Breve Análise do Ultrabook Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon 2016 (Core i7, WQHD)
Os Top 10
» Os Top 10 Portáteis Multimídia
» Os Top 10 Portáteis de Jogos
» Os Top 10 Portáteis Leves para Jogos
» Os Top 10 Portáteis Acessíveis de Escritório/Empresariais
» Os Top 10 Portáteis Premium de Escritório/Empresariais
» Os Top 10 dos Portáteis Workstation
» Os Top 10 Subportáteis
» Os Top 10 Ultrabooks
» Os Top 10 Conversíveis
» Os Top 10 Tablets
» Os Top 10 Smartphones
» A melhores Telas de Portáteis Analisadas Pela Notebookcheck
» Top 10 dos portáteis abaixo dos 500 Euros da Notebookcheck
» Top 10 dos Portáteis abaixo dos 300 Euros
|
iluminação: 95 %
iluminação com acumulador: 273 cd/m²
Contraste: 850:1 (Preto: 0.32 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 2.61 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.91
ΔE Greyscale 3.31 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
95% sRGB (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
63% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
68.4% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
94.7% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
66.7% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.35
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon 20FB003RGE 2.560 x 1.440 IPS-Panel | Lenovo ThinkPad T460s-20FA003GGE 2.560 x 1.440 IPS-Panel | Dell Latitude 14 7000 Series E7470 2.560 x 1.440 IPS-Panel | Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon 2015 2.560 x 1.440 IPS-Panel | HP EliteBook Folio 1040 G3 2.560 x 1.440 IPS-Panel | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Display | 3% | 1% | -20% | 2% | |
Display P3 Coverage | 66.7 | 68.7 3% | 67.2 1% | 52.4 -21% | 67.9 2% |
sRGB Coverage | 94.7 | 98.1 4% | 95.9 1% | 77.4 -18% | 96.8 2% |
AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage | 68.4 | 70.4 3% | 69.3 1% | 54 -21% | 70 2% |
Response Times | -1% | -11% | -8% | ||
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% * | 44 ? | 35.6 ? 19% | 48 ? -9% | 46.4 ? -5% | |
Response Time Black / White * | 24 ? | 29.2 ? -22% | 27 ? -13% | 26.4 ? -10% | |
PWM Frequency | 220 ? | 220 ? 0% | |||
Screen | -19% | 9% | -17% | -9% | |
Brightness middle | 272 | 257 -6% | 380 40% | 252.3 -7% | 327 20% |
Brightness | 268 | 248 -7% | 354 32% | 246 -8% | 316 18% |
Brightness Distribution | 95 | 94 -1% | 81 -15% | 95 0% | 87 -8% |
Black Level * | 0.32 | 0.26 19% | 0.26 19% | 0.426 -33% | 0.35 -9% |
Contrast | 850 | 988 16% | 1462 72% | 592 -30% | 934 10% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 2.61 | 4.59 -76% | 3.11 -19% | 3.8 -46% | 4.39 -68% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 6.43 | 9.72 -51% | 6.73 -5% | 7.27 -13% | |
Greyscale dE 2000 * | 3.31 | 6.38 -93% | 4.35 -31% | 2.92 12% | 4.69 -42% |
Gamma | 2.35 94% | 2.51 88% | 2.37 93% | 2.08 106% | 2.15 102% |
CCT | 6360 102% | 6238 104% | 6771 96% | 6070 107% | 7101 92% |
Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998) | 63 | 65 3% | 62 -2% | 50.41 -20% | 62.52 -1% |
Color Space (Percent of sRGB) | 95 | 98 3% | 96 1% | 96.71 2% | |
Total Average (Program / Settings) | -6% /
-12% | -0% /
5% | -19% /
-17% | -5% /
-7% |
* ... smaller is better
Display Response Times
↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
---|---|---|
24 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 5.2 ms rise | |
↘ 18.8 ms fall | ||
The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 50 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (20.9 ms). | ||
↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
44 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 17 ms rise | |
↘ 27 ms fall | ||
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 71 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (32.8 ms). |
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
Screen flickering / PWM detected | 220 Hz | ≤ 90 % brightness setting | |
The display backlight flickers at 220 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) Flickering detected at a brightness setting of 90 % and below. There should be no flickering or PWM above this brightness setting. The frequency of 220 Hz is relatively low, so sensitive users will likely notice flickering and experience eyestrain at the stated brightness setting and below. In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8705 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured. |
Cinebench R15 | |
CPU Single 64Bit | |
Dell Latitude 14 7000 Series E7470 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T460s-20FA003GGE | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon 20FB003RGE | |
HP EliteBook Folio 1040 G3 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon 2015 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T460s-20F9003SGE | |
CPU Multi 64Bit | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T460s-20FA003GGE | |
Dell Latitude 14 7000 Series E7470 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon 20FB003RGE | |
HP EliteBook Folio 1040 G3 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T460s-20F9003SGE | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon 2015 |
Cinebench R11.5 | |
CPU Single 64Bit | |
Dell Latitude 14 7000 Series E7470 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T460s-20FA003GGE | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon 20FB003RGE | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon 2015 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T460s-20F9003SGE | |
CPU Multi 64Bit | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T460s-20FA003GGE | |
Dell Latitude 14 7000 Series E7470 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon 20FB003RGE | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T460s-20F9003SGE | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon 2015 |
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 | |
Pass 1 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T460s-20FA003GGE | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon 20FB003RGE | |
Pass 2 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T460s-20FA003GGE | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon 20FB003RGE |
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon 20FB003RGE Samsung SSD PM871 MZNLN256HCHP | Lenovo ThinkPad T460s-20FA003GGE Samsung SSD SM951a 512GB M.2 PCIe 3.0 x4 NVMe (MZVKV512) | Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon 2015 Samsung SSD SM951 512 GB MZHPV512HDGL | Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon 2015 Samsung SSD PM851 256 GB MZNTE256HMHP | HP EliteBook Folio 1040 G3 Samsung SM951 MZVPV256HDGL m.2 PCI-e | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
AS SSD | 166% | 105% | -4% | 190% | |
Seq Read | 499.1 | 2039 309% | 1339 168% | 512 3% | 1839 268% |
Seq Write | 294 | 1407 379% | 1209 311% | 235.7 -20% | 1190 305% |
4K Read | 30.43 | 45.41 49% | 39.9 31% | 32.41 7% | 47.72 57% |
4K Write | 74.6 | 114.4 53% | 91.3 22% | 89.9 21% | 126.6 70% |
4K-64 Read | 370.4 | 968 161% | 510 38% | 355 -4% | 1858 402% |
4K-64 Write | 253.4 | 366 44% | 402.2 59% | 170.3 -33% | 344.3 36% |
PCMark 8 | |
Home Score Accelerated v2 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T460s-20FA003GGE | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon 20FB003RGE | |
HP EliteBook Folio 1040 G3 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon 2015 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon 2015 | |
Creative Score Accelerated v2 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T460s-20FA003GGE | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon 20FB003RGE | |
HP EliteBook Folio 1040 G3 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon 2015 | |
Work Score Accelerated v2 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T460s-20FA003GGE | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon 20FB003RGE | |
HP EliteBook Folio 1040 G3 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon 2015 |
PCMark 7 - Score | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon 20FB003RGE | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon 2015 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T460s-20FA003GGE | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon 2015 |
PCMark 7 Score | 5350 pontos | |
PCMark 8 Home Score Accelerated v2 | 3385 pontos | |
PCMark 8 Creative Score Accelerated v2 | 4150 pontos | |
PCMark 8 Work Score Accelerated v2 | 4342 pontos | |
Ajuda |
3DMark 11 - 1280x720 Performance GPU | |
Microsoft Surface Pro 4 Core i7 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T450s-20BWS1UT00 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T460s-20FA003GGE | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon 20FB003RGE | |
HP EliteBook Folio 1040 G3 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T460s-20F9003SGE | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon 2015 |
3DMark - 1920x1080 Fire Strike Graphics | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T450s-20BWS1UT00 | |
Microsoft Surface Pro 4 Core i7 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon 20FB003RGE | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T460s-20FA003GGE | |
HP EliteBook Folio 1040 G3 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon 2015 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T460s-20F9003SGE |
3DMark 06 Standard Score | 9532 pontos | |
3DMark 11 Performance | 1553 pontos | |
3DMark Ice Storm Standard Score | 52800 pontos | |
3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score | 5978 pontos | |
3DMark Fire Strike Score | 892 pontos | |
Ajuda |
baixo | média | alto | ultra | |
---|---|---|---|---|
BioShock Infinite (2013) | 51 | 28.3 | 23.8 | 6.9 |
Battlefield 4 (2013) | 42 | 29.9 | 19 | 5.9 |
Dirt Rally (2015) | 101.4 | 26.7 | 13 |
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon 20FB003RGE Intel Core i7-6500U, Intel HD Graphics 520 | HP EliteBook Folio 1040 G3 Intel Core i5-6300U, Intel HD Graphics 520 | Dell Latitude 14 7000 Series E7470 Intel Core i7-6600U, Intel HD Graphics 520 | Lenovo ThinkPad T460s-20FA003GGE Intel Core i7-6600U, Intel HD Graphics 520 | Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon 2015 Intel Core i5-5300U, Intel HD Graphics 5500 | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Noise | 2% | -0% | 1% | 4% | |
off / environment * | 29.1 | 29.1 -0% | 31.2 -7% | 29.2 -0% | |
Idle Minimum * | 29.1 | 29.1 -0% | 31.2 -7% | 29.2 -0% | 28.5 2% |
Idle Average * | 29.1 | 29.1 -0% | 31.2 -7% | 29.2 -0% | 28.6 2% |
Idle Maximum * | 29.1 | 29.1 -0% | 31.2 -7% | 29.2 -0% | 28.8 1% |
Load Average * | 35.6 | 32.6 8% | 31.9 10% | 33.7 5% | 30.7 14% |
Load Maximum * | 38.1 | 37.8 1% | 31.9 16% | 38.5 -1% | 36.9 3% |
* ... smaller is better
Barulho
Ocioso |
| 29.1 / 29.1 / 29.1 dB |
Carga |
| 35.6 / 38.1 dB |
| ||
30 dB silencioso 40 dB(A) audível 50 dB(A) ruidosamente alto |
||
min: , med: , max: ECM8000 + Voltcraft SL-451 (15 cm de distância) environment noise: 29.1 dB(A) |
(±) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 43.2 °C / 110 F, compared to the average of 34.3 °C / 94 F, ranging from 21.2 to 62.5 °C for the class Office.
(±) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 45 °C / 113 F, compared to the average of 36.8 °C / 98 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 27.1 °C / 81 F, compared to the device average of 29.5 °C / 85 F.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are cooler than skin temperature with a maximum of 26.6 °C / 79.9 F and are therefore cool to the touch.
(±) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 27.6 °C / 81.7 F (+1 °C / 1.8 F).
desligado | 0.23 / 0.38 Watt |
Ocioso | 3.8 / 7.1 / 7.7 Watt |
Carga |
30.2 / 44.7 Watt |
Key:
min: ,
med: ,
max: Metrahit Energy |
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon 20FB003RGE 52 Wh | Lenovo ThinkPad T460s-20FA003GGE 49 Wh | Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon 2015 50 Wh | HP EliteBook Folio 1040 G3 45.6 Wh | Dell Latitude 14 7000 Series E7470 55 Wh | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Battery Runtime | -25% | -2% | -23% | -11% | |
Reader / Idle | 942 | 833 -12% | 984 4% | 530 -44% | |
H.264 | 510 | 397 -22% | 339 -34% | ||
WiFi v1.3 | 429 | 340 -21% | 285 -34% | 309 -28% | 346 -19% |
Load | 115 | 62 -46% | 141 23% | 131 14% | 112 -3% |
WiFi | 401 |
Pro
Contra
E460, L460, T460, T460p, T460s, e agora o X1 Carbon: Parece que a Lenovo deseja preencher até o menor nicho com um modelo ThinkPad. Nós não queremos julgar aqui se isto é realmente necessário ou razoável - mas ajuda a encontrar o melhor aparelho para cada propósito.
Especialmente sua grande mobilidade é um forte argumento para o X1 Carbon.
Com um peso agressivo de nem sequer 1,2 kg, você pode levar o ThinkPad em suas viagens de negócios e ele dura facilmente todo um dia sem o adaptador de força. Apesar do design fino, o usuário dificilmente precisa se preocupar sobre limitações no desempenho, conectividade ou emissões. Além de tudo isso, a Lenovo incorporou um painel WQHD muito atraente, com ótimas cores e contrastes, que poderiam ter sido, no máximo, um pouco mais brilhante.
No entanto, existem bons motivos para preferir o T460s sobre o X1 Carbon. Em compensação por sua carcaça um pouco maior, você obterá um teclado ainda melhor, atualização adicional e opções de conectividade (porta LAN nativa, SmartCard, leitor SD) bem como reservas de desempenho maiores, graças a um TDP aumentado. Além disso, o preço do T460s é mais atraente, porém, ainda muito alto. Em resumo, recomendaríamos a série T - no entanto, esta decisão pode variar dependendo do usuário.
Esta é uma versão reduzida da análise original. Você pode ler a análise completa em inglês aqui.
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon 20FB003RGE
- 04/18/2016 v5.1 (old)
Till Schönborn