Breve Análise do Ultrabook Lenovo ThinkPad T460s (Core i5, Full HD)
Lenovo ThinkPad T460s-20F9003SGE (ThinkPad T460s Serie)
Processador
Intel Core i5-6200U 2 x 2.3 - 2.8 GHz, Skylake
Placa gráfica
Intel HD Graphics 520, Análises do: 950 MHz, Memoría: 1066 MHz, 20.19.15.4331
Memória
4 GB
, Single-Channel, 4 GB DDR4-2133 soldados, 1 de 1 Slot livre, até 20 GB
Pantalha
14.00 polegadas 16:9, 1920 x 1080 pixel, N140HCE-EAA, LEN40A9, IPS, Brilhante: não
placa mãe
Intel Skylake-U Premium PCH
Disco rígido
Samsung CM871 MZ7LF192HCGS, 192 GB
peso
1.37 kg, Suprimento de energia: 297 g
Preço
1400 Euro
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
N140HCE-EAA, LEN40A9 tested with X-Rite i1Pro 2
Máximo: 226 cd/m² (Nits) Médio: 211.2 cd/m² Minimum: 2 cd/m²iluminação: 89 %
iluminação com acumulador: 222 cd/m²
Contraste: 1027:1 (Preto: 0.22 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 6.44 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.91
ΔE Greyscale 5.87 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
61.15% sRGB (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
39.58% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
43.14% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
61.6% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
41.65% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.37
| Lenovo ThinkPad T460s-20F9003SGE 1920x1080, IPS | Lenovo ThinkPad T460s-20FA003GGE 2560x1440, IPS-Panel | Lenovo ThinkPad T450s-20BWS1UT00 1920x1080, IPS-Panel | HP EliteBook 840 G3 T9X59ET#ABD 1920x1080, TN LED | Dell Latitude 14 7000 Series E7470 2560x1440, IPS | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display | 62% | 45% | 18% | 59% | |
| Display P3 Coverage | 41.65 | 68.7 65% | 64.8 56% | 48.93 17% | 67.2 61% |
| sRGB Coverage | 61.6 | 98.1 59% | 83.8 36% | 73.7 20% | 95.9 56% |
| AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage | 43.14 | 70.4 63% | 61.2 42% | 50.5 17% | 69.3 61% |
| Response Times | 8% | 6% | -3% | ||
| Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% * | 42 ? | 35.6 ? 15% | 43 ? -2% | 48 ? -14% | |
| Response Time Black / White * | 29.2 ? | 29.2 ? -0% | 25 ? 14% | 27 ? 8% | |
| PWM Frequency | 220 ? | 204 ? | |||
| Screen | 20% | 18% | -26% | 40% | |
| Brightness middle | 226 | 257 14% | 288 27% | 366 62% | 380 68% |
| Brightness | 211 | 248 18% | 281 33% | 336 59% | 354 68% |
| Brightness Distribution | 89 | 94 6% | 94 6% | 87 -2% | 81 -9% |
| Black Level * | 0.22 | 0.26 -18% | 0.286 -30% | 0.65 -195% | 0.26 -18% |
| Contrast | 1027 | 988 -4% | 1007 -2% | 563 -45% | 1462 42% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 6.44 | 4.59 29% | 4.35 32% | 10.26 -59% | 3.11 52% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 17.18 | 9.72 43% | 6.73 61% | ||
| Greyscale dE 2000 * | 5.87 | 6.38 -9% | 3.7 37% | 11.51 -96% | 4.35 26% |
| Gamma | 2.37 93% | 2.51 88% | 2.68 82% | 2.4 92% | 2.37 93% |
| CCT | 6856 95% | 6238 104% | 6076 107% | 12725 51% | 6771 96% |
| Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998) | 39.58 | 65 64% | 54.7 38% | 47 19% | 62 57% |
| Color Space (Percent of sRGB) | 61.15 | 98 60% | 74 21% | 96 57% | |
| Total Average (Program / Settings) | 30% /
27% | 32% /
25% | -1% /
-12% | 32% /
38% |
* ... smaller is better
Display Response Times
ℹ
Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.| ↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
|---|---|---|
| 29.2 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 16 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 13.2 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows relatively slow response rates in our tests and may be too slow for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 76 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (20.9 ms). | ||
| ↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
| 42 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 19.6 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 22.4 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 64 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (32.8 ms). | ||
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
ℹ
To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.| Screen flickering / PWM not detected | ||
In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8715 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured. | ||
| PCMark 8 Home Score Accelerated v2 | 3024 pontos | |
| PCMark 8 Creative Score Accelerated v2 | 3644 pontos | |
| PCMark 8 Work Score Accelerated v2 | 4121 pontos | |
Ajuda | ||
| Lenovo ThinkPad T460s-20F9003SGE Intel Core i5-6200U, Samsung CM871 MZ7LF192HCGS | Lenovo ThinkPad T460s-20FA003GGE Intel Core i7-6600U, Samsung SSD SM951a 512GB M.2 PCIe 3.0 x4 NVMe (MZVKV512) | Lenovo ThinkPad T450s-20BWS1UT00 Intel Core i5-5200U, Samsung SSD PM871 MZ7LN256HCHP | Lenovo ThinkPad T450s-20BWS03F00 Intel Core i7-5600U, Intel SSD Pro 2500 Series SSDSC2BF360A5L | Dell Latitude 14 7000 Series E7470 Intel Core i7-6600U, Samsung SSD PM851 M.2 2280 256GB | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AS SSD | 614% | 241% | 63% | 179% | |
| Seq Read | 471 | 2039 333% | 503 7% | 489.6 4% | 495.5 5% |
| Seq Write | 163.3 | 1407 762% | 285.2 75% | 264.5 62% | 283.7 74% |
| 4K Read | 14.18 | 45.41 220% | 33.27 135% | 22.19 56% | 30.91 118% |
| 4K Write | 34.38 | 114.4 233% | 84.6 146% | 14.61 -58% | 85.1 148% |
| 4K-64 Read | 85.4 | 968 1033% | 380 345% | 210.1 146% | 336.1 294% |
| 4K-64 Write | 33.4 | 366 996% | 272.3 715% | 83.5 150% | 170 409% |
| Score Total | 296 | 2439 724% | 1086 267% | 546 84% | 913 208% |
Samsung CM871 MZ7LF192HCGS
Sequential Read:
446.5 MB/s
Sequential Write:
171.1 MB/s
512K Read:
259.2 MB/s
512K Write:
167.2 MB/s
4K Read:
5.78 MB/s
4K Write:
35.47 MB/s
4K QD32 Read:
94.9 MB/s
4K QD32 Write:
36.43 MB/s
| 3DMark 11 Performance | 1238 pontos | |
| 3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score | 4397 pontos | |
| 3DMark Fire Strike Score | 571 pontos | |
Ajuda | ||
| 3DMark 11 - 1280x720 Performance GPU | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad T450s-20BWS1UT00 | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad T460s-20FA003GGE | |
| HP EliteBook 840 G3 T9X59ET#ABD | |
| Dell Latitude 14 7000 Series E7470 | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad T460s-20F9003SGE | |
| baixo | média | alto | ultra | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Tomb Raider (2013) | 39.3 | 21.1 | 13.3 | |
| BioShock Infinite (2013) | 29.1 | 17.4 | 14.5 | |
| The Witcher 3 (2015) | 11.3 |
Barulho
| Ocioso |
| 29.1 / 29.1 / 29.1 dB |
| Carga |
| 32.3 / 36.6 dB |
 | ||
30 dB silencioso 40 dB(A) audível 50 dB(A) ruidosamente alto |
||
min:  , med:  , max:  ECM8000 + Voltcraft SL-451 (15 cm de distância) environment noise: 29.1 dB(A) | ||
| Lenovo ThinkPad T460s-20F9003SGE HD Graphics 520, 6200U, Samsung CM871 MZ7LF192HCGS | Lenovo ThinkPad T460s-20FA003GGE HD Graphics 520, 6600U, Samsung SSD SM951a 512GB M.2 PCIe 3.0 x4 NVMe (MZVKV512) | Lenovo ThinkPad T450s-20BWS1UT00 GeForce 940M, 5200U, Samsung SSD PM871 MZ7LN256HCHP | HP EliteBook 840 G3 T9X59ET#ABD HD Graphics 520, 6500U, Samsung SSD PM851 256 GB MZNTE256HMHP | Dell Latitude 14 7000 Series E7470 HD Graphics 520, 6600U, Samsung SSD PM851 M.2 2280 256GB | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Noise | -2% | 1% | -9% | -2% | |
| off / environment * | 29.1 | 29.2 -0% | 31.2 -7% | 31.2 -7% | |
| Idle Minimum * | 29.1 | 29.2 -0% | 29.1 -0% | 31.2 -7% | 31.2 -7% |
| Idle Average * | 29.1 | 29.2 -0% | 29.1 -0% | 32.1 -10% | 31.2 -7% |
| Idle Maximum * | 29.1 | 29.2 -0% | 29.1 -0% | 33.1 -14% | 31.2 -7% |
| Load Average * | 32.3 | 33.7 -4% | 33.1 -2% | 36.2 -12% | 31.9 1% |
| Load Maximum * | 36.6 | 38.5 -5% | 34.3 6% | 37.8 -3% | 31.9 13% |
* ... smaller is better
(+) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 31.6 °C / 89 F, compared to the average of 29.5 °C / 85 F for the devices in the class Office.
(±) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 41.4 °C / 107 F, compared to the average of 34.3 °C / 94 F, ranging from 21.2 to 62.5 °C for the class Office.
(±) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 41 °C / 106 F, compared to the average of 36.8 °C / 98 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 25.8 °C / 78 F, compared to the device average of 29.5 °C / 85 F.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are cooler than skin temperature with a maximum of 30.8 °C / 87.4 F and are therefore cool to the touch.
(-) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 27.6 °C / 81.7 F (-3.2 °C / -5.7 F).
(±) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 41.4 °C / 107 F, compared to the average of 34.3 °C / 94 F, ranging from 21.2 to 62.5 °C for the class Office.
(±) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 41 °C / 106 F, compared to the average of 36.8 °C / 98 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 25.8 °C / 78 F, compared to the device average of 29.5 °C / 85 F.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are cooler than skin temperature with a maximum of 30.8 °C / 87.4 F and are therefore cool to the touch.
(-) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 27.6 °C / 81.7 F (-3.2 °C / -5.7 F).
Consumo de energia
| desligado | 0.3 / 0.55 Watt |
| Ocioso | 3.7 / 6.8 / 7.3 Watt |
| Carga |
26.3 / 34.6 Watt |
   
| |
Key:
min: ,
med: ,
max: Metrahit Energy | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad T460s-20F9003SGE 49 Wh, 1920x1080 | Lenovo ThinkPad T460s-20FA003GGE 49 Wh, 2560x1440 | Lenovo ThinkPad T450s-20BWS1UT00 96 Wh, 1920x1080 | HP EliteBook 840 G3 T9X59ET#ABD 46 Wh, 1920x1080 | Dell Latitude 14 7000 Series E7470 55 Wh, 2560x1440 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power Consumption | -17% | -24% | -0% | -25% | |
| Idle Minimum * | 3.7 | 3.8 -3% | 3.1 16% | 3.8 -3% | 5.1 -38% |
| Idle Average * | 6.8 | 7.1 -4% | 8.6 -26% | 6.3 7% | 8.5 -25% |
| Idle Maximum * | 7.3 | 7.8 -7% | 9.6 -32% | 6.8 7% | 10.1 -38% |
| Load Average * | 26.3 | 36.3 -38% | 35.6 -35% | 34.4 -31% | 35.2 -34% |
| Load Maximum * | 34.6 | 46 -33% | 49.4 -43% | 28.3 18% | 31 10% |
* ... smaller is better
| Lenovo ThinkPad T460s-20F9003SGE 49 Wh, 1920x1080 | Lenovo ThinkPad T460s-20FA003GGE 49 Wh, 2560x1440 | Lenovo ThinkPad T450s-20BWS1UT00 96 Wh, 1920x1080 | Dell Latitude 14 7000 Series E7470 55 Wh, 2560x1440 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Battery Runtime | -24% | 83% | -8% | |
| Reader / Idle | 915 | 833 -9% | 1857 103% | |
| H.264 | 534 | 397 -26% | 757 42% | |
| WiFi v1.3 | 395 | 340 -14% | 648 64% | 346 -12% |
| Load | 116 | 62 -47% | 259 123% | 112 -3% |
Pro
+ Construção do chassi rígida e extremamente leve
+ Dobradiças da tela flexíveis
+ Teclado preciso
+ Desempenho veloz do Wi-Fi
+ Bom desempenho de aplicativos
+ Baixas emissões de ruído e calor
+ Diversos recursos de segurança
+ Boas durações da bateria
+ Tela IPS mate sem PWM
+ 3 anos de garantia
+ Boa razão preço-desempenho
Contra
- Baixo brilho da tela
- Gama de cores muito baixa
- Altos desvios de cores
- Apenas 4 GB de RAM
- Expansão limitada
- Sem USB-C
- Longo tempo de carga
A configuração básica do Lenovo ThinkPad T460s também é um muito bom portátil de escritório. Por cerca de 1.400 Euros (~$1591), você recebe um sistema veloz com um processador o suficientemente poderoso e um SSD. Somente o equipamento de memória é muito limitado com apenas 4 GB e deveria ser atualizado, o qual também melhoraria o desempenho gráfico. Não ficamos muito contentes sobre a tela Full HD. A Lenovo somente usa painéis IPS, mas a luminescência não cumpre com as afirmações do fabricante, e a versão WQHD também se desempenha melhor nas outras medições. Um problema adicional é a implementação de diferentes painéis Full HD, que podem ter especificações distintas. Se não tiver problemas com o PWM, somente podemos recomendar o painel WQHD. Isto, atualmente é um upgrade grátis quando você configura o portátil na Lenovo e ele também não consome muita mais energia que a contraparte Full HD.
A Lenovo também aumentou o limite habitual do TDP (15 watts) para o Core i5, mas não melhora o desempenho do processador devido às velocidades comparativamente baixas. Você somente pode nota-lo quando estressa a GPU ao mesmo tempo. Tarefas que exigem muito da CPU podem se beneficiar do Core i7, mas o T460s, de fato, deixa uma melhor impressão em termos de emissões e as durações de bateria. Provavelmente o melhor compromisso entre ambos os modelos é uma configuração com o Core i5 e o painel WQHD.
O modelo básico do ThinkPad T460s também é um bom portátil de escritório, mas você deveria optar por uma configuração com o painel WQHD, se possível.
Por causa do baixo brilho da tela, que poderia limitar a usabilidade em ambientes claros, decidimos deduzir dois pontos da avaliação final. Um produto premium, em particular, deveria estar equipado com um painel mais brilhante.
Esta é uma versão reduzida da análise original. Você pode ler a análise completa em inglês aqui.
Lenovo ThinkPad T460s-20F9003SGE
- 04/26/2016 v5.1 (old)
Andreas Osthoff
Office - Médio equilibrado
Price comparison
