Breve Análise do Workstation Eurocom Tornado F7W (i9-9900K, Quadro P5200)
Os Top 10
» Os Top 10 Portáteis Multimídia
» Os Top 10 Portáteis de Jogos
» Os Top 10 Portáteis Leves para Jogos
» Os Top 10 Portáteis Acessíveis de Escritório/Empresariais
» Os Top 10 Portáteis Premium de Escritório/Empresariais
» Os Top 10 dos Portáteis Workstation
» Os Top 10 Subportáteis
» Os Top 10 Ultrabooks
» Os Top 10 Conversíveis
» Os Top 10 Tablets
» Os Top 10 Smartphones
» A melhores Telas de Portáteis Analisadas Pela Notebookcheck
» Top 10 dos portáteis abaixo dos 500 Euros da Notebookcheck
» Top 10 dos Portáteis abaixo dos 300 Euros
SD Card Reader | |
average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs) | |
Asus Chimera G703GI (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
Eurocom Sky X7C (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
Eurocom Sky X9C (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
Eurocom Tornado F7W (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
HP Omen X 17-ap0xx (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
maximum AS SSD Seq Read Test (1GB) | |
Asus Chimera G703GI (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
Eurocom Sky X7C (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
Eurocom Sky X9C (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
Eurocom Tornado F7W (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
HP Omen X 17-ap0xx (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) |
|
iluminação: 92 %
iluminação com acumulador: 328.2 cd/m²
Contraste: 887:1 (Preto: 0.37 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 6.62 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.91, calibrated: 3.93
ΔE Greyscale 6.7 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
100% sRGB (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
87.9% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
98.3% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
100% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
85.9% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.44
Eurocom Tornado F7W AU Optronics B173ZAN01.0, IPS, 17.3", 3840x2160 | Eurocom Sky X7C AU Optronics B173ZAN01.0, IPS, 17.3", 3840x2160 | Asus Chimera G703GI B173HAN03.2 (AUO329D), IPS, 17.3", 1920x1080 | HP Omen X 17-ap0xx AU Optronics B173HW01, IPS, 17.3", 1920x1080 | Eurocom Sky X9C ID: AUO109B, Name: AU Optronics B173ZAN01.0, IPS, 17.3", 3840x2160 | MSI GT75 8RG-090 Titan CMN N173HHE-G32 (CMN1747), TN, 17.3", 1920x1080 | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Display | 0% | -21% | -24% | 1% | -2% | |
Display P3 Coverage | 85.9 | 86 0% | 65.8 -23% | 63.7 -26% | 86.6 1% | 90.9 6% |
sRGB Coverage | 100 | 99.9 0% | 92.6 -7% | 88.2 -12% | 100 0% | 100 0% |
AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage | 98.3 | 98.9 1% | 67 -32% | 64.2 -35% | 99.4 1% | 86.2 -12% |
Response Times | 10% | 75% | -5% | 0% | 81% | |
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% * | 40 ? | 38.4 ? 4% | 6.4 ? 84% | 44 ? -10% | 43.6 ? -9% | 8 ? 80% |
Response Time Black / White * | 31.6 ? | 26.8 ? 15% | 10.8 ? 66% | 31.6 ? -0% | 28.8 ? 9% | 5.6 ? 82% |
PWM Frequency | 26000 ? | |||||
Screen | 1% | 19% | 15% | 2% | 22% | |
Brightness middle | 328.2 | 333 1% | 285 -13% | 343 5% | 347.7 6% | 240 -27% |
Brightness | 310 | 330 6% | 275 -11% | 332 7% | 324 5% | 248 -20% |
Brightness Distribution | 92 | 88 -4% | 82 -11% | 83 -10% | 87 -5% | 83 -10% |
Black Level * | 0.37 | 0.4 -8% | 0.22 41% | 0.35 5% | 0.4 -8% | 0.22 41% |
Contrast | 887 | 833 -6% | 1295 46% | 980 10% | 869 -2% | 1091 23% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 6.62 | 5.87 11% | 3.18 52% | 3.35 49% | 6.39 3% | 2.14 68% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 9.49 | 9.74 -3% | 5.99 37% | 5.62 41% | 9.69 -2% | 5.04 47% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 calibrated * | 3.93 | 4.59 -17% | 1.73 56% | 2.5 36% | 1.54 61% | |
Greyscale dE 2000 * | 6.7 | 4.5 33% | 2.93 56% | 2.4 64% | 5.4 19% | 1.62 76% |
Gamma | 2.44 90% | 2.34 94% | 2.45 90% | 2.35 94% | 2.4 92% | 2.28 96% |
CCT | 6462 101% | 6384 102% | 7165 91% | 6495 100% | 6271 104% | 6846 95% |
Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998) | 87.9 | 88 0% | 60 -32% | 57 -35% | 87.8 0% | 77 -12% |
Color Space (Percent of sRGB) | 100 | 100 0% | 93 -7% | 88 -12% | 100 0% | 100 0% |
Total Average (Program / Settings) | 4% /
2% | 24% /
19% | -5% /
5% | 1% /
1% | 34% /
25% |
* ... smaller is better
Display Response Times
↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
---|---|---|
31.6 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 18 ms rise | |
↘ 13.6 ms fall | ||
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 84 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (20.9 ms). | ||
↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
40 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 18.8 ms rise | |
↘ 21.2 ms fall | ||
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 58 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (32.8 ms). |
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
Screen flickering / PWM not detected | |||
In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8706 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured. |
Cinebench R15 | |
CPU Single 64Bit | |
Eurocom Tornado F7W | |
Intel Core i9-9900K, AMD Radeon RX Vega 64 | |
Average Intel Core i9-9900K (203 - 218, n=9) | |
Eurocom Sky X7C | |
MSI GT75 8RG-090 Titan | |
Eurocom Tornado F5 | |
Eurocom Sky X9C | |
Eurocom Q6 | |
Eurocom Tornado F5W | |
Eurocom Sky MX5 R3 | |
Asus GL702ZC-GC104T | |
CPU Multi 64Bit | |
Intel Core i9-9900K, AMD Radeon RX Vega 64 | |
Average Intel Core i9-9900K (1623 - 2040, n=9) | |
Eurocom Tornado F7W | |
Asus GL702ZC-GC104T | |
Eurocom Sky X7C | |
MSI GT75 8RG-090 Titan | |
Eurocom Sky X9C | |
Eurocom Q6 | |
Eurocom Tornado F5 | |
Eurocom Tornado F5W | |
Eurocom Sky MX5 R3 |
Cinebench R11.5 | |
CPU Single 64Bit | |
Intel Core i9-9900K, AMD Radeon RX Vega 64 | |
Eurocom Tornado F7W | |
Average Intel Core i9-9900K (2.33 - 2.44, n=5) | |
MSI GT75 8RG-090 Titan | |
Eurocom Sky X9C | |
Eurocom Sky X7C | |
Eurocom Tornado F5 | |
Eurocom Q6 | |
Eurocom Tornado F5W | |
Eurocom Sky MX5 R3 | |
Asus GL702ZC-GC104T | |
CPU Multi 64Bit | |
Intel Core i9-9900K, AMD Radeon RX Vega 64 | |
Average Intel Core i9-9900K (17.4 - 21.8, n=5) | |
Eurocom Tornado F7W | |
Asus GL702ZC-GC104T | |
Eurocom Sky X7C | |
MSI GT75 8RG-090 Titan | |
Eurocom Sky X9C | |
Eurocom Q6 | |
Eurocom Tornado F5 | |
Eurocom Tornado F5W | |
Eurocom Sky MX5 R3 |
Cinebench R10 | |
Rendering Multiple CPUs 32Bit | |
Intel Core i9-9900K, AMD Radeon RX Vega 64 | |
Average Intel Core i9-9900K (36683 - 49142, n=4) | |
Eurocom Sky X9C | |
Eurocom Tornado F7W | |
Eurocom Sky X7C | |
Asus GL702ZC-GC104T | |
Eurocom Tornado F5 | |
Eurocom Sky MX5 R3 | |
Rendering Single 32Bit | |
Eurocom Tornado F7W | |
Average Intel Core i9-9900K (7786 - 8042, n=4) | |
Intel Core i9-9900K, AMD Radeon RX Vega 64 | |
Eurocom Sky X9C | |
Eurocom Tornado F5 | |
Eurocom Sky X7C | |
Eurocom Sky MX5 R3 | |
Asus GL702ZC-GC104T |
wPrime 2.10 - 1024m | |
Eurocom Tornado F5W | |
Eurocom Sky MX5 R3 | |
Eurocom Tornado F5 | |
Eurocom Sky X7C | |
Eurocom Sky X9C | |
Eurocom Tornado F7W | |
Average Intel Core i9-9900K (85.6 - 98.7, n=3) | |
Intel Core i9-9900K, AMD Radeon RX Vega 64 |
* ... smaller is better
PCMark 8 Home Score Accelerated v2 | 5130 pontos | |
PCMark 10 Score | 6255 pontos | |
Ajuda |
Eurocom Tornado F7W 3x Samsung SSD 970 Pro 512GB (RAID 0) | Eurocom Sky X7C 2x Samsung SSD 970 Pro 512GB (RAID 0) | Asus Chimera G703GI 2x Intel 760p 512 GB + 1x Samsung SM961 512 GB (RAID) | MSI GT75 8RG-090 Titan 2x Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP (RAID 0) | Eurocom Tornado F5 Samsung SSD 960 Pro 512 GB m.2 | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
AS SSD | 11% | 43% | 3% | 11% | |
Seq Read | 2139 | 3147 47% | 4886 128% | 3058 43% | 2819 32% |
Seq Write | 2447 | 2866 17% | 4110 68% | 2196 -10% | 2046 -16% |
4K Read | 29.7 | 48.74 64% | 57.4 93% | 38.37 29% | 51 72% |
4K Write | 102.5 | 116.7 14% | 141.3 38% | 97.7 -5% | 150.5 47% |
4K-64 Read | 1299 | 1348 4% | 1453 12% | 1347 4% | 1179 -9% |
4K-64 Write | 1236 | 1203 -3% | 1303 5% | 1236 0% | 1334 8% |
Access Time Read * | 0.045 | 0.034 24% | 0.03 33% | 0.056 -24% | 0.03 33% |
Access Time Write * | 0.033 | 0.032 3% | 0.026 21% | 0.038 -15% | 0.024 27% |
Score Read | 1543 | 1712 11% | 1999 30% | 1691 10% | 1512 -2% |
Score Write | 1583 | 1606 1% | 1855 17% | 1553 -2% | 1689 7% |
Score Total | 3928 | 4184 7% | 4843 23% | 4066 4% | 3943 0% |
Copy ISO MB/s | 2320 | 2330 0% | 1614 -30% | ||
Copy Program MB/s | 621 | 518 -17% | 635 2% | ||
Copy Game MB/s | 1585 | 1321 -17% | 1310 -17% | ||
CrystalDiskMark 5.2 / 6 | 11% | 44% | -11% | ||
Write 4K | 116.3 | 152.2 31% | 130.2 12% | 111.8 -4% | |
Read 4K | 52.7 | 60.4 15% | 57.3 9% | 42.09 -20% | |
Write Seq | 2539 | 3002 18% | 4049 59% | 2288 -10% | |
Read Seq | 2972 | 3329 12% | 5325 79% | 3321 12% | |
Write 4K Q32T1 | 454.6 | 432.9 -5% | 383.2 -16% | 308.3 -32% | |
Read 4K Q32T1 | 515 | 494 -4% | 424.9 -17% | 364.9 -29% | |
Write Seq Q32T1 | 3101 | 3391 9% | 4316 39% | 2440 -21% | |
Read Seq Q32T1 | 3078 | 3405 11% | 8905 189% | 3485 13% | |
Total Average (Program / Settings) | 11% /
11% | 44% /
43% | -4% /
-3% | 11% /
11% |
* ... smaller is better
3DMark 11 | |
1280x720 Performance GPU | |
Eurocom Sky X9C | |
Eurocom Sky X7C | |
Eurocom Tornado F7W | |
Eurocom Tornado F5W | |
Dell Precision 7720 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad P72-20MB000EGE | |
MSI WS63VR 7RL-023US | |
Dell Precision 5530 2-in-1 | |
Dell Precision 5530 Xeon E-2176M | |
1280x720 Performance Combined | |
Eurocom Tornado F7W | |
Eurocom Sky X7C | |
Eurocom Sky X9C | |
Lenovo ThinkPad P72-20MB000EGE | |
Dell Precision 7720 | |
Eurocom Tornado F5W | |
MSI WS63VR 7RL-023US | |
Dell Precision 5530 2-in-1 | |
Dell Precision 5530 Xeon E-2176M |
3DMark | |
1920x1080 Fire Strike Graphics | |
Eurocom Sky X9C | |
Eurocom Tornado F7W | |
Eurocom Tornado F5W | |
Dell Precision 7720 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad P72-20MB000EGE | |
MSI WS63VR 7RL-023US | |
Dell Precision 5530 2-in-1 | |
Dell Precision 5530 Xeon E-2176M | |
2560x1440 Time Spy Graphics | |
Eurocom Tornado F7W | |
Lenovo ThinkPad P72-20MB000EGE | |
Dell Precision 7720 | |
Dell Precision 5530 2-in-1 | |
Dell Precision 5530 Xeon E-2176M |
SPECviewperf 13 | |
3ds Max (3dsmax-06) | |
Eurocom Tornado F7W | |
Lenovo ThinkPad P72-20MB000EGE | |
Catia (catia-05) | |
Eurocom Tornado F7W | |
Lenovo ThinkPad P72-20MB000EGE | |
Creo (creo-02) | |
Eurocom Tornado F7W | |
Lenovo ThinkPad P72-20MB000EGE | |
Energy (energy-02) | |
Eurocom Tornado F7W | |
Lenovo ThinkPad P72-20MB000EGE | |
Maya (maya-05) | |
Eurocom Tornado F7W | |
Lenovo ThinkPad P72-20MB000EGE | |
Medical (medical-02) | |
Eurocom Tornado F7W | |
Lenovo ThinkPad P72-20MB000EGE | |
Showcase (showcase-02) | |
Eurocom Tornado F7W | |
Lenovo ThinkPad P72-20MB000EGE | |
Siemens NX (snx-03) | |
Eurocom Tornado F7W | |
Lenovo ThinkPad P72-20MB000EGE | |
Solidworks (sw-04) | |
Eurocom Tornado F7W | |
Lenovo ThinkPad P72-20MB000EGE |
3DMark 06 Standard Score | 44390 pontos | |
3DMark Vantage P Result | 65844 pontos | |
3DMark 11 Performance | 22226 pontos | |
3DMark Ice Storm Standard Score | 185544 pontos | |
3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score | 47810 pontos | |
3DMark Fire Strike Score | 16723 pontos | |
3DMark Time Spy Score | 6713 pontos | |
Ajuda |
baixo | média | alto | ultra | 4K | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Sleeping Dogs (2012) | 344.2 | 288.1 | 267.3 | 118.8 | |
Guild Wars 2 (2012) | 145.1 | 83.5 | 85.4 | ||
StarCraft II: Heart of the Swarm (2013) | 753 | 346.2 | 296.6 | 218.9 | |
BioShock Infinite (2013) | 435 | 375.5 | 346.5 | ||
Metro: Last Light (2013) | 177.5 | 175.2 | 171.6 | 119.2 | |
Thief (2014) | 149.4 | 145.1 | 145.7 | 114.2 | |
The Witcher 3 (2015) | 303.5 | 211.6 | 116.1 | 63.4 | 43.9 |
Batman: Arkham Knight (2015) | 186 | 176 | 131 | 90 | 50 |
Metal Gear Solid V (2015) | 60 | 60 | 60 | 60 | 60 |
Fallout 4 (2015) | 241.9 | 236.3 | 46.8 | ||
Rise of the Tomb Raider (2016) | 292.9 | 210.1 | 121.5 | 101 | 44.9 |
Ashes of the Singularity (2016) | 113 | 99.1 | 97.8 | 43.5 | |
Overwatch (2016) | 300 | 300 | 252.2 | 174.1 | 88.7 |
Prey (2017) | 145 | 144.6 | 145 | 144.1 | 60.9 |
Rocket League (2017) | 248.5 | 247 | 185.8 | 92.5 | |
Dirt 4 (2017) | 354.1 | 221.2 | 126 | 84.4 | 56.8 |
Middle-earth: Shadow of War (2017) | 219 | 137 | 106 | 84 | 33 |
Destiny 2 (2017) | 13 | 12.7 | 12.6 | 12.2 | 12.3 |
Monster Hunter World (2018) | 183.5 | 110.1 | 100.4 | 77.4 | 24.1 |
F1 2018 (2018) | 212 | 152 | 125 | 83 | 46 |
Shadow of the Tomb Raider (2018) | 147 | 91 | 84 | 72 | 26 |
Eurocom Tornado F7W Quadro P5200, i9-9900K, 3x Samsung SSD 970 Pro 512GB (RAID 0) | Acer Predator Helios 500 PH517-51-93LS GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, i9-8950HK, Liteon CA1-8D512 | Asus Chimera G703GI GeForce GTX 1080 Mobile, i9-8950HK, 2x Intel 760p 512 GB + 1x Samsung SM961 512 GB (RAID) | HP Omen X 17-ap0xx GeForce GTX 1080 Mobile, i7-7820HK, Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP | Eurocom Sky X9C GeForce GTX 1080 SLI (Laptop), i7-8700K, 2x Samsung SSD 960 Pro 1TB m.2 NVMe (RAID 0) | MSI GT75 8RG-090 Titan GeForce GTX 1080 Mobile, i9-8950HK, 2x Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP (RAID 0) | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Noise | 16% | -2% | 9% | -5% | -2% | |
off / environment * | 28.2 | 29.4 -4% | 29 -3% | 28.3 -0% | 28.4 -1% | 30 -6% |
Idle Minimum * | 33.2 | 29.4 11% | 30 10% | 31.5 5% | 34.2 -3% | 32 4% |
Idle Average * | 33.2 | 29.4 11% | 34 -2% | 31.6 5% | 39.6 -19% | 34 -2% |
Idle Maximum * | 33.2 | 30.1 9% | 42 -27% | 31.6 5% | 39.6 -19% | 37 -11% |
Load Average * | 47 | 36 23% | 53 -13% | 36.8 22% | 48.5 -3% | 43 9% |
Witcher 3 ultra * | 52.2 | 37.6 28% | 51 2% | 48.2 8% | 54 -3% | 57 -9% |
Load Maximum * | 64 | 42.2 34% | 53 17% | 52.1 19% | 56.5 12% | 62 3% |
* ... smaller is better
Barulho
Ocioso |
| 33.2 / 33.2 / 33.2 dB |
Carga |
| 47 / 64 dB |
| ||
30 dB silencioso 40 dB(A) audível 50 dB(A) ruidosamente alto |
||
min: , med: , max: Audix TM1, Arta (15 cm de distância) environment noise: 28.2 dB(A) |
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 34 °C / 93 F, compared to the average of 38.2 °C / 101 F, ranging from 22.2 to 69.8 °C for the class Workstation.
(-) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 47.6 °C / 118 F, compared to the average of 41.3 °C / 106 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 21.3 °C / 70 F, compared to the device average of 32 °C / 90 F.
(+) Playing The Witcher 3, the average temperature for the upper side is 28.6 °C / 83 F, compared to the device average of 32 °C / 90 F.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are cooler than skin temperature with a maximum of 22.6 °C / 72.7 F and are therefore cool to the touch.
(+) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 27.8 °C / 82 F (+5.2 °C / 9.3 F).
Eurocom Tornado F7W audio analysis
(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (80.7 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 12% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (9% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.8% away from median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (7.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 4.5% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (5.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (15.9% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 34% of all tested devices in this class were better, 9% similar, 57% worse
» The best had a delta of 7%, average was 18%, worst was 35%
Compared to all devices tested
» 22% of all tested devices were better, 5% similar, 73% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Apple MacBook 12 (Early 2016) 1.1 GHz audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (83.6 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 11.3% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (14.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2.4% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (10.2% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 6% of all tested devices in this class were better, 2% similar, 92% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 19%, worst was 53%
Compared to all devices tested
» 4% of all tested devices were better, 1% similar, 95% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
desligado | 6.7 / 8 Watt |
Ocioso | 28.5 / 36.7 / 37.8 Watt |
Carga |
144.6 / 336 Watt |
Key:
min: ,
med: ,
max: Metrahit Energy |
Eurocom Tornado F7W i9-9900K, Quadro P5200, 3x Samsung SSD 970 Pro 512GB (RAID 0), IPS, 3840x2160, 17.3" | Eurocom Sky X7C i7-8086K, GeForce GTX 1080 Mobile, 2x Samsung SSD 970 Pro 512GB (RAID 0), IPS, 3840x2160, 17.3" | Asus Chimera G703GI i9-8950HK, GeForce GTX 1080 Mobile, 2x Intel 760p 512 GB + 1x Samsung SM961 512 GB (RAID), IPS, 1920x1080, 17.3" | Eurocom Sky X9C i7-8700K, GeForce GTX 1080 SLI (Laptop), 2x Samsung SSD 960 Pro 1TB m.2 NVMe (RAID 0), IPS, 3840x2160, 17.3" | MSI GT75 8RG-090 Titan i9-8950HK, GeForce GTX 1080 Mobile, 2x Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP (RAID 0), TN, 1920x1080, 17.3" | Eurocom Tornado F5 i7-7700K, GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, Samsung SSD 960 Pro 512 GB m.2, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6" | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Power Consumption | 10% | -7% | -54% | -8% | 22% | |
Idle Minimum * | 28.5 | 33.3 -17% | 29 -2% | 54.7 -92% | 31 -9% | 21.2 26% |
Idle Average * | 36.7 | 40.1 -9% | 37 -1% | 55.7 -52% | 35 5% | 25.1 32% |
Idle Maximum * | 37.8 | 42.1 -11% | 46 -22% | 56.8 -50% | 45 -19% | 26.3 30% |
Load Average * | 144.6 | 95.6 34% | 156 -8% | 183.7 -27% | 130 10% | 169.4 -17% |
Witcher 3 ultra * | 218.9 | 152.9 30% | 252 -15% | 454.8 -108% | 268 -22% | |
Load Maximum * | 336 | 220 35% | 314 7% | 321.8 4% | 374 -11% | 202.4 40% |
* ... smaller is better
Eurocom Tornado F7W i9-9900K, Quadro P5200, 90 Wh | Eurocom Sky X7C i7-8086K, GeForce GTX 1080 Mobile, 82 Wh | Asus Chimera G703GI i9-8950HK, GeForce GTX 1080 Mobile, 71 Wh | Eurocom Sky X9C i7-8700K, GeForce GTX 1080 SLI (Laptop), 89 Wh | MSI GT75 8RG-090 Titan i9-8950HK, GeForce GTX 1080 Mobile, 75 Wh | Eurocom Tornado F5 i7-7700K, GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, 75.24 Wh | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Battery Runtime | -21% | -28% | -57% | 20% | ||
WiFi v1.3 | 180 | 143 -21% | 130 -28% | 78 -57% | 216 20% | |
Reader / Idle | 169 | 83 | 225 | 291 | ||
Load | 51 | 47 | 63 | 67 |
Pro
Contra
Os maiores motivos para escolher um workstation Eurocom são seu desempenho, opções configuráveis e capacidade de manutenção do usuário final. Sistemas concorrentes de marcas mais conhecidas, como Lenovo, Dell ou HP, tendem a ter hardware mais lento, menos opções de atualização e uma antipatia pelos ajustes do usuário final. Os usuários que pretendem explorar essas três vantagens vão gostar muito do Tornado F7W.
Ainda há muitas melhorias a serem feitas ao nos aprofundar nos detalhes. O desempenho da CPU, em particular, poderia ser melhor, já que os usuários não estão tirando todo o potencial do Core i9-9900K deste chassi. O painel 4K UHD é ligeiramente mais granulado do que o que estamos acostumados, até mesmo para um painel mate, e o adaptador de CA refrigerado ativamente às vezes pode ser mais barulhento que o portátil sob cargas médias. Os BIOS e a WLAN aparentemente com problemas, que experimentamos, provavelmente são problemas apenas com nossa unidade específica, mas, no entanto, eles merecem uma menção. Finalmente, mais reclamações menores, como as teclas menores do teclado numérico, falta de luz de fundo RGB e Ethernet de 10 Gbit, portas traseiras de difícil acesso, e cabo de força grosso, certamente se somam. Muitos destes podem ser perdoados em alternativas mais baratas e mais comuns, mas os usuários estarão esperando tudo considerando o preço deste sistema.
O Eurocom Tornado F7W não tem igual no mundo dos workstations móveis de 17 polegadas. Seu desempenho extremo e versatilidade de hardware devem satisfazer os profissionais que se sentem confortáveis com a troca de componentes e a solução de problemas por conta própria. Mesmo assim, há um punhado de pequenos aborrecimentos e omissões que esperamos que futuras iterações abordem.
Eurocom Tornado F7W
- 12/06/2018 v6 (old)
Allen Ngo