 fps
Lenovo ThinkPad P72-20MB000EGE
NVIDIA Quadro P3200, i7-8850H
29.9 fps -52%
Showcase (showcase-02)
Eurocom Tornado F7W
NVIDIA Quadro P5200, i9-9900K
74.7 fps
Lenovo ThinkPad P72-20MB000EGE
NVIDIA Quadro P3200, i7-8850H
58.4 fps -22%
Siemens NX (snx-03)
Eurocom Tornado F7W
NVIDIA Quadro P5200, i9-9900K
396.3 fps
Lenovo ThinkPad P72-20MB000EGE
NVIDIA Quadro P3200, i7-8850H
238.9 fps -40%
Solidworks (sw-04)
Eurocom Tornado F7W
NVIDIA Quadro P5200, i9-9900K
189.2 fps
Lenovo ThinkPad P72-20MB000EGE
NVIDIA Quadro P3200, i7-8850H
133.5 fps -29%
3DMark 06 Standard Score
44390 pontos
3DMark Vantage P Result
65844 pontos
3DMark 11 Performance
22226 pontos
3DMark Ice Storm Standard Score
185544 pontos
3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score
47810 pontos
3DMark Fire Strike Score
16723 pontos
3DMark Time Spy Score
6713 pontos
Ajuda
05101520253035404550556065Tooltip
Eurocom Tornado F7W Quadro P5200, i9-9900K, 3x Samsung SSD 970 Pro 512GB (RAID 0): Ø63 (59-67)
baixomédiaaltoultra4K
Sleeping Dogs (2012) 344.2 288.1 267.3 118.8
Guild Wars 2 (2012) 145.1 83.5 85.4
StarCraft II: Heart of the Swarm (2013) 753 346.2 296.6 218.9
BioShock Infinite (2013) 435 375.5 346.5
Metro: Last Light (2013) 177.5 175.2 171.6 119.2
Thief (2014) 149.4 145.1 145.7 114.2
The Witcher 3 (2015) 303.5 211.6 116.1 63.4 43.9
Batman: Arkham Knight (2015) 186 176 131 90 50
Metal Gear Solid V (2015) 60 60 60 60 60
Fallout 4 (2015) 241.9 236.3 46.8
Rise of the Tomb Raider (2016) 292.9 210.1 121.5 101 44.9
Ashes of the Singularity (2016) 113 99.1 97.8 43.5
Overwatch (2016) 300 300 252.2 174.1 88.7
Prey (2017) 145 144.6 145 144.1 60.9
Rocket League (2017) 248.5 247 185.8 92.5
Dirt 4 (2017) 354.1 221.2 126 84.4 56.8
Middle-earth: Shadow of War (2017) 219 137 106 84 33
Destiny 2 (2017) 13 12.7 12.6 12.2 12.3
Monster Hunter World (2018) 183.5 110.1 100.4 77.4 24.1
F1 2018 (2018) 212 152 125 83 46
Shadow of the Tomb Raider (2018) 147 91 84 72 26
Eurocom Tornado F7W
Quadro P5200, i9-9900K, 3x Samsung SSD 970 Pro 512GB (RAID 0)		Acer Predator Helios 500 PH517-51-93LS
GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, i9-8950HK, Liteon CA1-8D512		Asus Chimera G703GI
GeForce GTX 1080 Mobile, i9-8950HK, 2x Intel 760p 512 GB + 1x Samsung SM961 512 GB (RAID)		HP Omen X 17-ap0xx
GeForce GTX 1080 Mobile, i7-7820HK, Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP		Eurocom Sky X9C
GeForce GTX 1080 SLI (Laptop), i7-8700K, 2x Samsung SSD 960 Pro 1TB m.2 NVMe (RAID 0)		MSI GT75 8RG-090 Titan
GeForce GTX 1080 Mobile, i9-8950HK, 2x Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP (RAID 0)
Noise
16%
-2%
9%
-5%
-2%
off / environment *
28.2
29.4
-4%
29
-3%
28.3
-0%
28.4
-1%
30
-6%
Idle Minimum *
33.2
29.4
11%
30
10%
31.5
5%
34.2
-3%
32
4%
Idle Average *
33.2
29.4
11%
34
-2%
31.6
5%
39.6
-19%
34
-2%
Idle Maximum *
33.2
30.1
9%
42
-27%
31.6
5%
39.6
-19%
37
-11%
Load Average *
47
36
23%
53
-13%
36.8
22%
48.5
-3%
43
9%
Witcher 3 ultra *
52.2
37.6
28%
51
2%
48.2
8%
54
-3%
57
-9%
Load Maximum *
64
42.2
34%
53
17%
52.1
19%
56.5
12%
62
3%

* ... smaller is better

Barulho

Ocioso
33.2 / 33.2 / 33.2 dB
Carga
47 / 64 dB
  red to green bar
 
 
30 dB
silencioso
40 dB(A)
audível
50 dB(A)
ruidosamente alto
  
min: dark, med: mid, max: light   Audix TM1, Arta (15 cm de distância)   environment noise: 28.2 dB(A)
Carga Máxima
 34 °C34 °C32 °C 
 25.8 °C31.4 °C28.2 °C 
 21.2 °C18.8 °C20.2 °C 
Máximo: 34 °C
Médio: 27.3 °C
47.6 °C28.4 °C42.4 °C
36 °C25.8 °C27 °C
20.2 °C20.8 °C20.4 °C
Máximo: 47.6 °C
Médio: 29.8 °C
alimentação elétrica  26.4 °C | Temperatura do quarto 20 °C | Raytek Raynger ST // Voltcraft IR-360 // FIRT 550-Pocket // Fluke 62 Mini
(+) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 27.3 °C / 81 F, compared to the average of 32 °C / 90 F for the devices in the class Workstation.
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 34 °C / 93 F, compared to the average of 38.2 °C / 101 F, ranging from 22.2 to 69.8 °C for the class Workstation.
(-) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 47.6 °C / 118 F, compared to the average of 41.2 °C / 106 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 21.3 °C / 70 F, compared to the device average of 32 °C / 90 F.
(+) Playing The Witcher 3, the average temperature for the upper side is 28.6 °C / 83 F, compared to the device average of 32 °C / 90 F.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are cooler than skin temperature with a maximum of 22.6 °C / 72.7 F and are therefore cool to the touch.
(+) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 27.8 °C / 82 F (+5.2 °C / 9.3 F).
dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2035.137.42532.135.73133.932.54032.932.95031.6326333.236.3802941.710029.747.912528.754.416028.258.420026.857.725027.361.531526.164.440026.663.550025.865.563025.170.880024.972.5100024.767.6125024.170.616002479.4200024.780.7250024.279.9315024.175.5400023.772.3500023.874.1630023.774.7800023.569.41000023.667.51250023.658.31600023.562.7SPL36.587.8N2.769.5median 24.7median 69.4Delta1.36.135.335.132.931.831.83236.535.132.428.93328.936.328.848.32761.52752.924.860.92462.822.763.32269.521.267.82174.82075.919.472.718.97117.770.117.86917.671.817.668.117.671.417.673.717.670.417.571.617.671.617.669.617.459.717.583.630.662.51.5median 69.6median 17.84.72.4hearing rangehide median Pink NoiseEurocom Tornado F7WApple MacBook 12 (Early 2016) 1.1 GHz
Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)
Eurocom Tornado F7W audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (80.7 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 12% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (9% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.8% away from median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (7.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 4.5% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (5.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (15.9% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 34% of all tested devices in this class were better, 9% similar, 57% worse
» The best had a delta of 7%, average was 18%, worst was 35%
Compared to all devices tested
» 22% of all tested devices were better, 5% similar, 73% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Apple MacBook 12 (Early 2016) 1.1 GHz audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (83.6 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 11.3% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (14.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2.4% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (10.2% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 6% of all tested devices in this class were better, 2% similar, 92% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 19%, worst was 53%
Compared to all devices tested
» 4% of all tested devices were better, 1% similar, 95% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Consumo de energia
desligadodarklight 6.7 / 8 Watt
Ociosodarkmidlight 28.5 / 36.7 / 37.8 Watt
Carga midlight 144.6 / 336 Watt
 color bar
Key: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
Eurocom Tornado F7W
i9-9900K, Quadro P5200, 3x Samsung SSD 970 Pro 512GB (RAID 0), IPS, 3840x2160, 17.3"		Eurocom Sky X7C
i7-8086K, GeForce GTX 1080 Mobile, 2x Samsung SSD 970 Pro 512GB (RAID 0), IPS, 3840x2160, 17.3"		Asus Chimera G703GI
i9-8950HK, GeForce GTX 1080 Mobile, 2x Intel 760p 512 GB + 1x Samsung SM961 512 GB (RAID), IPS, 1920x1080, 17.3"		Eurocom Sky X9C
i7-8700K, GeForce GTX 1080 SLI (Laptop), 2x Samsung SSD 960 Pro 1TB m.2 NVMe (RAID 0), IPS, 3840x2160, 17.3"		MSI GT75 8RG-090 Titan
i9-8950HK, GeForce GTX 1080 Mobile, 2x Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP (RAID 0), TN, 1920x1080, 17.3"		Eurocom Tornado F5
i7-7700K, GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, Samsung SSD 960 Pro 512 GB m.2, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6"
Power Consumption
10%
-7%
-54%
-8%
22%
Idle Minimum *
28.5
33.3
-17%
29
-2%
54.7
-92%
31
-9%
21.2
26%
Idle Average *
36.7
40.1
-9%
37
-1%
55.7
-52%
35
5%
25.1
32%
Idle Maximum *
37.8
42.1
-11%
46
-22%
56.8
-50%
45
-19%
26.3
30%
Load Average *
144.6
95.6
34%
156
-8%
183.7
-27%
130
10%
169.4
-17%
Witcher 3 ultra *
218.9
152.9
30%
252
-15%
454.8
-108%
268
-22%
Load Maximum *
336
220
35%
314
7%
321.8
4%
374
-11%
202.4
40%

* ... smaller is better

Tempo de Execução da Bateria
WiFi Websurfing
3h 00min
Eurocom Tornado F7W
i9-9900K, Quadro P5200, 90 Wh		Eurocom Sky X7C
i7-8086K, GeForce GTX 1080 Mobile, 82 Wh		Asus Chimera G703GI
i9-8950HK, GeForce GTX 1080 Mobile, 71 Wh		Eurocom Sky X9C
i7-8700K, GeForce GTX 1080 SLI (Laptop), 89 Wh		MSI GT75 8RG-090 Titan
i9-8950HK, GeForce GTX 1080 Mobile, 75 Wh		Eurocom Tornado F5
i7-7700K, GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, 75.24 Wh
Battery Runtime
-21%
-28%
-57%
20%
WiFi v1.3
180
143
-21%
130
-28%
78
-57%
216
20%
Reader / Idle
169
83
225
291
Load
51
47
63
67

Pro

+ Duração da bateria WLAN respeitável para o tamanho
+ Temperaturas relativamente frias da superfície
+ Manutenção e atualização simples
+ Relativamente silencioso durante o uso leve
+ Amplas opções de configuração
+ Alto-falantes potentes com subwoofer
+ Slots LGA 1151 e MXM 3.1
+ Suporte para 128 GB de RAM DDR4
+ Ruído baixo das tecla
+ Base sólidas

Contra

- Adaptador de CA grande e pesado; cabos grossos e de difícil manuseio
- Tempos médios de resposta preto-preto e cinza-cinza
- Adaptador de CA de alta frequência sob uso intenso
- O painel 4K UHD mate é um pouco granulado
- As teclas do teclado numérico são pequenas e estreitas
- Desempenho reduzido com baterias
- Portas traseiras difíceis de alcançar
- A garantia básica é de apenas um ano
- Sem iluminação RGB por tecla
- A tampa poderia ser mais rígida
- Barulhento sob uso intenso
- Carregamento lento
In review: Eurocom Tornado F7W. Test model provided by Eurocom
In review: Eurocom Tornado F7W. Test model provided by Eurocom

Os maiores motivos para escolher um workstation Eurocom são seu desempenho, opções configuráveis e capacidade de manutenção do usuário final. Sistemas concorrentes de marcas mais conhecidas, como Lenovo, Dell ou HP, tendem a ter hardware mais lento, menos opções de atualização e uma antipatia pelos ajustes do usuário final. Os usuários que pretendem explorar essas três vantagens vão gostar muito do Tornado F7W.

Ainda há muitas melhorias a serem feitas ao nos aprofundar nos detalhes. O desempenho da CPU, em particular, poderia ser melhor, já que os usuários não estão tirando todo o potencial do Core i9-9900K deste chassi. O painel 4K UHD é ligeiramente mais granulado do que o que estamos acostumados, até mesmo para um painel mate, e o adaptador de CA refrigerado ativamente às vezes pode ser mais barulhento que o portátil sob cargas médias. Os BIOS e a WLAN aparentemente com problemas, que experimentamos, provavelmente são problemas apenas com nossa unidade específica, mas, no entanto, eles merecem uma menção. Finalmente, mais reclamações menores, como as teclas menores do teclado numérico, falta de luz de fundo RGB e Ethernet de 10 Gbit, portas traseiras de difícil acesso, e cabo de força grosso, certamente se somam. Muitos destes podem ser perdoados em alternativas mais baratas e mais comuns, mas os usuários estarão esperando tudo considerando o preço deste sistema.

O Eurocom Tornado F7W não tem igual no mundo dos workstations móveis de 17 polegadas. Seu desempenho extremo e versatilidade de hardware devem satisfazer os profissionais que se sentem confortáveis com a troca de componentes e a solução de problemas por conta própria. Mesmo assim, há um punhado de pequenos aborrecimentos e omissões que esperamos que futuras iterações abordem.

Eurocom Tornado F7W - 12/06/2018 v6 (old)
Allen Ngo

Acabamento
86 / 98 → 87%
Teclado
81%
Mouse
83%
Conectividade
65 / 81 → 80%
Peso
48 / 10-66 → 67%
Bateria
69%
Pantalha
86%
Desempenho do jogos
99%
Desempenho da aplicação
99%
Workstation
100%
Temperatura
93 / 95 → 98%
Ruído
62 / 90 → 69%
Audio
70%
Camera
79 / 85 → 93%
Médio
80%
86%
Workstation - Médio equilibrado

More articles related to this device

Eurocom Tornado F7W (Tornado Serie)
Análise
•
Breve Análise do Workstation E...
|
Análise
•
Breve Análise do Portátil Euro...
|
Análise
•
Breve Análise do Portátil Euro...

Price comparison

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Análises e revisões de portáteis e celulares > Análises > Análises > Breve Análise do Workstation Eurocom Tornado F7W (i9-9900K, Quadro P5200)
Allen Ngo, 2018-12- 6 (Update: 2018-12-11)